From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 11:38:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12098106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from y2s1982@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89F48FC14 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so4428669vws.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 03:38:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oV/jQw64XebWTLY2qHCSNdbs0hegm70uPRZGmJvOos0=; b=yDDh/NfOQmt0bpcyXEo4QiwKUJivYT6ah2mc7UFpiXDqmYTXuKMhgLKZ+8oW6R9ZA5 KWPP4o5KPwd//apebHuAOhtZt8KeBJgfCzgHGum1b2lConieZX27uRbe84/AxBtzh0Ne nAfZANdJ3hjm5kv3jiZUugO8WOXROy+NCkjWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qadYxvVxBINwBhY5I5/dHgmxcGh6LOFtAAD/iuz0NS0ntNbkTRJ0nZXLgMkGPpFwBK BNHUMTPWtIcfX5YVrZSxpmPj9jdU4ghPPF9JozbEhPaDfWp5LkI9BvH9YMx2KFA2JfE3 yuyfq5yIlszgQZ4jcsNLFatJVPNInijJ7UTIE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.98.210 with SMTP id r18mr1110124vcn.107.1291547454494; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 03:10:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.200.129 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 03:10:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:10:54 +0900 Message-ID: From: Tony Sim To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: questions about updates to linux-f10-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:38:48 -0000 It seems that in September, somebody had taken the initiative to build an rpm of pango based on fedora 10. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17745 I was wondering why the port has not been updated with the new rpm. Is the package considered unusable or otherwise invalid? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 14:52:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C703C106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827288FC14 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p57B3A1DC.dip.t-dialin.net [87.179.161.220]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A29884403D; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:36:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.2.110]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3562615C0; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:36:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:36:00 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Tony Sim Message-ID: <20101205153600.00005b7e@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 3A29884403D.A7D9E X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1292164570.67651@3vUvLoNHTM6bHHk8clmitg X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions about updates to linux-f10-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:52:11 -0000 On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:10:54 +0900 Tony Sim wrote: > It seems that in September, somebody had taken the initiative to > build an rpm of pango based on fedora 10. > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17745 > > I was wondering why the port has not been updated with the new rpm. > Is the package considered unusable or otherwise invalid? Probably nobody took the time to have a look if this rpm can be trusted. This is nothing against the person who did the rpm, it is just that with the official fedora-rpms, there is someone "official" behind who has some reputation, whereas Peter Littmann who generated the rpm is at least unknown to me and as such has an unknown reputation. Bye, Alexander. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 15:27:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D922C106566B; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7A68FC08; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB5FR1sU078936; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:01 GMT (envelope-from avg@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from avg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB5FR06R078932; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:00 GMT (envelope-from avg) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:00 GMT Message-Id: <201012051527.oB5FR06R078932@freefall.freebsd.org> To: avg@icyb.net.ua, avg@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: avg@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/72920: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:27:01 -0000 Synopsis: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: avg State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 5 15:26:02 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72920 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 15:27:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773CF1065673; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE398FC0C; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB5FRWhb079034; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:32 GMT (envelope-from avg@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from avg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB5FRW74079030; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:32 GMT (envelope-from avg) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:27:32 GMT Message-Id: <201012051527.oB5FRW74079030@freefall.freebsd.org> To: avg@icyb.net.ua, avg@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: avg@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/72920: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:27:32 -0000 Synopsis: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses State-Changed-From-To: closed->analyzed State-Changed-By: avg State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 5 15:27:04 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: Revert accidental status change. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72920 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 15:29:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EBD106566B; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45B28FC14; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB5FT5q5079267; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:05 GMT (envelope-from avg@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from avg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB5FT5rf079263; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:05 GMT (envelope-from avg) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:05 GMT Message-Id: <201012051529.oB5FT5rf079263@freefall.freebsd.org> To: avg@icyb.net.ua, avg@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: avg@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/73777: [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir special handling useless and harmful X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:29:06 -0000 Synopsis: [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir special handling useless and harmful State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: avg State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 5 15:28:19 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: It seems that the suggested change is not really useful for general FreeBSD user base. And I have no use for it now as well. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=73777 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 10:23:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBA71065673 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from y2s1982@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06808FC1B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so6424492qwj.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:23:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=f2cgR5V2f+LpZ6FFkOYYnMaDDp4ZUlLdiK/7UTVwoTs=; b=lIrfxjL9tcFzsERD1Zzwt4S5Fpp+Glr1Reeu4dfcuiJwFN2B8rYgra2m5SHn6hiY9P bPMKY3piVm3oKppx0xVC5aXmuBTHQ6eX7gjzFpds4eVWqqw7broJt1OhXxrsViNeOQHI pRLIJ9SZOSnZHxvHyen6tt6B+G8mGJWLRVeuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HkgisPjY5YnM1+phtYht0N0X1aoa7b8gjX52qsrDFU3PVYvMKJk+Ko3xtpbwA9A2Hb MvuZTOLjt169gZ8DVOpAXs3uNdQCBbwEPfkXZfdX8PwgYnuDI5G7sYg5nUGO20TCW7Vw 4ZLZhgOB019Md4rT/uLDVldkaj7LCv3/rgxcc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.240.85 with SMTP id kz21mr4202109qcb.230.1291631013849; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.200.129 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:23:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101205153600.00005b7e@unknown> References: <20101205153600.00005b7e@unknown> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:23:33 +0900 Message-ID: From: Tony Sim To: Alexander Leidinger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions about updates to linux-f10-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:23:35 -0000 Oops, it seems I forgot to do "reply-all." In case others are following, errr here it is: Thanks for the timely reply. What are the necessary steps to have the package validated or otherwise trusted? It would be a waste if Peter Littmann really have done the community a favor by going through the trouble of setting up the Fedora 10 box to create a package that at least some people have been dieing to find. I also understand the necessity to make sure the port is in fact genuine lest introduce a significant security concern. So what needs be done for the community to help validate the package? On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Alexander Leidinger < Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:10:54 +0900 Tony Sim wrote: > > > It seems that in September, somebody had taken the initiative to > > build an rpm of pango based on fedora 10. > > > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17745 > > > > I was wondering why the port has not been updated with the new rpm. > > Is the package considered unusable or otherwise invalid? > > Probably nobody took the time to have a look if this rpm can be > trusted. This is nothing against the person who did the rpm, it is just > that with the official fedora-rpms, there is someone "official" behind > who has some reputation, whereas Peter Littmann who generated the rpm > is at least unknown to me and as such has an unknown reputation. > > Bye, > Alexander. > From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 11:06:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F045A1065693 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E4F8FC1B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB6B6uqU068209 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:06:56 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB6B6uE5068205 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:06:56 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:06:56 GMT Message-Id: <201012061106.oB6B6uE5068205@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:06:57 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/151714 emulation print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of support in t a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o kern/149168 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes fo o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted o kern/145024 emulation [linux] [panic] kernel crash by linux.ko module with n f kern/144763 emulation [linux] [panic] Kernel panic when start linux binaries o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest f ports/137332 emulation add caution messages to some adobe products s ports/136321 emulation x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based po o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails f kern/99068 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux emulator crashed by java, when c o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 27 problems total.