From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 9 15:59:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF00106566C for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@pollux.local.net) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7F08FC1E for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4ECB4C80EE for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 17:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pollux.local.net (che78-3-82-246-30-233.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.30.233]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC84A4C80BD for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 17:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pollux.local.net (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 89E131CDBF; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:01:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:01:21 +0200 From: Harald Weis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:59:44 -0000 On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:52:10AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hello Marc, > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:14:01 +0200 Harald Weis wrote: > > > Portmaster is unable to fetch install_flash_player_9.tar.gz and I > > Anyway it's not a portmaster... Boris, what do you mean exactly? I use portmaster on 6 machines (since I discovered it in July 2008) without any problems whatsoever. Portmaster aborted the linux-flashplugin9 installation because of the size mismatch, not portmaster's fault, is it? > > cannot find the file manually. Seems to have disappeared from earth. > > Something (system, ports, network or else) is broken: > ----- > tba% LANG=C date > Fri Aug 7 02:50:06 MSD 2009 > tba% fetch http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/installers/current/9/install_flash_player_9.tar.gz > install_flash_player_9.tar.gz 100% of 2986 kB 1542 kBps > ----- Thank you for the URL. Downloaded it while reading your message. Did not realize the size mismatch then, because too busy elsewhere. I've just succeeded to install flash9 on firefox3 according to the Handbook and using the old version. Too unpatient today to install your patch which does certainly work, will try it on the next machine. I've read a long time ago (on this ML I think) that http://miniusa.com/crm/no_flash.jsp is an ideal test site. The install does work like a charm. Magnificent. There is a huge problem though: I've got now two vulnerable ports, firefox3 and linux-pango. The linux-pango case is apparently several months old. Any idea why the linux world doesn't seem to bother? How to persuade my user now not to use firefox, but w3m? Impossible. Anyway, thanks again to everybody, on-list and off-list. Harald