From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 11:08:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E771065679 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A5A8FC15 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBDB8EFU045489 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:14 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBDB8EDw045486 for freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:14 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:14 GMT Message-Id: <201012131108.oBDB8EDw045486@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:15 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/152609 geom [geli] geli onetime on gzero panics o kern/150858 geom [geom] [geom_label] [patch] glabel(8) is not compatibl o kern/150626 geom [geom] [gjournal] gjournal(8) destroys label o kern/150555 geom [geom] gjournal unusable on GPT partitions o kern/150334 geom [geom] [udf] [patch] geom label does not support UDF o kern/149762 geom volume labels with rogue characters o bin/149215 geom [panic] [geom_part] gpart(8): Delete linux's slice via o kern/147852 geom [geom] [panic] graid3 panic: wrong offset 16384 for se o kern/147851 geom [geom] [panic] graid3 panic: g_read_data: invalid leng o kern/147667 geom [gmirror] Booting with one component of a gmirror, the o kern/147664 geom [geom] [patch] Add the ability to create linux and fat o kern/145818 geom [geom] geom_stat_open showing cached information for n o kern/145042 geom [geom] System stops booting after printing message "GE o kern/144962 geom [geom] panic when accessing GPT disk with a large numb o kern/144905 geom [geom][geom_part] panic in gpart_ctlreq when unpluggin o kern/143455 geom gstripe(8) in RELENG_8 (31st Jan 2010) broken o kern/142563 geom [geom] [hang] ioctl freeze in zpool o kern/141740 geom [geom] gjournal(8): g_journal_destroy concurrent error s kern/141235 geom [geom_part] 8.0 no longer provides /dev entries for al o kern/140352 geom [geom] gjournal + glabel not working o kern/135898 geom [geom] Severe filesystem corruption - large files or l o kern/134922 geom [gmirror] [panic] kernel panic when use fdisk on disk o kern/134113 geom [geli] Problem setting secondary GELI key o kern/133931 geom [geli] [request] intentionally wrong password to destr o bin/132845 geom [geom] [patch] ggated(8) does not close files opened a o kern/132273 geom glabel(8): [patch] failing on journaled partition f kern/132242 geom [gmirror] gmirror.ko fails to fully initialize o kern/131353 geom [geom] gjournal(8) kernel lock p docs/130548 geom [patch] gjournal(8) man page is missing sysctls o kern/129674 geom [geom] gjournal root did not mount on boot o kern/129645 geom gjournal(8): GEOM_JOURNAL causes system to fail to boo o kern/129245 geom [geom] gcache is more suitable for suffix based provid f kern/128276 geom [gmirror] machine lock up when gmirror module is used o kern/127420 geom [geom] [gjournal] [panic] Journal overflow on gmirrore o kern/124973 geom [gjournal] [patch] boot order affects geom_journal con o kern/124969 geom gvinum(8): gvinum raid5 plex does not detect missing s o kern/123962 geom [panic] [gjournal] gjournal (455Gb data, 8Gb journal), o kern/123122 geom [geom] GEOM / gjournal kernel lock o kern/122738 geom [geom] gmirror list "losts consumers" after gmirror de o kern/122067 geom [geom] [panic] Geom crashed during boot o kern/121364 geom [gmirror] Removing all providers create a "zombie" mir o bin/120990 geom [patch] support "BIOS Boot" partition type in gpt(8) o kern/120091 geom [geom] [geli] [gjournal] geli does not prompt for pass o kern/115856 geom [geli] ZFS thought it was degraded when it should have o kern/115547 geom [geom] [patch] [request] let GEOM Eli get password fro o kern/114532 geom [geom] GEOM_MIRROR shows up in kldstat even if compile f kern/113957 geom [gmirror] gmirror is intermittently reporting a degrad o kern/113837 geom [geom] unable to access 1024 sector size storage o kern/113419 geom [geom] geom fox multipathing not failing back o kern/107707 geom [geom] [patch] [request] add new class geom_xbox360 to o kern/94632 geom [geom] Kernel output resets input while GELI asks for o kern/90582 geom [geom] [panic] Restore cause panic string (ffs_blkfree o bin/90093 geom fdisk(8) incapable of altering in-core geometry o kern/88601 geom [geli] geli cause kernel panic under heavy disk usage o kern/87544 geom [gbde] mmaping large files on a gbde filesystem deadlo o kern/84556 geom [geom] [panic] GBDE-encrypted swap causes panic at shu o kern/79251 geom [2TB] newfs fails on 2.6TB gbde device o kern/79035 geom [vinum] gvinum unable to create a striped set of mirro o bin/78131 geom gbde(8) "destroy" not working. 59 problems total. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 15:16:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D931065697; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076988FC12; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA14098; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:16:21 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4D08DBC5.30003@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:16:21 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Smedts , "Vladislav V. Prodan" References: <4D08B21B.5090000@ukr.net> <4D08BC09.3000801@freebsd.org> <4D08BE7D.2030700@ukr.net> <4D08CC18.7050908@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low speed disk subsystem after the upgrade 8.1-STABLE-201011 --> 9-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:16:28 -0000 on 15/12/2010 16:25 Olivier Smedts said the following: > 2010/12/15 Vladislav V. Prodan : >> 15.12.2010 15:11, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: >> >>> Now try to attach a screenshot. >>> >>> >> >> http://img576.imageshack.us/i/dsc00563u.jpg/ > > ad6: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=8638372 > > Maybe installkernel/installworld copied files on bad clusters, they > were previously bad but you notice only now that there are system > files on them... This indeed looks like a problem caused by disk. There shouldn't have been the panic though ("bio_completed can't be greater than bio_length"). It's a possible geom or ad driver problem. What is your geom topology on this system? Changing cc: from fs@ to geom@. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 14:19:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786391065673 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ACA8FC19 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1692713DF42 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:19:27 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:19:25 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <301293893.20101217171925@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: sys/kern/subr_disk.c and sys/geom/sched/subr_disk.c - is it intentional now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:19:29 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-geom. I've found, that these two files doesn't have any differencr but function names & one diaganostic function in "generic" version. Is it intentional or it is artefact of times when "geom_sched" was experemental code? No comments in "geom_sched-private" version is givent and it seems as copy'n'paste which is dangerous -- for example, any changes in one file should be transferred into other (or not?). Explanation of this situation in header of sys/geom/sched/subr_disk.c is good idea, IMHO. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 21:34:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8650C1065670 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429D28FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 991FD13DF5F for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:34:46 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:34:41 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1701263071.20101219003441@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Good configurable I/O benchmark? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:34:48 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-geom. Is here any good I/O benchmark? What do I mean by `good': (1) Multiprocess workloads with different workloads per processe (thread) (a) Sequential R or W. (b) Random R and W with configurable R:W ratio. (c) Configurable min/max/avg distance seek in random workloads. (2) All above with configurable block size. (3) All of above with configurable I/O queue depth. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 21:40:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48712106564A for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF24F8FC0C for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F183AE61E3; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:40:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=gM7I4SwNKHbd ofp5i13so7sTZQg=; b=I1tGeGe/nQkB+RfsivostGL/aRKG+u05Kf/qw3v5l7iT 6LsYjWA2FltCAavpuiI1T3fbUDOpRekWXNFP1/KxFQUrWkpPK4ooM5BHm9QPL6vd yeheywEj19Q6jrMSxTXUvKMjsTLjQm7LKT0nb4NOKwqDXxxzjPB5MzBh/uameyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=E6wujZ Il9kDvqwXaPZSrmkQFWsG99Onxy0ML8RP48x82NkKnqDVdMwVoVAnf5ZytmK4rPi Vbn6Sm+pX1YwL1uadj+KWXAVwtMUFuF7zPiCmDm+6xSB0u/0t4ZeQONicB4WQ9Mz Hf9Tx4wElGyguuNC1+TJrPyFd8k0XmTjqcLLY= Received: from unknown (client-86-29-47-22.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.29.47.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEAAEE61DF; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:40:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:40:03 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: <20101218214003.0000154d@unknown> In-Reply-To: <1701263071.20101219003441@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1701263071.20101219003441@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Good configurable I/O benchmark? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:40:10 -0000 On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:34:41 +0300 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Is here any good I/O benchmark? What do I mean by `good': > > (1) Multiprocess workloads with different workloads per processe > (thread) (a) Sequential R or W. > (b) Random R and W with configurable R:W ratio. > (c) Configurable min/max/avg distance seek in random workloads. > (2) All above with configurable block size. > (3) All of above with configurable I/O queue depth. It sounds like sysutils/fio should do a lot of that. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 21:43:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7661065670 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6869E8FC16 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DC1513DF5F; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:43:21 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:43:16 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <458893856.20101219004316@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20101218214003.0000154d@unknown> References: <1701263071.20101219003441@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20101218214003.0000154d@unknown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Good configurable I/O benchmark? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:22 -0000 Hello, Bruce. You wrote 19 =E4=E5=EA=E0=E1=F0=FF 2010 =E3., 0:40:03: >> Is here any good I/O benchmark? What do I mean by `good': >>=20 >> (1) Multiprocess workloads with different workloads per processe >> (thread) (a) Sequential R or W. >> (b) Random R and W with configurable R:W ratio. >> (c) Configurable min/max/avg distance seek in random workloads. >> (2) All above with configurable block size. >> (3) All of above with configurable I/O queue depth. > It sounds like sysutils/fio should do a lot of that. Thank you. "sysutils" is last place I would have though of looking at (I've looke at "benchmarks"). --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 21:47:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id E481810656A6; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:47:35 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: <20101218214735.GA42139@freebsd.org> References: <1701263071.20101219003441@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20101218214003.0000154d@unknown> <458893856.20101219004316@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <458893856.20101219004316@serebryakov.spb.ru> Cc: Bruce Cran , freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Good configurable I/O benchmark? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:47:36 -0000 On Sun Dec 19 10, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Bruce. > You wrote 19 ??????? 2010 ?., 0:40:03: > > >> Is here any good I/O benchmark? What do I mean by `good': > >> > >> (1) Multiprocess workloads with different workloads per processe > >> (thread) (a) Sequential R or W. > >> (b) Random R and W with configurable R:W ratio. > >> (c) Configurable min/max/avg distance seek in random workloads. > >> (2) All above with configurable block size. > >> (3) All of above with configurable I/O queue depth. > > It sounds like sysutils/fio should do a lot of that. > Thank you. "sysutils" is last place I would have though of looking > at (I've looke at "benchmarks"). it would be really nice to have a wiki.freebsd page which recommends certain benchmarks for disk io and network throughput etc. cheers. alex > > > > -- > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov > -- a13x