From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 08:48:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4F8106564A; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64938FC0A; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBK8mfOp069806; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:41 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBK8mfUB069802; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:41 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:41 GMT Message-Id: <201012200848.oBK8mfUB069802@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/153243: [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 in 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:42 -0000 Old Synopsis: Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 in 8.1 New Synopsis: [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 in 8.1 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-emulation Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 08:47:47 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153243 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 11:06:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3983710656C5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD228FC2A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBKB6sdi024510 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:06:54 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBKB6sLd024507 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:06:54 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:06:54 GMT Message-Id: <201012201106.oBKB6sLd024507@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:06:55 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o ports/151714 emulation print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of support in t a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o kern/149168 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes fo o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted o kern/145024 emulation [linux] [panic] kernel crash by linux.ko module with n f kern/144763 emulation [linux] [panic] Kernel panic when start linux binaries o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest f ports/137332 emulation add caution messages to some adobe products s ports/136321 emulation x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based po o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails f kern/99068 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux emulator crashed by java, when c o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 28 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 03:57:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CAC1065674 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270E98FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7592156026; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:41 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20101221035741.GA2710@lonesome.com> References: <20101130192314.GB28560@lonesome.com> <20101201132220.790748omutg2pp6o@webmail.leidinger.net> <20101201153335.GA12007@lonesome.com> <20101202101413.132350uwhyrh6z0o@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101202101413.132350uwhyrh6z0o@webmail.leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fwd: CFR: patch to cleanup usage of SRC_BASE in various ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:42 -0000 >> How about this? We change the override to only work if PACKAGE_BUILDING >> is set? > > This looks like a good plan. OK, I thought it was a one-line patch per port, but that's not true. Please take a look at the following revised patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~linimon/patches/diff.out.srcbase mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 08:39:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5D1106566C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CF88FC16 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p57B3AD6F.dip.t-dialin.net [87.179.173.111]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6775A844027; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:39:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.2.110]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895562938; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:39:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:39:15 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20101221093915.0000789e@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20101221035741.GA2710@lonesome.com> References: <20101130192314.GB28560@lonesome.com> <20101201132220.790748omutg2pp6o@webmail.leidinger.net> <20101201153335.GA12007@lonesome.com> <20101202101413.132350uwhyrh6z0o@webmail.leidinger.net> <20101221035741.GA2710@lonesome.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 6775A844027.A54AA X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1293525560.87321@rHGu3OKUePSWOF0kEurduA X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fwd: CFR: patch to cleanup usage of SRC_BASE in various ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:25 -0000 On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:41 +0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > >> How about this? We change the override to only work if > >> PACKAGE_BUILDING is set? > > > > This looks like a good plan. > > OK, I thought it was a one-line patch per port, but that's not true. > > Please take a look at the following revised patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~linimon/patches/diff.out.srcbase I agree that a patch with less redundancy would be more complex and more unreadable as what you propose here, so no objections from my side. Bye, Alexander.