From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 02:22:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C251065670 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Received: from iris.acsalaska.net (iris.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475F38FC18 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Received: from [192.168.254.100] (209-112-211-59-rb1.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net [209.112.211.59]) by iris.acsalaska.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n0I2MLlv053966 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:22:21 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Message-ID: <4972925E.4010406@alaska.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:22:22 -0900 From: Royce Williams User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sparc64@freebsd.org References: <49721C6B.9080002@alaska.net> <20090117212641.GA28973@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20090117212641.GA28973@soaustin.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.63; SA 3.2.4; spamdefang 1.122 Cc: Subject: Re: sparc64 dmesgs on wiki X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:22:22 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote, on 1/17/2009 12:26 PM: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:59:07AM -0900, Royce Williams wrote: >> I don't want to duplicate effort, but I also don't want to lose the >> history that I've collected. Should I lay off storing mine, should we >> fold some of them into the wiki, or something else? > > I'd say leave yours up and we'll change the wording on pointing to > yours. Well, that sounds fine - no pressure. Since the wiki is probably an easier way (read as: self-serve, for the wiki-enabled) to maintain it, maybe I could leave the newer ones (7+) for the wikiers to maintain going forward, and I could keep the older ones for historical purposes. The latter is obviously easier for me to maintain. :-) And I think that it's the newer ones that are probably more useful. Maybe put mine at the bottom and mention that the older dmesgs are at my place, so that people who are looking for the current stuff will see the useful content first. > I'm behind at least a couple of updates on it. No worries there - I was pleased to see it as-is! Aside: I've got a simple shell script to count them, cull out a couple of details, and package them up ... but it's nothing like the NYCBUG dmesgd (http://www.nycbug.org/?NAV=dmesgd). Part of me wants to just have everybody use that, since it's searchable. And part of me wants to roll my own. But it's probably not worth the cycles. Royce -- Royce D. Williams - http://royce.ws/ Shut off anything that's noisier than it is useful. - Merlin Mann