From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 00:29:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9E8106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964228FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E37EB4884; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:30 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26649452FB; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:30 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7sUuhLIfpEv; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:30 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp-94-64-203-204.home.otenet.gr [94.64.203.204]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EE5452B6; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:29 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAT0TS0t070339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAT0TSYS069874; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Ben Bullock References: <20091128182645.GA84615@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:29:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20091128182645.GA84615@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> (Frank Shute's message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:26:45 +0000") Message-ID: <87ljhqxjfd.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What port to use for python / https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:29:32 -0000 On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:26:45 +0000, Frank Shute wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:49:57PM +0900, Ben Bullock wrote: >> >> I am trying to install Mercurial on FreeBSD in order to install Go >> (programming language). I am running into a problem with Mercurial >> which looks like this: >> >> $ hg pull >> abort: could not import module thread! >> Exception AttributeError: "'httpsrepository' object has no attribute >> 'urlopener'" in > > ignored >> >> Googling turns up very little except the following: >> >> http://www.idimmu.net/2009/11/11/Python-support-for-SSL-and-HTTPS-is-not-installed > > security/py-openssl maybe? > Disclaimer: I don't use mercurial. The abort message does not refer to https/openssl but to a lack of the `thread' module. I think you should try to build Python with thread support instead and see how things work from there. The `keepalive.py' module of Mercurial tries to import the `thread' module: keramida@kobe:/hg/mercurial/crew$ fgrep thread mercurial/*py mercurial/keepalive.py:should be done with care when using multiple threads. mercurial/keepalive.py: * there is nothing that prevents another thread from creating new mercurial/keepalive.py:import thread mercurial/keepalive.py: self._lock = thread.allocate_lock() keramida@kobe:/hg/mercurial/crew$ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 00:30:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1028E1065692 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7108FC16 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58DFEB4884; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BBC45308; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:45 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 907Bmqtj2b1m; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp-94-64-203-204.home.otenet.gr [94.64.203.204]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6E7452B6; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAT0UiSL076472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAT0Ui7B076403; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Peter Steele References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAB5@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:30:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAB5@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> (Peter Steele's message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:48:18 -0600") Message-ID: <87hbsexjd7.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Sorting a device list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:30:47 -0000 On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:48:18 -0600, Peter Steele wrote: > Can anyone recommend a quick and dirty way to sort a device list? For example, if I do this: > > ls /dev/ad* | sort > > I get something like this: > > /dev/ad10 > /dev/ad4 > /dev/ad6 > /dev/ad8 Just use `sort -n': ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n It should work fine even when there are non-numeric prefix strings. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 00:51:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE399106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@shute.org.uk) Received: from atmail-9.bnguk.net (atmail-9.bnguk.net [80.74.253.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B47E8FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.54.144] helo=orange.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-9.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NEY00-0006Rb-Nl; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:50:48 +0000 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6BD904AC1B; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:50:48 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:50:48 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Paul Hoffman Message-ID: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Hoffman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade for binaries fails miserably, but not completely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:51:05 -0000 On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 07:47:03PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > Greetings again. I used freebsd-update to upgrade a system from 7.1 > to 7.2. The main upgrade went fine, but upgrading the ports had huge > problems. It could not find most (but not all) of the packages to > upgrade. A typical part of the failure looks like: > > ---> Checking for the latest package of 'lang/python25' ---> [snip] You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your ports/packages. You do realise that you don't have to upgrade your ports if you go from 7.1 to 7.2. You can do but don't have to. You should upgrade python25 to python26. See /usr/ports/UPDATING dated 20090608 for instructions on how to do so. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 04:22:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BA41065670 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0738FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pukruppa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAT4OgvJ038718; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:24:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: (from ulrich@localhost) by pukruppa.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAT4Ofqe038717; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:24:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20091128230140.GA84212@thought.org> References: <20091128230140.GA84212@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:24:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1259468680.13798.106.camel@pukruppa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: evoultion missing its top graphics [on menu-bar] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:22:50 -0000 Am Samstag, den 28.11.2009, 15:01 -0800 schrieb Gary Kline: > Folks, I t think I asked here a couple years ago when the > same thing happened; I didn't think it would happen again. >=20 > Evo works fairly well--is there a way I can make it my default > GUI mailer?-- I hope so. Anyway, in recent months it fails to > display the icons for "Delete" and everything else. Last time > I was told to do something; forget what. =20 >=20 > This is just another minor annoyance ... but they accumulate > +=3D fast! Hi Gary, Gnome-Team has just (some hours ago) released Gnome2-28.1 to the ports tree. Did you already try it? Greetings Uli. > thanks for any clues. >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 05:56:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973B6106566C for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505e.appriver.com [98.129.35.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ECB8FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:56:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.14 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht01.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: 112 113 114 115 119 120 131 218 X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.14] (HELO ht01.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 14958855 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:56:55 -0600 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.164]) by ht01.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.14]) with mapi; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:56:54 -0600 From: Peter Steele To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:56:50 -0600 Thread-Topic: Sorting a device list Thread-Index: AcpwizKwuqMBbrDwROeBXfqQFB/h9QALThCA Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEADA@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAB5@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <87hbsexjd7.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <87hbsexjd7.fsf@kobe.laptop> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Sorting a device list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:56:55 -0000 I had tried that. It doesn't work: # ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n /dev/ad10 /dev/ad4 /dev/ad6 /dev/ad8 I want the ad10 to appear last... -----Original Message----- From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:keramida@ceid.upatras.gr]=20 Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 4:31 PM To: Peter Steele Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sorting a device list On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:48:18 -0600, Peter Steele wr= ote: > Can anyone recommend a quick and dirty way to sort a device list? For exa= mple, if I do this: > > ls /dev/ad* | sort > > I get something like this: > > /dev/ad10 > /dev/ad4 > /dev/ad6 > /dev/ad8 Just use `sort -n': ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n It should work fine even when there are non-numeric prefix strings. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 06:27:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92F106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FAF8FC1D for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA09231 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:27:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:27:33 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Glass Message-Id: <200911290627.XAA09231@lariat.net> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: What does this message mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:27:38 -0000 Just installed mpd5 to experiment with it, and got the following error message on the next boot: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() What does this mean? Does it signal a serious problem? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 06:51:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9946A106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevenschlansker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f184.google.com (mail-yx0-f184.google.com [209.85.210.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B528FC0C for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe14 with SMTP id 14so2246903yxe.7 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:51:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=KVmU1WO2CJQf1IpUQUrmIs7yIF2jGB+0/qhnMqPij0o=; b=xZenyBUTSNIab1AnxfMxNGJRD1HpMdBsVQIO4NTuWsczlnXnH+zvD7Owu8q5lu3vfZ GeA2cRsUlUHHwhKNcIJQEcPooXeVs66Tsq8gnRC2JO6KgLjcgUI/xlHFagvjdJdPUvm9 qnUZaY61CZvkgl9CyU33rhfiisxheSArZi76c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=aKJHyw7S3sQqCyET+Vp6y08geZKssLDLfmYBqkE9mTUin7jPT66JMlY1bR08EEOLPR F3dlIeukGJ1UcTcipbVSNQFfukhaf+beBAih9qAUOuTFeBFU+sAkYuA+1eiRIwSDKObI rgrS9WoLlUYTTrDO/JiA0yAZXVQF/kIESKOGM= Received: by 10.150.43.17 with SMTP id q17mr4743951ybq.197.1259477496510; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:51:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.114? (adsl-70-231-249-188.dsl.snfc21.sbcglobal.net [70.231.249.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1204171ywf.10.2009.11.28.22.51.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:51:35 -0800 (PST) From: Steven Schlansker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:51:31 -0800 Message-Id: To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Subject: HighPoint RR 2640 support in 8.0-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:51:37 -0000 Hello everyone, I recently upgraded to 8, and purchased a HighPoint RocketRAID 2640 = card. Sadly I had remembered incorrectly that this was supported by either the = hptrr or hptiop driver, and instead it seems to only be supported by a = binary driver from HighPoint. However, the latest release of the driver = is for 7.2, and although it kldload's correctly, I see in dmesg: module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (pci/rr26xx, 0xffffffff805a92e0, = 0xffffffff81145ca0) error 22 rr26xx: RocketRAID 26xx controller driver v1.0.08.1230 (Jul 9 2009 = 13:58:26) rr26xx: no controller detected. it does not seem to work. Is there any hope of it being supported by the built-in drivers anytime soon, or is this an intentional oversight and do I have to wait for = HighPoint to fix their drivers for 8.0? 03:00.0 SCSI storage controller: HighPoint Technologies, Inc. RocketRAID = 2640 SAS/SATA Controller (rev 02) Thank you for any suggestions, Steven Schlansker= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 07:14:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A331065670 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from dd12710.kasserver.com (dd12710.kasserver.com [85.13.134.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9758FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from current.Sisis.de (ppp-93-104-112-230.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.112.230]) by dd12710.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B24B18312879; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:14:56 +0100 (CET) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAT7ExxV002292; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:14:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:14:59 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20091129071459.GB2182@current.Sisis.de> References: <20091128090544.GA80636@thought.org> <4B10ECDF.5010509@otenet.gr> <20091128115809.GA3467@current.Sisis.de> <20091128201511.GB80767@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091128201511.GB80767@thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) Cc: Manolis Kiagias , Matthias Apitz , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i automate building packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:14:58 -0000 El día Saturday, November 28, 2009 a las 12:15:11PM -0800, Gary Kline escribió: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:58:09PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día Saturday, November 28, 2009 a las 11:26:55AM +0200, Manolis Kiagias escribió: > > > > > Now that you got it installed, you may use pkg_create: > > > > > > pkg_create -Rb openoffice.org-3.1.1 > > > > > > (You can get the exact package name using pkg_info -Ix openoffice) > > > The -R flag will also build all dependencies of openoffice. > > ... > > > > If you build more than one package don't forget the flag -n > > > There are things I don't understand about this entire process. > That is, if I was a tarball to give to someone for > distribution anywhere among FBSD users. > > Somegow I wound up with 109 *tbz tarballs. These among them: ... After compiling and installing all ports I'm using I just do something like this: # mkdir PKGDIR # cd PKGDIR # ls /var/db/pkg > ../list # while read name ; do pkg_create -Rnb $name done < ../list this gives some 1000++ packages; # scp * toSomeOtherHost:. and can install all package ther by just do pkg_add(1M); matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 07:42:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD2E106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhert@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0D78FC14 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so794462eye.9 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:42:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=NFor/3a4ZDP+jgnhNZGQvUWh1WzWJx0MMtD2PU74nLw=; b=rLOOCT1lyIBKvvw0k7zgfvh+MXeBYGRA4T7oG8+gLhO9AXPoSa1PJHRzmsLZ86M1m0 oyvnkY60JJEiYNvklhq1FVhbSZRk2o8jK139JyTLsQogqnmd4nC0ecwH/AhX+cD+cUC/ nLXBAZ9TARZUijVtHNMMAGhfzblCofpQXudPY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kJl7xPf2izORBIiSeuRUfqmdnXUQkC+zLXWx3bnwPlJ2FK6V/XHyuSm8+1p/jVbPLq kvpcBADuanKMjzVc7GFioVnGcNF2l+Db3S9frL1oLku5EhIlhVDZ236uiPqU8LRyP9wm VaU6K6VX53IhqrSViar/f8ggyOLCc/dR8rvIw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.130 with SMTP id c2mr1039392wef.44.1259480550498; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:42:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:42:30 +0100 Message-ID: <8021a2660911282342p16e680efmf09f1fe4f4d0263e@mail.gmail.com> From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: portupgrade print/cups-client (cups-client-1.3.10_4) fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:42:32 -0000 In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client : ... Compiling bannertops.c... cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I.. -D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/ usr/local/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEF ILE64_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -c bannertops.c echo Compiling pstext.c... Compiling pstext.c... cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I.. -D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/ usr/local/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEF ILE64_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -c pstext.c echo Compiling common.c... Compiling common.c... cc -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -I.. -D_CUPS_SOURCE -I/ usr/local/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEF ILE64_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -c common.c echo Linking bannertops... Linking bannertops... cc -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -pie -fPIE -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-prot ector -o bannertops bannertops.o pstext.o common.o -lcupsimage \ -lcups -pthread -lm -lcrypt /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/crt1.o: could not read symbols: Bad value gmake[1]: *** [bannertops] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.4.2/filter ' gmake: *** [all] Error 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20091129-50 184-1684ok3-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=cups-client-1.3.10_4 UPG RADE_PORT_VER=1.3.10_4 make FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS=-q DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Build of print/cups-client ended at: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:29:01 +0100 (cons umed 00:00:20) ---> Upgrade of print/cups-client ended at: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:29:01 +0100 (co nsumed 00:00:20) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Skipping 'print/cups-image' (cups-image-1.3.10_4) because a requisite pack age 'cups-client-1.3.10_4' (print/cups-client) failed (specify -k to force) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed ---> Skipping 'print/cups-base' (cups-base-1.3.10_4) because a requisite packag e 'cups-client-1.3.10_4' (print/cups-client) failed (specify -k to force) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 2 skipped and 1 failed ---> Skipping 'x11-toolkits/gtk20' (gtk-2.16.6) because a requisite package 'cu ps-client-1.3.10_4' (print/cups-client) failed (specify -k to force) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 3 skipped and 1 failed ---> Skipping 'devel/gconf2' (gconf2-2.26.2_1) because a requisite package 'gtk -2.16.6' (x11-toolkits/gtk20) failed (specify -k to force) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 4 skipped and 1 failed ---> Skipping 'graphics/poppler-qt' (poppler-qt-0.10.6_1) because a requisite p ackage 'cups-client-1.3.10_4' (print/cups-client) failed (specify -k to force) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 5 skipped and 1 failed ---> Skipping 'x11-themes/gtk-engines2' (gtk-engines2-2.18.2_1) because a requi site package 'cups-client-1.3.10_4' (print/cups-client) failed (specify -k to fo rce) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 7: 0 done, 0 ignored, 6 skipped and 1 failed ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! print/cups-client (cups-client-1.3.10_4) (unknown build error) * print/cups-image (cups-image-1.3.10_4) * print/cups-base (cups-base-1.3.10_4) * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.16.6) * devel/gconf2 (gconf2-2.26.2_1) * graphics/poppler-qt (poppler-qt-0.10.6_1) * x11-themes/gtk-engines2 (gtk-engines2-2.18.2_1) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 6 skipped and 1 failed how to fix this ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 09:49:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAE6106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comp.john@googlemail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A25C8FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so805809eye.9 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=noZdFl5E+X3eo+mN/hquuBxXbE3vWyiADD4K9sPok+A=; b=ENyfFkayakZaKE4/UNnalUWDIr1n/b0XJGCAzIK/qql4+J+VLTRk9tc6m/ZgNDINKg xSH2bdYUaU8DtVIJJ3zCsNRZWChVrpdGAAnEdhGwBVJYjAqnhSSlIf/DGNN4v2UgniZj 2ifyaJabImEhrdFCgF15JMC+qwkUHx3J8bo8M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Ofj+kQfFIQhKp/No84zUOjWay5rUAR4FuzqkV5ok1ackJ/6qbvH55lUarKId/qmGws wR8RMhTBMSMYIhaJbqyOZnfkis+EwGXe08D6zALxmGe1nB0Y8bhOQLu7kv+m4fXp7nKc sIJZ7CWkzfV61Ni5Lqa2W4EpLVEdg7eGCjypg= Received: by 10.216.89.14 with SMTP id b14mr942933wef.76.1259488195034; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from potato (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm2252453eye.9.2009.11.29.01.49.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:49:32 +0000 From: John To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20091129094931.GA48553@potato> References: <20091124154514.GA91657@potato> <200911241725.42229.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20091124163718.GB91657@potato> <4B0C1249.1090600@lazlarlyricon.com> <20091124174025.GC91657@potato> <20091124210948.GC87829@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20091125082851.GA6151@john-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091125082851.GA6151@john-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2-STABLE to 8-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:49:56 -0000 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:28:52AM +0000, John wrote: [..stuff...] Looks like I had to learn the hard way. portmanager won't fix it all. Basically had to make delete old libs and files as per the Makefile in /usr/src, then did pkg_delete -a then rm -rf /usr/ports then portsnap, then installed what ports I needed starting off with the monsters like the latest perl and xorg. -- John - comp dot john at googlemail dot com OpenBSD firewall | FreeBSD desktop | Ubuntu Karmic laptop GPG: 0xF08A33C5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 10:17:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3298106568D for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comp.john@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f221.google.com (mail-ew0-f221.google.com [209.85.219.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682488FC16 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so3331323ewy.13 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:17:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=O7G4WFFkAmgXO6thaWfi02gIJsUlpkuGC0LEzhTHFdw=; b=WtWrTOocZ3Eh3vqkH0fptJioKwj4+ubkpCjXV0/Nc7kvqCDdTHhZJ+pymkFyjxVY7Y Ta3vgMigUoNaQbIwEcqzb3WTzFnQOOraPz4SM8Qxv1mtc3B0bGqLIujYMhsRM2+AsWq+ albz2MYKgELykeReiZswHg0wU/l+TtRgM99A8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=k29vH1a34FiHZE8jT6joKLqjhtSnatSOJ1adexzrKAXb/gg3dU5rI4RYix5XoNYPaN uGvhxSl9DhHhe/MJkcyIBpn53vPrJomkmbISxw70MiPpTGv3cHMHSgzO5RpGo8Boq9VS Wd6hNLfTeegWoiDJbp3oHZT6yrN+zNK8+fgXE= Received: by 10.213.24.22 with SMTP id t22mr3525563ebb.27.1259489834843; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from potato (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm5272738eyg.12.2009.11.29.02.17.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:17:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:16:53 +0000 From: John To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20091129101652.GB48553@potato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: slightly complex query - one machine with two network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:17:16 -0000 Hello list, I hope you can help. I have a freebsd 8.0-R machine with a wired and a wireless interface. The wired network has real IP addresses. I want the wireless to talk to the wireless network which is behind a NAT/firewall. The wireless interface on the freebsd box does not want to route traffic (although it would be nice if it could function as a repeater if a wireless laptop was in the vicinity closer to it than the actual access point, but that's another matter). All I want the wireless interface on the freebsd box to do right at this moment is to talk to the other wireless devices. The network is 192.168.0.0/24 Now, if I bring both interfaces up on the freebsd box, routing on that box turns horrible. but the routing table looks normal with 0.0.0.0 traffic going out on the wired re0 interface. I can ping the wireless interface from another computer on the private network, but that's about it. Can anyone give me pointers on how to make the wireless interface more usable? basically, I want to export via either nfs or samba some shares to the wireless network, but routing ropiness seems to kill this. cheers -- John - comp dot john at googlemail dot com OpenBSD firewall | FreeBSD desktop | Ubuntu Karmic laptop GPG: 0xF08A33C5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 10:27:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64D0106568B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [66.246.138.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E758FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (87-194-158-129.bethere.co.uk [87.194.158.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 511678775; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:26:39 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20091129102639.0000125f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <200911290627.XAA09231@lariat.net> References: <200911290627.XAA09231@lariat.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2cvs27 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What does this message mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:27:11 -0000 On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:27:33 -0700 (MST) Brett Glass wrote: > > Just installed mpd5 to experiment with it, and got the following > error message on the next boot: > > WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() > > What does this mean? Does it signal a serious problem? It seems to be a harmless warning message - I've seen it many times when starting the Bluetooth stack. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 10:56:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E6D106568F for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9168FC1E for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nATAuIRf093587; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:56:24 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk nATAuIRf093587 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1259492184; bh=uLVCGOZyQLWybAaN1uro7C09GteW0o218/vP4kb1pbg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4B12534B.4090809@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2029=20Nov=202009=2010:56:11=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20091129)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20John=20|CC:=20freebsd-q uestions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20slight ly=20complex=20query=20-=20one=20machine=20with=20two=20network=20 interfaces|References:=20<20091129101652.GB48553@potato>|In-Reply- To:=20<20091129101652.GB48553@potato>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6 |Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0 A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D" ------------enig0B25F43CDE378DA83F8AEC0C"; b=u59Fy8imFzHE1/zu0h/2G5dzwWsJ9yWGXI416XUxIccvX5FiJkHPembmoy7iTq45z boXyM/LLnCtdVqjqOFzr0lu1TmEZaa7iKM324wChlSqmyCCaSQi604f79K2hX9BjKK 9i3dD63OEXS7m9ZiDGrzjD2oIYnINpf1KQXc/p6A= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4B12534B.4090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:56:11 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John References: <20091129101652.GB48553@potato> In-Reply-To: <20091129101652.GB48553@potato> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0B25F43CDE378DA83F8AEC0C" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: slightly complex query - one machine with two network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:56:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0B25F43CDE378DA83F8AEC0C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John wrote: > Hello list, I hope you can help. >=20 > I have a freebsd 8.0-R machine with a wired and a wireless interface. > The wired network has real IP addresses. I want the wireless to talk to= > the wireless network which is behind a NAT/firewall.=20 >=20 > The wireless interface on the freebsd box does not want to route > traffic (although it would be nice if it could function as a repeater i= f > a wireless laptop was in the vicinity closer to it than the actual > access point, but that's another matter). All I want the wireless > interface on the freebsd box to do right at this moment is to talk to > the other wireless devices. The network is 192.168.0.0/24 >=20 > Now, if I bring both interfaces up on the freebsd box, routing on that > box turns horrible. but the routing table looks normal with 0.0.0.0 > traffic going out on the wired re0 interface. I can ping the wireless > interface from another computer on the private network, but that's abou= t > it. Can anyone give me pointers on how to make the wireless interface > more usable? basically, I want to export via either nfs or samba some > shares to the wireless network, but routing ropiness seems to kill this= =2E Hmmm... this isn't a particularly complex setup really. By bringing up your wireless i/f and assigning it an IP and netmask, you should create a route to the directly attached network (192.168.0.0/24)=20 automatically. Given that, you should certainly have the capability to=20 ping other hosts on that network, and they should be able to ping you. If there isn't an entry for 192.168.0.0/24 in the output of=20 % netstat -rn (note: it may be printed as 192.168.0/24) then try something like this: # route add -net 182.168.0.0/24 -interface wlan0 wlan0 should be the correct interface on 8.0-R but other OS versions will= probably need to substitute the particular device matching their hardware= =2E If that doesn't work, then please show us some real data: the output from= # ifconfig -a # netstat -rn plus any /etc/rc.conf settings relating to ifconfig or wlan. Once you've got the basic networking going, it's downhill from there. Yo= u'll need to provide some sort of means of doing name resolution for the wirel= ess=20 network (minimally this means adding entries to /etc/hosts, but it could = require fiddling with /etc/resolv.conf or other possibilities). You need to be c= areful that the source address of packets you send into the wireless lan is the = IP number on your wlan interface otherwise hosts on the wlan will send their replie= s out through the NAT gateway (their default route) instead of straight back to= you. By and large this will just work automatically -- there are some software= packages where you can override the normal behaviour, but presumably you should kn= ow if you've set up anything like that. If you suspect this is a problem, use = tcpdump or=20 wireshark to capture and examine the traffic passing across your wlan int= erface. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig0B25F43CDE378DA83F8AEC0C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAksSU1IACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyfVwCeLxq+mY9RgtQM+YsHdFkWkX2o jpoAn2h7QcKnPnwYevu5r1fhjh/lUtB8 =guMm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0B25F43CDE378DA83F8AEC0C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 11:55:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6371065672 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665CE8FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nATBtMBQ066022; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:55:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 782F7BA95; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:55:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:55:22 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: John Message-ID: <20091129115522.GA9244@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20091124154514.GA91657@potato> <200911241725.42229.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20091124163718.GB91657@potato> <4B0C1249.1090600@lazlarlyricon.com> <20091124174025.GC91657@potato> <20091124210948.GC87829@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20091125082851.GA6151@john-laptop> <20091129094931.GA48553@potato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091129094931.GA48553@potato> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2-STABLE to 8-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:55:25 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 09:49:32AM +0000, John wrote: >=20 > Looks like I had to learn the hard way. portmanager won't fix it all. Been there, done that. :-)=20 I think this problem is just too complex when updating between major versio= ns, for several reasons. First of all being that the port management tool proba= bly do not know they are updating to a new major version of the system libraries. Sometimes a port will not build correctly when an older version = is installed. And there can be special instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING that the upgrade tools can't read. IMO building a tool that can rebuild ports between major versions would be nice but not worth the effort, since it happens so infrequently. > Basically had to make delete old libs and files as per the Makefile in > /usr/src, then did pkg_delete -a then rm -rf /usr/ports then portsnap, > then installed what ports I needed starting off with the monsters like > the latest perl and xorg. It seems to me that deleting the entire ports tree is not necessary. That would delete all the distfiles as well. Next time just update it with portsnap, it will save you a lot of downloading. And if you have a spare machine, update that first and then copy /usr/local, /var/db/ports and /var/db/pkg to the other machines with the same hardware architecture. That will save you a lot of time and effort and will result in minimal downtime and risk. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksSYSoACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXNSACaAmUYWkkNWOwD7PDz6JQtDD28 ppAAn27npE5jVhbuWb3QPE6JD0TDVdcJ =/A9D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 12:35:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D52106568D for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comp.john@googlemail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4D08FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so823452eye.9 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:35:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YBpG68dagUMhzGJ+K/hNzCQ3dmeqsnCSZkA4lwSWHY8=; b=OJrzNsvCumSBqNYqKseqyqraSAowBxJbR7sXFzuFv7ofd9ghFXVhpgS4TKAU4YSL0c r1LN1j38CdY34/gsux+xQunqLAQoZTJ+sVxp+CLOpr9dN1WPsbAIs3qpQS7aT61VFIAO PuQZtVq3v4Ic8hQJSZOQtDlXEr5kRJskURQeA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=w7o2B/bSOABWJSxup5O+w0abh0FRB+ek5R+8jbZtpY7R2tIaI2T6z56eL3lwIzvVLx x5xVJXOeaRKRytWH/zaA1YQCcvrrhbxdbDDhmqDc+DnHIwznGf6ThLLkS68ym1eGq7bZ aFmbZv3Bw4wrUpAGeBq9KkN1LsHGlWi9y76Bc= Received: by 10.213.50.139 with SMTP id z11mr404349ebf.13.1259498154125; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:35:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from potato (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm5437558eyb.34.2009.11.29.04.35.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:35:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:35:29 +0000 From: John To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20091129123529.GC48553@potato> References: <20091129101652.GB48553@potato> <4B12534B.4090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B12534B.4090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: slightly complex query - one machine with two network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:35:56 -0000 On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:56:11AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: Thanks for your help! I will try what you suggest when I'm back at home. -- John - comp dot john at googlemail dot com OpenBSD firewall | FreeBSD desktop | Ubuntu Karmic laptop GPG: 0xF08A33C5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 14:41:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF90106566C for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAB78FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2360483fxm.14 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:41:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IaBcBOFQJb8gi/OFrygzdEP7X8JsPZ9ZY8tLVJRzf0k=; b=e+jdRxRoIAOKebOCxB7aPHqS4RaesFEqV/Kq6DrWsGOZBXj7eROSf/rE9fv7SwTUYZ UqOeo9PF85vXZRo6O66sSQOU4ijX3+56tOBXNhAUYFRvmLyWIrCIVb1GD3th5KgAtdz2 XUdme0DsOr0wB/+FaR0AaNzRBxUGo5Nq7cPC0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=R5NXbaqhcEjOElfp+QteGmok1UHHkD1Son9Lzth6ItvORaYt6MO4qIm/84nQHyeugR bGXJ1YfWPH+rXQf/+bCpPIkn+vaIfzopW6RwA6DYnN+TNMaPry7k71ltEUfRGINZInhT Dbj2rzVsuplbznRmCRSZ/btxZ4XKyS/cKK2io= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.144.102 with SMTP id n38mr292511hba.176.1259505704420; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:41:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200911282335.18987.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <200911282335.18987.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:41:44 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Mike Clarke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with Olympus USB camera on 8.0 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:41:46 -0000 2009/11/28 Mike Clarke > The camera in question is an Olympus C-2040Z, I've had no problems using > it with 6.4. I tried rev. 7 some time ago but plugging the camera in > always caused a panic and crash so I stayed with 6.4. Now that 8.0 is > out I'd like to move on and the good news is that with 8.0 I can > connect the camera without a panic but the bad news is that although > the system detects the camera I'm not able to access it. On plugging in > the camera I see the following console messages: > > ugen0.2: at usbus0 > umass0: on usbus0 > umass0: SCSI over (unknown 0x00); quirks = 0x0100 > umass0: could not setup required transfers, USB_ERR_INVAL > device_attach: umass0 attach returned 6 > > ... and camcontrol devlist returns nothing at all > > I only see this problem with this particular camera, 2 other USB devices > (Nikon Coolpix 3100 and Canon iP4500 printer) can be accessed OK. > > In case the info is any use for comparison here's the messages when I > connect the camera on the same PC running 6.4: > > umass0: OLYMPUS C-2040ZOOM, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 1.000MB/s transfers > da0: 62MB (128000 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 62C) > > -- > Mike Clarke > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > try connecting it via a powerd usb hub or forcing the usb speed down to version 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 15:08:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E155B1065670 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C612C8FC21 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NElNZ-0000ST-PO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:08:01 -0800 Message-ID: <26562798.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:08:01 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Worster To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: fsb@thefsb.org Subject: Dtrace X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:08:03 -0000 is it likely that Dtrace will be coming to standard RELEASE kernels in future? i prefer not compile custom kernels for production servers but i do find the system monitoring Dtrace affords rather handy. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Dtrace-tp26562798p26562798.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 15:24:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B9E1065676 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf08.insightbb.com (mxsf08.insightbb.com [74.128.0.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1198FC16 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:24:14 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,308,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="802382465" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf08.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 10:24:13 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AroEAKMgEkvQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBTdE6hDEEgXI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,308,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="338247895" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 10:24:13 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:24:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.3.3; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911291024.06896.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: ACPI temperature X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:24:15 -0000 I booted my HP Pavilion zd8215us and I immediately invoked chkCPUTemperature. The first temp reported was 52C, which is 125.6F. This leads me to believe that acpi has an anomaly regarding temperature measurement. The ambient temp was 71F (21.6C). The machine had been off for over eight hours. Here's chkCPUTemperature: #!/bin/sh # $Id:$ # # CPU Temperature Information from ACPI POLLING_RATE=`sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate|awk '{print $2}'` while [ 1 ] do sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature sleep $POLLING_RATE done uname -a FreeBSD laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org 7.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 #1: Sat Oct 3 18:47:43 EDT 2009 root@laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 16:01:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FF71065672 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@pollux.local.net) Received: from smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (smtpfb2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48788FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0307CA888F for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E164C818D; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from pollux.local.net (che78-3-82-246-30-233.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.30.233]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866854C813F; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by pollux.local.net (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 5516B1CDF0; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:14 +0100 From: Harald Weis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091129154314.GA2584@pollux.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Broken multimedia/dvdauthor repaired at last X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:01:35 -0000 I just found a way to ''repair'' dvdauthor which is broken since several months. It suffices to comment two lines - 1082 and 1083 - in subreader.c like so: //fribidi_set_mirroring (FRIBIDI_TRUE); //fribidi_set_reorder_nsm (FRIBIDI_FALSE); # cd /usr/ports/multimedia/dvdauthor # make This produces the error message. Change subreader.c as said. # vi work/dvdauthor-0.6.14/src/subreader.c # make install It works for me. Don't know what is missing now. But lxdvdrip which requires dvdauthor is working as usual. :) Hope it helps everybody else. -- Harald Weis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 16:03:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20B2106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f204.google.com (mail-yw0-f204.google.com [209.85.211.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7063E8FC17 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh42 with SMTP id 42so2581278ywh.28 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:03:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YU4VkgkpusZD9KjPrkn8UmExnX3xpEmP1Ayiz9qZF3w=; b=c+ijQ06mGMUdjrUsbbrwdgKyxUmFPLCYqXxuCJDgX/7x+peAeyeomHIq7yymfDyllM MClKg3hvxD1ihSPzVm59NxAFScVpRagEFkFlOHqIcNgXVSLcgSZ0wUTLGWZ8QoUkO7BM yd7Pdneb1myWo+gCtG9Qg2qAugvRIGkQ14Y34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KurMAgPunYTVADabbyVwotut5g75IAS8LFmpA41rYvL0elhgIIKatviQnaCPJaN83V 9mQW8AzETbO2PhAYPiCCeK4Z866Rut243GDoGZTZFKWTbMEZlOwDog5j9NtkiP5+1P8v +kadQ4UAbYOgwMGLKPzajGbDx7kaNK0bQxiWk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.161.32 with SMTP id n32mr2500794ago.80.1259510608678; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:03:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200911291024.06896.freebsd@insightbb.com> References: <200911291024.06896.freebsd@insightbb.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:03:28 -0500 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Steven Friedrich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI temperature X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:03:29 -0000 2009/11/29 Steven Friedrich : > I booted my HP Pavilion zd8215us and I immediately invoked chkCPUTemperature. > The first temp reported was 52C, which is 125.6F. This leads me to believe > that acpi has an anomaly regarding temperature measurement. The ambient temp > was 71F (21.6C). The machine had been off for over eight hours. > I'm not sure. My laptop shows about 59C as soon as I can log in, in a room kept around 16C ambient. It rather quickly drops to <40C if I let it idle with powerd doing its thing. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 18:36:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144C31065692 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivermahmoudi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9592E8FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2457086fxm.14 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:36:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Fv9Q5sUgUBHWdebPhFn+xA7/Q0+5Cbm4gYdAeek11MQ=; b=EYO8j+x0rdgpJjotMEqY5zXmu/a/pnO3H7lPMMgQKKKCI4lhRDrKyfVDKY+Eh7CK/o 68QDlF3OLDDCyBq+1G3FpGHFkJbZ06XKq781w8Xn5uDeJZ1Cu/krVhHYFDbsno+Cd/ax TMJ/QAMSHmnDwEAiWR1Qt9WxK+aUM3gds4VTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=I4PD5S8drL7ftW8ShbglL//ARrRpUdbjqfc1WApTVA/3odyLfer8P1HQWtzYdNV+VY 61JtDAWFX5XcjQdcjyaRfaQuIXec/9GqNcyZacGvapkQ+SThw5/Cw3CYLByvURXnU8W0 CnnFoX+SU3cKyqWmxtW9H7/GAuC/+ttlj2kMk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.170.32 with SMTP id q32mr331777hbe.16.1259519765343; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:36:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEADA@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAB5@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <87hbsexjd7.fsf@kobe.laptop> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEADA@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:36:05 +0100 Message-ID: <6b4b2d2c0911291036v358eb322m5bdf470e450f78ba@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Mahmoudi To: Peter Steele Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Sorting a device list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:36:07 -0000 you can try to delete the /dev/ad10 entry with sed and then just append it to the end manually using the printf(1) utility like so: # ls /dev/ad* | sed s/"\/dev\/ad10"// | grep "/dev/ad" && printf "/dev/ad10\n" Does that help? Oliver On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > I had tried that. It doesn't work: > > # ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n > /dev/ad10 > /dev/ad4 > /dev/ad6 > /dev/ad8 > > I want the ad10 to appear last... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 4:31 PM > To: Peter Steele > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sorting a device list > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:48:18 -0600, Peter Steele > wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a quick and dirty way to sort a device list? For > example, if I do this: > > > > ls /dev/ad* | sort > > > > I get something like this: > > > > /dev/ad10 > > /dev/ad4 > > /dev/ad6 > > /dev/ad8 > > Just use `sort -n': > > ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n > > It should work fine even when there are non-numeric prefix strings. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 18:38:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2B3106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anti_spam256@yahoo.ca) Received: from web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E6F48FC0C for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22431 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Nov 2009 18:38:33 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1259519913; bh=TKTlCM4+xyC/Z3U1kzMj5Bnbbpm3MupwrlujEJMPBgE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Q0n3HicG5izemjYnAkcnYZNp2Fsb7X044C7zBDCoG9g4/GT9RsX/nkf69l7XmadOa1aW5ETx3HqLLO3Usl+vGXr6kb07c665ZrbG0IFO7rHy9K30B0+CaCNTvvDOQv9c76IglG1uFnfKq02kZNmL+5kcMaVz/UsWl50cpU9Arc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=it4N5dpwtjFC+3vI7N4/woWuZlAEAQ08Lm/3NAUlkADA22iSFa3XMigRqkS6zPlrzdeo3qCc2ll+XM13LPgF3oGtvUi+IGapLh70AzynzJyw78UewA1rCDl59Lups6d7+U92+v/vLKiuVPGm+iB98+P4gpkeq/szwPr14UhBv8w=; Message-ID: <251296.22381.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: .dcpaqkVM1kJsrQJOpJIfjVAU0_l5Tw67svLYjKrr.OveZdfXJzCl5tAFEjM0q_k1y4nOkbB495CVWveKWcXCJKy9xSu5XKswt7pbG5W2XhJUmfOJOW23yYPlRXPxuPuas5VQyR3OIYb77QKdoAFJkLTjXdfWbHiznsU4VNN0ED29OKxTEOwxPjrjbCe07IVoElC31Z55Ek93VEtH6.QxmjTh3GeMyYxABMAv7eq_SBRuPfmIqqXVhURNSyPvIUTZM2m68ozIwlR8zdMZBxblSVsuwb6kVJD5TWZKcQRulgZHdfM0V7wdfkwaro0QnEd7is.oZqzBrDpuw4lHnLjd8ORKovI9ONGUik5qZB7t0hMGQ0LoZ.aE7hQ8qYL3ijtVZv8oisDzi_cCM036cvnna.zMrdqkgxpGmQdQc.nNou3.pPDKTzYAZpoOUHZF.n6e_wX0g-- Received: from [208.99.137.71] by web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:38:32 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:38:32 -0800 (PST) From: James Phillips To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20091129120021.A63951065693@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: slightly complex query - one machine with two network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:38:34 -0000 =0A=0A> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:16:53 +0000=0A> From: John =0A> Subject: slightly complex query - one machine with two=0A>= network=0A> =A0=A0=A0 interfaces=0A> To: freebsd-questions =0A> Message-ID: <20091129101652.GB48553@potato>=0A> Conten= t-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii=0A> =0A=0A> it. Can anyone give me p= ointers on how to make the wireless=0A> interface=0A> more usable? basicall= y, I want to export via either nfs or=0A> samba some=0A> shares to the wire= less network, but routing ropiness seems=0A> to kill this.=0A> =0A=0AI sugg= est you should be careful here. By default NFS seems to assume that only tr= usted hosts (not users) will connect. If your share is read-only that may n= ot be a problem (depending on the information shared).=0A=0AYou should also= make sure samba is using (sufficiently strongly) encrypted passwords as we= ll.=0A=0AYou may want to read the security section of the handbook.=0A=0ARe= gards,=0A=0AJames Phillips=0A=0APS: If I want to be paranoid over wireless = I need new hardware. My PII 350 can only do SSH (128 bit 3-DES?) at ~1MB/s.= =0A=0A=0A=0A _________________________________________________________= _________=0ALooking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! =0A=0Aht= tp://www.flickr.com/gift/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 18:43:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876261065670 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092308FC1D for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p549A4EF4.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.78.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nATIQxKl034837; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:26:59 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nATIQnYE077869; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:26:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nATIQrxE065272; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:26:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <200911291826.nATIQrxE065272@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Harald Weis From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:14 +0100." <20091129154314.GA2584@pollux.local.net> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:26:53 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken multimedia/dvdauthor repaired at last X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:43:31 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Harald Weis > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:14 +0100 > Message-id: <20091129154314.GA2584@pollux.local.net> Harald Weis wrote: > I just found a way to ''repair'' dvdauthor which is broken since several > months. > It suffices to comment two lines - 1082 and 1083 - in subreader.c like > so: > //fribidi_set_mirroring (FRIBIDI_TRUE); > //fribidi_set_reorder_nsm (FRIBIDI_FALSE); > > # cd /usr/ports/multimedia/dvdauthor > # make > This produces the error message. Change subreader.c as said. > # vi work/dvdauthor-0.6.14/src/subreader.c > # make install > > It works for me. Don't know what is missing now. But lxdvdrip which > requires dvdauthor is working as usual. :) > > Hope it helps everybody else. Please use send-pr so this will be seen by those who can commit your fix. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text not quoted-printable, HTML or Base64: http://asciiribbon.org Vote For Smoke Free Bavarian Pubs Restaurants http://berklix.org/~jhs/nim/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 18:47:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9596C106568B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505a.appriver.com [98.129.35.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5968B8FC2F for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:47:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.15 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht02.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: 112 113 114 115 119 120 131 218 X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.15] (HELO ht02.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 18033376; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:47:32 -0600 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.164]) by ht02.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.15]) with mapi; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:47:30 -0600 From: Peter Steele To: Oliver Mahmoudi Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:47:26 -0600 Thread-Topic: Sorting a device list Thread-Index: AcpxItEUXDCuTQkPQjyHCoEcJhzrZgAAWdNQ Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAEB@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAB5@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <87hbsexjd7.fsf@kobe.laptop> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEADA@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <6b4b2d2c0911291036v358eb322m5bdf470e450f78ba@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6b4b2d2c0911291036v358eb322m5bdf470e450f78ba@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Sorting a device list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:47:31 -0000 I ended up using ls /dev/ad*|sort -g -k1.8 Not quite as generic as I wanted but it works... From: Oliver Mahmoudi [mailto:olivermahmoudi@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:36 AM To: Peter Steele Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sorting a device list you can try to delete the /dev/ad10 entry with sed and then just append it = to the end manually using the printf(1) utility like so: # ls /dev/ad* | sed s/"\/dev\/ad10"// | grep "/dev/ad" && printf "/dev/ad10= \n" Does that help? Oliver On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Peter Steele > wrote: I had tried that. It doesn't work: # ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n /dev/ad10 /dev/ad4 /dev/ad6 /dev/ad8 I want the ad10 to appear last... -----Original Message----- From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 4:31 PM To: Peter Steele Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sorting a device list On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:48:18 -0600, Peter Steele > wrote: > Can anyone recommend a quick and dirty way to sort a device list? For exa= mple, if I do this: > > ls /dev/ad* | sort > > I get something like this: > > /dev/ad10 > /dev/ad4 > /dev/ad6 > /dev/ad8 Just use `sort -n': ls -d1 /dev/ad* | sort -n It should work fine even when there are non-numeric prefix strings. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing= list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 19:47:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEF9106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A469E8FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2106630bwz.3 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:47:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8S4Ewjk6DBpAXFLDcRCgn1kSxByDJ/UOH5YtskMvs5g=; b=KvLnIbnwmgYYPLMRqTrEfmQxn6Cj0Vl9GbrhLXb8eALy3nbjQhmIZr7mTTgPQoc5b6 l/SrtpiOAuLIjEHZphEYWfkd2rSuuGWn4gD8iQ7qMvLO+sJC6dinWQ7IuubLd0deIMBq hFtJYiHGrs7bmUdpRNtkHERcS9ytBQ5duq018= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=H85SIDcTFB9rIeW1FDDpECAEcibdc/g7J5XBunAnA1ZzxMdOjwSOSO9lSGqwXc6l6C Ef+kJq/qNcG8NQHk7W6D+L6c1IaamcrIC7Xfk30REwmCbH/73iYW94/I7T8p7x8tPkV7 bh3IJE4+GqRcQsbzCFASwszidNun3B/QsOX54= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.19 with SMTP id n19mr1704629bkn.19.1259524062116; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:47:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091126125459.24a9a2d0@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <20091126150926.GA50790@sandcat> <20091126161423.035f51b5.cyb.@gmx.net> <20091126153554.GB50790@sandcat> <20091126171138.8d936d2e.cyb.@gmx.net> <20091126125459.24a9a2d0@scorpio.seibercom.net> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:47:22 +0000 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: ifconfig - GUI interface available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:47:44 -0000 2009/11/26 Jerry : > > Even OSX greatly simplifies the > installation process. What are you trying to say about OS X? -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 20:16:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816E1106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F27A8FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nATKGGur070301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:16:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800 To: Frank Shute From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade for binaries fails miserably, but not completely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:16:20 -0000 At 12:50 AM +0000 11/29/09, Frank Shute wrote: >You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your >ports/packages. Sorry: portupgrade -aPPR >You do realise that you don't have to upgrade your ports if you go >from 7.1 to 7.2. You can do but don't have to. No, I didn't realize that. The FreeBSD Handbook indicates differently. >You should upgrade python25 to python26. See /usr/ports/UPDATING dated >20090608 for instructions on how to do so. Thanks, but that didn't help. So, I have now done a long, painful 'portrupgrade -a', having it stop regularly to prompt me for configuration settings. We'll see what happens when I go to 8. --Paul Hoffman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 20:35:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CED1065676 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9D28FC22 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1NEqUP-000Gqf-Me; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:35:25 +0300 To: Paul Hoffman References: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:35:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Paul Hoffman's message of "Sun\, 29 Nov 2009 12\:16\:15 -0800") Message-ID: <79175170@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade for binaries fails miserably, but not completely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:35:27 -0000 On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800 Paul Hoffman wrote: > So, I have now done a long, painful > portrupgrade -a', having it stop regularly to prompt me for > configuration settings. I'm sure portupgrade has an option to do a recursive configure before actual upgrade. If it doesn't you may look at portmaster. -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 20:41:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E7106568F for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell.rawbw.com (shell.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FF78FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (c-24-6-221-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.221.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.rawbw.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id nATKf5pT013845 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:41:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B12DC60.7070101@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:41:04 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: VirtualBox: How to install 'Guest Additions' on FreeBSD host with Linux Ubuntu guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:41:05 -0000 I've setup guest additions in the menu, this makes CDROM VBOXADDITIONS_3. to appear in guest. But it only has folder OS2 and Readme.txt file talking about "Where have the Windows drivers gone?". And doesn't talk where have FreeBSD/Linux drivers gone. Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 20:56:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB431065672; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@pollux.local.net) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B728FC1C; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D024C80CC; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from pollux.local.net (che78-3-82-246-30-233.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.30.233]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4944C8117; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by pollux.local.net (Postfix, from userid 2000) id B22731CDF0; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:21 +0100 From: Harald Weis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091129205621.GA3445@pollux.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20091129154314.GA2584@pollux.local.net> <200911291826.nATIQrxE065272@fire.js.berklix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911291826.nATIQrxE065272@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: Broken multimedia/dvdauthor repaired at last X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:56:32 -0000 On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 07:26:53PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Reference: > > From: Harald Weis > > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:14 +0100 > > Message-id: <20091129154314.GA2584@pollux.local.net> > > Harald Weis wrote: > > I just found a way to ''repair'' dvdauthor which is broken since several > > months. > > It suffices to comment two lines - 1082 and 1083 - in subreader.c like > > so: > > //fribidi_set_mirroring (FRIBIDI_TRUE); > > //fribidi_set_reorder_nsm (FRIBIDI_FALSE); > > > > # cd /usr/ports/multimedia/dvdauthor > > # make > > This produces the error message. Change subreader.c as said. > > # vi work/dvdauthor-0.6.14/src/subreader.c > > # make install > > > > It works for me. Don't know what is missing now. But lxdvdrip which > > requires dvdauthor is working as usual. :) > > > > Hope it helps everybody else. > > Please use send-pr so this will be seen by those who can commit your fix. Okay, done. Harald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 21:06:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C3106568D for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B408D8FC1D for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nATL61KT057021; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:06:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id nATL61n4057018; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:06:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:06:01 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Boris Samorodov In-Reply-To: <79175170@h30.sp.ipt.ru> Message-ID: References: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <79175170@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:06:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: Paul Hoffman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade for binaries fails miserably, but not completely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:06:03 -0000 On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800 Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> So, I have now done a long, painful >> portrupgrade -a', having it stop regularly to prompt me for >> configuration settings. > > I'm sure portupgrade has an option to do a recursive configure > before actual upgrade. Yes, it's -c or -C. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 21:17:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5ED106568B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phleng@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7D48FC16 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.36]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9F82571BA; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:43:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3086BFFE; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:43:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dslb-088-068-141-150.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.68.141.150]) (Authenticated sender: phleng@arcor.de) by mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDCDE2571BA; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:43:12 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-16.arcor-online.net CDCDE2571BA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arcor.de; s=mail-in; t=1259527393; bh=2Dl9gx0mi8u7dseEnO3CKmWXj7IJwvgz4gtuC2mi2BA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ew4bXrM4fA0nGElON1+33IyOkQwc9vO8ruxyOcoiFyhHWBrGUaftvKcCrqzvB9yNJ qCAqnfwLzJrJbhNAj34fuQWljKSfz79ucPUuALIk0RK8/dQ4lFY9ONSB/NlJ7wH6Qs xJriXTFslfz7TiK+hn/PFKNsJcZJX7zutRHUMiLY= Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:43:07 +0100 From: Philipp Lengemann To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20091129214307.1f536190@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: <20091128090544.GA80636@thought.org> References: <20091128090544.GA80636@thought.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i automate building packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:17:08 -0000 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkVEIE1FU1NBR0UtLS0tLQ0KSGFzaDogU0hBMQ0KDQpBbSBTYXQs IDI4IE5vdiAyMDA5IDAxOjA1OjQ3IC0wODAwDQpzY2hyaWViIEdhcnkgS2xpbmUgPGtsaW5lQHRo b3VnaHQub3JnPjoNCg0KPiANCj4gCUhvdyBkbyBJIGJ1aWxkIHRhcmJhbGxzIG9mIHBhY2thZ2Vz IHRoYXQgdXN1YWxseSB3aW5kIHVwIGluIA0KPiAJL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9wYWNrYWdlcz8NCj4gDQo+ IAlJIHRob3VnaHQgSSBoYWQgc29tZXRoaW5nIGluIC9ldGMvbWFrZS5jb25mLCBidXQgbm9wZS4g IE15DQo+IAlidWlsZCBvZiBPT28gWzMxMV0gcmVjZW50bHkgZmluaXNoZWQgb24gbXkgbmV3IHRv LWJlIHNlcnZlci4gIA0KPiAJU2luY2UgYm90aCB0aGUgbmV3IERlbGwgYW5kIHRoaXMgb2xkZXIg RGVsbCBhcmUgcnVubmluZyA3LjIsIEkNCj4gCWZpZ3VyZSBJIGNhbiBkbyBhbnkgYnVpbGRzIGFu ZCBtb3ZlIHRoZSBwYWNrYWdlcyBhY3Jvc3MuDQo+IA0KPiAJSSB0aG91Z2h0IEkgaGFkIHNlZW4g Zm9vLnRneiBpbiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL2Jhci9mb28vOyBidXQgdGhpcw0KPiAJdGltZSwgbm8gZXhw ZWN0ZWQgdGFyYmFsbC4gIC0tPz8tLSAgQSBtYW4gcG9ydHMgaXNuJ3QgdmVyeQ0KPiAJY2xlYXIu ICBJIHVzdWFsbHkgdHlwZSBtYWtlIGluc3RhbGwgY2xlYW4gd2hlbiBJIGJ1aWxkDQo+IAlhbnl0 aGluZy4gIElmIEkgaGF2ZSB0byBzdGFydCBvdmVyIGZyb20gc2NyYXRjaCB3aXRoDQo+IAlvcGVu b2ZmaWNlIHdvdWxkIEkgdHlwZQ0KPiANCj4gCSMgbWFrZSBpbnN0YWxsIHBhY2thZ2UgY2xlYW4/ IE9yIHdoYXQ/DQo+IA0KPiAJYW55Ym9keT8NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCg0KSWYgeW91IG5lZWQgcGFj a2FnZXMgb25lIHBvc3NpYmlsaXR5IGlzDQoNCiMgcGtnX2luZm8gLUVhIHwgeGFyZ3MgLUwxIHBr Z19jcmVhdGUgLWIgDQoNClRoaXMgd2lsbCBidWlsZCBhIHBhY2thZ2Ugb2YgZXZlcnkgaW5zdGFs bGVkIHBvcnQuDQotLS0tLUJFR0lOIFBHUCBTSUdOQVRVUkUtLS0tLQ0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcg djIuMC4xMyAoRnJlZUJTRCkNCg0KaUVZRUFSRUNBQVlGQWtzUzNPQUFDZ2tRbE9QbXZFdjMxZ1pM Y1FDZlRZdTFYOWp2cjZDeGdybXdnck1tYXZuQQ0KMzZVQW5peUhnT2tUZ2M1ZXFveWkwYWR0OTFi MkZjWkUNCj1LKzl0DQotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0NCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 21:47:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851B910656B3 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com (mail-iw0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516478FC28 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1686304iwn.3 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:47:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=OHhE/VOGFWxyeTE7Ub6w+QaxCaKUGofjSBjHG2U67YQ=; b=a/7uMZrsJzfa6xCdU3SDGa31DP5EuiH64YYbNv97q8ebC/cXnea2QB/TiLuCXds8hR AgPN3nJrCpOR+/emhRibELmxGJ3keB4USRjFHPmh6G7DPx+Xfx1Iu8oAFWUFnJ4RLL6V OO2SSQaM8atoRYMP8+xNSFK7PktA94YSCVsIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=taIlvxAYP/U7k7YCIBvf2OK7ra7LPj4grhzX4J7Co+iUDCPXEyj+iNqAsdaWt0xAL9 jSlJRepH47Lt6jvt3IYNOJYXLY5kPiyDfp9VEF6BbgXNhU+bPlenS7xLpIBGW2919wpy L/kxhh9XHxwwnu/61ltM0YG0xJ8HBO3Jv5brA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.6.79 with SMTP id 15mr9300286iby.36.1259531276597; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:47:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:47:56 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: 7.2R and Firefox 3.5.3 and Flash/Java - something odd I can't quite figure out... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:47:57 -0000 All, I've gotten Flash and Java going with Firefox, as root, using the directions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html However, I can't get it going as a standard user. When I run 'nspluginwrapper -v -a -i' I get the following: Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin Install plugin /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so ... already installed system-wide, skipping Auto-install plugins from /home/kurt/.mozilla/plugins Looking for plugins in /home/kurt/.mozilla/plugins and 'about:plugins' only shows libnullplugin.so as enabled for all MIME types. 'nspluginwrapper -l' shows /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so Original plugin: /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so Wrapper version string: 1.2.2 Any ideas? Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 21:56:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33081106568B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BF08FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nATLursI084759; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:56:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B727EBAAA; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:56:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:56:53 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Philipp Lengemann Message-ID: <20091129215653.GA65322@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20091128090544.GA80636@thought.org> <20091129214307.1f536190@arcor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091129214307.1f536190@arcor.de> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i automate building packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:56:58 -0000 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 09:43:07PM +0100, Philipp Lengemann wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Am Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:05:47 -0800 > schrieb Gary Kline : >=20 > >=20 > > How do I build tarballs of packages that usually wind up in=20 > > /usr/ports/packages? > >=20 > > I thought I had something in /etc/make.conf, but nope. My > > build of OOo [311] recently finished on my new to-be server. =20 > > Since both the new Dell and this older Dell are running 7.2, I > > figure I can do any builds and move the packages across. Now that my desktop and laptop are both running 8.0, I build ports on my (faster) desktop, and then rsync /usr/local to the laptop. Works fine. Of course my laptop now has some apps on it that it doesn't really need, but on the other hand I have been able to remove /usr/ports, /var/db/ports and /var/db/pkg from the laptop. This is a lot easier than creating packages and updating them on another machine. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksS7iUACgkQEnfvsMMhpyW8twCfVSQz7Oc9t4GxQ2j4vkFl9FcH l/MAnRBVLEYOApigPyG3f8wzPBzMIzFh =C55b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 29 22:03:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22880106566B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@shute.org.uk) Received: from atmail-8.bnguk.net (atmail-8.bnguk.net [80.74.253.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB6C8FC14 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.54.144] helo=orange.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-8.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NErrt-0006M4-Ol; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:03:45 +0000 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 44B344AC1B; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:03:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:03:45 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Paul Hoffman Message-ID: <20091129220345.GA88582@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Hoffman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade for binaries fails miserably, but not completely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:03:48 -0000 On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:16:15PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > At 12:50 AM +0000 11/29/09, Frank Shute wrote: > > >You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your > >ports/packages. > > Sorry: portupgrade -aPPR My opinion is that you shouldn't use packages and compile from source instead. In my experience it's less troublesome and because FreeBSD is so good at multi-tasking it's possible to get on with your work whilst it's doing the building. Packages only if you've got weak hardware and/or limited bandwidth. > > >You do realise that you don't have to upgrade your ports if you go > >from 7.1 to 7.2. You can do but don't have to. > > No, I didn't realize that. The FreeBSD Handbook indicates differently. It shouldn't do. You only have to rebuild all your ports if you're going from a major version to another major version e.g 7.* to 8.0 Between minor versions FreeBSD maintains things so it shouldn't be necessary. > > >You should upgrade python25 to python26. See /usr/ports/UPDATING dated > >20090608 for instructions on how to do so. > > > Thanks, but that didn't help. So, I have now done a long, painful > 'portrupgrade -a', having it stop regularly to prompt me for > configuration settings. We'll see what happens when I go to 8. The other guys have pointed out the neato switch to portupgrade so that you do the config beforehand. It's also possible to accept the default configs by putting: BATCH="yes" in /etc/make.conf ....IIRC. As to your problems, it could be that your ports tree is out of date. Have you c[v]sup'd or portsnapped it recently? > > --Paul Hoffman > Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 01:21:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624591065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf05.insightbb.com (mxsf05.insightbb.com [74.128.0.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DBE8FC0A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:21:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,309,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="753048541" Received: from unknown (HELO mxsf15.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.201]) by mxsf05.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 20:21:03 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,309,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="2915923" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf15.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 20:21:03 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEEAEStEkvQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBTtIIhDEE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,309,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="338300447" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 20:20:58 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:20:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.3.3; i386; ; ) References: <200911291024.06896.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911292020.55799.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: ACPI temperature X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:21:04 -0000 On Sunday 29 November 2009 11:03:28 am you wrote: > 2009/11/29 Steven Friedrich : > > I booted my HP Pavilion zd8215us and I immediately invoked > > chkCPUTemperature. The first temp reported was 52C, which is 125.6F. This > > leads me to believe that acpi has an anomaly regarding temperature > > measurement. The ambient temp was 71F (21.6C). The machine had been off > > for over eight hours. > > I'm not sure. My laptop shows about 59C as soon as I can > log in, in a room kept around 16C ambient. It rather quickly > drops to <40C if I let it idle with powerd doing its thing. > Thanks for the response. One question though, what OS are you running. The reason I ask is because I want to discover if it's FreeBSD specific or possibly affecting Linux distros as well. And if you're running FreeBSD, which version. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 01:22:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D935C1065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6563A8FC18 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so926822eye.9 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:22:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4u4uEp51V6BPdqfocj+086ch/Zh+2ToTRovTn5pe1xU=; b=PJJ6c1RBZCNwHLzbtpxQ6cM9KVRnLAC0qsiHkIhQMggJLCNep9xdoZ8eH9nbHzZuM9 SXttGQyre1eerJuaBWNWtPI4U6V53csV4fhw9bMSvud1OhcREkJ6KLTXHlqWgnzsj2uz f8Z8Gfb8z3hmFe1Kr+5C89OMNkE1npBfQgE9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XTSV7cJQfrYyCAEp2rZdiFkCRqSIqB972B+IvMWtMa8SUyRKwESP9iGPyPLqkXYXvi n8Ph3gEbnQ/yVn+4mxLdll7EBhTdgqAf03GX/FA3heVljIhDfZ8UQFX1DZ/RnUVxyDF4 p5bMRqmWE8otpiBhS0QQ+4uVMfaGzhadjBhYM= Received: by 10.216.89.193 with SMTP id c43mr1264579wef.221.1259544169375; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:22:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm9044282gve.1.2009.11.29.17.22.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:22:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:22:46 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091130012246.1fbd04e6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20091129005048.GA85331@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade for binaries fails miserably, but not completely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:22:50 -0000 On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800 Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 12:50 AM +0000 11/29/09, Frank Shute wrote: > >You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your > >ports/packages. > > Sorry: portupgrade -aPPR Packages for a release are built against the ports tree that's distributed with the installation cd. If you want portupgrade -aPP to work you need to use csup with the port release tag which I think is RELEASE_7_2_0. Otherwise use portupgrade -aP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 02:02:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4623D106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail3.networktest.com (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CC18FC18 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [69.55.234.60]) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D439608A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.networktest.com ([69.55.234.60]) by localhost (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.60]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54340-04 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from levi.local (cpe-76-83-7-25.socal.res.rr.com [76.83.7.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D5A19602C for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:02:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1327A5.3000900@networktest.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:02:13 -0800 From: David Newman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portmaster upgrade breaks cups-image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:02:15 -0000 8.0R amd64 Part of the upgrade process from 7.2R requires reinstalling all third-party software, such as ports. I use portmaster for this, following the nine-step procedure described in the EXAMPLES section of the manpage. During the upgrade, cups-image fails with the error shown below. A temporary workaround is to disable CUPS support in ghostscript8 and samba3, but I might want to use this box as a print server in the future. Thanks in advance for clues on fixing this error. Also, I believe this is the same issue as in this message: http://is.gd/57iuU dn .. cc -L../cgi-bin -L../cups -L../filter -L../ppdc -L../scheduler -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -pie -fPIE -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -fstack-protector -o bannertops bannertops.o pstext.o common.o -lcupsimage \ -lcups -pthread -lm -lcrypt /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/crt1.o: could not read symbols: Bad value gmake[1]: *** [bannertops] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/cups-image/work/cups-1.4.2/filter' gmake: *** [all] Error 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-image. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-image. ===>>> make failed for print/cups-image From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 02:03:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52135106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf04.insightbb.com (mxsf04.insightbb.com [74.128.0.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDE88FC15 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:03:53 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,309,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="764912959" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf04.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 21:03:52 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEEAMK2EkvQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBTtIohDEEgXI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,309,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="338305691" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2009 21:03:52 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:03:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.3.3; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911292103.41307.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: kdebindings4-python-pykde4 ver 4.3.3 fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:03:54 -0000 Anyone else seeing this? Here's the tail of the log: [ 98%] Built target compile_python_files make -f python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.dir/build.make python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.dir/depend cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 && /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.dir/DependInfo.cmake --color= Scanning dependencies of target kpythonpluginfactory_automoc make -f python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.dir/build.make python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.dir/build cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory && /usr/local/bin/automoc4 /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.cpp /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory /usr/local/bin/moc-qt4 /usr/local/bin/cmake /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4- python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/CMakeFiles [ 98%] Built target kpythonpluginfactory_automoc make -f python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/build.make python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/depend cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 && /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/DependInfo.cmake --color= Scanning dependencies of target kpythonpluginfactory make -f python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/build.make python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/build /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4- python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/CMakeFiles [ 98%] Building CXX object python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.o cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory && /usr/bin/c++ -DMAKE_KPYTHONPLUGINFACTORY_LIB -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL - DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT - D_REENTRANT -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DUSING_SOPRANO_NRLMODEL_UNSTABLE_API - DKDE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_AREA=15000 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium4 - Woverloaded-virtual -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -g - DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory - I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 - I/usr/local/kde4/include -I/usr/local/kde4/include/KDE - I/usr/local/include/qt4/KDE -I/usr/local/include/qt4 - I/usr/local/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtWebKit - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDBus - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtUiTools - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSvg - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSql - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtOpenGL -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtNetwork - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt3Support - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore - I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/default - I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.5 - I/usr/local/kde4/include/solid -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kio - I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint/lpr - I/usr/local/kde4/include/dom -I/usr/local/kde4/include/ksettings - I/usr/local/kde4/include/knewstuff2 -I/usr/local/kde4/include/dnssd - I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit/polkit-qt -I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit - DLIB_PYTHON=\"libpython2.5.so\" -o CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.o -c /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.cpp /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4- python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/CMakeFiles 1 [100%] Building CXX object python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kpythonpluginfactory.o cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory && /usr/bin/c++ -DMAKE_KPYTHONPLUGINFACTORY_LIB -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL - DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT - D_REENTRANT -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DUSING_SOPRANO_NRLMODEL_UNSTABLE_API - DKDE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_AREA=15000 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium4 - Woverloaded-virtual -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -g - DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory - I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 - I/usr/local/kde4/include -I/usr/local/kde4/include/KDE - I/usr/local/include/qt4/KDE -I/usr/local/include/qt4 - I/usr/local/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtWebKit - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDBus - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtUiTools - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSvg - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSql - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtOpenGL -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtNetwork - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt3Support - I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore - I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/default - I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.5 - I/usr/local/kde4/include/solid -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kio - I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint/lpr - I/usr/local/kde4/include/dom -I/usr/local/kde4/include/ksettings - I/usr/local/kde4/include/knewstuff2 -I/usr/local/kde4/include/dnssd - I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit/polkit-qt -I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit - DLIB_PYTHON=\"libpython2.5.so\" -o CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kpythonpluginfactory.o -c /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonpluginfactory.cpp /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonpluginfactory.cpp: In function 'QLibrary* LoadPythonLibrary()': /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonpluginfactory.cpp:301: error: 'RTLD_NOLOAD' was not declared in this scope *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 02:30:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A51065679 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB358FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so746908qwb.7 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:30:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=48H1ZFndMhnLFQNPzBOhnpQc2+JNWuKnphukS6zgQ4A=; b=dOmWHLYLcu2uFc7NqcS2HG7Ohh4PLALREjNODkGrDQnetNnq59qGVBrHijW608bTx9 h/2zNjIH88Id/H9l+P3RPGJLAuTH79rV0rTzjth0wHs8YKptotlXYL1wftXEM4BHk46I Pbz5Ha3FX+3jcEznzM2uwdWn8fLEg8GsiOl3E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=UXxm59QZFWuOGXPRYLq+n8eeYSDcleUt6GBfKkB5bbuANWeJdCa4OthxNXoLaGQDCU 9vZYIDeFXzlh9w3LQ9qCq7698NzfdV/cd9OA9K/Uz6KnlixBE1xQbXqcPsHRVZiO5SGv LIE9mOI8H4Bp3r5SfJg9gtbP6gtsL8iV2iNhM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.118.6 with SMTP id t6mr452383qcq.39.1259548257711; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:30:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:30:57 -0800 Message-ID: From: Derrick Ryalls To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: FreeBSD 8.0 system setup with ZFS steps X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:30:59 -0000 Greetings, I created the following guide when I was trying out ZFS in VirtualBox on my windows machine. I created 5 hard drives: 1 to represent a flash drive to boot off of, 4 to represent the large hard drives I would be using in raid. It seemed to work to get a running system, but wanted to make sure I wasn't doing anything stupid or missing a good step. FreeBSD 8.0 with ZFS *Setup Use a 2gig Flash device. 1 gig is enough space though. 512M will be tight. Collect the 4 other SATA drives. *Start FreeBSD normal install. Select the flash device as the device to install to. Use the entire device Install the bootMgr Create a single slice taking up the entire device, mount to / Select distribution minimal Run install Normal post install answers Reboot *Activate ZFS (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/filesystems-zfs.html) Follow instructions for RaidZ Be sure to add the instructions for daily raid mails *Create mount points in pool home local obj ports src var share tmp *One at a time, copy existing data from / to new mount points. Instructions are in the link above *Reboot (make sure nothing is broken) *Swap zfs create -V 4g storage/swap geli onetime -s 4096 /dev/zvol/storage/swap (encryption, might not be needed) swapon /dev/zvol/storage/swap.eli *pkg_add -r bash *Add users *Normal setup at this point. My goal is to not burn out the flash drive with a bunch of writes, so it should primarily be read only, with the occasional edit to a config file or installworld. I tried putting /etc in a ZFS pool to take advantage of snapshots and such, but the machine couldn't find the boot drive as that information is stored in /etc and ZFS is not loaded at that point. Am I doing something stupid that may burn out the flash drive or cause the system to be rather slow? Thanks, Derrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 02:45:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB0C106568B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gosand1982@yahoo.com) Received: from n62.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n62.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [98.136.44.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BDCC8FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.252.122.219] by n62.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.81] by t4.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.98] by t1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 97603.33776.bm@omp102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 73484 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Nov 2009 02:45:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1259549156; bh=cj3upsPn5HgpirDIX7LBAjGjvhbN5uOBQ9yCK2fF/5o=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rIXUOIBwohhh0/Oilw+95a2Bb498w75TkoJvX9e351vq/qU6atjyT+VECSXBSlV5KOs597CipdWEdOQuE4WK1B8iGyBOUt6qkJIuAvNIuPshfjFIRndlZ2o9YQ9lXoSlYiQfa4Sf7CZsOfkO7ZoEeOBG8gHa2Z6Qk4cYMtS24sg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MRm8npkrYTfdy92dcVux4H1qOMLsgPEiLukpi6Q4yv08SdJ0RRromXaO5FcPxgiute3pepRnHpRlJ+CzbZghApBUWlCymOToTx58X7xlV/zOoNEp3Ik0QZM+swTil9idBa5CMlnRq8AhOG5nJ/tbaZQDWux6ci6poybWQLvkdE8=; Message-ID: <917463.72731.qm@web111602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: DYeTG3sVM1nb6flojbESUI6oixrM1gmKhWxYlSz1XJASLh6Xm5SEuPY365jIhMo1kaQjRTvqQHJLF1XOsnyEv4ZbwokOe6T2B8788KZ2GeekawvnfAMgO4E_xKCi.GHxTjoapXSDpQcGE1Efrnx6_wf6HVAP_roKBfo1ovYOBbrFg.piyy9yymWXVb3NWioFgVT4bNSKZ.LySL.ZU_9tvFZqziOfoG0DvR.AWdm86YMD67Wfkqe8XRwQ33PVtFLQvBo- Received: from [24.5.102.43] by web111602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:45:56 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/211.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:45:56 -0800 (PST) From: George Sanders To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: mysterious "try" process dumping core on 7.2-RELEASE ... worried ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:45:57 -0000 I see these two entries in my /var/log/messages: Nov 24 18:08:41 hostname kernel: pid 25901 (try), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) Nov 24 18:10:29 hostname kernel: pid 35359 (try), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) But I've never heard of a "try" binary, and 'which try' shows nothing ... When I search through my system, the only thing remotely resembling "try" is: /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.9/lib/Test/Simple/t/try.t I do see that my perl binary is dated: 0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 24 Nov 24 18:12 /usr/bin/perl a few minutes after those error messages, so perhaps that is it ... Anyway, what is "try.t", what is a ".t file" and if a "try.t" file core dumped, would I indeed see simply "try" in my logs, as above ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 03:03:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44A5106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru) Received: from ns.ael.RU (ns.ael.ru [62.76.207.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CF58FC1A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Fluffy.Khv.RU (dhcp-14.local.ael [192.168.100.14]) by ns.ael.RU (8.14.3/8.14.3/Fluffy/5.3) with ESMTP id nAU33W2d071616 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:03:34 +1000 (VLAT) (envelope-from fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru) Received: from fluffy.khv.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Fluffy.Khv.RU (8.14.3/8.14.3/Fluffy/5.4.1) with ESMTP id nAU33EG4084117; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:03:14 +1000 (VLAT) (envelope-from fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru) From: Dima Panov Organization: Twilight Zone To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:03:10 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (FreeBSD/9.0-900002-CURRENT; KDE/4.3.3; amd64; ; ) References: <200911292103.41307.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <200911292103.41307.freebsd@insightbb.com> X-Face: "RE-2'yS-N:*/7DHOjQ%Az<.+SG>K7B'k(&; qb0K4]Hv>J}"l9,=:m2_]-3S/}`b\]yA-g !y3en*Zl(i-86iM?Q[w@!=rW&JdT>KHW@dri>+qMcy42O, 5#izEqa-K+=B<@A X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ns.ael.RU [192.168.1.1]); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:03:34 +1000 (VLAT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ns.ael.RU Cc: Steven Friedrich Subject: Re: kdebindings4-python-pykde4 ver 4.3.3 fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:03:37 -0000 --nextPart7578748.OH8dJ94VuF Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 30 November 2009 12:03:41 Steven Friedrich wrote: > Anyone else seeing this? >=20 > Here's the tail of the log: > [ 98%] Built target compile_python_files > make -f > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automo= c. > dir/build.make > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_autom= oc > .dir/depend cd > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 && > /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFil= es > /kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.dir/DependInfo.cmake --color=3D > =1B[35m=1B[1mScanning dependencies of target kpythonpluginfactory_automoc > =1B[0mmake -f > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_automo= c. > dir/build.make > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory_autom= oc > .dir/build cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory && > /usr/local/bin/automoc4 /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonp= lu > ginfactory_automoc.cpp /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory > /usr/local/bin/moc-qt4 /usr/local/bin/cmake > /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4- > python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/CMakeFiles > [ 98%] Built target kpythonpluginfactory_automoc > make -f > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/bu= il > d.make > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/d= ep > end cd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 > && /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFil= es > /kpythonpluginfactory.dir/DependInfo.cmake --color=3D > =1B[35m=1B[1mScanning dependencies of target kpythonpluginfactory > =1B[0mmake -f > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/bu= il > d.make > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/b= ui > ld /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4- > python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/CMakeFiles > [ 98%] =1B[32mBuilding CXX object > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kp= yt > honpluginfactory_automoc.o =1B[0mcd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory && > /usr/bin/c++ -DMAKE_KPYTHONPLUGINFACTORY_LIB -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL - > DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT= - > D_REENTRANT -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB > -DUSING_SOPRANO_NRLMODEL_UNSTABLE_API - DKDE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_AREA=3D15000 = =2DO2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=3Dpentium4 - Woverloaded-virtual > -fvisibility=3Dhidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -g - DNDEBUG > -DQT_NO_DEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory - > I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 - > I/usr/local/kde4/include -I/usr/local/kde4/include/KDE - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/KDE -I/usr/local/include/qt4 - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtWebKit - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDBus - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtUiTools - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSvg - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSql - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtOpenGL -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtNetwork - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt3Support - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/default - > I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.5 - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/solid -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kio - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint/lpr - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/dom -I/usr/local/kde4/include/ksettings - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/knewstuff2 -I/usr/local/kde4/include/dnssd - > I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit/polkit-qt -I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit - > DLIB_PYTHON=3D\"libpython2.5.so\" -o > CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kpythonpluginfactory_automoc.o -c > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonp= lu > ginfactory_automoc.cpp /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4- > python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/CMakeFiles 1 > [100%] =1B[32mBuilding CXX object > python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kp= yt > honpluginfactory.o =1B[0mcd /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory && > /usr/bin/c++ -DMAKE_KPYTHONPLUGINFACTORY_LIB -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL - > DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT= - > D_REENTRANT -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB > -DUSING_SOPRANO_NRLMODEL_UNSTABLE_API - DKDE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_AREA=3D15000 = =2DO2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=3Dpentium4 - Woverloaded-virtual > -fvisibility=3Dhidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -g - DNDEBUG > -DQT_NO_DEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory - > I/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3 - > I/usr/local/kde4/include -I/usr/local/kde4/include/KDE - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/KDE -I/usr/local/include/qt4 - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtWebKit - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDBus - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtUiTools - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSvg - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSql - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtOpenGL -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtNetwork - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt3Support - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore - > I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/default - > I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.5 - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/solid -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kio - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint -I/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeprint/lpr - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/dom -I/usr/local/kde4/include/ksettings - > I/usr/local/kde4/include/knewstuff2 -I/usr/local/kde4/include/dnssd - > I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit/polkit-qt -I/usr/local/include/PolicyKit - > DLIB_PYTHON=3D\"libpython2.5.so\" -o > CMakeFiles/kpythonpluginfactory.dir/kpythonpluginfactory.o -c > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonp= lu > ginfactory.cpp /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonp= lu > ginfactory.cpp: In function 'QLibrary* LoadPythonLibrary()': > /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4/kpythonpluginfactory/kpythonp= lu > ginfactory.cpp:301: error: 'RTLD_NOLOAD' was not declared in this scope > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.= 3. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.= 3. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python- > pykde4/work/kdebindings-4.3.3/python/pykde4. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4. Yep, we know about this. Fresh pyqt4/pykde4 stuff require full-featured rtl= d. versions prior to 8.0-release affected.=20 Still searching a workaround rolution =2D-=20 Dima "Red Fox" Panov @ Home | C73E 2B72 1FFD 61BD E206 1234 A626 76ED 93E3 = B018 Khabarovsk, Russia | 2D30 2CCB 9984 130C 6F87 BAFC FB8B A09D D539 = 8F29 KDE@FreeBSD Team | FreeBSD committer since 10.08.2009 | FreeBSD since Sept = 1995 Twitter.com:fluffy_khv | Skype:dima.panov | Jabber.org:fluffy.khv | ICQ:174= 5024 --nextPart7578748.OH8dJ94VuF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAksTNfEACgkQpiZ27ZPjsBhjHgCfXUVKQ4Cc+KQW6PJZb2aY3wcy PvwAn3xo5cIcP2k/8L6csteSk82SrdHy =Pl3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7578748.OH8dJ94VuF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 03:05:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447051065694 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFCD8FC0A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so751894qwb.7 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:05:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=gn+CrIZmCKMMie0XljFzs95QwGqio7TzEo9Pc1XzPo0=; b=HkDDRnFBJmubS8sBm3Q05sZOB3UH9+11d8RPwfpsgDcd0dProPyB7VpbI0vQbUfuZH Fv1MfTJtp7XT3I2HCHAhanXhvFO1lgQWtJhzXdlqPbHWoqe/bRcA0KuzrZ2XaQTgolv3 dhDRcYEIIWohDv3TrzN2RTPl+26h82xjwCRJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=I3bIns0PaQLEWP3WzAicrzIwXX/iJou7cFVRpbw8vtnOy6h8loC/SFh+/qM0V4J+vn LRtvICBilKV+Ay+toRWjPCH3PW4sMpEKUPcU45RFa1KOoRoQQYhDjn5Bs8eKKybZ2/Sr /QAIa/lMo9lLNBZm965M7OI927/1udnsgjMkc= Received: by 10.224.122.3 with SMTP id j3mr1820102qar.335.1259548790375; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from medusa.wi.rr.com (CPE-65-29-54-222.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm3346567qyk.3.2009.11.29.18.39.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:39:49 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:39:32 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.3.3; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: ntpdate on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:05:56 -0000 Hi! I have new installed FreeBSD 8.0 and in rc.conf I have: ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_hosts="ntp1.cs.wisc.edu" When I boot computer I get a message there are no this host but when I run /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp1.cs.wisc.edu it works. I had the same in rc.conf on FreeBSD 7.2 and it works all the time. All settings on FreeBSD8.0 are the same as I had on 7.2. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 03:11:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEDE106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell.rawbw.com (shell.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BDD8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (c-24-6-221-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.221.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.rawbw.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id nAU3BhBp080401 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:11:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1337EE.9080101@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:11:42 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Why I am getting message: "wlan0: ieee80211_new_state_locked: pending SCAN -> RUN transition lost" in 8.0 with ndis driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:11:44 -0000 After upgrading to 8.0 I am getting a new message: wlan0: /ieee80211_new_state_locked: pending SCAN/ -> RUN transition lost. I use ndis driver with Broadcom WiFi card BCM94312MCGSG. Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 03:34:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273DD106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xkyanh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f185.google.com (mail-pz0-f185.google.com [209.85.222.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E967F8FC1C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so2100689pzk.3 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:34:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization:x-operating-system :x-mailer:user-agent:x-face:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZBn5eTzxmx/c7glzxQtDxqrblY7W70qzgmLD8MZ2vOQ=; b=m4+6ogecSwLQ/jceKj33H/FWGaVuPg3nJR72xbJzFBwaFljjX9I75FIPSZ44y/gPAa ugIRgks7kIoc5p72sle88EO9UIDWZApjhwFAp7OmV4SsSo9eAd+u9leJkcZBJjRcFULv Jrp92IWNe39aG7A1rwKuG0sznC7MDTPOXMgbg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-operating-system:x-mailer:user-agent:x-face:face:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a29f2P07Wzgnuj9m7IKybwKQ8X0zmdLJTJC+Ap4cdUuJ/UIAjzHt2OKyCdZbduy6QA u7dw94tKwfZ2AXMs3Drfxx7K2j/ouP07lLRundRRV5cfhCq+QFO73qslX6blyn9YotW4 tn+vN78LMbdickiJ+Hc3ruzbrD/eqYoE4j9m4= Received: by 10.115.101.31 with SMTP id d31mr6249037wam.68.1259550837651; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:13:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from icy.localdomain ([118.69.224.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm2681102pxi.10.2009.11.29.19.13.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:13:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:13:30 +0700 From: "Anh K. =?UTF-8?B?SHXhu7NuaA==?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091130101330.0d109dfd@icy.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> Organization: Vietnamese TeX Users Group X-Operating-System: Windows 98 X-Mailer: Moveup mail client (windows 98) User-Agent: Moveup mail on Windows 98 X-Face: no-face Face: no-face Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ntpdate on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:34:48 -0000 On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:39:32 -0600 ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > I have new installed FreeBSD 8.0 and in rc.conf I have: > > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_hosts="ntp1.cs.wisc.edu" > > When I boot computer I get a message there are no this host but > when I run /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp1.cs.wisc.edu it works. > This is due to DNS problem. Your DNS resolver must work before you run `ntpdate`. > I had the same in rc.conf on FreeBSD 7.2 and it works all the time. > All settings on FreeBSD8.0 are the same as I had on 7.2. > > Thanks in advance. -- Anh K. Huynh Homepage: http://viettug.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 03:38:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAF81065672 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1398FC12 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAU3c4hc065053; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:38:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id nAU3c44D065050; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:38:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:38:04 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: ajtiM In-Reply-To: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:38:04 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpdate on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:38:05 -0000 On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, ajtiM wrote: > I have new installed FreeBSD 8.0 and in rc.conf I have: > > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_hosts="ntp1.cs.wisc.edu" > > When I boot computer I get a message there are no this host but when I run > /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp1.cs.wisc.edu it works. > > I had the same in rc.conf on FreeBSD 7.2 and it works all the time. All > settings on FreeBSD8.0 are the same as I had on 7.2. Might you have a Realtek network card? -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 04:38:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BE6106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd1@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDDF8FC19 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([202.69.172.43]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:38:56 -0800 Message-ID: <4B134C50.5050104@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:38:40 +0800 From: Fbsd1 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 04:38:57.0181 (UTC) FILETIME=[075924D0:01CA7177] X-Sender: fbsd1@a1poweruser.com Subject: 8.0 & MYSQL50 denying access to user root no password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:38:59 -0000 For many releases of Freebsd going back to 4.3 I have all ways used the default mysql user root localhost with no password which has been the default. With 8.0/mysql-server-5.0.86 I am denied access now. The mysql manual still says the normal install defaults to allowing access to user root with no password are in effect. After a fresh clean install of mysql Tried mysqladmin -u root drop test to delete the test db. Received this msg connect to srver at localhost failed access denied for user 'root@localost (using password: no) This in not suppose to happen. Is anyone else having this problem? Has the package for mysql50-server been changed to force securing user root with a password? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 05:13:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6971065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C665C8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id nAU5D0uq044888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:13:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id nAU5D0Jp044887; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:13:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA10492; Sun, 29 Nov 09 21:10:56 PST Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:10:57 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: psteele@maxiscale.com, olivermahmoudi@gmail.com Message-Id: <4b1353e1.Hqijnn9ZCQbcoq8k%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEAB5@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <87hbsexjd7.fsf@kobe.laptop> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB33BBEADA@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <6b4b2d2c0911291036v358eb322m5bdf470e450f78ba@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6b4b2d2c0911291036v358eb322m5bdf470e450f78ba@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sorting a device list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:13:02 -0000 Oliver Mahmoudi wrote: > you can try to delete the /dev/ad10 entry with sed and then just > append it to the end manually using the printf(1) utility like so: > > # ls /dev/ad* | sed s/"\/dev\/ad10"// | grep "/dev/ad" && printf > "/dev/ad10\n" Or strip the non-numerics from the beginning of each line, and put them back after sorting: # pfx=/dev/ad ; ls -d1 ${pfx}* | sed "s;$pfx;;" | sort -n | sed "s;^;$pfx;" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 05:41:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA661065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sarumont@sigil.org) Received: from mail.sigil.org (mail.sigil.org [208.86.227.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9889C8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220B8C1032; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:24:47 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sigil.org Received: from mail.sigil.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sigil.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LOKQ4m2Pwivq; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:24:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from illusion.portal.sigil.org (ip72-202-157-83.ks.ks.cox.net [72.202.157.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15A2FC0F64; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:24:31 -0600 (CST) Received: by illusion.portal.sigil.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:40:58 -0600 From: "Richard Kolkovich" Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:40:58 -0600 To: n dhert Message-ID: <20091130054058.GA3303@magus.portal.sigil.org> References: <8021a2660911282342p16e680efmf09f1fe4f4d0263e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8021a2660911282342p16e680efmf09f1fe4f4d0263e@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD magus 8.0-STABLE amd64 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Composed-With: vim X-PGP-Key: http://sarumont.sigil.org/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade print/cups-client (cups-client-1.3.10_4) fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:41:15 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote: > In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client : > ... > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when > making > a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/lib/crt1.o: could not read symbols: Bad value > gmake[1]: *** [bannertops] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.4.2/filter > ' > gmake: *** [all] Error 1 > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. I can confirm this same build error on my (amd64) box after upgrading to 8.= 0-STABLE (RELENG_8). cups-image was compiled previously on 8.0-RC1. --=20 Richard Kolkovich sarumont@sigil.org PGP Key: 0x9E54EF59 (http://pgp.mit.edu) --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksTWuoACgkQfXtD1KVAIbDzNgCg1s43FoVMRNOjROJIEB2W6Bgg LSUAn2/DbY5HbKZS6K39WPVgfYAK2qb1 =mI/M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 05:45:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F0D106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wenheping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f185.google.com (mail-pz0-f185.google.com [209.85.222.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5518FC1A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so2160552pzk.3 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:45:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=n7RUbqQIRC8Kvf/hmkJg722lwvSY+MgS//BVjAJ4S8M=; b=rmIV5rZZOSE0ZZOGE3YoY141xKNsKt0Hwe0kXpqh/SsBea5DuLDpTLN9ZRcqZppQCj C5ihYKcZx+ZiR0g2LnEpCuDspA4Ayi/K5G9+zdtKdXzsFmwErwqPN8hxrMrPt4Rx33o0 hAnnwqZlDrEFsGoo5URPaufbhD42fFvISUBMk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XysdR3qSS03Ahz9yhmrZSu0fdvuYy/W+ni47P7vButY0FE2GOSzmGPVYoC0ANYKZ/6 pjjjl0pa1PXsmVoRTLlQ/Gd4KBW/CXhyD23fatJkq9R5oxqDvdRAtG0Fw8iJGY9GMdV/ qTVuuzfWhh/8tBWlOx5xdW/L+9opZSbvHb4jA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.250.38 with SMTP id x38mr420699wfh.179.1259559923145; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:45:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091130054058.GA3303@magus.portal.sigil.org> References: <8021a2660911282342p16e680efmf09f1fe4f4d0263e@mail.gmail.com> <20091130054058.GA3303@magus.portal.sigil.org> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:45:23 +0800 Message-ID: <7be7a2800911292145i1b1fc631iaed20bab7ff4e167@mail.gmail.com> From: wen heping To: Richard Kolkovich , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade print/cups-client (cups-client-1.3.10_4) fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:45:24 -0000 On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Richard Kolkovich wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote: > > In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client : > > ... > > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when > > making > > a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > > /usr/lib/crt1.o: could not read symbols: Bad value > > gmake[1]: *** [bannertops] Error 1 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.4.2/filter > > ' > > gmake: *** [all] Error 1 > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. > > I can confirm this same build error on my (amd64) box after upgrading to > 8.0-STABLE (RELENG_8). > me too. > cups-image was compiled previously on 8.0-RC1. > > -- > > Richard Kolkovich > sarumont@sigil.org > PGP Key: 0x9E54EF59 (http://pgp.mit.edu) > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 06:12:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89661065679 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from forkandwait@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com (mail-iw0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9578FC1D for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1847196iwn.3 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:12:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=BsliOmYwjK3uaVG6Azl0Cm5+5KX0JeTVjOK43F8eArQ=; b=cR7vQu7hEBtdZB1MXhjEMbK68uscn8ARO2HQfM1eeMhcycbj87MC1+/MCjM4IoEnqR Mx6NKRTH/TapK4DfgYveiHdV0gs9wTPZ0wYMyfExBwBpE2BJOq9Xe8ZhjmR3sCH8kg87 N1+hvs0ukHoWXJQoD6ism8oC/hwyfEWC4bcMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SN3GqKHdp3U7mMmC/wdVJiNzp3Z3iMpotKVZ7IsVa8wny3t8iotZOzj6Vubh6x7Mkl 32unE5AUEay03MH2RcLiXSYR3MGroez0uvkByNBpe8+1z8wewgRjfW3zKQwXYNySjJau /98EBTgpDgiJvsuq56CEK3lAlMzvDT8HaD/Vk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.121.93 with SMTP id g29mr146370ibr.13.1259560219854; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:50:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:50:19 -0800 Message-ID: <8029763b0911292150t75039f71kc20f9715f697ce88@mail.gmail.com> From: w s To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: FreeBSD only on MacBook? Having problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:12:49 -0000 (x posted to http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=8827, my apologies, but no one seems interested there...) I am trying to follow the steps to install FreeBSD 8.0 on my MacBook. I don't want to dual boot or anything, so I am following along here: http://wiki.freebsd.org/AppleMacbook...15739bad407a8a (Note that earlier I managed to stomp all over the slices trying to partition without reading the directions...) However, it doesn't match my experience exactly, and I don't really have the FreeBSD background to compensate (long time Linux user, and never very hardware focused at all), so here are some starting questions (Note I am in the Fixit shell from the livefs CD): 1. Is "gpart" the same as "gpt"? 2. How can I "lose the GPT"? When I run "# gpart destory ad5" I get "gpart: Device busy". I presume that it is because / is mounted to run the livefs CD. So ... 3. Umm, what do I do now.... If I run "gpart show ad5" I get a bunch of stuff which I would have to type in manually -- let me know which pieces are important and I will do it. TIA! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 06:47:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81572106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E658FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAU6l6uJ057500; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:47:06 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk nAU6l6uJ057500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1259563627; bh=QbyuakKaMCGgL3K/2WzsLHafwqXBT47naau5EVKO4Fo=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4B136A63.40701@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Mon ,=2030=20Nov=202009=2006:46:59=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20 |Organization:=20Infracaninophile |User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20091129)|MIME-Versio n:=201.0|To:=20George=20Sanders=20|CC:=20fre ebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20mysterious=20"try"=20p rocess=20dumping=20core=20on=207.2-RELEASE=20...=20worried=0D=0A=2 0...|References:=20<917463.72731.qm@web111602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>| In-Reply-To:=20<917463.72731.qm@web111602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>|X-En igmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20mic alg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature" =3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig69DE7A8836ADADF6DC45565C"; b=QeMV+Cf1IkjqBSoA1W1ITnL4ppnrhpCp12jAMhjOHMKMUFLLYKxX7LVKdked7i9oO aClTVCNQG+CUyL5vckt3iuibtGCKCuYy71MkxMJUWJtGD3qxAkZh4SRNPl7f+AwQIe RiEvw2nmE8qb6pZpRnZRckQTjjq4bifA1mEtJRXs= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4B136A63.40701@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:46:59 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: George Sanders References: <917463.72731.qm@web111602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <917463.72731.qm@web111602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig69DE7A8836ADADF6DC45565C" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysterious "try" process dumping core on 7.2-RELEASE ... worried ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:47:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig69DE7A8836ADADF6DC45565C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable George Sanders wrote: >=20 > I see these two entries in my /var/log/messages: >=20 > Nov 24 18:08:41 hostname kernel: pid 25901 (try), uid 0: exited on sign= al 10 (core dumped) > Nov 24 18:10:29 hostname kernel: pid 35359 (try), uid 0: exited on sign= al 10 (core dumped) >=20 > But I've never heard of a "try" binary, and 'which try' shows nothing .= =2E. I believe this is generated by autoconf as one of its tests of OS behavio= ur. As such it's harmless. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig69DE7A8836ADADF6DC45565C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAksTamoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyaUgCeKLDYuucljOguzgRZt22UYrDb lO4An3EVhh2acIFm+JJUZx7F4xyR1q7Q =xSRZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig69DE7A8836ADADF6DC45565C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 07:17:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F511065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804F18FC1A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.240] (140.211.11.254) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:17:57 -0800 Message-ID: <4B13719A.4090505@p6m7g8.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:17:46 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: infrastructure-private@apache.org, rnoland@freebsd.org Subject: ZFSROOT / Custom Kernels [or upgrades] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:17:58 -0000 Hi All, 1) I followed this wiki link to setup our server [sigyn.apache.org] (Dell r710 with 4 disks mfid[0123] as raidz2) http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/RAIDZ2 Rebooted all was well. 2) off on another 'build' box [loki.apache.org], I had compiled release/8.0.0 userland+kernel [with LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes]. Whats the ETA for MFC from trunk->stable/8 for http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=199714 ** FWIW, loki is working nicely on 8.0-RELEASE geom+zfs. 3) I nfs mounted /usr/src, and /usr/obj on sigyn from loki. $ cd /usr/src $ sudo make installkernel KERNCONF=SIGYN It fails to mount from zfs:zroot upon reboot. Via great hoops and magic I got back into the fixit on remote console. I didn't see a loader.old or a zfsboot. So I repeated the steps in wiki to install zfsboot. Rebooted, same diff. Jumped backed to fixit and reverted the kernel to a stock GENERIC that worked the 1st time. Same error again. cd /boot $ mv kernel kernel.cust $ mv kernel.old kernel So assuming you are lucky enough to get a zfsroot system. Is there an actual upgrade path ? Am I missing something stupid ? Any help greatly appreciated. I have a few days to play with this machine before we forgoe zfsroot and drop back to geom gmirror. I'm at a datacenter for $work on Monday/Tuesday so I'll be spare over tonight. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 07:54:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85524106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458608FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-228-22.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.228.22]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D771E3BD; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:54:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id nAU7sERI001646; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:54:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:54:14 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Derrick Ryalls Message-Id: <20091130085414.8e5cef72.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.0 system setup with ZFS steps X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:54:18 -0000 Pease allow me a terminology note: On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:30:57 -0800, Derrick Ryalls wrote: > *Start FreeBSD normal install. > Select the flash device as the device to install to. > Use the entire device This step creates a slice covering the whole disk. Make sure that the slice is marked "active" when it should be the booting slice. > Install the bootMgr Only needed if you want to dual-boot something. In normal cases, writing the standard MBR is completely sufficient, because it only boots to FreeBSD. > Create a single slice taking up the entire device, mount to / A single partition - you've already created a slice. Terminology comparison from "Windows" land: A SLICE is a "DOS primary partition", and a PARTITION is comparable to a "logical volume inside an extended DOS partition". Partitions are the subdivisions of a slice holding a file system. > *pkg_add -r bash Really? :-) > Am I doing something stupid that may burn out the flash drive or cause > the system to be rather slow? Not that I see it. You could make sure that any mount options refering to the UFS / on the flash drive are honoring the fact that writes should be minimized, such as the "noatime" option. This shouldn't have negative effects on the booting process or the FreeBSD system running on it. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 08:46:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF876106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FD08FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NF1u6-0007bQ-7v>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:42 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NF1u6-0005w1-6F>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:47:25 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:46:43 -0000 I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite. oh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 09:07:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD2E1065676 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@mailinglist.ahhyes.net) Received: from mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308B88FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.1] (c122-106-11-224.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.11.224]) by mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAU97Hae021269 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:19 +1100 Message-ID: <4B138B43.4000809@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:15 +1100 From: alex User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:07:21 -0000 I didn't know these were released already, but I had a look. I was disappointed with the results. If anyone wants to look here is the link: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 Linux's ext4 seems to leave UFS and ZFS well behind in a number of benchmarks. O. Hartmann wrote: > I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the > Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded > I/O shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the > opposite. > > oh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 09:08:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430B31065693 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f221.google.com (mail-ew0-f221.google.com [209.85.219.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DCB8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so4072941ewy.13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:08:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UheMtlL/XmpyorEvN8Q4xGCIDmIUL9LndodNJrtsKeU=; b=EgQq4WwTMbBsYPFolz3uIitTXxmuagPdvgpVuwRrlBnLa1qcjpgfGjcipcfb27EqqK eqYA2eXZ0ThTABBvyEH5CLRCxLHa9Pl5MQLgEzc5t4ZejBd+X4e/STqFhW4YYSWgmcjT m3eDmwRDtwgeDV1cynvYdsrfWI0MNMBdpTcXI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=k9ik1LaWfo7AbaUzgopUC5PymljzRMCDCNHeSW/Dbo3HFxTlRAWbbaWA6eTMqVegqf 4/GshT5GqN4fcTB+OvlAQcRDEjMzbEynTuNHPlol/xD7BSyM99XkSYZ0Ng6aqSAywxFL chmZSwdLuHug/UVkSEBjlu3Gpw7vbOqqZsB6o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.37.20 with SMTP id v20mr1329091ebd.54.1259572121801; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:08:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B1337EE.9080101@rawbw.com> References: <4B1337EE.9080101@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:08:41 +0100 Message-ID: <3a142e750911300108n3b6d3724yde35700bf235fa40@mail.gmail.com> From: Paul B Mahol To: yuri@rawbw.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why I am getting message: "wlan0: ieee80211_new_state_locked: pending SCAN -> RUN transition lost" in 8.0 with ndis driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:08:43 -0000 On 11/30/09, Yuri wrote: > After upgrading to 8.0 I am getting a new message: wlan0: > /ieee80211_new_state_locked: pending SCAN/ -> RUN transition lost. > I use ndis driver with Broadcom WiFi card BCM94312MCGSG. That is debug message temporarely enabled unconditionally and then forgotten. There is race in if_ndis driver between how link state event is handled and how it is passed to net80211, causing such message. In almost all cases you can ignore it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 09:20:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A0F106568D; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B388FC25; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-253-248-99.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.248.99]:52050 helo=mx.exscape.org) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1NF2Q2-0007tV-41; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:19:44 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (macbookpro [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.exscape.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1065620D2D9; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:19:39 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Thomas Backman In-Reply-To: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:19:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: O. Hartmann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.248.99 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1NF2Q2-0007tV-41. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1NF2Q2-0007tV-41 0a328ffb3ff1b3eff2f43e069b7e0351 Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:20:02 -0000 On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the = Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O = shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the = opposite. Corrected link: = http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dfreebsd8_benchmarks= &num=3D1 And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... = The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( Regards, Thomas (PS. See my thread about horrible console latency during disk IO in the = archives, very related. DS.)= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 10:21:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A388C106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f220.google.com (mail-fx0-f220.google.com [209.85.220.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0323E8FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so3141400fxm.35 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:20:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UP76VeSlxmnBDPWimnvNb1XQMS6i3bqbgFsO0wiWMHU=; b=Uma80owOJwADCvVRa7pq0BO943wuEJGWVfbXXUQUf7heC0SiF+pVD2ejlW6OcD4hOz T5MfYRG6nSEVMuO1wzZgVYsWsZAzZUv3CU1fPBPdM92ecDkkcyQkiucyrcAym/PyGfdP 85W8lYquJU//SynfJ1dtLSG/s0iymC3eG7yrs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=d1mBDh8xB34AzdzfXWwKB0wTfbh7o55x200jDKo7/nFJK8Y9+YoKHTCXajbYtlsAlW GGbCVZ4LWlO7FwGVR9F8ArmpMoOKlrRovqPDHb2x0p/VF+Z53vW79Ti73AFnw0TNhDKI CbhhqNGkQNVcaWIvxwI1s9b7fqNR4r3BiY1/I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.190.216 with SMTP id y24mr391567hbh.185.1259576458589; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:20:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B13719A.4090505@p6m7g8.com> References: <4B13719A.4090505@p6m7g8.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:20:58 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: infrastructure-private@apache.org, questions@freebsd.org, rnoland@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFSROOT / Custom Kernels [or upgrades] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:21:00 -0000 2009/11/30 Philip M. Gollucci > Hi All, > > 1) > I followed this wiki link to setup our server [sigyn.apache.org] > (Dell r710 with 4 disks mfid[0123] as raidz2) > http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/RAIDZ2 > > Rebooted all was well. > > 2) off on another 'build' box [loki.apache.org], I had compiled > release/8.0.0 userland+kernel [with LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes]. > Whats the ETA for MFC from trunk->stable/8 for > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=199714 > > ** FWIW, loki is working nicely on 8.0-RELEASE geom+zfs. > > 3) I nfs mounted /usr/src, and /usr/obj on sigyn from loki. > $ cd /usr/src > $ sudo make installkernel KERNCONF=SIGYN > > It fails to mount from zfs:zroot upon reboot. Via great hoops and magic > I got back into the fixit on remote console. I didn't see a loader.old > or a zfsboot. So I repeated the steps in wiki to install zfsboot. > Rebooted, same diff. > > Jumped backed to fixit and reverted the kernel to a stock GENERIC that > worked the 1st time. Same error again. > cd /boot > $ mv kernel kernel.cust > $ mv kernel.old kernel > > So assuming you are lucky enough to get a zfsroot system. Is there an > actual upgrade path ? Am I missing something stupid ? > > Any help greatly appreciated. > > I have a few days to play with this machine before we forgoe zfsroot and > drop back to geom gmirror. > > I'm at a datacenter for $work on Monday/Tuesday so I'll be spare over > tonight. > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C > Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 > VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation > Committer, FreeBSD Foundation > Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. > Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > if you want to install the loader make sure you do a 'cd /usr/src/sys/boot/; make install' also never export the zpool before you reboot as this will clear it from the zpool.cache file and it wont boot proply From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 11:02:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968BC1065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalpin@muliahost.com) Received: from genesis.muliahost.com (genesis.muliahost.com [202.67.13.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148CA8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:02:57 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=muliahost.com; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:Importance; b=IxK1gZPZTRIooRghrCPSvo8Rj6Hx79e0TiffHMRLXunondLP6Yu+nTgMbOmeh/23rQfLFC2syb+5i40yab0qHSqGbzTXRs3rt/FtBkM403st7Ti4RUMHBZ8wd/x3E4/p; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=muliahost.com) by genesis.muliahost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NF3kZ-0004b7-0m for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:44:59 +0700 Received: from 203.153.106.5 ([203.153.106.5]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalpin@muliahost.com) by muliahost.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:44:59 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <2043.203.153.106.5.1259577899.squirrel@muliahost.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:44:59 +0700 (WIT) From: kalpin@muliahost.com To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - genesis.muliahost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - muliahost.com Cc: Subject: Transparent proxy using IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:02:58 -0000 Dear All, Is it possible to do like my requirement below? 1. Setup portfwd in my server listen on port 555 and forward all connection through this port to another server with same port or different port 2. All client which connected through this port, then remote server which landed to the end can see the client's IP. example: Client IP: 202.15.15.16 FreeBSD IP: 202.16.17.18 listen on port 555 Remote Server IP: 202.89.89.90 Client IP connect to 202.16.17.18 on port 555, and then FreeBSD forward it to 202.89.89.90 with same port or different port. Server with IP 202.89.89.90 can see Client's IP 202.15.15.16. I am using FreeBSD 7.2-stable. Thank you Kalpin Erlangga Silaen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 11:30:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463C51065696; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0769F8FC29; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.150.130.134] (helo=unknown) by marvin.harmless.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NF4Cv-000PVM-FG; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:14:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:14:10 +0100 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091130121410.00006f02@unknown> Organization: Harmless Digital Bt X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: harti@freebsd.org Subject: bsnmpd + zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:30:36 -0000 Hello, I've read in the 8.0 detailed release notes [1] that bsnmpd(1) now supports ZFS OIDs. So far i wasn't able to lure this support out of it, and I'm neither able to find any information on this in its manual or among the MIB files, or in the complete snmp walk of the host. I've enabled mbII nad hostres, and haven't seen any more modules that could be related in the example config, nor among /usr/lib/snmp_*.so. Could someone tell me please how to monitor a ZFS system on 8 using bsnmpd, what am I missing here? [1] http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#USERLAND (I've CC'd harti@ because he's the author according to bsnmpd(1) ) -- Sincerely, Gergely CZUCZY Harmless Digital Bt +36-30-9702963 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 11:38:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603E71065670; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187228FC17; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NF4a1-0008Cf-Lf>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:38:09 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NF4a1-0001PC-K5>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:38:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4B13AECE.2060005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:38:54 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Backman References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> In-Reply-To: <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:38:12 -0000 Thomas Backman wrote: > On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite. > Corrected link: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > > And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( > > Regards, > Thomas > > (PS. See my thread about horrible console latency during disk IO in the archives, very related. DS.) Hello Thomas. I recall myself having had similar problems during heavy disk I/O (UFS and ZFS) with stuck console, stuck clients and especially stuck X11-clients. The discussion was really 'hot', but in the end no clear statement was made whether this is disk-i/o related or a deeper problem in the scheduler. Sorry for the lack of the link, I thought Phoronix is well known ... Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 11:45:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3DB106566C; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6978FC17; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-253-248-99.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.248.99]:51556 helo=mx.exscape.org) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1NF4gM-0005Km-5O; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:44:44 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (macbookpro [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.exscape.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 628D2D5B3; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:44:43 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Thomas Backman In-Reply-To: <4B13AECE.2060005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:44:41 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9D847D35-A5A5-4A31-B045-76A39DEE8E54@exscape.org> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <4B13AECE.2060005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: O. Hartmann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.248.99 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1NF4gM-0005Km-5O. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1NF4gM-0005Km-5O ab1e8529ff33366bca8d9271b37b652d Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:45:36 -0000 On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Thomas Backman wrote: >> On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read = the Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded = I/O shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the = opposite. >> Corrected link: = http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dfreebsd8_benchmarks= &num=3D1 >> And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to = suck... The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( >> Regards, >> Thomas >> (PS. See my thread about horrible console latency during disk IO in = the archives, very related. DS.) >=20 > Hello Thomas. > I recall myself having had similar problems during heavy disk I/O (UFS = and ZFS) with stuck console, stuck clients and especially stuck = X11-clients. The discussion was really 'hot', but in the end no clear = statement was made whether this is disk-i/o related or a deeper problem = in the scheduler. >=20 > Sorry for the lack of the link, I thought Phoronix is well known ... >=20 > Oliver That's too bad, re: the scheduling. It seems to be a quite universal = problem, yet I haven't seen much effort spent on working on the problem. = :/ Re: phoronix, I commented mostly because the site is .com and not .org, = so I came to a parked domain when I clicked your link. :) Also, I figured linking directly to the article will help the archives. Regards, Thomas= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 11:51:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60546106568F for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from ostracod.unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0248FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (53.78-246-213.ippool.namesco.net [213.246.78.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by ostracod.unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAUBqq3V012305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:52:53 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4B13B1DB.3090106@unsane.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:51:55 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: w s References: <8029763b0911292150t75039f71kc20f9715f697ce88@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8029763b0911292150t75039f71kc20f9715f697ce88@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD only on MacBook? Having problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:51:58 -0000 w s wrote: > (x posted to http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=8827, my > apologies, but no one seems interested there...) > > I am trying to follow the steps to install FreeBSD 8.0 on my MacBook. > I don't want to dual boot or anything, so I am following along here: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/AppleMacbook...15739bad407a8a > > (Note that earlier I managed to stomp all over the slices trying to > partition without reading the directions...) > > However, it doesn't match my experience exactly, and I don't really > have the FreeBSD background to compensate (long time Linux user, and > never very hardware focused at all), so here are some starting > questions (Note I am in the Fixit shell from the livefs CD): > > 1. Is "gpart" the same as "gpt"? > Almost, gpart is the successor of gpt. the wiki still needs a little updating, (seems to be part gpt and part gpart based) > 2. How can I "lose the GPT"? When I run "# gpart destory ad5" I get > "gpart: Device busy". I presume that it is because / is mounted to run > the livefs CD. So ... > > Not quite, if you run gpart show you should get a list of stuff on ad5, so before you can destroy the GPT you have to delete the stuff using it,a quick example using an md device: (reminder just in case, this will remove ANY partitions on the disk, but you already know that :) [root@ostracod /scratch]# gpart show md0 => 34 19933 md0 GPT (9.8M) 34 19933 1 freebsd-ufs (9.7M) [root@ostracod /scratch]# gpart destroy md0 gpart: Device busy [root@ostracod /scratch]# gpart delete -i 1 md0 md0p1 deleted [root@ostracod /scratch]# gpart destroy md0 md0 destroyed > 3. Umm, what do I do now.... > > If I run "gpart show ad5" I get a bunch of stuff which I would have to > type in manually -- let me know which pieces are important and I will > do it. > > Hope that helps, gpart (and GPT) is great once you get used to it but its got a learning curve. Vince > TIA! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 12:13:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4009A106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62778FC1C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so817798qwb.7 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:13:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=otS3Sy8WFK8r68aRzFHUsEu+ys6TfsKc7d70kfTQzl4=; b=vGbNDZBzrdf9//RDSXm6YC9gLQdVC1aIHdcSR75GmyLvljRPGwtdLRghv1BTM94yJ7 Z9RApepGzJ+ODv23/N2bbHh8+qQgsXjYAR7BAFJXkQO1KhRVDsIQdZ3/htWK2qT6Dnj7 UKEOgaBT0HS2DsVYraOKTKg7/WP1sO0PDxv3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=OOCBH/mPdm/avvngm8dXLyMraJghpy3uTeIWoRNp1Mv8G0ZDsgnpKOtNlyzfAYqYOb kt/J+oM4JpMQxsotXXBEdqkb37aBnmUalsRXnLF59SoRFqV1ytD25kikMR1FovME1v6H PXzYRo8IDfGOJeYTcVYxpwQG3ipPwfHNhEZ/o= Received: by 10.224.78.36 with SMTP id i36mr1149322qak.194.1259583235049; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:13:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from medusa.wi.rr.com (CPE-65-29-54-222.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm11422998qwk.31.2009.11.30.04.13.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:13:54 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: Warren Block Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:13:24 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.3.3; i386; ; ) References: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911300613.24224.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpdate on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:13:56 -0000 On Sunday 29 November 2009 21:38:04 Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, ajtiM wrote: > > I have new installed FreeBSD 8.0 and in rc.conf I have: > > > > ntpdate_enable="YES" > > ntpdate_hosts="ntp1.cs.wisc.edu" > > > > When I boot computer I get a message there are no this host but when I > > run /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp1.cs.wisc.edu it works. > > > > I had the same in rc.conf on FreeBSD 7.2 and it works all the time. All > > settings on FreeBSD8.0 are the same as I had on 7.2. > > Might you have a Realtek network card? > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > Yes, I have realtek card too but it is not active. DHCP is on sk0 and as I wrote I never had problems with that. Maybe is different now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 13:04:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA18106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6978FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:04:15 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEADtLE0vUnw4T/2dsb2JhbADVQYQxBIFy Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net ([212.159.14.19]) by relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2009 12:35:18 +0000 Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1NF5TK-0008Fa-L0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:35:18 +0000 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NF5TJ-0000Lw-Uy for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:35:18 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:35:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200911282335.18987.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911301235.17753.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: 707fd7b5224a3c7433d2dea774d66eaa Subject: Re: problem with Olympus USB camera on 8.0 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:04:16 -0000 On Sunday 29 November 2009, krad wrote: > 2009/11/28 Mike Clarke > > > The camera in question is an Olympus C-2040Z, I've had no problems > > using it with 6.4. I tried rev. 7 some time ago but plugging the > > camera in always caused a panic and crash so I stayed with 6.4. Now > > that 8.0 is out I'd like to move on and the good news is that with > > 8.0 I can connect the camera without a panic but the bad news is > > that although the system detects the camera I'm not able to access > > it. On plugging in the camera I see the following console messages: > > > > ugen0.2: at usbus0 > > umass0: on > > usbus0 umass0: =A0SCSI over (unknown 0x00); quirks =3D 0x0100 > > umass0: could not setup required transfers, USB_ERR_INVAL > > device_attach: umass0 attach returned 6 [snip] > try connecting it via a powerd usb hub Unfortunately I don't have one, perhaps my simplest solution would be to=20 get a USB card reader and bypass the camera's USB system. > or forcing the usb speed down to version 1 I tried this by building a test kernel without ehci but that had no=20 effect and the camera was still inaccessible.. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 13:24:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68E7106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A148FC19 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NF6ET-0000bE-9f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:24:01 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:24:01 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:24:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:23:44 +0100 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090928) In-Reply-To: <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:24:04 -0000 Thomas Backman wrote: > On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite. > Corrected link: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > > And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( About the only useful result of the "Phoronix benchmark suite" in general is that benchmarking is hard, and that though tedious, statistical analisys and multiple runs actually have a realistic purpose. I suspect their runs have a very large variance between tests and are only useful in "order-of-magnitude" sort of comparisons. Most of their CPU-bound benchmarks therefore show results with insignificant differences, and most of the others benchmark the compilers. On the other hand, disk IO benchmarks like http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=7 reflect the real state of the things, which can be easily demonstrated by a large number of other benchmarks (e.g. blogbench). AFAIK there is some speculation among developers about why is this so, but nothing definite yet. For what it's worth, ZFS effectively does a fair bit of its own IO scheduling, so persons interested in this particular aspect should also try the tests with ZFS. My own tests (with other benchmarks) show that ZFS helps significantly, though the cumulative result is still significantly worse than Linux's. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 13:30:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D591065692 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4528FC15 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NF6KJ-0002uF-Sa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:30:03 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:30:03 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:30:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:27:08 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <4B0F3D3B.9010109@sprinthost.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090928) In-Reply-To: <4B0F3D3B.9010109@sprinthost.ru> Sender: news Subject: Re: 2 processes reproducible read same file with different speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:30:05 -0000 cronfy wrote: > Hello. > > I've noticed a very weird behavior of 2 Apache processes that shold read > the same file to process a request (they configured to read it on every > request). One spends about 6ms to read the file, and second spends about > 114ms (I used ktrace to find this out). Every time, on every request, > the problem is reproducible. Apaches are the same, the only difference > between them that they are working from different users to serve > different sites. Same binary, same config. > > First Apache used to work in the same way some time ago - it spent > ~120ms to read the file. But once it changed and now it is working fast. > > Restarts of Apache do not look to affect on anything. > > The file that Apache should read is 315k long. Apache reads it by small > blocks of 4096 bytes each. May be FreeBSD has some memory about how > process is working with files and after some time enables some > optimization or caching?.... I just do not have any clue... :( > > Can anyone explain this please? In addition to the other reply you got, there could also be a problem of different link speeds. If one user is connected by a slower link any you are doing blocking send()-after-read() operation, this will account for requests being processed at different speeds. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 13:47:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D17610656CD; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCD88FC08; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D1E2EBC3F; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:47:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:47:04 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:47:06 -0000 In response to Ivan Voras : > Thomas Backman wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > >> I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite. > > Corrected link: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > > > > And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( "All operating systems were left with their default options during the installation process..." It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance improvements can be made in most cases by raising it. While it would be nice if FreeBSD shipped with a more performant default setting, it would also be nice if mindless benchmark drones would quit assuming that every system ships pre-configured to perform optimally in their benchmarks. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 14:13:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7B11065693; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: from alogis.com (firewall.solit-ag.de [212.184.102.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710958FC19; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alogis.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAUE2XS7057180; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:02:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: (from hk@localhost) by alogis.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id nAUE2X2R057179; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:02:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:02:33 +0100 From: Holger Kipp To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20091130140233.GC51377@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:13:59 -0000 On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > >In response to Ivan Voras : > > > >>Thomas Backman wrote: > >>>On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>> > >>>>I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the > >>>>Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O > >>>>shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the > >>>>opposite. > >>>Corrected link: > >>>http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > >>> > >>>And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... > >>>The only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :( > > > >"All operating systems were left with their default options during the > >installation process..." > > > >It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is non- > >optimal for most hardware and that significant performance improvements > >can be made in most cases by raising it. > > On the other hand, random IO is negatively influenced by readahead :) Parallel Random I/O gives better results on Raid 5 than a single sequential read :-) I also found FreeBSD UFS with Softupdates handling directories with many small files much better than Linux and ReiserFS (same hardware) - at least a simple ls returned much quicker on FreeBSD (factor 5 to 10). So it is always a matter of what you intend to do with the filesystem - is it for logging, for mailserver-storage, for database usage, for fileserver, webserver etc. (with or without changing atime), with redundancy (raid 1, 5, 10) or using zfs, etc. With FreeBSD we have a system that works ok out of the box, but for real-world usage needs some tuning to be optimised for the specific task. Regards, Holger From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 14:16:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE367106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5AE8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-228-22.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.228.22]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233523CA8E; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:16:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id nAUEGpcV003007; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:16:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:16:51 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Mike Clarke Message-Id: <20091130151651.7ad83c2e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <200911301235.17753.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <200911282335.18987.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <200911301235.17753.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with Olympus USB camera on 8.0 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:16:54 -0000 On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:35:17 +0000, Mike Clarke wrote: > Unfortunately I don't have one, perhaps my simplest solution would be to > get a USB card reader and bypass the camera's USB system. I found this solution very handy. With my camera (Canon S3 IS), it's easier to get the card out of the camera than plugging the cable into the camera. Scripting (automatically moving pictures from card, placing them into ~/cam, dating and renumbering) is easy, too. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 14:24:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9E4106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84928FC1A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NF79d-0002rG-6b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:23:05 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:23:05 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:23:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:22:20 +0100 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20091130140233.GC51377@intserv.int1.b.intern> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090928) In-Reply-To: <20091130140233.GC51377@intserv.int1.b.intern> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:24:38 -0000 Holger Kipp wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> On the other hand, random IO is negatively influenced by readahead :) > > Parallel Random I/O gives better results on Raid 5 than a single sequential > read :-) I also found FreeBSD UFS with Softupdates handling directories with > many small files much better than Linux and ReiserFS (same hardware) - at least > a simple ls returned much quicker on FreeBSD (factor 5 to 10). Yes, until ext4 I was always surprised how bad Linux ext2/3 handled large metadata operations (file deletions and creations). UFS+SU definitely has places where it shines. > With FreeBSD we have a system that works ok out of the box, but for real-world > usage needs some tuning to be optimised for the specific task. Of course. But I think the issue at hand is that there really is more work to do to catch up on average IO performance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 14:35:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CA7106566B; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D908F8FC1D; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2009 09:35:35 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.7-GA) with ESMTP id QIP21866; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:35:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2009 09:35:35 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:35:34 -0500 To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:35:36 -0000 Bill Moran writes: > It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is > non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance > improvements can be made in most cases by raising it. Documentation/discussion where? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 14:46:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44717106566C; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148408FC14; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E628EBC0A; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:16 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Robert Huff Message-Id: <20091130094616.68a60c0d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:46:18 -0000 In response to Robert Huff : > > Bill Moran writes: > > > It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is > > non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance > > improvements can be made in most cases by raising it. > > Documentation/discussion where? http://www.google.com/search?q=freebsd+vfs.read_max ... although it doesn't seem to be "officially" documented anywhere. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 14:50:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EF91065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297458FC1B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NF7Zk-0000qC-5l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:50:04 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:50:04 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:50:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:46:46 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090928) In-Reply-To: <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:50:06 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Bill Moran writes: > >> It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is >> non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance >> improvements can be made in most cases by raising it. > > Documentation/discussion where? There is no documentation except for the sysctl documentation itself: "vfs.read_max: Cluster read-ahead max block count" but it depends on the load - it helps sequential reads, will probably do nothing for other kinds of loads. It is also UFS-only. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 15:23:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E72106568B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.meyers@lancaster.ac.uk) Received: from sideburn.lancs.ac.uk (sideburn.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.17.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3319E8FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from exchange-fe3.lancs.ac.uk ([148.88.18.5] helo=exchange-fe3.lancs.local) by sideburn.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NF7jU-0007yZ-86 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:00:08 +0000 Received: from exchange-be8.lancs.local ([10.42.26.7]) by exchange-fe3.lancs.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:59:54 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:00:06 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0, Perl 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 Thread-Index: Acpxzc24C/ruVN3BEd7GhwAZuTOjXw== From: "Meyers, Dan" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 14:59:54.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[C69E54E0:01CA71CD] Subject: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0, Perl 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:23:47 -0000 We've had a setup for a while where we have a FreeBSD server running FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 and using the rlm_perl module to examine a database and do some fairly complex checking of the returned data before deciding whether to accept or reject the radius request. This works fine on FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 with Perl 5.8.9 and FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 (all compiled from source out of the same copy of the ports tree. Perl compiled without threading support as that causes issues with our database connections when under high load). We had need to reinstall one of the servers over the weekend (We went from i386 to amd64 a while back, and now we're periodically getting mysql [replicated across multiple servers, but with a ruby on rails app running on and talking to/updating the mysql master] hanging on what should be very simple requests and causing our Ruby on Rails apps to die. We're going back to i386 to see if that resolves the issue, as the rails code hasn't been changed so it shouldn't be that. As far as we can tell, it is actually mysql that is hanging, not a lost connection from rails or similar). Anyway, as FreeBSD 8.0 is now out we decided to go with that. But now I can't get radius to start with rlm_perl enabled. Our radius script uses (among other things) the 'Switch' perl module. On trying to run radius -X I get the following: Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Filter/Util/Call/Call.so' for module Filter::Util::Call: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Filter/Util/Call/Call.so: Undefined symbol "PL_stack_max" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/DynaLoader.pm line 226. at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/Switch.pm line 11 and radius refuses to start. I've not got the perl Filter module installed, and installing it makes no difference. But this seems to be a minor symptom of a larger problem - The freeradius provided example script doesn't use Switch, but does use Data:Dumper. When I install a completely different server (a VM) with FreeBSD 8.0 and run up perl and FreeRADIUS using the example.pl rlm_perl script, I get much the same error, but for a slightly different variable: Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Data/Dumper/Dumper.so' for module Data::Dumper: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Data/Dumper/Dumper.so: Undefined symbol "PL_sv_undef" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/XSLoader.pm line 70. at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/Data/Dumper.pm line 36 I've tried commenting and uncommenting various modules in the script I want to run. Time::HiRes also causes a moan about PL_sv_undef. File::Basename seems to work OK. What's odd is that if I run up a test perl script that just does a 'use Switch;' and then has a switch statement in that prints out some text then it works absolutely fine from the command line. I have to admit to being a bit out of my depth here. I'm not sure if the issue is with freeradius/rlm_perl, perl itself, or what. As a last ditch test, I tried FreeBSD 7.2 i386 in a VM. I was very surprised when I got the same error, even though this server that is now having issues was FreeBSD 7.2 (admittedly on amd64) and having no problems whatsoever. I am completely stumped. Why are these symbols undefined, and what do I need to do to get things working? Thanks in advance. Apologies for the wall of text. -- Dan Meyers Network Specialist, Lancaster University E-Mail: d.meyers@lancaster.ac.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 15:35:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775E9106568B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316228FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAUFZkZn067866; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:35:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id nAUFZkX8067863; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:35:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:35:46 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: ajtiM In-Reply-To: <200911300613.24224.lumiwa@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> <200911300613.24224.lumiwa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:35:46 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpdate on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:35:47 -0000 On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, ajtiM wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 21:38:04 Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, ajtiM wrote: >>> I have new installed FreeBSD 8.0 and in rc.conf I have: >>> >>> ntpdate_enable="YES" >>> ntpdate_hosts="ntp1.cs.wisc.edu" >>> >>> When I boot computer I get a message there are no this host but when I >>> run /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp1.cs.wisc.edu it works. >>> >>> I had the same in rc.conf on FreeBSD 7.2 and it works all the time. All >>> settings on FreeBSD8.0 are the same as I had on 7.2. >> >> Might you have a Realtek network card? > > Yes, I have realtek card too but it is not active. DHCP is on sk0 and as I > wrote I never had problems with that. Maybe is different now? The 8.0 if_re code had the card go through a link up/down pair three times on startup. By the time DHCP had gotten to it, other stuff had already errored out (sendmail in my case). yongari fixed it with a patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c.diff?r1=1.162;r2=1.163 Your problem sounds like it might be similar. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 15:40:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC156106566B; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979B88FC1F; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NF8Mi-000555-KD>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:40:40 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NF8Mi-0000sX-IM>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:40:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4B13E7A5.3010202@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:41:25 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: ports/print/cups-base: failed to update via portmaster since yesterday X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:40:42 -0000 portmaster -dav fails updating ports since yesterday, stopping at print/cups-base with the following error message: [...] client.o(.text+0x1c95): In function `encrypt_client': /usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.4.2/scheduler/client.c:3217: undefined reference to `_httpReadGNUTLS' client.o(.text+0x1ca4):/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.4.2/scheduler/client.c:3218: undefined reference to `_httpWriteGNUTLS' gmake[1]: *** [cupsd] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.4.2/scheduler' gmake: *** [all] Error 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-base. ===>>> make failed for print/cups-base ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for cups-base-1.3.10_4 failed ===>>> Aborting update ---- Configuration of cups-base is with all but debugging options set, disabling all configurational options, especially GNU_TLS also fails updating the port. Is there any solution to fix this? What's wrong? Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 15:46:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63973106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F248FC1D for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so3143271fxm.14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:46:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HPn8Rq46YVeU9AQTkAgnlSrbyiZyYJTofKq25wGzCxE=; b=pUD+WcV9uxLajJcF/d6pGGj+PQiOhsrGFW9cj4rdEmZPAZcQywQT0EcO0FefefQOrI 95EK2eJS9KP/mjsHFWCWK06wP0BKOQ7pRpDTf8CJhkvRk/08CV/zex1ctxLC8N3liP+d iaihG793c+FHAbvr1kQeuw8zn3soFbHhqqTWE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VcQQ0HffuYqgpdlP8qucaaVfiQFkPO7Wt8lWcc0DHpjdbergWOrhps8lwXoj/7hmHj 19hfLmtZC6uAaPwhNyAexnuGWmW4gl+G3kTuY/O6zQf2bww8Y9DkUoopo6PFSfk3EpJR T/xO24m09VQjsq0Zh1oIODemomNjUNP5WyV4w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.144.102 with SMTP id n38mr413908hba.176.1259595959964; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:45:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2043.203.153.106.5.1259577899.squirrel@muliahost.com> References: <2043.203.153.106.5.1259577899.squirrel@muliahost.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:45:59 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: kalpin@muliahost.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Transparent proxy using IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:46:01 -0000 2009/11/30 > Dear All, > > Is it possible to do like my requirement below? > > 1. Setup portfwd in my server listen on port 555 and forward all > connection through this port to another server with same port or different > port > 2. All client which connected through this port, then remote server which > landed to the end can see the client's IP. > > example: > > Client IP: 202.15.15.16 > FreeBSD IP: 202.16.17.18 listen on port 555 > Remote Server IP: 202.89.89.90 > > Client IP connect to 202.16.17.18 on port 555, and then FreeBSD forward it > to 202.89.89.90 with same port or different port. Server with IP > 202.89.89.90 can see Client's IP 202.15.15.16. > > I am using FreeBSD 7.2-stable. > > Thank you > > Kalpin Erlangga Silaen > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > you can but you will need to do some natting otherwise the return traffic will go direct to host a from c and not via your box host b or you could use nc via inetd eg some_service stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/bin/nc nc -n -w 3 hostC port_on_hostc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 15:48:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14517106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933D28FC1D for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so3145725fxm.14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:48:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sIfZwm8T6W1RYrMp8TU5Wxvr7hfiQv4cJcCJLXGa+Ms=; b=KLSBtRjq1lp+uDPug6lk5ingppqmdjhZ5/qR5EG6l3gL4Zz4AlmNFha1SDsnUHI0Kn N3eRiqp/pAGUaWHxj77trV++g+yme+Wu+aPJllWuEJzLXDykVpiYtu0NaNOZe/2lGvrP H73fN1h/82fpULbZ3WiO/rBoLORJjesrw1bsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nDVlPyt4izxaAY9TTbBUeUGk0wVta0rksw1wRwA4LuIR1JlQd99J7hCCjhmiD573dq oBgkK+PdqDW4IQgqvVKBNdb3rye/B//O0+0JnJdG/DZDga6EwYZVmew7/bI/Wqc48zis LzrKSrkvpknKFiaYFH0iSjtpad6e83YVZ+v0o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.190.216 with SMTP id y24mr426998hbh.185.1259596081211; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:48:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091130121410.00006f02@unknown> References: <20091130121410.00006f02@unknown> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:48:01 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Gergely CZUCZY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: harti@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsnmpd + zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:48:03 -0000 2009/11/30 Gergely CZUCZY > Hello, > > I've read in the 8.0 detailed release notes [1] that bsnmpd(1) now > supports ZFS OIDs. So far i wasn't able to lure this support out of it, > and I'm neither able to find any information on this in its manual or > among the MIB files, or in the complete snmp walk of the host. > > I've enabled mbII nad hostres, and haven't seen any more modules that > could be related in the example config, nor among /usr/lib/snmp_*.so. > > Could someone tell me please how to monitor a ZFS system on 8 using > bsnmpd, what am I missing here? > > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#USERLAND > > (I've CC'd harti@ because he's the author according to bsnmpd(1) ) > > -- > Sincerely, > Gergely CZUCZY > Harmless Digital Bt > > +36-30-9702963 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I saw that and thought something similar. All I could find though is when you can browse the fs on the box it now reports the fs as 'zfs' rather than 'other', useful but not that exciting 8( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 16:18:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE806106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.meyers@lancaster.ac.uk) Received: from sideburn.lancs.ac.uk (sideburn.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.17.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19EC8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from exchange-fe6.lancs.ac.uk ([148.88.26.6] helo=exchange-fe6.lancs.local) by sideburn.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NF8x4-00049g-49 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:18:14 +0000 Received: from exchange-be8.lancs.local ([10.42.26.7]) by exchange-fe6.lancs.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:18:00 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:18:12 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0, Perl 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 Thread-Index: Acpxzc24C/ruVN3BEd7GhwAZuTOjXwACSgNg References: From: "Meyers, Dan" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 16:18:00.0650 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF9A9AA0:01CA71D8] Subject: RE: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0, Perl 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:18:16 -0000 Had a bit more of a poke. Same symptoms under FreeBSD 7.2 amd64. I am now looking towards there being some kind of issue with the perl or freeradius in ports/packages. Has anyone else seen this at all?=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Meyers, Dan > Sent: 30 November 2009 15:00 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0,Perl 5.8.9 > or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 >=20 > We've had a setup for a while where we have a FreeBSD server running > FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 and using the rlm_perl module to examine a database > and > do some fairly complex checking of the returned data before deciding > whether to accept or reject the radius request. This works fine on > FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 with Perl 5.8.9 and FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 (all compiled > from source out of the same copy of the ports tree. Perl compiled > without threading support as that causes issues with our database > connections when under high load). >=20 > We had need to reinstall one of the servers over the weekend (We went > from i386 to amd64 a while back, and now we're periodically getting > mysql [replicated across multiple servers, but with a ruby on rails app > running on and talking to/updating the mysql master] hanging on what > should be very simple requests and causing our Ruby on Rails apps to > die. We're going back to i386 to see if that resolves the issue, as the > rails code hasn't been changed so it shouldn't be that. As far as we > can > tell, it is actually mysql that is hanging, not a lost connection from > rails or similar). >=20 > Anyway, as FreeBSD 8.0 is now out we decided to go with that. But now I > can't get radius to start with rlm_perl enabled. Our radius script uses > (among other things) the 'Switch' perl module. On trying to run radius > -X I get the following: >=20 > Can't load > '/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Filter/Util/Call/Call.so' for > module Filter::Util::Call: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Filter/Util/Call/Call.so: > Undefined > symbol "PL_stack_max" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/DynaLoader.pm > line 226. > at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/Switch.pm line 11 >=20 > and radius refuses to start. >=20 > I've not got the perl Filter module installed, and installing it makes > no difference. But this seems to be a minor symptom of a larger problem > - >=20 > The freeradius provided example script doesn't use Switch, but does use > Data:Dumper. When I install a completely different server (a VM) with > FreeBSD 8.0 and run up perl and FreeRADIUS using the example.pl > rlm_perl > script, I get much the same error, but for a slightly different > variable: >=20 > Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Data/Dumper/Dumper.so' > for module Data::Dumper: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/Data/Dumper/Dumper.so: Undefined > symbol "PL_sv_undef" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/XSLoader.pm > line > 70. > at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/Data/Dumper.pm line 36 >=20 > I've tried commenting and uncommenting various modules in the script I > want to run. Time::HiRes also causes a moan about PL_sv_undef. > File::Basename seems to work OK. What's odd is that if I run up a test > perl script that just does a 'use Switch;' and then has a switch > statement in that prints out some text then it works absolutely fine > from the command line. I have to admit to being a bit out of my depth > here. I'm not sure if the issue is with freeradius/rlm_perl, perl > itself, or what. >=20 > As a last ditch test, I tried FreeBSD 7.2 i386 in a VM. I was very > surprised when I got the same error, even though this server that is > now > having issues was FreeBSD 7.2 (admittedly on amd64) and having no > problems whatsoever. I am completely stumped. Why are these symbols > undefined, and what do I need to do to get things working? >=20 > Thanks in advance. Apologies for the wall of text. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 16:36:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA4F106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692728FC12 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-154-218-170.ard.bellsouth.net [72.154.218.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAUFvNqU032417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:57:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <4B13719A.4090505@p6m7g8.com> References: <4B13719A.4090505@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:57:18 -0600 Message-Id: <1259596638.2315.186.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: infrastructure-private@apache.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFSROOT / Custom Kernels [or upgrades] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:36:57 -0000 On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 02:17 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Hi All, > > 1) > I followed this wiki link to setup our server [sigyn.apache.org] > (Dell r710 with 4 disks mfid[0123] as raidz2) > http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/RAIDZ2 > > Rebooted all was well. > > 2) off on another 'build' box [loki.apache.org], I had compiled > release/8.0.0 userland+kernel [with LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes]. > Whats the ETA for MFC from trunk->stable/8 for > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=199714 I set the MFC timer for 2 weeks from the initial commit. You don't say what error that you are getting, but the loader is updated during installworld or via direct make install from /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader. The 8.0-RELEASE code has the fix for raidz boot, but may still have issues with disks larger than 2TB. You need to make sure that you have installed the fixed gptzfsboot code to the drives. If you have not yet done an installworld, then it will be /usr/obj/sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot/gptzfsboot It sounds like when you install the new kernel, the block numbers are overflowing. (which should be addressed by the fix in 8.0) robert. > ** FWIW, loki is working nicely on 8.0-RELEASE geom+zfs. > > 3) I nfs mounted /usr/src, and /usr/obj on sigyn from loki. > $ cd /usr/src > $ sudo make installkernel KERNCONF=SIGYN > > It fails to mount from zfs:zroot upon reboot. Via great hoops and magic > I got back into the fixit on remote console. I didn't see a loader.old > or a zfsboot. So I repeated the steps in wiki to install zfsboot. > Rebooted, same diff. > > Jumped backed to fixit and reverted the kernel to a stock GENERIC that > worked the 1st time. Same error again. > cd /boot > $ mv kernel kernel.cust > $ mv kernel.old kernel > > So assuming you are lucky enough to get a zfsroot system. Is there an > actual upgrade path ? Am I missing something stupid ? > > Any help greatly appreciated. > > I have a few days to play with this machine before we forgoe zfsroot and > drop back to geom gmirror. > > I'm at a datacenter for $work on Monday/Tuesday so I'll be spare over > tonight. > > > > > > -- Robert Noland FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 17:22:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9811065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anti_spam256@yahoo.ca) Received: from web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E53C8FC1A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16514 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Nov 2009 17:22:17 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1259601737; bh=P6ritYIxVjkFwrCVwQC76PH5SlZUUlqEYDgON5Pb2DE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z8P9ypKNd9mUw7KACfIOD3qTg6Bf4urybmLPaJYANCaEaV08UQn/b40R2O0hdiz7wR2fpkjRFhtlyEOCbMKCTda95SD+XIbH4cRQWKQjdMl48/vceAlLujVeBmD+B1nhcPaTC+TTtxU4QmCtYl3TQJWb90X6WW+6jKdXoK0tDNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XdC3yKjqGi1FRiP4hhhZXiBwcSkqaSQUvrkz1mWn6GJdycUm1Vl7l8oN+rzRweFmCFnECjnif6DmHWzqgw/L6uNDnVENoVHOmVpY7cLChAsZk9tBQkKtWFRvjt2BRkX2dGZkhkVDNxgJYXHLE17EvBezXk5C+Xq/YmT4KQL5J4I=; Message-ID: <774934.16234.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: J1OXsVUVM1lv_3x1NjtpnlEGKcdFnDq.SFkd2cXdmoI1.EuYu4KNdj3f31aKh1ZNUHm43uE8bn3KK82WO08luzim7eL7flHKAYsiJhq9R8vhDrwcmXxkXal15ZcvF.LXSmsVcoGDx5Ona49sX6YQcTBLn8B4N61LauUPQDzFXvrfWLvhfrd0SRMVqrwEEguKsT6XusslJqDFa_qluKvw0cBR5FVHc6sKpqQ2zh1C3GQWR1sPT_ENwR1yNv9zJaz0SmfKtk64GjUd_ynVNsNgpufAP8Ig2_DRtdDKdV1XmTWeI4a0Eg18SBTDVFH.knNPtdh16Uei.uXS8J98AKsCjFT2ROY2soygV5sR947WG9HVK529MjHgg1mzV6RdJhj8MWUzXblbmVy8.fN54K7q4Gxy9D7Ro.9rUWqtz5BuT7Yy_lx7IpAinvEj1Kpg4o.DrwVhLoXpnyDjnmrfuRfcgsmVDSQ2xf3n0eQpeCL6mGxd9Manaod.Ejj1bEVlw4gOy.hJd.euqmjoSJucMPpvTIBKrpPYl0BHY2.e.hRdjpGQ9Rum0lO9eOgSTYG3hy17tGdE.jzlmSm3KdR9X9O.M5i.tg53mVLVkDJCGfST537FbjZXIDfC.Ldr0Slela8egqwZbmGdHyjRZfXXCgmSZDK8j7YuAffqXZG9.eb2xF7Z_UMCrfRdH1Krj4w_cfBwIBgP1ovhoBl48Qnx7rYilSQV_yKZPRshjkeTJnVBjQWyfQJWrR5mEcPI8Ml2xbWykW_0qtDrc7b9CYTqsW44F_JuCijs64gS8UvwK9VpFP7q9f.NQp5fjg.mxRQ- Received: from [208.99.137.71] by web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:22:17 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:22:17 -0800 (PST) From: James Phillips To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20091130120015.4F7AD10656CA@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:22:19 -0000 > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:15 +1100 > From: alex > Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD > 8.0? > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4B138B43.4000809@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > I didn't know these were released already, but I had a > look. I was > disappointed with the results. > > If anyone wants to look here is the link: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > > Linux's ext4 seems to leave UFS and ZFS well behind in a > number of > benchmarks. My first thought is that Ext4 may be "cheating" on the benchmarks. The performance regressions should probably be concerning though. Ext4 data loss; explanations and workarounds http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Ext4-data-loss-explanations-and-workarounds-740671.html Ext4 data loss Bug #317781 (Fix released) https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781 "If you really want to make sure the data in on disk, you have to use fsync() or fdatasync(). Even with ext3, if you crash at the wrong time, you will also lose data. So it's not the case with ext4 that "it's going to truncate files every time a non-redundant component dies". It's not every time. If you fdatasync() or fsync() the file, once the system call returns you know it will be safely on disk. With the patches, the blocks will be forcibly allocated in the case where you are replacing an existing file, so if you crash, you'll either get the old version (if the commit didn't make it) or the new version (if the commit did make it). If you really care, you could write a program which runs sync() every 5 seconds, or even every 1 second. Your performance will be completely trashed, but that's the way things break." - Theodore Ts'o wrote on 2009-03-06 __________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 17:31:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02682106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (ip-58-28-152-174.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.152.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66E98FC1B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53AE22840C; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:31:42 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:31:42 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: ajtiM Message-ID: <20091130173142.GA12319@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200911292039.32145.lumiwa@gmail.com> <200911300613.24224.lumiwa@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911300613.24224.lumiwa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpdate on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:31:45 -0000 On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:13:24AM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 21:38:04 Warren Block wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, ajtiM wrote: > > > I have new installed FreeBSD 8.0 and in rc.conf I have: > > > > > > ntpdate_enable="YES" > > > ntpdate_hosts="ntp1.cs.wisc.edu" > > > > > > When I boot computer I get a message there are no this host but when I > > > run /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp1.cs.wisc.edu it works. > > > > > > I had the same in rc.conf on FreeBSD 7.2 and it works all the time. All > > > settings on FreeBSD8.0 are the same as I had on 7.2. > > > > Might you have a Realtek network card? > > > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > > > > Yes, I have realtek card too but it is not active. DHCP is on sk0 and as I > wrote I never had problems with that. Maybe is different now? Try using: ifconfig_sk0="SYNCDHCP" which makes sure sk0 comes back with an address from DHCP before proceeding. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive." - Ferris Bueller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 17:34:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F255E106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.meyers@lancaster.ac.uk) Received: from sideburn.lancs.ac.uk (sideburn.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.17.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B547D8FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from exchange-fe3.lancs.ac.uk ([148.88.18.5] helo=exchange-fe3.lancs.local) by sideburn.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NFA8t-0008L8-HX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:34:31 +0000 Received: from exchange-be8.lancs.local ([10.42.26.7]) by exchange-fe3.lancs.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:34:17 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:34:29 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RE: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0, Perl 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 Thread-Index: Acpxzc24C/ruVN3BEd7GhwAZuTOjXwACSgNgAAL7PnAAAB07QA== From: "Meyers, Dan" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 17:34:17.0514 (UTC) FILETIME=[57A0A0A0:01CA71E3] Subject: RE: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0, Perl 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:34:33 -0000 Interestingly, a completely fresh install of 7.2 that never sees anything out of ports installs perl 5.8.9_2 not 5.8.9_2, and freeradius 2.1.4 instead of 2.1.6 via pkg_add if I do a pkg_add freeradius. *That* works absolutely fine. Unfortunately the packages for 8.0 are 5.8.9_3 and 2.1.6 respectively. For now, it looks like we'll stick with 7.2 and install from packages instead of ports. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Meyers, Dan > Sent: 30 November 2009 16:18 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0,Perl > 5.8.9 or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 >=20 > Had a bit more of a poke. Same symptoms under FreeBSD 7.2 amd64. I am > now looking towards there being some kind of issue with the perl or > freeradius in ports/packages. Has anyone else seen this at all? >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Meyers, Dan > > Sent: 30 November 2009 15:00 > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: PL_sv_undef and PL_stack_max undefined - FreBSD 8.0,Perl > 5.8.9 > > or 5.10, FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 > > > > We've had a setup for a while where we have a FreeBSD server running > > FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 and using the rlm_perl module to examine a database > > and > > do some fairly complex checking of the returned data before deciding > > whether to accept or reject the radius request. This works fine on > > FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 with Perl 5.8.9 and FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 (all compiled > > from source out of the same copy of the ports tree. Perl compiled > > without threading support as that causes issues with our database > > connections when under high load). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 18:49:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849B5106568B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018D58FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAUInset063274; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:49:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6B508BA95; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:49:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:49:54 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Richard Kolkovich Message-ID: <20091130184954.GA94329@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <8021a2660911282342p16e680efmf09f1fe4f4d0263e@mail.gmail.com> <20091130054058.GA3303@magus.portal.sigil.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091130054058.GA3303@magus.portal.sigil.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, n dhert Subject: Re: portupgrade print/cups-client (cups-client-1.3.10_4) fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:49:57 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:40:58PM -0600, Richard Kolkovich wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote: > > In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client : > > ... > > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used wh= en > > making > > a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > > /usr/lib/crt1.o: could not read symbols: Bad value > > gmake[1]: *** [bannertops] Error 1 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/print/cups-client/work/cups-1.4.2/filter > > ' > > gmake: *** [all] Error 1 > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-client. >=20 > I can confirm this same build error on my (amd64) box after upgrading to = 8.0-STABLE (RELENG_8). > cups-image was compiled previously on 8.0-RC1. Try this; # cd /usr/ports/print/cups-client # make patch # cd work/cups-1.4.2 Open Makedefs.in in an editor and remove @PIEFLAGS@ from line 143. # cd ../.. # make It should then build OK. Tested on 8.0-RELEASE amd64. The same trick is needed for cups-image, IIRC. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksUE9IACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVn6wCgl7dcM6XjHLN7TNeXWuczMu6l cp0AoJOKgMzBKuW5hj8cHedN6a7Fy7Wz =uAsF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 19:19:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06651065679 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f190.google.com (mail-px0-f190.google.com [209.85.216.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A708FC1A for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi28 with SMTP id 28so2876116pxi.7 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:19:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6+OW3I+rQs21WGGCMBaxYUdpm86HdnryD/VEEmvUaz8=; b=cJwAsMellgLcDaA2TrPIaxLLhW8PFMU3eRo/joxtn+jGkh1b1h1vw9EwDHJmI92CTJ p7C3uJyu+eONoj/Z1EmS6pGgEbVh664LBMuJOhn8m3tsgdpjG/Z3eSwGu8v6otjIBRkY T3sAzL9Z0K6sdpBZshXCXQVFgNF3t8YI0pxzM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ctOrbjlJusopoB9xtps5ZvFPAsOymF16AjiUkj911ZzjzTclpl8xiMIaqg+6I/0E6k fAygCqXMKyYeRBOk5GXxBjAADpNrjCLivQTH2WrqjDjvPut7HndgHx6ErHijUyJrkikV CPNm2XrAUgMdcrQ41TaU0hoTf6N7Tj4gypi7o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.113.6 with SMTP id q6mr8532069wam.55.1259608777253; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:19:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B134C50.5050104@a1poweruser.com> References: <4B134C50.5050104@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:19:37 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: Fbsd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: 8.0 & MYSQL50 denying access to user root no password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:19:38 -0000 On 11/29/09, Fbsd1 wrote: > For many releases of Freebsd going back to 4.3 I have all ways used the > default mysql user root localhost with no password which has been the > default. > With 8.0/mysql-server-5.0.86 I am denied access now. > The mysql manual still says the normal install defaults to allowing > access to user root with no password are in effect. > > After a fresh clean install of mysql > Tried mysqladmin -u root drop test to delete the test db. > Received this msg > connect to srver at localhost failed > access denied for user 'root@localost (using password: no) > This in not suppose to happen. Two issues, mysqladmin tries to connect to the mysql server -- i see in your message above it can't connect if it can't connect, how can it authorize? second, the undocumented mysql_install_db must be run to install the default database. But if you run this as root, you should change ownership of everything in /var/db/mysql to allow the mysql server access to the files. Those are two problems I'm seeing with your post. Correct me if I'm wrong, but try these first. > > Is anyone else having this problem? > Has the package for mysql50-server been changed to force securing user > root with a password? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 19:30:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1791065693 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233008FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26709 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:30:06 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200911301930.MAA26709@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:29:48 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: CF Ethernet for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0000 Everyone: I'm working on an embedded system which will be using a small Intel Atom motherboard with a single Ethernet port. The problem is, some configurations of the system are going to need two Ethernet ports, and only available ports on the system are a few USB slots and a CF (CompactFlash) socket. FreeBSD has drivers for several types of USB-to-Ethernet converters, but USB is a pretty inefficient way of doing Ethernet. So, I'm interested in finding out if anyone knows of an Ethernet interface which will plug into the CF socket and has drivers for FreeBSD. Please let me know; any help would be MUCH appreciated! --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 19:45:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AB21065670 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sarumont@sigil.org) Received: from mail.sigil.org (mail.sigil.org [208.86.227.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995B38FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBA2C105D; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:29:01 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sigil.org Received: from mail.sigil.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sigil.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LI7172OLJMRc; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:28:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from illusion.portal.sigil.org (ip72-202-157-83.ks.ks.cox.net [72.202.157.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4065EC105B; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:28:59 -0600 (CST) Received: by illusion.portal.sigil.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:45:53 -0600 From: "Richard Kolkovich" Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:45:53 -0600 To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20091130194552.GA2856@magus.portal.sigil.org> References: <8021a2660911282342p16e680efmf09f1fe4f4d0263e@mail.gmail.com> <20091130054058.GA3303@magus.portal.sigil.org> <20091130184954.GA94329@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091130184954.GA94329@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-OS: FreeBSD magus 8.0-STABLE amd64 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Composed-With: vim X-PGP-Key: http://sarumont.sigil.org/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Richard Kolkovich , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, n dhert Subject: Re: portupgrade print/cups-client (cups-client-1.3.10_4) fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:45:57 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:54PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > Try this; >=20 > # cd /usr/ports/print/cups-client > # make patch > # cd work/cups-1.4.2 > Open Makedefs.in in an editor and remove @PIEFLAGS@ from line 143. > # cd ../.. > # make >=20 > It should then build OK. Tested on 8.0-RELEASE amd64. >=20 > The same trick is needed for cups-image, IIRC. >=20 > Roland > --=20 > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) This works for cups-image - thanks! It looks like the cups-base maintainer has removed those in the tree: http://www.freshports.org/print/cups-base/ A 'portsnap fetch update' is all that is needed now. --=20 Richard Kolkovich sarumont@sigil.org PGP Key: 0x9E54EF59 (http://pgp.mit.edu) --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksUIPAACgkQfXtD1KVAIbAtiACff0EhlRwR1XB34Om9n1i6lIEn t+cAn0ltrcma/m2tXUmzzSzQglMirlt5 =105Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 20:50:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4391D1065693 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from forkandwait@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com (mail-iw0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E218FC15 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so2341009iwn.3 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:50:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=gArEsx8h0/OivwxixTY1/htE57IIIBibqNQTDgVZGHE=; b=T6b+RPdUl/qpVj6q/v2AkAdpnk1sJ5nwUTJtdyV38ES9jKlTZ1Zckv0IRW9aCPtJum k9gbZRi1/KFg/tnAH47jLk7yaJD7iJK0E9tlFI7Jmes8+NL0pTJeQbCuh0/UH/To87j3 sYkhtcwVaElHytmmqQQU45SgiBNPPArWS4z28= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; b=hfqBWCwadhZB9ciPxKfNp232rRKwUrhxV+bfqYDJJXhz2oIsM2AMpeC6zYrp+NBOCD NCWu5XoPipDaizFvg3y3h35pr87HHv8xSmtnv+72pNtxyJ8mkHn2Va17YVtA5XkyLCbZ 9Fl4GtTILY8BftMxynEJvf65g5x/+bIguqZwc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.121.164 with SMTP id h36mr12005507ibr.9.1259614231211; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:50:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B13B1DB.3090106@unsane.co.uk> References: <8029763b0911292150t75039f71kc20f9715f697ce88@mail.gmail.com> <4B13B1DB.3090106@unsane.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:50:31 -0800 Message-ID: <8029763b0911301250i3517b86bvb0b5ab475803e718@mail.gmail.com> From: w s Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: FreeBSD only on MacBook? Having problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:50:32 -0000 >> 2. How can I "lose the GPT"? When I run "# gpart destory ad5" I get >> "gpart: Device busy". I presume that it is because / is mounted to run >> the livefs CD. So ... >> >> > Not quite, if you run gpart show you should get a list of stuff on ad5, > so before you can destroy the GPT you have to delete the stuff using > it,a quick example using an md device: > (reminder just in case, this will remove ANY partitions on the disk, but > you already know that :) Bingo -- I cleared the partitions (gpart delete XXX) and then installed from CD without a hitch. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 21:52:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1059C106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [66.246.138.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35908FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (87-194-158-129.bethere.co.uk [87.194.158.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 695FA8192; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:51:26 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: James Phillips Message-ID: <20091130215126.0000563c@unknown> In-Reply-To: <774934.16234.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <20091130120015.4F7AD10656CA@hub.freebsd.org> <774934.16234.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2cvs27 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:52:15 -0000 On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:22:17 -0800 (PST) James Phillips wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:15 +1100 > > From: alex > > Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD > > 8.0? > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <4B138B43.4000809@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > > format=flowed > > > > I didn't know these were released already, but I had a > > look. I was > > disappointed with the results. > > > > If anyone wants to look here is the link: > > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > > > > Linux's ext4 seems to leave UFS and ZFS well behind in a > > number of > > benchmarks. > > > My first thought is that Ext4 may be "cheating" on the benchmarks. > The performance regressions should probably be concerning though. > > Ext4 data loss; explanations and workarounds > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Ext4-data-loss-explanations-and-workarounds-740671.html > > Ext4 data loss Bug #317781 (Fix released) > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781 > > "If you really want to make sure the data in on disk, you have to use > fsync() or fdatasync(). Even with ext3, if you crash at the wrong > time, you will also lose data. So it's not the case with ext4 that > "it's going to truncate files every time a non-redundant > component dies". It's not every time. If you fdatasync() or > fsync() the file, once the system call returns you know it will be > safely on disk. With the patches, the blocks will be forcibly > allocated in the case where you are replacing an existing file, so if > you crash, you'll either get the old version (if the commit didn't > make it) or the new version (if the commit did make it). If you > really care, you could write a program which runs sync() every 5 > seconds, or even every 1 second. Your performance will be completely > trashed, but that's the way things break." - Theodore Ts'o wrote on > 2009-03-06 This is actually the way UFS/FFS works too: when my system was crashing fairly regularly I was a bit surprised to find empty files after editing them. Also, I just verified that saving a file, rebooting, editing it again (with ee(1)) and powering off the system does still result in a zero length file being on disk. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 21:59:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E27106566C for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f204.google.com (mail-yw0-f204.google.com [209.85.211.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D38D8FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh42 with SMTP id 42so3715409ywh.28 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:59:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cbmf3DeaRT+WQtkNy8dzetoSe+p/t7dXvL5F2i97M/Y=; b=rj6SWTvuq2rCaX0k0/6TAeZtAPnhjPSKZ0gApQevG4CmYXBZZUO97ymlnW+Bd7BmhD 26ORXEgsxPONYpmIUZmQviAb96xVX/ksDGff6DSG9M9XDES6+pAFTuwaEQ2CY/ES3t31 DukuTsNm01tIVVvcb1clkDZ4fZxdcYx/YIsA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uHpLPlWFcjIrcAPblBMKAhnWF30mq6gqkn/9HeWcZQBhXiJJ4ftQcCvIpAR0VjmXSl nrMyIeZ3eYe3v2ySL6yEN+leCr4UzN4/ixg304eIXR9Up4xx/b1i0wIAZGZvkl4swN1X ppaoZSMxIl9/iczbTfpUzBUXl8IGntndiaTFQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.11.30 with SMTP id 30mr7114808agk.42.1259618391342; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:59:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200911292020.55799.freebsd@insightbb.com> References: <200911291024.06896.freebsd@insightbb.com> <200911292020.55799.freebsd@insightbb.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:59:51 -0500 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Steven Friedrich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI temperature X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:59:52 -0000 2009/11/29 Steven Friedrich : > On Sunday 29 November 2009 11:03:28 am you wrote: >> 2009/11/29 Steven Friedrich : >> > I booted my HP Pavilion zd8215us and I immediately invoked >> > chkCPUTemperature. The first temp reported was 52C, which is 125.6F. T= his >> > leads me to believe that acpi has an anomaly regarding temperature >> > measurement. The ambient temp was 71F (21.6C). The machine had been of= f >> > for over eight hours. >> >> I'm not sure. =A0My laptop shows about 59C as soon as I can >> log in, in a room kept around 16C ambient. =A0It rather quickly >> drops to <40C if I let it idle with powerd doing its thing. >> > Thanks for the response. One question though, what OS are you running. > > The reason I ask is because I want to discover if it's FreeBSD specific o= r > possibly affecting Linux distros as well. And if you're running FreeBSD, = which > version. > I think CPU use/temp during boot-up _could_ vary a lot from one operating system to another, I don't know that it must, though, since the whole business is arcane and full of magic (much like poutine). FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #1: Mon Nov 23 13:47:06 EST 2009 amd64 It's a turion x2 of 1990MHz I only had windows on long enough to burn one CD back in February, so I have not the least clue how it behaved (besides terribly). I can't find any way to get the actual temperature values under Opensolaris, but I do dual boot. It spends so much time starting so many mind-bogglingly worthless services prior to giving me a log-in prompt that I'm not sure the comparison is fair. The fan usually kick into high prior to the log-in prompt, though. Opensolaris is pretty horrible in terms of performance and battery life compared to FreeBSD. It's also like a strange, alien wasteland what with bash & gnome & other linuxisms, except pfexec. pfexec rocks. --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 22:33:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E12106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamt@corp.sonic.net) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233018FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from williamt.vpn.sonic.net (williamt.vpn.sonic.net [64.142.22.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id nAUMNPfD032302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:23:25 -0800 From: William Taylor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:23:24 -0800 Message-Id: <63450BC7-7E22-4448-B030-63F34AD00749@corp.sonic.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Subject: tcp delays in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:33:40 -0000 I recently started having a problem with tcp connections in one of my = jails. Im running 4.9-stable both sendmail and perdition experience the same problem. I even tried = stopping everything on the box and the problem still persists. Connections to other jails on different ip's on the same box are fine. There seems to be about a 5 second delay. =46rom this snippet of a ktrace I did you can see what looks to be a = delay of about 5 seconds after the CALL kevent 86872 perdition 1259617190.144575 GIO fd 6 wrote 43 bytes = "n\M^]\^A\0\0\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\^B18\^B96\^B81\^C206\ain-addr\^Darpa\0\0\f\0\= ^A" 86872 perdition 1259617190.144584 RET sendto 43/0x2b 86872 perdition 1259617190.144592 CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfde9c,0) 86872 perdition 1259617190.144604 RET gettimeofday 0 86872 perdition 1259617190.144619 CALL = kevent(0x4,0xbfbfdec0,0x1,0xbfbfdec0,0x1,0xbfbfdea4) 86872 perdition 1259617195.147032 RET kevent 0 86872 perdition 1259617195.147085 CALL close(0x6) 86872 perdition 1259617195.147120 RET close 0 86872 perdition 1259617195.147138 CALL socket(0x2,0x2,0) 86872 perdition 1259617195.147150 RET socket 6 86872 perdition 1259617195.147159 CALL = sendto(0x6,0xbfbfe100,0x2b,0,0x28269b60,0x10) 86872 perdition 1259617195.147186 GIO fd 6 wrote 43 bytes Any ideas of what I can do to figure this out? Thanks, William From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 00:13:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3119B106566C for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7AC8FC15 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037B43A3844; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:13:29 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1259626409; x= 1261440809; bh=yVUXqilDXGBg3z+m1mE5BTKpIbCpvORyZIpBN1Rwtg0=; b=Q XoBm3dfrpQAzUt2PHYE0gOyXUNRUryk/GRJmHoLplHn9a39oAySD0RZ1528IdbNa nn9oCKFLYMm0yhaGxftgie/W0nyDB4XWaQUjMFuFERVf05rIx+nRp3NOMiIkZvcB FOEX9dkgZi1leKccGa/akomBi+X1Tbds/9/uxK/4qA= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id J4rgJwKj5Qyq; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:13:29 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF533A3842; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:13:29 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nB10DSM6096812; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:13:28 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:13:28 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200912010013.nB10DSM6096812@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: brett@lariat.net In-reply-to: <200911301930.MAA26709@lariat.net> (message from Brett Glass on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:29:48 -0700) References: <200911301930.MAA26709@lariat.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CF Ethernet for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:13:32 -0000 Hi, > So, I'm interested in finding out if anyone knows of an Ethernet > interface which will plug into the CF socket and has drivers for > FreeBSD. Please let me know; any help would be MUCH appreciated! Not to mentione FreeBSD drivers, but only finding an Ethernet interface that plugs into a CF sockets seems very chalenging: you don't really send/receive the same information to memory and to network interface; CF can address GB of data, while the network card has a few KB at best; etc. Good luck, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 01:57:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D447D1065672 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3FE8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA01359; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:57:17 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200912010157.SAA01359@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:57:05 -0700 To: Olivier Nicole From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <200912010013.nB10DSM6096812@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <200911301930.MAA26709@lariat.net> <200912010013.nB10DSM6096812@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CF Ethernet for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:57:24 -0000 At 05:13 PM 11/30/2009, Olivier Nicole wrote: >Not to mentione FreeBSD drivers, but only finding an Ethernet >interface that plugs into a CF sockets seems very chalenging: you >don't really send/receive the same information to memory and to >network interface; CF can address GB of data, while the network card >has a few KB at best; etc. CF sockets usually can act as sockets for ATA/IDE compatible disk drives as well as for PCMCIA-like peripheral cards. Also, there are some Ethernet interface chips that are designed to be memory-mapped. See, for example, the one by ASIX, which is often used in embedded systems because it can interface with pretty much any CPU. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 02:43:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9213C106566B for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:43:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd1@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EDD8FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([202.69.172.43]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:43:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4B1482B5.8040808@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:43:01 +0800 From: Fbsd1 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Judd References: <4B134C50.5050104@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2009 02:43:14.0440 (UTC) FILETIME=[0790B080:01CA7230] X-Sender: fbsd1@a1poweruser.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: 8.0 & MYSQL50 denying access to user root no password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:43:14 -0000 Tim Judd wrote: > On 11/29/09, Fbsd1 wrote: >> For many releases of Freebsd going back to 4.3 I have all ways used the >> default mysql user root localhost with no password which has been the >> default. >> With 8.0/mysql-server-5.0.86 I am denied access now. >> The mysql manual still says the normal install defaults to allowing >> access to user root with no password are in effect. >> >> After a fresh clean install of mysql >> Tried mysqladmin -u root drop test to delete the test db. >> Received this msg >> connect to srver at localhost failed >> access denied for user 'root@localost (using password: no) >> This in not suppose to happen. > > > Two issues, mysqladmin tries to connect to the mysql server -- i see > in your message above it can't connect > if it can't connect, how can it authorize? Read the post again. says access denied not connection refused. > > > second, the undocumented mysql_install_db must be run to install the > default database. But if you run this as root, you should change > ownership of everything in /var/db/mysql to allow the mysql server > access to the files. > mysql_install_db is documented in the mysql manual. After re-reading the section about using mysql_install_db many times I finally saw my problem. mysql_install_db has to be run direct from the root command line. I was doing "script capture.console.msg.rpt and them running another script which had the mysql_install_db command buried in it. The mysql manual says mysql_install_db will hose up the user account table locking out all access. I rm -rf /var/db/mysql to delete the hosed up mysql user db and then ran mysql_install_db from the root command line and the default root/nopassword worked again. Thanks for your pointer as to where to look. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 04:46:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5FE1065670 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from compcent@mail.com) Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com (imr-db03.mx.aol.com [205.188.91.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F1C8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nB14Zt0i007141 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:55 -0500 Received: from compcent@mail.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id n.d4c.52f68849 (34905); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-db03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-db03.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.154]) by cia-da02.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA022-5c3f4b149d17257; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:43 -0500 Received: from web-mmc-d07 (web-mmc-d07.sim.aol.com [205.188.103.97]) by smtprly-db03.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDB035-5c3f4b149d17257; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:35 -0500 References: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, compcent@mail.com Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:35 -0500 X-AOL-IP: 66.53.120.202 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: compcent@mail.com X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: Mail.com Webmail 29202-STANDARD Received: from 66.53.120.202 by web-mmc-d07.sysops.aol.com (205.188.103.97) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:35 -0500 Message-Id: <8CC4056DBA54A5A-1304-1CA5@web-mmc-d07.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO X-AOL-SENDER: compcent@mail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Wanting to buy a laptop w/ FreeBSD, AND... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:46:06 -0000 Hello - I found the?"freebsd - hardware" ?list.? Where is the freebsd-soft= ware list?? I'm sending this to=20 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ? I would like to buy a new or dependable used laptop.??Initially, most of= my questions are concerning?software.?? For hardware, I would like a HP laptop, as?HP is my personal favorite.?=20 ? I prefer WP5.1 as a word processor.? I like to work on websites and to pos= t to internet forums.??I want to be=20 ?able to work with graphics, music, and videos, and to be able to watch mo= vies (and TV).?=20 ? 1.)? Hewlett-Packard laptop????? 2.)? FreeBSD as a OS????? 3.)? No MS?soft= ware or programs?? ?4).? WordPerfect 5.1????? 5.)? DOS partition????? 6.)? ? SBIE /FreeBSD ?l= ive CD ???????7.)? Computer Shops ?=20 ? What are my options concerning WordPerfect 5.1...?? Would WP 5.1 run on Fr= eeBSD?? Or,=20 would I need to run WP5.1 on a DOS partition?? If WP5.1 was on a DOS parti= tion, could I readily=20 move the WP text files to the internet browser, to easily post them onto= internet websites and forums??=20 ? Or, would I have to buy a new version of WordPerfect?? There was one of th= e newer versions that a person could=20 run in a WP5.1 mode.??? ?- - - - -=20 ? 7.)? Computer Shops=20 ? My first contact is with a computer tech in Placerville, CA (El Dorado Cou= nty)=20 MACKENDRICK COMPUTERS =3D http://www.rmack3.com/main.htm ? He is very experienced w/ Linux, but not with FreeBSD.?=20 ? I am looking for someone who is experienced with FreeBSD and is readily av= ailable for=20 answering questions / troubles, at least 5 days a week.?? Are there any Fr= eeBSD techs=20 in El Dorado County CA, or in the Sacramento area.? I would prefer to avoi= d to have to=20 travel to The Bay Area.??=20 ? My next considerations are "Best Buys / Geek Squad".???Or, Fry's Electroni= cs at=20 Northgate & I-80 ?in Sacramento.??? ? Please Reply to:?? compcent@mail.com=20 ? Thank you.?=20 ? ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 06:18:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AE5106566B for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EFCE8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83818 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 06:18:44 -0000 Received: from poshta.pknet.net (HELO pop.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2009 06:18:44 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.212 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:18:44 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <319b6dda1916df7b17638babf1ad98f1.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:18:44 -0700 (MST) From: "Peter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.17 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: stable/8/UPDATING - no mention of 8.0 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:18:45 -0000 iH, Been updating my src via svn and following stable/8. Looking at the UPDATING file, it does not mention '8.0-RELEASE' Did it just not make it in there yet? http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/8/UPDATING?view=markup vs. http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/release/8.0.0/UPDATING?view=markup It just confused me for awhile after I did a 'svn up' and did not see the release notes... [for the 7.X series, both stable/ and release/ mention the release in UPDATING] ]Peter[ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 07:08:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77CC106566B for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from okeeblow@cooltrainer.org) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8C58FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so2490231yxe.3 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:08:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.235.5 with SMTP id i5mr9034581ybh.271.1259649936820; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:45:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?172.16.20.138? ([168.28.136.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1928367ywh.33.2009.11.30.22.45.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:45:35 -0800 (PST) From: Curly Brace To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:44:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1259649840.6805.32.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Firefox 3.5 and Epiphany crashing since the GNOME 2.28 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:08:09 -0000 Hi all, I'm on 8.0/amd64, and my GNOME 2.28 update went off with no problems, but now Firefox 3.5 and Epiphany 2.28 crash when visiting certain pages, such as the "Welcome to firefox" first-start page. Firefox leaves "Segmentation fault (core dump)" in the console when it crashes, and Epiphany is silent. I've removed the Totem 2.28 plugins (thinking them to be the cause), removed Moonlight, removed Java, removed nspluginwrapper Flash10, and finally removed /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins altogether. This seems very similar to the Firefox 3.5 HTML5