From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 09:45:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9DB106566B for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F9D8FC08 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-162-46.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.162.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E3267E88B for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:28:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD91428.5090002@bsdforen.de> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:28:08 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101028 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: /pub/FreeBSD or /FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:45:47 -0000 Hello, I'm asking about the official layout policy for mirrors. I have an application that does parallel package downloads from a list of mirrors and the different Layouts cause me some trouble. A lot of mirrors locate everything in /FreeBSD instead of /pub/FreeBSD. Mirrors that don't follow the /pub/FreeBSD layout are currently subject to unnecessary load caused by my application and cause significant CPU load on my side. My application does only one download from each server at a time. If a job fails the next available job is dispatched to the server (and the failed job will try a different one as soon as one is availble), so failing mirrors are subject to the highest frequency of requests. Is there an official policy for the mirror layout? Of course I can add some layout probing, but it would significantly slow down the startup phase of my application, which is a nuisance for small use cases. Regards P.S.: I'm not on this list, so please CC me. If someone suggests being on this list is useful for developing package management software I will consider subscribing, though. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?