From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 02:04:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB827106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf05.insightbb.com (mxsf05.insightbb.com [74.128.0.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0B18FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:04:18 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,377,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="710478461" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf05.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2009 22:04:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvUTAGbwq0rQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBU4pdwhaLL4QYBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,377,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="226553574" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2009 22:04:16 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:04:11 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909122204.11782.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: SciTE anomaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:04:18 -0000 I'm running FreeBSD 7.2p3, KDE 4.3.1 I added scite port. When I GO (F5), the following ruby program issues an error and fails to work properly: puts "Hello, world. What is your name?" myname = gets() puts "Well, hello there " + myname + "." Here is the output: >ruby hello.rb hello.rb:2:in `gets': Bad file descriptor (Errno::EBADF) from hello.rb:2 Hello, world. What is your name? >Exit code: 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 04:24:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090001065676 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-125.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-125.bluehost.com [67.222.38.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C94328FC08 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21303 invoked by uid 0); 13 Sep 2009 04:24:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2009 04:24:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=inInhfKlhx0524Cyiel2A0CyOrKGreZzFKUpe11Ji1POOIdWwrCBdp+UV4w6iIMm/PSxa1GkPlrMQNNWebSyXfaNO3PqtN02L3mZYUJA4rpjdCL/W5HnA2nE8KuCIHeF; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmgdS-0003iq-6Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:24:22 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:24:21 -0600 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:24:21 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090913042421.GB32126@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090911034913.GA22437@kokopelli.hydra> <20090911104025.GA23566@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AAA2B35.4010309@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20090911070849.559fa992@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090912050123.GB27240@kokopelli.hydra> <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l76fUT7nc3MelDdI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: linux-pango won't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:24:24 -0000 --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 02:19:22PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:01:23 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: >=20 > > How long has this been broken for 7.2? Considering all the stuff that > > depends on linux-pango, I'm surprised it hasn't been fixed. >=20 > It will be broken until someone provide an URL to non-vulnerable > RPM package. Daniel Bye's comments seem to indicate that FreeBSD 8.x doesn't have this problem. Did I misunderstand? --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Antoine de Saint-Exupery: "A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqsc/UACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUIzQCg7CZt+uU8+yudQJjrf870Ee8i ATQAoKiiFJ5yZTC+mdnj9F6xLytV0CxM =eh5l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 09:46:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F817106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316A38FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D90C50879 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:45:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.71] (unknown [10.10.10.71]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814C150873 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:45:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AACBF63.8020304@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:46:11 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn Organization: Koudekerke, NL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Subject: Perl updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:46:00 -0000 Can someone explain why we have to run an update batch in order to have all Perl related programs running with this update? Wouldn't it be better to upgrade Perl and have all programs use it as it hadn't been updated at all? Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 10:38:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB94106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462B58FC08 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8DAbqjs028304; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:37:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8DAbqjs028304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1252838278; bh=LBv1IYcSRC07592wh6S4g3IXKO90xJtkzPttTW8Q56U=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AACCB7A.2050106@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2013=20Sep=202009=2011:37:46=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Jos=20Chrispijn=20|CC:=20FreeBS D=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20P erl=20updates|References:=20<4AACBF63.8020304@webrz.net>|In-Reply- To:=20<4AACBF63.8020304@webrz.net>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Co ntent-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=2 0protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"--- ---------enigE5FF4F0C961CE41ACA647A9B"; b=ZmevEBoLkFE6cwjD0vLCB/zlpbpsq0ugiCH4vllzSrPFH/rMHAsaw78uny0jL6yq3 0wWxbyJfV8ITOHQGSqpToMDkBGK/LCsUjDXw79xkltORbTQL+1SaWaZ677WD+7oDLe 7glXgmhCzhwRyXbiiBgcVAePnEtwLNPBuYkl/gfU= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AACCB7A.2050106@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:37:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jos Chrispijn References: <4AACBF63.8020304@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <4AACBF63.8020304@webrz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5FF4F0C961CE41ACA647A9B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Perl updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:38:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5FF4F0C961CE41ACA647A9B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Can someone explain why we have to run an update batch in order to have= =20 > all Perl related programs running with this update? Wouldn't it be=20 > better to upgrade Perl and have all programs use it as it hadn't been=20 > updated at all? You're talking about the update of lang/perl5.10 from perl-5.10.0 to perl-5.10.1 ? The reason you need to run perl-after-upgrade is because perl library modules are stored in directory trees which encode the perl version numbe= r. perl-after-upgrade basically moves installed modules from /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0=20 to /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1 plus it fixes up all of the pkg-plists and various other places where the directory path is embedded. Alternatively you could just re-install every single perl module on the system, plus any other ports that depend on perl, but that's going to be the majority of the software on your mach= ine and perl-after-upgrade is a lot quicker. Even so, ports that embed a perl interpreter -- ie. that dynamically link= against libperl.so -- will need to be recompiled, to account for libperl.= so now being in a different location. There aren't too many of these: net-mgmt/net-snmp and www/mod_perl{,2} are probably the most commonly encountered. One of the functions of perl-after-upgrade is to tell you w= hat packages need to be rebuilt because of this. Why isn't perl-after-upgrade run automatically? Two reasons. Firstly, th= e ports system cannot itself distinguish what updates would require perl-after-upgrade to be run: when updating, the mechanism is to delete = the old package and then install the new one as if de-novo. The newly instal= led package has no information about what older version of itself it is repla= cing, if any. Secondly, you can't make perl-after-upgrade clever enough to deal with al= l conceivable corner cases. Other than by enforcing particular usage rules= on how individual admins manage their perl installations -- a policy that= is manifestly *not the BSD way* -- this is unfeasible. Given that we hol= d that it is in the gift of the individual admin to decide how to manage their s= ystems, there have to be stages somewhere that involve the admin making a conciou= s decision about what to do. Running perl-after-upgrade is one of those po= ints. Lastly, just to note that if the upgrade is across a significantly large = change in version number: eg from perl-5.8 to perl-5.10, then any dynamically lo= aded compiled extension modules (see perlxs(1)) will have to be recompiled as = the ABI is not guaranteed to be kept the same in that case. Unfortunately, distinguishing modules that use perlxs from pure perl modules is not some= thing the ports system is currently capable of, so the upgrade instructions the= re are "rebuild everything that depends on perl". Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE5FF4F0C961CE41ACA647A9B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqsy4AACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxC7wCggv5Sa2FPophn6ClWxEHFISQC Wm0AniKl6zJTszExwppq19OdVaEt5a8K =x02N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5FF4F0C961CE41ACA647A9B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 10:44:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161601065676 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9329F8FC0C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8DAiKeW012604; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8DAiKme012603; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:19 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20090913104419.GA12516@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090911034913.GA22437@kokopelli.hydra> <20090911104025.GA23566@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AAA2B35.4010309@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20090911070849.559fa992@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090912050123.GB27240@kokopelli.hydra> <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:24 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-pango won't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:44:26 -0000 On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 02:19:22PM +0400, Boris Samorodov typed: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:01:23 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > If you still want to install the port, you could just add this to > > > the /etc/make.conf file: > > > > > > # Pango > > > .if $(.CURDIR:M*/x11-toolkits/linux-pango) > > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > > > .endif > > > How long has this been broken for 7.2? Considering all the stuff that > > depends on linux-pango, I'm surprised it hasn't been fixed. There is a native pango port. Suckz also... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 11:00:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05181065670 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ibb_orac@mbox.contact.bg) Received: from sd97.btc-net.bg (SD97.btc-net.bg [212.39.90.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDB838FC18 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7098 invoked by uid 605); 13 Sep 2009 11:00:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chameleon) (83.228.34.40) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2009 11:00:07 -0000 Message-ID: From: "Ivailo Bonev" To: "Wolfgang Zenker" References: <20090713075527.GA11259@duncan.reilly.home> <20090713193903.GA49591@lyxys.ka.sub.org> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:00:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD RoadMap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:10 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Zenker" To: Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:39 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD RoadMap >* Masoom Shaikh [090713 20:26]: >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Andrew Reilly >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:55:19AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >>>> Is there a general roadmap of what's planned >>>> for future major releases? I don't mean minor >>>> stuff like driver or contributed version bumps. >>>> But bigger, or just plain cool things, like as SMP, >>>> soft updates, ZFS, netgraph, pf, etc, were in the past. > >>> I doubt that there's much "big" in the ambit of "Unix-like OS" >>> that isn't already in the 8-current series. > >>> In a project like FreeBSD, "what's in the roadmap" equates >>> pretty closely with "what are the developers working on", and >>> that is summarised in the quarterly status reports, such as this >>> one: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2009-01-2009-03.html > >>> As for when any of this will "hit the tree" and find its way >>> into a release, that's very much a "how long is a piece of >>> string" sort of question; not really the way FreeBSD works. >>> Particularly since it moved to a calendar-based release >>> schedule. > >>> IMO, YMMV, i-do-not-speak-for-freebsd, etc. > >> can this help ? > >> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html > > or you could visit this years eurobsdcon and listen to > http://www.ukuug.org/events/eurobsdcon2009/talks/#mckusick or http://wiki.freebsd.org/8.0TODO for changes before 8-RELEASE > :-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 11:00:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34061065676 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FA78FC31 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8DB0ioM012695; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:00:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8DB0hpF012694; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:00:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:00:43 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Sagara Wijetunga Message-ID: <20090913110043.GB12516@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Sagara Wijetunga , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AABBAD9.7040005@tomahawk.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AABBAD9.7040005@tomahawk.com.sg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:00:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to setup mDNSResponder on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:00:49 -0000 On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:14:33PM +0800, Sagara Wijetunga typed: > Hi all > > I have installed the net/mDNSResponder port on a FreeBSD 7.2 i386 > computer. Set to launch the mdnsd on start up (in /etc/rc.conf). > Changed "hosts" line in /etc/nsswitch.conf to "hosts: files mdns dns". > Rebooted. > > "mDNSIdentify name.local" immediately shows the IP address of the other > computer but "ping name.local" shows following message: > ping: cannot resolve name.local: Unknown host > > Its the same for ssh too. Is there anything else to set up in FreeBSD? Yes. It's called bind. :) Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 11:21:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DE71065670 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2513D8FC1B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5D250879; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.71] (unknown [10.10.10.71]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD2950873; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AACD5C9.2030600@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:21:45 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn Organization: Koudekerke, NL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4AACBF63.8020304@webrz.net> <4AACCB7A.2050106@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4AACCB7A.2050106@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Perl updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:21:33 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > You're talking about the update of lang/perl5.10 from perl-5.10.0 > to perl-5.10.1 ? > > The reason you need to run perl-after-upgrade is because perl library > modules are stored in directory trees which encode the perl version > number. > perl-after-upgrade basically moves installed modules from [-snip-] Thanks, appreciate this detailed information. Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 12:05:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F44A106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f195.google.com (mail-qy0-f195.google.com [209.85.221.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D5B8FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so667940qyk.14 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=OPhoLn0kf8LPAFe80kO3t5+QO9k/uBpu9jlJuNKWCag=; b=mU4MjutLJ9yh2B0BKkUrDNeNGyYk/h7d0VaAWlcr0C38s9HyY0twqqzJkemoIYBokw CuTwOoVMcv35QaWSWdvrkpGmw/7vpumrpkd1MfYLCm5NYRJagxRCho1tBD2II8ka4x5U n7xc5NW7SMeBQfiznFGN5hnHfxdDh8lCHPNjo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=RMilueIEjuf5tNSwO0ex5sZI8hkGGZzvliPPwjWLCOm0aNZVzUqaoo7v/bI+FRDXa4 LArwAd4mphALp41H3zMIGWZWZDPdoYQb0sSYULoOnRTc4hXd9W7sKI3jDfVH7hCPoZww s4VlPP40uVGSZFvGVRCy6mzHwrV4bmTlLTQBc= Received: by 10.224.42.131 with SMTP id s3mr4318950qae.111.1252843555725; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? (CPE-65-29-54-222.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1504880qyk.4.2009.09.13.05.05.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:05:54 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:05:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090911034913.GA22437@kokopelli.hydra> <20090912050123.GB27240@kokopelli.hydra> <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909130705.42663.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: linux-pango won't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:05:56 -0000 On Saturday 12 September 2009 05:19:22 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:01:23 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > > > If you still want to install the port, you could just add this to > > > the /etc/make.conf file: > > > > > > # Pango > > > .if $(.CURDIR:M*/x11-toolkits/linux-pango) > > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > > > .endif > > > > How long has this been broken for 7.2? Considering all the stuff that > > depends on linux-pango, I'm surprised it hasn't been fixed. > > It will be broken until someone provide an URL to non-vulnerable > RPM package. Upgrade to the latest version of Pango (1.24 or later), available from the Pango Web site http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat...ch/pango/field[]/1/field[]/2 -- Mitja ----- http://starikarp.redbubble.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 12:44:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2371065672 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFE58FC1E for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1482842bwz.43 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:44:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Fdh5Lv7qUNmwI07OyW22WtRJ8aC2d3ydwYLMKZFUAj8=; b=FpF+LXxh124o9DLIXrfXSK52jjlo4k26icirmRW4SwtjPGtNj+oOs9Zrmr7mi/3thJ vcDQGyJODes01JNkE5dUJsIgIQXmvyJbRv6KkbaMC/Gkyh3glt/QbCMkKzXpuaLBNc1W bd0Katu/OaIAq6/g1u1fPfXyfeNIt6sQXTfEg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Spuv9ZiuMDBLk7cyhs64e8RuE3zUM2DTIcZPEt0WuFhvRYDOlzKHfUM/8jZfmR1hdJ u2yep1PYlK06V/ZejTP4Ik3R/UUmUSzQX3GXBriIvOm3cryVN/1qve2ajp5SqIMZUryP 0qFMWkzt6TvPMVZIFNIJUWI1XFI4sO2xcuJ3g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.144.70 with SMTP id y6mr1857150fau.51.1252843912729; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: <85a117790909130511p64548ed7s117a5a1e0bf90306@mail.gmail.com> From: Zbigniew Komarnicki To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Can't install FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE and 8.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:44:16 -0000 Hello, I can't install FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE and 8.0-BETA4 on laptop HP Pavilion Entertainment PC dv5 - 1150ew. I got the following message when boot from CD install 8.0-BETA4-amd64-bootonly.iso similarly for 7.2-RELEASE: ... run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 120 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 180 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 240 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for xpt_config panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long cpuid=0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 0 tid 100000] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movq $0,0x68d1e0(%rip) db> and thats all. Is maybe also someone also have such problem? Zbigniew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 13:49:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67816106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roys1012@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE628FC14 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2410551ewy.36 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:49:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=j0tTrBmcuNB4rOCpQI21oJKOM7SkJP1JXtImx1gqnRU=; b=mFkWEOTHtNqJ3TK3qQUDjzW/Zutx6LikCr2Xp9HYAVuirWGoF66tbuKZXMb6zawoc2 LhuhMyvHgbwBXaVvITiI9MRs4xPqgRnl4Vname6zuBz4qss0KaBhcg8knuIRtRdziaSm G9tkK/YfVFk0GXfTgyd56ZguEoValF1DU2NYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=L0Yd0WUfl9YDUrpLCV8PsyXzYkitKi73kffe14/OatRrTAZvVZfkJIu0oO6VhZ2XXq rfxZNL5YAzX8XtOdwS4cLmmASR+/p/4SS/wxoBjCahGovm3U3Hps7qgx0dQfMKED0t+N rDLCc6vhMGazm+lFogYEaN/zUX4YEyontbo68= Received: by 10.211.129.20 with SMTP id g20mr2021928ebn.14.1252849795576; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.125? (ip193-123-210-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl [87.210.123.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm4025969eyf.6.2009.09.13.06.49.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:49:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Roy Stuivenberg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:49:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1252849789.15701.5.camel@bsd1012.roycs.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: VLC from ports collection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:49:57 -0000 Hello, My install VLC did stop with remark Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/vlc: In the makefile i found this line .if ${PERL_LEVEL} < 500800 BROKEN= Does not compile with perl ${PERL_VERSION} .endif Can I (and if so who) edit this option? [FreeBSD 7.2 stable - gnome2] Regards, Roy Stuivenberg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 14:57:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAED3106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pstreem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.211.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3D48FC13 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh9 with SMTP id 9so3344144ywh.32 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=DEsn5UbCrmsecyAdpZdz5xwASNL7pLzLm0ywPr4br7s=; b=wgTQ4Sifr+3p6/mYV8e2qawYcfCaIBcCCO6raS/PbGUfO7IGyZOyzuz43us0VTan56 6OGqenatnV+JZvGPX4IfzUoKMxTMUZYFzVKBVOaP1dudUrwSY4JweNu48U+Spvl2mRFL o2YZnysMpBcnh8LlCyF7EVDzw+mujzq53oWu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JTgfTOfcGHrzAlXNyiYYVeKGbrLdeQVjpwDdsnEYV42Rz9qVpURavxxEo3qUrKDADz kKjlCbr9LRSn1zBVP23gFZUO8a1BwQIgE4wadeDqXboGDeY4GKa//iugUMfcTjMYIrJ1 Jz5deJs3gqgmhrCXX2XYH+xjJB27WyjzNPN8g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.16.2 with SMTP id 2mr8236276ybp.251.1252852323032; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:32:03 +0800 Message-ID: <2c66535d0909130732y7e2548by76a99b515a9b0600@mail.gmail.com> From: PstreeM China To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Question of keyboard input after lanuch vlc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:57:45 -0000 hello all : yestoday i install the vlc media player use ports , the question is that : After i lanuch vlc (In a X Env , just test Openbox and xfce ), i can not input any word ,look like keyboard is faile , mouse are normal , then i kill (click the X) it , the keyboard is normal. test that , lanuch vlc , when the CAPSLOCK is on , i can input any word (ADKXKOPI and so on ) .. and still can not input word when CAPSLOCK is off. can someone give me help for fix this Question ?? thanks all ! Best Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 15:31:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589371065672 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4688FC17 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:31:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1252855860; l=873; s=domk; d=laverenz.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=4drLMmCXBzp7npZThb2gxQmtt0g=; b=Ofj9RHecLedm9J1apjR7+uBRWHUtD83Ffo/FZguxUJZ930lMtF+v5NFQu7ZUe0xxWt9 HdhW3naAI2f4CMVTwHBLMppVkzdmqeQqsOq409uG3kduZKLHtbMdUWGw0vwCVJoCGZt6q uyl5a9ZDYGLsfQHMqgRkOmBHhT5VCJ/xhpQ= X-RZG-AUTH: :LWgJfE6Id/4Sm/WkdV0gEbKL+/p/UjmosA/b4BPR0oc5Ok8I77Pc2A== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from athena.laverenz.de (91-67-3-52-dynip.superkabel.de [91.67.3.52]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo35) (RZmta 21.0) with ESMTP id a051e9l8DFUYVd for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:31:00 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EF1127BD4 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29806-01 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from t42.laverenz.lan (unknown [192.168.23.42]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223F6127BD2 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:28:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AAD1033.1080708@laverenz.de> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:30:59 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz Organization: private site User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <85a117790909130511p64548ed7s117a5a1e0bf90306@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <85a117790909130511p64548ed7s117a5a1e0bf90306@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Subject: Re: Can't install FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE and 8.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:31:04 -0000 Am 13.09.2009 14:11, schrieb Zbigniew Komarnicki: > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 120 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 180 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 240 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for xpt_config > panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long > cpuid=0 > KDB: enter: panic > [thread pid 0 tid 100000] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movq $0,0x68d1e0(%rip) > db> > > and thats all. Is maybe also someone also have such problem? Yes, several people reported this problem. There is a workaround that might help: disable the firewire device (IEEE 1394) in the BIOS of your machine and try again. cu, Uwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 16:54:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7461065670 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ts8807385@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com (mail-px0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953178FC19 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi9 with SMTP id 9so2160338pxi.14 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=QiFr1mwO9Y/lA1XgJOkLNUbJzbxfvppFE+Q4ndGYaTc=; b=FtBpz5WrWM7cmIFkJxlFnrTY+KM10+oV/sYbZpH9XC01wsLOMMwWviXQA7WbpUyoip ikAHxQRv12xxxgCBFVcr1W7y1iav9ZYdRowBgRieFFE+knqp4lBFkf0AMW9KSiAPhaCI k8IVlYGAM0uiO0D0kolV8Q17/nHALEXO6CoOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=o08Dej7rmFv/wd/ViElsF8K1OwungxSzN91aHF7nv8ObmOMNVzsRucQY0bM8OlJ8ae na7GBTlqs9f+aFV6iz6ZqZjSAgR/ArrUK6aPfYwF2F4zVupdZAasQh9bsWI3ZFjMvvwh lvlJ/Pa3AD+eqIHTCAHXsEyd34jZY8t49b+MM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.166.15 with SMTP id o15mr854409rve.12.1252859296754; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:28:16 -0400 Message-ID: <9b1e5e1b0909130928u3a852794hb3b5744ec1925ad0@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD-8 Release Type? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:54:50 -0000 Hey guys, we've googled and searched the FreeBSD website... cannot find the answer. Will FreeBSD-8 be a 'normal' or 'extended' support release? If it's normal, we'll probably just stick with 7.1, but if it is extended, we'll go with 8. Thanks! Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 17:46:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E6E1065676 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullblaststorm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC15A8FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1583802fxm.43 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:46:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nk0Ar35PRvCPa38nguFu8t4If8AEg+EBUtx0QqaP9wo=; b=dfCZ0kESZiUCYLl8oIaNqBXfHuw3H06FKm+Zzdz7RzuZRIDssIetVU9EDd/Y5HUe+L EEEvW4337bQcFrCVyDhVjIBrvRqV1xJUaAjkdbYgXbxJMT6ivU/2q0nXDwkZUDOyVTBL iL6NIBxAQy+Aoe10TJmlds7M3gvjNQq2MHyNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IhjE9f4CknvEFS3ypqHVmL75pr4DYr4vcwdljE9WUdC90/BueyjGo8suGifh8e7LVG thjEtTphqNJE2GwHsFEE4De36QCk4/hTMEOYJwG89WLK5Qcdi3QofbFuy8gpYR4kS6xl LTa62kFXBVAkvpBM/VJmyAWSvRAb/WBdqRCdQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.170.18 with SMTP id q18mr523646hbe.50.1252862368070; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:19:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AAD1033.1080708@laverenz.de> References: <85a117790909130511p64548ed7s117a5a1e0bf90306@mail.gmail.com> <4AAD1033.1080708@laverenz.de> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:19:28 +0600 Message-ID: <6c51dbb10909131019o3409827bu1894416900ad04fc@mail.gmail.com> From: FuLLBLaSTstorm To: Uwe Laverenz , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Can't install FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE and 8.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:46:19 -0000 Hi, I am having _exactly_ the same issue with my Fujitsu-Siemens ESPRIMO V6505. And unfortunately for me the workaround listed above is not applicable as there're no option such as firewireIEEE1394 in my BIOS =3D(. I know it's bad policy to request a feature than to implement it, but anywayz...It would be greatly appreciated if someone fixed this issue. PLEASE!!! 2009/9/13 Uwe Laverenz : > Am 13.09.2009 14:11, schrieb Zbigniew Komarnicki: > >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_confi= g >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 120 seconds for xpt_conf= ig >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 180 seconds for xpt_conf= ig >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 240 seconds for xpt_conf= ig >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for xpt_conf= ig >> panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long >> cpuid=3D0 >> KDB: enter: panic >> [thread pid 0 tid 100000] >> Stopped at =A0 kdb_enter+0x3d: =A0movq =A0 =A0 $0,0x68d1e0(%rip) >> db> >> >> and thats all. Is maybe also someone also have such problem? > > Yes, several people reported this problem. There is a workaround that mig= ht > help: disable the firewire device (IEEE 1394) in the BIOS of your machine > and try again. > > cu, > Uwe > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 18:29:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D383106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf09.insightbb.com (mxsf09.insightbb.com [74.128.0.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA768FC15 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:29:50 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,379,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="172571457" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf09.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2009 14:29:49 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQEAMrWrErQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBUtZZhBgF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,379,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="105936864" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2009 14:29:48 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:29:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909131429.48206.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Character Escape sequences and fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:29:50 -0000 I'm wanting to embed escape sequences for colors into my fortune files. It appears that fortune doesn't user the pager specified by PAGER and doesn't support escape sequences. Anyone know how to embed color, bold, or italics into fortune files? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 18:53:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E0D1065670 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from sv4.hmnoc.net (sv4.hmnoc.net [63.247.76.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3788FC17 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [187.78.165.62] (port=52737 helo=papi) by sv4.hmnoc.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmuCG-0000Au-LT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:53:20 -0300 From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:53:53 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909131553.54114.mlobo@digiart.art.br> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sv4.hmnoc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - digiart.art.br Subject: [OFF?] Mac OX Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:53:51 -0000 Sorry to put a lame question here but I need a little feedback as to keep my hopes up or bury them. I have an old sound board (echo gina20) that I need to keep using (for $$$ reasons), but I also must upgrade my OSes to 64 bits. There are XP 32bit drivers but no XP 64bit ones for it. There are no Gina20 drivers for freebsd but there IS a Mac OS X driver for it!. Is it possible to use a Mac driver on FreeBSD? Has this ever been tried or done? should I bury my hopes? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winedows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 19:20:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F290410656A5 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (ip-58-28-152-174.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.152.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91918FC0C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29D8B2840C; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:20:05 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:20:05 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Roy Stuivenberg Message-ID: <20090913192005.GA56879@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <1252849789.15701.5.camel@bsd1012.roycs.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1252849789.15701.5.camel@bsd1012.roycs.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VLC from ports collection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:20:07 -0000 On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 03:49:49PM +0200, Roy Stuivenberg wrote: > Hello, > > My install VLC did stop with remark > > Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/vlc: > > In the makefile i found this line > > .if ${PERL_LEVEL} < 500800 > BROKEN= Does not compile with perl ${PERL_VERSION} > .endif > > Can I (and if so who) edit this option? [FreeBSD 7.2 stable - gnome2] The obvious solution is for you to upgrade perl. Is there a specific requirement for the perl version you're on? Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "If everything's under control, you're going too slow" - Mario Andretti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 16:06:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24BE106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edemkrimea@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857CE8FC18 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so659449fgg.13 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:06:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JJq+s1+6tV8eHC1CJuO6Ob23RffwMdokZTwAyB+Sn0A=; b=XXd7Xx7ot+t7v0T+czQ4ZTxsBt1c0+eMAkMgQ7llCQOCoPeZv5n3JOfj8xIllo1VRa wPplT1qLrp3iBE9PFhJkOSKs0TXS8mJsNuwZcbZJHZMKoCswe61unYyXssZwS2CFBaLg XljksjNTtLPtDO0GgngEXCITP66EqycaYSNUo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=SDtPIbnaObcsbL+YV+SnmFjKOTvIcHzRiMgek/gmccon3q6Z5FxggX0TYk9cwLrL5B DE38wjq+t89zNzmjiSBW7EIxNEpLKTQxuqDlp7A8SwrF8/W6rwcjCfWkzeaK/EAImK6/ bYvcPXmoC2JPjZ7ON9NulVe8oCCc28uNLqlC8= Received: by 10.86.243.15 with SMTP id q15mr4125483fgh.21.1252856079466; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.12? (nat-175-12.yapic.net [194.150.175.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm3467800fga.10.2009.09.13.08.34.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:34:38 -0700 (PDT) From: edem To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:34:25 -0400 Message-Id: <1252856065.8961.2.camel@edem> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:36:24 +0000 Cc: Subject: links_don't_work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:06:33 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/ru/projects/newbies.html On this page some links don't work .Could you update the page? Thanks in advance. Yours sincerely Jalaalov Edem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 19:38:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1EF106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68518FC12 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1595965bwz.43 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=gS+IVCW9UW+VZKJNYHgwhEe1D2yeXHic9pxvQ/P+6TI=; b=HmSVibZ7lRhcMjEmaWFl3y69HRTVdRV5gGk7PNEhPR7JnQqaQlmWEZyXQLY23woz4U TYhtZM5QQvLTVoWKjY5+/1AT0apBKHeP+kPaaArWzM6FGwoYjAhaM4EgFtjlWmmb8z23 aU6gxOQxDB3d3Qb0cR4whaWDeNrE9gg+8cXWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GvYrwyjn9qEN4xbpFkqhJlxxEa5dS9G4ZoWU/EEragSfwFVUSczo7XvDWZOkEze3C8 BDWTg5mrUh6rd7kmtWXylTs4vWGpUyFAYS8VidKtYRU4V/phj+oLwFIT4d/3Wr+fsZK1 vzv2u524IV7NpK4jONQaUnGiTNQ6Frx+BU4as= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.165.11 with SMTP id n11mr2361671mue.5.1252870680376; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:38:00 +0200 Message-ID: From: Stefan Miklosovic To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016364c778fda77ab04737aafef X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: add own program to ports + help with port / program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:38:02 -0000 --0016364c778fda77ab04737aafef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hi list, I am about writing shell script which adds system account by tens (even hundreds). Info about added accounts is stored in external file which has syntax like this account-name:comment:email-addres Briefly, account-name is name of account comment field is comment which appears in /etc/passwd comment field email-address is address where info about just created account is sent (optional) eg. joe:Joe Brown:joe@something.com mark:Mark Red:mark@nowhere.org tim:Tim Yellow:timmy@example.com Script is checking file syntax and if syntax is bad, it exits. If it is ok, accounts is being created. You can modify a lot of infos, these are stored in config file in /usr/local/etc/pwgroup.conf, eg # output file with passwords of newly # created user accounts PASSWD_FILE="passwords" # uid of first created user UID="2000" # root home dir of users HOME_DIR="/home" # comment for users, appears in /etc/passwd # in comment field COMMENT="" # primary group for users, if empty, # primary group will be a user name GROUP="users" # comma separated list of groups # users should be a member of GROUPLIST="" # shell for users SHELL="/bin/csh" # use quotas QUOTAS="NO" # hard quote limit QUOTA_HARD="1536" # soft quote limit QUOTA_SOFT="1024" # disk device upon which users are created DISK_DEV="/home" # expiration date of accounts ACCOUNT_EXP="30-Jun-2010" # length of password PASSWORD_LENGTH="8" ========== as you can see, you can set quotas for users, account expiration of accounts, password length, shell and so on. Variables in config file are default, if you do not overwrite some at command line. some examples: # pwgrp -a -f users -c "unix begginer" -s /usr/local/bin/bash -q -qh 2048 -l 10 (adding users) # pwgrp -r -f remove_users (list of users for removing) Password are generated by apg program Quotas are set by setquotas. The main reason I write this mail is to make some feedback about program to me and even test it and comment it. I want to write this program but I do not know if I do it correct and I need some feedback about programming style or just some info what do you think about it. At this time, there is absence of manual, but if you track code, I think you understand it. Any ideas are highly appreciated. --0016364c778fda77ab04737aafef-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 19:49:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262D5106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83B48FC12 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF823CAC9; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:49:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8DJnZ5Y022832; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:49:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:49:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Stefan Miklosovic Message-Id: <20090913214935.57a33015.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add own program to ports + help with port / program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:49:38 -0000 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:38:00 +0200, Stefan Miklosovic wrote: > I am about writing shell script which adds system account > by tens (even hundreds). Interesting and useful tool. I'm sure many sysadmins have created such tools for their own needs, but it wouldn't be bad to have one publically available from the ports collection. > Password are generated by apg program In order to employ an alternate password generation program (e. g. pwgen), you could even add an entry to your configuration file. > I want to write this program but I do not know if I do it correct and I need > some > feedback about programming style or just some info what do you think about > it. Style is highly debatable and is discussed ocassionally on this list. But finally, YOU are the programmer and YOU are the one who decides about style. Programming tips to mainly rely on which programming language you use. For example, if you're using C, I would suggest you to only use "safe functions" (e. g. no strcpy() function) and always check return values (e. g. fopen(), fputs() and fclose() functions, if you use them for accessing files). In case you are using threads, check that your program is "thread safe". Testing as much as possible is important because you're writing a program that is acting on system level (root) when it does "simply" create user accounts. > At this time, there is absence of manual, but if you track code, I think > you understand it. In order to comply to FreeBSD's philosophy of quality, you should, if your program is complete, take the time to write a manpage. As a developer, I always loved FreeBSD for its excellent documentation. Don't do it "the Linux way" - leave documentation to the Web, a Wiki, or the users. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 20:40:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677AD106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5218FC13 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.31] (jn@stealth.jnielsen.net [74.218.226.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n8DKdqel025252; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:39:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) References: <200909131553.54114.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Message-Id: <28D7E285-42B4-4D0C-A33B-DECF58CA1202@jnielsen.net> From: John Nielsen To: Mario Lobo In-Reply-To: <200909131553.54114.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A400) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A400) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:39:50 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [OFF?] Mac OX Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:40:13 -0000 On Sep 13, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > Sorry to put a lame question here but I need a little feedback as to > keep my > hopes up or bury them. > > I have an old sound board (echo gina20) that I need to keep using > (for $$$ > reasons), but I also must upgrade my OSes to 64 bits. There are XP > 32bit > drivers but no XP 64bit ones for it. There are no Gina20 drivers for > freebsd > but there IS a Mac OS X driver for it!. > > Is it possible to use a Mac driver on FreeBSD? In a word, no. If you have access to the source it should be possible to port the driver, but there's no reason to assume the effort would be trivial. > Has this ever been tried or > done? should I bury my hopes? See above. Drivers do get ported between OSes all the time but there's no magic involved. FreeBSD and Darwin have very different kernel origins. Snow Leopard may be your friend. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 21:11:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5D4106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel@toomuchdata.se) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2898FC1B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so698283fgg.13 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.169.3 with SMTP id r3mr4283744fge.15.1252874952638; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.3? (hd5e26117.gavlegardarna.gavle.to [213.226.97.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm51516fge.20.2009.09.13.13.49.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AAD5AEA.8010900@toomuchdata.se> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:49:46 +0200 From: Daniel Eriksson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Smartmontools + Highpoint hptrr? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:11:02 -0000 I'm trying to monitor SATA drives connected to a HighPoint RocketRAID 2340 card (hptrr driver) using smartmontools, but it doesn't seem to work. Has anyone managed to get this to work? I'm using RELENG_8 / amd64 if that makes any difference. I've tried both the smartmontools port and a direct checkout from their SVN, and I'm getting very similar error messages. From the changelog and the manpage it looks like some work has been done to make this work. /Daniel Eriksson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 21:23:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DE1106566C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdc@prgmr.com) Received: from mail.prgmr.com (mail.prgmr.com [64.62.173.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CAB8FC0C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frylock.local (c-71-202-68-54.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.68.54]) by mail.prgmr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D605368B5B; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AAD62D5.2060908@prgmr.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:23:33 -0700 From: Michael David Crawford Organization: Prgmr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mario Lobo References: <200909131553.54114.mlobo@digiart.art.br> In-Reply-To: <200909131553.54114.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OFF?] Mac OX Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:23:43 -0000 Mario Lobo wrote: > Is it possible to use a Mac driver on FreeBSD? Has this ever been tried or > done? should I bury my hopes? Mac OS X has a unique C++ driver architecture called the I/O Kit. It's quite unlike the driver systems in any other OSes I've seen. If you have the source to the Mac driver, you might be able to glean information from it that would help you write a FreeBSD driver. Even better would be to have the hardware specs to your sound board. Apple has some tech notes on porting drivers from other platforms to Mac OS X. Maybe reading them could give you some insight as to how to port them in reverse. One doesn't generally port device drivers between such different systems; it's more like doing a complete rewrite. Mike -- Michael David Crawford mdc@prgmr.com prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You Are Stupid. Xen-Powered Virtual Private Servers: http://prgmr.com/xen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 21:59:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B971065676 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7AA8FC0C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2610388ewy.36 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=K4bWnq6/hq7M11+s5c9+acbr8yZ6XNi+/WxAq9NonVk=; b=TFkvtMLIA8mpAy0q4op+GMKFD2yzpdKQLFSCN1HED+rVSVK6YX1tfWfF0Fcl54W0zO n5sm1siyGFzImyTcnQth14Ym2FGdAMubKs4coFo/7TQMXu/JtIrX5D2ouBDJ0YwOtWvF lKDddzrWU/+CXmAnli6CLpxlPZVNo5cKoLd7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=G0F+IgrzNk4VRJuqxxRbQlTwOq2pWb9ZJcOshV4lYl2PalJctPiBJ8RtyBCSSpkQdQ ABoZR8s2O38O3tNLImEgPunBqTDIiE41EzLhQySsFYAzvF6ZQgnY/3bI3EnXAy1HoZQu o/Vn3xtxyizd1UGDjmj7/685tBTwWSrvozWQo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.9.17 with SMTP id 17mr5280968ebi.23.1252879191368; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:59:55 -0000 I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG invokes installation of FF 2.x. This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the installation of these graphics programs fails. Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it? Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 22:15:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D7D106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77038FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452781DBB7; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:15:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8DMF9Vv046040; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:15:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:15:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Kurt Buff Message-Id: <20090914001509.ee4f7433.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:15:12 -0000 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others > as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG > invokes installation of FF 2.x. > > This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the > installation of these graphics programs fails. > > Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it? An explaination has recently been discussed on this list. See the archives, and I'm sure you'll find it very fast. (Sadly, I can't remember the thread name, but it involved "Firefox", as far as I remember.) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 23:15:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8E91065670 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jules.stocks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D988FC12 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1680495fxm.43 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h3EgII5Ap0Qlk+1ulLlEODOPIcIXN19Dq4lpCjAMJTM=; b=xEx4kayVX8Y9JwCHumwhw2RbN7Gt9vX/+YwgS+9vGpIOVJon3uSk5BH8SQ3VoNpfsm AJ/kxC+ek5aAA3qyZ/8Db2xNxvyNZwN6TAIuE2oXQF4uWEzsElY6fviJaKV/tI0NYKNj srVF8YPG+TmrPS+7zbsgEysuAxps0O/wplr8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SlABPCa/RY7JWpvO9LiGKXwaeT0CaQbR+/YM4ScgUiP6sIkzByLv+lMrTOLL6ZIuoF vMP+jNVGZRb3u2I57y6o3t4REHE/ggfy7COe2y7l7XlVhnwmaFpqgdnXfQdYBDPFlxu/ WMWAbALsgGuFgrS4AkrBLI1vNSHkIClWg3uO8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.83 with SMTP id n19mr4427884bkw.121.1252883711857; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:15:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17216271.1252735922654.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <17216271.1252735922654.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net> From: Jules Gilbert Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:14:51 -0400 Message-ID: <28d0cced0909131614x62bcd1a6oe47845d8cc737a19@mail.gmail.com> To: Kenneth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: configuring X on the Presario with the 8200M driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:15:15 -0000 Thanks, guys! I intend to set aside some time late this week to try this. I bought one but have not been able to configure the X environment yet; I notice that PC-BSD comes up fine; I thought of doing that and copying the file, but that's about a half day or more of effort that way... Not good. Anyway, a couple questions... Is this likely to be compatible with FBSD 8.0? Or no, and I will just use = 7.2. --jg On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Kenneth wrote: > Moving this discussion to freebsd-x11. > > I have a Presario CQ60 with the NVIDIA 8200M G, and X is working! > > Here are the steps to get there. =A0Do everything as root: > > 1) Update your ports to the most recent. =A0Follow the FreeBSD manual, se= ction 4.5 Using the Ports Collection, nuke the contents of /usr/ports, and = install a new base using portsnap or cvsup. > > 2) Install the nvidia-driver. > # cd /usr/ports/x11-driver/nvidia-driver > # make install clean =A0(I built with options FREEBSD_AGP checked, ACPI c= hecked, LINUX unchecked). > > 3) You can install 2 more optional tools for configuring the nvidia card = settings. =A0I have not used them, but I installed them. > # cd /usr/ports/x11-driver/nvidia-settings > # make install clean > # cd /usr/ports/x11-driver/nvidia-xconfig > # make install clean > > 4) I also installed the fbdev driver from X.Org. > # cd /usr/ports/x11-drivers/xf86-video-fbdev > # make install clean > > 5) Add the nvidia driver as a dynamically loaded kernel module. > # cd /boot > # vi loader.conf =A0(you better know how to use vi to edit) > --- add the line nvidia_load=3D"YES" > --- it is the only line I have in my loader.conf file > > 6) Reboot the system > # reboot > > 7) If you want to see the version you just installed (your versions may b= e newer than mine below)... > # pkg_info | grep nvidia > nvidia-driver-185.18.29 > nvidia-settings-190.32 > nvidia-xconfig-190.32 > # pkg_info | grep fbdev > xf86-video-fbdev-0.4.0_2 > > 8) Generate your xorg.conf.new file. > # cd /root > # Xorg -configure > > 9) Edit the xorg.conf.new file. > # vi xorg.conf.new > --- change the line =A0 =A0Driver "nv" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to read =A0 =A0Driver "nvidia" > > 10) Test the config file. > # Xorg -config xorg.conf -retro > --- you should get a grey screen and your mouse should work, especially i= f your mouse worked when installing FreeBSD > --- to kill the test, press CTRL-ALT-BKSP > > 11) If everything worked, move and rename (drop the new extension) the co= nfig file to the /etc directory > # mv xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf > > 12) Test again. =A0Log in as another user belonging to the wheel group (o= r login as root). > % startx > --- you should get 3 green windows > --- you can kill X by clicking on the large window on the left, and typin= g exit > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 23:42:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA77106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3297F8FC14 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n8DNgtAF003138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:42:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8DNgs3s080768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:42:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8DNgs2e080617; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:42:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:42:53 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Tom Smith Message-ID: <20090913234253.GA14988@dan.emsphone.com> References: <9b1e5e1b0909130928u3a852794hb3b5744ec1925ad0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9b1e5e1b0909130928u3a852794hb3b5744ec1925ad0@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:42:55 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 Release Type? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:42:57 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 13), Tom Smith said: > Hey guys, we've googled and searched the FreeBSD website... cannot find > the answer. Will FreeBSD-8 be a 'normal' or 'extended' support release? > If it's normal, we'll probably just stick with 7.1, but if it is extended, > we'll go with 8. So far, no .0 releases have been marked extended. http://security.freebsd.org/#sup -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 00:21:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBF61065692 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from sv4.hmnoc.net (sv4.hmnoc.net [63.247.76.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7678FC0A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [187.78.165.62] (port=56664 helo=papi) by sv4.hmnoc.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmzKC-0000H1-5U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:21:44 -0300 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:22:27 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909132122.27435.mlobo@digiart.art.br> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sv4.hmnoc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - digiart.art.br Subject: Re: [OFF?] Mac OX Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:21:45 -0000 On Sunday 13 September 2009 17:39:50 John Nielsen wrote: > origins. Snow Leopard may be your friend. > > JN What do you mean by that, John? What help can I get from Snow Leopard? On Sunday 13 September 2009 18:23:33 Michael David Crawford wrote: > One doesn't generally port device drivers between such different > systems; it's more like doing a complete rewrite. > > Mike Since my post, I have found out 2 things: 1) A good while back, a guy called Thomas Skibo was writing a driver for it It's pretty old and he has not touched it for a long time, but he was kind enough to send it to me. And I will try to make it work. 2) Downloaded the latest alsa drivers, which contains a driver specifically for my board (gina20). Maybe I can get clues from it. I would try OSS but only the comercial version has drivers for it. Don't know if I'll be successful but I'll post if I am. Many thanks to you both for replying ! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winedows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 01:01:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EFA1065676 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8688FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2682039ewy.36 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:01:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=S0SjH0CUT01PsRCCW1oJOQsNZUjjR+ktlfSGZ0IE3gc=; b=PG6MNNjUnOtOfR+3fvqQLKGQl5zQZBTIbrhERzGJXiOcoGYoZAhXW2jr5CfbIwMpBw X2TYSnbTWGaaLjqO01UH4FSgF+issSbL+6HeGD0HfuvPI9EYGN4aCSaEWtorpIAWXxmm gQCe0p3NczmVStOwUgIWtaTxIBVUhcHs/3fc0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qKTsL7F+EUs+lU6wunqt6QU1fmOWABupWU7HanAvMI28CKegQLjjSp3JjFkaW89uuR J9ZiXvCZjGmHXRaYJVmfKXlnyH3cbltaCZ2EGgSBs1nMav4AP9PZOh6LZZTzlIUItoat 2KH3a7Vm3OPgo9ZkSyRRPrZoEObcJKRjfAn/M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.132.3 with SMTP id j3mr2412770ebn.54.1252890097328; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:01:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090914001509.ee4f7433.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20090914001509.ee4f7433.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:01:37 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:01:38 -0000 On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 15:15, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: >> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others >> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG >> invokes installation of FF 2.x. >> >> This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the >> installation of these graphics programs fails. >> >> Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it? > > An explaination has recently been discussed on this list. See > the archives, and I'm sure you'll find it very fast. (Sadly, > I can't remember the thread name, but it involved "Firefox", > as far as I remember.) Thanks - I took a look around and I see a thread from April - "Firefox3 and dependencies on firefox2,libxul,xulrunner" - was that what you were referring to? Regardless, I'll try that when I have a few minutes. On to more difficult problems. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 01:09:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAF4106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79928FC12 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.31] (jn@stealth.jnielsen.net [74.218.226.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n8E19cel075033; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:09:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) References: <200909132122.27435.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Message-Id: <920641E4-941B-4B61-996B-1C2012A048B1@jnielsen.net> From: John Nielsen To: Mario Lobo In-Reply-To: <200909132122.27435.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A400) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A400) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:09:37 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [OFF?] Mac OX Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:09:48 -0000 On Sep 13, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Sunday 13 September 2009 17:39:50 John Nielsen wrote: > >> origins. Snow Leopard may be your friend. >> >> JN > > What do you mean by that, John? What help can I get from Snow Leopard? Your only stated OS requirement other than your soundcard working was 64-bit support, and Snow Leopard provides that (even more than its predecessors). If the mac driver for your card still works in that version then it might fit the bill. Of course if you have other requirements or preferences then it may not, I was just throwing it out as an idea. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 01:16:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49A01065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6103F8FC17 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2687948ewy.36 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=w5+Y77V73RxQP9+iJ2M4BCj9miHW2Zhr6uWtjWjWaXQ=; b=EV9VdiI4icttBHfNHcqOhXMUwO49xjdqyaF/XVidosUUwKGCW3wMrXSkgR25besYRk y1smXgebLWaJepEtS9hJkCfSZX92cUCj48h2xomSi5c64F6ci63GssA9yo9cGt4LG8/K tAt+D9H2ESCxMYFVsArN8U6qCu4hSlsue0+4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Fuzn4UQXLYcoxapS4jccVMUotPet3kflSdA9wI2TkOu+WGxJdriZZ/M+tZzQ7HTzRv 4y4K+b+SVV2ChlNf0lEd8tVbxT8/dWIx96+BIB0TB5NWPNVtR463UsfT45PIlHUM31VS mxGWt46NjsWJpkuzNhfzcUvDjYyGqMknjdO7Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.159.19 with SMTP id l19mr6223762ebo.83.1252890971172; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:16:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: wpi0 went away, though a reboot cures it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:16:13 -0000 Today, after leaving my Lenovo T61 on overnight to do some compiles, I lost my wireless. I tried a few other things that what I've listed below, but none of it worked. This is a dual boot machine - I also run Windows XP, and don't have any issues with wireless on that OS. Any clues would be appreciated. # uname -a FreeBSD grimsqueaker.pigfarm.org 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May 1 07:18:07 UTC 2009 root@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 First, in /var/log/messages, I found the following: Sep 13 15:09:23 grimsqueaker kernel: wpi0: device timeout Sep 13 15:09:23 grimsqueaker kernel: wpi0: link state changed to DOWN Sep 13 15:09:24 grimsqueaker kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode Sep 13 15:09:24 grimsqueaker kernel: wpi0: device config failed So I tried stopping and starting netif: # /etc/rc.d/netif stop Stopping network:wpa_supplicant not running? (check /var/run/wpa_supplicant/wpi0.pid). lo0 em0 wpi0 fwe0 fwip0. # /etc/rc.d/netif start em0: no link .............. giving up Starting wpa_supplicant. wpi0: no link .............. giving up lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=19b ether 00:1c:25:80:db:87 media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier wpi0: flags=8803 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:1f:3c:4d:e2:55 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier ssid "" channel 11 (2462 Mhz 11g) authmode WPA1+WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF txpower 50 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS roaming MANUAL Then, I let the compile get as far as it could, and rebooted. While rebooting, I noticed this on the console, and found these traces in /var/log/messages: Sep 13 16:05:44 grimsqueaker kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Sep 13 16:05:48 grimsqueaker last message repeated 4 times Sep 13 16:05:49 grimsqueaker syslogd: exiting on signal 15 Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: done Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...0 interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: 0 done Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: All buffers synced. Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: Uptime: 6h53m12s Sep 13 16:07:38 grimsqueaker kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq16:"; throttling interrupt source Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 01:47:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD201065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.maness@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.211.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED958FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh9 with SMTP id 9so3728157ywh.32 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=miaacCCi4hRgyz2zc9YfhYRSkCUp7y9SleLZmJbnQRc=; b=gcIsvaixf4jXr2mMVf0mWTi7eVlvjf6hFkI8WopYxWXtU7RGEZOAJNRm7HshUfjcIh UKrCxx1wnzaXbsDV6J89FkSVCBDXzpZsnl+sq9tkdwbKNIT02BJpn1ow7yuI9OWTtdBw SgV/ADsTSfUSK2UOK+zLfU4nvxho2eezgWe4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=L1rNiF7UT+UyFERcRGmzcLVj19OXKvc/ZmKNjUwGeFAPR/p/4dJXaR46GrXb286zaY g2D1pANBDHMWt2iMKfqSTYtVeqN3dM0QvouCbvS9vkZFgijmEypY4Th37JT8umGIdEOB 5AWzs/Mjk6SyygORMu+lWgH+0aw4UKS92HVQU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.91.178.19 with SMTP id f19mr3519017agp.33.1252890955949; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:15:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d4757aa78bf4dadb Message-ID: From: Chris Maness To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:47:44 -0000 I level 0 dump of my server. I lost a file that I need back. Is it possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory instead of a pristine partition/mount? Or even better, is it possible to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? Sorry if the question seems stupid. Chris KQ6UP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 01:50:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A3C106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.maness@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.211.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F271A8FC1D for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh9 with SMTP id 9so3729919ywh.32 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:50:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QDA88ACazBBqp3QeP9uLXlP6R+RNE/NbZkiwByCPS18=; b=IR1XgR4Ndv+xcw2T84Y9cKzNM6wZNpJLlyscnU1qLHzyW4LIGY3SDgUaIyi8gCljC1 OBGaCKrFQTK48LmINQdAFe7b0eMVPtxFWFd5egty8YnJPHZA8tuDRHWBeAcy0p09Oc7p MTit6zW10LpbVgpS7hGOwZ5GitETm1ZmNFgps= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=DdLj8r1bTlj6EaKdFj83eYLAmj2fGiyiCRPMAa+xpL75l5x57GFU5Ip/uh3hdsLyPT zmlrxX+SRl/LtAmPpg+NMH8jzTqMP/s8sab7LwWRS+zNNGunP895iyEh2cQBs/FyLkRR NJZQZiaGjfj0PKsM47rUYgoZiHG23r3PS5cHA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.91.154.4 with SMTP id g4mr3515689ago.60.1252893005477; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:50:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:50:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6c27cb4c58b597b2 Message-ID: From: Chris Maness To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:50:06 -0000 On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Maness wrote= : > I level 0 dump of my server. =A0I lost a file that I need back. =A0Is it > possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory > instead of a pristine partition/mount? =A0Or even better, is it possible > to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? > > Sorry if the question seems stupid. > > Chris KQ6UP > Sorry, I was reading the restore man from my mac, and it was not as clear. The restore does not seem to work from my mac (this is where my backup dumps reside as I have two massive HDs). I guess the mac restore would only work with HFS+ and not UFS. I guess the only way would be to move the massive dump file back over to the FreeBSD server. Thanks, Chris KQ6UP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 01:51:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362341065692 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jguojun@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C0868FC21 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45558 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 01:25:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ILTFxnLJHZVjsKpZ+FvUgGOELli073CEQaOVNfnieyxqe3eZS9nVhLXQfx5FMnIAsy+FF/gSAZeReNZCxSOabcwEau0ySOFg4mhN+KV/eevFLblGatMneooSQb87zXSC5wJBZ8W9fh+JceXFfhEe5WwPQEtevxadabJ55+COovQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.14?) (jguojun@76.204.16.27 with plain) by smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 01:25:09 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: QOQqPyEVM1kjiqHX1uVwl6GoVa9oN1W349LYZkaZ82wK.QcjER.KumhTRqd6ox3fS7tvKPA1FYUw2POUmrcMSkHsAn507oqzdhf7YOEhmfH4vYv1Ikzh5Q.y.SvDzuVugxmql0MNfDTgpgcTPlsgi4SFDwXYuWpCouINJsNJ5QAQEbK5fT4JQljFbT5lH8zVUwUzUyVnewAgSho- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4AAD9B71.3080703@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:25:05 -0700 From: Jin Guojun User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20071201 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:51:50 -0000 Tried to install from both 8.0-BETA{3, 4}-i386-dvd1.iso on a Phenom 9600 system and having some disk problems. The system is running 6.x and/or 7.2 FreeBSD (on different drives). Disconnected rest drives and only left 7.2 drive in. ad0: 76319MB at ata0-master UDMA100 Boot 8.0-BETA3-i386-dvd1.iso and sees no partition at all on the 7.2 disk. Boot back to 7.2 and everything works fine, so system has no hardware problem. Boot 8.0-BETA3-i386-dvd1.iso again, still sees no partition, so reconfigured partition with autoconfigure - A 512M for / on /dev/ad0s1a about 4G for swap on /dev/ad0s1b about 2.2G on /var 512M for /tmp rest spaces are for /usr After commit, installation says -- Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev The Creation of file system will abort. OK [Press enter or space] Hit CR and see some other errors, then back to installation menu. Reboot the system, 7.2 is gone. Download 8.0-BETA4-i386-dvd1.iso and burned another DVD, also did verify between DVD and ISO for OK. Run installation from Beta4 DVD, the same problem presents again. If my memory is correct, either 8.0-Beta1 or one version earlier than it was working on this machine. Is anything changed that requires different installation procedure? or is this a bug introduced recently? -Jin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 02:13:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941F41065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406868FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2009 22:13:29 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.7-GA) with ESMTP id QEF61212; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:13:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-227.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.227]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2009 22:13:30 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19117.42696.888649.236347@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:13:28 -0400 To: Jin Guojun In-Reply-To: <4AAD9B71.3080703@sbcglobal.net> References: <4AAD9B71.3080703@sbcglobal.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 8.0-Beta installation problem -- Unable to find /dev/ad0s1b X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:13:30 -0000 Jin Guojun writes: > Tried to install from both 8.0-BETA{3, 4}-i386-dvd1.iso on a > Phenom 9600 system and having some disk problems. > > After commit, installation says -- > > Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev > The Creation of file system will abort. > OK > [Press enter or space] Look at the archives of current@ within the last three weeks. I (and I believe at least one other person) had what seems like the same problem and found a work-around. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 04:26:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E6B106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:26:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kennethcf@earthlink.net) Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9586E8FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:26:24 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=N+wVGx+4ET7cOrm3X0bJqdhuS9ahzTE6QP/4bfZkIPYnKAlqJ+obNhr7ToUFczr9; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.86.224.66] (helo=wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mn38y-0002FI-3K; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:26:24 -0400 Received: from 66.32.238.44 by webmail.c.earthlink.net with HTTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:26:23 -0400 Message-ID: <27184812.1252902383777.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:26:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth To: Jules Gilbert Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0 X-ELNK-Trace: fa60bc5202b74016ef7f91bc926e004c7e972de0d01da9400e01af39a9ee498ce62eff72286bc09a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.66 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ath atheros 5424/2424 on the CQ60 Presario X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kenneth List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:26:25 -0000 Anyone been able to use the ath driver on an atheros 5424/2424? I have a C= ompaq Presario CQ60 and can not get the wireless light to turn blue? -----Original Message----- >From: Jules Gilbert >Sent: Sep 13, 2009 7:14 PM >To: Kenneth >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-x11@freebsd.org, gesbbb@yahoo.c= om >Subject: Re: configuring X on the Presario with the 8200M driver > >Thanks, guys! > >I intend to set aside some time late this week to try this. I bought >one but have not been able to configure the X environment yet; I >notice that PC-BSD comes up fine; I thought of doing that and copying >the file, but that's about a half day or more of effort that way... > >Not good. > >Anyway, a couple questions... > >Is this likely to be compatible with FBSD 8.0? Or no, and I will just use= 7.2. > >--jg > > >On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Kenneth wrote: >> Moving this discussion to freebsd-x11. >> >> I have a Presario CQ60 with the NVIDIA 8200M G, and X is working! >> >> Here are the steps to get there. =C2=A0Do everything as root: >> >> 1) Update your ports to the most recent. =C2=A0Follow the FreeBSD manual= , section 4.5 Using the Ports Collection, nuke the contents of /usr/ports, = and install a new base using portsnap or cvsup. >> >> 2) Install the nvidia-driver. >> # cd /usr/ports/x11-driver/nvidia-driver >> # make install clean =C2=A0(I built with options FREEBSD_AGP checked, AC= PI checked, LINUX unchecked). >> >> 3) You can install 2 more optional tools for configuring the nvidia card= settings. =C2=A0I have not used them, but I installed them. >> # cd /usr/ports/x11-driver/nvidia-settings >> # make install clean >> # cd /usr/ports/x11-driver/nvidia-xconfig >> # make install clean >> >> 4) I also installed the fbdev driver from X.Org. >> # cd /usr/ports/x11-drivers/xf86-video-fbdev >> # make install clean >> >> 5) Add the nvidia driver as a dynamically loaded kernel module. >> # cd /boot >> # vi loader.conf =C2=A0(you better know how to use vi to edit) >> --- add the line nvidia_load=3D"YES" >> --- it is the only line I have in my loader.conf file >> >> 6) Reboot the system >> # reboot >> >> 7) If you want to see the version you just installed (your versions may = be newer than mine below)... >> # pkg_info | grep nvidia >> nvidia-driver-185.18.29 >> nvidia-settings-190.32 >> nvidia-xconfig-190.32 >> # pkg_info | grep fbdev >> xf86-video-fbdev-0.4.0_2 >> >> 8) Generate your xorg.conf.new file. >> # cd /root >> # Xorg -configure >> >> 9) Edit the xorg.conf.new file. >> # vi xorg.conf.new >> --- change the line =C2=A0 =C2=A0Driver "nv" >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0to read =C2=A0 =C2=A0Driver "nv= idia" >> >> 10) Test the config file. >> # Xorg -config xorg.conf -retro >> --- you should get a grey screen and your mouse should work, especially = if your mouse worked when installing FreeBSD >> --- to kill the test, press CTRL-ALT-BKSP >> >> 11) If everything worked, move and rename (drop the new extension) the c= onfig file to the /etc directory >> # mv xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf >> >> 12) Test again. =C2=A0Log in as another user belonging to the wheel grou= p (or login as root). >> % startx >> --- you should get 3 green windows >> --- you can kill X by clicking on the large window on the left, and typi= ng exit >> >> >> >> >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 06:25:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BF01065676 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from sv4.hmnoc.net (sv4.hmnoc.net [63.247.76.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23088FC1F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [187.78.165.62] (port=53409 helo=papi) by sv4.hmnoc.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmxLk-0002Xo-Hh for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:15:13 -0300 From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:15:48 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200909131553.54114.mlobo@digiart.art.br> <28D7E285-42B4-4D0C-A33B-DECF58CA1202@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <28D7E285-42B4-4D0C-A33B-DECF58CA1202@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909131915.48990.mlobo@digiart.art.br> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sv4.hmnoc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - digiart.art.br Cc: Subject: Re: [OFF?] Mac OX Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:25:10 -0000 On Sunday 13 September 2009 17:39:50 John Nielsen wrote: > origins. Snow Leopard may be your friend. > > JN What do you mean by that, John? What help can I get from Snow Leopard? On Sunday 13 September 2009 18:23:33 Michael David Crawford wrote: > One doesn't generally port device drivers between such different > systems; it's more like doing a complete rewrite. > > Mike Since my post, I have found out 2 things: 1) A good while back, a guy called Thomas Skibo was writing a driver for it It's pretty old and he has not touched it for a long time, but he was kind enough to send it to me. And I will try to make it work. 2) Downloaded the latest alsa drivers, which contains a driver specifically for my board (gina20). Maybe I can get clues from it. I would try OSS but only the comercial version has drivers for it. Don't know if I'll be successful but I'll post if I am. Many thanks to you both for replying ! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winedows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 06:47:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636F41065676 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f229.google.com (mail-yw0-f229.google.com [209.85.211.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294648FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh18 with SMTP id 18so2299767ywh.3 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:47:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Received: by 10.216.87.135 with SMTP id y7mr39026wee.26.1252910860502; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0016e6d7ea7bc68d970473840acb@google.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:47:40 +0000 From: utisoft@googlemail.com To: Chris Maness , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:47:42 -0000 On 14 Sep 2009 02:50, Chris Maness wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Maness chris@chrismaness.com> > wrote: > > I level 0 dump of my server. I lost a file that I need back. Is it > > possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory > > instead of a pristine partition/mount? Or even better, is it possible > > to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? > > > > Sorry if the question seems stupid. > > > > Chris KQ6UP > > > Sorry, I was reading the restore man from my mac, and it was not as > clear. The restore does not seem to work from my mac (this is where > my backup dumps reside as I have two massive HDs). I guess the mac > restore would only work with HFS+ and not UFS. I guess the only way > would be to move the massive dump file back over to the FreeBSD > server. > Thanks, > Chris KQ6UP > _______________________________________________ Try using NFS or cat over ssh, something like $ ssh my_mac 'cat dumpfile' | restore -if - restore treats the file as a tape, so it doesn't pull any bytes until you ask it to. This should be the least network intensive way of doing it.... Good luck! Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 07:37:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50A106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA648FC1A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Mn67Y-000BXw-Et for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:37:08 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090911034913.GA22437@kokopelli.hydra> <20090912050123.GB27240@kokopelli.hydra> <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> <200909130705.42663.lumiwa@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:37:09 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200909130705.42663.lumiwa@gmail.com> (ajtiM's message of "Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:05:42 -0500") Message-ID: <67708234@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: linux-pango won't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:37:09 -0000 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:05:42 -0500 ajtiM wrote: > On Saturday 12 September 2009 05:19:22 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:01:23 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > If you still want to install the port, you could just add this to > > > > the /etc/make.conf file: > > > > > > > > # Pango > > > > .if $(.CURDIR:M*/x11-toolkits/linux-pango) > > > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > > > > .endif > > > > > > How long has this been broken for 7.2? Considering all the stuff that > > > depends on linux-pango, I'm surprised it hasn't been fixed. > > > > It will be broken until someone provide an URL to non-vulnerable > > RPM package. > Upgrade to the latest version of Pango (1.24 or later), available from the > Pango Web site > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat...ch/pango/field[]/1/field[]/2 Sorry, I didn't manage to find a Pango 1.24 package for Fedora Core 4. Can you post an URL? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 08:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA91106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9E08FC19 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546FDEB4E1F; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:55:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376A145164; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:55:57 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IbG3WnCbTDQ1; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:55:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from kobe.laptop (cm35.psi155.maxonline.com.sg [58.146.155.35]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B2645148; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:55:55 +0300 (EEST) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8E8toxJ095950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:55:51 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8E8tn9A095949; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:55:49 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Kurt Buff References: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:55:48 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Kurt Buff's message of "Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700") Message-ID: <87zl8xkiqz.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:55:59 -0000 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others > as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG > invokes installation of FF 2.x. > > This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the > installation of these graphics programs fails. > > Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it? You can build most of the ports that depend on GECKO with the following in your `/etc/make.conf' file: WITH_GECKO= libxul I just finished rebuilding my packages in a chroot with this option, and firefox 2.x was not required for a full x11/gnome2 build: # pkg_info | fgrep firefo firefox-3.5.3,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla # From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 10:33:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6891065693 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9958FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mn8sY-0007Zv-IG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:33:54 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mn8sX-00012V-Tc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:33:50 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EAXnWF032569 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:33:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8EAXn4n032568 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:33:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:33:49 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090914103349.GA32543@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.1 X-Spam-Level: ---- Subject: mutt users - text/enriched crashes mutt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:56 -0000 I've got a text/enriched email, which crashes mutt-devel-1.5.20_1 This is FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64 When I open this email, mutt freezes, while the /tmp/mutt* file is growing until it fills the partition, and I get a message on the terminal, something "can't copy file, device full": -rw------- 1 mexas wheel 215941357 14 Sep 10:48 mutt-mech-cluster241-RHvpz380-00000 Now, the manual, http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-5.html, claims: Mutt internally supports a number of MIME types, including text/plain, text/enriched, ... So is there something wrong with my installation, or with this message? Below is a copy of the offending email: Please advise many thanks ####################################################### >From xxx.zzz@bristol.ac.uk Wed Sep 9 16:06:03 2009 Return-Path: Received: from some.host (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by some.host (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n89F62Uv090897 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:06:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from xxx.zzz@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from epo.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.55] by some.host with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.11) for (single-drop); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:06:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from epo.bris.ac.uk ([unix socket]) by groucho (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:02:51 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.102]) by epo.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlOh9-0007Nc-Qu; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:02:51 +0100 Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlOh9-0004MN-Md; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:02:51 +0100 Received: from mech-sec144.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.144]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlOh9-00038K-GY; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:02:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:02:50 +0100 From: MK zzz To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: UG projects students Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090904113606.GA93415@some.host> References: <20090904113606.GA93415@some.host> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01yZcCczgEb94E2Hvd9y/9L9wB+XiWCTsNMNUGAXuX9yzFd94=; token_authority=postmaster@bristol.ac.uk X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="==========F08EA8DED4439FC5ABE4==========" Content-Disposition: inline Status: RO Content-Length: 3055 Lines: 175 --==========F08EA8DED4439FC5ABE4========== Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline zzz zzz --==========F08EA8DED4439FC5ABE4==========-- -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 331 5924 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 11:35:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E064106568D for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f195.google.com (mail-qy0-f195.google.com [209.85.221.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BD48FC27 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so181911qyk.14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:35:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=Bfbd/EidekGgIV2U+w1XR1oBq/jZNL5knrRNKpaPV7g=; b=uf1jODgD728prxDWaW4HF28M6Pt5lqt0+XvdPZO6wVLSLH1bg8ReBpdNCvDV8fst86 4wpbUx/s1AbvL9uR8n5x8s8R4p+BrGRBwmQubcAca3XbFijh2NOoXPdUZ6WSx4klS13K 89D8RCJ0f9z6202UiNj432Sxp1+ahnx0sl9cw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=nY+8qKpuK0+jYPdZsaay+CgsNVQf6/zhxpjSZ4eHwbl4XlxPguMcxJ9wLKhFodkRps bqMeQxmby1OsMZGEM3PCuyYADdSHu8wfxk9y+lFaIYD12KXvXwcgbG8Ij+DFnSHui/Di H3u2Z7L9y0ddznhV4zg+0IpYMqs4POb57S6aM= Received: by 10.224.54.206 with SMTP id r14mr4955993qag.204.1252928111257; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? (CPE-65-29-54-222.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1122298qwd.3.2009.09.14.04.35.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:35:10 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:34:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090911034913.GA22437@kokopelli.hydra> <200909130705.42663.lumiwa@gmail.com> <67708234@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <67708234@bb.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909140634.41632.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: linux-pango won't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:35:12 -0000 On Monday 14 September 2009 02:37:09 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:05:42 -0500 ajtiM wrote: > > On Saturday 12 September 2009 05:19:22 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:01:23 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > > If you still want to install the port, you could just add this to > > > > > the /etc/make.conf file: > > > > > > > > > > # Pango > > > > > .if $(.CURDIR:M*/x11-toolkits/linux-pango) > > > > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > > > > > .endif > > > > > > > > How long has this been broken for 7.2? Considering all the stuff > > > > that depends on linux-pango, I'm surprised it hasn't been fixed. > > > > > > It will be broken until someone provide an URL to non-vulnerable > > > RPM package. > > > > Upgrade to the latest version of Pango (1.24 or later), available from > > the Pango Web site > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat...ch/pango/field[]/1/field[]/2 > > Sorry, I didn't manage to find a Pango 1.24 package for Fedora Core 4. > Can you post an URL? I wil try but I don't know because Fedora core is veeeeery old. -- Mitja ----- http://starikarp.redbubble.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 12:12:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2D6106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8088FC0A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.23.170.146] (helo=anti-virus03-09) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1MnAPQ-0001Bp-Cj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:11:52 +0100 Received: from [94.168.156.45] (helo=Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1MnAPP-0006uB-Eq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:11:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:11:51 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F789739295741@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: postgresql does not build correctly Thread-Index: Aco1NIp7BVSsskVWQuq+GMXpsQ+6DQ== From: "Graeme Dargie" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: postgresql does not build correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:05 -0000 I have been trying on and off to set up postgresql for undernets gnuworld services for ircd. =20 Now according to the instructions below this should build with tcl support and you should end up with the following file /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgtclsh =20 Except you dont. =20 Instructions=20 =20 freebsd:/root# tar -xzf postgresql-8.1.4.tar.gz freebsd:/root# cd postgresql-8.1.4/ freebsd:/root/postgresql-8.1.4# ./configure --with-CXX \ --enable-multibyte \ --with-tcl --without-tk \ --with-tclconfig=3D/usr/local/lib/tcl8.4 \ --with-includes=3D/usr/local/include/tcl8.4 \ --with-libraries=3D/usr/local/lib/tcl8.4 =20 You need gmake 3.79 or above to build PostgreSQL (and you will also need it for GNUworld later), check you have it by running gmake --version, you should get something like this : Note: You will also need automake 1.6 or above in order to build GNUworld. =20 freebsd:/root/postgresql-8.1.4# gmake --version =20 If you don't have gmake, you can get it here . If you don't have automake 1.6+, you can get 1.7.9 here . If that's ok, you can go on and build PostgreSQL for real, then install it... =20 freebsd:/root/postgresql-8.1.4# gmake =20 =20 freebsd:/root/postgresql-8.1.4# gmake install =20 If you are using bash as your shell programm, add the following line : =20 export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/pgsql/lib =20 into /etc/profile. zsh, sh and ksh use the same command in their respective .shrc .zshrc .kshrc ~ files. =20 =20 For csh and tcsh you will need to use setenv instead : =20 setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/pgsql/lib =20 =20 =20 To check that your PostreSQL installation includes TCL support, check that the following file exists onto your system : =20 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgtclsh =20 =20 =20 =20 Everything seems to work without any errors during the ./configure stage and gmake install, I just dont end up with pgtclsh at the end of it. =20 =20 Regards =20 Graeme =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 12:31:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451F5106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7358FC1B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8ECUxET034084; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:31:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B7CEEBAA8; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:30:59 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Graeme Dargie Message-ID: <20090914123059.GA61804@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F789739295741@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F789739295741@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postgresql does not build correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:15 -0000 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:11:51PM +0100, Graeme Dargie wrote: > I have been trying on and off to set up postgresql for undernets > gnuworld services for ircd. >=20 > Now according to the instructions below this should build with tcl > support and you should end up with the following file >=20 > /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgtclsh >=20 > Except you dont. Try installing the databases/postgresql-tcltk port.=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkquN4MACgkQEnfvsMMhpyX/igCbBdAOAKoArO18ozpwBXO//Had a/IAn37kw53EsN3njPyNmB3BabyQvbL/ =/QHI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 12:31:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDD11065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psychosensor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5588FC2F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1941678fxm.43 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:31:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=zQtGDtoYdySTl9/UZWSNFDIoYu4hM0dT7qkFzjsUa5U=; b=X3s8ZP7FwqXh/09PqpZwGWwQUkAUt1iroMgZm9peTJXnS4WM58AZ26MgK+L9BgTxaN XSwIGTNyFt3N8ndanAU7gQg9fPXSSWZO0hcbE31lQC0MATTwxFY/KsuN66HKyJR+SNlt PprBuUMrD8ZB26AIG+leGjzyP+3J2+O2GpYl0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=P8YsMHr5AMkL+cBsCYo84dotaWRNaHGJCrEObK/Z81oFFWwlvLXXDW5FL+N+CFH0Yp DGVk9dKPwcIkBdF31gcFTywfOWA2Ze4K81jyHiVcgzsG+NVe0pb5cBoKpn80hY0W1u5P fommlHuvt2S2AcKMzqm0tvC0vvMRZtz4p+iYs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.98.74 with SMTP id p10mr471892fan.19.1252929513912; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:58:33 +0300 Message-ID: From: Sergey Listopad To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Routes to local addresses through lo0 on 8.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:49 -0000 Hi! On 8.0-BETA4 gate I see than in routing table are number of "routes" (link# records) through lo0 for some local addresses: hole> netstat -rnfinet | grep lo0 127.0.0.1 link#7 UH 0 30764 lo0 172.22.254.10 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 192.168.253.254 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 xl0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9 ether 00:04:76:16:5b:bc inet 10.106.148.206 netmask 0xfffff000 broadcast 10.106.159.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active [...] xl2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9 ether 00:b0:d0:e1:6b:62 inet 192.168.253.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.253.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active tun3: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1390 inet 172.22.254.10 --> 172.22.254.9 netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 1971 Is it normal. On older FreeBSD I see link# records only for network prefix. -- S.Listopad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 12:41:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFAD1065693 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.maness@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f171.google.com (mail-pz0-f171.google.com [209.85.222.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9DD8FC25 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so51203pzk.13 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:41:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k2RGONX0CC9ZNGBhphsLjP359bOWq07uMEUXHaDk4wI=; b=dZONYa0J4gfmre15+1Ws/Plm8KWZ5Z2KyehVWCUFQQJwM9rihkUo+xOgcPQxF0fK7F betnBsLbif1Ce1LIlIg9PDmGtBNQSdf9g9LCD7TD/eCnIch7+vO26/UYjme7D5NM7QcI YJJLNKWBk24SJdXhpAbNfWKjRaQmRt3uVpkXE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ePaebxHpzEPe6Oqhq3YZ26h/FX8VMkyopXy8QFGOaOxzpBSHYmLz/q0j3/XiusuLBC VGR+pb4m6ymtNVLUt2uqJaDEUx1cYCXY8a7Z2KsME3Z1Q3ooP+6hyZoxeq2+L6s654yB OrsZSsAD1mNmQ+gpCxF2EqVSa6VE+TlRrjw8E= Received: by 10.115.149.10 with SMTP id b10mr11256819wao.157.1252932075283; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm3554147pzk.5.2009.09.14.05.41.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Chris Maness Message-ID: <4AAE39E8.8080302@chrismaness.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:41:12 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: utisoft@googlemail.com References: <0016e6d7ea7bc68d970473840acb@google.com> In-Reply-To: <0016e6d7ea7bc68d970473840acb@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:41:16 -0000 utisoft@googlemail.com wrote: > On 14 Sep 2009 02:50, Chris Maness wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Maness chris@chrismaness.com> > wrote: > > > > > I level 0 dump of my server. I lost a file that I need back. Is it > > > > > possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory > > > > > instead of a pristine partition/mount? Or even better, is it possible > > > > > to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? > > > > > > > > > > Sorry if the question seems stupid. > > > > > > > > > > Chris KQ6UP > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I was reading the restore man from my mac, and it was not as > > > > clear. The restore does not seem to work from my mac (this is where > > > > my backup dumps reside as I have two massive HDs). I guess the mac > > > > restore would only work with HFS+ and not UFS. I guess the only way > > > > would be to move the massive dump file back over to the FreeBSD > > > > server. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris KQ6UP > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Try using NFS or cat over ssh, something like > > $ ssh my_mac 'cat dumpfile' | restore -if - > > restore treats the file as a tape, so it doesn't pull any bytes until > you ask it to. This should be the least network intensive way of doing > it.... > > > Good luck! > > Chris Thanks, that looks like a pretty cool trick. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 12:45:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6838B1065693 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahlerrd@yahoo.com) Received: from web51010.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51010.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.39.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1985F8FC17 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41758 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Sep 2009 12:45:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252932302; bh=i0jIjYwr55n5jqlQGb0NJ304NWIl5VppT+QXuuxzMu0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y/hy2W1wzmylpWmOPYkVUkUE6HhgJf1mRfHjVDFRtwBVq5wS2l9ZDdYihL4xj+VN7OH083t+aEa9klisdDgHHFcJAEmT9H+kcrcuzkqIcNOb5lH6Qn3RYCILBF6IUZFwDnZ9tdm9WXRRda8dXTywLHlH3sSMW69xpOzll5omUJ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tstb3HNIisWe63HslVtQ/yiGoDOVn6+90eOVb+MVMAv+L3M9w7fpMcut61QyIz7f2DbbB2vywN3xUMZzlY5OhL0G4DfDuEK0/PlX+SESYcmFSIueMmv7m4shxUyhHah+9iS1Cj2TUHMXEaWvGPr8q3o+L71Ksk4gQM2MKbOL6d4=; Message-ID: <302285.41141.qm@web51010.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4UGTzRYVM1mN0u3JwHa_8FKg8.CwVn1a4TgNVz0cflT39UmO2z3tnRFm.cHdJglvm5MdSHHVFUGZGIvDswiz9botIZbzXuICP1LcHLYdsKGuJOkeYNt_8ezYOe_Uih5swC47wVQOnyYQ0Ji.cXnI1QeBBDe7jZ_jDRciapPe_0SWpY8OHgt94gWXshBe.C_8j358r4W7uh8DUta_mgQtTA7NC8DCsnVkdGcLLxcJDD5kZj8s6CQ8Hv1gF3DmWbGE9_1HTdFtQRh9hjpq8_NezC2sYuvVzjSJOAS7aCkQg1vGAYX6wFoULwa7J4IHFrpH97vyihOTIeRgTzfq2iYrYXHuTgH3uESejPLmR4vvqSCoyZ4rT0gpUhC6X2QnvzZDn6Sv1e.hBXU- Received: from [12.175.9.194] by web51010.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:45:01 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:45:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Mahlerwein To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Chris Maness In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mahlerrd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:45:03 -0000 --- On Sun, 9/13/09, Chris Maness wrote: >From: Chris Maness =0A>Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? =0A>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org =0A>Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 9:50 PM =0A> =0A>On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Maness w= rote: >> I level 0 dump of my server. =A0I lost a file that I need back. =A0Is it >> possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory >> instead of a pristine partition/mount? =A0Or even better, is it possible >> to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? >> >> Sorry if the question seems stupid. >> >> Chris KQ6UP >Sorry, I was reading the restore man from my mac, and it was not as >clear.=A0 The restore does not seem to work from my mac (this is where >my backup dumps reside as I have two massive HDs).=A0 I guess the mac >restore would only work with HFS+ and not UFS.=A0 I guess the only way >would be to move the massive dump file back over to the FreeBSD >server. =0AIf the dump was made on the mac, it's highly likely restore will need to= be run from the mac.=A0 If it was made on freebsd, you'll likely need to r= un restore from freebsd.=A0 Assuming you run it from the appropriate place.= .=A0=20 =0AI don't have my Mac handy to check it's man pages, but in FreeBSD I beli= eve in it that it would be=20 =0A#restore -i -f =A0 or=20 #restore -i =0AThen use 'ls' and 'cd' to find the file you want. =0A =0AIn the "restore > : prompt you can=20 =0A"add " =0Ato add it to the restore list.=A0 Works with folders, too. =0A =0A"extract" =0Ato finally pull those out. =0A YMMV, so read the docs. I would suspect the Mac has similar options, though= can't confirm that at the moment. -Rich =0A=0A =20 =0A =0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 13:29:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51251065698 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F93E8FC1F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EDTkhx070330; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:29:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n8EDTkhh070327; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:29:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:29:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Kenneth In-Reply-To: <27184812.1252902383777.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: References: <27184812.1252902383777.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:29:46 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Jules Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath atheros 5424/2424 on the CQ60 Presario X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:29:48 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Kenneth wrote: > Anyone been able to use the ath driver on an atheros 5424/2424? I have a Compaq Presario CQ60 and can not get the wireless light to turn blue? For a working LED, the Atheros AR5007 (5424/2424) in my Acer requires dev.ath.0.ledpin=3 dev.ath.0.softled=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf. Works without that, just no LED. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 13:56:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935FB1065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270258FC13 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so3080130ewy.36 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:56:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qeICDx+foSHD5njC3H6YxuYWgyxH3UmLDPzswGTa+fk=; b=lu9FpAJ/hlUOBkycOIbqaVB/XCn/BlFfiHAI9peiIurxx/VPoG+B8RYAGn+OdqN7PA /HGlN1P8ZhLL/HiCZSYyNcfqMmxF81FVfdQTI1pjO7uXaT7u4VIQMXFvquAmTHXpfAN6 n5gHTiGy2bMS3dgXCEtqlK4jr9JCR+rl99NyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HbXj5HUEhwdvzEhAWsBOxqcB5bvK+q/YGLD5es7FyRMBQ2mtM7zOGDxCLc3CN0X9Ok gRLOF+zrO1eEwg43MvB4yIitE15hn/qV0x/pUMxZlHk1PAu2uPYCiaND+8lURabGohm1 um4XJrJpobGU/C2XJ2e+8q4VCB+mVQEK2gdCo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.145.8 with SMTP id x8mr3218629ebn.67.1252936585965; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:56:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zl8xkiqz.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <87zl8xkiqz.fsf@kobe.laptop> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:56:25 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: Giorgos Keramidas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: SVG and dependence on Firefox2.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:56:28 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:55, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote= : >> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others >> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG >> invokes installation of FF 2.x. >> >> This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the >> installation of these graphics programs fails. >> >> Not a huge deal, but any way to work around it? > > You can build most of the ports that depend on GECKO with the following > in your `/etc/make.conf' file: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0WITH_GECKO=3D =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 libxul > > I just finished rebuilding my packages in a chroot with this option, and > firefox 2.x was not required for a full x11/gnome2 build: > > # pkg_info | fgrep firefo > firefox-3.5.3,1 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Web browser based on the browser portion of= Mozilla > # Even better. Many thanks. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 14:05:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7283B106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BGInc@bounce.resultsmail.com) Received: from smtp4.resultsmail.com (smtp4.resultsmail.com [216.158.103.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A6D8FC1C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp4.resultsmail.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r13) id hlp6o80kpcku for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:12:02 -0700 (envelope-from ) X-mTrak-mID: 0bd7f7e4-d0bb-423f-808b-03ae0afaa1a8 X-mTrak-cID: ad64c3f6-a7a2-43a7-82df-17ac52ec97d7 From: "Strathmore Who's Who" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:12:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090914140504.7283B106566C@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Brent Jones - Selection Into Strathmore's Who's Who X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:05:04 -0000 Dear Brent Jones, It is my pleasure to inform you that on August 31st, 2009 your information was reviewed and accepted for inclusion in the 2009/2010 edition of our registry. Strathmore's Who's Who each year, recognizes and selects key executives, professionals and organizations in all disciplines and industries for outstanding business and professional achievements. This recognition is shared by those who have reached a distinguished level of success in their chosen profession. Please take a moment to complete the invitation by clicking on the link below. We ask that you complete it carefully, as it will be reviewed by our editorial department. http://www.strathmorewwonlineform.net ** Please complete the online link by September 30th. Strathmore's Who's Who is pleased to inform you that there are no fees or dues to be included in the publication. On behalf of the CEO and our esteemed staff, we wish you continued success. Sincerely, J.Edward Simmons Vice President, Research Division Strathmore's Who's Who This email was sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, by Premiere Marketing 23-35A Steinway Street Astoria, NY 11105 United States If you do not wish to receive future e-mail from Premiere Marketing, please use the link below. http://rm.resultsmail.com/unsubscribe.cfm?uid=ad64c3f6-a7a2-43a7-82df-17ac52ec97d7&mid=0bd7f7e4-d0bb-423f-808b-03ae0afaa1a8&route=http%3A%2F%2Frm%2Eresultsmail%2Ecom%2Funsubscribed%2Ecfm Powered by ResultsMail (http://www.resultsmail.com/) ResultsMail Privacy Policy: http://www.resultsmail.com/privacy ResultsMail Permission Email Policy: http://www.resultsmail.com/permission From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 14:06:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC931065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06F18FC2C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so2001870fxm.43 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:06:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dp35O9rpQSbs7fa92n6WhIikz9igL3V7RV+13NNUJHw=; b=q++gNbZ53GLHQllVbZRMOKgRUqMq+D9nN8rU0pVbGaMT2/JW69TUMlE5+JoYtd9/Ex KhLd9IITfzDBDJ/lz94z9tvuoP+NVky5tGoKs5tO2b47aFm/zq3HQsVYNZedd0s9UUXi ESZ+yxN9xk0UELwE6ReQKzWdFfJBN7yxmKkuQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YGw2B6bMak6SVsJnFyzKlK+9uxCkqnT8sxSFbbaD5/K8+ndHNfIDbgu/0dpezYJC/k 3XsHBQ0HIpCpWEbIiLJ3yhXZKXHFXG1gNaCrmgd21K++6eWKZw+dukCWYjxgFzICT+11 CXbK4Pe95N8JJB7V0+jmmXkCPfLG8fl/5LNZM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.28 with SMTP id u28mr5154765bkw.74.1252937175156; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:06:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AAE39E8.8080302@chrismaness.com> References: <0016e6d7ea7bc68d970473840acb@google.com> <4AAE39E8.8080302@chrismaness.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:05:55 +0100 Message-ID: To: Chris Maness Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:06:18 -0000 2009/9/14 Chris Maness : > utisoft@googlemail.com wrote: >> >> On 14 Sep 2009 02:50, Chris Maness wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Maness chris@chrismaness.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I level 0 dump of my server. =A0I lost a file that I need back. =A0I= s it >> > >> > > possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory >> > >> > > instead of a pristine partition/mount? =A0Or even better, is it poss= ible >> > >> > > to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Sorry if the question seems stupid. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Chris KQ6UP >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Sorry, I was reading the restore man from my mac, and it was not as >> > >> > clear. =A0The restore does not seem to work from my mac (this is where >> > >> > my backup dumps reside as I have two massive HDs). =A0I guess the mac >> > >> > restore would only work with HFS+ and not UFS. =A0I guess the only way >> > >> > would be to move the massive dump file back over to the FreeBSD >> > >> > server. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Chris KQ6UP >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> Try using NFS or cat over ssh, something like >> >> $ ssh my_mac 'cat dumpfile' | restore -if - >> >> restore treats the file as a tape, so it doesn't pull any bytes until yo= u >> ask it to. This should be the least network intensive way of doing it...= . >> >> >> Good luck! >> >> Chris > > Thanks, that looks like a pretty cool trick. > > Chris > Let me know how you get on with it, I gzip my dumps and can pipe together commands like that, so it should work! Chris --=20 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 14:33:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107911065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C039E8FC12 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n8EESo5T047153; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:28:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n8EESnwF047152; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:28:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:28:49 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Chris Maness Message-ID: <20090914142849.GA47054@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:57 -0000 On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote: > I level 0 dump of my server. I lost a file that I need back. Is it > possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory > instead of a pristine partition/mount? Or even better, is it possible > to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? Yes, it is easily done. Just use the 'interactive' option. First, be clear where you want the restores file[s] to go. The official way to do the interactive option is to cd in to the bottom level of the filesystem it is in and do it from there. Restore will then put the files in the directories where they were when the dump was made. So, if the file[s] were in /home/joes/files/ cd to /home and do the restore. It will take care of knowing about the joes and files subdirectories and build them if they are not there. But, really the general recommended way (and the way I do it) to do an interactive restore is to create a designated directory for it and cd in to that. It can be anywhere there is room for the files. So, for example, on some systems I have a large amount of extra space in a filesystem I mount as /work. Within that I create a directory I can recover (for lack of any more imaginative name). I cd to the /work/recover directory and do the interactive restore. eg do: cd /work/recover restore -if dump_device/file Then fish around amongst the directories. When you find the one[s] you need to restore, just do add filename You can keep going and add several files and directories. When you have all that you want/need, then type extract It will ask you what tape to start with. If the dump is a file or of there is only one tape or other device, type 1 If there are more than one tape, type in the number of the last tape. It will search backward through the list of tapes/devices until it finds the files. eg. if there are 7 tapes in the level 0 dump set, start with 7, then give it 6 and then 5, etc. It will quit asking when it finds the files. Finally, it will ask if you want to set ownership of . Say no unless you have a good reason for doing otherwise. Now, if you have used a separate directory as I suggest above, tell restore to quit and then look at the file[s] to make sure they are all right and then manually move then to whichever directory you want. You can then delete them from /work/recover but leave that directory around for when you need it again. This is good for any circumstance when you want to pull just one of a few files out of a dump (or a tar file). I do a similar thing when I untar stuff I have moved over. I make a /work/unroll directory and untar stuff in there and move whay I want to where I want it. This may seem to be an extra unnecessary step, but it cuts down on errors, in my handling directories and file locations. ////jerry > > Sorry if the question seems stupid. > > Chris KQ6UP > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 14:40:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D697010656A3 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993548FC20 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n8EEZJMK047197; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:35:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n8EEZIko047196; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:35:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:35:18 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Chris Maness Message-ID: <20090914143518.GB47054@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:40:26 -0000 On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 06:50:05PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > > I level 0 dump of my server.  I lost a file that I need back.  Is it > > possible to use restore like tar and explode it into a directory > > instead of a pristine partition/mount?  Or even better, is it possible > > to just extract a single file without exploding the whole tape dump? > > > > Sorry if the question seems stupid. > > > > Chris KQ6UP > > > > Sorry, I was reading the restore man from my mac, and it was not as > clear. The restore does not seem to work from my mac (this is where > my backup dumps reside as I have two massive HDs). I guess the mac > restore would only work with HFS+ and not UFS. I guess the only way > would be to move the massive dump file back over to the FreeBSD > server. The dump is just a file and it should not matter where it is stored, but you will have to use some network access type thing such as an rsh or an NFS connection to read it. Another thing is that restores need to be done on the same OS that the dumps were written - regardless of where they are stored. dump/restore depends on knowing something about the underlying filesystem, so it is not transferable from one system to another and often even between one OS version to another, like tar tends to be. But, you can make the dump file move between where it is stored and a system that can restore from it using one of the network protocols. ////jerry > > Thanks, > Chris KQ6UP > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 15:22:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFD01065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mail.gmx.com (unknown [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A32B78FC20 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2009 15:22:10 -0000 Received: from adsl-74.79.107.41.tellas.gr (EHLO [169.254.0.100]) [79.107.41.74] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu002) with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 17:22:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+isO1qab2iNC93/OG7jSgQH1AomhVRsokseyRlW8 7hwdFCtzywg4lz Message-ID: <4AAE5F65.6040407@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:21:09 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Listopad References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routes to local addresses through lo0 on 8.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:13 -0000 Sergey Listopad wrote: > Hi! > > On 8.0-BETA4 gate I see than in routing table are number of "routes" > (link# records) through lo0 for some local addresses: > > hole> netstat -rnfinet | grep lo0 > 127.0.0.1 link#7 UH 0 30764 lo0 > 172.22.254.10 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 > 192.168.253.254 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > Is it normal. > On older FreeBSD I see link# records only for network prefix. > Yes, it is normal. It's one of the user-visible changes from the ARP and NDP rewrite in 8.0. Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 15:37:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0526C1065676; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F828FC14; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MnDcP-00004A-Hn; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:35 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MnDcP-0006Qj-45; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:29 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EFbS1I060191; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8EFbSnP060190; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:28 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: glewis@freebsd.org Subject: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:36 -0000 on ia64 HEAD, gnuplot-4.2.6, any plot command hangs the program. top shows gnuplot is using 100% of CPU, yeat CPU time is zero: PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 60071 1001 2 48 0 98008K 51424K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot kill -9 60071, either from my account, or from root, has no effect, the process is still there. I cannot find a way to terminate this hanged process without reboot. This seems to be a regression. Please advise many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 331 5924 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 15:42:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0829C1065670; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BC48FC12; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MnDhS-0000LX-5x; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:42:45 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MnDhR-00055n-Is; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:42:41 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EFgfRO060278; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:42:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8EFgf59060277; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:42:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:42:41 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Level: -- Cc: glewis@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:42:46 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:37:28PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > on ia64 HEAD, gnuplot-4.2.6, any plot command > hangs the program. top shows gnuplot is using 100% of CPU, > yeat CPU time is zero: > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 60071 1001 2 48 0 98008K 51424K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot > > kill -9 60071, either from my account, or from root, > has no effect, the process is still there. > > I cannot find a way to terminate this hanged process without reboot. > > This seems to be a regression. running gnuplot in batch (non-interactive) mode seems fine, so the problem seems to be with the screen terminal. I'm mostly puzzled by the fact that I cannot kill the process.. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 331 5924 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 16:02:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA8610656B0 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B208FC1A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090914160231.BCMV6742.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:02:31 +0100 Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org ([82.21.107.64]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090914160230.ECXK2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@catflap.slightlystrange.org> for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:02:30 +0100 Received: by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix, from userid 106) id A4E80618A; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:02:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 170996152 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:02:27 +0100 (BST) Received: by torus.slightlystrange.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:02:27 +0100 From: "Daniel Bye" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:02:27 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090914160227.GB8179@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090911034913.GA22437@kokopelli.hydra> <20090911104025.GA23566@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AAA2B35.4010309@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20090911070849.559fa992@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090912050123.GB27240@kokopelli.hydra> <87407909@bb.ipt.ru> <20090913042421.GB32126@kokopelli.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090913042421.GB32126@kokopelli.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 i386 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ehNlctqhnw0A:10 a=z37tiUXc929ZU3cAgBAA:9 a=GHpzkT7l3gKMTcI4t64UC_5KAFIA:4 a=1MeVsLBbSww7uzLYwcgA:9 a=Jqm-UWHugU2ncrheAZ4uv0FiiHAA:4 Subject: Re: linux-pango won't install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:02:36 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:24:21PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 02:19:22PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:01:23 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > >=20 > > > How long has this been broken for 7.2? Considering all the stuff that > > > depends on linux-pango, I'm surprised it hasn't been fixed. > >=20 > > It will be broken until someone provide an URL to non-vulnerable > > RPM package. >=20 > Daniel Bye's comments seem to indicate that FreeBSD 8.x doesn't have this > problem. Did I misunderstand? FreeBSD 8 uses linux-f10 as its default linuxulator, and in that, pango has been updated to 1.22.3, which doesn't seem to suffer from the same vulnerabilities. Or at least, they haven't yet been exposed! ;-) You may be able to use f10 on 7.2 - set compat.linux.osrelease=3D2.6.16 in /etc/sysctl.conf, and=20 OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=3Df10 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=3Df10 in /etc/make.conf, then reinstall all your linux stuff. I did this before moving on to 8BETA1 and it worked OK. I think I ended up deleting all the old stuff, before installing afresh. As all the packages are already=20 compiled, it shouldn't take long. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkquaRMACgkQixf5fBYiFmrb+gCeMLhaVsBs0fC/ExjBuGwPD1QN 51sAoKLsVCuWj9tvjCYFGWLUbljFym0g =pRLW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 16:24:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B1D106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@peasoup.com) Received: from www01.reliabledata.com (www01.reliabledata.com [204.14.84.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5348FC27 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (c-75-68-62-48.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [75.68.62.48]) by www01.reliabledata.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EGAWL8025408 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:10:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Peasoup Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:10:35 -0400 Message-Id: <57998B4D-84FF-450E-9DC7-70BE8D1681C8@peasoup.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) Subject: ftpd virtual www hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:24:14 -0000 Hi Im new to the list, hope I have the right one, but if not, please let me know. And forgive me if I don't speak clear unix. I am trying to set up a webserver, with virtual hosting accounts. Naturally, I want to be able to give users the ability to upload files to their web directories. Setting up basic ftp is not an issue for me. I can set up a user at / usr/home/, and can upload via ftp just fine. Of course that directory is owned by user:user. I also get ftpchroot just fine. Next I go to vipw to change the user's home dir to something in the www area, which is owned by www:www. This is where my problems start with being denied. I am assuming that uploading to the unprivileged user www is getting in my way. I have tried to play with groups, ownership and permissions, etc, but I am not getting very far. I thought I'd see a boatload of information on Google about this. Any help is much appreciated, something that will give a user enough rights to upload his site, while at the same time keeping the webserver running as unprivileged as possible. I am new to freebsd. I was using wu on solaris prior to this... will the freebsd ftpd do what I want? Thank you Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 16:47:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C298106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0574B8FC21 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so494921eyf.3 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:47:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=73zkOyoFTHAsCMnDpvvoMGKGLgrko4IVmlMOyJXQf7o=; b=sKc/8hfAxpZAMUdfLZ92vnAWGhn2V2sQPBo8gG9sLbrvHCo0DN0lafQqyb2HJ3WxNI wPrO7PR9o7/yPnfZ2PDeMhaddh71lKvyCaCmAgEYzDkTE/QRIv5wTUrAHsqtCbm6e2EJ BqwQ5PzK96ul2AQXPtLs/zb9MBp+uUE8UQrHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=EYWaKIDQjmeezys/2Sf4VNezeyRZ//M3/k/EzOGD0plZYLs5MxQ+j0gYGZbqbBdivv Jyys+hywZpQ2/DSADdsv7u8Y1ujTOrWNeh7gjp17tj3JCgt/jvOyJ4EPnOav/pRerBHC Fj7Lx0uqC0/n1GqtXDJO8vW1vQxIriz/jiss0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.147.10 with SMTP id z10mr7212379ebn.61.1252946838035; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:47:18 +0100 Message-ID: From: Freminlins To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Non-root user and accept() or listen() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:19 -0000 Hi, I am not sure if this exists (but don't think so), so I am asking. Is there a sysctl type thing to disallow non-root users, or indeed any specified user or group, from running a program with listen() ? What I am looking at is improving network security, such that if a user account is compromised it can then not be used to run a dodgy web server/whatever on a non-privileged port. Although I can firewall off any port I wish, it seems like an obvious thing to disallow any user from opening a listening socket in the first place. I am suggesting something like "sysctl user.socket_listen" with enable or disable. Am I being really daft? Or does this exist already? Cheers, Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 16:52:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C197B106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8178A8FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so1265620and.13 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=6OhWgNwt7EHYvT88N2NNhsIsjxoDapXtuAxP7WiET8c=; b=bPlqgXquT79wPusgrNbOkPP4I2wy4K03dqdpQeICe2gDZO5hxocwiBDEZMVDWZzayU OyRtYPo+V9zE0gcY2pDj2Vp7/GHkeX8I3iYdD/hIEN/cWDXPHI75Y6abMhSD/EMgDQil jgsmg1lFYS3EvnmrvnxMARF2esWlZOKvoDe6k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DDkhhjEpOFVhH4isb70e1LApZZ0FEkIcsPq9oNYVP2QVX191ayndvs+1IAfPoOmfko MkmteAIIQKQnF/M02tl8dsc+WlGKrQopd0lqbVJrpIDEg9oInoyut+mu1jHyYr3FIT4l mG5YN9+Jem7qGJDCPy2qGAWphdRh8Vio0gVyI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.102.15 with SMTP id e15mr6406667anm.109.1252947176777; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:52:56 +0000 Message-ID: From: Eitan Adler To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:52:57 -0000 My laptop has a bunch of volume-up/down/mute internet/mail/etc keys. How do I map each of them to run a specific shell command when pressed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 17:22:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE7E1065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAA88FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EHMY3F046271; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:22:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A9F9FBAAA; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:22:33 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: glewis@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:22:42 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:42:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:37:28PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > on ia64 HEAD, gnuplot-4.2.6, any plot command > > hangs the program. top shows gnuplot is using 100% of CPU, > > yeat CPU time is zero: > >=20 > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMM= AND > > 60071 1001 2 48 0 98008K 51424K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnu= plot > >=20 > > kill -9 60071, either from my account, or from root, > > has no effect, the process is still there. > >=20 > > I cannot find a way to terminate this hanged process without reboot. > >=20 > > This seems to be a regression. >=20 > running gnuplot in batch (non-interactive) mode seems fine, so > the problem seems to be with the screen terminal. >=20 > I'm mostly puzzled by the fact that I cannot kill the process.. It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state (uninterruptable wai= t). You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and looking in the eight column when gnuplot is running.=20 Does the window with the plot actually appear? =20 Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkque9kACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXI9gCePHtRDUMNPNNKQuJLJA4uPzsa vUEAnibliv/6girC5eza19mRGUCdwh5I =fpyt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 17:34:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00561065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C178FC13 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EHYKrE066711; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:34:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 60FAEBAAA; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:34:20 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Eitan Adler Message-ID: <20090914173420.GB69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:22 -0000 --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:52:56PM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: > My laptop has a bunch of volume-up/down/mute internet/mail/etc keys. > How do I map each of them to run a specific shell command when pressed? That depends on a couple of things (assuming you're running the X window system, I don't know if it is even possible on the console). First you have to make sure that you actually can see the key signals. In X you can test that with xev(1). How you can bind keypresses to commands in X depends on the window manager = or desktop environment you are using. See the revelant documentation. On my laptop (centrino 2 platform, PM 45 chipset), using Fn combination wor= ks to change speaker volume and screen brightness, but this is done outside the OS. The X server doesn't even 'see' those keypresses. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqufpwACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVE9gCgiJqVxYyCy07F0CsHYUcTbH/9 xF4AoJprK1gG+bk3KuU26Vur8szLa5vK =3oAu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 17:45:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA16106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F5C8FC1F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so2123066bwz.43 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:45:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Upx8QcSFksIrB35uaqimJkZOXgalBPdeswi3zNCnXFY=; b=JCPPs1cz27eCiCxnhMcFzoZuZdrhaBX2MKHb1tmRtaaMZ4bgMhFpHjRs55qAqszyXY 5tHJI1qd1bde9F8LZGv5UtoAUvVfKuceF3t+7jweOpCTPIl41ECiymY0jyaReOXwSKs2 8ds864N/ZIbwP4iqcvhm1Wk9cLWfFCY308vt4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=LY8RXA30NPeNqzWfq43LdEQNPC3Txi+nW22k2cEEfEVdhXX0fi2HTYSb5uX5zvWkqB ByIk7kYV8HIX2MqgQd8nn85x14AaBKWi5/3Cc3tOWCKTUJT7mr7SecZ6oiIX19+zuHYD MLFzvzKAarAX3G39sUEjF+eGZbgDrEP6QaFzU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.148.69 with SMTP id o5mr5393523bkv.99.1252950308542; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:45:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:44:48 +0100 Message-ID: To: Freminlins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Non-root user and accept() or listen() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:45:10 -0000 2009/9/14 Freminlins : > Hi, > > I am not sure if this exists (but don't think so), so I am asking. > > Is there a sysctl type thing to disallow non-root users, or indeed any > specified user or group, from running a program with listen() ? > > What I am looking at is improving network security, such that if a user > account is compromised it can then not be used to run a dodgy web > server/whatever on a non-privileged port. Although I can firewall off any > port I wish, it seems like an obvious thing to disallow any user from > opening a listening socket in the first place. I am suggesting something > like "sysctl user.socket_listen" with enable or disable. > > Am I being really daft? Or does this exist already? > > > Cheers, > Frem. Isn't this a bit drastic? Listening sockets are opened by very many types of processes, as well as remembering that sendmail, BIND, and others don't actually run as root... I suppose it'd be possible, but would it actually be useful? BTW, there may be an ipfw rule for this, I'll have to look it up when my servers are back online! Chris -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 18:34:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4646A106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050F78FC1E for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 14:34:38 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.7-GA) with ESMTP id QEG68622; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:34:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-227.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.227]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 14:34:30 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19118.36021.489954.856994@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:34:29 -0400 To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: <20090914173420.GB69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914173420.GB69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Eitan Adler , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:34:39 -0000 Roland Smith writes: > > My laptop has a bunch of volume-up/down/mute internet/mail/etc > > keys. How do I map each of them to run a specific shell > > command when pressed? > > That depends on a couple of things (assuming you're running the X > window system, I don't know if it is even possible on the > console). > > First you have to make sure that you actually can see the key > signals. In X you can test that with xev(1). If this is what I think it is, he probably can't. I have a Logitech iTouch keyboard; it has eighteen buttons and two dials. None of them register under xev. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 19:13:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4D91065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@more.net) Received: from jane.spg.more.net (jane.spg.more.net [207.160.133.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46098FC19 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jane.spg.more.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA282C6B1 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:54:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Dan D Niles To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:54:54 -0500 Message-Id: <1252954494.858.35.camel@jane.spg.more.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Traffic Shaping Bridge with Dummynet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:13:21 -0000 I am trying to do traffic shaping using a bridge on FreeBSD 7.1. I have the bridge configured and it works fine. It looks like this: rest of network <-> xl0 <-> bridge0 <-> xl1 <-> side to be shaped It works with the following set of ipfw rules (pipes in but unlimited bw): network=10.10.10.0/24 limit=0 ipfw -q -f flush ipfw -q pipe 1000 config mask dst-ip 0x000000ff bw $limit ipfw -q add pipe 1000 ip from any to $network via xl1 ipfw -q pipe 1001 config mask src-ip 0x000000ff bw $limit ipfw -q add pipe 1001 ip from $network to any via xl1 ipfw -q add 60000 allow all from any to any If I change the limit to 1Mbit/s (or anything else) it stops passing traffic. I used tcpdump and I can see the traffic on the bridge but I cannot see it after the bridge. However "ipfw -a list" shows the counts for the pipe going up, which doesn't make sense to me. I've tried adding: ipfw -q add allow all from any to any via bridge0 ipfw -q add allow all from any to any via xl0 before the pipes. I also tried moving the pipes to bridge0 and xl0. The docs on bridging (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-bridging.html) says "The bridge can be used as a traffic shaper with altq(4) or dummynet(4)." So what am I doing wrong? What else do I need to do to limit the bandwidth over a bridge? Thanks, Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 19:45:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00C2106566C; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgoodin@sitpub.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E375F8FC2F; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so563812fga.13 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.13.37 with SMTP id 37mr5235710fgm.58.1252955575181; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.8? (adsl-99-32-114-22.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [99.32.114.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm13813fga.21.2009.09.14.12.12.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:50 -0700 From: Dan Goodin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, press@FreeBSD.org, media@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgoodin@theregister.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:45:43 -0000 Hello, Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. Security researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. Kind regards, Dan Goodin 415-495-5411 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FreeBSD <= 6.1 kqueue() NULL pointer dereference Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:49:33 +0200 From: Przemyslaw Frasunek Organization: frasunek.com To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@securityfocus.com References: <4A9028AC.9080902@freebsd.lublin.pl> Przemyslaw Frasunek pisze: > FreeBSD <= 6.1 suffers from classical check/use race condition on SMP There is yet another kqueue related vulnerability. It affects 6.x, up to 6.4-STABLE. FreeBSD security team was notified on 29th Aug, but there is no response until now, so I won't publish any details. Sucessful exploitation yields local root and allows to exit from jail. For now, you can see demo on: http://www.vimeo.com/6554787 -- * Fido: 2:480/124 ** WWW: http://www.frasunek.com ** NICHDL: PMF9-RIPE * * Jabber ID: venglin@czuby.pl ** PGP ID: 2578FCAD ** HAM-RADIO: SQ5JIV * _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 20:00:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965261065676 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4E98FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A20329604CA21E3; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:00:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4AAEA0CA.9050606@onetel.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:00:10 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <85a117790909130511p64548ed7s117a5a1e0bf90306@mail.gmail.com> <4AAD1033.1080708@laverenz.de> In-Reply-To: <4AAD1033.1080708@laverenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cblasius@gmail.com Subject: Re: Can't install FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE and 8.0-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:00:12 -0000 Uwe Laverenz wrote: > Am 13.09.2009 14:11, schrieb Zbigniew Komarnicki: > >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 120 seconds for >> xpt_config >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 180 seconds for >> xpt_config >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 240 seconds for >> xpt_config >> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for >> xpt_config >> panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long >> cpuid=0 >> KDB: enter: panic >> [thread pid 0 tid 100000] >> Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3d: movq $0,0x68d1e0(%rip) >> db> >> >> and thats all. Is maybe also someone also have such problem? > > Yes, several people reported this problem. There is a workaround that > might help: disable the firewire device (IEEE 1394) in the BIOS of your > machine and try again. > > cu, > Uwe > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi, I had the same problem on my ASUS M3N78-EM motherboard, see pr 136327. If you can't disable firewire you may be able to install a kernel with device sbp disabled. It's a bit of a fiddle, particularly for a laptop. You would have to - remove your hard drive and install it in another laptop or a usb hard drive caddy which you then plug into another computer. - install freebsd - build and install a new kernel with device sbp disabled - restore the hard disk to your laptop, see if it boots. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 20:13:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9431065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF0A8FC15 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C2D7E818; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:13:16 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:13:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <00B06063-9872-4ACE-8767-1221C22E33EE@silvertree.org> <200908211632.13723.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <54FB5CAC-AFF8-4997-9C85-D130BAD00BFE@silvertree.org> In-Reply-To: <54FB5CAC-AFF8-4997-9C85-D130BAD00BFE@silvertree.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909142213.01903.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Scott Schappell Subject: Re: Remounting a drive as read/write crashes the system and no dmesg.boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:13:05 -0000 On Saturday 22 August 2009 02:40:53 Scott Schappell wrote: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 17:32:13, Mel Flynn wrote: > > On Friday 21 August 2009 07:34:11 Scott Schappell wrote: > >> Looking at info.0 I see: > >> > >> > >> Dump header from device /dev/ad0s1b > >> Architecture: i386 > >> Architecture Version: 2 > >> Dump Length: 155131904B (147 MB) > >> Blocksize: 512 > >> Dumptime: Fri Aug 21 08:27:45 2009 > >> Hostname: arthur.silvertree.org > >> Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump > >> Version String: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 #1: Fri Aug 14 13:27:47 PDT > >> 2009 > >> root@arthur.silvertree.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARTHUR > >> Panic String: ffs_sync: rofs mod > >> Dump Parity: 2778312054 > >> Bounds: 0 > >> Dump Status: good > >> > >> This is interesting: > >> > >> "Panic String: ffs_sync: rofs mod" > >> > >> It looks I'm guessing this is saying "read only file system > >> modified". So it looks like the problem is with mount? > >> > >> If there's anything you want me to pull from the vmcore.0 let me > >> know. > >> > >> Again, this happens with the drive mounted RO from fstab. Unmounted > >> then mount -o rw /backup. > >> > >> Something is amiss, and first blush doesn't seem to be hardware > >> related. > > > > There should be a backtrace in info.0 already. That part contains more > > relevant information. > > Nope, that's all info.0 contains. Follow up. Temp fix available here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=193338+0+current/freebsd-current -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 20:37:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECCD1065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011838FC1B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECDE24D29; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8EKbNIH002062; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:37:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:37:23 +0200 From: Polytropon To: mahlerrd@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20090914223723.451088e2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <302285.41141.qm@web51010.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <302285.41141.qm@web51010.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chris Maness , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:37:28 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:45:01 -0700 (PDT), Richard Mahlerwein wrote: > In the "restore > : prompt you can=20 >=20 > "add " >=20 > to add it to the restore list.=A0 Works with folders, too. ^^^^^^^^ Excuse me, just a little terminology note: FreeBSD has directories, not folders. It doesn't have sheets of papers instead of files, too. :-) --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:01:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32791065692 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DD98FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MnIfu-0004Jp-TC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:01:26 -0700 Message-ID: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT) From: jaymax To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jaymax36@gmail.com Subject: Approx. restore time estimate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:01:28 -0000 I do not expect an exact or precise answer here, given all the subjective & dependent parameters. Just a rough ballpark approximation, what time frame should a restore occur in? param :- an ~1Ghz system, running 6.x O/S, dumpfile ~ 30 Gb, UFS2 file systems w/ default blocksize, target directory 400 Gb w/ > 190 Gb free capacity, minimal use system booted from Fixit Just wanted to get an idea if I am going anywhere or workig fast being stuck somewhere or nowhere. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Approx.-restore-time-estimate-tp25443580p25443580.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:02:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB2E106568F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338FD8FC17 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8EL1JEr069058 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:01:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:02:18 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20090914210215.GA43836@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: podcast on google? Or other? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:02:23 -0000 hey guys, i'll deny i ever wrote this because i *should* know already... but don't. i've clicked on several podcast sites and they show links to yahoo and a couple others. does google have this [POD] icon? OR what do i install here on freebsd-7.1 that i can use to listen to podcasts or otherwise play old/archived streams? tia, -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 5.67a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:06:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7AA1065679 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0F38FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A531E105; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:06:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8EL6K0v002229; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:06:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:06:20 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Robert Huff Message-Id: <20090914230620.2f7dd3d4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <19118.36021.489954.856994@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20090914173420.GB69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <19118.36021.489954.856994@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Roland Smith , Eitan Adler , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:06:23 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:34:29 -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > Roland Smith writes: > > > > My laptop has a bunch of volume-up/down/mute internet/mail/etc > > > keys. How do I map each of them to run a specific shell > > > command when pressed? > > > > That depends on a couple of things (assuming you're running the X > > window system, I don't know if it is even possible on the > > console). > > > > First you have to make sure that you actually can see the key > > signals. In X you can test that with xev(1). > > If this is what I think it is, he probably can't. For most laptop keyboards, there was (as already explained) a specific system that handled Fn+PFx outside the OS so it worked always. Even my old Toshiba T1600 can do that. "Modern" laptops do it differently: Fn+PFx key combinations have to be picked up by a specific driver that "listens" to stange and custom keycodes outside the standard range, and then communicate the selected purpose to the OS in order to perform the action, e. g. raise the volume. Even worse, "modern" laptops have replaced the simple switches in the earophone sockets. In the past, there was a mechanical switch that switched off the internal speakers when you inserted a 3,5mm jack. Today, a proprietary driver has to detect if a jack is inserted, and then switch of the speakers and then switch on the output of the socket. > I have a Logitech iTouch keyboard; it has eighteen buttons and > two dials. None of them register under xev. The Apple USB keyboard is something similar. Allthough most keys show up in xev, F13 and the four additional four keys on the right (volume, eject) don't show up. I've been advised that it is quite possible to look into the ukbd driver subsystem, add some debugging and log what happens when those keys are pressed; they can then be assigned a specific number which afterwards resolves tp a certain key symbol. Would be great if they worked... But life can be so easy when you've got good hardware, such as the Sun USB type 6 keyboard. The 2x5 and 1 keys on the left as well as the four keys on the top right show up in xev. I'm using a xmodmap file ~/.xmodmaprc to map them to a certain (arbitrary) key name, like ! Stop keycode 145 = F14 ! Meta links keycode 115 = Meta_L ! Meta rechte keycode 116 = Meta_R ! Compose keycode 117 = Multi_key add mod4 = Multi_key After that, I can use the config tool of WindowMaker to connect those key names to actions, like rolling up or hiding windows, running specific programs or performing other actions (e. g. moon key = log off, Ctrl+Alt+Moon = shutdown now; help = xlock). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:13:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9312A1065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EB98FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346D41DB59; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8ELDhGu002249; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:13:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:13:43 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Peasoup Message-Id: <20090914231343.ae27d3da.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <57998B4D-84FF-450E-9DC7-70BE8D1681C8@peasoup.com> References: <57998B4D-84FF-450E-9DC7-70BE8D1681C8@peasoup.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftpd virtual www hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:45 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:10:35 -0400, Peasoup wrote: > Next I go to vipw to change the user's home dir to something in the > www area, which is owned by www:www. This is where my problems start > with being denied. I am assuming that uploading to the unprivileged > user www is getting in my way. A common way is to create a specific directory within the user's home directory, such as ~/public_html/ which is accessed by the web server to obtain the files to be served. The user has his regular FTP access to his home directory, so he can put files into ~/public_html/ or just create a symlink into this directory from somewhere else in his home directory. I haven't done much webserver stuff recently, and I'm not quite sure I did understand your question correctly, so my suggestion could already be outdated. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:13:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB70106568F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A1C8FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so1352306and.13 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aUtru2xd21ajAdniYq9gqVUCmqx/cRMB9IjO/8JPbj8=; b=v/fYc8Dm9u8st+k68qMec38mfNqiYHt3R4PyI0oZhXwmgAO2SagXTVh8km9mQxOfO3 OyI4Ds2Loo43m7X40SI/wBn4l2dGUYPPv7Nj4ljtVjMy4HcW8X0444UOZL9qjNe6CyNg cgbfUFWI4CbEC0Ip20Ar2FIfLNcKO2BqQGFhg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CSV7GC9ncL45O22QaemmEo2LqbmDgB/QK/ejCPl5VjNd4Dj3IaDg1ZWr2q/R7gz7Fa 2HnDRy9ZWajAJi3S0ur++fiDcT+vof0zKoTEe6abTtamkskmeiM54DcP7b5uTa49dLGs y32wNWXBsPQVURhcKbUrmbs6U8gdbrcMHNM50= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.134.36 with SMTP id l36mr6705315ann.133.1252962834096; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:13:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:13:54 -0400 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: dgoodin@theregister.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:57 -0000 Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > Hello, > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. Security > researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD > has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August > 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:22:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1F91065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [69.31.85.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A13C8FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.1.8] ([68.195.158.255]) (authenticated user mikel@olivent.com) by mail.olivent.com (Kerio MailServer 6.7.1) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:22:01 -0400 Message-Id: From: Mikel King To: dgoodin@theregister.com In-Reply-To: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:21:48 -0400 References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: media@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, press@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:03 -0000 On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Dan Goodin wrote: > Hello, > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. > Security > researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of > FreeBSD > has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on > August > 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > > Kind regards, > > Dan Goodin > 415-495-5411 Hasn't 6.x been End Of Lifed? I mean considering that 8.0 is expected to be released either later this month or early next, and 6.x will be officially retired at that time, is it possible that this was overlooked? Personally I don't think it's ever good to overlook security, especially in the case of a root exploit. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.4R/announce.html Regards, Mikel King CEO, Olivent Technologies Senior Editor, Daemon News Columnist, BSD Magazine 6 Alpine Court, Medford, NY 11763 skype:mikel.king http://olivent.com http://mikelking.com http://twitter.com/mikelking From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:22:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E920106568B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8268FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8ELMQrq051138; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8ELMQrq051138 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1252963347; bh=0j5T8h5g9osZAqnCra3BCqeKLau/+SYE4r2s6oFUW98=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AAEB40B.1090302@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2014=20Sep=202009=2022:22:19=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20dgoodin@theregister.com|CC:=20freebsd-questions@f reebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20reporter=20on=20deadline=20seeks=20com ment=20about=20reported=20security=20bug=0D=0A=20in=20FreeBSD|Refe rences:=20<4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4AAE95B2.5 050409@sitpub.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20mu ltipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"app lication/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig7FC FC45C43B92D5B005DA7B7"; b=aYlw8z5Lj5oXV2y+YDFGeqmTwWqX3Tlu5mstaxU+0OJEDUgsd8mpgeEuQtjntDC9o Taasnf4Banz+0Pt6uf8jjcUXgduFJQ/qDKR3ywvbWgd3dEvImOsk8hTVUzfSoPoOvT OwMUq+bwfn93MaYW72jHJQxIWAwVM+gWA0Sh9kHQ= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AAEB40B.1090302@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:19 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dgoodin@theregister.com References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> In-Reply-To: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7FCFC45C43B92D5B005DA7B7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7FCFC45C43B92D5B005DA7B7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan Goodin wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. Securit= y > researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD= > has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on Augus= t > 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > Dan Goodin > 415-495-5411 >=20 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FreeBSD <=3D 6.1 kqueue() NULL pointer > dereference > Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:49:33 +0200 > From: Przemyslaw Frasunek > Organization: frasunek.com > To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@securityfocus.com > References: <4A9028AC.9080902@freebsd.lublin.pl> >=20 > Przemyslaw Frasunek pisze: >> FreeBSD <=3D 6.1 suffers from classical check/use race condition on SM= P >=20 > There is yet another kqueue related vulnerability. It affects 6.x, up t= o > 6.4-STABLE. FreeBSD security team was notified on 29th Aug, but there i= s no > response until now, so I won't publish any details. >=20 > Sucessful exploitation yields local root and allows to exit from jail. > For now, > you can see demo on: >=20 > http://www.vimeo.com/6554787 >=20 You need to contact the Security Officer to get the official position. T= hat's security-officer@freebsd.org I don't know why you seem to think this should have been reported to the = FreeBSD Foundation. They aren't the responsible parties. What to do is clearly = explained on this web page: http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html (which=20 Przemyslaw for one seems to have read). Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7FCFC45C43B92D5B005DA7B7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqutBIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxzewCfdC7bak2J0AAGqlQvPikfRP1q XkEAn0lFPYd3oiH9yU8Enj/utXVSdcmM =0Z3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7FCFC45C43B92D5B005DA7B7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:26:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC9A1065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEAF8FC16 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D1A1DF49; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:26:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8ELQRGf002297; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:26:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:26:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Message-Id: <20090914232627.ebcd3f9b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090914210215.GA43836@thought.org> References: <20090914210215.GA43836@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: podcast on google? Or other? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:26:29 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:02:18 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > hey guys, i'll deny i ever wrote this because i *should* know already... > but don't. i've clicked on several podcast sites and they show links to yahoo and a couple > others. does google have this [POD] icon? OR what do i install here on freebsd-7.1 that i > can use to listen to podcasts or otherwise play old/archived streams? What format are those podcasts in? In OGG/Vorbis or MP3 format, you can use your favourite music player (mine is xmms) and use it for the specific media type; the browser's configuration editor should allow you to do so. The xmms program is able to play streamed media content, but mplayer should be fine, too. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:27:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D46106568F for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.211.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4DC8FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh9 with SMTP id 9so4826207ywh.32 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5ejljmElydpzEQZ0uR1Yu0VTBkq3evI8TNW3+PM1Z2I=; b=ud4gsaBg13xdx74ypaaCsr+TfE9Gp0jr14QnJSS0CdO65tOM+jOXKaqVaVEkwhmQ9X EtINVEz8VwUpZIQDAv0GNNTwyh1XkNtCptOJZFDWbM8b59Aic86T2lnZzx3fyPiE0To8 EF0VenR0an+4yB63cwpFUoosA1UjZiF8Fr5n4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wW/bTNK6y4JZk+PEmvL0+9fF5Ay7fvXLQizA2JfBph3DRXT5K32rZ+8ss3w9KIK88S bObFdz4cH1KYWbuO1o/jUHfVPS+P5CK/FRHCaCpCJd2NvyCHGUS6BGoa8diq9fm7ZOuZ xy6PyX5fY+BpEQzFh3Jb1duMDmhpYUWkkK9n8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.154.14 with SMTP id b14mr4103745age.85.1252963676503; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:27:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:27:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Alexander Best Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where to put `startx` serverargs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:27:57 -0000 2009/9/12 Alexander Best : > hi there, > > since i don't use ipv6 X produces the following warning when starting up: > > _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 > _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/otaku:0 > _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6 > > so i'd to start X this way: `startx -- -nolisten inet6`. > > i looked through the man pages of startx and xinit but couldn't find where to > put the argument "-nolisten inet6" so `startx` picks it up automatically. > > currently i have this extra line in /usr/local/bin/startx: "serverargs = > -nolisten inet6" but that's just a hack because i couldn't find any > information on where to put the serverarg. > It seems to me that there should be a place in /etc/X11/xorg.conf However I cannot find it. I know it seems a bit clunky, but I would just put a short script in my $HOME/scripts (or wherever) rather than futzing with the actual startx script. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:31:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D37F106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [64.156.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26788FC19 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [72.29.180.81]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC10B4A30985; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:31:07 -0700 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:31:07 -0700 From: Jason To: Mikel King Message-ID: <20090914213107.GC56375@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 GENERIC X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: media@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, dgoodin@theregister.com, press@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:31:46 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:21:48PM -0400, Mikel King thus spake: > >On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Dan Goodin wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. >> Security >> researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of >> FreeBSD >> has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on >> August >> 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about >> this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Dan Goodin >> 415-495-5411 > >Hasn't 6.x been End Of Lifed? I mean considering that 8.0 is expected >to be released either later this month or early next, and 6.x will be >officially retired at that time, is it possible that this was >overlooked? Personally I don't think it's ever good to overlook >security, especially in the case of a root exploit. > >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.4R/announce.html Looks like the EOL will be: November 30, 2010 http://security.freebsd.org/ > >Regards, >Mikel King >CEO, Olivent Technologies >Senior Editor, Daemon News >Columnist, BSD Magazine >6 Alpine Court, >Medford, NY 11763 > >skype:mikel.king >http://olivent.com >http://mikelking.com >http://twitter.com/mikelking > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:36:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABC21065679 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415678FC16 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8ELalqf051367; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:36:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8ELalqf051367 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1252964208; bh=ft6zjXXp9utTWnzq5ShpBKv2IGwkz00ZC+nKffBwhBs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AAEB763.6060709@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2014=20Sep=202009=2022:36:35=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Mikel=20King=20|CC:=20dgo odin@theregister.com,=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20R e:=20reporter=20on=20deadline=20seeks=20comment=20about=20reported =20security=20bug=0D=0A=20in=20FreeBSD|References:=20<4AAE95B2.505 0409@sitpub.com>=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed= 3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-si gnature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig98878D655EED2E5D78 3A4EC3"; b=fdMG/7jQVSVkn1Cfv8RVC1NGJgij4eelqlIpbpxLLMns4uO1Jp13fl4aokbj3knSg ZwbFM0FjJ0YYyqCEecusmC3CBmKC4la+nZeHfx7yGF+HUiU/InPDbafNfjksHN5EMS A/3rPI3MMBCW5aXaJFaRFtyvAbFXoFGLZULukPlA= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AAEB763.6060709@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:36:35 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikel King References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig98878D655EED2E5D783A4EC3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dgoodin@theregister.com Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:36:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig98878D655EED2E5D783A4EC3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mikel King wrote: > Hasn't 6.x been End Of Lifed? I mean considering that 8.0 is expected t= o=20 > be released either later this month or early next, and 6.x will be=20 > officially retired at that time, is it possible that this was=20 > overlooked? Personally I don't think it's ever good to overlook=20 > security, especially in the case of a root exploit. Nope. 6.3 (RELENG_6_3) will be supported until at least 31 January 2010 while 6.4 (RELENG_6_4) and 6-STABLE (RELENG_6) will be supported until at= least 30 November 2010 by the Security team. There are no more releases planned from the RELENG_6 branch, but that's n= ot the same as 'unsupported' -- patches and advisories will be issued until = the dates listed, and quite usually beyond that. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig98878D655EED2E5D783A4EC3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqut28ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx1awCfYBBZTtAvMuu2EbiWEA/GpLJN NXkAnjAtw5ewV+m1hyZvExLOtwt5bIDL =aeXO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig98878D655EED2E5D783A4EC3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:38:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD91106568D for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahlerrd@yahoo.com) Received: from web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 286828FC0A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93809 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Sep 2009 21:38:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252964322; bh=Ettz+5EcGPtLFO+NX3xzdyFdjiCDjknTFphtFUeEmww=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Oxq6Lfk2NLo+a5UE9DewAPlLH0h4zXckazjN8G2yqBHEtskW0e1XVTlA+86pwoRBgyA/CF+6u+bOSQQYe+orDmuy5kwqwl11jogX2VuRUsOA2yANdxfL+QhUlhQG35XI0bVdxT3/PFuMA5DjsnhPVozWw17PrsdlZ9r2JUWOxWQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JbFehR2nTjyhynlgC65yge4uVkMbayQCR6W8XJ6fys9cJOYklOImjqrUMXCgjN1MEHIvxP+qHkR3hvwxpJ5WOS3qXFAN4x3Bo21zkehVsXkqFnXVWukT0NHogg87eCoOOwC0pCqEkUaljsE20XiQqUSG4KjkiNoEjY3/ZeMTRWI=; Message-ID: <484063.93124.qm@web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: OGMaivYVM1m2Fw7yIMz1PTC2QYgAYM4DkTFtBNGm_UQRwyaSxBXv7683_2FTSImDjhk8OiclYCXgEVzlCvCLK76eo3l1Z1cgkq3xBwGlkojd9tW2rZcFXG6P7.AaCJQrCof5F1WXAb5NCUVncP1Ys9vww0Rs7GXQrZAlKuBhXiTfS.6jpLpNMcnnps_fdq_z718IN4peaD7gYxAM98IQc6Fd8eH6Q_v.zoSYTC9fhAVUX0.zT3JOf1P5vwnciAzulAOcdZI16DO2jovnmKHE3ZitS4_jqgzGbmR05QDDZcRes23dmGtCtAE8riuGhBHT6Cpcm4dQLZDXG.Cy3VBt3YKYOQ5xYLGLkocdBv5jOW4aKQ-- Received: from [74.40.57.42] by web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:38:42 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:38:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Mahlerwein To: FreeBSD-Questions In-Reply-To: <20090914223723.451088e2.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mahlerrd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:43 -0000 --- On Mon, 9/14/09, Polytropon wrote: From: Polytropon Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? To: mahlerrd@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Chris Maness" Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 4:37 PM On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:45:01 -0700 (PDT), Richard Mahlerwein wrote: > In the "restore > : prompt you can=20 >=20 > "add " >=20 > to add it to the restore list.=A0 Works with folders, too. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0^^^^^^^^ Excuse me, just a little terminology note: FreeBSD has directories, not folders. It doesn't have sheets of papers instead of files, too. :-) Pie on my face.=A0 I work too much with multiple operating systems.=A0 *sig= h* BTW, I also work and develop heavily with a (non BSD, non-open source) docu= ment imaging and workflow management software, so you probably will, at som= e point, see me confuse files and sheets of paper.=A0 I will not mind a gen= tle reminder just like the above when I do that . :) =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:44:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210B61065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7098FC19 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-48-78.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.48.78]:60616 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1MnJKu-0004VI-4B for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:43:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 27599 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 23:43:45 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 23:43:45 +0200 Received: (qmail 35330 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Sep 2009 23:43:45 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:43:45 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Mikel King Message-ID: <20090914214345.GA24467@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.48.78 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1MnJKu-0004VI-4B. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1MnJKu-0004VI-4B aaf6fa8649931666a2e9cf85ea9921bd Cc: media@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, dgoodin@theregister.com, press@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:44:47 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:21:48PM -0400, Mikel King wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Dan Goodin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. > > Security > > researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of > > FreeBSD > > has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on > > August > > 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Dan Goodin > > 415-495-5411 > > Hasn't 6.x been End Of Lifed? Not at all. The 6.2 and earlier releases have been EOL'd, but 6.3 and 6.4 are still supported by the security team. 6.4 (and 6.x in general) will be supported until November 2010, which is more than a year away. (See http://security.freebsd.org/ for official EOL information.) > I mean considering that 8.0 is expected > to be released either later this month or early next, and 6.x will be > officially retired at that time, is it possible that this was > overlooked? Personally I don't think it's ever good to overlook > security, especially in the case of a root exploit. > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.4R/announce.html -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 21:46:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68D71065672 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C319B8FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16603 invoked by uid 0); 14 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (24.42.224.110) by smtp5.knology.net with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 6663D2841F; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:46:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:46:42 -0500 From: David Kelly To: "illoai@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dgoodin@theregister.com Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:46:46 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > > Hello, > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. Security > > researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD > > has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August > > 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? Przemyslaw Frasunek has PR's posted but none recent. IMO if a PR is not submitted then one has *not* informed the Powers That Be. Having said that, for all I know there is a PR in the system that has been given restricted access until its dealt with. IIRC there is an option where one may request privacy when submitting a PR, perhaps that is the case here? Why is this in -questions? Seems -chat is more appropriate. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:02:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC79106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9999F8FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (localhost.ccsf.cc.ca.us [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8EM2orX066098 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n8EM2oZa066095 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: libnsl.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:49 -0000 Hello all, I want to install a dispather module from Day Communique software on apache22. The binaray mod_dispatcher.so is provided by Day as a 64 bit *NIX compatible module to place in apache22 module directory. The mocule requires a shared library missing from system: --8<-- # apachectl -t httpd: Syntax error on line 827 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so into server: Shared object "libnsl.so.1" not found, required by "mod_dispatcher.so" --8<-- Does anyone know where to download libnsl.so.1, or from what port it can be installed? Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:02:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D82106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f229.google.com (mail-yw0-f229.google.com [209.85.211.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B098FC16 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh18 with SMTP id 18so2666081ywh.3 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <484063.93124.qm@web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Received: by 10.216.36.209 with SMTP id w59mr40221wea.5.1252965769483; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0016364c76f59b1d70047390d3ee@google.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:49 +0000 From: utisoft@googlemail.com To: Richard Mahlerwein , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:51 -0000 On 14 Sep 2009 22:38, Richard Mahlerwein wrote: > --- On Mon, 9/14/09, Polytropon freebsd@edvax.de> wrote: > From: Polytropon freebsd@edvax.de> > Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? > To: mahlerrd@yahoo.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Chris Maness" chris@chrismaness.com> > Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 4:37 PM > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:45:01 -0700 (PDT), Richard Mahlerwein > mahlerrd@yahoo.com> wrote: > > In the "restore > : prompt you can > > > > "add " > > > > to add it to the restore list. Works with folders, too. > ^^^^^^^^ > Excuse me, just a little terminology note: FreeBSD has directories, > not folders. It doesn't have sheets of papers instead of files, > too. :-) > Pie on my face. I work too much with multiple operating systems. *sigh* > BTW, I also work and develop heavily with a (non BSD, non-open source) > document imaging and workflow management software, so you probably will, > at some point, see me confuse files and sheets of paper. I will not mind > a gentle reminder just like the above when I do that . :) Yeah, unfortunately I still think of 'folders', and am continually wrong-footed by the term 'directory' in a graphical environment, even after years of GNU and FreeBSD use..... I have all sorts of strange habits that many will recognise as symptoms of multi-booting and running servers. There's no shame in that! Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:07:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC291065694 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27698FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix, from userid 12346) id A7D4D16B6C2; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.81]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EC8C16B562; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:38:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:38:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@debranded.6dollardialup.com To: jaymax In-Reply-To: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <20090914163643.X97663@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> References: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sanitizer: Anomy and SpamAssassin mail filter - see http://www.6dollardialup.com/support/spaminfo.html Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Approx. restore time estimate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:07:56 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, jaymax wrote: > > I do not expect an exact or precise answer here, given all the subjective > & dependent parameters. > > Just a rough ballpark approximation, what time frame should a restore occur > in? > > param :- > an ~1Ghz system, running 6.x O/S, dumpfile ~ 30 Gb, UFS2 file systems w/ > default blocksize, target directory 400 Gb w/ > 190 Gb free capacity, > minimal use system booted from Fixit > > Just wanted to get an idea if I am going anywhere or workig fast being > stuck somewhere or nowhere. I cannot begin to give you a number in the ballpark, all I can tell you is that restore *is* very, very slow and lacks reassuring progress indicators. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:14:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16794106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACFB8FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B795B3CCA5; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8EMEQmA002461; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:14:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:14:26 +0200 From: Polytropon To: utisoft@googlemail.com Message-Id: <20090915001426.2b49e1ca.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <0016364c76f59b1d70047390d3ee@google.com> References: <484063.93124.qm@web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <0016364c76f59b1d70047390d3ee@google.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Richard Mahlerwein Subject: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:30 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:49 +0000, utisoft@googlemail.com wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately I still think of 'folders', and am continually > wrong-footed by the term 'directory' in a graphical environment, even after > years of GNU and FreeBSD use..... Just imagine if the Xerox Alto and its first GUI wouldn't have been invented in the US, but in Germany. Then we would refer to "ring binders" or "lever arch folders", or "ordners" or "actenordner" (the german word is "der Ordner" or "der Akten- ordner"). Surely, this would be the default symbol: http://www.officexl.de/kopierpapier/images/ordner.jpg And all paper sizes defaults would refer to DIN A4 in the first place... what a beautiful imagination! :-) > I have all sorts of strange habits that many will recognise as symptoms of > multi-booting and running servers. There's no shame in that! Please don't get me wrong: There are correct places to use the term "folder", e. g. when talking about "mail folders" (which can be represented as files (mbox) or directories with files (MH) on the disk level). But in the case discussed, "directory" is the correct term. There's no need to change proven terminology just because some company indoctrinates you to do so. :-) How important it is to use the correct terminology is when users start asking you questions about their "modems" (refers to PC), their "TV" and their "brains" (refers to speakers), or start complaining that "the file system is too big" (refers to the icon size in the file manager used), and want "the same pictures at home as I have them at work" (refers to the OS). To sum it up in quite your own words: "I have all sorts of strange habits that many will recognise as symptoms of asperger's syndrome. There's no shame in that!" :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:18:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01CF1065676 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7220D8FC17 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-23-67.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.23.67]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A22C3CB00; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:18:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8EMItcq003660; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:18:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:18:55 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Joe R. Jah" Message-Id: <20090915001855.05b7d961.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> References: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:18:57 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0700 (PDT), "Joe R. Jah" wrote: > Does anyone know where to download libnsl.so.1, or from what port it can > be installed? At least on my system, it seems to be part of the Linux ABI, so maybe the module in question is designed for Linux? % locate libnsl /usr/compat/linux/lib/libnsl-2.3.6.so /usr/compat/linux/lib/libnsl.so.1 There's no "libnsl" in the ports, and "nsl" search results don't seem to bring up something appropriate. My suggestion would be to install the Linux ABI and have the setting linux_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. The linux.ko kernel module should be loaded automatically, or maybe you already have it in your kernel config. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:22:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5119F106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f229.google.com (mail-yw0-f229.google.com [209.85.211.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B5F8FC0A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh18 with SMTP id 18so2685811ywh.3 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090915001426.2b49e1ca.freebsd@edvax.de> Received: by 10.216.85.201 with SMTP id u51mr47889wee.13.1252966965195; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0016e6d7ea64e03c380473911a95@google.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:45 +0000 From: utisoft@googlemail.com To: Polytropon , utisoft@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Richard Mahlerwein Subject: Re: Re: Dump/Restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:47 -0000 On 14 Sep 2009 23:14, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:02:49 +0000, utisoft@googlemail.com wrote: > > Yeah, unfortunately I still think of 'folders', and am continually > > wrong-footed by the term 'directory' in a graphical environment, even > after > > years of GNU and FreeBSD use..... > Just imagine if the Xerox Alto and its first GUI wouldn't have > been invented in the US, but in Germany. Then we would refer > to "ring binders" or "lever arch folders", or "ordners" or > "actenordner" (the german word is "der Ordner" or "der Akten- > ordner"). Surely, this would be the default symbol: > http://www.officexl.de/kopierpapier/images/ordner.jpg > And all paper sizes defaults would refer to DIN A4 in the first > place... what a beautiful imagination! :-) > > I have all sorts of strange habits that many will recognise as symptoms > of > > multi-booting and running servers. There's no shame in that! > Please don't get me wrong: There are correct places to use the > term "folder", eg when talking about "mail folders" (which can > be represented as files (mbox) or directories with files (MH) on > the disk level). But in the case discussed, "directory" is the > correct term. There's no need to change proven terminology just > because some company indoctrinates you to do so. :-) > How important it is to use the correct terminology is when users > start asking you questions about their "modems" (refers to PC), > their "TV" and their "brains" (refers to speakers), or start > complaining that "the file system is too big" (refers to the > icon size in the file manager used), and want "the same pictures > at home as I have them at work" (refers to the OS). > To sum it up in quite your own words: "I have all sorts of strange > habits that many will recognise as symptoms of asperger's syndrome. > There's no shame in that!" :-) Certainly no shame in that, but also one should be corrected on errors of terminology. Sorry if I didn't make that clear (I didn't!). I merely meant to point out that the best of us make terminological errors, and that it's all part of our 'diversity'. However, you were still right to correct the term IMO. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:40:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69491065693 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D688FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EMecFp025819; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:40:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C01BCBAB6; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:40:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:40:38 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20090914224038.GA77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914173420.GB69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <19118.36021.489954.856994@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20090914230620.2f7dd3d4.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090914230620.2f7dd3d4.freebsd@edvax.de> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Eitan Adler , Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:40:41 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:06:20PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:34:29 -0400, Robert Huff wrot= e: > > Roland Smith writes: > >=20 > > > > My laptop has a bunch of volume-up/down/mute internet/mail/etc=20 > > > > keys. How do I map each of them to run a specific shell > > > > command when pressed?=20 > > > =20 > > > That depends on a couple of things (assuming you're running the X > > > window system, I don't know if it is even possible on the > > > console). > > > =20 > > > First you have to make sure that you actually can see the key > > > signals. In X you can test that with xev(1). > >=20 > > If this is what I think it is, he probably can't. >=20 > For most laptop keyboards, there was (as already explained) a > specific system that handled Fn+PFx outside the OS so it worked > always. Even my old Toshiba T1600 can do that. >=20 > "Modern" laptops do it differently: Fn+PFx key combinations > have to be picked up by a specific driver that "listens" to > stange and custom keycodes outside the standard range, and then > communicate the selected purpose to the OS in order to perform > the action, e. g. raise the volume. Not all of them. My laptop is based on a quite modern cantiga (aka centrino= 2) PM45 chipset (from 2008, according to Wikipedia). The function keys for changing the creen brightness and sound volume work OK with FreeBSD, even though xev doesn't see them. So that signal seems to go directly to the hardware. Using the Fn key with the virtual numeric keypad works, and generates normal keyboard events. I haven't tested the keys that can contro= l a media player, because I don't care about them. > Even worse, "modern" laptops have replaced the simple switches > in the earophone sockets. In the past, there was a mechanical > switch that switched off the internal speakers when you inserted > a 3,5mm jack. Today, a proprietary driver has to detect if a > jack is inserted, and then switch of the speakers and then > switch on the output of the socket. I just tested that today, and it worked OK in FreeBSD. Plug in the headphon= es, they work and the speaker goes silent. So I guess it is all about how the machine is put together. Even if a chips= et has certain functionality, it is up to the board manufacturer to connect it.=20 Writing a driver to detect if headphones are connected sounds much more complicated to me than connecting a couple of switches! I mean, you'd have = to measure something like the impedance of the jack. Surely that is more expensive than a simple switch? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkquxmYACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWhpQCgkmwwzBbGCKrOYIA+x+E2k8xJ GLYAn0t1AcAu0AJWRTsixn5t34A6JF70 =fAKK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 22:51:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC82106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3B98FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EMp96E076723; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:51:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2DEDCBAB6; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:51:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:51:09 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: "illoai@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20090914225109.GB77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where to put `startx` serverargs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:51:11 -0000 --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:27:56PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > 2009/9/12 Alexander Best : > > hi there, > > > > since i don't use ipv6 X produces the following warning when starting u= p: > > > > _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 > > _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/otaku:0 > > _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6 > > > > so i'd to start X this way: `startx -- -nolisten inet6`. > > > > i looked through the man pages of startx and xinit but couldn't find wh= ere to > > put the argument "-nolisten inet6" so `startx` picks it up automaticall= y. > > > > currently i have this extra line in /usr/local/bin/startx: "serverargs = =3D > > -nolisten inet6" but that's just a hack because i couldn't find any > > information on where to put the serverarg. > > >=20 > It seems to me that there should be a place in /etc/X11/xorg.conf > However > I cannot find it. =20 You can put them in /usr/local/lib/X11/xinit/xserverrc, together with the X server.=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkquyN0ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXUFQCeK7THLoZaAUw+/CNzqpavvp/l jR4AoIBQ/H5Gy0ByqcRmmDvy1py6Pjz2 =iN9k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 23:17:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E691065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510148FC1A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C687E818; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:17:18 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:17:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> In-Reply-To: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909150117.03050.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: "Joe R. Jah" Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:17:06 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 00:02:50 Joe R. Jah wrote: > Hello all, > > I want to install a dispather module from Day Communique software on > apache22. The binaray mod_dispatcher.so is provided by Day as a 64 bit > *NIX compatible module to place in apache22 module directory. The mocule > requires a shared library missing from system: > > --8<-- > # apachectl -t > httpd: Syntax error on line 827 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so into server: > Shared object "libnsl.so.1" not found, required by "mod_dispatcher.so" > --8<-- > > Does anyone know where to download libnsl.so.1, or from what port it can > be installed? nsl=name service library. All of it's functions are in FreeBSD implement in libc. If this mod_dispatcher.so is indeed loadable by FreeBSD's linker, then you can provide a dummy libnsl.so.1, like so: $ cat <'EOF' >BSDmakefile SHLIB=nsl SHLIB_MAJOR=1 NO_MAN=yes SRCS=nsl.c .include EOF $ cat <'EOF' >nsl.c int nsl_dummy(void); int nsl_dummy(void) { return 0; } EOF $ make; sudo make LIBDIR=/usr/local/lib install The symbols it's looking for should be provided by libc, but if there's any undefined ones, this trickery gets a little dangerous and you're better off asking the developers for a native FreeBSD version. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 23:22:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C24E106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9928FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D38F7E818 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:58 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:22:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> In-Reply-To: <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:22:46 -0000 On Monday 14 September 2009 23:46:42 David Kelly wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. > > > Security researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 > > > of FreeBSD has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD > > > Foundation on August 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a > > > brief article about this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to > > > comment. > > > > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? > > Przemyslaw Frasunek has PR's posted but none recent. IMO if a PR is not > submitted then one has *not* informed the Powers That Be. Wrong. Security bugs should be reported to the security team, not PR'd. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 23:36:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A061065670 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733D58FC12 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MnL6G-0001jN-U9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:36:48 -0700 Message-ID: <25445497.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:36:48 -0700 (PDT) From: jaymax To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090914163643.X97663@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jaymax36@gmail.com References: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090914163643.X97663@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Subject: Re: Approx. restore time estimate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:36:49 -0000 Thanks! That might explain. Is there an alternate process you would recommend with at least equal reliability. BTW I should have mentioned that I was restoring from a disk file rather than from a tape Thanks again. --- Lars Eighner-2 wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, jaymax wrote: > > > I cannot begin to give you a number in the ballpark, all I can tell you is > that restore *is* very, very slow and lacks reassuring progress > indicators. > > -- > Lars Eighner > http://www.larseighner.com/index.html > 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN _ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Approx.-restore-time-estimate-tp25443580p25445497.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 00:27:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629681065679 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF9C8FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix, from userid 12346) id 6F47C16B6D0; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:27:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.89]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD9016B67A; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:27:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:18:51 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:18:50 -0500 (CDT) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@debranded.6dollardialup.com To: jaymax In-Reply-To: <25445497.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <20090914191841.Q98566@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> References: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090914163643.X97663@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <25445497.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sanitizer: Anomy and SpamAssassin mail filter - see http://www.6dollardialup.com/support/spaminfo.html Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Approx. restore time estimate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:27:02 -0000 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, jaymax wrote: > > Thanks! > > That might explain. Is there an alternate process you would recommend with > at least equal reliability. I don't know of anything that isn't a bigger can of worms in a file system of any complexity to speak of. > BTW I should have mentioned that I was restoring from a disk file rather > than from a tape I was speaking of disk to disk. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 00:33:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DC91065693 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDE28FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so3605937ewy.36 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/LLh48LKeeQALrXVHdDsB1Npxg6svwtwF5ehNasCxTw=; b=d9zao5baE/rjiLFpczabNn7PsQQgtgNB5FIg+OZ7WvgaNxXJf1KTA+pYrq35HllkAn FvvMeLxnO/6qbwLVVbbCwn23VUUttgDbTRDYaV416YuQltMXMCLN89y+TzbdovK7x+2v 8gnWSDMa6Cq9MfFfYAs0yOA8gWX6YvQfezk+Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PI9Qg12ntmrGUOPtmmlK0CaRhBEX3NnQiYPNSS41D14zqqU9fcZpTcLs2dwSqu4sjg OsDleqJ/uiKaOId33ziwf+D6OVU3eR22AqtPuIQ886CiO/Cf+RC7ZNfVzi5cYC9HCmmK R8ur1u38FC8jK7Q6fSaMa/IOhWmwYxv0moZ0A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.147.10 with SMTP id z10mr58295ebn.28.1252974837481; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25445497.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090914163643.X97663@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <25445497.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:57 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: jaymax Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Approx. restore time estimate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:33:58 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 16:36, jaymax wrote: > > Thanks! > > That might explain. Is there an alternate process you would recommend with > at least equal reliability. > BTW I should have mentioned that I was restoring from a disk file rather > than from a tape > > Thanks again. IME, restoring from disk or tape makes little difference, if you're doing a full restore, and once the restore process is up and running. The bigger bottleneck is the write speed of the disk(s) you're restoring to - it's always slower to write than to read, often by a very large margin. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 00:39:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783A3106568D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629E58FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (localhost.ccsf.cc.ca.us [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8F0dp0G024452; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n8F0dold024449; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:39:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20090915001855.05b7d961.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: <20090914173144.Y21417@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> References: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> <20090915001855.05b7d961.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:39:54 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Polytropon wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:18:55 +0200 > From: Polytropon > To: Joe R. Jah > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0700 (PDT), "Joe R. Jah" wrote: > > Does anyone know where to download libnsl.so.1, or from what port it can > > be installed? > > At least on my system, it seems to be part of the Linux ABI, so > maybe the module in question is designed for Linux? > > % locate libnsl > /usr/compat/linux/lib/libnsl-2.3.6.so > /usr/compat/linux/lib/libnsl.so.1 > > There's no "libnsl" in the ports, and "nsl" search results don't > seem to bring up something appropriate. > > My suggestion would be to install the Linux ABI and have the > setting > > linux_enable="YES" > > in your /etc/rc.conf. The linux.ko kernel module should be loaded > automatically, or maybe you already have it in your kernel config. Thank you Polytropon. I have installed /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4 and now I have the following: /usr/compat/linux/lib/libnsl-2.3.6.so /usr/compat/linux/lib/libnsl.so.1 I have put linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and rebooted the server; however, I still get the same response. What am missing? Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 00:43:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C09D106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F2C8FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (localhost.ccsf.cc.ca.us [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8F0hWmI024850; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n8F0hWCh024847; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: Mel Flynn In-Reply-To: <200909150117.03050.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Message-ID: <20090914173958.C21417@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> References: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> <200909150117.03050.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:43:32 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Mel Flynn wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:17:02 +0200 > From: Mel Flynn > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Joe R. Jah > Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 > > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 00:02:50 Joe R. Jah wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I want to install a dispather module from Day Communique software on > > apache22. The binaray mod_dispatcher.so is provided by Day as a 64 bit > > *NIX compatible module to place in apache22 module directory. The mocule > > requires a shared library missing from system: > > > > --8<-- > > # apachectl -t > > httpd: Syntax error on line 827 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: > > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so into server: > > Shared object "libnsl.so.1" not found, required by "mod_dispatcher.so" > > --8<-- > > > > Does anyone know where to download libnsl.so.1, or from what port it can > > be installed? > > nsl=name service library. All of it's functions are in FreeBSD implement in > libc. If this mod_dispatcher.so is indeed loadable by FreeBSD's linker, then > you can provide a dummy libnsl.so.1, like so: > > $ cat <'EOF' >BSDmakefile > SHLIB=nsl > SHLIB_MAJOR=1 > NO_MAN=yes > SRCS=nsl.c > > .include > EOF > $ cat <'EOF' >nsl.c > int nsl_dummy(void); > > int nsl_dummy(void) { return 0; } > EOF > > $ make; sudo make LIBDIR=/usr/local/lib install > > The symbols it's looking for should be provided by libc, but if there's any > undefined ones, this trickery gets a little dangerous and you're better off > asking the developers for a native FreeBSD version. Thank you Mel. You were right about undefined ones; Here's what I get: --8<-- apachectl -t httpd: Syntax error on line 826 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so: Undefined symbol "__strdup" --8<-- Any more trickeries?;-) Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 00:44:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EC6106568D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlinfo@nwvd.org) Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com (mail-px0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5461A8FC17 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi9 with SMTP id 9so3107930pxi.14 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:44:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.9.39 with SMTP id 39mr530050wfi.115.1252974243221; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:24:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [76.27.225.45] Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:24:03 -0700 Message-ID: <11043b700909141724i4c8f4a5fm57efb383d5845d84@mail.gmail.com> From: perl info To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Bandwidth Control in FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:44:18 -0000 I have two questions in regards to a FreeBSD Server and avoiding ISP bandwidth charges. Are there changes to the ways bandwidth can be controlled in FreeBSD 8. Is there an accepted or standardized method to control and limit bandwidth usage over an interface. Thanks in advance for the help, Marcel http://nwvd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 01:13:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063741065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf08.insightbb.com (mxsf08.insightbb.com [74.128.0.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81478FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:13:16 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,386,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="760462260" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf08.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 21:13:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEADeHrkrQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBU9pLhBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,386,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="106090161" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 21:13:14 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:08 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909142113.09065.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: csh issues bogus error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:13:17 -0000 I'm working on my .cshrc file, so I have to use csh syntax. I, like most Unix shell programmers, usually steer clear of csh scripts, but obviously, .cshrc requires csh syntax. If I create a file with just a # in it, I get: set: Variable name must begin with a letter. I can change the # to #!/bin/csh but I get the same error message This looks like a csh bug to me 8o) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 01:14:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDA81065694 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf06.insightbb.com (mxsf06.insightbb.com [74.128.0.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACBC8FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:14:31 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,386,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="732779451" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf06.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 21:14:30 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AroEADeHrkrQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBU45qActghBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,386,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="106090344" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 21:14:30 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Steven Friedrich Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:14:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909142114.30539.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: csh issues bogus error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:14:32 -0000 I'm working on my .cshrc file, so I have to use csh syntax. I, like most Unix shell programmers, usually steer clear of csh scripts, but obviously, .cshrc requires csh syntax. If I create a file with just a # in it, I get: set: Variable name must begin with a letter. I can change the # to #!/bin/csh but I get the same error message This looks like a csh bug to me 8o) I'm running FreeBSD 7.2p3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 01:14:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053311065697 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27068FC19 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD087E821; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:14:47 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:38:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <20090914230620.2f7dd3d4.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090914224038.GA77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090914224038.GA77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909150138.18798.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Roland Smith , Eitan Adler , Robert Huff , Polytropon Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:14:36 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 00:40:38 Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:06:20PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:34:29 -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > > Roland Smith writes: > > > > > My laptop has a bunch of volume-up/down/mute internet/mail/etc > > > > > keys. How do I map each of them to run a specific shell > > > > > command when pressed? > > > > > > > > That depends on a couple of things (assuming you're running the X > > > > window system, I don't know if it is even possible on the > > > > console). > > > > > > > > First you have to make sure that you actually can see the key > > > > signals. In X you can test that with xev(1). > > > > > > If this is what I think it is, he probably can't. > > > > For most laptop keyboards, there was (as already explained) a > > specific system that handled Fn+PFx outside the OS so it worked > > always. Even my old Toshiba T1600 can do that. > > > > "Modern" laptops do it differently: Fn+PFx key combinations > > have to be picked up by a specific driver that "listens" to > > stange and custom keycodes outside the standard range, and then > > communicate the selected purpose to the OS in order to perform > > the action, e. g. raise the volume. > > Not all of them. My laptop is based on a quite modern cantiga (aka > centrino2) PM45 chipset (from 2008, according to Wikipedia). The function > keys for changing the creen brightness and sound volume work OK with > FreeBSD, even though xev doesn't see them. So that signal seems to go > directly to the hardware. Most likely not entirely. Having acpidump(8)ed a few laptops, I have seen references to multimedia keys in there. However I know not nearly enough about ACPI to know if the OS can intercept/reroute the bindings. A gamble I would take is to let FreeBSD post itself as a windows variant to acpi, by setting hw.acpi.osname="Windows 2001" in /boot/loader.conf. Then recheck xev. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 01:21:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F41D1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8078D8FC13 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9800 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2009 01:25:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 15 Sep 2009 01:25:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4AAEEC4F.4080909@ibctech.ca> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:23 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Friedrich References: <200909142113.09065.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <200909142113.09065.freebsd@insightbb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060407070208050902010706" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: csh issues bogus error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:21:53 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060407070208050902010706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steven Friedrich wrote: > I'm working on my .cshrc file, so I have to use csh syntax. I, like most Unix > shell programmers, usually steer clear of csh scripts, but obviously, .cshrc > requires csh syntax. > > If I create a file with just a # in it, I get: > set: Variable name must begin with a letter. > > I can change the # to #!/bin/csh > but I get the same error message > > This looks like a csh bug to me 8o) What exactly are you trying to do? Can you post the entire contents of your .cshrc file? ...seems as though there is something missing here. Steve --------------ms060407070208050902010706 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE1MDEyMjIzWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUWhe24bX7o8+2w565upgdfFFe pQswUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AHqtmryfDLZd31gJ0hb9OKGleZBtwvWoE4G2+j1p/NAo7FoVAi02SgsMioPRfOgJQgQZYzCE tunAFMCQFz92XVHGM3v1CnXoB9QMfiCYM1xhq9O9Ue3Es9zlxAhiLGRFnM+UgnjOFoc+InO7 xChGCYiFD23xVuMz88ZGl7KNg0p1LoR0LDZTRY3zVLBi4fokQjKQaX2n/3ah/0wz55LtT+xG OLPF97alKYAZnWGyRzxOGhrKgirzc6QFlgT8xCP5znTo/t11YG3KnJOqRLjUWqBdhw4q4vuC qg1N/oWf/dZnuPmFLapqf8XxqBepXhQzKatY0lUwjHyyzPT+PQz5pxUAAAAAAAA= --------------ms060407070208050902010706-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 02:38:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FA1106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf03.insightbb.com (mxsf03.insightbb.com [74.128.0.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBC28FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:38:42 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,386,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="725266654" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 22:38:41 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAF+brkrQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBU9pAhBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,386,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="94837220" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 22:38:41 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:38:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <200909142113.09065.freebsd@insightbb.com> <4AAEEC4F.4080909@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4AAEEC4F.4080909@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909142238.29848.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: csh issues bogus error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:38:43 -0000 On Monday 14 September 2009 21:22:23 Steve Bertrand wrote: > Steven Friedrich wrote: > > I'm working on my .cshrc file, so I have to use csh syntax. I, like most > > Unix shell programmers, usually steer clear of csh scripts, but > > obviously, .cshrc requires csh syntax. > > > > If I create a file with just a # in it, I get: > > set: Variable name must begin with a letter. > > > > I can change the # to #!/bin/csh > > but I get the same error message > > > > This looks like a csh bug to me 8o) > > What exactly are you trying to do? > > Can you post the entire contents of your .cshrc file? > > ...seems as though there is something missing here. > > Steve > Ok, I'm sorry. My brain farted. I had set -x in .cshrc, and that's a good line in a BOURNE script 8o) but in my csh scripts, I can place #!/bin/csh -x when I need debug. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 02:52:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0392E106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A08E8FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8F2pQmn071802; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:51:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:52:25 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20090915025225.GD44075@thought.org> References: <20090914210215.GA43836@thought.org> <20090914232627.ebcd3f9b.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090914232627.ebcd3f9b.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: podcast on google? Or other? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:52:36 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26:27PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:02:18 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > hey guys, i'll deny i ever wrote this because i *should* know already... > > but don't. i've clicked on several podcast sites and they show links to yahoo and a couple > > others. does google have this [POD] icon? OR what do i install here on freebsd-7.1 that i > > can use to listen to podcasts or otherwise play old/archived streams? > > What format are those podcasts in? In OGG/Vorbis or MP3 format, > you can use your favourite music player (mine is xmms) and use > it for the specific media type; the browser's configuration > editor should allow you to do so. > > The xmms program is able to play streamed media content, but > mplayer should be fine, too. > i usually use kmplayer because i can kill it o r click-on to kill/stop. i was looking at a particular show on national public radio [NPR] nd wound up at the podcast section. i think, am not certain, that if i select the 'podcast' thing, this show will show up daily or weekly, whatever .... rather than me having to spent minutes of finding Show, finding archive place, and then selecting Stream or Podcast. if i'm not making enough sense, i'll wait until i've had a good night's sleep! gary PS: DEfinite offtopic but i may have found a legit ebook publisher ... they pod publish in us, canada, and in europe. [[i had no idea it'd be this hard just finding the right place. =sigh=]] > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 5.67a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 03:01:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE884106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0FD8FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MnOIO-0001Yb-Oa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:01:32 +0200 Received: from pool-71-166-143-6.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.143.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:01:32 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-143-6.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:01:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:01:47 -0400 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <4AAEB763.6060709@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-143-6.washdc.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:01:34 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Mikel King wrote: > >> Hasn't 6.x been End Of Lifed? I mean considering that 8.0 is expected to >> be released either later this month or early next, and 6.x will be >> officially retired at that time, is it possible that this was >> overlooked? Personally I don't think it's ever good to overlook >> security, especially in the case of a root exploit. > > Nope. 6.3 (RELENG_6_3) will be supported until at least 31 January 2010 > while 6.4 (RELENG_6_4) and 6-STABLE (RELENG_6) will be supported until at > least 30 November 2010 by the Security team. > > There are no more releases planned from the RELENG_6 branch, but that's > not the same as 'unsupported' -- patches and advisories will be issued > until the dates listed, and quite usually beyond that. > Quoted from ~freebsd.security.general: "The bug was fixed in 6.1-STABLE, just before release of 6.2-RELEASE, but was not recognized as security vulnerability." So if the bug no longer exists in the non-EOL 6.3/6.4 there is nothing to fix. Seems to me this is more about not getting due credit and a writer who doesn't grok. The posting to security was a forward done by another individual, since the original discoverer notified the FreeBSD Foundation instead of the security team. Since the FreeBSD foundation is largely administrative and not the correct entity to notify, it is not surprising they did not reply. The writer sounds like he is attempting to spin the SNAFU into a "they knew about a security vulnerability and did nothing..." story. Self serving for him, headline grabbing and sensationalist for sure, but not true as it was quickly addressed at the time. This is water under the bridge and a writer flogging a dead horse. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 03:14:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11221065672 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mak@kolybabi.com) Received: from mail.nepharia.org (mail.nepharia.org [209.44.104.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ED38FC14 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brisbane.nepharia.org (wnpgmb0807w-ad02-161-57-125.dynamic.mts.net [207.161.57.125]) by mail.nepharia.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B24A3E8D5C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by brisbane.nepharia.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) mak@kolybabi.com; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:37 -0500 From: Mak Kolybabi To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090915031437.GA20647@brisbane.nepharia.org> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:14:19 -0000 On 2009-09-14 12:12, Dan Goodin wrote: > We'll be writing a brief article about this. I didn't notice anyone link the finished article yet, so here it is: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/14/freebsd_security_bug/ -- Matthew Anthony Kolybabi (Mak) () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org | Against proprietary extensions From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 03:27:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51AB1065672; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B81C8FC13; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE1EEB56A9; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:57:00 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC37D45171; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:56:59 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kiXoVAiVPIe; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:56:59 +0300 (EEST) Received: from kobe.laptop (cm35.psi155.maxonline.com.sg [58.146.155.35]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB264512A; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:56:58 +0300 (EEST) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8F2ur0H011761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:56:54 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8F2upxl011760; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:56:51 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: dgoodin@theregister.com In-Reply-To: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> (Dan Goodin's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:50 -0700") References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (berkeley-unix) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:56:50 +0800 Message-ID: <87fxaokj9p.fsf@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: media@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, press@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:27:28 -0000 Hi Dan, The right place to report security problems with FreeBSD is to the Security Officer team. A PGP signed email to the email address of the security team at is enough to get the attention of the FreeBSD Project. Przemyslaw should email security-officer with any details he thinks are relevant. Then the security team will make sure to fix the bug for all affected releases of FreeBSD, release a patch with the fix, issue an advisory through the usual channels, and post the details online at our security information web pages at . Regards, Giorgos On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:50 -0700, Dan Goodin wrote: > Hello, > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. Security > researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD > has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August > 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > > Kind regards, > > Dan Goodin > 415-495-5411 > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FreeBSD <= 6.1 kqueue() NULL pointer > dereference > Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:49:33 +0200 > From: Przemyslaw Frasunek > Organization: frasunek.com > To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@securityfocus.com > References: <4A9028AC.9080902@freebsd.lublin.pl> > > Przemyslaw Frasunek pisze: >> FreeBSD <= 6.1 suffers from classical check/use race condition on SMP > > There is yet another kqueue related vulnerability. It affects 6.x, up to > 6.4-STABLE. FreeBSD security team was notified on 29th Aug, but there is no > response until now, so I won't publish any details. > > Sucessful exploitation yields local root and allows to exit from jail. > For now, > you can see demo on: > > http://www.vimeo.com/6554787 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 03:28:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1510656A4 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DE68FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MnOiD-0006lN-SI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:28:13 +0200 Received: from pool-72-75-63-116.washdc.east.verizon.net ([72.75.63.116]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:28:13 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-72-75-63-116.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:28:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:27:07 -0400 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <57998B4D-84FF-450E-9DC7-70BE8D1681C8@peasoup.com> <20090914231343.ae27d3da.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-75-63-116.washdc.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: ftpd virtual www hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:28:17 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:10:35 -0400, Peasoup wrote: >> Next I go to vipw to change the user's home dir to something in the >> www area, which is owned by www:www. This is where my problems start >> with being denied. I am assuming that uploading to the unprivileged >> user www is getting in my way. > > A common way is to create a specific directory within the > user's home directory, such as > > ~/public_html/ > > which is accessed by the web server to obtain the files to > be served. The user has his regular FTP access to his home > directory, so he can put files into ~/public_html/ or just > create a symlink into this directory from somewhere else in > his home directory. > > I haven't done much webserver stuff recently, and I'm not > quite sure I did understand your question correctly, so my > suggestion could already be outdated. > This is facilitated by the Apache module mod_userdir. It utilizes the public_html folder in a user's home directory and usually in the default config shows up as http://www.someweb.somewhere/~username in the URI. As you indicated before, each user can FTP to his own content this way. Because FTP is passing passwords in the clear I consider this a poor security practice and won't go near it myself. However, if users could use sftp (from sshd) it would be a little more secure. You could also carry this one step further and issue each user a certificate, require certs to login, and disable password login. This is possibly overkill, as with sftp passwords will be inside the SSH tunnel and won't be in the clear. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 05:22:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C31106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8A38FC15 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so2400770bwz.43 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=6kyNQu5lH1G+RDXrWKWd40bcmaYfbOxGP8el4yG53tU=; b=ZZmXPqKafV6VjJIxXQ89aVfAhWpprUkFNOrTp0zb98OrKmdx9nBWvUvOz40TuCmSnt 8RDBMX6jxyK/WHjbqStQMQgLRX0xmt4VToqXwNqbCEWormAVEQeU5CvQofOqY/0Felpi GjEnZ8Ucc/cCDEvv6oxSL2B8VTa948v09DUQY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=m7cPblO1h4zM/VyHNYZRDgdLqOWUg6zNM3GQXyzGeOKutB5QQniXr6OyCDDQEJYoZr xGXo7perVL1vDwlMXykdOI9WSr6JQHKheHqcNT+vEk1GrXFQsCA+sLs3m1K6U0C/av8q W455zirh1s4D4E1b7YKIs2odVCNa21dMft5O8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.161.204 with SMTP id s12mr5863024bkx.26.1252992153185; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:22:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57998B4D-84FF-450E-9DC7-70BE8D1681C8@peasoup.com> References: <57998B4D-84FF-450E-9DC7-70BE8D1681C8@peasoup.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:22:13 +0300 Message-ID: <991123400909142222q7c27578ct6d94bda2a3f6a1ad@mail.gmail.com> To: Peasoup Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftpd virtual www hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:22:34 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Peasoup wrote: > Hi > > Im new to the list, hope I have the right one, but if not, please let me > know. And forgive me if I don't speak clear unix. > > I am trying to set up a webserver, with virtual hosting accounts. > Naturally, I want to be able to give users the ability to upload files to > their web directories. > > Setting up basic ftp is not an issue for me. I can set up a user at > /usr/home/, and can upload via ftp just fine. Of course that directory > is owned by user:user. I also get ftpchroot just fine. > > Next I go to vipw to change the user's home dir to something in the www > area, which is owned by www:www. This is where my problems start with being > denied. I am assuming that uploading to the unprivileged user www is getting > in my way. > If you have virtualhost A, with DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/apache2/data/siteA/htdocs, then set the home directory for the user who uploads to this path during user creation. chroot them to this path as well. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 06:17:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE55106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederique@isafeelin.org) Received: from progress.isafeelin.org (progress.isafeelin.org [213.163.82.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD4E8FC16 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from progress.isafeelin.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by progress.isafeelin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AC5130DF6 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s55919a03.adsl.wanadoo.nl (s55919a03.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.154.3]) by progress.isafeelin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FAE130DEB for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:57:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (unknown [192.168.1.15]) by s55919a03.adsl.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D5C1276C8 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:57:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AAF2CCE.2090609@isafeelin.org> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:57:34 +0200 From: Frederique Rijsdijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <11043b700909141724i4c8f4a5fm57efb383d5845d84@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11043b700909141724i4c8f4a5fm57efb383d5845d84@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control in FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:17:10 -0000 On 9/15/2009 2:24 AM, perl info wrote: > I have two questions in regards to a FreeBSD Server and avoiding ISP > bandwidth charges. > > Are there changes to the ways bandwidth can be controlled in FreeBSD 8. > > Is there an accepted or standardized method to control and limit bandwidth > usage over an interface. > Changes I don't know about. But you can use IPFW to limit and measure the bandwidth you're using. You can also use darkstat (port) to measure the traffic you're generating. -- Frederique From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 07:01:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5903106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFDA8FC14 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8F710PV098315; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:01:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 20A67BA84; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:01:00 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20090915070100.GA91800@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914230620.2f7dd3d4.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090914224038.GA77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <200909150138.18798.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909150138.18798.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Eitan Adler , Robert Huff , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:01:06 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:38:18AM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > > Not all of them. My laptop is based on a quite modern cantiga (aka > > centrino2) PM45 chipset (from 2008, according to Wikipedia). The funct= ion > > keys for changing the creen brightness and sound volume work OK with > > FreeBSD, even though xev doesn't see them. So that signal seems to go > > directly to the hardware. >=20 > Most likely not entirely. Having acpidump(8)ed a few laptops, I have seen= =20 > references to multimedia keys in there. However I know not nearly enough = about=20 > ACPI to know if the OS can intercept/reroute the bindings. A gamble I wou= ld=20 > take is to let FreeBSD post itself as a windows variant to acpi, by setti= ng=20 > hw.acpi.osname=3D"Windows 2001" in /boot/loader.conf. Then recheck xev. What would you see in the acpidump that indicates those keys? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqvO6wACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVu7gCglNCt2D7toXTChfJ6ofIHqLLL RK8An35fWbuC761tjLqHSuxAEaVmt9TF =yMEc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 08:11:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73DD1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8298FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n8F8BYEO096319 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:11:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n8F8BY1g096318; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA08079; Tue, 15 Sep 09 01:01:47 PDT Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:04:38 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: rsmith@xs4all.nl Message-Id: <4aaf4a96.rnIcIpF47vYAtgHm%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20090914173420.GB69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <19118.36021.489954.856994@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20090914230620.2f7dd3d4.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090914224038.GA77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090914224038.GA77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:11:35 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > Writing a driver to detect if headphones are connected sounds > much more complicated to me than connecting a couple of switches! > I mean, you'd have to measure something like the impedance of > the jack. Surely that is more expensive than a simple switch? Or use a simpler jack, with one switch that connects to ground or not depending on whether the plug is inserted or not. It probably costs a cent or two less than the usual two-switch variety, and this is a BOM (Bill Of Materials, i.e. per-unit-built) savings. Writing the driver is an NRE (non-recurring engineering) expense which can be amortized over -- the manufacturer hopes -- a huge number of delivered units. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 08:17:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3473B1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from przemyslaw@frasunek.com) Received: from lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl (lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl [193.138.118.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E865B8FC18 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.138.118.99] (ip-193-138-118-99.nette.pl [193.138.118.99]) by lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B32FAC54C11 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:59:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AAF4927.3070203@frasunek.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:31 +0200 From: Przemyslaw Frasunek Organization: frasunek.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:17:12 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Przemyslaw should email security-officer with any details he thinks are > relevant. Then the security team will make sure to fix the bug for all > affected releases of FreeBSD, release a patch with the fix, issue an > advisory through the usual channels, and post the details online at our > security information web pages at . I see that I received a lot of criticism after disclosing 6.4 vulnerability. Please read some facts: I send few mails: on 29th Aug to security team, on 2nd Sep and 11th Sep directly to security officer. None of them were responded. I haven't filled any PRs, because it would disclose details of vulnerability to the public and allow blackhats to exploit it. I won't publish anything more than video, before official security advisory. The exploit is private to me and it won't be given to the "community". Michael Powell wrote: > Quoted from ~freebsd.security.general: > "The bug was fixed in 6.1-STABLE, just before release of 6.2-RELEASE, but > was not recognized as security vulnerability." This is another bug. The former one affected only 6.1, this one affects everything up to 6.4-STABLE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 10:39:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98BB1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f221.google.com (mail-ew0-f221.google.com [209.85.219.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9698FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so3551040ewy.8 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:39:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PHdXskbWHqIUGzdnTmC8cFqWe4pIzi4MifsTWckioEQ=; b=sMemHo0tFnH1sgsLiII6heqkJ8EvS51W7qLhEazCCWlA1o4TOevAvKKqCjRiPHkWtu QfoogFl9NpOjsl4kK20Z9/LG5yeRiZGWanXPeQNHO9lpaHkG8FIpzvzjQe8jrZtkY2TI qktN7latIDnD2VPmNhGwFv7zUB2LYIu9g5LoI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gr39lVGmiWDczJMlspn9qjvVuIwlave/3taiME6KyaUOA9hvitHMT9v4QFNNeJWcl0 PVLDELNe9PCdCP1GvBPBymp3R1LXJHpQ9QAcaNm1hM7eONNGt594uav6hrtK+bO4qIJC 1K3EEf7ElDBK5VeTJBPzqRXvVFLXkmKC9eoGQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.159.6 with SMTP id l6mr5599240ebo.56.1253011146003; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:39:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:39:05 +0100 Message-ID: From: Freminlins To: utisoft@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Non-root user and accept() or listen() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:39:07 -0000 2009/9/14 Chris Rees > > Isn't this a bit drastic? Listening sockets are opened by very many > types of processes, as well as remembering that sendmail, BIND, and > others don't actually run as root... I suppose it'd be possible, but > would it actually be useful? > Sure, those open listening sockets. But those are things I want to listen. Now suppose a user account was hacked, and "Bob" sets up a web server listening on some random port above 1024. If "Bob" couldn't use listen() he wouldn't be able to do that. Of course, user accounts should be made secure, but what I am getting at is making the hack much less useful. > BTW, there may be an ipfw rule for this, I'll have to look it up when > my servers are back online! > > Chris > Frem. (Apologies for Gmail quoting, which is horrible). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 10:40:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E82F1065696 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277FF8FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7467E821; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:40:26 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:40:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <200909150138.18798.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915070100.GA91800@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090915070100.GA91800@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909151240.10909.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Roland Smith , Eitan Adler , Robert Huff , Polytropon Subject: Re: rebinding keys to functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:40:14 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:01:00 Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:38:18AM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > > > Not all of them. My laptop is based on a quite modern cantiga (aka > > > centrino2) PM45 chipset (from 2008, according to Wikipedia). The > > > function keys for changing the creen brightness and sound volume work > > > OK with FreeBSD, even though xev doesn't see them. So that signal seems > > > to go directly to the hardware. > > > > Most likely not entirely. Having acpidump(8)ed a few laptops, I have seen > > references to multimedia keys in there. However I know not nearly enough > > about ACPI to know if the OS can intercept/reroute the bindings. A gamble > > I would take is to let FreeBSD post itself as a windows variant to acpi, > > by setting hw.acpi.osname="Windows 2001" in /boot/loader.conf. Then > > recheck xev. > > What would you see in the acpidump that indicates those keys? Example, HPDV9000: If (LEqual (Local1, 0x07)) { Store ("Fn+F7 Pressed", Debug) If (LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6)) { If (IGDS) { Notify (\_SB.PCI0.GFX0.DD04, 0x87) } Else { Notify (\_SB.PCI0.PEGP.VGA.LCD, 0x87) } } Else { Store (0x15, SMIF) Store (0x00, TRP0) } Fn+F7 = screen darker. See the ref to OSYS. Also: Method (_Q16, 0, NotSerialized) { Store ("!!! DVD/Music Button pressed !!!", Debug) If (LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D6)) { And: If (\_OSI ("Windows 2006")) { Store (0x07D6, OSYS) } -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 11:18:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1172E106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59F48FC19 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from working (pool-72-95-226-5.pitbpa.ftas.verizon.net [72.95.226.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9871EBC0A; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:18:26 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Mel Flynn , dgoodin@theregister.com Message-Id: <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.0 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:18:45 -0000 Mel Flynn wrote: > > On Monday 14 September 2009 23:46:42 David Kelly wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The Register. > > > > Security researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says versions 6.x through 6.4 > > > > of FreeBSD has a security bug. He says he notified the FreeBSD > > > > Foundation on August 29 and never got a response. We'll be writing a > > > > brief article about this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to > > > > comment. > > > > > > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? > > > > Przemyslaw Frasunek has PR's posted but none recent. IMO if a PR is not > > submitted then one has *not* informed the Powers That Be. > > Wrong. Security bugs should be reported to the security team, not PR'd. It's typical for security issues to be kept hushed until a fix is ready. As a result, there are usually no PRs, and in the case where the person who discovered the problem is amenable, there is no public discussion at all until a fix is available. Apparently, Mr. Frasunek started out down that path, which is admirable. It seems as if he doesn't have much patience, however, since he thinks that only 2 weeks is enough time to fix a security problem and QA the fix. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 11:59:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9424106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maksverver@geocities.com) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx3.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BDB8FC5C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heaven.student.utwente.nl (heaven.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.52]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n8FBffxx027730 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:41:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4AAF7D75.8080805@geocities.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:41:41 +0200 From: Maks Verver User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090827) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: maksverver@geocities.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Can't boot Marvel Sheevaplug from USB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:12 -0000 Hi everyone, I'm also playing with a Sheevaplug and I'm running into the same problem as reported by Rafal Jaworowski, but I think I have a clearer picture of what goes wrong. To recap, the kernel fails to mount the root filesystem because the partition on the USB stick isn't recognized by the kernel: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Mon Sep 14 19:57:10 CEST 2009 -- blablabla -- ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 uhub0: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered Root mount waiting for: usbus0 ugen0.2: at usbus0 umass0: on usbus0 umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 Root mount waiting for: usbus0 umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a ROOT MOUNT ERROR: I think the problem is that the partition is detected only after the USB bus has been scanned. If I configure a kernel to boot from the network instead, it does recognize the USB device because of the additional delay involved in booting from the network: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #5: Mon Sep 14 20:45:30 CEST 2009 -- blablabla -- ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 uhub0: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered mge0: link state changed to UP Received DHCP Offer packet on mge0 from 130.89.1.145 via 130.89.160.4 (accepted) (no root path) Received DHCP Offer packet on mge0 from 130.89.1.144 via 130.89.160.5 (ignored) (no root path) ugen0.2: at usbus0 umass0: on usbus0 umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Retrying Command (per Sense Data) (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command pass0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: < USB Flash Memory 1.00> Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device pass0: Serial Number 0612140557130 pass0: 40.000MB/s transfers GEOM: new disk da0 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 da0: < USB Flash Memory 1.00> Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: Serial Number 0612140557130 da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 962MB (1971200 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 962C) Of course with the kernel configured like this, the kernel wants to mount the root filesystem from NFS and I can't break into the mountroot> prompt! It seems that the kernel assumes that it only needs to wait for the USB bus to finish scanning and then expects the root partition to be available, but apparently partitions can be detected after that. Does anyone have a suggestion how to deal with this? Is there a way to insert a delay before trying to mount root? (I tried setting SCSI_DELAY to 5000 but this didn't seem to have any effect -- I didn't notice any delay. Maybe this isn't supported for the ARM architecture?) Kind regards, Maks Verver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 12:27:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BE2106568B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413D68FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8FCRk5r027888; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:27:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8FCRkWi027887; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:27:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:27:46 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Freminlins Message-ID: <20090915122746.GA27732@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Freminlins , utisoft@gmail.com, FreeBSD Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:27:50 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions , utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: Non-root user and accept() or listen() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:27:52 -0000 On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Freminlins typed: > 2009/9/14 Chris Rees > > > > > Isn't this a bit drastic? Listening sockets are opened by very many > > types of processes, as well as remembering that sendmail, BIND, and > > others don't actually run as root... I suppose it'd be possible, but > > would it actually be useful? > > > > Sure, those open listening sockets. But those are things I want to listen. > > Now suppose a user account was hacked, and "Bob" sets up a web server > listening on some random port above 1024. If "Bob" couldn't use listen() he > wouldn't be able to do that. Haven't tried it, but you can probably set net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh to 65535. That way only root can bind(2) to any port. Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 12:29:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070F61065695 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56A28FC18 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AF37E818; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:29:19 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:29:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <20090914145447.K63280@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> <200909150117.03050.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090914173958.C21417@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> In-Reply-To: <20090914173958.C21417@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909151429.04818.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: "Joe R. Jah" Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:29:08 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 02:43:32 Joe R. Jah wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Mel Flynn wrote: > > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:17:02 +0200 > > From: Mel Flynn > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: Joe R. Jah > > Subject: Re: libnsl.so.1 > > > > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 00:02:50 Joe R. Jah wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I want to install a dispather module from Day Communique software on > > > apache22. The binaray mod_dispatcher.so is provided by Day as a 64 bit > > > *NIX compatible module to place in apache22 module directory. The > > > mocule requires a shared library missing from system: > > > > > > --8<-- > > > # apachectl -t > > > httpd: Syntax error on line 827 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: > > > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so into server: > > > Shared object "libnsl.so.1" not found, required by "mod_dispatcher.so" > > > --8<-- > > > > > > Does anyone know where to download libnsl.so.1, or from what port it > > > can be installed? > > > > nsl=name service library. All of it's functions are in FreeBSD implement > > in libc. If this mod_dispatcher.so is indeed loadable by FreeBSD's > > linker, then you can provide a dummy libnsl.so.1, like so: > > > > $ cat <'EOF' >BSDmakefile > > SHLIB=nsl > > SHLIB_MAJOR=1 > > NO_MAN=yes > > SRCS=nsl.c > > > > .include > > EOF > > $ cat <'EOF' >nsl.c > > int nsl_dummy(void); > > > > int nsl_dummy(void) { return 0; } > > EOF > > > > $ make; sudo make LIBDIR=/usr/local/lib install > > > > The symbols it's looking for should be provided by libc, but if there's > > any undefined ones, this trickery gets a little dangerous and you're > > better off asking the developers for a native FreeBSD version. > > Thank you Mel. You were right about undefined ones; Here's what I get: > > --8<-- > apachectl -t > httpd: Syntax error on line 826 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so into server: > /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dispatcher.so: Undefined symbol "__strdup" > --8<-- > > Any more trickeries?;-) Sure, add #define __strdup strdup to nsl.c, however this road is not likely to end soon. It seems to be compiled for a linux system, at least for a SYSV system, while FreeBSD follows '4.4BSD'. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 12:34:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4781065672 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED3C8FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134FC7E818; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:34:56 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:34:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <4AAF4927.3070203@frasunek.com> In-Reply-To: <4AAF4927.3070203@frasunek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909151434.41177.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Przemyslaw Frasunek Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:34:43 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:58:31 Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Przemyslaw should email security-officer with any details he thinks are > > relevant. Then the security team will make sure to fix the bug for all > > affected releases of FreeBSD, release a patch with the fix, issue an > > advisory through the usual channels, and post the details online at our > > security information web pages at . > > I see that I received a lot of criticism after disclosing 6.4 > vulnerability. Please read some facts: FWIW, I think some people here read with their eyes closed and I'm wondering myself, why security@ did not at least respond with a "we're looking into it, please hold on, as we're busy with 8.0 release.". -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 13:54:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EECE106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080BD8FC15 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9716EB5124; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:54:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53E645148; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:54:20 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id objZFMSn8nGj; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:54:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from kobe.laptop (cm35.psi155.maxonline.com.sg [58.146.155.35]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F55B4512A; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:54:19 +0300 (EEST) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8FDsE9C039514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:54:15 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8FDsC5d039513; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:54:12 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Przemyslaw Frasunek References: <4AAF4927.3070203@frasunek.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:54:11 +0800 In-Reply-To: <4AAF4927.3070203@frasunek.com> (Przemyslaw Frasunek's message of "Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:31 +0200") Message-ID: <877hw0mhz0.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:54:22 -0000 --=-=-= On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:31 +0200, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Przemyslaw should email security-officer with any details he thinks are >> relevant. Then the security team will make sure to fix the bug for all >> affected releases of FreeBSD, release a patch with the fix, issue an >> advisory through the usual channels, and post the details online at our >> security information web pages at . > > I see that I received a lot of criticism after disclosing 6.4 vulnerability. > Please read some facts: > > I send few mails: on 29th Aug to security team, on 2nd Sep and 11th Sep directly > to security officer. None of them were responded. I haven't filled any PRs, > because it would disclose details of vulnerability to the public and allow > blackhats to exploit it. > > I won't publish anything more than video, before official security advisory. The > exploit is private to me and it won't be given to the "community". Hi Przemyslaw, What I wrote is not criticism for what you have or might have not done. I now know (after posting the initial message) that the security officer is preparing a fix and an advisory, so my response was more like ``this is the usual way of handling this sort of thing''. The wording was a bit careful to avoid implying that you didn't know or were not prepared to do what is appropriate :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqvnIMACgkQ1g+UGjGGA7ZoeQCgpHS8dr+byGF0IRMnX0upHRp5 gesAniaVBvLXGSVhrzu1RBXc9EIVD6Ei =04jA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 14:17:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D411065676 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127058FC1C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979217E821; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:17:26 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:17:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909151617.11720.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Freminlins Subject: Re: Non-root user and accept() or listen() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:17:14 -0000 On Monday 14 September 2009 18:47:18 Freminlins wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure if this exists (but don't think so), so I am asking. > > Is there a sysctl type thing to disallow non-root users, or indeed any > specified user or group, from running a program with listen() ? > > What I am looking at is improving network security, such that if a user > account is compromised it can then not be used to run a dodgy web > server/whatever on a non-privileged port. Although I can firewall off any > port I wish, it seems like an obvious thing to disallow any user from > opening a listening socket in the first place. I am suggesting something > like "sysctl user.socket_listen" with enable or disable. > > Am I being really daft? Or does this exist already? See mac_portacl(4). -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 14:19:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCB21065672 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DAA8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8FEJI4M024024 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:19:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:19:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200909151419.n8FEJIjH024023@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: building emulators/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902 fails in kBuild X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:19:48 -0000 Here's the last part of the output. kBuild: Compiling RuntimeR0Drv - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/generic/RTMpIsCpuWorkPending-r0drv-generic.cpp kBuild: Compiling RuntimeR0Drv - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/generic/mpnotification-r0drv-generic.cpp kBuild: Compiling RuntimeR0Drv - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.c kBuild: Compiling RuntimeR0Drv - /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.c In file included from /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/the-freebsd-kernel.h:60In file included from /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/the-freebsd-kernel.h:60, from /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.c:34: /sys/vm/vm.h:64:24: error: machine/vm.h: No such file or directory , from /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.c:34: /sys/vm/vm.h:64:24: error: machine/vm.h: No such file or directory kmk[2]: *** [/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.o] Error 1 The failing command: @cc -c -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused -Wno-trigraphs -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wno-pointer-sign -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -O2 -fformat-extensions -ffreestanding -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-stack-protector -O2 -mtune=generic -fno-omit-frame-pointer -nostdinc -std=c99 -m32 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/gen-sys-hdrs -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/include -I/sys -I/sys/contrib/altq -I/sys/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/include -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release -DVBOX -DVBOX_OSE -DVBOX_W! ITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE=\"/usr/local/share/virtualbox\" -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE_ARCH=\"/usr/local/lib/virtualbox\" -DRTPATH_SHARED_LIBS=\"/usr/local/lib/virtualbox\" -DRTPATH_APP_DOCS=\"/usr/local/share/doc/virtualbox\" -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -D__FREEBSD__ -DRT_ARCH_X86 -D__X86__ -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DRT_WITHOUT_NOCRT_WRAPPERS -DRT_NO_EXPORT_SYMBOL -Wp,-MD,/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.o.dep -Wp,-MT,/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.o -Wp,-MP -o /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.o /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.c kmk[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... kmk[2]: *** [/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.o] Error 1 The failing command: @cc -c -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused -Wno-trigraphs -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wno-pointer-sign -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -O2 -fformat-extensions -ffreestanding -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-stack-protector -O2 -mtune=generic -fno-omit-frame-pointer -nostdinc -std=c99 -m32 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/gen-sys-hdrs -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/include -I/sys -I/sys/contrib/altq -I/sys/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/include -I/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release -DVBOX -DVBOX_OSE -DVBOX_W! ITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE=\"/usr/local/share/virtualbox\" -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE_ARCH=\"/usr/local/lib/virtualbox\" -DRTPATH_SHARED_LIBS=\"/usr/local/lib/virtualbox\" -DRTPATH_APP_DOCS=\"/usr/local/share/doc/virtualbox\" -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -D__FREEBSD__ -DRT_ARCH_X86 -D__X86__ -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DRT_WITHOUT_NOCRT_WRAPPERS -DRT_NO_EXPORT_SYMBOL -Wp,-MD,/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.o.dep -Wp,-MT,/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.o -Wp,-MP -o /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.x86/release/obj/RuntimeR0Drv/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.o /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebs! d.c kmk[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902' kmk[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902' kmk[2]: *** Exiting with status 2 kmk[1]: *** [pass_libraries_this] Error 2 kmk[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902' kmk: *** [pass_libraries_order] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox. ===>>> make failed for emulators/virtualbox ===>>> Aborting update 776.292u 85.168s 9:01.06 159.2% 5962+1451k 2687+1851io 235pf+0w hellas# exit exit Script done on Tue Sep 15 08:55:35 2009 The first lines of interest in /sys/vm/vm.h are: * $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/vm.h,v 1.27.2.2 2009/09/04 19:59:32 jhb Exp $ */ #ifndef VM_H #define VM_H #include The error occurs because /usr/include/machine has no vm.h, although there is a vm86.h and a vmparam.h. I am uncertain as to what might be the best way to deal with this. I haven't rebooted in the last 25 days, so I'm sure I haven't done a "make buildworld && mergemaster -p && make installworld && mergemaster && reboot" during that time. Would doing that result in an update to /usr/include/machine to add a vm.h file? Thanks in advance for any help. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 14:49:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA40F1065672 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp104.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp104.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E53E8FC13 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85028 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 14:49:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=luAqnHhldIevGVA0SrRPnWaX7gHVhoKNZcZgt6nmnk2AVhfoOzxRAFnUCi0pzdt1jy/mZlZetVqhb4hnZiRRNrGfFf1TIQLua1Fnb2H7KtstmFy9w2DCRYCA+bj/GW+bZfgABSGWqMNtoqQKbiUO2AjYAxUIDkCHCf4cH2Bax1E= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp104.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 07:49:13 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: 6zW5ylIVM1mmihSVJPx2nOykn8ccEAlX09oJLQLfbse4lc8asNyKDVzOcsB7VfmSHgeIFjCQw46bpkiZIDMsmGYmUE3XBpaDnN8W7fZ7hMPbOyvqDQZhv8Crw14dMezX7y9IouT13VzJ.xA3Br7WLODbtnGBMQQ0dMAGhrk_987_aPnYIhsFd62e6GbVRGmw6LvFVS3dHlfpmx935BR4DA9Ng2FnGdDVFGcm24FVi09IxOChhnStuQtsz32nL_y4GI4JYbMe_wSVEZR50fcqINXeogAMBMkek_QAxefEMbiQW0OhoH2puvuuK5WaJn35vEzAGRrwI9ccv0en2XClCkSDiIFE1w-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07D3F22849 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:49:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:49:12 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:49:14 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:18:26 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > Mel Flynn wrote: > > > > On Monday 14 September 2009 23:46:42 David Kelly wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The > > > > > Register. Security researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says > > > > > versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD has a security bug. He > > > > > says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August 29 and > > > > > never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > > > > > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > > > > > > > > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? > > > > > > Przemyslaw Frasunek has PR's posted but none recent. IMO if a PR > > > is not submitted then one has *not* informed the Powers That Be. > > > > Wrong. Security bugs should be reported to the security team, not > > PR'd. > > It's typical for security issues to be kept hushed until a fix is > ready. As a result, there are usually no PRs, and in the case where > the person who discovered the problem is amenable, there is no public > discussion at all until a fix is available. > > Apparently, Mr. Frasunek started out down that path, which is > admirable. It seems as if he doesn't have much patience, however, > since he thinks that only 2 weeks is enough time to fix a security > problem and QA the fix. I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from . Aren't FreeBSD security problems reported to their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the dark to known security problems is not a serviceable protocol. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com If there is a possibility of several things going wrong, the one that will cause the most damage will be the one to go wrong. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 15:11:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C62106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DC38FC13 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.166.135.148] (helo=mail.joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MnZgm-0001nN-1P for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:11:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (lholcombe-desktop.localnet.local [192.168.1.2]) by mail.joeandlane.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8FFBKfu062483 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:11:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) From: Lane Holcombe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:11:40 -0500 Message-Id: <1253027500.18746.36.camel@lholcombe-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DooleyDiligent-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n8FFBKfu062483 X-DooleyDiligent-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DooleyDiligent-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-Spam-Status: No X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec794898a5fa3243d4f1c67c0d2f3f947b3f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.166.135.148 Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:28 -0000 On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:49 -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:18:26 -0400 > Bill Moran wrote: > > > Mel Flynn wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 14 September 2009 23:46:42 David Kelly wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > snip > I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from > . Aren't FreeBSD security problems reported to > their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the dark to known > security problems is not a serviceable protocol. Jerry, point your aggregator to http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories.rdf There have only been 12 security advisories put out this year, as far as I can tell. Nothing about this one, though. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 15:13:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49F110656A3 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729468FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96434EBC0A; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090915111331.4fdfa964.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:13:33 -0000 In response to Jerry : > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:18:26 -0400 > Bill Moran wrote: > > > Mel Flynn wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 14 September 2009 23:46:42 David Kelly wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The > > > > > > Register. Security researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says > > > > > > versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD has a security bug. He > > > > > > says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August 29 and > > > > > > never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article about > > > > > > this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to comment. > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? > > > > > > > > Przemyslaw Frasunek has PR's posted but none recent. IMO if a PR > > > > is not submitted then one has *not* informed the Powers That Be. > > > > > > Wrong. Security bugs should be reported to the security team, not > > > PR'd. > > > > It's typical for security issues to be kept hushed until a fix is > > ready. As a result, there are usually no PRs, and in the case where > > the person who discovered the problem is amenable, there is no public > > discussion at all until a fix is available. > > > > Apparently, Mr. Frasunek started out down that path, which is > > admirable. It seems as if he doesn't have much patience, however, > > since he thinks that only 2 weeks is enough time to fix a security > > problem and QA the fix. > > I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from > . Aren't FreeBSD security problems reported to > their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the dark to known > security problems is not a serviceable protocol. Because releasing security advisories before there is a fix available is not responsible use of the information, and (as is being discussed) the fix is still in the works. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 16:20:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D99B1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468B58FC25 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mnalk-0001MZ-Pn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:20:40 -0700 Message-ID: <25457128.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:20:40 -0700 (PDT) From: jaymax To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090914191841.Q98566@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jaymax36@gmail.com References: <25443580.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090914163643.X97663@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <25445497.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090914191841.Q98566@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Subject: Re: Approx. restore time estimate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:20:41 -0000 I was wondering if 24, 48, 72 hrs or even a lifetime was the order of time. I am now approaching 24 hrs. probably wait until my geriatric years and come back to look at the machine ... lol!!! Or would I have been better off using dd if=/dev/* of=output/path/filename [options] All other things being equal, would the removal of the "restore" overheads be significant relative to those from dd . Thanks Lars Eighner-2 wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, jaymax wrote: > >> >> Thanks! >> >> That might explain. Is there an alternate process you would recommend >> with >> at least equal reliability. > > I don't know of anything that isn't a bigger can of worms in a file system > of any complexity to speak of. > >> BTW I should have mentioned that I was restoring from a disk file rather >> than from a tape > > I was speaking of disk to disk. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Approx.-restore-time-estimate-tp25443580p25457128.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 17:03:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A70106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C36218FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7716 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 17:03:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vcH4Gtj+/AizNk/4VoMntpjw6v+HAzPMY+l/QDj23IANLhDb1GKqNSRcIvQbHKLFHFi/7Y2oGrQVnzeenPkK9a6TUk0J0dyzMEepS26yhJFGx2J5ZLsX7Fj0DyClDkCMtYom9oz6Ib1EHahOQHCkCgH7COO1ZqSwhbDjMwtqYeM= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 10:03:50 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: bi3vQKQVM1nJzZxB_Z7cTD5klAQZK2JosEvxIbcPcQOMVUrmnsEFMFxbXr5StbxaO18YKAfj8VXuL4iRapolE7EbEaDedBGJNUOnM5IQL_dlha.T2s81hdaJ7d.T1WJc3Tgt1KJWlWLRDxBBn40yI3I3.Ej2YnMZlbHDxSHrXMv1hE.1PLklQPGsgLJnZ6GaxRfFYYwz4EVibNfRSDUhAZ.bh1qKkyJyybMswN10VgZ_y9d900pznljH6LBVXWKLCRRLvbbEyzjmbm81yhmPKnm2Pjsd7Zvn62CLLnGTASRH24e769yrMM5bkdScTN8uxxExuEl9v.1TQyMM9iZhQtP4cjJiUg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92EB42280B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:03:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:03:50 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090915130350.226fcf65@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915111331.4fdfa964.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090915111331.4fdfa964.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:03:52 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:31 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Jerry : > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:18:26 -0400 > > Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > Mel Flynn wrote: > > > > > > > > On Monday 14 September 2009 23:46:42 David Kelly wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:13:54PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 2009/9/14 Dan Goodin writhed: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan Goodin, a reporter at technology news website The > > > > > > > Register. Security researcher Przemyslaw Frasunek says > > > > > > > versions 6.x through 6.4 of FreeBSD has a security bug. He > > > > > > > says he notified the FreeBSD Foundation on August 29 and > > > > > > > never got a response. We'll be writing a brief article > > > > > > > about this. Please let me know ASAP if someone cares to > > > > > > > comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone submitted a PR about this? > > > > > > > > > > Przemyslaw Frasunek has PR's posted but none recent. IMO if a > > > > > PR is not submitted then one has *not* informed the Powers > > > > > That Be. > > > > > > > > Wrong. Security bugs should be reported to the security team, > > > > not PR'd. > > > > > > It's typical for security issues to be kept hushed until a fix is > > > ready. As a result, there are usually no PRs, and in the case > > > where the person who discovered the problem is amenable, there is > > > no public discussion at all until a fix is available. > > > > > > Apparently, Mr. Frasunek started out down that path, which is > > > admirable. It seems as if he doesn't have much patience, however, > > > since he thinks that only 2 weeks is enough time to fix a security > > > problem and QA the fix. > > > > I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from > > . Aren't FreeBSD security problems > > reported to their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the > > dark to known security problems is not a serviceable protocol. > > Because releasing security advisories before there is a fix available > is not responsible use of the information, and (as is being > discussed) the fix is still in the works. I disagree. If I have a medical problem, or what ever, I expect to be informed of it. The fact that there is no known cure, fix, etc. is immaterial, if in fact not grossly negligent. Being keep ignorant of a security problem is as foolish a theory as "Security through Obscurity". I find the updates invaluable. The fact that apparently FBSD does not encompass them I find discomforting. BTW, please do not CC: me. I am subscribe to the list and do not need multiple copies of the same post. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com There is no sin but ignorance. Christopher Marlowe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 17:13:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE81106568F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:13:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4218FC15 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD4E0EBC3F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:18:29 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20090915130350.226fcf65@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090915111331.4fdfa964.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915130350.226fcf65@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:13:24 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:03:50 -0400 Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:31 -0400 > Bill Moran wrote: > > > In response to Jerry : > > > > > > > > I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from > > > . Aren't FreeBSD security problems > > > reported to their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the > > > dark to known security problems is not a serviceable protocol. > > > > Because releasing security advisories before there is a fix available > > is not responsible use of the information, and (as is being > > discussed) the fix is still in the works. > > I disagree. If I have a medical problem, or what ever, I expect to be > informed of it. The fact that there is no known cure, fix, etc. is > immaterial, if in fact not grossly negligent. This is a stupid and non-relevant comparison. A better comparison would be if I realized that you'd left your car door unlocked in a less than safe neighborhood. Would you rather I told you discreetly, or just started shouting it out loud to the neighborhood? Wait, I know the answer, if I see _your_ car unlocked, I'll just start shouting. > Being keep ignorant of a > security problem is as foolish a theory as "Security through Obscurity". No, it's not. And I don't even want to hear your ill-fitting metaphor for how you arrived at that conclusion. > I find the updates invaluable. The fact that > apparently FBSD does not encompass them I find discomforting. You're missing the fact that FreeBSD's security issues _are_ listed there, when appropriate. Your obvious ignorance of how things operate absolves you of any right to complain. > BTW, please do not CC: me. I am subscribe to the list and do not need > multiple copies of the same post. Whine me a river, for crying out loud. List policy on this list since the Dawn of Time has been to CC the list and the poster. I'm not going to check with everyone on the list to see if they're subscribed or not. Don't like it? Get off the list. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 17:35:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C9B1065695 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CF68FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4298335ewy.36 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:35:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=2kWmwPao8wTfyvVCP5tCHaVbydDC/5VzXC4uaLOlBOU=; b=GQ8OAiZMD3yshBvdU6JgB2B2Nu3/wftkdBg0ejTnmsKoR4IZ+RpEzx5UZH2f4cDDFP 9vnt/SOaB+og4khTnHtV6GZRyAuMHD1UDgi9PhwY8ORa9xPVc5Q6dlxKx5G/umiD2/8l nNQjHwPEtbAgJpZ6iBcrM3Phhf469zJ+p6tL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NFfEuEYN95xU8s20JLBpzUNAJu9tTNWowMkvxqw6RRDwkbdEu29ZJlQiLWl5usJAby D5N5LqAPZVX2mzkWhf/qARegdeHtltBsBfnGryzLEMUClKJU8KN855KjMVy3J4XXaqME 6zZWmvd/NZjxqjl+WqkcQ0tM2BhwODjzBk2ig= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.0.198 with SMTP id 48mr1596317web.84.1253036147385; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:35:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:35:47 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: krootimage crashed at KDE 3.5 startup on signal 11 (7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:35:49 -0000 Hi folks!!! For some reason im getting krootimage (the wallpaper manager of kde) crashing everytime when i login... Any ideas of how to fix that? All the best! Jero From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 17:45:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45D7106568F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f189.google.com (mail-vw0-f189.google.com [209.85.212.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DD58FC2F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws27 with SMTP id 27so2645509vws.3 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=eFCMbFw0Met9E7Kir0UZhpoUoLLxNMJ3bHia+J92S1M=; b=RxDaaTgzmm66bK3MHnUbB2NGSwiMuajC4S2kwpUenVTWLEsqJALbhO0bVVUWQxiF/Q P2TNqyTdUqSp71kAln4yeKv5UBwEPGqkSKlCzlT4D9j7e6Zvl+jaAeAKVvP/xfjuuSpt WntrWeJmM5SUCOhwxauS7+lVkVhrE5mqpIfcQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=a4GlejVVb0wv0e50qffpJti/4dlIHLv5O47n3RFWvThidCAPxiuFX5pWFaS24oso7w izOyhHSCRc7gP0A26vch4hL0h2GEO4zjXtAIQz195ST1ZQDka0r6MlMeqjnASm7lsEZD wRe4VB4a2nVDtPU/Hr97CeKRStzo7l7m8GOHU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.79.168 with SMTP id p40mr10881526vck.110.1253036715413; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:45:15 -0700 Message-ID: <539c60b90909151045hf36d069n2607cb7b20568bbe@mail.gmail.com> From: Steve Franks To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: looking for motherboard with 7.2 proven suspend/resume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:45:16 -0000 S3 is a key feature for me for my desktops. I have gone thru probably 5 mobo's and 5 laptops in my time as a FBSD user, the only one which ever S3'd was a compaq of all things (well, lots of them will S3 if you kldunload usb, but they crash/hang/etc on resume generally). Anyway, it's time for a new system, and as long as I can shove a somewhat modern dual core in it, my second most critical criteria for purchase is that S3 works with FreeBSD with a minimum of or at least well described hacking. Thanks, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 18:13:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186A6106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8FA18FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23342 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 18:13:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=58qmKfOz6RMXevAZFZwqTc7FDm7plPVbeHFrYGJi0J65rpXLNuoU4FT9Bku1ARtVh8BuSq5NPt2ztDec4cvDN29g6zWls3tEXXVFJZBULvkxjEdxjOG0kwz9bhOTO2dryp/k6/5ooCNV0ivScKcqZbTZd1VIWAIujM6Qn2lWSMo= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 11:13:18 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: WamPVSEVM1lYaFjpMsOtOerKg6ut5tDn1qAxU.6nY6F9nQioWTCjD0VKv0RlKEUOMcg2hBuQ7lFXu0JH_i_tum56gOjv587iRuLkBG9udb_a2hfRUqS7dmbqXrQuG0hkV6iuKhwBtOz_tX7yy7oZhLUPmK2lhSv4FQfBpvsewAyBUv2mXRiRrBSGnDs9zCbU7UmdmQMFjZVFJkZ4JTTkV8q5bKX.Cllb_ChxCKYAnTNbHTZgiIDyL8mSuqynC1vupwTCnkNQVgSieqSVhG5J57BkbQoG3OBCcfojpBTBR8Bf9598b7jfpfGqHaktctyng4fp_qupSDK4N1dUoib. X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 439192280B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:13:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:13:17 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090915111331.4fdfa964.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915130350.226fcf65@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:13:20 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:18:29 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:03:50 -0400 > Jerry wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:31 -0400 > > Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > In response to Jerry : > > > > > > > > > > > I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from > > > > . Aren't FreeBSD security problems > > > > reported to their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the > > > > dark to known security problems is not a serviceable protocol. > > > > > > Because releasing security advisories before there is a fix > > > available is not responsible use of the information, and (as is > > > being discussed) the fix is still in the works. > > > > I disagree. If I have a medical problem, or what ever, I expect to > > be informed of it. The fact that there is no known cure, fix, etc. > > is immaterial, if in fact not grossly negligent. > > This is a stupid and non-relevant comparison. A better comparison > would be if I realized that you'd left your car door unlocked in a > less than safe neighborhood. Would you rather I told you discreetly, > or just started shouting it out loud to the neighborhood? Wait, I > know the answer, if I see _your_ car unlocked, I'll just start > shouting. The fact is, that you do in fact notify me. Keeping important security information secret benefits no one, except for possibly those responsible for the problem to begin with who do not want the knowledge of the problem to become public. A multitude of software, such as Mozilla, publish known security holes in their software. The ramifications of allowing a user to actively use a piece of software when a known bug/exploit/etc. exists within it is grossly negligent. > > Being keep ignorant of a > > security problem is as foolish a theory as "Security through > > Obscurity". > > No, it's not. And I don't even want to hear your ill-fitting > metaphor for how you arrived at that conclusion. > > > I find the updates invaluable. The fact > > that apparently FBSD does not encompass them I find discomforting. > > You're missing the fact that FreeBSD's security issues _are_ listed > there, when appropriate. > > Your obvious ignorance of how things operate absolves you of any right > to complain. > > > BTW, please do not CC: me. I am subscribe to the list and do not > > need multiple copies of the same post. > > Whine me a river, for crying out loud. List policy on this list > since the Dawn of Time has been to CC the list and the poster. I'm > not going to check with everyone on the list to see if they're > subscribed or not. Don't like it? Get off the list. I just check the FreeBSD list web page, and failed to find any indication that CC:ing was the desired posting response. In fact, except for a few, perhaps one or two others, I am not aware of any perpetual CC:'s on this list. Then again, I doubt that they feel as threatened when their beliefs are questioned. Perhaps you should seek professional help for your anger issues. Now, if you don't like that, "KISS MY ASS". > -Bill -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com If it doesn't smell yet, it's pretty fresh. Dave Johnson, on dead seagulls From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 18:33:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6F410656A3 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9838FC3F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97767E821; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:34:02 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:33:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909152033.47824.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Jeronimo Calvo Subject: Re: krootimage crashed at KDE 3.5 startup on signal 11 (7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:33:50 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 19:35:47 Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > Hi folks!!! > > For some reason im getting krootimage (the wallpaper manager of kde) > crashing everytime when i login... > Any ideas of how to fix that? Any chance you have two jpeg versions lying around? Please provide ldd -a output of krootimage. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 18:48:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66AD106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011298FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4361337ewy.36 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:48:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=07Q+DTOXNv6KPcI2UANiVzef68WcnNbK2P1u1LZ7pvw=; b=FIT2U7uUFbMmGk6j77yr1wMkdbev8AGwiG0uT5qKJJZKFcLWwOqfgANAiBy9GV5j6b rBFsjHLHCO2RgeK+MyLnt/6AhEWDUeLTaN/6uFBB1/PuUndEQtWRGiYBlUnTBLwrEl8j Q9itN7Uaf7VTfUBEyFt2EBPm08yCJU89r2MFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rVSfcXe9WWXjLrLARI/pyU+RQDwEOdpsL7RyJEXwp7R77OORLmhE45PxeWVgqRjGGj zulqtfphYUZ9qrCKlIHzBCLkgRMI+Jn5wla8wByKJ2ZwnUjd4tnlOeYFKt3qdywd2JyT j35fjEYAM3SCmOIt2ExlqIGR7L60lBBJBnLx0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.212 with SMTP id x62mr1499339web.79.1253040535722; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:48:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909152033.47824.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <200909152033.47824.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:48:55 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Mel Flynn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: krootimage crashed at KDE 3.5 startup on signal 11 (7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:48:57 -0000 Yes, I remember I had an error when I ran "pkgdb -F" due to 2 different versions of jpeg... here is the output: $ ldd -a /usr/local/bin/krootimage /usr/local/bin/krootimage: libkio.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkio.so.6 (0x80064f000) libkdeui.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdeui.so.6 (0x800b35000) libkdesu.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdesu.so.6 (0x800fef000) libkwalletclient.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libkwalletclient.so.1 (0x801108000) libkdecore.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdecore.so.6 (0x80121b000) libDCOP.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6 (0x8015c1000) libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x8016fb000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x80180a000) libidn.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16 (0x801921000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libkdefx.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6 (0x801d56000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libfam.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libfam.so.0 (0x803465000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x803ad4000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libkio.so.6: libkdeui.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdeui.so.6 (0x800b35000) libkdesu.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdesu.so.6 (0x800fef000) libkwalletclient.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libkwalletclient.so.1 (0x801108000) libkdecore.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdecore.so.6 (0x80121b000) libDCOP.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6 (0x8015c1000) libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x8016fb000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x80180a000) libidn.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16 (0x801921000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libkdefx.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6 (0x801d56000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libfam.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libfam.so.0 (0x803465000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /usr/local/lib/libkdeui.so.6: libkdecore.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdecore.so.6 (0x80121b000) libDCOP.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6 (0x8015c1000) libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x8016fb000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x80180a000) libidn.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16 (0x801921000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libkdefx.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6 (0x801d56000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /usr/local/lib/libkdesu.so.6: libkdecore.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdecore.so.6 (0x80121b000) libDCOP.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6 (0x8015c1000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x80180a000) libidn.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16 (0x801921000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libkdefx.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6 (0x801d56000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x8016fb000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /usr/local/lib/libkwalletclient.so.1: libkdecore.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdecore.so.6 (0x80121b000) libDCOP.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6 (0x8015c1000) libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x8016fb000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x80180a000) libidn.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16 (0x801921000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libkdefx.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6 (0x801d56000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /usr/local/lib/libkdecore.so.6: libDCOP.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6 (0x8015c1000) libutil.so.7 => /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x8016fb000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x80180a000) libidn.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16 (0x801921000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libkdefx.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6 (0x801d56000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /usr/local/lib/libDCOP.so.6: libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /lib/libutil.so.7: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5: libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.16: libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x801a53000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8: libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x801b5c000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libkdefx.so.6: libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x801e81000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libjpeg.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10 (0x80356d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3: libaudio.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x803e10000) libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x803f27000) libmng.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x804086000) libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9 (0x8041e6000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x804307000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x804410000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x804518000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x804622000) libXft.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x804724000) libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x804837000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x8049b6000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x803ad4000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5: libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6: libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6: libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1: libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6: libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2: libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /lib/libz.so.4: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libfam.so.0: libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x803ad4000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.10: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /lib/libm.so.5: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /lib/libthr.so.3: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2: libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x803f27000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6: libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1: libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) liblcms.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x804ae5000) libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9 (0x8041e6000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6: libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2: libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x802f26000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803040000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803143000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x803248000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1: libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x804c19000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1: libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2: libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x8049b6000) libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x804837000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9: libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x804837000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x804d1e000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1: libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3: libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6: libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) 2009/9/15 Mel Flynn : > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 19:35:47 Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> Hi folks!!! >> >> For some reason im getting krootimage (the wallpaper manager of kde) >> crashing everytime when i login... >> Any ideas of how to fix that? > > Any chance you have two jpeg versions lying around? Please provide ldd -a > output of krootimage. > -- > Mel > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 18:51:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1D2106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658D58FC2A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821BD7E818 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:51:55 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:51:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:43 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 20:13:17 Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:18:29 -0400 > > Bill Moran wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:03:50 -0400 > > > > Jerry wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:31 -0400 > > > > > > Bill Moran wrote: > > > > In response to Jerry : > > > > > I usually discover security problems with updates I receive from > > > > > . Aren't FreeBSD security problems > > > > > reported to their site? If not, why? IMHO, keeping users in the > > > > > dark to known security problems is not a serviceable protocol. > > > > > > > > Because releasing security advisories before there is a fix > > > > available is not responsible use of the information, and (as is > > > > being discussed) the fix is still in the works. > > > > > > I disagree. If I have a medical problem, or what ever, I expect to > > > be informed of it. The fact that there is no known cure, fix, etc. > > > is immaterial, if in fact not grossly negligent. > > > > This is a stupid and non-relevant comparison. A better comparison > > would be if I realized that you'd left your car door unlocked in a > > less than safe neighborhood. Would you rather I told you discreetly, > > or just started shouting it out loud to the neighborhood? Wait, I > > know the answer, if I see _your_ car unlocked, I'll just start > > shouting. > > The fact is, that you do in fact notify me. Keeping important security > information secret benefits no one, except for possibly those > responsible for the problem to begin with who do not want the > knowledge of the problem to become public. A multitude of software, > such as Mozilla, publish known security holes in their software. > The ramifications of allowing a user to actively use a piece of > software when a known bug/exploit/etc. exists within it is grossly > negligent. Please inform yourself properly before assuming you're right. Mozilla does not by default publish vulnerabilities before a fix is known. In some cases publishing has been delayed by months. The exception is when exploits are already in the wild and a work around is available, while a real fix will take more work. This is also why vulnerabilities are typically not disclosed till a fix is known, because it does not protect the typical user, but puts him in harms way, which is exactly what you don't want. In theory, if I know the details of this particular exploit, I can patch my 6.4 machines myself, but more realistically, if developers take all this time to come up with a solution that doesn't break functionality the chances that I and more casual users can do this are slim. Meanwhile, the exploit will be coded into the usual rootkits and internet scanners and casualties will be made. That doesn't help anyone. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 18:55:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E71106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from smtp2.tls.net (smtp2.tls.net [65.124.104.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EF78FC22 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33924 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 18:28:54 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.3 ppid: 33884, pid: 33921, t: 0.1555s scanners: attach: 1.2.3 spam: 3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on smtp-2.tls.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from 64-184-8-63.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.1.46?) (ldg@tls.net@64.184.8.63) by ssl-smtp2.tls.net with ESMTPA; 15 Sep 2009 18:28:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4AAFDCD5.1010106@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:28:37 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090914214642.GA12828@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200909150122.43566.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915071826.a273c4fa.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915104912.1cac505a@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090915111331.4fdfa964.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915130350.226fcf65@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:55:36 -0000 Jerry wrote: > Now, if you don't like that, "KISS MY ASS". I love IT mail lists! Sooooooooo classy. DAve -- "Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." John Quincy Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:01:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DBD1065694 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37D88FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so2888679fxm.43 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KcZ+EKopiR6OoJuxHfV8IsxT78G5H7Xko+tyEc3wiG0=; b=O6go+4/tm2VToc3Hfwj7UHBxGjujn7nRxLm+veqRq8+sxsj0SJfv96fUbigRHUS9qQ L/FihyhunG3LIYuJP2jODHr1QvkLeDtKRnIclE30kA+2kJZc/oV6xFdfqHcV2hlRsggQ r5lllw7rvnLAAfm4XDyHEmlH0xp3ws381Gu88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=c3Eo/EznkIQNBKhLG7NQWlh3FVY408LCvWr7Q/kZpstuSiv9YyCu7BoJXkEd6YnFIN uuhNBeNsuIAaiC65M7qRiv6ZoA+IQdaXfqdl8hWb+QrmpZzWGPRUk6EB1M7i11a+GMl5 DdJp4YhrtB2Mx6/XrbnAbuiVjX0QSZ3Hf+S1A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.80.14 with SMTP id d14mr3409200mub.73.1253041290604; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <539c60b90909151045hf36d069n2607cb7b20568bbe@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90909151045hf36d069n2607cb7b20568bbe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:30 +0000 Message-ID: <3a142e750909151201j67246318pdcdbf985cb7057bb@mail.gmail.com> From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: Steve Franks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: looking for motherboard with 7.2 proven suspend/resume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:32 -0000 On 9/15/09, Steve Franks wrote: > S3 is a key feature for me for my desktops. I have gone thru probably > 5 mobo's and 5 laptops in my time as a FBSD user, the only one which > ever S3'd was a compaq of all things (well, lots of them will S3 if > you kldunload usb, but they crash/hang/etc on resume generally). > > Anyway, it's time for a new system, and as long as I can shove a > somewhat modern dual core in it, my second most critical criteria for > purchase is that S3 works with FreeBSD with a minimum of or at least > well described hacking. Resume doesnt work on i386 SMP, on amd64 it should work (at least it worked on Intel T5500 last time I tried). -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:09:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF6B106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49AF8FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32EC7E818; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:09:32 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:09:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <200909152033.47824.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909152109.17764.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Jeronimo Calvo Subject: Re: krootimage crashed at KDE 3.5 startup on signal 11 (7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:09:21 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 20:48:55 Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > Yes, I remember I had an error when I ran "pkgdb -F" due to 2 > different versions of jpeg... > > here is the output: > > $ ldd -a /usr/local/bin/krootimage ... > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3: > libaudio.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x803e10000) > libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x803f27000) > libmng.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x804086000) > libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9 > (0x8041e6000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) > libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) > libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x804307000) > libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) > libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x804410000) > libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x804518000) > libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x804622000) > libXft.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x804724000) > libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x804837000) > libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > (0x8049b6000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) > libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x803ad4000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) > /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1: > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) > libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) > liblcms.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x804ae5000) > libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9 > (0x8041e6000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9: Those are the two culprits. Forcibly (portupgrade/portmaster -f) reinstall x11-toolkits/qt33 and graphics/libmng and make sure it's done from source, not from local packages. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:14:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AEB1065676 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D18518FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48570 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 19:14:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AgMGnxWrCDCEmJeOGUv55XfdM9k0Mcgp/MCNjGNxBaQPG6b1VTWpFqre348ai6SQSL46y6FtTaYq0stlBn3bOEWotNbKo/g3ZWmkGpTtLil9qEYxUMmbPQWZaJRvgllVfEF3mHlxQHOhLOxkXZw4j67NGw0UxqnBB2FI2XBrbq4= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 12:14:26 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: 2sFy7OkVM1nDzrCBS.xhqv8d3kSrXylLR_01inwn4k2Rr6X75eur7Kw4dvkbLSQCEUbFiEDluuZ5aQix_PiCTIZ6AUFXA0Bwwaii7KcdrVdLfITGC85_du8HgJ0c3LuHse4OCIlq6MBhxyWA9wiqFSo7xK6k_QPSVHuV07CCsfJrRsIriRkI_orlZU.0SQjLGkarYVrGzfU2ypvkI8CeGcmyYbzVtJE01XbAMzIEGCJufwRLB72Rck69CMfR81lcUXNqtDYFZX9y0oWkqmKmynCZl4c2dqAYrZ5hc_ViGremV2m5W2bvcTvwhG7zF92kp4AH2qyccM9CdLsM69n00pRVhirLVNwcqZjjDErk_EuOHNfL5YehSW89JO0- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D14822280B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:14:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:14:25 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:14:27 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:51:40 +0200 Mel Flynn wrote: > Please inform yourself properly before assuming you're right. Mozilla > does not by default publish vulnerabilities before a fix is known. In > some cases publishing has been delayed by months. The exception is > when exploits are already in the wild and a work around is available, > while a real fix will take more work. > > This is also why vulnerabilities are typically not disclosed till a > fix is known, because it does not protect the typical user, but puts > him in harms way, which is exactly what you don't want. > > In theory, if I know the details of this particular exploit, I can > patch my 6.4 machines myself, but more realistically, if developers > take all this time to come up with a solution that doesn't break > functionality the chances that I and more casual users can do this > are slim. Meanwhile, the exploit will be coded into the usual > rootkits and internet scanners and casualties will be made. That > doesn't help anyone. Assume that I have discovered a vulnerability in a widely used, or even marginal for arguments sake, program. I now start to exploit that vulnerability. Now assume that you are responsible for maintaining, that program. Use any job description that suits you for this purpose. Are you claiming that since it may take several months to fix, it is better to let users be exploited rather than inform them that there is an exploitable problem in said software? I fine that extremely disturbing. As you can no doubt tell, I am not a believer in the "Ignorance is bliss" theory. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com In the days of old, When Knights were bold, And women were too cautious; Oh, those gallant days, When women were women, And men were really obnoxious. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:23:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D641F106568B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639B58FC1C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4391789ewy.36 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:23:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TRxR0KWqVs42vfjWM9F5/p17C4QHuuNhd9RybEbpCRs=; b=dL+ggEwNmTX32yXq2pgPB1PvR1m+hoiAP0o9FKrcAbhrVjiUqJvTzwdeivyuQ26pon HdqjoZ2LfzVKP+QDt7wtDZQSDKf+DsLNsHtkTTnAeVPGSrVTGZTfmiQtAjXvirYtdcQz Ep57dxxKBenLjbGcsjuBt3J9urB8K84QBLDcE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XD/wRzcjNa28BemRQoO9fXjxYEhyHuerV4xIrbraC1OQ2MwHLnNZPMuIdQU+OJyMKa ahyYqW4EI1C7wZPjd7+h0gtSBabm+t32GopM8t32hSaZWJTxnQOBk3sXN3LNpnDp1Oeo jdjwbtLbYRWu1XxqWzhlqMm9PgfHgtH35NdPI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.48.139 with SMTP id v11mr1417029web.169.1253042620373; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:23:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909152109.17764.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <200909152033.47824.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <200909152109.17764.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:23:40 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Mel Flynn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: krootimage crashed at KDE 3.5 startup on signal 11 (7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:23:42 -0000 done and fixed!! thanks a lot!! btw, that was caused then to a portupgrade -f?? there is any additional steps, to solve any future errors caused by that as well?? Cheers! 2009/9/15 Mel Flynn : > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 20:48:55 Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> Yes, I remember I had an error when I ran "pkgdb -F" due to 2 >> different versions of jpeg... >> >> here is the output: >> >> $ ldd -a /usr/local/bin/krootimage > > ... > >> /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3: >> libaudio.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x803e10000) >> libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x803f27000) >> libmng.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x804086000) >> libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9 >> (0x8041e6000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x802796000) >> libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) >> libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x804307000) >> libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x802bef000) >> libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x804410000) >> libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x804518000) >> libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x804622000) >> libXft.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x804724000) >> libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x804837000) >> libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 >> (0x8049b6000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8028bc000) >> libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x802cf8000) >> libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x8029cd000) >> libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x802ad5000) >> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8036a1000) >> libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) >> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8039c7000) >> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x803ad4000) >> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) > >> /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1: >> libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8038ad000) >> libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x803351000) >> liblcms.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x804ae5000) >> libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9 >> (0x8041e6000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x803bec000) >> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libjpeg.so.9: > > Those are the two culprits. Forcibly (portupgrade/portmaster -f) reinstall > x11-toolkits/qt33 and graphics/libmng and make sure it's done from source, not > from local packages. > -- > Mel > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:29:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24944106568D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from smtp2.tls.net (smtp2.tls.net [65.124.104.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24478FC25 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41342 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 19:29:17 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.3 ppid: 41317, pid: 41339, t: 0.2121s scanners: attach: 1.2.3 spam: 3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on smtp-2.tls.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from 64-184-8-63.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.1.46?) (ldg@tls.net@64.184.8.63) by ssl-smtp2.tls.net with ESMTPA; 15 Sep 2009 19:29:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4AAFEAFB.9030603@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:28:59 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:29:18 -0000 Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:51:40 +0200 > Mel Flynn wrote: > >> Please inform yourself properly before assuming you're right. Mozilla >> does not by default publish vulnerabilities before a fix is known. In >> some cases publishing has been delayed by months. The exception is >> when exploits are already in the wild and a work around is available, >> while a real fix will take more work. >> >> This is also why vulnerabilities are typically not disclosed till a >> fix is known, because it does not protect the typical user, but puts >> him in harms way, which is exactly what you don't want. >> >> In theory, if I know the details of this particular exploit, I can >> patch my 6.4 machines myself, but more realistically, if developers >> take all this time to come up with a solution that doesn't break >> functionality the chances that I and more casual users can do this >> are slim. Meanwhile, the exploit will be coded into the usual >> rootkits and internet scanners and casualties will be made. That >> doesn't help anyone. > > Assume that I have discovered a vulnerability in a widely used, or even > marginal for arguments sake, program. I now start to exploit that > vulnerability. Now assume that you are responsible for maintaining, > that program. Use any job description that suits you for this purpose. > Are you claiming that since it may take several months to fix, it is > better to let users be exploited rather than inform them that there is > an exploitable problem in said software? I fine that extremely > disturbing. > > As you can no doubt tell, I am not a believer in the "Ignorance is > bliss" theory. > I believe the point that others are trying to make is this. Your example requires that the exploit is known to the blackhats and in use currently. Their example assumes that exploit is only known to those who discovered it. This particular exploit is not believed to be known to the black hats, and not known to be in use currently. Is it better for an exploit to remain a secret and not is use, protecting those that may not get their systems patched in time (as the blackhats *will* most certainly put the exploit to use as soon as they are told about it). Or, let the exploit remain a secret until it is either fixed and a patch made available or discovered in use by blackhats. I think you are both right. If the exploit is not being used, keep it a secret and let the developers design a permanent fix. If the exploit is discovered publicly before the fix is out, warn everyone loudly and provide a workaround. I believe all software I am aware of handles exploits with that method. DAve -- "Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." John Quincy Adams http://appleseedinfo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:39:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4771065781 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE128FC18 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302F27E818 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:40:05 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:39:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909152139.50403.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:39:53 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 21:14:25 Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:51:40 +0200 > > Mel Flynn wrote: > > The exception is > > when exploits are already in the wild and a work around is available, > > while a real fix will take more work. > Assume that I have discovered a vulnerability in a widely used, or even > marginal for arguments sake, program. I now start to exploit that > vulnerability. Now assume that you are responsible for maintaining, > that program. Use any job description that suits you for this purpose. > Are you claiming that since it may take several months to fix, it is > better to let users be exploited rather than inform them that there is > an exploitable problem in said software? I fine that extremely > disturbing. Then I suggest you cancel your internet account(s). Also, it helps to read what people are writing. But for the corner case where you are the person reporting me this vulnerability, telling me you won't exploit it, then do it anyway, there is no guard in place, other then that sooner or later, you'll compromise a machine administered by someone able to retrace what happened and it'll come back to me and I'd move up the timetable, cook up a work around and publish the details. There is some level of trust between reporter and fixer, whether it be good or bad, it's simply a fact of life and not likely to change. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 19:54:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB8E1065672 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-out1.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-OUT1.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012248FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:54:41 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,391,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="282784336" Received: from zivmaildisp2.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER05.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.143]) by zivm-relay1.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2009 21:54:39 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER05.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id C11071B07E5; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:54:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: Roland Smith , "illoai@gmail.com" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090914225109.GB77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where to put `startx` serverargs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:54:42 -0000 Roland Smith schrieb am 2009-09-15: > You can put them in /usr/local/lib/X11/xinit/xserverrc, together with > the X > server. > Roland thx. could you tell me what exactly i need to put in that file? because i already tried adding `startx -- -nolisten inet6` to ~/.serverrc and that didn't work. cheers. alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 20:06:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4B9106568B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9A88FC1A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE777E818; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:06:41 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:06:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <200909152109.17764.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909152206.26141.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Jeronimo Calvo Subject: Re: krootimage crashed at KDE 3.5 startup on signal 11 (7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:06:29 -0000 On Tuesday 15 September 2009 21:23:40 Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > done and fixed!! thanks a lot!! Good, and you're very welcome. > btw, that was caused then to a portupgrade -f?? there is any > additional steps, to solve any future errors caused by that as well?? Though the initial instructions about the jpeg upgrade were questionable at best, the current description is accurate and will resolve any future problems. You can of course reduce the amount of work by figuring out which ports still link with libjpeg.so.9, using ldd on /usr/local/bin/* and /usr/local/sbin/*, grep and pkg_info -W. pkg_updating -d 20090719 jpeg will show the UPDATING entry. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 20:37:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B781D1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55D068FC17 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75057 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 20:37:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZvnW3F4OQFHT6CTcnqO5czim24aazqHObK15AzfYij32+4uZyGomsNSRdie4RNJLD4LwZn2RwGa0ScWVXXSLJHdtBNH2N8kmoRPt88THOSfwdxUax+qXXRcSNyxiulT2bhGzZn/so48ZoUzw4VhEP5P13q61IGZy4dhBGXx0xa0= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 13:37:12 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: y1t7deUVM1nn6MEE_3ZuXFzczKN7WBilk8IulpcDDEXgm44tWf24VntcrVOSMgHZa0X57mI.MSNUty3TU3diaG05E2LvWhtqYLE0xAMXUYhI3m667Vt5isxPxnr0InuQ6L.beAD00TsISNlsdoLPDop15QxcJyqLsBPU86TLiBW_04YGDMtxokki9uufyhOngGlEsGUCqLNGlpkv4RWE69wNPDggSCBvEXF509PybDx3UFUGB0yAhktQpfPs8xO9OaoZjF1DcG78BNHuTT.IGcXFObKRSrHv6eYCBZzmqkDwFRRns7Br6boHcLSIYYiWkGWEria.Qkk8Sty6yushc6LsQYs_feRA0qY4Qt9OQaYwFSpXiY6rxuzKHA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4BCE22849 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:37:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:37:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090915163711.406257a6@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4AAFEAFB.9030603@pixelhammer.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4AAFEAFB.9030603@pixelhammer.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEX+/v7++v6YOTrq8PCcuIX989UvOSj++v0BNCbpAAAAB3RJTUUHsQwfFzs7RBhzUQAAAhJJREFUOI1dU8GOqzAMNKIoV1bvwD1i0ysqrHplIdBrVSX7ATSbd03VVvn9tQNtQy0hjAdn7LED4AAcPtWm9RV+MPSfxhBLx9ajd6X/ngB6/mTwnRSZua7i7Ca+0ctZKo4Qmz+JY13X6I3nFZBxIYW1PbgfQ5RP8g0XlltEWGf3cV03joYpRnFbvYDKbXjZlXyyhEZA4lI+cN3NaVXE4VKjSwTExO10eTEkkJVqIAD5z0nUBQJluQDRSQjcrBiHAJxZlAH5CUMBMC7OcJ4LMQNnxhZ1HYPscMc6J4UlWRMNwzOpCcAHKSICd1EDn83abdREIbXsHkD1OinP1aCUCOEVRaa1lMcvywUWdYgk13JQUpYNKmvXQ8Kw5ML9YI5h8SakctBc7E/IYuLhYd/zZIk+1gM1vNweQBvHE0j+oYah3sMqAytQYlZk6+ANaaawJdu3OFzYGMZ3iGpa3qMlq9ZH0VZTgrCtw/ngdYkEIIpSbP1bWQAdFdX9vocBdkH2qVjVmuMu3gI5rjs814EUdrCZgWlPaxZZ3RiLFUtr+ud0PXwp2dnQSNXgePt6AZpBj6UMJ7VQkzN4utVeaSW1Dhn/kblGrKeMvNGnzwX4zuEDarYz1KdPtR60Gul0Gued+515SJXhCsl+Tx/3kY/UDvicPll9mfu50t3tvQ/thZpJYgeuwdSKNJ6tCD98MCgoxLDaPxbwqqwPWaWiAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:37:13 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:28:59 -0400 DAve wrote: > Jerry wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:51:40 +0200 > > Mel Flynn wrote: > > > >> Please inform yourself properly before assuming you're right. > >> Mozilla does not by default publish vulnerabilities before a fix > >> is known. In some cases publishing has been delayed by months. The > >> exception is when exploits are already in the wild and a work > >> around is available, while a real fix will take more work. > >> > >> This is also why vulnerabilities are typically not disclosed till a > >> fix is known, because it does not protect the typical user, but > >> puts him in harms way, which is exactly what you don't want. > >> > >> In theory, if I know the details of this particular exploit, I can > >> patch my 6.4 machines myself, but more realistically, if developers > >> take all this time to come up with a solution that doesn't break > >> functionality the chances that I and more casual users can do this > >> are slim. Meanwhile, the exploit will be coded into the usual > >> rootkits and internet scanners and casualties will be made. That > >> doesn't help anyone. > > > > Assume that I have discovered a vulnerability in a widely used, or > > even marginal for arguments sake, program. I now start to exploit > > that vulnerability. Now assume that you are responsible for > > maintaining, that program. Use any job description that suits you > > for this purpose. Are you claiming that since it may take several > > months to fix, it is better to let users be exploited rather than > > inform them that there is an exploitable problem in said software? > > I fine that extremely disturbing. > > > > As you can no doubt tell, I am not a believer in the "Ignorance is > > bliss" theory. > > > > I believe the point that others are trying to make is this. Your > example requires that the exploit is known to the blackhats and in > use currently. Their example assumes that exploit is only known to > those who discovered it. > > This particular exploit is not believed to be known to the black > hats, and not known to be in use currently. > > Is it better for an exploit to remain a secret and not is use, > protecting those that may not get their systems patched in time (as > the blackhats *will* most certainly put the exploit to use as soon as > they are told about it). Or, let the exploit remain a secret until it > is either fixed and a patch made available or discovered in use by > blackhats. > > I think you are both right. If the exploit is not being used, keep it > a secret and let the developers design a permanent fix. If the > exploit is discovered publicly before the fix is out, warn everyone > loudly and provide a workaround. > > I believe all software I am aware of handles exploits with that > method. I am not aware of any infallible method of determining if an exploit is in use. By the time the exploit become common knowledge it is usually too late. Lacking same, I believe in the "For Warned is For Armed" policy. Waiting until someone is harmed is tantamount to being an accomplice to the act. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Never buy from a rich salesman. Goldenstern From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 20:40:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8CC1065679 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f189.google.com (mail-vw0-f189.google.com [209.85.212.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C7F8FC20 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws27 with SMTP id 27so2753592vws.3 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SbwqNqcAs5P3Rgq4pi7YYwD6+rLpe5Nd4uAvlUN0ZEM=; b=ffvKUTDbWT8bzagJUgDeSRvZ2hggvkkaRmCrmtWB53Ia+U35wQUSmeboFhdF1CXGlQ xii9x4v426fx60h3vf56bQzucAR/mnIyMlrtXKDmq6PsHUi3/0Z9A6dAQKWD0fUOJtRO 9hj1eJ2BV+MkMl70wyoHVlr6VR8nBmEhKsbQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lU7Y8ldOBFijH/kB2GGnbAm/xidVIDpH7sGNX9GTuEh8dw7W46LXxOsNVPL/Zow9p3 NVHWUk5D9LRZMwx5hK0lodyySoSB1R3qTM1ISPtagzlS5i88tb8bRdx4suIqFUSlY/uk BDGhcE1B83dlW2o4/XJs7byGKdfNhCNR2Mq3A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.19.199 with SMTP id c7mr10920508vcb.84.1253047227764; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:40:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3a142e750909151201j67246318pdcdbf985cb7057bb@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90909151045hf36d069n2607cb7b20568bbe@mail.gmail.com> <3a142e750909151201j67246318pdcdbf985cb7057bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:40:27 -0700 Message-ID: <539c60b90909151340qf0d9563h293ed0d8ee070ad8@mail.gmail.com> From: Steve Franks To: "Paul B. Mahol" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: looking for motherboard with 7.2 proven suspend/resume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:40:29 -0000 > On 9/15/09, Steve Franks wrote: >> S3 is a key feature for me for my desktops. I have gone thru probably >> 5 mobo's and 5 laptops in my time as a FBSD user, the only one which >> ever S3'd was a compaq of all things (well, lots of them will S3 if >> you kldunload usb, but they crash/hang/etc on resume generally). >> >> Anyway, it's time for a new system, and as long as I can shove a >> somewhat modern dual core in it, my second most critical criteria for >> purchase is that S3 works with FreeBSD with a minimum of or at least >> well described hacking. > > Resume doesnt work on i386 SMP, on amd64 it should work (at least it worked > on Intel T5500 last time I tried). So, no way to nix the second processor in rc.suspend, I take it? Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 22:16:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F321065672 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3378FC13 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8FMGbvm079462; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:16:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7480FBAAA; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:16:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:16:37 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Alexander Best Message-ID: <20090915221637.GA22432@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914225109.GB77585@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: "illoai@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where to put `startx` serverargs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:16:40 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:54:39PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: > Roland Smith schrieb am 2009-09-15: > > You can put them in /usr/local/lib/X11/xinit/xserverrc, together with > > the X > > server. >=20 > > Roland >=20 > thx. could you tell me what exactly i need to put in that file? because i > already tried adding `startx -- -nolisten inet6` to ~/.serverrc and that > didn't work. Read the startx(1) and xinit() manual pages closely. What you should put in= to the xserverrc is: -------- xerverrc -------- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/Xorg -nolisten inet6 -------- xerverrc -------- Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqwEkUACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWJwwCgpuAbI1uFL9m6clgoaodQ3Y29 8pcAn0cYxX4c2wS5k7khdKOQAxVxz454 =6AT6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 23:32:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD17106566B for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anti_spam256@yahoo.ca) Received: from web65504.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65504.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 073258FC16 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57076 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Sep 2009 23:32:27 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1253057547; bh=tEKFLQIUEGTJQDFeMz7gbB3Mg1Kcc+25fKyQMbK2Lkg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KIeew7sNHgjZfRKZ4hFDw1BNjydligQY4mVoDe8xBdeeqiLpzygyBM2JDEKnJ3OXyQuT4TqL5nXZpXm4gd1XGn8AxKrsbGvOkU8ZnRzpMGCHEfn0dEuMRgPqIUuCuA5fIEKKbwmpW7G9ljJFNHfRfjKIQKKkS+ZhLkbMDmzF384= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=389pxalopXO/9VoXlLGCZj7zzRAYJ4iHdh4+yVVoBFny5TU585RuvT8mS9bhWSaDYFedOAOIxkCKfsn8BLfyst1Ngmj3neYLPX3wFvY9ZUKCbtJgm+8O+MrcAJvaLemEue3wcD0I/tx5ep3C+QeVW0pSGHCAoTwGXBwGQ6sq1BM=; Message-ID: <397697.56713.qm@web65504.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: XVfPawwVM1k3fhXZYGd75VqxBguvEIv4ZofAx_dx5bJBxardE5OubEOy04cDhy81vEmIfxKGBXYqxWi4LOGeD61ABKqvz4AFyyUXT_yLeX0hsmkIU4tM_1Y6wWNmK8vyXqwdX22Kk__iSKGwY7RUyhYuo6r.S54WZ73jpyKvD.UeoGG.n58HRNToyvzXLFl0hCaX4zwtZkA8j68renndyXO6YuZOqblvRyYx2UGFzai.p52ui8vepeyNBhAstR_PAzsmgM5VHuWrQ_gTMUGpJUkH4KQXzIw61bH3ws4F8EXCW1cU85tlxaicQfln7kNi0Tn.u1BfeJEtKHZpTymQPY5QguRua.HqQrYZyBD5UCj8WVi9IH8- Received: from [208.99.137.71] by web65504.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:32:27 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:32:27 -0700 (PDT) From: James Phillips To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090915192353.08EFB1065696@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 276, Issue 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:32:29 -0000 =0A> =0A> Message: 15=0A> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:13:17 -0400=0A> From: J= erry =0A> Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment= about=0A> reported=0A> =A0=A0=A0 security bug in FreeBSD=0A> To: freebsd-q= uestions@freebsd.org=0A> Message-ID: <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibe= rcom.net>=0A> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII=0A> =0A> On Tue,= 15 Sep 2009 13:18:29 -0400=0A> Bill Moran =0A> w= rote:=0A> =0A=0A> =0A> The fact is, that you do in fact notify me. K= eeping=0A> important security=0A> information secret benefits no one, excep= t for possibly=0A> those=0A> responsible for the problem to begin with who = do not want=0A> the=0A> knowledge of the problem to become public. A multit= ude of=0A> software,=0A> such as Mozilla, publish known security holes in t= heir=0A> software.=0A> The ramifications of allowing a user to actively use= a=0A> piece of=0A> software when a known bug/exploit/etc. exists within it= is=0A> grossly=0A> negligent.=0A> =0A=0AThe important question is: known= by whom?=0AEvery reviewer brings their own bias and experience. The code h= as not been "proven correct," so there is not reason to assume that a Black= -hat will find the same bug/exploit. If there are more than about 3 unknown= exploits, they are more likely to find a different one.=0A=0AIMO, Mozilla = is a bad example. I've been bitten by (non-security) bugs going back to 1.5= or earlier. Disclosure: I still prefer Lynx.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A> =0A=0A= =0A __________________________________________________________________= =0AThe new Internet Explorer=AE 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Y= ahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplor= er/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 23:33:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4211065694 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-out2.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-OUT2.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2CF8FC16 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:33:02 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,392,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="223800974" Received: from zivmaildisp2.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.143]) by zivm-relay2.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2009 01:33:01 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id A89F21B0751; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:33:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: Roland Smith Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090915221637.GA22432@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "illoai@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where to put `startx` serverargs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:33:03 -0000 Roland Smith schrieb am 2009-09-16: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:54:39PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: > > Roland Smith schrieb am 2009-09-15: > > > You can put them in /usr/local/lib/X11/xinit/xserverrc, together > > > with > > > the X > > > server. > > > Roland > > thx. could you tell me what exactly i need to put in that file? > > because i > > already tried adding `startx -- -nolisten inet6` to ~/.serverrc and > > that > > didn't work. > Read the startx(1) and xinit() manual pages closely. What you should > put in to > the xserverrc is: > -------- xerverrc -------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/local/bin/Xorg -nolisten inet6 > -------- xerverrc -------- > Roland thx a bunch. that worked. imo the xorg guys should allow people to disable ipv6 support at compile time with a ./configure option. cheers. alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 00:37:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EE81065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sweetnavelorange@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743CB8FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4612410ewy.36 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:37:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y9cH/Y3z/0EuRPRPg8dJz4VdFuIVTCaLsu11lKShexs=; b=JeItBo0QgCzARoB1bU4RAQkmyhozmgMoEBhiNlTh6ZZGDNbegS9qalfdrg2T16Dhs4 Luz4I1FmJGO8/T1ptNFbR/P088FPhOkvW+Az7Vot6P8aIt/L5rPgzdTh9tGCIVp3dRkq dxS1gH/rzEVKC47J249tW/Og9oT6W9spvTFGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iZsKjbQ15F44egSpnK+YWNar6nDyaOnN9uJfrk2VWTwAUmBPF8ftS3rSlXMGjixBa5 zOQdEahggxIz4/r4qXevQlhRqnCC+SZPZLVHmLGP7KLeyTpPodpbdB7EYTTepNpQSYAi r/+PFiNj11gYFG/P7WbaHat+8yrkfyVfGl4aY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.131 with SMTP id y3mr2226796wee.9.1253060192218; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:16:32 +1200 Message-ID: From: James Butler To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Can't boot Marvel Sheevaplug from USB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:37:22 -0000 > Hi everyone, > > I'm also playing with a Sheevaplug and I'm running into the same problem > as reported =C2=A0by Rafal Jaworowski, but I think I have a clearer pictu= re > of what goes wrong. > > To recap, the kernel fails to mount the root filesystem because the > partition on the USB stick isn't recognized by the kernel: > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Mon Sep 14 19:57:10 CEST 2009 > -- blablabla -- > ugen0.1: at usbus0 > uhub0: on usbus= 0 > uhub0: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered > Root mount waiting for: usbus0 > ugen0.2: at usbus0 > umass0: 2> on usbus0 > umass0: =C2=A0SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks =3D 0x0000 > Root mount waiting for: usbus0 > umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > ROOT MOUNT ERROR: > > I think the problem is that the partition is detected only after the USB > bus has been scanned. If I configure a kernel to boot from the network > instead, it does recognize the USB device because of the additional > delay involved in booting from the network: > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #5: Mon Sep 14 20:45:30 CEST 2009 > -- blablabla -- > ugen0.1: at usbus0 > uhub0: on usbus= 0 > uhub0: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered > mge0: link state changed to UP > Received DHCP Offer packet on mge0 from 130.89.1.145 via 130.89.160.4 > (accepted) (no root path) > Received DHCP Offer packet on mge0 from 130.89.1.144 via 130.89.160.5 > (ignored) (no root path) > ugen0.2: at usbus0 > umass0: 2> on usbus0 > umass0: =C2=A0SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks =3D 0x0000 > umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Not ready to ready change, medium may have > changed > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. > CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Not ready to ready change, medium may have > changed > Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command > pass0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > pass0: < USB Flash Memory 1.00> Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device > pass0: Serial Number 0612140557130 > pass0: 40.000MB/s transfers > GEOM: new disk da0 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: < USB Flash Memory 1.00> Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: Serial Number 0612140557130 > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 962MB (1971200 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 962C) > > Of course with the kernel configured like this, the kernel wants to > mount the root filesystem from NFS and I can't break into the mountroot> > prompt! > > It seems that the kernel assumes that it only needs to wait for the USB > bus to finish scanning and then expects the root partition to be > available, but apparently partitions can be detected after that. > > Does anyone have a suggestion how to deal with this? Is there a way to > insert a delay before trying to mount root? (I tried setting SCSI_DELAY > to 5000 but this didn't seem to have any effect -- I didn't notice any > delay. Maybe this isn't supported for the ARM architecture?) > > Kind regards, > Maks Verver. > Sounds similar to: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D138798 Apparently Scott Long is working on a fix. -James Butler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 03:42:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4281B1065670 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steveb@eagle.ca) Received: from cohiba.eagle.ca (cohiba.eagle.ca [208.70.104.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24278FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9979 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2009 03:15:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steveb@eagle.ca@208.70.104.100) by cohiba.eagle.ca with ESMTPA; 16 Sep 2009 03:15:25 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:15:25 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "questions@freebsd.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090009080309040604060101" Cc: Subject: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:42:07 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090009080309040604060101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm looking potentially to try a different mail server setup. I'm requesting honest feedback from experienced mail ops. My minimum requirements: - IPv6 for all protocols - SPF - IMAP|POP3 must support SSL - SMTP AUTH - submit on 587 - MySQL backend for un/pw, vpopmail preferred, but not mandatory - Maildir storage preferred - easy (ie: well documented) integration with SA/clam - integration with maildrop .mailfiter preferred Right now I use a system wrapped around Qmail, and honestly, I just don't want to patch for IPv6 anymore. I've broken my personal system, so while I work on re-hacking everything, I thought I'd solicit some new ideas. I've been using the same email system pretty much across the board for seven years or so, so perhaps I should look at other options. Please cc me, as this addr isn't subscribed. I won't be receiving my list email from my backup mx until tomorrow, as it were ;) Steve --------------ms090009080309040604060101 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE2MDMxNTI1WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUx7OEJU+hq8Q+GgcmEo93vFIK QNcwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AEKoiWVjyrIWWW/TvMAf4TnC495AEFPfgNRLWme7iRyIdGBpUN/1kbsRc7IYcE0Y4lILogUS ZnfWu4ujGBiYe5q+wrmaCvn2KTElIf68tkk7oRAREdSX1V9jSPscVEzlIPHv4qsV/tPPVu02 WB2rXQVg4qBmsbCZAIJKDsupTur9Kt69VOODgtO6GcW5oqSeDpNPVpYWze+hulp4Rn6jjmJh XCu+Fyuxiem/ag6QYL8JADpq0+KijhKoCujHSDG94mGXT2EQyl7kF00XfPq5aKp2XUdKR8NV o2j7H2LGXTPcBm9QOaw+avB6HB/6ANw/ILnJka3h+dTeYVb/WTnMSS8AAAAAAAA= --------------ms090009080309040604060101-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 06:23:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF209106568F for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895948FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8G6NDMi081599; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:23:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8G6NDMi081599 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253082194; bh=EHhmp3A1eXforVpSWKXN9feuxsA1lWEKGp+7vxkrWQU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2016=20Sep=202009=2007:23:07=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Steve=20Bertrand=20|CC:=20"quest ions@freebsd.org"=20|Subject:=20Re:=20New=2 0mail=20server=20setup|References:=20<4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca>|I n-Reply-To:=20<4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200. 95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B= 0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary =3D"------------enig44C314D8E1BD246F5151C47A"; b=JXV11kkGrevw609gSJ1Fp7QwGVWatEkFnSi99JNxvAEUvnvaRSivaHJlm68DA/MNC dYfnnTGcYJHhGowWfrLfhgI0Y30i0vibwf/CelbKlhfyCpc5Wf9mpZ8KdKtnBzmG/V 0dSTnfN5KmovGrAEg5QqlFHd6CE+CYlouQySG8AI= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:23:07 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca> In-Reply-To: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig44C314D8E1BD246F5151C47A" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:23:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig44C314D8E1BD246F5151C47A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steve Bertrand wrote: > I'm looking potentially to try a different mail server setup. I'm > requesting honest feedback from experienced mail ops. >=20 > My minimum requirements: >=20 > - IPv6 for all protocols > - SPF > - IMAP|POP3 must support SSL > - SMTP AUTH > - submit on 587 > - MySQL backend for un/pw, vpopmail preferred, but not mandatory > - Maildir storage preferred > - easy (ie: well documented) integration with SA/clam > - integration with maildrop .mailfiter preferred >=20 > Right now I use a system wrapped around Qmail, and honestly, I just > don't want to patch for IPv6 anymore. >=20 > I've broken my personal system, so while I work on re-hacking > everything, I thought I'd solicit some new ideas. I've been using the > same email system pretty much across the board for seven years or so, s= o > perhaps I should look at other options. >=20 > Please cc me, as this addr isn't subscribed. I won't be receiving my > list email from my backup mx until tomorrow, as it were ;) For an MTA: postfix does everything you want, it's not too shabby speed w= ise and the config files are reasonably comprehensible. For an IMAP/POP3 server: dovecot has the required functionality and unles= s=20 you're dealing with thousands of user accounts it's probably a better alt= ernative for you than the nuclear option of cyrus-imapd. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig44C314D8E1BD246F5151C47A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqwhFEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyTgQCcDlOORD2VfNEprryqrHl/uWrG H3YAnilJsXuecQBBqexTewQV46qZp1au =kvc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig44C314D8E1BD246F5151C47A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 06:49:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AE1106568D for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376568FC13 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n8G6neZo066255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:49:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n8G6nenV066254 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA11601; Tue, 15 Sep 09 23:44:19 PDT Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:47:10 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4ab089ee.pco85GKJ5xtY03wv%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4AAFEAFB.9030603@pixelhammer.com> <20090915163711.406257a6@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090915163711.406257a6@scorpio.seibercom.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:49:42 -0000 Jerry wrote: > Waiting until someone is harmed is tantamount to being an > accomplice to the act. And providing details of a currently-undefendable vulnerability to a black hat who did not previously know about it, thereby enabling the black hat to perpetrate harm that would otherwise not have occurred, isn't? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 09:18:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98ABC106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from D.Forsyth@ru.ac.za) Received: from d.mail.ru.ac.za (d.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38C58FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.249]:50635) by d.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Mnqet-0003Xq-Q8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200 Received: from iwdf-5.iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.28]) by iwr.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Mnqet-000Cte-NI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200 From: "DA Forsyth" Organization: IWR To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4AB0C98F.394.AF4C0F7@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: d.mail.ru.ac.za (146.231.129.36) Subject: Re: portupgrade broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d.forsyth@ru.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:18:43 -0000 > Hiya all > > Something weird going on with portupgrade (and maybe ports in > general) here. Somewhere between last months upgrade and this month, > portupgrade has started to ignore ports that are reported by > portversion as needing upgrading. The result is I have to force each > one, one at a time. Big schlep. > > For example > > portversion -v | grep samba > samba-3.0.35,1 < needs updating (port has 3.0.36,1) > > > portupgrade -vr samba > ---> Session started at: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:18:47 +0200 > ** None has been installed or upgraded. > ---> Session ended at: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:18:47 +0200 (consumed > 00:00:00) I am still facing this issue. I have tried several ways of rebuilding the index and pkgdb but nothing is changing this behaviour. Doing a 'make index && pkgdb -fu' gets me a portversion list that shows nothing needs updating, which is clearly wrong when the cvsup just prior to it shows changes in ports I have installed. 'make fetchindex && pkgdb -fu' is more successful, showing all the ports I need to update correctly(?), however, portversion will still do this.... > portversion -v | grep png png-1.2.38 < needs updating (port has 1.2.40) > portupgrade -vrR png-1.2.38 ---> Session started at: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:11:50 +0200 [Gathering depends for graphics/png done] [Gathering depends for misc/mc ................................................ done] [Gathering depends for audio/sox ................................ done] [Gathering depends for x11-toolkits/pango ...................................................................... ............................... done] [Gathering depends for databases/rrdtool ............... done] [Gathering depends for sysutils/apcupsd ............. done] [Gathering depends for multimedia/mplayer .......... done] [Gathering depends for net-mgmt/mrtg .......... done] [Exclude up-to-date packages ...................................................................... ........ done] ** None has been installed or upgraded. ---> Session ended at: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:12:06 +0200 (consumed 00:00:16) I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one. How do I fix this? -- DA Fo rsyth Network Supervisor Principal Technical Officer -- Institute for Water Research http://www.ru.ac.za/institutes/iwr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 11:08:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35CA1065670 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47F0D8FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2447 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 11:08:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=C09Yq8V4gYPRPiy6YdLlcbstvqD6pU4lK0L2SnujyUIz1Co4+/iGLEty/z8k0cCrc+n2wxO7RYifSLEUualUTl8xVm+dytMrBNHA8UFfPGEzXijVBYM0MT+RnGW+lo+LMK1bGbJPlU3YxHXjfU6tYamSONvsQH1/fd92bhcc5SY= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 04:08:56 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: Fh6b6Q0VM1l8tlxAcIi22JkRjKH6mnlk6MX1L5oRYIdIkK9HVL6nvkcbeKpGcVDZl6kjEuexGVyKPJ8WHhQOeNgX8W1SaqwOv_IoZOqJqdnsqgaj_KiT4MaiCDuMvq6JQwv4ZgXfBbon3EZZZkRBdNFXjojenvoGutf8CKtz2FE6ecifLssHeMn4iyccHjkgkqbQpMo0ZSAFmawUWEF_ZTMPkzG4RDUYguXI.aql3ruqerDYXcatVm1mEDC6LQC1ik44D.3Zobt0ul6lj7U5hQPhLr4o2TRIQ4pdlDvpalIcmEN_t956TG6IIpvHIF9l4qMvoNynXnO9T.xrzCc4oLPKIuK13C_zjcmw X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5BB92280B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:08:50 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090916070850.213b1dfa@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4ab089ee.pco85GKJ5xtY03wv%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4AAFEAFB.9030603@pixelhammer.com> <20090915163711.406257a6@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4ab089ee.pco85GKJ5xtY03wv%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:58 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:47:10 -0700 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Jerry wrote: > > Waiting until someone is harmed is tantamount to being an > > accomplice to the act. > > And providing details of a currently-undefendable vulnerability > to a black hat who did not previously know about it, thereby > enabling the black hat to perpetrate harm that would otherwise > not have occurred, isn't? The simple act of publishing the fact that a know exploit exists for a given program compromises nothing. Example: WARN: The following program(s) have known exploits. PROGRAM: prog-name PROGRAM VERSION: 2.4 OS: FreeBSD-7.2+ EXPLOIT: Potential to render HD inaccessible PATCH: NONE AVAILABLE SUGGESTION: If prog-name is not imperative to system performance, remove it and consider using a similar product by another author. A simple solution that affords the end user the right to make an informed decision. I realize that governments, especially socialistic/fascists ones use the terms 'censorship' and 'secret' with the term 'For their own good' interchangeable. I would hate to see the open-source community, especially FBSD embracing that philosophy. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything. George Bernard Shaw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 11:16:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AF6106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E588FC0C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so1918454and.13 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:16:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yRg6osKlF6POPXrJC8mWtfOlHvU3jSDoFxW8A4WaIs=; b=jCbRAulFnSnOJP5vOgBeVy6nS7B31y0ze0Kux2k2gvCgUe/IaE1GHG6FbAXdi2kQ4u K3tzFKhBAsYVytT0o6sBY+LmQM8Ea15IPFudfShA28KUAJQhLDhiS+UYmTY3VneniuW+ NBurgfge5Tl7m7vOr8r/r8/jg5KFF6aRZUeos= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ftA1U4DmF1n7eYgas3crCJBFBX8B0taqR/f8lglGpSTyq79/BPp0xNS6wNfkvyrxGb u6VICnQkA8GfI7ydBc1vTUR0KSrp6/V+5PdDYis/KKDgxCCOhq1cBIihz+skyjuBFLyB fwtr/oH/3Vy73w1VzyMYy+rMqi3wzX0T7uGIQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.17.14 with SMTP id 14mr8860446anq.163.1253099784299; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:16:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090805081021.GA32513@marge.bs.l> References: <20090804112624.GB19171@marge.bs.l> <200908041850.24597.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090805081021.GA32513@marge.bs.l> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:16:24 +0000 Message-ID: From: Eitan Adler To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Moused crashes with Synaptics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:16:25 -0000 >> > =C2=A0 hw.psm.synaptics_support=3D"1" >> > =C2=A0 hw.psm.synaptics.vscroll_hor_area=3D1300 >> > Did this help your problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 11:27:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8AA1065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 827BB8FC30 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8494 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 11:27:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EWrXbQ84mJ0BqbDGFSLWuaEwMFjbykKTAebi1O0rZK2e99p51K/JltFFXX+iAq1HrKQ5mYFofhhKZzS5FzZ+zLlfcwwczxAul3Dt3on033rz7yqN3UC2J9BvmWsNJDRW+TWZTADns4qRNETPYQrKM1n3mQ49fmF/xm2v4/+Sd/0= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 04:27:50 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: yuNwSnUVM1lDN.8tMeSypI0Eb3vWVCdPLEc6uG6YN1Wqjgjo1CeuxsOSxKjWuH.E_6mcLkLmN7ogRH6si1Rw0NLc8q_4W__YsFXQ6EVUhfNOIORt3iauJ8t04TUVeGkYeLWo30VY4_dssM4HPZ5fHgAFDoYxQ9R_KWbk6b_8o0Jy8PMduX8IYJZOcRXss9w8P4RC69jvfJX9vbjrlzeWX.8xOQQqd27XUqnnVSisPqSZPD2He4RV3K.iznAAbNR_f50dzOWdF1Tbg6jzFygPp0FLiP9dFfDcceqaUeUZUxG9PL6LfMTay1cFLlHxAKzPCK9xhhthJC08wKKhJ2TZdtsSMZ9UNl1IHhvk X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B7262280B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:27:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:27:50 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090916072750.6ba23f0e@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4AB0C98F.394.AF4C0F7@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za> References: <4AB0C98F.394.AF4C0F7@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:27:52 -0000 On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200 "DA Forsyth" wrote: [snip] > I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has > not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one. > > How do I fix this? You could try the following; 1) Update your ports tree. 2) Remove: /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db 3) Run: /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Ffuv 4: Run: /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -fUu 4) Run: /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= Now run portupgrade as you normally do and see what transpires. If that still fails, install /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmanager Then run it as thus: portmanager -u -l -y -p I have had great success in getting updates completed successfully with portmanager when portupgrade and portmaster both crapped out. I would suggest that you consider deleting the contents of the /usr/ports/distfiles prior to running any of the above port utility programs. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com There is no comfort without pain; thus we define salvation through suffering. Cato From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 12:29:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2893D106566C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@bertram-scharpf.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB41E8FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bs.l (e180041086.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.41.86]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKv1o-1Mntd40Aue-0001NQ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:28:58 +0200 Received: from bsch by bs.l with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mntd3-0006c6-Ib for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:28:57 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:28:57 +0200 From: Bertram Scharpf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090916122857.GA25076@marge.bs.l> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090804112624.GB19171@marge.bs.l> <200908041850.24597.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090805081021.GA32513@marge.bs.l> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: Bertram Scharpf X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18jvMUmhFyncm1EUwkMn/OGizDBHNryCNMY0N5 Zj2I4vTxERcRQHHMXmh7dX3afi/M3vFNrT/MBdDy2G+19AmU1F FMaLdlsKmykHLE5Yz+fcTcrnrt9DWcT Subject: Re: Moused crashes with Synaptics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:29:00 -0000 Hi, Am Mittwoch, 16. Sep 2009, 11:16:24 +0000 schrieb Eitan Adler: > >> > =A0 hw.psm.synaptics_support=3D"1" > >> > =A0 hw.psm.synaptics.vscroll_hor_area=3D1300 > >> > > Did this help your problem? Arrgh. The problem was that I had hit Fn-F7 (deactivate touchpad). The really vicious thing was that every time I opened the psm0 device, it supplied 80-150 bytes before performing the deactivation. Bertram --=20 Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 13:34:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE831065693 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D22328FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6168 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2009 13:34:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 16 Sep 2009 13:34:22 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:34:51 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca> <4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010901000904060906070503" Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:34:51 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010901000904060906070503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matthew Seaman wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: >> My minimum requirements: >> >> - IPv6 for all protocols >> - SPF >> - IMAP|POP3 must support SSL >> - SMTP AUTH >> - submit on 587 >> - MySQL backend for un/pw, vpopmail preferred, but not mandatory >> - Maildir storage preferred >> - easy (ie: well documented) integration with SA/clam >> - integration with maildrop .mailfiter preferred > For an MTA: postfix does everything you want, it's not too shabby speed > wise > and the config files are reasonably comprehensible. > > For an IMAP/POP3 server: dovecot has the required functionality and > unless you're dealing with thousands of user accounts it's probably a > better alternative > for you than the nuclear option of cyrus-imapd. Ok, I'm back up and rolling again. Thanks Matthew, and the others who replied off-list for all of the feedback. One thing that I forgot to ask in my original post was that of clustering. In our production network, we have a cluster of perimeter MX's, and a similar setup for our submission boxes (it's been a couple of years since we've strictly enforced AUTH for all clients). What I don't have, and have always wondered about, is live redundancy for the IMAP/POP services. I know that this would be a challenge to some degree considering the high volume of data changes. Perhaps a carp(4) setup between a couple of MDA's, where when the primary is up, a constant rsync pushes the data to the backup. Or perhaps a combination of rsync for manual changes, and a method to have the primary write the emails to a local disk, and a network disk simultaneously? If anyone has a setup that has redundancy for their IMAP/POP services, and a method to keep the changing data relatively up-to-date, I'd love to hear about it. Cheers, Steve --------------ms010901000904060906070503 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE2MTMzNDUxWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU9DBUoF96Unaza82vq86MNtjc iPgwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AFSBYzly9whEVTbEnx12f9gzD4teS0r8N0bH5v6Av0lS2zEWUPWSXfp/HCVIj+ja6JY5MhT8 VTamBS2xP5hldVIJaZkQIvEGUNsHoLIUgQ2B5BR7nowTA5QPnn3VR2e7z+eG1mDtW9ufO2tW wV0TYcb9rq9LlJq139Xdmsf14BXk44eUL+2DdWcCK+UCF3iKJLXLD46htpQ6rkzFWb9YbJ5w lFvS70ZEaDdumYFrMYzUlcyaSr325+Iwf5AlGgjhZ4H0Yf6BHDKSQR57NPOid6aVa1GNXE5S RObX8rqamJVZ5Vmy5aFN/tIepPrcjYyj2x/L8mDa0ZgY5p7sPu6uQD8AAAAAAAA= --------------ms010901000904060906070503-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 13:38:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69B91065679 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdavtaker@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D28FC0C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1442670qwe.7 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=hsX1Ew9qnhpNNv4Z0rogx8SYXxZLye0nGOD83x9kK7M=; b=k7S+7CkNxa1YZM6AKsVH1VW3EhmKYjSCX8pk7tkZHvgajx3KCrWXiLw7OF+hqLGDLn IK4ehIbwYyLKl7UmiVyT7i6DtvhXGRB8NnjUZQ6TC6C9P5MfE2tE2TtppUtOz/D9k/F6 f/u2+KMkvd7rcO/Z+Ajo67bglSnkm8FTOLXvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HQoZzjNgM2hAgjT2OZegJ4uF5tA06X0Q83X4UN0wfB/6u9Sd7Lg6aukEsn4dIyaJa3 pBplCqPLxzZtLspouCiPNUg8aaHe8+fBUBAmia1ExMpHlgU6/Eab707NhyccMnJb7rQB S9Q1oyOo6+ZixrJx3qLFeknQhnToov1P6Zco8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.109.77 with SMTP id i13mr7255676qap.258.1253107832627; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:30:32 -0300 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sd=C3=A4vtaker?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Someone using eclipse PDT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:38:13 -0000 Hi, i was wondering if someone coud install the PDT for eclipse, i can successfull install eclipse from ports, but pdt is not a port and using the standard procedure installing elcipse packages from the update tool fails. Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 13:49:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863A41065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD868FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from significant-gravitas-shortfall.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8GDnZk4087508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:49:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8GDnZk4087508 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253108985; bh=o+bBfnF/b3jhiArLEbngV82Qh/IN+xLpvzrDar86lQQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2016=20Sep=202009=2014:49:28=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090824)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Steve=20Bertrand=20|CC:=20"ques tions@freebsd.org"=20|Subject:=20Re:=20New= 20mail=20server=20setup|References:=20<4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca>= 20<4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<4AB0E97B.4060606@ib ctech.ca>|In-Reply-To:=20<4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca>|X-Enigmail- Version:=200.95.7|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipa rt/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applicatio n/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigD2C71DFF63 5354C4A7387636"; b=W+K+eC2p+JQQKiSRWT62nkqa6yBPEJMp+Hc9NCzZJ1lecS6cfOp89hG0K9Waxg3Kt bXeLDcI8HntrZJ8x6njFyZ47M6yLmI4JMXafYN6iu/EFZl8GZBD2iKiFy5ATdqyLlZ zBHAcn3wCOX9PJBCtkNt4cYvTyEOf6bqkr1j4bYY= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4] claimed to be significant-gravitas-shortfall.thebunker.net Message-ID: <4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:49:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca> <4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD2C71DFF635354C4A7387636" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:49:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD2C71DFF635354C4A7387636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steve Bertrand wrote: > What I don't have, and have always wondered about, is live redundancy > for the IMAP/POP services. >=20 > I know that this would be a challenge to some degree considering the > high volume of data changes. >=20 > Perhaps a carp(4) setup between a couple of MDA's, where when the > primary is up, a constant rsync pushes the data to the backup. Or > perhaps a combination of rsync for manual changes, and a method to have= > the primary write the emails to a local disk, and a network disk > simultaneously? >=20 > If anyone has a setup that has redundancy for their IMAP/POP services, > and a method to keep the changing data relatively up-to-date, I'd love > to hear about it. Now, that is a different kettle of fish. This is a job for cyrus imap. I suggest googling for 'cyrus murder' -- this is almost, but not quite, a fully resilient mail store / IMAP system. Your mail store is divided into frontend IMAP protocol servers which handle user auth etc. and back-= end mail stores. The protocol layer servers are fully resilient and you can fail over a user session at will, but the mailstores don't quite get ther= e: mail is replicated across different stores, but actions modifying the mai= l store are not transactional across all the mail stores. Or in other words= , you can lose a small amount of data if one of the mail stores goes bang a= t precisely the wrong moment. Even so, it will do better at keeping multip= le copies of a mailstore in synch than any locally scripted rsync setup. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK --------------enigD2C71DFF635354C4A7387636 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqw7O4ACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+Vaq3QCeO7tofnQr5/B/zqMndEG7VUaT t74An1oHMysFJioBQJP9BqIAIYQCUloT =sxed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD2C71DFF635354C4A7387636-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 14:08:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40681065694 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12A5A8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20313 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2009 14:08:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 16 Sep 2009 14:08:30 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB0F17B.1030400@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:08:59 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca> <4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca> <4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060706010403010800020109" Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:08:58 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060706010403010800020109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matthew Seaman wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> If anyone has a setup that has redundancy for their IMAP/POP services, >> and a method to keep the changing data relatively up-to-date, I'd love >> to hear about it. > > Now, that is a different kettle of fish. This is a job for cyrus imap. > I suggest googling for 'cyrus murder' -- this is almost, but not quite, > a fully resilient mail store / IMAP system. Your mail store is divided > into frontend IMAP protocol servers which handle user auth etc. and back-end > mail stores. The protocol layer servers are fully resilient and you can > fail over a user session at will, but the mailstores don't quite get there: > mail is replicated across different stores, but actions modifying the mail > store are not transactional across all the mail stores. Or in other words, > you can lose a small amount of data if one of the mail stores goes bang at > precisely the wrong moment. Even so, it will do better at keeping multiple > copies of a mailstore in synch than any locally scripted rsync setup. This is *EXACTLY* what I was looking for! The possibility of loosing an extremely small amount of data far outweighs the possibility of a multi-hour outage where 3,000 users are receiving "can't reach the POP3 server" errors. Besides, our incoming SMTP gateway boxes cache all incoming email for 24 hours, and we can re-deliver any message to the back-end we wish during that window. I really try my best to design/implement all the systems I can like our networks... multiple paths and extremely quick convergence. Being able to take a box down to test/perform an upgrade, or during a failure without client impact is well worth any initial large learning curve imho. Thanks, Steve --------------ms060706010403010800020109 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE2MTQwODU5WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUir7fJOwtJTSZw/SsGTJQrH1A 1R4wUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AAC9bKSeG8jxEi8c2FMbkaCghcLG0mSq32AkGZz+iEMX1TcO55+/oGcjsEF+pWlF9j3mPeFn x/GXmIrXbaOj5nArNSRqmzIUG3HQOhb6uNBazwcFKaXSM2UBtWjeVzH0WQteLzCa8nLqA5jY 8wmArm6TjAtUpoypVVm4V7q9ix9Vq3CBenzTD+5DMzgwJPmNsNGy3KHkitej3pjkeF6iigQ0 SpO+f+Qvfcyg2f+VQqvJ7TJZ+Oso/3c71p8m9KTBM8WjAI8uk+QSL/sSWE0aH1C6xnF2VK+E KBarjkwPKyYeFB8buehDCda+OsE9+bBEZOBrHjnqbABbSbBlQBV7CFsAAAAAAAA= --------------ms060706010403010800020109-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 14:12:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A33C106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505e.appriver.com [98.129.35.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C278FC13 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:12:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.14 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht01.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: 111 112 113 114 118 119 130 215 X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.14] (HELO ht01.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 9392149 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:12:28 -0500 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.239]) by ht01.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.14]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:12:27 -0500 From: Peter Steele To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:12:25 -0500 Thread-Topic: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? Thread-Index: Aco217dBLt49gozSQd2CeuFpk3K/Zw== Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:12:29 -0000 I posted this on the -net list but didn't get any responses. I'm hoping a w= ider audience might help. We're using the lag driver to provide automatic failover in case of a netwo= rk outage. The default configuration looks like this: lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 options=3D19b ether 00:a0:d1:e3:58:26 inet 192.168.17.40 netmask 0xfffff000 broadcast 192.168.31.255 inet 192.168.22.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.22.255 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active laggproto failover laggport: nfe1 flags=3D0<> laggport: nfe0 flags=3D5 If nfe0 was to fail, we get an (almost) automatic failover to nfe1: lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 options=3D19b ether 00:a0:d1:e3:58:26 inet 192.168.17.40 netmask 0xfffff000 broadcast 192.168.31.255 inet 192.168.22.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.22.255 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active laggproto failover laggport: nfe1 flags=3D4 laggport: nfe0 flags=3D1 The problem we're having is when nfe0 comes online again, a failback occurs= making nfe0 active again. This causes a momentary network outage that we w= ant to prevent. Is there a way to configure the lagg device to stay with th= e currently active interface, even if the MASTER interface comes back onlin= e? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 14:23:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5FE1065776 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@superhero.nl) Received: from superhero.nl (wolverine.superhero.nl [77.73.16.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682818FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84595 invoked by uid 80); 16 Sep 2009 13:56:56 -0000 Received: from 85.119.21.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gelsemap) by webmail.superhero.nl with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:56:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:56:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\) - FreeBSD" To: "questions@freebsd.org" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.17 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:23:41 -0000 Hi list, I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image btw. Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before creating the image. Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? Rgds, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 14:46:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1609B106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phusion2k@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A998FC19 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1465305qwe.7 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=7bpYltLUflYzoRO1PoqReu41EOBtNrZnWHaBzjDOxzs=; b=Hb7wxvBbO6Nc040XCMQy1uksQjePihnH92ZOgxt2OgqsPI4Gy4zbInYGqerN45GlhS 9CNXLMAZMYr2ALUBSQ4wUE8GS0uhYd/KL+cBs7YEiW6yZiBUiM6d6emok3POsF2ZXzkK f/TEB7RtiurSzCDRvc66Ja6TUcpPOBWFcuuMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=clx4uO1RLHOp2cYC+PbnmvvecwqAy6JZ8fWadbUKo+ZgAKgCYMhl2C4Nbpw3qcvo1X EzccuVZZNZCtCLVkVFIouWB3soLJsBk0BObiTAckBFmbPtnMnXPoX3XWPDUVgPNDca0v yjYDlNVW1OVfp/sxvYzXRj6tDdPF3ONRcIvuU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.28.8 with SMTP id k8mr2689598qcc.78.1253107034461; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:17:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Phusion To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Help configuring sendmail to send only using authorization to smart host X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:46:13 -0000 I need some help configuring sendmail to send only using authorization to a smart host being the ISP's mail server. I'm running 7.2-RELEASE. I've looked over http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html but want to use the built-in sendmail. I've run the following command: sendmail -d0.1 -bv, but SASL isn't included. Also, I would rather uses packages. Please advise. Phusion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 15:27:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110EB106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=503da3aad=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu (ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99F48FC1D for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:27:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: RELAYLIST X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,398,1249275600"; d="scan'208";a="16789642" Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu ([129.110.20.110]) by ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2009 09:59:27 -0500 Received: from utd65257.utdallas.edu (utd65257.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A0244EF4A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:59:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:59:27 +0000 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <19BF38262156A790CFBB927F@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090916070850.213b1dfa@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915131829.0b0a0ab7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20090915141317.7a41b042@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909152051.40695.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090915151425.4b6ce6f2@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4AAFEAFB.9030603@pixelhammer.com> <20090915163711.406257a6@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4ab089ee.pco85GKJ5xtY03wv%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090916070850.213b1dfa@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) X-Munged-Reply-To: Figure it out MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:27:58 -0000 --On Wednesday, September 16, 2009 06:08:50 -0500 Jerry wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:47:10 -0700 > perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > >> Jerry wrote: >> > Waiting until someone is harmed is tantamount to being an >> > accomplice to the act. >> >> And providing details of a currently-undefendable vulnerability >> to a black hat who did not previously know about it, thereby >> enabling the black hat to perpetrate harm that would otherwise >> not have occurred, isn't? > > The simple act of publishing the fact that a know exploit exists for a > given program compromises nothing. Example: > > WARN: The following program(s) have known exploits. > > PROGRAM: prog-name > PROGRAM VERSION: 2.4 > OS: FreeBSD-7.2+ > EXPLOIT: Potential to render HD inaccessible > PATCH: NONE AVAILABLE > SUGGESTION: If prog-name is not imperative to system > performance, remove it and consider using a similar > product by another author. > > A simple solution that affords the end user the right to make an > informed decision. I realize that governments, especially > socialistic/fascists ones use the terms 'censorship' and 'secret' with > the term 'For their own good' interchangeable. I would hate to see the > open-source community, especially FBSD embracing that philosophy. > Are you really serious? What you posted (your example) does absolutely no good for the average user. What are you going to do? Stop using the program? And how can you possibly make an "informed decision" when you know nothing other than the fact that something is wrong? OTOH, it's all an attacker needs to start digging around and successfully break in. Think about this. A guy wants to find a pot of gold. He goes to a field and finds 12,000 pots. Where does he start? Along comes someone who believes in "freedom of speech" and says, "Well, I don't know where the gold is, but that pot over there is a good place to look. I happen to know that it was put there recently and there was a lot of secrecy surrounding it." Or an attacker approaches a seemingly impenetrable castle, trying to figure out how to defeat the army inside. He knows he's going to have probe every area and lose many men in the process in order to find a weakness he can exploit. Then one soldier, believing in "freedom" sends them a message that there's a weakness on the north face of the wall. He doesn't tell them exactly where, but he's managed to focus their efforts on the area most likely to allow them to breach the wall and defeat the army inside, he's reduced the attacker's efforts by three fourths and reduced their losses as well. You clearly don't understand the advantage that hackers have over the average user. Rather than censorship, how the FreeBSD team handles issues like this is good stewardship. They have a responsibility to the community to protect them. They do that by not irresponsibly trumpeting known weaknesses before a solution is available to the end users. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 16:32:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF0F106566C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-defer02.adhost.com (mail-defer02.adhost.com [216.211.128.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98AB8FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in03.adhost.com (mail-in03.adhost.com [10.212.3.13]) by mail-defer02.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0971388C1E for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:15:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (exchange.adhost.com [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in03.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5578E0481E; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:15:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:15:32 -0700 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCA07@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <4AB0F17B.1030400@ibctech.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: New mail server setup Thread-Index: Aco2101JOhj69HcOT+mi28FLUMuqVAAEVDFQ References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca><4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk><4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca><4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4AB0F17B.1030400@ibctech.ca> From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: "Steve Bertrand" , "Matthew Seaman" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:16 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:09 AM > To: Matthew Seaman > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: New mail server setup >=20 > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Steve Bertrand wrote: > > >=20 > >> If anyone has a setup that has redundancy for their IMAP/POP > services, > >> and a method to keep the changing data relatively up-to-date, I'd > love > >> to hear about it. > > > > Now, that is a different kettle of fish. This is a job for cyrus > imap. > > I suggest googling for 'cyrus murder' -- this is almost, but not > quite, > > a fully resilient mail store / IMAP system. Your mail store is > divided > > into frontend IMAP protocol servers which handle user auth etc. and > back-end > > mail stores. The protocol layer servers are fully resilient and you > can > > fail over a user session at will, but the mailstores don't quite get > there: > > mail is replicated across different stores, but actions modifying the > mail > > store are not transactional across all the mail stores. Or in other > words, > > you can lose a small amount of data if one of the mail stores goes > bang at > > precisely the wrong moment. Even so, it will do better at keeping > multiple > > copies of a mailstore in synch than any locally scripted rsync setup. >=20 > This is *EXACTLY* what I was looking for! >=20 > The possibility of loosing an extremely small amount of data far > outweighs the possibility of a multi-hour outage where 3,000 users are > receiving "can't reach the POP3 server" errors. >=20 > Besides, our incoming SMTP gateway boxes cache all incoming email for > 24 > hours, and we can re-deliver any message to the back-end we wish during > that window. >=20 > I really try my best to design/implement all the systems I can like our > networks... multiple paths and extremely quick convergence. Being able > to take a box down to test/perform an upgrade, or during a failure > without client impact is well worth any initial large learning curve > imho. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Steve Hello Steve: Another approach would be a cluster of Postfix servers and Dovecot servers behind PF load balancers. We have 3 "POP" servers (IMAP/POP), 9 Mail Servers, 2 Defer servers and 5 Filter servers that process over 20 million messages a day without a blip. We can take individual servers out of the pool for maintenance, etc. Everything is fed to a set of redundant NAS for the data storage and common configuration files. Regards, Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith@adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 16:45:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C618106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp174.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp174.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EE58FC19 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay27.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay27.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B236A1B4002 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:45:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay27.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 93C4B1B4053 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:45:33 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:45:29 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: Thread-Topic: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' Thread-Index: Aco27Rkd4ir2pTYmlkSF9KtptBG/2w== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:45:34 -0000 is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it '-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a config file? tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 17:35:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9A31065679 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0228FC18 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E187E818; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:36:05 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:35:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909161935.50758.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Tom Worster Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:35:53 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote: > is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a > daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? > > for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it > '-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a config file? You don't. Defaults are set in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, overridden in /etc/rc.conf. Unless you add the logic yourself in /etc/rc.conf, the environment is not looked at. So this means a one-time edit of /etc/rc.conf: if test -n "${SSHD_FLAGS}"; then sshd_flags="${SSHD_FLAGS}" else sshd_flags="${sshd_flags}" fi Then start with SSHD_FLAGS="-o X11Forwarding=no" /etc/rc.d/sshd start But this is specific for sshd, as it supports _flags. There's no generic way to do this. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 17:41:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2224106566C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471B8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC657E818; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:41:19 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:41:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909161941.04441.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Peter Steele Subject: Re: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:09 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 16:12:25 Peter Steele wrote: > The problem we're having is when nfe0 comes online again, a failback occurs > making nfe0 active again. This causes a momentary network outage that we > want to prevent. Is there a way to configure the lagg device to stay with > the currently active interface, even if the MASTER interface comes back > online? Not really, unless you manually change master. However I believe this also causes a slight or even bigger network outage. Any reason you're not using loadbalance algorithm, since it seems to suit you better? -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 18:11:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE0A1065676 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp184.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp184.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9403A8FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 18F48202DFE; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:11:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 76726202DCD; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:11:14 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:11:09 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: Mel Flynn , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' Thread-Index: Aco2+RDLGTks4frdN0qW9D2OWx31hA== In-Reply-To: <200909161935.50758.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:11:17 -0000 On 9/16/09 1:35 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote: >> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a >> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? >> >> for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it >> '-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a config file? > > You don't. Defaults are set in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, overridden in > /etc/rc.conf. Unless you add the logic yourself in /etc/rc.conf, the > environment is not looked at. > So this means a one-time edit of /etc/rc.conf: > if test -n "${SSHD_FLAGS}"; then > sshd_flags="${SSHD_FLAGS}" > else > sshd_flags="${sshd_flags}" > fi > > Then start with SSHD_FLAGS="-o X11Forwarding=no" /etc/rc.d/sshd start > > But this is specific for sshd, as it supports _flags. There's no generic way > to do this. thanks, Mel, that's good to know. i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy solution for me. tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 18:21:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA73106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057DF8FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id 6FEB7597D85; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:21:40 -0700 From: Chris Cowart To: Tom Worster Message-ID: <20090916182139.GJ37291@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Worster , Mel Flynn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200909161935.50758.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pP0ycGQONqsnqIMP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:21:41 -0000 --pP0ycGQONqsnqIMP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom Worster wrote: > thanks, Mel, that's good to know. >=20 > i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy > solution for me. You could also just put: sshd_flags=3D"-o X11Forwarding=3Dno" into your /etc/rc.conf file. Pretty much all of the rc.d scripts support the use of NAME_flags being defined in /etc/rc.conf, which are passed as extra commandline arguments to the daemon. You should generally check /etc/defaults/rc.conf to see what you might be clobbering. A small number of scripts may override this feature from the library, breaking this method, but it's pretty widely supported. --=20 Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley --pP0ycGQONqsnqIMP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAwAGBQJKsSyzAAoJEC8b9sM8ejXtAJ0P/2KY4mfn9X8nsBUkbMrb5MbL JskIcsEtMmcUtVlV75w68PSwwfAMAVEhDoRgrI0TlKd58LOhuaMaYYTYNN3Dd6/Q 3JtxYzmNB5Dqbzv0aZuz6/jr8TkGnMeI74t6FqTeBqa+esQvztTBLLkVTgka+eGV gvhqbFUWzgBTmHapb72rNEOCao1D2bUcrpSbhzqCgY2tE6EY7RTNNV4LOdFYrmDS 8JakGmSnmxZ8cQWGWOYFJXLZcPKTbgR3pULSFY1+H5gVwYPkCpyYFXvVaEPQDSJN /L1hfgllG9f4lrRjqKD9OxCjLiwV+G2FFMOGGr1e5FUcWrVgsUvQ8uxA5hY7CmF4 iYQINQgets1titfi6s0P7DZFbEsJY8WFJfZgsgHyMATNy1r6pndQ6am9qzXzh8w1 QY5fFyNfgPPB8N6peNXxRX0eznzT7qgeTh9j60gLaqDpdyfmoUDmQlhk9hS7UGag r9viNZibd+EKqdg2puhpjftkpIujxSc2Nwkn3QLyOX3DRjC7rJwZ/uUh0QzBrXGF 95a+8C6GOs9MxR7Thf2gFONh20Q7462LjQH+NzHwAY7N3roKyDEUlIIGPE4P+U4K e4Wwd1VI57sP3htuDe8n/+0H/e175LEncPngJ0mzrO11Jx/jJs5f+NGMkpVO8lIU ltTUcuk7BMo9/80cq//S =qMlk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pP0ycGQONqsnqIMP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 18:37:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF53B1065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCD88FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A84A7E818; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:37:42 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:37:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <200909161935.50758.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090916182139.GJ37291@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090916182139.GJ37291@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909162037.27752.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Tom Worster , Chris Cowart Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:37:31 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: > Tom Worster wrote: > > thanks, Mel, that's good to know. > > > > i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy > > solution for me. > > You could also just put: > > sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no" > > into your /etc/rc.conf file. What he wants is passing arguments without touching config files, which I find myself needing sometimes as well, on machines where static partitions are mounted read-only + kern.secure_level. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 18:58:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E21106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505b.appriver.com [98.129.35.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822F88FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.15 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht02.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: 111 112 113 114 118 119 130 215 X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.15] (HELO ht02.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 9463761 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:58:49 -0500 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.239]) by ht02.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.15]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:58:49 -0500 From: Peter Steele To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:58:45 -0500 Thread-Topic: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? Thread-Index: Aco29OpyNDMHofBNQ2SaJ76b+u8z0gACpQKg Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DDC4@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <200909161941.04441.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <200909161941.04441.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BaS1 BtGz CF9t CJlY CgEp C0Kr FTiV FpRi FrWA F4oU GFSX GnqS HxJd H/Xw JaY7 KZMv; 1; ZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAtAHEAdQBlAHMAdABpAG8AbgBzAEAAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {F92ECA85-A551-4C33-BEBC-07013AD1BFF9}; cABzAHQAZQBlAGwAZQBAAG0AYQB4AGkAcwBjAGEAbABlAC4AYwBvAG0A; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:58:45 GMT; UgBFADoAIABDAGEAbgAgAGwAYQBnAGcAMAAgAGYAYQBpAGwAYgBhAGMAawAgAGIAZQAgAHAAcgBlAHYAZQBuAHQAZQBkAD8A x-cr-puzzleid: {F92ECA85-A551-4C33-BEBC-07013AD1BFF9} acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:58:50 -0000 >Not really, unless you manually change master. However I believe this also= causes a slight or even bigger network outage. Any reason you're not using= loadbalance algorithm, since it seems to suit you better? Our resident network guru is quite opposed to using the loadbalancing optio= n since it comes with a lot of potentially undesirable baggage of its own..= . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 19:18:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63B5106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp174.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp174.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA508FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay17.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay17.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 25A361B408D; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay17.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id ED9821B4084; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:18:05 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:18:03 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: , Chris Cowart Message-ID: Thread-Topic: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' Thread-Index: Aco3AmlThv1aq1QNEUGoR2H9gSEjOw== In-Reply-To: <200909162037.27752.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:18:06 -0000 On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: >> Tom Worster wrote: >>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know. >>> >>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy >>> solution for me. >> >> You could also just put: >> >> sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no" >> >> into your /etc/rc.conf file. > > What he wants is passing arguments without touching config files, which I find > myself needing sometimes as well, on machines where static partitions are > mounted read-only + kern.secure_level. that's right. when i read in 11.7 of the handbook: "Since the rc.d system is primarily intended to start/stop services at system startup/shutdown time, ..." i thought: maybe i'm making things hard by trying to use rc.d scripts when i could just execute the daemon's binary. an advantage i imagined of using rc.d is it starts the service with the same config as at boot so i don't have to remember any config items that might not be in the daemons config files. maybe all config _should_ be in the daemon's config files but then i _might_ have been both lazy and forgetful. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 19:19:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7B51065670 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1706F8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8GJJq2M091948; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:19:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8GJJq2M091948 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253128793; bh=rT5+lNCL7osDqTVqkhAtjNtUQR7xoyV3atuvse+nyaY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB13A52.1010006@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2016=20Sep=202009=2020:19:46=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Tom=20Worster=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20 Mailing=20List=20|Subject:=20Re:=20 passing=20options=20thru=20'/etc/rc.d/foo=20start'|References:=20< C6D68E69.127BA%fsb@thefsb.org>|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart /signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applicatio n/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigF01D4822BC A9639B97F99FC6"; b=KZZr3Wu/AS7hsHdGKERLqzxjXFNK0/NGX1YDRnbvRgLsyYGoPRCGNU8dS/pxk7hzm XI+7yVqd3zmxUNqE/e1w29g68Z3bgIUhx/G0S/OxskG6xoNoMmovwWubOJuvajJiVD fmC4IFbegjN1py/C0Qn8BvrdEFXgS9xySj7tQIMk= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AB13A52.1010006@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:19:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Worster References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF01D4822BCA9639B97F99FC6" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:19:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF01D4822BCA9639B97F99FC6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom Worster wrote: > is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a= > daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define command= arguments by setting foo_flags=3D"-a -b -c". This is a convention, and p= articular services may use several more specific variables to build a command line or may simply ignore any flags variable completely, so you'll have to che= ck=20 each case individually. > for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it > '-o X11Forwarding=3Dno' without touching a config file? In this case, setting sshd_flags will work as sshd uses the default rc start function. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigF01D4822BCA9639B97F99FC6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqxOlgACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwwvwCeIkiIncP/KndGGWld6DgFb+e4 9Z0AmwZpbfz8H8fFSYsMajCP7EHb3EPa =hERx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF01D4822BCA9639B97F99FC6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 19:21:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F64106568B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artis.caune@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2768FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3529347bwz.43 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=e2biXIUps6iNbANLP+9THHLSKfqLnAyWnNL9buLbmC8=; b=ea1rFpv4CJRrWUAu2FgM2q5jWRb8ReGmUQOM71dsvdgihQvxM0FPuoqmGIbk+vWCEe AiePGmLfEnr/OpLYeljxX+uTx1yDQj9HmyFieoRYWB4fGPueqFK50KPIB1aITFE3o3St 0LGRnFE8tZ9cYy5FQMKWr0w5K/ozsfphTekZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=nahB5r2tDQ9ubuj9AAiCoJfXBbBDrZ+iutndki2vxL2iest/L0BhhF2eiGfuT0s5ro ibMRXzc5EqEmHIlq+QXSudPpgy542bWBlB+UZeBuEmcU5b15UBo3ybV69QgTiq2H8qHM ziJSMNhvt6Q37MuNTbKHBDjTDUUkAdcEaMq8g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.208 with SMTP id m16mr7714237bkd.47.1253128871673; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:21:11 +0300 Message-ID: <9e20d71e0909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com> From: Artis Caune To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: /tmp sticky bit differences on FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:21:13 -0000 Hi, can someone point me to what has changed in file creation modes in /tmp directory? # FreeBSD 6, 7: $ cd /tmp; id; touch testfile; mkdir testdir; ls -la uid=65534(nobody) gid=65534(nobody) groups=65534(nobody) drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody wheel 2 Sep 16 22:10 testdir -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody wheel 0 Sep 16 22:10 testfile # FreeBSD 8: $ cd /tmp; id; touch test; ls -la test uid=65534(nobody) gid=65534(nobody) groups=65534(nobody) drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nobody 2 Sep 16 22:12 testdir -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Sep 16 22:12 testfile On FreeBSD 6,7 files are created with wheel group, but on 8 - with `gid`. -- Artis Caune Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 19:31:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDDF1065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5623B8FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8GJV2o2092144; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:31:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8GJV2o2092144 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253129463; bh=9RhwHjH3EpizPNC86D8GWqs1ti7TtPJhN8mg6+KFhOg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2016=20Sep=202009=2020:30:56=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Artis=20Caune=20|CC:=20fre ebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20/tmp=20sticky=20bit=20 differences=20on=20FreeBSD=208|References:=20<9e20d71e0909161221i4 32edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<9e20d71e0 909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com>|X-Enigmail-Ver sion:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp- sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A= 20boundary=3D"------------enigFFAE4470291D72CFF50012A1"; b=JuVOGeAqH/J1gwy7JiKvgOtcBNkAApcE8HBd7qyAopwQqg//+tcNk63tq24z7pOaG ojVW3Xv6oH6RkfeiU6vi+8HcNGKTXTxuZuL35qChYbIzt/tinX0AHvLBc2xYapVpw0 QTTrPRrIT0LcLoF0nqYEHjJxSgPsFnMXNUc2fTeM= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:30:56 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artis Caune References: <9e20d71e0909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e20d71e0909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFFAE4470291D72CFF50012A1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /tmp sticky bit differences on FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:31:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFFAE4470291D72CFF50012A1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artis Caune wrote: > Hi, >=20 > can someone point me to what has changed in file creation modes in > /tmp directory? >=20 > # FreeBSD 6, 7: > $ cd /tmp; id; touch testfile; mkdir testdir; ls -la > uid=3D65534(nobody) gid=3D65534(nobody) groups=3D65534(nobody) > drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody wheel 2 Sep 16 22:10 testdir > -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody wheel 0 Sep 16 22:10 testfile >=20 >=20 > # FreeBSD 8: > $ cd /tmp; id; touch test; ls -la test > uid=3D65534(nobody) gid=3D65534(nobody) groups=3D65534(nobody) > drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nobody 2 Sep 16 22:12 testdir > -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Sep 16 22:12 testfile >=20 >=20 > On FreeBSD 6,7 files are created with wheel group, but on 8 - with `gid= `. It seems that ZFS uses SysV group semantics (new files get the 1ary group= of the user unless the directory is set to SGID). UFS filesystems on 8.x=20 still behave in the expected BSD way (new files get the same group as the= directory unless the user is not a member of that group, when they get th= e users' 1ary group). There's a thread 'ZFS Group ownership' on this topic in freebsd-hackers@= =2E.. at the moment. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigFFAE4470291D72CFF50012A1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqxPPYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwu8wCfXv4q6lIF4B748A86p9Qhh2zO BA4An3PYN9Kf+uH/yPRThfB7CR0R+fAR =NMGj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFFAE4470291D72CFF50012A1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 19:40:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADF21065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75578FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8GJecaD092294; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:40:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8GJecaD092294 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253130039; bh=AZggBF/yUY4XQ37S8P+dvjHRXP/sA+4kWHMV1edNHDI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB13F36.605@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Wed,= 2016=20Sep=202009=2020:40:38=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|U ser-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Version: =201.0|To:=20Artis=20Caune=20|CC:=20freebsd -questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20/tmp=20sticky=20bit=20diff erences=20on=20FreeBSD=208|References:=20<9e20d71e0909161221i432ed d65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com>=20<4AB13CF0.2060508@infracani nophile.co.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.c o.uk>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signe d=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp- signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigA9A6B9873C37E48B A3023ECE"; b=z4wH+CJUIOqRhPTU4HEYSgBpQ4l6Pmxmnfc+HETckwANKxK6PaPdw90ueiyCoFFh6 LCRc8gxgnQZiOZi2lRCNhXd66gy2mN4U/y1A+w8zTFkM6wSXlX0k805kSdj7/TRY4J AyX6dXnkZ6Nda9leAH6opjQvUvGmOkNSuPGfahqA= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AB13F36.605@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:40:38 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artis Caune References: <9e20d71e0909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com> <4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA9A6B9873C37E48BA3023ECE" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /tmp sticky bit differences on FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:40:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA9A6B9873C37E48BA3023ECE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matthew Seaman wrote: > still behave in the expected BSD way (new files get the same group as t= he > directory unless the user is not a member of that group, when they get = the > users' 1ary group). Errr... Correction. New files get the same group as the directory. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigA9A6B9873C37E48BA3023ECE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqxPzYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzmrACfd4fipCvhCAWeSHCNdaCOTqIF rCYAnRX4G+NtH0Slh1QYznL9JRdNxBoU =E3c0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA9A6B9873C37E48BA3023ECE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 19:42:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB523106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artis.caune@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F098FC1B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3541768bwz.43 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m56ZbiMdAgyVQe23nxd1Gt5wJJPz7AQAbmLzgbKNb0E=; b=MsQFb/AiLfaYcThKra6d7p2EbMfbtjIgpLcjViWwAK6Iv6/UWGBV/Pu5v+UFDZ5O8c uYLQSwYxmjNfTcoR42hcGq2b5xlDsBgYwGqGbZqpprVNvHpFbEESR0I0x2fiXulO1pJz 6tk2/EuDIeQ3FTN5wR4kUNOm6df5O8l+CMDzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K0p/1oOlUo1DNzVshYtFXFhLedj58sVMW0bcO99MrOEHUxs/XQM7T1mb85zffS4FsB VS5FF9fQ/L8S7JNgvKdmWltah6lLi1zI8A4yquRi8Dy9KzwbbR6ZxTyPkY0WNFPzBcOL xoExSWYWbcZ2ILMKJyjD/676u0gGzwcQ19gd0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.80.25 with SMTP id h25mr4039312mul.15.1253130151186; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <9e20d71e0909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com> <4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:42:30 +0300 Message-ID: <9e20d71e0909161242l56aaeecdy51a42f08906cf8ff@mail.gmail.com> From: Artis Caune To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /tmp sticky bit differences on FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:42:33 -0000 2009/9/16 Matthew Seaman : >> On FreeBSD 6,7 files are created with wheel group, but on 8 - with `gid`= . > > It seems that ZFS uses SysV group semantics (new files get the 1ary group= of > the user unless the directory is set to SGID). =C2=A0UFS filesystems on 8= .x still > behave in the expected BSD way (new files get the same group as the > directory unless the user is not a member of that group, when they get th= e > users' 1ary group). > > There's a thread 'ZFS Group ownership' =C2=A0on this topic in freebsd-hac= kers@... > at the moment. > hmm, I use ZFS on FreeBSD 7, but still get wheel group and not egid. --=20 Artis Caune Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 20:25:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114A5106568B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E2A8FC20 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8GKP4M6095537 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:25:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200909162025.n8GKP4M6095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:25:04 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: A question about the date Function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:25:17 -0000 The man page on date has an example showing how to get an output showing the number of seconds since the Epoch. date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s" There is an envokation of date embedded in this command of date +%s I was curious as to what this command does so I tried the long form and then the short form with: date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s" >f0 date +%s >f1 I then compared the outputs of f0 and f1 and they are identical. What does the long form of this command give us that date +%s fails to do? Nothing is broken, here. I am just curious. Thank you. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 20:44:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787AC106566C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fsb@thefsb.org) Received: from smtp124.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp124.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50ADF8FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.r2.iad.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay2.r2.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C08C844C04B; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:44:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay2.r2.iad.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fsb-AT-thefsb.org) with ESMTPSA id 44EF944C07E; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:44:28 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:44:27 -0400 From: Tom Worster To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Thread-Topic: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' Thread-Index: Aco3Dns6dBtaYQCutEyfhvgMUoYw9g== In-Reply-To: <4AB13A52.1010006@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:44:30 -0000 On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, "Matthew Seaman" wrote: > Tom Worster wrote: >> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a >> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? > > If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define command > arguments by setting foo_flags="-a -b -c". This is a convention, and > particular > services may use several more specific variables to build a command line > or may simply ignore any flags variable completely, so you'll have to check > each case individually. > >> for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it >> '-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a config file? > > In this case, setting sshd_flags will work as sshd uses the default rc > start function. hi matthew, i tried this and couldn't make it work before i emailed my question. then mel answered that the /etc/rc.d/foo scripts ignore environment. and then, looking closer at man pages, i got the impression that perhaps only /etc/rc uses the foo_flags variables when it invokes /etc/rc.d/foo scripts. tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 20:47:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82941065672 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leandro.magnabosco@fcdl-sc.org.br) Received: from mail.cdl-sc.org.br (mail.cdl-sc.org.br [189.39.224.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B957C8FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.200.189]) by mail.cdl-sc.org.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6942637B2; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:16:09 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <4AB14798.2000204@fcdl-sc.org.br> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:16:24 -0300 From: Leandro Quibem Magnabosco Organization: FCDL/SC User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) To: Artis Caune References: <9e20d71e0909161221i432edd65s9dac7e0da7c2fdc9@mail.gmail.com> <4AB13CF0.2060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <9e20d71e0909161242l56aaeecdy51a42f08906cf8ff@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e20d71e0909161242l56aaeecdy51a42f08906cf8ff@mail.gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /tmp sticky bit differences on FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:47:25 -0000 Artis Caune escreveu: 2009/9/16 Matthew Seaman [1]: On FreeBSD 6,7 files are created with wheel group, but on 8 - with `gid`. It seems that ZFS uses SysV group semantics (new files get the 1ary group of the user unless the directory is set to SGID). UFS filesystems on 8.x still behave in the expected BSD way (new files get the same group as the directory unless the user is not a member of that group, when they get the users' 1ary group). There's a thread 'ZFS Group ownership' on this topic in freebsd-hackers@... at the moment. hmm, I use ZFS on FreeBSD 7, but still get wheel group and not egid. Maybe you did a chmod g+s dir... Check that, maaaaybe it has something to do to what's happening to you. Otherwise, it might be something implemented only on v7. Leandro Magnabosco. References 1. mailto:m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 21:42:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7EA1065693 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsmtkk@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B1C8FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1592425qwe.7 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:42:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uNz05wuMkvte8q0nq2EA1TpHni2s1RTmjTpxs21MduM=; b=FZQc8coeXurGjzW0yJurPzLR5mfON+IG2+iPX4xR9WonAUaQGfC0PNrG9YPDm1gOPb OYiGxAk07kUWS/ELTXwCcrLuI59iivQSK1aaVs5U4fvFyrzTXlUtl1+B3yeFz0WSzvdM o4NW5b9waBaUx1jOr4RkN0cIY/oN9nVk4qgPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MS42U4Qwx8yWZXHCcspmsTaqE7mcV0KxnQnCgHrymuPf3InMbjTZj5zCRRgDysY4Ir 45VOFARAnILVTKyaU2QgZGmE26zU9/0gQh+qHgznMAM5Ae/Rk4ZnxIIzFQ5yddtVCwzt QtT9qLQkSDH2qZAeaZGjj1NqdKjteUiOETuz8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.32.82 with SMTP id b18mr2919981qcd.10.1253137350805; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:42:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6bae2c430909060711m3c57adfej33014f84cb23874@mail.gmail.com> References: <6bae2c430909060711m3c57adfej33014f84cb23874@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:42:30 +0900 Message-ID: <6bae2c430909161442q70afa3avb4cf2ec70c1f8502@mail.gmail.com> From: Hashimoto To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Clock delays in FreeBSD guest VM on VirtualBox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:42:34 -0000 Hello. > I am running several FreeBSD(8.0-BETA3) guest VMs > on VirtualBox on OpenSolaris. > On all hosts, I am configuring & running ntpd. > > However, only one host (naming HostX) can sync the clock. > All hosts except for HostX cannot sync the clock. > (The time delays about 10 minutes in an hour.) > What's the cause of this problem? > Regards. I found a tip in VirtualBox helps, and the trick seem to solve the problem. But, I am not sure this is the right solution. The trick is, on OpenSolaris (the host system), to type the command. $ VBoxManage setextradata "My VM name" "VBoxInternal/TM/TSCTiedToExecution" 1 The FreeBSD VMs no more need ntpd to sync the clock. Regards. -- Kouki Hashimoto hsmtkk@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 22:21:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96EC106566B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com [69.89.18.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A1058FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20599 invoked by uid 0); 16 Sep 2009 22:21:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 22:21:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=akAjOrriT57C+LU0UROGrqVhI5JaGw+O8UflLAbKQwZT5iAiXNqgD94H7P30UahMc6X+1tr0/74Zk4Ey1Z3mQY+u9OI/4vMWN0Oj4QjyC9HcXU0getLkGy9bUBI49sw1; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo2sa-0008HT-Jd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:21:36 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:21:35 -0600 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:21:35 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20090916222135.GA48517@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: sSMTP, this mailing list, and helo errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:21:37 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I moved email from a FreeBSD 6.2 machine to a FreeBSD 7.2 machine. On both machines, I'm using sSMTP[1] to send email to a mailserver managed by a shared hosting server, with SSL/TLS authentication. Everything works, except for one "small" problem -- sending email to this list. It has apparently exposed a problem with the setup. I get a "Helo command rejected: Host not found" error when sending to this list. The weird part is that I'm using *exactly* the same ssmtp.conf file on both the 7.2 system and the 6.2 system. As you can see -- since this email comes from the 6.2 system -- that configuration file isn't causing any problems sending with sSMTP on 6.2, so I'm a little confused about the cause of the problem. Where else should I look for a problem? My MUA is Mutt (and yes, that's using exactly the same configuration file too). Thanks in advance for any help. ### NOTES 1: /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Alan Kay: "I invented the term 'Object-Oriented', and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind." --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqxZO8ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXqngCfaOMp2lY80jcfBVQm8Qv1Hxu9 1h8Anio6Gi/KiLyTKEQ6KvU3r4bexODA =zD7j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 22:45:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7FB1065695 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B083E8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mo3Fl-0006co-TH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:45:33 +0200 Received: from pool-71-166-131-164.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.131.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:45:33 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-131-164.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:45:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:45:50 -0400 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <20090916222135.GA48517@kokopelli.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-131-164.washdc.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: sSMTP, this mailing list, and helo errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:45:39 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > I moved email from a FreeBSD 6.2 machine to a FreeBSD 7.2 machine. > > On both machines, I'm using sSMTP[1] to send email to a mailserver > managed by a shared hosting server, with SSL/TLS authentication. > Everything works, except for one "small" problem -- sending email to this > list. It has apparently exposed a problem with the setup. I get a "Helo > command rejected: Host not found" error when sending to this list. > > The weird part is that I'm using *exactly* the same ssmtp.conf file on > both the 7.2 system and the 6.2 system. As you can see -- since this > email comes from the 6.2 system -- that configuration file isn't causing > any problems sending with sSMTP on 6.2, so I'm a little confused about > the cause of the problem. Where else should I look for a problem? > My first guess would be DNS. Whenever I see something like a 'host not found' of this nature I think "no PTR record". Although I would think wrt mail the MX record would matter. My thinking is the two configs you have mentioned being identical the problem is a third config somewhere else, and first thing I'd look at is name resolution, forward and reverse. Grab a copy of the transaction with tcpdump or Wireshark. Perhaps the list filtering software is seeing mail with a From: it isn't recognizing and blocking. Tcpdump/Wireshark from both hosts and compare for differences in the mail headers, e.g., the one that works and the one that doesn't. With Wireshark this is easy, just start a capture, send an email, stop capture, and use the "Follow TCP Stream" menu option. Or use tcpdump and import it into Wireshark. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 23:32:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEC0106568B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A8D8FC18 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1174420fga.13 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3GNGe9f2s4/FmyNTWfMCMVX3jsBfZrccmA/fJZmGej0=; b=Lny6ru+vPNKZo+amVCngDGUzwbX87KSYWHZR7N1xXsD5faUIeVxAp6uRNWohNPGIcj u3KbbMTFX6e4F5mDl2X90NPDicApQGDJQQlihr1gMtTYUNMsDhkKvFgev/Uk1H0UF39w b3+MuRTMOsdsehPYEdPKbcGRGQmx/yMJXaaIA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nGGD2eUViIHOSF2zKNP4unmosZ+FTHcf9D2V5CmbcZbQ5GSyES60bUeh/1ZArimA28 W4Ee84It7x6sCLlf6qrr9NsreBZa3QZxluKUHEFlbav56+PPadH/oz/Vo9JDchMoyPIp zwD0QK/hczoVoueIy8+lk7acDKhlNZqaQF9+o= Received: by 10.86.10.36 with SMTP id 36mr272447fgj.61.1253143950086; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm534112fga.23.2009.09.16.16.32.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:32:26 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090917003226.5a3f2ed1@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200909162025.n8GKP4M6095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <200909162025.n8GKP4M6095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: A question about the date Function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:32:31 -0000 On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:25:04 -0500 Martin McCormick wrote: > > date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s" >f0 > date +%s >f1 > > I then compared the outputs of f0 and f1 and they are identical. > > What does the long form of this command give us that > date +%s fails to do? > > Nothing is broken, here. I am just curious. Thank you. I suspect that the the "long form" is just an example designed to demonstrate more than one thing in single line rather than a practical suggestion. I used to use it in scripts and never questioned it until for some reason it stopped working, and I tried the simpler alternative. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 23:49:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF291065670 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryant.eadon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com (mail-qy0-f176.google.com [209.85.221.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4868FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk6 with SMTP id 6so54614qyk.3 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:49:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9tSj4EX0gsZmfgAozhi2t2J0eyCthKxKxHJr3lKXnTw=; b=F1CWwJvVKDMwhA+2PeeUy9S1usbrvMlHmS//2Fbs/8sPyGO2nBCoiew6rRg2op2n/4 4aU7GBc0svzowMCS34NtAFRe3HE+TlHmyIkFEmC83KUI2coXI3qdjEk/aoxPpblH9pQ5 kElA6TDznewN/f41xmmRFCszwLUXe3Z3IMpko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bXcnuegyZdXeG+G/ROB+kxJH21uJJnOTYkCUKClDN1jC93dIFMzKcVmq6rNYsWEC4t RHaGT7johFfP68NLj0aXjUpSih4iGB0BVX2YS+HXLdmFI7cQw8lV4LoXLlJ/u6soj5rB 2idXutYhYUBrCXrJkw3zIvFnTaIISiLHU58uA= Received: by 10.224.39.70 with SMTP id f6mr7927948qae.341.1253143565301; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.4? (rrcs-24-103-43-79.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.43.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm237128qwg.26.2009.09.16.16.26.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB17409.4000601@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:26:01 -0400 From: Bryant Eadon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\) - FreeBSD" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bryant.eadon@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:49:32 -0000 Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > Hi list, > > I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image btw. > Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before creating > the image. > > Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also > bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content > with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. > > Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? Have you tried mounting it as a vnode ? and mounting it R/W ? mdconfig -a -t vnode -f file.img mount -t /dev/md0 /mnt/rw_dvd Where may be cd9660 or some other format of the image. I haven't seen reported success with this method (checked with various google searches), but perhaps there's something along these lines *will* work. Hope that helps, Bryant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 00:08:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79EB106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 764DE8FC1A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21838 invoked by uid 0); 17 Sep 2009 00:08:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 00:08:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=SRwTaEwtf/GsObWYYKJk6ss07ax9yw+IPfy69ff8uRVLZBpRY10Bq2/SJtHQvGzRXVzm1CkUjZm/mNVp7tH3I3apJ0wZp9DOHQZGghvKp37J6xxqbwZ+szIjwKh7rCrb; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo4Y2-0002fK-Tu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:08:31 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:01:37 -0600 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:01:37 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20090917000137.GA1066@kukaburra.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20090916222135.GA48517@kokopelli.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090916222135.GA48517@kokopelli.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: sSMTP, this mailing list, and helo errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:08:32 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I evidently forgot to disable Sendmail in my rc.conf on the 7.2 machine, which in turn reminded me that I had forgotten to change the mailer.conf to indicate my alternate MTA for sending emails. This means that my ssmtp.conf file was irrelevant, because sSMTP wasn't being used to send emails at all anyway. The relevant lines for mailer.conf, in case someone later on stumbles across this thread looking for a solution to the same problem, are: sendmail /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp send-mail /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp mailq /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp newaliases /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp hoststat /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp purgestat /usr/local/sbin/ssmtp If this email gets through to the list, consider my problem solved and myself suitably chagrined at having overlooked something that should have been so obvious to me. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqxfGEACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW1aACbB7mXNCJXQyb6jHzwRLq7ZWXF LCkAn2yFEJEM3DanbUFmZL4B9VK3PmOT =hoqH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 00:30:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5B41065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdc@prgmr.com) Received: from mail.prgmr.com (mail.prgmr.com [64.62.173.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7C18FC1A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frylock.local (nmd.sbx05412.santaca.wayport.net [98.97.215.230]) by mail.prgmr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BBF68B5B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB17EA5.7090900@prgmr.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:11:17 -0700 From: Michael David Crawford Organization: Prgmr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4AB17409.4000601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AB17409.4000601@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:30:56 -0000 Bryant Eadon wrote: > Have you tried mounting it as a vnode ? and mounting it R/W ? > > mdconfig -a -t vnode -f file.img > mount -t /dev/md0 /mnt/rw_dvd > > Where may be cd9660 or some other format of the image. > > I haven't seen reported success with this method (checked with various > google searches), but perhaps there's something along these lines *will* > work. Pardon my political incorrectness... If you can't get it to work under FreeBSD, I'm pretty sure that it works under Linux: mount -t iso9660 -o loop file.img /mnt (I'm not sure that "iso9660" is the right filesystem type, but "man mount" will tell you.) Once mounted that way you can use it like any other filesystem. I actually did this once, but it was years ago. Mike -- Michael David Crawford mdc@prgmr.com prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You Are Stupid. Xen-Powered Virtual Private Servers: http://prgmr.com/xen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 02:03:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1B0106568D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [64.156.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236058FC12 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (adsl-75-15-116-151.dsl.snlo01.sbcglobal.net [75.15.116.151]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8951E4A52040; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, _d Sep 2009 18:24:56 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:24:56 -0700 From: Jason To: Bryant Eadon Message-ID: <20090917012452.GA52817@jason-helfmans-macbook-pro.local> References: <4AB17409.4000601@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AB17409.4000601@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Darwin 9.8.0 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" , "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\) - FreeBSD" Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:03:50 -0000 Why not just make a release with the updated file? -jgh On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:26:01PM -0400, Bryant Eadon thus spake: > >Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: >>Hi list, >> >>I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image btw. >>Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before creating >>the image. >> >>Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also >>bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content >>with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. >> >>Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? > >Have you tried mounting it as a vnode ? and mounting it R/W ? > >mdconfig -a -t vnode -f file.img >mount -t /dev/md0 /mnt/rw_dvd > >Where may be cd9660 or some other format of the image. > >I haven't seen reported success with this method (checked with >various google searches), but perhaps there's something along these >lines *will* work. > >Hope that helps, >Bryant >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 03:02:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C9D106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5EB8FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8H32uXq082456; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:02:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n8H32uM0082453; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:02:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:02:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:02:56 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:03:00 -0000 On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image btw. > Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before creating > the image. > > Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also > bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content > with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. > > Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? Maybe use sysutils/geteltorito to extract the boot image, then mount the image and copy out the files, then reassemble the whole thing with mkisofs. Untested... -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 03:28:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7883E106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121428FC12 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so3759017fxm.43 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hkHCLY8EDyv8ZUPsXNNCpXyT0cT5yFzx2hJApS9AuAY=; b=PUZbhhHsIDFCgjH0gzLj5znbX9iSO7/PWz4Jyw/VL6YvXZLRTDO2BwLFAs7ViEXugO +r4VSdqp2zKOMRNkI96xA5Mlkb6Kml4QJx2FffcnPoZGiXNFaufPE8lY4ActoB6FAV/d 81YHCgYWnEBgNsXKTNuHAkFuB9UDddd4AjYHY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=Myf5mYW6n0SdkHMPvCDZvYcl6c6F9sLSVBKTmNV+wBV6QDFfygZqADWjuUqvmz01cM i90IEIQLJkLAas1SbA42rovtspeuA7cPZSqSPgOofwY0A5bLWpWbvkuIe2sr1YnCp+PU Zx08kzN1wwJY3ECuW0QZigeSPzjKypH45el14= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.143.215 with SMTP id l23mr869694hba.163.1253158098129; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:28:18 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd@superhero.nl Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:28:21 -0000 Patrick Gelsema wrote: >I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image btw. >Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before creating >the image. > >Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also >bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content >with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. > >Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? Unfortunately, libarchive(3), which is used by tar(1) and cpio(1) on recent versions of FreeBSD, seems to have only read and extract support for ISO 9660 archives, and not write support (see libarchive-formats(5) or http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/wiki/LibarchiveFormats ). So while you could use tar(1) or cpio(1) to extract the contents of the dvd without mounting it in order to make your change, you would have to use some other tool to write the new .iso image, like mkisofs(8) from the sysutils/cdrtools-devel port. (And if the original image has extensions that are not supported by librarchive(3), you could use something like readcd(1) from that same port instead of tar(1) or cpio(1) to read and extract it.) b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 04:22:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD07106568D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell.rawbw.com (shell.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7E48FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (c-24-6-221-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.221.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.rawbw.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n8H4MBSV070035 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB1B972.9050507@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:22:10 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: CD doesn't eject from the drive. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:22:12 -0000 I have PIONEER Model DVD-RW DVR-112D. I started the command "cdda2wav -v255 -D5,0,0 -B -Owav" to grab audio but stopped it with Ctrl-C. Now disk doesn't eject. Both "eject" command and "cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 eject" commands hang, and system log gets messages, see below. It seems like a bug in atapi driver, since it didn't clear the state of cdrom hardware after controlling app died. Anybody knows how to eject the disk now without rebooting? 72-STABLE. Yuri ---- messages ---- acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY freeing taskqueue zombie request acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY taskqueue timeout - completing request directly acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY freeing taskqueue zombie request aaccdd00:: WWAARRNNIINNGG -- PRREEAVDE_NTTO_CA LtLaOsWk qtuaesukeq uteiumee otuitm e-o ucto m-p lceotmipnlge trienqgu ersetq udeisrte cdtilryec tly acd0: WARNING - PREVENT_ALLOW freeing taskqueue zombie request acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY taskqueue timeout - completing request directly acd0: WARNING - READ_TOC freeing taskqueue zombie request From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 04:51:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99A9106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE6C8FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8H4o2TF099954 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:51:06 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20090917045103.GA52938@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: warning, 100pc Ot... almost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:51:11 -0000 this is only to the few hundred of you guys who read the slice of my novel. before i invest another twenty minutes in it, i'd be much obliged how many of you would actually buy th ebook. WEll, either ebook of pod. please answer only offlist; i'm asking here because this is where most of you guys know me. real question: anybody know when the latest OOo package will be available? by sheer carelessness i blew mine away. the only pkg on good-day is the amd........ can anybody build me a cp of OOo.311. i'm still running i386 7.1. on ubuntu, only 2.4, :( tx in advance, gary :wq -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 5.67a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 05:47:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2414D1065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB168FC17 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8H5klfQ002373; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:46:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8H5klfQ002373 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253166408; bh=iSyqS6mkRCKZgVQv4YGgUmF/7MiHNPyfILcKAelbLTo=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB1CD40.5020307@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T hu,=2017=20Sep=202009=2006:46:40=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090823)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Martin=20McCormick=20| CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20A=20question= 20about=20the=20date=20Function|References:=20<200909162025.n8GKP4 M6095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu>|In-Reply-To:=20<200909162025.n8GKP4M6 095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Ty pe:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protoco l=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"----------- -enigEC0F0DB6067783BC8514F8A7"; b=S0fRLXrfJJ75qJ5fePPNec9xdurC6EpaDf3bdmVsU5xJMhEFdQggM6LCpmzLyt5li y+ObHvCx7geB2mI/wA3TFJ6sDghkcEEq9iDiVbRGniIb+UKJUmMvKwS3Hn7YGvvKCF MsIBXu8mlaiIXpr0kcypeFXqyvWm7fCeSgH7My/A= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4AB1CD40.5020307@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:46:40 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <200909162025.n8GKP4M6095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <200909162025.n8GKP4M6095537@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEC0F0DB6067783BC8514F8A7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A question about the date Function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:47:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEC0F0DB6067783BC8514F8A7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Martin McCormick wrote: =20 > date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s" >f0 > date +%s >f1 > What does the long form of this command give us that > date +%s fails to do? It's a contrived example: date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s"=20 -j says "don't alter the system date" -- this is used if you want to read and format a date/time string other than the present time. -f says use the following format to read the input date. That's %a -- abbreviated weekday name (localized) %b -- abbreviated month name (localized) %d -- day of month as decimal number, zero padded to two digits %T -- equivalent to %H:%M:%S %H -- Hour in 24h clock, zero padded to two digits %M -- Minute, zero padded %S -- Second, zero padded %Z -- Time zone name %Y -- Year as 4 digits including century. (See strftime(3)) Which looks like this: % date +"%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" Thu Sep 17 06:31:15 BST 2009 and that just happens to be the default *output* format date produce= s without any arguments. Which is appropriate as the next item on the= command line is "`date`" Rune the date command without arguments and substitute the ou= tput into the command line here as a single argument +%s finally, says output the date that was read in as the number of se= conds since the epoch. This is an argument to the initial date command. so the end result is that the command reads the current date time in the = standard output format, parses all of that then converts it into seconds-since-the= -epoch, using two invocations of the date(1) program to do so. Which is not at al= l efficient if all you need to do is generate the current epoch time. Just use date +%s for that. On the other hand, it does show you how to convert an arbitrary date/time= to=20 epoch time. eg.: % date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "Fri Feb 13 23:31:30 GMT 2009" +%s 1234567890 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigEC0F0DB6067783BC8514F8A7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkqxzUcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzYvwCfel77w5JPlqr7UBE1s+deYALS llcAn0WNlNerblTjPovf1LQvNWB4eLW2 =byaT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEC0F0DB6067783BC8514F8A7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 06:50:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB7F1065676 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@superhero.nl) Received: from superhero.nl (wolverine.superhero.nl [77.73.16.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2918FC1D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71977 invoked by uid 80); 17 Sep 2009 06:50:21 -0000 Received: from 85.119.21.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gelsemap) by webmail.superhero.nl with HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:50:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <777245ba16ca077458cb9fca288b3c37.squirrel@webmail.superhero.nl> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:50:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\) - FreeBSD" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.17 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:50:23 -0000 On Thu, September 17, 2009 05:28, b. f. wrote: > Patrick Gelsema wrote: >>I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image >> btw. >>Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before >> creating >>the image. >> >>Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also >>bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content >>with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. >> >>Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? > > Unfortunately, libarchive(3), which is used by tar(1) and cpio(1) on > recent versions of FreeBSD, seems to have only read and extract > support for ISO 9660 archives, and not write support (see > libarchive-formats(5) or > http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/wiki/LibarchiveFormats ). So > while you could use tar(1) or cpio(1) to extract the contents of the > dvd without mounting it in order to make your change, you would have > to use some other tool to write the new .iso image, like mkisofs(8) > from the sysutils/cdrtools-devel port. (And if the original image has > extensions that are not supported by librarchive(3), you could use > something like readcd(1) from that same port instead of tar(1) or > cpio(1) to read and extract it.) > > If the linux suggestion fails I will try this one. Unfortunately I can't do Make release as it is not Freebsd. It is a Windows based boot cd. Thanks! > b. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 07:05:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE970106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.mckeown@ru.ac.za) Received: from d.mail.ru.ac.za (d.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3518FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:05:00 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ru-msa; d=ru.ac.za; h=Received:From:Organization:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:X-Face:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Virus-Scanned:X-Authenticated-User; b=SmNbeRDhmYiof51+Yox57F4e1wG1iolILclZd5J9lI5h0/1oPslwohAjIJJcq/U8oz9FAAD/8XCVfcXU6RFbJLju2IRlPNMG9LzvUHHYgwmiWKw7omTCDBrdqE7snIIV; Received: from vorkosigan.ru.ac.za ([2001:4200:1010:1058:219:d1ff:fe9f:a932]:56687) by d.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MoB34-000L1g-SH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:04:58 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Rhodes University To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:04:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090916070850.213b1dfa@scorpio.seibercom.net> <19BF38262156A790CFBB927F@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <19BF38262156A790CFBB927F@utd65257.utdallas.edu> X-Face: $@VrUx^RHy/}yu]jKf/<4T%/d|F+$j-Ol2"2J$q+%OK1]&/G_S9(=?utf-8?q?HkaQ*=60!=3FYOK=3FY!=27M=60C=0A=09aP=5C9nVPF8Q=7DCilHH8l=3B=7E!4?= =?utf-8?q?2HK6=273lg4J=7Daz?=@1Dqqh:J]M^"YPn*2IWrZON$1+G?oX3@ =?utf-8?q?k=230=0A=0954XDRg=3DYn=5FF-etwot4U=24b?=dTS{i X-Virus-Scanned: d.mail.ru.ac.za (2001:4200:1010::25:4) X-Authenticated-User: s0900137 from vorkosigan.ru.ac.za (2001:4200:1010:1058:219:d1ff:fe9f:a932) using auth_plaintext Subject: Killfiles (was Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:05:01 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 16:59:27 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Wednesday, September 16, 2009 06:08:50 -0500 Jerry The backscatter is useful in a way, in that it confirms that my original reasons for applying an ignore filter on Jerry's email address still apply, but I wish a few more people would just ignore him as well. If he's not trolling for angry responses, I find it hard to see what he's doing here at all, given how little good he has to say about FreeBSD or the people involved with it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 08:44:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9A01065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8462B8FC1B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from significant-gravitas-shortfall.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8H8hsY3004669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:44:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n8H8hsY3004669 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1253177042; bh=4yqr7y2NUgzbs7V1rqVfiaSCnt/dNE+iAsmW+cG4SYU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4AB1F6C6.3020000@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T hu,=2017=20Sep=202009=2009:43:50=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20090824)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Tom=20Worster=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20 Mailing=20List=20|Subject:=20Re:=20 passing=20options=20thru=20'/etc/rc.d/foo=20start'|References:=20< C6D6C66B.127F5%fsb@thefsb.org>|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.7|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C| Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=2 0protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"--- ---------enig2E12B39DEB8BEF3D0B0F554B"; b=1JbbIBGK7AzaYLlj/UIDBBAdXsKN70jrArMMF+yE3WxqA5hgX8lVWZnay9RMzbEKu QYZimSXTIX0P63Gjj96yVGSqUNKM+FISlyA2uWAcbePqkMv9ZHsw5BcBz1c2xbDUcG pFuyYKJo1uKUN3riJwFfbKkiZKmWJj+OYmeexkFc= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4] claimed to be significant-gravitas-shortfall.thebunker.net Message-ID: <4AB1F6C6.3020000@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:43:50 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Worster References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2E12B39DEB8BEF3D0B0F554B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2E12B39DEB8BEF3D0B0F554B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom Worster wrote: > On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, "Matthew Seaman" > wrote: >=20 >> Tom Worster wrote: >>> is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to= a >>> daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? >> If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define comm= and >> arguments by setting foo_flags=3D"-a -b -c". This is a convention, an= d >> particular >> services may use several more specific variables to build a command li= ne >> or may simply ignore any flags variable completely, so you'll have to = check >> each case individually. >> >>> for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it= >>> '-o X11Forwarding=3Dno' without touching a config file? >> In this case, setting sshd_flags will work as sshd uses the default rc= >> start function. >=20 > hi matthew, >=20 > i tried this and couldn't make it work before i emailed my question. th= en > mel answered that the /etc/rc.d/foo scripts ignore environment. and the= n, > looking closer at man pages, i got the impression that perhaps only /et= c/rc > uses the foo_flags variables when it invokes /etc/rc.d/foo scripts. Uh, yeah. My tortured mental processes had somehow concluded that /etc/r= c.conf *wasn't* a config file and then I pretty much forgot to add 'in /etc/rc.c= onf' at the crucial point in what I wrote. I don't think your request is possible without editing at least one file under /etc Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK --------------enig2E12B39DEB8BEF3D0B0F554B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqx9soACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VZlxACgp1megPaOdLT6mHUus7U6gGuK sCkAn0sVrcwH/Uqnukg/5oKZatDzbX2c =Fqti -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2E12B39DEB8BEF3D0B0F554B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 10:47:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A849E1065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp104.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp104.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F44F8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52620 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 10:47:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Followup-To:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SP9hBO0G/MKbpnxOxeLsOLljTA2CsbNA911PrVErR+kB6h/8KaUS3puBKngVN9aCOKP9oLjcOif2yeZw+bj1ElFP4mZxMOvwtcQAjRQSfLzaDzaT4GgHrQFMjzxoBPRd23OyPxeVBhig0srQdaonIzpqCykC8ViDbx9sOMUS56Y= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp104.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 03:47:22 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: AcQfE0AVM1nvpc2TTjyx2kpFka1EVVuhPBB39PW1MZ5EJK9j0FlsSfD9Iq0r7tOiqaqmFHlYF4LTJu3sYZoIBakkpUb0OtWCiXeWAvtPqI9Hp0_zvPAakKTed5T1QEHNUQf1OsXVlxIsxjPWOemzkXeDLmF6cbGDBcFrNSlICtZr8kOcFl9C9BOUDxxKJ09te3YJKrrH_d7KzaaNLj.2DM1BtgM4pEw5ocDczEOLwEB2mtbRKP1Ae2fPdNnmIQktb8uAJBA.VbfIPLXSFJoUGcu.oAAlnOggXzlTEsFMrKE1pNwOKbIjBJXZHFqHj.lCp1YlPSFx X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3648A22849; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:47:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:47:21 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090917064721.368cfc54@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <200909170904.58697.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090916070850.213b1dfa@scorpio.seibercom.net> <19BF38262156A790CFBB927F@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <200909170904.58697.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> Followup-To: Jonathan McKeown Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Killfiles (was Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:47:24 -0000 On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:04:58 +0200 Jonathan McKeown wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 16:59:27 Paul Schmehl wrote: > > --On Wednesday, September 16, 2009 06:08:50 -0500 Jerry > > > > The backscatter is useful in a way, in that it confirms that my > original reasons for applying an ignore filter on Jerry's email > address still apply, but I wish a few more people would just ignore > him as well. If he's not trolling for angry responses, I find it hard > to see what he's doing here at all, given how little good he has to > say about FreeBSD or the people involved with it. Ah,boo-hoo. Since I am a believer in free speech and vehemently anti censorship you find my beliefs at odds with your totalitarian socialistic/fascist concepts. Nothing proved the failure of Communism like the building of the Berlin wall. Your use of kill filters, and continued advocacy of censorship and withholding of vital news confirms your political alliance. By the way, I love the way you just 'trolled' into, hijacked the thread and modified the 'subject'. Real class act on your part. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Serfs up! Spartacus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 11:57:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27D4106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFEA8FC20 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so327553ewy.36 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version :subject:date; bh=qyVCnOA4THHAeAjMhYFp78UDCJlWc/c164wHofws/0A=; b=uzeIzlBZ2xbFD4CznQZCeBgW8+8YPwoOSmsH9bIA3nw62ZL2CrR1vJUpGvvvJuInE6 KoaIh3hwZwmku/r0CyZg0DJr4s0SwwYFEJLmFIDc+6d19CPvfWfAIQc7iOcN8fNXVRZU ZaXsKnkX2fchobB6n9TvQB7ZnUDcgtM+Tus0U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date; b=Awj3y8RnjgN5QwQnrH/ZaAhuV1q/C4rBl1ddLfp2IWU2J5/K98QH859kdaMx2G0ohF P9HHkUvpzCe85IUdvaKuqJbpqg+qaDt2FV7qokeTzAiApqUmy10PivbEVu59EXrT6ZcJ wz1g3VUumTcD3cldkzAVrV65xz0pLqqKoTfn8= Received: by 10.210.9.12 with SMTP id 12mr536969ebi.3.1253188300104; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.122.78.149? (gprs13.swisscom-mobile.ch [193.247.250.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm1608173eyg.37.2009.09.17.04.51.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <73A54F2D-CC7F-460F-BF62-09980F7C17C3@gmail.com> From: Anselm Strauss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C144) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C144) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:51:15 +0200 Subject: Booting ZFS and GPT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:57:51 -0000 Hi, I've read and tried out that FreeBSD is able to boot from ZFS directly, also with GPT partitions, through zfsboot and gptzfsboot. When I tried the last time 8-CURRENT it was however not built into the release CD. Will this be included in the final release image? Is there any plan to include GPT and ZFS setup in sysinstall during an initial installation? Cheers, Anselm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 12:14:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697A0106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12E38FC13 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so340068ewy.36 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:14:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version :subject:date; bh=VOskg80Up1DFSUAuJslkb8yZxBz0x/2S9LyfNJWYmro=; b=L1KoghnysPRXpxY72xUzruCUvPNGm1L5D2i5x9EZk3fIhCJTOXhwFP27rXQjqtiyFd SoO8+24FBXqf1RXfvPkqvQxNpImcnV6o9z93HTGptxFgsnu9e7VHdxmu2eBLpi14hWqX Kk62EKcqQN00W5cvU6IMjmtymjqilWc0fqaj0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date; b=v4xm5sq2yLFftnXiJRrvOrkKOt0xI7YgL+1X0Wi9Mp7PXI9WPLr5RaxWEDVw/AQy06 wvQJw0VEkvW4XbVlwWE/cs8SwrvBGCIyI9b3lPIecrqkk8Q8UUG17spPrh3Z1WR++jgH ZgVS0vvir8fS09bqwbRl5MXDsjlG+BuTcVmLM= Received: by 10.211.158.15 with SMTP id k15mr503627ebo.25.1253187888453; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.122.78.149? (gprs13.swisscom-mobile.ch [193.247.250.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm1579232eyz.34.2009.09.17.04.44.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> From: Anselm Strauss To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C144) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C144) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:44:20 +0200 Subject: ZFS on small systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:14:45 -0000 Hi, I'm interested in using ZFS on one of my small systems with 256 MB of RAM and 4 GB flash disk. Since ZFS is now considered production ready on FreeBSD I would like to use it as root filesystem and profit mainly from the cool snapshot features for easy backups. I found multiple recommendations to run ZFS only on systems with enough resources. But is this only a requirement if you want good performance or also for ZFS to function properly at all? Thanks for any thoughts on that. Anselm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 12:26:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D75106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B98328FC12 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54354 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2009 12:26:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 17 Sep 2009 12:26:24 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB22B09.4070507@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:26:49 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anselm Strauss References: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030404030206090309010106" Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ZFS on small systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:26:48 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030404030206090309010106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anselm Strauss wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in using ZFS on one of my small systems with 256 MB of > RAM and 4 GB flash disk. Since ZFS is now considered production ready on > FreeBSD I would like to use it as root filesystem and profit mainly from > the cool snapshot features for easy backups. > > I found multiple recommendations to run ZFS only on systems with enough > resources. But is this only a requirement if you want good performance > or also for ZFS to function properly at all? I've found that on the i386 arch, that at minimum you need 756M of memory to do anything really useful. Now, I don't know if this has changed or not, but I doubt that the box would be useful for anything with only 256M. With that said, I can keep a box running at max disk r/w for hours on end with 2GB, and 1536M allocated/reserved for ZFS. Perhaps however that there have been enhancements introduced that I don't know about, that allow ZFS to operate in such a small memory address space, but for some reason I doubt it. If I'm wrong, someone will let us know ;) Steve --------------ms030404030206090309010106 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE3MTIyNjQ5WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUXk9u8QIbX9CxoRhvksrWn1ZB O84wUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AHAGpv2DQEPiaPHPz6m9lXHuHnGZM5vt+jnc6OEqPHNst9TVWCzcW9B742ryXJra/rA4lQA5 l3O3rD5VuUdPIFoloELMp87ImJsDXdolCI5zZn81i2OWy0X5omAweKBcQVSK/v53e1bQs7/7 PlRjlGNw/1uSq01OvTq+NygRxrdBqVGf28KJ074MouhaLWSIqbXwASYXk3i+KXSh0SSnfhGU FVsPAFXltBMSGj5NywQ46D9rlslG0dCGUI+3er+zjm9Nayhv1fyTDTWUmZA4SiQdCjlOeBO0 TOZbMlsZxICaMmAq4FgSuYe091JvAiz8xdMWXc1tqSH/g8mb9RSUMngAAAAAAAA= --------------ms030404030206090309010106-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 12:34:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEC6106566B; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35ABC8FC12; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoGBZ-0001uD-DX; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:12 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MoGBY-00055y-Kk; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:05 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8HCY4Ln000131; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HCY4sr000130; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:04 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: glewis@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:34:14 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:22:33PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:42:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:37:28PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > on ia64 HEAD, gnuplot-4.2.6, any plot command > > > hangs the program. top shows gnuplot is using 100% of CPU, > > > yeat CPU time is zero: > > > > > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > > > 60071 1001 2 48 0 98008K 51424K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot > > > > > > kill -9 60071, either from my account, or from root, > > > has no effect, the process is still there. > > > > > > I cannot find a way to terminate this hanged process without reboot. > > > > > > This seems to be a regression. > > > > running gnuplot in batch (non-interactive) mode seems fine, so > > the problem seems to be with the screen terminal. > > > > I'm mostly puzzled by the fact that I cannot kill the process.. > > It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state (uninterruptable wait). > You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and looking in the eight column when > gnuplot is running. > > Does the window with the plot actually appear? > > Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. I reinstalled gnuplot-4.2.6 and (hopefully) all ports on which it depends. I still get the same behaviour. top -PISu shows: last pid: 108; load averages: 0.88, 0.35, 0.19 up 2+02:23:38 13:27:52 109 processes: 4 running, 88 sleeping, 17 waiting CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 100% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 105M Active, 2074M Inact, 363M Wired, 768K Cache, 827M Buf, 5322M Free Swap: 19G Total, 19G Free PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 0 2 171 ki31 0K 64K RUN 0 77.9H 100.00% idle 99992 1001 2 48 0 98240K 55608K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot so gnuplot is using 100% and all in system state. and ps -u: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND mexas 99992 98.1 0.7 98240 55608 5 R+ 1:25pm 0:00.72 gnuplot so the state is not "D". The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. My guess is that the problem is not in gnuplot, but in the base OS. Any advice on how to debug this problem further. Once again, batch use of gnuplot is fine, it's just the screen operations which are affected. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 12:39:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EFB106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FC478FC18 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81553 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Sep 2009 12:39:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1253191193; bh=ANm43PpO2bKRnI4B3/nOAhIP9UzLSTIjzGmEpgRcs8M=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TqFstvz0mpGw9QvLRePAvvxeSy0yACGyAtR/V6bms7B/R+YdlLt/ohZTITuyk8UUfKITC2BOpAWkL52k1Jult5BXqnItiw2D7anugY1VPdrOq7GoOlZQGe9CGJOX8DpSrnpMaEx/lrI3lrKnGDS8wImu7xEPxhrjWeI7YzVuh10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OLJETheyP+oqqj/qhKFJdWwMMEexcd4fGcdzI7cVvUyOiJil80sq1E7uKxuOYUYsU2/GRFAbLNAnH07NDLYjDe+mmBAmikdJr3QQFInyF+3jDk5/jH3bJtShykorcXKutQQoeEkaoOgPEcMVT/TYSIfbxQ0QiWirj9nU8fFP+3E=; Message-ID: <418329.78823.qm@web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 135dancVM1lP4XejECgTEaf9HX_E5tabrYiMoW1mjU7Cvy.mEeHQnpZqc8nPRh3d9bZw.5gxFFLtRZb3dFbLzxUN7qgbvGtxdK98F91Vcs5v8HlbRkab5wdfLPVUyIcpIuiWfkiecwxmUIug5YwVkx7b39jvOuOVqMjEnRtEr51PASAdWbIqHOWVTXUZEMj.89dKgruxw_j0XOhS.K1ydnt21jHnJsiX.2tuV23q0XSJefTCuuBFLQEmiNDuHwjQ5VZBlGEMzUDmZBHxqLQM4nIyj17B.fe4PoqA9QovECbGSTxYckxGppAcadNzHHwUDastikH.BHEC_57DLKrVoOjPGmYctFDMWsYLLVYX8kwpO95y4EWFx2hx7xkVwgBLNPKEHkY- Received: from [209.30.231.225] by web81207.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:39:53 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:39:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark To: yuri@rawbw.com In-Reply-To: <4AB1B972.9050507@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: help help Subject: Re: CD doesn't eject from the drive. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:39:55 -0000 Read man camcontrol before using this. I have a sony that hangs every now a= nd then. I also have needed to use reset. Command to un-jam dvd tray To allow removal: camcontrol cmd cd1 -v -c "1e 0 0 0 0 0" --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Yuri wrote: > From: Yuri > Subject: CD doesn't eject from the drive. > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 11:22 PM > I have PIONEER Model DVD-RW=A0 > DVR-112D. > I started the command "cdda2wav -v255 -D5,0,0 -B -Owav" to > grab audio but stopped it with Ctrl-C. > Now disk doesn't eject. Both "eject" command and "cdcontrol > -f /dev/acd0 eject" commands hang, and system log gets > messages, see below. >=20 > It seems like a bug in atapi driver, since it didn't clear > the state of cdrom hardware after controlling app died. >=20 > Anybody knows how to eject the disk now without rebooting? >=20 > 72-STABLE. >=20 > Yuri >=20 >=20 > ---- messages ---- > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY freeing taskqueue zombie > request > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY taskqueue timeout - > completing request directly > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY freeing taskqueue zombie > request > aaccdd00::=A0 WWAARRNNIINNGG=A0 --=A0 > PRREEAVDE_NTTO_CA LtLaOsWk qtuaesukeq uteiumee otuitm e-o > ucto m-p lceotmipnlge trienqgu ersetq udeisrte cdtilryec > tly > acd0: WARNING - PREVENT_ALLOW freeing taskqueue zombie > request > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY taskqueue timeout - > completing request directly > acd0: WARNING - READ_TOC freeing taskqueue zombie request >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 12:49:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AB51065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:49:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFAF78FC20 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54936 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2009 12:49:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 17 Sep 2009 12:49:24 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB2306D.1070009@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:49:49 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca><4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk><4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca><4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4AB0F17B.1030400@ibctech.ca> <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCA07@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCA07@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070601010501020207060104" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:49:46 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070601010501020207060104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: >>> Steve Bertrand wrote: >>> >>>> If anyone has a setup that has redundancy for their IMAP/POP >> services, >>>> and a method to keep the changing data relatively up-to-date, I'd >> love >>>> to hear about it. [ big snip ] > Another approach would be a cluster of Postfix servers and Dovecot > servers behind PF load balancers. We have 3 "POP" servers (IMAP/POP), 9 > Mail Servers, 2 Defer servers and 5 Filter servers that process over 20 > million messages a day without a blip. We can take individual servers > out of the pool for maintenance, etc. Everything is fed to a set of > redundant NAS for the data storage and common configuration files. Thanks Mike, I'm interested to learn a little more about your setup. I was going to take it off-list, but if you can provide some further details, it would probably add long-term value to keep it here. So, a couple of questions: - can your PF load balancers 'sense' when one of the Postfix/Dovecot units are down, or is this a manual change in config to prevent any time-out conditions? I like this load balancer idea. In my environment, it would be trivial to set up a couple of them, throw Quagga on them, and integrate them directly into our iBGP setup. On the other side, I could use VRRP or the like to ensure redundancy from front to back. - do the Postfix/Dovecot servers communicate with each other, or are they simply stand-alone units that don't know/care that they have other peers helping with the workload? - are your filter servers in front of, or behind the load balancers (iow, is all of your inbound email passed through the balancers, and then filtered/processed/delivered in behind them)? - how do all of the pieces communicate with the NAS...NFS? - could you share a small snip of your PF config in relation to load-balancing, so I can get a bit of a better understanding config-wise on how that piece hangs together? (I've never used PF, only IFPW ;) Thanks, and regards, Steve --------------ms070601010501020207060104 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE3MTI0OTQ5WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUK2PLYNbkuHvL6gSluhVDL97a 7VQwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AA/Rgulay2EUnBqcRjWFxgwkLQUl+hXeGjZI2C+t0mrcqfLnyOZ8dKFnjfdz5zsTkv4GkWTg 6Qlp4Wi6izzciJ7xR1UXeWf8viawMXjLON9K6mV1Fujt4Ntoth/36dEb58b/KbbJZnkiVAzT XnNaatBJK0gDMeTcueotI3f3037VddxxmcqG1YXGA9GE10AdGsKKvYjfMlOLh1rsAg5MfSrq t7QuI0eRvZGzxKfP9J8uq+M5dztnn0TnAYxx2GjLE8915tvrsXYCBiWYZpW9HGD9MZIFvPhY vX+py3+Yk50Ba2pvxJDwTiV97z95W7KDvuBEf8WiXpqVLVvdcjH6JScAAAAAAAA= --------------ms070601010501020207060104-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 12:55:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5BE106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maksverver@geocities.com) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D535F8FC27 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heaven.student.utwente.nl (heaven.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.52]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n8HCt3XE018719 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:55:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4AB231A5.2040100@geocities.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:55:01 +0200 From: Maks Verver User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090827) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: maksverver@geocities.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Can't boot Marvel Sheevaplug from USB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:55:13 -0000 James Butler wrote: > Sounds similar to: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138798 > Apparently Scott Long is working on a fix. Interesting! Is there any way I can help debug/solve this? As for running FreeBSD on the SheevaPlug: I think I will stick with Ubuntu for now, as I haven't been able to get FreeBSD to recognize the NAND storage nor the SDIO controller, and FreeBSD doesn't seem to have a wear-leveling filesystem (or GEOM layer) anyway. I think FreeBSD on the SheevaPlug right now only makes sense if you intend to boot from the network, and maybe use additional storage from a USB-attached hard disk. Kind regards, Maks Verver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 13:02:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1F0106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2242B8FC19 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55602 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2009 13:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 17 Sep 2009 13:02:11 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB2336C.50200@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:02:36 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan McKeown References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090916070850.213b1dfa@scorpio.seibercom.net> <19BF38262156A790CFBB927F@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <200909170904.58697.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <200909170904.58697.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020603030406010108000906" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Killfiles (was Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:02:33 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020603030406010108000906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jonathan McKeown wrote: > but I wish a few more people would just ignore him as well. If he's not > trolling for angry responses, I find it hard to see what he's doing here at > all, given how little good he has to say about FreeBSD or the people involved > with it. Realize (in this case) that the replies you are reading are extremely valuable, even to relative newcomers. Most replies have been quite informative. Some with very good analogies explaining why we don't broadcast security-related issues before any investigative work has been done to at *minimum* determine their impact to the userbase. Others have expressed their appreciation for what the sec-team does, why they do it that way, and why it makes sense to do it that way. The FreeBSD security folks take their jobs very seriously, and it shows. They are very good stewards acting with common-sense, good judgement while following best common practises, all on behalf of the people they are responsible for....us (and technically, themselves). Steve --------------ms020603030406010108000906 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE3MTMwMjM2WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUBq0V9ygPl3JOeY2x5Y/y+4vi hsowUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AG/Q0iRjc+AZTIV5YDcUgbNx0BJmezCpYm92W8o5rc2tOVG4LCetg0NzDVcBxh+6DJgUv28f bJa8l+m+41ExLd7rq/r8vkRq3Rjq1eUfGSBk5dELJUWNEefgEKUuGJKyeqVe4wVUComYOKID e32oOfb1pTs+EU30/iTqpwfkf3vWUf33r6xxVCqFU/wIpZXwrSIysZaNwU1cYOloF8EqI6aB tYVGbDAFhM324Gd94Zc8rhASmmcTh7C+EjzZKTYJpgbTrdRiQ2KpMftSRtr57jvKI0terF1d 74rf3OzoEoJOnEjQubBhRHNDJYODSTw5yD3m9yaI1fSstPzDj/zfOmUAAAAAAAA= --------------ms020603030406010108000906-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 13:03:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4297A106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F135B8FC1D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HD3fEV044827 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:03:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200909171303.n8HD3fEV044827@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <44825.1253192621.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:03:41 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: A question about the date Function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:03:45 -0000 Thanks to those who answered my question. I have discovered in the process one big difference between the date function in freebsd and Linux. Under freebsd, date -r 1234567890 or whatever value you need converts that unsigned long in to the normal date output set to that reference value. IN Linux, -r should be followed by a file name and it gives you the formatted date as read from the mtime of that reference file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 13:16:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1D7106566B; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521E98FC20; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HDGHEE008048; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:16:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE7B9BA89; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:16:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:16:16 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: glewis@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:16:25 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state (uninterruptable= wait). > > You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and looking in the eight column= when > > gnuplot is running.=20 > >=20 > > Does the window with the plot actually appear? > > =20 > > Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. >=20 > I reinstalled gnuplot-4.2.6 and (hopefully) all ports on which it depends. > I still get the same behaviour.=20 >=20 > top -PISu shows: >=20 > last pid: 108; load averages: 0.88, 0.35, 0.19 up 2+02:23:38 13= :27:52 > 109 processes: 4 running, 88 sleeping, 17 waiting > CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle > CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 100% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle > Mem: 105M Active, 2074M Inact, 363M Wired, 768K Cache, 827M Buf, 5322M Fr= ee > Swap: 19G Total, 19G Free >=20 > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 11 0 2 171 ki31 0K 64K RUN 0 77.9H 100.00% idle > 99992 1001 2 48 0 98240K 55608K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnupl= ot >=20 > so gnuplot is using 100% and all in system state. >=20 > and ps -u: >=20 > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > mexas 99992 98.1 0.7 98240 55608 5 R+ 1:25pm 0:00.72 gnuplot >=20 > so the state is not "D". >=20 > The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and > the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. The wxt terminal is only available when gnuplot is compiled with the wxWidg= ets toolkit. Try using the plain x11 terminal, and see if that works better? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyNqAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWIFACdHRlQWqXX54L2RHvtVN2agmVB pcIAnj5lQRDvABxOFN/0NywtUSlYwaju =b8xi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 13:40:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C3810656A4; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4278FC1D; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoHDl-0005QI-MM; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:31 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MoHDl-0000II-12; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:25 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8HDeOOL002414; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HDeO0e002413; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:24 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20090917134024.GA2350@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: glewis@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:40:32 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:16:16PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state (uninterruptable wait). > > > You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and looking in the eight column when > > > gnuplot is running. > > > > > > Does the window with the plot actually appear? > > > > > > Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. > > > > I reinstalled gnuplot-4.2.6 and (hopefully) all ports on which it depends. > > I still get the same behaviour. > > > > top -PISu shows: > > > > last pid: 108; load averages: 0.88, 0.35, 0.19 up 2+02:23:38 13:27:52 > > 109 processes: 4 running, 88 sleeping, 17 waiting > > CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle > > CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 100% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle > > Mem: 105M Active, 2074M Inact, 363M Wired, 768K Cache, 827M Buf, 5322M Free > > Swap: 19G Total, 19G Free > > > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > > 11 0 2 171 ki31 0K 64K RUN 0 77.9H 100.00% idle > > 99992 1001 2 48 0 98240K 55608K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot > > > > so gnuplot is using 100% and all in system state. > > > > and ps -u: > > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > > mexas 99992 98.1 0.7 98240 55608 5 R+ 1:25pm 0:00.72 gnuplot > > > > so the state is not "D". > > > > The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and > > the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. > > The wxt terminal is only available when gnuplot is compiled with the wxWidgets > toolkit. Try using the plain x11 terminal, and see if that works better? yes, that works fine! Thank you! So the problem must be with wxgtk2-2.8.10_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.8.10_1 ? How can I kill the offending gnuplot process? many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 13:57:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D394106566B; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857198FC15; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HDutdO067124; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:56:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1B5C6BA95; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:56:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:56:55 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090917135655.GA3705@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917134024.GA2350@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917134024.GA2350@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: glewis@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:57:05 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:40:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and > > > the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. > >=20 > > The wxt terminal is only available when gnuplot is compiled with the wx= Widgets > > toolkit. Try using the plain x11 terminal, and see if that works better? >=20 > yes, that works fine! Thank you! >=20 > So the problem must be with wxgtk2-2.8.10_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.8.10_1 ? Looks that way. Since gnuplot works very well with plain X11, I've never bothered building it with wxWidgets. Rebuild gnuplot without wxWidgets to circumvent the problem. > How can I kill the offending gnuplot process? You can try 'kill -9'. If the process is stuck in the 'D' state after you've tried that, you'll have to reboot. :-) Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyQCcACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXXQgCffX9lcW8Sqs//g2UdrMadk7Rg Bn8An3HULin/B02bP2ES3ofkROSQfstl =l3Rm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 13:57:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F87106566B; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE098FC17; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoHUW-0006NZ-33; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:46 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MoHUV-0005zw-C7; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:43 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8HDvhJ7001041; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HDvhBl001040; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:43 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090917135743.GA1013@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917134024.GA2350@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917134024.GA2350@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.7 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: Roland Smith , glewis@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: mpt timed out and Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:57:48 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:40:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:16:16PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state (uninterruptable wait). > > > > You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and looking in the eight column when > > > > gnuplot is running. > > > > > > > > Does the window with the plot actually appear? > > > > > > > > Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. > > > > > > I reinstalled gnuplot-4.2.6 and (hopefully) all ports on which it depends. > > > I still get the same behaviour. > > > > > > top -PISu shows: > > > > > > last pid: 108; load averages: 0.88, 0.35, 0.19 up 2+02:23:38 13:27:52 > > > 109 processes: 4 running, 88 sleeping, 17 waiting > > > CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle > > > CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 100% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle > > > Mem: 105M Active, 2074M Inact, 363M Wired, 768K Cache, 827M Buf, 5322M Free > > > Swap: 19G Total, 19G Free > > > > > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > > > 11 0 2 171 ki31 0K 64K RUN 0 77.9H 100.00% idle > > > 99992 1001 2 48 0 98240K 55608K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot > > > > > > so gnuplot is using 100% and all in system state. > > > > > > and ps -u: > > > > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > > > mexas 99992 98.1 0.7 98240 55608 5 R+ 1:25pm 0:00.72 gnuplot > > > > > > so the state is not "D". > > > > > > The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and > > > the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. > > > > The wxt terminal is only available when gnuplot is compiled with the wxWidgets > > toolkit. Try using the plain x11 terminal, and see if that works better? > > yes, that works fine! Thank you! > > So the problem must be with wxgtk2-2.8.10_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.8.10_1 ? > > How can I kill the offending gnuplot process? On reboot I see this on the console: System shutdown time has arrived Stopping cron. Stopping sshd. Stopping ntpd. Stopping devd. Writing entropy file:mpt0: request 0xa0000000000d2140:52792 timed out for ccb 0x e000000019ece800 (req->ccb 0xe000000019ece800) mpt0: completing timedout/aborted req 0xa0000000000d2140:52792 mpt0: Timedout requests already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning. Sep 17 14:49:59 mech-cluster241 syslogd: exiting on signal 15 Sep 17 14:49:59 init: timeout expired for /bin/sh on /etc/rc.shutdown: Interrupt ed system call; going to single user mode Sep 17 14:50:19 init: some processes would not die; ps axl advised Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop... Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...3 1 2 I'm a bit worried about mpt0 messages - this is the SCSI driver. Does this indicate a problem with mpt? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 14:15:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5C6106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDADA8FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2009 10:15:02 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.7-GA) with ESMTP id LDA71903; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:14:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-227.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.227]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2009 10:14:15 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19122.17463.670129.782291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:14:15 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: ipfw + NAT doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:15:04 -0000 I have a machine running FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64 It has this in the config file for the running kernel: options IPFIREWALL #firewall options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8) options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by default options IPFIREWALL_NAT #ipfw kernel nat support options LIBALIAS It (10.0.0.1) connects correctly to another machine (10.0.0.3); I know because .3 mounts one of .1's disks using Samba. With the ipfw rules appended below, I can't NAT, nor should I be able to. ("em0" faces the Internet; "em1" faces the other machine.) However: using these I still can't get through ipfw add 5000 nat 15 all from any to any ipfw nat 15 config log same_ports ip 10.0.0.0/8 Have I forgotten something? Or misunderstood something? If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong? Respectfully, Robert Huff 00100 3830 864746 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00350 110 42464 allow udp from any 67-68 to any dst-port 67-68 00600 0 0 allow ip6 from any to any via lo0 00610 0 0 deny ip6 from any to ::1 00620 0 0 deny ip6 from ::1 to any 00630 3 256 allow ip6 from :: to ff02::/16 proto ipv6-icmp 00640 0 0 allow ip6 from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 proto ipv6-icmp 00650 4 304 allow ip6 from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 proto ipv6-icmp 00660 0 0 allow ip6 from 2001:db8:2:1::1 to 2001:db8:2:1::/64 00670 0 0 allow ip6 from 2001:db8:2:1::/64 to 2001:db8:2:1::1 00680 0 0 allow ip6 from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 00690 0 0 allow ip6 from 2001:db8:2:1::/64 to ff02::/16 00700 0 0 allow ip6 from any to any established proto tcp 00710 0 0 allow ip6 from any to any frag 00720 0 0 allow ip6 from any to 2001:db8:2:1::1 dst-port 25 setup proto tcp 00730 0 0 allow ip6 from 2001:db8:2:1::1 to any setup proto tcp 00740 0 0 deny ip6 from any to any setup proto tcp 00750 0 0 allow ip6 from any 53 to 2001:db8:2:1::1 proto udp 00760 0 0 allow ip6 from 2001:db8:2:1::1 to any dst-port 53 proto udp 00770 0 0 allow ip6 from any 123 to 2001:db8:2:1::1 proto udp 00780 0 0 allow ip6 from 2001:db8:2:1::1 to any dst-port 123 proto udp 00790 0 0 allow ip6 from any to any ip6 icmp6types 1 proto ipv6-icmp 00800 0 0 allow ip6 from any to any ip6 icmp6types 2,135,136 proto ipv6-icmp 06000 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 137 in via em0 06050 32 3000 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 137 in via em0 06100 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 138 in via em0 06150 15 3465 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 138 in via em0 06200 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 139 in via em0 06250 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 139 in via em0 07000 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 111 in via em0 07050 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 111 in via em0 07100 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 530 in via em0 07150 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 530 in via em0 07200 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 161 in recv em0 07225 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 161 in recv em0 07250 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 162 in recv em0 07275 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 162 in recv em0 07300 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 194 07310 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 194 07320 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 529 07330 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 529 07340 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 994 07350 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 994 07360 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any dst-port 6667 07370 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any dst-port 6667 10000 45012 38961511 allow tcp from any to any established 10100 1452 112487 allow ip from any to any out via em0 10200 0 0 allow tcp from 10.0.0.0/8 to any dst-port 80 10300 0 0 allow tcp from any 80 to any dst-port 1024-65535 via em0 10400 0 0 allow tcp from any 443 to any dst-port 1024-65535 via em0 10500 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any 1024-65535 to any dst-port 80 via em0 10600 0 0 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any 1024-65535 to any dst-port 443 via em0 65000 1548 325720 allow ip from any to any 65535 20 2383 allow ip from any to any From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 14:17:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67D8106576F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10288FC29 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31303 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 14:17:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Sep 2009 14:17:33 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 35E6B5086E; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:17:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200909171303.n8HD3fEV044827@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:17:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200909171303.n8HD3fEV044827@dc.cis.okstate.edu> (Martin McCormick's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:03:41 -0500") Message-ID: <44vdjhbqpv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: A question about the date Function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:17:34 -0000 Martin McCormick writes: > Thanks to those who answered my question. I have discovered in > the process one big difference between the date function in > freebsd and Linux. Under freebsd, date -r 1234567890 or whatever > value you need converts that unsigned long in to the normal date > output set to that reference value. IN Linux, -r should be > followed by a file name and it gives you the formatted date > as read from the mtime of that reference file. The *only* standardized option for date is -u... -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 14:35:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D82106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD198FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so66963fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aCmr3ZubiAG59QaUtbSMs+WoLIsEAIzGIHaOWfqWSlY=; b=n8ZXv7WUeXS9B+Y/vDMmEKqfDAMbXOH4qRNiQh3hZD73kpd7lbNx2uiBhJVjMx5kKC TIkQivMCRTQUwyQ265BiwlpxfsBvjQKykFZi9dJQVxD7XUborAXm96BJcXroz1Nag/hW RRZsEl7P0NzLg4p3/C9k191vvHThT/6QhAujg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Zmmz+xRB0TbIdM7VAA4no1gcdpRo7WhVm3lmPBxd47E5E81vaodGXQPeWhgRSYOqKs bEwt2mn9sC7SAlmqYSEIwVaA9gnKsnUYuHCTedH81F+ptu3MTeZfPuADzl/asoVrwLJ+ lvMfGrNo5sLjhCPG/ZjHZGi/oCvYcjxSnCUL4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.60.134 with SMTP id p6mr55598fah.95.1253198138007; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AB22B09.4070507@ibctech.ca> References: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> <4AB22B09.4070507@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:35:37 +0200 Message-ID: <29722c130909170735w24886ac9j8c5faaed15d17bb9@mail.gmail.com> From: Anselm Strauss To: Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: ZFS on small systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:35:39 -0000 Thanks for your advice, Steve. I looked a bit at the source code and in /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c and I found this: /* set min cache to 1/32 of all memory, or 16MB, whichever is more */ arc_c_min = MAX(arc_c / 4, 64<<18); Could this mean that 16 MB are already enough to run ZFS? On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > Anselm Strauss wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm interested in using ZFS on one of my small systems with 256 MB of >> RAM and 4 GB flash disk. Since ZFS is now considered production ready on >> FreeBSD I would like to use it as root filesystem and profit mainly from >> the cool snapshot features for easy backups. >> >> I found multiple recommendations to run ZFS only on systems with enough >> resources. But is this only a requirement if you want good performance >> or also for ZFS to function properly at all? > > I've found that on the i386 arch, that at minimum you need 756M of > memory to do anything really useful. Now, I don't know if this has > changed or not, but I doubt that the box would be useful for anything > with only 256M. > > With that said, I can keep a box running at max disk r/w for hours on > end with 2GB, and 1536M allocated/reserved for ZFS. > > Perhaps however that there have been enhancements introduced that I > don't know about, that allow ZFS to operate in such a small memory > address space, but for some reason I doubt it. If I'm wrong, someone > will let us know ;) > > Steve > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 14:58:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4AD1065676 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F688FC1C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n8HErS3A061490; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:53:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n8HErSD1061489; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:53:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:53:28 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Yuri Message-ID: <20090917145328.GB61378@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4AB1B972.9050507@rawbw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AB1B972.9050507@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CD doesn't eject from the drive. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:58:14 -0000 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:22:10PM -0700, Yuri wrote: > I have PIONEER Model DVD-RW DVR-112D. > I started the command "cdda2wav -v255 -D5,0,0 -B -Owav" to grab audio > but stopped it with Ctrl-C. > Now disk doesn't eject. Both "eject" command and "cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 > eject" commands hang, and system log gets messages, see below. > > It seems like a bug in atapi driver, since it didn't clear the state of > cdrom hardware after controlling app died. > > Anybody knows how to eject the disk now without rebooting? Do you have some process active in the CD image - such as is some process or shell (X-window or whatever) CD-ed to somewhere in the mount point of the DVD. eg, say you mounted the DVD at /cdrom and then did a cd /cdrom/song or whatever or some process you were using such as the 'cdda2wav' utility CD-ed to it and was left there. For example, after you did the CTRL-C, it quit right there and stayed CD-ed to the image. In that case, it will not eject, either under program control or manually. The solution is to make sure there is no process or shell that is CD-ed to the image. ////jerry > > 72-STABLE. > > Yuri > > > ---- messages ---- > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY freeing taskqueue zombie request > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY taskqueue timeout - completing request > directly > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY freeing taskqueue zombie request > aaccdd00:: WWAARRNNIINNGG -- PRREEAVDE_NTTO_CA LtLaOsWk qtuaesukeq > uteiumee otuitm e-o ucto m-p lceotmipnlge trienqgu ersetq udeisrte cdtilryec > tly > acd0: WARNING - PREVENT_ALLOW freeing taskqueue zombie request > acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY taskqueue timeout - completing request > directly > acd0: WARNING - READ_TOC freeing taskqueue zombie request > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 15:04:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B0F106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [216.240.60.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415BA8FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from levi.local (cpe-76-83-12-67.socal.res.rr.com [76.83.12.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2233378C7A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:45:52 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:16 -0000 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the patch error pasted below. Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything helpful in the archives or on Google. dn somehost# cd /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/ somehost# make clean ===> Cleaning for libxcb-1.4 somehost# make install clean ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for libxcb-1.4 => MD5 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for libxcb-1.4 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libxcb-1.4 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xcb_auth.c.rej => Patch patch-src-xcb_auth.c failed to apply cleanly. => Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libxcb. And here is /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/work/libxcb-1.4/src/xcb_auth.c.rej: *************** *** 251,257 **** info->namelen = memdup(&info->name, authptr->name, authptr->name_length); if(info->namelen) - ret = compute_auth(info, authptr, sockname); if(!ret) { free(info->name); --- 251,262 ---- info->namelen = memdup(&info->name, authptr->name, authptr->name_length); if(info->namelen) + { + if (getsockname(fd, sockname, &socknamelen) == -1) + ret = 0; + else + ret = compute_auth(info, authptr, sockname); + } if(!ret) { free(info->name); From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 15:11:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3198010656A5 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A148FC22 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090917151139.HEUE6611.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:11:39 +0100 Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org ([82.21.107.64]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090917151127.EZM13254.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@catflap.slightlystrange.org> for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:11:27 +0100 Received: by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix, from userid 106) id 6EEC1618A; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:11:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6E66617A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:11:20 +0100 (BST) Received: by torus.slightlystrange.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:10:29 +0100 From: "Daniel Bye" Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:10:29 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 i386 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ehNlctqhnw0A:10 a=tPE4xpujbf_YSmD93TUA:9 a=Dq1xRvbJgi1kgskX7y9JHGz82nIA:4 a=UvunGEtcwiu39j74r9wA:9 a=m4FjBcSKycKVH5yFbNwFB4QYob8A:4 Subject: Re: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:11:41 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote: > FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 >=20 > Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the > patch error pasted below. >=20 > Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything > helpful in the archives or on Google. Try `make distclean' and then `make && make install' Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyUWQACgkQixf5fBYiFmo+xgCgl9sziMepGgAutXDlRg3OMtmE M8sAmwcBoe3ERio3LzM4sYGYD/GlHxC5 =i8lv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 15:27:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23919106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f189.google.com (mail-vw0-f189.google.com [209.85.212.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5CD8FC17 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws27 with SMTP id 27so327853vws.3 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:27:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qk23IE+zUmKpLAUJN7oQbX75yM7UhJi09RqWVIinEHg=; b=FYBM0/zYWQklylNftyaUz21shrC8V+yJx4xJz+2QRykXH1QFHiksnPpgIXTLbf1JaT c2T8/08pdM6ceVUBb1zKlz7kVNNrMosfx5CICZCh/DtjQbEZ4PecrK5uX0ZM7uqnLQjD 0bLevzGXxOKMuAeajeCTakRuk+Dy/Npg/GhA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UDQDvZtOR6Aa5aPqwlMh1vQDWqpYkl77EPzdWgGGPfb26f9FVPGR9qQVG+bUpI33xl 2PAcL11JB7uIHjedqgzhKHZLAHGeMv7vM0xK7ZTlCa2EFOOsFeo9vWE6yII4B2lCu0md ToCVnu+MjKlRw+YvEqIuVttuCy3C6BM7gQ13Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.88.140 with SMTP id a12mr14655619vcm.27.1253199896965; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:04:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:04:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: Pablo Mora To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sd=E4vtaker?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Someone using eclipse PDT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:27:24 -0000 I used eclipse for a while, but i prefer netbeans. Have you used it? http://www.freshports.org/java/netbeans/ Sorry, but I never used eclipse on FBSD. On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Sd=E4vtaker wrote: > Hi, i was wondering if someone coud install the PDT for eclipse, i can > successfull install eclipse from ports, but pdt is not a port and using t= he > standard procedure installing elcipse packages from the update tool fails= . > Damian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------- PGP KeyID: 0xC730A079 Key fingerprint =3D F626 3C47 02F5 E43C 6620 8A1B E7A8 533B C730 A079 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys C730A079 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------- ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML e-mail & Microsoft Attachments FreeBSD Since 4.x & unixbsd.blogspot.com maintainer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 15:27:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F1A106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4338FC2F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MoItd-0006ZH-Kk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:27:45 -0700 Message-ID: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv Subject: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:27:46 -0000 I'm new in BSD, I installed FreeBSD 7.2 and want to use as gateway with IPF and NAT. I have 2 NIC's fxp0 and rl0. When i booted up my pc i got a message "gateway kernel: arp xxx.xxx.88.17 is on fxp0 but got reply from rl0". My configuration files looks like this: ----rc.conf---- clear_tmp_enable="YES" hostname="gateway.fbsdfreeco.com" ifconfig_fxp0=" inet xxx.xxx.88.20 netmask 255.255.255.240" gateway_enable="YES" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipmon_enable="YES" ipmon_flags="-Ds" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="xxx.xxx.88.17" ----resolv.conf---- search xxx.xxx.88.17 nameserver xxx.xxx.88.17 nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ----ipf.loadrules.sh---- oif="fxp0" odns="xxx.xxx.88.17" myip="xxx.xxx.88.20" ks="keep state" fks="flags S keep state" /sbin/ipf -Fa -f - << EOF pass out quick on $oif proto tcp from any to $odns port = 53 $fks pass out quick on $oif proto udp from any to $odns port = 53 $ks pass out quick on $oif proto tcp from xxx.xxx.88.20 to any port = 80 $fks pass out quick on $oif proto tcp from xxx.xxx.88.20 to any port = 443 $fks EOF ----ipnat.rules---- map fxp0 192.168.1.0/16 -> xxx.xxx.88.20/32 rdr fxp0 0.0.0.0/0 -> xxx.xxx.88.20 map fxp0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map fxp0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 map fxp0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0/32 ----------------------------------- ISP Gateway<-fxp0--ping-ok--->My Gateway<-rl0-LAN-->Switch<---ping-ok>---pc ISP IP - xxx.xxx.88.17 (static) My IP - xxx.xxx.88.20 (fxp0 static) My IP - 192.168.1.2 (rl0 private) pc IP - 192.168.1.x (private) where's the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25491958.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 15:58:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561CF1065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117718FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoJN9-0005e1-MO; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:58:19 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MoJN9-0002Tr-2p; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:58:15 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8HFwEdU022261; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:58:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HFwEYi022260; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:58:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:58:14 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20090917155814.GA22231@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:58:20 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:16:16PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state (uninterruptable wait). > > > You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and looking in the eight column when > > > gnuplot is running. > > > > > > Does the window with the plot actually appear? > > > > > > Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. > > > > I reinstalled gnuplot-4.2.6 and (hopefully) all ports on which it depends. > > I still get the same behaviour. > > > > top -PISu shows: > > > > last pid: 108; load averages: 0.88, 0.35, 0.19 up 2+02:23:38 13:27:52 > > 109 processes: 4 running, 88 sleeping, 17 waiting > > CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle > > CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 100% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle > > Mem: 105M Active, 2074M Inact, 363M Wired, 768K Cache, 827M Buf, 5322M Free > > Swap: 19G Total, 19G Free > > > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > > 11 0 2 171 ki31 0K 64K RUN 0 77.9H 100.00% idle > > 99992 1001 2 48 0 98240K 55608K CPU1 1 0:00 100.00% gnuplot > > > > so gnuplot is using 100% and all in system state. > > > > and ps -u: > > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > > mexas 99992 98.1 0.7 98240 55608 5 R+ 1:25pm 0:00.72 gnuplot > > > > so the state is not "D". > > > > The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and > > the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. > > The wxt terminal is only available when gnuplot is compiled with the wxWidgets > toolkit. Try using the plain x11 terminal, and see if that works better? Roland, perhaps you also know the origin of this gnuplot warning: Could not find/open font when opening font "arial", using internal non-scalable font >From searching the net it appears that gnuplot is not finding truetype fonts, something to do with GD library. I've got xorg-fonts-truetype-7.4 and gd-2.0.35_1,1 installed. So I'm not sure what the problem is. Several functions are not available without truetype fonts, e.g. label rotation, which is sometimes useful. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 16:09:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F8C106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in02.adhost.com (mail-in02.adhost.com [216.211.128.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBFB8FC20 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (exchange.adhost.com [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in02.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCE1CBCD61; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:09:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:09:48 -0700 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCB5B@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <4AB2306D.1070009@ibctech.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: New mail server setup Thread-Index: Aco3lVlj1Rj84bxRSxabdo/bdIcv4wAGbQFg References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca><4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk><4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca><4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4AB0F17B.1030400@ibctech.ca> <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCA07@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> <4AB2306D.1070009@ibctech.ca> From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: "Steve Bertrand" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:09:50 -0000 Hello Steve: I'll try to answer your questions in line. =20 >=20 > > Another approach would be a cluster of Postfix servers and Dovecot > > servers behind PF load balancers. We have 3 "POP" servers > (IMAP/POP), 9 > > Mail Servers, 2 Defer servers and 5 Filter servers that process over > 20 > > million messages a day without a blip. We can take individual > servers > > out of the pool for maintenance, etc. Everything is fed to a set of > > redundant NAS for the data storage and common configuration files. >=20 > Thanks Mike, >=20 > I'm interested to learn a little more about your setup. I was going to > take it off-list, but if you can provide some further details, it would > probably add long-term value to keep it here. >=20 > So, a couple of questions: >=20 > - can your PF load balancers 'sense' when one of the Postfix/Dovecot > units are down, or is this a manual change in config to prevent any > time-out conditions? Not natively. When we initially implemented this setup, ifstated wasn't up to snuff, so we wrote some PERL scripts that make connections to the required ports and, if no connection is established, pull the server from the table and send us an alarm. We also have scripts so that we can pull servers out when we're doing maintenance. >=20 > I like this load balancer idea. In my environment, it would be trivial > to set up a couple of them, throw Quagga on them, and integrate them > directly into our iBGP setup. On the other side, I could use VRRP or > the > like to ensure redundancy from front to back. We use two PF boxes and CARP with PFSync for failover, so no dynamic protocols are needed. =20 >=20 > - do the Postfix/Dovecot servers communicate with each other, or are > they simply stand-alone units that don't know/care that they have other > peers helping with the workload? >=20 They are standalone. All of the user authentication is handled from a centralized database, so there are no local credentials stored on the server. =20 > - are your filter servers in front of, or behind the load balancers > (iow, is all of your inbound email passed through the balancers, and > then filtered/processed/delivered in behind them)? > They are behind the PF boxes. We have other hooks in PF that we use to block SPAM in PF, including Cloudmark and some custom stuff that looks for multiple mails to non-existent addresses. We also use the overload tables for abusive connections. =20 > - how do all of the pieces communicate with the NAS...NFS? Yes. Originally we used TCP but we found performance to be much better with UDP. NFSv3 by the way. >=20 > - could you share a small snip of your PF config in relation to > load-balancing, so I can get a bit of a better understanding config- > wise > on how that piece hangs together? (I've never used PF, only IFPW ;) That might be difficult because it's about 720 lines. :-) Here are some highlights, though. 1) Our customers use mail.adhost.com for everything - SMTP, POP and IMAP. We use redirects in PF so that traffic coming in on the associated ports goes to the appropriate servers. 2) We have our load-balanced DNS servers behind the same PF boxes so we localize the tons of DNS queries related to mail. 3) We do a lot of our rejecting in PF, including Spamhaus, Cloudmark, check scripts for Phishing, Porn and Viruses, as well as our own list of "Nefarious" IP's culled from various sources. When traffic matches these originators, we send them to mail reject servers that send out a 550 message with the group name so we can find false positives more quickly. 4) Because 3 does have false positives, we have a whitelist that we can add to that will pass traffic to the mail servers before they match against any of the tables in 3. 5) We use POP before SMTP, so once we authenticate a user to send, their IP address is also added to an allow table. 6) The filter servers are load balanced to and from the mail servers so we can take them in and out of their pool for maintenance. If you have a particular scenario you're thinking about I could help you with the rules to make it work. Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 16:15:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14EF1065676 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3874D8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HGFMQE017344; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:15:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B36B3BA95; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:15:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:15:21 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090917161521.GA9122@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917155814.GA22231@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917155814.GA22231@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:15:27 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Roland, perhaps you also know the origin of this gnuplot warning: >=20 > Could not find/open font when opening font "arial", > using internal non-scalable font >=20 > From searching the net it appears that gnuplot is not finding truetype > fonts, something to do with GD library. I've got xorg-fonts-truetype-7.4 > and gd-2.0.35_1,1 installed. So I'm not sure what the problem is. When using gd fonts, you must either specify either the full path of the fo= nt file, or the font filename (not the font name, AFAIK). In the latter case y= ou have to set the GDFONTPATH variable containing the path. =20 > Several functions are not available without truetype fonts, e.g. label > rotation, which is sometimes useful. I used the following with the PNG terminal: set terminal png font "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf" = 8 \ size 300,150 x76848f xb1b1b1 xb1b1b1 x00ff00 x00ff00 x00ff00 x00ff00 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyYJkACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXp/wCfWIMkITXL15XOww1PaukVdviE OPEAnA79muJ6MBxk1BrIvpRhb+izb5RI =lbbS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 16:35:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD9E1065676 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [216.240.60.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4058FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp130.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [216.240.60.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E645678C7A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB2656B.6090705@networktest.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:35:55 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:35:57 -0000 On 9/17/09 8:10 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 >> >> Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the >> patch error pasted below. >> >> Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything >> helpful in the archives or on Google. > > Try `make distclean' and then `make && make install' This produced the same result. Thanks again for any additional clues in resolving this error. dn o# cd /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/ somehost# make distclean ===> Cleaning for libxcb-1.4 ===> Deleting distfiles for libxcb-1.4 somehost# make && make install ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found => libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/. libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 100% of 298 kB 29 kBps 00m00s ===> Extracting for libxcb-1.4 => MD5 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for libxcb-1.4 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libxcb-1.4 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xcb_auth.c.rej => Patch patch-src-xcb_auth.c failed to apply cleanly. => Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libxcb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 16:48:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95941065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 007958FC1F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86521 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2009 16:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 17 Sep 2009 16:47:50 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB2684E.1070704@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:48:14 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" References: <4AB0584D.3050206@eagle.ca><4AB0844B.5080804@infracaninophile.co.uk><4AB0E97B.4060606@ibctech.ca><4AB0ECE8.2080905@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4AB0F17B.1030400@ibctech.ca> <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCA07@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> <4AB2306D.1070009@ibctech.ca> <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCB5B@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031606AFCB5B@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070604010504040002080908" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mail server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:48:13 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070604010504040002080908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: >> - can your PF load balancers 'sense' when one of the Postfix/Dovecot >> units are down, or is this a manual change in config to prevent any >> time-out conditions? > > Not natively. When we initially implemented this setup, ifstated wasn't > up to snuff, so we wrote some PERL scripts that make connections to the > required ports and, if no connection is established, pull the server > from the table and send us an alarm. We also have scripts so that we > can pull servers out when we're doing maintenance. Ok. I've done the above in similar situations numerous times, so that works. >> I like this load balancer idea. In my environment, it would be trivial >> to set up a couple of them, throw Quagga on them, and integrate them >> directly into our iBGP setup. On the other side, I could use VRRP or >> the >> like to ensure redundancy from front to back. > We use two PF boxes and CARP with PFSync for failover, so no dynamic > protocols are needed. I'll have to review this further. I'm not overly familiar with CARP (ie I've never used it), nor PFSync. My mentality for infrastructure gear (the balancers, not the servers) is always "make each device connect to two different switches/routers, and try to make it dynamic in a way that it fits into our OSPF/iBGP design, so if necessary, we can move the entire thing to a different network segment, and not have to renumber". I'm getting a mental picture how I can have load balancing & failover with the two devices, and network resiliency by having each balancer connected to different network segments (between buildings over fibre if I want). >> - do the Postfix/Dovecot servers communicate with each other, or are >> they simply stand-alone units that don't know/care that they have > other >> peers helping with the workload? >> > They are standalone. All of the user authentication is handled from a > centralized database, so there are no local credentials stored on the > server. Perfect...do your auth/acct db's generally reside on the same storage mechanism that the data does, in order to keep 'email related stuff' altogether? >> - are your filter servers in front of, or behind the load balancers >> (iow, is all of your inbound email passed through the balancers, and >> then filtered/processed/delivered in behind them)? >> > They are behind the PF boxes. We have other hooks in PF that we use to > block SPAM in PF, including Cloudmark and some custom stuff that looks > for multiple mails to non-existent addresses. We also use the overload > tables for abusive connections. Ok. We have a Barracuda cluster hanging off of one of our Internet facing edge routers, that filters then passes what it allows back into the network, and to the servers. The only reason I don't aggregate all of the mail systems together, is so that I can filter the spam as soon as possible upon ingress to our network, instead of having it traverse the core. >> - how do all of the pieces communicate with the NAS...NFS? > > Yes. Originally we used TCP but we found performance to be much better > with UDP. NFSv3 by the way. Ok. [ snip ] > If you have a particular scenario you're thinking about I could help you > with the rules to make it work. I do, and that would be fantastic! I'll draw up a diagram this afternoon of what I envision. Where I'll need a bit of advice will likely be in the details, as opposed to the design, especially if I migrate completely away from our existing mail platform(s). Cheers! Steve --------------ms070604010504040002080908 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE3MTY0ODE0WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUvkj7w/TsyCGO+Ewn1E0bS5J3 DrgwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AEyArbiK5rReg+H775cTHbYCDfVRFkkJA8rDnION9vfie2k15aJjcnKNlhHZASY1YDmRjLmb 6QPtICb811JS9ARuXqgT8p65pvdlyM+ndUJEHOW78Dfn2nZLxatImt16S8as9NmHjYzGA4H9 qh1kzjEbH2XxlNhBO+rfHjOISbga2jDJdkcE/340Sk18DlOWcbCGacpaMyCQ+YTr+oeOvJHN ZPjIxScPstoe1LCO3TZeQjZqrzMRPtQ3LMtHkQ4PZYG3ZwpZICH2b02t3vl+fVHwUBXgq1tU d4jMSekglhPy2d01s+zhiDfzKGYheFFILKLfcYrjH/zvJS6CpCGZ674AAAAAAAA= --------------ms070604010504040002080908-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:14:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CD81065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088C38FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F447E818; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:14:44 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:14:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909171914.29389.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Tom Worster Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:14:32 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote: > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn" > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: > >> Tom Worster wrote: > >>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know. > >>> > >>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy > >>> solution for me. > >> > >> You could also just put: > >> > >> sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no" > >> > >> into your /etc/rc.conf file. > > > > What he wants is passing arguments without touching config files, which I > > find myself needing sometimes as well, on machines where static > > partitions are mounted read-only + kern.secure_level. > > that's right. > > when i read in 11.7 of the handbook: "Since the rc.d system is primarily > intended to start/stop services at system startup/shutdown time, ..." i > thought: maybe i'm making things hard by trying to use rc.d scripts when i > could just execute the daemon's binary. One downside I forgot to mention: You do open yourself up now to SSHD_FLAGS="-o AllowRoot=yes", so you may need to complicate the logic a bit more, by sanitizing SSHD_FLAGS. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:21:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A40106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D8F8FC13 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E277E818; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:21:13 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:20:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <200909161941.04441.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DDC4@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DDC4@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909171920.58874.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Peter Steele Subject: Re: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:21:01 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:58:45 Peter Steele wrote: > >Not really, unless you manually change master. However I believe this also > > causes a slight or even bigger network outage. Any reason you're not > > using loadbalance algorithm, since it seems to suit you better? > > Our resident network guru is quite opposed to using the loadbalancing > option since it comes with a lot of potentially undesirable baggage of its > own... Then your best option is to patch lagg(4) with an "avail" algorithm, that prefers $master and sticks with an interface till it's detected down. When done properly the chances are good to get this into base. Another approach would be to change the failover with a 'fader' algorithm, that gradually fades from one nic to the other, kind of like an audio mixer, though I'm not sure if that's possible and would work satisfactory. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:42:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08029106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33338FC16 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE087E818; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:42:14 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:41:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917134024.GA2350@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917135743.GA1013@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090917135743.GA1013@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909171941.59489.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Roland Smith , Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: mpt timed out and Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:42:03 -0000 On Thursday 17 September 2009 15:57:43 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:40:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:16:16PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:34:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > > It could be that the process is stuck in the 'D' state > > > > > (uninterruptable wait). You can veryfiy that by running 'ps -u' and > > > > > looking in the eight column when gnuplot is running. > > > > > > > > > > Does the window with the plot actually appear? > > > > > > > > > > Interactive use of gnuplot-4.2.6 is fine on amd64 7.2-RELEASE-p2. > > > > > > > > I reinstalled gnuplot-4.2.6 and (hopefully) all ports on which it > > > > depends. I still get the same behaviour. > > > > > > > > top -PISu shows: > > > > > > > > last pid: 108; load averages: 0.88, 0.35, 0.19 up 2+02:23:38 > > > > 13:27:52 109 processes: 4 running, 88 sleeping, 17 waiting > > > > CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% > > > > idle CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 100% system, 0.0% interrupt, > > > > 0.0% idle Mem: 105M Active, 2074M Inact, 363M Wired, 768K Cache, 827M > > > > Buf, 5322M Free Swap: 19G Total, 19G Free > > > > > > > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU > > > > COMMAND 11 0 2 171 ki31 0K 64K RUN 0 77.9H > > > > 100.00% idle 99992 1001 2 48 0 98240K 55608K CPU1 1 > > > > 0:00 100.00% gnuplot > > > > > > > > so gnuplot is using 100% and all in system state. > > > > > > > > and ps -u: > > > > > > > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > > > > mexas 99992 98.1 0.7 98240 55608 5 R+ 1:25pm 0:00.72 gnuplot > > > > > > > > so the state is not "D". > > > > > > > > The window does appear (just using simple gnuplot> plot sin(x), and > > > > the terminal is set to 'wxt', but nothing ever apears in the window. > > > > > > The wxt terminal is only available when gnuplot is compiled with the > > > wxWidgets toolkit. Try using the plain x11 terminal, and see if that > > > works better? > > > > yes, that works fine! Thank you! > > > > So the problem must be with wxgtk2-2.8.10_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.8.10_1 ? > > > > How can I kill the offending gnuplot process? > > On reboot I see this on the console: > > System shutdown time has arrived > Stopping cron. > Stopping sshd. > Stopping ntpd. > Stopping devd. > Writing entropy file:mpt0: request 0xa0000000000d2140:52792 timed out for > ccb 0x > > e000000019ece800 (req->ccb 0xe000000019ece800) > mpt0: completing timedout/aborted req 0xa0000000000d2140:52792 > mpt0: Timedout requests already complete. Interrupts may not be > functioning. Sep 17 14:49:59 mech-cluster241 syslogd: exiting on signal 15 > Sep 17 14:49:59 init: timeout expired for /bin/sh on /etc/rc.shutdown: > Interrupt > > ed system call; going to single user mode > Sep 17 14:50:19 init: some processes would not die; ps axl advised > Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done > Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done > Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop... > Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...3 1 2 > > > I'm a bit worried about mpt0 messages - this is the SCSI driver. > Does this indicate a problem with mpt? Since gnuplot was spinning in kernel mode, all bets are off. This timeout is most likely a side effect from that, unless you see this every reboot not just with an unkillable gnuplot. If your system has the ability to run procstat -k, you might find out what gnuplot is spinning on. You'll need at least a 7.x system, but I'm not sure if kernelthreads are supported on ia64 and kernel needs to have STACK or DDB options. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:45:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C49106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06358FC16 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8HHj2ma034792; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:45:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8HHj15C034791; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:45:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:45:01 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20090917174501.GA34712@ei.bzerk.org> References: <19122.17463.670129.782291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19122.17463.670129.782291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:45:05 +0200 (CEST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw + NAT doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:45:07 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:14:15AM -0400, Robert Huff typed: > > I have a machine running > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64 > > It has this in the config file for the running kernel: > > options IPFIREWALL #firewall > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8) > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by default > options IPFIREWALL_NAT #ipfw kernel nat support > options LIBALIAS > > It (10.0.0.1) connects correctly to another machine (10.0.0.3); > I know because .3 mounts one of .1's disks using Samba. > With the ipfw rules appended below, I can't NAT, nor should I > be able to. ("em0" faces the Internet; "em1" faces the other > machine.) > However: using these I still can't get through Through to what? You seem to be able to connect on a local subnet, but not to the internet through NAT, which you say is ok, because you shouldn't ? Please explain exactly what you want to do. > Have I forgotten something? Or misunderstood something? > If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong? /var/log/security is a good place to start, as your config seems to log allmost all denies. BTW, CURRENT is a development branch. Fine if you want to run it, but you should do some basic debugging yourself before posting problems with it. And then the -questions list is probably not the best place to find answers. regards, Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:46:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267DD1065695 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:46:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9476E8FC28 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8HHkEQR034810; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:46:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8HHkEBW034809; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:46:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:46:14 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Anselm Strauss Message-ID: <20090917174614.GB34712@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Anselm Strauss , Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> <4AB22B09.4070507@ibctech.ca> <29722c130909170735w24886ac9j8c5faaed15d17bb9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29722c130909170735w24886ac9j8c5faaed15d17bb9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on small systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:46:20 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:35:37PM +0200, Anselm Strauss typed: > Thanks for your advice, Steve. > > I looked a bit at the source code and in > /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c and I > found this: > > /* set min cache to 1/32 of all memory, or 16MB, whichever is more */ > arc_c_min = MAX(arc_c / 4, 64<<18); > > Could this mean that 16 MB are already enough to run ZFS? I seriously doubt it. Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:49:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84481065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9CA8FC1B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8HHno1r034839; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8HHnoxU034838; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:50 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Freeco Message-ID: <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Freeco , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:53 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:49:55 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:27:45AM -0700, Freeco typed: > > I'm new in BSD, I installed FreeBSD 7.2 and want to use as gateway with IPF > and NAT. I have 2 NIC's fxp0 and rl0. When i booted up my pc i got a message > "gateway kernel: arp xxx.xxx.88.17 is on fxp0 but got reply from rl0". My > configuration files looks like this: [...] > where's the problem? Both interfaces are on the same physical subnet. Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:52:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B4A106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdavtaker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f188.google.com (mail-qy0-f188.google.com [209.85.221.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E568FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so334380qyk.7 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:52:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hdo1+StncZXBC6M78gcH3qvkZ1GftU7J1uZPaqkPy2k=; b=L5/Sm2IdfcVI/sdB9hXqKTvWQjVxqE/Xx5LPC7Lutg3gBKwR2UnhL1AFXyfu7Ran+q Jgr0i9GOKgoqifYtSTJlKYb7dE2/1f+9fJwznUxY5WKkogMMJKsmhZ8zlTCMZVOouEsf l7T0A7fRcLgla7ULg7eBUZ5pg5oNoYqnc+W40= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=r9rbxs5dfy4eKdIODMjLyZrAr5L1ZkAFz6P/KvvBBaeWlEP8fwyTgpNTK9Gw6lzTmZ /Eb27UDlneSPOufszouZBHMWHmwBfw4ZftOKziSGGqjKHFF7Kk7qpcYdG6sx5JYaI8Y6 9DAtkyz0LjDjDUTpPYaLopKylpCBrdVmWku2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.110.135 with SMTP id n7mr591433qap.185.1253209939303; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:52:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:52:19 -0300 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sd=C3=A4vtaker?= To: Pablo Mora Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Someone using eclipse PDT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:52:20 -0000 I could make freebsd work in FreeBSD the problem is it says it cant install any plugin, so i cant fetch the PDT components, as far as i know netbeans lacks a lot of functionalities in PHP or other scripting languages, anyway, i will give it a shoot, thanks for reply On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:04, Pablo Mora wrote: > I used eclipse for a while, but i prefer netbeans. Have you used it? > > http://www.freshports.org/java/netbeans/ > > Sorry, but I never used eclipse on FBSD. > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Sd=C3=A4vtaker wro= te: > > Hi, i was wondering if someone coud install the PDT for eclipse, i can > > successfull install eclipse from ports, but pdt is not a port and using > the > > standard procedure installing elcipse packages from the update tool > fails. > > Damian > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------- > PGP KeyID: 0xC730A079 > Key fingerprint =3D F626 3C47 02F5 E43C 6620 8A1B E7A8 533B C730 A079 > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys C730A079 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------- > ASCII Ribbon Campaign > Against HTML e-mail & Microsoft Attachments > FreeBSD Since 4.x & unixbsd.blogspot.com maintainer > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------- > --=20 Sd=C3=A4vtaker prays to Rikku goddess for a good treasure. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:55:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310911065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B0D8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8HHtY8i034889; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:55:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8HHtXcw034888; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:55:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:55:33 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20090917175533.GD34712@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Mel Flynn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Tom Worster References: <200909171914.29389.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909171914.29389.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_21 autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:55:36 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Tom Worster Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:55:38 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed: > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote: > > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn" > > > > wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: > > >> Tom Worster wrote: > > >>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know. > > >>> > > >>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy > > >>> solution for me. > > >> > > >> You could also just put: > > >> > > >> sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no" > > >> > > >> into your /etc/rc.conf file. > > > > > > What he wants is passing arguments without touching config files, which I > > > find myself needing sometimes as well, on machines where static > > > partitions are mounted read-only + kern.secure_level. > > > > that's right. > > > > when i read in 11.7 of the handbook: "Since the rc.d system is primarily > > intended to start/stop services at system startup/shutdown time, ..." i > > thought: maybe i'm making things hard by trying to use rc.d scripts when i > > could just execute the daemon's binary. > > One downside I forgot to mention: > You do open yourself up now to SSHD_FLAGS="-o AllowRoot=yes", so you may need > to complicate the logic a bit more, by sanitizing SSHD_FLAGS. Please explain how this can be exploited by a non-root user? Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 18:30:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9621065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from honeysuckle.london.02.net (honeysuckle.london.02.net [87.194.255.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8128FC1A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by honeysuckle.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A23EDE604BAB74F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:30:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4AB2804A.2010604@onetel.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:30:34 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AB0C98F.394.AF4C0F7@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za> <20090916072750.6ba23f0e@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20090916072750.6ba23f0e@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:30:36 -0000 Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200 > "DA Forsyth" wrote: > > [snip] > >> I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has >> not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one. >> >> How do I fix this? > > You could try the following; > > 1) Update your ports tree. including updating INDEX-7 or is that taken as read? #make fetchindex if done at the same time as updating the ports tree #make index any other time but it takes a long time Chris > 2) Remove: /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db > 3) Run: /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Ffuv > 4: Run: /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -fUu > 4) Run: /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > > Now run portupgrade as you normally do and see what transpires. > > If that still fails, install /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmanager > Then run it as thus: portmanager -u -l -y -p > > I have had great success in getting updates completed successfully with > portmanager when portupgrade and portmaster both crapped out. I would > suggest that you consider deleting the contents of > the /usr/ports/distfiles prior to running any of the above port utility > programs. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 18:31:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA93106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3958FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2009 14:31:24 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.7-GA) with ESMTP id LDB22613; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:31:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-227.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.227]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2009 14:31:24 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19122.32891.480770.467029@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:31:23 -0400 To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= In-Reply-To: <1751911935.20090917212007@yandex.ru> References: <19122.17463.670129.782291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20090917174501.GA34712@ei.bzerk.org> <1751911935.20090917212007@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Ruben de Groot , Robert Huff , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: ipfw + NAT doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:31:25 -0000 writes: > >> If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong? > What is your ipfw rules? They were appended to the original post. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 18:31:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162911065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.yandex.ru (forward12.yandex.ru [95.108.130.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4CD8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp14.yandex.ru (smtp14.yandex.ru [95.108.131.192]) by forward12.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3EA2615D0F12; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:20:00 +0400 (MSD) Received: from HOMEUSER (unknown [77.93.42.18]) by smtp14.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTPA id C1A64682C7; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:19:59 +0400 (MSD) X-Nat-Received: from [192.168.9.80]:1572 [ident-empty] by SPAM FILTER: with TPROXY id 1253211747.14909 abuse-to kes-kes@yandex.ru Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:20:07 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1751911935.20090917212007@yandex.ru> To: Ruben de Groot In-Reply-To: <20090917174501.GA34712@ei.bzerk.org> References: <19122.17463.670129.782291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20090917174501.GA34712@ei.bzerk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1253211600 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp14.yandex.ru Cc: Robert Huff , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: ipfw + NAT doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:31:32 -0000 Çäðàâñòâóéòå, Ruben. >> If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong? What is your ipfw rules? Âû ïèñàëè 17 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2009 ã., 20:45:01: RdG> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:14:15AM -0400, Robert Huff typed: >> >> I have a machine running >> >> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64 >> >> It has this in the config file for the running kernel: >> >> options IPFIREWALL #firewall >> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8) >> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity >> options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by default >> options IPFIREWALL_NAT #ipfw kernel nat support >> options LIBALIAS >> >> It (10.0.0.1) connects correctly to another machine (10.0.0.3); >> I know because .3 mounts one of .1's disks using Samba. >> With the ipfw rules appended below, I can't NAT, nor should I >> be able to. ("em0" faces the Internet; "em1" faces the other >> machine.) >> However: using these I still can't get through RdG> Through to what? You seem to be able to connect on a local subnet, but RdG> not to the internet through NAT, which you say is ok, because you shouldn't ? RdG> Please explain exactly what you want to do. >> Have I forgotten something? Or misunderstood something? >> If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong? RdG> /var/log/security is a good place to start, as your config seems to log allmost RdG> all denies. RdG> BTW, CURRENT is a development branch. Fine if you want to run it, but you RdG> should do some basic debugging yourself before posting problems with it. And RdG> then the -questions list is probably not the best place to find answers. -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Êîíüêîâ mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 18:36:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB081065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252AE8FC1A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so229115fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MAkP5J0uktJvuGKZtR1N920/rk3DVGn9ke6KERi1Lzw=; b=ckoj2fADVK1EpV2/gHJMFoksJSUlEEythcIn0rxsMkU/TK2LKCNw/mjwZDBaq5rr3Z qQYFODiCMBpnqFjKMR/BO4pMB058t7wzMlsuMiBcJYB503lQ9bOXtfTXup1XeceaJlya jjw/svKRTfEResidNwkU3rGJowjVN4yx6lJwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sgwEitgMeuS3KBj6cdEB1QJLft4eACNPdSZFzK5hNHRho6B933JmljBryviiSGo4s2 YRdBWPH6quo51Pk78Hfcj8//x3iRoI8Xs6Rq9ZWPKvrLkEBSVuaODKO+aTnq9zLWwUwU D5o7Ko2yChal4hjd0Oz/+tpv+YvwZK3xhbdC8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.9.23 with SMTP id j23mr646998bkj.162.1253212568936; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:36:08 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:36:10 -0000 Hi folks! I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but nothing happens... $ id uid=1001(iscariote) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel),920(vboxusers) User has been added to vboxusers mount: $ mount procfs on /proc (procfs, local) any ideas?? I did follow following: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/virtualization-host.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 18:39:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7064E106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139D68FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A20329604DB00E3; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:39:21 +0100 Message-ID: <4AB28258.4050208@onetel.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:39:20 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20090917045103.GA52938@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20090917045103.GA52938@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: warning, 100pc Ot... almost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:39:39 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > this is only to the few hundred of you guys who read the slice of my novel. before i invest > another twenty minutes in it, i'd be much obliged how many of you would actually buy th ebook. > WEll, either ebook of pod. please answer only offlist; i'm asking here because this is where most > of you guys know me. > > real question: anybody know when the latest OOo package will be available? by sheer > carelessness i blew mine away. the only pkg on good-day is the amd........ > > can anybody build me a cp of OOo.311. i'm still running i386 7.1. on ubuntu, only 2.4, :( you could _try_ one from here http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com/downloads-page it's 3.1.0 and FreeBSD 7.2 but it might do the trick. Chris > > > tx in advance, > > gary > > :wq From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:00:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05DF1065693 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (ip-58-28-152-174.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.152.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3EB8FC1E for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C6162840F; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:00:53 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:00:53 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jeronimo Calvo Message-ID: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:00:54 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > Hi folks! > > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but > nothing happens... Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "A person should be able to do a small bit of everything, specialisation is for insects" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:02:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A390A106568D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706EA8FC1E for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098127E821; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:02:22 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:02:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <200909171914.29389.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090917175533.GD34712@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20090917175533.GD34712@ei.bzerk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909172102.07287.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Ruben de Groot , Tom Worster Subject: Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:10 -0000 On Thursday 17 September 2009 19:55:33 Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed: > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote: > > > On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, "Mel Flynn" > > > > > > wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: > > > >> Tom Worster wrote: > > > >>> thanks, Mel, that's good to know. > > > >>> > > > >>> i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a > > > >>> tidy solution for me. > > > >> > > > >> You could also just put: > > > >> > > > >> sshd_flags="-o X11Forwarding=no" > > > >> > > > >> into your /etc/rc.conf file. > > > > > > > > What he wants is passing arguments without touching config files, > > > > which I find myself needing sometimes as well, on machines where > > > > static partitions are mounted read-only + kern.secure_level. > > > > > > that's right. > > > > > > when i read in 11.7 of the handbook: "Since the rc.d system is > > > primarily intended to start/stop services at system startup/shutdown > > > time, ..." i thought: maybe i'm making things hard by trying to use > > > rc.d scripts when i could just execute the daemon's binary. > > > > One downside I forgot to mention: > > You do open yourself up now to SSHD_FLAGS="-o AllowRoot=yes", so you may > > need to complicate the logic a bit more, by sanitizing SSHD_FLAGS. > > Please explain how this can be exploited by a non-root user? By adding this to .profile of compromised wheel account and waiting for him to run sudo -E or using an older version of sudo. Yes, it's an unlikely path. More to the point, it defeats having ro mounted /etc + secure level, since no reboot is required to modify the running sshd, so you're compromising your failsafe. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:10:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3B0106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140998FC28 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so713860ewy.36 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=HTejjENnMOPlIAsNpihgy4stl7icFd9yXdIh25ZKSDI=; b=iM79DOqw9vX1de0Mz1eQjzjEORoDkUYJrCTAU1NQfgAynBIJaVdbKrRbPqv9Kf8eK1 aw8S8b5GE4CIHov95UlsS6y6DulM/SPQhH0bIpICfUN9iHkfh2bXi3tMVKMdyTsv3gel xoOyW4U/1Iy4i03po/8QASqkTbrL4je9/hWq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Hc/GzzS7IJbuSuW6oQReeNG5cH8ZI2Xrqk+I/k2AW2kzbM5Xki/1QikhWXw4aoJFKR bZwZzn2mWNxh8bnyk+x47NjK5tKyudDRRTn2pO8vNik+Fy3AxvXG3om1HZZBC5EvLI2m cBvHqrT/NYvgy8y/9yvMTciBRP2QCrEaCbPzs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.93.16 with SMTP id k16mr295592wef.33.1253214636936; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:10:36 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:10:38 -0000 Chris Whitehouse wrote: >Jerry wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200 >> "DA Forsyth" wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has >>> not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one. >>> >>> How do I fix this? >> >> You could try the following; >> >> 1) Update your ports tree. > >including updating INDEX-7 or is that taken as read? > >#make fetchindex >if done at the same time as updating the ports tree >#make index >any other time but it takes a long time > Or just add the "F" flag to the portsdb call in step "4:". b. >Chris >> 2) Remove: /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db >> 3) Run: /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Ffuv >> 4: Run: /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -fUu >> 4) Run: /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:25:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C8106568D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675C98FC18 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so259694fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:25:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wzktYpNrW4AqAlTVFczz8XvZFM1lG+WU5sm+AhI1Xck=; b=nQ5Wra358nzBSgG9HWyExmM5/zRqK61kN6ezQ7kfDGJp5jsKi9nyy3UnbmF8k0+aCl emvMdZQfv7Sl07ATMItRdU5xKapR+UbRyfcCn9AzhhOxRud0BaiUK2m9CbeUj5vMMNHQ 0k+ZW7hUu3jELBF5qAH+MAPmO2WJHKLgrwXWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=cmUYlxgSd09JnpZqjPo0uqR814gV24IY6kiwUNT/Cfmb1jRscodbznhYHhchUA0J3s 1lUz2SSIg+Lo2I+h1OaSFqEVpgtD8sCpMWx+uP+VX0knxrqWaSAuyyxPmfPp1OJUp8L5 frJCxYTjYfarwfOXkNrX5iMTe/IsRCP96tRNw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.207 with SMTP id u15mr719650bkd.39.1253215518266; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:25:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:18 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Jonathan Chen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:19 -0000 Yes, I do # kldload vboxdrv.ko kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: File exists 2009/9/17 Jonathan Chen : > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> Hi folks! >> >> I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), >> when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but >> nothing happens... > > Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? > -- > Jonathan Chen > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > "A person should be able to do a small bit of everything, > specialisation is for insects" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:26:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2721F1065676 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9F08FC17 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84773 invoked by uid 98); 17 Sep 2009 20:33:09 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.135 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.135):. Processed in 0.045548 secs); 17 Sep 2009 19:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.135?) (192.168.0.135) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 20:33:09 +0100 From: Craig Butler To: Jonathan Chen In-Reply-To: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:16:48 +0000 Message-Id: <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jeronimo Calvo Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:26:09 -0000 On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), > > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but > > nothing happens... > > Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? Hi Have you tried running it under truss ? I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain and hang... Solution; Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 Hope it helps Cheers Craig Butler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:32:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40205106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D6D8FC19 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so263862fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:32:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Ds3gSM6RCFwKbz80tiYSal+zDgQuidYcX4ZoMcB8oRQ=; b=sTftQl0F3hiDfgYajO4vgFm9sH5mPZo6DtS4PInjCmf4jXtxEeGWf8tRWhLivcGUZZ 4tM0KHO2QLBqPnu0LPlqgfD8PGuTh2frk/ZBj13AO/FRYDiPCHYFGtzExVVTj2Lj2ycY v62hVjf4jJSYCnULfhyYGzviEKKciDSf9xWIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XZo0vSoN+FISzm9mbwNuG5vq7UY9tSrnHLbyXbSYCaOvUjBMrvhs3sm4YbEXF5VI+V AUksvOf4pf4Ij7Q1gonJK/z6Fi28CXEXEPkEYxeAkmnpbziqmBZIeIj7GT1YMiu/SAnF yWkmesk4sz8WluRf4WWzAnkBWpvlzp4xvKmWs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.162.143 with SMTP id v15mr729067bkx.50.1253215926507; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:32:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:32:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Craig Butler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:32:08 -0000 True... when runned $truss VirtualBox it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? Thanks a lot!! 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> > Hi folks! >> > >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but >> > nothing happens... >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? > > Hi > > Have you tried running it under truss ? > > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain > and hang... > > Solution; > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > > Hope it helps > > Cheers > > Craig Butler > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:41:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E8F106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:41:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC938FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so740387ewy.36 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:41:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=78CL85Ofi95trZNkgxk7Xi8tzvutAGVyGW3SONLIUwo=; b=pXpky5aK5FFGIf6vkmwDXSGuc+mYlPVRdlePjAtw8f1boE1ySatuvYV92Oc2NRrXiB 1NhDsGl2hIEud50ngnn+umkc9t8t7tTzuFGlhMhXsXPoVrTyFYUYSee7ttyG60+cT0i4 EezWmm1sgvvfe48AJ0SetrWEj/lufRcj6KKPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PCR84SVc5I8fiNaW+f6EIlwP66XNisKapUfDg4pCWeQCpos5dh896fOXk1noEOLdzM AGfAQGmfBiTYk3LacV1ZYm3B92tp7RAt7JXyBBSYf6ycz0A0c2Q9DYMMO64J1Ukl/7hI 1ewJ9IEUuBML0Ek/fe5doqcm5j0qOisEoAvow= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.0.73 with SMTP id 51mr308717wea.15.1253216469513; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:41:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:41:11 -0000 Patrick Gelsema wrote: >If the linux suggestion fails I will try this one. > I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to do here -- but from what I saw, the suggestions you are referring to only mentioned different ways of mounting the iso image from the dvd. Whether you mount the dvd, or just use some tool to extract the contents of the dvd without mounting it, you will still have to edit the contents, and then write them to a new medium. Most disks do not allow easy in-place editing of their contents, and in any case I would be reluctant to do this for WinPE. >Unfortunately I can't do Make release as it is not Freebsd. It is a >Windows based boot cd. I think by "make a release", the poster meant that you would use a WAIK or BartPE or whatever to make a new version of WinPE that incorporates your changes, and not that you would use a literal "make release". If WinPE has some kind of self-consistency checks against the content of it's own files that may be violated by editing one of them in an existing image, then you may have to do this anyway. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:44:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35913106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628328FC21 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88691 invoked by uid 98); 17 Sep 2009 20:51:22 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.135 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.135):. Processed in 4.186029 secs); 17 Sep 2009 19:51:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.135?) (192.168.0.135) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 20:51:17 +0100 From: Craig Butler To: Jeronimo Calvo In-Reply-To: References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:34:57 +0000 Message-Id: <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:44:22 -0000 On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > True... > > when runned > > $truss VirtualBox > > it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... > > How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ # make clean # make extract patch # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 # make # make deinstall # make reinstall /Craig B > > Thanks a lot!! > > 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> > Hi folks! > >> > > >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), > >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but > >> > nothing happens... > >> > >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? > > > > Hi > > > > Have you tried running it under truss ? > > > > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain > > and hang... > > > > Solution; > > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that > > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > > > > Hope it helps > > > > Cheers > > > > Craig Butler > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 19:49:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EFA10656CE for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF0C8FC21 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HJnlWn079304 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:49:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 282EABA95; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:49:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:49:47 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090917194947.GA78583@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:49:49 -0000 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:41:09PM +0000, b. f. wrote: > Patrick Gelsema wrote: > >If the linux suggestion fails I will try this one. > > > > I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to do here -- but from what I > saw, the suggestions you are referring to only mentioned different > ways of mounting the iso image from the dvd. Whether you mount the > dvd, or just use some tool to extract the contents of the dvd without > mounting it, you will still have to edit the contents, and then write > them to a new medium. Most disks do not allow easy in-place editing > of their contents, and in any case I would be reluctant to do this for > WinPE. =20 Have a look at the sysutils/isomaster port. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyktsACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUQRQCcDRYZYGn/1o3bMmn+taOp43Zr F7EAoJQo4irmqsrExvv2GjiSvfntrYJe =liWu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:20:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAAF106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A4C8FC1C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so283491bwz.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:20:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4Q01HbjOAyyiGSm6o0XQOR+SOT/p0IaJAlnwogo7cZs=; b=AGpecplcms3qfy8wZz/dVyehq3UQ4S4aOpmFaK8L6auv2DNTPH4k1OKcV/okMHNQhO MAp55700Ofa1BOvolUykh1FmL39rjStS3aEDv1v2QMNMP9EfEuhx7g4MTjjSOA603SfX 3O2QlPhqjsGjnDtHiFvTDfZPbQlP0slz8+WrQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bJTpXKU+aDTSwGJk7dcxAbYBOm/JxSEs5zB2/PcJd69O56C3jENF4In66+K/fke5/x q1hGTt1BIZ/NSY0rO1kWR9z+nk8tKJZYNtu80wIwyfQKn5boN0h5a43ONiWuC2yFDsZ7 zEEngyFkbEoCHHuf6s1WNq60gX3P04giDqNmM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.168.221 with SMTP id l29mr40245hbe.118.1253218839753; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:20:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090917174614.GB34712@ei.bzerk.org> References: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> <4AB22B09.4070507@ibctech.ca> <29722c130909170735w24886ac9j8c5faaed15d17bb9@mail.gmail.com> <20090917174614.GB34712@ei.bzerk.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:20:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Ruben de Groot , Anselm Strauss , Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: ZFS on small systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:20:41 -0000 2009/9/17 Ruben de Groot > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:35:37PM +0200, Anselm Strauss typed: > > Thanks for your advice, Steve. > > > > I looked a bit at the source code and in > > /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c and I > > found this: > > > > /* set min cache to 1/32 of all memory, or 16MB, whichever is more */ > > arc_c_min = MAX(arc_c / 4, 64<<18); > > > > Could this mean that 16 MB are already enough to run ZFS? > > I seriously doubt it. > > Ruben > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Sun dont recommend it on a system with < 1 gb of ram, 2 or more is preferred though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:25:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A3B1065676 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27878FC17 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so296993fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=00IXk6TixxXziP85hq2sW9SBmtf+uA1qTM9OYnpYcRk=; b=lARNrMXUG/CDQ4TNCW/ZHnUVaC1M74XkfOcyVeBQvEhEmrEooHib7qSxDbTojV3BPW YWohU8qFpIpc58IO/DPBrvzvJY03Z1QakHrstW1fHnGwVt0uWKNx9eCo6c2xiEcMoekP pxG0seAKt0VthDBpu63f2DmwHmfjrTMOZEH8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=fPFMC7DQujsRy+cNZUxhCRMXUn7yWCTfmohxHdbjTEkrUBhr633jEiT/9XnSdEz9Q3 0o3crkFhZubmwf9uS5wKGvBU+LZqx+Ltjxa8wk0sqGB/CPlfcs/cPXQBiZKtsL2RLOxK Pk8xgSQWlCF8WxZd3lhdBb6ieoTElf+2lbBck= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.168.220 with SMTP id l28mr46079hbe.117.1253219145569; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <73A54F2D-CC7F-460F-BF62-09980F7C17C3@gmail.com> References: <73A54F2D-CC7F-460F-BF62-09980F7C17C3@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:25:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Anselm Strauss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting ZFS and GPT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:25:47 -0000 2009/9/17 Anselm Strauss > Hi, > > I've read and tried out that FreeBSD is able to boot from ZFS directly, > also with GPT partitions, through zfsboot and gptzfsboot. When I tried the > last time 8-CURRENT it was however not built into the release CD. Will this > be included in the final release image? Is there any plan to include GPT and > ZFS setup in sysinstall during an initial installation? > > Cheers, > Anselm > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > To big a rewrite needed i think. I've heard of plans to potentially release a graphical installer based on pc-bsd, which will do all the bells an whistles. Not sure what stage its at though. The biggest thing we need for the release is for the loader to be compiled with zfs support in. It seems to have been in and out over the past few months so i try to make sure i have my own version specially compiled with it in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:42:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E211065679 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luizbcampos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7D18FC16 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so306765fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:42:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=tVmvsmZxQTsHh5oNAJcxLVqY1mcq1MHllH/A2J6AUVQ=; b=SMvMKW6JopBeYrF9yfU/mcLABTelRNDIi/NRy04yEqh9MSxJ1IRTRzICCgB/vbbK6d A6xgxT0j+alyRaD60sMyMVn8TNMR6WxCzJqBfT6pRsVVwY8ySegG+D7PC2GcO9wfyvYH JTofKW80L+n0DiodDRKTp1B1TNoqpz6b10f4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mVtQ/b+WKuSbmMF50S2EsKk1+3vcrBhMdHYRWv1D2TJeN4psBRc3lZ3Hc/W4yIpazK YJrY1nHxLc68tT7PYSxiiTOpn0cf/lJM615Egw0NyvVt5Q1YDRmkT4lpf5jmmE/Egeli 5ToJITY4FjS37p2bnkxE6q683ecRZ2UQx4XiU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.161.205 with SMTP id s13mr218843fax.70.1253218406093; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:13:26 -0300 Message-ID: From: LuizBCampos To: "questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Boot failure mounting FreeBSD-8.0beta4 DVD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:42:26 -0000 Dear Sirs After I had downloaded 8.0beta4 amd64 and recorded it on DVD on my Linux, I dont get booting this OS from DVD. I've followed all the info from man growisofs but it's unable to boot # growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=8.0-BETA4............... what's wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:45:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A21E1065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B874B8FC12 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so297808bwz.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:45:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RxisN2K733YQu1GyMlVdnxcN+XHMMvQX/pVeezpf3ac=; b=Kot3tDvoou1zOPJOSg6eF8wJmym65tsDMf+no/I7nLn+VnCn/R7oQCDuZyQe/48Iss Y5k+A3IviYUKxRVMKhzUm/pFCWZAb5KWEntduqqLkxgelXz1ltwgVLS3wLF0QUco3JjJ Ehv1HfsJ+4Ja0tHLyaCYRaZvfDC4n7TQa+SxA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sXf4TiJ/4RPIfsNUDIqYchsPR1LQaTvsuUzsU5pxSliq0r0nK9xcvRYOnXG+a0pBiI RrL42nKrcF6vLPqaNKxUIXs8cebWL39OnZfMhhcyG8IgBmT3vi7djGLuYn6VD5SYVWUl LlOAfcdnw+nKAHJLfMkFNmOia3iyMITzq2zwg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.162.143 with SMTP id v15mr791307bkx.50.1253220317468; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:45:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:45:17 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Craig Butler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:45:19 -0000 I am getting the following error on #make deinstall # make deinstall ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall it only takes few secs... and gives VirtualBox was installed. but when i run it as a normal user i get: $ VirtualBox bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> True... >> >> when runned >> >> $truss VirtualBox >> >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... >> >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ > # make clean > # make extract patch > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > # make > # make deinstall > # make reinstall > > /Craig B > >> >> Thanks a lot!! >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> > Hi folks! >> >> > >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but >> >> > nothing happens... >> >> >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? >> > >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain >> > and hang... >> > >> > Solution; >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> > >> > Hope it helps >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > Craig Butler >> > >> > >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:46:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C691B106568D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847A48FC1F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8HKj9tf009378; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:45:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:46:14 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Chris Whitehouse Message-ID: <20090917204614.GA55632@thought.org> References: <20090917045103.GA52938@thought.org> <4AB28258.4050208@onetel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AB28258.4050208@onetel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: warning, 100pc Ot... almost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:46:19 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:39:20PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > >this is only to the few hundred of you guys who read the slice of my > >novel. before i invest > >another twenty minutes in it, i'd be much obliged how many of you would > >actually buy th ebook. > >WEll, either ebook of pod. please answer only offlist; i'm asking here > >because this is where most of you guys know me. > > > >real question: anybody know when the latest OOo package will be > >available? by sheer > >carelessness i blew mine away. the only pkg on good-day is the amd........ > > > >can anybody build me a cp of OOo.311. i'm still running i386 7.1. on > >ubuntu, only 2.4, :( > > you could _try_ one from here > http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com/downloads-page > > it's 3.1.0 and FreeBSD 7.2 but it might do the trick. > > Chris > i've got the page bookmarked, thanks. and thanks to glenn for making this site available. (just a small fwiw, but i must've blown part of evo away because ir fails. kmail still works, tho. ) gary ps: i must really be tutrning into a feed; time for freebsd-for-dummies. =sigh= pps. thank for all 2 of you re my soon-to-be best selling novel [choke]!! > > > > > >tx in advance, > > > >gary > > > >:wq > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 5.67a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:52:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181931065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C1A8FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HKqREN008749; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:52:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AA58BA95; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:52:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:52:27 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: LuizBCampos Message-ID: <20090917205227.GA94532@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Boot failure mounting FreeBSD-8.0beta4 DVD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:52:29 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:13:26PM -0300, LuizBCampos wrote: > > After I had downloaded 8.0beta4 amd64 and recorded it on DVD on my > Linux, I dont get booting this OS from DVD. I've followed all the info > from man growisofs but it's unable to boot Can you be somewhat more specific? What is the error that you get? Is your system set up to boot from DVD? > # growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=3D8.0-BETA4............... what= 's wrong? Does the checksum of the DVD image match the one that you can find on the F= TP site?=20 If you run 'file' on the image, does it say that it is a bootable ISO 9660 filesystem? Ditto for the burned DVD? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyoYsACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXUvgCfRwVwlhVFvFcUWyLaz77kO1b1 2uoAnjuA5uOTtdprOxa0pzMeVkZfy104 =a9zy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:53:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3160410656A4 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222ED8FC19 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3155 invoked by uid 98); 17 Sep 2009 22:00:23 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.135 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.135):. Processed in 4.78502 secs); 17 Sep 2009 21:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.135?) (192.168.0.135) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 22:00:18 +0100 From: Craig Butler To: Jeronimo Calvo In-Reply-To: References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:43:58 +0000 Message-Id: <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:53:24 -0000 On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:45 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > I am getting the following error on #make deinstall > > # make deinstall > ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox > ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > incorrectly specified?) > > Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall > > it only takes few secs... and gives > > VirtualBox was installed. > > but when i run it as a normal user i get: > > $ VirtualBox > bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory ok maybe the reinstall is broke... try; # make deinstall # make install > > > > 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> True... > >> > >> when runned > >> > >> $truss VirtualBox > >> > >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... > >> > >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? > > > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ > > # make clean > > # make extract patch > > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so > > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > > # make > > # make deinstall > > # make reinstall > > > > /Craig B > > > >> > >> Thanks a lot!! > >> > >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> >> > Hi folks! > >> >> > > >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), > >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but > >> >> > nothing happens... > >> >> > >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? > >> > > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? > >> > > >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain > >> > and hang... > >> > > >> > Solution; > >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that > >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > >> > > >> > Hope it helps > >> > > >> > Cheers > >> > > >> > Craig Butler > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:56:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D361B106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5401E8FC16 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so304406bwz.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:56:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pHuoAfirhJKS49J4JKp8D6GkmA2HVRM1azOsuax/mG0=; b=EN49jHKXBkyfhRp29yiIxME2i/UCphaAlCrzDw9ueat7J+s0tgINDNvrCSJ7WyZFVe 8hbEdO+/pxkHdc+PYEIYOqM1Milz3BXvjayOKlkBdYlYy6OVWPNCsghJpZKZTIsBDQJP Ei4cfaV9HT6u82+bnH95gJ/JvARqqp3AnoaWQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GNyLrmdATyoEpe6PO9s5G6WXucr587zk2rPJ0QTnkESfrtAR4tQgjfk/248lVVExcG 2J9PHKC7mLDbdL2ZMJWl8yCv928TAjcOSAAdssc73VvC1lDz4vqIwdAb/WIVw8+n9dXY d9PjwRPxRGHIjeySDiK1hFkt87uOPRNBZyccg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.83 with SMTP id k19mr797683bkd.96.1253220993359; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:56:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:56:33 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Craig Butler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:56:35 -0000 same thing... when making #make deinstall i get the same error: ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox > ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > incorrectly specified?) and when making install, keep saying that is already installed :S 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:45 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> I am getting the following error on #make deinstall >> >> # make deinstall >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox >> ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is >> incorrectly specified?) >> >> Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall >> >> it only takes few secs... and gives >> >> VirtualBox was installed. >> >> but when i run it as a normal user i get: >> >> $ VirtualBox >> bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory > > ok maybe the reinstall is broke... try; > > # make deinstall > # make install > > >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> True... >> >> >> >> when runned >> >> >> >> $truss VirtualBox >> >> >> >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... >> >> >> >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? >> > >> > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ >> > # make clean >> > # make extract patch >> > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so >> > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> > # make >> > # make deinstall >> > # make reinstall >> > >> > /Craig B >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot!! >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> >> > Hi folks! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), >> >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but >> >> >> > nothing happens... >> >> >> >> >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? >> >> > >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? >> >> > >> >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain >> >> > and hang... >> >> > >> >> > Solution; >> >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that >> >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> >> > >> >> > Hope it helps >> >> > >> >> > Cheers >> >> > >> >> > Craig Butler >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 20:58:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A047110656B9 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordofhyphens@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCE48FC16 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so316026fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:58:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WalW6Fe1KEBnTCwvX4AcdMHJG8y5s9YB7joEVGGe7Js=; b=lzuwtrZug/Qv3YdmXRia6XK+0gwOAPm/9i0SF/bZi29vE2YusIty6IkBC0bgEqGlgk 6iIx4L6zWtPcrdIeGSmZWE5Ul0iyelr90YlrxzRCLLczUNn4JcO1AOn+sEMpC8dF9Ve+ iw8MvjCWO59dK+ddRi/S/nSioLQ8ilqy3vUM4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ccQZuVqsQC8aM046xjjZ5ljwujMKFXSmev80R6ykBt42KZzGwG4V68csHDzw/vmgBi oZa8nMaP/WrTBsnRn5bD65JsPkc/7kTKOWvjRz79dC1v0031e2mT625WKNvgN3W28XQE S1fu9jqXdAMGXYK4IgJ8/7uy/yjhOx7TGmUKk= Received: by 10.204.13.195 with SMTP id d3mr791812bka.135.1253221091060; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?131.230.191.154? (ee173.engr.siu.edu [131.230.191.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e17sm634135fke.32.2009.09.17.13.58.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB2A2DF.2090503@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:58:07 -0500 From: LoH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Unsolicited NFS notification causing panic? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:58:12 -0000 I've been trying to debug a server running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE/amd64 that's hanging intermittently or rebooting without much luck. The machine hosts the home directories for the users over NFS. The workstations that use it are pretty much all Solaris 10 boxes (mostly sparc with five x86 installs), with between two and five Solaris 8 machines. The same machine is also a CUPS print server, which merely takes print requests and forwards them to networked printers. The machine had been running for about three weeks before exhibiting these problems (I had tinkered with using the RARP daemon, but have since reloaded the OS in an attempt to make sure my tinkering hadn't left any lasting damage). The only messages I'm getting from /var/log/messages are like the ones below (the last message sent before the machine went down and rebooted). Sep 17 13:54:32 rpc.statd: Unsolicited notification from host The machine itself is a Dell PowerEdge 2900, and the HDDs are three 1TB drives in RAID5 (two virtual HDDs). Any ideas as to what could be causing this? Our next test is to do a complete backup of the NFS partition onto a separate machine (different hardware) and test that one with a near-identical setup to screen for hardware problems. --Joseph Lenox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 21:05:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C41E106572F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C25F8FC14 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5319 invoked by uid 98); 17 Sep 2009 22:12:02 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.135 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.135):. Processed in 4.566775 secs); 17 Sep 2009 21:12:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.135?) (192.168.0.135) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 22:11:58 +0100 From: Craig Butler To: Jeronimo Calvo In-Reply-To: References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:55:37 +0000 Message-Id: <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:05:03 -0000 On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:56 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > same thing... > > when making > > #make deinstall i get the same error: > > ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox > > ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > > pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist > > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' > > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > > incorrectly specified?) > > and when making install, keep saying that is already installed :S try pkg_delete with the -f flag; you'll need to; # pkg_info | grep virtualbox # pkg_delete -f virtualbox- then in virtualbox port dir.... # make install I suspect the make reinstall script failed to symlink the VirtualBox executable into /usr/local/bin > > 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:45 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> I am getting the following error on #make deinstall > >> > >> # make deinstall > >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox > >> ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist > >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' > >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > >> incorrectly specified?) > >> > >> Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall > >> > >> it only takes few secs... and gives > >> > >> VirtualBox was installed. > >> > >> but when i run it as a normal user i get: > >> > >> $ VirtualBox > >> bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory > > > > ok maybe the reinstall is broke... try; > > > > # make deinstall > > # make install > > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> >> True... > >> >> > >> >> when runned > >> >> > >> >> $truss VirtualBox > >> >> > >> >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... > >> >> > >> >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? > >> > > >> > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ > >> > # make clean > >> > # make extract patch > >> > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so > >> > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > >> > # make > >> > # make deinstall > >> > # make reinstall > >> > > >> > /Craig B > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Thanks a lot!! > >> >> > >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > >> >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> >> >> > Hi folks! > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), > >> >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but > >> >> >> > nothing happens... > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi > >> >> > > >> >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? > >> >> > > >> >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain > >> >> > and hang... > >> >> > > >> >> > Solution; > >> >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that > >> >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > >> >> > > >> >> > Hope it helps > >> >> > > >> >> > Cheers > >> >> > > >> >> > Craig Butler > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 21:09:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88625106568F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458B78FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so299214and.13 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EruXDwqrZy3gS2w4T3aI1HlNWbFnF/rxolDrDjLg5w4=; b=kqkya8DeQ9l6IYlW75GTQ5vZ70pgP7IHfAxyFwfeFVYXE/rtAbk7cOhZGV4I21HC7U z9wpw+EAxeZj1nByvnGjT6OcYBRHz2qjyKI9o7lVL8COF8NNqAI8IiZModLDduhwT5Jc csXgBLe+JQGSwJ2us2Nbb3AeRZTz0r6Siby5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eHLUu8/JLmNnfJZ3CuhLPU9kxRqD6zCf5yo+3JAckxZsFZpSLP8hpU444Nk0nVxr6l yhYzQfVz92748mxPtvVqcGdFjoX2kYEFr7A6xfREhMbYitAj0d9UwdCRqRpMM4OGMiq5 ZaT2drZx2P+goJyRwskr64dC5Afo0SmTDr+s8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.80.7 with SMTP id d7mr667253anb.43.1253221768231; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:09:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:09:28 -0600 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: "Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:09:29 -0000 On 9/16/09, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > Hi list, > > I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image btw. > Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before creating > the image. > > Mounting is not the issue, copying data neither but the ISO is also > bootable. There must be a simpler solution as in copying all the content > with cpio and making it bootable. OS on the DVD is WinPE btw. > > Does anyone have some pointers for performing this action? > > Rgds, > > Patrick the cd9660/iso9660 filesystem type doesn't support rw options. Even if you mdconfig and mount -o rw, it is mounted ro "editing" a ISO is not possible. will require a remastering process. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 21:50:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E97E106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47878FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so331719bwz.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:50:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Cg9ogkfXJR07SF1ptPKo8i+I2d9LqAnGV0L/jqKGIqo=; b=wIyjkjSR7C7DlD6fQj85fsf4DwthlVbUiFYFGpNhkUYl2LaEvru/m83xysny7GutsG U0EMe8CbKQeesMJ+YIocUKSePLPOgswU5mUMMzzZ79zW8yg/G2rJwRUqwR+bH6Lu95iP BMMwM6ndwDepF0UwrfNz8dOwMj6fNYe8cD9NQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FAmDN51HQ/HR35noVfiviVSQzJy2aEpcfn2RsC3nzubfcF7aGXfwi8NXls9gUxCCu+ tYAenjRDznjwdanCzdJdehp002OSuzyBLvVcdE9gXbacNHNMNvNI0vNIql1zZCU4JeCQ A979ggmBaHyDOBJwk8WvjMP0dBsRGLRqX5pz4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.151 with SMTP id g23mr821018bkw.148.1253224246548; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:50:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:50:45 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Craig Butler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:50:48 -0000 I am still having the same issue... I think a pkgdb -F should solve this... what do u think? 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:56 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> same thing... >> >> when making >> >> #make deinstall i get the same error: >> >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox >> > ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> > pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' >> > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is >> > incorrectly specified?) >> >> and when making install, keep saying that is already installed :S > > try pkg_delete with the -f flag; > > you'll need to; > > # pkg_info | grep virtualbox > # pkg_delete -f virtualbox- > > then in virtualbox port dir.... > > # make install > > I suspect the make reinstall script failed to symlink the VirtualBox > executable into /usr/local/bin > >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:45 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> I am getting the following error on #make deinstall >> >> >> >> # make deinstall >> >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox >> >> ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' >> >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is >> >> incorrectly specified?) >> >> >> >> Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall >> >> >> >> it only takes few secs... and gives >> >> >> >> VirtualBox was installed. >> >> >> >> but when i run it as a normal user i get: >> >> >> >> $ VirtualBox >> >> bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory >> > >> > ok maybe the reinstall is broke... try; >> > >> > # make deinstall >> > # make install >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> >> True... >> >> >> >> >> >> when runned >> >> >> >> >> >> $truss VirtualBox >> >> >> >> >> >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... >> >> >> >> >> >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? >> >> > >> >> > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ >> >> > # make clean >> >> > # make extract patch >> >> > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so >> >> > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> >> > # make >> >> > # make deinstall >> >> > # make reinstall >> >> > >> >> > /Craig B >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot!! >> >> >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> >> >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hi folks! >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), >> >> >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but >> >> >> >> > nothing happens... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hi >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain >> >> >> > and hang... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Solution; >> >> >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that >> >> >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hope it helps >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Cheers >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Craig Butler >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 21:57:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8690A106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB738FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so345738fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=xxyj94eaygPnJc/HLafMxX4AG+O9B86n5WYEycTyVNQ=; b=jfz1LO/GWAk2QayX8LyxwY4DQSnbijEkryjSBVfVpHpS+CVr4KKXPk/3bBpwo78Ke8 yilpUJxJoxt+YJxWZNV0nPdEU/FJsIxzXbE4zOkM8LTAR45foXeCg8sT7Lb7fKCgkXLm Ec9YJs+iMbnUY3n0xJlQm3tPRiYcIxfLGVgiY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=v6hwp4VC2ZuNbLNpvHwPX7nNrrgVvL6cGyCi/8CEcVPKzFOu775RNa6qXBtH31GlZt W0DXX/9U+yQ4Hex6a87h891a29Rfsbk9/zprl9hkzTpkcpGGqcZC5tk7k3+PTdXXWbHF qqSKaS2nqSeSW8oq/ColuSdZl35yVLffQKgNY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.207 with SMTP id u15mr840834bkd.39.1253224629188; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:57:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory (pkgdb -F) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:57:10 -0000 Hi folks, dealing with broken package.... (virtualbox which is driving me crazy) I am getting the following error everytime i try to deinstall it, to make a clean installation from source: pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory any idea on how to manage to get rid of this error? Cheers! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:01:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02DC106566C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA3A8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16760 invoked by uid 98); 17 Sep 2009 23:08:20 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.135 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.135):. Processed in 4.039579 secs); 17 Sep 2009 22:08:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.135?) (192.168.0.135) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 23:08:16 +0100 From: Craig Butler To: Jeronimo Calvo In-Reply-To: References: <20090917190053.GA5250@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:51:55 +0000 Message-Id: <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:01:19 -0000 On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 21:50 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > I am still having the same issue... > > I think a pkgdb -F should solve this... > > what do u think? It cant hurt... pkg_delete -f should have solved it tho according to the manual; -f, --force Force removal of the package, even if a dependency is recorded or the deinstall or require script fails. > > 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:56 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> same thing... > >> > >> when making > >> > >> #make deinstall i get the same error: > >> > >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox > >> > ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > >> > pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist > >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > >> > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' > >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > >> > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > >> > incorrectly specified?) > >> > >> and when making install, keep saying that is already installed :S > > > > try pkg_delete with the -f flag; > > > > you'll need to; > > > > # pkg_info | grep virtualbox > > # pkg_delete -f virtualbox- > > > > then in virtualbox port dir.... > > > > # make install > > > > I suspect the make reinstall script failed to symlink the VirtualBox > > executable into /usr/local/bin > > > >> > >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:45 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> >> I am getting the following error on #make deinstall > >> >> > >> >> # make deinstall > >> >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox > >> >> ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > >> >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist > >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > >> >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' > >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > >> >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > >> >> incorrectly specified?) > >> >> > >> >> Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall > >> >> > >> >> it only takes few secs... and gives > >> >> > >> >> VirtualBox was installed. > >> >> > >> >> but when i run it as a normal user i get: > >> >> > >> >> $ VirtualBox > >> >> bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory > >> > > >> > ok maybe the reinstall is broke... try; > >> > > >> > # make deinstall > >> > # make install > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > >> >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> >> >> True... > >> >> >> > >> >> >> when runned > >> >> >> > >> >> >> $truss VirtualBox > >> >> >> > >> >> >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... > >> >> >> > >> >> >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? > >> >> > > >> >> > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ > >> >> > # make clean > >> >> > # make extract patch > >> >> > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so > >> >> > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > >> >> > # make > >> >> > # make deinstall > >> >> > # make reinstall > >> >> > > >> >> > /Craig B > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks a lot!! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > >> >> >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > >> >> >> >> > Hi folks! > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), > >> >> >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but > >> >> >> >> > nothing happens... > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Hi > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain > >> >> >> > and hang... > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Solution; > >> >> >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that > >> >> >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Hope it helps > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Cheers > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Craig Butler > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:04:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBA41065695 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3174F8FC20 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n8HM4Tx1090481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:04:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8HM4TgO080895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:04:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HM4TIx080884; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:04:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:04:28 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Jeronimo Calvo Message-ID: <20090917220427.GA22019@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:04:29 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory (pkgdb -F) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:33 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 17), Jeronimo Calvo said: > dealing with broken package.... (virtualbox which is driving me crazy) I > am getting the following error everytime i try to deinstall it, to make a > clean installation from source: > > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > > any idea on how to manage to get rid of this error? That is a warning that the packing list included a directory delete request, but there were still files in it. It could be a bug in the plist (not specifying all the files the package installed), or it could be a shared directory that another package installed other files into. Regardless, it's just a warning and the package was deleted. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:04:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3388110656C3 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17698FC12 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so349110fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PVE6dGEVGC8N0+L70Kbx4W88ZwR/jllywfx02CvwG/c=; b=Hz1YynaRJ9adGDrVKsgoEdIBB8w/qMUdbqr9EdNQUmKwXbg9av52aZQpbQhY31gNO7 lBlkNp+CR2pFPWec9lRsJ4I7T7VllrAjowjYrRfJkdHXRGE3scr8a2+7g5eZ/BIe+ILG z68aUaAqgF3Gns/3AdHEJOGlyE/Y+xKUdheyI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=x8p1rXmB9I8NyKC1LRagWAn4E/u6g+BulNTGCMkk9TQ5VeGYMPpL8za7N4+Dt0Itb0 0ePs3uS6seOxf7l5yvavg9merD4mNuqxUtwx6EN6udc4HE8NJs4ajomA7woUe3ftXDuZ j2AGkZ/ZhAei7mOYEM+7nhs/QS29Hc0dw1GA8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.207 with SMTP id u15mr846431bkd.39.1253225088779; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> References: <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:48 +0000 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Craig Butler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:50 -0000 for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D # pkg_info | grep virtualbox virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware # pkg_delete -f virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 21:50 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> I am still having the same issue... >> >> I think a pkgdb -F should solve this... >> >> what do u think? > It cant hurt... pkg_delete -f should have solved it tho according to > the manual; > > -f, --force > Force removal of the package, even if a dependency is > recorded or the deinstall or require script fails. > >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:56 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> same thing... >> >> >> >> when making >> >> >> >> #make deinstall i get the same error: >> >> >> >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox >> >> > ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> >> > pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist >> >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> >> > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' >> >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' >> >> > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is >> >> > incorrectly specified?) >> >> >> >> and when making install, keep saying that is already installed :S >> > >> > try pkg_delete with the -f flag; >> > >> > you'll need to; >> > >> > # pkg_info | grep virtualbox >> > # pkg_delete -f virtualbox- >> > >> > then in virtualbox port dir.... >> > >> > # make install >> > >> > I suspect the make reinstall script failed to symlink the VirtualBox >> > executable into /usr/local/bin >> > >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:45 +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> >> I am getting the following error on #make deinstall >> >> >> >> >> >> # make deinstall >> >> >> ===> Deinstalling for emulators/virtualbox >> >> >> ===> Deinstalling virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> >> >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' doesn't exist >> >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> >> >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox/nls' >> >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' >> >> >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is >> >> >> incorrectly specified?) >> >> >> >> >> >> Btw, skipping that step and doing a #make reinstall >> >> >> >> >> >> it only takes few secs... and gives >> >> >> >> >> >> VirtualBox was installed. >> >> >> >> >> >> but when i run it as a normal user i get: >> >> >> >> >> >> $ VirtualBox >> >> >> bash: /usr/local/bin/VirtualBox: No such file or directory >> >> > >> >> > ok maybe the reinstall is broke... try; >> >> > >> >> > # make deinstall >> >> > # make install >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> >> >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:32 +0100, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> >> >> True... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when runned >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> $truss VirtualBox >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> it gives me Error in SUPR3hardenedmain... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> How do i reinstall the package properly to get VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/ >> >> >> > # make clean >> >> >> > # make extract patch >> >> >> > # edit work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22683/Config.kmk (or LocalConfig.kmk) so >> >> >> > that VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> >> >> > # make >> >> >> > # make deinstall >> >> >> > # make reinstall >> >> >> > >> >> >> > /Craig B >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot!! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2009/9/17 Craig Butler : >> >> >> >> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:00 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:08PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > Hi folks! >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > I do have a problem when launching VirtualBox (installed from source), >> >> >> >> >> > when launched as a normal user it doesnt lunch. Takes few secs... but >> >> >> >> >> > nothing happens... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Did you "kldload vboxdrv.ko"? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Hi >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Have you tried running it under truss ? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I think you might find that it will say - Error in SUPR3HardenedMain >> >> >> >> > and hang... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Solution; >> >> >> >> > Rebuild and install Virtualbox port after editing Config.kmk so that >> >> >> >> > VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0 >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Hope it helps >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Cheers >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Craig Butler >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:12:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A032F106568B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BD38FC14 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8HMCJbH084944; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:12:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5CECDBA8F; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:12:19 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Jeronimo Calvo Message-ID: <20090917221219.GA96757@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory (pkgdb -F) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:12:21 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:57:09PM +0000, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: > Hi folks, >=20 > dealing with broken package.... (virtualbox which is driving me crazy) > I am getting the following error everytime i try to deinstall it, to > make a clean installation from source: >=20 > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >=20 > any idea on how to manage to get rid of this error? The package/ports system will not delete files unless it knows they came fr= om a package/port that is being deleted; it will not delete possible user-made files, which is a Good Thing! Apparently some file(s) were left in the directory in question. Have a look= at what they are. If they are part of VirtualBox, then the packing list for virtualbox should be updated to include them, so that they will be deleted when virtualbox is removed. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqytEMACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXNtwCcCApbgKk0+8ktSvLLBhUnbzRg 7d0An0aJG8zD0MoxuH3xeG9rx+dC8c5S =1alc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:48:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875F21065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB768FC18 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workvpn (jn@stealth.jnielsen.net [74.218.226.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n8HMmJel046384 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:48:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:48:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909171848.18612.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:48:20 -0000 On Thursday 17 September 2009 17:09:28 Tim Judd wrote: > On 9/16/09, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > > I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image > > btw. Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before > > creating the image. > > the cd9660/iso9660 filesystem type doesn't support rw options. Even > if you mdconfig and mount -o rw, it is mounted ro If your change does not require altering the size of the file you wish to edit you may be able to just use a hex editor. I don't know enough about the ISO 9660 filesystem to say whether and how often it fragments files, but for a localized change you should be able to find the block containing the original file data and alter it. On the plus side you can check your work by mounting the modified ISO image and making sure you got the right file, etc. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 00:37:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12E91065679 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C53D8FC19 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MoRTi-0005RM-5c for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:37:34 -0700 Message-ID: <25498179.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:37:34 -0700 (PDT) From: jaymax To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jaymax36@gmail.com Subject: Undelete or recover from badblocks on disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:37:34 -0000 I seemed to have lost some critical dump files during a restore. The directory in which they were backed up in seemed to vaporize. The data was present as indicated by df -h but the directory was not listed. fsck on the disk was ineffective fsck_ffs produced an extensive listing of bad block, a final SALVAGE option, but on completion, the disk "capacity" from the df -h was significantly reduced. Is there anyway of recovering even 'partial' data from these lost blocks? The drive has been disconnected so that there would be no 'write' activities? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Undelete-or-recover-from-badblocks-on-disks-tp25498179p25498179.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:50:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A981065694 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kickeyhickey@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f189.google.com (mail-vw0-f189.google.com [209.85.212.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991DF8FC21 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws27 with SMTP id 27so584860vws.3 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:50:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=5jGm8Bn+0/KUsam2C3GznDLOk6DITCtv/ItrvFPJ6hc=; b=lLrknTjFNy3Ya/RZOaXOsUonMu8rW4PzzlTxbWfi9n/Wuy1cUPFT526TWuK1vvfpi/ KZpGnDRn0LiY/kd4PHYMozZEbGrPOUmxCWyIDBLk5hpCNInSZA8lbWmUmc+y9xIOPvET JyxLEo2d2YPUEBqlm/VOmQR4miYq4qE74aIHI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vrJ3iR8jNBa58b/HNUzp9otqT03aSXq7Drh0WMgnS7III8bUgfW/DXtCU5UKzSYir4 yYaEdyaCerwUVEu0fKKP4npZwqjglg1WPxYuqyABIT+pNcIjU6Xveo7JMZiZuN4N91Ti LpJ8g51/JPIBqTis3n8OJRczgorZJKfz5ygIE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.107.41 with SMTP id z41mr211929vco.5.1253226583088; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:29:43 -0700 Message-ID: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> From: Chris Hickey To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:54:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:50:58 -0000 A friend installed this program and I don't know how to use it. Everything was fine until the power went out and when it booted back up it said "/dev/amrd0s1d: unexpected soft update inconsistency: run fsck manually . the following file system had an inconsistency: ufs: /dev/amrd0s1d (/var) Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh. If you could give me a step by step of what to do that would be awesome. I tried sending this to your bug department and they told me to talk to you. -- Chris Hickey "Kickey" Hollywood Dropout Productions cell: 858-220-6610 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 02:15:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C69F106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dstegner@earthlink.net) Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54B58FC18 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:15:41 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=lV4lC6r9p4rzT30le/YEzojq4JZXPGP3PnZZ4b06mVdE6xQQQKJASBr8+Cx+8gR3; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [64.183.64.219] (helo=xws001) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MoSob-00079P-80 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:03:13 -0400 Message-ID: <000601ca3804$2ebc2fb0$69dea8c0@xws001> From: "Dave Stegner" To: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:03:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-ELNK-Trace: 4844461f90b6f2561aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79c0e3f52bb096d6dd546d20797a92cd0e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.183.64.219 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:01:31 +0000 Subject: Virus scanning for Exim mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:15:42 -0000 I have been looking on the FreeBSD site and ports for a virus scanner to use with an Exim mail server, without much luck. Does anyone know of command line virus scanners (open source or commercial) that work with FreeBSD 7.2 and Exim?? Thanking you in advance, David R. Stegner From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 03:11:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB931065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599368FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3583A3844; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:11:29 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1253243489; x= 1255057889; bh=zg2T7r2OtbeEeITK3Jt+ic5RN1/iiLdwD9v3f6232aE=; b=C gpFcreHMy4XuS0Y6ANi6gqYXkDBskI7heWuND0Gr/hrWTZ60qtiqwKmCuOMYiL5I zKLzQz3rILYVIJZendgjTUMX2oeH1prE0PoV3g26RrD5o0FJizidEoIULbjcqhW4 vhx+bRc1XaXhrmzJylllXWw5ba8Zmrg0wcHEECNrbM= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2mqPZQVXk5U7; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:11:29 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC063A3836; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:11:28 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8I3BSST038257; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:11:28 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:11:28 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200909180311.n8I3BSST038257@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: dstegner@earthlink.net In-reply-to: <000601ca3804$2ebc2fb0$69dea8c0@xws001> (dstegner@earthlink.net) References: <000601ca3804$2ebc2fb0$69dea8c0@xws001> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virus scanning for Exim mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:11:31 -0000 Hi, > Does anyone know of command line virus scanners (open source or > commercial) that work with FreeBSD 7.2 and Exim?? Clamav, open source, in the ports, command line and daemon mode. Kaspersky, commercial, command line and daemon mode for the mail server package (something undocumented called aveserver and aveclient). The advantage of a daemon scanner, when used in conjunction with a mail server is that the scanner runs in the background and scans the files that are submited to it, as the scanner is always running, it does not take time loading the virus patterns every time, so there is no start-up over head (few seconds) and the scan is very fast. I think there are others, but these are the one I use. They both integrate fine in amavisd-new (and I beleive amavisd-new works with Exim). Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 03:27:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5851A1065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from sv4.hmnoc.net (sv4.hmnoc.net [63.247.76.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334918FC16 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [187.78.120.104] (port=64966 helo=papi) by sv4.hmnoc.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoU89-00039p-AG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:27:29 -0300 From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:28:22 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909180028.22764.mlobo@digiart.art.br> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sv4.hmnoc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - digiart.art.br Subject: Re: HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:27:30 -0000 On Thursday 17 September 2009 19:29:43 Chris Hickey wrote: > A friend installed this program and I don't know how to use it. Everything > was fine until the power went out and when it booted back up it said > "/dev/amrd0s1d: unexpected soft update inconsistency: run fsck manually . > the following file system had an inconsistency: ufs: /dev/amrd0s1d (/var) > Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh. > > If you could give me a step by step of what to do that would be awesome. I > tried sending this to your bug department and they told me to talk to you. 1) press ENTER for /bin/sh 2) type: fsck -y /dev/amrd0s1d (or just fsck -y to check ALL drives) 3) type: reboot -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winedows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 03:28:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43551065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803B88FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so392979and.13 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:28:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cjhacyU2TdpgEcTih2LR2wJ+S1TIOxzfV/ykZjyAurY=; b=iwIj9qSoDkULLbSomG/f2ZeCxIDnN7LODd0MmMv126XIjZPz5wt2eR5pRaIhzWo8eQ dCpajR5XUDXZi4I7xpHYg0FGM/S4VytOxeoQfnzP6iGwMtzEXfqXaIfsG/XMQCZREHI+ p0rhhRfH41++oUt68ZGcG864xtgcsRajS0Bn4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=k5wmpVzw/hpJQAIHfwNG0lDO8YIO5c27wDzHJVLG//b9gq/NFjq5naJ/STE4+yPULt HmcHJnOgd8K1nq+cFZ8XiWEiGTKut2TOkoXocIzuStfXGRCvwF6e4i1jELmowmncdFhe yaX3zs6lwTjzEqeSzSuZU0L01cQYLkeIyiR6Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.24.22 with SMTP id 22mr945108anx.119.1253244532893; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:28:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909171848.18612.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <200909171848.18612.lists@jnielsen.net> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:28:52 -0600 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: John Nielsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Change one file in an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:28:53 -0000 On 9/17/09, John Nielsen wrote: > On Thursday 17 September 2009 17:09:28 Tim Judd wrote: >> On 9/16/09, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: >> > I need to change one file in an existing ISO image. It is a DVD image >> > btw. Unfortunately I dont have many options of changing the fie before >> > creating the image. >> >> the cd9660/iso9660 filesystem type doesn't support rw options. Even >> if you mdconfig and mount -o rw, it is mounted ro > > If your change does not require altering the size of the file you wish to > edit > you may be able to just use a hex editor. I don't know enough about the ISO > 9660 filesystem to say whether and how often it fragments files, but for a > localized change you should be able to find the block containing the > original > file data and alter it. On the plus side you can check your work by mounting > the modified ISO image and making sure you got the right file, etc. > > JN Until the CRC kicks in. Copy, edit, remaster. To me, there's a reason it's called 'mastering' a CDROM I'm sorry, unionfs is the only other way, and unionfs isn't workable on WinPE (to which the OP clearly stated that this is the disc he wants to edit). Bart's bbie (Bart's Boot Image Extractor), an win32 app will write the image file in any iso or cdrom to a file. re-use that file to specify the el-torito boot image... probably need no-emulation mode. Until I see proof of "on the fly editing" of a CD-ROM image, I will always preach that a CD-ROM cannot be altered except by remastering an image. Thank you, --Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 03:33:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D921065676 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A298FC1A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885423A3844; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:17:07 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1253243827; x= 1255058227; bh=wYMgfSK6jjxJtNQDmlg5vNtqWVIUyOniNqbap4kd+yw=; b=D w1SJL04Y6XQtG1OvkksVp/c4MNlSrnjFVRpadczk1sgz6d+AZsW6FsnGovZlctlj OrbGt+OZScsnbirCEH84fhxPDwwJUwRdFrGrO68ztagVBxJe43I+r4R+U5vXHnS5 41ygR/4AAfjPbOELEyV5Jo+dUUQkA/DaBgl4FnJevk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id f62w3hZcbXaS; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:17:07 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5A43A3836; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:17:06 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8I3H62o038401; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:17:06 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:17:06 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200909180317.n8I3H62o038401@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: kickeyhickey@gmail.com In-reply-to: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> (message from Chris Hickey on Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:29:43 -0700) References: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:33:58 -0000 Hi Chris, > was fine until the power went out and when it booted back up it said > "/dev/amrd0s1d: unexpected soft update inconsistency: run fsck > manually . the following file system had an inconsistency: ufs: > /dev/amrd0s1d (/var) Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for > /bin/sh. At this line, you press the RETURN/ENTER key. You will be given a command promt that should be # (or $). At that stage, you are in command mode, you cannot use the mouse, there is no window system, you have to type commands on the keyboard and see the result on the screen. You type the command "fsck", it will scan your disks for inconsistencies and prompt you for action. Now it is up to you to give sensible answers to the questions (as I don't know what inconsistencies it will detect, I cannot tell you what to answer for each question). When fsck has finished working, you type the command "exit" and your machine should finish booting properly. Good luck, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 03:39:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37674106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ges+lists@wingfoot.org) Received: from wingfoot.org (caduceus.wingfoot.org [66.80.251.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052DE8FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wingfoot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B939DC2B; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:21:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wingfoot.org Received: from wingfoot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wingfoot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10042) with ESMTP id QdSQI6suMv+p; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:21:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Sandal.local (ool-4353640b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.100.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by wingfoot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEF1739DC22; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4AB2FCB5.8020401@wingfoot.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:21:25 -0400 From: Glenn Sieb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hickey References: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46756ac80909171529h167fdf07nc60e32bb3ca862dd@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:39:49 -0000 Chris Hickey said the following on 9/17/09 6:29 PM: > A friend installed this program and I don't know how to use it. Everything > was fine until the power went out and when it booted back up it said > "/dev/amrd0s1d: unexpected soft update inconsistency: run fsck manually . > the following file system had an inconsistency: ufs: /dev/amrd0s1d (/var) > Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh. > > If you could give me a step by step of what to do that would be awesome. I > tried sending this to your bug department and they told me to talk to you. > > > When you see the "Enter full pathname of shell.." just hit the Enter/Return key on your keyboard. At the command prompt, type: fsck -y /var (If there is more than one file system that needs fixing, you can put that on the command line as well:) fsck -y /var /usr etc.etc.etc. Wait until it's done. Once you get the command prompt back (it looks like #), type to log out, which should complete the boot process. Good luck, --Glenn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 04:46:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E701065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sweetnavelorange@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com (mail-ew0-f208.google.com [209.85.219.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF0E8FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so148746ewy.36 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:46:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KLsmc+bjkixKHlHDUKhBZfSJLvfuxwX0mIxfy2Rpw5A=; b=G4bLiazO5jIlT9c+hFivjJq5VLBpZ/RhkgJTgcWdfYsyIAi35zAaslPUMNKMuy7x/u 9ixVesUC/EykNMsSx1Plgv9xGPH19zU21XxTBuy2X/XjKDwbnnSRHHM7jOC8ELbPZo9Y Uojz50wR/Y1LOCXGuiN/+S/i7u7BCUMyasQaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iwQZXd8+Iu6RR6/8KPsRjmlFJNJveLlSK+0pcCl8JF0hHScgq7dOVi6wKIRqfmflYe Y4+Gr+RB2gAvc4KJSW+wLyyCgL0q3XnmxK+2qmPJiFNW1pWHNoqbKOkB3xIU+JxoJtL0 I1vWpY5dvJ/fV3GrOpO6i7LoyZy1EQNhI1NkI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.2.5 with SMTP id 5mr420935wee.216.1253249177799; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:46:17 +1200 Message-ID: From: James Butler To: maksverver@geocities.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Can't boot Marvel Sheevaplug from USB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:46:19 -0000 Maks Verver wrote: > James Butler wrote: > > Sounds similar to: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D138798 > > Apparently Scott Long is working on a fix. > > Interesting! Is there any way I can help debug/solve this? Test the fix when it arrives? Scott seems to have some idea what the problem is, and a lot of people have been bitten by it, so I'm hoping for a fix soon(TM). > As for running FreeBSD on the SheevaPlug: I think I will stick with > Ubuntu for now, as I haven't been able to get FreeBSD to recognize the > NAND storage nor the SDIO controller, and FreeBSD doesn't seem to have a > =C2=A0wear-leveling filesystem (or GEOM layer) anyway. Well, it's debatable how necessary a special filesystem is for flash media, although recognising the hardware would be nice I guess :-) Do mmc(4)/sdhci(4) not support the controller? I've seen it suggested that UFS+softupdates is about as good as a conventional filesystem gets for flash media, because it's good at minimising transient writes. -James Butler (please CC me, I'm off-list) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 05:24:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E280A1065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788958FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8I5ONxA036055; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:24:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E29B4BAA0; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:24:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:24:22 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: jaymax Message-ID: <20090918052422.GA8637@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <25498179.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25498179.post@talk.nabble.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Undelete or recover from badblocks on disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:24:25 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:37:34PM -0700, jaymax wrote: >=20 > I seemed to have lost some critical dump files during a restore. The > directory in which they were backed up in seemed to vaporize. The data was > present as indicated by df -h but the directory was not listed. > fsck on the disk was ineffective > fsck_ffs produced an extensive listing of bad block, a final SALVAGE opti= on, > but on completion, the disk "capacity" from the df -h was significantly > reduced.=20 >=20 > Is there anyway of recovering even 'partial' data from these lost blocks? > The drive has been disconnected so that there would be no 'write' > activities? Check the disk with smartctl(8) from the sysutils/smartmontools port to ch= eck that this isn't a hardware malfunction. If it is a hardware malfunction, the disk is dying and should be replaced ASAP. If the hardware is OK, try fls from sysutils/sleuthkit. As long as the data isn't overwritten, it should still be there. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqzGYYACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUvPwCfZwdv04yRTkZSOxtFP/XcgpRT hqQAn2OY9LeduxLNXiLTO3dB1ArfeRY0 =ckwF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 08:05:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD44106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CBE8FC15 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MoYSw-0002V8-15 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:05:14 -0700 Message-ID: <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:05:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:05:14 -0000 How to change the interfaces to not to be on same physical subnet? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25504647.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 08:15:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135961065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AA08FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939023A3844; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:15:53 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1253261753; x= 1255076153; bh=OqhL85R4Oq1Nb16j6JcrB8PaeARO1Y38X+j/J3cyaB4=; b=I UrWHCMoCEichTclEmYag1cHPEamXE50HS/EIKhYgbh2EndIXwWWNE3FKkXVhmIMG 3pHGHlQUiX6zDbp/af0VNlfjHi6ekGK3Pd52icnRD/Kd5KbYPWcj2/3ss2UljPpR tYzRwnRnSeuoo3gQACqTKvDq/aKRPX5ekL1/8Ag47I= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DO9J+F5U7R01; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:15:53 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB513A383C; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:15:52 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8I8FpFS045063; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:15:51 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:15:51 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freeco@inbox.lv In-reply-to: <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> (message from Freeco on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:05:14 -0700 (PDT)) References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:15:55 -0000 > How to change the interfaces to not to be on same physical subnet? Hummm, subnet is virtual, it is not physical. To have interface on different phisical network, plug your interfaces to different switchwes that are not interconnected one to the other. To have a different subnet used on different interfaces, configure them. Now you can run two or more subnets on the same physical LAN. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 08:59:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4276A106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79D68FC2D for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090918085951.PREQ6611.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:51 +0100 Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org ([82.21.107.64]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090918085951.OBFE2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@catflap.slightlystrange.org> for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:51 +0100 Received: by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix, from userid 106) id E37AE617A; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5635F6133 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:48 +0100 (BST) Received: by torus.slightlystrange.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:47 +0100 From: "Daniel Bye" Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:47 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090918085947.GB23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AB2656B.6090705@networktest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AB2656B.6090705@networktest.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 i386 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ehNlctqhnw0A:10 a=e5mUnYsNAAAA:8 a=TlR6pnGqLVUKU6xzvuoA:9 a=wTMF2C6ItJxFkp_BxPkA:7 a=Iv150mb09t0aF_GMcMWoBdEZGH0A:4 a=kVFg98nkO-f_iw1PU08A:9 a=PzUQMqs7pDrhsE8pDOdBUy2HxI0A:4 Subject: Re: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:59:53 -0000 --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:35:55AM -0700, David Newman wrote: > On 9/17/09 8:10 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote: > >> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 > >> > >> Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the > >> patch error pasted below. > >> > >> Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything > >> helpful in the archives or on Google. > >=20 > > Try `make distclean' and then `make && make install' >=20 > This produced the same result. Thanks again for any additional clues in > resolving this error. >=20 > dn >=20 >=20 > o# cd /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/ > somehost# make distclean > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for libxcb-1.4 > =3D=3D=3D> Deleting distfiles for libxcb-1.4 > somehost# make && make install > =3D=3D=3D> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > =3D> libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > =3D> Attempting to fetch from http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/. > libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 100% of 298 kB 29 kBps > 00m00s > =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for libxcb-1.4 > =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. > =3D=3D=3D> Patching for libxcb-1.4 > =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for libxcb-1.4 > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xcb_auth.c.rej > =3D> Patch patch-src-xcb_auth.c failed to apply cleanly. > =3D> Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in applied cleanly. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libxcb. Hmm... I don't have the file patch-src-xcb_auth.c in x11/libxcb/files. Is your ports tree up to date? Other than that, I'm afraid I'm out of ideas. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqzTAMACgkQixf5fBYiFmqkBgCgghE4E8AKmamiRi7D5tQGKMQ7 1KoAn3vDnHPmfGGzfJsSG55wpv9USDix =T43i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 09:04:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7058D106568B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:04:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA7D8FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoZNr-000491-9l; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:04:09 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MoZNq-000094-M3; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:04:03 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8I942KW049195; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:04:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8I9422H049194; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:04:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:04:02 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20090918090402.GA49183@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090914153728.GA60162@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914154241.GA60268@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090914172233.GA69286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917123404.GA101@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917131616.GA1393@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090917155814.GA22231@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20090917161521.GA9122@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917161521.GA9122@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port math/gnuplot hangs and ignores "kill -9" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:04:10 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > Roland, perhaps you also know the origin of this gnuplot warning: > > > > Could not find/open font when opening font "arial", > > using internal non-scalable font > > > > From searching the net it appears that gnuplot is not finding truetype > > fonts, something to do with GD library. I've got xorg-fonts-truetype-7.4 > > and gd-2.0.35_1,1 installed. So I'm not sure what the problem is. > > When using gd fonts, you must either specify either the full path of the font > file, or the font filename (not the font name, AFAIK). In the latter case you > have to set the GDFONTPATH variable containing the path. > > > Several functions are not available without truetype fonts, e.g. label > > rotation, which is sometimes useful. > > I used the following with the PNG terminal: > > set terminal png font "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf" 8 \ > size 300,150 x76848f xb1b1b1 xb1b1b1 x00ff00 x00ff00 x00ff00 x00ff00 Roland, thank you, very helpful. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 10:16:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9788106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@tanis.us) Received: from QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C28FC1C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id i9zS1c00317dt5G59A3fSX; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:03:39 +0000 Received: from pandora.tanis.us ([76.97.49.245]) by OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iA3f1c0035HQhhY3ZA3fHs; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:03:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.189] (unknown [192.168.0.189]) by pandora.tanis.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19FEB852 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:02:51 -0400 (EDT) From: James Tanis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:03:38 -0400 Message-Id: <7640F3CC-586D-4087-A78B-DF43F515A8E4@tanis.us> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) Subject: dhcpd related issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:16:54 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 7.0 gateway/server with isc-dhcpd 3.1.2p1_2. Late yesterday I began having some unique and intermittent issues. Basically, random computers will all of a sudden lose their dhcp leases and be unable to contact the dhcp server. At first I figured the dhcp server had crashed, but it did not. It was still up and running. Secondly I figured we ran out of leases; this has happened before -- the school is growing rapidly enough, not to mention the kids keep getting more connected. Unfortunately, after doubling the amount of available leases the problem is still persisting. Now the issue gets more confused by the fact that some computers haven't been affected at all. There seems to be no real difference between their configurations and the configurations of the computers affected. For a while I was considering the possibility of the switch dropping packets or developing bad ports, but the behavior isn't consistent with that. One would think that if the port connecting a secondary switch to the main switch was going bad that it would affect all clients on the secondary switch -- this is not the case. There doesn't seem to be much rhyme or reason to which computers are affected. The server isn't reporting any dropped packets on either of its interfaces and the links aren't even close to saturated. I'm completely at a loss as to the cause of the problem. The problem occurs in a time period that is pretty consistent with the default lease time -- which would suggest there is something odd happening with lease renewal, but I certainly can't seem to get a grasp on it. If I do a "cat debug.log|grep dhcpd" I get: Sep 17 08:36:07 grendel dhcpd: ICMP Echo Reply for 192.168.1.243 late or spurious. Sep 17 12:58:04 grendel dhcpd: ICMP Echo Reply for 192.168.1.57 late or spurious. Sep 17 12:58:04 grendel dhcpd: ICMP Echo Reply for 192.168.1.57 late or spurious. Sep 17 13:56:27 grendel dhcpd: ICMP Echo Reply for 192.168.1.155 late or spurious. Sep 17 14:03:15 grendel dhcpd: ICMP Echo reply while lease 192.168.1.253 valid. Sep 17 15:25:19 grendel dhcpd: ICMP Echo Reply for 192.168.1.74 late or spurious. which doesn't seem particularly relevant or heinous. Many more computers than the ones above have been affected. doing the same for the console.log got me a whole bunch of: Sep 17 16:45:18 grendel dhcpd: if mdchs203-2.mdchs.org IN A rrset doesn't exist add mdchs203-2.mdchs.org 300 IN A 192.168.1.162: timed out. Sep 17 16:45:26 grendel dhcpd: if mdchs100-1.mdchs.org IN A rrset doesn't exist add mdchs100-1.mdchs.org 300 IN A 192.168.1.126: timed out. which is pretty much the norm and shouldn't be causing the problem. The main switch is a HP Procurve 1700-24 and it doesn't seem to be reporting any problems. All ports are up that should be. There is 1 "Rx Error Packet" on Port 23 being reported. Port 23 is the one that goes out to the server, but a single packet couldn't be causing this kind of behavior. Does anyone have *any* ideas? I'm about tapped out myself here. I'll attack the problem fresh if it persists tomorrow, but I'd like to come with some ideas from different perspectives. Here is the dhcpd.conf file, recently changed to add more leases: ddns-update-style ad-hoc; option domain-name "mdchs.org"; option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1; option netbios-name-servers 192.168.1.1; option netbios-node-type 8; shared-network mdchs { default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.255.255; option routers 192.168.1.1; subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.1.46 192.168.1.253; host mdchs12 { hardware ethernet xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx; fixed-address 192.168.1.6; } #### snipped the rest of the host entries for brevity #### } subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.254; } } It seems worth noting that this server was functioning perfectly well for a year and half before this occured. Nothing was changed before the problem manifested. After the problem manifested I upgraded to the above mentioned version and added the shared-network with the second subnet. So far the nature of the problem has not change whatsoever. -- James Tanis Technical Coordinator Computer Science Department Monsignor Donovan Catholic High School From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 10:21:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE08106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@mailinglist.ahhyes.net) Received: from mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693AE8FC1D for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.201] (c122-106-58-139.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.58.139]) by mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8IALuVW003056 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:21:57 +1000 Message-ID: <4AB35F44.8090606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:21:56 +1000 From: Alex R User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Security vulnerability in 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:21:59 -0000 Hi All, I was sent this by a friend, could someone confirm if this exploit is really existant? http://www.vimeo.com/6580991 (requires flash) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 10:27:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CB9106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F928FC20 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so569092bwz.43 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:27:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4OYwRYBaodTZMWl8Jso/aWnUdW0rRg+5gNLa+aBbZTM=; b=NK6xulTf8NXTlfrE5Fbf03izUuPbosUSmv9QBbftEC9H1/X+6ZpncyBHJmHo8sh195 0Z7qfJcNvP5v4pV7nQqAhV4w9P3OjlNkMFSlcCRqnhZECn7TQfUDshQiPUSfKzMZpGvy TY2ab+1JSsTHafscVbnjFWnU0BB0gtbt11hvQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XGKnYLHRGKcBnVXKOnvQFp+Gf95F7G03cmqWLlyOQHjZ7dBCSF8+K1x9DY2yOKqeeO YuqNOrHkIYCofOYXOr4VKPfqSfiDC2AV8TqEGWpG4jNmvqbV96q3IJUsRXIj1cWmEM6a yGvL2il5z8ZlXw/x5jJWigvL6IjhHtfCuThn8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.23.193 with SMTP id s1mr1364883bkb.25.1253269653284; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:27:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AB35F44.8090606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> References: <4AB35F44.8090606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:27:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Alex R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Security vulnerability in 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:27:34 -0000 look for this subject on the maillist "reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD" You will find an almost 50 chained... topic about this... ;o) btw, yes, it does. 2009/9/18 Alex R : > Hi All, > > I was sent this by a friend, could someone confirm if this exploit is really > existant? > > http://www.vimeo.com/6580991 (requires flash) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 11:34:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C4E1065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64C68FC15 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MobjL-0000YR-Sj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:34:23 -0700 Message-ID: <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:34:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:34:25 -0000 What does it look like? ISP>---------------Pc Or ISP>-----------------Pc -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25507235.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 12:16:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8579106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C0D8FC24 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MocNv-0001tZ-Qc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:16:19 -0700 Message-ID: <25507722.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:16:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:16:20 -0000 In the beginning when gateway starts the web page opens, but after that no one web doesn't open. The same is in first 5min ping reach my ISP gateway, but then it's gone. Same from my gateway with ping. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25507722.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 12:19:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB952106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3232B8FC1E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19650 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 12:19:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 12:19:23 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:19:44 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080208060009010009080105" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:19:39 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080208060009010009080105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > What does it look like? > > ISP>---------------Pc > Or > ISP>-----------------Pc > ...are you sure that by accident that you don't have the following *physical* setup? ----------- | Gateway | ----------- | | | | |------- Switch/Hub --------| | | | | ISP PC This doesn't appear to be a logical subnetting issue, but more of a 'having two interfaces on a logically undivided physical medium'. If you do have the above setup, it may work, but I would highly advise against it. The only way you can get around the warnings and still have things in this case work properly is to use VLANs. Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet would be: |--------- | ISP>--------------------- | |_________ Trash bin>------------ Steve --------------ms080208060009010009080105 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTIxOTQ0WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUkXgXlA2Xe27rloqKTKMGW+MP 3h4wUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AEABYvIOjWpyk86wjLAHrZIz/d+sGtwyBYELUAX9VH+FYWKGapSnb19Bxplu0dxeOd4s+jKQ MWhhHaoFxr0bHEXQzQxmQmLlq2cNbLBQZwldNUFKfQTS5NnN0bl2gudVLTKwviOW2+bk5sKo 35WxTnAB5gS/ELMWUihNX3/noqe8Mx5RdLMrBFDcqiVLDDgu2e7hkdjcfh/upSfgIOgh3b0B 2ujw8zZj5x6WVINLTMG9cfu/2tnOHLcYBvjhxYoP9ly1gZiGpZGKyS+7VRzCimg99UdT16vt N3rhG+yzScodemt/LXOWQdwb0R/Mdd0cxX1m9n6eOz9WyatK6hs8A6gAAAAAAAA= --------------ms080208060009010009080105-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 12:23:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F3410656A5 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@mailinglist.ahhyes.net) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2846C8FC18 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.201] (c122-106-58-139.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.58.139]) by mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8ICNEhU022796 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:23:14 +1000 Message-ID: <4AB37BB2.3070606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:23:14 +1000 From: Alex R User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com> <20090915031437.GA20647@brisbane.nepharia.org> In-Reply-To: <20090915031437.GA20647@brisbane.nepharia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:23:17 -0000 Mak Kolybabi wrote: > On 2009-09-14 12:12, Dan Goodin wrote: > >> We'll be writing a brief article about this. >> > > I didn't notice anyone link the finished article yet, so here it is: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/14/freebsd_security_bug/ > > -- > Matthew Anthony Kolybabi (Mak) > > > () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org | Against proprietary extensions > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > http://www.vimeo.com/6580991 The article says that "Versions 7.1 and and beyond are not vulnerable." That video contradicts that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 12:38:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7796106568D for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 753DD8FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20080 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 12:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 12:38:33 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:38:53 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060701020503060100090102" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:38:48 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060701020503060100090102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steve Bertrand wrote: [ snip ] > Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet > would be: > > |--------- > | > ISP>--------------------- > | > |_________ I just noticed that your ISP has assigned you a /28 prefix. Is all of this 255.255.255.240 yours, or are you on a shared network segment? If it is yours, and you plan on using it, you'll want to set things up like the following. If it is all yours (88.18 - 88.30) and you didn't request it, I'd sure be interested to know who is giving away /28's nowadays when the client didn't even request it ;) |------------- | ISP>-------------- | \ | | \ |_____________ | \ ...Not depicted, but I'd recommend a firewall for anything between the gateway and the ISP. Steve --------------ms060701020503060100090102 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTIzODUzWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU3kHAWBh5qyL+CMbUzZC/X8S0 VH4wUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AEcP5vjOkropm01n/rG+6EEu+0X+uUPsb2CdkGr9jkU/WVOIMKZKAVF4OomyQeB0sr/g2bkZ jntlQAdE9RX4+Wt73MhHj3HIWYwjGb/cnPsed1LquTvLYEoqHlcXm2cWuyZzM70FkqXndAfP ufoHqv6jW8bPGswuCCXuKbH4tWzdEhukoy5OOu2vlq+U68wP7muM5jHbXCAoj6f/Jzd5TVVd tnPBKj77Rvaw9Ly5ztpNsPuwauf1pAaYFbwYyVYmZi/BUXqr3LKkxkdthL1fqpvRhkYL+2km LhidYlxoRf7APbbFYcW+oJACQipdfi1WDK+WoITqe9LgDvmrP+cOq0AAAAAAAAA= --------------ms060701020503060100090102-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 12:44:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED44106568B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E788FC1E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D425B1CC6C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:53 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at liukuma.net Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JakVlBQlNIYD for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (a88-114-134-146.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.134.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D908F1CC76 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:49 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <977EC17F30A642A5B2DFACE4D8A25A89@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com><20090915031437.GA20647@brisbane.nepharia.org> <4AB37BB2.3070606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> In-Reply-To: <4AB37BB2.3070606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:57 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8064.206 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8064.206 Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:57 -0000 > http://www.vimeo.com/6580991 > > The article says that "Versions 7.1 and and beyond are not=20 > vulnerable." That video contradicts that. As someone who has manipulated moving picture for fun and profit,=20 having a video of something is a proof of nothing. For all what it's=20 worth the OS in video might be FreeBSD - or even loonix made to look=20 like FreeBSD, made vulnerable on purpose of tarring the project. Until the security team gives their official response and patches, I=20 read the entire story with a grain of salt, especially as the=20 originator was so keen on getting his discovery into news websites... If the discovery is real, the patch will come when it will come, until=20 then the publicity is just negligible buzz. -Reko=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 13:14:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20BC106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705448FC14 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ModHp-0003nf-Cn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:14:05 -0700 Message-ID: <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:14:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:07 -0000 So it means that i will need 2 more NIC's in my gateway? |--------- | ISP>--------------------- | |_________ Why all pc's can't be in one subnet? I'll be happy with one subnet, i don't need more. I tried this: ISP x.x.88.17>---------------------? I want to use this one: |--------- | ISP x.x.88.17>--------------------- | |_________ The gateway will work like firewall and nat. Maybe i have wrong settings on my pc? ----PC Settings---- IP: 192.168.1.7 Mask: 255.255.255.128 (same in rc.conf) Gateway: 192.168.1.2 Dns: x.x.88.17 Dns: 192.168.1.2 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25508442.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 13:43:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F770106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maksverver@geocities.com) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx3.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66F48FC27 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heaven.student.utwente.nl (heaven.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.52]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n8IDh8xx013850; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:43:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4AB38E6A.2000705@geocities.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:43:06 +0200 From: Maks Verver User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090827) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Butler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: maksverver@geocities.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't boot Marvel Sheevaplug from USB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:43:24 -0000 James Butler wrote: [regarding USB booting problems] > Test the fix when it arrives? Scott seems to have some idea what the > problem is, and a lot of people have been bitten by it, so I'm hoping > for a fix soon(TM). Ok, I'll just wait for this then. :-) > Do mmc(4)/sdhci(4) not support the controller? I don't think so, but I didn't test extensively. (I added them to the kernel config but none of the boot messages suggested the SDIO slot is being detected.) I think Linux uses a specific driver for the Marvell SDIO port ("mvsdio") but to be honest, I don't really understand how the mvsdio, sdhci and mmc drivers work together. > I've seen it suggested that UFS+softupdates is about as good as a > conventional filesystem gets for flash media, because it's good at > minimising transient writes. True, but I think the internal NAND storage device is not a block device, which is why Linux needs the UBI/UBIFS combination to make a useful filesystem out of it. I'm not sure if FreeBSD has anything like this. In any case, it's probably not essential. It would already be nice if FreeBSD would be able to run off an USB storage device or MMC in the SDIO slot. Kind regards, Maks Verver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:05:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F6A1065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589DB8FC08 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8IE5imI041706; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:05:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8IE5h2J041705; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:05:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:05:43 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20090918140543.GA41585@ei.bzerk.org> References: <19122.17463.670129.782291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20090917174501.GA34712@ei.bzerk.org> <19122.34200.621509.774171@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19122.34200.621509.774171@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:05:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw + NAT doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:05:49 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Robert Huff typed: > > Ruben de Groot writes: > > > > However: using these I still can't get through > > > > Through to what? You seem to be able to connect on a local subnet, but > > not to the internet through NAT, which you say is ok, because you > > shouldn't ? > > > > Please explain exactly what you want to do. > > 1) With the firewall enabled, but no NAT-related rules, I can't > get out. > This is as expected. > 2) With the NAT rules added, I should be able to get out, but > can't. > Clear? I think so. What's your outgoing ip? The rules you posted: >ipfw add 5000 nat 15 all from any to any >ipfw nat 15 config log same_ports ip 10.0.0.0/8 ^^^^^^^^^^ Looks strange to me. Instead of 10.0.0.0/8 I believe you should use a single IP that you want to translate to (ie your outgoing IP address). Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:08:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B05E1065679 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3CCE8FC1C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22834 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 14:08:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 14:08:37 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:08:57 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080901060202040402090300" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:08:52 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080901060202040402090300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > So it means that i will need 2 more NIC's in my gateway? > > |--------- > | > ISP>--------------------- > | > |_________ > > Why all pc's can't be in one subnet? I'll be happy with one subnet, Ok. One of us is confused, but I don't know who yet :) A 'subnet' is a term used to describe a portion of an IP address space, where each device in that space can communicate with one another without using a router: 192.168.1.0/24 is a subnet, so hosts 192.168.1.1 through 192.168.1.254 can 'speak' to each other without using a router. If you have more than one PC, you need a 'switch' or hub to physically connect all of those devices, so they can all speak to each other. (fwiw, I cringe at the term subnet). In the diagram above, you need two NICs in the gateway. One goes to the ISP, and the other 192.168.1.2 goes to the switch. The rest of the computers also plug into the switch. If all of the devices have 192.168.1.x, they are all in the same subnet. > i don't > need more. I tried this: > > ISP x.x.88.17>--------------------- unplugged 192.168.1.7>? You need what's known as a 'cross-over' cable to connect the PC to the Gateway directly. The first sentence in this link describes it well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_crossover_cable > I want to use this one: > > |--------- > > | > ISP x.x.88.17>----------- 192.168.1.2>---------- > > | > > |_________ > The diagram got mangled, but from what I can tell, this is the same as the diagram I left at the top of this message. > The gateway will work like firewall and nat. Maybe i have wrong settings on > my pc? You do. Although technically it will work, you have in your gateway: 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 ...but on the pc: 192.168.1.7 255.255.255.128: > ----PC Settings---- > IP: 192.168.1.7 > Mask: 255.255.255.128 (same in rc.conf) > Gateway: 192.168.1.2 > Dns: x.x.88.17 > Dns: 192.168.1.2 I'm not convinced that there still isn't a cabling issue,. I don't use NAT, so perhaps someone else can help with any config issues, but I would find out/fix what is causing the traffic to be received on the wrong interface first. Also, I just noticed in your original post that there appears to be another clerical error. Again, I don't know ipnat, but I would suspect that this: map fxp0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0/32 should really be this: map fxp0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 Aside from that, are you sure that this entry shouldn't be: map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 ? Again, I don't know ipnat, but to me, in the fxp0 entry, it looks like you are trying to map the 192 space coming INTO fxp0 (which in your original post is the NIC that faces the ISP, not the internal network). If this is how ipnat looks at this, then this is also a problem. Steve --------------ms080901060202040402090300 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTQwODU3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUidQTsJwhtjrnQENQD/X4NqiS W6MwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AFN7AL2rRw16Fi+N4EMI1dsEz5EhgQ46EUXbDQQdOAyRSb1leRz/tyOFmF8lP6HyqJJBRn2Z X5PbfFQV2eRUFUbosK0brtY+ilUwIM6K7Yjb1OPqnj6wDEWXfxJKteZFOrU+8F4CRT0EPQ7L XwKv4cV0WYvQkZSu1djS7NAtiMyy6X9nbL7Yr1W79EZshWEwgs5pKW6ns84HNDNZ0ajCbalH YM2/WFqo3CD8jO/BM2WBrk8K3swbaaycLUR/+tQU/VK2F4g1H0UG8BkYISE+qZmhExhcVzZ0 Dd6QgV3UeoiJzXEEvuLVNgpSAHCfhINWi7XpvwYigRBVgKoVvi4hxSUAAAAAAAA= --------------ms080901060202040402090300-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:15:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03381065676 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewlylegould@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A558FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so707429fxm.43 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:15:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=k0pf3+CDuKBPKdjCClGmqAwYWECjjf0KT2rtbWaEH4o=; b=DrCU8z65inRZHr6YX9XYk++Jsj8Dj8YWfdXbf3V7Lnz0FzMMscfhedgbiBzE9wmY5C efxQG5/iZwjOKrYAI7YoXrbnntI7YILBkVIY3dEy4PS3cXpk6qcfZrzJaSrmdLYLRFqn hrI436WSrHBPhLtiltXcW7cJnvY2mrEtvwUpc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hcw1J/zGksboAshFKLh80RjUw/8iJ3k4rzPjS4SirViJisHc9XqkqXzTVOlII+XGzE +J9vOEZTVI8O5HgjIiRZz6ZatDWQ7A4yW3PL8I6ZPoksf8zg0ldFAaPdRY0R6+QlyL90 SQT8RlSIcOSot4ym0GO5ryLuRtv5XLdiPmo+8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.24.151 with SMTP id v23mr420145fab.44.1253283299973; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:14:59 -0500 Message-ID: From: Andrew Gould To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: updating pc's to the same date/time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:15:01 -0000 I would like to do a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.2 and then update it to the same state as another computer so I can transfer it's packages and have them in sync with the ports. Is my understanding of the system correct in that all I have to do is: 1. Copy /usr/src and /usr/ports to the new computer. 2. Rebuild and install the kernel and "world". 3. Copy and install the packages I created on the first computer. Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:16:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879531065694 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE478FC1B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MoeG2-0006Rt-Kr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:16:18 -0700 Message-ID: <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:16:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:19 -0000 Steve Bertrand wrote: [ snip ] > Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet > would be: > > |--------- > | > ISP>--------------------- > | > |_________ |------------- | ISP>-------------- | \ | | \ |_____________ | \ Steve wrote: ...Not depicted, but I'd recommend a firewall for anything between the gateway and the ISP. The gateway will work like IPF (Firewall) and NAT. Is it wrong? Steve wrote: I just noticed that your ISP has assigned you a /28 prefix. Is all of this 255.255.255.240 yours, or are you on a shared network segment? If it is yours, and you plan on using it, you'll want to set things up like the following. If it is all yours (88.18 - 88.30) and you didn't request it, I'd sure be interested to know who is giving away /28's nowadays when the client didn't even request it ;) Yes, it's mine. I'm paying just for 3 static addresses 18-20. I plan other static addresses to use for other plans. So i'll need 2 more NIC's for gateway? I think that my ISP uses the 2nd image. In my room is a switch. In our home is switch. 3 homes from mine is a gateway. I don't know what else there is. P.S. Sorry for my poor english -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25509501.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:18:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E97B106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14D748FC17 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23528 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 14:18:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 14:18:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB396B4.3080003@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050800070501090406070805" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:18:23 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms050800070501090406070805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steve Bertrand wrote: > map fxp0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 > > Aside from that, are you sure that this entry shouldn't be: > > map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 > > ? Again, I don't know ipnat, but to me, in the fxp0 entry, it looks like > you are trying to map the 192 space coming INTO fxp0 (which in your > original post is the NIC that faces the ISP, not the internal network). > If this is how ipnat looks at this, then this is also a problem. Just a note, section "30.5.16 IPNAT Rules" of the handbook states that using the external interface in the map rule is the correct way of doing things. Steve --------------ms050800070501090406070805 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTQxODI4WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUeL17OTFOMdldaeTu9YbAw/qK Z64wUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AHcKxsjPH4GYEQzfmfnUfEGyQAaala4QBQBQBdwJjkZSQ+Rhe9ctGH7cAaI6HwwCh47CKddY ra+rbdk4z2/IPbFfQ2QJElv7Zjo2pbAn69vh93BFNGuDKH3CrKp0hIbXb99vZhcguSsWxlQW vDAVbfMIqrcxIvWg/haYPmEJx+qzJve4BkD261TK8eEPzadfhmtNkrFXFG/KYktYPVkfuHHE VchTEswMsYSCp2az54tRJHtbxj1zcxWtsrRUBobsqMATEq6MFeOIrN0dw/+BqCAYo+ALINNE SBi0fQjXS1cvv2q7iYPqjLWLQ1eKv7nJda5zI4FHrlQdVEP0qVrfsJYAAAAAAAA= --------------ms050800070501090406070805-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:23:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55051065694 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 794CC8FC1B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23674 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 14:22:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 14:22:51 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:23:11 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030502010107070703070502" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:23:05 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030502010107070703070502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: > > > |------------- > | > ISP>-------------- > | \ | > | \ |_____________ > | \ > > > So i'll need 2 more NIC's for > gateway? No, unless there is something I don't know about. > I think that my ISP uses the 2nd image. In my room is a switch. In our home > is switch. 3 homes from mine is a gateway. I don't know what else there is. Ok. Lets start with the basics. - What is connected to the switch in your room? - what is connected to the switch in your home? - what is connected to the gateway down the street? - how do you connect your room, to your home, to the house three homes away? This new information makes it more believable that there is some sort of cabling mishap. > P.S. Sorry for my poor english You don't have to be. You're doing just fine! Steve --------------ms030502010107070703070502 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTQyMzExWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU7CmQTXFiAu7YtFq5NE6rKGAw 2acwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB ABv9uB/GXqQDLEQCV6ctojlzpzPqLcpcZ/TNNxnWr9rx3mRPDlnZfWA7AihzzKe9RxNxHgeA qxuRhtqZYLZ5GYrfKCSxWWLyqKRkWA422wMwi4VhTX85SNB/Ziqv2jb5Y9+Ei97rylUwluc5 rU34nH15ZNJxCQKBBS5sWoiG5BCe6Oe6mH4nXBlB06qugxpIgerQYhIZWHvnMy2NvkUSABMo Pangws83PfvUL5E/bOFNknp2FhNx0jHINKC8hOq0CxIeMQbqom+GTcp8hQ7caHW7RjftHWvx XT6hc4HdKJ9sVAdWdtA6SKHAPLBxIEf52sGml51tqooul1+v5BNIxIgAAAAAAAA= --------------ms030502010107070703070502-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:38:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A76F106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f189.google.com (mail-vw0-f189.google.com [209.85.212.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAB98FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws27 with SMTP id 27so900045vws.3 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:38:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tNVaCjbDcOSkrDxb3JUsXSdPzNvjyilsNVB6aZPhIn4=; b=FkBljiIG6F6HeoeEQly4yG86eyzODcjySueiZa0DqR9xj9ksckUFB7T1FWnalAMNWW +ftlGDo3uc2O7dzPRAArQ6g7MXahgNFhF/spdyEsa6nHqqGbbQ4bRzCyIZPf4ZmGiA/t DqzXbcB2e+u5b1MrnFPP7kM4ADya1M1fWDLp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IjxpQTP84nQxYaHtzaxgHu/CKiEy1rJS9dp4d4TgyIReNDzCz76l31Jg6XU4fDvU/i GUeae/mkdEbVRSe1hsFmqT5VINra/FBKIePKgmNfQFJEwge4Jg1WkgJYc51ep6H+omUF eE85VEIBCWvdOk/+AJjiKkeG0xBQruIJ83rEQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.81.6 with SMTP id e6mr3414356ybb.295.1253284715413; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:38:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:38:35 -0500 Message-ID: <6201873e0909180738j76b11d9ua70665343ac0852d@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Andrew Gould Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: updating pc's to the same date/time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:38:36 -0000 On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andrew Gould wrote: > I would like to do a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.2 and then update > it to the same state as another computer so I can transfer it's > packages and have them in sync with the ports. Is my understanding of > the system correct in that all I have to do is: > > 1. Copy /usr/src and /usr/ports to the new computer. > 2. Rebuild and install the kernel and "world". > 3. Copy and install the packages I created on the first computer. > > Thanks, > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > There are many ways to accomplish this, but first there's no reason to cp /usr/ports if you're going to do step 3. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:55:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2FC1065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ernestotinajeroseo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f192.google.com (mail-px0-f192.google.com [209.85.216.192]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6948FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi30 with SMTP id 30so821703pxi.7 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:55:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QCU2WETpgX1W0yYndheaWx9c2YgGSGIevZe3lzmAjWQ=; b=kn7FWAmbIge1QqXQu7dSit0cUUwvbjePJWhEqsHQ6wGuh0LIWuPqZ02ERWxyeu3et0 tq8vk3reVQaVESG3T7VHO/qOsrI9Sudo97JfBdcBEFHj8BPEzUc20zUesuBDtNEPIJzT x1xvFkbXz7CXdsL5jDuq0bEPBF/7rhyyAzkTo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TLphyaxWbau/ixsus1/sfCCBtfQSlQfqogpYp8ZTt395TwG20ye9jaPMSpDk/+OYCv GwVAz1hwutMvp4PEIKpQIa/T0zu0GowNuNqg5KGh4IOVadXH83a/t+HL+hWbpsFCpZ0W C/3ZRP4aWS0bCLl80h7A/siSNye/D9FQXwjQc= Received: by 10.115.101.25 with SMTP id d25mr2569043wam.46.1253284440489; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernesto-tinajeros-macbook.local (c-98-225-28-81.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [98.225.28.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm985674pxi.4.2009.09.18.07.33.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB39A56.1030302@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:33:58 -0700 From: Ernesto Tinajero User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Question about xhttp://www.freebsddiary.org/apsfilter.php X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ernestotinajeroseo@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:55:37 -0000 Hello I am contacting you on behalf of a client printer accessories website, http://www.abacus24-7.com/ I'm interested in purchasing a link from your great site. I noticed you were running Ads so I thought you might be interested. I'm not looking for a banner or anything flashy. In fact, I'm not looking to take traffic from your site at all. I'm solely looking for a simple 2-3 word text link anywhere on the page. I'd like to offer a monthly fee via PayPal every month just to keep the link live on the site. If this sounds like a possibility, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you, -- Ernesto Tinajero SEO & SEM consultant etinajero@linkmonopoly.com (509) 321-0609 Monday - Thursday 9am-6pm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 14:59:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1BA106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C898FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8IExSrZ085394; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:59:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EBBC4BAAE; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:59:27 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Andrew Gould Message-ID: <20090918145927.GA24180@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: updating pc's to the same date/time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:59:30 -0000 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:14:59AM -0500, Andrew Gould wrote: > I would like to do a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.2 and then update > it to the same state as another computer so I can transfer it's > packages and have them in sync with the ports. Is my understanding of > the system correct in that all I have to do is: >=20 > 1. Copy /usr/src and /usr/ports to the new computer. If you copy the installed applications, you don't have to copy /usr/ports. > 2. Rebuild and install the kernel and "world". > 3. Copy and install the packages I created on the first computer. Ports and packages install in /usr/local by default. So after you have built/installed all ports on the first machine, use tar(1) and nc(1) to copy the whole /usr/local tree over. Subsequently, after you have updated the po= rts on the first machine, use rsync(1) to keep both copies syncronized; that is much faster than copying. (In this scenario the second machine doesn't need /usr/ports or /var/db/ports and /var/db/pkg at all!) Remember to enable any daemons in /etc/rc.conf as necessary. Alternatively, you could use nfs to export /usr/local from the first to the second machine. But this will probably be significantly slower in day-to-day usage. And if the first machine is down, the second one looses its ports. := -( Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqzoE8ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXXgwCeKBnAtBEV4avj0UhdEJIE9Jkj KJ4AniJLXrYevYZqUjkFjbmRGqqGLawv =p85Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:09:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7E01065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2A08FC14 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mof56-0001hn-L5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:09:04 -0700 Message-ID: <25510433.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:09:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:05 -0000 A 'subnet' is a term used to describe a portion of an IP address space, where each device in that space can communicate with one another without using a router: Steve wrote: 192.168.1.0/24 is a subnet, so hosts 192.168.1.1 through 192.168.1.254 can 'speak' to each other without using a router. If you have more than one PC, you need a 'switch' or hub to physically connect all of those devices, so they can all speak to each other. (fwiw, I cringe at the term subnet). I have a switch to connect all of these 3 pc's. Steve wrote: In the diagram above, you need two NICs in the gateway. One goes to the ISP, and the other 192.168.1.2 goes to the switch. The rest of the computers also plug into the switch. If all of the devices have 192.168.1.x, they are all in the same subnet. If the 2 pc's will be connected to gateway directly and another one with the switch, then all 3 pc's won't be in one subnet. Right? > I want to use this one: > |------- > > | > ISP x.x.88.17>--------- 192.168.1.6> | > |_______ > Steve wrote: 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 ...but on the pc: 192.168.1.7 255.255.255.128: > ----PC Settings---- > IP: 192.168.1.7 > Mask: 255.255.255.128 (SAME IN rc.conf ON FREEBSD) > Gateway: 192.168.1.2 > Dns: x.x.88.17 > Dns: 192.168.1.2 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510433.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:26:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C484106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB3198FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25521 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 15:25:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 15:25:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB3A695.60409@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:26:13 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> <25510433.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25510433.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040200030807050408090505" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:26:09 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms040200030807050408090505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > Steve wrote: > In the diagram above, you need two NICs in the gateway. One goes to the > ISP, and the other 192.168.1.2 goes to the switch. The rest of the > computers also plug into the switch. If all of the devices have > 192.168.1.x, they are all in the same subnet. > > If the 2 pc's will be connected to gateway directly and another one with the > switch, then all 3 pc's won't be in one subnet. Right? That is right. Knowing that you aren't bridging on the gateway, if you connect two pc's directly to the gateway, and another to the gateway through a switch, they will all need different prefixes (they'll be in different subnets): 192.168.1.x 192.168.2.x 192.168.3.x etc. In this case, you WILL need at least four NICs in the gateway, and you will need at least three different NAT configurations. I'm at a loss of what you are trying to do, primarily because I now envision a scenario where you have multiple switches with cables going everywhere (possibly back to one another), and have no idea what your physical layout truly is. You need to answer the questions in my other message before I can even begin to comprehend what your setup is. Steve --------------ms040200030807050408090505 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTUyNjEzWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU48m1JCOcMS3U2hrZNSOvrKoQ MAcwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AI4D5A1k54dLwIjEteANX8uOfPZxb8RSU1HlangeRT5AcuT1mi8YHnYUK9ursHyhxfCPAWc4 xWB2YHOaFD+EHYQhmZ1G9eQxw+tNJdk6SKxzRtk5Gmg3lMexhtKNWH91OwcTXuCKbF0SZHjA ajov3xpmnadZywJ9kfTr4z/NcDXumpqjRTv1/VaWrXXrBRQNgBfDcypF9lDO3EOaZvatRT9H in306Ejo56Vin2UY0/FcSm32eYFpICZNPyQZExOIIBaVW2A82eO8zIdZoWOh13tLcws8yWXs I0zueOGWh0Dhmpq4V4ofz9WRAd9DlWEmp2rnbAfraHEd4jB9RZUzt/oAAAAAAAA= --------------ms040200030807050408090505-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:28:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B7F1065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C628FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MofNe-0002S3-6s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:28:14 -0700 Message-ID: <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:28:15 -0000 Ok. Lets start with the basics. - What is connected to the switch in your room? There is connected ISP cable from my home switch and 3 pc's - what is connected to the switch in your home? I'm not sure, but i think there is connected a cable to my switch ( i plan: my gateway -> switch) And my neighbour (with private IP) - what is connected to the gateway down the street? I already said, i don't know. I haven't been there. - how do you connect your room, to your home, to the house three homes away? Everything is connected with cable. This new information makes it more believable that there is some sort of cabling mishap. > P.S. Sorry for my poor english You don't have to be. You're doing just fine! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510716.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:29:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7DB1065676 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016CA8FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MofOr-0002WJ-Kg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:29:29 -0700 Message-ID: <25510735.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:29:29 -0700 (PDT) From: FreeBSD admin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: alligator424@free.fr References: <49A4180C.9060209@webanoide.org> <49A66DEA.7080607@fechner.net> Subject: Re: PHP5 and ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:29:30 -0000 Hi folks, I don't know how to enable ldap for php5 on my Freebsd 7.2 system this is a client only ldap system. ldapsearch works well with tls on it. but I try to enable roundcube ldap, and roundcube says: LDAP Error: No ldap support in this installation of PHP (GET /?_task=addressbook&_action=list&_source=ldap&_page=1&_remote=1) here is the output of pkg_info: pkg_info | grep ldap openldap-client-2.4.16 Open source LDAP client implementation php5-ldap-5.2.9 The ldap shared extension for php find / -name ldap.so /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/ldap.so any idea? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PHP5-and-ldap-tp22183625p25510735.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:31:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF428106568F for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3BD8FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30861 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2009 15:31:39 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Sep 2009 15:31:39 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 88E9E5086E; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:31:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jeronimo Calvo References: <1253218609.1320.4.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:31:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jeronimo Calvo's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:48 +0000") Message-ID: <44my4s1d7p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:31:40 -0000 Don't top-post, please. Jeronimo Calvo writes: > for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is > pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D > > > # pkg_info | grep virtualbox > virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware > > # pkg_delete -f virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > incorrectly specified?) This error isn't serious. You can look in that directory, see what's left, and either submit a fix for the port to remove it, or perhaps find out that there is local configuration that the port *shouldn't* be removing. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:37:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F661065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488188FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MofWa-0002t4-Tm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:37:28 -0700 Message-ID: <25510880.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB396B4.3080003@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB39479.8090205@ibctech.ca> <4AB396B4.3080003@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:37:29 -0000 fxp0 is integrated NIC. In this NIC connects a cable from ISP. rl0 is PCI NIC the cable connets to switch with all other 3 pc's. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510880.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:44:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F22106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FC68FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9780EBC0A; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:44:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:44:34 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: FreeBSD admin Message-Id: <20090918114434.63ea0091.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <25510735.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <49A4180C.9060209@webanoide.org> <49A66DEA.7080607@fechner.net> <25510735.post@talk.nabble.com> Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP5 and ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:44:38 -0000 In response to FreeBSD admin : > > Hi folks, I don't know how to enable ldap for php5 on my Freebsd 7.2 system > > this is a client only ldap system. > ldapsearch works well with tls on it. > but I try to enable roundcube ldap, and roundcube says: > > LDAP Error: No ldap support in this installation of PHP (GET > /?_task=addressbook&_action=list&_source=ldap&_page=1&_remote=1) > > here is the output of pkg_info: > pkg_info | grep ldap > openldap-client-2.4.16 Open source LDAP client implementation > php5-ldap-5.2.9 The ldap shared extension for php > > find / -name ldap.so > /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/ldap.so > > any idea? I have a couple of guesses. 1) If you installed php5-ldap from ports, you generally have to restart Apache for the running PHP to recognize that it's there. 2) Check /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini to ensure the .so was properly listed. I've seen cases where it's not listed correctly. You can check the output of php_info() to make sure PHP thinks it's there. Hope this helps. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:58:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEC4106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B99D8FC17 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26468 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 15:58:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 15:58:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:59:03 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030806020001000506070503" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:59 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030806020001000506070503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > - What is connected to the switch in your room? > There is connected ISP cable from my home switch and 3 pc's So, like this: | | ----------- | | | | /|\ / | \ / | \ > - what is connected to the switch in your home? > I'm not sure, but i think there is connected a cable to my switch ( i plan: > my gateway -> switch) > And my neighbour (with private IP) Since you already said that you could ping from your gateway to the 'ISP' router, I'll pretend I didn't hear that your neighbour has a private IP whilst possibly on the same physical broadcast domain. Now, this is what you want to do if I understand the situation correctly: | | ----------- | | | | x.x.88.20 192.168.1.2 | | /|\ / | \ / | \ 192.168.1.5 .6 .7 To test, plug the gateway into the cable that comes from the home switch. Do not plug anything else into the gateway. Now, while logged into the gateway pc: % ping x.x.88.20 % ping x.x.88.17 % ping 208.70.104.211 ...if that works, you now know that the WAN side of your network is working correctly. Now plug the room switch into the other NIC on the gateway, and plug in ONE pc into the switch. Have a look to see if the 'received on wrong int' messages have gone away. If so, on the pc: % ping 192.168.1.2 ...if that works: % ping x.x.88.20 ...if that one does NOT work, post back to the list, and I'll help you with a few commands to do, so we can see where things are dying, and try to find out if this is a NAT problem or not. If it does work: % ping x.x.88.17 ...if that works, we now know that NAT is functional, and you can reach the ISP gateway, and it knows how to get back to you. % ping 208.70.104.211 ...if that works, you are done :) Steve --------------ms030806020001000506070503 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTU1OTAzWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUm+IrNrXr9z44bIz2xMYRiNnl +scwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AGBtOWBYZ6obsuG1PhZv67+jk6YqSxMe0k4Pmzrbr2zyz3ZJi3gOx9pb7UlOPWYhM1cL2rWH 4MsuAjq9Nu3kWSOnxUiZf3tz/qL3l+eFQ4A784569ovPPddQmrDOkEmATQn1gYDK3uC08OEB 2BhcXnwQYz1mwE8shbAH/BWyQSfGw+xmqkeW5lNUzFcdd4MjiabL0LGCnwbT2vaYdg/yQahy y/YyKxPUNhYJIqsbGK44LT+Vb9N0fwCOJo2EebY/rlA+cNXF8vuUP56CMi6GBJmGaaCXtAl4 RzDEPQeCFBw9VHqol9jP6WMUZOFoNDHeSnlKPBVhDmLMv3n6doBsXMMAAAAAAAA= --------------ms030806020001000506070503-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:01:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D17610656A6 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A028FC19 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so777918fxm.43 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yILEkONyWgmOleJzqzZCMuJTh4jd8/v9sIflIwH/TOw=; b=Dfbpbzz0caNeal4CkzngxsZDASX066wjcIZHSCIATzcJgP5v7D6q0EX4Mc/dtrneoF CBy/hDbKbm7qh1Lr5IWY2edfZAnzE/PLvtQAyGt6u87KZmZOJeLXzOZmV4kb4FivPNYe T8pTeiSjr9yGwIscrptl5L/QlW/qgucBzwBSU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ckqJCoOiGt7kD9zEsZs2WEyEBTfNsFLZRPRFYvy82FmhoggG72XlGElVve+/g8NXq8 9CvdZa99v4l8m3RWl2uvmDfq1box0e8lyJJgllI43k2Z1CuvEYK/BwwG5h5JsKkCP5MH nzuTQA62Tf07Ge1JcIVxiVpUs1A35STjDJyy8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.32.146 with SMTP id c18mr1631638bkd.88.1253289716903; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:01:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44my4s1d7p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1253219698.1320.13.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <44my4s1d7p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:56 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:01:58 -0000 make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing is that im not able to launch the app... it doesn't seems to do the correct link... as "which or whereis" doesnt give me any output pointing to "VirtualBox" so in consequence im not able to launch the app post-installation... Can u maybe paste the output of #which virtualbox ? Cheers! 2009/9/18 Lowell Gilbert : > Don't top-post, please. > > Jeronimo Calvo writes: > >> for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is >> pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D >> >> >> # pkg_info | grep virtualbox >> virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hard= ware >> >> # pkg_delete -f virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/virtua= lbox' >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list i= s >> incorrectly specified?) > > This error isn't serious. =A0You can look in that directory, see what's > left, and either submit a fix for the port to remove it, or perhaps find > out that there is local configuration that the port *shouldn't* be > removing. > > -- > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:07:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F4B1065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f189.google.com (mail-vw0-f189.google.com [209.85.212.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23528FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws27 with SMTP id 27so957779vws.3 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XdkBhGH8c743C95C/JhKzU380IduDttyaONK62JQndw=; b=LE3nqlLYhcVqZ7oMhLa8e+B1qVwMGnZVyqW9b7SCbZppwFrs7uuVJxm1kX5m0trBHm HVFOeGm0xLANF5JCWPpTBUCJHZa3A9h6pvDXV/UmWvrR8adIgfh+d2DX8f30XtPYJVhJ +vyHa6RaUITaxhZ70krCZ3kf6UsYcty24gJZY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YR/va6kXhyTduTms1YOOWBTz9sqG+0hb21RvL+7q+0skgIBQ6PCNtIxkR+sdBXkeAj c4ZZ/7MKycsJXBJcpy+/P+4wb0eymoKNSTDHnmODn9aPjt80DkciCckPHywKb74lPUSf LkFUyvEFVBi4HmLxEOfk3yPTxjmb31u/vf4G8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.71.4 with SMTP id t4mr3577017yba.226.1253290038023; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:07:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <44my4s1d7p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:07:17 -0500 Message-ID: <6201873e0909180907k7f34756ai43e157bac517295f@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Jeronimo Calvo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:07:19 -0000 On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeronimo Calvo < jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com> wrote: > make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing is that im > not able to launch the app... it doesn't seems to do the correct > link... as "which or whereis" doesnt give me any output pointing to > "VirtualBox" so in consequence im not able to launch the app > post-installation... > > Can u maybe paste the output of #which virtualbox ? > > Cheers! > > 2009/9/18 Lowell Gilbert : > > Don't top-post, please. > > > > Jeronimo Calvo writes: > > > >> for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is > >> pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D > >> > >> > >> # pkg_info | grep virtualbox > >> virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 > hardware > >> > >> # pkg_delete -f virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > >> > >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list > is > >> incorrectly specified?) > > > > This error isn't serious. You can look in that directory, see what's > > left, and either submit a fix for the port to remove it, or perhaps find > > out that there is local configuration that the port *shouldn't* be > > removing. > > > > -- > > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Did you unselect configuration option Build with QT4 Frontend ? -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:12:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204BB106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E931A8FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mog4p-0004Ro-HL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:12:51 -0700 Message-ID: <25511444.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT) From: FreeBSD admin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090918114434.63ea0091.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: alligator424@free.fr References: <49A4180C.9060209@webanoide.org> <49A66DEA.7080607@fechner.net> <25510735.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090918114434.63ea0091.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Subject: Re: PHP5 and ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:12:52 -0000 SOLVED! i had an incorrect php.ini in front of my apache installation. You put me on the right tracks! problem solved. no I have a TLS negociation error, but this is another part. Cheers -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PHP5-and-ldap-tp22183625p25511444.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:19:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C668106568D for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58528FC1E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so788870fxm.43 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JDzphtliDC5rEJ+rBAvCv7FBbNcEtlYc7AsRaKwcwY=; b=CoC1aNH0X6eGkBGGgtn24RG10Ifti0aX3T9sSIpMven+nDdDHdMQb4m8a1pSa9Jv8+ gTJ2BUwCWGFKnktEqNehSlGf/PPmjIrASna9lf8VbRXrlgKw+Xxf8wk2Ehe5B/xtAF+c eiciPrKaBxOEezibvM9+RLL0091iowlaTBSHM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EwCM0NknOpxpfJhnlgwFgxWc2Fw6zEop5kCYK514DIcwdZTO7wJ+yN/hO6JpyvWa3E 21mbjKjB7nUbJkxdq3jDGROF4IH7VwPq4cJjZnY7Br3oPs4/wXG00ygOgTRmIR1HvFuN rrluIxaaBOdpULbgSK4kSJ1P7+hoYcerRrpdI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.18.145 with SMTP id w17mr1665935bka.42.1253290762179; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6201873e0909180907k7f34756ai43e157bac517295f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1253223838.46513.1.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <44my4s1d7p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <6201873e0909180907k7f34756ai43e157bac517295f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:19:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jeronimo Calvo To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:19:24 -0000 no, I did not, the only change i made was VBOX_WITH_HARDENING =3D 0, on Config.kmk, before compiling... 2009/9/18 Adam Vande More : > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeronimo Calvo > wrote: >> >> make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing is that im >> not able to launch the app... it doesn't seems to do the correct >> link... as "which or whereis" doesnt give me any output pointing to >> "VirtualBox" so in consequence im not able to launch the app >> post-installation... >> >> Can u maybe paste the output of #which virtualbox ? >> >> Cheers! >> >> 2009/9/18 Lowell Gilbert : >> > Don't top-post, please. >> > >> > Jeronimo Calvo writes: >> > >> >> for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is >> >> pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D >> >> >> >> >> >> # pkg_info | grep virtualbox >> >> virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 >> >> hardware >> >> >> >> # pkg_delete -f virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 >> >> >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' >> >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing lis= t >> >> is >> >> incorrectly specified?) >> > >> > This error isn't serious. =A0You can look in that directory, see what'= s >> > left, and either submit a fix for the port to remove it, or perhaps fi= nd >> > out that there is local configuration that the port *shouldn't* be >> > removing. >> > >> > -- >> > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Did you unselect configuration option > > Build with QT4 Frontend > > ? > -- > Adam Vande More > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:22:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C0B106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15488FC08 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MogEX-0004rR-GE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:22:53 -0700 Message-ID: <25511620.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:22:53 -0700 (PDT) From: FreeBSD admin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <25511444.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: alligator424@free.fr References: <49A4180C.9060209@webanoide.org> <49A66DEA.7080607@fechner.net> <25510735.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090918114434.63ea0091.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <25511444.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: PHP5 and ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:22:54 -0000 and now it working... tls_ssf=256 ssf=256 great thanks for php.ini trick! @+ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PHP5-and-ldap-tp22183625p25511620.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:40:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBCB106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A412F8FC4E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MogVQ-0005Xm-1U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:40:20 -0700 Message-ID: <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:40:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:40:20 -0000 Thanks man! Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short. But i want my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2 cables and inet will doesn't work again? I could ping all IP's when cables was connected. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25511903.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:49:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1730106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEBB98FC1F for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27651 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 16:48:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 16:48:47 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:49:07 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040203070201010100080202" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:49:04 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms040203070201010100080202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > Thanks man! > > Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this > there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short. I kind of figured something along those lines. > But i want > my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2 cables and > inet will doesn't work again? You can't change the way it is...it must stay this way. Do whatever you have to do (get a longer cable for instance) in order to keep things the way they are. Here is a solution for you. Note that the has ONLY the ISP cable, and the gateway cable plugged into it AND NOTHING ELSE. A new switch may cost only about $40USD, but not only will it work the same, but it will allow you to put the gateway in your other room: | | ----------- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | x.x.88.20 192.168.1.2 | | /|\ / | \ / | \ 192.168.1.5 .6 .7 Cheers. I'm glad it worked out for you! :) Steve --------------ms040203070201010100080202 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTY0OTA3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQULpNJp5UK4Whc6J3jBQuE5xzX jHkwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AH5oGaSWoTMFQA6xrwlT92qlHVU7h3IQhfl/QICL3OWk2DeKO6MW/z4OGlIAXx+qYgbT49uA 6rLH2jkapeP/dj9BWVLMCg7w6lISrNiwffkufTPI6VItoqD3HOWEgWt8ueyJNaYvVffxrJx9 fY3L479n1n9vgNvt9crNxqp4VZRxrSzonrXR4LIxvmNQXnNQ6pwM+S8d83N74JYvso0A3tr/ VBpFdeuOhFmRNgsJFKaTJSHXSbllbrt5krLwrPWyiQx5wSm0yWn04wvJG3T/EwmDlZ/U5dVp iToaPCNi+8n+255/9w98lvLtFzqeyexTzcKcRALM+5WlsXwU1bixj/UAAAAAAAA= --------------ms040203070201010100080202-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 16:57:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DF8106568B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E84C8FC17 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27934 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 16:57:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 16:57:42 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB3BC1A.4050509@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:58:02 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060605030102040009030400" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:57:56 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060605030102040009030400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > Thanks man! > > Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this > there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short. But i want > my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2 cables and > inet will doesn't work again? > > I could ping all IP's when cables was connected. Now that we've resolved it, I suspect this is what you had, with the pc's (quite possibly) plugged into the as well: | | ----------- | | | | | \ | \ x.x.88.20 \ | 192.168.1.2 | | | | | |_________| Yes? Steve --------------ms060605030102040009030400 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTY1ODAyWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU08zWUvJfCDfEdswS9oAU6ERR pZIwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AEbSNq83sSLGoiwwwHmk5zrgX0TXywKJxBxis7Oi65BVB7KhLawivayROKv/XWthtGpdvndr NHmJC8nWuuMWnZ4ID1rJAQlfvNhXc+X4dBIZBbIEhMvNqVKIeFdSfCYhlR/1dOUzE+R0cwrW d9DmWQfQyaXctls6s+W2nsg25z9Q4WS2vZ8ilKgkuzxttN/ySZ6G6PkUMM3H/2H64pAVLyjg pfutrOlhpibWFLFpGxcXC2O9zV1yzIuwFpiCLYYLItr953LKPrh7yssxs1cN1HPruBiqk6iJ iyfrWxzRgPT1JZXjemzin/oIFWbkaX5upjrpOq7eRaug+dCeGi4LvAYAAAAAAAA= --------------ms060605030102040009030400-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 17:01:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B367106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEC98FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yx0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 2so1451419yxe.3 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+GGTy8hxSRffYQPuyMEjkf/tuzwDoCmw5uwcK6M9qrw=; b=nKL1TU5nPGtTcNWAxkEv+3zByZSI5U32Jk73bKcaUzrHDh3JbAVTpmNoLTslBjTwdl 7gCwmWRacXyuWB138H3vfj5E8jfpd9AZkFdUqoIkxAuCq3f6ccQL7bFfoTQve4+vYfUR PWgPm4vtG1IQKqQkSD0abYY6HKxA5IdrQ6rQI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rk9srisKORMRhc3y+TWGs+Ode+qIOLm/fotpRpP5+KjRXY7FKnitdhWlVFxrf3IcW2 +DgaH5DV0O1L2IvesBhcBqa1HGrQ3+6DlEGckUTphqhlSdv7t8ZEvtld84jszrCbSrvA xJNNe0hRzPXBo3qmO/r6p1Waq0KVfdBKqpWiA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.65.5 with SMTP id n5mr3667572yba.190.1253293294746; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1253224538.46513.5.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <1253227916.46513.10.camel@coyote.lerwick.hopto.org> <44my4s1d7p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <6201873e0909180907k7f34756ai43e157bac517295f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:01:34 -0500 Message-ID: <6201873e0909181001j42db11b6gda44b3ca44695346@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Jeronimo Calvo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Virtualbox does not lunch (FREEBSD 7.2 STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:35 -0000 On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jeronimo Calvo < jeronimocalvop@googlemail.com> wrote: > no, I did not, the only change i made was VBOX_WITH_HARDENING = 0, on > Config.kmk, before compiling... > > 2009/9/18 Adam Vande More : > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeronimo Calvo > > wrote: > >> > >> make install, seems to do the work... but the only thing is that im > >> not able to launch the app... it doesn't seems to do the correct > >> link... as "which or whereis" doesnt give me any output pointing to > >> "VirtualBox" so in consequence im not able to launch the app > >> post-installation... > >> > >> Can u maybe paste the output of #which virtualbox ? > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > >> 2009/9/18 Lowell Gilbert : > >> > Don't top-post, please. > >> > > >> > Jeronimo Calvo writes: > >> > > >> >> for some reason, it gives me the same error... the funny thing is > >> >> pkgdb gives me a nice colection of errors as well :D > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> # pkg_info | grep virtualbox > >> >> virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 > >> >> hardware > >> >> > >> >> # pkg_delete -f virtualbox-3.0.51.r22226 > >> >> > >> >> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > >> >> '/usr/local/lib/virtualbox' > >> >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing > list > >> >> is > >> >> incorrectly specified?) > >> > > >> > This error isn't serious. You can look in that directory, see what's > >> > left, and either submit a fix for the port to remove it, or perhaps > find > >> > out that there is local configuration that the port *shouldn't* be > >> > removing. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > >> > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Did you unselect configuration option > > > > Build with QT4 Frontend > > > > ? > > -- > What is the output of cat /var/db/ports/virtualbox/options -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 17:09:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4471065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-out1.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-OUT1.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776928FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:09:33 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,410,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="283068619" Received: from zivmaildisp2.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER05.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.143]) by zivm-relay1.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2009 19:09:32 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER05.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id 700A51B07E5; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:09:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:09:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: /etc/X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:09:35 -0000 hi, is "/etc/X11" in "/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist" still necessary? using "/usr/local/etc/X11/" seems like a much better place to store one's "xorg.conf". cheers. alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 17:27:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37C4106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E3E8FC15 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MohF8-0007LH-BY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:27:34 -0700 Message-ID: <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:27:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:27:35 -0000 Ok, thanks for advice about switch. You really helped me so much. Now i'll get with my ipf and nat rules. What ports u recomend to keep open and how to block gateway ping? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25512314.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 17:52:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F45C106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:52:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B89528FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29419 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 17:52:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 17:52:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:52:28 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020206020307060403050809" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:52:24 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020206020307060403050809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > Ok, thanks for advice about switch. You really helped me so much. Now i'll > get with my ipf and nat rules. I'm glad I could help. So many people here and on other lists have helped me significantly over the years, so I try to give back whenever I can/have time. > What ports u recomend to keep open and how to block gateway ping? About the ports....that depends on what you are going to do. My theory is, unless you are an Internet Provider, all ports should be closed by default, and opened on an as-is needed basis. Generally, there isn't very much that will break if you block everything coming into the ISP side of your gateway (so long as you are using the firewall as a 'stateful' firewall). On the other hand, having the idea that "wide open and block certain things" leads to accidentally leaving things like SSH on your gateway accessible. As for the ping. I am generally dead against blocking any type of ICMP. I've spent countless nights trying to troubleshoot wide-scale Internet reachability problems because someone out there decided that blocking ICMP was the same as blocking ping. This goes against my above 'deny everything', but it's my only exception. Those who have ever had to deal with pmtud issues when it's least expected know exactly what I mean. Issues caused by careless filtering of ICMP can have the same effect to a home user as it does to an ISP, but the home user will likely have a much harder time figuring out what is wrong :) For instance, most will do the following: # ipfw add 100 deny icmp from any to any in You just broke Path MTU Discovery, lost the ability to learn when a remote port/host is unreachable, and our tests earlier would have failed as well. If your firewall is clamped down, there is no real good reason to block ping requests IMHO. If you don't want others on the WAN side to be able to ping you, block ICMP Type 8 messages inbound only. In IPFW, it would look like this: # ipfw add 10 deny icmp from any to me in via $ext_if icmptypes 8 # ipfw add 15 allow icmp from any to any ...but my personal recommendation is to not do it. Even for the simple fact that if you ever have to call your ISP for support, pinging is one of the most basic and helpful utilities available. Again, IMHO. Cheers, Steve --------------ms020206020307060403050809 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTc1MjI4WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUwy2Qg6/4GaSQ9svdyF9B+ZFF LX8wUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AAp60KQLx5ckS4m7N5bxgi68xYf4CwbJlt1Fh8IlKWu3nyYO78vMHg1Fd2mxcH9T9yQCTTkA MczBQDjtxFiDZBedEQH7LyYVrXF633uaK/L0I0QUCUEE3P1/INSCAbekCBm8S5gOlefO2fDk odLzTjwnFDNp9YQcFVoI/VdodV6EMOTddSo9g39DEelCTq5/ys0IazmFAUWvuOOwTXb5+rFp xrSs9rB3DTD4Mxc40BilMqJzgs1W6u0mpS7A4dLxEMkVYKkvX4PpeEkd/IkhGJchPhkyXeEj qRYn6UZABJQFhr0g9FrVw9c4qIsGNcXDRdqGFF6zCVGfxEJ9GAN7qR8AAAAAAAA= --------------ms020206020307060403050809-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 18:16:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE461065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560CA8FC1A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Moi0K-0000la-Lu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:16:20 -0700 Message-ID: <25513318.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:16:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:16:21 -0000 After some time, when all 3 pc's was connected to switch inet lost. I couldn't open any web page. I didn;t try to ping anything. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513318.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 18:32:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47781065679 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8588FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MoiG2-0001Lt-31 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:32:34 -0700 Message-ID: <25513518.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:32:34 -0000 My gateway gave me a message: "gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513518.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 19:22:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246411065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:22:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AA378FC1E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31585 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2009 19:22:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 18 Sep 2009 19:22:03 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB3DDED.4060909@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:22:21 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freeco References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> <25513518.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25513518.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000500030101070207030203" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:22:17 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000500030101070207030203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Freeco wrote: > My gateway gave me a message: "gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but > got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0 That MAC address is that of a Mikrotic router. I suspect that you've created a cabling loop of some sort again. Steve --------------ms000500030101070207030203 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE4MTkyMjIxWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUG8zrki1NqLL4hpfxQ7dNELHl 3jEwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AGrhhc+bn/uzQ5xc3eZjyCtaxPMguvaylZIbh5m0Sb2Fg/cRouHbI2aUep2U1pHqtZsXsqcg UE45aQLTqBQyFIUK8Nr/ClJX8VlBlGZcWoMXVEBk2MjBZNKWX/2v/xU31aWfKSxWDmQCeILX ISd7zj9sHGD08ZAwGuD7jq7+6t0qRPQHHOoSBKHZXrdPOB6WVLJvhEiynqVhNctWaITAk9qe xMnnmyeZQTGautBsSL54g8Qf+VLwl13pVXGm/xI+D7O9ez7uFq10nNbxiU9M0u+z/rZBeU7c a5GEuH7+S6w2BPBfwWHLDg1rIkhvARjBYKDfXgfFhFvANj+bvU9htLwAAAAAAAA= --------------ms000500030101070207030203-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 19:26:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C35106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from przemyslaw@frasunek.com) Received: from lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl (lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl [193.138.118.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9E28FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.138.118.99] (ip-193-138-118-99.nette.pl [193.138.118.99]) by lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4598AC54C19; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:26:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AB3DEE4.3060109@frasunek.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:26:28 +0200 From: Przemyslaw Frasunek Organization: frasunek.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reko Turja References: <4AAE95B2.5050409@sitpub.com><20090915031437.GA20647@brisbane.nepharia.org> <4AB37BB2.3070606@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <977EC17F30A642A5B2DFACE4D8A25A89@rivendell> In-Reply-To: <977EC17F30A642A5B2DFACE4D8A25A89@rivendell> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:26:50 -0000 Reko Turja pisze: > As someone who has manipulated moving picture for fun and profit, having > a video of something is a proof of nothing. For all what it's worth the > OS in video might be FreeBSD - or even loonix made to look like FreeBSD, > made vulnerable on purpose of tarring the project. > > Until the security team gives their official response and patches, I > read the entire story with a grain of salt, especially as the originator > was so keen on getting his discovery into news websites... Actually, the 6.4 vulnerability was confirmed by Xin Li on freebsd-security@. The patch along with advisory will be out very soon. You might be also interested in reading statement on my webpage, regarding both 6.4 and 7.2 vulnerabilities. -- * Fido: 2:480/124 ** WWW: http://www.frasunek.com ** NICHDL: PMF9-RIPE * * Jabber ID: venglin@czuby.pl ** PGP ID: 2578FCAD ** HAM-RADIO: SQ5JIV * From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 19:32:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242991065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D668FC08 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MojC8-0001sG-Vo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:32:36 +0200 Received: from 78-105-124-69.zone3.bethere.co.uk ([78.105.124.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:32:36 +0200 Received: from cdr.nil by 78-105-124-69.zone3.bethere.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:32:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mark Willson Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:32:20 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-105-124-69.zone3.bethere.co.uk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Help configuring sendmail to send only using authorization to smart host X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:32:40 -0000 Phusion wrote: > I need some help configuring sendmail to send only using authorization > to a smart host being the ISP's mail server. I'm running 7.2-RELEASE. > I've looked over > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html but > want to use the built-in sendmail. I've run the following command: > sendmail -d0.1 -bv, but SASL isn't included. Also, I would rather uses > packages. Please advise. Phusion, I originally replied via Google, but it doesn't seem to have hit the list, so here's a repeat. Apologies for the repetition, if it occurs. This link might provide useful information: http://www.hydrus.org.uk/journal/smtp-client-auth.html -mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 21:39:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDC9106566C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35DF8FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MolAd-0002J1-6o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:39:11 +0200 Received: from pool-70-21-16-236.res.east.verizon.net ([70.21.16.236]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:39:11 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-70-21-16-236.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:39:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:39:27 -0400 Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <4AAF4927.3070203@frasunek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-21-16-236.res.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: reporter on deadline seeks comment about reported security bug in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:39:14 -0000 Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Przemyslaw should email security-officer with any details he thinks are >> relevant. Then the security team will make sure to fix the bug for all >> affected releases of FreeBSD, release a patch with the fix, issue an >> advisory through the usual channels, and post the details online at our >> security information web pages at . > > I see that I received a lot of criticism after disclosing 6.4 > vulnerability. Please read some facts: > > I send few mails: on 29th Aug to security team, on 2nd Sep and 11th Sep > directly to security officer. None of them were responded. I haven't > filled any PRs, because it would disclose details of vulnerability to the > public and allow blackhats to exploit it. > > I won't publish anything more than video, before official security > advisory. The exploit is private to me and it won't be given to the > "community". > > Michael Powell wrote: >> Quoted from ~freebsd.security.general: >> "The bug was fixed in 6.1-STABLE, just before release of 6.2-RELEASE, but >> was not recognized as security vulnerability." > > This is another bug. The former one affected only 6.1, this one affects > everything up to 6.4-STABLE. > Please allow me to express my appreciation for your efforts in this matter. Your work will only improve FreeBSD and I would like to thank you kindly for that. I apologize if any, or all, of my comments appeared critical of your work. I was trying to express criticism of the writer whose only imperative was to generate a sensationalist headline. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 21:57:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B68106566B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from selgram@verifpoint.com) Received: from dukecmfep06.coxmail.com (dukecmfep06.coxmail.com [68.99.120.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0328FC14 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dukecmimpo02.coxmail.com ([68.99.120.135]) by dukecmfep06.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20090918215754.RUOU11808.dukecmfep06.coxmail.com@dukecmimpo02.coxmail.com> for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:57:54 -0400 Received: from is02 ([172.18.18.217]) by dukecmimpo02.coxmail.com with bizsmtp id iMxr1c0014h0NJL01Mxunf; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:57:54 -0400 From: "Scott Elgram" To: Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:57:33 -0700 Organization: VerifPoint/CreDENTALs Message-ID: <3F3F36886F1E4185AB1EE019FF6DB93D@CREDENTALS> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Aco4qwbPDpT2tjROTWOHT1lAKSqkWA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help with NAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SElgram@VerifPoint.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:57:55 -0000 Hello, I am at my wits end with this one. I have set up a box to use of firewall/nat. However, during the setup I pointed set net to do a port redirect of port 6502 to port 80 of my development web server. Everything worked fine so I deployed my new box onto a live IP and tested it again with the same redirect to my dev server. Still, everything works fine so I changed /etc/natd.conf to point to my production web server and it won't work. I have tried everything that I can think of to narrow down this issue but I just can't figure it out. I pointed everything back to my dev server and it's still working. I changed the dev servers IP and changed nat to point to the new IP and it still works. It would see that nat will work only with my dev server and no other computer. Can anyone offer any suggestions, I'm sure I'm missing something basic. -Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 00:18:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0453106566B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2046F8FC18 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39079 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2009 00:18:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 19 Sep 2009 00:18:01 -0000 Message-ID: <4AB4234B.5060409@ibctech.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:18:19 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SElgram@VerifPoint.com References: <3F3F36886F1E4185AB1EE019FF6DB93D@CREDENTALS> In-Reply-To: <3F3F36886F1E4185AB1EE019FF6DB93D@CREDENTALS> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000708030908000106050508" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with NAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:18:14 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000708030908000106050508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Scott Elgram wrote: > Hello, > > I am at my wits end with this one. I have set up a box to use > of firewall/nat. However, during the setup I pointed set net to do a port > redirect of port 6502 to port 80 of my development web server. Everything > worked fine so I deployed my new box onto a live IP and tested it again with > the same redirect to my dev server. Still, everything works fine so I > changed /etc/natd.conf to point to my production web server and it won't > work. I have tried everything that I can think of to narrow down this issue > but I just can't figure it out. I pointed everything back to my dev server > and it's still working. I changed the dev servers IP and changed nat to > point to the new IP and it still works. It would see that nat will work > only with my dev server and no other computer. > > > > Can anyone offer any suggestions, I'm sure I'm missing something basic. On the production server, after you've got things pointed to it: # tcpdump -n -i em0 port 80 ...where em0 is the interface. Send a request through from the outside, and verify that you can see the HTTP request come in to the production box, and go back out again. It should look like the following. Note that these are v6 addrs not v4, but the result is the same. In the first packet, 5 -> b6 is request in, and b6 -> 5 is response back. You 'should' see the same result, but with your v4 addresses instead. pearl# tcpdump -n -i em0 port 80 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on re0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 20:09:52.912361 IP6 2607:f118::5.1752 > 2607:f118::b6.80: S 3408461679:3408461679(0) win 16384 20:09:52.912425 IP6 2607:f118::b6.80 > 2607:f118::5.1752: S 1781312333:1781312333(0) ack 3408461680 win 65535 ...whether you see the packets come in or not, post back with your findings. Do you perhaps have to 'restart' natd in order to release any sort of caching? STeve --------------ms000708030908000106050508 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCC AtowggJDoAMCAQICEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV1HcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDUwNzIzMTYxMFoX DTEwMDUwNzIzMTYxMFowQjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0G CSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAJSTRAjP1RVa87/mnZn+PBTbENgyhhBJ4rWApmaNcthzRdk2DB/49KrXx3EQP60w Lj4KU0DFkiGNVj9BnVxRAx/WDXKxGC3uGGEG6gjyWv8KFMWMsH9mL7y7uNow1HueT6pZUf9o yY8Ewd+01QpGi7FfXOae7lGHhbEwnEJGwz08ytRfLmH0KtEzlZanZZhwDGX5s1kIHnyxdACh 3byXY6Z2bOrx0rcrQHCnHJppxddR60F7igjaMuBFstE51h9XTgXDNKJbglqTug5ghGihNuP6 VsBN7ue62y96UGIE22TvKEcAQ665vQGjHqZeSzZYy+hWNOa27pWFmhlqFjx0x8MCAwEAAaMt MCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc3RldmVAaWJjdGVjaC5jYTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4GBAMOmjxjp2Xzk6ZHLwTgFDzVhm98RjRT3UXotKjNIR7SgwfWF5wkJrx4I+dXu ui5ztMEq4bTTRgJ344MqE6uZiZlg+tBIFHZGCJfKdzsX4QuV2jmw0sR5dMaYxG6tlDB0YUMv gTqzV7ZDpiusTMOZe9pP1PdxFhOcIJXtMQDj5LhuMIIC2jCCAkOgAwIBAgIQSznGD8ne3vtB YnhJq1XUdzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDkwNTA3MjMxNjEwWhcNMTAwNTA3MjMxNjEwWjBCMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzdGV2ZUBpYmN0 ZWNoLmNhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlJNECM/VFVrzv+admf48 FNsQ2DKGEEnitYCmZo1y2HNF2TYMH/j0qtfHcRA/rTAuPgpTQMWSIY1WP0GdXFEDH9YNcrEY Le4YYQbqCPJa/woUxYywf2YvvLu42jDUe55PqllR/2jJjwTB37TVCkaLsV9c5p7uUYeFsTCc QkbDPTzK1F8uYfQq0TOVlqdlmHAMZfmzWQgefLF0AKHdvJdjpnZs6vHStytAcKccmmnF11Hr QXuKCNoy4EWy0TnWH1dOBcM0oluCWpO6DmCEaKE24/pWwE3u57rbL3pQYgTbZO8oRwBDrrm9 AaMepl5LNljL6FY05rbulYWaGWoWPHTHwwIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRBzdGV2ZUBp YmN0ZWNoLmNhMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAw6aPGOnZfOTpkcvB OAUPNWGb3xGNFPdRei0qM0hHtKDB9YXnCQmvHgj51e66LnO0wSrhtNNGAnfjgyoTq5mJmWD6 0EgUdkYIl8p3OxfhC5XaObDSxHl0xpjEbq2UMHRhQy+BOrNXtkOmK6xMw5l72k/U93EWE5wg le0xAOPkuG4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoT EVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERp dmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcN MTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRp bmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f 6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRw Oi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8E BAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bG CE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEs5xg/J3t77QWJ4SatV 1HcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDkwOTE5MDAxODE5WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUQMW3P3JZxSK3EQ2/YivcBSA/ p/wwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0Fi eEmrVdR3MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBLOcYPyd7e+0FieEmrVdR3MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AGDDty0MJ4wp9RdZjcuzugpV8URsV9blGXaAicB8YRlIheIuclfsoAip25yJIqH/XmUk1pbU TsSWgODAcvwqxWtnPchCMiUMMj2p4Y+rVd1cxIHqd6QxICq6BEE72bffSaWotyZxQ/6FM51Z smSzh2NZ7dYRvIi79HzNev5J9NyqhRcoNftAj2CNiE76fpyHQbQ7OYBLSKinA8CzNUovdVoZ TjrqHn7l9fkL9TzV5olNXOmCtBrSdfR0GgCFxCBiR+LwlFpHnzZzEs5LBVb1IVn7eDlZRzha nin+hjB3yXcGfOSC9/AvzDh9MgTnRXEsb/ayolPIjLwHqt60xbX+e1kAAAAAAAA= --------------ms000708030908000106050508-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 02:36:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36F4106566B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [64.156.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6AD8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [75.15.116.151]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3434A30842 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, _d Sep 2009 19:36:17 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:36:17 -0700 From: Jason To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090919023617.GA27825@jason-helfmans-macbook-pro.local> References: <20090810162450.GD55676@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <20090811161704.GC99758@eggman.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090811161704.GC99758@eggman.experts-exchange.com> X-Operating-System: Darwin 9.8.0 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: freebsd-update-server, 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:36:19 -0000 No worries, all. I've managed to get this to work, and have a working internal freebsd-update server. With some help from Colin, I've realized a couple of things that needed to be changed for my setup to work. In regards to the amd64 build I was doing, it was missing some kernel sources that were not in the configuration file I was following for i386 that is part of the cvs source. I will be submitting my configuration files for review, as well. In addition to this, I will submit documentation to FreeBSD on how I've used the software to create a working freebsd-update server. -jgh On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:17:04AM -0700, Jason thus spake: >Does anyone have any thoughts, or experience in using the >freebsd-update-server code? > >Thanks, >Jason > >On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:24:52AM -0700, Jason thus spake: >>Hi. >> >>The freebsd-update-server project software hasn't been updated for 7,2, >>but after making a couple of simple modifications, it seems to work rather well. >> >>I am close, but not quiet smoking the cigar of triumph, yet. >> >>When it initially builds, I get this error in the output: >> >>Fri Aug 7 18:50:56 PDT 2009 Extracting world+src for FreeBSD/amd64 >>7.2-RELEASE >>Sun Sep 12 01:51:21 UTC 2010 Building world for FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-RELEASE >>Sat Sep 11 18:51:30 PDT 2010 Moving components into staging area for >>FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-RELEASE >>mv: rename /R/stage/trees to /R/trees/world: No such file or directory >>Fri Aug 7 18:51:30 PDT 2009 Extracting extra docs for FreeBSD/amd64 >>7.2-RELEASE >>tar: could not chdir to '/R/trees/world' >> >>I would like to clear these errors up, as well... but... >> >>The only code change I have made is adding this to build.subr for the iso >>fetch. Basically a path change. >> >>ISO=${FTP}/ISO-IMAGES-${TARGET}/${RELNUM}/${REL}-${TARGET}-disc1.iso >> >>However, it does build. I send the update to my update server, and need to >>copy latest.ssl and pub.ssl from one of the official update servers from >>FreeBSD. If I don't do that, I will get this error. >> >>freebsd-update fetch >>Looking up xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx mirrors... none found. >>Fetching metadata signature for 7.2-RELEASE from >>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ... invalid signature. >>No mirrors remaining, giving up. >> >>If I do that, I then get to the next step: >> >>freebsd-update fetch >>Looking up xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx mirrors... none found. >>Fetching metadata signature for 7.2-RELEASE from >>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ... done. >>Fetching metadata index... fetch: >>http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/7.2-RELEASE/amd64/t/14e85c887f8e9ecaef130d50e3d2ddbb3664af22d9e05f652a66219bda5b76ba: >>Not Found >>failed. >> >>On the update server, I do have this file though under the "t" directory: >>4eeb3a30c564302be5e8129e6afdf3477ff316a891b5a4b6c9535947b7a81e28 >> >>I am curious why it is requesting the wrong file. >> >>Here is my configuration file for 7.2: >> >># SHA256 hash of RELEASE disc1.iso image. >>export RELH=1ea1f6f652d7c5f5eab7ef9f8edbed50cb664b08ed761850f95f48e86cc71ef5 >> >># Components of the world, source, and kernels >>export WORLDPARTS="base catpages dict doc games info manpages proflibs" >>export SOURCEPARTS="base bin contrib crypto etc games gnu include krb5 \ >> lib libexec release rescue sbin secure share sys tools \ >> ubin usbin" >>export KERNELPARTS="generic" >> >># EOL date >>export EOL=1275289200 >> >>Thanks, >>Jason >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 05:17:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9D7106566B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D4E8FC12 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MosKB-0006yr-8C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:17:31 -0700 Message-ID: <25518685.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:17:31 -0700 (PDT) From: jaymax To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090918052422.GA8637@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jaymax36@gmail.com References: <25498179.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090918052422.GA8637@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: Undelete or recover from badblocks on disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:17:32 -0000 Thanks Roland, smartctl showed disk to be fine! fls requires a disk image, is there one created by default in FreeBSD 6.0 . > SYNOPSIS > fls [-adDFlpruvV] [-m mnt ] [-z zone ] [-f fstype ] [-s seconds ] > [-i > imgtype ] [-o imgoffset ] image [images] [ inode ] > Running fls in directory of deleted files/dir produced > #fls -adr 2 > Missing image file names (img_open) > Is there a solution to this ? Roland Smith wrote: > > Check the disk with smartctl(8) from the sysutils/smartmontools port to > check > that this isn't a hardware malfunction. If it is a hardware malfunction, > the > disk is dying and should be replaced ASAP. > > If the hardware is OK, try fls from sysutils/sleuthkit. As long as the > data > isn't overwritten, it should still be there. > > Roland > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Undelete-or-recover-from-badblocks-on-disks-tp25498179p25518685.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 08:43:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF941106566C for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD7F8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8J8hO57064384; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:43:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 64D3DBA95; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:43:24 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: jaymax Message-ID: <20090919084324.GB51231@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <25498179.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090918052422.GA8637@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <25518685.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25518685.post@talk.nabble.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Undelete or recover from badblocks on disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:43:26 -0000 --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:17:31PM -0700, jaymax wrote: >=20 > Thanks Roland,=20 > smartctl showed disk to be fine! > fls requires a disk image, is there one created by default in FreeBSD 6.0= .=20 No, you have to create one. > Running fls in directory of deleted files/dir produced >=20 > > #fls -adr 2 > > Missing image file names (img_open) > >=20 >=20 > Is there a solution to this ? Create a disk image from the damaged drive, and save it on another disk with enough space. You can use dd(1) to create a disk image. You can devide the image into several files. For example, I will use dd to get two consecutive= 10 MiB pieces from a disk partition on a USB stick: # dd if=3D/dev/da0s1 of=3Ddd1.img bs=3D1m count=3D10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10485760 bytes transferred in 1.031497 secs (10165575 bytes/sec) # dd if=3D/dev/da0s1 of=3Ddd2.img bs=3D1m count=3D10 iseek=3D10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10485760 bytes transferred in 1.021128 secs (10268799 bytes/sec) Without specifying it, dd uses 512 byte blocks. This can take along time, because dd then needs to do a lot of small reads. Therefore I tend to speci= fy a larger block size. Note that 'bs=3D1m count=3D10' reads the save amount o= f data as 'bs=3D10m count=3D1' and 'bs=3D1k count=3D10240'. Using a larger blocksi= ze will usually mean faster reads, but I do not know what the practical limits to block sizes are. I would not start by using 'bs=3D1g', though. The (valid, IMHO) reason for using disk images is that you want to investig= ate a copy of the data, so you cannot accidentily destroy the original data. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkq0mawACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWG9ACfWzT05vbi7kXO1M7VL02yNMmA 8HwAoJ3yUgVc90VvLriD0hQ63zENwM+Z =u9NX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 10:26:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A41F106568D for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4BF8FC19 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mox8t-0007Gj-DC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:26:11 -0700 Message-ID: <25520353.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:26:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4AB3DDED.4060909@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> <25513518.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3DDED.4060909@ibctech.ca> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:12 -0000 I suspect that you've created a cabling loop of some sort again. Maybe i made some cabling loop, becauce my internet stoped to work. In the beginning everything was ok, but after some time when all 3 pc's was connected to switch it stopped to work. Why? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25520353.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 10:26:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2E9106568F for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E3B8FC1B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mox9L-0007Hx-P2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:26:39 -0700 Message-ID: <25520353.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:26:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:40 -0000 Maybe i made some cabling loop, becauce my internet stoped to work. In the beginning everything was ok, but after some time when all 3 pc's was connected to switch it stopped to work. Why? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25520353.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 13:22:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE908106568B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A418FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Moztq-0004f3-2Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:22:50 -0700 Message-ID: <25521566.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:22:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <25520353.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca> <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB397CF.2030809@ibctech.ca> <25510716.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3AE47.1090403@ibctech.ca> <25511903.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3BA03.5030603@ibctech.ca> <25512314.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3C8DC.7000509@ibctech.ca> <25513518.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB3DDED.4060909@ibctech.ca> <25520353.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:22:50 -0000 Freeco wrote: > > Maybe i made some cabling loop, becauce my internet stoped to work. In the > beginning everything was ok, but after some time when all 3 pc's who was > connected to switch it stopped to work. Why? > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25521566.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 13:33:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600921065670 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0158FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mp03g-0004w0-QN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:33:00 -0700 Message-ID: <25521649.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:33:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Colin Brace To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cb@lim.nl Subject: postfix + cyrus sasl: no go X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:33:01 -0000 Hi all, I have compiled postfix with the SASL2 option. After creating the saslpass file, I added the appropriate lines to main.cf: smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/saslpass smtp_sasl_security_options = and restarted postfix. However, when I try to send an email, I see these lines in maillog: Sep 19 15:07:19 venus postfix/smtp[75188]: warning: unsupported SASL client implementation: cyrus Sep 19 15:07:19 venus postfix/smtp[75188]: fatal: SASL library initialization Also, "postconf -A" doesn't return anything. FWIW, "postconf -a" returns dovecot. Any ideas what is going wrong here? versions: postfix-2.6.5,1 cyrus-sasl-2.1.23 FreeBSD 7.0 ----- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/postfix-%2B-cyrus-sasl%3A-no-go-tp25521649p25521649.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 14:14:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1F41065672 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3564E8FC12 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17082 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2009 14:14:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eubLdNNdcT3JKKe9xVzfET+Dq5CsB8qSn1QYreATFH6XBcknVn/8qnTD1rwT8UjW/eiRfDYniJn5sud7eFga3DzO3+vIS9HxXNT7puzX+TFWfMvS8n6Ukq0xcA4pIfuPJbxxbIkTTYkIFnKkkaJFxNRCwmBEygdWzH+6CTb2sEE= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2009 07:14:23 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: yXWVYDAVM1nH7Y.8ROU1GftxX7sX.mn69g5C4OYBnYVakL3_4kTYDW1WrpaloPk.ezZlFSfjkeCe_Jr8w3R4vxKsBqoEDHct9HEH_Ihf8uRALxlp7fCH5DgdIP2sY583_b0HN5LV1_TP_EwEIk6GnEoenP5ucUh5nSzEK4UD5V9PFw9ev78oT4blaOaLUKzOMUe8mefbRmadYFQK.6BVe_CZf8bF5CHBp7GzjPKwBt2pcZenjKcrJryQIiKENSvWBpQGdeRV5x3K45Mwnu8ohPuA0XWTOciBXt_KmJKAt4bvE94X1FuTtxMKNlTZ9QxRQxU2uZL9YYkyBPl5k9_nLM4_UP.eRnBSrw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C83092286A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:14:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:14:22 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090919101422.50ff0ad1@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <25521649.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <25521649.post@talk.nabble.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: postfix + cyrus sasl: no go X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:14:24 -0000 On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Colin Brace wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have compiled postfix with the SASL2 option. After creating the > saslpass file, I added the appropriate lines to main.cf: > > smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes > smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/saslpass > smtp_sasl_security_options = > > and restarted postfix. > > However, when I try to send an email, I see these lines in maillog: > > Sep 19 15:07:19 venus postfix/smtp[75188]: warning: unsupported SASL > client implementation: cyrus > Sep 19 15:07:19 venus postfix/smtp[75188]: fatal: SASL library > initialization > > Also, "postconf -A" doesn't return anything. FWIW, "postconf -a" > returns dovecot. > > Any ideas what is going wrong here? > > versions: > postfix-2.6.5,1 > cyrus-sasl-2.1.23 > FreeBSD 7.0 This question really belongs on the Postfix forum. In any case: 1) Post the complete output of "postconf -n" 2) Post the contents of: /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf 3) Please check: http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html 4) Post the output of a telnet session to your mail server In the mail/postfix directory, do a "make rmconfig" then redo the config; i.e., "make config". Be sure to enable SASL2. You also will probably need to enable a database format; i.e.,berkley, MySql or whatever you intend to use. If you ever intend to use TLS/SSL, now would be the time to enable it. Then do: make clean && make deinstall && make reinstall && make distclean Check again with a telnet session and post the output if it still does not work. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com I was in Vegas last week. I was at the roulette table, having a lengthy argument about what I considered an Odd number. Steven Wright From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 14:59:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B8A1065672 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [216.240.60.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370D98FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from levi.local (cpe-76-83-12-67.socal.res.rr.com [76.83.12.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 946A578C7A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB4F1E5.6020500@networktest.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:59:49 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AB2656B.6090705@networktest.com> <20090918085947.GB23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20090918085947.GB23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:59:50 -0000 On 9/18/09 1:59 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:35:55AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >> On 9/17/09 8:10 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >>>> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 >>>> >>>> Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the >>>> patch error pasted below. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything >>>> helpful in the archives or on Google. >>> Try `make distclean' and then `make && make install' >> This produced the same result. Thanks again for any additional clues in >> resolving this error. >> >> dn >> >> >> o# cd /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/ >> somehost# make distclean >> ===> Cleaning for libxcb-1.4 >> ===> Deleting distfiles for libxcb-1.4 >> somehost# make && make install >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >> => libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >> => Attempting to fetch from http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/. >> libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 100% of 298 kB 29 kBps >> 00m00s >> ===> Extracting for libxcb-1.4 >> => MD5 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. >> => SHA256 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. >> ===> Patching for libxcb-1.4 >> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libxcb-1.4 >> 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xcb_auth.c.rej >> => Patch patch-src-xcb_auth.c failed to apply cleanly. >> => Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in applied cleanly. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libxcb. > > Hmm... I don't have the file patch-src-xcb_auth.c in x11/libxcb/files. > Is your ports tree up to date? Other than that, I'm afraid I'm out of ideas. Me too. Same failure after updating ports. dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 15:28:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206781065676 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95DE8FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26719 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2009 15:28:54 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Sep 2009 15:28:54 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADD650883; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:28:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 317B21CCAA; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:28:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: David Newman References: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AB2656B.6090705@networktest.com> <20090918085947.GB23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AB4F1E5.6020500@networktest.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:28:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AB4F1E5.6020500@networktest.com> (David Newman's message of "Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:59:49 -0700") Message-ID: <44k4zvuf6a.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:28:55 -0000 David Newman writes: > On 9/18/09 1:59 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:35:55AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >>> On 9/17/09 8:10 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >>>>> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 >>>>> >>>>> Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the >>>>> patch error pasted below. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything >>>>> helpful in the archives or on Google. >>>> Try `make distclean' and then `make && make install' >>> This produced the same result. Thanks again for any additional clues in >>> resolving this error. >>> >>> dn >>> >>> >>> o# cd /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/ >>> somehost# make distclean >>> ===> Cleaning for libxcb-1.4 >>> ===> Deleting distfiles for libxcb-1.4 >>> somehost# make && make install >>> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >>> => libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >>> => Attempting to fetch from http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/. >>> libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 100% of 298 kB 29 kBps >>> 00m00s >>> ===> Extracting for libxcb-1.4 >>> => MD5 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. >>> ===> Patching for libxcb-1.4 >>> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libxcb-1.4 >>> 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xcb_auth.c.rej >>> => Patch patch-src-xcb_auth.c failed to apply cleanly. >>> => Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in applied cleanly. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libxcb. >> >> Hmm... I don't have the file patch-src-xcb_auth.c in x11/libxcb/files. >> Is your ports tree up to date? Other than that, I'm afraid I'm out of ideas. > > Me too. Same failure after updating ports. That patch file was removed from the port *years* ago. Remove the whole port and update it again (you must have updated -- incorrectly, somehow -- at some point to get stale patches with the current Makefile). -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 16:54:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06A21065676 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93FC28FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23247 invoked by uid 110); 19 Sep 2009 16:27:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@69.113.73.210) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 19 Sep 2009 16:27:27 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:26:03 -0400 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20090919165410.D06A21065676@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: FreeBSD AMD64 7.1 LAST_ACK stuck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:54:10 -0000 Hello, I'm running FreeBSD AMD64 7.1-p4 After the server experienced a DoS attack, it ended up with many sockets stuck in LACK_ACK state as reported by netstat -na Is this a bug or something else is wrong, how would I troubleshoot this? Please CC me. Thank you very much! Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 17:12:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2021F1065693 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8FA8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mp3UG-0004Jt-9Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:12:40 -0700 Message-ID: <25523570.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Colin Brace To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090919101422.50ff0ad1@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cb@lim.nl References: <25521649.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090919101422.50ff0ad1@scorpio.seibercom.net> Subject: Re: postfix + cyrus sasl: no go X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:12:41 -0000 Jerry-107 wrote: > > 2) Post the contents of: /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf > Jerry, this file doesn't exist on my system. ----- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/postfix-%2B-cyrus-sasl%3A-no-go-tp25521649p25523570.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 17:22:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B131065672 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f191.google.com (mail-yw0-f191.google.com [209.85.211.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122788FC19 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh29 with SMTP id 29so5788792ywh.7 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:22:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ryBTIO+4tYdK94mI+YlnxlJ97Jer+azc9UiNbVghnQM=; b=jcu9NuiOisXMmcHqfT4FH3SX5K7iC5ULRnMXffFd0CE1jW283oIu37Uf28o6Y6W+Mb bV7pNwWZebObSeFlDZ8tblBIzuXHckZ/uniODPEVuUE0MM5iM8ZmcSmbmcW3WVDy3GHe FrRJPKndpXd17e+H2+QYA64eVwOC3Gnky9sWs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hhnzjBdRN4ZkMCxFXvyCIkMZaUe4jMC/f6L6rgsDrNi0WwskJv/aRr6oGs6iRp53O7 R4iLiboYv10VeSlFi7WAjGc/oGT0LGyU07GIWQFJUW7nx4GMqSfu421KH3fWOyEph8bx WqtccDVrq7KiaH8p4MJ7+o4rHN86QZ3N2dcI0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.50.29 with SMTP id c29mr1961919agk.63.1253380921313; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:22:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7E2DB08A-9E11-47D7-904D-9F3D8490868E@gmail.com> <4AB22B09.4070507@ibctech.ca> <29722c130909170735w24886ac9j8c5faaed15d17bb9@mail.gmail.com> <20090917174614.GB34712@ei.bzerk.org> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:22:01 -0400 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ruben de Groot , Steve Bertrand , Anselm Strauss , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on small systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:22:02 -0000 2009/9/17 krad : > 2009/9/17 Ruben de Groot > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:35:37PM +0200, Anselm Strauss typed: >> > Thanks for your advice, Steve. >> > >> > I looked a bit at the source code and in >> > /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c and I >> > found this: >> > >> > /* set min cache to 1/32 of all memory, or 16MB, whichever is more */ >> > arc_c_min = MAX(arc_c / 4, 64<<18); >> > >> > Could this mean that 16 MB are already enough to run ZFS? >> >> I seriously doubt it. >> > > Sun dont recommend it on a system with < 1 gb of ram, 2 or more is preferred > though. I believe you can install OpenSolaris (& OS by default only installs into zfs) with as little as 768M, but it will (in my exp) run terribly. Even with 4G on a dual-core 64bit lap-top it's pretty sluggish: like FreeBSD 7 on a 300mHz p2 sluggish. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 17:44:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCE81065670 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F25D8FC15 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43908 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2009 17:44:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MyFZid3m6ToZWKwUnOCeCi2NEIaaIjhCOL3ZXuucA6QVwUuC0lmDRP1FBn1apcS/wlhkvaE614Zw1/gKrLZ8Qhlq20VPHlbhRWXzSd0w2sNm0zvj1tyTLfudEeQPP6qq1HjbAlMOZ0YZTIn4j70RXDK1AFKUSQ89g4TwRV0RvIo= ; Received: from c-67-189-183-172.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.183.172 with login) by smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2009 10:44:53 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: BVmHV3wVM1mKTJrbl8HanJvnFgxeYRKvZv7Qi88eIPy85kuhSYKRnqni2ZzdJn5gXP7QfT0.8TIMyiYGyo2vzaWVhLYDF1GeM18jCijhkwKMMxZv75t84dZUkJnLBD38s4TJWdKlO2JHGoI97ZTZoJDHSPtcMrS6cL18vNM6j6HpDgSWq7haUOp9qVPk54ZnRFNoT34jonqHA1.sqsaroniInm2OiIKDlovxP7raj04DE_UoJDnrpySFhO6esoa3UUFhpAewUhuLTVFPwF1e560wFKtxb9EtQVsRnUToN0hAO6ydtXL6SiYgg8sPFD2ePTqWjMR.JZF5IMacxopcDdu9ugZI7dZbYw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8CA222862 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:44:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:44:52 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090919134452.0b85b183@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <25523570.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <25521649.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090919101422.50ff0ad1@scorpio.seibercom.net> <25523570.post@talk.nabble.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEX+/v7++v6YOTrq8PCcuIX989UvOSj++v0BNCbpAAAAB3RJTUUHsQwfFzs7RBhzUQAAAhJJREFUOI1dU8GOqzAMNKIoV1bvwD1i0ysqrHplIdBrVSX7ATSbd03VVvn9tQNtQy0hjAdn7LED4AAcPtWm9RV+MPSfxhBLx9ajd6X/ngB6/mTwnRSZua7i7Ca+0ctZKo4Qmz+JY13X6I3nFZBxIYW1PbgfQ5RP8g0XlltEWGf3cV03joYpRnFbvYDKbXjZlXyyhEZA4lI+cN3NaVXE4VKjSwTExO10eTEkkJVqIAD5z0nUBQJluQDRSQjcrBiHAJxZlAH5CUMBMC7OcJ4LMQNnxhZ1HYPscMc6J4UlWRMNwzOpCcAHKSICd1EDn83abdREIbXsHkD1OinP1aCUCOEVRaa1lMcvywUWdYgk13JQUpYNKmvXQ8Kw5ML9YI5h8SakctBc7E/IYuLhYd/zZIk+1gM1vNweQBvHE0j+oYah3sMqAytQYlZk6+ANaaawJdu3OFzYGMZ3iGpa3qMlq9ZH0VZTgrCtw/ngdYkEIIpSbP1bWQAdFdX9vocBdkH2qVjVmuMu3gI5rjs814EUdrCZgWlPaxZZ3RiLFUtr+ud0PXwp2dnQSNXgePt6AZpBj6UMJ7VQkzN4utVeaSW1Dhn/kblGrKeMvNGnzwX4zuEDarYz1KdPtR60Gul0Gued+515SJXhCsl+Tx/3kY/UDvicPll9mfu50t3tvQ/thZpJYgeuwdSKNJ6tCD98MCgoxLDaPxbwqqwPWaWiAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: postfix + cyrus sasl: no go X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:44:54 -0000 On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Colin Brace wrote: > > > Jerry-107 wrote: > > > > 2) Post the contents of: /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf > > > > Jerry, this file doesn't exist on my system. Please, check the URL I sent previously. You have SASL2 configured incorrectly. It needs the smtpd.conf file to work correctly. There is an abundance of documentation of the Postfix site describing how to configure the file. Start with the URL I sent you. You really should post on the Postfix forum for best results also. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Why you say you no bunny rabbit when you have little powder-puff tail? The Tasmanian Devil From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 20:06:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4681065693 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A7D8FC17 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2156F38E42 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:06:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-200-187.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.200.187]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53E52D1F6 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:06:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Mp6C3-0002cn-00 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:06:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:06:03 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 15:59:46 up 49 days, 21:01, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.06, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:06:05 -0000 I have a situation at work, where I need a FreeBSD machine to be in the corporate DNS. We have been bought out, and the new owner says "no static DNS entries". They use some Microsoft technogly where the client machiens register thier names with the corprate DNS. My Windows laptop for instance, may get different IP addresses using DHCP depending on what physical location I connect it in. but it's always the same DNS name. Can anyone sugest where to look for information as to how this works, and how I cna make my FreeBSD machine participate in this? -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 20:16:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879BB1065745 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E828FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so339645eyf.3 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=YrIeBfbdIz1zCi5k/mS2X4m/esfeYJWIY26SpRn4JjA=; b=FU42T+cK+sUir9NsAdcQZ3lIdGog8Voy7k4ZaJUUtlm3bpNF5M1SUTSRfzF4MysYpN K8LGtZCAsP+lpEODR6BR8F7r1CCFWozkxSvi39RU3VwelnA42NTyE2cpDC6IecDNk9+Z eRWdOabFmL2+x4omg+gB3E9VgiE6bdgY7MdyU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uOnIqGO+hl2GfWt+qW42W+Hd4ErlKOhWWLGhs6d5pvL5J5y8GIztQ+S965d/J8qZ6O KEWG2AUDb7DIkyQBqfUsNuUdctO2O60S+yw0T9oxzqAyOLi8X+Sgv+Sqvdvm/MUpDu7q +BIVsIm3MShsovM3/6dzUX7eMH/wx/GHakXNc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.128.11 with SMTP id f11mr1044460ebn.62.1253391390130; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:16:30 -0300 Message-ID: From: Agus To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Polling and kern.hz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:16:31 -0000 Hi guys... Im reading ant playing with polling and kernel..... I read that polling increase net performance and i plan on using it... Now the question that arises is.. is polling and performance in general affected by the value of kern.hz? i have put in /boot.loader.con kern.hz=50 and was wondering if this number affects the number i choose for the polling options I wanna recompile kernel using options DEVICE_POLLING options HZ=1000 So that 1000hz how affects the system? if it affects it at all........ thanks for anyone who can give me a hint.... Cheers, A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 20:30:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C213F1065672 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [216.240.60.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FA88FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from levi.local (cpe-76-83-12-67.socal.res.rr.com [76.83.12.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D94F78C7A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB53F76.8010205@networktest.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:30:46 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4AB24BA0.4060104@networktest.com> <20090917151028.GA23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AB2656B.6090705@networktest.com> <20090918085947.GB23243@torus.slightlystrange.org> <4AB4F1E5.6020500@networktest.com> <44k4zvuf6a.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44k4zvuf6a.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libxcb won't compile from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:30:47 -0000 On 9/19/09 8:28 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > David Newman writes: > >> On 9/18/09 1:59 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:35:55AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >>>> On 9/17/09 8:10 AM, Daniel Bye wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:45:52AM -0700, David Newman wrote: >>>>>> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE, i386 >>>>>> >>>>>> Running 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/libxcb returns the >>>>>> patch error pasted below. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance for clues on resolving this. I did not see anything >>>>>> helpful in the archives or on Google. >>>>> Try `make distclean' and then `make && make install' >>>> This produced the same result. Thanks again for any additional clues in >>>> resolving this error. >>>> >>>> dn >>>> >>>> >>>> o# cd /usr/ports/x11/libxcb/ >>>> somehost# make distclean >>>> ===> Cleaning for libxcb-1.4 >>>> ===> Deleting distfiles for libxcb-1.4 >>>> somehost# make && make install >>>> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >>>> => libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >>>> => Attempting to fetch from http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/. >>>> libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2 100% of 298 kB 29 kBps >>>> 00m00s >>>> ===> Extracting for libxcb-1.4 >>>> => MD5 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. >>>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for libxcb-1.4.tar.bz2. >>>> ===> Patching for libxcb-1.4 >>>> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libxcb-1.4 >>>> 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xcb_auth.c.rej >>>> => Patch patch-src-xcb_auth.c failed to apply cleanly. >>>> => Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in applied cleanly. >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>> >>>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libxcb. >>> Hmm... I don't have the file patch-src-xcb_auth.c in x11/libxcb/files. >>> Is your ports tree up to date? Other than that, I'm afraid I'm out of ideas. >> Me too. Same failure after updating ports. > > That patch file was removed from the port *years* ago. Remove the whole > port and update it again (you must have updated -- incorrectly, somehow > -- at some point to get stale patches with the current Makefile). Thanks, this helped. Reinstalling ports cleared the issue. thanks again dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 20:35:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9CD1065670 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D428FC1B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8827138E41 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-200-187.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.200.187]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E202D880 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Mp6eQ-0002nF-00 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:35:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:35:22 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20090919203522.GA10656@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list References: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 16:32:41 up 49 days, 21:34, 2 users, load average: 0.28, 0.17, 0.08 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Re: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:35:24 -0000 On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:06:03PM -0400, stan wrote: > I have a situation at work, where I need a FreeBSD machine to be in the > corporate DNS. We have been bought out, and the new owner says "no static > DNS entries". They use some Microsoft technogly where the client machiens > register thier names with the corprate DNS. > > My Windows laptop for instance, may get different IP addresses using DHCP > depending on what physical location I connect it in. but it's always the > same DNS name. > > Can anyone sugest where to look for information as to how this works, and > how I cna make my FreeBSD machine participate in this? > Following up to my own post. I have managed to get a wireshark capture of my Windows laptop doing a DHCP operation, including registering it's name with this DNS system. Can anyone tell me what I need to look for in this to better narow down how this is ebing done? -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 20:46:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4EE1065676 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordofhyphens@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC898FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so2385480yxe.3 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:46:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bf1pcTOO2TeFSkumQAN7kpMoGBVmXPiiz8HfTVdKwAk=; b=Ic5ENZSVSaMIKCRiXEfNwTcRkSOp/qdGn+hv/YRs4d3onetk1SYYo5wcjulPPCun7Q iQeQebR66/9Jwkl83x8Ww18XzUxxQq8yIWr5kxU84gs7i5dk5J1FrXxaDNLF2l77FX5K RDbWvIS3vtkZjUYobhn7rNc1ABXi2/EvVhznA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=amiF2VwDAXV7fJzHENgoBZ4fFuUxyEN/l5OKut1oX3JBUNDUC08yLXNWCYH3lylmy9 278h005Ca004OxjCqn+KN44rcKi5qUqT24unUOXcQe0LJQ5u2tp+Re8JNJ217M0gkBZX FLG5EuMJOWDYFwmshjWP554Q01bIK9DnxUbo4= Received: by 10.101.15.6 with SMTP id s6mr3030674ani.120.1253393210085; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?131.230.41.134? (ws041134.vas.siu.edu [131.230.41.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1366060yxe.5.2009.09.19.13.46.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB54339.8000406@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:46:49 -0500 From: LoH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> <20090919203522.GA10656@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20090919203522.GA10656@teddy.fas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:46:51 -0000 stan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:06:03PM -0400, stan wrote: > >> I have a situation at work, where I need a FreeBSD machine to be in the >> corporate DNS. We have been bought out, and the new owner says "no static >> DNS entries". They use some Microsoft technogly where the client machiens >> register thier names with the corprate DNS. >> >> My Windows laptop for instance, may get different IP addresses using DHCP >> depending on what physical location I connect it in. but it's always the >> same DNS name. >> >> Can anyone sugest where to look for information as to how this works, and >> how I cna make my FreeBSD machine participate in this? >> >> > > Following up to my own post. I have managed to get a wireshark capture of > my Windows laptop doing a DHCP operation, including registering it's name > with this DNS system. Can anyone tell me what I need to look for in this to > better narow down how this is ebing done? > > Have you looked at dhclient.conf? There should be an option to send your client's host name available. --Joseph Lenox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 21:01:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC1410656C2 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mehul.n.ved@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f191.google.com (mail-yw0-f191.google.com [209.85.211.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05318FC17 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh29 with SMTP id 29so6268487ywh.7 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=9gkWt6c08xsjTpr05zS2eHULshgNLndJJVMsdXV5pQM=; b=tf7a8eyQHj4haQdoEvpnTsypNH51javpTRGQrQTi54apWrxUOmWwQOeabEuV+pMWUL V2Ifn7f+gaezdn9jUndtXX8eKk168JCO8CfVP9vZf4Sp2OftHSw3dXAM7yB2/qcq7hXp ZWGVD7RqIa+vXOq4sYSbOydHJuPjM6xzN01iA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=oLYkNK5+b9sftcgOFU4Fm0sutxyHBpIPOIYmzZ1oPGApKYZDEm6V9DSeOUsSIFqchr 7wxbsbo29YmZ+EWcAL3T8B+kZNwM0W4LvEBILb9JhpwAh61nGJUZmsQVVxIrEsCk5MoM bY6Jn1EaTGYrWeJqUdDYTjFKvJjEF52SVPW6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.111.1 with SMTP id o1mr3057607anm.2.1253392356089; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:32:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> References: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> From: Mehul Ved Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:02:16 +0530 Message-ID: To: Free BSD Questions list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:01:10 -0000 On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:36 AM, stan wrote: > My Windows laptop for instance, may get different IP addresses using DHCP > depending on what physical location I connect it in. but it's always the > same DNS name. > > Can anyone sugest where to look for information as to how this works, and > how I cna make my FreeBSD machine participate in this? Am not very familiar with it, but is it using WINS by any chance? No idea on how to get it working on FreeBSD though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 21:17:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDC91065672 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342BE8FC13 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhost3.waddell.com (mailhost3.waddell.com [10.1.10.28]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8JLHfGo029886; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:17:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost3.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 508811A64C2; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:17:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wadpexf0.waddell.com (wadpexf0.waddell.com [192.168.204.24]) by mailhost3.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7F41A64C0; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:17:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from WADPEXV0.waddell.com ([192.168.204.25]) by wadpexf0.waddell.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:17:41 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:08:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4578_1253395061_4AB54A75_4578_883_2_70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A08CCEBF3@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" Thread-Index: Aco5bGG0aj8GNFB+R16HnDoe7tE/9wAAOPYn From: "Gary Gatten" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2009 21:17:41.0116 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F0DFBC0:01CA396E] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:17:57 -0000 SSdtIHByZXR0eSBzdXJlIERETlMgaXMgYW4gUkZDLCBJJ20gc3VyZSBGQlNEIHN1cHBvcnRzIGl0 LiAgV0lOUyBpcyBkaWZmZXJlbnQgYWx0b2dldGhlci4NCg0KLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2Fn ZSAtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogb3duZXItZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgPG93bmVy LWZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnPg0KVG86IEZyZWUgQlNEIFF1ZXN0aW9ucyBs aXN0IDxmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6IFNhdCBTZXAgMTkgMTU6 MzI6MTYgMjAwOQ0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IE1pY3Jvc29mdCAiRHluYW1pYyBETlMiDQoNCk9uIFN1 biwgU2VwIDIwLCAyMDA5IGF0IDE6MzYgQU0sIHN0YW4gPHN0YW5iQHBhbml4LmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6 DQo+IE15IFdpbmRvd3MgbGFwdG9wIGZvciBpbnN0YW5jZSwgbWF5IGdldCBkaWZmZXJlbnQgSVAg YWRkcmVzc2VzIHVzaW5nIERIQ1ANCj4gZGVwZW5kaW5nIG9uIHdoYXQgcGh5c2ljYWwgbG9jYXRp b24gSSBjb25uZWN0IGl0IGluLiBidXQgaXQncyBhbHdheXMgdGhlDQo+IHNhbWUgRE5TIG5hbWUu DQo+DQo+IENhbiBhbnlvbmUgc3VnZXN0IHdoZXJlIHRvIGxvb2sgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGFz IHRvIGhvdyB0aGlzIHdvcmtzLCBhbmQNCj4gaG93IEkgY25hIG1ha2UgbXkgRnJlZUJTRCBtYWNo aW5lIHBhcnRpY2lwYXRlIGluIHRoaXM/DQoNCkFtIG5vdCB2ZXJ5IGZhbWlsaWFyIHdpdGggaXQs IGJ1dCBpcyBpdCB1c2luZyBXSU5TIGJ5IGFueSBjaGFuY2U/IE5vDQppZGVhIG9uIGhvdyB0byBn ZXQgaXQgd29ya2luZyBvbiBGcmVlQlNEIHRob3VnaC4NCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Zy ZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zDQpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiZnJlZWJz ZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmciDQoKCgoKCjxmb250IHNpemU9IjEi Pgo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSdib3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItYm90dG9tOmRvdWJsZSB3aW5kb3d0ZXh0 IDIuMjVwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjBpbiAwaW4gMS4wcHQgMGluJz4KPC9kaXY+CiJUaGlzIGVtYWlsIGlz IGludGVuZGVkIHRvIGJlIHJldmlld2VkIGJ5IG9ubHkgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudAog YW5kIG1heSBjb250YWluIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgaXMgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBhbmQvb3IgY29u ZmlkZW50aWFsLgogSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudCwgeW91IGFy ZSBoZXJlYnkgbm90aWZpZWQgdGhhdAogYW55IHJldmlldywgdXNlLCBkaXNzZW1pbmF0aW9uLCBk aXNjbG9zdXJlIG9yIGNvcHlpbmcgb2YgdGhpcyBlbWFpbAogYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cywg aWYgYW55LCBpcyBzdHJpY3RseSBwcm9oaWJpdGVkLiAgSWYgeW91IGhhdmUKIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRo aXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBi eQogcmV0dXJuIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBmcm9tIHlvdXIgc3lzdGVtLiIK PC9mb250PgoK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 21:32:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C771065744 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luizbcampos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786AC8FC1E for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so1248906bwz.43 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=di5gRt2po6n7mEdcy7Up46AT1DPlmjO2pYTb5K9q0r+8Ecg7tq7MjFyhiIcgBAEGO0 EiMPsaMuvYEPnCmdc+rb8Eii36gPbfNHQCrkEiQ8UUuO7JwQ8fP6+u0E/MVH5tXtNhlx 0mB+YJyd97I0WAbCpUrpM6B4nyFEja/cz6wKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GO2N5Cp8tU/f/glSjYqT2yzNvojk/EYgHfxLRFXs9uXmQnkvNKqqteX3klsHVwltf/ Jft3sYxxzbUGESoNNlFUrOEDWoL/WKF+Q+F3jEynQ7ret3Gorl6O+yp/MzP67EV9FrY/ e8A/DTnAPsBM7Q+Xr6dyNLbcbKIpxHtmygQN0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.57.22 with SMTP id a22mr686836fah.4.1253395930262; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:32:10 -0300 Message-ID: From: LuizBCampos To: "questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Boot failure mounting 8.0BETA4.iso.gz [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:32:12 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 22:12:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E10A1065672 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from smtp.cyberfingers.net (smtp.cyberfingers.net [198.177.254.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB2B8FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mdaemon.pldrouin.net (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.246.67.95]) by smtp.cyberfingers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E97CAB6C0F for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:55:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4AB5535A.3080600@pldrouin.net> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:55:38 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IRQ storm when trying to burn a CD/DVD with JMicron JMB363 controller and PATA DVD burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:12:06 -0000 Hi, My motherboard (EVGA X58 Classified) has a JMicron JMB363 SATA300/PATA controller and it seems to be working fine with FreeBSD as long as I don't try burning a DVD or a CD with my PATA DVD burner, which is the only device hooked to the controller. However, when I try burning a CD or a DVD with either cdrecord or growisofs, I get the following: interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source interrupt storm detected on "irq17:"; throttling interrupt source ... I have seen a few emails on the mailing lists from people having the exact same issue with this controller 2 years ago, but I could not find any helpful reply. Is there any workaround for this? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 22:28:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD8F106568B for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95A48FC15 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mp8Q4-0006ba-SD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:28:40 +0200 Received: from pool-70-21-15-218.res.east.verizon.net ([70.21.15.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:28:40 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-70-21-15-218.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:28:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:28:57 -0400 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <20090919200603.GA10036@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-21-15-218.res.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: Microsoft "Dynamic DNS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:28:47 -0000 stan wrote: > I have a situation at work, where I need a FreeBSD machine to be in the > corporate DNS. We have been bought out, and the new owner says "no static > DNS entries". They use some Microsoft technogly where the client machiens > register thier names with the corprate DNS. In a correctly configured $MS environment the DHCP servers and DNS servers are twins of each other. The DHCP server is what actually updates the DNS server's database. > My Windows laptop for instance, may get different IP addresses using DHCP > depending on what physical location I connect it in. but it's always the > same DNS name. > > Can anyone sugest where to look for information as to how this works, and > how I cna make my FreeBSD machine participate in this? > I did this once a long time ago after googling for a quick fix, Not sure I remember everything. IIRC it was putting an empty hostname in /etc/rc.conf like: hostname="" and something like the following in /etc/dhclient.conf: interface "em0" { send host-name "workstation"; } In Windows, the hostname would be the "machine name", and since you know it's always the same (as per above) sounds like you know the hostname. Substitute for your interface and hostname. The way this should work is your box does a "force send hostname" to the DHCP server and the DHCP server should update the DNS server. At least if the $MS boxen are setup correctly. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 19 22:37:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE541065670 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jarrod.sl@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00BE8FC15 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so1261753bwz.43 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cH3hHpaCBUuT1SkXPY9cl7cjjJExtzk1r25BGvbRHeE=; b=Uxz/9cS9i8oemQa7V806avJbXQzxX491ahrusfBNsa5P8C70htVaghFEezjdSwXBUN 3GSV98Z2esdEK/PwxalNKsGSjR6HPooDE4fMkz74YWFaZzsZ/gyk5y0ppKl1TmKYTp3X 5yoZO5MZ4Nev/UJ8CupKx0wDDssS4D9fTLk3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XCYg3jrkj8BTkzhVXxpAwdwwW2Yows3R3OJ+RJ2lVga/oKenjSHfaGza+vzJU7uU/y RBrA649JWJ2pdWUnWaiWtLK3iv4e+ZcZMrB29o6pRbL/WsEFgMMKOYByPJgfTsWIQHml X/n0C533Rwzl3b0eg1mdSX2QRCFWjh1/wEIWU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.2.200 with SMTP id 8mr678584fak.60.1253397924422; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:05:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090919134452.0b85b183@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <25521649.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090919101422.50ff0ad1@scorpio.seibercom.net> <25523570.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090919134452.0b85b183@scorpio.seibercom.net> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:05:24 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jarrod Slick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: postfix + cyrus sasl: no go X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:37:05 -0000 use dovecot . . . I spent days trying to get postfix configured with cyrus sasl, tweaking everything I could think of multiple times, and I still couldn't get it to work. Tried dovecot and had everything working in 10 minutes. On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT) > Colin Brace wrote: > > > > > > > Jerry-107 wrote: > > > > > > 2) Post the contents of: /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf > > > > > > > Jerry, this file doesn't exist on my system. > > Please, check the URL I sent previously. You have SASL2 > configured incorrectly. It needs the smtpd.conf file to work correctly. > There is an abundance of documentation of the Postfix site describing > how to configure the file. Start with the URL I sent you. > > You really should post on the Postfix forum for best results also. > > -- > Jerry > gesbbb@yahoo.com > > Why you say you no bunny rabbit when you have little powder-puff tail? > > The Tasmanian Devil > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >