Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:27:56 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: Philip Herron <redbrain@gcc.gnu.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using lex in a shared library Message-ID: <20100705062756.GA80063@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTintFOTV_FztqxIVE2d1PI15qIgoljA3_aOPWUGb@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTilp0zvMRbw96cifhIzmT4YbNVkxgOFZFa_nvl2m@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTildN27EcRSXXTpQl5vZD-kczKrIbgERQuiNkiTt@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik1dsTJYw0jy5mfEljWe-ETH1RJlZ8S4-taV1PV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTintFOTV_FztqxIVE2d1PI15qIgoljA3_aOPWUGb@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 2010-Jul-02 23:53:17 +0100, Philip Herron <redbrain@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> Although maybe not helpful but have you considered using >>> automake/libtool instead makes it so much simpler in my opinion. ... >Automake will auto-handle Lex and Yacc files too. And is extremely portable. You are joking, right? Of all the supposedly "portable" build environment tools I've used, GNU autotools is by far the slowest, most bloated and least portable. And when you run into problems, you are faced with trying to follow hundreds of KB of opaque shellscript and obfuscated makefiles. -- Peter Jeremy [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwxe2wACgkQ/opHv/APuIffNwCgwY3LdAvqrGvgbuy598zFTA2Z 2PMAnAnimtOSv40FjK9PhcIh+YDpcnIw =GF97 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100705062756.GA80063>