From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 00:01:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C03D106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316038FC15 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0O01Gt60482; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:01:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:01:16 -0600 From: John To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20100123180116.A60343@starfire.mn.org> References: <20100123131347.A56510@starfire.mn.org> <20100123192502.GA85810@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20100123192502.GA85810@slackbox.xs4all.nl>; from rsmith@xs4all.nl on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 08:25:02PM +0100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backward compatibility libraries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:01:23 -0000 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 08:25:02PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:14:01PM -0600, John wrote: > > The GENERIC 8.0 kernel and the kernel I built for my new FreeBSD 8.0 > > system both contain > > options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 > > > > yet, when I try to run a program compiled on the FreeBSD 4.3 system on > > the new system, I get > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found, required by "pipetype" > > > > So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've > > looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what I'm > > looking for (probably looking right at it). > > It's in ports, misc/compat4x. Morgan and Roland both - Thanks! Perfect! They work now. -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 00:09:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDD1106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6F08FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A203296074C5BE6; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:08:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4B5B8F98.3000500@onetel.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:08:56 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <4B5AF1AC.8090409@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: What sort of file system is this and how to mount it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:09:25 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > ... >> That makes me think ad4p2 is HFS or HFS+ so I installed hfsexplorer >> (http://hem.bredband.net/catacombae/hfsx.html) and it tells me ad4p2 >> is an invalid HFS type. >> >> So try a few other things >> eco# mount /dev/ad4p2 /mnt >> mount: /dev/ad4p2 : Invalid argument >> eco# mount_msdosfs /dev/ad4p2 /mnt >> mount_msdosfs: /dev/ad4p2: Invalid argument >> eco# mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad4p2 /mnt >> mount: /dev/ad4p2 : Invalid argument >> >> Any ideas? > > file -s /dev/ad4p2 may be able to identify it. > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > Thanks for the tip, it is indeed HFS eco# file -s /dev/ad6p2 /dev/ad6p2: Macintosh HFS Extended version 4 data last mounted by: 'HFSJ', created: Wed Jun 4 06:44:51 2008, last modified: Tue Mar 31 17:31:18 2009, last checked: Wed Jun 4 14:44:51 2008, block size: 4096, number of blocks: 29221228, free blocks: 2704022 (I since plugged in another disk and moved this one to another slot which made this one ad6) I tried hfsexplorer in Windows and could see the data. hfsexplorer on FreeBSD says (handtyped) Invalid HFS type Program supports: HFS_PLUS HFSX HFS_WRAPPED_HFS_PLUS HFS Detected type is (UNKNOWN) and there is a stream of console messages ending with CEncryptedEncoding structure not found. Proceeding... Trying to detect UDIF structure... UDIF structure not found. Proceeding... Does mean hfsexplorer just doesn't work on FreeBSD? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 23 23:43:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DC31065670 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436D28FC13 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NYpdO-0001OI-Pz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:43:18 -0800 Message-ID: <27290996.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:43:18 -0800 (PST) From: vigol To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4B5A8841.7000906@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: mehrshadmoslehi@yahoo.com References: <20100123042120.89902oyvgkbxvxog@webmail-srv2.servage.net> <4B5A8841.7000906@daleco.biz> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:13:01 +0000 Subject: Re: Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:43:19 -0000 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > >> Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev! >>>$ grep ad /var/run/dmesg.boot > you had installed slice/part by sysinstall, so 1- by default b partitions are dedicated to swap part. 2- you haven't a swap partition in ad0s1 3- /var/run/dmesg.boot won't show you any infos about swap 4- type following command for getting infos about swap parts: % swapinfo -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Unable-to-find-device-node-for--dev-ad0s1b-in--dev%21-tp27283484p27290996.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 02:50:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55D5106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from nomoremozzie.com (nomoremozzie.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02D68FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([112.199.149.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by nomoremozzie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0O2o7lX025396; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:50:09 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:49:50 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <201001231015.22934.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> <20100123161934.GA27277@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20100123161934.GA27277@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001241049.54312.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Cc: Jerry McAllister , John Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:50:10 -0000 Hi, On 24 January 2010 am 00:19:34 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:15:19AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > On 23 January 2010 am 01:12:19 John wrote: > > > 1) Create a "migrate" account in Wheel with home as > > > /var/migrate so that I can do a dump/restore on "home" > > > without messing things up > > > > Are you sure? Use /usr to make sure you will have enough > > space. > > You are making the rash and probably incorrect assumption that > /usr is the largest partition/filesystem. Many people, > including I, make /home or another partition be the large one. > The OP may also have done that. so true. > > > It might be easier for you to run both machines and move > > first the simple things over. > > > > > 7) Nuke /home and /var/mail and migrate them again to get > > > the latest version 8) Do the real switch > > Move/migrate them first. Don't make assumptions about what the > OP has on /home. This was written by him not me. > > But, I agree, if possible, use a second machine with V 8.0 > installed and migrate to it. > > Otherwise, make full backups, check them for readability. Then > do a new install of FreeBSD V8. Add a large disk and pull > stuff out of your dump to it and then migrate that stuff piece > by piece back to the machine main filesystems. It sounds to me that his main problem is that it is a life system and he wants to avoid down-time. Not this easy. > Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 02:55:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148C51065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from nomoremozzie.com (nomoremozzie.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42938FC16 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([112.199.149.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by nomoremozzie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0O2tOw1028325; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:55:32 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: John Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:55:14 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <20100123161934.GA27277@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20100123110827.A54749@starfire.mn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100123110827.A54749@starfire.mn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001241055.17552.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Cc: Jerry McAllister , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:55:34 -0000 Hi, On 24 January 2010 am 01:08:27 John wrote: > doing this on a new machine! And I don't need any "migration" > storage, because, well, gosh - it's tcp, people! ;) I just > did the first transfer of home, and it went swell: > how did you handle the strange group IDs? > > 10:56AM up 492 days, 13:57, 2 users, load averages: 0.02, > 0.03, 0.00 Isn't this normal for a FreeBSD machine running as a server? > > That's right! Nearly 500 days! And it was well over a two > hundred days before that, but we had a power outage that > outlasted the UPS. No diesel powered generator nearby? > 987 522 505 cpu context switches I have had to put the spacesin to be able to read it. I assume, the scheduler really works. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 02:57:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124D4106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@sheringeorge.co.cc) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E6B8FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so1707706pxi.3 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:57:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.56.12 with SMTP id e12mr3423659rva.272.1264301865312; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:57:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100123182709.GM30253@mail2.dcoder.net> References: <7f14551c1001230122q155fadadscf1575f9795fa871@mail.gmail.com> <20100123182709.GM30253@mail2.dcoder.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:27:45 +0530 Message-ID: <7f14551c1001231857t68dd78ceu804cf9626f910351@mail.gmail.com> From: Sherin George To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:57:46 -0000 Hello, Thanks for the reply. Please see the result of "netstat -rn" command. ============ myserver# netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default XXX.XXX.XXX.241 UGS 62 209247 em0 127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 0 0 lo0 XXX.XXX.XXX.240/29 link#1 U 0 0 em0 XXX.XXX.XXX.242 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 link#3 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHS lo0 ff01:3::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 ============= Note: I have replaced first three octets. -- Regards, Sherin On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:57 PM, dacoder wrote: > you don't say what "netstat -rn" shows for a default route. > +++ Sherin George [23/01/10 14:52 +0530]: > >> Hello, >> >> i am facing some sort of strange network issue in a freebsd server >> occasionally. >> >> OS: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE - amd64 >> >> The servers loses network connection once in a few days. I logged into >> console and verified that network is up. I even restarted network service >> using following command. >> >> /etc/rc.d/netif restart >> >> Still, it didn't fix. >> >> I checked /var/log/messages, but I am not getting any clue. >> >> ============== >> Jan 19 12:10:20 myserver kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding >> provider ad0 finished. >> Jan 19 20:20:23 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system call >> Jan 19 20:21:07 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system call >> Jan 23 02:14:33 myserver login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0 >> Jan 23 02:19:51 myserver kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed >> Jan 23 02:19:57 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN >> Jan 23 02:20:02 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to UP >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver reboot: rebooted by root >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver syslogd: exiting on signal 15 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD >> Project. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, >> 1988, >> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: The Regents of the University of >> California. All rights reserved. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The >> FreeBSD Foundation. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 >> 15:02:08 >> UTC 2009 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu: >> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >> quality 0 >> ============== >> >> Network, TCP stack all were up. It was pinging gateway even. But, >> traceroute >> was not going beyond gateway. >> >> I believe the issue is not related to anything outside server since a >> reboot >> always fixes the issue. >> >> I will be grateful for any advise that can help me in troubleshooting this >> problem. >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Sherin >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -- > > regards, > > David Coder > Network Engineer Emeritus, Verio/NTT > Telluride, CO & Washington, DC > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 03:01:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9F01065698 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@sheringeorge.co.cc) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFDF8FC0A for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so1740546pwi.3 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:01:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.101.4 with SMTP id d4mr1156265rvm.225.1264302076343; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:01:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100123180227.Y50932@familysquires.net> References: <7f14551c1001230122q155fadadscf1575f9795fa871@mail.gmail.com> <20100123180227.Y50932@familysquires.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:31:16 +0530 Message-ID: <7f14551c1001231901u6e8d0e52y2c064b3d7fe216b8@mail.gmail.com> From: Sherin George To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:01:18 -0000 Hello, Thanks for the reply. Please see the rc.conf file given below. =========== myserver# cat /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="XXX.XXX.XXX.241" hostname="myserver.net" ifconfig_em0="inet XXX.XXX.XXX.242 netmask 255.255.255.248" nfs_client_enable="YES" nfs_server_enable="YES" rpcbind_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" zfs mount -a inetd_enable="YES" ========== Note: I have replaced first three octets. -- Regards, Sherin On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Michael L. Squires wrote: > I am using an "em0" card with 7.2-STABLE, no problems. > > My guess is that there is something wrong with the ifconfig commands in > rc.conf for the em0 card. What do they look like? > > Mine are (DHCP via a Comcast cable modem) > > network_interfaces="fxp0 bge0 lo0" > hostname="familysquires.net" > ifconfig_fxp0="DHCP" > ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.5.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_type="simple" > natd_enable="YES" > natd_interface="fxp0" > natd_flags="" > # other > > For a system inside the firewall with a fixed IP I have > > defaultrouter="10.1.5.1" > ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.5.160 netmask 255.255.255.0" > inetd_enable="YES" > > (System 1 connects to outside via a cable modem (fxp0); the em0 interface > connects to a gigabit switch. System 2 is on the switch and uses System 1 > as its router). > > Mike Squires > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 03:18:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4816106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dak.col@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f203.google.com (mail-iw0-f203.google.com [209.85.223.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA698FC14 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so2037820iwn.12 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:18:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mUuZ1LRM37MwW4mMvAn84Tjm7UtJsoI3ianPSBacnss=; b=ETGb9OR6D5lxcF9N1Glowl6XGjbC1ISFqZx/zfJ1s0OVqY0kSkU37+IGQ9zk2yhzye 3BvnPoGRatTI741JercxbDPvEEbcHl2Sb6vbiTJ+KuFEF9Jz3FeCUq4GjF9NnjaHjG2K NH0Jg44lEn9mW1CWhFOSgSZX4he6C1S7bFb1E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=s2LH4k+Mw7YGnnFGCE8ewxbiV4KIKBNm9hk/owOqTG36Lf/JMqoLZFdn0BJ6Wjf1qI fC9TwKcdtOgMMnCglIrc0dXX1qHb3T9YJyAXzTJniXGEveVNL4yGxmAWU3hWX2f+Qjn9 ZDPWJxMedweXRskQ4dRDWpWQtO8wK87VvYp5g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.158.21 with SMTP id d21mr4288312ibx.61.1264303118789; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:18:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7f14551c1001231901u6e8d0e52y2c064b3d7fe216b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f14551c1001230122q155fadadscf1575f9795fa871@mail.gmail.com> <20100123180227.Y50932@familysquires.net> <7f14551c1001231901u6e8d0e52y2c064b3d7fe216b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:18:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3b93bd111001231918u46d2b659lbe0f14df928761d2@mail.gmail.com> From: "Diego F. Arias R." To: Sherin George Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:18:40 -0000 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Sherin George wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the reply. > > Please see the rc.conf file given below. > > =========== > myserver# cat /etc/rc.conf > > defaultrouter="XXX.XXX.XXX.241" > hostname="myserver.net" > ifconfig_em0="inet XXX.XXX.XXX.242 netmask 255.255.255.248" > nfs_client_enable="YES" > nfs_server_enable="YES" > rpcbind_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > > zfs mount -a > > inetd_enable="YES" > ========== > > Note: I have replaced first three octets. > > -- > Regards, > Sherin > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Michael L. Squires >wrote: > > > I am using an "em0" card with 7.2-STABLE, no problems. > > > > My guess is that there is something wrong with the ifconfig commands in > > rc.conf for the em0 card. What do they look like? > > > > Mine are (DHCP via a Comcast cable modem) > > > > network_interfaces="fxp0 bge0 lo0" > > hostname="familysquires.net" > > ifconfig_fxp0="DHCP" > > ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.5.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > gateway_enable="YES" > > firewall_enable="YES" > > firewall_type="simple" > > natd_enable="YES" > > natd_interface="fxp0" > > natd_flags="" > > # other > > > > For a system inside the firewall with a fixed IP I have > > > > defaultrouter="10.1.5.1" > > ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.5.160 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > inetd_enable="YES" > > > > (System 1 connects to outside via a cable modem (fxp0); the em0 interface > > connects to a gigabit switch. System 2 is on the switch and uses System > 1 > > as its router). > > > > Mike Squires > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hello there: i have one problem like that once with a motorolla cable-modem dont know why the machine just lost network connection. The problemas was the cable modem i can see the "admin" page of it but donde have internet. My ISP change it after 3 months of tickets. -- mmm, interesante..... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:01:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759D7106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E06F8FC08 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8103 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 04:01:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 04:01:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=SdXxMdqstKBjOxozEArOlSxGTRxK5IlONei00yqX3lTdYjW5z2clGV8vmE89bMc/PcJFcvdn1kqWEnJHdRbINnf3xbsI4BmqU0s2DkttJmIgAUXSA7SKKaQqbeGk3LC1; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYtf6-0002Ry-By for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:01:20 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:01:14 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0342808141EAA213E62B9173" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:01:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0342808141EAA213E62B9173 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is probably the wrong place to ask, and if it is I ask your forgiveness. I'm browsing the FTP server for FreeBSD-8.0 packages[0] and am looking for drivers for my winWiFi card (zonenet, unsure of chipset currently) and realized, I'm not sure what package I would need for that. I didn't set up eth0 (wired NIC, realtek) as that would mean lugging my box halfway across the house into a room with no room in it for me and my box. I figured I could just set my wireless card up after install, not thinking I wouldn't have a clue as to what I'm doing. Any clues as to what part of the FTP server I should be looking in? I'm looking at the packages under net/ but looking at them they all seem to be for someone with a working connection (icecast, nbd-server, etc). Thoughts? [0]: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0-release/ --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig0342808141EAA213E62B9173 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLW8YQAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0ILAH/0tNksyyvnl0RL5YRoPTlu/5 SyZ+BC8yjxg0yEiC8aI8IiuVDGcYRuPwYaxOpS+KZ9qaUjJkodg08TcWZXWB2/fR KrwqC4TLWBHPqyqb+UqtxHxA/iRz7Ov0mA8VP51RILEYuKd9CcFTpkVyJv/kkZUG +xIeFPMm29Dj8OqAEFz1Cc7FrT+eZx7CXQ0TPE3WqpVRRjDUZTHm62kOzvoSQydr FUlSh0v9xey2qhsOV3+ZFPobNoQaTpZIIrULVv+PSM7Jrry4e0KpnSRWSFbX8oUG EVZc0CDJDFj+uAOQba8z0c0Qbo8Tx7TNLS8yd3J2FAlkaZWT2Zcq54zRGoCzr1s= =mVYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0342808141EAA213E62B9173-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:09:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC40106568F for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f201.google.com (mail-qy0-f201.google.com [209.85.221.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDAC8FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk39 with SMTP id 39so1358227qyk.27 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:09:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cqQwDTSlmtTDyB7AHkThXSYPfoK8ue+3vOUqu4nf0JI=; b=AqZDuaORYV29DfsU8WjhdzTa1H+c6F8U/PrTI0U25iP9Sry6XaNtFKO9+IiMDko7Ln wych2fKZST/6Pb87VpKr89J6Tc9ZMBUZgH4m7PLZYwMSuWZvl0N2DkkKCHYtxt/Vai0U TbkOdt689mM2LHPZHg2Hx8OLTONktym/nu41A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Y4mydWkpmfq+zLDpKZzx+ccnAZ0NnOVeAUVXuTNbpCXYBb4pQce23j5o5iI/JZQNi3 T7dt6jnoEgtH+R6Tp7djPGAPk0BMIQH9iI+MhrmufA6KoZmwDPZwZk53aG1JBDzs7BKT nDqqwxGyH7Ol2V29jsVDfLRvw5YyvYyrK9Kx0= Received: by 10.229.127.164 with SMTP id g36mr2934250qcs.99.1264306153189; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:09:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm1448715qyk.1.2010.01.23.20.09.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:09:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:05:51 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Programmer In Training Message-ID: <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:09:14 -0000 Programmer In Training wrote: > This is probably the wrong place to ask, and if it is I ask your > forgiveness. > Nope, this is the right place. > I'm browsing the FTP server for FreeBSD-8.0 packages[0] and am looking > for drivers for my winWiFi card (zonenet, unsure of chipset currently) > and realized, I'm not sure what package I would need for that. I didn't > set up eth0 (wired NIC, realtek) as that would mean lugging my box > halfway across the house into a room with no room in it for me and my > box. I figured I could just set my wireless card up after install, not > thinking I wouldn't have a clue as to what I'm doing. > That is the wrong place. :) What is listed with ifconfig(8)? That will help determine the driver (if it is supported). Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:11:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325491065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f201.google.com (mail-qy0-f201.google.com [209.85.221.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91898FC0A for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk39 with SMTP id 39so1358731qyk.27 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wR6dC5+zSSl25XKLY8xEiylJ2ICLF9WuOYtl8s0+X98=; b=c/91j7/TSNY/nYU2KRgIjtng9lYV8kg0ns0/9kmQqcRS2OI4xz3sXwhmh4QGTglBvT c8jPxpzmhDyV5V1+KvgZGVfASaAKnPXmd99sYT8/DiaS1Bs8b8J2llD9fe7XUl5I3O6i lewuTs/acbD3mMrApvEOmYJ5BkPqDnlNYfQsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=PXTQGgcM/hpn3rsnXqfzC5AZn/39gKraYPZOFksXLnBkDhFlIhuIoSSpBW7xZjfs+K mR6LhaczJzptru3ZFoCeM2sA8cuclENnq1YfnWitzHFSIVH6nNOUGvQjcyDtGpbOwB9Z Ef5buaxiodUuAG/S8V1eEJ1adXE0UHH7q+6xg= Received: by 10.229.110.199 with SMTP id o7mr1331468qcp.76.1264306279022; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm3317217qyk.8.2010.01.23.20.11.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:11:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:07:56 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Programmer In Training Message-ID: <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:11:20 -0000 Glen Barber wrote: > What is listed with ifconfig(8)? That will help determine the driver (if > it is supported). > Oops... Meant to say dmesg; perhaps ifconfig will help as well, though. Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:26:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA54C1065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8C348FC15 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15967 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 04:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy6.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 04:26:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=W+0o082zrlqmXSP8F7z91lvCUKD01aOKhDLzTOGRnY1V+dFnJxcoTn1CyalU2FtBWg7nlfJqqEuR84CY8nLakT68JnYBEnonUoTV8yydeLc3dwyyJES8CIlBM+9uPJHn; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYu3f-0008DA-WA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:26:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:26:33 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8263030C247818147A6C98BE" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:26:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8263030C247818147A6C98BE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/23/2010 10:05 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > Programmer In Training wrote:=20 >> This is probably the wrong place to ask, and if it is I ask your >> forgiveness. >> >=20 > Nope, this is the right place. Awesome >> I'm browsing the FTP server for FreeBSD-8.0 packages[0] and am looking= >> for drivers for my winWiFi card (zonenet, unsure of chipset currently)= >> and realized, I'm not sure what package I would need for that. I didn'= t >> set up eth0 (wired NIC, realtek) as that would mean lugging my box >> halfway across the house into a room with no room in it for me and my >> box. I figured I could just set my wireless card up after install, not= >> thinking I wouldn't have a clue as to what I'm doing. >> >=20 > That is the wrong place. :) Which is OK. At least I only downloaded a dozen files. ;) >=20 > What is listed with ifconfig(8)? That will help determine the driver (= if > it is supported). (this is all typed out so please excuse typos) #ifconfig rl0: flags=3D8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3D8 ether 00:40:ca:35:6c:09 media: ethernet autoselect status: no carrier plip0: flags=3D8810 metric 0 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D3 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 [I am absolutely sure that percent sign is correct] inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Should I assume that rl0 is the wireless? I'm not sure what plip0 is and I know lo0 is my wired nic. --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig8263030C247818147A6C98BE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLW8wAAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0A+UH/0oekTWtElqghfChD0dKA2R3 QsvzFwbiFjuR1AQ5/pUA0nPlXziBvqrs80CX0+5Q41Cj9mEonAlfVuzUAsf0YZUa Gb4+RQRFCGIV/GbF1O53J8x/h4Nsd/tgaNsgEoLTrVOXhoTHrUD2SKKQ3VwzT8BK 9vZsUxbgE3NoLSyFDIwyXb55CFAb1MDzrlutMS57yzXaFuHmW/SHr5SahtMJRR7S zqcVOKD38m3+oxnB8LkfCd05RACHxH1khtmfFYRLsBq19ysfsDzSvJn97bQq4YBz H2F5r3qxgTEAtAEUkd9in3fgZZo01jmXVb1AEB8ESj4hBxet3YLk3ik9FDYUTSc= =qFtZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8263030C247818147A6C98BE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:35:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29578106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3ED38FC08 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22449 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 04:35:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 04:35:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=ZHWs4is4Wg/FFo+tDE4cgAldRQ9r6/MvxCCUSsGAMW8A2lgEbk5iuiHtt2RjVavE8Fh/ZmHHxAu3UKEbAXO4EOUi+TVfbKwhmv5JXlUDysJNrmHxxmFaldvow9KuZ0Db; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYuCN-00020b-44 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:35:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:35:32 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7E5CD1F204A2B94DF405313E" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:35:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7E5CD1F204A2B94DF405313E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/23/2010 10:07 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > Glen Barber wrote:=20 >> What is listed with ifconfig(8)? That will help determine the driver = (if >> it is supported). >> >=20 > Oops... Meant to say dmesg; perhaps ifconfig will help as well, though.= >=20 > Regards, >=20 I hope ifconfig will help more then dmesg as I have no way of getting files (like dmesg.log that I created) off the box (floppy drive isn't even hooked up, IIRC) and rl0 is my wired NIC, non-internal. --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig7E5CD1F204A2B94DF405313E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLW84fAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0SroIAKo3RYjcejCrUgVUNnHz0oay 2WdoL9Mprm/8AruQIDqRD2oQWs8CX1zQy3jhU4AvQ/N9RmqBfdeGojPbWeRrCfON dVUf4X43soCv+E1HDTSyh3RACAoiWqhN/fOIezSqtASk+RS6a2+WtZnWZEiELYqw /c0v4Qs91BBpUGU4q1Apr6vuj3MFiE2r4AlVi9GeQbW3vbkq3WJZBahiC/16fIyA xeE1ADr8nJR94J3f62bEUcao7VZozk9Y7ciqOROYDEmfGN2IPha8zjdndrd8ZvYT 6w9spX43B2MCJ8Cf0P7BO2/UuPc0KbwTQ6pw3NvVGWn5QKGVfLlITdZkEbjdcno= =7tHJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7E5CD1F204A2B94DF405313E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:37:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC590106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745A68FC1B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15940 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 04:37:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 04:37:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=oXACfXDacXms5IMn2/2a5OnP97nUCaf88UdVzVUur57gAVz3q7ZffyJ7zpfXSv9VgHNLgLtDwkjjnbtg1vPoqt8ywVtHJ91ew4FjpipX6TPt426hHlwdxY8BwKm4b30V; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYuDo-0002Nj-Mq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:37:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5BCE78.8060406@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:37:12 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> In-Reply-To: <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig577E229BF6C13EDBBE128884" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:37:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig577E229BF6C13EDBBE128884 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/23/2010 10:26 PM, Programmer In Training wrote: > #ifconfig > rl0: flags=3D8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=3D8 > ether 00:40:ca:35:6c:09 > media: ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier > plip0: flags=3D8810 metric 0 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=3D3 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 [I am absolutely sure that > percent sign is correct] > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >=20 > Should I assume that rl0 is the wireless? I'm not sure what plip0 is an= d > I know lo0 is my wired nic. >=20 Haha, assumptions rock. Not. rl0 is my wired NIC. --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig577E229BF6C13EDBBE128884 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLW854AAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0qfYH/2kiomXzFkrxwG+S7dqeuxRp l/Y2UARiDcv0Ns3fVL4x0H7HtAZXIZJljsvWTGbLe0K3ic1FJx4KzX5moEBCMmJ0 B4hV8XNGVzZ5VVr62ohOAVQhdUhczyPWOLhcpwcuWvApLoQ8wP4xE6EEEvb3vGwE viwa706kvMAU6hn0Xdg6a2YsqEsb/AZrHJaIJnvAtDhfyOkNyfr1HbIsDnwrVEa1 WwlbQHKBP9CMHQ1Qg9RUzStinYhQAayiOwfKTDhYbtL2A2FaL7u5NVHkbET3Fijy 85lhqqJy/RyUXvTIUOG+NSuKzNbtLLWIjQrbsDXaXCqs85uJwV4cUZbXmnK4QUk= =3mxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig577E229BF6C13EDBBE128884-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:43:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15BC106568F for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732C88FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so75qwd.7 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:43:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HZ6iOesfIS1S2naocp+N2LF6kj97TXbEViZ2XHxrubM=; b=fmgRzz6kXUiRG9lMLgofeOWLRI/iz2b5zPpImUWetCDtdCtqAjYC12lV8ZjmkDMIbH UmowXKX/dkES61M7KPDe31HadHRGuIHlqjSjOvQYLDUrfwk+Yh4rNctG+GAg2jQVfY8T 2ZyiA7SAuWswdH455P3AUYO857Ixp0trsVVsY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=I9BvlmbJfRORC/cXL/a2vyQBpSDBUSllhCcoKRLIpyR1k4oGgjcBNLohXMgcGmhszR 2kAI8ZydCXegvIggiRa504ktMQAY/ej4+3+I3J7otTxBdKQxjeqtufLRoaH2qVtnPErm VVE4XApEQNAMJCEYFmMARrQo4SdT3nGxSe5uE= Received: by 10.224.23.141 with SMTP id r13mr3168695qab.334.1264308188346; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:43:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm1486266qyk.5.2010.01.23.20.43.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:43:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:39:47 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Programmer In Training Message-ID: <20100124043947.GA13618@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:43:09 -0000 Programmer In Training wrote: > On 1/23/2010 10:05 PM, Glen Barber wrote: [huge snip] > > Should I assume that rl0 is the wireless? I'm not sure what plip0 is and > I know lo0 is my wired nic. rl0 is your physical NIC, lo0 is the loopback. >From your other reply, I think you already noticed that. Try this, paying particular attention to any lines beginning with 'none': pciconf -lv Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:45:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B53106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA3C8FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-164-220.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.164.220]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9D51E6C5; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:45:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0O4jLFb003289; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:45:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:45:21 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Programmer In Training Message-Id: <20100124054521.8f69c788.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:45:25 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:26:33 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: > >> [...] > >> set up eth0 (wired NIC, realtek) as that would mean lugging my box > >> halfway across the house into a room with no room in it for me and my > >> [...] > [...] > #ifconfig > rl0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=8 > ether 00:40:ca:35:6c:09 > media: ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier > plip0: flags=8810 metric 0 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=3 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 [I am absolutely sure that > percent sign is correct] > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > Should I assume that rl0 is the wireless? I'm not sure what plip0 is and > I know lo0 is my wired nic. You've already given the correct answer: Realtek wired NIC. This the rl driver; "eth" is a Linuxism, in FreeBSD every NIC, wireless or wired, is represented by a device file named after the driver. If you're not sure what something is, try FreeBSD's excellent manpage system. You'll be surprised how much information is in there, in opposite to many Linusi: % whatis lo lo(4) - software loopback network interface The lo0 is NOT your wired NIC. That's this one: % whatis rl rl(4) - RealTek 8129/8139 Fast Ethernet device driver You can access information about nearly everything in FreeBSD via the apropos, whatis and man commands - be it system binaries, library functions, kernel calls, configuration files, maintenance procedures and misc. documentation topics. So THAT's awesome! :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:49:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00E106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8C08FC39 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so722qwd.7 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:48:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=v4CiRA2aEGTBdRy1xCpsEIkHG6dKzmi5kudsbI9YajY=; b=oAApg8nnYZ/EcjFypdpNRXl/sy8Sj+neRHBx9wrSppouJhBwf1sDHyMzc4RDUqMJE2 5VY2NKMX+yHssCfn8ylcqXYZ6hwsnD6Lob52ZhDxogSIfYbUxQ4sySikILsIjPL6FsCs BMHvfEn/EKUbRYL0nIaokcyZFjmXGNdAUVbao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Qzbpk+ITqFX3HARFztJwKFwE12uAFbdwIT6nNWf83elI8GthL5hfRP2ajqAwBKEZKD Z5fvzwNuUg9tbIC25XHD1jJR/wgcPvdw72+9iIuA9nkvyvW2zHMBVpKHpjCsY3AkJn+a pMLQGLBwgV04gQQMSKCp6bif2XMl3HhQlGj28= Received: by 10.224.109.79 with SMTP id i15mr384147qap.368.1264308539565; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm1489463qyk.9.2010.01.23.20.48.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:48:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:45:38 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20100124044538.GB13618@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124054521.8f69c788.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100124054521.8f69c788.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Programmer In Training Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:49:01 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:26:33 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> set up eth0 (wired NIC, realtek) as that would mean lugging my box > > >> halfway across the house into a room with no room in it for me and my > > >> [...] [...] > > You've already given the correct answer: Realtek wired NIC. > This the rl driver; "eth" is a Linuxism, in FreeBSD every NIC, > wireless or wired, is represented by a device file named after > the driver. > I believe the intent is to use the integrated wireless chipset, not the ethernet. Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:51:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3A21065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4C78FC13 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-164-220.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.164.220]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DF21E226; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:51:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0O4pSM6003335; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:51:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:51:28 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Programmer In Training Message-Id: <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:51:31 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:35:32 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: > I hope ifconfig will help more then dmesg as I have no way of getting > files (like dmesg.log that I created) off the box (floppy drive isn't > even hooked up, IIRC) and rl0 is my wired NIC, non-internal. The ifconfig program (often used as "ifconfig -a") tells you only about NICs that are already connected to a driver. Most wireless NICs require loading a specific kernel module (which is not in the GENERIC kernel), and therefore it's helpful to know what exact model it is, so you can load the correct driver. There are of course programs that help you with this: "pciconf -lv" and "usbdevs -v" are common tools for this particular tasks. As soon as you can tell what the name of the wireless NIC is, you can check which driver it needs and the load it, e. g. with "kldload if_bge.ko", where "bge" is the name of the driver (remember to check "man bge" to see what it is intended for). As soon as you've loaded it, "dmesg" will show its existance and "ifconfig -a" will print its settings. PS. The plip0 interface is the "printer port Internet Protocol driver". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 04:53:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83731065679 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EF58FC14 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-164-220.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.164.220]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837571E226; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:53:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0O4rt3r003353; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:53:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:53:55 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Glen Barber Message-Id: <20100124055355.4e174c50.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100124044538.GB13618@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCBF9.2050109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124054521.8f69c788.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100124044538.GB13618@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Programmer In Training Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:53:59 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:45:38 -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > I believe the intent is to use the integrated wireless chipset, not the > ethernet. I see, I just wanted to point out a "Linuxism" that could lead to misunderstandings, as well as to mention FreeBSD's excellent documentation in this context. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 05:40:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D130E106566B; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C810D8FC0C; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0O5efJF057515; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:40:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:40:40 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: John In-Reply-To: <20100123004226.C42331@starfire.mn.org> Message-ID: <20100124135557.T14027@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100122235448.A229410656EE@hub.freebsd.org> <20100123161628.I14027@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20100123004226.C42331@starfire.mn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Randi Harper Subject: Re: "Invalid partition table" after installation (GOOD NEWS!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:40:45 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, John wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:34:10PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 294, Issue 12, Message 19 > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:35:21 -0600 John wrote: > > [..] > > > > > OK! Well! Good news! After a sort. > > > > > > > > > > I switched to BootMgr, and it came right up with 8.0! > > > > > > > > > > Slight downside - extra prompt during boot, and of course, it > > > > > offers me all three slices, when I only need to boot from > > > > > one. > > > > See boot0cfg(8); you can specify which slice/s are offered by the boot > > menu, from none to four, and you can specify the delay in ticks (~1/18 > > second). I'm not sure if 0 is a valid delay, but 1 is not very long. > > > > > > > Is that's what's wrong with "Standard" MBR? Are all three FSD > > > > > partitions (type 165) marked bootable and that's upsetting it? > > > > > Can I change it so only one of them is marked bootable? > > > > See fdisk(8) -a switch. I expect this would clear other active flags. I haven't checked the code, but that seems to be correct. For sure setting one slice active in sysinstall's fdisk menu turns off another. [..] > > > > > Anyway, it appears that there is a problem with the "Standard" MBR > > > > > boot. I don't think I was doing anything that unnatural - I wanted > > > > > quite a few file systems, so I used multiple slices, both to keep > > > > > the boot slice below 1.5Gb and to be able to support all the file > > > > > systems I wanted, and maybe that's what upset it. I don't know. > > > > > All I know is that Standard MBR didn't work, and BootMgr does. I have checked the code :) and you are right; /boot/mbr aborts if more than one slice is set active. I'm pasting from 5.5 sources, but have checked this section vs 8.0 .. /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/mbr/mbr.s says: # Scan the partition table looking for an active entry. Note that %ch is # zero from the repeated string instruction above. We save the offset of # the active partition in %si and scan the entire table to ensure that only # one partition is marked active. # main: xorw %si,%si # No active partition movw $partbl,%bx # Partition table movb $0x4,%cl # Number of entries main.1: cmpb %ch,(%bx) # Null entry? je main.2 # Yes jg err_pt # If 0x1..0x7f testw %si,%si # Active already found? jnz err_pt # Yes movw %bx,%si # Point to active main.2: addb $0x10,%bl # Till loop main.1 # done testw %si,%si # Active found? jnz main.3 # Yes int $0x18 # BIOS: Diskless boot .. where err_pt prints 'Invalid partition table' and exits. > > > > OK - my current best theory is that if the Standard boot manager > > > > is faced with anything other than exactly 1 bootable slice (partition > > > > to it), it defaults to "Invalid partition table." I'll bet anyone > > > > lunch that this is true. Any takers? > > > > Perhaps. Certainly only one should be set active at boot time, either > > statically or by being chosen by a boot menu. Someone owes you lunch, but I'm not sure it's me :) The question is how all three slices you setup with sysinstall wound up having their active flags set, which does seem a mystery. It's not the boot code's fault. > > > > I'll test my theory tonight and let you all know how it turns out. > > > > If this is true, then we should at least post some warnings, if not > > > > actually fix the installation process so that if you choose "Standard," > > > > it helps ensure that you have one and only one bootable slice/partition! > > > > > > > > Whaddaya think? > > > > sysinstall (fdisk) lets you toggle the active flag while slicing the > > disk. You're supposed to have set one (and only one) active there, and > > you've already chosen which slice you want to install to, though I agree > > that selecting Standard boot sector might check for one active slice. To be fair, if you read the help (F1) in sysinstall's fdisk section, it makes the point that you should mark one slice active or select the Boot Manager, and because of other usage cases (like allocating other slices or disks post-install) sysinstall has to be very careful in assuming what you're wanting to do. That said, marking each slice that you setup as active without you having done so deliberately does seem wrong. [..] > > > I have used dd and cat to manufacture a new boot record from > > > /boot/mbr and the parition (slide) table I've modified, > > > and I'm tempted to put THAT in place over this one, but I'm > > > afraid of what that might mean - are there other changes > > > to the structure of the disk that I need to make to switch from > > > BootMgr to the "Standard" MBR? Even if my synthesized MBR > > > is correct, is it going to run into trouble at the next step? > > > Does it need a different "level 1" boot code? Or should I just > > > use "fdisk -b /boot/mbr" rather than my synthesized mbr? > > > Will that take care of all the linkages (if any)? > > > > fdisk -b /boot/mbr should work .. it doesn't mess with the slice table, > > so now you have it how you want it, that should be fine. OTOH, perhaps > > boot0cfg with zero slices offered would come to the same thing? Actually, no that's not right. fdisk -B updates the boot sector, -b specifies which bootcode to use, /boot/mbr being the default anyway. > > boot0cfg -f will save your current boot sector, in case of accidents. > > > > > I still think that the ultimate solution is to CHANGE THE > > > INSTALLATION PROCESS so that there is ONE and ONLY ONE > > > active partition when the "Standard" mbr is used. Well, I'll > > > make that an even more general statement - let's change the > > > installation process so that ONLY THE FREEBSD PARTITION(s) > > > CONTAINING /boot GET THE ACTIVE FLAG SET. There's nothing > > > to boot otherwise, anyway, right? > > > > Yes, but consider systems having two or more versions of FreeBSD, using > > a boot menu to choose which to boot. I know of one running 6-STABLE, > > 7-STABLE, 8-STABLE and 9-CURRENT on one laptop, but I'm only running > > 7-STABLE and 8.0-RELEASE on mine. All contain a /boot dir of course. > > > > > I'm not 100% sure how best to do this, but I have some ideas. I > > > think it starts with having fdisk leave the flag off by default, > > > and only turn it on for slices where it has loaded boot code, but > > > maybe it's not that simple. > > > > Unless you choose to, fdisk (as run by sysinstall) doesn't mess with > > slices other than the one you're working with. Whether it should is > > another matter, I can't imagine all usage cases, but you'd want to run > > suggested changes to fdisk by the right lists (maybe -hackers and -fs?) > > > > > My concern is that it sounds like someone is already working on > > > fdisk / diskpart with an eye to replacing it, so maybe I'm > > > working on a "zombie" problem that's already "walking dead." > > > I have no interest in putting time and effort into that in > > > such a case, but I'm very willing to help in this area if it > > > will have some value. > > > > > > Open to suggestions here, folks - what do you say? > > > > > > John Lind > > > john@starfire.MN.ORG > > > > Not wishing to sound unkind, but you might explore a bit more deeply > > what fdisk and boot0cfg already offer. We hear something about ongoing > > work on sysinstall and its potential replacement, and conversion to the > > GEOM framework is underway, but you'd need to hunt out the right lists > > and be running -CURRENT to be participating in the process, I expect. > > > > cc'ing Randi Harper, who's been working on sysinstall lately (and to > > whom I still owe some mail about related matters) > > > > cheers, Ian > > Thanks, Ian! > > I'm very paranoid about fdisk, because I don't seem to be able to make it > work on a file - it insists on messing with the disk. Well I wouldn't recommend using fdisk -f unless you're really certain you know what you're doing with a configuration file. I see there's the -p switch to write a formatted config file out from the current setup (which wasn't in 5.5 anyway) so that's worth saving the output from for restoration later, but really all you needed here is fdisk -a1 to set slice 1 active (and clear any others). Being paranoid is highly recommended with some fdisk options, but if you use the -t switch you can try anything, nothing will be written to the disk, and you get to see that interactively you get plenty of warning before updating the boot sector. eg safely try 'fdisk -tv -a1 ad0' See note in boot0cfg(8) about setting sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=0x10 to update the boot sector of a mounted disk; I'm pretty sure it applies to fdisk in the same circumstances, though fdisk(8) doesn't mention it. Personally I've always relied on sysinstall and more lately sade(8) to do things like post-install config of other slices and/or BSD partitions without trying to do the ikky cylinder and sector maths, but YMMV. > Quoting from above... > > sysinstall (fdisk) lets you toggle the active flag while slicing the > > disk. You're supposed to have set one (and only one) active there, and > > you've already chosen which slice you want to install to, though I agree > > that selecting Standard boot sector might check for one active slice. > > I didn't explicity tell it to set ANY of the slices/partitions > to active/bootable. It did that all on its own. > > I would be happy to work with someone working on sysinstall. Yeah, perhaps you'd enjoy finding that code in sysinstall and suggesting a patch, bearing in mind possible other usage cases. Happy hunting! BTW, fbsd1's assertion that you should have made all your partitions in one slice rather than across three, is both wrong and right :) What you're doing is certainly unconventional, but valid, though there may be plusses and minuses in having so many fixed-size partitions: > > >>>>> ad0s1a / 384Mb > > >>>>> ad0s1d /usr 1Gb > > >>>>> ad0s2b SWAP 1Gb > > >>>>> ad0s2d /tmp 384Mb > > >>>>> ad0s2e /var 512Mb > > >>>>> ad0s2f /var/mail 2Gb > > >>>>> ad0s2g /usr/ports 1Gb > > >>>>> ad0s3d /home/mysql 4Gb > > >>>>> ad0s3e /home 50Gb > > >>>>> ad0s3f /usr/src 3Gb > > >>>>> ad0s3g /usr/obj 3Gb > > >>>>> ad0s3h /extra 8483Mb Looks like an 80GB drive? A few points, given you know your own usage: / 384MB is small these days, more than one kernel rebuild with symbols might lean on that. There's lately talk of changing suggested / size in sysinstall from 512MB to 1GB, and/or moving symbols somewhere else. /tmp 384MB could well be limiting too, depending on your usage. I tend to link /tmp to /var/tmp or /usr/tmp myself, having been burned .. Probably you'll want to link /var/db/mysql to your /home/mysql, as the former is the default mysql dir and you won't want to mess with that. 3GB for /usr/src and /usr/obj is, um, very generous. On another slice I recently built 7-STABLE and 'du -d1 /usr' has ~512MB /usr/src, bit over 1GB for /usr/obj, but over 2GB in /usr/local, over 3GB on my 8.0 system with not a lot installed yet. Your /usr wouldn't take that at all, unless you link (or mount) /usr/local somewhere else too. In short, run 'du -d1 /usr' especially ('du -xd1' to not descend into the mounts), and perhaps reconsider your partitioning in that light? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 06:00:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324CB106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF78FC14 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0O60SJt017377; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:00:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o0O60Rc5017374; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:00:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:00:27 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Programmer In Training In-Reply-To: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Message-ID: References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:00:28 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:00:29 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Programmer In Training wrote: > This is probably the wrong place to ask, and if it is I ask your > forgiveness. > > I'm browsing the FTP server for FreeBSD-8.0 packages[0] and am looking > for drivers for my winWiFi card (zonenet, unsure of chipset currently) > and realized, I'm not sure what package I would need for that. Post the model number of the Zonet card. Is it PCI or USB? You could try just loading all of the wireless kernel modules and seeing if any of them find the hardware. There's a list of those in the See Also section for wlan(4). -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 06:42:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07A4106568D for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714B88FC15 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0O6gBc64862; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:42:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:42:11 -0600 From: John To: Erich Dollansky Message-ID: <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <20100123161934.GA27277@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20100123110827.A54749@starfire.mn.org> <201001241055.17552.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <201001241055.17552.oceanare@pacific.net.sg>; from oceanare@pacific.net.sg on Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800 Cc: Jerry McAllister , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:42:17 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On 24 January 2010 am 01:08:27 John wrote: > > doing this on a new machine! And I don't need any "migration" > > storage, because, well, gosh - it's tcp, people! ;) I just > > did the first transfer of home, and it went swell: > > > how did you handle the strange group IDs? Have not done that yet. My current best plan (which I'm not really crazy about, but haven't come up with anything better) is to do 121 "find /home -uid ... -exec chown {} +" and 37 "find /home -gid ... -exec chgrp {} +" commands. This is also called "Let's modify every inode in the filesystem. Twice." Oh, well, the ctimes are blown up by the migration anyway (as they really should be). I have to be careful, if there are any IDs that are used on both systems, but with different associations, to do the change in the right order (sigh). I could try to get really fancy and just find the distinct combinations of "uid:gid" and do only one "chown uid:gid" for each file, but, getting it done will be more important than being pretty at some point. Open to suggestions! (I'd generate the commands via a script, of course.) And, of course, there's the whole matter of migrating the passwords... > > 10:56AM up 492 days, 13:57, 2 users, load averages: 0.02, > > 0.03, 0.00 > > Isn't this normal for a FreeBSD machine running as a server? It probably is, but I see so much of other servers running on similar hardware with a certain other operating system that have a reguluar 30-day scheduled reboot, it still delights me. I just wanted to share my delight! > > That's right! Nearly 500 days! And it was well over a two > > hundred days before that, but we had a power outage that > > outlasted the UPS. > > No diesel powered generator nearby? No - though this system does "real work" - it is actually located in my home. It probably isn't unusual for data center machines, except those that are on some sort of regular "uptick upgrade" schedule. > > 987 522 505 cpu context switches > > I have had to put the spacesin to be able to read it. > > I assume, the scheduler really works. So it would seem! > Erich -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 07:35:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DBD106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [206.117.18.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FB38FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (pool-71-109-144-133.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.144.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0O7ZKdt099779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:35:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <20100123161934.GA27277@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20100123110827.A54749@starfire.mn.org> <201001241055.17552.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <97F6366F-5364-4990-A794-047F3E5B2FB1@lafn.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Doug Hardie Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:35:20 -0800 To: John X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions - Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:35:22 -0000 On 23 January 2010, at 22:42, John wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> On 24 January 2010 am 01:08:27 John wrote: >>> doing this on a new machine! And I don't need any "migration" >>> storage, because, well, gosh - it's tcp, people! ;) I just >>> did the first transfer of home, and it went swell: >>>=20 >> how did you handle the strange group IDs? >=20 > Have not done that yet. My current best plan (which I'm not really > crazy about, but haven't come up with anything better) is to do > 121 "find /home -uid ... -exec chown {} +" and 37 > "find /home -gid ... -exec chgrp {} +" commands. This is also called > "Let's modify every inode in the filesystem. Twice." Oh, well, the > ctimes are blown up by the migration anyway (as they really should = be). > I have to be careful, if there are any IDs that are used on both > systems, but with different associations, to do the change in=20 > the right order (sigh). I could try to get really fancy and just > find the distinct combinations of "uid:gid" and do only one > "chown uid:gid" for each file, but, getting it done will be more > important than being pretty at some point. You might check out tar. At one time it had the option to use user and = group names and not ids. Hence the ids could change between the 2 = systems. It seems like it was on FreeBSD 3 or 4 that I last did that. I just tried it with FreeBSD 7.2 creating a tar file. Digging through = the file it shows the ascii names for owner and group - not uid/gid. I = un-tar'd it on a Mac and sure enough it used the names and the uids are = quite different for the two systems.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 11:32:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809B01065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CEDD8FC1B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16963 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 11:32:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 11:32:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=nzWI+4T6clHLW5kFiw3EIaYhVh1mL/GOCOMENY+VaWbbU4OOyQ9MGifC3QlO6tXjh4sZ9O65c3ZCu5i9d17RY1zRWlvJLW237bQqBY4GgxxykZPYo9rSEp9kTOoKSbGz; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ0hF-0004Gv-Ah for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:32:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:31:53 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC9F4BFA788CE319722F9FE83" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:32:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC9F4BFA788CE319722F9FE83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/23/2010 10:51 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:35:32 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: >> I hope ifconfig will help more then dmesg as I have no way of getting >> files (like dmesg.log that I created) off the box (floppy drive isn't >> even hooked up, IIRC) and rl0 is my wired NIC, non-internal. >=20 > The ifconfig program (often used as "ifconfig -a") tells > you only about NICs that are already connected to a driver. > Most wireless NICs require loading a specific kernel module > (which is not in the GENERIC kernel), and therefore it's > helpful to know what exact model it is, so you can load the > correct driver. There are of course programs that help you > with this: "pciconf -lv" and "usbdevs -v" are common tools Thanks, this probably wouldn't be such an issue if I hadn't thrown away the box two-three weeks ago (at least, I think I threw it out; I've had the card for about a two years). none3@pci0:2:2:0: class 0x20000 card=3D0x1faa11ab chip=3D0x00351033 rev=3D= 0x43 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology LLC)' device =3D 'Marvell Libertas 02.llb/g Wireless (8335)' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet I can't find any wlan modules in /boot/kernel that aren't already loaded.= P.S.: I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me. --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigC9F4BFA788CE319722F9FE83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLXC+wAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0KjEH/1xQj8XGJ8kLEWJqCSwHacjy NJ5wfDqUndkvGgtJ7PY+eGki+oLPMBkrRsArchg4TMz384FDBb4I6chTt12wj8DC QudM3sbGALNKO27FtgbMbOLqzDsawIQrtyym9ZKBatb1rEuNkZUa5NhfbyeR0UEw EOoSg6NweWzM5S09MMMw8aRwizmOHgi0aH9KiOFQ0PAmxtlsZ0d+LjkISq3l5EGd oWsrTJRWHx8b3cU20t+Nl1e4ijdacYoOlBMMdsinrE26v2Kru7Gd3uYqDykYrkSW 1aVir47NnTVjDTYZS67dntSw3TTQZv08BKzcmdJRDFvSu9oYFmSxtkkvWx0tRT0= =krO8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC9F4BFA788CE319722F9FE83-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 12:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB9610657D3 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:22:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3378FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0OCMqLi066080; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:22:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 82DCEBAA8; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:22:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:22:52 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Programmer In Training Message-ID: <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:22:55 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 05:31:53AM -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: > Thanks, this probably wouldn't be such an issue if I hadn't thrown away > the box two-three weeks ago (at least, I think I threw it out; I've had > the card for about a two years). >=20 >=20 > none3@pci0:2:2:0: class 0x20000 card=3D0x1faa11ab chip=3D0x00351033 rev= =3D0x43 > hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology LLC)' > device =3D 'Marvell Libertas 02.llb/g Wireless (8335)' > class =3D network > subclass =3D ethernet zgrep Libertas /usr/share/man/man4/* /usr/share/man/man4/if_malo.4.gz:.Nd "Marvell Libertas IEEE 802.11b/g wirel= ess network driver" So go and read if_malo(4). It looks like your card is supported, but you ne= ed to download a firmware package. This driver was added in 7.1, according to the= manpage. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktcO5wACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVWvACgiYYjwtcW4ddzJboDDoODAdC2 EdcAnRdLTlFg/bSbwMXy8arXwb7G25Ii =ulp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 12:27:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E530F106566B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD1078FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4897 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 12:27:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 12:27:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=safLG15f8QR0wjRiKsYMPPrp2lTPeuEfQARLDDwNg+wWW7caauwsIH3wL6iXvdGciyoUDxT+Q7H59nLekKFTdoLZp29DoXV/7Rv0yQr+kYtOcC5a3Ol4HwrVEr/tczmQ; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ1Z1-0003Es-LB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:27:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5C3CAF.1010903@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:27:27 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB6FE29D2CBB277EBBA7D906F" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:27:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB6FE29D2CBB277EBBA7D906F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do not CC me. I am subscribed to the list. There is no need. THANK YOU. On 1/24/2010 6:22 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > zgrep Libertas /usr/share/man/man4/* > /usr/share/man/man4/if_malo.4.gz:.Nd "Marvell Libertas IEEE 802.11b/g w= ireless network driver" >=20 > So go and read if_malo(4). It looks like your card is supported, but yo= u need to > download a firmware package. This driver was added in 7.1, according to= the manpage. >=20 > Roland Thanks. --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigB6FE29D2CBB277EBBA7D906F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLXDy2AAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0UPUIAK/6grjFUuMAwnuvSkMt5ATz fI+BYxCgQg7hMp8g8FOkIvZqjHFTaKmtzQ9bg+CKDgtFMqpk11UFDTnl4RwX6Wy8 H9Vonu1QOxBGu+CdzniDgYcKyDI9T+t03i3R2Waal3g4Sn0LBkhQp8ElgCJuOYPd i5N+dMk9y9xQ1S/HYP8k0pmFNu7RZnLjnxisTYfNtLFkBR0cM/dQou/Z3VpGrMt6 n6AErK5A1EiFYg+9aI9G5IPtM2tB4CFGq/VJdxmICQQDbn0cbFGjQK2tWkc0XbLg mz87tFIQk1hN/MwkF5uJ6jS22b7T9CGEpui1Ll1HmtWqMovY2oQ1gqwEOpsc3AU= =oBmx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB6FE29D2CBB277EBBA7D906F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 13:13:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EA5106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C2328FC1B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24375 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2010 13:13:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 13:13:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=tObSYdZFdrv8C3QcENBFxGXi/FnMo1D0bqk+k9AFiOKUnq7MIgQEEdzae87J2PcVPCDx0N2FFxRdAST92TeuuE3kBTPd8dwvIvOW2n/JuMd0Oz7xJndXBKHAlhgTLUNi; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ2HD-0006tG-82 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:13:15 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5C4761.2040405@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <4B5C3CAF.1010903@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> In-Reply-To: <4B5C3CAF.1010903@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA44CE9C8B92A3761A28CF8AB" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:13:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA44CE9C8B92A3761A28CF8AB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/24/2010 6:27 AM, Programmer In Training wrote: > Do not CC me. I am subscribed to the list. There is no need. THANK YOU.= >=20 > On 1/24/2010 6:22 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > >> zgrep Libertas /usr/share/man/man4/* >> /usr/share/man/man4/if_malo.4.gz:.Nd "Marvell Libertas IEEE 802.11b/g = wireless network driver" >> >> So go and read if_malo(4). It looks like your card is supported, but y= ou need to >> download a firmware package. This driver was added in 7.1, according t= o the manpage. >> >> Roland >=20 > Thanks. >=20 Thanks for the help folks. I've found everything I need, I believe, now to just do what needs to be done. I'll post here later on today, after I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer). --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigA44CE9C8B92A3761A28CF8AB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLXEdoAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0C1UH/RWLehIea6R2D4N08jkBMVnv AP4CGmjIeRxV4EHgoM6+CQvcXv3pfcCdB6cSFJV/UyZfg297y7nwuYu43EBHB78M pug3WMf8cELKBG3K0ziSgW4Zsm39jg7L/EwG6w+n24z3Zgt+GF8BOCzJuVjwrt4V PTM1AT1I3y33IG26O2mVWcnXxL8CWlWSnUJmgnt/SvPc4ZGtpLDesTXdYwkAxlq0 ZBgSwiQRV2R/GSOS23PAnYFnqBB1ySrE2fwgior+nrkX52HhKsv0BIC5kOsOMPHu ogrCLbqVcPeF33b6uMD87lD2qc8fUo06ErcCACJP+9G/ypq2pQ9gDowLBoTVVko= =sw6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA44CE9C8B92A3761A28CF8AB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 13:23:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41631065692 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344098FC16 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.1-16-172-dyn.locolomo.org (unknown [172.16.1.127]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C4661C1A67; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:23:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B5C49C9.9050404@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:23:21 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie References: <4B594FC0.3010200@el.net> <4B5973AD.8070603@locolomo.org> <772FAD6A-C534-4217-9AA7-274561879E86@lafn.org> <4B59887E.30301@locolomo.org> <4D14E7C8-DFFD-4580-8CD0-99BB3C4EB051@lafn.org> <4B5AE8FB.1030901@locolomo.org> <9E94EB55-A094-4E65-9820-C74EAF44E3EA@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <9E94EB55-A094-4E65-9820-C74EAF44E3EA@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions - Subject: Re: pf rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:23:24 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: >> 1. pf allows short cuts, but these also makes it more difficult to debug. I'd separate NAT from filtering, > > Ok. I guess you want some white space between them? Here it is with the white space and comments: > > ext_if="dc0" > table persist file "/etc/blackhole" > table persist > table persist > table persist file "/etc/mail/whitelist" > MAILHOSTS = "{zool.lafn.org}" > > # NAT/RDR Rules > no rdr on { lo0, lo1 } from any to any > no rdr inet proto tcp from to any port smtp > no rdr inet proto tcp from to any port smtp > rdr pass log inet proto tcp from any to any port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd > > # Filter Rules > pass in log inet proto tcp to $MAILHOSTS port smtp keep state > pass in log on sis0 reply-to (sis0 192.168.25.1) proto tcp from any to any port 75 keep state > block in quick log on $ext_if from to any > > Other than the comments I don't see the difference. you didn't separate nat from filtering, and you didn't add interfaces on your rdr rules. When you make these shortcuts, maybe your ruleset becomes more compact, maybe it works, but it becomes more difficult to debug. >> that is never use "rdr pass" even though pf allows it. You also need to understand when rdr takes place to write your filtering rules. > > That would be really helpful if that information were available somewhere it could be found. I have not been able to find that anywhere. Basically, for rdr, the address translation takes place before the packet is parsed by the filter rules. For nat, it takes place after the filtering. For binat, you can think of it as nat in one direction rdr in the other. This is for the first packet, keep state and you don't have to worry about the rest. se also, http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html >> 2. you can deploy one of two policies: Default block with a whitelist or default pass with a black list. Mixing these is a bad idea. This is one thing you should see to clarify in your ruleset above. When you have both whitelist and blacklist what happens to those that are in neither? what happens to those that are in both. Which default policy makes sense depends on the service. You may want to use black lists for smtp but whitelist for ssh for example. >> anyway, to interpret the output of pflog, you need the output from pfctl -sr and pfctl -sn rather than your config file. > > zool# pfctl -sr > No ALTQ support in kernel > ALTQ related functions disabled > pass in log inet proto tcp from any to 206.117.18.7 port = smtp flags S/SA keep state > pass in log on sis0 reply-to (sis0 192.168.25.1) inet proto tcp from any to any port = 75 flags S/SA keep state > block drop in log quick on dc0 from to any so your filter rules are numbered 0, 1, 2 > zool# pfctl -sn > No ALTQ support in kernel > ALTQ related functions disabled > no rdr on lo0 all > no rdr on lo1 all > no rdr inet proto tcp from to any port = smtp > no rdr inet proto tcp from to any port = smtp > rdr pass log inet proto tcp from any to any port = smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8025 your rdr rules are numbered 0, .. 4, but you only have log in rule 4. So, when you see matches in your pflog, rule 0 .. 2 are filter rules and rule 4 is rdr rule, which you can also see from the action logged, pass, block or rdr. That seems to explain why you have no matches for rule 3. >> So, to solve your problem, separate first NAT and filtering. Things becomes so much more clear. Repeated: Get rid of that "rdr pass" make an rdr rule and a pass rule. Yes, it's the rule recommended by the spamd man page, but if you want to see and understand what's going on, that kind of rules can really make things obscure. BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 14:30:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E619106568B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romain.garbage@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f200.google.com (mail-iw0-f200.google.com [209.85.223.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0F58FC1A for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so2280234iwn.11 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:30:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=LglaquWLajX8c8aKz1sQ24KVEwH76jwnPXLtfXujpS4=; b=F8pnTzzDEHB97wC3GoJ0Z3NJyEpkYNH/f8dQBrzLoac40egss7JakYEzg9bx6rY5VX 9bxxCSaaz3PxtCgY8eN7ts/59Qvh1TkYyWoOgt6vQhrYe7KgMZF0/b2usqBVHEuB0eJR XLCMWPKKxXx+9H/vV1p4l4ow3Yf/YUGQir+1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lq4AzXokBvNx0AwaLDLVwig6W2Nhl5lu13trc2kSJg3s/BVD/mak/VYOMRFCHQV09A LMTlqzfvXAmjK8wFDd6PA5RBGoxhdtm6e2+C09S32O1tTcZdOUVHAkfH4FcmWJKECZ3K LMcyauejcSl8+ZzivaCbaJ3PnSii9Jp8oIAok= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.148.16 with SMTP id n16mr3963112ibv.37.1264341868660; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:04:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:04:28 +0100 Message-ID: <7ab0356e1001240604v22d59edfgcb3761b677aea2f3@mail.gmail.com> From: Romain Garbage To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: automating network configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:05 -0000 Hello, I am looking for a way to automate the configuration of my network depending on its "topology" (don't know if it's the good word) : I would like to check the wired interface to see if a cable is plugged in (by looking at carrier status), if so, bring up the wired interface, if no bring up the wireless interface. Is there a way to do this? I was wondering if it is possible to do so by scripting rc.conf? Thanks in advance for any advice, Romain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 14:31:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5435A1065672 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@shute.org.uk) Received: from atmail-15.bnguk.net (atmail-15.bnguk.net [80.74.253.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E238FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 77-44-105-82.xdsl.murphx.net ([77.44.105.82] helo=orange.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-15.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ3UC-0005R0-F4; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:44 +0000 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 329D14AC1B; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:44 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:30:44 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Dale Scott Message-ID: <20100124143044.GA97875@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dale Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201001231401.o0NE1f9j034930@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <005301ca9c65$0b42af30$21c80d90$@ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005301ca9c65$0b42af30$21c80d90$@ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall and the Right Terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:31:00 -0000 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:48:32PM -0700, Dale Scott wrote: > > Using Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) and GNOME Terminal 2.28.1, $TERM is Xterm. > > $ echo $TERM > Xterm > $ > > The only thing I'd change about the mapping is that I'd rather flash the > screen instead of ringing the bell. > Put: XTerm*visualBell: true in ~/.Xdefaults and that should fix it. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 14:38:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AE2106566C; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romain.garbage@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f200.google.com (mail-iw0-f200.google.com [209.85.223.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7518FC08; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so2283386iwn.11 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:38:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YPvXNvN6wfnrvRxnY66iJvIHVXrKZwA4zVPwoAKDY5g=; b=CergfLSOnBQdM5hR20uF1CRax6vvnrpf02BBkoWcRbI9u2BEoJnsIKmczMLOKevOuX VgajDh1YN9a7MHioCmQBbcg/syUbK0P23s+PIO9c7qglZHaN+evq57+BULVt+YyH5kgi 7GseOpczHYTvqGoHVMW1hDDXewpKlqP1cvBBE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kwUwjBXSmtDnnSXWbPkWR3ijQlk6JvYIh2qVgRZB9CiWYN4w4RaC2sMDj6e2aO8jzz pubfjwLOmYpBFepmbF7cChoAaUsTW4FTRUL5L8FYvq7jPU9SwJPz1nHxYccPZ/wQu8Ti Idk5ecQAvklc1yR/O3sQYHEY5zFaG07khkMEQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.145.206 with SMTP id e14mr3258613ibv.10.1264343888786; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:38:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:38:08 +0100 Message-ID: <7ab0356e1001240638r6cd56b91h47852cb3591b7446@mail.gmail.com> From: Romain Garbage To: Dan Naumov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , "Thomas K." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:38:10 -0000 2010/1/22, Dan Naumov : > Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into > it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in > 1 slice if the swap comes first? Similar problem here: I have a full-zfs system in a bsd slice, but I have the zfs-freebsd partition before the swap one. The problem is that the system doesn't seem to detect the swap partition partition (I see "swapon: /dev/ada0s1b: No such file or directory" during boot) % bsdlabel /dev/ada0s1 # /dev/ada0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 53043200 0 ZFS b: 9883342 53043200 swap c: 62926542 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit but to see ada0s1b in /dev/ I have to reload geom_bsd module (loading it at boot time doesn't work). Even though (but this seems to be another problem): % sudo swapon /dev/ada0s1b swapon: /dev/ada0s1b: Operation not permitted Regards, Romain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 14:38:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDE9106576D for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4705D8FC1C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.1-16-172-dyn.locolomo.org (unknown [172.16.1.127]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F24BD1C1A67; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:38:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B5C5B61.2020306@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:38:25 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Romain Garbage References: <7ab0356e1001240604v22d59edfgcb3761b677aea2f3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7ab0356e1001240604v22d59edfgcb3761b677aea2f3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automating network configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:38:27 -0000 Romain Garbage wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for a way to automate the configuration of my network > depending on its "topology" (don't know if it's the good word) : I > would like to check the wired interface to see if a cable is plugged > in (by looking at carrier status), if so, bring up the wired > interface, if no bring up the wireless interface. > Is there a way to do this? > > I was wondering if it is possible to do so by scripting rc.conf? Normally you really don't have to think, just enable both, assuming you use dhcp. Wired configuration with dhcp will fail if there is no cable, wireless will fail if there is no signal. You usually won't experience problems even if both are configured. BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 14:50:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5222C1065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+517422.46571418.351799@icpbounce.com) Received: from smtp4.icpbounce.com (smtp4.icpbounce.com [216.27.93.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CE58FC08 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.icpbounce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150DB2409CA for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:34:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:34:52 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org From: "CAPP" Message-ID: <2b3a8b40c6dcde7647450c39c8ed7eef@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer (phpmailer.codeworxtech.com) [version 2.2] Errors-To: bounces+517422.46571418.351799@icpbounce.com X-List-Unsubscribe: X-Unsubscribe-Web: X-ICPINFO: X-Return-Path-Hint: bounces+517422.46571418.351799@icpbounce.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: The New Era in Aesthetic Dentistry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:50:53 -0000 [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/] The Tooth Preparation for CAD CAM Technology Dr. Nadim Aboujaoude Speaker at the 4th CAD/CAM & Computerized Dentistry International Conference. The development of the computer aided technology in design and manufacturing made it possible to have the infrastructures for crown and bridges made bypassing the craftsmanship of the laboratory technicians. But this revolutionary input in our daily dental work implies some adaptations and modifications of the tooth preparations to adapt to technical possibilities and limitations. In this presentation we will discuss: • The tooth preparation for CAD CAM technology • The appropriate design of the preparation • The limitations of the cutting machines. Meet Dr. Nadim Aboujaoude and learn about Tooth Preparation for CAD CAM Technology at the [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4] 4th CAD/CAM & Computerized Dentistry Internationa Conference >> REGISTER TODAY! 00971 50 2793711 or [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/registration.php] ONLINE Promotion up to February 15, 2010 [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/callforpapers.php] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/index.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/orgcom.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/program.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/sponsorship.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/statistics.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/press.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/image_slideshow-5.html] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/venue.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/accommodation.htm] [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/pages/contact.php] ORGANIZERS SOCIAL NETWORKS [http://www.facebook.com/pages/Center-for-Advanced-Professional-Practices/133952242941] [http://twitter.com/cappmea] VENUE The Address Dubai Marina Contact CAPP: Hotline: +971 50 2793711 | Tel: +971 4 3616174 | Fax: +971 4 3686883 Email: [mailto:info@cappmea.com] info@cappmea.com | Web: [http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4] www.cappmea.com/cadcam4 This message was sent by: CAPP, Kv, Bldg.9, Off.8, Dubai, none 502221, United Arab Emirates Email Marketing by iContact: http://freetrial.icontact.com Manage your subscription: http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=46571418&l=22740&s=LOEF&m=351799&c=517422 Forward to a friend: http://app.icontact.com/icp/sub/forward?m=351799&s=46571418&c=LOEF&cid=517422 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 15:18:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF96106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FA38FC12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0OFIcb72170; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:18:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:18:38 -0600 From: John To: Doug Hardie Message-ID: <20100124091838.A72039@starfire.mn.org> References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <20100123161934.GA27277@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20100123110827.A54749@starfire.mn.org> <201001241055.17552.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> <97F6366F-5364-4990-A794-047F3E5B2FB1@lafn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <97F6366F-5364-4990-A794-047F3E5B2FB1@lafn.org>; from bc979@lafn.org on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:35:20PM -0800 Cc: freebsd-questions - Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:18:41 -0000 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:35:20PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 23 January 2010, at 22:42, John wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 24 January 2010 am 01:08:27 John wrote: > >>> doing this on a new machine! And I don't need any "migration" > >>> storage, because, well, gosh - it's tcp, people! ;) I just > >>> did the first transfer of home, and it went swell: > >>> > >> how did you handle the strange group IDs? > > > > Have not done that yet. My current best plan (which I'm not really > > crazy about, but haven't come up with anything better) is to do > > 121 "find /home -uid ... -exec chown {} +" and 37 > > "find /home -gid ... -exec chgrp {} +" commands. This is also called > > "Let's modify every inode in the filesystem. Twice." Oh, well, the > > ctimes are blown up by the migration anyway (as they really should be). > > I have to be careful, if there are any IDs that are used on both > > systems, but with different associations, to do the change in > > the right order (sigh). I could try to get really fancy and just > > find the distinct combinations of "uid:gid" and do only one > > "chown uid:gid" for each file, but, getting it done will be more > > important than being pretty at some point. > > You might check out tar. At one time it had the option to use user and group names and not ids. Hence the ids could change between the 2 systems. It seems like it was on FreeBSD 3 or 4 that I last did that. > > I just tried it with FreeBSD 7.2 creating a tar file. Digging through the file it shows the ascii names for owner and group - not uid/gid. I un-tar'd it on a Mac and sure enough it used the names and the uids are quite different for the two systems. Well, that would just serve me right after dissing tar in favor of dump/restore earlier in this thread, now wouldn't it? I think you can preserve the mtimes, too, if I recall correctly. The reason that I don't want to do this, though, is that I don't believe there's anyway to preserve the "atime" on either system. The last access time of every file in the file system would be when I did the migration (because tar is reading the files through the filesystem, rather than reading the file system structure on the disk, like dump does), rather than when they were really last used. -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 15:29:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBA5106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6B98FC17 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0OFTlZ72385; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:29:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:29:47 -0600 From: John To: Dan Naumov Message-ID: <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from dan.naumov@gmail.com on Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200 Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , "Thomas K." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:29:54 -0000 On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and > >>> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing it > >>> from GPT to MBR partitioning. However, I was stumped, even though I > >>> had done everything right (or so I thought), the system would get > >>> stuck at Loader and refuse to go anywhere. After trying over a dozen > >> > >> probably this line is the cause: > >> > >> dd if=/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s1a skip=1 seek=1024 > >> > >> Unless by "swap first" you meant the on-disk location, and not the > >> partition letter. If swap is partition "a", you're writing the loader > >> into swapspace. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Thomas > > > > At first you made me feel silly, but then I decided to double-check, I > > uncommented the swap line in the partitioning part again, ensured I > > was writing the bootloader to "${TARGETDISK}"s1b and ran the script. > > Same problem, hangs at loader. Again, if I comment out the swap, > > giving the entire slice to ZFS and then write the bootloader to > > "${TARGETDISK}"s1a, run the script, everything works. > > I have also just tested creating 2 slices, like this: > > gpart create -s mbr "${TARGETDISK}" > gpart add -s 3G -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" > gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s1 > gpart add -t freebsd-swap "${TARGETDISK}"s1 > > gpart add -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" > gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s2 > gpart add -t freebsd-zfs "${TARGETDISK}"s2 > > gpart set -a active -i 2 "${TARGETDISK}" > gpart bootcode -b /mnt2/boot/boot0 "${TARGETDISK}" > > > and later: > > dd if=/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2 count=1 > dd if=/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2a skip=1 seek=1024 > > > Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into > it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in > 1 slice if the swap comes first? I know what the answer to this USED to be, but I don't know if it is still true (obviously, I think so, I or wouldn't waste your time). The filesystem code is all carefully written to avoid the very first few sector of the partition. That's because the partition table is there for the first filesystem of the slice (or disk). That's a tiny amout of space wasted, because it's also skipped on all the other filesystems even though there's not actually anything there, but it was a small inefficency, even in the 70's. Swap does not behave that way. SWAP will begin right at the slice boundry, with 0 offset. As long as it's not the first partition, no harm, no foul. If it IS the first partition, you just nuked your partition table. As long as SWAP owns the slice, again, no harm, no foul, but if there were filesystems BEHIND it, you just lost 'em. That's the way it always used to be, and I think it still is. SWAP can only be first if it is the ONLY thing using that slice (disk), otherwise, you need a filesystem first to protect the partition table. -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 15:59:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7629E106568F; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ED18FC1B; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2143495ywh.7 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:59:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zlZM2cWzVhqN2QvRpv6mWtSDfBXJT9EJPE9cHME4iLI=; b=X/x1QYhj2WtTWehGsJC5GyuS7t3AbBcAhvCevk3xMJeYtnh7X3WZFOxT51P9Eh0Z8+ 5xCMvwoHbg08sgSBPy5RyN3IOmyELptbJDi681Z1a4kQ7GlJXpydFhDwE2WljBV2llTK Qa/ghqKMEHkcIa+wr06/X/Ll9Jx4M8b4UeZaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WQR+i7fEge+9Kd4k3DK7auxbn2CNTQJbngPjAQ/8HHGrFUjBEiWxbpuqf2lPMwXkyz G1c6Nw/E1Vd1vkiwioHbp/6tsdNlNm+YY1wxh6HjxPFIsIXNkikLVP1HjjmJYHXoDARc gofNW6BEntk5UmCCzvujNO5pR0+eVoO1DDwrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.10.24 with SMTP id n24mr6614152ani.78.1264348753300; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:59:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:59:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: John Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , "Thomas K." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:59:14 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov wrote= : >> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. wro= te: >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >>> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and >> >>> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing = it >> >>> from GPT to MBR partitioning. However, I was stumped, even though I >> >>> had done everything right (or so I thought), the system would get >> >>> stuck at Loader and refuse to go anywhere. After trying over a dozen >> >> >> >> probably this line is the cause: >> >> >> >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s1a skip=3D1 seek= =3D1024 >> >> >> >> Unless by "swap first" you meant the on-disk location, and not the >> >> partition letter. If swap is partition "a", you're writing the loader >> >> into swapspace. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Thomas >> > >> > At first you made me feel silly, but then I decided to double-check, I >> > uncommented the swap line in the partitioning part again, ensured I >> > was writing the bootloader to "${TARGETDISK}"s1b and ran the script. >> > Same problem, hangs at loader. Again, if I comment out the swap, >> > giving the entire slice to ZFS and then write the bootloader to >> > "${TARGETDISK}"s1a, run the script, everything works. >> >> I have also just tested creating 2 slices, like this: >> >> gpart create -s mbr "${TARGETDISK}" >> gpart add -s 3G -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" >> gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s1 >> gpart add -t freebsd-swap "${TARGETDISK}"s1 >> >> gpart add -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" >> gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s2 >> gpart add -t freebsd-zfs "${TARGETDISK}"s2 >> >> gpart set -a active -i 2 "${TARGETDISK}" >> gpart bootcode -b /mnt2/boot/boot0 "${TARGETDISK}" >> >> >> and later: >> >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2 count=3D1 >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2a skip=3D1 seek=3D= 1024 >> >> >> Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into >> it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in >> 1 slice if the swap comes first? > > I know what the answer to this USED to be, but I don't know if it is > still true (obviously, I think so, I or wouldn't waste your time). > > The filesystem code is all carefully written to avoid the very > first few sector of the partition. =A0That's because the partition > table is there for the first filesystem of the slice (or disk). > That's a tiny amout of space wasted, because it's also skipped on > all the other filesystems even though there's not actually anything > there, but it was a small inefficency, even in the 70's. > > Swap does not behave that way. =A0SWAP will begin right at the slice > boundry, with 0 offset. =A0As long as it's not the first partition, no > harm, no foul. =A0If it IS the first partition, you just nuked your parti= tion > table. =A0As long as SWAP owns the slice, again, no harm, no foul, but > if there were filesystems BEHIND it, you just lost 'em. > > That's the way it always used to be, and I think it still is. =A0SWAP can > only be first if it is the ONLY thing using that slice (disk), otherwise, > you need a filesystem first to protect the partition table. > -- > > John Lind > john@starfire.MN.ORG This explanation does sound logical, but holy crap, if this is the case, you'd think there would be bells, whistles and huge red label warnings in EVERY FreeBSD installation / partitioning guide out there warning people to not put swap first (unless given a dedicated slice) under any circumstances. The warnings were nowhere to be seen and lots of pointy hair first greyed and were then lost during the process of me trying to figure out why my system would install but wouldn't boot. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 16:11:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC521065670 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0048FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0OGBrYl019748 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:11:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o0OGBrDh019745 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:11:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:11:53 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:11:53 -0700 (MST) Cc: Subject: Mouse selection overeagerness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:11:55 -0000 Mouse selection in both xfce4's Terminal and the FreeBSD console is a bit touchy. Select a block, click in another window to paste, and... it's now highlighted a block in the target window. Or maybe a whole line. Mouse speed and click-to-focus are fine the way they are, it'd just be nice if there was a way to reduce this selection oversensitivity. Is there a place to increase the threshold that defines when a selection is taking place? Somewhere between moused and syscons, maybe, but a cursory [hah] look at their man pages didn't show an adjustment. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 16:36:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1E1106566B; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037438FC0C; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2155988ywh.7 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:36:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=i/+uDXn7ijsjDRMI+huRYoteHW8xWKP71eiWT2QtTwI=; b=XB5DGEvb22DO3uAcGFpTzF8+VqgdyknX3ERVi5zdtuvJajCWjxSwKlv2n1rswFcVlr XZ5OJp0ns7wOrDGTckhxS+jfMOR/Et2iQjUDEBnHQ4D/t+N9nr5SKO98KcYLsARBg0p/ sHZta9cRKYK4BOROZL0bhv8jdoREApwcQJIKI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SmdO0NyTLyazmK8ukteUiPIdDrSe3JRmt41SOdrf/DH9VvBOpKR1Wwbxn+hup7o9wv jyvG34zoxkjvwFFHzJIl6CtHlu38DBqlij9Bb3CyreeFMGblF1Hf7awFv+GU7wqEpuOO ypaMXtb0imTmte4srJrrS70UPeDZgAKG7RuJ0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.235.36 with SMTP id i36mr3795152anh.104.1264350982055; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:36:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:36:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:23 -0000 Note: Since my issue is slow performance right off the bat and not performance degradation over time, I decided to start a separate discussion. After installing a fresh pure ZFS 8.0 system and building all my ports, I decided to do some benchmarking. At this point, about a dozen of ports has been built installed and the system has been up for about 11 hours, No heavy background services have been running, only SSHD and NTPD: ================================================================================== bonnie -s 8192: -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 8192 23821 61.7 22311 19.2 13928 13.7 25029 49.6 44806 17.2 135.0 3.1 During the process, TOP looks like this: last pid: 83554; load averages: 0.31, 0.31, 0.37 up 0+10:59:01 17:24:19 33 processes: 2 running, 31 sleeping CPU: 0.1% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.7% interrupt, 85.2% idle Mem: 45M Active, 4188K Inact, 568M Wired, 144K Cache, 1345M Free Swap: 3072M Total, 3072M Free Oh wow, that looks low, alright, lets run it again, just to be sure: -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 8192 18235 46.7 23137 19.9 13927 13.6 24818 49.3 44919 17.3 134.3 2.1 OK, let's reboot the machine and see what kind of numbers we get on a fresh boot: =============================================================== -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU 8192 21041 53.5 22644 19.4 13724 12.8 25321 48.5 43110 14.0 143.2 3.3 Nope, no help from the reboot, still very low speed. Here is my pool: =============================================================== zpool status pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 ad10s1a ONLINE 0 0 0 ad8s1a ONLINE 0 0 0 =============================================================== diskinfo -c -t /dev/ad10 /dev/ad10 512 # sectorsize 2000398934016 # mediasize in bytes (1.8T) 3907029168 # mediasize in sectors 3876021 # Cylinders according to firmware. 16 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. WD-WCAVY0301430 # Disk ident. I/O command overhead: time to read 10MB block 0.164315 sec = 0.008 msec/sector time to read 20480 sectors 3.030396 sec = 0.148 msec/sector calculated command overhead = 0.140 msec/sector Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 7.309334 sec = 29.237 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 5.156117 sec = 20.624 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 8.147588 sec = 16.295 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 2.544309 sec = 6.361 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 2.007679 sec = 5.019 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.392994 sec = 0.192 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.332582 sec = 0.162 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 1.576734 sec = 64944 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 1.381803 sec = 74106 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.145432 sec = 47729 kbytes/sec =============================================================== diskinfo -c -t /dev/ad8 /dev/ad8 512 # sectorsize 2000398934016 # mediasize in bytes (1.8T) 3907029168 # mediasize in sectors 3876021 # Cylinders according to firmware. 16 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. WD-WCAVY1611513 # Disk ident. I/O command overhead: time to read 10MB block 0.176820 sec = 0.009 msec/sector time to read 20480 sectors 2.966564 sec = 0.145 msec/sector calculated command overhead = 0.136 msec/sector Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 7.993339 sec = 31.973 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 5.944923 sec = 23.780 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 9.744406 sec = 19.489 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 2.511171 sec = 6.278 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 2.233714 sec = 5.584 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.427523 sec = 0.209 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.341185 sec = 0.167 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 1.516305 sec = 67533 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 1.351877 sec = 75747 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.090069 sec = 48994 kbytes/sec =============================================================== The exact same disks, on the exact same machine, are well capable of 65+ mb/s throughput (tested with ATTO multiple times) with different block sizes using Windows 2008 Server and NTFS. So what would be the cause of these very low Bonnie result numbers in my case? Should I try some other benchmark and if so, with what parameters? - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 16:36:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E547106568B; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A89B8FC18; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NZ5SJ-0003pf-Se>; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:36:55 +0100 Received: from e178029033.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.29.33] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NZ5SJ-0001fK-BU>; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:36:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4B5C771C.4040605@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:36:44 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100123 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.29.33 Cc: Subject: PCIe audio cards: what is tob be preferred with FreeBSD 8.0/9-CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:57 -0000 Well, At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate expensive audio board with the workstation which is supported by FreeBSD 8/9. In the past - means two or three ywars ago, I had problems with Soundblaster PCIe boards, so I was recommended avoiding those and choosing the more elabotrated M-Audio cards for the PCI bus. At this moment, I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, but I'm not sure whether they are supported by FreeBSd 8/9. Any suggestions? Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 17:42:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577091065670; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC28FC1C; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so2275433yxe.3 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:42:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=j88x6XhvR75nuWm2yTKP7/tyUJkjzQo0D5wtSP5t/Gs=; b=NH2HzacZQP2uCFh5RJWrbwrJrlt8RcQ5rex70CUV4KW8vReXnVG0sESFFh6wQBuzA9 r6wIFcX+QUSMFBdbGpZ0FeRer3PQnqsTWp+5PJWXA9VFqD2vszEkVMMlF4CF+oAxLRmM 3y+4TBhF2sxcUyHlYofpJf9ODXk/eF1HMuBN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cO7S2cshb89hsDgyAqO9AzCVXz6C+xdAI/1JC1SmD1cESNpsUqHKAPShRTE3cKyGvY VVAv/Ez07pniyN8THgxN+uHSgMxU2vXcbnzqZedZNRztIa4KPo7CyFZzmyv/HMqHAZpf wBTYDvk9GXaO7O7EDLL41VJYTdG8jVszUFebI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.6.22 with SMTP id j22mr6557167ani.224.1264354942041; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:42:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:42:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:42:23 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS. > Perhaps i can help you with that. > > You seem to be running a single mirror, which means you won't have any speed > benefit regarding writes, and usually RAID1 implementations offer little to > no acceleration to read requests also; some even just read from the master > disk and don't touch the 'slave' mirrored disk unless when writing. ZFS is > alot more modern however, although i did not test performance of its mirror > implementation. > > But, benchmarking I/O can be tricky: > > 1) you use bonnie, but bonnie's tests are performed without a 'cooldown' > period between the tests; meaning that when test 2 starts, data from test 1 > is still being processed. For single disks and simple I/O this is not so > bad, but for large write-back buffers and more complex I/O buffering, this > may be inappropriate. I had patched bonnie some time in the past, but if you > just want a MB/s number you can use DD for that. > > 2) The diskinfo tiny benchmark is single queue only i assume, meaning that > it would not scale well or at all on RAID-arrays. Actual filesystems on > RAID-arrays use multiple-queue; meaning it would not read one sector at a > time, but read 8 blocks (of 16KiB) "ahead"; this is called read-ahead and > for traditional UFS filesystems its controlled by the sysctl vfs.read_max > variable. ZFS works differently though, but you still need a "real" > benchmark. > > 3) You need low-latency hardware; in particular, no PCI controller should be > used. Only PCI-express based controllers or chipset-integrated Serial ATA > cotrollers have proper performance. PCI can hurt performance very badly, and > has high interrupt CPU usage. Generally you should avoid PCI. PCI-express is > fine though, its a completely different interface that is in many ways the > opposite of what PCI was. > > 4) Testing actual realistic I/O performance (in IOps) is very difficult. But > testing sequential performance should be alot easier. You may try using dd > for this. > > > For example, you can use dd on raw devices: > > dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 > > I will explain each parameter: > > if=/dev/ad4 is the input file, the "read source" > > of=/dev/null is the output file, the "write destination". /dev/null means it > just goes no-where; so this is a read-only benchmark > > bs=1M is the blocksize, howmuch data to transfer per time. default is 512 or > the sector size; but that's very slow. A value between 64KiB and 1024KiB is > appropriate. bs=1M will select 1MiB or 1024KiB. > > count=1000 means transfer 1000 pieces, and with bs=1M that means 1000 * 1MiB > = 1000MiB. > > > > This example was raw reading sequentially from the start of the device > /dev/ad4. If you want to test RAIDs, you need to work at the filesystem > level. You can use dd for that too: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/path/to/ZFS/mount/zerofile.000 bs=1M count=2000 > > This command will read from /dev/zero (all zeroes) and write to a file on > ZFS-mounted filesystem, it will create the file "zerofile.000" and write > 2000MiB of zeroes to that file. > So this command tests write-performance of the ZFS-mounted filesystem. To > test read performance, you need to clear caches first by unmounting that > filesystem and re-mounting it again. This would free up memory containing > parts of the filesystem as cached (reported in top as "Inact(ive)" instead > of "Free"). > > Please do make sure you double-check a dd command before running it, and run > as normal user instead of root. A wrong dd command may write to the wrong > destination and do things you don't want. The only real thing you need to > check is the write destination (of=....). That's where dd is going to write > to, so make sure its the target you intended. A common mistake made by > myself was to write dd of=... if=... (starting with of instead of if) and > thus actually doing something the other way around than what i was meant to > do. This can be disastrous if you work with live data, so be careful! ;-) > > Hope any of this was helpful. During the dd benchmark, you can of course > open a second SSH terminal and start "gstat" to see the devices current I/O > stats. > > Kind regards, > Jason Hi and thanks for your tips, I appreciate it :) [jago@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test1 bs=1M count=1024 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes transferred in 36.206372 secs (29656156 bytes/sec) [jago@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test2 bs=1M count=4096 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 4294967296 bytes transferred in 143.878615 secs (29851325 bytes/sec) This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks are capable of. Dmesg shows: atapci0: port 0x1000-0x100f mem 0x90108000-0x9010807f,0x90100000-0x90107fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on pci4 ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master SATA300 I do recall also testing an alternative configuration in the past, where I would boot off an UFS disk and have the ZFS mirror consist of 2 discs directly. The bonnie numbers in that case were in line with my expectations, I was seeing 65-70mb/s. Note: again, exact same hardware, exact same disks attached to the exact same controller. In my knowledge, Solaris/OpenSolaris has an issue where they have to automatically disable disk cache if ZFS is used on top of partitions instead of raw disks, but to my knowledge (I recall reading this from multiple reputable sources) this issue does not affect FreeBSD. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 18:12:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8994D106568D; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9728FC0A; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2189749ywh.7 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:12:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Nudg+xoe53eItQvs+LtVZir/9Twc7UMwOIIF8NZIsgM=; b=ZRf6dBnvdGEUdr0v09fxRZJNHAokhpKN/nvlt0N3hnFR9w5DqTPV552wYi5Yat3npp SDYb0DVgP678/UtCaEK5JFyP3daj1nv2/n8uMwHKT3MS9BnEL8Ocfn5lfVDQsE8jvI3Q RVXzXpTbxBI87YPlVNrt5geZ4x877uLiVmfyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rUJ/STK6QLdsQzCXy8kDc/qaR25SFK4zcrq2oVZwD0vxqprTFmRcyWUhMaHBNL2O1O u7N6+Vcnje1HN0SNK1VjJXaLq+Zw1lYP20N6ZGCSAznkkWMwQo6HSawNs7N8lnhekRMt VUwO8JVoQQohG/x5eX0yWXkcSk3FYknvPmQYQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.135.23 with SMTP id m23mr6524863ann.222.1264356750021; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:12:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:12:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:12:31 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS. >> Perhaps i can help you with that. >> >> You seem to be running a single mirror, which means you won't have any speed >> benefit regarding writes, and usually RAID1 implementations offer little to >> no acceleration to read requests also; some even just read from the master >> disk and don't touch the 'slave' mirrored disk unless when writing. ZFS is >> alot more modern however, although i did not test performance of its mirror >> implementation. >> >> But, benchmarking I/O can be tricky: >> >> 1) you use bonnie, but bonnie's tests are performed without a 'cooldown' >> period between the tests; meaning that when test 2 starts, data from test 1 >> is still being processed. For single disks and simple I/O this is not so >> bad, but for large write-back buffers and more complex I/O buffering, this >> may be inappropriate. I had patched bonnie some time in the past, but if you >> just want a MB/s number you can use DD for that. >> >> 2) The diskinfo tiny benchmark is single queue only i assume, meaning that >> it would not scale well or at all on RAID-arrays. Actual filesystems on >> RAID-arrays use multiple-queue; meaning it would not read one sector at a >> time, but read 8 blocks (of 16KiB) "ahead"; this is called read-ahead and >> for traditional UFS filesystems its controlled by the sysctl vfs.read_max >> variable. ZFS works differently though, but you still need a "real" >> benchmark. >> >> 3) You need low-latency hardware; in particular, no PCI controller should be >> used. Only PCI-express based controllers or chipset-integrated Serial ATA >> cotrollers have proper performance. PCI can hurt performance very badly, and >> has high interrupt CPU usage. Generally you should avoid PCI. PCI-express is >> fine though, its a completely different interface that is in many ways the >> opposite of what PCI was. >> >> 4) Testing actual realistic I/O performance (in IOps) is very difficult. But >> testing sequential performance should be alot easier. You may try using dd >> for this. >> >> >> For example, you can use dd on raw devices: >> >> dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 >> >> I will explain each parameter: >> >> if=/dev/ad4 is the input file, the "read source" >> >> of=/dev/null is the output file, the "write destination". /dev/null means it >> just goes no-where; so this is a read-only benchmark >> >> bs=1M is the blocksize, howmuch data to transfer per time. default is 512 or >> the sector size; but that's very slow. A value between 64KiB and 1024KiB is >> appropriate. bs=1M will select 1MiB or 1024KiB. >> >> count=1000 means transfer 1000 pieces, and with bs=1M that means 1000 * 1MiB >> = 1000MiB. >> >> >> >> This example was raw reading sequentially from the start of the device >> /dev/ad4. If you want to test RAIDs, you need to work at the filesystem >> level. You can use dd for that too: >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/path/to/ZFS/mount/zerofile.000 bs=1M count=2000 >> >> This command will read from /dev/zero (all zeroes) and write to a file on >> ZFS-mounted filesystem, it will create the file "zerofile.000" and write >> 2000MiB of zeroes to that file. >> So this command tests write-performance of the ZFS-mounted filesystem. To >> test read performance, you need to clear caches first by unmounting that >> filesystem and re-mounting it again. This would free up memory containing >> parts of the filesystem as cached (reported in top as "Inact(ive)" instead >> of "Free"). >> >> Please do make sure you double-check a dd command before running it, and run >> as normal user instead of root. A wrong dd command may write to the wrong >> destination and do things you don't want. The only real thing you need to >> check is the write destination (of=....). That's where dd is going to write >> to, so make sure its the target you intended. A common mistake made by >> myself was to write dd of=... if=... (starting with of instead of if) and >> thus actually doing something the other way around than what i was meant to >> do. This can be disastrous if you work with live data, so be careful! ;-) >> >> Hope any of this was helpful. During the dd benchmark, you can of course >> open a second SSH terminal and start "gstat" to see the devices current I/O >> stats. >> >> Kind regards, >> Jason > > Hi and thanks for your tips, I appreciate it :) > > [jago@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test1 bs=1M count=1024 > 1024+0 records in > 1024+0 records out > 1073741824 bytes transferred in 36.206372 secs (29656156 bytes/sec) > > [jago@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test2 bs=1M count=4096 > 4096+0 records in > 4096+0 records out > 4294967296 bytes transferred in 143.878615 secs (29851325 bytes/sec) > > This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and > 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the > bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( > The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my > Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, > with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was > that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were > tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers > roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed > usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the > throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, > but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both > read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks > are capable of. Dmesg shows: > > atapci0: port 0x1000-0x100f mem > 0x90108000-0x9010807f,0x90100000-0x90107fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on > pci4 > ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 > ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master SATA300 > > I do recall also testing an alternative configuration in the past, > where I would boot off an UFS disk and have the ZFS mirror consist of > 2 discs directly. The bonnie numbers in that case were in line with my > expectations, I was seeing 65-70mb/s. Note: again, exact same > hardware, exact same disks attached to the exact same controller. In > my knowledge, Solaris/OpenSolaris has an issue where they have to > automatically disable disk cache if ZFS is used on top of partitions > instead of raw disks, but to my knowledge (I recall reading this from > multiple reputable sources) this issue does not affect FreeBSD. > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov To add some additional info, for good measure I decided to check if disk write cache is enabled and sure enough it was: [jago@atombsd /var/log]$ sysctl hw.ata hw.ata.setmax: 0 hw.ata.wc: 1 hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1 hw.ata.ata_dma_check_80pin: 1 hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 Also if you want to see/know the exact way the system was built and installed, here is the build script I used: http://jago.pp.fi/zfsinst.sh The reason me (and this script) use MBR partitioning instead of GPT is because my motherboard cannot reliably boot off GPT, but this should not be really relevant to the performance issues shown. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 18:29:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4B3106568D; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40A48FC17; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2195803ywh.7 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:29:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jd59GblytqTsj/A2jL+22mSk53JxWa7kKpN2Tgprzag=; b=fJgnzGR/GnQ1t0OKMUyoXZkAoPpLFO3lPDjBTvvAP7Pa/eNs9edsqR+fpAObo7R1s4 TdgieZBAfaiTRbntM5vFqyuj1/+GYRFZa89XQowAgSsUP4JsCwrl66qzILFqjhSuI3vK 7+FWh/UZStxlHbEeByew33jvhYweVqf1S8Nmg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W9lTWgQ4payHtP/RFPn1cchDjsPrvIwRzSdhPO4wyAQJGnIyVZ+5O0WSGqq4wV/R2e /sKogAa96O7PgkgzNMgIIiLoMzfwbYK+xqpGzZmzFcw5By8iAP+5RTDlaR5FAmzOFK54 Pu6HOpQcJKrlY+ijAA58U6HqgHfE587eKxIOM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.12.6 with SMTP id p6mr6559698ani.248.1264357792623; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:29:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:29:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Bob Friesenhahn , sub.mesa@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:29:54 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: >> >> This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and >> 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the >> bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( >> The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my >> Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, >> with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was >> that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were >> tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers >> roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed >> usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the >> throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, >> but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both >> read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks >> are capable of. Dmesg shows: > > There is a mistatement in the above in that a "mirror setup offers roughl= y > the same write speed as individual disk". =A0It is possible for a mirror = setup > to offer a similar write speed to an individual disk, but it is also quit= e > possible to get 1/2 (or even 1/3) the speed. ZFS writes to a mirror pair > requires two independent writes. =A0If these writes go down independent I= /O > paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. =A0If the wr= ites > go through a bandwidth-limited shared path then they will contend for tha= t > bandwidth and you will see much less write performance. > > As a simple test, you can temporarily remove the mirror device from the p= ool > and see if the write performance dramatically improves. Before doing that= , > it is useful to see the output of 'iostat -x 30' while under heavy write > load to see if one device shows a much higher svc_t value than the other. Ow, ow, WHOA: atombsd# zpool offline tank ad8s1a [jago@atombsd ~]$ dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/home/jago/test3 bs=3D1M count=3D1= 024 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes transferred in 16.826016 secs (63814382 bytes/sec) Offlining one half of the mirror bumps DD write speed from 28mb/s to 64mb/s! Let's see how Bonnie results change: Mirror with both parts attached: -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Rand= om-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seek= s--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec = %CPU 8192 18235 46.7 23137 19.9 13927 13.6 24818 49.3 44919 17.3 134.3 = 2.1 Mirror with 1 half offline: -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Rand= om-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seek= s--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec = %CPU 1024 22888 58.0 41832 35.1 22764 22.0 26775 52.3 54233 18.3 166.0 = 1.6 Ok, the Bonnie results have improved, but only very little. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 18:31:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03FA1065694 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253DC8FC1B for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-70-227.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.227]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0OIV1A4038768; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:31:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4B5C91E5.7090005@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:31:01 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: slrn/1.0.8 (FreeBSD) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen References: <4B5B0DA6.1020702@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4B5B0DA6.1020702@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird language should be Swedish but it's not! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:31:07 -0000 Leslie Jensen said the following on 2010-01-23 15:54: > > When I install Thunderbird3 > > thunderbird-3.0.1 > thunderbird-dictionaries-20060220_4 > thunderbird3-i18n-3.0.1 > > It does not adapt to what I have in /etc/make.conf > > > # Firefox-i18n > FIREFOX_I18N=sv-SE > # Thunderbird-i18n > THUNDERBIRD_I18N=sv-SE You need thunderbird3-i18n not thunderbird-i18n. > Firefox instals xpi-quick-locale-switcher-1.7 set to Swedish. It can be > disabled and Firefox keeps the swedish setting. > > Any suggestions on how to get Thunderbird to display Swedish? > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 18:40:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADBF106566C; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA748FC18; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2199414ywh.7 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:40:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cYTS0m2zo4yDD/C80NV/kKNkjUleB0nYq6cDz3m1o8M=; b=E/QHnw9cxELemG6LgKrCQFM00BIeOJXlPkCLLH7bNWlgqbmNLl95XVNSie0qyuFBGt ak510/HzecvrOJg+q7TJpoobuntrIl0o0A+HM+9FIcNC+yrA2AtxSFyfSnUTiatyN2xw QW06WJsoILZcAjyLjPI27iCMpw8JpBftAOuRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=McVl6IfCbStweIGUId0p5GYs2NDRQnZfA1tzwHQ4QcA5KKsoBb4f9oKiWRc3HdXftV 9VRwxZO786iWEOOvqUU3lht82fN4Yts15TFkg4Ghcsm5dfCcGkdhor15ubMc/JrB2HL1 8s/vXLjqqAvey+UrP2bOMluaxJ6sKYt9MUQMw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.133.37 with SMTP id k37mr6619685ann.237.1264358436052; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:40:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <883b2dc51001241034u40c97fdet83eb1e6edb5f4df4@mail.gmail.com> References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <883b2dc51001241034u40c97fdet83eb1e6edb5f4df4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:40:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:40:37 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jason Edwards wrote: >> ZFS writes to a mirror pair >> requires two independent writes. =A0If these writes go down independent = I/O >> paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. =A0If the >> writes >> go through a bandwidth-limited shared path then they will contend for th= at >> bandwidth and you will see much less write performance. > > What he said may confirm my suspicion on PCI. So if you could try the sam= e > with "real" Serial ATA via chipset or PCI-e controller you can confirm th= is > story. I would be very interested. :P > > Kind regards, > Jason This wouldn't explain why ZFS mirror on 2 disks directly, on the exact same controller (with the OS running off a separate disks) results in "expected" performance, while having the OS run off/on a ZFS mirror running on top of MBR-partitioned disks, on the same controller, results in very low speed. - Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 20:57:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC871065740; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E24D8FC24; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2E3E60CD; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0OKvHUE089237; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:57:17 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: Dan Naumov From: Mark Andrews References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:59:13 +0200." Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:57:17 +1100 Sender: marka@isc.org Cc: John , "Thomas K." , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:57:26 -0000 In message , Dan N aumov writes: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov wrote= > : > >> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. wro= > te: > >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >>> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and > >> >>> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing = > it > >> >>> from GPT to MBR partitioning. However, I was stumped, even though I > >> >>> had done everything right (or so I thought), the system would get > >> >>> stuck at Loader and refuse to go anywhere. After trying over a dozen > >> >> > >> >> probably this line is the cause: > >> >> > >> >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s1a skip=3D1 seek= > =3D1024 > >> >> > >> >> Unless by "swap first" you meant the on-disk location, and not the > >> >> partition letter. If swap is partition "a", you're writing the loader > >> >> into swapspace. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Thomas > >> > > >> > At first you made me feel silly, but then I decided to double-check, I > >> > uncommented the swap line in the partitioning part again, ensured I > >> > was writing the bootloader to "${TARGETDISK}"s1b and ran the script. > >> > Same problem, hangs at loader. Again, if I comment out the swap, > >> > giving the entire slice to ZFS and then write the bootloader to > >> > "${TARGETDISK}"s1a, run the script, everything works. > >> > >> I have also just tested creating 2 slices, like this: > >> > >> gpart create -s mbr "${TARGETDISK}" > >> gpart add -s 3G -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" > >> gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s1 > >> gpart add -t freebsd-swap "${TARGETDISK}"s1 > >> > >> gpart add -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" > >> gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s2 > >> gpart add -t freebsd-zfs "${TARGETDISK}"s2 > >> > >> gpart set -a active -i 2 "${TARGETDISK}" > >> gpart bootcode -b /mnt2/boot/boot0 "${TARGETDISK}" > >> > >> > >> and later: > >> > >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2 count=3D1 > >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2a skip=3D1 seek=3D= > 1024 > >> > >> > >> Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into > >> it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in > >> 1 slice if the swap comes first? > > > > I know what the answer to this USED to be, but I don't know if it is > > still true (obviously, I think so, I or wouldn't waste your time). > > > > The filesystem code is all carefully written to avoid the very > > first few sector of the partition. =A0That's because the partition > > table is there for the first filesystem of the slice (or disk). > > That's a tiny amout of space wasted, because it's also skipped on > > all the other filesystems even though there's not actually anything > > there, but it was a small inefficency, even in the 70's. > > > > Swap does not behave that way. =A0SWAP will begin right at the slice > > boundry, with 0 offset. =A0As long as it's not the first partition, no > > harm, no foul. =A0If it IS the first partition, you just nuked your parti= > tion > > table. =A0As long as SWAP owns the slice, again, no harm, no foul, but > > if there were filesystems BEHIND it, you just lost 'em. > > > > That's the way it always used to be, and I think it still is. =A0SWAP can > > only be first if it is the ONLY thing using that slice (disk), otherwise, > > you need a filesystem first to protect the partition table. > > -- > > > > John Lind > > john@starfire.MN.ORG > > This explanation does sound logical, but holy crap, if this is the > case, you'd think there would be bells, whistles and huge red label > warnings in EVERY FreeBSD installation / partitioning guide out there > warning people to not put swap first (unless given a dedicated slice) > under any circumstances. The warnings were nowhere to be seen and lots > of pointy hair first greyed and were then lost during the process of > me trying to figure out why my system would install but wouldn't boot. >From "man bsdlabel". offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the correct offset to use (the end of the previous partition plus one, ignor- ing partition `c'. For partition `c', * will be interpreted as an offset of 0. The first partition should start at offset 16, because the first 16 sectors are reserved for metadata. > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 21:45:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDE21065670; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5188FC08; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so486385fxm.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:45:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rcYHoSN/Vq+P+c3cBbd6bi+yJGrFxh5AL3C0k4y/TNE=; b=pstD0Yxa9mWFHNKBZp5lqwxaHArmN/Liig+gQqRORlws/GolG/Xsm7+/Yj0MRNhgi7 iV5HosqcsUIWlmIoFvo7Zk1B84AACKP3V1Zu8MOYCGnWmfv24CekFVI8pLF6/VCFBjpo HFP4BZFnEscNHP4/NZwk3pwjaFG4P3Xh3YiuE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vRg9UNIANKibgAXXT63R5GHchzTVxU7DMU45OWlqw9N4NujSJ1khjqbz61mwLkLnbC e/DH3flJkR5Lodk5fbBKb4AkEZOshlSQGJMucPkoifm5y94Q3Emrys9mtvjnBk8YZMuA jQ6XwzqowTfH2L+Ml6UCrW0tXRqKkqOPdjrRY= Received: by 10.223.75.66 with SMTP id x2mr4175164faj.7.1264369539445; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:45:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm2407944fxm.14.2010.01.24.13.45.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:45:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4B5CBF4B.2040205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:44:43 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <1264364581.00211056.1264351201@10.7.7.3> In-Reply-To: <1264364581.00211056.1264351201@10.7.7.3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCIe audio cards: what is tob be preferred with FreeBSD 8.0/9-CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:45:41 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Well, > At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which > I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS > P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes > for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate expensive audio > board with the workstation which is supported by FreeBSD 8/9. In the > past - means two or three ywars ago, I had problems with Soundblaster > PCIe boards, so I was recommended avoiding those and choosing the more > elabotrated M-Audio cards for the PCI bus. > At this moment, I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, > but I'm not sure whether they are supported by FreeBSd 8/9. Any > suggestions? I would first test on-board HDA codec, placed on that motherboard. They are free and usually work with FreeBSD just out of the box, using snd_hda driver. Now snd_hda and snd_uaudio are only two drivers supporting multichannel playback. If you need analog connection, snd_hda can usually provide multichannel 24bit/192kHz playback. But also it supports digital SPDIF I/O, including AC3/DTS pass-through. Together with SPDIF-connected external audio receiver, even simple HDA codec could become very interesting high-quality choice. Personally I am completely fulfilled with combination of simple Realtek HDA codec, digitally connected via SPDIF to Marantz SR4001 receiver, loaded to the full-sized Eltax 7.1 speaker set. Previously I was using Creative Audigy2 ZS, but now it just collecting dust in my table. It works, but I really don't need it. PS: If you want to look cool, you may use optical SPDIF connection. :) -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 21:54:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0578B106566B; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F0E8FC1A; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so490877fxm.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:54:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EsVLB3AoYxVdcmOhg/E17qMGAwiszH33kOdv6DLGnkc=; b=KeZs8mx3sPtgIvFFstTBBUMInJngHEd+n5wrAaq/qEI/euXhjn4bJEgr1+ylmhClRE 9YsrBQduyrTPWC45Ut3EnusLxqw5hyfxuRv0LRrnvINCLKde0Ia1tajIVk/uQiFlXKvm EwXY0pZ0rD8QFyMHoTYuTTD7mT8KJoElhrSts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=DG3i9KcESzUrIT7CyydH8AUK9G+opbU/AauE4kC2h4h5vL1F/2q4JqJIg7uZHyTZNF d+Jg2MIF3N1mNz+3nnTobUvW5vI9PvaSejp751QbMx7kp4eNk3DgoxtjiDh9yr/u6Qiu oYflKNK6cosVrMSRCknDJG+YVqe/vFdZH6UzM= Received: by 10.223.92.142 with SMTP id r14mr5880299fam.93.1264370080984; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:54:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm2415845fxm.8.2010.01.24.13.54.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:54:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:53:43 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: lucky.freebsd.fs,lucky.freebsd.questions,lucky.freebsd.stable To: Dan Naumov References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> In-Reply-To: <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:54:43 -0000 Dan Naumov wrote: > This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and > 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the > bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( > The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my > Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, > with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was > that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were > tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers > roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed > usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the > throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, > but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both > read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks > are capable of. Dmesg shows: > > atapci0: port 0x1000-0x100f mem > 0x90108000-0x9010807f,0x90100000-0x90107fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on > pci4 > ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 > ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master SATA300 8.0-RELEASE, and especially 8-STABLE provide alternative, much more functional driver for this controller, named siis(4). If your SiI3124 card installed into proper bus (PCI-X or PCIe x4/x8), it can be really fast (up to 1GB/s was measured). -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 22:26:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A99B1065679 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noamscai.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f204.google.com (mail-iw0-f204.google.com [209.85.223.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92BB8FC23 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so970104iwn.9 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:26:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=NkDo8NZfpRI5HR0y7U0g1FRvpFRZb5RD+5YeFJazI1w=; b=LvRgkBEIMGzlTFL4nT/2YWsvaQc0W1ehBF7kofEbodTKAsd7XFKA+GzSrZCU4p8UV0 NgWrGwxCa2uZ5tRhTmwu3/EdmHyx4wRmA76M4dNP0XM3xOWyfMXlKrul7pL/BxbaP492 bI4vpzakpfONCATp2LUaUi0XQmQhycRNuamcU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MApxtSEBbtV6/AMbMJFsJren3alOxS6p6UO3kg4YLcO7C2fuy9F59nLbMxHg2HVgkX tDgneC7uYl/P16GTWe/z9nOTL5skz9gwoRajo718f6wyOIWWKitFu/QrSiQYPZXetHsb H9Yi2ckGlaAJv3DKVroHBVF04ib27M3PX6Uy4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.168.132 with SMTP id u4mr2979457iby.79.1264370393719; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:59:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:59:53 +0300 Message-ID: <4c44ea791001241359g46f76a03l148c9c81a975195b@mail.gmail.com> From: Ivan Borodin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Determine usb-storage capacity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:26:58 -0000 Greetings! A short question: is there a way to determine usb-storage and md-device capacity( for further fdisk and bsdlabel applying ) from within a sh script, in which device's /dev file-name is present? Something similar to atacontrol cap | grep lba... ............................................. (c) Lame English Inc. noamscai@home From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 22:36:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF50106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8629E8FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o0OMaCAr078074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0OMaCRV084361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o0OMaCrS084299; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:11 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Ivan Borodin Message-ID: <20100124223611.GH50360@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4c44ea791001241359g46f76a03l148c9c81a975195b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4c44ea791001241359g46f76a03l148c9c81a975195b@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:36:13 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Determine usb-storage capacity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:36:14 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 25), Ivan Borodin said: > Greetings! > > A short question: is there a way to determine usb-storage and md-device > capacity( for further fdisk and bsdlabel applying ) from within a sh script, > in which device's /dev file-name is present? Something similar to atacontrol > cap | grep lba... Works for all disk devices: diskinfo /dev/da0 Works for devices attached via CAM: camcontrol readcap da0 See the respective manpages for more info. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 24 23:29:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0AB1065679 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cronfy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777FB8FC0A for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so535266fxm.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:29:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eUu2Pftg+Y3WtjNTI1BOr9luyCuoDCkq4EM3U94ZZsA=; b=plo1j20/ijkGKzcjCb77Dyn3Roske8RNLKw2dr1rAgnQEEzDRiA3O+AizjtnDppqsE TIL3/xVcgdqpuilgfPc1rUZjZU0FGCylzM9sIvw7yXiWq+exkKc6FvVrWldbzKz7HxL8 A14rw8zTCH7FIJAjyY++DKktYDSnV2nByTwv0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hWVITALQ44D+LWy7P5BpdqWOOCYbxks80UnzBhSD0tbL+Bwc/Z04GQVC+xoYmcg2g3 wwezr72NhgIL3TPMYPtvmAAVi1z8g8HLac74yTIAiYO8Zl0ZcLNmxJ5uRQj0hM5efvGO Tgu7mfvOETczjZfFuTqAdQFGHejd1dDtocF/Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.5.212 with SMTP id 20mr6090391faw.19.1264375782098; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:29:42 -0800 (PST) From: cronfy Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:29:22 +0300 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Unique process id (not pid) and accounting daemon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:29:45 -0000 Hello. I am trying to create an accounting daemon that would be more precise than usual BSD system accounting. It should read the whole process tree from time to time (say, every 10 seconds) and log changes in usage of CPU, I/O operations and memory per process. After daemon notices process exit, it should read /var/account/acct to get a last portion of accounting data and make a last entry for the process. Also daemon should read=A0/var/account/acct to find information about processes that had been running between taking process tree snapshots. There is a problem: it is not always possible to link a process in a process tree against matching process in an accounting file. Only command name, user/group id =A0and start time will match, but: =A0* start time may change (i. e. after ntpdate); =A0* command name saved in=A0/var/account/acct is 15 characters max (AC_COMM_LEN in sys/sys/acct.h), while command name in the process tree is 19 characters max (MAXCOMLEN in sys/sys/param.h). To ensure that process in the process tree and process in the accounting file are the same, I want to add unique process identifier (uint64_t) to 'proc' struct in sys/sys/proc.h and increment it for every process fork. I see it is possible to do this just before sx_sunlock() in fork1() in sys/kern/kern_fork.c. I'll have to add saving of this identifier in kern_acct.c, of course. This way I will be extremely easy to remember a process in the process tree and find a matching one in the accounting file after it finishes. Am I looking in a right direction or should I try some other way? Thanks in advance. -- // cronfy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 00:14:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D251065679; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:14:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f214.google.com (mail-gx0-f214.google.com [209.85.217.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132E78FC16; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so1170273gxk.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:14:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3YpQos/pk73Wtl6z7um1EgvYkoli8EkkyMGyYzrDFrI=; b=spW34RSIABu2YFypcGftfCPTkErZI9haz41QGL4j1ytdv26WZK8oMCiXFgEKW3U9SB aeLTtrXwxtyTlV732rXZZGeE9/Yaij/J6EN7/uFMrscbCtl4n2dL+G1tI7xTDQxARxcm 0kuqr2ZydgxS1HzSiAsyygBE0OMNhiMG21YKI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TqUujur+bzY1vb7yDeTumzF9zpQMrVEkDEq2HL4hCwv+KIK59tEBRCBDxhZ2EA125j FdDIv9gpSzVWY03vXguqD07gXp7R/kWjXHwZ6OsBD7jbjFIZe2ldcDoMOEyHZyBabean swg/9My9JaxZzHL2sJd5BNT1se73+L+BH4irQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.10.24 with SMTP id n24mr7044299ani.78.1264378467375; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:14:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:14:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Alexander Motin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:14:28 -0000 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: > Dan Naumov wrote: >> This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and >> 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the >> bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( >> The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my >> Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, >> with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was >> that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were >> tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers >> roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed >> usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the >> throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, >> but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both >> read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks >> are capable of. Dmesg shows: >> >> atapci0: port 0x1000-0x100f mem >> 0x90108000-0x9010807f,0x90100000-0x90107fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on >> pci4 >> ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 >> ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master SATA300 > > 8.0-RELEASE, and especially 8-STABLE provide alternative, much more > functional driver for this controller, named siis(4). If your SiI3124 > card installed into proper bus (PCI-X or PCIe x4/x8), it can be really > fast (up to 1GB/s was measured). > > -- > Alexander Motin Sadly, it seems that utilizing the new siis driver doesn't do much good: Before utilizing siis: iozone -s 4096M -r 512 -i0 -i1 random random bkwd record stride KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 4194304 512 28796 28766 51610 50695 After enabling siis in loader.conf (and ensuring the disks show up as ada): iozone -s 4096M -r 512 -i0 -i1 random random bkwd record stride KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 4194304 512 28781 28897 47214 50540 I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is available at http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/ I have the card described later on the page, the one with 4 SATA ports and no eSATA. Alright, so it being PCI is probably a bottleneck in some ways, but that still doesn't explain the performance THAT bad, considering that same hardware, same disks, same disk controller push over 65mb/s in both reads and writes in Win2008. And agian, I am pretty sure that I've had "close to expected" results when I was booting an UFS FreeBSD installation off an SSD (attached directly to SATA port on the motherboard) while running the same kinds of benchmarks with Bonnie and DD on a ZFS mirror made directly on top of 2 raw disks. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 00:29:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A424E1065670; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C368FC18; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2328435ywh.7 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:29:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=I1rTt5+AtkuF3NDO8eiHPav4aNN1MzV8f6fQzMt6M2o=; b=nFlhTdrrGcnTNDP04CbMdgueZF/TVHKYCOVrjUvV6M3mRPZPJ0/r196MVWaVuzBFg6 3RHTPgiiOV8yZYJsOK7cnGYtvs08DSHgNUWuH6a7A9QOZFt3LmPeQJCKnxAthWD+SPmo hsr26e9Duu/8GRoWPTFLzae7X6pO9K2NY2AlA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RRz4XmYnSpIYQbMaj1fTu0CAk1gV4frh4LkR8pa1zHdsw/IZPK4UBITtNoCxTFpzlC Mt5CyAzj6TNixWqSV6WsL/wZxqfIc/hGECFd7Y9v6Pah7HtkqRWwQ0OBvQhWuq5VpLjI 7bvpH6+MyRP9T/V6vP85ZOYwEfpQKLStuPjWc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.186.1 with SMTP id n1mr6994422anp.124.1264379389237; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:29:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Alexander Motin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:29:59 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin wrote= : >> Dan Naumov wrote: >>> This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and >>> 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the >>> bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( >>> The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my >>> Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, >>> with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was >>> that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were >>> tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers >>> roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed >>> usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the >>> throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, >>> but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both >>> read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks >>> are capable of. Dmesg shows: >>> >>> atapci0: port 0x1000-0x100f mem >>> 0x90108000-0x9010807f,0x90100000-0x90107fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on >>> pci4 >>> ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 >>> ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master SATA300 >> >> 8.0-RELEASE, and especially 8-STABLE provide alternative, much more >> functional driver for this controller, named siis(4). If your SiI3124 >> card installed into proper bus (PCI-X or PCIe x4/x8), it can be really >> fast (up to 1GB/s was measured). >> >> -- >> Alexander Motin > > Sadly, it seems that utilizing the new siis driver doesn't do much good: > > Before utilizing siis: > > iozone -s 4096M -r 512 -i0 -i1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0random > random =A0 =A0bkwd =A0 record =A0 stride > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0KB =A0reclen =A0 write rewrite =A0 =A0read =A0= =A0reread =A0 =A0read > write =A0 =A0read =A0rewrite =A0 =A0 read =A0 fwrite frewrite =A0 fread = =A0freread > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 4194304 =A0 =A0 512 =A0 28796 =A0 28766 =A0 =A051610 =A0 = =A050695 > > After enabling siis in loader.conf (and ensuring the disks show up as ada= ): > > iozone -s 4096M -r 512 -i0 -i1 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0random > random =A0 =A0bkwd =A0 record =A0 stride > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0KB =A0reclen =A0 write rewrite =A0 =A0read =A0= =A0reread =A0 =A0read > write =A0 =A0read =A0rewrite =A0 =A0 read =A0 fwrite frewrite =A0 fread = =A0freread > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 4194304 =A0 =A0 512 =A0 28781 =A0 28897 =A0 =A047214 =A0 = =A050540 Just to add to the numbers above, exact same benchmark, on 1 disk (detached 2nd disk from the mirror) while using the siis driver: random random bkwd record stride KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 4194304 512 57760 56371 68867 74047 - Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 00:35:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04121065676 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB58B8FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-164-220.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.164.220]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8A83D54A; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:35:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0P0ZqB2001507; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:35:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:35:52 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Programmer In Training Message-Id: <20100125013552.c1ba6096.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4B5C4761.2040405@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <4B5C3CAF.1010903@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <4B5C4761.2040405@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:35:56 -0000 On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: > I'll post here later on today, after > I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer). No possibility to transfer the file via wired network? Your RealTek NIC works out of the box. Or maybe use an USB stick? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 00:42:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1F81065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from nomoremozzie.com (nomoremozzie.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988A78FC21 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([112.199.161.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by nomoremozzie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0P0ggXG026157; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:42:44 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:42:32 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <201001241055.17552.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001250842.35330.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Cc: John , Jerry McAllister Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:42:46 -0000 Hi, On 24 January 2010 pm 14:42:11 John wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > > how did you handle the strange group IDs? > > Have not done that yet. My current best plan (which I'm not > really crazy about, but haven't come up with anything better) > is to do 121 "find /home -uid ... -exec chown {} +" and 37 have you ever thought that it does not really matter as you have control over the group file. You can leave your strange group IDs but you must maintain your group file by hand. You might have to check it after each new software installation but for the operation for machine, it should not matter. > And, of course, there's the whole matter of migrating the > passwords... This I never did. > > It probably is, but I see so much of other servers running on > similar hardware with a certain other operating system that > have a reguluar 30-day scheduled reboot, it still delights me. > I just wanted to share my delight! Is it a Tuesday? Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 01:01:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE81D106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:01:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from nomoremozzie.com (nomoremozzie.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A33E8FC13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([112.199.161.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by nomoremozzie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0P11cKp005188; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:01:41 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:01:26 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100122111219.A31898@starfire.mn.org> <20100124004211.B64294@starfire.mn.org> <97F6366F-5364-4990-A794-047F3E5B2FB1@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <97F6366F-5364-4990-A794-047F3E5B2FB1@lafn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001250901.28338.oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Cc: John Subject: Re: Migration planning - old system to new X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:01:42 -0000 Hi, On 24 January 2010 pm 15:35:20 Doug Hardie wrote: > On 23 January 2010, at 22:42, John wrote: > > I just tried it with FreeBSD 7.2 creating a tar file. Digging > through the file it shows the ascii names for owner and group - > not uid/gid. I un-tar'd it on a Mac and sure enough it used > the names and the uids are quite different for the two > systems._______________________________________________ what happens if you first create the user names on the target system and then open the archive? It would be then very easy to move files accross systems. I never have had to do this. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 01:10:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55431106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from billy@nlcc.us) Received: from toaster.abovetec.com (toaster.abovetec.com [208.75.177.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231A98FC1F for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76779 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2010 01:10:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ibm.nlcc.us) (67.54.213.138) by 127.0.0.21 with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 01:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 51246 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2010 01:10:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.46?) (billy@192.168.0.46) by ibm.nlcc.us with ESMTPA; 25 Jan 2010 01:10:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4B5CEF4F.3010305@nlcc.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:09:35 -0600 From: Billy Newsom User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B59E61B.3090504@nlcc.us> <795fc2b81001221030n321c994cv9fd3c76b981fead0@mail.gmail.com> <4B5A9BB9.2070801@nlcc.us> In-Reply-To: <4B5A9BB9.2070801@nlcc.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How to troubleshoot a frozen boot sequence X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:10:30 -0000 I am not sure why, but here was my solution. I determined through a lot of poking that the Master Boot Record of each drive. Here is what I found out: 1. My backup drive (ad0) had the FreeBSD boot manager installed. 2. My main drive (twed0) had the FreeBSD MBR installed. So, what is the problem? All I could figure is to install the boot manager (called boot0cfg) onto my main drive. Silly, but it worked. Why, I don't have a clue. I do, by the way, remember purposely using this setup when I ran sysinstall to configure this machine. I felt that the ad0 drive needed a boot manager (just in case it was used someplace else) and the main drive would not need a boot manager. But nothing ever indicated to me that a standard MBR on twed0 would not work if ad0 was missing. Here is my partition table from twed0: # /dev/twed0 g c60801 h255 s63 p 1 0xa5 63 976768002 a 1 Notice there is just one partition and it is active. But it wouldn't boot until I ran: bootcfg -B twed0 which keeps the slice table the same. Once I was done, the server will now boot with or without the ad0 drive. In case of a backup drive failure, I had to also mess with fstab: 1. I had to add the "noauto" option, as someone suggested. 2. I had to disable all fsck passes (3 didn't work -->0) or fsck failure will boot single user. My question is now, do I write a script to mount the drive (too late, I did) during boot and then to run fsck also? I am not sure how fsck should be run, but I assume it is kind of important. My main challenge was determining when to mount the disk. Here is my solution and my script so far that seems to work. ===================== #!/bin/sh # mounts my special drive # TODO: Need to fsck it # PROVIDE: mountbackup # REQUIRE: mail # KEYWORD: nojail . /etc/rc.subr name="mountbackup" start_cmd="mountbackup_start" stop_cmd=":" THIS="/disk250" HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname` MAILTO=root@${HOSTNAME} TOD=`/bin/date` mountbackup_start() { local err # Mount "backup" filesystems. echo -n "Mounting $THIS Backup filesystems" mount $THIS err=$? echo '.' case ${err} in 0) ;; *) echo "Mounting $THIS filesystems failed," \ " but it's okay for now. Sending mail to $MAILTO" (echo " Mounting $THIS filesystems failed on boot!" echo " " echo "Host: $HOST Date: $TOD" | \ mail -s "FAILURE to mount $THIS on $HOST" $MAILTO ;; esac } load_rc_config $name run_rc_command "$1" ===================== Billy Newsom wrote: > Nathan Vidican wrote: > > To me, it sounds like you have two issues to deal with here: > > > > #1 - booting off of the twed0 disk, what is your systems' BIOS currently > > set to boot from, from the way you describe it's almost as if the system > > is booting from ad0 - in which case yes, you will have to put a valid > > boot config onto twed0 > > I feel that I have run across a common and old "SCSI v IDE" battle (The > FreeBSD Handbook still talks about it). Even though I make the drive > controller (the twe = 3Ware SATA controller) as my first boot drive in > BIOS (effectively 0x80 as I understand it), FreeBSD does not ever pay > attention to the BIOS's numerical order. (See my reason below*) It wants > to find stuff on ad0 and boot that drive if it exists. > > My supposition is that since I had twe0 and ad0 running during my 7.2 > install, that the correct drive partition and MBR stuff were applied to > get it to boot AS-IS, but... > > When it is not as it is now, It freezes at the boot loader, attempting > to find ad0. > > It is either > > a. Finding ad0 in fstab and really wishing it was there > or > b. The boot strap code is physically on ad0 and not twed0 because the > Sysinstall process never wrote it there. > > I think it is b. If b, the boot process may be: > > Stage 1: BIOS picks twe0 to be the first drive to attempt a boot. > Stage 2: MBR (boot 0) -- located on twe0 > Stage 3: boot1 -- located on twed0 (BTX Boot Loader?) > Stage 4: boot2 -- located on ad0 (FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader 1.1?) > Stage 5: Boot Loader -- shows menu on twed0s1a > Stage 6: Kernel boots up on twed0s1a > > And so when I remove ad0 to simulate a backup drive failure, the stage 4 > tries to run a missing bootstrap loader from twed0. > > Stage 4: boot2 -- missing on twed0, system hangs. > > I think this is happening because it is the BTX loader which may find > and concatenate the BIOS drives, getting confused, and switching the > boot to ad0 for just the one stage that finishes the bootstrap. > > I think one solution is to (next time) not install my backup drive until > after Sysinstall is long done! I think it's a sysinstall bug, some of this. > > * My Reason for saying that is my guess that the sysinstall program saw > the ad0 as something important, and included it in the chain of the > boot. For example, when I was done SLICING my drives in Sysinstall, the > silly thing then got the "w" write command and went out there and made > some (wrong) decisions under the assumption that ad0 would NATURALLY > (via BIOS) be part of the boot process. So the right code never got > written to twe0 in the right places. Sure, it got all the kernel and I > told it to put a standard FreeBSD MBR, but it must be missing something > on track 0. > > > #2 - you could add the flag 'noauto' to ad0 from within fstab - this > > will allow the system to boot without mounting the disk (alleviating the > > dreaded single-user-mode). Use a startup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > to then mount the disk if available on bootup. I've done similar setups > > to this before where we were using external USB drives for backup and > > weren't 100% sure they'd always be connected in the case a server might > > be rebooted - worst case, you'll end up with it not mounted, but the > > system will still be up at least. > > I will give it a try. I need to do something to correct this second > issue for certain. My ad0 is a good spare, but it's old. > > > -- > > Nathan Vidican > > nathan@vidican.com > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Billy Newsom > > wrote: > > > > I am doing a test run on a production server. It has 2 hard drives. > > > > ad0 (mounted on /disk250 in a single slice plus SWAP) > > twed0 (mounted on / /var /usr and a SWAP) > > > > The twed0 is a hardware mirror and my main drive. > > ad0 is just for backups. > > > > What the issue is, and you probably know where I'm heading. The boot > > process freezes if I remove the ad0 (to test a drive failure > condition) > > > > It freezes after saying: > > BTX boot loader.... etc. > > > > FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader 1.1 > > It spins for a second, then stops... unless I have ad0 in the > computer. > > /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x7b03a0 data=0xcdee0 / > > > > And it never gets to the boot menu. > > > > So: > > > > 1. Should I put a new boot0config on the twed0 drive? If so do I > > boot from a CD to do that? > > > > I need to potentially do something also to my disk labels and my > > fstab so that I don't boot to single user mode if drive ad0 fails. I > > haven't done this exact type of thing before, so I am looking for a > > little help. > > > > my fstab: > > /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 > > 0 > > /dev/twed0s1b none swap sw 0 > > 0 > > /dev/twed0s1a / ufs rw 1 > > 1 > > /dev/ad0s1d /disk250 ufs rw 2 > > 2 > > /dev/twed0s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 > > 2 > > /dev/twed0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 > > 2 > > /dev/twed0s1d /var ufs rw 2 > > 2 > > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 > > 0 > > > > > > I tried to read the MBR from the twed0 drive, and the program > > couldn't read it. The one from the ad0 drive is readable and I saved > > a copy of it. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 02:47:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB873106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from n-butcher=freebsd-questions=freebsd.org=xnhrueqv@fusiongol.com) Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com (smtp11.dentaku.gol.com [203.216.5.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEE98FC1E for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pat.gol.ad.jp ([203.216.1.191] helo=[172.16.1.151]) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpsa (Dentaku) id 1NZEz4-0002jX-54 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:47:22 +0900 Message-ID: <4B5D0639.4040503@fusiongol.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:47:21 +0900 From: Nathan Butcher User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100124223626.37E5210656BD@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100124223626.37E5210656BD@hub.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com Subject: Raw sockets in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:47:23 -0000 I'm just curious as to whether FreeBSD8.0 can support raw sockets on some jails and not on others. I'm trying to find the jail flags to allow this to happen. Not having much luck. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 03:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBA4106568B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 768F38FC1E for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7737 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2010 03:55:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 03:55:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=cACEjQrkUzAm0P0cF9GrhtoqeSSBK4PELzUrbErVRRcPTbbUOMmkST/CYZ8yzYSXvpfkjFrtetE0xDnm5Wafmdz3os5LMoGvEoJhixFvMk5N+mCz0bgXd36zJEgmaqct; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZG2t-0002Wt-LP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:55:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5D1619.2020608@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:55:05 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <4B5C3CAF.1010903@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <4B5C4761.2040405@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100125013552.c1ba6096.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100125013552.c1ba6096.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2D7400677FFF1C1D82CB7615" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:55:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2D7400677FFF1C1D82CB7615 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/24/2010 6:35 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: >> I'll post here later on today, after >> I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer). >=20 > No possibility to transfer the file via wired network? Your > RealTek NIC works out of the box. Or maybe use an USB stick? >=20 >=20 >=20 No. Right now I'd have to move the box halfway across the house into a room that's already too crammed for what's in there. I have considered just running the cable, but I'd have to do so on a day my 3 year old nephew isn't home (one home, 8 people, don't ask) or risk all sorts of problems (nephew tripping and hurting self (biggest concern), nephew tripping and ripping out the cable from the connector, nephew tripping and damaging the router (which would kill entire home network), dogs doing same thing). No floppy disk drive, so only safe option is to burn a CD. IF I can do the run-to-router-with-CAT5 option, that would be ideal (and then there would be no issue, I'd be installing ports like mad until I had the system set up the way I want). --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig2D7400677FFF1C1D82CB7615 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLXRYgAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0Q+cIAKrBCQAdYF0ReKC902VybAUm HTfYSr56rYxxiYscA0/9mS2NgpR/veh8PQUMNydvh6I6V3XhflprCNzDuqtViIKI AWg7YkcXul4BV/rA72M0DIgUKcJx+8OCdcxrTVFDX3wfZiAlIVTR7+UDX7wxOWLw nkT5swVwv25sXRXHgw9OxzVzeRe/cvNANBC53fUjQZX66TI4xbMd+o3Uwmx3mrYM ctVikHlfT08sXU+t96hsWEqHnRlXr9usb6IJb/6s5UCFXAVQbcsXcnz8qBTZsCMP h+qUCYzrGnjLExzrxphVG8CcXa8sKzpetcciXiXA01tkfpDDN91rznMqwN8v3TE= =6Zvp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2D7400677FFF1C1D82CB7615-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 04:01:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA08106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56A2F8FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29012 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2010 04:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 04:01:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=DHjfU97YgphUHOTRe63R8PkAGdChBc+nbG5terIaaGKW6ZJGV1Yhy14K+6A4nztWjEB2JjZJuHPBwkmqpMD7Z4WmCcTOM6U7ppibrD1mqzJ19UxMEfqUEfVpHD/ItPzg; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZG8c-0004Gl-Ql for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:01:19 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5D1782.3090109@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:01:06 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124040551.GA12664@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <20100124040756.GA12755@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <4B5BCE14.3040107@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124055128.f5e742d3.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5C2FA9.1050309@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100124122252.GA74652@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <4B5C3CAF.1010903@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <4B5C4761.2040405@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100125013552.c1ba6096.freebsd@edvax.de> <4B5D1619.2020608@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> In-Reply-To: <4B5D1619.2020608@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC4BFA69841772E2F2AF25EFE" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:01:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC4BFA69841772E2F2AF25EFE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/24/2010 9:55 PM, Programmer In Training wrote: > On 1/24/2010 6:35 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: >>> I'll post here later on today, after >>> I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer). >> >> No possibility to transfer the file via wired network? Your >> RealTek NIC works out of the box. Or maybe use an USB stick? Forgot to mention, I don't own a USB Stick (yet). I intend to get about two dozen 4GB models when I can (so I can start distributing my PGP Pub Key in person with others so I can say I fully trust them and that key and vice-versa, important for taking steps in doing other verification for products like the Pidgin plugin, OTR (Off-the-Record)). --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigC4BFA69841772E2F2AF25EFE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLXReCAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0WI0H/RcGBCcU4nppkXSjs0yauPRv uqk/YsIv1G0MKIDZaleq5iDeqKfdtZQjB76ouQfUzpJNHI/mGz231OZkHeMiQrGK K4EfsUd3NIFO8iF/YSKFzmGM7+fHDcEEXAIEkKsFFDilTL5WxbJC6C2oxCEqLdDB zQaY7eSApqUcq7gEUhh509QHWI6Y8+3X5W7Z4ZTp0dCulH50nlPHloXfF6ofBi73 eBRElu5h65r06SKPXYNBi3e13dLwQERDfqa0nqivGnE1TGlNgLFAJqrLJq3yh6Fd VOwMwMtx2oEWB5z6VFOBWB89o2hnE4FcyWPPMmTBTSOuid/XA1ywXS6gZVx4zpQ= =h+vX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC4BFA69841772E2F2AF25EFE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 02:58:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891001065670; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588158FC0A; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-157-36-161.bna.bellsouth.net [70.157.36.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0P2w7kb080850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:58:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Mark Andrews In-Reply-To: <201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> <201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:41:22 -0600 Message-Id: <1264387282.2869.24.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:04:20 +0000 Cc: John , "Thomas K." , Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:58:12 -0000 On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message , Dan N > aumov writes: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov wrote= > > : > > >> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. wro= > > te: > > >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi, > > >> >> > > >> >>> I recently found a nifty "FreeBSD ZFS root installation script" and > > >> >>> been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing = > > it > > >> >>> from GPT to MBR partitioning. However, I was stumped, even though I > > >> >>> had done everything right (or so I thought), the system would get > > >> >>> stuck at Loader and refuse to go anywhere. After trying over a dozen > > >> >> > > >> >> probably this line is the cause: > > >> >> > > >> >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s1a skip=3D1 seek= > > =3D1024 > > >> >> > > >> >> Unless by "swap first" you meant the on-disk location, and not the > > >> >> partition letter. If swap is partition "a", you're writing the loader > > >> >> into swapspace. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Regards, > > >> >> Thomas > > >> > > > >> > At first you made me feel silly, but then I decided to double-check, I > > >> > uncommented the swap line in the partitioning part again, ensured I > > >> > was writing the bootloader to "${TARGETDISK}"s1b and ran the script. > > >> > Same problem, hangs at loader. Again, if I comment out the swap, > > >> > giving the entire slice to ZFS and then write the bootloader to > > >> > "${TARGETDISK}"s1a, run the script, everything works. > > >> > > >> I have also just tested creating 2 slices, like this: > > >> > > >> gpart create -s mbr "${TARGETDISK}" > > >> gpart add -s 3G -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" > > >> gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s1 > > >> gpart add -t freebsd-swap "${TARGETDISK}"s1 > > >> > > >> gpart add -t freebsd "${TARGETDISK}" > > >> gpart create -s BSD "${TARGETDISK}"s2 > > >> gpart add -t freebsd-zfs "${TARGETDISK}"s2 > > >> > > >> gpart set -a active -i 2 "${TARGETDISK}" > > >> gpart bootcode -b /mnt2/boot/boot0 "${TARGETDISK}" > > >> > > >> > > >> and later: > > >> > > >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2 count=3D1 > > >> dd if=3D/mnt2/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/"${TARGETDISK}"s2a skip=3D1 seek=3D= > > 1024 > > >> > > >> > > >> Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into > > >> it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in > > >> 1 slice if the swap comes first? > > > > > > I know what the answer to this USED to be, but I don't know if it is > > > still true (obviously, I think so, I or wouldn't waste your time). > > > > > > The filesystem code is all carefully written to avoid the very > > > first few sector of the partition. =A0That's because the partition > > > table is there for the first filesystem of the slice (or disk). > > > That's a tiny amout of space wasted, because it's also skipped on > > > all the other filesystems even though there's not actually anything > > > there, but it was a small inefficency, even in the 70's. > > > > > > Swap does not behave that way. =A0SWAP will begin right at the slice > > > boundry, with 0 offset. =A0As long as it's not the first partition, no > > > harm, no foul. =A0If it IS the first partition, you just nuked your parti= > > tion > > > table. =A0As long as SWAP owns the slice, again, no harm, no foul, but > > > if there were filesystems BEHIND it, you just lost 'em. > > > > > > That's the way it always used to be, and I think it still is. =A0SWAP can > > > only be first if it is the ONLY thing using that slice (disk), otherwise, > > > you need a filesystem first to protect the partition table. > > > -- > > > > > > John Lind > > > john@starfire.MN.ORG > > > > This explanation does sound logical, but holy crap, if this is the > > case, you'd think there would be bells, whistles and huge red label > > warnings in EVERY FreeBSD installation / partitioning guide out there > > warning people to not put swap first (unless given a dedicated slice) > > under any circumstances. The warnings were nowhere to be seen and lots > > of pointy hair first greyed and were then lost during the process of > > me trying to figure out why my system would install but wouldn't boot. > > >From "man bsdlabel". > > offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of > the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the correct > offset to use (the end of the previous partition plus one, ignor- > ing partition `c'. For partition `c', * will be interpreted as > an offset of 0. The first partition should start at offset 16, > because the first 16 sectors are reserved for metadata. Ok, now this has my attention... My gut feeling right now is that this is a bug in geom_part_bsd. I don't understand why the label isn't protected. (Adding -b 16 when adding the swap partition fixes this) Another project to goes on my list... If anyone knows why this is done like this... please share. robert. > > - Sincerely, > > Dan Naumov > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Robert Noland FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 04:59:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884AF1065672; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6336C8FC08; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o0P4ae7u071142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:36:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o0P4aeN3071141; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA05845; Sun, 24 Jan 10 20:22:09 PST Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:19:59 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de Message-Id: <4b5d1bef.QEz5a8Mvh7OFA7+l%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4B5C771C.4040605@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4B5C771C.4040605@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCIe audio cards: what is tob be preferred with FreeBSD 8.0/9-CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:59:15 -0000 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with > which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots > at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, It's possible to get an adapter that plugs into a PCIe slot and provides a PCI slot, which might enable you to continue using your current card. I've never actually seen one, so don't know about the mechanics; it could turn out that it can only be used by leaving the cover off of the box :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 06:35:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2B1106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from n22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFC978FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.182.177] by n22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2010 06:35:02 -0000 Received: from [87.248.111.149] by t3.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2010 06:35:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp206.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2010 06:35:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 694270.31194.bm@omp206.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 22086 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jan 2010 06:35:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1264401302; bh=pnJs8XxqrlT3MSWOiGKqc0QvJbaaX5Jggc0PGn8TZmY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jwv6p4rBm65X84r0ccl2Dad/TLdkqcDVHlhzwaiTgI0UX6Dd7Z7nsb1q8i2O7pNi4mZdl/y+dGcUYlwAUKoib1VcVkoe3FtrjFkslpVfNw7zyLEc35kYJlimSCOsrtTgqvA1PESB2WMxmezBTJ/BaumTxRWjXTVSZQ/49ZT7gyU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ewFP2P5PQ3JDLfFgDNXcADfRBkJwrIMg7uOuoT5BnNSFTTT/8eH5f+vfp9JQEZEtbiLLyCjFm0m1ME8OGYI0DdsInlrVjF33OuQkVrlWZaao9pHmpjf0sxhmvb52IBhm+aZxT3eqXVlhBpMSJiDnW3l/XQY23794UebHjXW//8Y=; Message-ID: <476019.21896.qm@web24803.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: uPzKk3gVM1lAQI_UfzyarJ_SjjhPA7Oo_XdlC1nH0rUoEkUfrz5SGPOfbh8Y6eA_e.ZVgbAUXAGXMXPfsOTI5jXifVEMZdygQ5g4H4R3c1xxhu4nT8XqWg5Q3enYU0miQAi.7BqqnFsAdf2t.kMowdpY8g.ZtK6Ihs25U34q0qtphx908EYjkXJum4931rHj4ZDa_r6jT.aWoLivawcnGu8km9yqWCPreQRffhZdsKKHp.EeAuys5_JiqzJ264VHqf836V0h Received: from [192.54.193.25] by web24803.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:35:02 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.1.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:35:02 -0800 (PST) From: "Alexandre L." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <4B59C80F.8050204@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re : polkit-0.95_3: update fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:35:04 -0000 You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit a= nd polkit.=0A=0A--- En date de=A0: Ven 22.1.10, O. Hartmann a =E9crit=A0:=0A=0A> De: O. Hartmann =0A> Objet: polkit-0.95_3: update fails=0A> =C0: freebsd-questions@fr= eebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Vendredi 22 Janvier 2010, 15= h45=0A> I try to update ports via 'portmaster=0A> -av' on a regular basis a= nd ran into a sticky problem with=0A> poolkit and docbook I'm incapable to = solve.=0A> =0A> Error message follows.=0A> =0A> Does anybody has any hint o= r tip? Please email me in CC.=0A> =0A> Regards,=0A> Oliver=0A> =0A> =3D=3D= =3D>>> Starting build for for ports that need=0A> updating <<<=3D=3D=3D=0A>= =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update polkit-0.95_3=0A> =0A> =3D=3D= =3D>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/polkit=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting= check for build dependencies=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list fo= r=0A> sysutils/polkit from ports=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting dependency check= =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: devel/eggdbus=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Check= ing dependency: devel/gettext=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: devel/g= lib20=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: devel/gmake=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Ch= ecking dependency:=0A> devel/gobject-introspection=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checkin= g dependency: devel/pkg-config=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: textpr= oc/docbook-410=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update=0A> textproc/docb= ook-410=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 polkit-0.95_3 >>=0A> textproc/docbook-410=0A> = =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Port directory:=0A> /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-410=0A> = =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting check for build dependencies=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gatheri= ng dependency list for=0A> textproc/docbook-410 from ports=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>>= Starting dependency check=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: archivers/= unzip=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Dependency check complete for=0A> textproc/docbook-4= 10=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 polkit-0.95_3 >>=0A> textproc/docbook-410=0A> =3D=3D= =3D>=A0 Cleaning for docbook-4.1_3=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Vulnerability che= ck disabled, database not=0A> found=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Extracting for docboo= k-4.1_3=0A> =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for docbk41.zip.=0A> =3D> SHA256 Checksum = OK for docbk41.zip.=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0=A0=A0docbook-4.1_3 depends on file:= =0A> /usr/local/bin/unzip - found=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Patching for docbook-4.= 1_3=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Configuring for docbook-4.1_3=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> S= tarting check for runtime dependencies=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependenc= y list for=0A> textproc/docbook-410 from ports=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting de= pendency check=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: textproc/iso8879=0A> = =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update textproc/iso8879=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= polkit-0.95_3 >>=0A> textproc/docbook-410 >> textproc/iso8879=0A> =0A> =3D= =3D=3D>>> Port directory:=0A> /usr/ports/textproc/iso8879=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> = Starting check for build dependencies=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency= list for=0A> textproc/iso8879 from ports=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting depende= ncy check=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: archivers/unzip=0A> =3D=3D= =3D>>> Dependency check complete for=0A> textproc/iso8879=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 polkit-0.95_3 >>=0A> textproc/docbook-410 >> textproc/iso8879=0A> =3D= =3D=3D>=A0 Cleaning for iso8879-1986_2=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Vulnerability= check disabled, database not=0A> found=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Extracting for is= o8879-1986_2=0A> =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for isoENTS.zip.=0A> =3D> SHA256 Chec= ksum OK for isoENTS.zip.=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Patching for iso8879-1986_2=0A> = =3D=3D=3D>=A0=A0=A0iso8879-1986_2 depends on=0A> executable: unzip - found= =0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Configuring for iso8879-1986_2=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Sta= rting check for runtime dependencies=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency = list for=0A> textproc/iso8879 from ports=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting dependen= cy check=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking dependency: textproc/xmlcatmgr=0A> =3D= =3D=3D>>> Dependency check complete for=0A> textproc/iso8879=0A> =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 polkit-0.95_3 >>=0A> textproc/docbook-410 >> textproc/iso8879=0A> = =3D=3D=3D>=A0 Installing for iso8879-1986_2=0A> =3D=3D=3D>=A0=A0=A0Generati= ng temporary packing list=0A> xmlcatmgr: entry already exists for `iso8879/= catalog' of=0A> type `CATALOG'=0A> *** Error code 1=0A> =0A> Stop in /usr/p= orts/textproc/iso8879.=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Installation of iso8879-1986_2= =0A> (textproc/iso8879) failed=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update=0A> =0A> = =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for textproc/iso8879 failed=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting u= pdate=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for textproc/docbook-410 failed=0A> =3D= =3D=3D>>> Aborting update=0A> =0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for polkit-0.95_3 fa= iled=0A> =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update=0A> =0A> ____________________________= ___________________=0A> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> = http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To unsubscr= ibe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A= =0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 06:55:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D50106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E60A8FC1C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15700 invoked by uid 399); 25 Jan 2010 06:55:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 25 Jan 2010 06:55:27 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B5D405D.7070703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:55:25 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100123 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexandre L." References: <476019.21896.qm@web24803.mail.ird.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <476019.21896.qm@web24803.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re : polkit-0.95_3: update fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:55:28 -0000 Please don't crosspost to -ports and -questions. On 01/24/10 22:35, Alexandre L. wrote: > You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and polkit. Correct. I'll add (since I could see from the OP that you're a portmaster user) that I tested the following and it worked for me: portmaster sysutils/policykit sysutils/polkit Of course, make sure that you update your ports tree FIRST, since there apparently was a docbook-related issue in the early stages that was fixed recently. Also, there is a new version of portmaster out as of yesterday so update your ports tree, update portmaster to 2.17, THEN do the above. :) hth, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 07:00:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6626D1065676; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAE68FC29; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so689533fxm.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p6eu0eZZ0xKVt/XSKpZZv3bpWEX+BO2tnASnZOTfEdI=; b=akjh+F4rYocKFdx5jCLmq8q9J8ADZajKCHIAu1a551RSIutwk4Q4n02bBMA8y4efPE 0NOHAkM5FZLoAsU/doxkAVrOsMw7vMzONTtNfJUpJxbDrwMgXRF81iThvdkZaSWhV2gp Uij9axdqnqu6L29u73Cp334YacXUlQYp05Hs4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HWOJBXaf7RbmnT473CpKL2PGOPv+IIvS8mh7560RQ529+PleQ4ENllw317EOMeiRX9 ss03Rv2p7sbIGfRHci6LNMDiUt2FHzcZH/M+jhRIMiinj9qiCNrHV3Ql+vVG7jAnsBHz yvDBYpB/9h+ouYgOu2Sz1zaiyDI09j3uHXUzI= Received: by 10.223.17.155 with SMTP id s27mr6428939faa.13.1264402857645; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm2542816fxm.6.2010.01.24.23.00.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4B5D41A6.5080203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:00:54 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:00:59 -0000 Dan Naumov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> Dan Naumov wrote: >>>> This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and >>>> 4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the >>>> bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :( >>>> The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my >>>> Windows benchmarks showing 65mb/s+ were done on exact same machine, >>>> with same disks attached to the same controller. Only difference was >>>> that in Windows the disks weren't in a mirror configuration but were >>>> tested individually. I do understand that a mirror setup offers >>>> roughly the same write speed as individual disk, while the read speed >>>> usually varies from "equal to individual disk speed" to "nearly the >>>> throughput of both disks combined" depending on the implementation, >>>> but there is no obvious reason I am seeing why my setup offers both >>>> read and write speeds roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of what the individual disks >>>> are capable of. Dmesg shows: >>>> >>>> atapci0: port 0x1000-0x100f mem >>>> 0x90108000-0x9010807f,0x90100000-0x90107fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on >>>> pci4 >>>> ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 >>>> ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master SATA300 >>> 8.0-RELEASE, and especially 8-STABLE provide alternative, much more >>> functional driver for this controller, named siis(4). If your SiI3124 >>> card installed into proper bus (PCI-X or PCIe x4/x8), it can be really >>> fast (up to 1GB/s was measured). >>> >>> -- >>> Alexander Motin >> Sadly, it seems that utilizing the new siis driver doesn't do much good: >> >> Before utilizing siis: >> >> iozone -s 4096M -r 512 -i0 -i1 >> random >> random bkwd record stride >> KB reclen write rewrite read reread read >> write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread >> 4194304 512 28796 28766 51610 50695 >> >> After enabling siis in loader.conf (and ensuring the disks show up as ada): >> >> iozone -s 4096M -r 512 -i0 -i1 >> >> random >> random bkwd record stride >> KB reclen write rewrite read reread read >> write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread >> 4194304 512 28781 28897 47214 50540 > > Just to add to the numbers above, exact same benchmark, on 1 disk > (detached 2nd disk from the mirror) while using the siis driver: > > random > random bkwd record stride > KB reclen write rewrite read reread read > write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread > 4194304 512 57760 56371 68867 74047 If both parts of mirror uses same controller, it doubles it's bus traffic. That may reduce bandwidth twice. The main benefit of siis(4) is a command queuing. You should receive more benefits on multithread random I/O. -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 07:24:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D7A106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CED7E8FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31384 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2010 07:24:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 07:24:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=BEZt5QkV3IElCO1B43wwik3Dj4gdZZHGmSETzcxNBMvpzq2gKqXauWjWYY+cSOFGYC1uSIRk2IhYpuauGiMnUyI5EYxdATJ5UrqbldwnBCJ82jljMBXjllQL6fp9gT7g; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZJJ0-0000tE-Sj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:24:16 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:16:06 -0700 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:16:06 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125071606.GA1628@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100123061958.73f3bc31@scorpio.seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100123061958.73f3bc31@scorpio.seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Problem with GnuPG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:24:17 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:19:58AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > I posted this recently on the GnuPG forum; however, no one had ever > seen it before. >=20 > FreeBSD-7.2 >=20 > gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.14 > libgcrypt 1.4.4 >=20 > gpa 0.9.0 > =20 > I honestly have no idea what the problem is here. I recently > installed GnuPG on my system. Everything appeared to go fine. For some > reason, I have numerous keys listed that I have no knowledge of. >=20 > This URL shows the keys: >=20 > http://seibercom.net/gnupg/KeyListing.png =20 >=20 > These are not OpenPGP keys, but x.509 certificates. I have no idea why > they are showing up in the listing, nor can I delete them. GnuPG no > longer works with my MUA either.I have tried deleting GnuPG in its > entirety and the "~/.gnupg" directory. That did not alleviate the > problem. Once I reinstalled them, the problem resurfaced. I've never heard of anything like this with GnuPG either, and I'm really not sure how you'd end up with a bunch of X.509 certificates in a GnuPG keyring. I do have a hypothesis for you to investigate, however: You're using a tool I don't know anything about from personal experience. Specifically, I'm talking about GPA. I've always just used the command line tools. Because what you describe doesn't seem to make any sense for the functionality of GnuPG, and you have this featureful GUI application for managing keys, I thought maybe that was the place to look. The contents of the pkg-descr file for security/gpa say: The GNU Privacy Assistant is a graphical frontend to GnuPG and may be used to manage the keys and encrypt/decrypt/sign/check files. It is much like Seahorse. WWW: http://gpa.wald.intevation.org/ Checking the site didn't really give me any information at all, but the pkg-descr file for Seahorse says: Seahorse is a Gnome front end for GnuPG - the Gnu Privacy Guard program. It is a tool for secure communications and data storage. Data encryption and digital signature creation can easily be performed through a GUI and Key Management operations can easily be carried out through an intuitive interface. WWW: http://seahorse.sourceforge.net/ Looking at the Seahorse site, it says it supports GnuPG keys *and* SSH keys. It lists a few other things it does, including an ambiguous and frustratingly undefined "More...". I hunted around a bit and, on the developer wiki, found a short list labeled "To Do (Grand Plans and Quackery)" that included "Support X.509 certificates" as its first item. My thought is, if the GPA developers are following a similar path to what the Seahorse developers are doing, they might even have gotten to X.509 certs first. If that's the case, GPA may have just automagically hunted up the X.509 certificates used by your browser and added them to the list of managed keys. Given the notion that GPA may have a bunch of functionality and features that aren't even known to the user, and that it may try to magically do things its developers assume people want, it's possible that it is interfering somehow in the proper operation of GnuPG with regard to your MUA. Perhaps some configuration file(s) for GPA, separate from the GnuPG configuration directory itself, are surviving the uninstalls and reinstalls of your various OpenPGP related tools -- and maybe that's the reason it isn't currently working with your MUA. It could be worth investigating. Is the manpage for GPA any help at all (since there doesn't appear to be any documentation at all on the Website)? I'm curious about what's causing the problem, so if/when you get this sorted out, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know anything you learn about the problem. I may try to help you investigate the matter further as well if you keep me abreast of what you uncover about the matter. Of course, I don't plan to install GPA anywhere, so my ability to look into it is *somewhat* limited, but I might be able to pitch in a little as time permits. >=20 > Other than dumping the whole system, reformatting and re-installing the > OS, has anyone ever heard of this happening before; and if so, how to > correct it? I'm sure there's *something* you can do without nuking and paving -- even if it's somewhat drastic, like selecting a different MUA (if, for instance, a change in one of the tools or in the MUA itself has introduced an incompatibility somewhere). Oh, that reminds me . . . is it possible that a change has been made to some configuration for the MUA itself, without your knowledge? What *is* your MUA, anyway? Good luck. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktdRTYACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVxBQCeKGlzkvWAsx63J410w1drBUyo q5gAoKg2Ibdsic579aSGzd4O3FXeXMOK =f7X/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 08:11:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE351065676 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7938FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACE910EE01; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:12:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B5D5244.60806@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:11:48 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100125 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson References: <4B5B0DA6.1020702@eskk.nu> <4B5C91E5.7090005@bah.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <4B5C91E5.7090005@bah.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Troback-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 1ACE910EE01.AAA8B X-Troback-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Troback-MailScanner-From: leslie@eskk.nu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird language should be Swedish but it's not! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:11:18 -0000 On 01/24/10 19:31, Bernt Hansson wrote: > > You need thunderbird3-i18n not thunderbird-i18n. > Yes, of course. Unfortunately there's no change, after deinstalling and rebuilding it's the same behaviour. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 09:19:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C437106568D; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBC88FC1E; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA12164; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:19:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1NZL68-000FFq-60; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:19:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4B5D6207.9090105@icyb.net.ua> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:19:03 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091128) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Noland References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> <201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1264387282.2869.24.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <1264387282.2869.24.camel@balrog.2hip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, Mark Andrews Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:19:09 -0000 on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following: > On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: >> offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of >> the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the correct >> offset to use (the end of the previous partition plus one, ignor- >> ing partition `c'. For partition `c', * will be interpreted as >> an offset of 0. The first partition should start at offset 16, >> because the first 16 sectors are reserved for metadata. > > Ok, now this has my attention... My gut feeling right now is that this > is a bug in geom_part_bsd. I don't understand why the label isn't > protected. (Adding -b 16 when adding the swap partition fixes this) > Another project to goes on my list... > > If anyone knows why this is done like this... please share. I presume that this is for purely historic reasons. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 09:45:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DC61065672; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88A88FC0C; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0P9jWjl084189; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:45:33 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk o0P9jWjl084189 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1264412733; bh=6PXE7g/CMqQJaqwG5UkX03GLmxcMsXlHMEt3wgSv39E=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4B5D6833.6050200@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2025=20Jan=202010=2009:45:23=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.23=20(X11/20100114)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Andriy=20Gapon=20|CC:=20Robert=2 0Noland=20,=20=0D=0A=20FreeBSD-STABLE=20Maili ng=20List=20,=0D=0A=20freebsd-question s@freebsd.org,=20Mark=20Andrews=20|Subject:=20Re:=2 0Loader,=20MBR=20and=20the=20boot=20process|References:=20=09<201001220 41237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com>=09=09=09<20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn. org>=09=09<201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org>=09<1264387282. 2869.24.camel@balrog.2hip.net>=20<4B5D6207.9090105@icyb.net.ua>|In -Reply-To:=20<4B5D6207.9090105@icyb.net.ua>|X-Enigmail-Version:=20 0.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3 B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20bounda ry=3D"------------enig92565AFF53C5CD32CB9CF14E"; b=hgxXeTmMviZXjvOPkkUa0fSOcWaJkJvZir1MqbInf+nDOIEgC2Ex+L5m2SWbqhn/h QLqwJ7AI4zaDsf9ZRs31Zh2Q9AlKxf4MxXO4v4v+2cqhS5utk1GVFMHddNXRzEI+XZ S1DY961vLegm9QHllFitVKS07GZG4AjhvmTfR0Z4= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host localhost [IPv6:::1] claimed to be happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4B5D6833.6050200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:45:23 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> <201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1264387282.2869.24.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <4B5D6207.9090105@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4B5D6207.9090105@icyb.net.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig92565AFF53C5CD32CB9CF14E" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Mark Andrews , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Noland Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:45:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig92565AFF53C5CD32CB9CF14E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following: >> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: >>> offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginn= ing of >>> the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate th= e correct >>> offset to use (the end of the previous partition plus on= e, ignor- >>> ing partition `c'. For partition `c', * will be interpr= eted as >>> an offset of 0. The first partition should start at off= set 16, >>> because the first 16 sectors are reserved for metadata. >> Ok, now this has my attention... My gut feeling right now is that this= >> is a bug in geom_part_bsd. I don't understand why the label isn't >> protected. (Adding -b 16 when adding the swap partition fixes this) >> Another project to goes on my list... >> >> If anyone knows why this is done like this... please share. >=20 > I presume that this is for purely historic reasons. >=20 I believe this has been known about since 5.x days: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D72812 As far as I recall, sometime around 6.1-RELEASE this should have been fixed. It certainly seems to be the case that it is harmless to have=20 a plain swap partition start at offset 0, but anything else, like encrypt= ed swap or putting a filesystem there needs the 16 sector offset. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig92565AFF53C5CD32CB9CF14E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAktdaDwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyGdQCfcUh+FFXVu1qBJOvJS6c+BNLD YaEAnRvo4aW3DSv+eZrW88/TMtt/848q =Q6zY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig92565AFF53C5CD32CB9CF14E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 10:00:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E385106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160048FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zlzv1d0031ZMdJ4A9m0qlm; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:00:50 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zm1p1d0061f6R9u8cm1q3P; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:01:51 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:00:47 -0800 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:00:47 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125100047.GF12145@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:00:50 -0000 http://www.mini-box.com/D510MO-mini-ITX-Intel I'm thinking of ordering one of these motherboards, which have the newest dual-core Atom processor and NM10 chipset. I'm intrigued by its low-power, fanless operation. I already have FreeBSD running on one of the older Atom mobo's, so I know not to expect high-end performance from these inexpensive processors. But that older board has an annoyingly noisy fan, and I'd like to replace it. Has anyone already tried putting FreeBSD on one of these? Any problems? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 11:03:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26449106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl) Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (solfertje.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01E98FC20 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 61CE98035 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:03:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from hollewijn.internal (hollewijn.internal [10.236.150.4]) by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B388033; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:03:55 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Alban Hertroys In-Reply-To: <4B5C771C.4040605@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:03:55 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <124D663A-A5EA-429E-85F0-91E479ED081E@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> References: <4B5C771C.4040605@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: O. Hartmann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Jan 25 12:03:57 2010 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 760,4b5d7a9c10602068968553 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, In-Reply-To*mail.zedat.fu, 0.40000, To*mail.zedat.fu+berlin.de>, 0.40000, but, 0.40000, but, 0.40000, From*Alban, 0.40000, Subject*tob+be, 0.40000, Mime-Version*Message, 0.40000, don't+have, 0.40000, an, 0.40000, Date*12, 0.40000, I+look, 0.40000, 8/9+Any, 0.40000, Message-Id*85F0, 0.40000, of, 0.40000, of, 0.40000, have+that, 0.40000, Subject*8.0/9, 0.40000, digital+audio, 0.40000, some+kind, 0.40000, some+proprietary, 0.40000, Received*ESMTP, 0.40000, Received*12, 0.40000, of+signals, 0.40000, Content-Transfer-Encoding*8bit, 0.40000, Cc*freebsd+stable, 0.40000, are+supported, 0.40000, Message-Id*429E, 0.40000 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCIe audio cards: what is tob be preferred with FreeBSD 8.0/9-CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:03:59 -0000 On 24 Jan 2010, at 17:36, O. Hartmann wrote: > At this moment, I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, but I'm not sure whether they are supported by FreeBSd 8/9. Any suggestions? I'm actually looking for a replacement for my X-Fi (I have the PCI X-Fi Gamer). The sound quality isn't great and it's only supported in Windows. I believe there's an effort going on to get a functioning driver on Linux at the moment. Besides that, the card I have got some proprietary connectors for digital audio that you need to buy some kind of dongle for that dangles outside your case. You can fit a 3.5mm optical jack in the proprietary connector, but the signal isn't SP/DIF - my receiver has no idea what to do with it. The more expensive versions probably don't have that problem, they have plenty of connections for all kinds of signals after all. Alban Hertroys -- Screwing up is the best way to attach something to the ceiling. !DSPAM:760,4b5d7a9c10602068968553! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 11:14:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAF010656BA for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499EF8FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2602360ywh.7 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:14:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Y2xJM/vXTmQrI49/FWjSU4aUXIgGymu/7l8oWqzyW9Q=; b=eF5exU1P9QI5chzesEBNZVqpXTaSpcs4hPTMly566dtHTtRtAuPUI6Lzwf89SG5DGs mBvrSE5RalVxDRaR1/EVrS6V2qPJAMUwJpQtKDGHGag4i0C+Hkmxx1giol2+8QurII0u Wfc6GvJmzG9L3A566uh9II2AHUSY/tn+UpK84= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SC97q7nLZtDOLp+3k1mJIebgrUpVUUGbpR7kgSY/+p7cPdtxpmfrVpguqPzxrphew3 /CmXoQJwqqjhLYXx6UxM5VgQwBnzhtRE1jMA76flMUkKDlX66ovOPavceM7oM84AeEnv 3iiPjkd3FetUQQFHltKRtz1z+1QkbNdt5zfAc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.201.10 with SMTP id d10mr7502022anq.193.1264418082052; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:14:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:14:42 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: RE: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:14:49 -0000 Not to steal your discussion thread, but I thought I'd ask (and you'd perhaps too be interested) what's the status of FreeBSD on these 2: Supermicro X7SPA-H: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H Supermicro X7SPA-HF: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y Supermicro recently came out with quite a bunch of Atom-based solutions and these 2 boards stuck out as havign 6 x SATA ports, which make them tempting for a NAS solution. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 11:58:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649081065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0214F8FC20 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46286 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 11:58:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Kopm35fcVyZJ0kdw5jmTR+CV7MaTNo8HVyrSQVUoybn0o7I11sBKyF/PxKniCGSdmot380dcf0z2BMzrUHlgDXelmH2qB/SNOuNQNJdXfIJn+NCruwQEOnA8rfUS7agBEWtN4f9BP/YiIAVHbrNwX1HRvqSzNSY1ndqyr785bgo= ; Received: from c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.160.65 with login) by smtp110.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 03:58:25 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: U6vhUY8VM1knES5qBmvk_9gxLVeAedGaFCu91YW7EZ1cVru4_OPif3YCt3mwBTGOAZEQE0jQMWLMXdhm1iUe3uUpgS43GpFt1c7ukdMfp1g37IofIZresCbq5t3zC00WdB._2S_gQ1vcytfeK4HVwmLRCN44Mtq0wgevZHOZzZokGp0FfulYLHrAfgwTTNccdWqmffW1hjaiOfZSZFBBu1kFaZaqKWnpsMJMAYAUEPdnTHeEyBDITMtOJt5stj01C.IYc.5cwadz.cMDuZFZlM6iHA.qJ7d3_kR.WCBEUV7ar2ACguVZ4mW6xR1OZVM3Uoswlx9QzHD6nOq2h2i2pTPPPnuL.vxxQt2tj7m298mtZTEWdhFZbGy.dfsbL5g1bsjMm35aJeZnWl7_3qb.l.8FpHhoZ1G079CEjOAOa8JAXj3Op5GlkIJJxqDhSYoqLLEw.51Wl05siy.VESCXZoSxlJg1LllwwV5.MERc0XkIXVNfjgEJYf90xnvcRoPw9w0n6oX3d5IqCG7xE5MTmDF2WMYoFkxDMYytyzhpXHHS_Sz7Fg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7B9F2285B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:58:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:58:17 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125065817.3f555bb3@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20100125071606.GA1628@guilt.hydra> References: <20100123061958.73f3bc31@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100125071606.GA1628@guilt.hydra> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/FgI_AC7fXgvwY+cHoaOly6B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: Problem with GnuPG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:58:27 -0000 --Sig_/FgI_AC7fXgvwY+cHoaOly6B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:16:06 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:19:58AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > > I posted this recently on the GnuPG forum; however, no one had ever > > seen it before. > >=20 > > FreeBSD-7.2 > >=20 > > gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.14 > > libgcrypt 1.4.4 > >=20 > > gpa 0.9.0 > > =20 > > I honestly have no idea what the problem is here. I recently > > installed GnuPG on my system. Everything appeared to go fine. For > > some reason, I have numerous keys listed that I have no knowledge > > of. > >=20 > > This URL shows the keys: > >=20 > > http://seibercom.net/gnupg/KeyListing.png =20 > >=20 > > These are not OpenPGP keys, but x.509 certificates. I have no idea > > why they are showing up in the listing, nor can I delete them. > > GnuPG no longer works with my MUA either.I have tried deleting > > GnuPG in its entirety and the "~/.gnupg" directory. That did not > > alleviate the problem. Once I reinstalled them, the problem > > resurfaced. >=20 > I've never heard of anything like this with GnuPG either, and I'm > really not sure how you'd end up with a bunch of X.509 certificates > in a GnuPG keyring. I do have a hypothesis for you to investigate, > however: >=20 > You're using a tool I don't know anything about from personal > experience. Specifically, I'm talking about GPA. I've always just > used the command line tools. Because what you describe doesn't seem > to make any sense for the functionality of GnuPG, and you have this > featureful GUI application for managing keys, I thought maybe that > was the place to look. >=20 > The contents of the pkg-descr file for security/gpa say: >=20 > The GNU Privacy Assistant is a graphical frontend to GnuPG and > may be used to manage the keys and encrypt/decrypt/sign/check > files. It is much like Seahorse. >=20 > WWW: http://gpa.wald.intevation.org/ >=20 > Checking the site didn't really give me any information at all, but > the pkg-descr file for Seahorse says: >=20 > Seahorse is a Gnome front end for GnuPG - the Gnu Privacy > Guard program. >=20 > It is a tool for secure communications and data storage. > Data encryption and digital signature creation can easily > be performed through a GUI and Key Management operations > can easily be carried out through an intuitive interface. >=20 > WWW: http://seahorse.sourceforge.net/ >=20 > Looking at the Seahorse site, it says it supports GnuPG keys *and* SSH > keys. It lists a few other things it does, including an ambiguous and > frustratingly undefined "More...". I hunted around a bit and, on the > developer wiki, found a short list labeled "To Do (Grand Plans and > Quackery)" that included "Support X.509 certificates" as its first > item. >=20 > My thought is, if the GPA developers are following a similar path to > what the Seahorse developers are doing, they might even have gotten > to X.509 certs first. If that's the case, GPA may have just > automagically hunted up the X.509 certificates used by your browser > and added them to the list of managed keys. >=20 > Given the notion that GPA may have a bunch of functionality and > features that aren't even known to the user, and that it may try to > magically do things its developers assume people want, it's possible > that it is interfering somehow in the proper operation of GnuPG with > regard to your MUA. Perhaps some configuration file(s) for GPA, > separate from the GnuPG configuration directory itself, are surviving > the uninstalls and reinstalls of your various OpenPGP related tools > -- and maybe that's the reason it isn't currently working with your > MUA. It could be worth investigating. Is the manpage for GPA any > help at all (since there doesn't appear to be any documentation at > all on the Website)? >=20 > I'm curious about what's causing the problem, so if/when you get this > sorted out, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know anything you learn > about the problem. I may try to help you investigate the matter > further as well if you keep me abreast of what you uncover about the > matter. Of course, I don't plan to install GPA anywhere, so my > ability to look into it is *somewhat* limited, but I might be able to > pitch in a little as time permits. >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > Other than dumping the whole system, reformatting and re-installing > > the OS, has anyone ever heard of this happening before; and if so, > > how to correct it? >=20 > I'm sure there's *something* you can do without nuking and paving -- > even if it's somewhat drastic, like selecting a different MUA (if, for > instance, a change in one of the tools or in the MUA itself has > introduced an incompatibility somewhere). >=20 > Oh, that reminds me . . . is it possible that a change has been made > to some configuration for the MUA itself, without your knowledge? >=20 > What *is* your MUA, anyway? >=20 > Good luck. OK, I posted this on the 'GnuPG' list earlier; however, since you requested further info, here it is. This is the file that apparently GPA is loading that has those pesky 'certs': /usr/local/share/gnupg -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 27K Jan 20 22:43 com-certs.pem I renamed the file, deleted those "~/.gnupg/*.kbx" files and restarted GPA and the problem went away. Apparently, GnuPG does have support for X.509 certificates. I have been reading through the documentation -- info gnupg -- to discover its full potential and usage. In any case, it apparently is configurable. I am not sure what that is, or if I inadvertently turned it on. I am still working on that phase of debugging. I have GnuPG working with 'claws-mail' now though. For whatever reason, the plug-in that claws-mail uses for GnuPG was unloaded. I don't know why; I certainly never did it. In any case, after reloading it, claws-mail works again with GnuPG. I wouldn't doubt that there is some sort of gnomish bug lurking around, though I doubt that I will ever discover its existence. --=20 Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com |::::=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |::::=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D | Consider a spherical bear, in simple harmonic motion... =0D Professor in the UCB physics department --Sig_/FgI_AC7fXgvwY+cHoaOly6B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLXYdgAAoJEGnxpuiKsj5SLxoH/RNoah2ErO0WI9YAB9iSLlwm XUflRIqW30jZtxmFh3pwznvvVPcY1fXWZtzDy62ktTq2WJaU/NfzohRhEm1owIc3 aWuR2gYG9UIMtYjJmdG3eDquAjEreP826nnpu66SAC576oRyUBtKXesUoeRwpZB1 QE4LdLYUktiZebmGCf6c5te1Wi6G2GaRY0F4mN+LWBIM6zKDHUuLtmsgKvNMvsi5 KQLAYEYupS1yJHB9rYGtHuNqxiYDlOtJL8AATYhlALuLgTITZXPpN4uoz+BC/X04 EM2YxlFLAtok4aCG+Pz8QeEPdV1wmNEZdn+M1MUXpfdxSrnBUK9CHIo1bihAju8= =fh5U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FgI_AC7fXgvwY+cHoaOly6B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 05:55:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F790106566C; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80388FC0C; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0P5X7BA024156; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:33:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:33:07 -0600 (CST) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Dan Naumov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:33:07 -0600 (CST) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:18:53 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin , Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:55:06 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: > > I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in > this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is > available at http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/ > I have the card described later on the page, the one with 4 SATA ports > and no eSATA. Alright, so it being PCI is probably a bottleneck in > some ways, but that still doesn't explain the performance THAT bad, > considering that same hardware, same disks, same disk controller push > over 65mb/s in both reads and writes in Win2008. And agian, I am > pretty sure that I've had "close to expected" results when I was The slow PCI bus and this card look like the bottleneck to me. Remember that your Win2008 tests were with just one disk, your zfs performance with just one disk was similar to Win2008, and your zfs performance with a mirror was just under 1/2 that. I don't think that your performance results are necessarily out of line for the hardware you are using. On an old Sun SPARC workstation with retrofitted 15K RPM drives on Ultra-160 SCSI channel, I see a zfs mirror write performance of 67,317KB/second and a read performance of 124,347KB/second. The drives themselves are capable of 100MB/second range performance. Similar to yourself, I see 1/2 the write performance due to bandwidth limitations. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 07:34:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C381065672; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F408C8FC1A; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so2622784yxe.3 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:34:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JPV6jRzwieQnlULeFbANGq33ETf6qoWOFzZvsS7JwUU=; b=Px0wT+TVXcSQg2pTyl1dwQnGUu4xjUpIb2mwLE8kiWEia9qmnYrHYMR6XS8m/QKwQ0 GBo48VVmQWg8R8sk6ji7Bnp/eGndAL/hfNaDgK85jWk3GTWK7uxQ4Gw5oTmbudWQ14P1 qcjATXHI7zzitK4ZS7mgD41rwVLJiktiAKXOo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tSAtR80zCR1KORgccYf7rdboVg/kELJ0IKa8LtX6wZETdeRY9O5xS/b+TRbCdADWIo blDYI7JU04wIAJK7ZimMNQ5jzp1eKVghPmyDkKNG2drg6CFphDL4hFhT38/Ap150Cl+P d1PFoV18tWHDfBq22RYDJiLozD0AU+sf5saR4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.2.23 with SMTP id e23mr7310095ani.206.1264404892197; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:34:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:34:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Bob Friesenhahn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:33:32 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin , Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:34:53 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: >> >> I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in >> this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is >> available at >> http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/ >> I have the card described later on the page, the one with 4 SATA ports >> and no eSATA. Alright, so it being PCI is probably a bottleneck in >> some ways, but that still doesn't explain the performance THAT bad, >> considering that same hardware, same disks, same disk controller push >> over 65mb/s in both reads and writes in Win2008. And agian, I am >> pretty sure that I've had "close to expected" results when I was > > The slow PCI bus and this card look like the bottleneck to me. Remember t= hat > your Win2008 tests were with just one disk, your zfs performance with jus= t > one disk was similar to Win2008, and your zfs performance with a mirror w= as > just under 1/2 that. > > I don't think that your performance results are necessarily out of line f= or > the hardware you are using. > > On an old Sun SPARC workstation with retrofitted 15K RPM drives on Ultra-= 160 > SCSI channel, I see a zfs mirror write performance of 67,317KB/second and= a > read performance of 124,347KB/second. =A0The drives themselves are capabl= e of > 100MB/second range performance. Similar to yourself, I see 1/2 the write > performance due to bandwidth limitations. > > Bob There is lots of very sweet irony in my particular situiation. Initially I was planning to use a single X25-M 80gb SSD in the motherboard sata port for the actual OS installation as well as to dedicate 50gb of it to a become a designaed L2ARC vdev for my ZFS mirrors. The SSD attached to the motherboard port would be recognized only as a SATA150 device for some reason, but I was still seeing 150mb/s throughput and sub 0.1 ms latencies on that disk simply because of how crazy good the X25-M's are. However I ended up having very bad issues with the Icydock 2,5" to 3,5" converter jacket I was using to keep/fit the SSD in the system and it would randomly drop write IO on heavy load due to bad connectors. Having finally figured out the cause of my OS installations to the SSD going belly up during applying updates, I decided to move the SSD to my desktop and use it there instead, additionally thinking that my perhaps my idea of the SSD was crazy overkill for what I need the system to do. Ironically now that I am seeing how horrible the performance is when I am operating on the mirror through this PCI card, I realize that actually, my idea was pretty bloody brilliant, I just didn't really know why at the time. An L2ARC device on the motherboard port would really help me with random read IO, but to work around the utterly poor write performance, I would also need a dedicaled SLOG ZIL device. The catch is that while L2ARC devices and be removed from the pool at will (should the device up and die all of a sudden), the dedicated ZILs cannot and currently a "missing" ZIL device will render the pool it's included in be unable to import and become inaccessible. There is some work happening in Solaris to implement removing SLOGs from a pool, but that work hasn't yet found it's way in FreeBSD yet. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 08:32:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EB5106566B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966868FC0A; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2538895ywh.7 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:32:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g5zFN5gisNK7vcHBmsGGkEdHWsTjCP+1nRHAdd6EGCk=; b=ozR3+lulCZ7MWvjNi1AV+lTeXB7JwvwG7U9rGyvl8/VGareW7S9rwNYF72DBHvttdX e0RDM3vnTIoVllZQhrhd0zpw/fHrRdc4qInK8ocaqYE+J8fmmoELncO4Tgz8vnazTw/i uPy9Vs1tfhz6O0ICQguA/wgDOx5DGnKAJlUC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VqsNGlty9c/zOBZpkqNtxRFYD7stzBA95/5YhqdMOZp4W/9+6hJKBoF5kOkCsgfQvX RBGtak27CpYRcAFwmNXfXKr/BhIM6onDdyaks6j30qBXv/B1XJKpUFpoAYh3BxoQcbdH jjV5T3hkJM+YH5R1JdMroeuTVa9zpK3FYnTz4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.6.22 with SMTP id j22mr7317943ani.224.1264408339787; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:32:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:32:19 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Bob Friesenhahn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:33:51 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin , Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:32:21 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn > wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: >>> >>> I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in >>> this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is >>> available at >>> http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/ >>> I have the card described later on the page, the one with 4 SATA ports >>> and no eSATA. Alright, so it being PCI is probably a bottleneck in >>> some ways, but that still doesn't explain the performance THAT bad, >>> considering that same hardware, same disks, same disk controller push >>> over 65mb/s in both reads and writes in Win2008. And agian, I am >>> pretty sure that I've had "close to expected" results when I was >> >> The slow PCI bus and this card look like the bottleneck to me. Remember = that >> your Win2008 tests were with just one disk, your zfs performance with ju= st >> one disk was similar to Win2008, and your zfs performance with a mirror = was >> just under 1/2 that. >> >> I don't think that your performance results are necessarily out of line = for >> the hardware you are using. >> >> On an old Sun SPARC workstation with retrofitted 15K RPM drives on Ultra= -160 >> SCSI channel, I see a zfs mirror write performance of 67,317KB/second an= d a >> read performance of 124,347KB/second. =A0The drives themselves are capab= le of >> 100MB/second range performance. Similar to yourself, I see 1/2 the write >> performance due to bandwidth limitations. >> >> Bob > > There is lots of very sweet irony in my particular situiation. > Initially I was planning to use a single X25-M 80gb SSD in the > motherboard sata port for the actual OS installation as well as to > dedicate 50gb of it to a become a designaed L2ARC vdev for my ZFS > mirrors. The SSD attached to the motherboard port would be recognized > only as a SATA150 device for some reason, but I was still seeing > 150mb/s throughput and sub 0.1 ms latencies on that disk simply > because of how crazy good the X25-M's are. However I ended up having > very bad issues with the Icydock 2,5" to 3,5" converter jacket I was > using to keep/fit the SSD in the system and it would randomly drop > write IO on heavy load due to bad connectors. Having finally figured > out the cause of my OS installations to the SSD going belly up during > applying updates, I decided to move the SSD to my desktop and use it > there instead, additionally thinking that my perhaps my idea of the > SSD was crazy overkill for what I need the system to do. Ironically > now that I am seeing how horrible the performance is when I am > operating on the mirror through this PCI card, I realize that > actually, my idea was pretty bloody brilliant, I just didn't really > know why at the time. > > An L2ARC device on the motherboard port would really help me with > random read IO, but to work around the utterly poor write performance, > I would also need a dedicaled SLOG ZIL device. The catch is that while > L2ARC devices and be removed from the pool at will (should the device > up and die all of a sudden), the dedicated ZILs cannot and currently a > "missing" ZIL device will render the pool it's included in be unable > to import and become inaccessible. There is some work happening in > Solaris to implement removing SLOGs from a pool, but that work hasn't > yet found it's way in FreeBSD yet. > > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov OK final question: if/when I go about adding more disks to the system and want redundancy, am I right in thinking that: ZFS pool of disk1+disk2 mirror + disk3+disk4 mirror (a la RAID10) would completely murder my write and read performance even way below the current 28mb/s / 50mb/s I am seeing with 2 disks on that PCI controller and that in order to have the least negative impact, I should simply have 2 independent mirrors in 2 independent pools (with the 5th disk slot in the NAS given to a non-redundant single disk running off the one available SATA port on the motherboard)? - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 09:29:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9D9106566B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wonslung@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC0A8FC13; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so85570fga.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:29:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yILrgnuSr+kV0FohkSJQBB2hXNICQ/BGuFH3nOOhtdk=; b=RwfNgDn9ihjqjNUKyFxs1NznV3Q9lMBxiI0triZUCsk5iKyZ8jYuwy7CIfkbGk/PZx 7P37KRNSFBUNuzZ7+4nNhGXON30uXc7+GU6rRrCQl1CG03HB0ZjItGNg14ytfYzqSlZB gOhJT862QLnK+Xn1WVlvL0itT2h2wlfGe4UUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=WBr7xcZ5R+ZAslVVAsJzl4cBriv/h2gCislho34tKZ5ruTY+gwFd7jxzbcsZVpxqw0 v7zuO8SJ7qHHJyiUsE8iz8MURXrYfF3vHBj/dl3BwRu1GAICPT9AJDD0cN5+RQahUjQE e2k6Q1BRAy2yCymFkq/br2DtRBjfzrVfsMmoQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.84.15 with SMTP id m15mr3186048mul.43.1264409928645; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:58:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <883b2dc51001240905r4cfbf830i3b9b400969ac261b@mail.gmail.com> <1264368182.00211075.1264355402@10.7.7.3> <4B5CC167.5010604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:58:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: Thomas Burgess To: Dan Naumov X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:38:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jason Edwards , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Alexander Motin , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Bob Friesenhahn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:29:36 -0000 It depends on the bandwidth of the bus that it is on and the controller itself. I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cards....that way you get a lot more bandwidth.. On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn > > wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: > >>> > >>> I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in > >>> this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is > >>> available at > >>> http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/ > >>> I have the card described later on the page, the one with 4 SATA ports > >>> and no eSATA. Alright, so it being PCI is probably a bottleneck in > >>> some ways, but that still doesn't explain the performance THAT bad, > >>> considering that same hardware, same disks, same disk controller push > >>> over 65mb/s in both reads and writes in Win2008. And agian, I am > >>> pretty sure that I've had "close to expected" results when I was > >> > >> The slow PCI bus and this card look like the bottleneck to me. Remember > that > >> your Win2008 tests were with just one disk, your zfs performance with > just > >> one disk was similar to Win2008, and your zfs performance with a mirror > was > >> just under 1/2 that. > >> > >> I don't think that your performance results are necessarily out of line > for > >> the hardware you are using. > >> > >> On an old Sun SPARC workstation with retrofitted 15K RPM drives on > Ultra-160 > >> SCSI channel, I see a zfs mirror write performance of 67,317KB/second > and a > >> read performance of 124,347KB/second. The drives themselves are capable > of > >> 100MB/second range performance. Similar to yourself, I see 1/2 the write > >> performance due to bandwidth limitations. > >> > >> Bob > > > > There is lots of very sweet irony in my particular situiation. > > Initially I was planning to use a single X25-M 80gb SSD in the > > motherboard sata port for the actual OS installation as well as to > > dedicate 50gb of it to a become a designaed L2ARC vdev for my ZFS > > mirrors. The SSD attached to the motherboard port would be recognized > > only as a SATA150 device for some reason, but I was still seeing > > 150mb/s throughput and sub 0.1 ms latencies on that disk simply > > because of how crazy good the X25-M's are. However I ended up having > > very bad issues with the Icydock 2,5" to 3,5" converter jacket I was > > using to keep/fit the SSD in the system and it would randomly drop > > write IO on heavy load due to bad connectors. Having finally figured > > out the cause of my OS installations to the SSD going belly up during > > applying updates, I decided to move the SSD to my desktop and use it > > there instead, additionally thinking that my perhaps my idea of the > > SSD was crazy overkill for what I need the system to do. Ironically > > now that I am seeing how horrible the performance is when I am > > operating on the mirror through this PCI card, I realize that > > actually, my idea was pretty bloody brilliant, I just didn't really > > know why at the time. > > > > An L2ARC device on the motherboard port would really help me with > > random read IO, but to work around the utterly poor write performance, > > I would also need a dedicaled SLOG ZIL device. The catch is that while > > L2ARC devices and be removed from the pool at will (should the device > > up and die all of a sudden), the dedicated ZILs cannot and currently a > > "missing" ZIL device will render the pool it's included in be unable > > to import and become inaccessible. There is some work happening in > > Solaris to implement removing SLOGs from a pool, but that work hasn't > > yet found it's way in FreeBSD yet. > > > > > > - Sincerely, > > Dan Naumov > > OK final question: if/when I go about adding more disks to the system > and want redundancy, am I right in thinking that: ZFS pool of > disk1+disk2 mirror + disk3+disk4 mirror (a la RAID10) would completely > murder my write and read performance even way below the current 28mb/s > / 50mb/s I am seeing with 2 disks on that PCI controller and that in > order to have the least negative impact, I should simply have 2 > independent mirrors in 2 independent pools (with the 5th disk slot in > the NAS given to a non-redundant single disk running off the one > available SATA port on the motherboard)? > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 11:29:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CA0106566B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012338FC12; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NZN87-000GvC-Hy; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:29:15 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NZN87-000JtL-Gy; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:29:15 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:29:15 +0000 Message-Id: To: dan.naumov@gmail.com, wonslung@gmail.com In-Reply-To: From: Pete French X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:38:45 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, mav@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:29:25 -0000 > I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cards....that way you > get a lot more bandwidth.. I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100 meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is, however on PCI-X, not PCI. It's a shame PCI-X appears to have gone the way of the dinosaur :-( -pete. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 12:45:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C9710656B3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sakncli@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5248FC40 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so156858fga.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:45:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=mWG8T02EWwPYgPFaOB4PQZ9x4EOkLjxkePvGGU1kZB0=; b=IAOtw0JiW+P/L4uEWS0/1i7vXGiHwhIfIBKZlSLv8tWje+ybr+AWgIi5HaLjuhfB6a 8pDuo23Sdjr/N6Elblvm60xMGiXpnb2VOUmXOQPRvIvyUQfngMgSHKiRQg5A0IA4VHIG K1ivhpgMKVilCwlqxL8XoyNWXLTgc9R0+0NDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hckihI6/WRQPeY6AhZo+aRdLXmAX5iccj+6eDrfT6Bxe5i6Af+xGw2n2ifQbxDUo4t QB3gPAv3vXYQqB2c9MfBAk+vbVcqc9Ocgu6VBsLCTKZ28QmscCSrq/ECZPvI4oWqwgEo KSf0CKpVHU8RebyX1d3j0j/hvGk2eNsTq8+oE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.6.23 with SMTP id 23mr10530639fgf.16.1264421796859; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:16:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: <97371e801001250416s1109e3c5hae98cad0db876fe3@mail.gmail.com> From: yavuz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: writing divert sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:45:41 -0000 Hi all, I have a problem while writing divert sockets. I found a simple application and modified it to compile in freebsd. Simple divert socket application only prints incomming packet and reinject packet to IP stack. My simple application and test codes are available at ( http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10589) I think I have a problem in reinject part, i.e writing packet back to ip stack. I have a server application listening on port 2000 and a client sends packet to port 2000. And I have a ipfw rule as: > ipfw add 1000 divert 2000 tcp from any to any 2000 In divert socket application a divert socket is created and bind to port 2000. Socket receives packet with no problem: > n=recvfrom( fd, packet, BUFSIZE, 0, (struct sockaddr_in *) sin, &sinlen); After receiving packet what I want to do is simply reinjecting packet. >n=sendto(fd, packet, n ,0, (struct sockaddr *) &sin, sinlen); Reinjecting packet is not working in my case. I miss some point:) please help me. In addition to the problem, I couldn't understand a point in man page of divert. "The port part of the socket address passed to the sendto(2) contains a tag that should be meaningful to the diversion module. In the case of ipfw(8) the tag is interpreted as the rule number after which rule processing should restart." If I change the port value of sending address to ipfw rule number, how can server receive the packet? (Assume the rule number is 1000 and server listens port 2000. ) Thanks in advance yavuzg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 13:32:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA679106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11588FC21 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 148 invoked by uid 98); 25 Jan 2010 13:24:36 +0000 Received: from 192.168.0.2 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.95.1/9971. hbedv: 7.9.1.53/7.1.6.174. spamassassin: 3.2.5. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.2):. Processed in 3.960047 secs); 25 Jan 2010 13:24:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (192.168.0.2) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 13:24:31 +0000 From: Craig Butler To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:31:52 +0000 Message-Id: <1264426312.2173.7.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: wpi problems -- kern/142907 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:32:00 -0000 Hi All Anyone else having problems with wpi ?? I have upgraded the firmware, helps a little but is still far from perfect. Unless I continuously ping the gateway wpi silently drops the connection. Even then connections to other servers on the lan are dodgy unless I am actively pinging them to keep the connection alive. After a time it all self destructs anyway and I have to restart if_wpi and /etc/rc.d/netif I know that it isn't the access points at fault as other devices and wifi cards work well. Cheers Craig Butler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 14:24:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE311065676 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC358FC19 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZPrj-0003lM-5o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:33 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NZPri-00024n-GL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:30 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PEOUAS001536 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:30 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0PEOUQV001535 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:30 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:30 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: can't load smbfs kernel module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:24:35 -0000 This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64 I've built a kernel with smbfs module: # ls -al /boot/kernel/smb* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols but can't load it: # kldload smbfs kldload: can't load smbfs: No such file or directory Other modules load fine with kldload, e.g.: # ls -al /boot/kernel/geom_part_apm* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21320 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/geom_part_apm.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 51141 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/geom_part_apm.ko.symbols # kldload geom_part_apm # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 5 0xe000000004000000 b69e60 kernel 2 1 0xe000000004b6a000 3d268 geom_mirror.ko 3 1 0xa000000000646000 14000 geom_part_apm.ko # All I need is to mount an MS WIndows partition to my fbsd box. Please advise many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 15:25:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5821065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8918FC2A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0PFPL0t074757 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:25:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201001251525.o0PFPL0t074757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <74755.1264433121.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:25:21 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: sysinstall and the Right Terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:25:28 -0000 Thomas Dickey writes: > "Terminal" would probably be one of the programs using VTE, > which differs from "linux". This is all very interesting. Thanks to all. What I normally do is start a command-line shell on a Debian Linux box. This defaults to a "linux" console. When I ssh somewhere, ssh passes the exported $TERM value to the remote host so as I understand it, it will use this value in the environment that it exports to any application called from that shell. The question is whether or not all the escape codes it sends to address the terminal and all the escape sequences it looks for to represent arrow keys, etc, will still work. The best results, so far, are with using cons25 as the TERM value. The Up and Down arrows work right as opposed to going right straight to X Exit this menu. I appreciate all the input because in this game, knowledge is the power to fix it. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 15:29:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08B0106568F for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DBA8FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so2490455pxi.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:29:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3IHnzZ3o2crg4KHEuHZyclQ4YRbJe69v92KlLwm7gzU=; b=F/+4HGP3q1vo7xJay+LA1io1zVp5ZqHObSsL/v7ZW9BCc53SCT4vbRMaS/xhoMYRVn Bvi+XH62CRBgk8FVl/EShhcPLCr8nB13rk7C97gaXZWkKBOYDpouAg6qaYVqEWa4vo5a j5Kzh5ppwpMCw7Oi1jmAlIcGPWaj4f/juZMQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LS7X7GiUxDV7wPidIr5EJN0fklhVl+1SC+jfaWYl3oRsiAjz4mVS7iEHygSilNAJr1 REndrE7Y2GttDCpnDxNLbhfFx/BE1d1OdNXu7nk0798XTnqnKfl4cRHVgTf2dSSuTcL8 E832A5sCHN3q5Ces8TKaE46l+TNreSA32/ElY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.59.20 with SMTP id h20mr4662574wfa.44.1264433343806; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:29:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5D0639.4040503@fusiongol.com> References: <20100124223626.37E5210656BD@hub.freebsd.org> <4B5D0639.4040503@fusiongol.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:29:03 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001250729s36073a22t1c6f95bd2af7c2d4@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Nathan Butcher Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raw sockets in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:29:04 -0000 2010/1/24 Nathan Butcher > I'm just curious as to whether FreeBSD8.0 can support raw sockets on > some jails and not on others. > > I'm trying to find the jail flags to allow this to happen. Not having > much luck. > Any ideas? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00978.html -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 15:51:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC141065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from masoom.shaikh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f202.google.com (mail-pz0-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2437B8FC18 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so748033pzk.7 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:51:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=D9mYY2eVxXyxpBDHiptJfVYFWw3/c6pN3BXWKp01lIo=; b=sc/+MngRZzsMfkt7sLbUyZg67o5Bpz2fo/i2a/qeW85vtWs/rp0kFc0/5SiCLS5/oO tqxq/FEGEs0+6Z+vX0s0qEHcDOKbMNjiGdglKFPTPHADQsIsyEARmGoBMj9n3KK7uKa6 ZGFVxKCbmOz5Bgjt1RbRMdolzK0N0VwzISWlk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=AyDf/BOfc/63ebk73AYk6PJUls7Gmgi0RKy+zMdtZZBswOZN7vv6+GaVpm5iA/R/fS K5wGBKAIvOrm+q8FSKnTsFTv0wqJpagdP621PZI1Prc4IwSEUyde6ShIZtu4QpJCos+g zqjtL+x9XwsiEcEyKpE33cm4Y6cZgm5grSBUQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.5.13 with SMTP id 13mr4593640wae.222.1264434686108; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:51:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +0000 Message-ID: From: Masoom Shaikh To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD sources from svn repos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:27 -0000 Hi List, I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos 1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/ 2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/ 3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ (2) is easy, most probably it means stable how about (1) and (2) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 16:33:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123261065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9564F8FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so253437fga.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:33:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0c8IjtKhopCFOnDJLorca2Rx8ZdwufxHJxWnDXPOTOE=; b=m+dMloBA7qeyuqJ33KPXZcVfuV9QuXHxcTXTdRXw+AhsYR81zusvOe+CfhiEl5GL7d rHYjr+QhTJUnoWvEL+F42rhGM7ojFVXQnLXoP3T516DsmHRAN1jaYZJrIIxaAEDSAhdb +CgLFkdRKT0wXf6UASSO/pYeFQ/67WXwD2vwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XP7E63SRl9xi63xcooB/zr5czZ+cCMF73KR4Gb4jV/tBZO/lSRv5VmZ8R2s+214lK7 zqghkmJ86oMa8gZh8hMXfEfyxbeEzwegzH/Hgj04rxUcJKcT4iMMI0+Cy2YvmHWYEQ2Y HGR88eCO+Ua/OzFIwwdZQsFSzdQ0W7dwvLnxU= Received: by 10.87.63.20 with SMTP id q20mr5822498fgk.27.1264437182173; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:33:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm6314841fgb.0.2010.01.25.08.32.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:33:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:32:57 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125163257.00b60420@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD sources from svn repos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:33:05 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +0000 Masoom Shaikh wrote: > Hi List, > > I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos > > 1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/ > 2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/ > 3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ > > (2) is easy, most probably it means stable Rather than the one that has "stable" in the url? > how about (1) and (2) The obvious interpretation is that 3 is stable, 2 is the release, and 1 is the RELENG_8_0 security branch. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 16:39:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F601065942 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3157F8FC2D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0PGctag003488; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:38:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1ISKTGoW3eLJ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:38:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (ezekiel.daleco.biz [66.76.92.18]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PGclhs003483; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:38:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4B5DC917.3080605@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:38:47 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't load smbfs kernel module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:39:04 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64 > > I've built a kernel with smbfs module: > > # ls -al /boot/kernel/smb* > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols > > but can't load it: > > # kldload smbfs > kldload: can't load smbfs: No such file or directory > > > Other modules load fine with kldload, e.g.: Does it make any difference to use the ".ko" extension, to call it by absolute path, or to use "-v" for more information, per The Friendly Manual? Certainly no expert. Wondering tho, as I don't know if the kernel maintains a list of "new" objects if they've been recently added. Hate to ask if you've done a reboot :-) Also, for curiosity, `file /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko`? > All I need is to mount an MS WIndows partition to my fbsd box. > > Please advise > > many thanks > anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 16:43:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6952106568B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf00.insightbb.com (mxsf00.insightbb.com [74.128.0.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C878FC08 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:43:44 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,340,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="744398873" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2010 11:15:19 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkoGAFNSXUvQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBRY5MAcpfhDsE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,340,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="5618932" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2010 11:15:19 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Steven Friedrich Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:15:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001251115.18221.freebsd@insightbb.com> Subject: pwcview vs permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:43:45 -0000 When I run pwcview as a non-root user, it complains about permissions. The perms were 644 on /dev/video0. I set them to 666 and it works, but what is the intended approach? Should I just create a device hint? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 16:44:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DE310656A8 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1381A8FC19 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0PGiRLK003657; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:44:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HdmUd1xMhTn9; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:44:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (ezekiel.daleco.biz [66.76.92.18]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PGiNLn003652; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:44:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4B5DCA67.4010200@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:44:23 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <20100125163257.00b60420@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100125163257.00b60420@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD sources from svn repos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:44:28 -0000 RW wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +0000 > Masoom Shaikh wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos >> >> 1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/ >> 2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/ >> 3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ >> >> (2) is easy, most probably it means stable > > Rather than the one that has "stable" in the url? > >> how about (1) and (2) > > The obvious interpretation is that 3 is stable, 2 is the release, and > 1 is the RELENG_8_0 security branch. But to the initiate :-), remember that the terms can be confusing. A RELEASE is extremely "stable" in terms of operation, most usually, per our reputation (and will never be changed again). The RELENG tag means that only security fixes, etc. are added to the code, and the -STABLE tag refers to the fact that the API isn't going to change in any substantial way without developer's heads rolling, most likely, but stuff is Merged-from-Current (or wherever) fairly continually, and, as such, is occasionally susceptible to hiccups. Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 17:13:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC171065670; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294738FC1B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NZSV1-0001An-SW>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:15 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NZSV1-0004hj-Qc>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4B5DD17E.3030705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:14:38 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100122 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexandre L." References: <476019.21896.qm@web24803.mail.ird.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <476019.21896.qm@web24803.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re : polkit-0.95_3: update fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:13:17 -0000 On 01/25/10 06:35, Alexandre L. wrote: > You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and polkit. > > --- En date de : Ven 22.1.10, O. Hartmann a écrit : > > >> De: O. Hartmann >> Objet: polkit-0.95_3: update fails >> À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org >> Date: Vendredi 22 Janvier 2010, 15h45 >> I try to update ports via 'portmaster >> -av' on a regular basis and ran into a sticky problem with >> poolkit and docbook I'm incapable to solve. >> >> Error message follows. >> >> Does anybody has any hint or tip? Please email me in CC. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> >> ===>>> Starting build for for ports that need >> updating<<<=== >> >> ===>>> Launching child to update polkit-0.95_3 >> >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/polkit >> ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for >> sysutils/polkit from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/eggdbus >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/gettext >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/glib20 >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/gmake >> ===>>> Checking dependency: >> devel/gobject-introspection >> ===>>> Checking dependency: devel/pkg-config >> ===>>> Checking dependency: textproc/docbook-410 >> ===>>> Launching child to update >> textproc/docbook-410 >> polkit-0.95_3>> >> textproc/docbook-410 >> >> ===>>> Port directory: >> /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-410 >> ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for >> textproc/docbook-410 from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: archivers/unzip >> ===>>> Dependency check complete for >> textproc/docbook-410 >> polkit-0.95_3>> >> textproc/docbook-410 >> ===> Cleaning for docbook-4.1_3 >> >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not >> found >> ===> Extracting for docbook-4.1_3 >> => MD5 Checksum OK for docbk41.zip. >> => SHA256 Checksum OK for docbk41.zip. >> ===> docbook-4.1_3 depends on file: >> /usr/local/bin/unzip - found >> ===> Patching for docbook-4.1_3 >> ===> Configuring for docbook-4.1_3 >> >> ===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for >> textproc/docbook-410 from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: textproc/iso8879 >> ===>>> Launching child to update textproc/iso8879 >> polkit-0.95_3>> >> textproc/docbook-410>> textproc/iso8879 >> >> ===>>> Port directory: >> /usr/ports/textproc/iso8879 >> ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for >> textproc/iso8879 from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: archivers/unzip >> ===>>> Dependency check complete for >> textproc/iso8879 >> polkit-0.95_3>> >> textproc/docbook-410>> textproc/iso8879 >> ===> Cleaning for iso8879-1986_2 >> >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not >> found >> ===> Extracting for iso8879-1986_2 >> => MD5 Checksum OK for isoENTS.zip. >> => SHA256 Checksum OK for isoENTS.zip. >> ===> Patching for iso8879-1986_2 >> ===> iso8879-1986_2 depends on >> executable: unzip - found >> ===> Configuring for iso8879-1986_2 >> >> ===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for >> textproc/iso8879 from ports >> ===>>> Starting dependency check >> ===>>> Checking dependency: textproc/xmlcatmgr >> ===>>> Dependency check complete for >> textproc/iso8879 >> polkit-0.95_3>> >> textproc/docbook-410>> textproc/iso8879 >> ===> Installing for iso8879-1986_2 >> ===> Generating temporary packing list >> xmlcatmgr: entry already exists for `iso8879/catalog' of >> type `CATALOG' >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/iso8879. >> >> ===>>> Installation of iso8879-1986_2 >> (textproc/iso8879) failed >> ===>>> Aborting update >> >> ===>>> Update for textproc/iso8879 failed >> ===>>> Aborting update >> >> ===>>> Update for textproc/docbook-410 failed >> ===>>> Aborting update >> >> ===>>> Update for polkit-0.95_3 failed >> ===>>> Aborting update >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > > Sorry for the noise! Yes, you're right and I must confess that I looked at this place at last :-( Next time I will look here the first time. Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 17:15:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C29D1065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:15:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7748FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (system.jails.se [87.237.210.209]) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 482D47CC4A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.25.0.40] (c-f306e155.166-7-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.225.6.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DEDF7CC41 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:32 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:31 +0100 Message-Id: <31D1B7FC-E6D9-40D7-9BFE-8EE5B46CD3E5@pean.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Jan 25 18:15:32 2010 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 4b5dd1b416951600420182 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, but, 0.40000, Received*cipher+AES128, 0.40000, Mime-Version*Message, 0.40000, inet6+net, 0.40000, org, 0.40000, Message-Id*40D7, 0.40000, route+in, 0.40000, Received*client+certificate, 0.40000, ipv6+route, 0.40000, Date*Mon, 0.40000, Subject*static+route., 0.40000, use, 0.40000, pean, 0.40000, To*questions+freebsd.org, 0.40000, Received*7+64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se, 0.40000, Received*TLSv1+with, 0.40000, works+route, 0.40000, rc+conf, 0.40000, Message-Id*E6D9+40D7, 0.40000, Date*15, 0.40000, X-Mailer*Mail+(2.1077), 0.40000, add+inet6, 0.40000, Received*Mon+25, 0.40000, 2+and, 0.40000, Message-Id*40D7+9BFE, 0.40000, 64+2003, 0.40000, 64+2003, 0.40000 Subject: ipv6 static route. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:15:35 -0000 How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf? This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen = 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2 and I use this in rc.conf: ipv6_static_routes=3D"2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 = 2003:16c8:dc1e::2" but it does not set the correct routes. -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 17:23:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EE81065672; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E186D8FC12; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NZSef-00042S-O4>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:23:13 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NZSef-0005Ih-MP>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:23:13 +0100 Message-ID: <4B5DD3D4.9020000@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:24:36 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100122 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4B5C771C.4040605@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4b5d1bef.QEz5a8Mvh7OFA7+l%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4b5d1bef.QEz5a8Mvh7OFA7+l%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCIe audio cards: what is tob be preferred with FreeBSD 8.0/9-CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:23:15 -0000 On 01/25/10 04:19, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > >> At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with >> which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots >> at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, >> > It's possible to get an adapter that plugs into a PCIe slot and > provides a PCI slot, which might enable you to continue using > your current card. I've never actually seen one, so don't know > about the mechanics; it could turn out that it can only be used > by leaving the cover off of the box :( > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I gues this is he worst scenario I can imagine. I'd ike to spend some money on a new audio card adapted for PCIe, but it should have support both in FreeBSD and Windows. For mplayer/vlc and so forth my M-Audio audio quality was great. This level should be kept in FreeBSD. Regards Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 17:27:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893B11065697 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artemb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f204.google.com (mail-iw0-f204.google.com [209.85.223.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA3F8FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so695087iwn.9 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:27:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=Kwc/e4Cr0JlaU+TkwDYYtG0ZkN6fjBWBKotxxdJN3ng=; b=gbCe6ZursasSKl2MtrjlsnrDUM/V1yUAOzYUEtw9li2wq2Vm7ZoKce2l9wdh88q+Zl 7ybsGpcgsaa6DCgJU9fZl/0h1Gk/mcxZ+zp7IF4CQ/Zrr0OBEB6Uzr1GrpBMyu4r2oJW tSbAGjNyO/eJb/3WOQNSbc8SDAdzdIdT9JUKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=dh/U8VA/Cyw3jhAfRIsFsoqDixTKgn14Sz42ZCBrHQurD9U/n+/sxNFNEZOT5IuFsC Q9E24rkBf1RFjU4IVSAU8RSx45DAMqszD/Q1rvDyy2fX3EY7kNTAp2X1KyaYXHQE0UMJ 2gT0Sc+gewrpLxVNGxN6uBSsljPlxOmBlVBSk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: artemb@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.149.9 with SMTP id r9mr3885943ibv.74.1264439040810; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:04:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:04:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 06ca1031c6b56ef4 Message-ID: From: Artem Belevich To: Pete French Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:30:17 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, mav@freebsd.org, dan.naumov@gmail.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:27:27 -0000 aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068 controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks. I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with 8-disk raidz2 was noticeably lower than that of LSI1068 in the same configuration. Both LSI1068 and MV2 were on the same PCI-X bus. It could be a driver limitation. The driver for Marvel SATA controllers in NetBSD seems a bit more advanced compared to what's in FreeBSD. I wish intel would make cheap multi-port PCIe SATA card based on their AHCI controllers. --Artem On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Pete French wrote: >> I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cards....that way you >> get a lot more bandwidth.. > > I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with > a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100 > meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is, however on PCI-X, not > PCI. It's a shame PCI-X appears to have gone the way of the dinosaur :-( > > -pete. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 17:59:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29155106568D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17B08FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:25:36 -0500 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::6 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; s=noc_cfi_pgh_pa_us_key_dkim; l=1097; t=1264443936; i=@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; h=Message-ID:Date:From: Reply-To:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=jNZt7leNuBad55Yb6n7VgZeGtSA=; b=cm2ue5Ls0RO+kjmosqUph5lnfTKAn rPEFE6QsoTyd/HlmzjDDivSQTIjnRgE76/c+IZzZWqcrUQ8ZsOJ1KijYAyhyVXxd ha7weLHZ8PhhQKjxI8oPpq41b8bl83xm0FN Message-ID: <4B5DDC18.7000901@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:59:52 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)" Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. (DRP NOC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= References: <31D1B7FC-E6D9-40D7-9BFE-8EE5B46CD3E5@pean.org> In-Reply-To: <31D1B7FC-E6D9-40D7-9BFE-8EE5B46CD3E5@pean.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipv6 static route. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:59:57 -0000 On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote: > How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf? > > This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2 > > and I use this in rc.conf: > ipv6_static_routes="2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2" > Do it like IPv4 static routes with an itemized/serialized list: ipv6_static_routes="pitbpa0_0 pitbpa0_1 faith_0 faith_1" ipv6_route_pitbpa0_0="2607:f000:0010:0100::/56 2607:f000:10::4000" ipv6_route_pitbpa0_1="2607:f000:0010:0200::/56 2607:f000:10::4000" ipv6_route_faith_0="2607:f000:10:0:ffff:: -prefixlen 96 ::1" ipv6_route_faith_1="2607:f000:10:0:ffff:: -prefixlen 96 -ifp faith0" Keep the faith, yea? ~BAS > but it does not set the correct routes. > -- > Peter Ankerstål > peter@pean.org > http://www.pean.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 18:12:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3821A1065679 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E9B8FC0C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (system.jails.se [87.237.210.209]) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with SMTP id BBA977CF78 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:12:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.25.0.40] (c-f306e155.166-7-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.225.6.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 322FF7CF73; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:12:37 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= In-Reply-To: <4B5DDC18.7000901@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:12:36 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <81D79E11-24BA-47B0-A0C7-3AD2AE5DE6ED@pean.org> References: <31D1B7FC-E6D9-40D7-9BFE-8EE5B46CD3E5@pean.org> <4B5DDC18.7000901@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Jan 25 19:12:38 2010 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 4b5ddf1616951204550265 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, >+ipv6_route_pitbpa0_0="2607, 0.40000, Received*cipher+AES128, 0.40000, just, 0.40000, >+ipv6_route_pitbpa0_1="2607, 0.40000, 1/25/2010, 0.40000, Mime-Version*Message, 0.40000, Message-Id*24BA+47B0, 0.40000, an, 0.40000, inet6+net, 0.40000, 10, 0.40000, 10, 0.40000, org, 0.40000, Date*12, 0.40000, >>+and, 0.40000, ipv6_route_pitbpa0_1="2607+f000, 0.40000, 59+PM, 0.40000, route+in, 0.40000, Received*client+certificate, 0.40000, figured+it, 0.40000, f000, 0.40000, f000, 0.40000, ipv6+route, 0.40000, an+itemized/serialized, 0.40000, Date*Mon, 0.40000, Subject*static+route., 0.40000, use, 0.40000, faith_0, 0.40000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipv6 static route. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:12:40 -0000 On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote: > On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote: >> How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf? >>=20 >> This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: = -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2 >>=20 >> and I use this in rc.conf: >> ipv6_static_routes=3D"2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 = 2003:16c8:dc1e::2" >>=20 >=20 > Do it like IPv4 static routes with an itemized/serialized list: >=20 > ipv6_static_routes=3D"pitbpa0_0 pitbpa0_1 faith_0 faith_1" > ipv6_route_pitbpa0_0=3D"2607:f000:0010:0100::/56 2607:f000:10::4000" > ipv6_route_pitbpa0_1=3D"2607:f000:0010:0200::/56 2607:f000:10::4000" > ipv6_route_faith_0=3D"2607:f000:10:0:ffff:: -prefixlen 96 ::1" > ipv6_route_faith_1=3D"2607:f000:10:0:ffff:: -prefixlen 96 -ifp faith0" >=20 > Keep the faith, yea? >=20 > ~BAS >=20 Thanks, I just figured it out too!=20 -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org http://www.pean.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 18:15:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC641065880 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2178FC1A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60C910EE06; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:16:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B5DDFBD.6060206@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:15:25 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100125 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson References: <4B5B0DA6.1020702@eskk.nu> <4B5C91E5.7090005@bah.homeip.net> <4B5D5244.60806@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4B5D5244.60806@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Troback-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: C60C910EE06.AB21D X-Troback-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Troback-MailScanner-From: leslie@eskk.nu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird language should be Swedish but it's not! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:30 -0000 01/25/10 09:11, Leslie Jensen skrev: > > On 01/24/10 19:31, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> >> You need thunderbird3-i18n not thunderbird-i18n. >> > > > Yes, of course. Unfortunately there's no change, after deinstalling and > rebuilding it's the same behaviour. > > Thanks. Found it! The Swedish language pack is not installed. After downloading and installing, Thunderbird is now displaying the right language. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 17:40:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE71106566B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D708FC1C; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1035750fxm.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:40:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jyVLdTkQZoMWraDkskVuVR3bPC8wn5sQeuUCWzwb9Q8=; b=S4RSwRySSyrX++8NofKAKsDgLvcnI4jg/4pWfM7m5tgiUKLN0z3C5AYaEZsBYxSzG2 LGSlNxxoVy7q7HPyvULC1PyV7/9SOKqheWIgbbdeypj1c0v7K0jqUOe9YFCWpQal+qpY 0o0rJA6OlSeI4E+iEZtwaXSOL9bi0bmVE4U1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Hrb7I+C0KBOdAAeBbBOLrVO5EBykitEpMIvD0VaaTjhO/4ikrrimK1hS0Zg2P3Qusy ktWjJmtlNsV43ipa6CPbwVDpnmhsekLE0Wb4j9w/ZpODVC38IVUn2vZvossqPGedNnMm FJGyKw5xVsBsGKH3idE7LtLbullHt8cpNACN8= Received: by 10.223.16.72 with SMTP id n8mr6510981faa.26.1264441254397; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm2850502fxm.12.2010.01.25.09.40.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:40:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:40:50 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Artem Belevich References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:28:50 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French , dan.naumov@gmail.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:40:56 -0000 Artem Belevich wrote: > aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068 > controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks. > I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that > does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't > have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with 8-disk raidz2 was > noticeably lower than that of LSI1068 in the same configuration. Both > LSI1068 and MV2 were on the same PCI-X bus. It could be a driver > limitation. The driver for Marvel SATA controllers in NetBSD seems a > bit more advanced compared to what's in FreeBSD. I also wouldn't recommend to use Marvell 88SXx0xx controllers now. While potentially they are interesting, lack of documentation and numerous hardware bugs make existing FreeBSD driver very limited there. > I wish intel would make cheap multi-port PCIe SATA card based on their > AHCI controllers. Indeed. Intel on-board AHCI SATA controllers are fastest from all I have tested. Unluckily, they are not producing discrete versions. :( Now, if discrete solution is really needed, I would still recommend SiI3124, but with proper PCI-X 64bit/133MHz bus or built-in PCIe x8 bridge. They are fast and have good new siis driver. > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Pete French > wrote: >>> I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cards....that way you >>> get a lot more bandwidth.. >> I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with >> a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100 >> meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is, however on PCI-X, not >> PCI. It's a shame PCI-X appears to have gone the way of the dinosaur :-( -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 18:03:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B521065679; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251B78FC0C; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so2926521ywh.7 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:02:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nZtf3l4PCbMY400oXJwuloFDENM2ZdBfDGqzTYpxpm8=; b=rYZu0wav4efSK1MEUAd3tPW8fI9bFybJCPS2kISQ1m6hRinY1X8wDU7FxgZbA6YeST dNftvcTu0aBtzeH+S1gmiByDcOY+dn9iRcmcH/ZzPw1f+PBWIaT2WpiHgQhem50QuRdQ z3TshhsoiainWblREgVwBnixzWm4q1sSpQYDQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CRhUR5DCk0bSfYEo88AX2XIqcuJoVI/kjNBON5laZmfQdCz3PPexzXqPcIB4YJXypa MeY/Vjp4SuPfjD4LhlBjxvBytIfLOkzYWClMpThWU5h4eTqClDnR/7WT0n+LPSL4Lsw6 BPhybnwnYJTCzKZTopDB8htoq0o1pl7psznUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.200.9 with SMTP id x9mr8457030anf.76.1264442578767; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:02:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:02:58 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Alexander Motin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:36:41 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, Artem Belevich Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:03:00 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: > Artem Belevich wrote: >> aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068 >> controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks. >> I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that >> does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't >> have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with 8-disk raidz2 was >> noticeably lower than that of LSI1068 in the same configuration. Both >> LSI1068 and MV2 were on the same PCI-X bus. It could be a driver >> limitation. The driver for Marvel SATA controllers in NetBSD seems a >> bit more advanced compared to what's in FreeBSD. > > I also wouldn't recommend to use Marvell 88SXx0xx controllers now. While > potentially they are interesting, lack of documentation and numerous > hardware bugs make existing FreeBSD driver very limited there. > >> I wish intel would make cheap multi-port PCIe SATA card based on their >> AHCI controllers. > > Indeed. Intel on-board AHCI SATA controllers are fastest from all I have > tested. Unluckily, they are not producing discrete versions. :( > > Now, if discrete solution is really needed, I would still recommend > SiI3124, but with proper PCI-X 64bit/133MHz bus or built-in PCIe x8 > bridge. They are fast and have good new siis driver. > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Pete French >> wrote: >>>> I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cards....that way you >>>> get a lot more bandwidth.. >>> I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with >>> a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100 >>> meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is, however on PCI-X, not >>> PCI. It's a shame PCI-X appears to have gone the way of the dinosaur :-( > > -- > Alexander Motin Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 18:32:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93530106568D; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24748FC1C; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so305433fga.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:32:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x52Et8PK7t/Kk68XZ2LAGn4xrdE0aigYg/9K5/J6bTY=; b=QCzegvUd6v1jeoLJErwP7BrHyd/3FD3AxHaR/ptUe5za64cJZCnqsJjBIaZtW82beX 8VymcaNCSpoXZVIBweUkERirdkgD7dYQuceyZLTT2bq7M9lbOqdJJwarkrZIx+Gqxnhg 3CcinNPcFB1DKCkwXU57BSMTcHEiA+8bXSzTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HG7WH0gRwWw9v2f9nAeNpDlXNCmbWhJUjP4maw0fyy97CX9NTBdAJO7NvOpHqdHYUN 1rFH/HLIHYgX4qBgRKjK3J4taZlGwJyvfx9O3SYRD017mG/xPDnhyBTCauk06Ec4IrvT UVQ1WeV9fGbWGNobkbbRwv8PIVwZAMjWboxrI= Received: by 10.87.65.9 with SMTP id s9mr11295928fgk.48.1264444357606; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:32:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm2873540fxm.3.2010.01.25.10.32.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:32:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:32:33 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:36:51 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, Artem Belevich Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:32:39 -0000 Dan Naumov wrote: > Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you > think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS: > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H > http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y Unluckily I haven't yet touched Atom family close yet, so I can't say about it's performance. But higher desktop level (even bit old) ICH9R chipset there is IMHO a good option. It is MUCH better then ICH7, often used with previous Atoms. If I had nice small Mini-ITX case with 6 drive bays, I would definitely look for some board like that to build home storage. -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 18:39:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB5E10656EE; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989868FC1F; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so3074706yxe.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:39:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QCTb72G72iYvVessua3UeOR1nv/wXzNbeFrePJ64fAM=; b=j5ZN1Xhf1AGy965Hcf1bq4lg8Cui34jMifLHy3BzxYGT5HnXA5vKOzuLsy7XGP7KWX NkFDH1GBU+PqJNvXms1E/YjkFGskS3BCnQqf1E2wAjcdBdRur3cdSReZ9GHZJWlL8A2u t3F4qp/Whbofiqqf91BT+qFtmMRo57SQEWscM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TeP6Pq0aiLvuPulbRUWW0eRnyII7jmtG66WAcj2IWxCsgXlgHNlfKh+uQMeLRvtfhP cawR3OGk48NAe+q0cDWksQSJ6U1/WkZMzP5Ko9LyNVuwhw4wePqsyN9iXYX4kaQCba0D qZX3VwMfc9/WrYNT2Rl6BDpphjU79qsyJ3CHM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.220.13 with SMTP id s13mr5484672ang.101.1264444741488; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:39:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:39:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Alexander Motin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:44:05 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, Artem Belevich Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:39:05 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: > Dan Naumov wrote: >> Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you >> think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS: >> >> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H >> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y > > Unluckily I haven't yet touched Atom family close yet, so I can't say > about it's performance. But higher desktop level (even bit old) ICH9R > chipset there is IMHO a good option. It is MUCH better then ICH7, often > used with previous Atoms. If I had nice small Mini-ITX case with 6 drive > bays, I would definitely look for some board like that to build home > storage. > > -- > Alexander Motin CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are reliability, stability, low power use, quietness and fast disk read/write speeds. I've been hearing some praise of ICH9R and 6 native SATA ports should be enough for my needs. AFAIK, the Intel 82574L network cards included on those are also very well supported? - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 19:47:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B04106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A118FC1D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZvhR1d0011GXsucA1vn10y; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:47:01 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zvmz1d0051f6R9u8TvmzP1; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:47:00 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:46:57 -0800 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:46:57 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125194657.GG12145@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:47:01 -0000 On Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 03:14:42 PST Dan Naumov wrote: >Not to steal your discussion thread, but I thought I'd ask (and you'd >perhaps too be interested) what's the status of FreeBSD on these 2: > >Supermicro X7SPA-H: >http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H >Supermicro X7SPA-HF: >http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y > >Supermicro recently came out with quite a bunch of Atom-based >solutions and these 2 boards stuck out as havign 6 x SATA ports, which >make them tempting for a NAS solution. Interesting. But I don't have any need for the extra SATA ports. Are there any other significant differences between the ICH9 chipset and the NM10 used on the D510MO? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 20:19:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B434A106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EF08FC15 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0PKJC26069328 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:19:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2E0F8BA9E; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:19:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:19:08 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125201908.GA49361@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20100125194657.GG12145@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100125194657.GG12145@comcast.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:19:14 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:46:57AM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 03:14:42 PST Dan Naumov wrote: > >Not to steal your discussion thread, but I thought I'd ask (and you'd > >perhaps too be interested) what's the status of FreeBSD on these 2: > > > >Supermicro X7SPA-H: > >http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ= =3DH > >Supermicro X7SPA-HF: > >http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ= =3DH&IPMI=3DY > > > >Supermicro recently came out with quite a bunch of Atom-based > >solutions and these 2 boards stuck out as havign 6 x SATA ports, which > >make them tempting for a NAS solution. >=20 > Interesting. But I don't have any need for the extra SATA ports. Are > there any other significant differences between the ICH9 chipset and the > NM10 used on the D510MO? Well, ICH9 definitely works with FreeBSD in my laptop. :-) Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktd/LwACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUyxwCfcFFHUbtO28YV9R6nXDya0qxo uwYAn2KU1REbTC86XZ58bVoKMo13lLUq =24LC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 20:34:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F741065694; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from honeysuckle.london.02.net (honeysuckle.london.02.net [87.194.255.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFE78FC1F; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by honeysuckle.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A23EDE6072988D7; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:38 +0000 Message-ID: <4B5E005E.9030500@onetel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:38 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Motin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:41 -0000 Dan Naumov wrote: > > CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is > an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and > from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a > tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are > reliability, stability, low power use, quietness and fast disk > read/write speeds. I've been hearing some praise of ICH9R and 6 native > SATA ports should be enough for my needs. AFAIK, the Intel 82574L > network cards included on those are also very well supported? > These might be interesting then www.fit-pc.com The Intel US15W SCH chipset or System Controller Hub as it's called is mentioned in hardware notes for 8.0R and 7.2R but only for snd_hda, I don't know if this means other functions are supported or not. This thread says it is supported http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-i386/2010/01/03/msg001695.html Chris ps I removed some of the recipients from the recipients list as my original post was held for moderation because of "Too many recipients to the message" > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 20:42:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3B51065670 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD4078FC1F for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10005 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2010 20:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 20:42:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=BfUl5vkycbojJH5b7lmOoeR0EbT7SXXG9ZJZmrWKlhRTs2kEQlVnh2eQvFK65XLsPzknvDwB4TzNbgvdVSrJXz8WBfxBdCawbB1Vvszhk5M5wG/zcaIJ105iSes4IR+E; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZVlU-0003l3-EA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:42:30 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:34:19 -0700 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:34:19 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125203419.GB5509@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100123061958.73f3bc31@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100125071606.GA1628@guilt.hydra> <20100125065817.3f555bb3@scorpio.seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100125065817.3f555bb3@scorpio.seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Problem with GnuPG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:42:32 -0000 --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:58:17AM -0500, Jerry wrote: >=20 > OK, I posted this on the 'GnuPG' list earlier; however, since you > requested further info, here it is. Thanks. >=20 > This is the file that apparently GPA is loading that has those pesky > 'certs': >=20 > /usr/local/share/gnupg >=20 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 27K Jan 20 22:43 com-certs.pem >=20 > I renamed the file, deleted those "~/.gnupg/*.kbx" files and restarted > GPA and the problem went away. >=20 > Apparently, GnuPG does have support for X.509 certificates. I have been > reading through the documentation -- info gnupg -- to discover its full > potential and usage. In any case, it apparently is configurable. I am > not sure what that is, or if I inadvertently turned it on. I am still > working on that phase of debugging. Interesting. I've been using GnuPG all this time, and I had no idea GnuPG itself supported X.509 certs. In retrospect, I guess it makes sense to support X.509 certificates for an OpenPGP application, since some CAs are starting to use OpenPGP for authentication. >=20 > I have GnuPG working with 'claws-mail' now though. For whatever reason, > the plug-in that claws-mail uses for GnuPG was unloaded. I don't know > why; I certainly never did it. In any case, after reloading it, > claws-mail works again with GnuPG. I wouldn't doubt that there is some > sort of gnomish bug lurking around, though I doubt that I will ever > discover its existence. Is it possible you uninstalled GnuPG and GPA while trying to get rid of those certs you saw in GPA, then reinstalled, and didn't realize the plugin for your MUA went away with the uninstall? I'm just guessing. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkteAEsACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXNrQCfRgTkGRW1n87UsOThDwTTi0JO u4IAoO4XxNsb5MEMjgonQvoZh5m74MVS =ICxF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 21:47:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC13106566C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2988FC1D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id o0PLlbV4018991; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:47:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id o0PLlbdM018990; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:47:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:47:37 -0500 From: Thomas Dickey To: Martin McCormick Message-ID: <20100125214737.GA15815@saltmine.radix.net> References: <201001251525.o0PFPL0t074757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001251525.o0PFPL0t074757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysinstall and the Right Terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:47:40 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:25:21AM -0600, Martin McCormick wrote: > Thomas Dickey writes: > > "Terminal" would probably be one of the programs using VTE, > > which differs from "linux". >=20 > This is all very interesting. Thanks to all. What I > normally do is start a command-line shell on a Debian Linux box. > This defaults to a "linux" console. When I ssh somewhere, ssh > passes the exported $TERM value to the remote host so as I > understand it, it will use this value in the environment that it > exports to any application called from that shell. The question > is whether or not all the escape codes it sends to address the > terminal and all the escape sequences it looks for to represent > arrow keys, etc, will still work.=20 It should - the remote machine "should" have the same terminal description. Your local machine however may have initialized the Linux console to expect UTF-8 encoding, and the remote machine may not know about that. Line- drawing wouldn't work properly in that case, but cursor-movement and keys should. =20 > The best results, so far, are with using cons25 as the > TERM value. The Up and Down arrows work right as opposed to going > right straight to X Exit this menu. My first impression was that it could be a disagreement between the two machine whether cursor-application mode is set. That changes the escape sequence sent by the cursor-keys. However, ncurses' descriptions for both say they're using normal (non-application) mode. So that doesn't seem to explain it. It's also possible that the screensize isn't being transmitted (and "stty -a" would show if it's really 25 lines or not). >=20 > I appreciate all the input because in this game, > knowledge is the power to fix it. >=20 > Martin McCormick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFLXhFOtIqByHxlDocRAhOwAKCi/E87pLeH76w+YJGIuNjwOpKktACfXk1y iOwntUQ1jksPJwshF3d5Guw= =LdKX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 20:34:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49458106568F; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CD48FC1E; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1227178fxm.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oVRY+Su/J/ScL502cZEdc1r1uSa5EvtN93PVQdchD0o=; b=FGTtx1cDTPAeJRDstvzHKdeOkCM3ekxgGXpwWF1xQ80SMxL+gTIHci1KDgM6u25t2q qT4cox8B7nu4N8cbLlBeipX2pcBXUowktMbZ558RjMbf7nv3nTMtvSp7/uAnphN/q0fp mUx/PZhy7GmvVX0jdKdDu6Lke8iPTCv8rHGro= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=coVQ4Fk86R9Sl0f9yQf5PXg4DpDXRGJlYVgRINB64IgoxeUsMVwL7uq1U0E/kf8CZZ 2oNhyJz4gRyLaRW+EglzVEPDVspd9WwvIUKx1C8Do75VWIbV4LHnqiiHpnfIlYzn7imF 9NvFniMqUnWaV2L9QWUaGT6ItQWZ89TT3g3Ts= Received: by 10.223.3.135 with SMTP id 7mr7452629fan.21.1264451696497; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm2944360fxm.11.2010.01.25.12.34.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4B5E006D.1000302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:34:53 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Whitehouse References: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> <4B5DFE78.3010805@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <4B5DFE78.3010805@onetel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:53:04 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French , Dan Naumov , Artem Belevich , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:58 -0000 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > Dan Naumov wrote: >> >> CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is >> an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and >> from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a >> tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are >> reliability, stability, low power use, quietness and fast disk >> read/write speeds. I've been hearing some praise of ICH9R and 6 native >> SATA ports should be enough for my needs. AFAIK, the Intel 82574L >> network cards included on those are also very well supported? > > These might be interesting then > www.fit-pc.com > The Intel US15W SCH chipset or System Controller Hub as it's called is > mentioned in hardware notes for 8.0R and 7.2R but only for snd_hda, I > don't know if this means other functions are supported or not. This > thread says it is supported > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-i386/2010/01/03/msg001695.html Intel US15W (SCH) chipset heavily stripped and tuned for netbooks. It has no SATA, only one PATA channel. It is mostly supported by FreeBSD, but with exception of video, which makes it close to useless. it has only one benefit - low power consumption. -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 20:57:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211B1106566B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from april.london.02.net (april.london.02.net [87.194.255.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6DF8FC12; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by april.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A23ECF807794BCD; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:57:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4B5E05B0.1050807@onetel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:57:20 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Motin References: <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> <4B5DFE78.3010805@onetel.com> <4B5E006D.1000302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4B5E006D.1000302@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:53:14 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French , Dan Naumov , Artem Belevich , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:57:22 -0000 Alexander Motin wrote: > Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> Dan Naumov wrote: >>> CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is >>> an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and >>> from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a >>> tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are >>> reliability, stability, low power use, quietness and fast disk >>> read/write speeds. I've been hearing some praise of ICH9R and 6 native >>> SATA ports should be enough for my needs. AFAIK, the Intel 82574L >>> network cards included on those are also very well supported? >> These might be interesting then >> www.fit-pc.com >> The Intel US15W SCH chipset or System Controller Hub as it's called is >> mentioned in hardware notes for 8.0R and 7.2R but only for snd_hda, I >> don't know if this means other functions are supported or not. This >> thread says it is supported >> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-i386/2010/01/03/msg001695.html > > Intel US15W (SCH) chipset heavily stripped and tuned for netbooks. It > has no SATA, only one PATA channel. It is mostly supported by FreeBSD, > but with exception of video, which makes it close to useless. it has > only one benefit - low power consumption. > The intel spec sheet does say single PATA but according to the fit-pc website it has SATA and miniSD. Still as you say without video support it's not much use, which is useful to know as I had been looking at these. Ok I will go away now :O Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 21:57:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41C21065694 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D96A8FC3A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZWvZ-0006od-8o; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:01 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NZWvY-0004g4-9P; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:56:56 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PLuuor079957; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:56:56 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0PLusuc079956; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:56:54 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:56:54 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Kevin Kinsey Message-ID: <20100125215654.GB79921@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4B5DC917.3080605@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5DC917.3080605@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't load smbfs kernel module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:03 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:38:47AM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64 > > > > I've built a kernel with smbfs module: > > > > # ls -al /boot/kernel/smb* > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols > > > > but can't load it: > > > > # kldload smbfs > > kldload: can't load smbfs: No such file or directory > > > > > > Other modules load fine with kldload, e.g.: > > Does it make any difference to use the ".ko" extension, to > call it by absolute path, or to use "-v" for more information, > per The Friendly Manual? no, doesn't make any difference: # kldload -v /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko kldload: can't load /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko: No such file or directory # but I see in /var/log/messages: kernel: KLD smbfs.ko: depends on libiconv - not available or version mismatch I've rebuilt world, rebuilt and reinstalled kernel, installed world, and merged, etc., including rm -rf /usr/obj/* , so there shouldn't be any version mismatch. Is there a way to debug this further? > Also, for curiosity, `file /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko`? seems to be the same as other modules: # file /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, IA-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, not stripped # file /boot/kernel/geom_mirror.ko /boot/kernel/geom_mirror.ko: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, IA-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, not stripped # many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 21:57:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915D510656A3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5281F8FC2F for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so3125257ywh.7 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:57:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=4+qaRsTUwzaL4E+5hRPNtp7OzbsvyYzTrHL4rbkDy0s=; b=KUmcJCXzKTwYBmG+U0d14vIVrfT44zzWAuRvjlmO8e2wEB1jd7HDKuIwp/4Wccq0JV wCDPagHEXo0UKNxeicGtf77301/v36y63vqRVF4NOAEx4nW3W4YssQR06lLElrbZCRWz Bw/GbmYk/2dwXflfAth/4cniWH6FcZiUumc84= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Z09C9u7dtIcgTmT9THmhg7PXqg8YhozMTxJOSc8u+YBiSDXhXaq1byoSKfrCoqvrig JA63rd9GjR+r4TgaMxpYTCkRFjL4juWjXX8Z/qkYh7zYKcUI3fjDsTxopABOQmd790sr ivG/nHWEsy9as2by8fMgUXVQpTYp8JIpWvwzU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.153.1 with SMTP id f1mr6273416ago.21.1264455107002; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:31:47 -0800 (PST) From: Ross Penner Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:31:26 -0800 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:57:37 -0000 I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot). Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to load. output: FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root@, Mon Jan 25 13:03:11 UTC 2010) \ can't load 'kernel' Type '?' for a list of command, 'help' for more detailed help. OK I used the memstick 8.0-Release. Can anybody suggest what could have gone wrong, or how I could find out what could have gone wrong? Thank you for any help From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 22:13:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151CE106566B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6388FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0PMDtH01794 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:13:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:13:55 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100125161355.A1778@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: options IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT or loader.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:13:57 -0000 I guess I can either pre-buuild a kernel with options IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT, or I can load them via loader.conf. Why would I not always do the latter? Is there any advantage to pre-linking them? Thanks! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 22:52:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898F6106568D for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006148FC13 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PMq3qe014973 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:52:03 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PMq3El031631 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:52:03 +0200 Received: from pluto.universe (62.1.218.120.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [62.1.218.120]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PMq1Tx018804 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:52:02 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:52:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.3.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001260052.00776.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:52:06 -0000 On Monday 25 of January 2010 23:31:26 Ross Penner wrote: > I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I > followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot). > Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to > load. > > output: > > FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 > (root@, Mon Jan 25 13:03:11 UTC 2010) > \ > can't load 'kernel' > > Type '?' for a list of command, 'help' for more detailed help. > OK > > > I used the memstick 8.0-Release. Can anybody suggest what could have > gone wrong, or how I could find out what could have gone wrong? > > Thank you for any help > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > It seems that the system cannot mount the ZFS partition properly and see the /boot/kernel. Can you boot using fixit console, kldload the opensolaris and zfs modules and see if you have everything configured properly (like loader.conf, etc., set the mountpoint of the zfs partition to legacy and zpool set bootfs=zroot zroot)? Remember that the zfs pool is there, so zpool list first and if you can see the pool, import it. Actually I'm not a zfs geek, but these are the first steps I would follow to "debug" the problem. I've used the same guide to make my system a zfs-only system and everything went fine. I didn't install a new FreeBSD system but I dump-restored my existing one... Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 22:55:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822E4106568F for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from srussell@solutionmanagers.com) Received: from solutionmanagers.com (mail.solutionmanagers.com [173.15.142.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBA58FC0A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:50:56 -0500 Message-ID: <7B95EEC70BBBD24DA9518252AE67EB01153D60@butters.SMI2.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SU Thread-Index: AcqZOFVRrICcOnwVSbqSepOzwDLH6A== From: "Shone Russell" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:18:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: SU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:55:20 -0000 I am not able to execute any commands when I utilize the su function, I am entering our correct password. It was working on Friday, but now it's not. Also can you tell me how to install the module for Bacula, or Amanda I keep getting an error message that module.info is missing. My phone number is 973-244-0555 ext 39 =20 Thanks FreeBSD WEB01 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 1 14:37:25 UTC 2009 root@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 23:16:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B85106566B; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F14D8FC16; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-156-224.lns6.adl6.internode.on.net [121.45.156.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0PNG4TQ084912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:46:05 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:45:57 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1284787.2vsuEm6DAF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001260946.01541.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.682 () AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:18:25 +0000 Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, Pete French , Alexander Motin , Dan Naumov , Artem Belevich , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:16:16 -0000 --nextPart1284787.2vsuEm6DAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: > CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is > an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and > from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a > tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are > reliability, stability, low power use, quietness and fast disk > read/write speeds. I've been hearing some praise of ICH9R and 6 > native SATA ports should be enough for my needs. AFAIK, the Intel > 82574L network cards included on those are also very well supported? You might want to consider an Athlon (maybe underclock it) - the AMD IXP=20 700/800 south bridge seems to work well with FreeBSD (in my=20 experience). These boards (eg Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H) have 6 SATA ports (one may be=20 eSATA though) and PATA, they seem ideal really.. You can use PATA with=20 CF to boot and connect 5 disks plus a DVD drive. The CPU is not fanless however, but the other stuff is, on the plus side=20 you won't have to worry about CPU power :) Also, the onboard video works well with radeonhd and is quite fast. One other downside is the onboard network isn't great (Realtek) but I=20 put an em card in mine. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1284787.2vsuEm6DAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBLXiYx5ZPcIHs/zowRAkB2AJ9XVkRqtWestP2Y3LC+ygn4pqqZUACcDzLz DvH9w9HtCsd2NJKnfFB1wHk= =p8ya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1284787.2vsuEm6DAF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 23:19:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D973010656AA for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FE58FC1C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579C8EB47C7; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:15 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4290F160CE8; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:15 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOexDo6NURml; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:15 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (athedsl-416701.home.otenet.gr [79.131.179.187]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F312B160CE7; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PNJEw9005614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0PNJDdt005611; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Masoom Shaikh References: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Masoom Shaikh's message of "Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +0000") Message-ID: <87y6jlwz66.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD sources from svn repos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:16 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +0000, Masoom Shaikh wrote: > Hi List, > > I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos > > 1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/ > 2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/ > 3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ > > (2) is easy, most probably it means stable > > how about (1) and (2) You got confused a bit. Here's a slightl better description of all three paths: http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ This is the same as the tag RELENG_8 in CVS. It is the 'stable branch' and is receiving commits that are in all the branches of the 8.X series. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/ This is the 'security branch' for release 8.0. The security-officer takes over this branch when our release engineer are done with the preparation of the 8.0-RELEASE. This is essentially the same as the RELENG_8_0 branch in CVS. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/ This is essentially a 'tag'. It is a copy of the stable/8 branch at the point where the 8.0-RELEASE was cut. This is the same as the RELENG_8_0_0_RELEASE tag in CVS. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 25 23:19:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5061065672 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAAA8FC1B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZYDk-0002KI-9D; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:51 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NZYDj-00059Z-9G; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:47 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PNJlMc001386; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0PNJkr1001385; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:46 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20100125231946.GA1363@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100125142430.GF1355@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4B5DC917.3080605@daleco.biz> <20100125215654.GB79921@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100125215654.GB79921@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 X-Spam-Level: -- Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't load smbfs kernel module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:19:53 -0000 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:54PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:38:47AM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64 > > > > > > I've built a kernel with smbfs module: > > > > > > # ls -al /boot/kernel/smb* > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols > > > > > > but can't load it: > > > > > > # kldload smbfs > > > kldload: can't load smbfs: No such file or directory > > > > > > > > > Other modules load fine with kldload, e.g.: > > > > Does it make any difference to use the ".ko" extension, to > > call it by absolute path, or to use "-v" for more information, > > per The Friendly Manual? > > no, doesn't make any difference: > > # kldload -v /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko > kldload: can't load /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko: No such file or directory > # > > but I see in /var/log/messages: > > kernel: KLD smbfs.ko: depends on libiconv - not available or version mismatch > > I've rebuilt world, rebuilt and reinstalled kernel, installed world, > and merged, etc., including rm -rf /usr/obj/* , so there shouldn't > be any version mismatch. > > Is there a way to debug this further? well.. maybe this is irrelevant, but I disovered that there is actually a module libiconv, despite the fact that there are already libiconv lib built with the base OS: > ls -al /usr/local/lib/libiconv.* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1113476 4 Aug 22:40 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 920 4 Aug 22:40 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13 4 Aug 22:40 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -> libiconv.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1102764 4 Aug 22:40 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 Anyway, I've built the libiconv module, and loaded it to the kernel, but still get the same error trying to load smbfs. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 01:04:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EB4106568B for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDB58FC22 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9370981; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:04:53 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9370979; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:04:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4B5E3191.6070400@radel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:04:33 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shone Russell References: <7B95EEC70BBBD24DA9518252AE67EB01153D60@butters.SMI2.local> In-Reply-To: <7B95EEC70BBBD24DA9518252AE67EB01153D60@butters.SMI2.local> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080807060508020701020607" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:04:54 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080807060508020701020607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Shone Russell wrote: > I am not able to execute any commands when I utilize the su function, I > am entering our correct password. It was working on Friday, but now it's > not. Please let us know exactly what you're entering (without the password, of course) and what the results are. Do you get an error message? Does it hang? What? -- --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms080807060508020701020607 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJMTCC AvMwggJcoAMCAQICEB1eDeVYxhAO39zOEnHiAbwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDIyNTA0MTMyNloX DTEwMDIyNTA0MTMyNlowXjEOMAwGA1UEBBMFUmFkZWwxEzARBgNVBCoTCkpvbiBUaG9tYXMx GTAXBgNVBAMTEEpvbiBUaG9tYXMgUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5j b20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDeT7qtj+euqWr2wXM7OnwrXJe9 Jlc0CGaM69AcTWOFakRY7MUXrqcmF5WjrqrMoagfGjS362eb6787x313ZdLoGuQPh/o2Mqp4 BbSgcnGZRj82SxkUmSN6+2q5ZOOYA6JmfvJwmBuRQ8sHki4GnoSwbIc11a70/z4at5qRi8bb /RtmJYewnpwXErfuuq0hhVSsYKFPXELzSahlpyC+lUfIdgvLJGxc7eU5QuvtYmuohNjn4k9C SJinvfjFbkvgbIgtvZxxmcE74NsKTeW2bEwgoCjZlcAD/QMgLE9KGSVn4/LzC/OZwkPKcWKO CPTNIZK1P+HxaIW4BvvYtjLu2Qx5AgMBAAGjKjAoMBgGA1UdEQQRMA+BDWpvbkByYWRlbC5j b20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBT+qFXV8sexrNOJuK8rhVpnCNF iFslD9Kelhon5Tt1tlTsw+B9F9B8ys9tfV559tzVqE+ULcqnjX2rsaJCwFmn6gyucCN0yGML h1O4ddsNQmoTOILyBCv/rkfO4tbXJM3si2JDNPZnL/0Rf3FpDTc3U3SnAdqE1a/8PGBTTmay VDCCAvMwggJcoAMCAQICEB1eDeVYxhAO39zOEnHiAbwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkG A1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNV BAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDIyNTA0MTMy NloXDTEwMDIyNTA0MTMyNlowXjEOMAwGA1UEBBMFUmFkZWwxEzARBgNVBCoTCkpvbiBUaG9t YXMxGTAXBgNVBAMTEEpvbiBUaG9tYXMgUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRl bC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDeT7qtj+euqWr2wXM7Onwr XJe9Jlc0CGaM69AcTWOFakRY7MUXrqcmF5WjrqrMoagfGjS362eb6787x313ZdLoGuQPh/o2 Mqp4BbSgcnGZRj82SxkUmSN6+2q5ZOOYA6JmfvJwmBuRQ8sHki4GnoSwbIc11a70/z4at5qR i8bb/RtmJYewnpwXErfuuq0hhVSsYKFPXELzSahlpyC+lUfIdgvLJGxc7eU5QuvtYmuohNjn 4k9CSJinvfjFbkvgbIgtvZxxmcE74NsKTeW2bEwgoCjZlcAD/QMgLE9KGSVn4/LzC/OZwkPK cWKOCPTNIZK1P+HxaIW4BvvYtjLu2Qx5AgMBAAGjKjAoMBgGA1UdEQQRMA+BDWpvbkByYWRl bC5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBT+qFXV8sexrNOJuK8rhVp nCNFiFslD9Kelhon5Tt1tlTsw+B9F9B8ys9tfV559tzVqE+ULcqnjX2rsaJCwFmn6gyucCN0 yGMLh1O4ddsNQmoTOILyBCv/rkfO4tbXJM3si2JDNPZnL/0Rf3FpDTc3U3SnAdqE1a/8PGBT TmayVDCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUw EwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNp b24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0xMzA3 MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me 7L3N9VvyGna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQq E88r1fOCdz0Dviv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEA AaOBlDCBkTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9j cmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9UaGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIB BjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEaMBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNmrGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNw PP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQlGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq72 6jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11fZU8xggNkMIIDYAIBATB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNU aGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQHV4N5VjGEA7f3M4SceIBvDAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBwzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0xMDAxMjYwMDA0MzNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQ8FfKH9IJO4HpjBddhMSxrPrtKCDBS BgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0D AgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCBhQYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMXgwdjBiMQswCQYD VQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEB1eDeVYxhAO39zOEnHi AbwwgYcGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMXigdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEB1eDeVYxhAO39zOEnHiAbwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAixKP Is3DyxvaqS0FOMtrtUjq9+nTkXZIX+TJFd1JZY3paLvhd11zpENVh/w5qlrlO37UEx80luX8 ocpJTZnW3iRbpz3UXtoIXue0f//HsgLl/Och+jnjgGSWmpS/NyEnBBxkCkCznbrEUwOQG84w yyQZvBNLg3gQoJglUv4URAUP0Mgolg7yV45r92CxLteMZfrGge/yU803hrSxFMMHfNAQIe2a vuG8kiSK3CNmwZOFZmWQW4ae3KQg/Vj9DktHBK4xReiQ6C8l+PmwKZoW3TNnFumeguHySM8z FGtES1daopt8gZLazZ3YjbodR4X+AWcY/DcdF4w1eZs+cs0OygAAAAAAAA== --------------ms080807060508020701020607-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 01:29:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C091065676 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDED8FC1D for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so253735fxm.14 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:29:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kWHQdRVcZy9QEiC0ETv/9ONMkV0mqkUUfGuprkcwKvs=; b=Sab2CyXHg4RHD2s2w9Ead9Wy61SpiM+uulo4gfEYgYhZdITUwC/ydFH6HtSuZ1AM9o TeQPjjI99e1Spc0LfiDyJVvE5RCFUQ7l9BakkKhjY8+M4Xx8hd7pJUYkKdXQrfYoUNKu NJR2tJE0oXQ7uCnVGedHzySHXo5TKDjUPuSFA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KbhhCIliWUvBbWOsZBokRxarHKUdYHXBAskJ0mMFX7tT8xXhNZv35YaWQglKVgy3+r vMGHN5aFamykoAYffQ43fMKH2NHuBNDYeV45wApvwGHugDqKZ2PjKNaDjEt2kLm67uO/ icSZTt6cKCMiI10LuICSxdbJEE4JaeObF8Tw4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.77.155 with SMTP id g27mr6672837fak.2.1264469347769; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:29:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:29:07 +0000 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: Ross Penner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:29:09 -0000 I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under /zroot/boot/zfs. On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ross Penner wrote: > I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I > followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot). > Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to > load. > > output: > > FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 > (root@, Mon Jan 25 13:03:11 UTC 2010) > \ > can't load 'kernel' > > Type '?' for a list of command, 'help' for more detailed help. > OK > > > I used the memstick 8.0-Release. Can anybody suggest what could have > gone wrong, or how I could find out what could have gone wrong? > > Thank you for any help > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 01:34:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72B51065679; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:34:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B8C8FC1A; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-149-142-141.bna.bellsouth.net [70.149.142.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0Q1Y9dk091619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:34:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <4B5D6833.6050200@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20100122041237.GA22312@gothschlampen.com> <20100124092947.B72039@starfire.mn.org> <201001242057.o0OKvHUE089237@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1264387282.2869.24.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <4B5D6207.9090105@icyb.net.ua> <4B5D6833.6050200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:34:04 -0600 Message-Id: <1264469644.2869.49.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Andriy Gapon , Mark Andrews , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loader, MBR and the boot process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:34:13 -0000 On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:45 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following: > >> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > >>> offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of > >>> the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the correct > >>> offset to use (the end of the previous partition plus one, ignor- > >>> ing partition `c'. For partition `c', * will be interpreted as > >>> an offset of 0. The first partition should start at offset 16, > >>> because the first 16 sectors are reserved for metadata. > >> Ok, now this has my attention... My gut feeling right now is that this > >> is a bug in geom_part_bsd. I don't understand why the label isn't > >> protected. (Adding -b 16 when adding the swap partition fixes this) > >> Another project to goes on my list... > >> > >> If anyone knows why this is done like this... please share. > > > > I presume that this is for purely historic reasons. > > > > I believe this has been known about since 5.x days: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72812 > > As far as I recall, sometime around 6.1-RELEASE this should have been > fixed. It certainly seems to be the case that it is harmless to have > a plain swap partition start at offset 0, but anything else, like encrypted > swap or putting a filesystem there needs the 16 sector offset. When the first partition (whatever it is), starts at offset 0, if you dd into that partition you wipe out the label entirely, which just doesn't make sense to me. Trying to manage this in the file system code and the swap pager or whatever other consumer might make use of the partition seems like madness to me. robert. > Cheers, > > Matthew > -- Robert Noland FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 02:56:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207AA1065672 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from n-butcher=freebsd-questions=freebsd.org=xnhrueqv@fusiongol.com) Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com (smtp11.dentaku.gol.com [203.216.5.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15008FC14 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pat.gol.ad.jp ([203.216.1.191] helo=[172.16.1.151]) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpsa (Dentaku) id 1NZbbT-000811-DK; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:56:31 +0900 Message-ID: <4B5E59DE.8050901@fusiongol.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:56:30 +0900 From: Nathan Butcher User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <20100124223626.37E5210656BD@hub.freebsd.org> <4B5D0639.4040503@fusiongol.com> <6201873e1001250729s36073a22t1c6f95bd2af7c2d4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6201873e1001250729s36073a22t1c6f95bd2af7c2d4@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raw sockets in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:56:33 -0000 Thanks for the link. That clears a few things up, but not quite what I'm trying to achieve.I set the following in rc.conf for a jail called "test" jail_test_flags="allow.raw_sockets" then I start the test jail with # /etc/rc.d/jail start test ... and then I get the following cryptic response... Configuring jails:. Starting jails: cannot start jail "test": But it doesn't look like one. . ... and the jail doesn't start. What's the story there? On 1/26/2010 12:29 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > 2010/1/24 Nathan Butcher > >> I'm just curious as to whether FreeBSD8.0 can support raw sockets on >> some jails and not on others. >> >> I'm trying to find the jail flags to allow this to happen. Not having >> much luck. >> Any ideas? >> >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00978.html > > -- $B%U%e!<%8%g%s!&%3%_%e%K%1!<%7%g%s%:3t<02q Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F271106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1612D8FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so2996013pxi.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sicSveuOpBFZZKBuAl3Nmzio0DJ3SUdrPXs8TEFytcE=; b=tnlKnvDCTTF6IfyPS/LGWtw/H3Np03zjMTfktJ/ij67mCtgKAPfKz2K5iLS/uMEwWz zgE1HhNTVYMz64Hk1EzsCd1jNTak0yM+TQf6GBLPng2D4yfqaFpl4HqMZv5xF6gjHple XPwjM8wyraemq9v04rDQZO5XX16f3+izouD9M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=R8uE7f4P1WPIdKP+XmKUKAs957bZMQTE6eULmQ2Nrcfz8jsgDyVGhXbZQ1jP4eFyK3 kUCqN3okqtRILkAuHjp0N6yVYkMYL5g5+Op6FsrdvqfTuFjJBD9POetChf6uE+V3EEWH hdT4S485LaWuMwe6uwHYMpQhZuAGCmhBBd7do= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.101.40 with SMTP id d40mr3884009wam.95.1264485991112; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5E59DE.8050901@fusiongol.com> References: <20100124223626.37E5210656BD@hub.freebsd.org> <4B5D0639.4040503@fusiongol.com> <6201873e1001250729s36073a22t1c6f95bd2af7c2d4@mail.gmail.com> <4B5E59DE.8050901@fusiongol.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:06:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: Nathan Butcher Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raw sockets in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:06:32 -0000 On 1/25/10, Nathan Butcher wrote: > Thanks for the link. That clears a few things up, but not quite what I'm > trying to achieve.I set the following in rc.conf for a jail called "test" > > jail_test_flags="allow.raw_sockets" > > then I start the test jail with > > # /etc/rc.d/jail start test > > ... and then I get the following cryptic response... > > Configuring jails:. > Starting jails: cannot start jail "test": > But it doesn't look like one. > . > > ... and the jail doesn't start. > What's the story there? allowing raw sockets to a jail is a sysctl sysctl -a | grep "jail." the raw sockets tunable should easily be found. make the change permanent by editing/adding it to /etc/sysctl.conf --TJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 08:49:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B3A1065676 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE60F8FC0C for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-06.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0Q8nOs8013067 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:49:24 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.30]) by mx-av-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0Q8nOeN009366 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:49:24 +0200 Received: from pluto.universe (62.1.128.155.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [62.1.128.155]) by MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0Q8nNKm010123 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:49:23 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:49:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.3.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001261049.22832.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:49:26 -0000 On Tuesday 26 of January 2010 03:29:07 George Liaskos wrote: > I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under > /zroot/boot/zfs. > Yes, that is also mandatory. I forgot to mention... Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 08:52:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934241065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f197.google.com (mail-yw0-f197.google.com [209.85.211.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501EB8FC17 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh35 with SMTP id 35so3459476ywh.7 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:52:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=C6euZXH1DlwonOZnTD2ZnLzlkfyxT0qdeG9nXuQU1jQ=; b=T6PeMVqyTn3ciLdsjA/eFROiXBxPWWnoGhPUDXkLPsIBxX78z/56TjlLM8+Q6xUfzh egK3tfMCAUw7moCGVAY9+CjPvCuoUNk7MAGEV/AcMa8fsEcb9FQOgfi6Gy2Xw7wk4/Px oKM2rfdbu15ie/Mgj+kh7XrjPZaxHnLoeBitA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=sStG/Jv7GdhFM65ClAa7XrZS0GehSPDpHl00nkKvyXiBkKNhDlp3ZavdpNdpRsNPn2 von4SqxuIQOB2GlfrOiutReYAa8x0suEakejETKS+RkYhO4ayHnGl7aElWs9GrdSnGQ5 BY7vW9Oo+cACD8cbNSB7nQhs7uy86ku0jUFUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.193.19 with SMTP id v19mr6795253agp.4.1264495923168; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:52:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ross Penner Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:51:43 -0800 Message-ID: To: George Liaskos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:52:04 -0000 That seems to have been the problem. Thanks for the help. On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM, George Liaskos wrote: > I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under > /zroot/boot/zfs. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ross Penner wrote: >> I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I >> followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot). >> Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to >> load. >> >> output: >> >> FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 >> (root@, Mon Jan 25 13:03:11 UTC 2010) >> \ >> can't load 'kernel' >> >> Type '?' for a list of command, 'help' for more detailed help. >> OK >> >> >> I used the memstick 8.0-Release. Can anybody suggest what could have >> gone wrong, or how I could find out what could have gone wrong? >> >> Thank you for any help >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 09:11:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0139A106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F10C8FC14 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3446166bwz.3 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:11:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=X0iXOwZNY+FMVW2Awi+PpVvLVVolxqJG0wpCAiXsKYc=; b=YflzGGZ3h1zyOlKbDAEOvymY2XIvwv+XT2din2u6gvK5xZ6hG0P1kHT4DkdwwCpMvo vUPI/kLldeFSt5u3/hKB8M5MsM0iqcOaVnM85oAyzAFTm9E7jOtW3CBxhoD2J6GoFVf2 wdXGBpY1/xQCgtVbWX6Zv76Zpt6wmNyjBQ7hA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=lkA0m3MF++Vlet2pzig35Nv7Noc4tewCBNCedvzcExVGh7Reae/WTOS/hAS3psMNey 6JflYcKLJV9CLdAEskgnaKKVIlmq5eW4HjnI8n949ef+oRlW0uHvQd7It1/FCBIltIER uOLS+DciQvShgvuJlsi3aCIi8a1g2dqBMKVq4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.213 with SMTP id p21mr1348353bkw.163.1264495345883; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:42:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5E3191.6070400@radel.com> References: <7B95EEC70BBBD24DA9518252AE67EB01153D60@butters.SMI2.local> <4B5E3191.6070400@radel.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:42:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jon Radel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Shone Russell , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:11:56 -0000 are you logged as su, and can't execute commands ? or does su fail ? if you're correctly identified, what does your env and/or set contains Samuel Mart=EDn Moro CamTrace {EPITECH.} tek4 "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Jon Radel wrote: > Shone Russell wrote: > >> I am not able to execute any commands when I utilize the su function, I >> am entering our correct password. It was working on Friday, but now it's >> not. >> > > Please let us know exactly what you're entering (without the password, of > course) and what the results are. Do you get an error message? Does it > hang? What? > > -- > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 12:03:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F410106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56048FC17 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1838185fxm.3 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:03:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KH6FJzM8dxUGufw+Ly5E4vp2lm5K2Ic6iIF/VvQbiYA=; b=LGN4hDJrVROK1xqZil69GRkyAgfuHxBF8Rty1AksDY1lXgf6422y88hJ8GJP/NSALn fOdFQR/AGEH1gc0nqX2Pruj6oPLbQacLsCk923gCFy3OzXqWi56f3hYI3Av/F0QdEUqf Cxk0ZpB38ITs4uOY+CC+5KJYWcBSxVttfhoBc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tJ6Rf84y7KiZtKJ0IC2k2VlODSFtPkh3mOqZmJ3sc8Z5dyn066qM0NBbiyEupGmytZ UYMok/BdOKvgZJzdM75vn5vCklrXREcWQAf4AWK7QUnYrTLJUnnAK2cjFQ7R+831mBs6 GJDEeNOzPQh6RKc4B3hbB+diQg7qMsAAqnqts= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.186.197 with SMTP id i5mr872269hbh.103.1264507418642; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:03:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:03:38 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Ross Penner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: George Liaskos , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:03:40 -0000 2010/1/26 Ross Penner > That seems to have been the problem. > > Thanks for the help. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM, George Liaskos > wrote: > > I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under > > /zroot/boot/zfs. > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ross Penner > wrote: > >> I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I > >> followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot). > >> Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to > >> load. > >> > >> output: > >> > >> FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 > >> (root@, Mon Jan 25 13:03:11 UTC 2010) > >> \ > >> can't load 'kernel' > >> > >> Type '?' for a list of command, 'help' for more detailed help. > >> OK > >> > >> > >> I used the memstick 8.0-Release. Can anybody suggest what could have > >> gone wrong, or how I could find out what could have gone wrong? > >> > >> Thank you for any help > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > once you have generated the zpool.cache never never never export the boot pool again. Exporting isnt the same as unmounting (a common misconception). If you do export it the pool will become unbootable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 12:34:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6D6106568D for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C93E68FC1E for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6930 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2010 12:35:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by ::ffff:208.70.104.210 with ESMTPA; 26 Jan 2010 12:35:51 -0000 Message-ID: <4B5EE153.9050402@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:34:27 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: krad References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: George Liaskos , Ross Penner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:34:36 -0000 krad wrote: > 2010/1/26 Ross Penner > >> That seems to have been the problem. >> >> Thanks for the help. >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM, George Liaskos >> wrote: >>> I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under >>> /zroot/boot/zfs. > once you have generated the zpool.cache never never never export the boot > pool again. Exporting isnt the same as unmounting (a common misconception). > If you do export it the pool will become unbootable. Out of curiosity (because I had this problem a few weeks back), how does one move a bootable pool into another physical server in order to be able to see the pool as a 'data' set without exporting/importing, and then moving the pool back to the hardware that it normally boots from? Perhaps I was lucky when copying the cache back onto itself worked... Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 14:24:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76191065672 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D778FC12 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1988607fxm.3 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:24:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CgR6T+w2KA432rAuprWyetoeWN8iM2JewCZLmjuG6Z4=; b=Q9+dZ4GgP7yxNXQB/gfuzeqry4Umyc3N3PVLcFFJ5xbzkPSiaGQYHRYl0D1tdfSukr EncVy2qrWg13eV7cBqj3Q/hjr1sPccKSZ6LDqBcXaEyob66Daa+qOIPCJBCoHV+ggVSq Ri+/IUP9V4Ddq/1IbXl4xntuucfGOQgQ15Y3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZbENnWDPerIQqqUL5zvuMg4Yny0xKro7jCpyX7UySjeQXSTsjJ2k9T15zTs7o71/5C RkRIZqHqGkVIbUQGyf9t1drZx5ScfM925PwmaWz7jDAbJ35tWtFIAx646IZu0K8At1iU b0a10Fa6lyyMA6okXkYvzZhriVbomTNfh8ncA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.186.1 with SMTP id e1mr866043hbh.169.1264515857413; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:24:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5EE153.9050402@ibctech.ca> References: <4B5EE153.9050402@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:24:17 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Steve Bertrand Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: George Liaskos , Ross Penner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:24:18 -0000 2010/1/26 Steve Bertrand > krad wrote: > > 2010/1/26 Ross Penner > > > >> That seems to have been the problem. > >> > >> Thanks for the help. > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM, George Liaskos > >> wrote: > >>> I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under > >>> /zroot/boot/zfs. > > > once you have generated the zpool.cache never never never export the boot > > pool again. Exporting isnt the same as unmounting (a common > misconception). > > If you do export it the pool will become unbootable. > > Out of curiosity (because I had this problem a few weeks back), how does > one move a bootable pool into another physical server in order to be > able to see the pool as a 'data' set without exporting/importing, and > then moving the pool back to the hardware that it normally boots from? > > Perhaps I was lucky when copying the cache back onto itself worked... > > Steve > with difficulty i suspect. You will probably have to specify an alternate root and zpool.cache file. Then copy the cache file onto the zpool before powering down, and NOT exporting. If you don't use an alternate zpool.cache file I suspect you will get issues as the test systems zpools will be referenced in there, and will cause a pickle when you bring the broken system up. Its probably best to use a non zfs based rescue system just to keep things simpler. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 14:25:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741A41065698 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0133A8FC1F for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3659417bwz.3 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:25:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=H8bNqIChOVFbTvdrCjIsSH1YhbjSlc1ncPfg9SdiYLI=; b=LyPC16o42NmJKIeQEwiQbx0oQsgdcykHb3DURw63lwCe/8bLiGDUGM2bkg5i6Ik5wl XiXIb7YksLmRoEMIIExpbbM/fk7w6pi+dMAmWo6yz0DiVQFHFb3zpM83l6s2vtaOP9dE vfALXnawrE54wGWomdHnbVntbp8eObYmj6ZAc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UnOCBR3OeDw+5Drgc0DwTHdyZnB49TIjbr8bnSnBXrUz1jr2UGDGX7BMV2fcCF5dQB J57VdKT6jGUiEN7BTnrvp129Bbtz5d+tZrWLFCLnCwERBwut17ToPZTfFEZqven7qXa0 9BrH/kjsoW62fKkE4sBexNBftUoBuFuFaVPEY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.193.140 with SMTP id j12mr876658hbi.70.1264515921293; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:25:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B5EE153.9050402@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:21 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Steve Bertrand Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: George Liaskos , Ross Penner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:23 -0000 2010/1/26 krad > > > 2010/1/26 Steve Bertrand > > krad wrote: >> > 2010/1/26 Ross Penner >> > >> >> That seems to have been the problem. >> >> >> >> Thanks for the help. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:29 PM, George Liaskos > > >> >> wrote: >> >>> I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under >> >>> /zroot/boot/zfs. >> >> > once you have generated the zpool.cache never never never export the >> boot >> > pool again. Exporting isnt the same as unmounting (a common >> misconception). >> > If you do export it the pool will become unbootable. >> >> Out of curiosity (because I had this problem a few weeks back), how does >> one move a bootable pool into another physical server in order to be >> able to see the pool as a 'data' set without exporting/importing, and >> then moving the pool back to the hardware that it normally boots from? >> >> Perhaps I was lucky when copying the cache back onto itself worked... >> >> Steve >> > > with difficulty i suspect. You will probably have to specify an alternate > root and zpool.cache file. Then copy the cache file onto the zpool before > powering down, and NOT exporting. > > If you don't use an alternate zpool.cache file I suspect you will get > issues as the test systems zpools will be referenced in there, and will > cause a pickle when you bring the broken system up. > > Its probably best to use a non zfs based rescue system just to keep things > simpler. > > > > > Not sure if there will be any issues with hostid being different. I presume the pool is imported with a -f option on boot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 15:39:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341C61065694 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0E98FC18 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 15EC61DE347; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:39:08 -0800 (PST) To: Ross Penner References: From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.1.0; tzolkin = 10 Ahau; haab = 18 Muan Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:39:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Ross Penner's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:51:43 -0800") Message-ID: <867hr46fl0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: George Liaskos , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:39:09 -0000 >>>>> "Ross" == Ross Penner writes: Ross> That seems to have been the problem. Yes, what I learned the hard way is that every single step there needs to be precisely followed, without deviation, even if you don't understand it or think it's important. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 15:42:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B851065676 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646738FC22 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F29421DE35D; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:41:59 -0800 (PST) To: krad References: <4B5EE153.9050402@ibctech.ca> From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.1.0; tzolkin = 10 Ahau; haab = 18 Muan Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:41:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: (kraduk@googlemail.com's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:21 +0000") Message-ID: <863a1s6fg8.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, George Liaskos , Steve Bertrand , Ross Penner Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:42:00 -0000 >>>>> "krad" == krad writes: krad> Not sure if there will be any issues with hostid being different. I krad> presume the pool is imported with a -f option on boot No. The bootloader will not work with drives that were not imported at time of shutdown. One of the things I learned the hard way. I kept "exporting" after installation, out of my OCD to "cleanly unmount" everything before shutting down, and then cursed at my machine for not seeing the disk on boot. After four times of installing from scratch, I finally followed the instructions precisely (*without* the export), and it worked just fine. So, no, the bootloader will not import and especially not import -f. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 15:46:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A85106568F for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F369B8FC14 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so45280gve.39 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:46:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yMj01ipYJnBPoWPIaKGHvIJqRvKBtoQJ5J656hMypGA=; b=AiZnVgdMZKlcV8wDyo6VbRx+kwzaZrhJO2vdLccw8VGGoMABI84MOujotTS3ZTXTUX esrCGVIhLngkCHkQKElS7bOLP3BssXSqxtBalFeGm7aLeRLU6WVmBSx29CwH4Q4xTEKv 5fEmsprU2LIHLGEs/UdPbSxJUMnIgCcaA41V4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kxFFtk9D6FpO/m5B9jOtbtTs4PDRxoaDyQ2vVmE3BK55TNspBMEE+D+NtcYM+ekmBa stqfHKu7dCoStn0IqDkbz5VO3QxYRw3WcmDVN0k8nuVHBGSV3mXWz2OyLkh0zzCLsDtF /tHtADgV2ry4dV3gWpcXvOXTCNyl2fdgMgKj0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.193.140 with SMTP id j12mr887337hbi.70.1264520781642; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:46:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <863a1s6fg8.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <4B5EE153.9050402@ibctech.ca> <863a1s6fg8.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:21 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, George Liaskos , Steve Bertrand , Ross Penner Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:23 -0000 2010/1/26 Randal L. Schwartz > >>>>> "krad" == krad writes: > > krad> Not sure if there will be any issues with hostid being different. I > krad> presume the pool is imported with a -f option on boot > > No. The bootloader will not work with drives that were not imported at > time > of shutdown. One of the things I learned the hard way. > > I kept "exporting" after installation, out of my OCD to "cleanly unmount" > everything before shutting down, and then cursed at my machine for not > seeing the disk on boot. After four times of installing from scratch, > I finally followed the instructions precisely (*without* the export), > and it worked just fine. > > So, no, the bootloader will not import and especially not import -f. > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside > discussion > thats not what i meant. The pool could be in an imported state. However the pool knows who imported it, or rather the hostid of the machine. If you import it on another machine and dont export it then try to import it on another machine you have to use the -f flag. Not sure if this hostid mismatch would cause an issue on boot as i haven't tested it. You are right about exporting it does totally bugger all, hence my 1st post on this thread From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 01:20:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB58C106568F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf02.insightbb.com (mxsf02.insightbb.com [74.128.0.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9F58FC1A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:20:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,349,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="704911215" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf02.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:20:53 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsoEAF0jX0vQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBO9hvhDcE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,349,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="345246237" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:20:52 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:20:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001262020.45317.freebsd@insightbb.com> Subject: SNMP of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:20:59 -0000 I'm running 8-Stable, and ports are current. I'm installing snmp support, mostly just to investigate it. I have three ports installed: bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation I got a few errors after initial install. I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. I changed the name of the public community name. I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? What client(s) tools should I look at? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 01:23:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E441106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA0E8FC15 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33117 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2010 01:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by ::ffff:208.70.104.210 with ESMTPA; 27 Jan 2010 01:24:41 -0000 Message-ID: <4B5F9584.5020600@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:23:16 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Friedrich References: <201001262020.45317.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201001262020.45317.freebsd@insightbb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SNMP of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:23:23 -0000 Steven Friedrich wrote: > I'm running 8-Stable, and ports are current. > > I'm installing snmp support, mostly just to investigate it. > > I have three ports installed: > bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools > mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X > net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation > > I got a few errors after initial install. > > I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. > I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. > I changed the name of the public community name. > I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) > > I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: > WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() > > Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? > What client(s) tools should I look at? What is it exactly that you need/want SNMP for? If for client only, what do you need to poll? Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 01:28:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD50106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf03.insightbb.com (mxsf03.insightbb.com [74.128.0.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7138FC18 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:28:11 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,349,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="788650366" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:28:10 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsoEAKslX0vQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBO9hvgjOCBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,349,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="345247008" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:28:09 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:28:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001262028.02698.freebsd@insightbb.com> Subject: mDNSResponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:28:12 -0000 I'm running 8-Stable and current ports. I installed mdnsd in an attempt to check out KDE4's Network Services use of zeroconf. I get these messages on the console: Starting mdnsd. Jan 26 18:38:33 laptop2 mDNSResponder: mDNSResponder (Engineering Build) (Jan 20 2010 04:57:08) starting Starting default mousedJan 26 18:38:33 laptop2 mDNSResponder: mDNS_AddDNSServer: Lock not held! mDNS_busy (0) mDNS_reentrancy (0) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 01:45:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79361065670 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf01.insightbb.com (mxsf01.insightbb.com [74.128.0.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946108FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:45:46 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,349,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="803814633" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:45:45 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsoEAGspX0vQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBO9hthDcEgyQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,349,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="242906915" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:45:44 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: Steve Bertrand Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:45:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) References: <201001262020.45317.freebsd@insightbb.com> <4B5F9584.5020600@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4B5F9584.5020600@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001262045.37400.freebsd@insightbb.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SNMP of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:45:46 -0000 On Tuesday 26 January 2010 08:23:16 pm Steve Bertrand wrote: > Steven Friedrich wrote: > > I'm running 8-Stable, and ports are current. > > > > I'm installing snmp support, mostly just to investigate it. > > > > I have three ports installed: > > bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools > > mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X > > net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation > > > > I got a few errors after initial install. > > > > I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. > > I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. > > I changed the name of the public community name. > > I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) > > > > I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: > > WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() > > > > Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? > > What client(s) tools should I look at? > > What is it exactly that you need/want SNMP for? > > If for client only, what do you need to poll? > > Steve > I want to find out what I can monitor with it. I don't know enough about it to know if it will be useful to me. I'm an old hardware guy and I've been Admin'ing my own systems for many years. I am having a hard time finding pertinent documentation. I know one of the ports allows you to monitor the cpu, memory, etc. I already have a Superkaramba theme that has a StarTrek gauge for cpu, memory, swap, network in, network out, etc. I just want to know if SNMP has anything to offer me... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 01:54:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23786106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8F518FC1B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40317 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by ::ffff:208.70.104.210 with ESMTPA; 27 Jan 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4B5F9CCA.1040106@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:54:18 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Friedrich References: <201001262020.45317.freebsd@insightbb.com> <4B5F9584.5020600@ibctech.ca> <201001262045.37400.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201001262045.37400.freebsd@insightbb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SNMP of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:54:25 -0000 Steven Friedrich wrote: > On Tuesday 26 January 2010 08:23:16 pm Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Steven Friedrich wrote: >>> I have three ports installed: >>> bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools >>> mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X >>> net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation >>> >>> I got a few errors after initial install. >>> >>> I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. >>> I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. >>> I changed the name of the public community name. >>> I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) >>> >>> I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: >>> WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() >>> >>> Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? >>> What client(s) tools should I look at? >> What is it exactly that you need/want SNMP for? >> >> If for client only, what do you need to poll? >> >> Steve >> > I want to find out what I can monitor with it. I don't know enough about it > to know if it will be useful to me. I'm an old hardware guy and I've been > Admin'ing my own systems for many years. I am having a hard time finding > pertinent documentation. > > I know one of the ports allows you to monitor the cpu, memory, etc. > > I already have a Superkaramba theme that has a StarTrek gauge for cpu, memory, > swap, network in, network out, etc. > > I just want to know if SNMP has anything to offer me... Personally, I use SNMP for read-only network gathering information. Depending on the device you are trying to poll, you can generally retrieve almost all information from a device. What you have described that you have already seems like SNMP. Can you give an example of a device that you want to 'test' against? Assuming that you have an SNMP v2 device available for polling, try this on your FreeBSD box: # pkg_add -r net-snmp # rehash # snmpwalk -v2c -c your_ro_community ip_or_name_of_device If you want specifics to test against, let me know off-list, and I'll give you a Cisco router to poll. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 01:58:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E84D106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C8B8FC1B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so707605ewy.3 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:58:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:reply-to:to:subject :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yx0jWVibz7sWgnWZAM7oRSYqemKNncGLwuaTBCrLMB0=; b=R/ExGjG/nSQ5HpomDXsLjt4tL2m+OJEyispJdk37OGG5AT+XUVNnlcE8VUt7p9Cmb/ 2bOUb5biKRNfO3Jn//NbcriLOk8VYAlhb71xuave+C/RHqukjFZx+NIdWiRRkfpSiWyW wUHGDYzylKV78L2DfSxcX0PAakQnmmY6VbZq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JrnzqV5Q9FVjLaV5AnLZ06C5uAzQOMboQGifgU0HoTLTZCxfgNSQZIuVLINQuFtTB0 B1FyN7jQr8XRFW46J3evBkSXlzWYV2tBcJEF+XiQ1duucncbc2rUZi+30lYboVpHEjcN 88wG5gOyA0DgCxpRy/+uhbA2s9a+wJO0AQNBg= Received: by 10.213.97.80 with SMTP id k16mr8841410ebn.2.1264557498043; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from viper.homeunix.com (host217-44-55-158.range217-44.btcentralplus.com [217.44.55.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm11231408eyd.21.2010.01.26.17.58.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:58:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:59:57 +0000 From: David Collins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4b5f9e1d.zyutaQNEYxlor32j%davidcollins001@gmail.com> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: devfs rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidcollins001@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:58:19 -0000 Hi, I am trying to get devfs to only show me a few devices but I can't seem to get devfs to recognise the new rules that I create. devfs recognises some of the rules but not all of them: # devfs -m /path/to/jail rule showsets 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 Rules 12 and 13 are not recognised. If I try to set the devfs ruleset to 4 (for jail in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) for the /dev mounted in the jail then add the rules and applyset everything works fine. When i try to start the jail I get the following: viper:/usr/jails# /etc/rc.d/jail restart myjail Configuring jails:. Starting jails:devfs rule: expecting argument for include devfs rule: expecting argument for include /etc/rc.d/jail: WARNING: devfs_set_ruleset: you must specify a ruleset number devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process I'm not sure why I get the first warning, it doesn't seem to prevent anything from working in my other jails. The second warning is because devfs can't find the rule set (defined as jail_avr_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail_avr" in rc.conf) Can anyone shed any light on this for me I can't seem to figure it out. Googling doesn't seem to help me either viper:~$ uname -a FreeBSD viper 7.0-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 #0: Wed Oct 7 13:39:21 BST 2009 VIPER i386 The contents of my devfs.rules is below # cat /etc/devfs.rules # # Devices for xserver in jail # [devfsrules_unhide_xorg=8] add path agpgart unhide #add path console unhide add path dri unhide add path 'dri*' unhide add path io unhide add path mem unhide #add path pci unhide add path tty unhide add path ttyv0 unhide add path ttyv1 unhide add path ttyv8 unhide [devfsrules_unhide_cam=9] add path 'da*' unhide add path 'cd*' unhide [devfsrules_unhide_kmem=10] add path kmem unhide # # This allows to run a desktop system in a jail. Think about what you want to # achieve before you use this, it opens up the entire machine to access from # this jail to any sophisticated program. # [devfsrules_jail_desktop=11] add include $devfsrules_hide_all add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic add include $devfsrules_unhide_login add include $devfsrules_unhide_audio add include $devfsrules_unhide_input add include $devfsrules_unhide_xorg add include $devfsrules_unhide_cam add include $devfsrules_unhide_kmem # # add include $devfsrules_jail # [devfsrules_jail_dhcp=12] add include $devfsrules_hide_all add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic add include $devfsrules_unhide_login add path 'bpf*' unhide add path net unhide add path 'net/*' unhide # # dev rules for serial avr device jail # [devfsrules_jail_avr=13] add include $devfsrules_jail add path 'cuaU*' unhide David Collins From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 02:06:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008A1106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CCA68FC1F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40564 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2010 02:07:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by ::ffff:208.70.104.210 with ESMTPA; 27 Jan 2010 02:07:40 -0000 Message-ID: <4B5F9F96.1050404@ibctech.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:06:14 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Friedrich References: <201001262020.45317.freebsd@insightbb.com> <4B5F9584.5020600@ibctech.ca> <201001262045.37400.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201001262045.37400.freebsd@insightbb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SNMP of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:06:22 -0000 Steven Friedrich wrote: > I want to find out what I can monitor with it. I don't know enough about it > to know if it will be useful to me. I'm an old hardware guy and I've been > Admin'ing my own systems for many years. I am having a hard time finding > pertinent documentation. > > I know one of the ports allows you to monitor the cpu, memory, etc. > > I already have a Superkaramba theme that has a StarTrek gauge for cpu, memory, > swap, network in, network out, etc. > > I just want to know if SNMP has anything to offer me... ...out of curiosity, are you simply trying to gain info on your local machine that you are working from? I use SNMP for network management, so I assumed that from the beginning. If what you are looking for is gathering stats from only the hardware that you are working on, that is a bit of a different story. With that said, I may be able to provide configs for that, too. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 02:11:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F3E106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07A368FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16420 invoked by uid 0); 27 Jan 2010 02:11:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy6.bluehost.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 02:11:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=hw125xTFLgDGb9MPD44Xsq6pa3uERCLDIa6UCdVExdwlIKj0gceLK85GZoEMPhPD1SDu7qDVYVDTzAAef5K2WNsTtV8WQJWeJoob1q909qCLAWULb+X1ssiPlltPDHzp; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZxNm-0003Bx-BE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:11:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5FA0E3.8050808@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:11:47 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B5BC60A.5040101@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB3174697341CD933A73577DD" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Finding Drivers For winWiFi Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:11:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB3174697341CD933A73577DD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/24/2010 12:00 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Programmer In Training wrote: >=20 >> This is probably the wrong place to ask, and if it is I ask your >> forgiveness. >> >> I'm browsing the FTP server for FreeBSD-8.0 packages[0] and am looking= >> for drivers for my winWiFi card (zonenet, unsure of chipset currently)= >> and realized, I'm not sure what package I would need for that. >=20 > Post the model number of the Zonet card. Is it PCI or USB? >=20 > You could try just loading all of the wireless kernel modules and seein= g > if any of them find the hardware. There's a list of those in the See > Also section for wlan(4). >=20 > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA I'm going to have to do that because the one provided by the company that put out the card are for FreeBSD 7.0. I tried using it anyway and the moment I went to load the kernel, it caused my computer to reboot without warning. It's PCI and I have no clue as to the model number anymore. --=20 PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigB3174697341CD933A73577DD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLX6DjAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0qH4H/2mQOt9C7EnnTKktQiLdcXeG phoV/0IIBOv8Du1hLNkpnZtnZRQR46oKW3PdyW6WblCLTFNUNJfoYUE4FKITByxQ vO+hQTC6RoLqvHgjbg58QTOhL+a73IFLfGo1KVvWZMmcznl4UQ0c7lcgirLnBpnq bh/G6oDRcd9+LG+hdIk+nW+B5Y8+YTlSAAo9HZAi/Mj8b71Cwu02N2BhmMrlCYyZ BeD/LsN6t2zlypt0dsAtMuXar+JFPEw/1+Sdp1neTxPAK4umIzUnJDPB1wCRgTJA p7AMO17bctEG0EEthdr0mKDZr6OQBnNE0uTUJknQIIm5v8ZpcWiuWmYAXT/gbxc= =o+ly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB3174697341CD933A73577DD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 04:54:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748BA1065670 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail1.hostpark.net (mail1.hostpark.net [212.243.197.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5A38FC14 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A939C87F67; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:54:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail1.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id m4YkOdDuHpkN; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:54:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (182-142.2-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.2.142.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C21687F56; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:54:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0R4slp9074781; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:54:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0R4slvZ074780; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:54:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:54:46 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100127045446.GG28438@saturn.pcs.ms> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: ipfw: limit bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:54:55 -0000 Hello I use FreeBSD 7.2 on a amd64. I want to limit the bandwidth thru this machine. Here is the relevante part of /etc/rc.firewall [snip] $ipfwcmd pipe 1 config bw 80kByte/s $ipfwcmd add pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 $ipfwcmd queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 1 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff $ipfwcmd add queue 1 all from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 [snip] I generate this from different sources but it seems that it is not working. What do I'm wrong? Here the part from ipfw show: 00100 0 0 check-state 00200 24327 1497881 pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 00300 0 0 queue 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 [snip] Regards, -- Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 11:13:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3261065670 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0588F8FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so3924003pxi.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:13:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=4R2ahjPpRTFiiHlA8fONDgKJ+fS1+jzVx3hCvRc1Kmo=; b=prbghIzYoem+j+KeL3mxjvC6Skyp/3Xr6IG0ZaxQJ+/wvC+ehEosqw13cZ9HgaHxpA OswVLQxVPIwkMm/4xO+/lvoXpcPPzelzGvImIXx9FIt7auMzsoLO0/aqACsxcw0chQx/ 68McBKtAxjGtqEarV1DJ1rxI+iQRQxZZWgYv0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KuVsyY+YamBBX9kYdwEK7gPyPK62Bsnw4dbd8IHchKtBRQndayKVND126cadV/8thc TyQraJaXCW03rme+Jcwu54+L80iEXu/BuJOLxXjqm1DE2YrtYR+VqD/GnnmQVOJnAWh1 /pZGDb483v1UllyT30xyVb3aCYpxnqFfWxpg4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.9.27 with SMTP id 27mr196154wfi.241.1264590822487; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:13:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:13:42 -0700 Message-ID: <64c038661001270313v7990c0b9m6dff12504f04cfef@mail.gmail.com> From: Modulok To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Does geli metadata contain sensitive information? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:13:43 -0000 Does a geli metadata backup contain any sensitive information? Like... should apply the same precations as I do the key and password? Thanks! -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 14:35:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04711106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@imp.ch) Received: from godot.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7550C8FC15 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from origami.imp.ch (wotan.imp.ch [157.161.4.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by godot.imp.ch (8.14.1/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o0REEUUs060311 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:14:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dan@imp.ch) Message-ID: <4B604A41.6080706@imp.ch> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:14:25 +0100 From: Daniel Mueller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 8.0 how to enter kernel debugger inside vmware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:35:46 -0000 Hi all I have an unstable machine running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE inside vmware. It freezes on average once a week but doesn't panic, so i would like to enter the kernel debugger, to at least being able to force a panic. Unfortunately, i have no serial interface and can't enter into the debugger on the console using ctrl-alt-esc either, because it conflicts with the key sequence to leave the console in the vmware client. What can i do? many thanks and best regards -Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 14:47:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E8C106580C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D138FC19 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1151663fga.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:47:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ef11iO6MZJQNO9zrbxNSTx8WqRIkr8G0JgXs2S87bI8=; b=e/O31RQif3lSelxnvwbcwW01HPdMOcqpI1tzLTWbekVEGH0d3nEcjWGvCWP0zHAptm viGr+F9Cf154SE5vl+vU4k1uO1ZrotgkgDhVIdB1Xa3z58wBtjorG0szqr4CVKcvwRff p8F0x4uazW/5YBdqUXa5D9aErtEFKL9hm6DOI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iAzlBwXII89c5fAd6AZxJ8V7rvEaagqtUbafQyM/sVblwJJ2w5Df7m8d9W9vLbXDBe rWwb9Nd9TxwfVt8Aef89dV4qfnGJ+qrxD3f8I1Ti2frNANyTDvqYPEp/b20hatiaNNyj J+OQYh4ndZUD3/44k8TbxSR/bWqjl5hdThW0w= Received: by 10.86.236.26 with SMTP id j26mr14191065fgh.77.1264603623297; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm10823936fgb.5.2010.01.27.06.47.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:47:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:46:59 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100127144659.59f84863@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038661001270313v7990c0b9m6dff12504f04cfef@mail.gmail.com> References: <64c038661001270313v7990c0b9m6dff12504f04cfef@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Does geli metadata contain sensitive information? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:47:05 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:13:42 -0700 Modulok wrote: > Does a geli metadata backup contain any sensitive information? Like... > should apply the same precations as I do the key and password? If you change the keyfile the metadata is changed and the old keyfile becomes useless; but if the attacker also has the old metadata file they can make use of the old keyfile. Likewise if someone has the metadata you lose the ability to delete all copies of it making the partition instantaneously unrecoverable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 15:27:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD53C1065693 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from techlist@mail.bnetmd.net) Received: from smtp-gw30.mailanyone.net (smtp-gw30.mailanyone.net [208.70.128.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9068FC1D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailanyone.net by smtp-gw30.mailanyone.net with esmtpa (MailAnyone extSMTP glenn@bnetmd.net) id 1Na9ZM-0004DP-Hg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:12:37 -0600 Message-ID: <10713CBA99A4455684AA7CB50185C3A3@GLENN2> From: "Glenn McCalley" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:12:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:30:07 +0000 Subject: MRTG vs. character of traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Glenn McCalley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:11 -0000 OK so the data center says my traffic is unreasonable. Turns out they may be correct. MRTG is showing one server with a totally unreasonable level of outbound traffic so now I know which machine to study. Are there recommendations for a tool to tell me what KIND of traffic, not just the gross bit rate? I want to find that idiot that's causing all the bandwidth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 15:32:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85127106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF318FC0A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o0RFWipd017835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:32:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0RFWirJ050645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:32:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o0RFWh0F050625; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:32:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:32:43 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Glenn McCalley Message-ID: <20100127153243.GV50360@dan.emsphone.com> References: <10713CBA99A4455684AA7CB50185C3A3@GLENN2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10713CBA99A4455684AA7CB50185C3A3@GLENN2> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:32:45 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MRTG vs. character of traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:32:48 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 27), Glenn McCalley said: > OK so the data center says my traffic is unreasonable. Turns out they may > be correct. MRTG is showing one server with a totally unreasonable level > of outbound traffic so now I know which machine to study. Are there > recommendations for a tool to tell me what KIND of traffic, not just the > gross bit rate? I want to find that idiot that's causing all the > bandwidth. tcpdump or wireshark would be a good start, if you're around when it happens. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 15:34:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AB6106568B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07198FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6304EF7419; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:34:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:34:43 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Glenn McCalley Message-Id: <20100127103443.90bbc302.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <10713CBA99A4455684AA7CB50185C3A3@GLENN2> References: <10713CBA99A4455684AA7CB50185C3A3@GLENN2> Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MRTG vs. character of traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:46 -0000 In response to "Glenn McCalley" : > OK so the data center says my traffic is unreasonable. > Turns out they may be correct. > MRTG is showing one server with a totally unreasonable level of outbound > traffic so now I know which machine to study. Are there recommendations for > a tool to tell me what KIND of traffic, not just the gross bit rate? I want > to find that idiot that's causing all the bandwidth. ntop -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 16:28:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C901065670 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s21.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s21.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A4F8FC21 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT111-W62 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s21.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:28:47 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [117.193.141.129] From: dhaneshk k To: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:28:47 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2010 16:28:47.0339 (UTC) FILETIME=[CD0503B0:01CA9F6D] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:28:48 -0000 Fellow FreeBSDians=2C =20 I am trying to configure my laptop for wireless connectivity to a broad= band connection. =20 these are the steps I followed=2C I don't know what I made wrong=2C please= help to fix the issue.. =20 1 ) To /boot/loader.conf =20 =20 if_wpi_load =3D "YES" wlan_load =3D "YES" wlan_amrr_load =3D "YES" firmware_load =3D "YES" wpifw_load =3D "YES" legal.intel_wpi.licence_ack=3D1 =20 save and rebooted the machine =20 and=20 =20 2) issued the command ifconfig wpi0 up scan =20 but nothing is reported for this command =20 =20 3) then I checked the out put of ifconfig =20 it showing wpi0 but no carriers for the device =20 I am using FreeBSD-7.2 i386 release. Wireless card is Intel Pro/Wireles= s 3945 . (In Windows XP it works from this Windows I am sending this mai= l via Wireless access) Any help most welcome. =20 thanks in advance dhanesh =20 =20 _________________________________________________________________ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 16:39:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8487F106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brampton@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7338FC18 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so781459fxm.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:39:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=nwGT2jDSwfX3rTw7WHx5/JLU3q4acbLqA5mWjnTcJYw=; b=wd9eIEL5Q00ZhRM2T3akHir5RngKUxSFXH3s19OUsC1B2hlZweuLAYBKH/Tek0OV2T RemqpN/vByq3En8UfJWBoa4Hyuacw0MZDW2VA74JeKuL4a/MlvlZdSDtDo0gs78IYl+R 1AsuUWJANhPafRjgMZEo+G1v0xHcmt3QHEo2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=d2Mm5+r1tHKmzChoF3CSdbBGqbpggJ5QXsiT4P2mZRke20Y7Z0D1o5hUnp9kQ3kRG2 nOMtOzHzhsaE1BhqNwtCy9LpYKzxuQ5jZxwpzTCeQK/16beiHPwgF24rguQsLsUKLf87 rrnQQh2RCGPQT22UHivDPFQ4a84LOjn5iV/rM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: brampton@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.88.78 with SMTP id z56mr1288558wee.37.1264610394315; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:39:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B604A41.6080706@imp.ch> References: <4B604A41.6080706@imp.ch> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:39:54 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 649efff103a23210 Message-ID: From: Andrew Brampton To: Daniel Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.0 how to enter kernel debugger inside vmware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:39:56 -0000 You might want to recompile your kernel with the ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER option. This allows you to use ~^b to enter the debugger instead of ctrl-alt-esc. Andrew 2010/1/27 Daniel Mueller : > > Hi all > > I have an unstable machine running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE inside vmware. It > freezes on average once a week but doesn't panic, so i would like to > enter the kernel debugger, to at least being able to force a panic. > Unfortunately, i have no serial interface and can't enter into the > debugger on the console using ctrl-alt-esc either, because it conflicts > with the key sequence to leave the console in the vmware client. What > can i do? > > many thanks and best regards > -Daniel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 16:40:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FA41065696 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward14.mail.yandex.net (forward14.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D258FC19 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp15.mail.yandex.net (smtp15.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.69]) by forward14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0AFC9268078A; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:40:52 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1264610457; bh=VaJQcz3wi8dzlvOOXcf6PR4kcoELuaoMky7n4nrNayo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RzW6tMLZRIkl53PJC2SqW3KDOF+fve+1VrRdE5vz4ifbPNPreQzYH+oDaUrbpHnbp YdqxxrURM7SAHkvlToWporZuAXYrR+A6Z4QVCjHGuCMq14o3vZmnDB7QlkKQgIYy9X dId21kLY5/kziMhDPDnrUkb1NfsncsqYfZTVwm2k= Received: from HOMEUSER (unknown [77.93.42.18]) by smtp15.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPA id 5F99D4E280A1; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:40:44 +0300 (MSK) X-Nat-Received: from [192.168.9.5]:3144 [ident-empty] by SPAM FILTER: with TPROXY id 1264611160.52460 abuse-to kes-kes@yandex.ru Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:40:45 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <181688930.20100127184045@yandex.ru> To: Martin Schweizer In-Reply-To: <20100127045446.GG28438@saturn.pcs.ms> References: <20100127045446.GG28438@saturn.pcs.ms> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1264610452 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp15.mail.yandex.net Cc: Martin Schweizer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw: limit bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:59 -0000 Hello, Martin. First of all you must decide you want your shaper rule act as allow rule or not: kes# sysctl -a | grep one_pass net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: 0 or 1 man ipfw pipe pipe_nr Pass packet to a dummynet(4) ``pipe'' (for bandwidth limitation, delay, etc.). See the TRAFFIC SHAPER (DUMMYNET) CONFIGURATION Section for further information. The search terminates; however, on exit from the pipe and if the sysctl(8) variable net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass is not set, the packet is passed again to the firewall code starting from the next rule. Second you do not need to put packet to pipe and to queue at same time. use pipe to just limit rate or use queue to limit rate and process groups of packets in round robin manner. packets are grouped my mask pipe is like this: http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/img/queue_fifo.jpg queue is like this: http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/img/queue_pcq.jpg some doc: http://kes.net.ua/softdev/advanced_firewall.html translated by google: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&swap=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fkes.net.ua%2Fsoftdev%2Fadvanced_firewall.html&sl=ru&tl=en MS> Hello MS> I use FreeBSD 7.2 on a amd64. I want to limit the bandwidth thru MS> this machine. Here is the relevante part of /etc/rc.firewall MS> [snip] MS> $ipfwcmd pipe 1 config bw 80kByte/s MS> $ipfwcmd add pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 MS> $ipfwcmd queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 1 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff MS> $ipfwcmd add queue 1 all from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 MS> [snip] MS> I generate this from different sources but it seems that it is not working. What do I'm wrong? MS> Here the part from ipfw show: MS> 00100 0 0 check-state MS> 00200 24327 1497881 pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 MS> 00300 0 0 queue 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 MS> [snip] MS> Regards, -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Êîíüêîâ mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 16:45:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C1B106566B; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com (mail-yw0-f194.google.com [209.85.211.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE21B8FC13; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so2399957ywh.14 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:45:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=4ylXmzQtKvCtjOic3arwQsi5yaq6oKM5lwBEaOQWa6s=; b=YKPAoEnu++QiW4fZGPlqnkKYQTB8vdKac7tA/Zqeghbp/AbzKO84+ngzbTNC8OpzLB yKZj8wX0r7z1eXnauXrRW7AG8kYa9EUCyq+f+ZaNCIwiM2El9iLQnIA8ED6Z09B9bwKs 7rNsFKXdDZEmRELerbl6sVLew2CLn/Zy3wsmQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=AMUp6aNuHz92mR4+SlHP4dNOUQM6dhb8rC8h9igCrHEKlacjwDH4SPc4eXxJniwM1f iDqzP7xH1Cae23tVMyJ4n6/YBv+x1JQoqQ+zNXrUuUKkwSGYSDW4lvI1uEnGWeSporo+ 4eo1HKwU6WxKGiIA5xNRhSuUloezgNzknhUhQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.93.10 with SMTP id v10mr831527anl.185.1264610736650; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:45:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:45:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:45:39 -0000 Hey I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current motherboards have support for this. Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguided? - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 16:53:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7E9106568B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236808FC0A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97999 invoked by uid 98); 27 Jan 2010 16:45:56 +0000 Received: from 192.168.0.2 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.95.1/9971. hbedv: 7.9.1.53/7.1.6.174. spamassassin: 3.2.5. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.2):. Processed in 3.53198 secs); 27 Jan 2010 16:45:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (192.168.0.2) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 16:45:53 +0000 From: Craig Butler To: dhaneshk k In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:25 +0000 Message-Id: <1264611205.11551.7.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:15 -0000 On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 16:28 +0000, dhaneshk k wrote: > Fellow FreeBSDians, > > > > I am trying to configure my laptop for wireless connectivity to a broadband connection. > > > > these are the steps I followed, I don't know what I made wrong, please help to fix the issue.. > > > > 1 ) To /boot/loader.conf > > > > > > if_wpi_load = "YES" > > wlan_load = "YES" > > wlan_amrr_load = "YES" > > firmware_load = "YES" > > wpifw_load = "YES" > > legal.intel_wpi.licence_ack=1 > > > > save and rebooted the machine > > > > and > > > > 2) issued the command ifconfig wpi0 up scan > > > > but nothing is reported for this command Howdy Dhanesh Try; ifconfig wpi0 list scan this should bring up a list of all the wifi spots in your area with signal strengths and rates. > 3) then I checked the out put of ifconfig > > > > it showing wpi0 but no carriers for the device Once you have found the access point you want to access you'll need to pass more arguments to ifconfig and possibly setup wpa_supplicant.conf http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html should help.... > > I am using FreeBSD-7.2 i386 release. Wireless card is Intel Pro/Wireless 3945 . (In Windows XP it works from this Windows I am sending this mail via Wireless access) Any help most welcome. > > > > thanks in advance > > dhanesh Wpi isn't the most stable wifi for freebsd at the moment, I am having a few issues with it... It keeps dropping the connection silently unless I hammer the AP with ping... Regards Craig B From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 17:05:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6811065693 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA7A8FC2C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id afum1d00W1vN32cA6gs0y9; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:52:00 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.46.159]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id agt11d00S3S48mS8igt2NE; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:02 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9BB51E3033; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:51:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:51:58 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Dan Naumov Message-ID: <20100127165158.GA84643@icarus.home.lan> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:10 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now > I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I > contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), > who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is > supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current > motherboards have support for this. > > Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguided? For what it's worth, I've never encountered any production x86 system that I've worked on (Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris) which has used GPT. I don't know who's giving you the impression that "everyone and their dog is using GPT". Why is this feature a deal-breaker for you? Why are you giving it so much attention? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 17:09:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCA0106568B; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EB88FC24; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (43.78-246-213.ippool.namesco.net [213.246.78.43]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0RH9iWs052108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:09:46 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4B607357.7050707@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:09:43 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:09:49 -0000 GPT booting is I believe only natively supported using an EFI BIOS. However if you wish to use GPT booting with FreeBSD its not too hard, you just cant install using sysinstall. The Examples section of the gpart manpage is what i used to configure the disk for my home server, a zotac ion atom based board (dont have any production servers at work using it at the moment.) Then i just installed using the files on the usb image. >From what I understand gpart installs the pmbr file as a basic bootstrap in the protective MBR present in the GPT partition scheme, this is bootable by a standard bios and is able to understand enough GPT to look for a freebsd boot partition, load the bootcode in that, which loads the kernel etc. So no they arent completely misguided, but its certainly possible to use a GPT scheme without an EFI BIOS. What I would like is an efi bootloader for i386 so I can get my powerbook to run FreeBSD again as it has got an efi bios and bootcamp wont boot freebsd for me at the moment :( Vince Dan Naumov wrote: > Hey > > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now > I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I > contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), > who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is > supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current > motherboards have support for this. > > Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguided? > > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 17:18:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1132D106566C; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212478FC17; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA01021; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:18:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <4B607547.8000307@icyb.net.ua> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:17:59 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:07 -0000 on 27/01/2010 18:45 Dan Naumov said the following: > Hey > > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now > I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I > contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), > who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is > supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current > motherboards have support for this. > > Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguided? Perhaps both :-) It depends on what booting capabilities you need from your BIOS. With FreeBSD we currently typically don't use "pure" GPT and use Protective MBR and install real boot code into a special boot partition. Protective MBR looks like a "normal" MBR to BIOS, and boot code in Protective MBR is smart to find the boot partition and hand off boot process to code in it. This way you can almost have the best of both worlds, but with some limitations (like multibooting). I don't know what other OSes do or expect in this area. Obligatory wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Legacy_MBR_.28LBA_0.29 -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 17:24:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA93106568D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBAB8FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0RHAIYM040156; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:10:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0RHAIk0040155; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:10:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:10:18 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Dan Naumov Message-ID: <20100127171017.GA40068@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:10:18 -0600 (CST) Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:24:48 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > Hey >=20 > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now > I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I > contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), > who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is > supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current > motherboards have support for this. >=20 > Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguid= ed? The compatability MBR should be sufficent to let a non-GPT aware BIOS boot from GPT. Once you've loaded code from the boot partition, the BIOS doesn't need to know anything about the partitions. -- Brooks --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLYHN5XY6L6fI4GtQRAk6uAKCDz8HRDrS/Cjibj8Pqg7/OziXrFQCdGKAr gRQvLCMrggm9C1qKuyi727E= =ZIxv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:05:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1331106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD9F8FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o0RI5Be42622 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:05:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:05:11 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: "adduser" and single-user groups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:05:13 -0000 Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard to the value add of the "group per user" approach that adduser uses? Is that a FreeBSD thing, or a *BSD thing, or a unix-like-universe thing, or what? Thanks! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:06:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1FB1065697 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kickbsd@ya.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66ED8FC1F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail110.yandex.ru (webmail110.yandex.ru [95.108.130.10]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5A27415D29FC for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:02:59 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1264615379; bh=qKy0nd0dmwZSXlYWmxzRxd+hb/oD5UVG/CwpNfpm0pY=; h=From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=Ls68nCbimV9uN0fzeLpHj5ue9/U9+zHLYSUNCljT+XP5erxt/VwqKSzFE893g3CwX vczKoWl0gvADYpAzMtoz2ht/nmJ9HpFM6mmSyEM0aGgpdwkve1ewnQtf1pK6XrqDQW 8FbBxLw2GJCbjM55bIaFc/C63xksTmiLhBc6PmsE= Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail110.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 35E2029BC064 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:02:59 +0300 (MSK) X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: webmail110 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1264615379 Received: from iphone-charles.as6453.net (iphone-charles.as6453.net [64.86.53.183]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:02:58 +0300 From: Baginski Darren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <6701264615378@webmail110.yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:02:58 +0300 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Subject: cannot create 'tank': permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:40 -0000 Hi! Getting weird error #zpool create tank mfid0p4 cannot create 'tank': permission denied On dmesg: vdev_geom_open_by_path:466[1]: Found provider by name /dev/mfid0p4. vdev_geom_attach:112[1]: Attaching to mfid0p4. vdev_geom_attach:153[1]: Created consumer for mfid0p4. vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p4... vdev_geom_detach:173[1]: Closing access to mfid0p4. vdev_geom_detach:177[1]: Destroyed consumer to mfid0p4. vdev_geom_open_by_path:477[1]: guid mismatch for provider /dev/mfid0p4: 15029269312013869400 != 0. vdev_geom_open_by_guid:435[1]: Searching by guid [15029269312013869400]. vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from acd0... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p4... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p3... vdev_geom_read_guid:339[1]: guid for mfid0p3 is 9402336837364771330 vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p2... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p1... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from gptid/85a347ae-0b3f-11df-84de-001ec9b0c152... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from ufsid/4b6033ebc4edab5d... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from gptid/2f7b4cd6-e983-11de-ac17-001ec9b0c152... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from gptid/2f7aa939-e983-11de-ac17-001ec9b0c152... vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0... vdev_geom_open_by_guid:449[1]: Search by guid [15029269312013869400] failed. vdev_geom_open_by_path:466[1]: Found provider by name /dev/mfid0p4. vdev_geom_attach:112[1]: Attaching to mfid0p4. vdev_geom_open:521[1]: Provider /dev/mfid0p4 not found. But # gpart list Geom name: mfid0 fwheads: 255 fwsectors: 63 last: 570949598 first: 34 entries: 128 scheme: GPT Providers: 1. Name: mfid0p1 Mediasize: 65536 (64K) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r0w0e0 rawtype: 83bd6b9d-7f41-11dc-be0b-001560b84f0f label: (null) length: 65536 offset: 17408 type: freebsd-boot index: 1 end: 161 start: 34 2. Name: mfid0p2 Mediasize: 124354560 (119M) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r0w0e0 rawtype: 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b label: (null) length: 124354560 offset: 82944 type: freebsd-swap index: 2 end: 243041 start: 162 3. Name: mfid0p3 Mediasize: 6442449920 (6.0G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 rawtype: 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b label: (null) length: 6442449920 offset: 124437504 type: freebsd-zfs index: 3 end: 12825951 start: 243042 4. Name: mfid0p4 Mediasize: 285759307264 (266G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r0w0e0 rawtype: 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b label: (null) length: 285759307264 offset: 6566887424 type: freebsd-zfs index: 4 end: 570949598 start: 12825952 Consumers: 1. Name: mfid0 Mediasize: 292326211584 (272G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e2 Any ideas ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:12:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40146106568F; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mattjreimer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com (mail-yw0-f194.google.com [209.85.211.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6DD8FC2B; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so2487309ywh.14 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:12:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZMMR1+hIyePw22sBR8zsayvsssvZAPSOTwkS2BA9PjM=; b=ggY/6srxTVlo2nf244W6xQ07y0Ogtrjhtt2cQdKQ336h2SlPoPHMkBAiVaOt3sz52o tnHJ78Q/M+1u6DqCeIbWWzlludxuzvec5eTJPr389NbRcmerZWp1IT4ehsKls1EwI+RA FnY3AIM8FL5HOxvFCkSbFBz/ksAd8RUh05dSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=jlMBd5LIFX5xxllpBLITjnc4lwU8D5XC6gL9j8o8KBBTZ++TzxzQWrEylLDQVmfYxw 1kQkMsqTC326/6yY1cBNwFUEFpmgCViOZovqL7B+XAU1v3WRnKZRQ6iU2Mxnh+MBOihH GgBY0lhxUPEPvfaDo/gWGcgy6q5+VIIdZCJ8c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.252.1 with SMTP id z1mr11279072ybh.263.1264614408855; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:46:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:46:48 -0800 Message-ID: From: Matt Reimer To: Dan Naumov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:12:01 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: > Hey > > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now > I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I > contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), > who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is > supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current > motherboards have support for this. > > Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech > misguided? > > I'm booting servers with SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards just fine using pmbr + GPT + ZFS. Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:15:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEA810656A3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FAA8FC1D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so212993gve.39 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:15:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=NqJmvMw9ce01/0363vMqF2zBLkTkSrAogGL42XKGQfI=; b=GD4ZWKOHUqKJQ/9WV+L/WIx6ihYrbcFelAiWI+dr0BdtQBJlo6IhAU69OD621AGP4o WnisSr+Z6qvr+xnjbZw4Y+jMPSu1H7Ac/L+Xuu6+auJB8GrsaJ+GGcxfxl5KbFekM66m xz/bZi/rQPJEngUhcr9Ua3dPTROLhhn5u3o0k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Esukbq2moKNXWPEzYiCP98UfOPB+J3hhJ/fzKzJpumkxcXgYRHnRoMTkMxSWcUo6va BmMRhfdj8BwT/RQKUb+bHR+qc35i8QQ1KW/sufmKKXO1WUtxdhxpSgVxX3RQ6vxLzv8L rUCXDH5gGlMPHKi/Z1Y/YWmVRFENPKq8ZvRQY= Received: by 10.102.14.17 with SMTP id 17mr482243mun.52.1264616136158; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:15:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s11sm731109mue.4.2010.01.27.10.15.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:15:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:12:15 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: John Message-ID: <20100127181215.GA68645@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "adduser" and single-user groups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:15:38 -0000 Hi, John John wrote: > Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard > to the value add of the "group per user" approach that adduser > uses? Is that a FreeBSD thing, or a *BSD thing, or a unix-like-universe > thing, or what? > If I understand your question correctly, you are asking about the default group to which a user is added upon user creation. If not, please explain more on what you are asking. useradd(8) will automatically add a user to a group, named after the user, unless otherwise specified. This is the login group for the user, and the primary GID used when read/write access to files and directories is determined. This, of course, can be overridden with the '-g' flag, changing the default group, and additionally with '-G' to add to several groups. Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:33:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739A110656B5 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2031E8FC1A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.1-16-172-dyn.locolomo.org (unknown [172.16.1.127]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A8BD1C1A67 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:33:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B6086FB.1010809@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:33:31 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "adduser" and single-user groups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:33:34 -0000 On 27/01/10 19.05, John wrote: > Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard > to the value add of the "group per user" approach that adduser > uses? Is that a FreeBSD thing, or a *BSD thing, or a unix-like-universe > thing, or what? Many systems do this AFAIK. IIRC, the point is that you can set umask to 007 or 002 and your home directory with owner you, and group you will remain private or at least only writable by you. The umasks 007 or 002 are useful if you have some shared folder where you have multiple users with write access, say: drwxrwxr-x root:users /home/share With umask 002, when files are created in this directory by another user in the users group, all users in this group can edit that file, no need to modify permissions. BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:36:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7222B106568D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CDB8FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B612F10E50E; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:37:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B608799.8010003@eskk.nu> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:36:09 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100125 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dhaneshk k References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Troback-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: B612F10E50E.AB662 X-Troback-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Troback-MailScanner-From: leslie@eskk.nu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:36:10 -0000 2010-01-27 17:28, dhaneshk k skrev: > > Fellow FreeBSDians, > > > > I am trying to configure my laptop for wireless connectivity to a broadband connection. > > > > these are the steps I followed, I don't know what I made wrong, please help to fix the issue.. > > > > 1 ) To /boot/loader.conf > > > > > > if_wpi_load = "YES" > > wlan_load = "YES" > > wlan_amrr_load = "YES" > > firmware_load = "YES" > > wpifw_load = "YES" > > legal.intel_wpi.licence_ack=1 > > > > save and rebooted the machine > > > > and > > > > 2) issued the command ifconfig wpi0 up scan > > > > but nothing is reported for this command > > > > > > 3) then I checked the out put of ifconfig > > > > it showing wpi0 but no carriers for the device > > > > I am using FreeBSD-7.2 i386 release. Wireless card is Intel Pro/Wireless 3945 . (In Windows XP it works from this Windows I am sending this mail via Wireless access) Any help most welcome. > > > > thanks in advance > > dhanesh > You need some lines i /etc/rc.conf wpa_supplicant_enable="YES" # is for security, try without first wlans_wpi0="wlan0" # mine is wlans_iwn0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" / From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:42:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1A51065694 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BBB8FC23 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0RIgK40035531; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:42:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o0RIgKQc035528; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:42:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:42:20 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Leslie Jensen In-Reply-To: <4B608799.8010003@eskk.nu> Message-ID: References: <4B608799.8010003@eskk.nu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:42:20 -0700 (MST) Cc: dhaneshk k , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:42:23 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Leslie Jensen wrote: > 2010-01-27 17:28, dhaneshk k skrev: >> >> I am trying to configure my laptop for wireless connectivity to a >> broadband connection. >> >> these are the steps I followed, I don't know what I made wrong, please >> help to fix the issue.. >> >> 1 ) To /boot/loader.conf >> >> if_wpi_load = "YES" >> wlan_load = "YES" >> wlan_amrr_load = "YES" >> firmware_load = "YES" >> wpifw_load = "YES" >> legal.intel_wpi.licence_ack=1 ... >> 3) then I checked the out put of ifconfig >> >> it showing wpi0 but no carriers for the device >> >> I am using FreeBSD-7.2 i386 release. Wireless card is Intel >> Pro/Wireless 3945 . (In Windows XP it works from this Windows I am >> sending this mail via Wireless access) Any help most welcome. > > You need some lines i /etc/rc.conf > > wpa_supplicant_enable="YES" # is for security, try without first > wlans_wpi0="wlan0" # mine is wlans_iwn0="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" The virtual wlan0 was added for FreeBSD 8. For 7.2, it should still be done the old way (using the actual card, wpi0 in this case). -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:51:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DAC106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from mail.pil.net (ns3.pil.net [209.17.170.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA1EA8FC13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31190 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 13:24:20 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 13:24:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:24:20 -0500 (EST) From: James Smallacombe X-X-Sender: up@ns3.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:04 -0000 NOTE: Please reply off-list as well as I am not subscribed My server (7.2-STABLE) suffered at least two outages Sunday through yesterday after having been up since July (it is a rented dedicated server with my FSBD install). The first time, I was able to log in via remotely, saw a ton of spam apparently abusing a php mail form script (more on that later) filling the /var partition. I purged it, but it still required a reboot as CPU was through the roof. Yesterday morning, I was unable to get into the server at all...pings were very high. I called the provider and got in via KVM over IP. CPU was fine and there wre no full partitions. As I had to catch a flight, I just rebooted it and it was fine. After getting home, I looked in the syslog and see thousands of these: Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending response: not enough free resources Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending response: not enough free resources Some googling on this error found a reference to a possible queue limiting problem in pf/qlimit, but the only firewalling I do is a very basic ipfw setup strictly for bruteblock. I am not even sure if this error caused the outage(s) or was caused by them, let alone a fix or workaround. Appreciate any and all clues, especially if you are familiar with this. TIA! James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 18:55:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AF4106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AF28FC14 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22802 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 18:55:03 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jan 2010 18:55:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8492E5082E; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:55:00 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:55:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100127120511.A42534@starfire.mn.org> (john@starfire.mn.org's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:05:11 -0600") Message-ID: <448wbjl6nv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: "adduser" and single-user groups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:55:04 -0000 John writes: > Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard > to the value add of the "group per user" approach that adduser > uses? "man adduser"; about 60 lines in, there is a whole section titled "UNIQUE GROUPS". This is the document you want. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:03:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F43F1065694 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kickbsd@ya.ru) Received: from forward7.mail.yandex.net (forward7.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DC38FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail25.yandex.ru (webmail25.yandex.ru [213.180.223.152]) by forward7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 626B23117E1 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:03:01 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1264618981; bh=2Aw3Bv5jAsQ+HGPS1SvM76IdLbVg0mCPi3pLWwm3gqk=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=iEda41nUgxgsquw40zkLc2Zk67uXJ6S+XynENzyI0r4sbd/KVGERAQJnmcC1pgLry cBkx3mN1PGDqz92/L2AGoafe23al+9BHYmo/11sShwVlPLzY0y8bev70TEqBjF3eVs WO/5zfDxwSieJCKdNXF4Ccxe4i/6xsN486nVuihY= Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail25.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2519644804F; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:03:01 +0300 (MSK) X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: webmail25 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1264618981 Received: from iphone-charles.as6453.net (iphone-charles.as6453.net [64.86.53.183]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:02:58 +0300 From: Baginski Darren To: Baginski Darren In-Reply-To: <6701264615378@webmail110.yandex.ru> References: <6701264615378@webmail110.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <102291264618979@webmail25.yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:02:59 +0300 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot create 'tank': permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:03:05 -0000 Looks like it is the same issue as there http://groups.google.com/group/muc.lists.freebsd.fs/browse_thread/thread/8bc6c68057e5d416 but still don't know how to fix.... 27.01.10, 21:02, "Baginski Darren" : > Hi! > > Getting weird error > #zpool create tank mfid0p4 > cannot create 'tank': permission denied > > On dmesg: > vdev_geom_open_by_path:466[1]: Found provider by name /dev/mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_attach:112[1]: Attaching to mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_attach:153[1]: Created consumer for mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p4... > vdev_geom_detach:173[1]: Closing access to mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_detach:177[1]: Destroyed consumer to mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_open_by_path:477[1]: guid mismatch for provider /dev/mfid0p4: 15029269312013869400 != 0. > vdev_geom_open_by_guid:435[1]: Searching by guid [15029269312013869400]. > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from acd0... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p4... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p3... > vdev_geom_read_guid:339[1]: guid for mfid0p3 is 9402336837364771330 > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p2... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0p1... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from gptid/85a347ae-0b3f-11df-84de-001ec9b0c152... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from ufsid/4b6033ebc4edab5d... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from gptid/2f7b4cd6-e983-11de-ac17-001ec9b0c152... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from gptid/2f7aa939-e983-11de-ac17-001ec9b0c152... > vdev_geom_read_guid:301[1]: Reading guid from mfid0... > vdev_geom_open_by_guid:449[1]: Search by guid [15029269312013869400] failed. > vdev_geom_open_by_path:466[1]: Found provider by name /dev/mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_attach:112[1]: Attaching to mfid0p4. > vdev_geom_open:521[1]: Provider /dev/mfid0p4 not found. > > But > # gpart list > Geom name: mfid0 > fwheads: 255 > fwsectors: 63 > last: 570949598 > first: 34 > entries: 128 > scheme: GPT > Providers: > 1. Name: mfid0p1 > Mediasize: 65536 (64K) > Sectorsize: 512 > Mode: r0w0e0 > rawtype: 83bd6b9d-7f41-11dc-be0b-001560b84f0f > label: (null) > length: 65536 > offset: 17408 > type: freebsd-boot > index: 1 > end: 161 > start: 34 > 2. Name: mfid0p2 > Mediasize: 124354560 (119M) > Sectorsize: 512 > Mode: r0w0e0 > rawtype: 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b > label: (null) > length: 124354560 > offset: 82944 > type: freebsd-swap > index: 2 > end: 243041 > start: 162 > 3. Name: mfid0p3 > Mediasize: 6442449920 (6.0G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Mode: r1w1e1 > rawtype: 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b > label: (null) > length: 6442449920 > offset: 124437504 > type: freebsd-zfs > index: 3 > end: 12825951 > start: 243042 > 4. Name: mfid0p4 > Mediasize: 285759307264 (266G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Mode: r0w0e0 > rawtype: 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b > label: (null) > length: 285759307264 > offset: 6566887424 > type: freebsd-zfs > index: 4 > end: 570949598 > start: 12825952 > Consumers: > 1. Name: mfid0 > Mediasize: 292326211584 (272G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Mode: r1w1e2 > > Any ideas ? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- úÄÅÓØ ÓÐÁÍÁ ÎÅÔ http://mail.yandex.ru/nospam/sign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:16:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A98110656A6 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f203.google.com (mail-qy0-f203.google.com [209.85.221.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426DB8FC12 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk41 with SMTP id 41so4165610qyk.29 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:16:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvBLBJyh8NsZwueO2N6iEzQRxGoBm/jxuedJkgaI0Sc=; b=qczmiGy72+mTpsdgl7VJKVwpXb/JnAzF/RQGeJMLnyumR2rAFSnYPQmc3lPP8FyhYo 7Qe7/wTSRy8J7ldrRXl7WfdziXQy3JFdBplDYiL3YHdh90qV48AxQRzft9NGtrVIfMhw Cl2C/Aph+fl3oeWN1KzZLhUnPtGaDGuiPdeAM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vN41c75YlphbupSE/9iZefNJ6hjLEqFJRqynzOfhTg5cm9icIsbo8+DvMKrHDOB4us w5nR6HP5BHYe1LyhXuIlh/W8p9aRrc/MfEZRZ+OZGo8j5VMAmDj3ZRKJFzd5Axx6be2Z ZN/x7TqLTPfO46vi/J6h+5NlKBcRnQzdyQ3Q0= Received: by 10.229.68.11 with SMTP id t11mr60516qci.25.1264619771244; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:16:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from aryeh-desktop.istudentunion.com (ool-44c0cd7a.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.205.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm117488qyk.11.2010.01.27.11.16.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:16:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:16:12 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:16:12 -0000 I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it else rm it)... any quick way to do this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:21:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FB91065672 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f220.google.com (mail-bw0-f220.google.com [209.85.218.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6458FC15 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so468026bwz.14 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=INYyZu3DYGLPKaW53LQjki/bllPLY6SwuGPWXJvegAg=; b=oJdR7ACsVV7o3k/HXW7upAe140fhCQYFNA3vrP7gUNYLoLq/doWf0h+dRwthbMuuGV xGU8pKNBjnv2b8MifkpoSA+jaemi481FbUuY1LqXXHW9bDa4rhcZ/n+xU4MpVZvirPvi ReXloj7oPa9rODmeoZ4cb30T6xy6FRZimItwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=G0UqmTgbsV8M+wcG+ZWbfrxAEksElagwu46Znsoq85/xFK+13DceFzBuOdzBzseK47 dUlpWNGHczZw3NTSxJQRcUgsAGxSAZyOFDqJDPNicKqQOTD3Jt2hWjLMrVJaX1cH+Gbn ZzaZdfloia3hOitQ30uOBWWXYaMTiJjetfsQs= Received: by 10.102.14.13 with SMTP id 13mr4912255mun.32.1264620058137; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s11sm962829mue.34.2010.01.27.11.20.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:17:37 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Message-ID: <20100127191737.GA70795@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:21:01 -0000 Hi, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove > any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it > else rm it)... any quick way to do this? Perhaps something like this will help: find /dir -type f | \ grep -v `cat excludelist` | \ xargs rm Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:24:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17281065670 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [64.156.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EA88FC18 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [72.29.180.81]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA824A2E70E; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:23:23 -0800 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:23:23 -0800 From: Jason To: Glen Barber Message-ID: <20100127192322.GK43904@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> <20100127191737.GA70795@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100127191737.GA70795@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "Aryeh M. Friedman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:24:49 -0000 You could probably use rsync with : --exclude-from=FILE read exclude patterns from FILE -jgh On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:17:37PM -0500, Glen Barber thus spake: >Hi, > >Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: >> I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove >> any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it >> else rm it)... any quick way to do this? > >Perhaps something like this will help: > > find /dir -type f | \ > grep -v `cat excludelist` | \ > xargs rm > >Regards, > >-- >Glen Barber >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:25:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA80D1065692 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8838FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21583 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 19:25:08 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jan 2010 19:25:08 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 27D225082E; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:25:07 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:25:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> (Aryeh M. Friedman's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:16:12 -0500") Message-ID: <443a1rl59p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:08 -0000 *not* OT, I would say... "Aryeh M. Friedman" writes: > I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove > any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it > else rm it)... any quick way to do this? mtree(8) -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:25:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A86C1065679 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f203.google.com (mail-qy0-f203.google.com [209.85.221.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCC18FC25 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk41 with SMTP id 41so4170112qyk.29 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:25:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ACEfGUhluawGhFqqUjaCkn10JlaTDFDmj8NqDC91ZLY=; b=Snrel5gstlSGH2wwfN8pXsgJx5jSTq5lE7x5Xc22lRUBjlHsHEujaG44pzUGwl9u/h tMW7FRM2Axf4BawPSe1Iwl0F8I40SwWYf5n1ZPcO6ZgeOv/N74Av8KqjdkgSnFtB1mfj mtqYxVwiCxj/3RiLcbcsMg0hJAARnxI2Kp9Vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rrncn/+C0OUEg1w9+zYKkAR31n/xP2Dxye1U8hp4EmSvbqavpLFWnVgoWKyLa4epiu ONcoTd6Q9YYm7CMXrZQg6my23QF4hUUrBVdRIale6SxfWf5XnDaZAp6zPMYt+C+/mq4s HO4xew16hSDAxY+psd/e/dhUU4fOSFaNziSpg= Received: by 10.224.79.200 with SMTP id q8mr3046094qak.341.1264620340265; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:25:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from aryeh-desktop.istudentunion.com (ool-44c0cd7a.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.205.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm123471qyk.0.2010.01.27.11.25.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:25:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B609335.8060808@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:25:41 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> <20100127191737.GA70795@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100127191737.GA70795@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:41 -0000 Glen Barber wrote: > Hi, > > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > >> I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove >> any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it >> else rm it)... any quick way to do this? >> > > Perhaps something like this will help: > > find /dir -type f | \ > grep -v `cat excludelist` | \ > xargs rm > > Regards, > > Note quite since it will see every file after the first as a file to be grepped instead of filtered out... I was playing with the idea of doing a tcsh foreach loop on each file and then using it cut down the output of find... the problem there is it is O(n^2) where is a "good" solution is O(n) [I need to do this {don't ask the reasons} everytime I build a program I am developing] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:29:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAC71065679 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f192.google.com (mail-yx0-f192.google.com [209.85.210.192]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECD48FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe30 with SMTP id 30so3695626yxe.29 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:29:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=c5o7UgpUkJKQ/sfhfkbrjmfQmmiRNSZTYI+S5Sffumo=; b=UXpOCZAYKs6mDJrLiQ5nbLDjXnWk/pmL7TDHODQIRCNLwTmHURIh+n+nxHTumdWFxI DF1f+jSW0h2mWMTcia9/I0q9pDVaC3CqvQaarbqSSS+A/Ww2PauDn28p2/K1dVnSpBd0 UIZHgvlN6gMKkaIpbPdSmKqjtHr5B+mgG2sGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=KXObPgBkBZRLZqynlA9NLt5Cys8HZXmm6/l/pA3L7493KL0IGOE31sh3mGUQOAMPmx ViHZK7QZJiQZW7wqqISmqbkZPXw/vsSHkbF7wNsE3lnGeDRjUY8LGxkbtU1PE2fffgzz 6el5KHXP2r6KsX9FkQLMjaYhoglKDiziC9wtI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.11.12 with SMTP id 12mr989882agk.18.1264620569127; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:29:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <867hr46fl0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <867hr46fl0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> From: Ross Penner Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:29:09 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: George Liaskos , krad , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Steve Bertrand Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:30 -0000 On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>> "Ross" == Ross Penner writes: > > Ross> That seems to have been the problem. > > Yes, what I learned the hard way is that every single step there needs to be > precisely followed, without deviation, even if you don't understand it or > think it's important. :) Yes! But because I was extra anal retentive this time around, I've run into some more trouble. I have 2 disks and I only added one when I created the zroot pool. Now that my system is booted I figured I could just go 'zpool add -f zroot /dev/gpt/disk1' but I get the error message: "cannot add to 'zroot': root pool cannot have multiple vdevs or seperate logs". I prepared the second disk in a similar manner to the first: "gpart -t freebsd-zfs -l disk1 ad6". Any advice would be greatly appreciated! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:30:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4201065778 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEF38FC15 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so566646qwi.7 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:30:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sOk5cGr+UHsAnheGWkMtFk6Pki1nKAAe0HQDWvMOEAU=; b=ZTaahUQ7E0mgo299qsIJ6nFv4q9W9vsV7YCUX7pKJtuKoNQrnlRX08ueGnpbGULYeZ v72QJ1vtwvC/BzcYczvgrYwkiLsgete1zdFH6/3UnMJUF8EQ77UWyE5dlU8FgyQDIocY E199c8mu7UiIgzo0AbJGD6a/UlgCXOsbGOISQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UK5F1aPqpKBUIUFAYoe4TFx7grSI3Fi7D8cVvJMBJB2Ye/jOap8eRr0+/bCOM+tWrv FzJN7k+8RQJIOXCK5SMRqkuOKzJZckihYKqKQB1dfNdPbOaf/uj55+YqhjEUA9cBtjME sAm39Aonx94fNAmoH4nPwd1Tpe7YbZ1GADFw8= Received: by 10.224.52.81 with SMTP id h17mr5789961qag.131.1264620653596; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:30:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from aryeh-desktop.istudentunion.com (ool-44c0cd7a.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.205.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm127014qyk.7.2010.01.27.11.30.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:30:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B60946D.3070708@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:30:53 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> <443a1rl59p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <443a1rl59p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:30:55 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > *not* OT, I would say... > > "Aryeh M. Friedman" writes: > > >> I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove >> any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it >> else rm it)... any quick way to do this? >> > > mtree(8) > > Tried aelpf -p master | mtree -p ~aegis/master/baseline/" (ignore the aelpf it is a command unique to devel/aegis) but got the following: mtree: line 1: slash character in file name The reason is here is a very small snippet of aelpf's output: data/config/dns/agilejavatools.com.db data/config/dns/istudentunion.com.db From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 19:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76BF106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18C18FC2A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:50:04 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KWX007ED8F3U120@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:49:55 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001270158 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:49:51 -0800 Message-id: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> References: To: James Smallacombe X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:50:04 -0000 On Jan 27, 2010, at 10:24 AM, James Smallacombe wrote: > NOTE: Please reply off-list as well as I am not subscribed OK. In return, please don't cross-post or multi-post the same question to multiple FreeBSD lists. > My server (7.2-STABLE) suffered at least two outages Sunday through yesterday after having been up since July (it is a rented dedicated server with my FSBD install). The first time, I was able to log in via remotely, saw a ton of spam apparently abusing a php mail form script (more on that later) filling the /var partition. I purged it, but it still required a reboot as CPU was through the roof. See "man pkill" for an easier way to terminate processes short of rebooting. Depending on just how badly this PHP script was being taken advantage of and how closely you've been tracking security updates, it's possible that your machine might have been compromised. > Yesterday morning, I was unable to get into the server at all...pings were very high. I called the provider and got in via KVM over IP. CPU was fine and there wre no full partitions. As I had to catch a flight, I just rebooted it and it was fine. > > After getting home, I looked in the syslog and see thousands of these: > > Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending response: not enough free resources > Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending response: not enough free resources Were these client IPs expected to be talking to this machine? It indicates a problem sending UDP traffic; netstat -s output would be informative. You might find that setting options in named.conf to tune the # of outstanding queries will help: clients-per-query 10; max-clients-per-query 20; Doing a tcpdump and examining the queries to see what DNS resources are being requested would also be useful. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 20:11:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94A106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com (dorsai-02.celestial.com [192.136.111.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DD08FC1F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9F2205A8C4 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at celestial.com Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dorsai-02.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9Eu0L5sysyVH for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD91205A668 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7991168EEF8E7; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12WVif1-iYLU; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 5BBBD68EEF8E5; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:11:50 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100127201150.GB19557@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 OpenPKG/% (2009-01-05) Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:11:51 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove > any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it > else rm it)... any quick way to do this? One way to do this that I use quite frequently uses the comm program to compare lists, something like cd /path-to-dir1 find . -type f | sort > /tmp/list1 cd /path-to-dir2 find . -type f | sort > /tmp/list2 comm -23 /tmp/list1 /tmp/list2 > /tmp/filesinlist1notinlist2 comm -13 /tmp/list1 /tmp/list2 > /tmp/filesinlist2notinlist1 comm -12 /tmp/list1 /tmp/list2 > /tmp/filescommontolist1andlist2 Then of course one could remove files in list1 not in list2 with: xargs rm < /tmp/filesinlist1notinlist2 NOTE: The xargs command will not work if the files contain whitespace. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186 Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792 Criminals love gun control it makes their jobs safer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 20:23:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA1C1065693 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23C488FC0A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23218 invoked by uid 0); 27 Jan 2010 20:23:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy6.bluehost.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 20:23:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=s2K9mYpJ3eDgCndpPTW4peGixwdmiq2XEFOfO3N0q8ljvqYzHKnKx8sE04Y3hRnEueDHzT3X62gJBalrGOALhCdq/HydhDrDRVqBZDEp2CsOyMihLjFj+NDv9Ul5mDwF; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaEQ9-00014K-Jw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:23:26 -0700 Message-ID: <4B60A0B3.8040505@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:23:15 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD054549F0A4FA13DE1FE35D7" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Migrating Thunderbird 3 Email Archives from XP Pro SP3 to FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD054549F0A4FA13DE1FE35D7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've done some searching on the Thunderbird (TB) website and have posted the question at one of their support forums, but I felt I should ask here, too, just in case someone else has confronted this. I only use POP3 to retrieve email (the merits of POP3 vs IMAP not withstanding) and store locally so I have easy and offline access to it. For about two years now I've been using XP to retrieve and check my email, upgrading through various versions of TB without a problem. Now I'm confronted with an issue I've not faced before (or attempted to confront). Transferring archives from one computer to another. I know where they are kept on the XP machine, I /think/ I know where they are kept on my FreeBSD box (nothing a little ls -a won't help me find). My question is if this even possible since Mozilla Foundation went to using binary archives for the email. I think it might be, but I'm not really wanting to waste the time to only be frustrated in the end. Has anyone attempted such a migration? Did you need any special tools? If not, was it as simple as copy/pasting into the appropriate directory structure? Or do I need to set up the accounts in TB on my FreeBSD box /first/ then copy/paste? TIA for reading and especially for helping (if you can)! (: --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigD054549F0A4FA13DE1FE35D7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLYKC5AAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0M74H/02ErSHtgANY03hZfF20f8RC OSozkZnBdm6r3FfDeABLId8rvxsr1vZN/nrzhffiWLQtKoYqFYMG2FAnPlHghsBo rSa3WkXa4+wD77SeOjNzrMQOlaD7xVkuC/zmbp7P+NnimbNIWz/6OXmweVXlLCDH fulm+p5QWAUVU++FIxybZ5U87FFoqnPh6CmpqZYpY9O9kgpXZ1uK7oJ+smPtYy+S XWQbknILsGyZnx7FavMn01d3Ku/nxgB3Z3fJX7XJsJuA5frNpIJVf+JYf1wNmJ3I 4s6mOkiPSEuDC6t2VZdtfVv53DmDiNVRbTZ4vBPbcW+Nsp1J9+FA9b5y9fb1JnI= =4LAf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD054549F0A4FA13DE1FE35D7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 20:40:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C1A1065679 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C18B8FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10823 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 20:39:59 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jan 2010 20:39:59 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 74C645082E; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:39:58 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> <443a1rl59p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4B60946D.3070708@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:39:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B60946D.3070708@gmail.com> (Aryeh M. Friedman's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:30:53 -0500") Message-ID: <44wrz3jn8h.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:40:00 -0000 "Aryeh M. Friedman" writes: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> *not* OT, I would say... >> >> "Aryeh M. Friedman" writes: >> >> >>> I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove >>> any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it >>> else rm it)... any quick way to do this? >>> >> >> mtree(8) >> >> > Tried aelpf -p master | mtree -p ~aegis/master/baseline/" (ignore the > aelpf it is a command unique to devel/aegis) but got the following: > > mtree: line 1: slash character in file name You'll need to turn the file list into an mtree specification before you can use it to do this. Why don't you try one of the other suggestions (which may be usable as-is)? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 21:15:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9095106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from mail.pil.net (ns3.pil.net [209.17.170.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9546A8FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12803 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 16:15:16 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 16:15:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:15:16 -0500 (EST) From: James Smallacombe X-X-Sender: up@ns3.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:15:17 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 27, 2010, at 10:24 AM, James Smallacombe wrote: >> NOTE: Please reply off-list as well as I am not subscribed > > OK. In return, please don't cross-post or multi-post the same question > to multiple FreeBSD lists. I posted to the -isp list a couple of hours earlier, then looked at the archives and noticed zero traffic on that list for the past couple of weeks, so I then posted here. >> After getting home, I looked in the syslog and see thousands of these: >> >> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending response: not enough free resources >> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending response: not enough free resources > > Were these client IPs expected to be talking to this machine? It This server is authoritative for a few hundred domains, so I would imagine anybody doing a query on any of them would need to talk to it...unless I misunderstand what you mean by "talk". > indicates a problem sending UDP traffic; netstat -s output would be Unfortunately, I did not have time for netstats or tcpdumps when this was happening and I've not seen this log entry since yesterday evening. > informative. You might find that setting options in named.conf to tune > the # of outstanding queries will help: > > clients-per-query 10; > max-clients-per-query 20; Thanks, I will look into those. the man page for named.conf doesn't tell you much and my latest cricket book is 3rd edition (only up to BIND 8), so I guess it's time to break down and get the latest. James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 21:15:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7C9106568F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368008FC1D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0RLFa2r058113 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:15:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201001272115.o0RLFa2r058113@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:15:36 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Swap Partition First? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:15:54 -0000 Our FreeBSD systems mostly have a very simple disk layout. There is a 1 or 2-gigabyte swap partition and all the rest is FreeBSD. When manually configuring these partitions in sysinstall, I usually set up swap first with a 1GB size and then use the remaining space by selecting the values as defaults. An attempt to script this in an install.cfg file is not going well. The disk formatting part of the file is as follows: disk=ad0 partition=all bootManager=none diskPartitionEditor #Entire disk is FreeBSD. diskPartitionWrite ################################ ################################ # All sizes are expressed in 512 byte blocks! # #1G swap followed by / on rest of disk. # ad0s1-2=swap 2097152 #All the rest is FreeBSD with soft updates. ad0s1-1=ufs 0 / 1 # Let's do it! diskLabelEditor diskLabelCommit # OK, everything is set. Do it! installCommit This doesn't work. sysinstall reports that it can't write the swap space. fdisk reports a FreeBSD partition and all the others are shown as free. Any ideas? Thank you. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 21:21:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE4E106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961DA8FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:21:25 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KWX0088VCNJC670@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:21:25 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001270178 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:21:18 -0800 Message-id: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> To: James Smallacombe X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:21:25 -0000 Hi-- On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: >>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending response: not enough free resources >>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending response: not enough free resources >> >> Were these client IPs expected to be talking to this machine? It > > This server is authoritative for a few hundred domains, so I would imagine anybody doing a query on any of them would need to talk to it...unless I misunderstand what you mean by "talk". OK, if the nameserver is published / authoritative, then it would be expected to be fielding requests from the Internet at large. >> indicates a problem sending UDP traffic; netstat -s output would be > > Unfortunately, I did not have time for netstats or tcpdumps when this was happening and I've not seen this log entry since yesterday evening. Unless you rebooted the machine again since the errors were reported, the netstat output would still be relevant. >> informative. You might find that setting options in named.conf to tune the # of outstanding queries will help: >> >> clients-per-query 10; >> max-clients-per-query 20; > > Thanks, I will look into those. the man page for named.conf doesn't tell you much and my latest cricket book is 3rd edition (only up to BIND 8), so I guess it's time to break down and get the latest. Good luck.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 21:30:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BA91065676; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCE88FC0A; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A845946B2C; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:30:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9DB9C8A024; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:30:46 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:27:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20100120; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001271627.37955.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:30:46 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:30:48 -0000 On Wednesday 27 January 2010 11:45:36 am Dan Naumov wrote: > Hey > > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having supposedly shaky support for GPT boot. But right now > I am having an email exchange with Supermicro support (whom I > contacted since I am pondering their X7SPA-H board for a new system), > who are telling me that booting off GPT requires UEFI BIOS, which is > supposedly a very new thing and that for example NONE of their current > motherboards have support for this. > > Am I misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguided? GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based bootstrap that can handle GPT-labelled disks. I doubt the SuperMicro tech is familiar with that case. I thought I heard that some folks had added GPT support to grub as well. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 21:59:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13E4106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465A68FC20 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so40122fxm.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:59:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7DOdHR64JLItFnmErqiEMei+6ezUC07ZYkcJw/eEpYo=; b=gboU4jXJMOUlkNmZ69S1jap1rELYrD8slmndxcKZguPP1vLlY6BX3poq9kIUmLtA9V MP72ysaL5NWpIyBzc+CX6jrf1I+3ih8c+33HNn+B/SA7JebphhMICAjy3FhCcA/MTFZ8 f7qtO9u5hLYAunHuSHqcRgr3AA3bkFirG8x+M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wlGI87vAUOXe7jumWfC0ECuypR/fYNNmroM6HKrpYhBiJuuxaAJC8Qc2DhFcImQacE PJdPykFSqt6sshtZYOxko3VI29k+Lcv+QRWIFBFUMmG0afol+isBDMVrLPZWb2EY1TYp zjoYqmFxZcFfzF57YvRP1+81U9AByaDSSfavQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.177.199 with SMTP id w7mr22293hbf.11.1264629588985; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:59:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <867hr46fl0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:59:48 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Ross Penner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: George Liaskos , Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Randal L. Schwartz" Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:59:50 -0000 2010/1/27 Ross Penner > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Randal L. Schwartz > wrote: > >>>>>> "Ross" == Ross Penner writes: > > > > Ross> That seems to have been the problem. > > > > Yes, what I learned the hard way is that every single step there needs to > be > > precisely followed, without deviation, even if you don't understand it or > > think it's important. :) > > Yes! But because I was extra anal retentive this time around, I've run > into some more trouble. I have 2 disks and I only added one when I > created the zroot pool. Now that my system is booted I figured I could > just go 'zpool add -f zroot /dev/gpt/disk1' but I get the error > message: "cannot add to 'zroot': root pool cannot have multiple vdevs > or seperate logs". > > I prepared the second disk in a similar manner to the first: "gpart -t > freebsd-zfs -l disk1 ad6". > > Any advice would be greatly appreciated! > u need to attach the drive create a mirror, adding creates a new vdev ie creates a stripe aka raid0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:05:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67E6106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [89.234.8.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CDB8FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (p54A7F46D.dip.t-dialin.net [84.167.244.109]) by thing.verysmall.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B14F917024 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:58:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Iv Ray Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:49:01 +0100 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Subject: Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:05:54 -0000 We are getting a new web server - Singe Dual Core Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM It will have - 2 x 250 GB SATA gmirror RAID 1 We will run - - Apache 2.x - PHP 5.x - PostgreSQL 8.x - Postfix 2.x We have a couple of questions- If we are more interested in stability than in features and performance - a) Is FreeBSD 8.0 the right for us, or shall we rather go for FreeBSD 7.x? b) Is i386 or amd64 the right way? Thanks! Iv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:10:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832CC106568B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABBD8FC1B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so28576pwi.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:10:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5E8wQF93qpiv7jiQmQZ/zxGGoLMCr8puqTEEflYVtWY=; b=toEmz4XFzQYEBbD1Blg05/S/LW44i0ly6WrCoHJX2upaWaha+MysaE9Qprb0Boy4Al K7iRNGLhgjCrkMvyvxzzR09URxZJ/kJLvCjzYkYhgilvUvAtfDrfqEXsk0rV5/buvNzV kB0J4+q1Fx0MT6/nOGw/ALIXVHNlw9N9mzHww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xHXSKFQQ/HuVzK8QAPR7yBpUaaR7xhvFYk+zOgR75gqJrV7PxeCXulR8ESYlE5cphq HvRSW2Iy4ylDJLyZERjGlFYdAOBaESpoA3w0bPvHbC5rMIOZsKmJA64ZUC+msP0p+nwo osSYyApUoa/JbYGRFVZelqrXf3hU1BbvH2+Q0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.5.26 with SMTP id 26mr642607wfe.210.1264630246996; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:10:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201001272115.o0RLFa2r058113@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <201001272115.o0RLFa2r058113@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:10:46 -0500 Message-ID: <54db43991001271410y6e4156ddl4737d4d6f96f2b6c@mail.gmail.com> From: Bob Johnson To: Martin McCormick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Swap Partition First? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:10:47 -0000 The only thing that looks out of place is that you have defined ad0s1-2 before ad0s1-1. I've never tested it, but perhaps this is causing it to get confused when calculating the disk layout? In other words, perhaps you should use #1G swap followed by / on rest of disk. # ad0s1-1=swap 2097152 #All the rest is FreeBSD with soft updates. ad0s1-2=ufs 0 / 1 so they are defined in numerical sequence. On 1/27/10, Martin McCormick wrote: > Our FreeBSD systems mostly have a very simple disk layout. There > is a 1 or 2-gigabyte swap partition and all the rest is FreeBSD. > When manually configuring these partitions in sysinstall, I > usually set up swap first with a 1GB size and then use the > remaining space by selecting the values as defaults. > > An attempt to script this in an install.cfg file is not > going well. The disk formatting part of the file is as follows: > > disk=ad0 > partition=all > bootManager=none > diskPartitionEditor > #Entire disk is FreeBSD. > diskPartitionWrite > ################################ > > ################################ > # All sizes are expressed in 512 byte blocks! > # > #1G swap followed by / on rest of disk. > # > ad0s1-2=swap 2097152 > #All the rest is FreeBSD with soft updates. > ad0s1-1=ufs 0 / 1 > # Let's do it! > diskLabelEditor > diskLabelCommit > > # OK, everything is set. Do it! > installCommit > > This doesn't work. sysinstall reports that it can't > write the swap space. > > fdisk reports a FreeBSD partition and all the others are > shown as free. > > Any ideas? Thank you. > > Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK > Systems Engineer > OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- Bob Johnson fbsdlists@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:11:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA861065698 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f202.google.com (mail-pz0-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A099E8FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so27428pzk.7 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:11:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8+XBCXQ2IY8P5xA1VSh5tppdvMww1iQ5mo9zQQpfR7Q=; b=wkfXpQYW3nxPlmb5UF8DkX0IC408bJi2UVAMpm7mnYP5T9I3BnPbXKNkjXrWUMFa2O i006XsiUf+XIm4148yeFR4KvyDXh/ccJ6st/OBpFR8HS2xXuK/lIBU1bUxtD/pqAgDZM DsbBFeWF9dP14AqAxcCcHaax1R37neuSZ4jdI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VopcxIQ8tb7v9T6VTV2aDBcns9SG4jB1p0VxmkbSqUfh2dRPoi7UKCUi1GvI+t4XHk DagMFfnY/HwWlPV4LhVt4eap4r9Bmh4lPl0MVVoq550xEJgr1Uxc7dBjs0WvW1evx/7F nKc9Z2jCpq1/BKVG7+wKA99QL3KS/2mVZLLDk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.1 with SMTP id u1mr310269wfh.249.1264630312326; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:11:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:11:52 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001271411ya202dcy901c46a097d83bce@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Iv Ray Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:11:52 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Iv Ray wrote: > We are getting a new web server - > > Singe Dual Core Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM > > It will have - > > 2 x 250 GB SATA gmirror RAID 1 > > We will run - > > - Apache 2.x > - PHP 5.x > - PostgreSQL 8.x > - Postfix 2.x > > We have a couple of questions- > > If we are more interested in stability than in features and performance - > > a) Is FreeBSD 8.0 the right for us, or shall we rather go for FreeBSD 7.x? > > b) Is i386 or amd64 the right way? > > Thanks! > > Iv > 8.0, amd64 if there's chance you'll ever put more ram in the system. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:20:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86752106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1B48FC19 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so34846pxi.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:20:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AoMrVPYCL3SCUewV0jZCoOT5nOuUBW7ZrUXlkSxYzWA=; b=OSCfuTVqLmYaWhBYV2jhaQ0byZlk3x+Hq5lbAR7Jo++/7MDDVPfVp8Y91cmm2QNw0d TC7iTJk62zGqsLr0DBE22fQWqths0CeLhNgXcyefJtIGRYkX/XwTuQ6G/ndxVJ9KIQ34 s8uEMoJY5s4RYfOPU1YxSuc/ufBxP91A6vrn4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=D1jRft3VB8AWctTdt/7l6cbRlI+1MBk661jLVv4BFGcMA5YykDjKymVzft57ceJif5 fH4kltdtHIZ8+jY8sRTj3ae6v1HrcqksvV0IgMFVZW71LKqecflVUPODKzTo7DNKP7el sLZEmUch0uhV5fbacognHs4D1DMH72DtZEH8I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.119.41 with SMTP id r41mr644240wfc.150.1264630815911; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:20:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6201873e1001271411ya202dcy901c46a097d83bce@mail.gmail.com> References: <6201873e1001271411ya202dcy901c46a097d83bce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:20:15 -0600 Message-ID: <11167f521001271420t2bb4be50maf6aa18381ca9830@mail.gmail.com> From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Iv Ray , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:16 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Iv Ray wrote: > >> We are getting a new web server - >> >> Singe Dual Core Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM >> >> It will have - >> >> 2 x 250 GB SATA gmirror RAID 1 >> >> We will run - >> >> - Apache 2.x >> - PHP 5.x >> - PostgreSQL 8.x >> - Postfix 2.x >> >> We have a couple of questions- >> >> If we are more interested in stability than in features and performance - >> >> a) Is FreeBSD 8.0 the right for us, or shall we rather go for FreeBSD 7.x? >> >> b) Is i386 or amd64 the right way? I vote for 8.0. and amd64 even if you stay at 4GB Sam Fourman Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:20:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CB1106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Viraj.Dixit@CityofPaloAlto.org) Received: from xmail.cityofpaloalto.org (cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us [199.33.32.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9ED8FC20 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xpo.staff.copa ([172.17.1.12]) by xmail.cityofpaloalto.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:08:41 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA9F9D.4885A0B0" Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:08:40 -0800 Message-ID: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> Thread-Topic: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP Thread-Index: AcqfnV5pTCnMRiGTQL2jqoqtoFunOQ== References: From: "Dixit, Viraj" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2010 22:08:41.0371 (UTC) FILETIME=[48CF56B0:01CA9F9D] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:43 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA9F9D.4885A0B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will run ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS there is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and will automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you want. Thanks, VJ ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA9F9D.4885A0B0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:32:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD4110656AB for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com (mail-yw0-f194.google.com [209.85.211.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723A78FC24 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so55963ywh.14 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:32:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=LzyjreRK+vZqUVFnA9jxIfeD9tCzKqmPDwXSUEGsqVc=; b=fyCfUkyqiTwNo0nJxuyAEk6OEOMfJE8IA/h+XHKJbM+lxk04IVDoyIQTzTllnS1p3H V98vdgP5iBjQU2aVldbmIWUXwZjRH5eTtXciEJoqlcORkgu7VyCZ4W16zTB34toTyRSl ccRcwW1MEW8lrtLHbsdzA9zqTsav8B/2Ayo8M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=LBdeJI3aWnhZ5lAjJEtnwkoS6qRrvqHVfwghfg3kMQYO4n6CdYRtZwyzZKJlr843f0 PR5Sw4IAaFNWTF8sYCy7hU3w/Qz9S+WqziX8gG0gol5WjumtTX1Mrbgv8QRW071LzuO+ wAvY82VMLmfNz6T7A3yLaoIH7iZC9/3XJ1STw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.219.9 with SMTP id r9mr3673727agg.85.1264631544710; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:32:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <867hr46fl0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> From: Ross Penner Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:32:04 -0800 Message-ID: To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: George Liaskos , Steve Bertrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Randal L. Schwartz" Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:32:25 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM, krad wrote: > > > 2010/1/27 Ross Penner >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Randal L. Schwartz >> wrote: >> >>>>>> "Ross" == Ross Penner writes: >> > >> > Ross> That seems to have been the problem. >> > >> > Yes, what I learned the hard way is that every single step there needs >> > to be >> > precisely followed, without deviation, even if you don't understand it >> > or >> > think it's important. :) >> >> Yes! But because I was extra anal retentive this time around, I've run >> into some more trouble. I have 2 disks and I only added one when I >> created the zroot pool. Now that my system is booted I figured I could >> just go 'zpool add -f zroot /dev/gpt/disk1' but I get the error >> message: "cannot add to 'zroot': root pool cannot have multiple vdevs >> or seperate logs". >> >> I prepared the second disk in a similar manner to the first: "gpart -t >> freebsd-zfs -l disk1 ad6". >> >> Any advice would be greatly appreciated! > > > u need to attach the drive create a mirror, adding creates a new vdev ie > creates a stripe aka raid0 > I didn't want a mirror though, I wanted a stripe. I still don't understand why what I'm doing isn't working. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:49:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC88E1065679 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:49:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70408FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:49:52 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KWX00L5SGQK6V80@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:49:33 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001270200 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:49:32 -0800 Message-id: <83E26D74-56FF-4B60-B675-7AC43D7540CB@mac.com> References: To: Iv Ray X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:49:52 -0000 Hi-- On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:49 PM, Iv Ray wrote: > If we are more interested in stability than in features and performance - > > a) Is FreeBSD 8.0 the right for us, or shall we rather go for FreeBSD 7.x? Pretty much by definition, the stability of a .x release is better than that of a .0 release. That said, I haven't heard of major issues with 8.0, so either is likely to be fine. > b) Is i386 or amd64 the right way? For a machine with 4GB of RAM, amd64 is likely to be a better choice. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:53:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478FC1065692 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7E08FC1F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o0RMrZgF072100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0RMrYsM077719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o0RMrYeg077696; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:34 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-ID: <20100127225334.GX50360@dan.emsphone.com> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:35 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:53:39 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 27), Dixit, Viraj said: > I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will > allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another > server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will run > ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS there > is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and will > automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you want. > Thanks, FreeBSD's ftp command supports .netrc files. Is your current script not working? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ftp#THE_.netrc_FILE -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 22:54:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F73D1065698 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E33A8FC22 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id o0RMsEpo026985 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:54:14 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:54:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001272354.14384.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:54:26 -0000 I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. These commands: cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal cpuset -c -l 2 make Will always result in errors, for example this one: gmake: *** No rule to make target `@MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@', needed by `config.h.in'. Stop. *** Error code 1 Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check the input files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of syntax errors for example. The configure process always completes, but apparently it creates broken files. When I run make on any other core, it always completes successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make I've checked with script that the output of the build process is exactly the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried to run cpuburn on that core, but it didn't find any problem. It's really weird that system is otherwise very stable. What do you guys think the problem is? CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. I've also tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. Thanks! -- Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 23:18:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD9F106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f192.google.com (mail-yx0-f192.google.com [209.85.210.192]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1218FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe30 with SMTP id 30so80965yxe.29 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:18:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=glCNRKbcqNo6QhSaRl/lnXLVc2GSBY5cGz6sHxYkHIk=; b=I3OZmgCMN4jqN80UryKrzHqq11gAt/tKnLBeqRD/nGHsTrjN4hqMTzhO75xjitFfVA q/D9fM4mlbn0CWqXEuNwnpz3TomBkP046tYZ4xqIsKwii2yVjlMp+WoCK6U08rmgnyG/ UNSZi+lSkxlLrLudnjdlvG0tqgOiBYnV5aDIo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TwC2GCOeY0m01ACNbnkFHYPMTytkhSp9tYQtBGuYYLWP1ytBw7XRvhc9dhBRVjQkIh wJ6UKj8ep020ZiIIRHFcp4JSJUw5LWNT9+ZYWTE/kdmbUPyspr8zfpFPKE7AE1IBaunZ jjloAV414RksFAuNg3mujslwfVCIWVnWDneog= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.129.3 with SMTP id g3mr12940714ann.209.1264634325189; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:18:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:18:45 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: RE: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:18:51 -0000 >I didn't want a mirror though, I wanted a stripe. > >I still don't understand why what I'm doing isn't working. As far as I know, having the root pool on a stripe isn't supported. OpenSolaris supports having the root pool on a "simple" pool and a mirror pool. FreeBSD supports having the root pool on a simple pool, mirror pool and raidz, but afaik booting off raidz used to have issues. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 23:27:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20491065676; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AEB8FC1B; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:481c:61a7:de40:51a1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:481c:61a7:de40:51a1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9826A5C43; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:27:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B60CBFA.4050601@andric.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:27:54 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2pre) Gecko/20100126 Lanikai/3.1b1pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <201001271627.37955.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201001271627.37955.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Naumov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:27:45 -0000 On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote: > GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI > to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based > bootstrap that can handle GPT-labelled disks. I doubt the SuperMicro tech is > familiar with that case. I thought I heard that some folks had added GPT > support to grub as well. However, this won't boot disks larger than 2TiB, right? At least not without BIOS support... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 23:30:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45227106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0588D8FC21 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o0RNTdug055259; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:29:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id o0RNTcHj055256; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:29:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:29:38 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-ID: <20100127232938.GB54380@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:30:45 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:08:40PM -0800, Dixit, Viraj wrote: > Hi, > I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will > allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another > server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will > run ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS > there is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and > will automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you > want. Thanks, > VJ Sounds like you might want to learn about rsync. It is in the ports, probably //usr/ports/net/rsync It will work unattended if you sent up public/private key SSH. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 23:32:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124EC1065672 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AFA8FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaHNA-00065H-JN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:32:32 +0100 Received: from pool-68-239-73-86.res.east.verizon.net ([68.239.73.86]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:32:32 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-68-239-73-86.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:32:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:32:22 -0500 Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <201001272354.14384.pieter@degoeje.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-68-239-73-86.res.east.verizon.net User-Agent: KNode/4.3.4 Sender: news Subject: Re: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:32:36 -0000 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. > > These commands: > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal > cpuset -c -l 2 make > > Will always result in errors, for example this one: > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `@MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@', needed by > `config.h.in'. Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check the input > files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of syntax errors for > example. > > The configure process always completes, but apparently it creates broken > files. When I run make on any other core, it always completes > successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make > > I've checked with script that the output of the build process is exactly > the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried to run cpuburn on > that core, but it didn't find any problem. It's really weird that system > is otherwise very stable. > > What do you guys think the problem is? > > CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. I've also > tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. > As a test I just ran these two commands on my Athlon II 630 here, but running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64 build. The make process ran directly to completion with no error. With overclocking too. Tried 4 runs, on each core. I'm not sure I recall all the details correctly without checking, but I thought there were some early samples or generations of these processors that were not the same as the final production releases. Something to do with being Phenom cores that had L3 cache disabled, being released as early engineering samples but the die of the final products is different with no L3 cache present from manufacturing. I'd check into the stepping and if it turns out not to be a final version get whoever you bought it from to replace it. It may not be the core itself, but bad L1/L2 cache. It's either that or the only other difference is you're running stable, and I'm not. But I'd suspect bad cache spots in L1/L2. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 23:48:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62210106566C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [89.234.8.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6EA8FC08 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (p54A7BD6B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.167.189.107]) by thing.verysmall.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A6F8D1702C for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:57:46 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) From: Iv Ray In-Reply-To: <83E26D74-56FF-4B60-B675-7AC43D7540CB@mac.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:48:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <182B7B60-FDF2-4048-AC8F-501253047236@verysmall.org> References: <83E26D74-56FF-4B60-B675-7AC43D7540CB@mac.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Subject: Re: Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:48:11 -0000 Thank you all for the consistent advice. Iv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 00:28:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE371065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3578FC1D for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaIFP-0006ID-HM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:38 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NaIFO-0004kL-Hf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:35 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0S0SYSA016758 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:34 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0S0SYRF016757 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:34 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:34 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100128002834.GC16628@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.5 X-Spam-Level: ---- Subject: libutil.so.8 -> libutil.so.9, WAS: openssh-portable fails to build on ia64, sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:28:40 -0000 I didn't get any reply from ports@, so maybe somebody here can help ----- Forwarded message from Anton Shterenlikht ----- maybe this has been discussed already, my apologies in that case. on current r203046 I'm trying to rebuild openssh-portable-5.2.p1_2,1 due to an upgrade from libutil.so.8 to libutil.so.9 I get this error on sparc64 and ia64 (don't have any other arch to check): ===> Building for openssh-portable-5.2.p1_2,1 cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-c ompare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat-security -fno-builtin-memset -I. -I.. -I. -I./ .. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c bsd-openpty.c bsd-openpty.c: In function 'openpty': bsd-openpty.c:128: error: 'I_PUSH' undeclared (first use in this function) bsd-openpty.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bsd-openpty.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.2p1/openbsd-compat. *** Error code 1 ----- End forwarded message ----- many programs installed by this port are not usable anymore because I deleted the old version of this lib. Now I can't update the port to use the new version. What shall i do? below are extract from ldd output: /usr/local/bin/ssh: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/scp: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/ssh-add: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/ssh-agent: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/ssh-keygen: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/ssh-keyscan: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/sftp: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) /usr/local/bin/slogin: libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 00:31:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134E810656AC for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [64.156.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9E58FC1B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [72.29.180.81]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1BF4A2E6CC; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:22:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:29:43 -0800 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:29:43 -0800 From: Jason To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20100128002941.GC66657@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <20100128002834.GC16628@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100128002834.GC16628@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libutil.so.8 -> libutil.so.9, WAS: openssh-portable fails to build on ia64, sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:31:09 -0000 If you upgrade a library port, you need to rebuild all ports that depend on that library. On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:28:34AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht thus spake: >I didn't get any reply from ports@, >so maybe somebody here can help > >----- Forwarded message from Anton Shterenlikht ----- > > >maybe this has been discussed already, my apologies in that case. > >on current r203046 I'm trying to rebuild openssh-portable-5.2.p1_2,1 >due to an upgrade from libutil.so.8 to libutil.so.9 > >I get this error on sparc64 and ia64 (don't have any other arch to check): > >===> Building for openssh-portable-5.2.p1_2,1 >cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-c >ompare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat-security -fno-builtin-memset -I. -I.. -I. -I./ >.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c bsd-openpty.c >bsd-openpty.c: In function 'openpty': >bsd-openpty.c:128: error: 'I_PUSH' undeclared (first use in this function) >bsd-openpty.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >bsd-openpty.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.) >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.2p1/openbsd-compat. >*** Error code 1 > >----- End forwarded message ----- > >many programs installed by this port are not usable >anymore because I deleted the old version of this lib. >Now I can't update the port to use the new version. > >What shall i do? > >below are extract from ldd output: > >/usr/local/bin/ssh: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/scp: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/ssh-add: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/ssh-agent: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/ssh-keygen: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/ssh-keyscan: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/sftp: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) >/usr/local/bin/slogin: > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >many thanks >anton > > >-- >Anton Shterenlikht >Room 2.6, Queen's Building >Mech Eng Dept >Bristol University >University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK >Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 >Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 00:34:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51345106568F for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D858FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaILL-0006UV-A3; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:47 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NaILK-0004mj-86; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:42 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0S0YgqF016786; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:42 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0S0YfEI016785; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:41 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:41 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Jason Message-ID: <20100128003441.GD16628@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100128002834.GC16628@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20100128002941.GC66657@eggman.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100128002941.GC66657@eggman.experts-exchange.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libutil.so.8 -> libutil.so.9, WAS: openssh-portable fails to build on ia64, sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:34:48 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:29:43PM -0800, Jason wrote: > If you upgrade a library port, you need to rebuild all ports that depend on > that library. I know, but the port in question doesn't build anymore. Or are you saying that I might have missed some intermediate ports? The error message seem like a compiler error to me.. many thanks anton > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:28:34AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht thus spake: > >I didn't get any reply from ports@, > >so maybe somebody here can help > > > >----- Forwarded message from Anton Shterenlikht ----- > > > > > >maybe this has been discussed already, my apologies in that case. > > > >on current r203046 I'm trying to rebuild openssh-portable-5.2.p1_2,1 > >due to an upgrade from libutil.so.8 to libutil.so.9 > > > >I get this error on sparc64 and ia64 (don't have any other arch to check): > > > >===> Building for openssh-portable-5.2.p1_2,1 > >cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-c > >ompare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat-security -fno-builtin-memset -I. -I.. -I. -I./ > >.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c bsd-openpty.c > >bsd-openpty.c: In function 'openpty': > >bsd-openpty.c:128: error: 'I_PUSH' undeclared (first use in this function) > >bsd-openpty.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > >bsd-openpty.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.) > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.2p1/openbsd-compat. > >*** Error code 1 > > > >----- End forwarded message ----- > > > >many programs installed by this port are not usable > >anymore because I deleted the old version of this lib. > >Now I can't update the port to use the new version. > > > >What shall i do? > > > >below are extract from ldd output: > > > >/usr/local/bin/ssh: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/scp: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/ssh-add: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/ssh-agent: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/ssh-keygen: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/ssh-keyscan: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/sftp: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > >/usr/local/bin/slogin: > > libutil.so.8 => not found (0x0) > > > >many thanks > >anton > > > > > >-- > >Anton Shterenlikht > >Room 2.6, Queen's Building > >Mech Eng Dept > >Bristol University > >University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK > >Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 > >Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 00:35:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF35106568F for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6038FC14 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NaILe-0003xs-Ej for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:35:02 -0800 Message-ID: <27349277.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:35:02 -0800 (PST) From: gfot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: giorgosfm@yahoo.gr Subject: How to use an older version of gcc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:35:03 -0000 Hi i'm trying to compile a toochain for mips and i'm having some problems with gcc 4.2.1 that my Freebsd 8.0 (64-bit) system came with. So i decided (it was proposed by the README of the toolchain) to use gcc 3.4 but i installed gcc 3.4 from ports but i still use the 4.2 when i type gcc. How can i use gcc 3.4? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-use-an-older-version-of-gcc--tp27349277p27349277.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 00:43:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32111065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E208FC19 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so162044fxm.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gohzr8lPtjyhXoPOam/Y7g47nRxjDqdGzZr2Are1sVg=; b=c+2OK6qq1BvayFNzuNOb7A1kduZkh3pnPhbJ1RT34Z5nnBZ/ad+tj6auurvCX0hxAe LssMxuPVfQmbgV/UucKZTB6J1Pv0MWdc3rWlqqknMY4wtulKBPeL+5Fe+WnpVTauT1yP SieKmNJQ/Ffn+96CbQBprH0o6TjPgwTuVD080= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cRbVmqJ8VJipwdogb5naaEBvgXow/XxLqlhY0eeXA7KkZxXfNcEh/VqV86KDNZ+W5Y 4B48IX0/FTw2jIgDWgsR1jeZPDZcIX7fUDzb3N3MOmozT7UiDtzKgv1hUpFlk88aAp/S jcedX8UQlTzaXhnWFiOsxLIkV7ZOKnndGAdrw= Received: by 10.87.9.39 with SMTP id m39mr5416149fgi.73.1264639419124; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8sm849693fga.3.2010.01.27.16.43.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:43:35 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100128004335.31ba30c6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <27349277.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27349277.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How to use an older version of gcc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:43:40 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:35:02 -0800 (PST) gfot wrote: > > Hi i'm trying to compile a toochain for mips and i'm having some > problems with gcc 4.2.1 that my Freebsd 8.0 (64-bit) system came > with. So i decided (it was proposed by the README of the toolchain) > to use gcc 3.4 but i installed gcc 3.4 from ports but i still use the > 4.2 when i type gcc. How can i use gcc 3.4? It's probably called gcc34 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 00:54:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EEA1065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j65nko@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE268FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 25so1296247eya.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:54:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZD1k0dIeAjqHh34GxIzDrDTPuTu662vH/W4aCd+Ljh4=; b=SNHN2nlNmypvhmjcJOzObyJ4BTa3nrlNZcSVvaGhtCD3urx3W/hytwJbnGf4SguXZ0 I1KxiJfLxQ1dv2ckzXvph5+bndEW57CFo4Eql0ObMegYzzGS2R6+Cun4A57cTeocjI1c klPIYmLI5fPXCtUn5tGDvACkYYEFQ0rUzD50w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=joUsEgYTNrJ8URFX09rxzQOsnAkk0W/vfb3tLlS52OCies8nR57SW89soOqmXdaoUB TsfxZPvvtazeKZ5VZeVbC6fBPFog3sdnshuDe26mehSfsmdWzGJxpd7OtxByuR5OA1rY LXo6imCyV+XnNO3H7juTneQ0DdDecMp5sLax0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.109.212 with SMTP id k20mr2481379ebp.32.1264640042110; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:54:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:54:01 +0100 Message-ID: <19861fba1001271654o5ede6ca6k450c53c5b235e4b9@mail.gmail.com> From: J65nko To: "Dixit, Viraj" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:54:03 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Dixit, Viraj wrote: > Hi, > I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will > allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another > server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will > run ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS > there is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and > will automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you > want. Thanks, > VJ Yes, FreeBSD ftp supports .netrc files. I posted a guide to download a FreeBSD release with a .netrc file at http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=4212 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 01:27:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F015F1065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from mail.pil.net (ns3.pil.net [209.17.170.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB5FB8FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8536 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 20:27:13 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 20:27:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:27:13 -0500 (EST) From: James Smallacombe X-X-Sender: up@ns3.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:27:15 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: >>>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error >>>> sending response: not enough free resources > >>> indicates a problem sending UDP traffic; netstat -s output would be >> >> Unfortunately, I did not have time for netstats or tcpdumps when this >> was happening and I've not seen this log entry since yesterday evening. > > Unless you rebooted the machine again since the errors were reported, > the netstat output would still be relevant. Ok, I saw this at least once since the last reboot, so here are the tcp and udp portions of the netstat -s: tcp: 31422122 packets sent 23133142 data packets (3473553079 bytes) 314215 data packets (132175418 bytes) retransmitted 6579 data packets unnecessarily retransmitted 11 resends initiated by MTU discovery 5408494 ack-only packets (200066 delayed) 0 URG only packets 1237 window probe packets 868892 window update packets 1713629 control packets 28600984 packets received 17029642 acks (for 3351867346 bytes) 1256410 duplicate acks 73760 acks for unsent data 11363962 packets (548204663 bytes) received in-sequence 184682 completely duplicate packets (16657176 bytes) 2327 old duplicate packets 1468 packets with some dup. data (339128 bytes duped) 334018 out-of-order packets (337877573 bytes) 85687 packets (637782 bytes) of data after window 10 window probes 114047 window update packets 160975 packets received after close 1148 discarded for bad checksums 0 discarded for bad header offset fields 0 discarded because packet too short 9123 discarded due to memory problems 413250 connection requests 1504359 connection accepts 6 bad connection attempts 100 listen queue overflows 186225 ignored RSTs in the windows 1912682 connections established (including accepts) 2050764 connections closed (including 1022550 drops) 1058803 connections updated cached RTT on close 1065370 connections updated cached RTT variance on close 252114 connections updated cached ssthresh on close 3769 embryonic connections dropped 11958433 segments updated rtt (of 11574855 attempts) 285733 retransmit timeouts 12079 connections dropped by rexmit timeout 1884 persist timeouts 4 connections dropped by persist timeout 0 Connections (fin_wait_2) dropped because of timeout 385 keepalive timeouts 345 keepalive probes sent 40 connections dropped by keepalive 2663719 correct ACK header predictions 5996181 correct data packet header predictions 1520655 syncache entries added 58477 retransmitted 26560 dupsyn 20622 dropped 1504359 completed 137 bucket overflow 0 cache overflow 6190 reset 10206 stale 100 aborted 0 badack 47 unreach 0 zone failures 1541277 cookies sent 415 cookies received 21638 SACK recovery episodes 37110 segment rexmits in SACK recovery episodes 51620488 byte rexmits in SACK recovery episodes 240368 SACK options (SACK blocks) received 217836 SACK options (SACK blocks) sent 0 SACK scoreboard overflow udp: 9663633 datagrams received 0 with incomplete header 0 with bad data length field 549 with bad checksum 9609 with no checksum 12092 dropped due to no socket 49230 broadcast/multicast datagrams undelivered 0 dropped due to full socket buffers 0 not for hashed pcb 9601762 delivered 42443353 datagrams output 0 times multicast source filter matched James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 01:30:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C94E1065692 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@ovitrap.com) Received: from nomoremozzie.com (nomoremozzie.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE928FC0C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([180.129.21.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by nomoremozzie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0S0sEjP023538; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: ALO Green Technology Pte Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:54:01 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201001272354.14384.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <201001272354.14384.pieter@degoeje.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001280854.03215.erich@ovitrap.com> Cc: Pieter de Goeje Subject: Re: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:30:04 -0000 Hi, On 28 January 2010 am 06:54:13 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. it really looks like. Are you sure it is a quad core and not just a triple core? As already mentioned, you should check the stepping the software tells you but also what is actually written onto the CPU itself. Try to get the CPU exchanged and see what happens then. Erich > > These commands: > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal > cpuset -c -l 2 make > > Will always result in errors, for example this one: > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `@MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@', > needed by `config.h.in'. Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check > the input files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of > syntax errors for example. > > The configure process always completes, but apparently it > creates broken files. When I run make on any other core, it > always completes successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make > > I've checked with script that the output of the build process > is exactly the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried > to run cpuburn on that core, but it didn't find any problem. > It's really weird that system is otherwise very stable. > > What do you guys think the problem is? > > CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. > I've also tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. > > Thanks! > > -- > Pieter > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 01:48:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B944106568B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx3.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E6F8FC17 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id o0S1lwHH008058; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:47:59 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: Erich Dollansky Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:47:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201001272354.14384.pieter@degoeje.nl> <201001280854.03215.erich@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <201001280854.03215.erich@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001280247.58686.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:48:06 -0000 On Thursday 28 January 2010 01:54:01 Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On 28 January 2010 am 06:54:13 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > > I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. > > it really looks like. > > Are you sure it is a quad core and not just a triple core? It definitely identifies itself as a quadcore in dmesg (the text matches what it said on the box): AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 620. I don't think the hacks which activate the 4th core on a triple core can alter that information. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 620 Processor (2600.02-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x100f52 Stepping = 2 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x802009 AMD Features=0xee500800 AMD Features2=0x37ff TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 2147483648 (2048 MB) avail memory = 1795858432 (1712 MB) ACPI APIC Table: <120909 APIC1901> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 > > As already mentioned, you should check the stepping the software > tells you but also what is actually written onto the CPU itself. > > Try to get the CPU exchanged and see what happens then. I suppose that's the only way... hopefully I can convince the shop I bought it from that it is broken. > > Erich > > > These commands: > > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal > > cpuset -c -l 2 make > > > > Will always result in errors, for example this one: > > > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `@MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@', > > needed by `config.h.in'. Stop. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check > > the input files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of > > syntax errors for example. > > > > The configure process always completes, but apparently it > > creates broken files. When I run make on any other core, it > > always completes successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make > > > > I've checked with script that the output of the build process > > is exactly the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried > > to run cpuburn on that core, but it didn't find any problem. > > It's really weird that system is otherwise very stable. > > > > What do you guys think the problem is? > > > > CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. > > I've also tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Pieter > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 02:05:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B07D1065670; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@sheringeorge.co.cc) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F006E8FC16; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so156269pwi.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:05:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.107.6 with SMTP id j6mr7099399rvm.288.1264644351037; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:05:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B60E157.9090200@ip6.com.au> References: <7f14551c1001231916s1c142b21j916ae406ea71bd97@mail.gmail.com> <4B60E157.9090200@ip6.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:35:51 +0530 Message-ID: <7f14551c1001271805w758c3e95s569365ad468ab9ae@mail.gmail.com> From: Sherin George To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:05:52 -0000 Hello Sam, The problem happened today again. I am getting this message on traceroute =============== traceroute: findsaddr: write: No such process ================ When running a ping to 8.8.8.8, it says following. =================== ping: sendto: No route to host ==================== Please see the result of "netstat -rn" command. ============ myserver# netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default XXX.XXX.XXX.241 UGS 62 209247 em0 127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 0 0 lo0 XXX.XXX.XXX.240/29 link#1 U 0 0 em0 XXX.XXX.XXX.242 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 link#3 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHS lo0 ff01:3::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 ============= Note: I have replaced first three octets. I have checked netstat -m also. It is also not showing any problem. Could anyone please help me to sort out this issue. -- Thanks, Sherin On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:29 AM, sam wrote: > Hi, > > Is this problem still happening? > > Cheers > Sam > > > On 24/01/2010 2:16 PM, Sherin George wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am facing some sort of strange network issue in a freebsd server >> occasionally. >> >> OS: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE - amd64 >> >> Now, I have updated to FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 >> >> The servers loses network connection once in a few days. I logged into >> console and verified that network is up. I even restarted network service >> using following command. >> >> /etc/rc.d/netif restart >> >> Still, it didn't fix. >> >> I checked /var/log/messages, but I am not getting any clue. >> >> ============== >> Jan 19 12:10:20 myserver kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding >> provider ad0 finished. >> Jan 19 20:20:23 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system call >> Jan 19 20:21:07 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system call >> Jan 23 02:14:33 myserver login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0 >> Jan 23 02:19:51 myserver kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed >> Jan 23 02:19:57 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN >> Jan 23 02:20:02 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to UP >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver reboot: rebooted by root >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver syslogd: exiting on signal 15 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD >> Project. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, >> 1988, >> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: The Regents of the University of >> California. All rights reserved. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The >> FreeBSD Foundation. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 >> 15:02:08 >> UTC 2009 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu: >> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >> quality 0 >> ============== >> >> Network, TCP stack all were up. It was pinging gateway even. But, >> traceroute >> was not going beyond gateway. >> >> I believe the issue is not related to anything outside server since a >> reboot >> always fixes the issue. >> >> I will be grateful for any advice that can help me in troubleshooting this >> problem. >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Sherin >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 02:24:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802F41065679; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B518FC1B; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0S2Nt9X046961; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0S2Nnsr046960; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:49 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Dimitry Andric Message-ID: <20100128022349.GB46919@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <201001271627.37955.jhb@freebsd.org> <4B60CBFA.4050601@andric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B60CBFA.4050601@andric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:55 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:24:48 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote: >> GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to us= e EFI >> to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based >> bootstrap that can handle GPT-labelled disks. I doubt the SuperMicro te= ch is >> familiar with that case. I thought I heard that some folks had added GPT >> support to grub as well. >=20 > However, this won't boot disks larger than 2TiB, right? At least not > without BIOS support... You won't be able to boot from a partition more than 2TiB in, but you should still be able to boot as long as you boot from the front part of the disk. -- Brook --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLYPU1XY6L6fI4GtQRAov9AJ0b6IZwb4rqIb/TbfssEoV/djwpwACePrWF g9Z6zw9wMhIZ3zsgm/e6oRI= =3k/J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 02:37:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76653106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334BF8FC19 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0S2b1wl030636 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:37:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201001280237.o0S2b1wl030636@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:37:01 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Swap Partition First? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:37:31 -0000 Bob Johnson writes: > The only thing that looks out of place is that you have defined > ad0s1-2 before ad0s1-1. I've never tested it, but perhaps this is > causing it to get confused when calculating the disk layout? In other > words, perhaps you should use > > #1G swap followed by / on rest of disk. Thank you. I wondered about that. I didn't know how smart the allocater was. Technically, when I defined ad0s1-1 as being the rest of the disk, nothing else had been defined yet so that should mean 100% of the disk. That's called thinking too much. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 03:06:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7CE106566B; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FD18FC13; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com ([10.2.2.95]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0S2tWBW015092; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:55:32 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:52:41 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 Thread-Index: AcqfvpM4rcqcQAOsSbKHSGYJksHSPgABmJy+ References: <7f14551c1001231916s1c142b21j916ae406ea71bd97@mail.gmail.com><4B60E157.9090200@ip6.com.au> <7f14551c1001271805w758c3e95s569365ad468ab9ae@mail.gmail.com> From: "Li, Qing" To: "Sherin George" , , , Cc: Subject: RE: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:06:12 -0000 I have been consumed by day job 200% of my time. I have some free time tonight and can work with you off-line. Is it possible for you to update to the latest stable-8 kernel=20 and we start from there ? -- Qing -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org on behalf of Sherin George Sent: Wed 1/27/2010 6:05 PM To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; = freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 =20 Hello Sam, The problem happened today again. I am getting this message on traceroute =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D traceroute: findsaddr: write: No such process =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D When running a ping to 8.8.8.8, it says following. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ping: sendto: No route to host =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Please see the result of "netstat -rn" command. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D myserver# netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif = Expire default XXX.XXX.XXX.241 UGS 62 209247 em0 127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 0 0 lo0 XXX.XXX.XXX.240/29 link#1 U 0 0 em0 XXX.XXX.XXX.242 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 link#3 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHS lo0 ff01:3::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Note: I have replaced first three octets. I have checked netstat -m also. It is also not showing any problem. Could anyone please help me to sort out this issue. -- Thanks, Sherin On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:29 AM, sam wrote: > Hi, > > Is this problem still happening? > > Cheers > Sam > > > On 24/01/2010 2:16 PM, Sherin George wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am facing some sort of strange network issue in a freebsd server >> occasionally. >> >> OS: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE - amd64 >> >> Now, I have updated to FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 >> >> The servers loses network connection once in a few days. I logged = into >> console and verified that network is up. I even restarted network = service >> using following command. >> >> /etc/rc.d/netif restart >> >> Still, it didn't fix. >> >> I checked /var/log/messages, but I am not getting any clue. >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> Jan 19 12:10:20 myserver kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding >> provider ad0 finished. >> Jan 19 20:20:23 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system = call >> Jan 19 20:21:07 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system = call >> Jan 23 02:14:33 myserver login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0 >> Jan 23 02:19:51 myserver kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion = failed >> Jan 23 02:19:57 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN >> Jan 23 02:20:02 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to UP >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver reboot: rebooted by root >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver syslogd: exiting on signal 15 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver syslogd: kernel boot file is = /boot/kernel/kernel >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD >> Project. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, = 1986, >> 1988, >> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: The Regents of the University of >> California. All rights reserved. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of = The >> FreeBSD Foundation. >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 >> 15:02:08 >> UTC 2009 >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu: >> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency = 1193182 Hz >> quality 0 >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> Network, TCP stack all were up. It was pinging gateway even. But, >> traceroute >> was not going beyond gateway. >> >> I believe the issue is not related to anything outside server since a >> reboot >> always fixes the issue. >> >> I will be grateful for any advice that can help me in troubleshooting = this >> problem. >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Sherin >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 03:19:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A6F1065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from evuraan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E342F8FC0C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so194733pwi.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:19:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=+IfdLAATGBDT+xww6Ft2VXX5J9W+/RwyI/wxT9PvKkM=; b=h/ISmjXkl0KnhYBABjdKqDQIDkqR6rUoYa614Ddw2qfHnjLC/tAsWboFmoa1lNbeJ8 64hsQo3a1Wzs/EjYWttOjVN3dFS7rAlDFu30oL7jej1y8g+orcfv+crb+ukOjOsz0eDh 9FQ5SIEXL2FtvM6M+Y4bma4C2zPIOupFDsvk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=xK8fXI1/KlMt/FX+WTI6va/u2k/QpRtp6tH/uW42RG+u81xP3dpEtxD/yFfyT1Zrv7 msOLNO3OCZIc/T8XEImpNSzxHd/DISBD85S57uUidSr8B+ndNBa2zgViHajh3IbBawbv MTJn0mBze7x10af8B/QPaeOsz7dOTQnCCxNrU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.66.40 with SMTP id o40mr805122wfa.262.1264648768599; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:19:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:19:28 -0800 Message-ID: <6fbcd0711001271919x6da782dcs129014b3a550b0f1@mail.gmail.com> From: Evuraan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: bsdlabel size mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:29 -0000 On a FreeBSD 7.2 machine, I've a ~1TB drive as /dev/da0: da0: 953664MB (1953103872 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 121575C) the lone slice is of ~19G (per df) yet bsdlabel shows that it is spanning the entire drive. also notice how it says unused despite it really being an ufs FS. [root@evu ~]# df -h / Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 19G 1.2G 17G 7% / [root@evu ~]# bsdlabel /dev/da0s1 # /dev/da0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 1953102296 16 unused 0 0 c: 1953102312 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit needless to say, i cannot edit and add a new partition as "a" seems to be spanning the entire disk according to bsdlabel at least. any advise on this would be much appreciated. I am looking to alloc a 16G swap, and add a couple of ufs filesystems to da0. many thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 03:20:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731681065696; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@ip6.com.au) Received: from mail01.ip6.com.au (ns1.ip6.com.au [125.255.112.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2071A8FC0C; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ip6.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.ip6.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F132882E; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:03:38 +1100 (EST) Received: by mail01.ip6.com.au (Postfix, from userid 500) id D48472882D; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:03:37 +1100 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail01.ip6.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from [10.250.250.37] (unknown [203.41.110.193]) by mail01.ip6.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2CDF928538; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:03:37 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4B60FE95.7040209@ip6.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:03:49 +1100 From: sam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sherin George References: <7f14551c1001231916s1c142b21j916ae406ea71bd97@mail.gmail.com> <4B60E157.9090200@ip6.com.au> <7f14551c1001271805w758c3e95s569365ad468ab9ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7f14551c1001271805w758c3e95s569365ad468ab9ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:20:08 -0000 that s why I 've been so in doubt using freebsd AMD64 release. On 28/01/2010 1:05 PM, Sherin George wrote: > Hello Sam, > > The problem happened today again. > > I am getting this message on traceroute > > =============== > traceroute: findsaddr: write: No such process > ================ > > When running a ping to 8.8.8.8, it says following. > > =================== > ping: sendto: No route to host > ==================== > > Please see the result of "netstat -rn" command. > > ============ > myserver# netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default XXX.XXX.XXX.241 UGS 62 209247 em0 > 127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 0 0 lo0 > XXX.XXX.XXX.240/29 link#1 U 0 0 em0 > XXX.XXX.XXX.242 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags > Netif Expire > ::1 ::1 UH > lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 link#3 U > lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHS > lo0 > ff01:3::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U > lo0 > ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U > lo0 > ============= > > Note: I have replaced first three octets. > > I have checked netstat -m also. It is also not showing any problem. > > Could anyone please help me to sort out this issue. > > -- > Thanks, > Sherin > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:29 AM, sam wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> Is this problem still happening? >> >> Cheers >> Sam >> >> >> On 24/01/2010 2:16 PM, Sherin George wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am facing some sort of strange network issue in a freebsd server >>> occasionally. >>> >>> OS: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE - amd64 >>> >>> Now, I have updated to FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 >>> >>> The servers loses network connection once in a few days. I logged into >>> console and verified that network is up. I even restarted network service >>> using following command. >>> >>> /etc/rc.d/netif restart >>> >>> Still, it didn't fix. >>> >>> I checked /var/log/messages, but I am not getting any clue. >>> >>> ============== >>> Jan 19 12:10:20 myserver kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding >>> provider ad0 finished. >>> Jan 19 20:20:23 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system call >>> Jan 19 20:21:07 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system call >>> Jan 23 02:14:33 myserver login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0 >>> Jan 23 02:19:51 myserver kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed >>> Jan 23 02:19:57 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN >>> Jan 23 02:20:02 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to UP >>> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver reboot: rebooted by root >>> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver syslogd: exiting on signal 15 >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD >>> Project. >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, >>> 1988, >>> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: The Regents of the University of >>> California. All rights reserved. >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The >>> FreeBSD Foundation. >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 >>> 15:02:08 >>> UTC 2009 >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu: >>> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >>> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>> quality 0 >>> ============== >>> >>> Network, TCP stack all were up. It was pinging gateway even. But, >>> traceroute >>> was not going beyond gateway. >>> >>> I believe the issue is not related to anything outside server since a >>> reboot >>> always fixes the issue. >>> >>> I will be grateful for any advice that can help me in troubleshooting this >>> problem. >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Sherin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 03:28:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114F9106566B; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@sheringeorge.co.cc) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57138FC0C; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so199584pwi.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.55.5 with SMTP id d5mr6619876rva.177.1264649325606; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7f14551c1001231916s1c142b21j916ae406ea71bd97@mail.gmail.com> <4B60E157.9090200@ip6.com.au> <7f14551c1001271805w758c3e95s569365ad468ab9ae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:58:45 +0530 Message-ID: <7f14551c1001271928k112321e4s1338979bfb1e7d44@mail.gmail.com> From: Sherin George To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:28:47 -0000 Hello, Thanks Qing. I have already upgraded to latest patch as per per the advise of "freebsd-hackers" ============================== myserver# uname -a FreeBSD myserver.server.net 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Tue Jan 5 21:11:58 UTC 2010 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 myserver# freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 8.0-RELEASE from update4.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 8.0-RELEASE-p2. ============================== -- Regards, Sherin On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Li, Qing wrote: > > I have been consumed by day job 200% of my time. > > I have some free time tonight and can work with you off-line. > Is it possible for you to update to the latest stable-8 kernel > and we start from there ? > > -- Qing > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org on behalf of Sherin George > Sent: Wed 1/27/2010 6:05 PM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 > > Hello Sam, > > The problem happened today again. > > I am getting this message on traceroute > > =============== > traceroute: findsaddr: write: No such process > ================ > > When running a ping to 8.8.8.8, it says following. > > =================== > ping: sendto: No route to host > ==================== > > Please see the result of "netstat -rn" command. > > ============ > myserver# netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default XXX.XXX.XXX.241 UGS 62 209247 em0 > 127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 0 0 lo0 > XXX.XXX.XXX.240/29 link#1 U 0 0 em0 > XXX.XXX.XXX.242 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags > Netif Expire > ::1 ::1 UH > lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 link#3 U > lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHS > lo0 > ff01:3::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U > lo0 > ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U > lo0 > ============= > > Note: I have replaced first three octets. > > I have checked netstat -m also. It is also not showing any problem. > > Could anyone please help me to sort out this issue. > > -- > Thanks, > Sherin > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:29 AM, sam wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is this problem still happening? > > > > Cheers > > Sam > > > > > > On 24/01/2010 2:16 PM, Sherin George wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am facing some sort of strange network issue in a freebsd server > >> occasionally. > >> > >> OS: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE - amd64 > >> > >> Now, I have updated to FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 > >> > >> The servers loses network connection once in a few days. I logged into > >> console and verified that network is up. I even restarted network > service > >> using following command. > >> > >> /etc/rc.d/netif restart > >> > >> Still, it didn't fix. > >> > >> I checked /var/log/messages, but I am not getting any clue. > >> > >> ============== > >> Jan 19 12:10:20 myserver kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding > >> provider ad0 finished. > >> Jan 19 20:20:23 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system > call > >> Jan 19 20:21:07 myserver nfsd[732]: select failed: Interrupted system > call > >> Jan 23 02:14:33 myserver login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0 > >> Jan 23 02:19:51 myserver kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed > >> Jan 23 02:19:57 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN > >> Jan 23 02:20:02 myserver kernel: em0: link state changed to UP > >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver reboot: rebooted by root > >> Jan 23 02:29:58 myserver syslogd: exiting on signal 15 > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver syslogd: kernel boot file is > /boot/kernel/kernel > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD > >> Project. > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, > >> 1988, > >> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: The Regents of the University of > >> California. All rights reserved. > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of > The > >> FreeBSD Foundation. > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 > >> 15:02:08 > >> UTC 2009 > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu: > >> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > >> Jan 23 02:31:31 myserver kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 > Hz > >> quality 0 > >> ============== > >> > >> Network, TCP stack all were up. It was pinging gateway even. But, > >> traceroute > >> was not going beyond gateway. > >> > >> I believe the issue is not related to anything outside server since a > >> reboot > >> always fixes the issue. > >> > >> I will be grateful for any advice that can help me in troubleshooting > this > >> problem. > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards, > >> Sherin > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 04:05:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226C41065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@woy.us) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D051E8FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.53]) by hrndva-qmta02.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20100128034305829.LEYR1979@hrndva-qmta02.mail.rr.com> for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:43:05 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=pmrLzWDPK8YA:10 a=eiIctnwA33QA:10 a=NYcIN9P_6sGrgYRAuCYA:9 a=e5eifwbhskN5YZ9HJOsA:7 a=ZACDyDJ0zxrRxKIpxe65l94srLEA:4 a=tMNjEnUbBREA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 69.76.152.118 Received: from [69.76.152.118] ([69.76.152.118:63959] helo=Stark.kc.rr.com) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id D8/C0-12545-B87016B4; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:42:04 +0000 Message-ID: <4B610793.3060805@woy.us> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:42:11 -0600 From: Randy Woy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Programmer In Training References: <4B60A0B3.8040505@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> In-Reply-To: <4B60A0B3.8040505@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Migrating Thunderbird 3 Email Archives from XP Pro SP3 to FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: randy@woy.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:05:02 -0000 Programmer In Training wrote: > I've done some searching on the Thunderbird (TB) website and have posted > the question at one of their support forums, but I felt I should ask > here, too, just in case someone else has confronted this. > > I only use POP3 to retrieve email (the merits of POP3 vs IMAP not > withstanding) and store locally so I have easy and offline access to it. > For about two years now I've been using XP to retrieve and check my > email, upgrading through various versions of TB without a problem. Now > I'm confronted with an issue I've not faced before (or attempted to > confront). > > Transferring archives from one computer to another. I know where they > are kept on the XP machine, I /think/ I know where they are kept on my > FreeBSD box (nothing a little ls -a won't help me find). My question is > if this even possible since Mozilla Foundation went to using binary > archives for the email. I think it might be, but I'm not really wanting > to waste the time to only be frustrated in the end. > > Has anyone attempted such a migration? Did you need any special tools? > If not, was it as simple as copy/pasting into the appropriate directory > structure? Or do I need to set up the accounts in TB on my FreeBSD box > /first/ then copy/paste? > > TIA for reading and especially for helping (if you can)! (: I made the same migration in the opposite direction. It's a straight copy from one system to the other. I copied my FreeBSD Thunderbird archives to Windows 7 Thunderbird on a dual boot system using a USB memory key. Copy the contents of C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\Thunderbird\Profiles\.default\Mail\Local Folders\ to /usr/home//.thunderbird/.default/Mail/Local Folders/ That's it. Randy -- Randy Woy randy@woy.us From Thunderbird on FreeBSD 7.1 "Believe me, they'll find a way. Governments loath people being free." - Bill Nighy as Quentin in Pirate Radio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 06:03:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A29106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd1@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B2E8FC1C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([202.69.173.59]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:03:09 -0800 Message-ID: <4B612891.9040905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:02:57 +0800 From: Fbsd1 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2010 06:03:12.0901 (UTC) FILETIME=[932A0B50:01CA9FDF] X-Sender: fbsd1@a1poweruser.com Subject: 8.0 and floppy support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:03:12 -0000 When booting release 8.0 i no longer get the fd0 floppy device prob message. This pc has run freebsd 6.4 7.0 7.2 which all supported the floppy drive. Has floppy drive support been dropped in 8.0? I know the floppy drive works because i can boot win98 floppy disk ok. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 06:20:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53BA106568D for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F37B8FC1E for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28768 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2010 06:20:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy6.bluehost.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 06:20:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=MfpSAmJK02O3pPuTq3PaeZQnuiSYuoeE21oRxtNPI0q2w9R0M2TiujNBiO+04K5dP60oVXkL5k/LZH6uExq9b6Wjgu6Yiz+vmqaoBlJFhgqqzKG2nN+Wp/OewqttjWFx; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaNjg-0002MT-7g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:20:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4B612C98.7060007@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:20:08 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B60A0B3.8040505@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <4B610793.3060805@woy.us> In-Reply-To: <4B610793.3060805@woy.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig858B06648A43C998B7A62821" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Migrating Thunderbird 3 Email Archives from XP Pro SP3 to FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:20:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig858B06648A43C998B7A62821 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/27/2010 9:42 PM, Randy Woy wrote: > I made the same migration in the opposite direction. It's a straight > copy from one system to the other. I copied my FreeBSD Thunderbird > archives to Windows 7 Thunderbird on a dual boot system using a USB > memory key. >=20 > Copy the contents of > C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\Thunderbird\Profiles\.def= ault\Mail\Local > Folders\ to > /usr/home//.thunderbird/.default/Mail/Local Folders= / >=20 > That's it. >=20 > Randy >=20 That is completely awesome to know. Thanks for alleviating my fears and concerns. --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig858B06648A43C998B7A62821 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLYSyYAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0mhQH/1o4NcjRRKBaxYMMT3jJ5iTN tVjaV39ZHeWKg3vWtnh1vettxhasEcIkhM3ChHd7LXienQa3MaiY1hzLkgaYNwZR m/6zXdPLoiaSmBpRKp+5XsBSH2N1CLdQ+BQHakYuDzkjY3cR5vg/5gLTQ46DtMx5 48rSA496pmH1lG0p5a7OxV/Ax/G6BVn6oHgUIcem2IJRNFAPiJywja5v7jn1VTG7 kypg1WQC5GWPUPPaDrg7sBfAhZYBEXsU2RNR2FuPP8DsVNPlpeW+73p8OvdNW7dJ hFbBrmjFpzzTzlmxKnrYI3GHlHbkGnmQIAbnYb2MMxf9Q1qLmyk3xLbCtaYhPrw= =71sV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig858B06648A43C998B7A62821-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 08:02:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6C0106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFEE8FC12 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-188-34.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.188.34]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5731D8FF; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:02:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0S82sQS002167; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:02:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:02:54 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-Id: <20100128090254.7452a557.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:02:57 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:08:40 -0800, "Dixit, Viraj" wrote: > Hi, > I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will > allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another > server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will > run ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS > there is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and > will automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you > want. Thanks, In FreeBSD, there's documentation on that; read "man ftp" and see the -u option. I'm often (ab)using a Makefile to upload (send) files per FTP to a server, and I call this "make install". You can put this into a shell script (sh) and then call it, e. g. #!/bin/sh FTPUSER=my_account_name_on_ftp_server FTPPASSWD=my_very_complicated_password SERVER=ftp.where_my_stuff_is.foo.bar UPLOAD=/path/to/files/to/upload cd ${UPLOAD} && ftp -u ftp://${FTPUSER}:${FTPPASSWD}@${SERVER} * Of course, you can utilize .netrc to contain FTP access data. Then, you just need to call "pure" ftp with server name, and you can replace * with any file name(s) you want. However, be aware that FTP doesn't encrypt passwords. You should take into mind that using FTP with an SSH wrapper, or even better - scp - is a more secure way to "send files". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 08:14:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343451065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148BE8FC14 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NaPW2-0007jh-Cb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:14:14 -0800 Message-ID: <27352106.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:14:14 -0800 (PST) From: gfot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20100128004335.31ba30c6@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: giorgosfm@yahoo.gr References: <27349277.post@talk.nabble.com> <20100128004335.31ba30c6@gumby.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: How to use an older version of gcc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:14:15 -0000 yes i know i can call it gcc34 but the real problem is that the toolchain has some scripts to automate the building and it uses some paths to pick up the appropriate tools and when i run the scripts gcc42 is used. I figure out that the path that gcc42 is located is the same as gcc34 /usr/local/bin . But i don't know how to switch to the old gcc34 let's say for a particular user on my system. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-use-an-older-version-of-gcc--tp27349277p27352106.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 09:41:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B5D106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5628FC0C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so179704fxm.13 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:41:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fXhx1eiycDhqkA/6Bwz5KjYIVDu4/Q9nDU7koTirdHs=; b=Jy/M2GdW0Wv2qMRpOep3PV70DpHhtEZ4dDvzNQvqKCMB59szFMeM2aCG7oqzYcPlvn tbEB8FMAHykBoMJJZe/PvggMRnaX3Um+XaQWKFZZpSnu+8BZkw7li+DdySmgCr89LQZG oj6pVdPdj5bKhKqF/+2eFjbGTz8vDorp1U/ec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ooCHFhjlUFQLVYBgwIl775IzR6Cq/knDOOF83cFlXwUirQ/RpvjPb7fjwDf2QRGrWw IyvV4R9rXLCN1xO7w1NrEZdJxymnGOFVJmtAxtP8/aL/48m4nC6HMjGpeXwaJVfLNgHO pt1jdZQKVHXGhyL73f3IuW0zqnBjnMEVxeB3k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.188.82 with SMTP id o18mr1232117hbh.129.1264671687880; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:41:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:41:27 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Dan Naumov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help booting FreeBSD with a ZFS root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:41:29 -0000 On 27 January 2010 23:18, Dan Naumov wrote: > >I didn't want a mirror though, I wanted a stripe. > > > >I still don't understand why what I'm doing isn't working. > > As far as I know, having the root pool on a stripe isn't supported. > > OpenSolaris supports having the root pool on a "simple" pool and a mirror > pool. > FreeBSD supports having the root pool on a simple pool, mirror pool > and raidz, but afaik booting off raidz used to have issues. > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Even if a stripe did work its questionable why you need it for the os itself. Mostly you only need to read from the os pool, so you will still benefit from the speed of 2 drives with a mirror. If you are worried about db writes etc, then partition up the drives and have another pool for the db with the zpool configuration you want. Better still put it on its own spindles. Use tmpfs for tmp space etc and you could put swap on the striped pool as well. Just keep the os pool as a mirror its far safer. I also set copies=2 on the root zfs fs as well just for a bit more paranoia From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 10:22:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FE1106568B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 278EF8FC23 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27048 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2010 10:22:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 10:22:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=AwiI7mBFELUULRQ8gRRdDujN7MYOjbhKveLN497/3rwrbW/uOxxZyVZdA/TZ2MNMNrx2mIOMIHlDWePfZxSwd3VIq/yaWSN06Ga3QAuMvfksz9Kx5NIjQ9C5kPSH2yuU; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaRVn-0005cN-Ch for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:22:08 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:13:51 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:13:51 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100128101351.GA27490@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:22:09 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove=20 > any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it=20 > else rm it)... any quick way to do this? You should probably use a shell command as recommended by others, but I decided to write a Ruby script to do what you describe. It assumes you have a plaintext file full of to-keep filenames with each filename being an absolute path filename (e.g., /usr/local/bin/xpdf instead of something like xpdf with no absolute path), one such filename per line, with nothing else in the file. The script, which I saved as fkeep.rb, looks like this on the inside: #!/usr/bin/env ruby # syntax: # fkeep.rb [path] # # where: # is the file containing paths for files to keep # [path] is an optional path to where this program should # start deleting files losers =3D Dir["#{Dir.getwd}/**/*"] keepers =3D IO.readlines ARGV.shift startpath =3D ARGV.shift if startpath Dir.chdir startpath end keepers.each {|filepath| losers.delete filepath.chomp } losers.each do |filepath| unless File.directory?(filepath) File.delete filepath end end I've done some cursory testing with this, and it seems to work just fine, but use it only at your own risk. Note that this will not delete directories, because it felt like too much work to make it *safely* delete directories. You will have to delete any empty directories yourself if you use this script as written. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkthY18ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUiPgCg5ooM3b1JVrF41bvAD3CerEI3 N9sAn2USq4gC5uCbLJxf1JO8P93PuhWv =OPcO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 10:27:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C8F1065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30F1C8FC1E for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12861 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2010 10:27:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 10:27:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=aYFQ7Cm+r1GBEdpkhDGzdmznxa1/FF3ZwHwL5qzOjvlELMJxh/OBWmzugLhlZpi93bQ9muSFzqE5uVIjb5WJgqDsjFoM+/K74IQ2o8aYoa1n2hyjvVaQdX2BZuqIKr2h; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaRb7-00025e-He for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:27:38 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:21 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:21 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100128101921.GA28664@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> <20100128101351.GA27490@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100128101351.GA27490@guilt.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:27:39 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:13:51AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: >=20 > losers =3D Dir["#{Dir.getwd}/**/*"] > keepers =3D IO.readlines ARGV.shift > startpath =3D ARGV.shift >=20 > if startpath > Dir.chdir startpath > end Oops. Speaking of using at your own risk . . . That line that reads `losers =3D Dir["#{Dir.getwd}/**/*"]` should be *after* the conditional block. Thus, the above quoted code should look like this instead: keepers =3D IO.readlines ARGV.shift startpath =3D ARGV.shift =20 if startpath Dir.chdir startpath end losers =3D Dir["#{Dir.getwd}/**/*"] =2E . . otherwise you might end up deleting a bunch of files in the wrong part of the directory hierarchy if you execute the program from somewhere other than where you want files deleted. I guess I shouldn't have gotten fancy and tried to provide a way to execute it from anywhere in the filesystem. Sorry about that. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkthZKkACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVngACcCdUmbu49vcWzGmAfgOmQjJR1 6+EAnAmrDaoMIRwegXXVyALzeNwRTSy6 =EjdG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 10:37:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8654106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalpin@muliahost.com) Received: from genesis.muliahost.com (genesis.muliahost.com [202.67.13.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB8C8FC17 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:37:48 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=muliahost.com; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:Importance; b=Jxa0NFrdDT9GMu98kTos12dhiAPmvf1E5Q0KuFd4FnvID24eupOZH7za/QfZmYV+jMPCtlO/5YrqkTXYmGhlj5cXzZ0xG0UwRSvq2uwInkfrhawtQXpmQxnR0ARcqivf; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=muliahost.com) by genesis.muliahost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaRkq-0008Qz-Hv for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:37:40 +0700 Received: from 203.153.106.5 ([203.153.106.5]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalpin@muliahost.com) by muliahost.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:37:40 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <4658.203.153.106.5.1264675060.squirrel@muliahost.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:37:40 +0700 (WIT) From: kalpin@muliahost.com To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - genesis.muliahost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - muliahost.com Cc: Subject: Missing Library libc-client4.so.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:37:51 -0000 Hello all, I have FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE. Suddenly I can not start my apache webserver which load php5. The error said, missing libc-client4.so.9. I checked that libc-client4.so.9 should be in /usr/local/lib but I can not find it. How do I get this one? Best Regards, Kalpin E. Silaen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 10:46:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85988106568B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A378FC3A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 81-187-76-165.infracaninophile.co.uk ([IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0SAk8YO056374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:09 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk o0SAk8YO056374 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1264675569; bh=whOPMNGJDfQ7/OmXDmRwjE77/9PBjEkkeBf++YR0KdM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4B616AF0.3000009@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T hu,=2028=20Jan=202010=2010:46:08=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac= 20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.7)=20Gecko/20100111=20Thu nderbird/3.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd .org|Subject:=20Re:=20Missing=20Library=20libc-client4.so.9|Refere nces:=20<4658.203.153.106.5.1264675060.squirrel@muliahost.com>|In- Reply-To:=20<4658.203.153.106.5.1264675060.squirrel@muliahost.com> |X-Enigmail-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset =3DISO-8859-1|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit; b=IOwlbU3It6woRvV1XStWjEc2XPoeDVhTgygN20UjwVJGL3eeZ7xQ9NMymtvtUtHLH LxWk/cbdCPXOhQce5RRkaKFLGm7rUeFIR0poIxEGr93dBnLyaxZ+LBwL/WQWmPi+2d MIZUmu9nAPSWj7QafoC29TSp7cOtmwChGHPFz1Ow= X-Authentication-Warning: happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb] claimed to be 81-187-76-165.infracaninophile.co.uk Message-ID: <4B616AF0.3000009@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:08 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4658.203.153.106.5.1264675060.squirrel@muliahost.com> In-Reply-To: <4658.203.153.106.5.1264675060.squirrel@muliahost.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Missing Library libc-client4.so.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:14 -0000 On 28/01/2010 10:37, kalpin@muliahost.com wrote: > I checked that libc-client4.so.9 should be in /usr/local/lib but I can not > find it. It's installed by the mail/cclient port, which is a dependency of the php5-imap module. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 12:41:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528FD1065694 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcdowse@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95E8B8FC1A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2010 12:41:05 -0000 Received: from p4FD4F3D9.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO bytebox) [79.212.243.217] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 13:41:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #30106961 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18mHG9F9AsmcFqo/T+tKjwsMvf/cx5yn/FnEo54H8 Nzy5xCKqqwudti Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:30 +0100 From: "Daniel C. Dowse" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20100128134030.3dd18490.dcdowse@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <27352106.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27349277.post@talk.nabble.com> <20100128004335.31ba30c6@gumby.homeunix.com> <27352106.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-unknown-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.68000000000000005 Subject: Re: How to use an older version of gcc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:41:08 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:14:14 -0800 (PST) at gfot wrote: > >yes i know i can call it gcc34 but the real problem is that the toolchain has >some scripts to automate the building and it uses some paths to pick up the >appropriate tools and when i run the scripts gcc42 is used. I figure out >that the path that gcc42 is located is the same as gcc34 /usr/local/bin . >But i don't know how to switch to the old gcc34 let's say for a particular >user on my system. >-- You could add to your make.conf. GCC=gcc34 CXX=ccp34 CC=gcc34 greetings Daniel -- \\|// (o o) -----------ooO-(_)-Ooo---------------------------- - Unix is a computer virus with a user interface - -------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 12:06:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0611065692; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A64A8FC13; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-149-142-141.bna.bellsouth.net [70.149.142.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0SC6p9S039711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:06:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Brooks Davis In-Reply-To: <20100128022349.GB46919@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <201001271627.37955.jhb@freebsd.org> <4B60CBFA.4050601@andric.com> <20100128022349.GB46919@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:06:46 -0600 Message-Id: <1264680406.2869.72.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:42:42 +0000 Cc: Dan Naumov , Dimitry Andric , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:06:57 -0000 On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:23 -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote: > >> GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI > >> to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based > >> bootstrap that can handle GPT-labelled disks. I doubt the SuperMicro tech is > >> familiar with that case. I thought I heard that some folks had added GPT > >> support to grub as well. > > > > However, this won't boot disks larger than 2TiB, right? At least not > > without BIOS support... > > You won't be able to boot from a partition more than 2TiB in, but you > should still be able to boot as long as you boot from the front part of > the disk. John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue. The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The bootstrap code knows how to read the GPT tables and can deal with > 2 tb lba's. So, as long as you can successfully load the bootstrap code from sector 0, all *should* be good. robert. > -- Brook -- Robert Noland FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 12:26:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C275D106566B; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8313C8FC13; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:8004:3a2d:b5f3:27ec] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:8004:3a2d:b5f3:27ec]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23F395C43; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:26:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B618270.3050309@andric.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:26:24 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2pre) Gecko/20100126 Lanikai/3.1b1pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Noland References: <201001271627.37955.jhb@freebsd.org> <4B60CBFA.4050601@andric.com> <20100128022349.GB46919@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <1264680406.2869.72.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <1264680406.2869.72.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:43:15 +0000 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis , Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:26:15 -0000 On 2010-01-28 13:06, Robert Noland wrote: > John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue. > The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and > tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The bootstrap code knows how to read the > GPT tables and can deal with> 2 tb lba's. Ah yes, I see it now. It uses EDD packets with the BIOS int 13 interface, which apparently have a 64-bit LBA. This should support up to 8 ZiB with 512-byte sectors... OTOH, I have no idea how well most BIOSes actually implement this. Since many OSes simply don't support anything over 2^32 sectors, I would not be amazed to find much BIOSes out there that behave the same. Or am I too paranoid now? :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 13:40:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97400106566B; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540418FC08; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA19216; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:40:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <4B6193CA.1040702@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:40:26 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sam References: <7f14551c1001231916s1c142b21j916ae406ea71bd97@mail.gmail.com> <4B60E157.9090200@ip6.com.au> <7f14551c1001271805w758c3e95s569365ad468ab9ae@mail.gmail.com> <4B60FE95.7040209@ip6.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4B60FE95.7040209@ip6.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Sherin George , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange network issue in freebsd 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:39 -0000 on 28/01/2010 05:03 sam said the following: > that s why I 've been so in doubt using freebsd AMD64 release. Why again? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 14:21:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A856D106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4308A8FC0C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so822883ewy.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:21:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=neYOdP4Ps/5h4Om4HatN0KpoeRWqaBDSj5zcdOZBaiM=; b=biJ29Il76A0XQh5eZDqHLiTZ+dJh9uHh0JzHTUQ9v0EpTWbhnpQBQAv/vaV1vM5Of/ hPQTQfN+/i/g0nx8Apc9yLW6b9jqafzCLW0vL272PIRWGn3z9fXEYEhs8GKEbm0Yd25f tDsdthBTNQ6tJcwMVT6KDXdYE2tlqycN3BGow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mOfElutQM4OMPzx5I8VLV6XDjSvZw1Upw2KfqALZwGj2eQ9tHhMuByHTpCQRvSl3iV oNIoQnVZr0F0bFS0l4+9HqyiUvGKd+PRPf5KO1EsF6OmSRLVcA9dMeeDY5lRQAgoDzHI DUUsZBhn50rZLj45h3i/b8KqOWDv2ItlKYnKU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.1.22 with SMTP id 22mr3737291ebd.92.1264688512950; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:21:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:21:52 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: questions@freebsd.org, jails@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: How do you manage your jails? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:21:54 -0000 So you have installed a FreeBSD server and setup several jails on your system. They run the services they need and everything works smoothly. But how do manage all of them? What do you do if you want to run a command on all jails? Do you run cfengine/puppy? How do you setup sendmail? Do you have sendmail on all jails? Do you share ports to all jails? How do you keep ports up to date on them? Do you have a set of scripts that you want to share? On http://antarctica.no/stuff/UNIX/FreeBSD/jails/ you'll find what I use. I'm preparing a talk for BLUG (the local Linux/BSD group) and I want to know how YOU manage your jails, there sure are more than one way do it. -- chs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 14:28:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1355106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C908FC15 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so528784pxi.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:28:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v02nV6+mUkPfrwQLvDstQDwssEtgelvSClRYyFInYhc=; b=FeGHM4G8Y9UmNCzUlsrQlj2kLZWvirDE0+ZNiBtVvIs6xLK/d50zByecuMVpowHXdW xkfuQU7S3f6xYT4NHovqzNRS3+2QD4FH+2YU/1D/4ELe9OHgqECtInkSTXtT0xfVxC5Y qgHmQrbEJRhArX0vU7VLBx38AaxNSypaiCf44= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=fi+QZaKHNiUVcw+Bm8MTZGWWvhyZsDjtfPx3H+/KiT6A1ChTeuQjwSGyLkZgjgPaAE lDkJhkFUjEvLNzfEFajWL3S+naSKFxnJ9FyorF9JvZpbONapwyMWXgR021FjTuq5bDbu i+wLVN9an8waU9Eb2ACHuYjNIItE6arw9MHe4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.151.23 with SMTP id y23mr974326wfd.269.1264688936106; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:28:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:28:56 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001280628o212d2c20n630c3369f0028985@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Christer Solskogen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jails@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you manage your jails? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:28:57 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Christer Solskogen < christer.solskogen@gmail.com> wrote: > So you have installed a FreeBSD server and setup several jails on your > system. They run the services they need and everything works smoothly. But > how do manage all of them? What do you do if you want to run a command on > all jails? Do you run cfengine/puppy? How do you setup sendmail? Do > you have sendmail on all jails? > Do you share ports to all jails? How do you keep ports up to date on them? > Do you have a set of scripts that you want to share? On > http://antarctica.no/stuff/UNIX/FreeBSD/jails/ you'll find what I use. > > I'm preparing a talk for BLUG (the local Linux/BSD group) and I want to > know how > YOU manage your jails, there sure are more than one way do it. > you should check out /usr/ports/sysutils/ezjail -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 14:32:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC64C1065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E4D8FC0A; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so834238ewy.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:32:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uthcRNVr05fMtdLPCVvYh9xMcqQsKzYPXMELej7sds8=; b=s++o2GV3pyQI7HOAqf2KPaqtI4m4unAbpKZEFPyHrIFla0SepcdgSOEgxqs0f7BG8C z2vPQY/yqrEOE/a5yMEgx86xGFq0jjZ2+ShtGldY4mFlrOh5P4GHnZUjj4YljxAkv8Cy EgGXAGzwHSODJQjQ5wfe+eXYm+iuYzFtuzqd0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=EVs5m9a0B82k0iuKVGJuLTgbUJHwMHoyJF7yoveAtzMyZ7FZime/GzIE9Qqo7cWx4/ vbuwo76t4bEc4irzivkkdz3J2cDLfPBLrjSWLyvWbugipG1MlOLVj+lmkzhR0YAGVE96 F/vVDI/+M+NbOYRADTw125vEm8OvzLsSy4x7s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.19 with SMTP id i19mr6898950eba.65.1264689162258; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:32:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6201873e1001280628o212d2c20n630c3369f0028985@mail.gmail.com> References: <6201873e1001280628o212d2c20n630c3369f0028985@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:32:42 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: jails@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you manage your jails? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:32:44 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > you should check out /usr/ports/sysutils/ezjail > Already noted :) I use it myself. -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 15:57:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8711065692 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D048FC17 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so360956fgg.13 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:57:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IkvMucvX2o0nC3X7WqNWyGsJmc/ml6bjbDK8fNFwnHM=; b=uY/5ihEc066es2vylMztMY5sx5jbQupPm38zlwZSKUajMu+qRQ5x/l9fF5//SVXNGZ BCj24HQPLlPWqFHcdTJLDsntbkJPZxTZQTl2o1WgP5rkI27JXTYryjJgMXo7GZqwBOQN Xip/6y/binZBNjmKbtUKC/bHGUkhTM4WF36sQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=wz9Lf6ODyJk2tlVvWIOvyDCAXdXrvVV5WHqe5SK88Rvnm1y56/5i/dQhFwEhr7lysn 6uNtoKW9K5JZZUhx0tcM28Idyco0jDHc/GxUuxM0xuz/fBwRnPViCMlOdADlkshj073J oHWGM4I0QepvKGnoESjn+tnjf8FyLtH9l05LE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.144 with SMTP id a16mr2810966wef.208.1264694236275; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:57:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:57:16 -0500 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: giorgosfm@yahoo.gr Subject: Re: How to use an older version of gcc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:57:17 -0000 gfot wrote: ... >yes i know i can call it gcc34 but the real problem is that the toolchain has >some scripts to automate the building and it uses some paths to pick up the >appropriate tools and when i run the scripts gcc42 is used. I figure out >that the path that gcc42 is located is the same as gcc34 /usr/local/bin . >But i don't know how to switch to the old gcc34 let's say for a particular >user on my system. I'm not sure why you would have lang/gcc42 installed on FreeBSD 8, unless you needed certain extra components that didn't come with the base system compiler, which is a patched version of gcc 4.2. Are you sure your toolchain isn't using /usr/bin/cc or /usr/bin/gcc, instead of /usr/local/bin/gcc42? And I'm not sure that it's a good idea to use lang/gcc34, either. In any event, if you are determined to do this, you could try defining: setenv CC gcc34 setenv CPP cpp34 alias cc gcc34 alias gcc gcc34 alias cpp cpp34 ... and so on, in the user's shell configuration file The location of that configuration file (e.g., $HOME/.cshrc, or $HOME/.profile) and the exact syntax will obviously depend upon the shell used. Or you could redefine the PATH variable of the user in question, so that, for example, $HOME/bin precedes /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin, and set ln -s /usr/local/bin/gcc34 $HOME/bin/gcc ln -s /usr/local/bin/gcc34 $HOME/bin/cc ln -s /usr/local/bin/cpp34 $HOME/bin/cpp and so on. Of course the aliases and links above are just typical examples, and may not work in your specific case: you have to consult the scripts in your MIPS tools in order to determine which values to use. If your user still wants to have the flexibility of using the base system compiler in some cases, without having to undo changes like those above, and only wants to use gcc34 with the MIPS tools, you could try using a per-directory environment change with the sysutils/penv port. I don't mean to be impolite, but I would have thought that someone who will be doing cross-development for MIPS would have been able to figure this out, or patch the toolchain scripts. Are you sure this user is up to the task? Regards, b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 16:27:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A52106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19488FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5768 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 16:27:11 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Jan 2010 16:27:10 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id ECF955082E; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:27:09 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Fbsd1 References: <4B612891.9040905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:27:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B612891.9040905@a1poweruser.com> (fbsd1@a1poweruser.com's message of "Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:02:57 +0800") Message-ID: <44wrz2ci02.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: 8.0 and floppy support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:27:11 -0000 Fbsd1 writes: > When booting release 8.0 i no longer get the fd0 floppy device prob > message. This pc has run freebsd 6.4 7.0 7.2 which all supported the > floppy drive. > > Has floppy drive support been dropped in 8.0? No; it's still in the GENERIC kernel, and it still works for me. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 16:36:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38E0106568B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CC38FC28 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0SGaMkh062534 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:36:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201001281636.o0SGaMkh062534@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:36:22 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Swap Partition First? Something is still Wrong. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:36:39 -0000 Here is the output of fdisk from the drive to be formatted. ******* Working on device /dev/ad0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=77504 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) Let's try a million or so blocks left as swap. ad0s1-1=ufs 77116032 / 1 #That should the FreeBSD active partition. ad0s1-2=swap 0 #That should give us what's left as swap. This is the opposite of what I want to do, but it is in the order that one would likely do it so if it is going to work, it should. This gives a benchmark to start from. The complaint is that it can't write ad0s1-2 swap as always. I changed the syntax. ad0s1a=ufs 77116032 / 1 ad0s1b=swap 0 I ran sysinstall and loaded the install.cfg file with those changes and was overjoyed to see that it had successfully written all file system to the disk. Not true! It writes in to MFS until that fills up and then it overwrites some of mfs so that one must reboot. The fdisk output never changes from the following: ******* Working on device /dev/ad0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=77504 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) snip cylinders=77504 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 78123969 (38146 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 15/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: I have yet to see anything on the other 3 partitions. It does format just fine if I manually set it up via sysinstall. I know I am doing something wrong but not sure what. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 16:42:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE68106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 698F28FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2010 16:42:36 -0000 Received: from adsl-144.79.107.94.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.73.195]) [79.107.94.144] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 17:42:36 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+OBQgJi+WOvRZNxsIeMNIet3bxI3hEm63K1/NGmG x/zt/IAKJDCsYh Message-ID: <4B61BE70.1090109@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:42:24 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64000000000000001 Subject: gjournal on compact flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:42:39 -0000 Hi, I am using a 40MB journal on a 500MB compact flash. Would that be sane, or I am causing more harm than good? My concerns are: 1) wear leveling. The journal is on specific part of the "disk" writing again and again. That should be handled by the CF itself. Though I am not sure it does a good job??? 2) I do care about ungraceful power cycles and I've seen posts on the net, mentioning: > More, If > you interrupt power at arbitrary times while the device is writing, > you can lose the integrity of the file system being modified. The loss > is not limited to the 512 byte sector being modified, as it generally > is with rotating disks; you can lose an entire erase block, maybe 64K > at once. I guess the above comment renders the use of a journaling filesystem useless. But, doing some naive tests, power cycling the machine while writing and checksumming the data after fsck in preen mode, revealed no error. Thanks in advance for any insights, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 16:51:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7307106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAB68FC0C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so640987pwi.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wz4s2hgvPUMKhBy7M6efe+P2FcCzTbV+bTkVVtpH0js=; b=i44nG78pdrYcH4DsvOP46eL+h4w9QnFuiPyUMGgY0Q0jicvENSgziqtpq2N/8RlSAM Psp7CHy8KT5ZSyj740LuFhM9Gb/NvqSGB2YEHj/OB8aVJC3hqioonX+zOzG/GK/C6LHQ XT4su/jaxZ2qdEWtngXAhN7MDuGjvS/jev3sg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XFLovKnu93rNAL1vT9WOIXsxEMk9l5Z0J5XdOo2IPB12y/3kXb/fzONMBKsCUN71JO 6sTob6xdBbaaPh1EaKv8DQnTRoagkcnCmwp3bmrm3I6T1m8MPV/TT616vJ6sVNxB/l0k 4miTGdSMwR9PgJWWWJu7ksffL0FOjk0pPqiAk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.6 with SMTP id d6mr2508251wfa.303.1264697484996; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B61BE70.1090109@gmx.com> References: <4B61BE70.1090109@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:51:24 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001280851i726f7827p520f138ee84217d8@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Nikos Vassiliadis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: gjournal on compact flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:51:25 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Hi, > > I am using a 40MB journal on a 500MB compact flash. > Would that be sane, or I am causing more harm than > good? > > My concerns are: > 1) wear leveling. The journal is on specific part > of the "disk" writing again and again. That > should be handled by the CF itself. Though > I am not sure it does a good job??? > 2) I do care about ungraceful power cycles and I've seen > posts on the net, mentioning: > >> More, If >> you interrupt power at arbitrary times while the device is writing, >> you can lose the integrity of the file system being modified. The loss >> is not limited to the 512 byte sector being modified, as it generally >> is with rotating disks; you can lose an entire erase block, maybe 64K >> at once. >> > I guess the above comment renders the use > of a journaling filesystem useless. But, doing > some naive tests, power cycling the machine > while writing and checksumming the data after > fsck in preen mode, revealed no error. > > Thanks in advance for any insights, Nikos > Soft Updates seem more appropriate for a 500MB CF drive than gjournal. AFAIK, they are a wash in terms of reliability, and gjournal needs to write all data twice meaning it's slower, and increases the wear on the drive. The big drawback to soft updates is the fsck times after an unclean shutdown which really shouldn't be an issue on a 500MB drive. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 16:59:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62870106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C9F8FC1A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaXi9-00004V-32 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:17 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NaXi9-0006RE-0l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:17 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0SGxGeD085211 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:16 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0SGxGIg085210 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:16 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:16 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: make doesn't see changes in /etc/mail/freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:18 -0000 I've seen this behaviour for years, but never bothered to ask why. Imagine I already have in /etc/mail local .mc and .cf files. Imagine I then update freebsd.mc. When I run make nothing happens. What I think should happen is that local .mc should be updated and then .cf generated. Because of this behaviour I have to manually delete local .mc files and all .cf files before running make. Any comments? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 17:03:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF481065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7F18FC1C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so710868bwz.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:03:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CPw5cheg8JTcY7o85f4C+ylBCC5UAyFNleA8ll5ytXo=; b=RS9PovandWXngBcUXL6Eo5pdSkGIWizmnXg5oiU3POuDNU2UB1xcokh7bQ72Fz4lb3 RSiVwAwk/Z/im/za/pnzuR0k6EXKp2Rfc4WjqwsUa41ucd43QyxZwy2oDN44KUlte88F J5pwmnCdoh9nuoTwdNpxv5CZ/MKW7SpHEQ60c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=MkJJhEGgGUYdu4O6/TD5LQw9VZNmRZSIHI6odS9oELh2QzbZUcAhtItE7KvFm0Wcvq kIZo6Zx6yCMhXE2YFYBkykHOGobmVqRbZBqVvwBFPfQL3bhod3SmhT1T1r+pIF9wueAd CAurXQRxkvQKcfyeQnI6X1Us05haT2dGqFYPo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.6.209 with SMTP id a17mr751008bka.37.1264698226153; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:03:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:03:26 +0000 Message-ID: To: Anton Shterenlikht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make doesn't see changes in /etc/mail/freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:03:47 -0000 On 28 January 2010 16:59, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I've seen this behaviour for years, but never bothered > to ask why. > > Imagine I already have in /etc/mail local .mc and .cf > files. Imagine I then update freebsd.mc. When I run make > nothing happens. What I think should happen is that > local .mc should be updated and then .cf generated. > > Because of this behaviour I have to manually delete > local .mc files and all .cf files before running make. > > Any comments? > > many thanks > anton > Because your carefully crafted local .mc files shouldn't be clobbered whenever freebsd.mc is updated? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 17:11:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9AB106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1778FC1D for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaXtt-000477-IX; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:25 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NaXtt-000245-E2; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:25 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0SHBPLZ085266; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:25 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0SHBPmE085265; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:25 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:25 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: utisoft@gmail.com Message-ID: <20100128171124.GF60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make doesn't see changes in /etc/mail/freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:27 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:03:26PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > On 28 January 2010 16:59, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I've seen this behaviour for years, but never bothered > > to ask why. > > > > Imagine I already have in /etc/mail local .mc and .cf > > files. Imagine I then update freebsd.mc. When I run make > > nothing happens. What I think should happen is that > > local .mc should be updated and then .cf generated. > > > > Because of this behaviour I have to manually delete > > local .mc files and all .cf files before running make. > > > > Any comments? > > > > many thanks > > anton > > > > Because your carefully crafted local .mc files shouldn't be clobbered > whenever freebsd.mc is updated? I see.. so you are saying that freebsd.mc shouldn't even be touched at all, all local chages should be made straight to local .mc? thank you -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 17:16:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432591065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s28.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s28.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1144A8FC14 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT111-W14 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s28.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:15:43 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [117.193.149.228] From: dhaneshk k To: , Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:15:43 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: <4B608799.8010003@eskk.nu>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2010 17:15:43.0869 (UTC) FILETIME=[863722D0:01CAA03D] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:16:38 -0000 still unable to connect to wireless modem. In dmesg output I am seei= ng a message =20 wpi0 failed can't load firmware image . why it failed to load firmware module ? I tried to load it by kldload firmware then it reports file already exis= ts . what went wrong how to fix the issue of firmware module unable to load ? Thanks in advance Dhanesh > Date: Wed=2C 27 Jan 2010 11:42:20 -0700 > From: wblock@wonkity.com > To: leslie@eskk.nu > CC: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com=3B freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue >=20 > On Wed=2C 27 Jan 2010=2C Leslie Jensen wrote: >=20 > > 2010-01-27 17:28=2C dhaneshk k skrev: > >> > >> I am trying to configure my laptop for wireless connectivity to a= =20 > >> broadband connection. > >>=20 > >> these are the steps I followed=2C I don't know what I made wrong=2C p= lease=20 > >> help to fix the issue.. > >>=20 > >> 1 ) To /boot/loader.conf > >>=20 > >> if_wpi_load =3D "YES" > >> wlan_load =3D "YES" > >> wlan_amrr_load =3D "YES" > >> firmware_load =3D "YES" > >> wpifw_load =3D "YES" > >> legal.intel_wpi.licence_ack=3D1 > ... > >> 3) then I checked the out put of ifconfig > >>=20 > >> it showing wpi0 but no carriers for the device > >>=20 > >> I am using FreeBSD-7.2 i386 release. Wireless card is Intel=20 > >> Pro/Wireless 3945 . (In Windows XP it works from this Windows I am= =20 > >> sending this mail via Wireless access) Any help most welcome. > > > > You need some lines i /etc/rc.conf > > > > wpa_supplicant_enable=3D"YES" # is for security=2C try without fir= st > > wlans_wpi0=3D"wlan0" # mine is wlans_iwn0=3D"wlan0" > > ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA DHCP" >=20 > The virtual wlan0 was added for FreeBSD 8. For 7.2=2C it should still be= =20 > done the old way (using the actual card=2C wpi0 in this case). >=20 > -Warren Block * Rapid City=2C South Dakota USA =20 _________________________________________________________________ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 18:07:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A512A106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D51A8FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:07:39 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KWY0093LYC4Q450@asmtp024.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:07:18 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001280137 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20100128171124.GF60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:07:16 -0800 Message-id: References: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20100128171124.GF60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Anton Shterenlikht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: make doesn't see changes in /etc/mail/freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:07:39 -0000 On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> Because your carefully crafted local .mc files shouldn't be clobbered >> whenever freebsd.mc is updated? > > I see.. so you are saying that freebsd.mc shouldn't even be > touched at all, all local chages should be made straight > to local .mc? Please see /etc/mail/Makefile: # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # This Makefile uses `.mc' as the default MTA .mc file. This # can be changed by defining SENDMAIL_MC in /etc/make.conf, e.g.: # # SENDMAIL_MC=/etc/mail/myconfig.mc # # If '.mc' does not exist, it is created using 'freebsd.mc' # as a template. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 18:21:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F961065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Viraj.Dixit@CityofPaloAlto.org) Received: from xmail.cityofpaloalto.org (cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us [199.33.32.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C87F8FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xpo.staff.copa ([172.17.1.12]) by xmail.cityofpaloalto.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:21:32 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:21:32 -0800 Message-ID: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C7@xpo.staff.copa> In-Reply-To: <20100128090254.7452a557.freebsd@edvax.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP Thread-Index: Acqf8E21QsBiusPdRW25itShNsrFfgAVb2NA References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> <20100128090254.7452a557.freebsd@edvax.de> From: "Dixit, Viraj" To: "Polytropon" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2010 18:21:32.0659 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7E0AC30:01CAA046] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:21:33 -0000 Thanks so much. One question, I created a .netrc file and put it in the root (/root) directory and this is what it looks like below. I have taken out the IP, user name & password so no body can use them. Can you tell me if my syntax is correct and how do I activate this file and is this file in the right place on the server. Thanks, machine 172.16.0.38 login =20 password =20 macdef init binary lcd /ftp cd /var/temp get newemp.db quit VJ Viraj Dixit City of Palo Alto Information Technology 650-329-2118 -----Original Message----- From: Polytropon [mailto:freebsd@edvax.de]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:03 AM To: Dixit, Viraj Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:08:40 -0800, "Dixit, Viraj" wrote: > Hi, > I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will > allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another > server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will > run ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS > there is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and > will automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you > want. Thanks, In FreeBSD, there's documentation on that; read "man ftp" and see the -u option. I'm often (ab)using a Makefile to upload (send) files per FTP to a server, and I call this "make install". You can put this into a shell script (sh) and then call it, e. g. #!/bin/sh FTPUSER=3Dmy_account_name_on_ftp_server FTPPASSWD=3Dmy_very_complicated_password SERVER=3Dftp.where_my_stuff_is.foo.bar UPLOAD=3D/path/to/files/to/upload cd ${UPLOAD} && ftp -u ftp://${FTPUSER}:${FTPPASSWD}@${SERVER} * Of course, you can utilize .netrc to contain FTP access data. Then, you just need to call "pure" ftp with server name, and you can replace * with any file name(s) you want. However, be aware that FTP doesn't encrypt passwords. You should take into mind that using FTP with an SSH wrapper, or even better - scp - is a more secure way to "send files". --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 18:59:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA611065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from mail.pil.net (ns3.pil.net [209.17.170.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 816D48FC18 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14783 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 13:59:38 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 13:59:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:59:38 -0500 (EST) From: James Smallacombe X-X-Sender: up@ns3.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:59:39 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: >>>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #57938: error sending response: not enough free resources >>>> Jan 26 21:50:32 host named[667]: client #59830: error sending response: not enough free resources >>> > > OK, if the nameserver is published / authoritative, then it would be expected to be fielding requests from the Internet at large. To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. They switched it to 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. Does this sound like it could be the entire cause? I ask because I've maxed out pipes before, but never seen it shut all traffic down this much. One key difference that I forgot to mention is that this server is running TWO instances of named, on two different IPs (for different domains), each running a few hundred zones. Bottom line: Would congestion cause this issue, or would this issue cause congestion? Thanks again! James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 19:10:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB05E1065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799DB8FC18 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-188-34.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.188.34]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C023C3DAFD; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:10:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0SJAL1I005068; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:10:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:10:21 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-Id: <20100128201021.40b0e44c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C7@xpo.staff.copa> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> <20100128090254.7452a557.freebsd@edvax.de> <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C7@xpo.staff.copa> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:24 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:21:32 -0800, "Dixit, Viraj" wrote: > Thanks so much. One question, I created a .netrc file and put it in the > root (/root) directory and this is what it looks like below. I have > taken out the IP, user name & password so no body can use them. Do you regularly work as root? :-) > Can you > tell me if my syntax is correct [...] Check "man ftp", there's a whole section "THE .netrc FILE". I know that the ability to rely on manpage information isn't very common in Linux land due to missing documentation quality. :-) > [...] and how do I activate this file and is > this file in the right place on the server. The syntax is "ftp -N ". The default is ~/-netrc. > machine 172.16.0.38 > login > password > macdef init > binary > lcd /ftp > cd /var/temp > get newemp.db > quit That looks okay to me. You can process it with "ftp -v" to check verbose output for any strange things, should they ever happen. In order to avoid interaction (especially when working with more than one file), you could add "prompt" to supress any manual input. By the way, FreeBSD's ftp program accepts stdin input, such as printf "prompt\nmdelete *\nbye\n" | \ ftp ftp://$(FTPUSER):$(FTPPASSWD)@$(SERVER)/ This is what I call "make deinstall" for web pages. :-) This means that you could do the same as with .netrc. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 20:02:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CCC10656B1 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erobison@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f204.google.com (mail-iw0-f204.google.com [209.85.223.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F5A8FC32 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so1216142iwn.9 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:02:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=smn1fzg+RuIPhrZ8k6brPUzFMXv79G3L7UQEvrkbTcs=; b=tjCx6OwEcHxEretu5obX7M+Y9VT+IghX6WVNe4vfEAcuxzQVcdc5BHwXY7V7PEZ5tI 3c5tQ4TpolpP0ZR3aK5H3+NyHd2OQR6/JVVSiWe9h0AK3M67dhR6FMbVB2J0icEm9QL/ S/8abedWZEpwIfqAIpHY5wK5/cQCxN+7BK4j4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=mLL3iBWY6Gq51fZCw8rtJNdiiMZ7iV2sQtk2a9nCRBaBl6FgPMl2RZLc3KZ9A+o/lm 2wFk5AZRPyYlQgaR4y8jEKE99cNCoZ89NOvOypDRV9E/73R9NkKgmUUni5iuoXRGlBEV s/OwuI/J6bzX5A2wyKLax3H8au14NuljzvSeM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.146.66 with SMTP id g2mr1056900ibv.60.1264707433755; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:37:13 -0800 (PST) From: ericr Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:36:53 -0700 Message-ID: <7fc6c27a1001281136taf9e8d9g76e712db1e14186e@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Anyone know what this CAM error at boot means? CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:02:59 -0000 I've got an Adaptec 2200S RAID controller in a server running 5.3-RELEASE with a GENERIC kernel. (We're going to upgrade Real Soon Now, but I've got to keep things going until then.) It's been running fine for years, but a few days ago, it started taking about 3 times longer than usual to boot. The error is: (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Data Overrun (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Retrying Command followed a bit later by: (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Request completed with CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command The system seems to run ok once it boots, but taking forever to boot concerns me. Anyone know what this error means, and what I should do about it? Here's the dmesg from boot -v showing the controller, and the above CAM related error: ... aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 48 at device 1.0 on pci3 aac0: [FAST] aac0: Unknown processor 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery not installed aac0: Kernel 4.2-0, Build 8205, S/N ba904a aac0: Supported Options=31d7e aacp0: on aac0 aacp1: on aac0 ... aacd0: on aac0 aacd0: 419994MB (860149632 sectors) GEOM: new disk aacd0 [0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:63 l:860136102 [1] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [2] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [3] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1, start 32256 length 440389684224 end 440389716479 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1a, start 0 length 26843545600 end 26843545599 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1b, start 26843545600 length 4294967296 end 31138512895 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1c, start 0 length 440389684224 end 440389684223 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1d, start 31138512896 length 137438953472 end 168577466367 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1e, start 168577466368 length 4294967296 end 172872433663 GEOM: Configure aacd0s1f, start 172872433664 length 267517250560 end 440389684223 (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Data Overrun (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Data Overrun (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Retrying Command (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Data Overrun (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Retrying Command (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Data Overrun (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Retrying Command (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Data Overrun (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Retrying Command (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Data Overrun (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Data Overrun (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Retrying Command (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Data Overrun (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Retrying Command (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Data Overrun (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Retrying Command (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Data Overrun (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Retrying Command (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Data Overrun (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Data Overrun (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Retrying Command (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Data Overrun (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Retrying Command (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Data Overrun (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Retrying Command (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Data Overrun (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Retrying Command (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Data Overrun (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Data Overrun (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Retrying Command (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Data Overrun (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Retrying Command (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Data Overrun (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Retrying Command (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Data Overrun (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Retrying Command (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Data Overrun (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): error 5 (probe0:aacp0:0:0:0): Retries Exausted (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Data Overrun (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): error 5 (probe5:aacp0:0:5:0): Retries Exausted (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Data Overrun (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): error 5 (probe4:aacp0:0:4:0): Retries Exausted (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Data Overrun (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): error 5 (probe3:aacp0:0:3:0): Retries Exausted (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Data Overrun (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): error 5 (probe2:aacp0:0:2:0): Retries Exausted (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Request completed with CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Request completed with CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Request completed with CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Request completed with CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Request completed with CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): error 5 (probe30:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retries Exausted pass0 at aacp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass1 at aacp0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 pass1: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass1: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass2 at aacp0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 pass2: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass2: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass3 at aacp0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 pass3: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass3: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass4 at aacp0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 pass4: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass4: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass5 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass5: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device pass5: 1.000MB/s transfers pass0 at aacp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass1 at aacp0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 pass1: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass1: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass2 at aacp0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 pass2: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass2: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass3 at aacp0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 pass3: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass3: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) pass4 at aacp0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 pass4: Fixed unknown SCSI-3 device pass4: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit) GEOM: new disk da0 ... da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 305245MB (625142448 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 38913C) [0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:63 l:625137282 [1] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [2] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [3] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 GEOM: Configure da0s1, start 32256 length 320070288384 end 320070320639 GEOM: Configure da0s1c, start 0 length 320070288384 end 320070288383 GEOM: Configure da0s1d, start 0 length 320070288384 end 320070288383 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s1a ... Thanks! - ericr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 20:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30012106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f176.google.com (mail-pz0-f176.google.com [209.85.222.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CAB8FC13 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so776711pzk.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t2GGyx8d/GCYnJSvS/B+zDYrC9Pw2IAnTRWeOnv4O7M=; b=bIm9zlR1HEQ7P8WdltXlhowUO9GLRBNf/4G0499a1jsEPQUtQNEDkn/LQqV7nv6n0i 4IVHg8POwaKoiZPP5P9wl4RadTz4h2klx9NJpikz5LznP2UUcNuL4edeqn2D8hTzVdxI LPbIMIiXF8LHwUkqkXT4jf5grGAuXkpz/EhAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Y+cmfVDTmHIRzYU35vFcDUbzs3C4fLfYUrQ6cElZJV4CbkCOunlI7XZ7CY150rPQG+ TfRz9pAOuSIFrfjqZd5Y7R206nySU64vBUd1hWJ51sP/QmAvzerqVoe6tLXI6vm2TNt0 ZuI4irWa0dzXiy1zs8XG3nTCocfnrOWJKiZm0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.5.39 with SMTP id 39mr1586483wfe.81.1264709266410; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:46 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: James Smallacombe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:07:47 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: > To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was > accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got > through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that > they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. They switched it to > 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. > > Does this sound like it could be the entire cause? I ask because I've > maxed out pipes before, but never seen it shut all traffic down this much. > One key difference that I forgot to mention is that this server is running > TWO instances of named, on two different IPs (for different domains), each > running a few hundred zones. > > Bottom line: Would congestion cause this issue, or would this issue cause > congestion? > I would guess no, but that guess could easily be wrong. Have you tried turning up the logging to verbosity to get a better idea of what's happening? -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 20:49:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D23E1065670 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkrafczyk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f204.google.com (mail-iw0-f204.google.com [209.85.223.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0848C8FC16 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so1264281iwn.9 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:49:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TRyV33MqkJoafqvxeuw1F8kzH5XfamKH+pZUiJpNs94=; b=MQi7ZKqMGv/a9CpGfuUAnm2oukgqLFbS5tIiG2e8aMz+cIGWx4I4JaPNuevxmLveJF AU1BopvycWkum4l+oL1ChYkG06dC7ZCz6Vbf/73gvhkVDkp9tlmuROb6XDbTbQH2PnSt 1zN5Rs9nSmg18iN05EtmZrVb1O/WrBFC21tCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FX2d+OSDBtdW5T8JtQ68/+jDwblg59plere+FfENz1KnBpe8Q/xXOES3GzvN0TBVWV 7im0XF5gPlOI3ykGdXklu0h9Yb9wwyaOCepBpqLRrHCEoGyt2PBlQpvO96uFU/ZU+9u5 5c02BdJNImVDhoFuoOcq6rBcYqnHmd0zpbB9w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.147.203 with SMTP id m11mr370451ibv.86.1264709901382; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:18:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:18:21 -0500 Message-ID: <86d606731001281218h41172eb7w467675fa38e6224@mail.gmail.com> From: Michael Krafczyk To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:49:55 -0000 Hi, I am new to FreeBSD and recently created a FreeNAS server. I had a problem with GEOM: GPT rejected. I have Award Bios and found this fix http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406. I, though, do not know how to apply the patch. I would appreciate any help. Thanks, Mike Krafczyk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 21:03:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302201065672 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68248FC1B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so957550bwz.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:03:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0eZ6qaRPKg9Ml+XrqvQPeuxb+GTNpUOCWN7QfSW+qqA=; b=cQoXsbI2f9FD4giSzuD+CPLjLIRh/ANLVUQIeUHyfjIj42M4V4prLfjyAVtXPv5S+T neZ08uHWT3vIomLLwpqNrjPa7SWhO+Skyd2x0tVqw2l7iPzxs5QT/Pb8bkVBwW5Kasn+ 8lUgBDXNeB9bTLqtdp5TKCOqrj+iNOefyKsds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LD2RvGvzECE2TzW+PG5hHmgbNgqrhIBQuxx3MmXtDKG09lfAY7bmRH/vQ/ySRrdMy2 Ij/cDIxtnhdAQ4Qa6wKKzJyOVuX8FlcPknGHx7ac4iwgxRQAtUVDYRuiSjGsgoFd8Wgr qwK+ouZEcJ/LPQXakG7qzfQ7o1KIdfPgAkHCw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.134 with SMTP id p6mr3624123bkp.34.1264712589183; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:03:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86d606731001281218h41172eb7w467675fa38e6224@mail.gmail.com> References: <86d606731001281218h41172eb7w467675fa38e6224@mail.gmail.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:01:03 +0000 Message-ID: To: Michael Krafczyk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:03:12 -0000 On 28 January 2010 20:18, Michael Krafczyk wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to FreeBSD and recently created a FreeNAS server. =A0I had a pro= blem > with GEOM: GPT rejected. =A0I have Award Bios and found this fix > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D115406. =A0I, though, do not= know > how to apply the patch. =A0I would appreciate any help. > > Thanks, > > Mike Krafczyk Are you certain that you need to? What version of FreeBSD are you using? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 21:07:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D591065679 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:07:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C00838FC27 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6990 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2010 21:07:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 21:07:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=CJMYEQFCkpOlUYHoNPB89RkvJTQXLqo3nw84CBcl56/+yDeqcTGr16d0c1JK19HTAqjSHFU0ePkIriBn+aDaLoG9z0TtHH5XLno8bnHsPDcNH1JjbgS3p9m4sFlHVwZ0; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Naba6-0002ao-Mv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:17 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:58:56 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:58:56 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100128205856.GA99708@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: clarification on polkit upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:07:21 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In /usr/ports/UPDATING, I see this: Due to a recent change in sysutils/policykit, both sysutils/policykit, and sysutils/polkit need to be rebuilt, but in a certain order. First, upgrade sysutils/policykit to 0.9_6. Then, force a rebuild and reinstall of sysutils/polkit. If you do not do this, applications which depend on polkitd will fail. It's a little unclear about the requirement for the polkit upgrade. Does this mean that `portupgrade polkit` is enough after upgrading policy kit, or not? If not -- what's needed? Would a deinstall/reinstall be needed? Is `portupgrade -f` good? I've already used `portupgrade polkit` here, and I haven't seen any problems yet, but then I haven't restarted anything that relies on polkit for a while either. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkth+pAACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKU5RQCg8Z0agSOglHxRVGJf15t8R6PZ zMUAnRKBE3113D1G6uZqIFLuKK7AYsXB =DOeD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 21:39:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90E7106566C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Viraj.Dixit@CityofPaloAlto.org) Received: from xmail.cityofpaloalto.org (cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us [199.33.32.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912088FC1A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xpo.staff.copa ([172.17.1.12]) by xmail.cityofpaloalto.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:39:39 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:39:38 -0800 Message-ID: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016CD@xpo.staff.copa> In-Reply-To: <20100127225334.GX50360@dan.emsphone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP Thread-Index: Acqfp6xneHjUUgpSQHKjG6pmDnzJOwAuYFKA References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> <20100127225334.GX50360@dan.emsphone.com> From: "Dixit, Viraj" To: "Dan Nelson" , "Polytropon" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2010 21:39:39.0301 (UTC) FILETIME=[64DE4D50:01CAA062] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:39:42 -0000 Hi, The script that I have setup does not work if I run the .netrc file. I ran the commands in ftp -v mode and it did not like machine command, did not like passwd or pwd etc.=20 machine 0.0.0.0 login VJ password 123456 macdef init binary lcd /ftp cd /var/temp get newemp.db quit =20 If I use this command in .netrc it connects to the server but it does not connect using my login name VJ, it points to some other name. ftp 0.0.0.0 =20 .netrc simply doesn't work in FreeBSD. Is their someone who has a working script. Thanks!!! =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:54 PM To: Dixit, Viraj Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP =20 In the last episode (Jan 27), Dixit, Viraj said: > I am looking to see if there a command or a script In BSD Os that will > allow me to ftp to a server automatically and get a file from another > server. User name and passwd will be already in the script so it will run > ftp and download a file or a JPG from that server. Like in Linux OS there > is a command using .netrc file and you can script that file and will > automatically do what is in the file at time interval that you want.=20 > Thanks, =20 FreeBSD's ftp command supports .netrc files. Is your current script not working? =20 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dftp#THE_.netrc_FILE =20 --=20 Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 22:03:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A5C106566B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F07B8FC15 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667C8EB47BB; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E594160CFF; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:40 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXh556PdtAZL; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp-94-64-225-26.home.otenet.gr [94.64.225.26]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07996160CFE; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o0SM3cea036392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o0SM3bfR036385; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:16 +0000") Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:32:27 +0200 Message-ID: <873a1p3ogk.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <20100128165916.GD60207@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make doesn't see changes in /etc/mail/freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:03:42 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:59:16 +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I've seen this behaviour for years, but never bothered > to ask why. > > Imagine I already have in /etc/mail local .mc and .cf files. Imagine I > then update freebsd.mc. When I run make nothing happens. What I think > should happen is that local .mc should be updated and then .cf > generated. > > Because of this behaviour I have to manually delete local .mc files > and all .cf files before running make. Or merge your local changes *into* the "local.mc" file. For example, I have several dozen lines of local customizations in "HOSTNAME.mc" here: root@kobe:/etc/mail# diff -u freebsd.mc kobe.mc | diffstat -p1 kobe.mc | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) I would be very annoyed if updating freebsd.mc clobbered these :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 22:19:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACBE1065694 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bulinskp@iem.pw.edu.pl) Received: from volt.iem.pw.edu.pl (volt.iem.pw.edu.pl [194.29.146.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A188FC2D for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.1.2] (chello087206034160.chello.pl [87.206.34.160]) (Authenticated sender: bulinskp) by volt.iem.pw.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BD93A66720; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:04:07 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Piotr_Buli=C5=84ski?= Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-29-793722448; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:04:07 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter devel-20100125-exp at volt.iem.pw.edu.pl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Problem with sftp server, static linking, pam and nss_ldap. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:19:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail-29-793722448 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, recently we moved our users database to LDAP server, but after that sftp = stops working on our students server.=20 We use: - OpenLDAP 2.4.21 - nss_ldap-1.265_3 - pam_ldap-1.8.5 - FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 When I use sftp, it drops the connection: {volt}-{~}% sftp localhost Connecting to localhost... Connection closed {volt}-{~}%=20 After short investigation, I've found that problem is in = /usr/libexec/sftp-server program (which is our default subsystem in = sshd): {volt}-{~}% /usr/libexec/sftp-server=20 No user found for uid 5567 {volt}-{~}%=20 what was quite weird, because sshd works perfectly with users from LDAP = server (so I assume that PAM is configured correctly). After that, I've tried to make a simple test with program below: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { struct passwd *user_pw; user_pw =3D getpwuid(getuid()); if ((user_pw =3D getpwuid(getuid())) =3D=3D NULL) { fprintf(stderr, "No user found for uid %lu\n", (u_long)getuid()); return 1; } else { fprintf(stderr, "It works %s!\nYour uid is: %lu\n", user_pw->pw_name, (u_long)getuid()); } return 0; } =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D which is almost copy-pasted from = /usr/src/crypto/openssh/sftp-server-main.c I've build it twice. Once with dynamic linking: {volt}-{~}% cc -o test test.c =20 {volt}-{~}% ./test It works bulinskp! Your uid is: 5567 {volt}-{~}%=20 another one with static linking: {volt}-{~}% cc -o test -static test.c {volt}-{~}% ./test =20 No user found for uid 5567 {volt}-{~}%=20 As you can see, it works great with dynamic linking, but if it's build = with static linking it can't get user information from LDAP database. Could you be so kind and help me better understand this problem and find = some solution for it (I spend some time trying to find it, but this is = probably beyond my scope)? I would be really appreciate for any tip. Below are information about my PAM and NSS configuration: {volt}-{~}% cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep passwd passwd: files ldap {volt}-{~}%=20 {volt}-{~}% cat /etc/pam.d/sshd | grep -v "^#" | grep -v "^$" auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn = no_fake_prompts auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn = allow_local auth requisite /usr/local/lib/pam_af.so debug auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so no_warn auth required pam_unix.so no_warn = try_first_pass account required pam_nologin.so account required pam_login_access.so account required /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so no_warn = ignore_authinfo_unavail ignore_unknown_user account required pam_unix.so session required pam_permit.so session sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so no_warn = try_first_pass=20 password required pam_unix.so no_warn = try_first_pass {volt}-{~}%=20 regards --=20 Piotr Buli=C5=84ski Informatyka na Wydziale Elektrycznym Politechnika Warszawska --Apple-Mail-29-793722448-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 22:23:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D330106568F for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD78D8FC12 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.14] (h-74-2-96-2.chcgilgm.static.covad.net [74.2.96.2]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A9B295D6; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:23:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B620E5E.2040908@cyberleo.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:23:26 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:23:29 -0000 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove > any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it > else rm it)... any quick way to do this? # ls -1F keep old/ # find old old old/a old/a/1 old/a/4 old/b old/b/2 old/b/5 old/c old/c/3 old/c/6 # find new find: new: No such file or directory # cat keep a/4 b/5 c/6 # ( cd old; cat ../keep | cpio -pld ../new ) /tmp/old 0 blocks # ls -1F keep new/ old/ # find new new new/a new/a/4 new/b new/b/5 new/c new/c/6 -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 22:41:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787291065698 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAE48FC1C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o0SMfebS035008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0SMfdFj048996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o0SMfdQq048990; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:38 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-ID: <20100128224137.GZ50360@dan.emsphone.com> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> <20100127225334.GX50360@dan.emsphone.com> <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016CD@xpo.staff.copa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016CD@xpo.staff.copa> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:40 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:41:41 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 28), Dixit, Viraj said: > The script that I have setup does not work if I run the .netrc file. I > ran the commands in ftp -v mode and it did not like machine command, did > not like passwd or pwd etc. The commands in .netrc are not the same ones that you send on the ftp commandline (except for the macdef block), so that's to be expected. I just tried your sample netrc file (with changes to match my system) and it worked just fine: (dan@dan.19) /tmp> cat ~/.netrc machine 127.0.0.1 login dan password xxxxxx macdef init binary lcd /tmp cd / get COPYRIGHT quit (dan@dan.19) /tmp> ftp 127.0.0.1 Connected to 127.0.0.1. 220 studio FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. 331 Password required for dan. 230 User dan logged in. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. binary 200 Type set to I. lcd /tmp Local directory now: /tmp cd / 250 CWD command successful. get COPYRIGHT local: COPYRIGHT remote: COPYRIGHT 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||62084|) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'COPYRIGHT' (6191 bytes). 100% |*************************************| 6191 11.48 MB/s 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. 6191 bytes received in 00:00 (6.32 MB/s) quit 221 Goodbye. (dan@dan.19) /tmp> ls -l /COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6191 Jan 13 11:14 /COPYRIGHT -rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 6191 Jan 13 11:14 COPYRIGHT If all you really want to do is download a single file from a remote server, you can give ftp a url-style commandline argument and it will log in and download the file automatically: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ftp#AUTO-FETCHING_FILES (dan@dan.19) /tmp> ftp ftp://dan:xxxxx@127.0.0.1/%2fCOPYRIGHT Connected to 127.0.0.1. 220 studio FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. 331 Password required for dan. 230 User dan logged in. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. 200 Type set to I. local: COPYRIGHT remote: /COPYRIGHT 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||57935|) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for '/COPYRIGHT' (6191 bytes). 100% |*************************************| 6191 4.42 MB/s 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. 6191 bytes received in 00:00 (2.52 MB/s) 221 Goodbye. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 16:25:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AE7106568B; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EC78FC18; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FEA246B0D; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:25:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C896F8A01F; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:25:55 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Dimitry Andric Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:23:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20100120; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <1264680406.2869.72.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <4B618270.3050309@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <4B618270.3050309@andric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001281123.33097.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:25:55 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:03:38 +0000 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis , Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Noland Subject: Re: booting off GPT partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:25:57 -0000 On Thursday 28 January 2010 7:26:24 am Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-01-28 13:06, Robert Noland wrote: > > John or Marcel can correct me, but I don't think that this is an issue. > > The bootstrap is located in the pmbr in sector 0 and the GPT headers and > > tables are in sectors 1 - 34. The bootstrap code knows how to read the > > GPT tables and can deal with> 2 tb lba's. > > Ah yes, I see it now. It uses EDD packets with the BIOS int 13 > interface, which apparently have a 64-bit LBA. This should support up > to 8 ZiB with 512-byte sectors... > > OTOH, I have no idea how well most BIOSes actually implement this. > Since many OSes simply don't support anything over 2^32 sectors, I would > not be amazed to find much BIOSes out there that behave the same. Or am > I too paranoid now? :) It should work fine. The GPT boot code was originally written specifically to supporting booting from RAID volumes > 2TB. I've tested it on mfi(4) volumes that large (though I didn't verify the individual LBAs of all the various bits read in by the bootstrap and loader were). I know that other folks ran into bugs until the ZFS GPT boot code was all made 64-bit clean and that they have since booted > 2TB ZFS volumes ok. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 28 23:26:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D6A106568F for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C1C8FC17 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id b1nB1d00E1u4NiLAEBS3NE; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:26:04 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bBS11d00w1f6R9u8hBS2w1; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:26:03 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:26:00 -0800 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:26:00 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100128232559.GB64692@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100125100047.GF12145@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100125100047.GF12145@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:26:04 -0000 On Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 02:00:47 PST Charlie Kester wrote: >http://www.mini-box.com/D510MO-mini-ITX-Intel > >I'm thinking of ordering one of these motherboards, which have the >newest dual-core Atom processor and NM10 chipset. I'm intrigued by its >low-power, fanless operation. I already have FreeBSD running on one of >the older Atom mobo's, so I know not to expect high-end performance from >these inexpensive processors. But that older board has an annoyingly >noisy fan, and I'd like to replace it. > >Has anyone already tried putting FreeBSD on one of these? Any >problems? I did go ahead and buy one of these boards and can now report that FreeBSD-8.0/i386 boots and runs on it with no apparent problems. A user in the forums reports similar success running 8.0/amd64. Extremely quiet and inexpensive board. At around $80, it is one-third the cost of the Supermicro boards. Not much use as a space heater, however; I've had it running for more than 24 hours, busily recompiling ports, and the heatsink is just barely warm to the touch. Next time I reboot it I'm going to plug it into my Kill-a-Watt meter to measure its power draw... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 01:39:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF69F1065693 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s18.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s18.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823F78FC14 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT111-W45 ([65.55.90.199]) by snt0-omc4-s18.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:39:29 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [117.193.139.158] From: dhaneshk k To: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:39:29 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jan 2010 01:39:29.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6129D60:01CAA083] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Intel Pro/Wireless 3945 issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:39:30 -0000 =20 still unable to connect to wireless modem. In dmesg output I am seeing a me= ssage=20 wpi0 failed can't load firmware image . =20 why it failed to load firmware module ? =20 I tried to load it by kldload firmware then it reports file already exists = . what went wrong how to fix the issue of firmware module unable to load ? =20 Thanks in advance Dhanesh =20 > Date: Wed=2C 27 Jan 2010 11:42:20 -0700 > From: wblock@wonkity.com > To: leslie@eskk.nu > CC: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com=3B freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Intel Pro/Wireless3945 issue >=20 > On Wed=2C 27 Jan 2010=2C Leslie Jensen wrote: >=20 > > 2010-01-27 17:28=2C dhaneshk k skrev: > >> > >> I am trying to configure my laptop for wireless connectivity to a=20 > >> broadband connection. > >>=20 > >> these are the steps I followed=2C I don't know what I made wrong=2C pl= ease=20 > >> help to fix the issue.. > >>=20 > >> 1 ) To /boot/loader.conf > >>=20 > >> if_wpi_load =3D "YES" > >> wlan_load =3D "YES" > >> wlan_amrr_load =3D "YES" > >> firmware_load =3D "YES" > >> wpifw_load =3D "YES" > >> legal.intel_wpi.licence_ack=3D1 > ... > >> 3) then I checked the out put of ifconfig > >>=20 > >> it showing wpi0 but no carriers for the device > >>=20 > >> I am using FreeBSD-7.2 i386 release. Wireless card is Intel=20 > >> Pro/Wireless 3945 . (In Windows XP it works from this Windows I am=20 > >> sending this mail via Wireless access) Any help most welcome. > > > > You need some lines i /etc/rc.conf > > > > wpa_supplicant_enable=3D"YES" # is for security=2C try without first > > wlans_wpi0=3D"wlan0" # mine is wlans_iwn0=3D"wlan0" > > ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA DHCP" >=20 > The virtual wlan0 was added for FreeBSD 8. For 7.2=2C it should still be= =20 > done the old way (using the actual card=2C wpi0 in this case). >=20 > -Warren Block * Rapid City=2C South Dakota USA =20 _________________________________________________________________ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969_____________________________= __________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 02:40:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C521065676 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from bee.hiwaay.net (bee.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE188FC14 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.9] (dynamic-24-42-224-110.knology.net [24.42.224.110] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by bee.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0T2e1Kh1563650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:40:02 -0600 (CST) References: <4B6090FC.4070002@gmail.com> <4B620E5E.2040908@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <4B620E5E.2040908@cyberleo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <08A06102-454D-4E82-8447-F2170978972D@hiwaay.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:40:13 -0600 To: CyberLeo Kitsana X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: "Aryeh M. Friedman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: finding every file not in a list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:40:05 -0000 On Jan 28, 2010, at 4:23 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: >> I have a list of files that should be in a dir tree and want to remove >> any files from the tree not in list (i.e. if it is on the list keep it >> else rm it)... any quick way to do this? > > # ls -1F > keep > old/ [...] I think mtree(8) is the proper tool for this job. Especially the -r option: -r Remove any files in the file hierarchy that are not described in the specification. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 03:10:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CEC1065672 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3E18FC1F for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (ethic.thought.org [10.47.0.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0T3A3OB039311 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 kline@thought.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:03 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100129031000.GA39222@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Subject: need help setting up webpage for xyxbuilders.us domain.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:10:07 -0000 can anybody help me set up my /etc/namedb/ files and mt /usr/local/etc/apache22/ files to help a builder friend? since this probably isn't exactly on-topic, this might best be handled offlist from now on. nutshell is that this gentleman has saved me, my house, my family umpteen times and i'm waaay overdue to return the favors. i have no idea how much work having a web page will get him, but it's certainly worth a try. thanks, guys, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 09:36:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8B81065670 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com (mail-yw0-f194.google.com [209.85.211.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196C08FC1D for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so925947ywh.14 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:36:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Aavft67egou0SlcsIvvYg1KdqEvqLzcJi8gqBJArEyo=; b=D1Pt0J/KvrZAkTQHrMollVVXjrnjNW+qMOBZWaxUS+fVzymfFg3gR0FwWr246/Twk/ vsP26A5Ad2I/7P68MxOL4GlNTTkuIu3xdw1YldaqMEVll1J44/ZAcVhM8t4+eNEERS7k T0kiSpwVsiBk/2quIE0lkAGq9V1E/Z0g7p9VA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dyeAHwtDj9bEBFNSIlLkeAx8bShg0fx+3m0nkbheamVnJythNwxzm68krPGC8hRZYi HfQb01yvGoJLLEm3c2W5dfKbOi8YgJMRS62wEQpjjW1p0BATho4EfdFE7/Arxh3WhJMC i+BaJdH+BpC2q+TCg6UwO+DNLzY3QSn8f7Iss= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.244.21 with SMTP id r21mr589001anh.92.1264757775228; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:36:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: RE: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:16 -0000 > > >I did go ahead and buy one of these boards and can now report that >FreeBSD-8.0/i386 boots and runs on it with no apparent problems. A user >in the forums reports similar success running 8.0/amd64. > >Extremely quiet and inexpensive board. At around $80, it is one-third >the cost of the Supermicro boards. > >Not much use as a space heater, however; I've had it running for more >than 24 hours, busily recompiling ports, and the heatsink is just barely >warm to the touch. Next time I reboot it I'm going to plug it into my >Kill-a-Watt meter to measure its power draw... Reports of successes with both adm64 andi386 versions of 8.0-RELEASE and Intel D510MO board have been showing up on a few different discussion forums now. I have to correct myself in regard to the Supermicro X7SPA-H board. The board seems to be roughly 2 times as expensive as the Intel D510MO (~75$ for the D150MO vs $150-170$ for the X7SPA-H). However, these prices seem to only be like that in the US. When looking at European prices, it seems that the D510MO board goes for about 75-80 euro and the X7SPA-H goes for about 190-230 euro, depending on country and reseller. So while the Supermicro board is roughly twice as expensive as the Intel board in the US, it's roughly 3 times as expensive if you are buying in Europe. I still ended up going with the X7SPA-H though (finally pulled the plug on ordering all the parts for a new system yesterday), mainly because it saves me the trouble of immideately having to hunt for an additional disk controller card: the D510MO has only 2 SATA ports and a PCI slot for expansion (and I have REALLY burned myself badly on the performance of PCI disk controller cards in the past), while the X7SPA-H comes with 6 native SATA ports on an ICH9R controller and has a 4xPCIE (in 16x physical form) for expansion. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 10:20:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582BD106568D for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D65B8FC08 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bNGp1d0061vN32cABNKAAx; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:19:10 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bNMk1d0011f6R9u8iNMkpn; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:21:45 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:20:34 -0800 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:20:34 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100129102034.GD64692@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Intel D510MO Mini-ITX Motherboard - Is anyone using FreeBSD on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:20:38 -0000 On Fri 29 Jan 2010 at 01:36:15 PST Dan Naumov wrote: > >Reports of successes with both adm64 andi386 versions of 8.0-RELEASE >and Intel D510MO board have been showing up on a few different >discussion forums now. > >I have to correct myself in regard to the Supermicro X7SPA-H board. >The board seems to be roughly 2 times as expensive as the Intel D510MO >(~75$ for the D150MO vs $150-170$ for the X7SPA-H). However, these >prices seem to only be like that in the US. When looking at European >prices, it seems that the D510MO board goes for about 75-80 euro and >the X7SPA-H goes for about 190-230 euro, depending on country and >reseller. So while the Supermicro board is roughly twice as expensive >as the Intel board in the US, it's roughly 3 times as expensive if you >are buying in Europe. > >I still ended up going with the X7SPA-H though (finally pulled the >plug on ordering all the parts for a new system yesterday), mainly >because it saves me the trouble of immideately having to hunt for an >additional disk controller card: the D510MO has only 2 SATA ports and >a PCI slot for expansion (and I have REALLY burned myself badly on the >performance of PCI disk controller cards in the past), while the >X7SPA-H comes with 6 native SATA ports on an ICH9R controller and has a >4xPCIE (in 16x physical form) for expansion. Don't the Supermicro boards also have a better network chip than the Realtek one used on Intel's boards? FWIW, my Kill-a-Watt meter says the D510MO is drawing about 25W on average. That's for everything inside the case. If I'd gone with a single-core chip and a solid-state drive, I could probably get that down to about 20W. This is definitely a green machine! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 10:46:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA0B106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6278FC1A for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-232.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.232]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26113DCA8; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:46:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0TAktv5001507; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:46:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:46:55 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-Id: <20100129114655.31700ac8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016CD@xpo.staff.copa> References: <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016C5@xpo.staff.copa> <20100127225334.GX50360@dan.emsphone.com> <9A8CAB63B4C2014B883AF16FDFB362FB01F016CD@xpo.staff.copa> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is their Automatic command to send a JPG file using FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:46:57 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:39:38 -0800, "Dixit, Viraj" wrote: > Hi, > > The script that I have setup does not work if I run the .netrc file. I > ran the commands in ftp -v mode and it did not like machine command, did > not like passwd or pwd etc. Did you issue the command % ftp -v 0.0.0.0 (where 0.0.0.0 refers to the "machine" identifier in .netrc)? > machine 0.0.0.0 > login VJ > password 123456 > macdef init > binary > lcd /ftp > cd /var/temp > get newemp.db > quit Looks valid to me, but you could do this more easily, at least for testing: % cd /var/temp % ftp VJ:123456@0.0.0.0/ftp/newemp.db This should get you the file into the correct directory. > If I use this command in .netrc it connects to the server but it does > not connect using my login name VJ, it points to some other name. > > ftp 0.0.0.0 That's not the correct way to call the ftp program. > .netrc simply doesn't work in FreeBSD. For sure it does, as described in the manpage. > Is their someone who has a working script. Thanks!!! See my example above. At the moment, it doesn't seem that you "send" a file per FTP, but "receive" one. This can also be achieved through the .netrc file, but to make sure everything works ON BOTH SIDES of the connection, try the ftp command given above where the needed information is "hardcoded". You can add the -v parameter, too. If you require more help, describe more exactly what you're intending to do. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 10:55:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE44C1065679 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C338FC13 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8753A383C for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:55:47 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1264762547; x=1266576947; bh=JXuqlpEsd KMzWS/W6iVPcKhxJU/1KOcOi8GBcW5vwJ4=; b=ESnPiM48jTkT26ENnf/pxY28/ t3hAs8ue9IVqUoZP90aM5onb2bscufhxeTJT9fsCUllCLxIy6yJbaku/Sn5O1ORP 9lkn1U5z6gslqMKCcKL5x74HZmSHc6UbtP+FAYCz1YV/UK07OJwY9LBQu4U8s9O3 SPWjsxhE4gJagDeZCk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id UoLRlgJTH7Pc for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:55:47 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118173A3836 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:55:46 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0TAtiwd091062; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:55:44 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:55:44 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201001291055.o0TAtiwd091062@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ssh/sshd cores dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:55:49 -0000 Hi, I have this weird error since yesterday, one a system that used to be working nicely, suddenly: ssh cores dump when run as non priviledged user, works fine for root sshd aborts on signal 11 I tried to reinstall world, but it is the same. There is openssl installed from the ports on that machine (what port needed it?) as well as ldap/nss_ldap/open_ldap. It seems that the problem started when I tried to upgrade openldap libbrary (openldap-client port). I did a little bit more diging: ssh cores dump on a strcmp, from /lib/libc.so.6; I checked with a working machine, the library are the same; I checked ssh, they are the same. This is very puzzeling. Any clue? The machine is running 6.4-RELEASE-p9 TIA. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 13:38:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2C8106568B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from office@pc-service.ch) Received: from tr18.bluewin.ch (tr18.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FBC8FC37 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.10.161] (193.5.4.227) by tr18.bluewin.ch (The Blue Window 8.5.119.018.5.119.01) (authenticated as pc-service.schweizer@bluewin.ch) id 4B447CFD00ECE845; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:16:29 +0000 Message-ID: <4B62DFCA.3030402@pc-service.ch> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:16:58 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= References: <20100127045446.GG28438@saturn.pcs.ms> <181688930.20100127184045@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <181688930.20100127184045@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw: limit bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:38:21 -0000 Hello Sorry for the delay. I read again the man page an used the example which is described there and, how every, now it works as expected (I tried it many, many times). Thank again. Regards, Êîíüêîâ Åâãåíèé schrieb: > Hello, Martin. > > First of all you must decide you want your shaper rule act as allow > rule or not: > kes# sysctl -a | grep one_pass > net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: 0 or 1 > > man ipfw > pipe pipe_nr > Pass packet to a dummynet(4) ``pipe'' (for bandwidth limitation, > delay, etc.). See the TRAFFIC SHAPER (DUMMYNET) CONFIGURATION > Section for further information. The search terminates; however, > on exit from the pipe and if the sysctl(8) variable > net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass is not set, the packet is passed again to > the firewall code starting from the next rule. > > Second you do not need to put packet to pipe and to queue at same > time. > > use pipe to just limit rate or use queue to limit rate and process > groups of packets in round robin manner. packets are grouped my mask > > pipe is like this: > http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/img/queue_fifo.jpg > > queue is like this: > http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/img/queue_pcq.jpg > > some doc: > http://kes.net.ua/softdev/advanced_firewall.html > translated by google: > http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&swap=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fkes.net.ua%2Fsoftdev%2Fadvanced_firewall.html&sl=ru&tl=en > > > > MS> Hello > > MS> I use FreeBSD 7.2 on a amd64. I want to limit the bandwidth thru > MS> this machine. Here is the relevante part of /etc/rc.firewall > > MS> [snip] > MS> $ipfwcmd pipe 1 config bw 80kByte/s > MS> $ipfwcmd add pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 > > MS> $ipfwcmd queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 1 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff > MS> $ipfwcmd add queue 1 all from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 > MS> [snip] > > MS> I generate this from different sources but it seems that it is not working. What do I'm wrong? > > MS> Here the part from ipfw show: > > MS> 00100 0 0 check-state > MS> 00200 24327 1497881 pipe 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 > MS> 00300 0 0 queue 1 ip from any to 192.168.10.0/24{100-254} via em1 > MS> [snip] > > > MS> Regards, > > > -- Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; Postfach 132; CH-8608 Bubikon; Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 13:50:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662D7106568F for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkrafczyk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f199.google.com (mail-iw0-f199.google.com [209.85.223.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC8D8FC1E for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so1989969iwn.30 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:49:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R00jvDLhVSSUH/x0uVNs+9gTi9oOq4I2tzxYLqdzx3Q=; b=rPIrSsjoVrdj00e7klYc+Tx5k/EAMctZySRiUH7Vj3bVeMO537NVwozLh/9GXjRPXc NAd/Lv/cQI+JU2FKYjvizvwHOlc6eNUC5/94TdNMfXuxBdc4DdCsHeX0wnWH/0mV+Q9X zmgTNINsJzNmU+ob79aOxApDtn+zsRfMnm1Ks= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cs9BCAJgYY3z/QFsK19NdMQ9Gqgt69J7oNbySCZxoHE7umcxMsvftwuzv69Zrun0pJ cCqDgYFD3E04KSkX5P0x4secOknsZ5Y5qAWH+iRKafMXVrg0LTsrxLGuOz1v1NeWst69 O1hvBW0jnDIV4bnm3ioQ3ntofHYd8//ZOdnyk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.169.71 with SMTP id x7mr1342446iby.18.1264772999347; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:49:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <86d606731001281218h41172eb7w467675fa38e6224@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:49:59 -0500 Message-ID: <86d606731001290549p29b9c700wd8128f58c9588d2c@mail.gmail.com> From: Michael Krafczyk To: utisoft@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:50:00 -0000 I apologize for ignorance but I have freenas and not sure freebsd is the same. But the version of freenas I have is: i386 07.1.4997 I am pretty sure I need the patch. Whenever I reboot my system I get an error that states the GPT is rejected. If I unplug the power to the hard drive and reboot and then plug in the power to the hard drive it works and I do not get this error as per the instructions in the link above. Mike On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 28 January 2010 20:18, Michael Krafczyk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am new to FreeBSD and recently created a FreeNAS server. I had a > problem > > with GEOM: GPT rejected. I have Award Bios and found this fix > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406. I, though, do not > know > > how to apply the patch. I would appreciate any help. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike Krafczyk > > Are you certain that you need to? What version of FreeBSD are you using? > > Chris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 15:09:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF354106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from nomoremozzie.com (nomoremozzie.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6318FC1A for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([112.199.212.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by nomoremozzie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0TF9kAT003113 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:09:49 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:09:38 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001292309.39703.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Subject: gam_server opening 4000 file descriptors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:09:50 -0000 Hi, I have had to set a FreeBSD up again after the hard disk died. It runs now on 7.2. I noticed today that the gam_server opens some 4000 file descriptors. Ok, I have read http://www.gnome.org/~veillard/gamin/ All I have found out is that I should increase the number of file descriptors. Isn't there any other way to tell gamin not to do this? Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 16:51:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7151065679 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from mail.pil.net (ns3.pil.net [209.17.170.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D912F8FC12 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48929 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 11:51:05 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 11:51:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:51:05 -0500 (EST) From: James Smallacombe X-X-Sender: up@ns3.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: UDP flooding / Ethernet issues? WAS Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:51:07 -0000 > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: > >> To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was >> accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got >> through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that >> they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. They switched it to >> 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. >> >> Does this sound like it could be the entire cause? I ask because I've >> maxed out pipes before, but never seen it shut all traffic down this much. >> One key difference that I forgot to mention is that this server is running >> TWO instances of named, on two different IPs (for different domains), each >> running a few hundred zones. >> >> Bottom line: Would congestion cause this issue, or would this issue cause >> congestion? Some updates that may confuse more than inform: I caught this while it was happening yesterday and was able to do a tcpdump. I saw a ton of UDP traffic outbound to one IP that turned out to be a colocated server in Chicago. I put that IP in my ipfw rules and once I blocked "any to" that IP, it seemed to stop. Since then however, the logs have show the same issue again and there have been a few brief service disruptions. Today's security run output showed this: +(RULE NUMBER) 16054161 131965203420 deny ip from any to (blocked IP) and more alarmingly, this: kernel log messages: +++ /tmp/security.BErFHSS3 2010-01-29 03:09:32.000000000 -0500 +re0: link state changed to DOWN +re0: link state changed to UP +re0: promiscuous mode enabled +re0: promiscuous mode disabled +re0: promiscuous mode enabled +re0: promiscuous mode disabled +re0: promiscuous mode enabled +re0: promiscuous mode disabled re0 obviously being the Realtek Ethernet driver. The server itself never went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. Is there any DOS type of event that could cause this, or could the root of the problem be an Ethernet hardware or driver issue? Again, it is not clear to me which is the cause and which is the effect. Last bit of info: I just did a: 'tcpdump -n | grep -i udp' and saw a bunch of these, coming up a couple of times per second: 11:31:59.387561 IP (IP REMOVED) > (IP REMOVED): NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST Where the source and destination IPs vary, but are NOT one of mine, but DO appear to belong to my colo/dedicated server provider and their customers. Is my server being used to DDOS others? If so, how? TIA, James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 17:13:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649F91065672 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f201.google.com (mail-qy0-f201.google.com [209.85.221.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177918FC23 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk39 with SMTP id 39so967087qyk.27 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:13:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jJHNvSXfBjFDY9NY0A/mMw79c+OAPNMLuJyKGk6Svxc=; b=iWaw18iIxWRj4VXc9zzuhnS3EnKRS8jRoiwGpEKa60E4XffWWKCfz6B7uuDcNc7oac 3Sf2uWqG39GSSnRbiCs4UwmdKUzJwQVSU865QJ5VaXUB1HSg19ah7f3ixJyYp1g4yinh BCP+4fDzQ7hDPy08OLAIk4cC8BZcxFThbB/qw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mx459eTtwL2JZkotPHcsqyAutH3HSW/eO/zirA4HX7eNsm91Y4HbB+iWPK5X0XVCUe eD4CjomZV3FRRLdpXerJ/l1USRkZ2H5IOXK4Pk16L5RZeAIP+FIO8WHDEyC/GniuQF5M pJulNnWNgrEqglsDuJ1arQW+YRrdDYrjS6c+I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.196.14 with SMTP id t14mr726309wff.326.1264785226800; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:13:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:13:46 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001290913p3616411fo966c6683020662b6@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: James Smallacombe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP flooding / Ethernet issues? WAS Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:13:48 -0000 On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:51 AM, James Smallacombe wrote: > Some updates that may confuse more than inform: I caught this while it was > happening yesterday and was able to do a tcpdump. I saw a ton of UDP > traffic outbound to one IP that turned out to be a colocated server in > Chicago. I put that IP in my ipfw rules and once I blocked "any to" that > IP, it seemed to stop. Since then however, the logs have show the same > issue again and there have been a few brief service disruptions. > > Today's security run output showed this: > > +(RULE NUMBER) 16054161 131965203420 deny ip from any to (blocked IP) > > and more alarmingly, this: > > kernel log messages: > +++ /tmp/security.BErFHSS3 2010-01-29 03:09:32.000000000 -0500 > +re0: link state changed to DOWN > +re0: link state changed to UP > +re0: promiscuous mode enabled > +re0: promiscuous mode disabled > +re0: promiscuous mode enabled > +re0: promiscuous mode disabled > +re0: promiscuous mode enabled > +re0: promiscuous mode disabled > > re0 obviously being the Realtek Ethernet driver. The server itself never > went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. Is there any DOS type of > event that could cause this, or could the root of the problem be an Ethernet > hardware or driver issue? Again, it is not clear to me which is the cause > and which is the effect. > > Last bit of info: I just did a: 'tcpdump -n | grep -i udp' and saw a bunch > of these, coming up a couple of times per second: > promiscuous mode entries are caused by tcpdump -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 17:40:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B84010656A3 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout029.mac.com (asmtpout029.mac.com [17.148.16.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396888FC1B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KX0006X3RQLGD40@asmtp029.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:40:00 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001290148 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:39:57 -0800 Message-id: References: <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> To: James Smallacombe X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP flooding / Ethernet issues? WAS Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:40:03 -0000 Hi-- On Jan 29, 2010, at 8:51 AM, James Smallacombe wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: >>> To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was >>> accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got >>> through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that >>> they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. They switched it to >>> 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. [ ... ] > Today's security run output showed this: > > +(RULE NUMBER) 16054161 131965203420 deny ip from any to (blocked IP) > > and more alarmingly, this: > > kernel log messages: > +++ /tmp/security.BErFHSS3 2010-01-29 03:09:32.000000000 -0500 > +re0: link state changed to DOWN > +re0: link state changed to UP These are probably from your ISP changing the link speed from 10 to 100Mbs. > +re0: promiscuous mode enabled > +re0: promiscuous mode disabled > +re0: promiscuous mode enabled > +re0: promiscuous mode disabled > +re0: promiscuous mode enabled > +re0: promiscuous mode disabled These are from running tcpdump. > re0 obviously being the Realtek Ethernet driver. The server itself never went down during this time, but the Ethernet did. Is there any DOS type of event that could cause this, or could the root of the problem be an Ethernet hardware or driver issue? Again, it is not clear to me which is the cause and which is the effect. > > Last bit of info: I just did a: 'tcpdump -n | grep -i udp' and saw a bunch of these, coming up a couple of times per second: > > 11:31:59.387561 IP (IP REMOVED) > (IP REMOVED): NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST > > Where the source and destination IPs vary, but are NOT one of mine, but DO appear to belong to my colo/dedicated server provider and their customers. Is my server being used to DDOS others? If so, how? That is standard Windows NetBIOS over IP traffic. It shouldn't be coming over your link unless your machines are sharing a subnet with someone else's Windows (or Samba) domain. You might discuss this with your ISP and ask them what's up, but failing that, using IPFW rules like this would be prudent: add deny tcp from any 135-139 to any add deny tcp from any to any 135-139 add deny udp from any 135-139 to any add deny udp from any to any 135-139 Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 17:41:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1ED1065696 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf03.insightbb.com (mxsf03.insightbb.com [74.128.0.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683EF8FC20 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:41:14 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,369,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="790205675" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2010 12:41:12 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AikFAHqsYkvQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBNNkYhEIEhUQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,369,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="6236418" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2010 12:41:12 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:41:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) X-Face: &&IkKoZ_M9~8]\>8lAd-c:; {:qUC5-m~u&lQlBfvlv1T92=JKMxYc{|~D*Dfa<^09+W%Rs 75JlQjqfQ?9p|"}|}sqJ~Tf:H9~f?P?:X2D3@FBJ^IC0_vqvMHr3Lnx=/AN>jF-!R&H$$+ $Y8E//Ay$RN$hr; -&[nCfN8d&k^$Kgk`\If['+W; /v@; BQePJW>6h.T8{hO}%Nk@#qyF8 Subject: How do I create a 40x40 pixel monochrome mage for KMail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:41:14 -0000 I've noticed that several apps support images of the user, such as KMail, which supports a 40x40 pixel jpeg. I have a webcam, but it won't take a monochrome picture and it doesn't snapshot all the resolutions that it can display in. In particular, I tried the two lowest and the lowest, sqcif, isn't supported by my webcam and qsif seg faults. Those would have been 128x96 and 160x120. I figured that if I used the lowest resolution, I could crop out a 40x40 image. Kopete also supports a 200x200 pixel image, but I think it requires exactly 200x200, so 128x96 won't work. I thought that someone said they used kamera to take a snapshot with their webcam but Logitech webcams aren't listed. I can take one with pwcview, which is what I was talking about above. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 17:51:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A17106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2615F8FC1A for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-232.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.232]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FCF1E37D; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:51:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0THp6xI003701; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:51:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:51:06 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Steven Friedrich Message-Id: <20100129185106.a8256a5e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201001291241.06909.freebsd@insightbb.com> References: <201001291241.06909.freebsd@insightbb.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I create a 40x40 pixel monochrome mage for KMail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:51:09 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:41:06 -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I have a webcam, but it won't take a monochrome picture and it doesn't > snapshot all the resolutions that it can display in. In particular, I tried > the two lowest and the lowest, sqcif, isn't supported by my webcam and qsif > seg faults. Those would have been 128x96 and 160x120. > > I figured that if I used the lowest resolution, I could crop out a 40x40 > image. You can use ImageMagick's convert command to scale the image, and turn it into monochrome; see "man convert" for -resize and -monochrome parameters. It's even possible to use Gimp for this task. :-) > Kopete also supports a 200x200 pixel image, but I think it requires exactly > 200x200, so 128x96 won't work. You can use "!" with -resize to force a specific image size, even if it violates the source picture's aspect ratio (which -resize usually keeps). > I thought that someone said they used kamera to take a snapshot with their > webcam but Logitech webcams aren't listed. Maybe you can use gtkam / gphoto2 to talk to the Logitech camera? I don't own one because I'm familiar with the fact that they are not standard-compatible and that's why not supported. > I can take one with pwcview, which is what I was talking about above. You can even use a "regular" digital camera to take the photo, transfer it from the camera (or its CF or SD storage) and then postprocess it with ImageMagick. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 18:03:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691D6106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A5D8FC0C for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:03:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KX0007ZNST1D230@asmtp024.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:03:02 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001290151 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <201001291241.06909.freebsd@insightbb.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:03:00 -0800 Message-id: <0122EE0C-02B4-4FAD-A5EC-506488236ADC@mac.com> References: <201001291241.06909.freebsd@insightbb.com> To: Steven Friedrich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I create a 40x40 pixel monochrome mage for KMail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:03:02 -0000 On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I've noticed that several apps support images of the user, such as KMail, > which supports a 40x40 pixel jpeg. > > I have a webcam, but it won't take a monochrome picture and it doesn't > snapshot all the resolutions that it can display in. In particular, I tried > the two lowest and the lowest, sqcif, isn't supported by my webcam and qsif > seg faults. Those would have been 128x96 and 160x120. Take a bigger image, convert it to greyscale, resize it down to the size you want. You could most easily do this with Photoshop, IrfanView, GIMP, ImageMagick, etc, but something like graphics/netpbm will work even on the FreeBSD command line.... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 19:40:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFD0106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 547368FC14 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2010 19:39:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.73.195]) [79.107.188.140] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 20:39:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/GKMBpRSHG7B8SU9Z7NdI8kKEzc3LFTs/habIioh 9fJzYEzhE5uVny Message-ID: <4B63397C.2010408@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:39:40 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4B61BE70.1090109@gmx.com> <6201873e1001280851i726f7827p520f138ee84217d8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6201873e1001280851i726f7827p520f138ee84217d8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.59999999999999998 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: gjournal on compact flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:40:01 -0000 On 1/28/2010 6:51 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Nikos Vassiliadiswrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am using a 40MB journal on a 500MB compact flash. >> Would that be sane, or I am causing more harm than >> good? >> >> My concerns are: >> 1) wear leveling. The journal is on specific part >> of the "disk" writing again and again. That >> should be handled by the CF itself. Though >> I am not sure it does a good job??? >> 2) I do care about ungraceful power cycles and I've seen >> posts on the net, mentioning: >> >>> More, If >>> you interrupt power at arbitrary times while the device is writing, >>> you can lose the integrity of the file system being modified. The loss >>> is not limited to the 512 byte sector being modified, as it generally >>> is with rotating disks; you can lose an entire erase block, maybe 64K >>> at once. >>> >> I guess the above comment renders the use >> of a journaling filesystem useless. But, doing >> some naive tests, power cycling the machine >> while writing and checksumming the data after >> fsck in preen mode, revealed no error. >> >> Thanks in advance for any insights, Nikos >> > > Soft Updates seem more appropriate for a 500MB CF drive than gjournal. > AFAIK, they are a wash in terms of reliability, and gjournal needs to write > all data twice meaning it's slower, and increases the wear on the drive. > The big drawback to soft updates is the fsck times after an unclean shutdown > which really shouldn't be an issue on a 500MB drive. > fsck time in my case is not an issue. What concerns me mostly is a situation where user intervention is required. The CF filesystem will be used in a embedded system and should work without user intervention. I too feel that geom journaling is not the best solution for my needs, but softupdates need more attention than gjournal. Perhaps, I should wait for SUJ, which will be in the tree soon. Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 19:45:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27C3106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronnyforberger@ronnyforberger.de) Received: from wp112.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp112.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A795F8FC08 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hmbg-5f777bfd.pool.mediaways.net ([95.119.123.253] helo=sonne.rf.homeunix.net); authenticated by wp112.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpa id 1NawXK-0002Fu-4O; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:29:46 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.rf.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E5A2514 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:29:45 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rf.homeunix.net Received: from sonne.rf.homeunix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sonne.rf.homeunix.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fuo-T3AhbyeS for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:29:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.166.44.27] (host-44-27.dhcp.rf.homeunix.net [10.166.44.27]) by sonne.rf.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B804D2508 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:29:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B633703.2060103@ronnyforberger.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:29:07 +0000 From: Ronny Forberger Organization: www.ronnyforberger.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090920) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; ronnyforberger@ronnyforberger.de; 1264794335; e4f290d2; Subject: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined symbol "EVP_idea_cbc" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:45:36 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, my FreeBSD seems to be broken, since I get the following error when trying to link against libssl etc: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined symbol "EVP_idea_cbc" I am using openssl-0.9.8k_5 from the base system 8.0. uname -a => FreeBSD sonne.rf.homeunix.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Dec 4 21:26:46 CET 2009 root@sonne.rf.homeunix.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Can you help me ? Any further info I will provide. Thanks, Ronny - -- ___________________________________ Ronny Forberger ronnyforberger at ronnyforberger.de PGP public key: http://www.ronnyforberger.de/~rf/wwwroot/pgp/0x71AE1E17.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktjNvkACgkQC1+bGHGuHhfVGQCgjKoWYsGjKnGGpxnx4MzwImqw ES8AnixZdHvvAgJWDS6AWcD9NhYbIiZJ =mrAj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:07:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7731065672 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F588FC08 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:07:34 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KX000JTJYKICD20@asmtp025.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:07:31 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001290177 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4B633703.2060103@ronnyforberger.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:07:30 -0800 Message-id: References: <4B633703.2060103@ronnyforberger.de> To: Ronny Forberger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined symbol "EVP_idea_cbc" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:07:34 -0000 Hi-- On Jan 29, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Ronny Forberger wrote: > my FreeBSD seems to be broken, since I get the following error when > trying to link against libssl etc: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined symbol > "EVP_idea_cbc" > > I am using openssl-0.9.8k_5 from the base system 8.0. Actually, the base system OpenSSL would be located at /usr/lib/libssl.so.# ; the error message you display there indicates that you've got another installation of OpenSSL under /usr/local. Running: pkg_which /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6 ...might indicate whether you installed it from a port, in which case updating ports and rebuilding it would likely help. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:08:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CE910656A3 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schweikh@schweikhardt.net) Received: from rs2.shuttle.de (rs2.shuttle.de [194.95.249.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5888FC22 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rs2.shuttle.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 2BAEC580DD; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:08:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from hal9000.schweikhardt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hal9000.schweikhardt.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0TK8O2T002986 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:08:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from schweikh@hal9000.schweikhardt.net) Received: (from schweikh@localhost) by hal9000.schweikhardt.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0TK8OLd002985 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:08:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from schweikh) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:08:14 +0100 From: Jens Schweikhardt To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100129200814.GA1919@schweikhardt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Printing via ulpt0 extremely slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:08:32 -0000 hello, world\n I have a system with a handful of kernels I chose from with grub. Recently compiled 8-STABLE systems show strange printing behaviour. While a one year old 8.0-CURRENT #0 r185532 has no problem printing to my HP Laserjet 2300d (via cups and USB/ulpt0), newer systems and even 9-CURRENT print extremely slow, on the order of 1 page every 6 minutes. The printer's "Data" LED blinks sometimes erratically, sometimes is on for a few seconds, with intermittent periods of 1Hz blinking (which is the expected normal behavior). So I'm wondering what causes this oddity. I've ruled out an issue with hald/dbus which recent systems use for xorg 7.4, by turning them off, rebooting and printing from the console--same slow printing. The cups log says it sent the file succesfully (/var/log/cups/access_log): localhost - - [29/Jan/2010:20:17:11 +0100] "POST /printers/LaserJet_2300d HTTP/1.1" 200 18530 Send-Document successful-ok I can't find anything obvious in my kernel config that might account for this behavior. It does not matter if the printer is on or off when the system starts. I've read about interrupt storms (when printing via lpt0), but vmstat -i looks sane AFAICT: $ vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq16: vgapci0 ahc* 192947 62 irq18: skc0 uhci2++ 3765 1 irq19: fwohci0++ 383725 124 irq23: uhci3 ehci1 3700 1 cpu0: timer 6227448 2018 irq256: hdac0 92 0 cpu1: timer 6219346 2015 Total 13031023 4223 Anyone seen something similar? What else can I try to debug this problem? Regards, Jens -- Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:15:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1D31065672 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B5488FC0A for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10336 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jan 2010 20:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 20:15:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=vpkBbQknXnmDWdJn/74lruM3RhXUdj0U8K5qLe4M3uGE3ZiAOFk4J4GA+/laoITmSAAlO1/j76LrVakIkUL3Hiw7Ud0F+gCDYfuG/qDpXHx8pywJW2tknKVEKN5RcqMf; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaxFM-0003TN-0g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:15:16 -0700 Message-ID: <4B6341C7.9020809@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:15:03 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC8691D2AB570D9C0D4ABA047" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Xorg Not Finding AGP Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:15:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC8691D2AB570D9C0D4ABA047 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable First time I installed FreeBSD (yes, there was a first time, I managed to hose the root account and had to start over again) I was asked something about whether or not my vid card was PCI or AGP. I answered AGP (as that is all I have that is halfway decent). I had Xorg up and running with minimum fuss (aside from it's choice of default wm even when I had wmaker already installed), I had no such prompt this time, which I didn't think of until now. I've got the latest Xorg installed from ports (I think it's 7.4_2). http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html #Xorg -configure No devices to configure. Configuration failed. Which is a pile of malarky, obviously. It also says it cannot find fbdev. hald and dbus are installed (although I get "no such command" when I try to start dbus from the cli (despite it being a requirement for like 50 million different packages (yes, I can nest parenthesis and use hyperbole all day long), half of which are probably installed by now)= ). I am /not/ reinstalling for this relatively minor problem, though my patience (mainly with my lack of apparent ability) is wearing thin. --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enigC8691D2AB570D9C0D4ABA047 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLY0HNAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW06oIIAIWNq/i1nJ0UXZ15SIixZ89I aaCVliis9x6e/T0bw0taCXmdTyHgU5PXbehg34loECYWUtYNDgzWiYTxpzTj1mXJ 6ULYgUv0UGzOsjq0znTaIgAmHLr58rOwB6oS9/kDDOQWWAi4J7ulmp8Py18xNQmI ICd5ZpPB1kCnjwZjTFBYJ7JjgTDYS7gJ3ASifamY2n43ZUaT9xg7MH0C7m9d05vQ Aj8+NvYA+JXuqPlrG/obiIVi2bpR8RKE6GJJxktjtbzArhAYPnPh/4D/gxLCRrcF Cci2dY9S31n0SQyRDWbdOgvzl1NfUpFsCMDe+Dhn4E9BI3wTG5x+cSXsdaRifkU= =VXSZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC8691D2AB570D9C0D4ABA047-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:23:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BB7106568B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronnyforberger@ronnyforberger.de) Received: from wp112.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp112.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F9F8FC13 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hmbg-5f777bfd.pool.mediaways.net ([95.119.123.253] helo=sonne.rf.homeunix.net); authenticated by wp112.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpa id 1NaxMy-0008MR-UR; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:23:09 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.rf.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1062DF0; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:23:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rf.homeunix.net Received: from sonne.rf.homeunix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sonne.rf.homeunix.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qp6Hm2vfjeIv; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:22:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.166.44.27] (host-44-27.dhcp.rf.homeunix.net [10.166.44.27]) by sonne.rf.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77D92DD3; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:22:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B634392.9050007@ronnyforberger.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:22:42 +0000 From: Ronny Forberger Organization: www.ronnyforberger.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090920) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <4B633703.2060103@ronnyforberger.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; ronnyforberger@ronnyforberger.de; 1264796590; 362fef1a; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined symbol "EVP_idea_cbc" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:23:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Swiger schrieb: > Hi-- > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Ronny Forberger wrote: >> my FreeBSD seems to be broken, since I get the following error >> when trying to link against libssl etc: >> >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined >> symbol "EVP_idea_cbc" >> >> I am using openssl-0.9.8k_5 from the base system 8.0. > > Actually, the base system OpenSSL would be located at > /usr/lib/libssl.so.# ; the error message you display there > indicates that you've got another installation of OpenSSL under > /usr/local. Running: > > pkg_which /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6 > > ...might indicate whether you installed it from a port, in which > case updating ports and rebuilding it would likely help. > > Regards, Thanks for the help. I installed from a binary package using pkg_add - -r openssl since I cannot build openssl from ports: [root@sonne ~]# portupgrade -f openssl ** Port marked as IGNORE: security/openssl: is marked as broken: No patchset for 0.9.8 ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - security/openssl (marked as IGNORE) (Using RELEASE_8_0_0) I dont really want to upgrade to Freebsd-current Ports. How can I fix the missing symbol error then? Cheers, - -- ___________________________________ Ronny Forberger ronnyforberger at ronnyforberger.de PGP public key: http://www.ronnyforberger.de/~rf/wwwroot/pgp/0x71AE1E17.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktjQ5AACgkQC1+bGHGuHhfGzQCfUqEyRtF1GSxV1JnlO5DEZcNT aKcAnjwjEOWRWqjem44FDtPy5P2MbO45 =sKHQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:32:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1945F1065672 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017F68FC17 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:32:09 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KX0009SVZP2XG60@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:32:09 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001290182 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4B634392.9050007@ronnyforberger.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:31:50 -0800 Message-id: <11894BE3-5049-4DD4-BCE1-2FD0D3E099D6@mac.com> References: <4B633703.2060103@ronnyforberger.de> <4B634392.9050007@ronnyforberger.de> To: Ronny Forberger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.6: Undefined symbol "EVP_idea_cbc" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:32:10 -0000 On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Ronny Forberger wrote: > Thanks for the help. I installed from a binary package using pkg_add > - -r openssl since I cannot build openssl from ports: > > [root@sonne ~]# portupgrade -f openssl > ** Port marked as IGNORE: security/openssl: > is marked as broken: No patchset for 0.9.8 > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > - security/openssl (marked as IGNORE) > > (Using RELEASE_8_0_0) > > I dont really want to upgrade to Freebsd-current Ports. How can I fix the missing symbol error then? Delete the broken OpenSSL port and use OpenSSL from the base system instead. Anything which is trying to use the /usr/local/lib version will have to be recompiled.... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:45:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729A7106568F for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AEE8FC12 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (Kerio MailServer 6.7.2) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:45:17 -0500 Message-Id: <66E69BCC-331D-4662-95B6-214F44F88A55@olivent.com> From: mikel king To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:45:16 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Subject: Shared object "libcrypt.so.4" not found ...(or library munging after make-delete-old) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:45:19 -0000 As expected several port needed to be rebuilt however I have hit a roadblock with the built in perl with. ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ Date/Parse.pm in /usr/ports/devel/p5-TimeDate ===> p5-TimeDate-1.20,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found ===> Configuring for p5-TimeDate-1.20,1 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypt.so.4" not found, required by "perl5.8.8" I would have thought that perl was rebuilt when I make the world and upgraded from 7.x to 8.0. Anyone have a quick and easy fix out of this mess? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Mikel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 20:53:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774DA106568B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601858FC1D for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:53:44 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KX100EEH0P93W20@asmtp024.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:53:33 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001290187 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <66E69BCC-331D-4662-95B6-214F44F88A55@olivent.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:53:33 -0800 Message-id: <9F56EF3D-2837-433C-BB83-23FF76EF7E7B@mac.com> References: <66E69BCC-331D-4662-95B6-214F44F88A55@olivent.com> To: mikel king X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shared object "libcrypt.so.4" not found ...(or library munging after make-delete-old) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:53:44 -0000 Hi-- On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:45 PM, mikel king wrote: [ ... ] > I would have thought that perl was rebuilt when I make the world and upgraded from 7.x to 8.0. > > Anyone have a quick and easy fix out of this mess? perl isn't part of FreeBSD 7.x; hence, it was not rebuilt when you upgraded to 8.0. There isn't a quick and easy fix to dealing with ports after upgrading to a different major OS version, short of rebuilding all of the installed ports. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 21:02:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAAE1065693 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ckern1@roadrunner.com) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4C8FC12 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.127.143.53]) by cdptpa-qmta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20100129200036660.JJNC16905@cdptpa-qmta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:00:36 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=5jVJOVLVAAAA:8 a=-s5w_yA4AAAA:8 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=xKvAT4H2fsXMOpsDlR8A:9 a=oLPpsSCuHm_cTnr0OfQA:7 a=9osa1TngKLV3IuodBhnZ6EPoJa0A:4 a=0vUscowIxtUA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.71.116.173 Received: from [74.71.116.173] ([74.71.116.173:32564] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 68/92-19307-72E336B4; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:59:35 +0000 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:59:34 -0500 From: Clayton Scott Kern To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100129195934.GA66728@reddwarf.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Sendmail & Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:02:50 -0000 I just upgraded to FBSD 8.0 from 6.4 and I'm having a problem with sendmail passing email to procmail. I only use this combination for email from root's cron jobs. Right now emails to me from cron go to /var/mail/ckern1. Here's my mc file: divert(-1) # # Copyright (c) 1983 Eric P. Allman # Copyright (c) 1988, 1993 # The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. # # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without # modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions # are met: # 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. # 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the # documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. # 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software # must display the following acknowledgement: # This product includes software developed by the University of # California, Berkeley and its contributors. # 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors # may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software # without specific prior written permission. # # THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND # ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE # IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE # ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE # FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL # DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS # OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) # HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT # LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY # OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF # SUCH DAMAGE. # # # This is a generic configuration file for FreeBSD 5.X and later systems. # If you want to customize it, copy it to a name appropriate for your # environment and do the modifications there. # # The best documentation for this .mc file is: # /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README or # /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf/README # divert(0) VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc,v 1.37.2.1.2.1 2009/10/25 01:10:29 kensmith Exp $') OSTYPE(freebsd6) DOMAIN(generic) FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -T /etc/mail/access') FEATURE(blacklist_recipients) FEATURE(local_lmtp) FEATURE(local_procmail) FEATURE(mailertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable') FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') dnl Uncomment to allow relaying based on your MX records. dnl NOTE: This can allow sites to use your server as a backup MX without dnl your permission. dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX) dnl DNS based black hole lists dnl -------------------------------- dnl DNS based black hole lists come and go on a regular basis dnl so this file will not serve as a database of the available servers. dnl For that, visit dnl http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/E-mail/Spam/Blacklists/ dnl Uncomment to activate Realtime Blackhole List dnl information available at http://www.mail-abuse.com/ dnl NOTE: This is a subscription service as of July 31, 2001 dnl FEATURE(dnsbl) dnl Alternatively, you can provide your own server and rejection message: dnl FEATURE(dnsbl, `blackholes.mail-abuse.org', ``"550 Mail from " $&{client_addr} " rejected, see http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?" $&{client_addr}'') dnl Dialup users should uncomment and define this appropriately FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) dnl Setup for RoadRunner MASQUERADE_AS(`roadrunner.com') MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(`myhost.roadrunner.com') define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp-server.roadrunner.com') dnl Uncomment the first line to change the location of the default dnl /etc/mail/local-host-names and comment out the second line. dnl define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/sendmail.cw') define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names') dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA') define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `add-to-undisclosed') define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,noexpn,novrfy') MAILER(local) MAILER(smtp) MAILER(procmail) I created the cf file using make cf, then make install and make restart. What have I missed. This is the same setup on 6.4 and it worked fine. Thank you in advance -- Clayton Scott Kern ckern1@roadrunner.com Finally, brethern, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything wothy of praise, dwell on these things. Phil 4:8 NASB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 21:29:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571D106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22D08FC08 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16592 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jan 2010 21:29:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (24.42.224.110) by smtp1.knology.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 21:29:25 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 5DEDA2841F; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:29:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:29:10 -0600 From: David Kelly To: Clayton Scott Kern Message-ID: <20100129212910.GA90705@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20100129195934.GA66728@reddwarf.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100129195934.GA66728@reddwarf.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail & Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:29:27 -0000 On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:59:34PM -0500, Clayton Scott Kern wrote: > I just upgraded to FBSD 8.0 from 6.4 and I'm having a problem with > sendmail passing email to procmail. I only use this combination for > email from root's cron jobs. Right now emails to me from cron go to > /var/mail/ckern1. [...] > I created the cf file using make cf, then make install and make > restart. OK, but did the procmail enhancements make it in the generated .cf file? > What have I missed. This is the same setup on 6.4 and it worked fine. If making procmail available (or mandatory) for all users I can see justification for what you are trying. But for just one user why not keep it simple with a "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" in /etc/aliases? -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 22:14:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0541065670 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf13.insightbb.com (mxsf13.insightbb.com [74.128.0.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D138FC24 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:14:13 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,371,1262581200"; d="txt'?scan'208";a="32622175" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf13.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2010 17:14:12 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak4FAHbsYkvQLicL/2dsb2JhbACBM9lFhEIE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,371,1262581200"; d="txt'?scan'208";a="345646096" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2010 17:14:12 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:14:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) X-Face: i~b2iK'Z*tJ)pO9@6lJG=k7>N, V~YMq":Iwdl!m|A"g, N@)'|zb[{ Subject: Is there a driver for memory sticks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:14:14 -0000 --Boundary-00=_u21YLHBPP1yFwwz Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'd like to access the digital media slots on my laptop. Specifically, I want to read Sony Memory Sticks. pciconf -lv shows the devices: none2@pci0:11:0:3: class=0x018000 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8033104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' device = 'PCIxx11/21 Integrated FlashMedia Controller' class = mass storage none3@pci0:11:0:4: class=0x080500 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8034104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' device = 'SDA Standard Compliant SD Host Controller (10981734)' class = base peripheral subclass = SD host controller Also, is there one for high definition audio? none0@pci0:0:30:3: class=0x070300 card=0x3082103c chip=0x266d8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Intel 82801GB ICH7 - High Definition Audio Controller [A-1] (82801I)' class = simple comms subclass = generic modem I guess this is my built in modem, but could it also be used as a sound device? --Boundary-00=_u21YLHBPP1yFwwz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; name="pciconf.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pciconf.txt" none0@pci0:0:30:3: class=0x070300 card=0x3082103c chip=0x266d8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Intel 82801GB ICH7 - High Definition Audio Controller [A-1] (82801I)' class = simple comms subclass = generic modem none1@pci0:11:0:2: class=0x0c0010 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8032104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' device = 'OHCI Compliant IEEE-1394 FireWire Controller' class = serial bus subclass = FireWire none2@pci0:11:0:3: class=0x018000 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8033104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' device = 'PCIxx11/21 Integrated FlashMedia Controller' class = mass storage none3@pci0:11:0:4: class=0x080500 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8034104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' device = 'SDA Standard Compliant SD Host Controller (10981734)' class = base peripheral subclass = SD host controller none4@pci0:11:3:0: class=0x028000 card=0x1355103c chip=0x431814e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Broadcom 802.11b/g (BCM43XX)' class = network --Boundary-00=_u21YLHBPP1yFwwz-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 22:30:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE9A106568B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79918FC0C for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bTLb1d08A27AodY5BaWDGL; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:30:13 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id baWw1d0031f6R9u3faWwQ9; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:30:58 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:30:09 -0800 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:30:09 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100129223008.GG64692@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B6341C7.9020809@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6341C7.9020809@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Xorg Not Finding AGP Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:30:13 -0000 On Fri 29 Jan 2010 at 12:15:03 PST Programmer In Training wrote: >First time I installed FreeBSD (yes, there was a first time, I managed >to hose the root account and had to start over again) I was asked >something about whether or not my vid card was PCI or AGP. I answered >AGP (as that is all I have that is halfway decent). I had Xorg up and >running with minimum fuss (aside from it's choice of default wm even >when I had wmaker already installed), I had no such prompt this time, >which I didn't think of until now. > >I've got the latest Xorg installed from ports (I think it's 7.4_2). > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html > >#Xorg -configure > >No devices to configure. Configuration failed. > >Which is a pile of malarky, obviously. It also says it cannot find >fbdev. hald and dbus are installed (although I get "no such command" >when I try to start dbus from the cli (despite it being a requirement >for like 50 million different packages (yes, I can nest parenthesis and >use hyperbole all day long), half of which are probably installed by now)). I'm not sure why Xorg isn't seeing your video card. Do you see a device named "agpgart" in /dev? If not, it probably means the agp module couldn't identify your card when you last booted the machine. What's the make and model of your card, and what version of FreeBSD are you running? You're not supposed to start hald or dbus from the commandline like that. Instead add the following lines to your /etc/rc.conf file: hald_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" Then run the following commands from the command line: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald start /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus start From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 22:54:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19C71065694 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE5218FC17 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13233 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jan 2010 22:54:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 22:54:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=Z4GcmUAmaBXEQU0M8Dmeh/Skoipc2GY3VuWX4n/ZlmBiTnRRzg9Vbww1HPtm+r5DL/wk8CloNgE/4uN7gaqGFh+giB5osYFnrEE1FaVyGE7w9qftgEe330DazshZiYMJ; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.51]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nazj9-0001sv-Ny for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:54:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4B6366F3.8060906@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:53:39 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B6341C7.9020809@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100129223008.GG64692@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100129223008.GG64692@comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4849EDB91BD477D6D1C6A873" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Xorg Not Finding AGP Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:54:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4849EDB91BD477D6D1C6A873 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/29/2010 4:30 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > I'm not sure why Xorg isn't seeing your video card. Do you see a device= > named "agpgart" in /dev? If not, it probably means the agp module > couldn't identify your card when you last booted the machine. What's > the make and model of your card, and what version of FreeBSD are you > running? ATI Radeon 9200 (might be just a 9K, I forget exactly), FreeBSD-8.0RELEASE. What would have changed between first install and this one? Yes, agpgart is there. > You're not supposed to start hald or dbus from the commandline like > that. Instead add the following lines to your /etc/rc.conf file: >=20 > hald_enable=3D"YES" > dbus_enable=3D"YES" Already there, just seems like last time I was able to start dbus from the cli. > Then run the following commands from the command line: >=20 > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald start > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus start which is probably how I did it before. Heh. I've already rebooted since adding the hald and dbus lines to rc.conf --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. --------------enig4849EDB91BD477D6D1C6A873 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLY2b5AAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0Rg0H/3QzQ9G9yzLHqsGS5YeN1PjJ hcs7XyCazm+GDKSwOT+fMZJWxpkZgGCscvM/84f8VBduy/cljZA5OXkD4CaLFTqO bZkJBXwItoQS03mn+SW5yXB9IbnaetPlh+jzacaVpCFVMgMrFlAKF/ehh+RN3fbY StNunmN+BvbnfW64MM6DMSNz1RgjrQAyTcBmhBKPUWsdr1fxPUYAerG+FNaMNkKN zYgtZbBTowzdNyrBXzRn40bbNVrNnpI1figKLAr7fjmOy3bM8f/fVpfU2rPCDFvX FmsWKrbTYr6bWObNnpWH1Pw0+VhmmI//tHCvigyeHD3QjCly+U5LGSwkCMDuZ6s= =B56Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4849EDB91BD477D6D1C6A873-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 23:35:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402021065676 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FBA8FC17 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so648727pxi.3 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:35:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q5UpwdIX0KwNcAc6wLbiUjJZkwfSEBuwrP3D0l3lKeI=; b=L+J1waytxLP3sP2T/0pKX2E+62waY/98w4GbW3QvpdBeFylPpGCCxZYyfydOYvwaK+ lAZhWxMXnRMd0i+W6U3/SOhBdT9yuR2M3KYrBX+iTJKqyrt9UONOLPHVk1kPUdPNmb61 KYnd9nJVSmKxkKknpnm/Z7i6OHkUcDbASfyTs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=es+ahaDAKVpTzGK7tBNRmrYD/bRwkgyKeOSUQn7M2t7xusodDXIMqte1LGrXbOjSiI /t6Mm6TgtTsQlw2nWXkowHUIMqjvmRO7WH3StOV5vHMXLNk+mPss08rSDW1RcFxLzKhN 5N65m4dCDhpTpfuBqj+FFo2KLrYz3MrsDE068= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.122.24 with SMTP id u24mr1020054wfc.53.1264808125543; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:35:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B63397C.2010408@gmx.com> References: <4B61BE70.1090109@gmx.com> <6201873e1001280851i726f7827p520f138ee84217d8@mail.gmail.com> <4B63397C.2010408@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:35:25 -0600 Message-ID: <6201873e1001291535l62a548ady546a2598506835bb@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Nikos Vassiliadis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: gjournal on compact flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:35:26 -0000 On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > fsck time in my case is not an issue. What concerns me mostly is > a situation where user intervention is required. The CF filesystem > will be used in a embedded system and should work without user > intervention. I too feel that geom journaling is not the best > solution for my needs, but softupdates need more attention than > gjournal. Perhaps, I should wait for SUJ, which will be in the > tree soon. > > Nikos > There is an rc flags to automatically do a full fsck instead of backgroud, but I am unsure exactly what you mean by user intervention. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 00:29:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8820D106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAE48FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id o0U0T3F4009889; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:29:03 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:29:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201001291714.07000.freebsd@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201001291714.07000.freebsd@insightbb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001300129.03294.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Steven Friedrich Subject: Re: Is there a driver for memory sticks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:29:12 -0000 On Friday 29 January 2010 23:14:06 Steven Friedrich wrote: > I'd like to access the digital media slots on my laptop. > > Specifically, I want to read Sony Memory Sticks. > > pciconf -lv shows the devices: > > none2@pci0:11:0:3: class=0x018000 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8033104c rev=0x00 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' > device = 'PCIxx11/21 Integrated FlashMedia Controller' > class = mass storage > none3@pci0:11:0:4: class=0x080500 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8034104c rev=0x00 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' > device = 'SDA Standard Compliant SD Host Controller (10981734)' > class = base peripheral > subclass = SD host controller Probably supported by sdhci(4). > > > Also, is there one for high definition audio? > > none0@pci0:0:30:3: class=0x070300 card=0x3082103c chip=0x266d8086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'Intel 82801GB ICH7 - High Definition Audio Controller > [A-1] (82801I)' > class = simple comms > subclass = generic modem > > I guess this is my built in modem, but could it also be used as a sound > device? Try snd_hda(4). Good luck! -- Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 00:58:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAB21065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ckern1@roadrunner.com) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766A48FC18 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:58:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=R_4_8qS_AAAA:8 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=Hb1hyGKJDCLqUSMf4uAA:9 a=oXRqGU7oPub9rv15Na0A:7 a=30nrv3drkmcxjsWqpwOQXFPOTn0A:4 a=rasnAZ4BSVMA:10 a=kLQ54MB0OY8A:10 a=0vUscowIxtUA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.71.116.173 Received: from [74.71.116.173] ([74.71.116.173:29538] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id B7/71-02041-334836B4; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:58:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:58:27 -0500 From: Clayton Scott Kern To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20100130005827.GA9189@reddwarf.local> References: <20100129195934.GA66728@reddwarf.local> <20100129212910.GA90705@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100129212910.GA90705@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: Sendmail & Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:58:28 -0000 on 01-29-2010, David Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:59:34PM -0500, Clayton Scott Kern wrote: > > I just upgraded to FBSD 8.0 from 6.4 and I'm having a problem with > > sendmail passing email to procmail. I only use this combination for > > email from root's cron jobs. Right now emails to me from cron go to > > /var/mail/ckern1. > > [...] > > > I created the cf file using make cf, then make install and make > > restart. > > OK, but did the procmail enhancements make it in the generated .cf file? > > > What have I missed. This is the same setup on 6.4 and it worked fine. > > If making procmail available (or mandatory) for all users I can see > justification for what you are trying. But for just one user why not > keep it simple with a "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" in /etc/aliases? > > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net > ======================================================================== > Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. I aliased root to me and now it works. Thank you for the tip. I set up sendmail this way years ago, before I discovered fetchmail, procmail, getmail & maildrop. I would like to get away from sendmail or any other MTA for that matter, but never found solution for handling the emails generated by the system. -- Clayton Scott Kern ckern1@roadrunner.com Finally, brethern, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything wothy of praise, dwell on these things. Phil 4:8 NASB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 01:05:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE84B106566C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from gsicomp.on.ca (gsicomp.on.ca [200.46.208.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A030D8FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FACFCC84D; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gsicomp.on.ca ([200.46.208.251]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74812-05; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes (CPE002129cfd480-CM001ac3584898.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.236.129.198]) by gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id DB1ABFCC737; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Clayton Scott Kern" , References: <20100129195934.GA66728@reddwarf.local><20100129212910.GA90705@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20100130005827.GA9189@reddwarf.local> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:05:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Cc: Subject: Re: Sendmail & Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:05:02 -0000 > on 01-29-2010, David Kelly wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:59:34PM -0500, Clayton Scott Kern wrote: >> > I just upgraded to FBSD 8.0 from 6.4 and I'm having a problem with >> > sendmail passing email to procmail. I only use this combination for >> > email from root's cron jobs. Right now emails to me from cron go to >> > /var/mail/ckern1. >> >> [...] >> >> > I created the cf file using make cf, then make install and make >> > restart. >> >> OK, but did the procmail enhancements make it in the generated .cf file? >> >> > What have I missed. This is the same setup on 6.4 and it worked fine. >> >> If making procmail available (or mandatory) for all users I can see >> justification for what you are trying. But for just one user why not >> keep it simple with a "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" in /etc/aliases? > > I aliased root to me and now it works. Thank you for the tip. > > I set up sendmail this way years ago, before I discovered fetchmail, > procmail, getmail & maildrop. > > I would like to get away from sendmail or any other MTA for that matter, > but > never found solution for handling the emails generated by the system. Check out DragonFlyBSD's dma(1). It's designed just for this purpose. -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 04:01:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF31106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nocmonkey@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7518E8FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so296071vws.13 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:01:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ow83VV5Qu+hnFbPKu3TDYUsNiIhRIU+LY08/b9Svg3U=; b=lCuWPS6ZY+gwWtnUl+PbTj/XgkyY20OYy+rnDiX0GkOs1+tz2uqzxT1S6Cu6sswdDj 6yGzkolfKKns6f6XQy5/NNQAcITmjBRQJYu5DwKdDbXDAyFc2+18jdbCgDmQdyNgHEmu nq/3j3muUhJdcCeD8GPcjJL5P2A3v9mUd8RQg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DN/haa5f9HTzbDWWiE+L9VGbpQOA8HYP0pFe7X70ZvZEJhUOOX8xhOGbtNI7PzZ+FB 70bTUD1qa2vFOFkIPQ+RkFDeYhNTDpip00GTNDvchn7Fzg/JwogFbisI3RiX7GND5+si A/+YPXcVkrTaxqNbeRpN2vm90ZxfZcC+AzRUE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.124.106 with SMTP id t42mr1692451vcr.32.1264822678923; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:37:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:37:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Danny Edge To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Software RAID options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:01:14 -0000 What works for you and can you suggest a guide? I haven't setup a BSD server in 8 years, but my environment will be: FreeBSD 7.2 Release x2 HD's (not the same size, if I need to spend the money, on two like drives, kindly insist) DNS cache and auth Postfix MTA 1 user/1 IMAP mailbox & less than 10GB's of data I also plan on backing up via newbie rsync and SSH scripts. Thanks. -- CPDE - Certified Petroleum Distribution Engineer CCBC - Certified Canadian Beer Consumer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 04:21:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0DA106568D for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7C28FC0A for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so305065vws.13 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:21:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ks+3IiGUpU6WQF9I/6EwHB4k0kGoFic9yQz2T4CsOvU=; b=lUAr+GiIOgrLnDKtZ9i5p5akdEz9OPMDDZzv7h5S1lE+v2TWlMTLU2lmqPRr4uIDGD vGLQm84URAVyIV+dtdOKK0+GdJq4RFNtrv7Pl33tlkvSoyrT5wDng5DBF0ndX8tmqnJz ueMw4muQnZhgBv/ecspCzVzfdHxh9FIPXWLiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=kWCjYOYMS7xUn49v6CjExCNRTFsqCpQs2mvFDZlC+MNwYambJYUG/csefQlZ6WaEVm Rnld5UflKf/K4CHFESRpKs7xs2JZVmEJROUnOyzbgVhedsX4REuHDRfE0RuodgmgJgLB Inj7qihI4UFI0A4yvcS11VioRl89YoEZsnI/s= Received: by 10.220.125.17 with SMTP id w17mr1688235vcr.76.1264825286970; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:21:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 42sm33740813vws.10.2010.01.29.20.21.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:21:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:18:05 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Danny Edge Message-ID: <20100130041805.GA60266@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Software RAID options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:21:28 -0000 Hi, Danny Edge wrote: > What works for you and can you suggest a guide? I haven't setup a BSD server > in 8 years, but my environment will be: I've been using gmirror for some time, without problems. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html > > FreeBSD 7.2 Release > x2 HD's (not the same size, if I need to spend the money, on two like You really never specified your RAID type. If it is RAID-0 (striping), as the cliche goes, size doesn't matter. If it is RAID-1, if you do not have identically sized disks, the mirror will only be as large as the smallest disk. (This is mentioned in the handbook, as well.) > > I also plan on backing up via newbie rsync and SSH scripts. > May I suggest rsnapshot? Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 04:27:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196B81065670 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nocmonkey@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00288FC15 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so307914vws.13 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:27:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DI1XWbdz+HEc76jwhYf16vlbzyrdiIFhKUqEGU79hJg=; b=oClOB3Jen11nTU8cmb2uK65QqPJEG+RJim5jOfg0tIfKadjRSHGuWIntW+72qV98TA Qurhpn9xBVOv948Du/nuW/Tk9HEQdWNfiqEMEEuiQo2HLgTBzSA7OCmwkzJDf0fRWCT0 02nS6K2JNs+yu1YBn8YNLI/shfSfImiXDOyzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ljusB/E1hPRxFZWI96hDpgYfYe8KzKrvCNTRH7YO6cOmZAv1j99Ns7/6Rh7nYT+b/C EXPzV9A7s94aZMVoaZOvHnvT9pGtR0+4aS2QOxvTcYlzCo1FHRB04QbMSEOPlXv8dK3f /EzdMsBueMBzHmX0mqmTB8gNi1Or3JPmOYr58= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.121.168 with SMTP id h40mr1686132vcr.73.1264825667045; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:27:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100130041805.GA60266@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <20100130041805.GA60266@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:27:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Danny Edge To: Glen Barber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Software RAID options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:27:48 -0000 On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > Hi, > > Danny Edge wrote: > > What works for you and can you suggest a guide? I haven't setup a BSD > server > > in 8 years, but my environment will be: > > I've been using gmirror for some time, without problems. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html > > Thanks, Glen, I should have mentioned that I did see gmirror mentioned in the HB. Pending further suggestions, I will try gmirror for software RAID 1 (yes, as large as the smallest disk). [Snip...] . > > > > > I also plan on backing up via newbie rsync and SSH scripts. > > > > May I suggest rsnapshot? > I will look into rsnapshot. All these new tools that I didn't have 10 years ago! -- CPDE - Certified Petroleum Distribution Engineer CCBC - Certified Canadian Beer Consumer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 06:26:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E7F1065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A668FC13 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nb6mz-0001Su-6a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:26:37 +0100 Received: from 193.33.173.33 ([193.33.173.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:26:37 +0100 Received: from c.kworr by 193.33.173.33 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:26:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:26:26 +0200 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <201001292309.39703.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.33.173.33 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100124 Thunderbird/3.0.1 In-Reply-To: <201001292309.39703.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: gam_server opening 4000 file descriptors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:26:39 -0000 On 29.01.2010 17:09, Erich Dollansky wrote: > I have had to set a FreeBSD up again after the hard disk died. > > It runs now on 7.2. > > I noticed today that the gam_server opens some 4000 file descriptors. > > Ok, I have read > > http://www.gnome.org/~veillard/gamin/ > > All I have found out is that I should increase the number of file descriptors. > > Isn't there any other way to tell gamin not to do this? Don't increase the number of file descriptors. Did you read pkg-message? gamin uses at most 70% of kern.maxfiles On the other hand you can switch to polling. This way gamin would not use file descriptors in expense of greater cpu usage. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 09:39:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CA6106566C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1CA8FC17 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:39:08 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAIuMY0tUXebz/2dsb2JhbADYCYRCBA Received: from relay02.plus.net ([84.93.230.243]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2010 09:39:07 +0000 Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Nb9nH-0001UA-FC; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:39:07 +0000 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nb9nH-0000ga-4Q; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:39:07 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:39:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100130041805.GA60266@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001300939.07061.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: 4e0479dcb3d6425331d5b7ab29fee351 Cc: Danny Edge Subject: Re: Software RAID options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:39:09 -0000 On Saturday 30 January 2010, Danny Edge wrote: > Thanks, Glen, I should have mentioned that I did see gmirror > mentioned in the HB. Pending further suggestions, I will try gmirror > for software RAID 1 (yes, as large as the smallest disk). It's also possible to mirror individual slices rather than an entire disk so you could create matching slices on the disks and still have the spare space of the larger disk available for use as non-mirrored space. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 09:44:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3CD106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24578FC1D for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1035734fxm.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YH+RgT7bbyC51h6uqUMr17U9y367pYQa9YoDgJt4m8k=; b=XSl3HXcvv3eieTncqhPbNkcZgWTbn0FchuLClnq1ByJJZMrHhJfv6hwMJ7ArfrdPF5 K7kgxtX5QZKt4cUuHQFkTR74cx/eGD067ptYiEN3uYvLj4hOhNHo//Zf9CBb2rXFhMWb rLMW0Hjf1P/z7GWlPCrgQMh4LU0MNKAuN5YA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bnQJhrO2se/tm9P0vnDVDnlbS8zdQ62xHy64P7WF5tt2mi7fteaN4C2eNb4qG27Ngh 0JahDbaAc9A2ijRY/pglqUY9pBJLB0QplF7KfABezyMbfVrvI5W69YiwhOfYNDNrQ5IU xbSN1nI/UqqZwbxHkn6sswFVJ2+XoSZpwgtgI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.188.133 with SMTP id p5mr176014hbh.100.1264844696364; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:44:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9F56EF3D-2837-433C-BB83-23FF76EF7E7B@mac.com> References: <66E69BCC-331D-4662-95B6-214F44F88A55@olivent.com> <9F56EF3D-2837-433C-BB83-23FF76EF7E7B@mac.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:44:56 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Chuck Swiger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: mikel king , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shared object "libcrypt.so.4" not found ...(or library munging after make-delete-old) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:44:58 -0000 On 29 January 2010 20:53, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:45 PM, mikel king wrote: > [ ... ] > > I would have thought that perl was rebuilt when I make the world and > upgraded from 7.x to 8.0. > > > > Anyone have a quick and easy fix out of this mess? > > perl isn't part of FreeBSD 7.x; hence, it was not rebuilt when you upgraded > to 8.0. > > There isn't a quick and easy fix to dealing with ports after upgrading to a > different major OS version, short of rebuilding all of the installed ports. > > Regards, > -- > -Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > well you could do pkg_delete -f perl* pkg_add -rv perl you might need to redo your modules as well or you could install the compatibility libs cd /usr/ports/misc/compat7x make make installl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 09:51:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC671065679 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731E78FC17 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:51:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <4B64010C.6020604@intersonic.se> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:51:08 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091214) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Recommendation on GPS time source for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:51:12 -0000 Hi all, Does anyone have a recommendation on a good GPS receiver/board for use with NTP/FreeBSD to create a stratum 1 public time server? Preferably something above the Garmin "puck" level but not ridiculously expensive either... Thanks for any input, -- per From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 10:24:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880F41065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC4C08FC1B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2010 10:24:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.73.195]) [79.107.188.140] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 30 Jan 2010 11:24:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+HZnptu8aHxkg+Lmos96S9c14O3aAaw3Q1TXtgpR w/GVUidDz9L1YS Message-ID: <4B6408D2.8020808@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:24:18 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4B61BE70.1090109@gmx.com> <6201873e1001280851i726f7827p520f138ee84217d8@mail.gmail.com> <4B63397C.2010408@gmx.com> <6201873e1001291535l62a548ady546a2598506835bb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6201873e1001291535l62a548ady546a2598506835bb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71999999999999997 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: gjournal on compact flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:24:46 -0000 On 1/30/2010 1:35 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > There is an rc flags to automatically do a full fsck instead of > backgroud, but I am unsure exactly what you mean by user intervention. Practice has shown that while softupdates handle most situations cleanly, they don't handle ALL situations. In short, having to do a blind_yes_to_all full fsck is not an option for me. OTOH a journaling solution like gjournal or softupdates journaling, makes sure that the filesystem will be surely consistent after an ungraceful power cycle. I am not in a hurry and waiting for SUJ to hit the 8 branch seems sensible. Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 11:36:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD211065692 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from n24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD3C68FC0C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.182.178] by n24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jan 2010 11:36:44 -0000 Received: from [87.248.110.106] by t4.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jan 2010 11:36:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jan 2010 11:36:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 630529.83536.bm@omp211.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68419 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jan 2010 11:36:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1264851399; bh=vA+vakzb8+OlhlxaE/Wweb5zkmX3XlVWwMTp4uU4nt8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uwhMXNUEQymFmONGl6/tW9Zx8ULZP8QND0UW45TDBGeUYgLVZ+lI0Te+ripYLHm8HDlevs0zt344i+t2Pk1rcPhu2izuoZ7ZWngv85MgRSn2Dz0l4GA/tQmWobpTK6qMWBUUeQWvluVUuiknWpXp1/OkymnlD8yriPFOFO718FM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UccE9bpxuTA/GONG5txR/snUze2nu4WwCK4lPf5c1etUXinRutulxn6ieiCe74jHdtLGT6yJScZRm38QWfYV2EvzSxYP/jIw83R9eS2Ra20SjTotAweOmVra0j3PTi92lZEYXOdKZv1dweMPcyOkm7DA185Nfkoux7VySbi3QNk=; Message-ID: <431745.67501.qm@web24806.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 5QovaEcVM1lcLciSCD8.JMYcLW4H9bIpon0uLcGUj5f44wuDrjQrN4mNzezU812YNDh.Z1JNc.uHJHRD6X_4icedJ2jNv7LboKqGILYtixmatZE6LF7HIyOkyZWfqwitiUZ.a13nVrkHio.Upc88bwnPf3RCkQSNrWa7xueJ1sRWd7C6KdOV1.2xxxWbU1uq5Mre6N9okslxsWLVYKhQgK6ipKEY2VR1IyNMqVfc2EZHdCDxYw-- Received: from [82.243.40.23] by web24806.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:36:39 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.1.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:36:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Alexandre L." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Per olof Ljungmark In-Reply-To: <4B64010C.6020604@intersonic.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re : Recommendation on GPS time source for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:36:41 -0000 You can see here : http://www.meinberg.de/english/=0AI don't use their prod= ucts (I don't know about the quality products), I just use their NTP packag= e software for Windows.=0A=0A--- En date de=A0: Sam 30.1.10, Per olof Ljung= mark a =E9crit=A0:=0A=0A> De: Per olof Ljungmark =0A> Objet: Recommendation on GPS time source for FreeBSD=0A> = =C0: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Samedi 30 Janvier 2010, 9h51= =0A> Hi all,=0A> =0A> Does anyone have a recommendation on a good GPS=0A> r= eceiver/board for use with NTP/FreeBSD to create a stratum=0A> 1 public tim= e server?=0A> =0A> Preferably something above the Garmin "puck" level but n= ot=0A> ridiculously expensive either...=0A> =0A> Thanks for any input,=0A> = =0A> --=0A> per=0A> _______________________________________________=0A> fre= ebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> http://lists.freebsd.org/ma= ilman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free= bsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 12:45:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DFB1065670 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gaubrig@yahoo.com) Received: from web50703.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web50703.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D09B88FC18 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10028 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jan 2010 12:18:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264853923; bh=9/nzOHNlOHq95bx5ML7PouBODYRy+McU3CraGAJn+d0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wxl7koxY8ddhqOU2G76A3hujRUXb3oLxYYjQ4Ki6PYAiXEifz+ncGGhB6F6QFuIH8yqpVpQdQHyc67VFXHS0p8X0fx8QKYADJaD4BY3YiUa9xnVOf40Hn/L3vytDd0OFBfZSqXjsxtuZOH3hU424UC87ReG79PBn4QjphnavQzY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=psmeznw6OgLC86D4GZRegWUXdXljbI6RDtlVKUti+6xpx5c4CYd6zIb8At4o6RuMipQMqLIKhzDiRl6H9+WCacQKqnmf/l4TYNKbSwL2/V1w8bHgp9BIyHVFyvkWJ2+/P03Pbpna3vwvH9DEqXmJSDXvTAeGHXK68zmAeQeFQbE=; Message-ID: <185856.9292.qm@web50703.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1_Sr9usVM1l.eTxrYbz68rCxicbpzo1UzRREE_kcftqiMsdeRNmoFen6XMcPPHMctzcrYi5GIP.4fIF4SSsb_6ww1_XcEAKViZwA1.V8gyMP5Kgf1UryhMPKUeSDBZ40KxDLLCYFi5DFjrIUBt8DA8QHHgP_zCTxPBoAtEbRrjnqvAaL6gZZMc21nm33_u_8sEcBFV2gT4.6it8lnX3zzNjDfyAU1qJ30okt7g9dqW4MfCcuRsNhVuWL6ZxogJwUZtC8iqc1ZwbNrIOmlh1zI7BKMjHQM7bw77DvhJzA.OihvBgCBFK._ay7rLVqOv9wrVHJ5_pJvT3QN270XNSw0w-- Received: from [218.186.12.234] by web50703.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:18:43 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:18:43 -0800 (PST) From: Gaurang Pandya To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:56:13 +0000 Subject: ral vap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:45:25 -0000 Hi , Just configured my new linksys wmp54G in Freebsd-8 worked like charm, but when tried to create yet another wireless interface (wlan1), am getting error ral0: only 1 vap supported, checked man for ral and found "Only one hostap" Just before selling the wifi card in ebay (as I wanted, it just for multiple wireless interfaces), I thought let me post a question in list to check if there is any possibilities of getting multiple virtual wlan interfaces configured with ral0, both working in ap mode? Thanks, Gaurang. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 15:07:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73467106568F for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from djr@pdconsec.net) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F400A8FC18 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:07:36 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEABPXY0uWZcBC/2dsb2JhbADYYII9gggEgyc Received: from goliath.pdconsec.net (HELO smtp.pdconsec.net) ([150.101.192.66]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with SMTP; 31 Jan 2010 01:37:35 +1030 Received: from mail1.pdconsec.net ([192.168.1.41] helo=mail1.pdconsec.net) with IPv4:25 by smtp.pdconsec.net; 31 Jan 2010 02:07:33 +1100 Received: from smtp.pdconsec.net ([192.168.1.32] RDNS failed) by mail1.pdconsec.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:06:53 +1100 Received: from [10.14.6.41] ([150.101.192.69] helo=[10.14.6.41]) with IPv4:25 by smtp.pdconsec.net; 31 Jan 2010 02:07:33 +1100 Message-ID: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:06:53 +1100 From: David Rawling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2010 15:06:54.0014 (UTC) FILETIME=[DBB05DE0:01CAA1BD] Subject: Replacing base NTP with ports NTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:07:37 -0000 Greetings all and sundry About 3 months ago I built myself a time server using 8.0-RC3, IIRC, and I upgraded to 8.0-RELEASE (and now -p2). Naturally, as I want this server to provide time services, I've installed the net/ntp port, among others. Recently, for reasons that have become lost in the mists of time, I noticed that I wasn't running the port version of NTP (/usr/local/sbin/ntpd), but the version installed with the base system (/usr/sbin/ntpd). For the immediate term, I've renamed the base versions of the files in /usr/sbin, and then symlinked to the port version (in /usr/local) - ntpd is now the ports version, as are most of the tools. This does, however, seem like a rather silly way of getting the most current NTPd running. I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to get the Ports version of NTP to overwrite the base system's NTP. Yet I'm sure (since there *is* a port of NTP) there must be a better way to do this. Can anyone point me in the direction of some documentation? Dave. -- David Rawling PD Consulting And Security Mob: +61 412 135 513 Email: djr@pdconsec.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 15:17:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0126A106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benschumacher@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64B68FC1D for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so1154858pxi.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:17:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=elxDq17ZS9EG4f40whW39vG59N6Id3A07UAl+33EZoI=; b=wyEbtt8y5icO8tWjGA5fEM9kXl2/9gRewKQCMn4tre3y87+alhMCiNLk+KeHjX4xCo rdi1GThwT4cqHQEBgb1IksRnoK2751gOacA+cniraO5Wi4z1VSDQ4o60uhKV+xK4KzcV QB1e+l5I0sE530F55Yh16m3LWzBK2zksnHbH8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=E+ASAte9rycm1wdk17sUZEwO80PTt7qXhZD1dnGF4Q3EBrtLWSex+oFWAsamezu6IK xQ0CRgOaHIwII8vBtw/cr1siEj14XKTCl7uhjFkFoOsWRw+yBN9LP/UC7Ye3KU4AancO o5qhYnlUTPcFvRwYqGS57VMBm+meuTsvjiDfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.37 with SMTP id c37mr1529332wfj.172.1264864676268; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:17:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> References: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:17:56 -0700 Message-ID: <9859143f1001300717o35e3b283jb83b1580948c5e0e@mail.gmail.com> From: Ben Schumacher To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: David Rawling Subject: Re: Replacing base NTP with ports NTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:17:57 -0000 On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:06 AM, David Rawling wrote: > About 3 months ago I built myself a time server using 8.0-RC3, IIRC, and I > upgraded to 8.0-RELEASE (and now -p2). Naturally, as I want this server to > provide time services, I've installed the net/ntp port, among others. > > Recently, for reasons that have become lost in the mists of time, I noticed > that I wasn't running the port version of NTP (/usr/local/sbin/ntpd), but > the version installed with the base system (/usr/sbin/ntpd). > > For the immediate term, I've renamed the base versions of the files in > /usr/sbin, and then symlinked to the port version (in /usr/local) - ntpd is > now the ports version, as are most of the tools. This does, however, seem > like a rather silly way of getting the most current NTPd running. > > I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to get the Ports version of NTP > to overwrite the base system's NTP. Yet I'm sure (since there *is* a port of > NTP) there must be a better way to do this. > > Can anyone point me in the direction of some documentation? David- I'm not going to claim that this is the "best" way either, but if you're doing source installs you could just set "WITHOUT_NTP=true" in /etc/src.conf to disable the installation of the system one. You can use "man src.conf" to find out more about this. I stop installations of a bunch of standard services this way -- lpr, bind, nis, sendmail, etc. "make delete-old" from your source build will clean up those files that are no longer used. Hope this helps, Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 15:30:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AA21065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@coder.cl) Received: from mail-yx0-f202.google.com (mail-yx0-f202.google.com [209.85.210.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C636C8FC13 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe40 with SMTP id 40so2625684yxe.28 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.40.31 with SMTP id n31mr1370085agn.76.1264865428217; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from coder-cl.no-ip.org ([201.215.99.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1087774ywc.36.2010.01.30.07.30.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:30:27 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Molina Wegener Organization: http://coder.cl/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:30:26 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-17-generic; KDE/4.3.5; i686; ; ) References: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> In-Reply-To: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2522772.UYOCyxYV26"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001301230.27224.dmw@coder.cl> Subject: Re: Replacing base NTP with ports NTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@coder.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:30:45 -0000 --nextPart2522772.UYOCyxYV26 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 30 January 2010, David Rawling wrote: > Greetings all and sundry Hello David, >=20 > About 3 months ago I built myself a time server using 8.0-RC3, IIRC, and > I upgraded to 8.0-RELEASE (and now -p2). Naturally, as I want this > server to provide time services, I've installed the net/ntp port, among > others. >=20 > Recently, for reasons that have become lost in the mists of time, I > noticed that I wasn't running the port version of NTP > (/usr/local/sbin/ntpd), but the version installed with the base system > (/usr/sbin/ntpd). OK, rc.conf(5) does the trick. Look here for an overview of rc.conf: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/configtuning-rcd.html And try the next command to gather information about rc.conf(5): man 5 rc.conf Possibly you are looking for the /ntpd_program/ variable (from the manual page): =2D----8<----------8<----------8<----- ntpd_program (str) Path to ntpd(8) (default /usr/sbin/ntpd). =2D----8<----------8<----------8<----- >=20 > For the immediate term, I've renamed the base versions of the files in > /usr/sbin, and then symlinked to the port version (in /usr/local) - ntpd > is now the ports version, as are most of the tools. This does, however, > seem like a rather silly way of getting the most current NTPd running. Bad practice... ;) >=20 > I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to get the Ports version of > NTP to overwrite the base system's NTP. Yet I'm sure (since there *is* a > port of NTP) there must be a better way to do this. No problem, just try the configuration above. Also, you do not need to restart the complete system, just proceed as follows: 1. As root stop ntpd: # /etc/rc.d/ntpd stop 2. Edit the /etc/rc.conf file... 3. Start ntpd: # /etc/rc.d/ntpd start >=20 > Can anyone point me in the direction of some documentation? >=20 > Dave. >=20 Best regards, =2D-=20 | Daniel Molina | | IT Consulting & Software Development | | Phone: +56 2 9790277 | http://coder.cl/ | --nextPart2522772.UYOCyxYV26 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJLZFCTAAoJEHxqfq6Y4O5NxhwP/AmNEl38IaTY0iWtlN5HDSPU 63xlqUboDEW082Nc5nPdzm51At7y2725UtdzD+toNH7Nyt34SmqNXORa5vsVe6lc OX1CrXLyXDkhLrP7qFA0LgRnhdJ+qnAoqAsvVg8so8s2sa4jDv9FVeLzRmApMWwX f/K92SJDd+habDNrMjCX7FfR5isuYGLR0lO/T3MqglW6HqjEhAXfu5kcGK4BoWyl GMt6KoPAan+XtFX1JQUSCi0YqeaS26we1A2f4SjTVq5OOnUEIDnpapuBZv7K6ic1 K62XYhZqcnba0Uroh6c7LszCyaMG32LfNRjOSbIujohbONE4hxgarHtlGx1DW1/x W7i+9lrs2Zt31yemuMCrOftq+IUShbqy0Ms4H1cfv3CDJFqfZsdHbqYc/LkLjLMC 5JNY+NLEtjGh4l1Zvq4nChb77rX0bL8x3YE2crZbwAi4DmvVMdDKqg9nnKC7WCP/ N5F8TkpyE74JYSUlrb5wx6nd/66n7e1WpSeIEjh9AelLsSUemlH7iabdPMvWCa9K HokauTo9xEG+SdUPwRB4LIGdLVwNhevvtR4p95GnYtIdjMxoopK4Dqg8NQ7m3CTW dn+7YYXVNV3uZRxndm/0RXKtOYP1giIvdLfV+ii1VUuVObSjNPeTq1fFHY/jrjNv DaKKWrp1Fu8TzcG6v/l/ =Tt8a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2522772.UYOCyxYV26-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 15:34:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050C21065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E8678FC12 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21761 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2010 15:34:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=WpGWaMn73WitmdF0kN1K3Z4VkJM1VxMK7/cyeSfkDtNqdBdTONxl0VpJ65BF5Tsc9hnWWisREY1yc35fcPgFNSi63x/ey/Q0SjfUoZBSfdQJc4T2TvGtQ+i4O5P8oQut5NISwC1Jd4bHQUfD/2v5T10YeRrYTwifOE+ADnxIhmA= ; Received: from c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.160.65 with login) by smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2010 07:34:40 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: bbYFJxoVM1mJBYn8xzHP.GkveGjH0GYGOcV3OJuQocjpu1KFUGKwPaqRtkrvYLwcaeEDsR3VRWkpDrE0qSntbQYltE6z9UrPCxvZpueJKvSTuTmOOE6FT2uuATBnG84ki17EIDnvFY2Z_j.kCtL3_.TiZmo_29CwO2.vtbK3GWAl7Y__9vgHm2eXQhTrCq8FxsMTnHuVO0uDYDhkv1tyUDsclc__K3UXb6DjHRD6jOIP9so.2ZAsfJb9Yfhtu9MOQ_UDV1Mls2pUVoJniGvChPfWY8ntpcbNiQXCjCJNVX3lTUcpybuiSEX0i6QZv8ro5sdv18odK8EkbRqKQv_eAQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 528B822855 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:34:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:34:34 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100130103434.08a786a2@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> References: <4B644B0D.60306@pdconsec.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/jDhy0bW1o+NiMOftQOVlXKh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: Replacing base NTP with ports NTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:34:42 -0000 --Sig_/jDhy0bW1o+NiMOftQOVlXKh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:06:53 +1100 David Rawling articulated: > Greetings all and sundry >=20 > About 3 months ago I built myself a time server using 8.0-RC3, IIRC, > and I upgraded to 8.0-RELEASE (and now -p2). Naturally, as I want > this server to provide time services, I've installed the net/ntp > port, among others. >=20 > Recently, for reasons that have become lost in the mists of time, I=20 > noticed that I wasn't running the port version of NTP=20 > (/usr/local/sbin/ntpd), but the version installed with the base > system (/usr/sbin/ntpd). >=20 > For the immediate term, I've renamed the base versions of the files > in /usr/sbin, and then symlinked to the port version (in /usr/local) > - ntpd is now the ports version, as are most of the tools. This does, > however, seem like a rather silly way of getting the most current > NTPd running. >=20 > I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to get the Ports version > of NTP to overwrite the base system's NTP. Yet I'm sure (since there > *is* a port of NTP) there must be a better way to do this. >=20 > Can anyone point me in the direction of some documentation? >=20 > Dave. =46rom the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file: ntpdate_enable=3D"NO" # Run ntpdate to sync time on boot (or NO= ). ntpdate_program=3D"/usr/sbin/ntpdate" # path to ntpdate, if you want a = different one. ntpdate_flags=3D"-b" # Flags to ntpdate (if enabled). ntpdate_config=3D"/etc/ntp.conf" # ntpdate(8) configuration file ntpdate_hosts=3D"" # Whitespace-separated list of ntpdate(8)= servers. ntpd_enable=3D"NO" # Run ntpd Network Time Protocol (or NO). ntpd_program=3D"/usr/sbin/ntpd" # path to ntpd, if you want a different o= ne. ntpd_config=3D"/etc/ntp.conf" # ntpd(8) configuration file ntpd_sync_on_start=3D"NO" # Sync time on ntpd startup, even if offs= et is high ntpd_flags=3D"-p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift" # Flags to ntpd (if enabled). Enter the appropriate line(s) into your /etc/rc.conf file. DO NOT modify the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file. --=20 Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com |::::=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |::::=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D | You will soon meet a person who will play an important role in your life. --Sig_/jDhy0bW1o+NiMOftQOVlXKh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLZFGPAAoJEGnxpuiKsj5SD1cIAIrU3wMnMDrKWhQtCw2Xy9Yv V0Wa9TZHTI8ogl/8bJ6ZKQsp35pC670JQzIzF1aEJ3qXyZFmgu0I1mE7i0qoF8If UHZfC8TpJXlHzhZu69HKHEtlWjd/xu6Qg/YLaAKVIprv6llj1KcQw1BE8o2T0gQw NQwfzROFoFZmGF4NbWcw1Mze70h8G+u0a3ZWKUZGfWWNTVwJNC1a4i/KWCVJWEUW BWfhWVF/6RjpjjdPdfWtjMi38AR83CDCwPMAbvSsLnrMqyFlwyqgGAvEi+lci5+/ KsZPk1EaiNufK7cnf6WzhqMwcr3k/nub82WLIxttMN5gZ3QHQmDkB6KAACjOylM= =ojjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jDhy0bW1o+NiMOftQOVlXKh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 19:05:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E584106566C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wtf.jlaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD18FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1297953fxm.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:05:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=S26Ko65Szxh6y5+iHsvI/dOlfQliX0tdMETDjH9oEU0=; b=eVjdUXQO5JXzrY5x/NSPLl4G/XwwQ1I02H2XQQr+p+ASDwapdYUY8nKtb+pvJfOlCI JZKtoNZEnqAZD355PZDdfXw+XU/UMUvynVvfv0xKOX0AEjoWDzj+3jWZmwffkFeCEcYs bAT3pP37NgdE/Xa9t8zUytBYzwZqltnJs0aHw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=pA2zqerr/gMacAll0bamRe6bXbKImf8DKPAeEav8HIqK5Zp1pwhTP5mBTyXzk3V4q4 BXtCJS5auj2PAZ3uJ1calXAbLLWyE0AZhrP92DFl95xlaV/uHP3q1ygCjcjpcHWLT4XI QrHIdP1+6Av1/zdSNAily0SmyW7bU1x92gCdA= Received: by 10.87.62.39 with SMTP id p39mr4345708fgk.9.1264878351842; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:05:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from aperture_lab ([77.66.145.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm5705495fgg.22.2010.01.30.11.05.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by aperture_lab (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:05:43 +0300 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:05:43 +0300 From: Jeff Laine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: fstab syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:05:53 -0000 Hello, My question is regarding /etc/fstab synax. How can I use spaces and quote symbols in my device name? I tried to use double quotes and backslash, but no luck so far. I.e. I'd like to put the following line: /dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 Any ideas? -- Best regards, Jeff | "Nobody wants to say how this works. | | Maybe nobody knows ..." | | Xorg.conf(5) | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 19:15:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BD0106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joespr@yahoo.com) Received: from web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83DB18FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50062 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jan 2010 18:48:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264877303; bh=jP0ryAN04P4ef0rziW7cHAeGHspXDjUDhXkodPBW3d4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5AAuqVbazIBpeLRMyGoHgP/urHPyHgmWibeJnAENi+DjlpnOMkGHaFaN8NF1xHi17p1Wyfn4LtU+kwQ/3wYwIHbvU6t2o0dQns3XSJThS7mR980fxmPEGGdXYvjNOexUYcww8kndz/z+mhxOM6c5g8cAgZ4cHZr/CvJlOabtRqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QuUDr4VZxXK4XgtLqhpTcSMqmq0KSk2g3ap37iB9wkzYy8EkziDHps4BB+LvuX5SINS6VTI7TdIgoXUe0Igh782vophH3VvG66cNImOnL9aqXP575jEqjgR8KSbNe2ToWOjzXv2swSm3ZbQ/qz7dKXHwauxJzyF43KFl2qjt9FU=; Message-ID: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: q2s4fvYVM1lpDmEcF4vXG_ZMHIPZDQxQg60DJ15LqQuUCQRdC5MXi5OgwGTz4TsfMdufXQSCEkuCQLroIPnrrfcrkuX5av8ZyXKZbzyWf.iLNuX_jo7zptDYpiS6Zwv.JcAGMK6GOAxGmlsp0HB.lU7KLDpf_O95nAWReiCuBE4k5Wc50sOqr_JzBYhF_e6cR9dpjBfZVquVI8zNye4B46H3ZCieyXhLyQEG2ejkv8SogDJe4ulFO1ITaizmE8tYHiQ71td7rYY0HiYuV9Z8dDSsCiMl4LNWMv.30ZkeaYCUWA9FMfNwNm_EeplqYRm10k8RhkXEnCX9OiuAFhPfkA-- Received: from [63.206.72.126] by web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:48:23 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.1.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) From: Joe Springer To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Pain finding packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:15:06 -0000 Hi. I am very new to FreeBSD with several years of Linux experience. After installed FreeSDB for the first time, I wanted to install some packages. For example, samba. I found that pkg_add -r samba fails. I need to know specifically the samba version to install it. To install, I needed do this: pkg_add -r samba3 This is difficult. Do I need to look up every package in advance on your website to understand what version I need to install? Isn't there a way to specify "Install the latest version of some package that is appropriate to the version of my installed FreeBSD"? Thanks, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 19:33:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9B71065670 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CE88FC0C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1310950fxm.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:33:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KCJcG8OG2lWO/mCk0SDj8oyyGnNctsqOqjm8hJgPyNg=; b=o+CyRmjaB9IrZ4HJlYvHXDl9ZRUgwjHYqAaQkb270izTXJrpZdf2BtEDLlZUQqwbAv IZZu/3kS48DfJkYuqIEYxyBSV/m8feQJNDF6+a6fKb2wN0QkZAE/3CieDpLlydYhW2gc NZ6NQS3oB+Pc5EHhCWCG29yjPuuEejGW+EqzM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Zv4ufe7cBY6HADQ8ohJ0Q1hgqRgCIzKpnCxwJoB4E7GCxGi6DQ/t5HRGB2YHA5Twu2 ltG8mV+rWhFeYgYPZoR4KFMbrODgYRodBKuBvWRAaTHiK/Kqe0RaPao0awVEmDJV33mB d2hoTf6zpy6YVu57j/ioE7cU2g3u47jQw7xq0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.180.201 with SMTP id j9mr236626hbg.145.1264880017261; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:33:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> References: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:33:37 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Jeff Laine Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstab syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:33:39 -0000 On 30 January 2010 19:05, Jeff Laine wrote: > Hello, > > My question is regarding /etc/fstab synax. > How can I use spaces and quote symbols in my device name? > I tried to use double quotes and backslash, but no luck so far. > I.e. I'd like to put the following line: > > /dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > Any ideas? > > > -- > Best regards, > Jeff > > | "Nobody wants to say how this works. | > | Maybe nobody knows ..." | > | Xorg.conf(5) | > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > /dev/msdosfs/MY\ FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 or "/dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH" /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 should work, but i guess you tried these? The alternative way would be to use the UUID of the drive, as that wont have spaces in, and is more versatile than /dev/das1a type syntax From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 19:42:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC3B106566C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f194.google.com (mail-pz0-f194.google.com [209.85.222.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FBE8FC1C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so338018pzk.27 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:42:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uyK9rzHmf5fbqOIGs0lzaRzQVMSL7t8gy/mnEvYTLp8=; b=oZ4I6ZKmSrZ0ZWqxNV38/cB0O4NpSx0wWOxwa+CtlS+uGInQGRptHfg8VlbKRwDZCa cs/gXvFf3l7r/R7y2D8LzUEG8JD5zH1Rqv38kIJefx/M41JT17IGJVvg9a6+lWfXG2EC Qt+SCwVBVqiFHoYXhPvHpkSf5WImmCNi4dhrs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=n7BugoIeANEk9YGb+mzK39X3KamSGB+XPRYAJEdr6FXbwPGxXCmxQ+3PHc1tDM3FmL v9xs4ma/Uu9WFGtFv4JvGhjiboq4c0qKk9r3xd0fnG5VawN+g+g1aXeKFKOJfLVZc/qe hsHiWU2ambbGO8U6yZyoAIG3r70friAXnOGM0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.188.8 with SMTP id l8mr1694672waf.12.1264880525092; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:42:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Tim Judd Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:41:45 -0700 Message-ID: To: Joe Springer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pain finding packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:42:06 -0000 On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Joe Springer wrote: > Hi. > > I am very new to FreeBSD with several years of Linux experience. After > installed FreeSDB for the first time, I wanted to install some packages. For > example, samba. > > I found that > > pkg_add -r samba > > fails. I need to know specifically the samba version to install it. > > To install, I needed do this: > pkg_add -r samba3 > > This is difficult. Do I need to look up every package in advance on your > website to understand what version I need to install? > > Isn't there a way to specify "Install the latest version of some package > that is appropriate to the version of my installed FreeBSD"? > > Thanks, > Joe > > Since the ports tree (for which packages are made from) can house multiple versions of a software package (samba 3.0, 3.2 and 3.3 IIRC), specifying "samba" alone sometimes work for the default, and sometimes it's "samba32" or similar. It's up to the port maintainer to name it and what the resulting package name will be. Like most distributions, a search online can yield the version you want. Go to http://ports.freebsd.org and query any part of a substring to search for. --TJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 19:59:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B32106568B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp106.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp106.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E9738FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94891 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2010 19:59:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=obtMifvOLsrvGzauWtgfcKantkJHS7etp6zcZvszneYSJB+gISjzejsWizhH7b2iD0y4+jgiAAr9u+0t/s1GpUoO+pAGa4Fxns4sE2mVuEwNxrQT7h767/LfT9DxxNWT+wxEGjgIuuvVsptBV758C8+O00SKPlupiDK0p1i9EuA= ; Received: from c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.160.65 with login) by smtp106.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2010 11:59:15 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: kWfuqYsVM1lAglSkYSG9RcoXYp1EBCwLx7KXDQpCU6VY_cmTsJy.QOjW77jbXZnafeY9BTNeDpEgvnXuAsp_J.7BhpX2BlEjj93LGVRZ.Jty70RVU2l4Ti780lsMqxtjRpjzGqw5_ETDGKLVBxqcKw0acw0o3LfGs4cA6BiTvSNMsiMbeSE1HYMzRYq_WNNdCtTvJNUzUO_.P4VmFgHL21eHvllP6Bs3i76u7ePkKVrOdMSAkvUt09c_cmJKwMsYySEBuMmuygObmbr7jmscShFtp5lTQ_LBS2XzEf0e5bbuVZvea.0eV.W_jSw9pobUfTxDXVhP0ZC1mRxiUeierg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8886C22855 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:59:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:59:14 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100130145914.4d216da0@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Pain finding packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:59:16 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) Joe Springer articulated: > Hi. > > I am very new to FreeBSD with several years of Linux experience. > After installed FreeSDB for the first time, I wanted to install some > packages. For example, samba. > > I found that > > pkg_add -r samba > > fails. I need to know specifically the samba version to install it. > > To install, I needed do this: > pkg_add -r samba3 > > This is difficult. Do I need to look up every package in advance on > your website to understand what version I need to install? > > Isn't there a way to specify "Install the latest version of some > package that is appropriate to the version of my installed FreeBSD"? You didn't specify exactly what you wanted installed. Just specifying 'samba' is useless. There are several versions of samba, as well as ports that begin with samba. For example: Port: ja-samba-3.0.35,1 Path: /usr/ports/japanese/samba3 Info: Japanese Samba Port: gnosamba-0.3.3_5 Path: /usr/ports/net/gnosamba Info: Samba configuration tool for X Window System Port: gsambad-0.1.9_3 Path: /usr/ports/net/gsambad Info: Gtk2 Frontend for samba daemon Port: p5-Samba-LDAP-0.05_1 Path: /usr/ports/net/p5-Samba-LDAP Info: Manage a Samba PDC with an LDAP Backend Port: py26-samba-3.0.37 Path: /usr/ports/net/py-samba Info: Python bindings for Samba Port: samba-libsmbclient-3.0.37 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba-libsmbclient Info: Shared libs from the samba package Port: samba-nmblookup-3.0.37 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba-nmblookup Info: NetBIOS Name lookup tool Port: samba-pdbsql-0.3.1_1 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba-pdbsql Info: Multiplexor, MySQL and PostgeSQL passdb backends for Samba3 Port: samba-smbclient-3.0.37 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba-smbclient Info: Samba "ftp-like" client Port: samba-3.0.37,1 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba3 Info: A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX Port: samba-3.2.15 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba32 Info: A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX Port: samba-3.3.9 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba33 Info: A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX Port: samba4-devel-4.0.0.a8_2 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba4-devel Info: A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX Port: samba4wins-1.0.7_1 Path: /usr/ports/net/samba4wins Info: A full featured replicating WINS server for UNIX Port: sambasentinel-0.1_5 Path: /usr/ports/net/sambasentinel Info: SambaSentinel is a gtk-frontend to smbstatus with additional features Port: cups-samba-6.0_2 Path: /usr/ports/print/cups-samba Info: The Common UNIX Printing System: MS Windows client drivers Port: samba-vscan-0.3.6c_2 Path: /usr/ports/security/samba-vscan Info: On-access virus scanning with Samba Port: japanese/samba20 Moved: japanese/samba Date: 2003-04-13 Reason: security vulnerability Port: net/samba-tng Moved: Date: 2003-08-07 Reason: port was marked broken for 3 months with no fix submitted Port: net/samba-devel Moved: net/samba3 Date: 2004-06-07 Reason: considered stable Port: net/samba Moved: net/samba3 Date: 2006-09-02 Reason: Security vulnerabilities Port: japanese/samba Moved: japanese/samba3 Date: 2008-07-21 Reason: Superseded by japanese/samba3 Port: net/samba32-devel Moved: net/samba32 Date: 2009-02-16 Reason: Samba 3.2 became stable enough to be used in production. Did you read man pkg_add(1) thoroughly before using the utility? -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com |::::======= |::::======= |=========== |=========== | Systems programmers are the high priests of a low cult. R. S. Barton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 20:04:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF73E106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:04:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gesbbb@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp106.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp106.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A298FC17 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96440 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2010 20:04:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:Organization:X-Mailer:Face:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=u3oKc1z79iu2etwpnS2yAcebyqxk+RQOeqQq+gMmKR8QLphDQ/ySDI/M5mP1xmCB0YWdLHJN40ttvQDuk+Rntrfl5fmepgUP5WU7ivjOjIetA3E0CY1RWdn5W2HV4qYOesjEKbSKOj17eVexjlHdHSqQfWFWc1oXyLUXt/JHKTw= ; Received: from c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net (gesbbb@67.189.160.65 with login) by smtp106.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2010 12:04:26 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: yeAAMgKswBATCul4lSbCWspvTA-- X-YMail-OSG: dW5SgJoVM1lZ8TkkrXpkcRudJi89s6O.nMcqYqPBpbyR55suy9ciZSSdFJHyhCwgwwmGdiWBNHfvVbnbyKwea_.DRw14IOOn9GNFd95lK5yEH78MUVavRBFEgsYyk9LOMZH9S8Xnz_xTkAIT6M0AZ2oV681.UkxtDPsg6WB3pJFBFdRVuuLOy5RwL_U3Pa1fp4b9VASbH5ChWS87aeEsrgqC9JoMH2FQ2kNCk7JD.RtbteLUL5LU1Sdej4CJaPsjtRhyiilKusxIuPCbiWam9fKrBBikDKaXIIpE3rXuhNb0xf76yT5W.Qs0Jg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (scorpio.seibercom.net [192.168.1.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gesbbb@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D847822885 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:04:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:04:25 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100130150425.350ec2dd@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> References: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fstab syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:04:28 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:05:43 +0300 Jeff Laine articulated: > Hello, > > My question is regarding /etc/fstab synax. > How can I use spaces and quote symbols in my device name? > I tried to use double quotes and backslash, but no luck so far. > I.e. I'd like to put the following line: > > /dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 As far as I know, that cannot be done. I saw something about that here awhile ago. Perhaps, a patch has been submitted that will modify its behavior by now. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com |::::======= |::::======= |=========== |=========== | Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal. Zaphod Beeblebrox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 20:08:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB3D1065670 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank.wissmann41@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de (fmmailgate03.web.de [217.72.192.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8FE8FC19 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp08.web.de (fmsmtp08.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.216]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A822C13CE050A for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:08:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [77.176.206.113] (helo=grissom.einundvierzig.org) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NbJc0-0003Wo-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:08:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4B6491D4.4090304@web.de> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:08:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Frank_Wi=DFmann?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091214) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: frank.wissmann41@web.de X-Sender: frank.wissmann41@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Nt/kzhmtkVbqALtZN4bnK9g0dPqZ2GORnOOWP AOdBu1Jpxwx2QJG12Y3Ir1xvidxuugop5R6JYcbLuUdo/Lr6mv 1/R1qC6Z03/376KE0plw== Cc: Subject: Problems with "make clean" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank.wissmann41@web.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:08:10 -0000 Hi, Beasties! I just installed the new VirtualBox through ports. It worked fine, but now I have trouble cleaning the directory. Neither "make clean" nor a "rm -rf work/" do what they are supposed to. Here is the output: rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.amd64/debug/obj/VBoxRT/VBox: Directory not empty rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.amd64/debug/obj/VBoxRT/common: Directory not empty rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.amd64/debug/obj/VBoxRT: Invalid argument rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.amd64/debug/obj: Directory not empty rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.amd64/debug: Directory not empty rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out/freebsd.amd64: Directory not empty rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/out: Directory not empty rm: work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902: Directory not empty rm: work/: Directory not empty A "cd" to the named directories and a "ls -la" show no files there. Has anybody an explanation for this? Greetings Frank -- GU d- s:+ a+ C+>$ UBS>$ P L- !E--- W N+@ !o K--? !w--- O !M- !V- PS+ PE Y? !PGP- t+ 5 X !R tv- b++ DI !D G e h+ r- y? When pack meets pack in the jungle and no one will move from the trail wait till the leaders have spoken it may be fair words shall prevail (Rudyard Kipling) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 21:38:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07BA106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-111.bluehost.com [69.89.18.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0F078FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12529 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jan 2010 21:38:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2010 21:38:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=lFFspra1EKXSv/AclmDkqWCuF6aRKEoxGXDLCNP++qHxHz61BbBRY3b5Gyxg9FXuUMlFM5xj+pzjwmECtquP5HP8wOSozIMZi+1nYfIK2Yo0PPn4+JJSJPRf8ruRKBHc; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbL1B-0006CQ-ON for questions@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:38:15 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:29:51 -0700 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:29:51 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20100130212951.GA86118@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Cc: Subject: Re: Pain finding packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:38:16 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:48:23AM -0800, Joe Springer wrote: > Hi. >=20 > I am very new to FreeBSD with several years of Linux experience. After > installed FreeSDB for the first time, I wanted to install some > packages. For example, samba. >=20 > I found that >=20 > pkg_add -r samba=20 >=20 > fails. I need to know specifically the samba version to install it.=20 >=20 > To install, I needed do this: > pkg_add -r samba3 >=20 > This is difficult. Do I need to look up every package in advance on > your website to understand what version I need to install? >=20 > Isn't there a way to specify "Install the latest version of some > package that is appropriate to the version of my installed FreeBSD"? Unfortunately, there isn't -- sometimes. Some ports (and their associated packages) will have the name you expect. Some will not. The names of binary packages should have the same names as their respective ports, at least most of the time, as far as I'm aware. Thus, if you have the ports tree on your system, you can at least check locally to see what various software installs will be called. If not, you may have to search online. I don't use binary packages much, personally, so I'm not exactly an expert in that regard. Something I said may turn out to be mistaken. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktkpM8ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXbVACg7jszz+qVtQPGLYCWm7DbY5aO OsEAoPuGU+b1eycBUlEnLv1oqC5hDNam =xuKh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 22:23:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262DC106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wtf.jlaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82AF8FC16 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1383942fxm.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:23:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=hNtiUuC0XArkr7bge8rHQd8cPfUQuIQYBYbyhBJoxkk=; b=O+CHLToawMiNgfLZclJl+BSLhgjouaiLB2kt6iq7ZcTWaF9HLY3gbvD/poU1eQQxNL qA0jKL+zGZWqMGSyo1omjrBvbs9SNhnn1BfalCA9axocFKL3OSUifYEkhfVUrjeN0o4+ fii6mBJRSMR9BE3JD5RXPKYE30H9p9X9BdzY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system :user-agent; b=mVzp1NXaQWZAthXFr+jdnQQT1MKQ/HZQZBVUkmOAB6VmSKw+BIY5P/TlwVMI2nUz01 pN2vSedncBUwedLtKcHbtGd9TarppfOycf2ygybfI710O7Sz7wj2YH1pTY10Mb73q9Oz 1G+pKSZpIR1RQHxgPozhAVJfRpYknU9x1S6F8= Received: by 10.86.236.26 with SMTP id j26mr4002786fgh.77.1264890230484; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from aperture_lab ([77.66.145.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm4875950fga.13.2010.01.30.14.23.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:23:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by aperture_lab (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:23:42 +0300 Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:23:42 +0300 From: Jeff Laine To: krad Message-ID: <20100130222341.GA17449@free.bsd.loc> References: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstab syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:23:52 -0000 On Sat,30-01-2010 [19:33:37], krad wrote: > On 30 January 2010 19:05, Jeff Laine wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > My question is regarding /etc/fstab synax. > > How can I use spaces and quote symbols in my device name? > > I tried to use double quotes and backslash, but no luck so far. > > I.e. I'd like to put the following line: > > > > /dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Jeff > > > > | "Nobody wants to say how this works. | > > | Maybe nobody knows ..." | > > | Xorg.conf(5) | > > > > /dev/msdosfs/MY\ FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > or > > "/dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH" /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > should work, but i guess you tried these? > > The alternative way would be to use the UUID of the drive, as that wont have > spaces in, and is more versatile than /dev/das1a type syntax Yep, neither is working. After all I used glabel to generate a new label and avoid reformatiing my volume. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 22:27:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9986106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@socket.net) Received: from mf1.socket.net (mf1e.socket.net [216.106.88.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89AE8FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.129.40.201] (216.106.12.14.reverse.socket.net [216.106.12.14]) by mf1.socket.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D6363B3C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:27:24 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: From: Jay Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:27:23 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Subject: Jails and Hardware security X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:27:26 -0000 Is it possible to limit what hardware a jail has access to? I am wanting to limit access to the tape drive/autoloader in one jail, but allow another to have access to it. Is this as simple as deleting the appropriate entries in /dev? Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 22:35:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0BA106568D for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889878FC13 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0UMZBuC006493 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:11 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (mx-in-02.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.185]) by mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0UMZBIg000699 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:11 +0200 Received: from pluto.universe (62.1.173.159.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [62.1.173.159]) by MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0UMZ4qF003946 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:05 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:35:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.3.4; amd64; ; ) References: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> In-Reply-To: <20100130190543.GA16205@free.bsd.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201001310035.03260.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Subject: Re: fstab syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:35:14 -0000 On Saturday 30 of January 2010 21:05:43 Jeff Laine wrote: > Hello, > > My question is regarding /etc/fstab synax. > How can I use spaces and quote symbols in my device name? > I tried to use double quotes and backslash, but no luck so far. > I.e. I'd like to put the following line: > > /dev/msdosfs/MY FLASH /mnt/flash msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > Any ideas? > Unfortunatelly, spaces are not allowed in fstab syntax. I also have tried it before and figured out that there is no way to insert spaces in a folder or device name. Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 22:50:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63FF1065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975308FC12 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0UMocHg061461 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:50:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:50:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:50:38 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100130225035.GA10807@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,URIBL_RHS_DOB autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Subject: apache22 and new hostname??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:50:41 -0000 Guys, As some of you might know, i am trying to host a friend's website on my DNS and web server. Can anybody suggest what i have to add to my /usr/local/etc/apache22/* files and directories to get http://www.anacondabuilders.us to display since I do not own this domain . My builder friend, Steven Ross just bought the website. I am trying to get his ".us" site be served on my DNS server; in my /etc/namedb/* files. Steven's needs as a builder, home-repair, home-improvement, etc, are much simpler than my own web sites: basically one page with a few lines of text and photos of his work. Since I am the {throat-clearing here} "designer," the KISS philosophy servers well. But I do need the basics of having/serving/hosting two domains on one computer. gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 7.79a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 22:58:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B3110656A6 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from gsicomp.on.ca (gsicomp.on.ca [200.46.208.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE4D8FC08 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8A3FCC55D; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gsicomp.on.ca ([200.46.208.251]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11541-09; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes (CPE002129cfd480-CM001ac3584898.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.236.129.198]) by gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 10487FCA42D; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <73E8BD3A8F2344848C1C4662BD37460B@hermes> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Gary Kline" , "FreeBSD Mailing List" References: <20100130225035.GA10807@thought.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:58:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Cc: Subject: Re: apache22 and new hostname??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:58:20 -0000 Gary, > But I do need the basics of having/serving/hosting two domains on one > computer. What you are looking for are called "virtual hosts". See the examples in /usr/local/etc/apache22/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf. The Apache documentation (mentioned in the above file) is also helpful. Regards, -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 23:12:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECFF1065672 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from bee.hiwaay.net (bee.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3822D8FC12 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.183] (dynamic-24-42-224-110.knology.net [24.42.224.110] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by bee.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0UNBwHg1363362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:11:59 -0600 (CST) From: David Kelly To: Per olof Ljungmark In-Reply-To: <4B64010C.6020604@intersonic.se> References: <4B64010C.6020604@intersonic.se> Message-Id: <10CE5827-D2EE-4820-9778-2B5B319B2678@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:11:55 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendation on GPS time source for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:12:00 -0000 On Jan 30, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone have a recommendation on a good GPS receiver/board for > use with NTP/FreeBSD to create a stratum 1 public time server? > > Preferably something above the Garmin "puck" level but not > ridiculously expensive either... Why would you want something more than the Garmin "puck"? I have a couple of instrumentation grade GPS's at work but their primary justification is to generate IRIG time to sync a multitude of instruments which expect a time signal in IRIG format. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 23:42:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEED106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com (mail-iw0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F5D8FC17 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so3439146iwn.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:42:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LTxCCxwP9aZvLhPUeNEP3xlB+GFn39DW6djHVkfr+VY=; b=Uh4+tMPsaf/wzm6qLVLuypO6vIdCXIknhsbqoZqRgNKwaHI0UGCg9nG+KmixqmkgV4 /UQtxq/S0hbE3MtZB6qF2r6Y65ikA9AMtGnpIIMkjJ0MfY4Jp4A64VKuvMhffl95YobK mTYp7T5kaTAriIeHEt2/GULCKhlZr2zZYk4Aw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Yahs42oOvR/Y26YYSNYHvxH+r9abhPPCw4qLz7Oz1hhx+hiRZrgb/qk2bxgbVcVWIT B/W/F5WpwkbO/ubOcJvd+7SJ0avjN33Mjjyzz8y+VHvtcDXwBiLVbWs8KTwaPc91S5Zf VSNOdukSfX/+9C6I4uVODGnrlZjEiwp60Oe00= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.154.207 with SMTP id p15mr1680820ibw.91.1264894939096; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:42:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <881950.49266.qm@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:42:19 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: Joe Springer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pain finding packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:42:20 -0000 On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:48, Joe Springer wrote: > Hi. > > I am very new to FreeBSD with several years of Linux experience. After in= stalled FreeSDB for the first time, I wanted to install some packages. For = example, samba. > > I found that > > =C2=A0 pkg_add -r samba > > fails. I need to know specifically the samba version to install it. > > To install, I needed do this: > =C2=A0 pkg_add -r samba3 > > This is difficult. Do I need to look up every package in advance on your = website to understand what version I need to install? > > Isn't there a way to specify "Install the latest version of some package = that is appropriate to the version of my installed FreeBSD"? > > Thanks, > Joe Not really. However, you should have installed a copy of the ports tree during the creation of your machine. Here are your tools: csup (or portsnap, either of which will keep your ports tree current), portupgrade (or portmaster or one of a couple of others, to upgrade your current ports) and make. csup is native, and portupgrade seems to be more commonly used than the others of its kind. For make, do the following, after csup (or an alternative): cd /usr/ports make search name=3Dsamba | less or cd /usr/ports make search key=3Dsamba | less Then browse that list to see what most particularly applies to your needs. HTH, Kurt