Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:27:48 +0000
From:      "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: mmap/munmap with zero length
Message-ID:  <3a142e750907041727l6fac4b67m33973ec352664c6b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <permail-20090704224845f0889e84000046f1-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
References:  <permail-20090704224845f0889e84000046f1-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/4/09, Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> wrote:
> i'm wondering why mmap and munmap behave differently when it comes to a
> length
> argument of zero. allocating memory with mmap for a zero length file returns
> a
> valid pointer to the mapped region.

there is V flag for malloc.conf

>
> munmap however isn't able to remove a mapping with no length.
>
> wouldn't it be better to either forbid this in mmap or to allow it in
> munmap?

It wouldn't improve badly written program.

-- 
Paul



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750907041727l6fac4b67m33973ec352664c6b>