From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 08:40:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC986106566C for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com (mail-ew0-f228.google.com [209.85.219.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465388FC19 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so449188ewy.13 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:40:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=UCcxnog/HJqQvLTb0DCSfqOkwzSkne7xbT2WUiuI9N0=; b=eUL/zWbxbi1NUQisLT4pri+AHhZvjpaXa82LJ0CX47JLFNSHh+RjSiSpcr0TheqrxD Z3Mw+L7M46XxqPIQVhOGviEG0mqsWjpQIK9ocWttxa5Hvp/bK3g28cM9yjVnPQa/DDj1 MjZXIV9mQyendQl+gpHN0CNJuAKnepigIzLYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Zt0SLJAUlEc/FJ4gp9Q00wHgh3cAB7gMR/Spgv3tXOIawvuTSv6DDJu2y6BUl3oaDu SGqwWBshOEbbtknwSCyYCoYbkLrQ0LGieHsP0VdJlstHCKW0OEUy3d1NhaoD3AlChqxX ijNAPouZpjNDevM6fXean6fMak8ip9lotDrjA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.39.140 with SMTP id g12mr1432334ebe.48.1268556054019; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:40:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:40:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ftp-proxy on jails on lo1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:40:55 -0000 I've been setting up my jails on a cloned interface called lo1 (127.0.1.0/24) - and it seems jails are having bit of a problem using ftp in passive mode even when I think I've set things up correctly. The only jail that is not on lo1 (192.168.0.4) is not having any issues connecting to a ftp server. pf.conf:: int_if="em0" jif="lo1" db1="127.0.1.1" web="127.0.1.2" proxy="127.0.1.3" imap="127.0.1.6" tomcat="127.0.1.8" ns="192.168.0.4" postgres="127.0.1.9" nat on $int_if from $jif:network to any -> ($int_if) nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" rdr pass proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021 #redirects to jails rdr pass on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port 8180 -> $tomcat rdr pass on { $int_if, lo0 } proto tcp from any to any port { 80, 443, 993 } -> $proxy rdr pass on $int_if proto { tcp, udp } from any to ($int_if) port domain -> $ns rdr pass on $int_if proto tcp from any to ($int_if) port 5432 -> $postgres anchor "ftp-proxy/*" pass all keep state and ftp-proxy is really running: shine# sockstat -4 | grep ftp proxy ftp-proxy 94980 3 tcp4 127.0.0.1:8021 *:* Any clues? -- chs, From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 11:07:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBDE106566B for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB228FC0A for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2FB7Gdj026918 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:07:16 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2FB7FPC026916 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:07:15 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:07:15 GMT Message-Id: <201003151107.o2FB7FPC026916@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:07:16 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s conf/142972 jail [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail o conf/141317 jail [patch] uncorrect jail stop in /etc/rc.d/jail o kern/133265 jail [jail] is there a solution how to run nfs client in ja o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 6 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 11:33:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D211065676 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mayank.Agarwal@netapp.com) Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D458FC17 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:33:38 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,642,1262592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="331019046" Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2010 04:21:56 -0700 Received: from sacrsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.28]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o2FBLukj024769 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from btcrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.73.251.109]) by sacrsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:21:56 -0700 Received: from BTCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.73.251.108]) by btcrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:51:52 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:51:51 +0530 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: information about resource limitation of jails Thread-Index: AcrEMbWq6+f2syHfShunsBUaZbW1TA== From: "Agarwal, Mayank" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2010 11:21:52.0082 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6160B20:01CAC431] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: information about resource limitation of jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:33:39 -0000 Hi, =20 Can someone tell me about the status about the "CPU + RAM limits" on FreeBSD jail. As par I know wiki pages of FreeBSD jails the status given is stalled. If Anyone, of you know the actual status of this feature of FreeBSD jail please give some information. And, Also if you have any idea about whether this is going to be part of main-line FreeBSD jails or not.=20 Please point me towards some documents on this feature if any is available. =20 Thanks, Mayank