From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 09:31:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A58106566B for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbmelnikov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC288FC19 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so1227874ewy.13 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:31:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ink6UqZFwNTyBPU2Qg5tUZoqKATmYyTOGABbUtvPZt8=; b=jXX2GCuOfHmmgvbT3NFAxUEXgA5i+9NrZUoN6WX56ToKXoEKIqpH/nAzYmhdVFRbFP rT4/mE9qgbl+MYJ7lj4EreSAzmnvmvrKggbds/ph7Sec6btAlI3fjGRlFgLyeELW8I/I n9Z0gkQYbvi0VekPNyoBlhklb3JvW+z7nXZVQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=D6ED4R+vD8A9C7lQ8rIsFMefS0KQm5BuPxKQ5m7IxlTzfcB55pXuHeoPqb3jdhJ3wh AgpCFAVQIacIb8R4rqMQiPxqpnXgNWTwNGs1WC1gC5QEQ1ROO5voNyu+T0TxeIlfpCKS Ys22VWwgTjCa4EU+eoA9mV+Xf3p5e8yxUqts8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.8.200 with SMTP id i8mr1378119ebi.18.1282208620674; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.110.204 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:03:40 +0400 Message-ID: From: Denis Melnikov To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Does ULE restrict available RAM? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:31:06 -0000 Hi! 7.0-RELEASE (amd64) RAM 33 GB (8*4096+2*512) 2 quad-core Xeons The server ran GENERIC kernel with 4BSD scheduler earlier. When loaded with ULE scheduler it has missed 8GB. dmesg: usable memory = 26829983744 (25587 MB) avail memory = 25999904768 (24795 MB) # dmidecode -t 17 | grep Size Size: 512 MB Size: 4096 MB Size: No Module Installed Size: 512 MB Size: 4096 MB Size: No Module Installed Size: 4096 MB Size: 4096 MB Size: No Module Installed Size: 4096 MB Size: 4096 MB Size: No Module Installed It looks like BIOS-level problem, but... maybe ULE restricts RAM? Hopefully, Denis From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 17:28:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FB41065675 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpaetzel@freebsd.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DA28FC26 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567B9558; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:13:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:13:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=from:to:subject:date:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; s=smtpout; bh=UD6hkaaL/mcyxT344SwMblFkO+M=; b=N0CkOwP0CpxEEbLGtFPKKiXLld8n/PGuyj3KTSSmb24Lh/dkH811dmrAf2tqnIcCNgJBM3ivedHGBky7khSwNdC2pfuassNxinzY610he5lapFLXaR9oLCPdyws3IOp2t5rt3zFXcgU/J9w5G4a5xCgzSCgFQlyXJPasXzNOBgA= X-Sasl-enc: 0WQOo0ZfTGD2PnzdZ+CtZG1RgiK1jHlOb1lekL3HcxZ2 1282237995 Received: from ix.tcbug.org (74-34-20-9.dr01.rsmt.mn.frontiernet.net [74.34.20.9]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF81C408597; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:13:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:13:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: Organization: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7166021.fpoUPUCS5e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008191213.13413.jpaetzel@freebsd.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:41:41 +0000 Cc: Denis Melnikov Subject: Re: Does ULE restrict available RAM? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:28:26 -0000 --nextPart7166021.fpoUPUCS5e Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 19 August 2010 04:03:40 Denis Melnikov wrote: > Hi! > 7.0-RELEASE (amd64) > RAM 33 GB (8*4096+2*512) > 2 quad-core Xeons >=20 > The server ran GENERIC kernel with 4BSD scheduler earlier. When loaded > with ULE scheduler it has missed 8GB. >=20 > dmesg: > usable memory =3D 26829983744 (25587 MB) > avail memory =3D 25999904768 (24795 MB) >=20 > # dmidecode -t 17 | grep Size > Size: 512 MB > Size: 4096 MB > Size: No Module Installed > Size: 512 MB > Size: 4096 MB > Size: No Module Installed > Size: 4096 MB > Size: 4096 MB > Size: No Module Installed > Size: 4096 MB > Size: 4096 MB > Size: No Module Installed >=20 > It looks like BIOS-level problem, but... maybe ULE restricts RAM? >=20 > Hopefully, > Denis How much RAM does the BIOS report present? =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel =46reeBSD -- The power to serve --nextPart7166021.fpoUPUCS5e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJMbWYpAAoJEKFq1/n1feG2ML0IANRqjBBFPPbj2or6SYzFsiUJ xdmOkGgNDRy4tpWcMOaziWoyU73Hann6IdgG3FoIngSMSyw5d0EtPX+I54kdsvR4 CwyNWPg99jgQ+85345BMzLh3mAa3773HruFv4Sx1rzhPuuKCH+ZOC+OznOZoMHXk kkT4idL08t30cCZ2TfeJcqQf1rrLGF4DXUkrU0oBeqzgYpRuQuOcUGnTSqP7tpJq 0OdXr1B1f64Hs3fur+JGfx8JtQlLXPiZi7e0SOGdU0/XChf28R1Y0SBBBBEnAfyG as8X4ZVZo3B0i3Ukll9DykDZ8VPsRolHE0i2a93eToERmeT8vUk8wvLK29s/ozU= =VEeg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7166021.fpoUPUCS5e-- From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 07:45:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C34106564A for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbmelnikov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7728C8FC14 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so2192320ewy.13 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8IDNpwFJg1e8OzcaR+on7UYSFfPTzZqGQOGqGRF6UdM=; b=xfj9476v/5VvG3ECaIgScc6AzrdYeSW0shTdlSsygPm0YvTe3+QFcmpeEey0ZkF1td pWAD0e+T/0cXBdAMM70AAWqf6iQ9fJ66KR5w6JriFwZtpUxdiv442GSUXV0UNfXuS1su F4rjxSSkEmwoneGxXmhwc/6infL2CzBtZJj+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IrrdxNjDyEnklxdz1bhj8MQs7XT33t8glVDTxLafa7crx9POsxGQvad07IKjI2V8U4 au9TpIzsJz1Ng+PFElbfgEAzeAXgGpIm9YpACvGOza66WraC26EjSGfYCQxMooNg8tIh Yym8bEvxM7pQK0IZpqqO3erwGA2KBiB5MXnJo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.82 with SMTP id j18mr1119563eba.1.1282290344337; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.110.204 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201008191213.13413.jpaetzel@freebsd.org> References: <201008191213.13413.jpaetzel@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:45:44 +0400 Message-ID: From: Denis Melnikov To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Does ULE restrict available RAM? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:45:46 -0000 It was a DIMM failure, just a fatal coincidence. Thank you! Denis 2010/8/19, Josh Paetzel : > On Thursday 19 August 2010 04:03:40 Denis Melnikov wrote: >> Hi! >> 7.0-RELEASE (amd64) >> RAM 33 GB (8*4096+2*512) >> 2 quad-core Xeons >> >> The server ran GENERIC kernel with 4BSD scheduler earlier. When loaded >> with ULE scheduler it has missed 8GB. >> >> dmesg: >> usable memory = 26829983744 (25587 MB) >> avail memory = 25999904768 (24795 MB) >> >> # dmidecode -t 17 | grep Size >> Size: 512 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> Size: 512 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> >> It looks like BIOS-level problem, but... maybe ULE restricts RAM? >> >> Hopefully, >> Denis > > How much RAM does the BIOS report present? > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > FreeBSD -- The power to serve