From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 01:25:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B15106568B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 01:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gatinhodosseussonhos@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc1-s18.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc1-s18.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13658FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 01:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT102-W35 ([65.55.90.9]) by snt0-omc1-s18.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:25:11 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [201.3.139.204] From: Phillip Spring To: , , Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:25:10 +0100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2010 01:25:11.0548 (UTC) FILETIME=[432653C0:01CA8A81] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Suggestion: rename "killall" to "fkill", but wait five years to phase the new name in X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:25:12 -0000 > Dear hackers=2C thanks for maintaining it on FreeBSD you are welcome=2C and happy new year for everybody! :) =20 why rename killall? what's next? rename init? why not enhance kill? this is= the end of alias? omg... =20 write shell script and name it=2C this is not a sin. it can be a crime... b= ut don't worry=2C all freebsd users will go to hell anyways. =20 underdog. my dream is a /lib/kill.so (and a job) =20 _________________________________________________________________ Fique protegido de ame=E7as utilizando o Novo Internet Explorer 8. Baixe j= =E1=2C =E9 gr=E1tis! http://brasil.microsoft.com.br/IE8/mergulhe/?utm_source=3DMSN%3BHotmail&utm= _medium=3DTagline&utm_content=3DTag1&utm_campaign=3DIE8= From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 02:41:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13135106566B; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com (mail-iw0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57C08FC18; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so8947679iwn.3 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:41:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent :x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version :content-type; bh=XaLvoykVor+tgdOSDcjCAcywNRZYoeEjrKp7+U5ClLI=; b=k4RFTy4PiXlDFVy9uTaiqvZ9vmm7lGXUXy8NRGUS39WRXqE5vIf8/nfmZK1kLpiq4o Eg7jSPUkyMgWa4VoP5Z9U7xJBvTViATdNlYMQnlZroexIQAdKt2ixnHh7cej0/gtGYbs onOn1P5Fwh7K2FsWvE4wUyW5DzHlAtl/uLDyE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version :content-type; b=fjgFqHnC5G5s1Ow0pN4LVzgRt4iB4qoiUhSzvIrrgWKtb2iBSPilwBW5I5meBcpR/U rIY1wQBbPda3eSqHIoT4kz/Vf96jICPlUZQlKynRSh/PAyOh0Bj/mQXc+mjAZILZbEHC RHJzISMXdYBk7ynWXUQg6AfyatQhreLqC3CNc= Received: by 10.231.121.69 with SMTP id g5mr2581761ibr.44.1262313674506; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from dimension.5p.local (ppp-22.162.dialinfree.com [209.172.22.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm14133201iwn.7.2009.12.31.18.41.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:41:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:41:05 -0500 From: jhell To: Ed Schouten In-Reply-To: <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> Message-ID: References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x89D8547E X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: 85EF E26B 07BB 3777 76BE B12A 9057 8789 89D8 547E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 02:41:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:18, ed@ wrote: > * jhell wrote: >> Take a look at your git config. The problem lies there and is very >> visible. After you are done fixing that re-read the whole email that >> you posted. > > Would you mind sharing what causes the problem then, Sherlock Holmes? > > I would say it is elementary my dear Watson but I really do not feel like calling you dear and I certainly do not want to take Roberts last name in vain. With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure out. - -- Thu Dec 31 21:38:14 2009 jhell -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLPWDPAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+fzEH/10sPwSo0gt8NgSwXGP05PLt dehayjOEs7gm3PBTKgT43IvBU82sAQxPueVSGVzAKsNJomG4x+pST2t7NYYZ81lL DioRCgRInYUvAMz2bM8b3xemvwaLLjLq9Fkzh3pxw3HOXygQywK2Az+4maKdLeSg CQRcGAZGgAry9zCljo56v4Ur85MAA00xB5aY33nV1xKYTk46+Suv4P3tx6PaMKLt Dp3KbezL5N3ZbHtP0NC3AMNGxam8Vkm+ZjMEUGYQoG3shu3F9nrgLOUzf13Deper Izm3Wx7HCsv06KT502MbiNL3029vYZq4HFl7A7LfplyP47nDMWFZ8q4Q2G4ElrA= =ImPu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 10:33:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56FA106568B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 10:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sh@visor.slugabed.org) Received: from visor.slugabed.org (visor.slugabed.org [64.69.77.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8238FC16 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 10:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from visor.slugabed.org (sh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by visor.slugabed.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o01AX2bm057256; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:33:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sh@visor.slugabed.org) Received: (from sh@localhost) by visor.slugabed.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id o01AWvNf057242; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:32:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sh) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:32:57 -0800 From: Sean Hamilton To: Lawrence Stewart Message-ID: <20100101103257.GM720@visor.slugabed.org> References: <20091113020835.GE12442@visor.slugabed.org> <4B2ADF1F.10908@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B2ADF1F.10908@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NUMA support; tweaking TCP for GPRS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:33:05 -0000 On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:47:11PM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Sean Hamilton wrote: > > [...] > > Second, I am using a FreeBSD server to talk to equipment > > which has a GPRS internet connection. This is fairly high > > latency (approximately one second RTT) and is prone to > > bursts of packet loss, or bursts of extremely high latency > > -- perhaps up to a minute. These intervals cause many > > retransmissions, which I presume is a good strategy over the > > internet, but not so good for GPRS. > > > > For my application, latency is mostly irrelevant. However, > > data over GPRS is very expensive, so I would like to reduce > > as much as possible the number of TCP retransmissions made > > on the FreeBSD side, possibly at the expense of latency. > > > > So, I am looking for suggestions on how to achieve this, via > > sysctl, setsockopt, etc. There seems to be a lot of > > literature regarding TCP tuning, but usually the focus is on > > improving performance, not reducing network traffic. The > > "rexmit_min" and "rexmit_sop" sysctls mentioned in tcp(4) > > seem interesting, but it's not clear to me exactly how they > > might be adjusted for this purpose. > > Just back from 6 months of travel and a bit busy right now catching up > on things, but ping me in a week or two about the TCP issue and I can > provide some insights. At this point, the issue is mostly resolved -- we were seeing a huge number of TCP retransmissions, but this was due to braindead and undocumented behaviour on the GPRS device side, not FreeBSD's fault at all. Specifically, the TCP stack on the device (eCos-based, but possibly using the TCP stack in the GSM chipset -- not sure) was setting some of its parameters based on the requested GPRS service class. For instance, if the GPRS service class indicated a desired average RTT of 0.5s, then it would just retransmit every 0.5s, or something like that -- the exact behaviour is undocumented, but clearly laughably broken. Anyway, I am still really interested in what you might have to say about this. I have already increased the minimum retransmission interval to a few seconds, with some success. -- Sean Hamilton From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 11:24:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EADC1065670; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311508FC08; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1BAB71CEA3; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:24:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:24:17 +0100 From: Ed Schouten To: jhell Message-ID: <20100101112417.GU64905@hoeg.nl> References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sL/b0W08aWx8yHQO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:24:18 -0000 --sL/b0W08aWx8yHQO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * jhell wrote: > With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure out. If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is to help each other. --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --sL/b0W08aWx8yHQO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAks922AACgkQ52SDGA2eCwX0kACfQW1k3sxGSckHXUrtOEEhdEmM likAn0plKP7uz71ZlB7F0ryg0CUPiKt7 =tRzv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sL/b0W08aWx8yHQO-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 18:12:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A1910656AA for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ABD8FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so11216800ewy.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:12:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=OFERSc9MLxwbyTBJWQF/Ida9zt6wCSz6GuUyx2c6DNI=; b=uC+zSe6gEKhaj/ZFGTte978KPw+3LYUZ+t1ngrhe2XHNVrSHg2+Ov3DHxn9jRa+dSo Q0/5A2PfCKdN6t7CghYwfXQsMBL09Isss8alll8BaKgWWhCFM0ucKduh5yWvkKBHXDX2 Z6SiiQI8iMYKu9vqS5qHRS9ESBdlxYamGaEig= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TJ7idxd/S+xOUuy2PJPWScksst0DdqN3JoZcdSeq//qWavFE7WS3r44RomCNi1dObl f40aint5HCyox2xAEfK0pn+Qn8cVghtSdg6uXqak3TmfgviWGLw1uHS9XmksEIaAMGK3 +Rxu3Nzk4Lnp3GNIsXtJJ8us0svsE4dujwsoo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.50.129 with SMTP id z1mr22214285ebf.33.1262367933434; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:45:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:45:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1bd550a01001010945i1a043ff9t70eb814cafe4b30a@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: FreeBSD Hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: linprocfs Input/output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:12:30 -0000 Hi all, I post here cause I didn't get any answers in freebsd-emulation. In 8.0-RELEASE-p1 if I try to execute this: cat /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo > ~/cpuinfo.txt I get cat: /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo: Input/output error truss shows the read system call returns ERR#5. It is the same with other files from linprocfs. cat /compat/linux/proc/[any_file] works fine What am I missing? Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 19:38:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E34F106568F for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jilles@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay04.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82EB8FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::135]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C101DD688; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:38:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1677) id 0AFC473F9D; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:38:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:38:14 +0100 From: Jilles Tjoelker To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Message-ID: <20100101193814.GA60021@stack.nl> References: <1bd550a01001010945i1a043ff9t70eb814cafe4b30a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1bd550a01001010945i1a043ff9t70eb814cafe4b30a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: linprocfs Input/output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:38:17 -0000 On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 06:45:33PM +0100, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > Hi all, I post here cause I didn't get any answers in freebsd-emulation. > In 8.0-RELEASE-p1 if I try to execute this: > cat /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo > ~/cpuinfo.txt > I get > cat: /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo: Input/output error > truss shows the read system call returns ERR#5. It is the same with > other files from linprocfs. > cat /compat/linux/proc/[any_file] works fine > What am I missing? You are not missing anything, this is a bug. A while ago, cat(1) was changed to use larger buffers when writing to regular files on machines with sufficient RAM, usually a multiple of MAXPHYS. On the other hand, pseudofs (the general framework for filesystems such as procfs, linprocfs and linsysfs) in src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c pfs_read() fails any read over MAXPHYS + 1 with EIO. This limit probably has to do with the allocation of a buffer of that size using sbuf_new(9) (and so, malloc(9)). Some sort of limit seems appropriate, but MAXPHYS seems unrelated, and if the request is too long it should perhaps just truncate it. -- Jilles Tjoelker From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 19:41:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5AE106566B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF6A8FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so11263173ewy.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:40:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnT+n4m53QsRU/otHQNFdAUwbQx/QxkHXUhMOQ7TW2I=; b=nl1Ne7n8nafHzdaMQoFlxELOSblliI+kvBVIP30v95k66K/G6qgUiSGV9tk3PNgDBa 6Jb8cw3vEmTz6KiSk0B2P/+YxE+gjhDu4nv+fCTSZAJkWqEVGek9uu9AToGNLP9+/cTU ZMexSM5jZUKGWXOsgDRvnTO5pdVK0QUUUgGsY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JUSscN2lu+zjNDqWQESXk6geQnbJ+llDdlsizGGw28E51MXuC2C05spyavnG415Ee6 M9Jhf6oAK3HUE8P1R0BaUVASrb8SDfcy7oBSmoDP8iyFRFoRqnN8oXaZj5erR49xi7Li jck+l+1LGhINEl50LgW3DwYdXMgqjcFISLv7A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.50.129 with SMTP id z1mr22317128ebf.33.1262374851500; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:40:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100101193814.GA60021@stack.nl> References: <1bd550a01001010945i1a043ff9t70eb814cafe4b30a@mail.gmail.com> <20100101193814.GA60021@stack.nl> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:40:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1bd550a01001011140y716bc636v8a9e054a35164087@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Jilles Tjoelker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: linprocfs Input/output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:41:03 -0000 2010/1/1 Jilles Tjoelker : > On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 06:45:33PM +0100, Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: >> Hi all, I post here cause I didn't get any answers in freebsd-emulation. > >> In 8.0-RELEASE-p1 if I try to execute this: > >> cat /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo > ~/cpuinfo.txt > >> I get > >> cat: /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo: Input/output error > >> truss shows the read system call returns ERR#5. It is the same with >> other files from linprocfs. > >> cat /compat/linux/proc/[any_file] works fine > >> What am I missing? > > You are not missing anything, this is a bug. A while ago, cat(1) was > changed to use larger buffers when writing to regular files on machines > with sufficient RAM, usually a multiple of MAXPHYS. On the other hand, > pseudofs (the general framework for filesystems such as procfs, > linprocfs and linsysfs) in src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c > pfs_read() fails any read over MAXPHYS + 1 with EIO. This limit probably > has to do with the allocation of a buffer of that size using sbuf_new(9) > (and so, malloc(9)). > > Some sort of limit seems appropriate, but MAXPHYS seems unrelated, and > if the request is too long it should perhaps just truncate it. Thanks a lot for the explanation. > > -- > Jilles Tjoelker > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 20:57:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09521106566B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2D28FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost by koef.zs64.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o01KSUfO065562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:28:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) (authenticated as stb) From: Stefan Bethke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:28:30 +0100 Message-Id: <8E9BCE63-C37A-438C-94D8-7AA86B9F6597@lassitu.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Subject: TEMPer USB Thermometer X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:57:30 -0000 Various outfits including Brando are selling a cheap-ish USB thermometer = named =93TEMPer=94. (I need one to monitor my home server closet.) I've put together a small command line utility that reads out the = temperature from the LM75 sensor in the TEMPer: = http://wiki.zs64.net/TEMPer_USB_Thermometer To run it, you will need to have the driver for WinChipHead = USB-to-serial controller loaded (uchcom(8) on FreeBSD). It puts the LM75 into 12-bit resolution mode (about one measurement per = second) and outputs temperature data once per second in degrees Celcius. The LM75 thermostat is connected to an LED, so you can use that as an = indicator of temperature. Note that driving the LED dissipates enough = power (probably through the current-limiting resistor) that the measured = temperature rises by two degrees. usage: temper [-d device] [-h high] [-l low] [-n count] -d device USB serial port of the TEMPer -h high thermostat on temperature -l low thermostat off temperature -n count number of readings to take, <0 is infinite If the high temperature is below the low temperature, operation of the thermostat is reversed, and the output is turned on when the measured temperature is below the threshold. Enjoy! Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 21:25:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4DF106566B for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jilles@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay04.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C958FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::135]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE481DD625 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:25:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1677) id CD0F173F9D; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:25:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:25:35 +0100 From: Jilles Tjoelker To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100101212535.GB60021@stack.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: [PATCH] fts(3): allow FTS_LOGICAL without FTS_NOCHDIR X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:25:36 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline fts(3) currently automatically enables FTS_NOCHDIR if FTS_LOGICAL (-L in various utilities) is used, according to a comment because symlinks are too hard. However, the effect of fts_instr=FTS_FOLLOW seems quite similar to FTS_LOGICAL in chdir mode. Using one more bit in fts_flags, I made FTS_LOGICAL work with chdir. This has several advantages: * it runs faster * it eliminates the PATH_MAX restriction on deep directory trees * find -L ... -type l -delete can be made to work without ugliness (although it is of course still insecure if run over directory trees where untrusted users have write access) Question: why are the values for fts_flags in the public header file fts.h, even though they are supposedly private? In case the mailing list eats the patch, it is also available here: http://www.stack.nl/~jilles/unix/fts-logical-chdir.patch -- Jilles Tjoelker --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fts-logical-chdir.patch" Index: include/fts.h =================================================================== --- include/fts.h (revision 201269) +++ include/fts.h (working copy) @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ #define FTS_DONTCHDIR 0x01 /* don't chdir .. to the parent */ #define FTS_SYMFOLLOW 0x02 /* followed a symlink to get here */ #define FTS_ISW 0x04 /* this is a whiteout object */ +#define FTS_DIRSYM 0x08 /* this is a symlink to a directory */ unsigned fts_flags; /* private flags for FTSENT structure */ #define FTS_AGAIN 1 /* read node again */ Index: lib/libc/gen/fts.c =================================================================== --- lib/libc/gen/fts.c (revision 201269) +++ lib/libc/gen/fts.c (working copy) @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ /* Shush, GCC. */ tmp = NULL; - /* Logical walks turn on NOCHDIR; symbolic links are too hard. */ - if (ISSET(FTS_LOGICAL)) - SET(FTS_NOCHDIR); - /* * Start out with 1K of path space, and enough, in any case, * to hold the user's paths. @@ -355,8 +351,10 @@ /* If skipped or crossed mount point, do post-order visit. */ if (instr == FTS_SKIP || (ISSET(FTS_XDEV) && p->fts_dev != sp->fts_dev)) { - if (p->fts_flags & FTS_SYMFOLLOW) + if (p->fts_flags & FTS_SYMFOLLOW) { (void)_close(p->fts_symfd); + p->fts_symfd = -1; + } if (sp->fts_child) { fts_lfree(sp->fts_child); sp->fts_child = NULL; @@ -385,6 +383,14 @@ * FTS_STOP or the fts_info field of the node. */ if (sp->fts_child != NULL) { + if (p->fts_flags & FTS_DIRSYM && + !(p->fts_flags & FTS_SYMFOLLOW)) { + if ((p->fts_symfd = _open(".", O_RDONLY, 0)) < 0) { + p->fts_errno = errno; + p->fts_info = FTS_ERR; + } else + p->fts_flags |= FTS_SYMFOLLOW; + } if (fts_safe_changedir(sp, p, -1, p->fts_accpath)) { p->fts_errno = errno; p->fts_flags |= FTS_DONTCHDIR; @@ -674,8 +680,8 @@ nlinks = 0; /* Be quiet about nostat, GCC. */ nostat = 0; - } else if (ISSET(FTS_NOSTAT) && ISSET(FTS_PHYSICAL)) { - if (fts_ufslinks(sp, cur)) + } else if (ISSET(FTS_NOSTAT)) { + if (ISSET(FTS_PHYSICAL) && fts_ufslinks(sp, cur)) nlinks = cur->fts_nlink - (ISSET(FTS_SEEDOT) ? 0 : 2); else nlinks = -1; @@ -707,7 +713,19 @@ */ cderrno = 0; if (nlinks || type == BREAD) { - if (fts_safe_changedir(sp, cur, dirfd(dirp), NULL)) { + if (cur->fts_flags & FTS_DIRSYM && + !(cur->fts_flags & FTS_SYMFOLLOW)) { + if ((cur->fts_symfd = _open(".", O_RDONLY, 0)) < 0) { + if (nlinks && type == BREAD) + cur->fts_errno = errno; + cur->fts_flags |= FTS_DONTCHDIR; + descend = 0; + cderrno = errno; + } else + cur->fts_flags |= FTS_SYMFOLLOW; + } + if (!(cur->fts_flags & FTS_DONTCHDIR) && + fts_safe_changedir(sp, cur, dirfd(dirp), NULL)) { if (nlinks && type == BREAD) cur->fts_errno = errno; cur->fts_flags |= FTS_DONTCHDIR; @@ -796,7 +814,8 @@ } else if (nlinks == 0 #ifdef DT_DIR || (nostat && - dp->d_type != DT_DIR && dp->d_type != DT_UNKNOWN) + dp->d_type != DT_DIR && dp->d_type != DT_UNKNOWN && + (dp->d_type != DT_LNK || ISSET(FTS_PHYSICAL))) #endif ) { p->fts_accpath = @@ -883,7 +902,7 @@ FTSENT *t; dev_t dev; ino_t ino; - struct stat *sbp, sb; + struct stat *sbp, sb, sb2; int saved_errno; /* If user needs stat info, stat buffer already allocated. */ @@ -923,6 +942,20 @@ if (S_ISDIR(sbp->st_mode)) { /* + * Check if this is actually a symlink to a directory. + * If so, record this fact so we save a file descriptor + * to get back instead of using "..". + */ + if (ISSET(FTS_LOGICAL) && !follow) { + if (lstat(p->fts_accpath, &sb2)) { + p->fts_errno = errno; + goto err; + } + if (S_ISLNK(sb2.st_mode)) + p->fts_flags |= FTS_DIRSYM; + } + + /* * Set the device/inode. Used to find cycles and check for * crossing mount points. Also remember the link count, used * in fts_build to limit the number of stat calls. It is --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 1 21:59:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1FE1065679; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:59:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (hylle01.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5CF8FC0A; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CA331E026; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:59:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hylle01.itea.ntnu.no Received: from carrot (lynx.stud.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::180]) by hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5114F31E025; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:59:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 23:59:18 +0100 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100101225918.GA6184@carrot> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, sarawgi.aditya@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, sarawgi.aditya@gmail.com Subject: [HEADSUP] Google SoC work on ext2fs to be committed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:59:31 -0000 Hello, In a few days, I will commit the ext2fs improvements done by Aditya Sarawgi during and after Google Summer of Code to CURRENT. Some quick notes: - BSD licensed block and inode allocation policies for ext2fs. This involves the use FFS1 style block and inode allocation for ext2fs. Preallocation was removed since it was GPL'd. - Orlov Block Allocator for ext2fs. (Aditya can perhaps provide some details). - Some PR fixes and older bugs. - Make ext2fs MPSAFE by introducing locks to per-mount datastructures. More information along with nice shiny graphs can be found here: http://wiki.freebsd.org/SOC2009AdityaSarawgi and, of course, the code: http://gitorious.org/freebsd-ext2fs/freebsd-ext2fs As the work on support MP-safe operation may cause race conditions not discovered yet, it is important to report on these issues as they are encountered. Issues with the new implementation may be adressed to Aditya (CCed). http://wiki.freebsd.org/AdityaSarawgi -- Ulf Lilleengen From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 00:21:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB58D1065692; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DB48FC15; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so12452993yxe.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:21:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/gdcPPWnq2UfYe2YjMnYvTploq7lC5xxuLA/rGZgbZ4=; b=aHqzN5nB0DSGMrsCwM5uajRCerEQT89m5Has/hddU71Y8cVHEh7Ge1pyWSxF86b6Xt 6H266I381mqcMt4Drv2dN5a2mvjHS9x267WEUuEaMYudKKmnwkOCr1d4aB1HSBgQAqpS RplvMs9Hby9zIf2kyLo90bjNY69xbZ9QlzKUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cD99OQN1AVkMz1njFqtqJHf6lSY2AfReV7xEc+rJFJJK+jynKPawMAgytMcFanpM1W 6oKe78YJArEVijEzFH3/eXqWzgOuM8+Jkm0QVU/bt5+OFvwq1WUwQqtaCqXMQZ0VKSno iXYnGQiSDy6c3lETkzhnF6K+U0SizRFyfo2fw= Received: by 10.151.25.6 with SMTP id c6mr30019921ybj.243.1262391662474; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:21:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.31.240? (ppp-22.143.dialinfree.com [209.172.22.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm15017452iwn.15.2010.01.01.16.20.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:21:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:20:54 -0500 From: jhell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Schouten References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> <20100101112417.GU64905@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20100101112417.GU64905@hoeg.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:21:15 -0000 On 1/1/2010 6:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > * jhell wrote: >> With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure out. > > If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from > responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is > to help each other. > You know really... I did not see anything that you have replied with to be constructive criticism "At all". And personally if you really want to reply with remarks of "Would you mind sharing your findings Sherlock Holmes" You can then keep your comments to your self as I do not find them useful and my name is not Sherlock Holmes. Secondly I would expect a much more intelligent remark to come from someone with your background but I guess that comes with age. So my suggestion in constructiveness to you would be to think harder before you critique a post of the very same nature as the one you posted. As regards to the OP the email was meant as a confirmation to the author that the problem did lye on his end and that by paying closer attention to "the paths" that were displayed in the OP would have revealed the problem. -- jhell From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 00:32:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653701065679; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C059D8FC15; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so8640348bwz.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:32:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HlgumiJbayx1VEFq69r9RqKrGHfMzPzsq3b4mEJEFDM=; b=dcEL2yPAfg7jseBeILVH0Y2/BDXvrSHxTqV+n2KpVALEgzk6aqyu5MPY1wekgpX8Tq ajjcUiMbK26IGVTLzs8SPXXWPu6RxSwIFiMVykZSMUYvEc8TPQ6QaBPgBlnf6EuIsKtL l4tiNR9/x+TnAYXf0yoRMNwaCwdpIxDCOTa9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LF4GXnr3bvTXY1nCm9/yZi5rH38r1QhdCdR/ernW6VBYHKgpa1jbNoanb5WhlBsL2A 5RbT3zhkJlb4L4aLwo7s+VrzAlHUC23ZwBcOVeUgmOPYNV7ZIfT5IbQT8tdaiqZZiDVv o2yrLvpwXrrTmnk3khDhhpAObzIA8lGWioG9s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.3.220 with SMTP id 28mr6421248bko.4.1262392369049; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:32:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net> References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> <20100101112417.GU64905@hoeg.nl> <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:32:48 +0100 Message-ID: <6101e8c41001011632y2e72e8fbw8869d376f3616e5d@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Pinter To: jhell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ed Schouten , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:32:55 -0000 the problem is at a standstill above always, only I did not see a sense so since I did not receive constructive feedback v=E9=E1aszolni... otherwise i tested more things, but the situation did not change. // sorry for bad english, but I never learned it.. On 1/2/10, jhell wrote: > On 1/1/2010 6:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: >> * jhell wrote: >>> With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure ou= t. >> >> If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from >> responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is >> to help each other. >> > > You know really... I did not see anything that you have replied with to > be constructive criticism "At all". > > And personally if you really want to reply with remarks of "Would you > mind sharing your findings Sherlock Holmes" You can then keep your > comments to your self as I do not find them useful and my name is not > Sherlock Holmes. > > Secondly I would expect a much more intelligent remark to come from > someone with your background but I guess that comes with age. > > So my suggestion in constructiveness to you would be to think harder > before you critique a post of the very same nature as the one you posted. > > As regards to the OP the email was meant as a confirmation to the author > that the problem did lye on his end and that by paying closer attention > to "the paths" that were displayed in the OP would have revealed the > problem. > > -- > > jhell > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 00:47:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65051065672; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058918FC0C; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so8642837bwz.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:47:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pffCwMjO7Now8DDfQoqa3PuLjbXL/QnDlFtnLdnMjQo=; b=p4h6fRUkMlEG5dyx3Xo2XUyvBWNvmWfYB4s7lcpN3ceIlI2tT3SSqtPz9o73m+C+Dm ++2jNMi0JZi42aJaldTtyZTusG3H7cXrqHFKd8Em+JKps0go0A8iAdXvb1x5ye5wPw1m qjpg3EOJw/ID8Ue7eY8H+YuDLz2amVIvX6heM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RTmIeN67t//w6DpMD2Yp7JiNpEvz3+ic09UXiNToEfWbgbCm+CBg5tuY6T5MGCwxN0 WnDHmhqrJRYshpLGmpeqO6Q1TPxEgMo6T90vF6h58RceFnOhbO6ZURWVFtSjJPMURXIt xXonOXy0MBiRkBXPEG239LytLyhpf3a1Jsbis= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.19 with SMTP id u19mr7343229bkw.62.1262393227424; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:47:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6101e8c41001011632y2e72e8fbw8869d376f3616e5d@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> <20100101112417.GU64905@hoeg.nl> <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net> <6101e8c41001011632y2e72e8fbw8869d376f3616e5d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:47:07 +0100 Message-ID: <6101e8c41001011647h4717c699gfac48b9a38884791@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Pinter To: jhell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ed Schouten , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:47:13 -0000 and the newest log: ____ M COPYRIGHT r201336 =3D a1f0e71ec85d326f0cb79b829129279961a36ed9 (refs/remotes/git-svn) M lib/libc/gen/time.3 M lib/libc/sys/clock_gettime.2 Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/lib/libc/stdtime Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/vendor/tzcode/dist/libc/stdtime Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/lib/libc Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/vendor/tzcode/dist/libc r201363 =3D b04276d84884164bf0878eb7d11f3100bcdcd3a0 (refs/remotes/git-svn) Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/stable/8/sys Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/user/kmacy/releng_7_2_fcs/sys Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/user/peter/kinfo/sys Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys/contrib/dev/acpica Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys/contr= ib/pf Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/stable/8/sys/contrib/pf Couldn't find revmap for svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/user/peter/kinfo/sys/contrib/pf r201365 =3D 4ad205e7e4ca78fc6ac8e5e9ea81b2199339917f (refs/remotes/git-svn) First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Fast-forwarded master to refs/remotes/git-svn. >From /usr/data/source/git/7-STABLE 00e48c1..4ad205e master -> origin/master Merge made by recursive. COPYRIGHT | 2 +- lib/libc/gen/time.3 | 1 + lib/libc/sys/clock_gettime.2 | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----= --- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) ____ the master local git repo don't touched, only synced with freebsd's svn repo, and the local commit are in second git tree commited, say it as: ~/src/, and the master is /usr/data/source/git/7-STABLE - this is a simple _git svn rebase_ based git tree. the command with synced the tree is: alias src_update '(cd /usr/data/source/git/7-STABLE.git; git svn rebase; cd ~/src; git pull) |& less' so, the all process show as this: 1) cd /usr/data/source/git/7-STABLE.git # can't comment.. 2) git svn rebase # this fetched the source from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7, and then updated the git repo 3) cd ~/src # can't comment.. 4) git pull # this fetched from the GIT repo the source, this runned without error So, the error is somewhere in process 2). And the errors in log is recently this files: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/lib/libc/stdtime svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/vendor/tzcode/dist/libc/stdtime svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/lib/libc svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/vendor/tzcode/dist/libc svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/stable/8/sys svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/user/kmacy/releng_7_2_fcs/sys svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/user/peter/kinfo/sys svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys/contrib/dev/acpica svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head/sys/contrib/pf svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/stable/8/sys/contrib/pf svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/user/peter/kinfo/sys/contrib/pf when you see the PATHs, then its showed as: 7-STABLE_base_path+"do something else" and at the end, i synced with this process my source code over one year, but it showed since ~1 week, as the first mail wroted.. On 1/2/10, Oliver Pinter wrote: > the problem is at a standstill above always, only I did not see a > sense so since I did not receive constructive feedback v=E9=E1aszolni... > otherwise i tested more things, but the situation did not change. > > // sorry for bad english, but I never learned it.. > > On 1/2/10, jhell wrote: >> On 1/1/2010 6:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: >>> * jhell wrote: >>>> With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure >>>> out. >>> >>> If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from >>> responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is >>> to help each other. >>> >> >> You know really... I did not see anything that you have replied with to >> be constructive criticism "At all". >> >> And personally if you really want to reply with remarks of "Would you >> mind sharing your findings Sherlock Holmes" You can then keep your >> comments to your self as I do not find them useful and my name is not >> Sherlock Holmes. >> >> Secondly I would expect a much more intelligent remark to come from >> someone with your background but I guess that comes with age. >> >> So my suggestion in constructiveness to you would be to think harder >> before you critique a post of the very same nature as the one you posted= . >> >> As regards to the OP the email was meant as a confirmation to the author >> that the problem did lye on his end and that by paying closer attention >> to "the paths" that were displayed in the OP would have revealed the >> problem. >> >> -- >> >> jhell >> > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 01:22:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7A21065693; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail4.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:6000:6::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2828FC15; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o021LuwQ027758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:21:57 -0800 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 9B9CB1CC0B; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:21:56 -0800 (PST) To: jhell In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:20:54 EST." <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:21:56 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20100102012156.9B9CB1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-01-02_01:2009-12-31, 2010-01-02, 2010-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001010194 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:39:59 +0000 Cc: Ed Schouten , stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter , FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:22:53 -0000 > Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:20:54 -0500 > From: jhell > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > On 1/1/2010 6:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > > * jhell wrote: > >> With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure out. > > > > If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from > > responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is > > to help each other. > > > > You know really... I did not see anything that you have replied with to > be constructive criticism "At all". > > And personally if you really want to reply with remarks of "Would you > mind sharing your findings Sherlock Holmes" You can then keep your > comments to your self as I do not find them useful and my name is not > Sherlock Holmes. > > Secondly I would expect a much more intelligent remark to come from > someone with your background but I guess that comes with age. > > So my suggestion in constructiveness to you would be to think harder > before you critique a post of the very same nature as the one you posted. > > As regards to the OP the email was meant as a confirmation to the author > that the problem did lye on his end and that by paying closer attention > to "the paths" that were displayed in the OP would have revealed the > problem. OK. I will try to say something "constructive". You seem to think that "clever", useless comments make you look good. As someone who has been working with FreeBSD and the FreeBSD community for a long time, all you really do is make yourself look juvenile, arrogant, and rude. You are a prime example of why many people approaching the FreeBSD community for help claim that we are an arrogant and rude bunch. The information content of your messages approaches zero. Maybe the problem is trivial and obvious to you. Maybe it would be to Ed, if he could spot it. Now, if you have never missed an obvious bug until you asked someone why the code would not work, you are either truly exceptional (along with the adjectives listed above) or have written little or no code of your own. Please either provide reasonable assistance when responding to questions or don't reply at all. No one likes a smart ass, -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 01:48:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE0B106566B for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F048FC13 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so11420483ewy.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:48:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sho8sdbrS3TJuuoMElCIEygRUqj2cm/PXGVLS8qzQ3A=; b=AGoB6UG5Bkj1eCJHXEDfsYGY9sAPa0HO5ETvkiXwqGvdJ1oi37DjowCGGzSPeLmusq 8l0YzCDEygqj+nXAD1i+eEvKoo4q0ow3ujF142Jn5A5XdARDC0bAWRwcVadad/NeIVWy eEcQBpPTm94T8DH3g1PgwyLCPC3ajjUSC/O9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VP9/7ODf0OgRJksuj6Vf/nsxgqnQxLtdZreN91G/2apW3j8v2dlGOXi1PmRH/Ce4jO RDGN31/XgwAICiWXyTXAYvXCk6cACM8JGC65n9Q1Oh6QZL/Rj8k4NW3doXR7yNR/bW7o GXGf/l9y7UTgUrLsucubVQuDLFY0RjyKy99YY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.195 with SMTP id w45mr4914362wee.82.1262396911607; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:48:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:48:31 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: Oliver Pinter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:48:45 -0000 > the git config is: > > [core] > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0repositoryformatversion =3D 0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0filemode =3D true > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0bare =3D false > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0logallrefupdates =3D true > [svn-remote "svn"] >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0url =3D svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7 <<<< > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0fetch =3D :refs/remotes/git-svn > It looks like the error is on the line I've highlighted(note that it's trying to fetch files under svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head, which clearly won't work). I don't know anything about git so I can't give advice as to how to accomplish what you're trying to do. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 01:58:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6055D106566C; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831428FC08; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so8654934bwz.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:58:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TOwlKqKNZa3Epv2czEwi0dxyvHD2EFTAdxZ1/VQibgI=; b=DgIlU5eS+KbmxIXVlTDyUu2poKtVv2gBLjugNSli0ygGg7jiEdXPqV6fHUwI02Swxa kHoiQdQ/SSgFyyIijgMXXEhrJGB0hw8TUtHffF2GEcZ8Rwpx7O3qqcYuKDDu9sGOFqEo XxXNo3fkUIk5xA1QKIpFp6G1GOtlzQLAsAFvA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hdNKGddixGR1NDShLDU8ra6YF0nznDcc61GYtBjqZxT0MXkfMnht+HaqI3Eqksrd48 jly0TxyFuGLDV+RxZQTkRptvpTxONb6b0ETE+3bz1+WX4b8yqOhkpHHpAPWz43tWeaLB oDcNEnJfflpsfl1cjw8Lu06UxoUhmjbbn+3TE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.32.215 with SMTP id e23mr9282360bkd.36.1262397508927; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:58:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:58:28 +0100 Message-ID: <6101e8c41001011758y76db700cm3599bb932a1f5d0d@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Pinter To: Ryan Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:58:40 -0000 yeah, but svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head don't exist. git svn log -v some of broken infos find in this commit: r200570 | stas | 2009-12-15 11:34:05 +0100 (Tue, 15 Dec 2009) | 23 lines Changed paths: M share/man/man4/bge.4 M sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c M sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h - MFC r197832, r197834, r197837: - Add support for new BGE chips (5761, 5784 and 57780). These chips uses= new BGE_PCI_PRODID_ASICREV register to store the chip identifier and its re= visio n. - Add new grouping macro for 7575+ chips (BGE_IS_5755_PLUS). - Add IDs for Fujitsu-branded Broadcom adapters. > PR: If a GNATS PR is affected by the change. > Submitted by: If someone else sent in the change. > Reviewed by: If someone else reviewed your modification. > Approved by: If you needed approval for this commit. > Obtained from: If the change is from a third party. > MFC after: N [day[s]|week[s]|month[s]]. Request a reminder email. > Security: Vulnerability reference (one per line) or description. > Empty fields above will be automatically removed. _M 7/share/man/man4 M 7/share/man/man4/bge.4 _M 7/sys M 7/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h M 7/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c _M 7/sys/contrib/pf _M 7/sys/contrib/dev/acpica _M 7/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris On 1/2/10, Ryan Stone wrote: >> the git config is: >> >> [core] >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0repositoryformatversion =3D 0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0filemode =3D true >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0bare =3D false >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0logallrefupdates =3D true >> [svn-remote "svn"] >>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0url =3D svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7 <<<< >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0fetch =3D :refs/remotes/git-svn >> > > It looks like the error is on the line I've highlighted(note that it's > trying to fetch files under svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head, > which clearly won't work). I don't know anything about git so I can't > give advice as to how to accomplish what you're trying to do. > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 02:34:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B167F1065672; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E9D8FC13; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so8661136bwz.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:34:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2u0zAKz+Y7vdOCFZNpfzkGDO4zbYqurLrzXah3VpE8U=; b=lPNNqO5DaW7IW2aO6QeoHPNjcV4K8hvLZjLDqwCBhrporelikG1WvSEFkxqMv0X5Cg Wfn9zUfx95TSARvh8oyuKaqpWs9FGiFNSrMeAzVIJIStPnG2K/lcbqtDaEd2+nQK90ly 8dWGn/DC+NoYvzr/Ptw8fjHoky39hfhy+bFGQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NZN3ssgW5HEMQO/PGcSSSG1Iv5tKOadNNLWYohCun9pX5j+oUMlxBM/gzOf8v4Lvem KYu+aMilQ9pAHJbvRm0XpE+O380dtoAjVfLeardxhJDGpb9De4uephz/I3h5E1nbYRGK j/wtxccJKtuBWMBZP3RvbqPFOGAXoyb5BgAfU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.195 with SMTP id y3mr4922248bkw.46.1262399663721; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:34:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6101e8c41001011758y76db700cm3599bb932a1f5d0d@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c41001011758y76db700cm3599bb932a1f5d0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:34:23 +0100 Message-ID: <6101e8c41001011834v10f932ah90459bfb05847bfa@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Pinter To: Ryan Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Sam Vilain Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:34:32 -0000 hmmm, it's look like this: http://lists-archives.org/git/707921-git-svn-memoize-conversion-of-svn-merge-ticket-info-to-git-commit-ranges.html git releated change is the source of the warnings.. and the git is updated at Dec 28 20:39 ll /usr/local/bin/git -rwxr-xr-x 95 root wheel 1066766 Dec 28 20:39 /usr/local/bin/git so i have this workaround: --8<-- alias src_update '(cd /usr/data/source/git/7-STABLE.git; '\ 'git svn rebase' \ '| grep -E -v "^Couldn.t find revmap for svn://svn\.freebsd\.org/base/stable/7";' \ 'cd ~/src;' \ 'git pull)' \ '|& less' --8<-- and sorry for noise.. ps.: added the git patch author to cc On 1/2/10, Oliver Pinter wrote: > yeah, but svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head don't exist. > > git svn log -v > > some of broken infos find in this commit: > > r200570 | stas | 2009-12-15 11:34:05 +0100 (Tue, 15 Dec 2009) | 23 lines > Changed paths: > M share/man/man4/bge.4 > M sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c > M sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h > > - MFC r197832, r197834, r197837: > - Add support for new BGE chips (5761, 5784 and 57780). These chips uses > new > BGE_PCI_PRODID_ASICREV register to store the chip identifier and its > revisio > n. > - Add new grouping macro for 7575+ chips (BGE_IS_5755_PLUS). > - Add IDs for Fujitsu-branded Broadcom adapters. >> PR: If a GNATS PR is affected by the change. >> Submitted by: If someone else sent in the change. >> Reviewed by: If someone else reviewed your modification. >> Approved by: If you needed approval for this commit. >> Obtained from: If the change is from a third party. >> MFC after: N [day[s]|week[s]|month[s]]. Request a reminder email. >> Security: Vulnerability reference (one per line) or description. >> Empty fields above will be automatically removed. > > _M 7/share/man/man4 > M 7/share/man/man4/bge.4 > _M 7/sys > M 7/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h > M 7/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c > _M 7/sys/contrib/pf > _M 7/sys/contrib/dev/acpica > _M 7/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris > > > On 1/2/10, Ryan Stone wrote: >>> the git config is: >>> >>> [core] >>> repositoryformatversion = 0 >>> filemode = true >>> bare = false >>> logallrefupdates = true >>> [svn-remote "svn"] >>>>>>> url = svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7 <<<< >>> fetch = :refs/remotes/git-svn >>> >> >> It looks like the error is on the line I've highlighted(note that it's >> trying to fetch files under svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7/head, >> which clearly won't work). I don't know anything about git so I can't >> give advice as to how to accomplish what you're trying to do. >> > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 04:44:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263301065670; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 04:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBCF8FC0C; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 04:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so12526555yxe.3 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:44:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7X2XKFWaI6LlZQCAlJFsdua2z1yDRfEPJUCyJR8SVpo=; b=jU+YWysf8LjxWNk5AQsm1CQxXo3KNZMYCzPA8OIZDldeI04nrV2/H57rKtx2CwgRa/ O9K2qB+90DBm2lxl4cCFqG6AhyJUIoCC8Umlmlp7t29cEndEzRha0i1op1AP0apAuPnN WTVr3XvpM9YC7oY0u+c8wgYlrdi2+lasN5A1U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PPcaTSIMYdmGzpeuNL/qv48+dcTcIJ4nDlJu4ppcbqL0vyoHZc5t/S5vQsyxBpXtpi JuzgtyBL55kTVQ5AflMhuJWeZWSJ2k80mKOBLPMt9P470jCFtykiRzKuBlgjgJNVgFiE TYLRghhiraTxUz5oBJwjj/vmOD2DcN7EPXTXI= Received: by 10.150.45.36 with SMTP id s36mr13995367ybs.334.1262407440163; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:44:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.31.240? (ppp-22.43.dialinfree.com [209.172.22.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm15204934iwn.3.2010.01.01.20.43.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:43:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <4B3ECF05.8020904@DataIX.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:43:49 -0500 From: jhell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <20100102012156.9B9CB1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20100102012156.9B9CB1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ed Schouten , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers , Oliver Pinter Subject: Re: something fails with svn X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:44:15 -0000 On 1/1/2010 8:21 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:20:54 -0500 >> From: jhell >> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> >> On 1/1/2010 6:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: >>> * jhell wrote: >>>> With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure out. >>> >>> If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from >>> responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is >>> to help each other. >>> >> >> You know really... I did not see anything that you have replied with to >> be constructive criticism "At all". >> >> And personally if you really want to reply with remarks of "Would you >> mind sharing your findings Sherlock Holmes" You can then keep your >> comments to your self as I do not find them useful and my name is not >> Sherlock Holmes. >> >> Secondly I would expect a much more intelligent remark to come from >> someone with your background but I guess that comes with age. >> >> So my suggestion in constructiveness to you would be to think harder >> before you critique a post of the very same nature as the one you posted. >> >> As regards to the OP the email was meant as a confirmation to the author >> that the problem did lye on his end and that by paying closer attention >> to "the paths" that were displayed in the OP would have revealed the >> problem. > > OK. I will try to say something "constructive". > > You seem to think that "clever", useless comments make you look good. As > someone who has been working with FreeBSD and the FreeBSD community for > a long time, all you really do is make yourself look juvenile, arrogant, > and rude. You are a prime example of why many people approaching the > FreeBSD community for help claim that we are an arrogant and rude bunch. > That's great and all but have you read the reply that I had originally made to the OP. It does not "seem" like it from your comments. > The information content of your messages approaches zero. Maybe the > problem is trivial and obvious to you. Maybe it would be to Ed, if he > could spot it. Now, if you have never missed an obvious bug until you > asked someone why the code would not work, you are either truly > exceptional (along with the adjectives listed above) or have written > little or no code of your own. > > Please either provide reasonable assistance when responding to questions > or don't reply at all. No one likes a smart ass, > Reasonable assistance I think that was pretty reasonable, I do not recall anyone paying something for anything I have said and it seemed to me that he was asking for more of a confirmation. > I do not like smart asses either, which in turn is why I am still replying to comments about the followup and why I don't know that I feel I should have to defend my self on this matter. For one: The followup that I had made as I already stated was confirming the problem was on his end and in no way that I see was offending, maybe I could have choose different words but that does not relieve the response I had received after from Ed. For two: If you want to call someone something call them by the respective name or email address that they have spoken with. I do not ever recall naming Ed anything other than his own name nor anyone else. As spoken do on to others as you would do onto your self. I repeat my name is not Sherlock Holmes. Thirdly: Constructive ? there was nothing non-constructive about the followup I had made. I have missed plenty of things in the past and would never claim otherwise and the information that I offered certainly was not complete but was meant not to be, and not in a critiquing manner. -- jhell From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 03:32:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9AA106568B for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from web113517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DAB78FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84549 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2010 03:06:13 -0000 Message-ID: <454084.84334.qm@web113517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: CgPAmHEVM1nmOIr3MhFs.SuXGzGCD1LHbvqpbPH8_t5RMa6Gh0bY3b4hnaho_OHgnLXLdAzUnAnReXmqXltmLzXxiGs_x1qy2pzKVYTHcLOFDUmoR9C.uEKEjCg1uMeGrF7m72CQ7bsD5rTFGvZzbpauPBBtQ4ihg5YN.o0gDVJJ4OXgtrnYcQ8cazXA721WGmn08WWEmEobFmUWvlk6TbrKBrFDQ4z9.D2xFcFSHnTKphzKFhA8jIbKVrlF3hstUJ.1E72C2PYWDoNOH08HpI61jKnocmOF79gRgFNAhPpqlbH2A11y3KhtcrcL6YiCzgT1tT4XrQW7qf3nW.6auEA4nLu3yNxEeVulK7VE2uzoqp1uyVZgAMjMF0nzR.Jrv8eH1hn9tWWFthc3pCbVOF2tghX7AydEkJmzXmHXHalWMbtLR.ghPgjy2xy7vKxGoulTTDo0aj3cB3iDDA3Ug_9EG9jLsZTrA2Bxb6EOW3c1y1l6d2x9JhTKf0eSNwJFtHRfjd8uTzG46NHUSSLA2LSVFdrYUS7lECtiWRVEjyxutEnYDLHCUWngWq4gzw.6_lMsGqRe0Z9CK1XtkA_oSBl97k9a63fhD7h2WvQMr2OuJkGQjgyH.GvDV1xHjNUcEpXyenVnXO80nDyZ.iRVuQyePV9ONNd1N3.3vaMVyzUhxUKRDsixvXo_d6Zv_SAkosBxvZBbt3F2IjzsbN2f1Q6zTJ1cqlD_GjFYwl9nd48zcA-- Received: from [190.157.123.47] by web113517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:06:13 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.0.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:06:13 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:54:19 +0000 Cc: sarawgi.aditya@gmail.com, Ulf Lilleengen Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Google SoC work on ext2fs to be committed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Hello; I've been following closely this port and have been sending comments and patches to Aditya so I would like to comment on some points: - The code in it's current state is very similar to UFS1 without softupdates and EA/ACLs. - preallocation pretends to provide a similar effect as BSD's reallocblk (which is partially ported but may be difficult to finish). Preallocation has changed on different ext?fs versions but there are a couple of documents on the net on how this is done in linux. (1) - For the linux guys the Orlov allocator is their interpretation of what UFS knows to be the "dirpref changes". The code was ripped from FFS1 with some adaptations for ext2fs. The linux specific directory hacks don't apply. - While the benchmarking results are very similar, they achieve the results through different means: apparently making the code MPSafe (which was also heavily borrowed from UFS) has somewhat compensated for the removal of the preallocation code. Things TODO The fact that it so simple and similar to our beloved FFS1 and that the linux guys have published documents about it makes this filesystem an excellent target to play with. Some possibilities: - Implement preallocation. (1) - Htree is some similar to ufs dirhash. (2) - Ext3 Journaling (3) or maybe just gjournal support. (3) - Make it understand the basic ext4 layout. - NetBSD has some basic mkfs_ext2fs and fsck_ext2fs. I have to say Aditya did an excellent job, and was even careful to keep everything as similar as possible to UFS and NetBSD's ext2fs so we can adopt future enhancements they make. References (sorry for broken links) (1) http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/kumar-reprint.pdf (2) http://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2002/ols2002-pages-425-438.pdf (3) http://jamesthornton.com/hotlist/linux-filesystems/ext3-journal-design.pdf regards, Pedro.