From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 08:00:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDA31065670 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from earl.lapus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C398FC15 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so2794443iwn.13 for ; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 01:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YOqWqiEVWkFuj/iRc4gN7XWBUWCsoxAxDoXSbTO/4qI=; b=BfPinLSsTquVyIjYsbhsmO6lO0DTkTnVN5TbLuoCnSGGk9our4pOost5y47xQ1uwDu u9PNOT87MvaIfllygLwdIH9BsmSLjiBiUtT+oixLPp9jlxZ6/JAuH7l1S5I8GdG3CdAc fGPv3aV2MS8xc6Jeptepwqye1egRoZiTsQzuQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hzCmvVzyifOObWM/ZXofG7PkKihiDKFG4qT93+JTLAslS7glEoDao/NwD6XYp90+hU 9ZP0lWBXnM6LqPcG4kgtaaBYChB8KoVStcBMogzUjLOIQPwLVHT0ZFpFCMas6m3AB18G goYJzQN4TcL7u0ODdNwZS5MQchvKLzsm4BgJY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.198 with SMTP id e6mr1425260ibd.86.1278230453998; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 01:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.145.144 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 01:00:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:00:53 +0800 Message-ID: From: Earl Lapus To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: patch review for kern/146534 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 08:00:54 -0000 Hi, I just want to follow-up on this PR. Basically a working icmp6 functionality that exists in 7.x and below broke in 8.x and CURRENT. I believe it's too late to have it fixed in 8.1. Maybe someone on the list that really knows the icmp6 code can have a look and verify if it is indeed a bug. If it is, hopefully it can be fixed on the next releases. Cheers! Earl -- There are seven words in this sentence.