From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 08:59:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040FC106564A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from smadev.internal.net (host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E998FC0A for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smadev.internal.net (localhost.internal.net [127.0.0.1]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oA18xGNV094453 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:59:16 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id oA18xGAc094452 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:59:16 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:59:16 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <40bff08b3502166b8e1e21c7df2a584c.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201011011059.16227.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Subject: Re: jdk16 vs openjdk X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:59:20 -0000 =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 Saturday 30 October 2010 17:23:10 =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Ro= nald Klop =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:57:04 +0200, wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > > > > can someone clarify the status of jdk16 vs. openjdk16? > > > > At what patchlevel (in terms of JSE6_uXX) is the diablo-jdk16 download = at > > the FreeBSD-foundation? > > > > Will it get updated to the latest patchlevel (u22) any time? > > > > Or should one just use OpenJDK16? > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Rainer >=20 > I would bet on openjdk6. As it is already much more up-to-date than jdk16= =2E =20 > I think openjdk6 gets more love. :-) i think jdk16 should be marked as deprecated, since this confuses a lot of = people. >=20 > Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios