From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 15 06:22:47 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADA1106566C
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th)
Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5445D8FC0A
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th)
Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5])
	by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2F61gCB086513
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:01:42 +0700 (ICT)
	(envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th)
Received: (from on@localhost)
	by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.2/8.12.11) id n2F653Uw021328;
	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:05:03 +0700 (ICT)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:05:03 +0700 (ICT)
Message-Id: <200903150605.n2F653Uw021328@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
From: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>
To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/)
Subject: ipfw amd bridge
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:22:48 -0000

Hi,

I remember reqading in the past (4.x) that on a machine with bridged
interfaces, only layer 2 rules of ipfw would apply.

Is this still the case with 6.4, 7.1?

best regards,

Olivier