From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 01:27:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F6F1065670 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57CD8FC0A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27359 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2010 01:27:44 -0000 Received: from poshta.pknet.net (HELO pop.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 21 Mar 2010 01:27:44 -0000 Received: from 216.241.170.11 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by pop.pknet.net with HTTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:27:44 -0600 Message-ID: <45c7a5dcf32819443b68c881ddde9135.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> In-Reply-To: <87wrx69b1l.fsf@upnet.gr> References: <201003201318.o2KDIcIt001241@fix.fantomatic.co.uk> <87wrx69b1l.fsf@upnet.gr> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:27:44 -0600 From: "Peter" To: "Leonidas Tsampros" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20-RC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Jamie Griffin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: securing sshd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:27:45 -0000 > Jamie Griffin writes: > >> Hello >> >> I've been reading up on securing sshd after being bombarded with >> attempted logins. >> >> The steps i've taken so far to make things more secure are: >> >> * changed the encryption method for passwords in /etc/login.conf from >> md5 to blowfish and changed all the passwords to ridiculously obscure >> ones (at least as obscure as I could think of). >> >> * changed /etc/ttys secure entries to insecure to prevent root logins on >> the console >> >> (the above are not really sshd specific i know.) >> >> * Disabled root login by ssh in /etc/ssh/sshd_config >> >> * Set myself as the only user able to login by ssh >> >> * Disabled password logins completely, and to only allow public key >> authentication >> >> * Changed the default ssh port from 22 to something much higher >> >> I'm the only user that will ever need to log into the machine. I >> wondered, does this setup seem ok and are there any other methods used >> by anyone on list that might help me to secure remote logins even >> further? > > Hi, > > I'm using the following pf snippet in order to "protect" myself and my > system's logs against brute force attemps on sshd: > > # > # Block them all > # > block log quick from > > # > # connection rate the incoming ssh connections and fill the bruteforce > # table > # > pass in log inet proto tcp from any to any port = 22 \ > flags S/SA keep state \ > (max-src-conn 10, max-src-conn-rate 5/4, \ > overload flush global) > > For more information on how this works, take a look at pf.conf(5). > > I don't know if it's complete (or even good practice), but a) I think it > works for me and b) it does not depend on a port-provided solution. > >> Thanks for any help. >> >> Jamie On the same line, portknocking with pf: . .. ... # Table for allowed IPs # [gets auto populated via portknocking] table persist . .. ... block #default block policy # Allow everyone to hit 'any' on port '1234' - pf proxies tcp connection # [if not using 'synproxy', the connection is never established to # 'overload' the rule] # 5 attempts in 15 seconds pass in log quick proto tcp from any to any port {1234} synproxy state \ (max-src-conn-rate 5/15, overload ) #Allow IPs that have been 'overload'ed into the portknock_ssh table pass in log quick proto tcp from {} to any port {ssh} . .. ... Although ssh is blocked from all except some trusted IPs, you can still always have access, just have to knock first. ]Peter[ Then put a crontab on a per needed basis to expire all IPs in that table that have not been referenced in 60 seconds: * * * * * /sbin/pfctl -vt portknock_ssh -T expire 60 All established sessions will be kept alive, all new sessions will need to portknock after the IP is cleared from table From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 01:33:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA28F1065675 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9898FC15 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.local (ppp-88-217-26-61.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.26.61]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 159971C0871 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:33:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA57776.8020404@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:33:42 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1269123444.32263.53.camel@ubuntu> In-Reply-To: <1269123444.32263.53.camel@ubuntu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: bruteforce protection howto X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:33:45 -0000 On 20/03/10 23:17, Vadkan Jozsef wrote: > What's the best method to ban that ip [what is bruteforcig a server] > what was logged on the logger? > I need to ban the ip on the router pc. Take your time to think about if this is indeed the right solution. 1st: You need to decide which is the right policy to deploy. Basically you can opt for a default deny or a default allow. With default deny you create white lists for the exceptions that should be allows. With default allow you create black lists. Default deny and default allow roughly corresponds to the policies of OpenBSD vs. Microsoft Windows. So, when is white listing an option? When you have a limited set of exceptions, for example your local users that need ssh access. If this set is limited consider deploying default deny. On the other hand, this is not an option for your web service that you wish to provide for anyone anywhere. Blacklisting is futile (think, did anti-virus solve the virus problem?). Intruders may attempt to connect from anywhere, blocking a single IP won't solve your problem, most likely the next attempt will not come from that IP. This is because these attacks may be launched from a number of compromised pc's and because the attacking pc may have dynamically assigned address. So you need to block entire ranges, but which? I recently analysed my maillog to see where attempted spammers connected from. I found some 3500 hosts in 1600 ranges (using whois lookup). These ranges being typically /16. I haven't tried with ssh but I doubt it would be much different. If on top of this you make some auto-respond system, you expose yourself to a denial of service attack, blindly blocking anything that creates a log entry. Whether you use white or black listing this is effective only if you can make informed decisions. If you don't do business with say China and you know that 25% of all spam originates from China, it is only rational to block access from China. But, whenever possible, use white listing. BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 01:48:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B084106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723D58FC14 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so3451844pwj.13 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:48:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=puIpSMiBr1BUVNHP1ouH1sK3jBYVZWhDLqvv1s0Wp04=; b=wU9jqFFPMMKb+1RAb/9pUBuaP6sYcUOJE7tnvdt4uPDEXwZKUNqwhRbJk+1C5B8axC f6wf+S6DHJQaN+T75vfa6GWEWmkv9R/eB4w9Bn08A7SCJKynzkS9eVNYCkWpmXtk+3vF 8xBonW5Un7xZKVUBvow5Fteda0TgHeAB8u3TA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uin78wH28tsj0yEQ+arNzacPmqul9YHoirWVx0zCcKPkveC16g1IlXH9spB1NMD2Ep jdWuTNymCqcoIByAb0m41BZRuiHqju8wsoeWxMQ4/dJNUYyN4TEVaDsO4Eo9UWEgr04V hc+CwZuMJATVFFI8R9XLZ2zUEueMDnXmOnmiY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.121.5 with SMTP id t5mr2566035wfc.277.1269136136850; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:48:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003201532.48793.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <201003201532.48793.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:48:56 -0600 Message-ID: <64c038661003201848o1379a891t680593cf3594b7b0@mail.gmail.com> From: Modulok To: Mike Clarke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying mirrored partitions - will this work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:48:57 -0000 How valuable is your data? I recommend you make an offline backup. There's a lot of steps in your procedure which introduce room for error. You could perhaps disconnect one of the hard drive's data cable (same thing). Also, make a backup copy of your geom meta data somewhere. Other than that, your procedure sounds like it should work. Though, I've never tried it. I do recall, that when updating from 6.2-RELEASE to 8-RELEASE, the geom meta data was automatically updated. I'm not sure if there is any change between Release and Stable, though. I'm also not sure if it was a backward incompatible change, as I never went back to 6.2. Just something to be aware of. Sorry I can't be more helpful. Maybe someone else knows more. -Modulok- On 3/20/10, Mike Clarke wrote: > > I'm currently running 8.0-RELEASE and am considering experimenting with > 8.0-STABLE. I'd like to preserve my existing system in case things go > pear-shaped so I'll copy the entire system onto a spare slice and then > use csup to upgrade the copy to STABLE. Normally I'd go through the > steps of bsdlabel, newfs and then dump|restore to create the copy but > I'm wondering if I can take advantage of my recently created gmirror to > cut down the work. > > I have two 500GB disks, /dev/ad4 and /dev/ad8, each partitioned into 4 > slices of 88, 88, 42 and 259GB. My system is installed on the first > slices (ad4s1 and ad8s1) which are mirrored as /dev/mirror/gm0. The > second slices (ad4s2 and ad8s2) are currently unused. My thoughts are > to temporarily add ad4s2 into gm0 with "gmirror insert gm0 ad4s2" and > wait for the mirror to synchronise. I should then be able to remove the > temporary addition with "gmirror remove gm0 /dev/ad4s2" at which point > ad4s2 should be a duplicate of the original system and I can then go > ahead and create a new mirror with "gmirror label -b load gm1 ad4s2" > and "gmirror insert gm1 ad8s2". After editing /etc/fstab in the new > mirror to use gm1 instead of gm0 I should then be able to boot into the > system on slice 2 and upgrade it to STABLE while still keeping my > original system to fall back to if required. > > Is this approach of moving disks from one mirror to another workable, or > have I missed something that would lead me into deep trouble? I don't > mind unduly if I make a mess of the second slice and have to start > again but I don't want to lose the contents of my original system on > slice 1. > > -- > Mike Clarke > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 05:00:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9F01065672 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26018FC0A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o2L50XD3077094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:00:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2L50XYL013270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:00:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o2L50XIF013159; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:00:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:00:31 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Vadkan Jozsef Message-ID: <20100321050030.GD12330@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1269078531.32263.31.camel@ubuntu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1269078531.32263.31.camel@ubuntu> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:00:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: freenas-like solution for aoe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:00:36 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 20), Vadkan Jozsef said: > Does anybody know a FreeNAS-like solution, that supports AoE? - Ata over > Ethernet? You can get iSCSI with the net/istgt port, which should perform better than AoE. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 05:17:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8326106564A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2348D8FC0C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:17:52 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApEBAH9HpUvKRa39/2dsb2JhbAAH1ROEfQSDHA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,281,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10430814" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp3.comclark.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2010 13:10:51 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:10:43 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:17:53 -0000 I don't have sources installed on my system. Just use the binary Freebsd-update function. At new releases I do a clean install. I only have a single public IP address. Now I would like to play with jails. One for postfix, apache, and ftp. My reading of EZJAIL and the jails section of the handbook lead me to believe I need a unique IP address for each jail. Is that correct? I have no need to build world or install world because it does this from /usr/src which i don't install. Is there some EZJAIL option to just copy over the running system binaries instead of the sources? The handbook "15.4 Creating and Controlling Jails" talks about “complete” jails, which resemble a real FreeBSD system, and “service” jails, dedicated to one application or service. Section 15.4 is the procedure for building a "complete jail" using the jail command. The 15.6 Application of Jails (service jails) talks about creating a root skeleton containing the host running files which are shared with all the guest jails in read only mode. This eliminates the massive duplication of running system files in each jail as in the complete jail system talked about in handbook section "15.4 Creating and Controlling Jails". Now reading the ezjail man pages I see that ezjail also creates a base template that is shared between all jails. Is this the same method talked about in the handbook section 15.6 Application of Jails (service jail)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 09:39:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787451065672 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241DD8FC19 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.local (ppp-93-104-79-92.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.79.92]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CCF91C0871 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA5E961.5020902@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:45 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201003201318.o2KDIcIt001241@fix.fantomatic.co.uk> <87wrx69b1l.fsf@upnet.gr> <45c7a5dcf32819443b68c881ddde9135.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> In-Reply-To: <45c7a5dcf32819443b68c881ddde9135.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: securing sshd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:39:49 -0000 On 21/03/10 02:27, Peter wrote: > On the same line, portknocking with pf: Port knocking suck: If you have to knock a single time on the secret port you might just have no added security at all, could be that the port scanner first knocked on the secret port then on the ssh port. If you have to knock multiple times on the secret port, same thing, usually when you scan for open ports, multiple packets are sent in case of packet loss. You can't use timing between packets because this may change on the path. Yet you do need to implement timeouts to avoid a halfway knocked sequence. If you have to knock various ports, you can't rely on packets arriving in a particular sequence. And even if you did, the port scanner might just get that order right. If your secret is to knock port 1234 and then port 2345 nmap might do just that when scanning ports 0-10000. And if the secret is the reverse order, again, nmap might just do that because multiple packets are sent to each port. If you require more than a single knock you have to monitor also for wrong knocks or a simple nmap scan may be just sufficient to expose your server as in the example above. A port knock or port knock sequence is a shared password that cannot be encrypted. Since there is no previous user identification the knocking is the same for all users. It's not encrypted because the secret is in the port number you knock. This is possibly the worst kind of secret you can manage. If you find yourself thinking you need port knocking, then your passwords are not strong enough. It is far better to use longer and more complex passwords: They are individual for each user and encrypted. Then you have the problem of monitoring established connections to flush the tables once a session is terminated. Port knocking adds complexity to your server, meaning more things can go wrong, and adding yet another attack vector for the intruder. Having a script to automatically update a live rule set is a recipe for disaster. It's as unuserfriendly and impractical as it gets: The more ports you have to knock the higher the probability that some packets will be filtered when you're behind somebody else's firewall. You can be most certain that you can't convince the admin of some corporate network to open up for your port knocking. Because of the build in stealth you have no way of knowing if packets are dropped or filtered. And the user will have to accept a delay for your port knocking script to update the rules. You add complexity for the user, now they have your special port knocking client, know the secret, on top of carrying around their private ssh keys etc. Port knocking suck at security: It does not solve a single existing problem but introduces a host of other problems. Use it at home for playing around and learning about protocols and stuff, but please don't give people the illusion that their security problems will be solved with port knocking. BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 10:09:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF07106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8FB8FC12 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:09:21 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABqNpUvUnw4R/2dsb2JhbACbO3O3XIR9BA Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net ([212.159.14.17]) by relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2010 10:09:20 +0000 Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1NtI5w-0007B2-8M; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:09:20 +0000 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NtI5v-0000SX-UN; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:09:20 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:09:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201003201532.48793.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <64c038661003201848o1379a891t680593cf3594b7b0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038661003201848o1379a891t680593cf3594b7b0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201003211009.19888.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: 1c364dda2ca042183442525fea0767ab Cc: Modulok Subject: Re: Copying mirrored partitions - will this work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:09:22 -0000 On Sunday 21 March 2010, Modulok wrote: > On 3/20/10, Mike Clarke wrote: [snip] > > I have two 500GB disks, /dev/ad4 and /dev/ad8, each partitioned > > into 4 slices of 88, 88, 42 and 259GB. My system is installed on > > the first slices (ad4s1 and ad8s1) which are mirrored as > > /dev/mirror/gm0. The second slices (ad4s2 and ad8s2) are currently > > unused. My thoughts are to temporarily add ad4s2 into gm0 with > > "gmirror insert gm0 ad4s2" and wait for the mirror to synchronise. > > I should then be able to remove the temporary addition with > > "gmirror remove gm0 /dev/ad4s2" at which point ad4s2 should be a > > duplicate of the original system and I can then go ahead and create > > a new mirror with "gmirror label -b load gm1 ad4s2" and "gmirror > > insert gm1 ad8s2". After editing /etc/fstab in the new mirror to > > use gm1 instead of gm0 I should then be able to boot into the > > system on slice 2 and upgrade it to STABLE while still keeping my > > original system to fall back to if required. > How valuable is your data? In financial terms not very, but still valuable enough to not want to lose it. > I recommend you make an offline backup. Yes, I take regular backups but regard them as the "emergency parachute" and prefer to not put myself in a position where I'm doing something risky and the backup files are the only protection, so I'll be making additional backups anyway. > There's a lot of steps in > your procedure which introduce room for error. Yes, it's a bit of unknown territory for me but with 6 partitions on the slice it does require fewer potentially dangerous manual steps (like newfs or restore to the wrong device) so looks like an interesting experiment. > You could perhaps > disconnect one of the hard drive's data cable (same thing). Also, > make a backup copy of your geom meta data somewhere. That's a possibility to consider but would result in additional changes to the mirror configuration, something I'd prefer to keep to a minimum. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 10:11:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3452106566C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from atmail-8.bnguk.net (atmail-8.bnguk.net [80.74.253.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8DC8FC13 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 77-44-105-82.xdsl.murphx.net ([77.44.105.82] helo=melon.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-8.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtI8A-0004iH-AD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0000 Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF05BFCA4B4; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:37 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 i386 X-Organisation: 'http://www.shute.org.uk/' Subject: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:41 -0000 Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting the power on button had no effect as did using another known working outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it in and again no joy - no sign of life. Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy way to replace it. My hardware: Antec Sonata case. Gigabyte board. Core 2 duo TIA, Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 10:33:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B207106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abalour@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0688F8FC14 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so2464919gwj.13 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:33:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qjk0YTR1Joo4yFPQ6Jp6N6OLicnFhD6yGtszjAwNnRU=; b=tMWLxArZldID/vCMLNz9T4S8IBXKcUuqfTN2aBhmyutYkSAHIgfyEhgPyNDfR053uK Nnivz3Sv1yl/xNQKbEhhg3UeNyO3FMi2LcnO16g0HuamWGDRuityA7fjUakUanFuJsyH 9WxBYQ0PXGBrRKY9E83aZ1O4sp3lc4z7jrbPo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PkyEazzGvlsCCNf4Op9TPCsQ4chK0+vWcc+fO9ToWd6WkFKUYxPzWom6hKbsbiqCoy dJfCTGTpfyzySJOu/aLZU0IuUToM1MVuZU9onq56JZPWQC0eLMd5ugWx2apo0DrFFtbs s+ReojDsnVViEGtg2B7034bkKH7SLSF0NcZvc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.23.5 with SMTP id a5mr12860785anj.158.1269167591341; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:33:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> From: Ross Cameron Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:32:51 +0200 Message-ID: <35f70db11003210332w79faa5a9x2ae380ebe9b8095d@mail.gmail.com> To: Frank Shute , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ross.cameron@linuxpro.co.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:33:12 -0000 The easiest way to check if its the power switch is detach the "PWR" switch connector from the mobo and briefly short the two pins. If the machine turns on its ure switch, however that is probably unlikely - Ive never seen it before at least. Check ure mobo for popped caps,... remove ure ram and cpu and clean all relevant connectors with compressed air. Disconnect everything not needed for the mobo to power up while ure at = it. I had a workstation the other day that had a dead HDD that was preventing it from powering up, as soon as I removed the HDD the mobo powered up. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Frank Shute wrote: > Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. > > I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting > the power on button had no effect as did using another known working > outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. > > I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it > in and again no joy - no sign of life. > > Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > way to replace it. > > My hardware: > > Antec Sonata case. > Gigabyte board. > Core 2 duo > > TIA, > > Regards, > > -- > > =C2=A0Frank > > > =C2=A0Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 "Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 11:19:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47B11065676 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C7B8FC23 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so223394fgg.13 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:19:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-length:x-uid :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=g4VJa5hmH82wYdcmlnPl4s9j1C3bsoVgPmHaZnpxK1A=; b=hee/WaehubO0v33q4EzJblsqUIWBxsnZdoxRuqd52QdH2lWfs7iasa5B4sRO6sz5pQ hWBdtjRJNQMK6pzo1GmcAvaqgDBNLGtK5dw7ZER74mV7MJtYakLxcaSwAEcZxjhbvXOF /JRNWog2OWTyUwJ/INU2UuJk9hEwvAFWQeu9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-length:x-uid:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=QPwMwHMWnk09+cIkOmRNqOULBOFJf29YeSHI9+9VU0IvMbAoH36HmSQp5Uej4YPf3M InZvvmGJt7y0sHa5aiIPaR5djpgvW7ZnDBFp9PfZpjG43juOzhtyb37RDiVuZUPffrce V3lO8j7s67I3MhcIGfeei5SkqCbyo5mlKpRIc= Received: by 10.87.74.23 with SMTP id b23mr9277402fgl.33.1269170349975; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hulk.l.ttyv0.net (80-219-19-168.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.19.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm2782894fgb.7.2010.03.21.04.19.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:19:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Anselm Strauss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:18:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.3.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201003071456.15638.amsibamsi@gmail.com> <201003071129.17644.jpaetzel@freebsd.org> <4B982111.9090005@pcbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <4B982111.9090005@pcbsd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Length: 3350 X-UID: 521 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003211218.27125.amsibamsi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: KDE firefox integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:19:11 -0000 On Wednesday 10 March 2010 23:45:37 you wrote: > On 03/07/2010 12:29, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > On Sunday 07 March 2010 10:53:29 Anselm Strauss wrote: > >> On Sunday 07 March 2010 15:52:30 Josh Paetzel wrote: > >>> On Sunday 07 March 2010 08:13:53 Elias Chrysoheris wrote: > >>>> On Sunday 07 of March 2010 15:56:15 Anselm Strauss wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> I noticed that in PC-BSD 8 firefox is nicely integrated into KDE. > >>>>> Anybody knows how to achieve this on FreeBSD 8? > >>>>> > >>>>> Anselm > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>>>> > >>>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>>> > >>>> I believe you mean that you need KDE to open Firefox whenever you > >>>> click on a link. That's easy. From your KDE menu, open "System > >>>> Settings" (in the first tab, "favorites") > >>>> Then select "Default Applications". Then, in the left list of the > >>>> applications, choose "Web browser", and at the right part of the > >>>> screen choose the radio button "in the following browser" and in the > >>>> edit box enter the "/usr/local/bin/firefox3". Then apply the new > >>>> settings. > >>>> > >>>> Elias > >>> > >>> Another trick that PC-BSD uses....which might be more of what you are > >>> > >>> asking about is the installation of a port called > >>> x11-themes/gtk-qt4-engine This port allows gtk applications to be > >>> displayed using qt, which helps integrate the look of things like FF, > >>> Thunderbird, OOo with KDE. > >> > >> I already installed the gtk-qt4-engine, but it has some serious bugs. > >> Scroll bars are not painted, tab borders are painted at the wrong > >> position, etc. Could this be because I modified some of KDEs appearance > >> options? > > The gtk-qt4-engine works great here, not run into those problems you > describe. Check the gtk-qt4-engine configuration gui in KDE4's system > settings though, there is a fix you can enable to fix scrollbar issues. > > >> Are there any other integration tweaks, like icons, keyboard shortcuts, > >> file chooser dialog, ... ? > > We've not modified anything else like that, just standard stuff. > > >> Thanks, > >> Anselm > > Kris Moore > PC-BSD Software > http://www.pcbsd.com > I think I found a rather complete guide of firefox integration in KDE on: http://digitizor.com/2009/09/20/a-complete-guide-to-firefox-integration-in-kubuntu/ Unfortunately a lot of it is not working for me in FreeBSD 8. The gtk-qt4-engine stuff constantly produces high CPU usage after I close firefox. At least it does not crash or freeze. Also, I don't see any changes in fonts at all, and in the GUI when I already have enabled a KDE theme in firefox. When I enable the FlashGot plugin there is also a constant very high CPU usage after startup. And for the printing I can't find kprinter in KDE 4.3.5. For now, I will just use a KDE theme in firefox and enable the KDE file chooser dialog ... ;-( Thanks for the help, Anselm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 11:23:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B331065670 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9708FC12 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4A203296087C5587 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 Message-ID: <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:36 -0000 Frank Shute wrote: > Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. > > I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting > the power on button had no effect as did using another known working > outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. > > I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it > in and again no joy - no sign of life. > > Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > way to replace it. > > My hardware: > > Antec Sonata case. > Gigabyte board. > Core 2 duo > > TIA, > > Regards, > When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 12:24:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAC4106566C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from atmail-8.bnguk.net (atmail-8.bnguk.net [80.74.253.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C07D8FC18 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 77-44-105-82.xdsl.murphx.net ([77.44.105.82] helo=melon.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-8.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtKCV-0003rn-M1; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:15 +0000 Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3DFD6FCA4B4; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:15 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:15 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Chris Whitehouse Message-ID: <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Whitehouse , FreeBSD Questions References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 i386 X-Organisation: 'http://www.shute.org.uk/' Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:18 -0000 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:23:34AM +0000, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > Frank Shute wrote: > >Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. > > > >I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting > >the power on button had no effect as did using another known working > >outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. > > > >I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it > >in and again no joy - no sign of life. > > > >Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > >the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > >way to replace it. > > > >My hardware: > > > >Antec Sonata case. > >Gigabyte board. > >Core 2 duo > > > >TIA, > > > >Regards, > > > > When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan > spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged > in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. > When I hit the power button I get nothing. None of the fans spin up and there's no sign of life. I'm beginning to think that I might be in for a new motherboard anyway :( Why do these things strike when you least need them? Damn Murphy and his stinking law! Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 13:01:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3701065673 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.221.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B728FC1F for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so3032335qyk.13 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:01:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.223.140 with SMTP id ik12mr653330qcb.98.1269176477959; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:01:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:01:17 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 446c322ffcdfebb3 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:01:19 -0000 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Frank Shute wrote: > Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. > > I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting > the power on button had no effect as did using another known working > outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. > > I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it > in and again no joy - no sign of life. > > Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > way to replace it. > I had this happen recently (BTW it was FBSD server ;-) )! I took _everything_ appart, and then assembled it little by little checking at each step. Incredibly it just workd after reseating the CPU, RAM, and re-connecting every single component. Also, I swapped components with a similar machine for testing which will help you test the components on a known-working machine. Good luck, Alejandro Imass > My hardware: > > Antec Sonata case. > Gigabyte board. > Core 2 duo > > TIA, > > Regards, > > -- > > =A0Frank > > > =A0Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 13:08:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D70B106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A878FC17 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31300 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2010 13:08:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Mar 2010 13:08:52 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD89250832 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:08:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E64811CCE5; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:08:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:08:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> (Frank Shute's message of "Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:24:15 +0000") Message-ID: <441vfdstyb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:53 -0000 Frank Shute writes: > When I hit the power button I get nothing. None of the fans spin up > and there's no sign of life. Well, that's not a *good* sign... ;-) > I'm beginning to think that I might be in for a new motherboard anyway :( I think you can safely conclude it isn't an OS problem, at any rate. Don't try a new motherboard yet, though. If the system is critical and you're really desperate to get it back up ASAP, I'd go with a whole brand-new system. That's to protect against the possibility that the motherboard isn't the source of the problem, in which case you could waste time fixing the wrong thing, and possibly even damage a new motherboard before you recognize the real problem. If you can afford a little more time to isolate the trouble, try disconnecting the power to the motherboard to make sure the power supply starts up (I think someone else suggested this earlier, albeit for a slightly more likely set of symptoms). If not, and if you have a multimeter, make sure that there's voltage across the switch, and that there isn't when the switch closes. > Why do these things strike when you least need them? Damn Murphy and > his stinking law! Murphy never said anything about *when* things go wrong... Sorry if I've gone overboard in following your jocular tone. I realize that you might be feeling desperate by now, particularly if the machine really is critical. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 13:15:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F811065670 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3C38FC0C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so780912qwi.7 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:15:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.218.203 with SMTP id hr11mr3025648qcb.85.1269177322500; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100320184228.M62623@brightstar.bomgardner.net> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:15:22 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9e07eb79e899b5d6 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: AMD 64 X2 - Dual Core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:15:24 -0000 On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:35 PM, krad wrote: > I totally disagree with using the 32bit unless you have a specific > need or potentially if you are running it as a desktop. 64 everytime > for servers for loads of reasons. If you are running less than 4 gig > their is a fair chance you will in the next few years > I second Krad, though 64bit may use considerably more RAM in general, but the overall computing throughput is very much worth it. We use AMD 64 in all our HW for several years now and are _very happy_, both FBSD and Linux. Best, Alejandro Imass > On 3/20/10, Gene wrote: >> Hi - >> I just got a board with an AMD Athlon 64 X2 cpu. I was wondering - >> >> 1) Is the amd64 8.0 release the fbsd of choice here? >> >> and >> >> 2) Does it take advantage of the athlon's dual cores? >> >> Thanks, >> >> IHN, >> Gene >> >> -- >> To everything there is a season, >> And a time to every purpose under heaven. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 13:21:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3592B1065688 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:21:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E65B28FC26 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15037 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2010 13:21:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=enf/CMTbtuHN9/rPEhBTobBFxtXTpuGulVsZvOGW4vo0N55H4otip3wC2go5BckvJLz4iAHpJ1XlkwAfQVB7aJxRs1DaErRvx4n8PkWHqTY6aBZvilQjCJyHZNd2C4ab/lh0GbXqxVPnzBgF0nSJgeOrkXkLo/MAlNSgYt0OQhk= ; Received: from napoleon.localnet (mike.jeays@99.224.61.141 with plain) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2010 06:21:38 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- X-YMail-OSG: EHRpiG0VM1nXpzzcHrGsPyZRHe.kvUuqrm5Ty1.ZS3KazUAE62GgqXShK2SrkfBQtA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Mike Jeays To: Chris Whitehouse , FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:21:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003210921.35408.mike.jeays@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:21:39 -0000 On March 21, 2010 08:24:15 am Frank Shute wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:23:34AM +0000, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > Frank Shute wrote: > > >Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. > > > > > >I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting > > >the power on button had no effect as did using another known working > > >outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. > > > > > >I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it > > >in and again no joy - no sign of life. > > > > > >Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > > >the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > > >way to replace it. > > > > > >My hardware: > > > > > >Antec Sonata case. > > >Gigabyte board. > > >Core 2 duo > > > > > >TIA, > > > > > >Regards, > > > > When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan > > spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged > > in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. > > When I hit the power button I get nothing. None of the fans spin up > and there's no sign of life. > > I'm beginning to think that I might be in for a new motherboard anyway :( > > Why do these things strike when you least need them? Damn Murphy and > his stinking law! > > > Regards, It sounds more like a dead power supply to me, if there is no sign of any activity at all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 13:53:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374C9106564A; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f228.google.com (mail-bw0-f228.google.com [209.85.218.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E268FC13; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz28 with SMTP id 28so4151869bwz.14 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:53:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=siMSZo5nr4uHTacpuKBtx27xPajaLbIp8OL6RyQiz90=; b=qTdX7h8J0O3m2jAiRWRmGNwymwAKuDiP1e10dh/m5zYa5Pw5wPiEbZYU65RkXTaW/j yEGXdkSRWdHKKH3JjGsXQqbkqr2KNYbEf1cbtBGJlny7vh0+s3UJonpQjoyQfH3Zdo1C A9OdumHKO0ZM+F1fyCKmj/dbgqytzg8ti27jk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TJ255XjXE9mURjnifyOiQPn7dMOAM9aySEPrt48nd8d0SopuqseoCNXsTyGe1JyxIy 6DMOxhZhWP91JQS4zxV2hRizi3wgg7vaiR5Qd0VT3uqcDc+ju5hckUuPweS6d0Yg0DqG HrxfIeJyeViIwx71l5EAprS6j89+OEg1HRxFk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.85 with SMTP id w21mr3355485bks.174.1269179596110; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:53:16 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:53:18 -0000 What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) in base does not support this directly, so I would have to either use a custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to GENERIC so I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too much configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and throttle it (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). Are there any sftp servers with directly built-in functionality for this? I just would to be able to set limits for upload speed globally for the entire server and preferably to also be able to do speed settings on a per-user basis. Thanks. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 14:16:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECD11065672 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDA08FC25 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so2842278wwb.13 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:16:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=y2YlQ6V6atRaS0w/kQvAFWy4fBwOT1+dz12OCb8ekOs=; b=R9eJHwHD3g7BQu7j0tz9SzmezDepNKNlf19zDwmCXaT1ULt8xXUkg9aFk3jYqPqGQJ W+9INKwOsUbzDFTNZUVXXjokE/c3/O5kHy/JDACS9f3vCWYuLt+KFsteseeTQiu12amV +9xj7UnM8iegani/APDJCkbL/4EDA67xQdZnE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; b=r3JNXPHlpQ2zsboQasc28N8WDNzCSn5A46DFKTtmAazr19DEIw3OVmz9Uo3woIZG4+ GZpqCYxds2+xhJXBVhKvjP7olDBCPYjbWdNvDtoJxPRGkL60jK/aCtd9b2UOrKv5Gf7D 5vBzkm7uaz7p7qWvSuM/tCKvbBCmT3yqjAq5Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.83 with SMTP id x61mr720611wee.7.1269180983242; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:16:22 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Gary Kline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: shell script to cap first letter? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:16:25 -0000 >i'm wondering if there is a script that i could run my plaintext >files thru that would capitalize thef first letter of each >sentence [[ assuming the character wasn't already a cap!]] > >more and more, in recent years, i have posted questions or >written things that have been sloppily or casually hacked >together in all lower case. this filter would have to determine >what was and was not a sentence. or a sentence fragment. >[ai]spell can catch "i've" and suggest "I've", etc. You're asking a lot from a simple filter if you want it to discriminate between uses of "." to terminate a sentence, and other uses of "." that do not require the following word to be capitalized, such as the use of "." in abbreviations -- a lot of fairly sophisticated spelling and grammar checkers can fail to do this reliably. But if you want a naive filter you could use textproc/gsed, with the /U GNU extension (our BSD sed(1) doesn't understand it), e.g.: gsed -e 's|\(\.[.[:space:].]\)\([a-z]\)|\1\U\2|g' or you could use BSD sed(1), together with a more cumbersome capitalization script, like the cflword[12345].sed scripts at: http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/scripts/#txfo Or you could use Perl. Or awk(1). Or script a [non-]interactive call to a more sophisticated spelling or grammar checker. Or roll your own. For questions like this, try searching the web first. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 17:31:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAB9106566C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51D38FC17 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2LHVVhS035209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:31:38 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA657F3.9060400@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:31:31 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:31:43 -0000 On 21/03/2010 13:53:16, Dan Naumov wrote: > What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed > throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) in > base does not support this directly, so I would have to either use a > custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to GENERIC so > I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too much > configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and throttle it > (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). That's not an either-or. ALTQ is PF's traffic shaping mechanism. Unfortunately, yes, ALTQ needs to be compiled into the kernel rather than being loaded as a .ko. Also, PF cannot distinguish sftp traffic from other ssh traffic: all you can do is rate limit port 22 stuff. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 18:27:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C679D106566C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from atmail-10.bnguk.net (atmail-10.bnguk.net [80.74.253.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2B58FC12 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 77-44-105-82.xdsl.murphx.net ([77.44.105.82] helo=melon.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-10.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtPrT-0001Q3-EM; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:26:55 +0000 Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3CEF9FCA4B4; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:26:55 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:26:55 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20100321182655.GA18786@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Lowell Gilbert , FreeBSD Questions References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <441vfdstyb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <441vfdstyb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 i386 X-Organisation: 'http://www.shute.org.uk/' Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:27:12 -0000 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Frank Shute writes: > > > When I hit the power button I get nothing. None of the fans spin up > > and there's no sign of life. > > Well, that's not a *good* sign... ;-) > > > I'm beginning to think that I might be in for a new motherboard anyway :( > > I think you can safely conclude it isn't an OS problem, at any rate. Yep. FreeBSD doesn't even have a chance to get going! > > Don't try a new motherboard yet, though. > > If the system is critical and you're really desperate to get it back up > ASAP, I'd go with a whole brand-new system. That's to protect against > the possibility that the motherboard isn't the source of the problem, > in which case you could waste time fixing the wrong thing, and possibly > even damage a new motherboard before you recognize the real problem. No, it's not critical. I run 2 machines nowadays, the other tentatively a server but I keep X and associated progs on it up to date for scenarios like the present. > > If you can afford a little more time to isolate the trouble, try > disconnecting the power to the motherboard to make sure the power supply > starts up (I think someone else suggested this earlier, albeit for a > slightly more likely set of symptoms). If not, and if you have a > multimeter, make sure that there's voltage across the switch, and that > there isn't when the switch closes. The power supply should be good but the switch is a possibility so I'll test that. > > > Why do these things strike when you least need them? Damn Murphy and > > his stinking law! > > Murphy never said anything about *when* things go wrong... But the swine said they *would* go wrong...;) > > Sorry if I've gone overboard in following your jocular tone. I realize > that you might be feeling desperate by now, particularly if the machine > really is critical. > As I say, it's not critical but I'd like to get it going. There is always a bit of data on it which is missing on the server and besides that it's the machine that's tweaked to my preferences. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 19:55:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB880106566C; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FD68FC08; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbook.local ([10.0.0.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2LJt0Vm045536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:01 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA67994.1000506@unsane.co.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:00 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:03 -0000 On 21/03/2010 13:53, Dan Naumov wrote: > What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed > throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) in > base does not support this directly, so I would have to either use a > custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to GENERIC so > I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too much > configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and throttle it > (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). > > Are there any sftp servers with directly built-in functionality for > this? I just would to be able to set limits for upload speed globally > for the entire server and preferably to also be able to do speed > settings on a per-user basis. > A quick google indicates there are at least 2 sftp servers with this functionality, http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html http://mysecureshell.sourceforge.net/en/index.html Proftpd with mod_sftp needs the proftp-devel port so I'm guessing its still in testing but at least its in ports. No idea about the mysecureshell program, its not in ports. I havent actually tried with of these so no idea how well they work, good luck. Vince > Thanks. > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 20:17:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1191065670 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@icsmx.com) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479B78FC0A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC1122.icsmx.com (189.216.60.170) by icsmx.com with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:18:31 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:17:45 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:17:51 -0000 Hello all. I have been talking with a Linux guy (you know the never ending kind of war, my Linuxreligion is better than your Freebsdreligion, easier to install , upgrade blah blah blah). Anyway, talking about the best option for filtering spam and having an email solution for personal simple use (small office, 3-4 people) that sendmail could be the simples and the best option to follow, with some rules like spamcop, rbl , etc, could be fine. I said that I am not sure but that even spamassin could be configured to run under send mail or if that does not work that to move from sendmail to another could be the solution and not so difficult, like postfix. Am I wrong? could be that movement easy to do? I mean to move from sendmail to postfix to be able to have spamassasin run. Or it is better to have that solution (have mail server with spam filters) could be get with some other mix of software and tools? (of course my linux friend says that they have rpm's ready to solve that even when do not know how it works, not interested in that) Can you comment on your experience to accomplish this? Thank in advance and I am sorry if this sound too basic. Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 20:24:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757061065676 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FA88FC0A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2LKO6MC093705; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:24:06 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: bf1783@gmail.com Message-ID: <20100321202406.GB92695@thought.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ethic.thought.org Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: shell script to cap first letter? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:24:10 -0000 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:16:22AM -0400, b. f. wrote: > >i'm wondering if there is a script that i could run my plaintext > >files thru that would capitalize thef first letter of each > >sentence [[ assuming the character wasn't already a cap!]] > > > >more and more, in recent years, i have posted questions or > >written things that have been sloppily or casually hacked > >together in all lower case. this filter would have to determine > >what was and was not a sentence. or a sentence fragment. > >[ai]spell can catch "i've" and suggest "I've", etc. > > You're asking a lot from a simple filter if you want it to > discriminate between uses of "." to terminate a sentence, and other > uses of "." that do not require the following word to be capitalized, > such as the use of "." in abbreviations -- a lot of fairly > sophisticated spelling and grammar checkers can fail to do this > reliably. But if you want a naive filter you could use textproc/gsed, > with the /U GNU extension (our BSD sed(1) doesn't understand it), > e.g.: > > gsed -e 's|\(\.[.[:space:].]\)\([a-z]\)|\1\U\2|g' > > or you could use BSD sed(1), together with a more cumbersome > capitalization script, like the cflword[12345].sed scripts at: > > http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/scripts/#txfo > > Or you could use Perl. Or awk(1). Or script a [non-]interactive call > to a more sophisticated spelling or grammar checker. Or roll your own. > For questions like this, try searching the web first. > > b. given the sheer i.q. power ofthis list, i almost always ask here first rather thsan hunting for something this obscure. thanks for the url, tho. i'm pretty sure than *someone* has hacked every imagineable function in at least this universe. too bad that there are no web sites that have a library of them. gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 7.79a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 20:26:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7DA1065672 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580288FC16 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.51]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vvpl1d00516LCl053wR0Dc; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:25:00 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vwSl1d0021f6R9u3SwSlva; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:26:47 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:26:43 -0700 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:26:43 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20100321202642.GA52032@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Lowell Gilbert References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <20100321122415.GA8495@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <441vfdstyb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20100321182655.GA18786@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100321182655.GA18786@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:26:49 -0000 On Sun 21 Mar 2010 at 11:26:55 PDT Frank Shute wrote: >On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >> Murphy never said anything about *when* things go wrong... > >But the swine said they *would* go wrong...;) Hey, don't shoot the messenger! On second thought, perhaps that would be an object lesson for Mr. Murphy, to let him know that sometimes things will go unexpectedly and undeservedly wrong for him too. ;-) Here's hoping your machine is easily and cheaply recoverable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 21:19:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095F01065670 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89028FC08 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so1236101pxi.14 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:19:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=RzoPAzUXL7QACmFjrjQK/7B9XWU5vT7S9AcFx12bsAI=; b=Q0NUoCztSSHN94affpJdOF+YvkJi5o77lD83ZybJLauXRNmat7k3XWMJ/sWOrnSoNY kYW+OUkc0d/BCMKJP9YrhyrD+mxtSaMjoeCzMU3ATifgHpaQbJ4XnGb1btn1Ig3qIZQA T9nsvmZlyMcuB6JdbpXoYb6u3yEN4lEvhS37c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=R5j5X8PRAtZyPG+Z5hCPQdRm3W4a8OgX4riwaz1qBiThNjhWnhe42tBZ3tb6Rac0ci 2uwUpV+cmOTqHWJfNig91/9BGzCrGRzJ3UkKlpJZj7WAj3PRTejzMdi83zACjTAdEaks JoC2EBXH40Sxxm2HXjBDoHe4dEPpYKSuQcIpo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.11 with SMTP id u11mr1872051wfh.205.1269206344298; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:19:04 -0600 Message-ID: <64c038661003211419j5815ac92q8d93eb4f9960162b@mail.gmail.com> From: Modulok To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Wireless access point rc.conf syntax in FreeBSD 8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:19:06 -0000 I have a wireless network card. But I can't configure it. I read in UPDATING that this had to do with some split up of the wireless drivers into software/hardware interfaces? Something to do with me having to clone the interface before I can configure it? There was no mention of this in the handbook wireless section that I saw. Anyway, I want to run it as an access point, not a client. The ral driver supports this, but I'm not sure on the rc.conf synax for creating an access point out of it. Could anyone point to some access-point-like examples? Thanks! -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 21:53:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373ED106564A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subscriber+freebsd@markshroyer.com) Received: from frodo.paleogene.net (frodo.paleogene.net [206.125.175.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168798FC17 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from auth-client.paleogene.net (auth-client.paleogene.net [206.125.175.178]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by frodo.paleogene.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F40C33F416 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:53:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=markshroyer.com; s=default; t=1269208426; bh=PDDwHNC6EvoRonJI7Terl6SC+X1mEeMdnX9wpmAjRtc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dsT9X7X3m1PGa9uthZeBFiflB0t5uoEArP/nuR8PJoBSne4+9CGYlmC5yJ8ZRNp09 ArDhs0D7huoadcChSyTFidLXPR1Trx3ukXMzkV+RarQhi8SHPObJfDk+NNCrluHohG 89fDLs9KZFnRLyAtn0UAnvi/m7W7WddwUoBa6VJk= Message-ID: <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:53:42 -0400 From: Mark Shroyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:53:47 -0000 On 3/21/2010 1:10 AM, Aiza wrote: > I don't have sources installed on my system. Just use the binary > Freebsd-update function. At new releases I do a clean install. > I only have a single public IP address. > > Now I would like to play with jails. One for postfix, apache, and ftp. > My reading of EZJAIL and the jails section of the handbook lead me to > believe I need a unique IP address for each jail. Is that correct? Yes. But if you have only one public IP address, you can give the jail a loopback interface with an address in 127.0.0/24 or one of the RFC 1918 private blocks (there's some debate as to which is the more "correct" type of address to use, but either will work), then use NAT if you need your jail to be able to access the Internet. If it helps you to reason about this, keep in mind that your jail does *not* have its own virtualized network stack, like with Solaris Zones for instance. The best way to think about your jails is as a group of processes running on the same operating system as the host, just with the restriction that (among other things) they can only communicate with the outside world using a limited subset of the IP addresses available to non-jailed processes. > I have no need to build world or install world because it does this from > /usr/src which i don't install. Is there some EZJAIL option to just copy > over the running system binaries instead of the sources? Until recently, the method for creating ezjail's "basejail" was to issue the "ezjail-admin update" command, which compiles the basejail from /usr/src. Just recently an "ezjail-admin install" command was added, which downloads binaries from a FreeBSD FTP server instead. So you shouldn't need sources to get started, however I'm not sure what the update mechanism is if you use the install command. > The handbook "15.4 Creating and Controlling Jails" talks about > “complete” jails, which resemble a real FreeBSD system, and “service” > jails, dedicated to one application or service. Section 15.4 is the > procedure for building a "complete jail" using the jail command. > > The 15.6 Application of Jails (service jails) talks about creating a > root skeleton containing the host running files which are shared with > all the guest jails in read only mode. This eliminates the massive > duplication of running system files in each jail as in the complete jail > system talked about in handbook section "15.4 Creating and Controlling > Jails". > > Now reading the ezjail man pages I see that ezjail also creates a base > template that is shared between all jails. Is this the same method > talked about in the handbook section 15.6 Application of Jails (service > jail)? It's essentially the same approach. (With ezjail you'll still be duplicating binaries between the host system and the basejail, but I wouldn't loose sleep over it.) -- Mark Shroyer http://markshroyer.com/contact/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 22:16:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798A3106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E358FC28 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtTRt-0002pj-9e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:16:45 +0100 Received: from pool-68-239-65-75.res.east.verizon.net ([68.239.65.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:16:45 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-68-239-65-75.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:16:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:16:07 -0400 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-68-239-65-75.res.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:16:47 -0000 Mark Shroyer wrote: > On 3/21/2010 1:10 AM, Aiza wrote: >> I don't have sources installed on my system. Just use the binary >> Freebsd-update function. At new releases I do a clean install. >> I only have a single public IP address. >> >> Now I would like to play with jails. One for postfix, apache, and ftp. >> My reading of EZJAIL and the jails section of the handbook lead me to >> believe I need a unique IP address for each jail. Is that correct? > > Yes. But if you have only one public IP address, you can give the jail > a loopback interface with an address in 127.0.0/24 or one of the RFC > 1918 private blocks (there's some debate as to which is the more > "correct" type of address to use, but either will work), then use NAT if > you need your jail to be able to access the Internet. > > If it helps you to reason about this, keep in mind that your jail does > *not* have its own virtualized network stack, like with Solaris Zones > for instance. The best way to think about your jails is as a group of > processes running on the same operating system as the host, just with > the restriction that (among other things) they can only communicate with > the outside world using a limited subset of the IP addresses available > to non-jailed processes. > You might find the below interesting. Only just begun reading/studying it myself. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#KERNEL [snip] -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 22:59:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CE9106566C for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913BD8FC08 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AAF1CC1A; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:59:20 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4BA6A4C7.30703@hdk5.net> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:59:19 -1000 From: Al Plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:59:21 -0000 Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Frank Shute wrote: >> Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. >> >> I came in the other day to find my workstation powered off. Hitting >> the power on button had no effect as did using another known working >> outlet. I checked all the cables and they seem attached. >> >> I thought my power supply must have died so I got another, screwed it >> in and again no joy - no sign of life. >> >> Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly >> the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy >> way to replace it. >> > > I had this happen recently (BTW it was FBSD server ;-) )! I took > _everything_ appart, and then assembled it little by little checking > at each step. Incredibly it just workd after reseating the CPU, RAM, > and re-connecting every single component. Also, I swapped components > with a similar machine for testing which will help you test the > components on a known-working machine. > > > Good luck, > Alejandro Imass > >> My hardware: >> >> Antec Sonata case. >> Gigabyte board. >> Core 2 duo >> >> TIA, >> >> Regards, >> >> -- ############ Aloha, Like Alejandro did two weeks ago I replaced a mobo that acted the same way. I took the old board apart one device at a time and it remained dead until I removed the CPU and and reseated it and up she came. This desktop is in an un-airconditioned house here in Hawaii and we get cool nights in the Winter months and warm days. Components walk out of the sockets I think from the temperature changes and corrosion from the tropic air. You may want to see if this is the problem. ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* + < email: noc@hdk5.net > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 23:04:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AA3106564A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1A68FC19 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbook.local ([10.0.0.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2LN4qlQ063270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:04:52 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA6A614.3040907@unsane.co.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:04:52 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:04:54 -0000 On 21/03/2010 21:53, Mark Shroyer wrote: > Until recently, the method for creating ezjail's "basejail" was to issue > the "ezjail-admin update" command, which compiles the basejail from > /usr/src. Just recently an "ezjail-admin install" command was added, > which downloads binaries from a FreeBSD FTP server instead. So you > shouldn't need sources to get started, however I'm not sure what the > update mechanism is if you use the install command. > > you can use ezjail-admin update -u which uses freebsd-update, for some reason this isnt in the manpage. Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 23:44:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29814106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B738FC0A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9865B1DE540; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:44:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Jorge Biquez References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.3.14; tzolkin = 12 Ix; haab = 12 Cumku Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:44:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> (Jorge Biquez's message of "Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:17:45 -0600") Message-ID: <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:44:22 -0000 >>>>> "Jorge" == Jorge Biquez writes: Jorge> I said that I am not sure but that even spamassin could be configured Jorge> to run under send mail or if that does not work that to move from Jorge> sendmail to another could be the solution and not so difficult, like Jorge> postfix. Am I wrong? could be that movement easy to do? I mean to move Jorge> from sendmail to postfix to be able to have spamassasin run. Or it is Jorge> better to have that solution (have mail server with spam filters) could Jorge> be get with some other mix of software and tools? (of course my linux Jorge> friend says that they have rpm's ready to solve that even when do not Jorge> know how it works, not interested in that) Once I discovered postfix, my opinion with sendmail is "never again!". Postfix has a readable config file (with comments!) that doesn't require "compiling" into the proper syntax. Postfix understands and plays well with things like content-filters, RBLs, dovecot (and others) for SSL. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 23:50:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC02106564A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA8C8FC1F for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18E53A3888; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:50:08 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269215408; x= 1271029808; bh=MzSbAJ7OGgChsyS1qwvw5fF0OD4DBuCQywkKraB0rYY=; b=G 1tNVjePtxglZZzp+VQxHYzQ5mLvS94ATId5Qo7FiyXTjtM6MtS5xjKibyvaC/LRa RSWolOIc9EmndmFqMq0eXsiTisyFF1XMH5e5dvyvpM1FyZEArNe0ed2zg6EY8+5N d9ud/rjXxrle8Bwc2IWYEPHmr9vedWlu8YP9W8zoa0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id n9KuYqIW3Ljx; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:50:08 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F8A3A3839; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:50:08 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2LNo6GQ015829; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:50:06 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:50:06 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003212350.o2LNo6GQ015829@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: frank@shute.org.uk In-reply-to: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> (message from Frank Shute on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:37 +0000) References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:50:10 -0000 > Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > way to replace it. Check if teh power on button is not stucked in the pushed position, it happens on old cases that the plastic get old and dusty and the putton will not pop out as it should. And I came to some mother board that would not start is if the power button is pushed while the power cable is pluged in. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 00:00:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B367106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93F48FC13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8273A3888; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:00:04 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269216004; x= 1271030404; bh=ZKE0d8KADZ/WbUlCT/qAE7EbFY8kwGQzK7QmeAF17Nw=; b=k QKxoh7RbVwxGJy0uVaLPdvTOWJjeO5EEbGHTxcvBGMaBWQd/IZofcpPIAXl9xh+Q 3zdlgVQUHeNsXUE9hwTHig6+RWUM5AMBcqYUFEf1iqwydhydQtgCXz8JI4e7dFC8 q6vmerbk+rAa670ZdavBozIXqso6qwnXaPPzxNTtVk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DmM48J2S7D6U; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:00:04 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08DCF3A3839; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:00:04 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M003cg016869; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:00:03 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:00:03 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003220000.o2M003cg016869@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: frank@shute.org.uk In-reply-to: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> (message from Frank Shute on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:11:37 +0000) References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:06 -0000 > Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > way to replace it. In the process of dis-assembling the machine and re-assembling is, you may want to use a rubber to clean the contacts on the RAM and various boards. I use one of those white rubbers for pencil, remeber to remove the dust before you put the card in the machine. While assembling the CPU do not forget the thermo paste between the CPU and the heat skin, do not over use it, a thin layer is enough. You can check the CPU by shorting the light green and light blue wires from the main connector (that would be 2nd and 4th from one end; but colour are always light green 2nd and light blue 4th so far I have seen), see if the fan on the power unit turn on. Be carefull, while this is only 2 or 3 volts, your are delaing with a unit connected to the main power. paper clip is a good way to do the test. Good luck, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 00:05:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0F8106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDF48FC1B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6063A3888; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:05:13 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269216313; x= 1271030713; bh=DcwQtiChjHc9BbSNrEhNuUOY61JTWeqnp2iLEtl0CnA=; b=F Y7XBDGzFXxo4mkp7zKKt9rgsUHP3TghHI47gOH+Bl5763/gGD9UWwPof/mZgqhN+ Fn477aVxGOlT8YtUj1PYyOiuUTtKq81wFuwpu+Iv73sVrQvxIYREP7yNUGAcSspz zYsvun0P583YazuvHdSwSZ5X6rOpZgvlRP/DeBOFKY= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id qRW2cCSK27ue; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:05:13 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76E33A3839; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:05:12 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M05BTl017397; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:05:11 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:05:11 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003220005.o2M05BTl017397@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jbiquez@icsmx.com In-reply-to: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> (message from Jorge Biquez on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:17:45 -0600) References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:05:14 -0000 > I said that I am not sure but that even > spamassin could be configured to run under send mail or if that does > not work that to move from sendmail to another could be the solution > and not so difficult, like postfix. Of course it can. In the ports you have a thing called spammilter? that is just what you want. I beleive there are little things that you can do with POstfix that you coul dnot do with sendmail, only writting a filter for Postfix is way easier than writting a milter for sendmail, so that is why there are mor eready made Postfix filters than sendmail milters. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 00:21:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF481065676 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4987D8FC13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:21:39 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtomAI5UpkvKRa39OWdsb2JhbAAHmz4BAQEBNwa5KIR9BIMc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,284,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10533433" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp5.comclark.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2010 08:21:38 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:21:35 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Shroyer References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:21:41 -0000 Mark Shroyer wrote: > On 3/21/2010 1:10 AM, Aiza wrote: >> I don't have sources installed on my system. Just use the binary >> Freebsd-update function. At new releases I do a clean install. >> I only have a single public IP address. >> >> Now I would like to play with jails. One for postfix, apache, and ftp. >> My reading of EZJAIL and the jails section of the handbook lead me to >> believe I need a unique IP address for each jail. Is that correct? > > Yes. But if you have only one public IP address, you can give the jail > a loopback interface with an address in 127.0.0/24 or one of the RFC > 1918 private blocks (there's some debate as to which is the more > "correct" type of address to use, but either will work), then use NAT if > you need your jail to be able to access the Internet. > > If it helps you to reason about this, keep in mind that your jail does > *not* have its own virtualized network stack, like with Solaris Zones > for instance. The best way to think about your jails is as a group of > processes running on the same operating system as the host, just with > the restriction that (among other things) they can only communicate with > the outside world using a limited subset of the IP addresses available > to non-jailed processes. > Does the ip address notation for the jail include the port number? Like 10.0.20.2:80 Nat port forwarding is the long way around just to get the correct port number to the jail ip address. >> I have no need to build world or install world because it does this from >> /usr/src which i don't install. Is there some EZJAIL option to just copy >> over the running system binaries instead of the sources? > > Until recently, the method for creating ezjail's "basejail" was to issue > the "ezjail-admin update" command, which compiles the basejail from > /usr/src. Just recently an "ezjail-admin install" command was added, > which downloads binaries from a FreeBSD FTP server instead. So you > shouldn't need sources to get started, however I'm not sure what the > update mechanism is if you use the install command. > I found the man ezjail-admin has this format ezjail-admin install -h file:// Where -h file:// means get the binaries from the host system the jails are running on. Am I correct? >> The handbook "15.4 Creating and Controlling Jails" talks about >> “complete” jails, which resemble a real FreeBSD system, and “service” >> jails, dedicated to one application or service. Section 15.4 is the >> procedure for building a "complete jail" using the jail command. >> >> The 15.6 Application of Jails (service jails) talks about creating a >> root skeleton containing the host running files which are shared with >> all the guest jails in read only mode. This eliminates the massive >> duplication of running system files in each jail as in the complete jail >> system talked about in handbook section "15.4 Creating and Controlling >> Jails". >> >> Now reading the ezjail man pages I see that ezjail also creates a base >> template that is shared between all jails. Is this the same method >> talked about in the handbook section 15.6 Application of Jails (service >> jail)? > > It's essentially the same approach. (With ezjail you'll still be > duplicating binaries between the host system and the basejail, but I > wouldn't loose sleep over it.) > My understanding of handbook section 15.6 Application of Jails (service jails)is a copy of the host binaries is populated into the basejail and all the other jails have read only access to it. Each guest jail also has a read/write space for installing ports/packages unique to that jail including /var /usr /etc. Am I correct? Is this how ezjail is configured now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 00:54:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE0A106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@icsmx.com) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64428FC19 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.icsmx.com (201.153.82.97) by icsmx.com with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:55:25 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:54:39 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <201003220005.o2M05BTl017397@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <201003220005.o2M05BTl017397@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3352064125-2078122592@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:54:45 -0000 I installed that spammilter, run without problems. Thanks.... Just curios I have a client that has a dedicated server using CPanel. I am just curios that they are using Exim as the MTA . I imagine that has an an advantage for using under CPanel. Thanks for you time At 06:05 p.m. 21/03/2010, you wrote: > > I said that I am not sure but that even > > spamassin could be configured to run under send mail or if that does > > not work that to move from sendmail to another could be the solution C > > and not so difficult, like postfix. > >Of course it > >In the ports you have a thing called spammilter? that is just what you >want. > >I beleive there are little things that you can do with POstfix that >you coul dnot do with sendmail, only writting a filter for Postfix is >way easier than writting a milter for sendmail, so that is why there >are mor eready made Postfix filters than sendmail milters. > >Bests, > >Olivier >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 01:07:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0599F1065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26368FC0A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B413A385E; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:07:39 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269220059; x= 1271034459; bh=KB/W7Os4TFMXvu6Ky3C47NkxxJLA1gegQBBs+4xlgJI=; b=V yuCUn/3R7GZnjdgQvOF5/pJ45S9kJZv2C4nvo15GOubqWhNZAzsIdTBAjRxpARG/ 5sLRPxzJsp4OYr/mDkiK8V66XNwAnxbx1h/qyop8mGBgqbuBctOe4UFMqrLi8aYo 9WTPAFXg4ePMqSK6GZwBsL1WDbuJ72uty16FcEBy/I= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TthmGQHV3IcV; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:07:39 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80E53A3857; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:07:38 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M17ZU5022595; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:07:35 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:07:35 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003220107.o2M17ZU5022595@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jbiquez@icsmx.com In-reply-to: <3352064125-2078122592@intranet.com.mx> (message from Jorge Biquez on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:54:39 -0600) References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <201003220005.o2M05BTl017397@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <3352064125-2078122592@intranet.com.mx> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:07:41 -0000 > Just curios I have a client that has a dedicated server using CPanel. > I am just curios that they are using Exim as the MTA . I imagine that > has an an advantage for using under CPanel. I never laid my hand on any Exim server, I don't even know what CPanel is. If it's a kind of GUI for Exim, I never use GUI on my servers, I strictly stick to an all text files politics: - I have a consistent GUI for all files, my usual text editor; - even from the other side of the world, throught a very slow connection (talking like 12kbps) I can do some administration; - I feel I have much more control on what is doing what, and where is everything. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 01:24:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A265D1065673 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@icsmx.com) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ADB8FC1D for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.icsmx.com (201.153.82.97) by icsmx.com with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:25:27 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:24:41 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <201003220107.o2M17ZU5022595@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <201003220005.o2M05BTl017397@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <3352064125-2078122592@intranet.com.mx> <201003220107.o2M17ZU5022595@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3352065927-2078122595@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:24:46 -0000 Hello. CPANEL is an interface , graphical, pro administering services (jailed usually) in servers. That way users can do almost anything with is virtual server. It is kind of popular and for what I have used is good. You open another question I was going to ask in the list. If all of you guys can comment the use of Freebsd in Graphical or text mode. In my case I have to confess that I do not know any GUI under Freebsd I have never installed one since version 2 since all the services I have used I guess do not need the GUI. With my latest installatio I was thinking on playing with X Windows but I decided for later. For general use what do you do? I know some of you use only or mainly FreeBSD. Always in text. I have done it for a while, I am not an expert like you at all but a few days could do my job only on text console. Now I am planing to return to my basics, developing and I am constructing a small machine for that . I will be doing simple thing, PHP, Python, Mysql and that's all. Still thinking what's more convenient if under text or GUI. (remember the good old days under HP300, fortran cobol, clipper, etc etc?) I am deciding for a good text editor (suggestions?) and maybe for testing will use and old PC with any flavor of Windows with any browser will be enoiough) Can some of you give me your comments and advice? Thanks Olivier and all for your time. Jorge Biquez At 07:07 p.m. 21/03/2010, you wrote: > > Just curios I have a client that has a dedicated server using CPanel. > > I am just curios that they are using Exim as the MTA . I imagine that > > has an an advantage for using under CPanel. > >I never laid my hand on any Exim server, I don't even know what CPanel >is. If it's a kind of GUI for Exim, I never use GUI on my servers, I >strictly stick to an all text files politics: > >- I have a consistent GUI for all files, my usual text editor; > >- even from the other side of the world, throught a very slow > connection (talking like 12kbps) I can do some administration; > >- I feel I have much more control on what is doing what, and where is > everything. > >Bests, > >Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 01:42:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3501065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:42:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@icsmx.com) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263698FC15 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.icsmx.com (201.153.82.97) by icsmx.com with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:43:06 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:42:20 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <201003220000.o2M003cg016869@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <201003220000.o2M003cg016869@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3352066986-2078122599@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:42:25 -0000 No sounds (beeps) no cpu fan no lights? At 06:00 p.m. 21/03/2010, you wrote: > > Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking possibly > > the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there seems no easy > > way to replace it. > >In the process of dis-assembling the machine and re-assembling is, you >may want to use a rubber to clean the contacts on the RAM and various >boards. I use one of those white rubbers for pencil, remeber to remove >the dust before you put the card in the machine. > >While assembling the CPU do not forget the thermo paste between the >CPU and the heat skin, do not over use it, a thin layer is enough. > >You can check the CPU by shorting the light green and light blue wires >from the main connector (that would be 2nd and 4th from one end; but >colour are always light green 2nd and light blue 4th so far I have >seen), see if the fan on the power unit turn on. Be carefull, while >this is only 2 or 3 volts, your are delaing with a unit connected to >the main power. paper clip is a good way to do the test. > >Good luck, > >Olivier >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 01:44:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7361065672 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subscriber+freebsd@markshroyer.com) Received: from frodo.paleogene.net (frodo.paleogene.net [206.125.175.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5244E8FC21 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from auth-client.paleogene.net (auth-client.paleogene.net [206.125.175.178]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by frodo.paleogene.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C05BC3F416 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:44:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=markshroyer.com; s=default; t=1269222286; bh=vm1Zw5Nh6SX8YW0ojS1NXsKREXD20geaeUF7jB49Sm8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PcRc/YkVhwzHfEzB9RrCPU602tVJMpOrVdzBZvmq1I7Ti5wuAnyNxkJAsxDOe6VsR YnOrFJ8+UtpIjLDJUsI4Q0Vn2HY11whDVyJIsdqAbtQOGR7PhvcPerE5EuqGIJSfrc pEdXFEouGgN/jNepc5UvA1nBa9kZ9MtLeMPIjYVg= Message-ID: <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:44:43 -0400 From: Mark Shroyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:44:46 -0000 On 3/21/2010 8:21 PM, Aiza wrote: > Does the ip address notation for the jail include the port number? > Like 10.0.20.2:80 Nat port forwarding is the long way around just to get > the correct port number to the jail ip address. Nope, jails are assigned one (or more) specific IP addresses, but not specific port numbers. So if you don't have a separate public IP for your jail, you'll be relying on some sort of packet filter to redirect traffic to its private IP address. This isn't as big a deal as it may sound, especially if you're already using PF, which has built-in packet redirection capabilities that do not require you to run a separate NAT daemon. > I found the man ezjail-admin has this format > ezjail-admin install -h file:// Where -h file:// means get the > binaries from the host system the jails are running on. Am I correct? Yes, according to the man page. I haven't tried it yet myself, since I set up my basejail before this option was available. > My understanding of handbook section 15.6 Application of Jails > (service jails)is a copy of the host binaries is populated into the > basejail and all the other jails have read only access to it. Each guest > jail also has a read/write space for installing ports/packages unique to > that jail including /var /usr /etc. Am I correct? Is this how ezjail is > configured now? Yes, that's correct. -- Mark Shroyer http://markshroyer.com/contact/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 02:24:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD80C106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from services.rulez.sk (services.rulez.sk [92.240.234.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6873D8FC22 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from services.rulez.sk (services.rulez.sk [92.240.234.125]) by services.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F131133474B; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:06:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rulez.sk Received: from services.rulez.sk ([92.240.234.125]) by services.rulez.sk (services.rulez.sk [92.240.234.125]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdvBe5qPEFWy; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:06:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from danger-mbp.local (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: danger@rulez.sk) by services.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C75A51334715; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:06:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA6D0A7.7010107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:06:31 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.2pre) Gecko/20100311 Lanikai/3.1b2pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: HEADSUP: Call for FreeBSD Status Reports - 1Q/2010 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:03 -0000 Dear all, I would like to remind you that the next round of status reports covering the first quarter of 2010 is due on April 15th, 2010. This initiative is very welcome in our community. Therefore, I would like to ask you to submit your status reports as soon as possible, so that we can compile the report on time. There is a lot of projects which are currently being worked on, so do not hesitate and write us a few lines - a short description about what you are working on, what are your plans and goals, so we can inform our community about your great work! Check out the reports from past to get some inspiration of what your submission should look like. If you know about a project that should be included in the status report, please let us know as well, so we can poke the responsible people to provide us with something useful. Updates to submissions from the last report are welcome too. Note that the submissions are accepted from anyone involved with the FreeBSD community, you do not have to be a FreeBSD committer. Submissions about anything related to FreeBSD are very welcome! Please email us the filled-in XML template to be found at http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml to monthly@FreeBSD.org, or alternatively use our web based form located at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/monthly.cgi. For more information, please visit http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/. We are looking forward to see your submissions! -- S pozdravom / Best regards Daniel Gerzo, FreeBSD committer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 02:30:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6C0106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7098FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536413A38B7; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:36 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269225036; x= 1271039436; bh=8P77o/NP/NtFhVIk1klZnCr0Y/SL7lgv1i+g8jPBb9I=; b=U KtohcOh+AryblItd/UPLDnxvs52rJUVj2iP1pKIHYM3tNygO4QGQhYwjYPjy0jG5 OdgZzFhip6CafYcz1hwI2hjtWTRUgnq2eXhusDgndsFWXMOckwbRPqgpuSyYRqAF fKu1Sebb6doXPxsaNZwk/eI3iJNZLTUaOZo+Qgd+A8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CzSQUXc11Grk; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:36 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55B23A38B5; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:35 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M2UWT4025223; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:32 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:32 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003220230.o2M2UWT4025223@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jbiquez@icsmx.com In-reply-to: <3352065927-2078122595@intranet.com.mx> (message from Jorge Biquez on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:24:41 -0600) References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <201003220005.o2M05BTl017397@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <3352064125-2078122592@intranet.com.mx> <201003220107.o2M17ZU5022595@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <3352065927-2078122595@intranet.com.mx> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:30:37 -0000 > I am deciding for a good text editor (suggestions? Your opening the pandora box of flame war :) Emacs with no doubt, because I have been using it for over 20 years, over 3 major operating systems (Multics, DOS/Windows, all possible Unix and the like). So yes, I feel very at ease with Emacs and sheel uses the same CTRL/ESC sequences as Emacs :) Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 18:05:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D589D106566B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beerkezoposta@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFE98FC20 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so2258975wyb.13 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:05:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=SvxTDdHN5R5sZDlWKeEe0M9smQySryo2+c44JHeWOTM=; b=OZmCB1qcf3l/UMwcHok9lA8za2hSk+6hVrAFWrGiHZlWISMOOcxpNH7E7KsXi4hojO k+6hkFLfL0L/Uid+kbDZ912QWBDSZTPANkZgUYDknrWaksVSmzayRzfXwzv59hgFFb10 r7uRbFD9qGo44nUQ28/ItUrZ6E+4oGeSrpWpA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KOGkvPX1SpzwBHYbjbasSWMcgw8rTw6N1HytAG0xLngLyGwfFwV+QCPOoJZFRBMWB9 zZvbb9iwh1KW8gfhxhAJZ1eg4rOzZ5wxONCcHqy38X9OFkxCg9x6UITZUHXT7scl6xTn halz8cQjLJKOldFc5cZB1ixeA5vDkfhXk2T+4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.165.146 with SMTP id e18mr718360wel.54.1269193149536; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:39:09 +0100 Message-ID: <5f83dc531003211039o711ff43aya0188f9888f1025@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1rton_Sztriha?= To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:48:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: some qs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:05:37 -0000 Dear Developer, I have some questions regarding free BSD. Can I run open office cross platform on BSD? Does BSD run the .exe files? Does BSD recognise SATA drives? Thanks, m From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 02:58:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D62B106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0038FC16 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359A83A3863; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:58:52 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269226731; x= 1271041131; bh=XSKuozhAP1DpOtvuHltUHV4NpTAbgKWykeQMa80SAvk=; b=T rpV/bF9k7Mnzwh7zauAxr4hkyX39VHxEQUdCDEMCI6bu94k8nBJ1YZSCgbr2qOKw XQY3Uwq61muvcRe5zRka2CuDpFavYlCOAzrb2HaYLAFX/Vo4vaSkRPto/qxL83WS wo+Z2BT2sXHch0J+ZEZbbpcovPrAhV2zdoPaiQu8S0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 3LZIDsVKOM-3; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:58:51 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C825C3A3857; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:58:51 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M2wpI8025424; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:58:51 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:58:51 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003220258.o2M2wpI8025424@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: beerkezoposta@gmail.com In-reply-to: <5f83dc531003211039o711ff43aya0188f9888f1025@mail.gmail.com> (message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1rton_Sztriha?= on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:39:09 +0100) References: <5f83dc531003211039o711ff43aya0188f9888f1025@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: some qs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:58:53 -0000 Hi, > Can I run open office cross platform on BSD? Yes. > Does BSD run the .exe files? Some, via some emulators. If you install VMWare you can run a full Windows machine in FreeBSD. > Does BSD recognise SATA drives? Of course. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 03:01:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B07106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6FF8FC0A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2010 23:01:58 -0400 Received: from mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.54]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.8-GA) with ESMTP id LMK93969; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:01:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2010 23:01:42 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19366.56725.102901.774953@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:01:41 -0400 To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <5f83dc531003211039o711ff43aya0188f9888f1025@mail.gmail.com> References: <5f83dc531003211039o711ff43aya0188f9888f1025@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: some qs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:01:59 -0000 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1rton_Sztriha?= : > I have some questions regarding free BSD. > > Can I run open office cross platform on BSD? /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 > Does BSD run the .exe files? Only unde emulation. > Does BSD recognise SATA drives? man 4 ata Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 03:40:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E101065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E608FC20 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:40:10 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvUcAPaDpkvKRa39OWdsb2JhbAAHh1eTZwEBAQE3BroShH0Egxw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,285,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10549534" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp3.comclark.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2010 11:40:08 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA6E696.4040901@comclark.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:40:06 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Shroyer References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:40:11 -0000 >> I found the man ezjail-admin has this format >> ezjail-admin install -h file:// Where -h file:// means get the >> binaries from the host system the jails are running on. Am I correct? > > Yes, according to the man page. I haven't tried it yet myself, since I > set up my basejail before this option was available. > Well I tried it. The man page does not explain it clearly. What the -h really means is the -h file:// is the location for the release-8.0/base/ files. These files are not part of the base release directory tree that are part of the running system. They are only on the .iso install image such as the disc1.iso. I mounted the Release 8.0 disc1 install cd and changed into directory cd /cdrom/8.0-RELEASE and issued ezjail-admin install -h file:// it ran creating 3 jails, /usr/jails/basejail, /usr/jails/newjail, /usr/jails/flavours. This is not the same as copying the binaries from the host system. Next step is to ID directory names in the basejail and recreate basejail using the cpdup command to copy the host binaries. I see 2 questionable directories in the basejail, boot and rescue. Can I remove them from the basejail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 07:11:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FD0106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aaron.lewis1989@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f201.google.com (mail-yx0-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A69F8FC1A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe39 with SMTP id 39so2207995yxe.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BsGLz2aVjR3Y25h5WXWJeE2poNoHx6VCQq06CVvTDWM=; b=P0UqE67sGNC4E7EEmwcizOmv8x/tKPh3MJWK35piXh5W3RujZkWEQDvWXN/83trquS 5uWjaSs3R5eaLF5ILlXZ0dfLdnjJ8MDwttZm+NfbrxP+YS2T+TRUTG4aEVaXjhqTBvly mPYsHBLniZILc+XZ75nBamFbR710En0rCyc8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oziegYl3hhJ/bf8XmMzdefRm1jJN9BWHlWr9RCwjS6aS+5pCkaAe5PCG9BU9b2t3hS X/yudl1VLbebnAy0vNLNgNPh5Jj1c8DyqVrSLb4U8udEQO6zSVTsVngvzS6EDunh87ba hpHQyks4JFhKrtGxYp5YSxwf1swH4Sff6qNWg= Received: by 10.101.159.2 with SMTP id l2mr2101526ano.142.1269241866348; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.7.16.42] ([58.58.36.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm1382882yxh.15.2010.03.22.00.10.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:11:23 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:11:07 -0000 Hello BSD hackers, I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through ssh , everything's fine. But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: no home directory Logging in with home dir "/" Does anyone has any ideas ? Here's some debug information ========================================= %> grep aaron /etc/passwd aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash %> ls -ladh /home/aaron/ drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron ============================================ -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 07:17:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0931106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antinix@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552A28FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so44405wwb.13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:17:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o+evsmejyWPIeLxcTELdzxP57c87lxGDmFS4lqwh6k4=; b=YUymmoDG5y9VHMdtcUQBYUEYoMaRXqb7tAn9MD9/9I0n9BM2JSEph66ckSdo2/WLQW wYy4RMvQYb38g2V1mXv6WbfzcsfGtuOnYOmRB5kzC7byTpGjaGjAY2EWLvbLqsGjUXFN G7Z2TrdH6dnjcS1aupe90aaCkdkfWN6jhFxdk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=oF/qShg8MLKc2Wsrbj+TL7TIZ9LPwTAClIeHM8OZdYpvrDfnQlbWGMAcv2NONfuxDr Jd8F791yenibvZ8RQWptLnmnCMco3OFP1oMpElxdWiBrUOw0svILHDUqvzu5KUSunyEK f1YRp0Gu1CVVcdoncFxfWcTp4XtifzVIpvezk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antinix@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.87.7 with SMTP id x7mr3029592wee.53.1269240956282; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:55:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrei Kolu Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:55:36 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1788e734aadb32bc Message-ID: <10263ac1003212355v358f70edx665353fd556a0fa4@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:17:49 -0000 2010/3/21 Dan Naumov : > What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed > throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) in > base does not support this directly, so I would have to either use a > custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to GENERIC so > I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too much > configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and throttle it > (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). > > Are there any sftp servers with directly built-in functionality for > this? I just would to be able to set limits for upload speed globally > for the entire server and preferably to also be able to do speed > settings on a per-user basis. > > Only OpenSSH alternative I use sometimes is http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/security/ssh2-nox11/../ssh2/pkg-de= scr security/ssh2-nox11 Not about throttling but about chrooting: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:35:46 +0930 To: Philip Paeps From: Wincent Colaiuta El Thursday, 15 August, 2002, a las 11:13 PM, Philip Paeps escribi=F3: > I'm in the process of setting up a form of fileserver, and I'd like for > my > users to be able to work only in their home directories, not anywhere > else. I > would like to use SSH for the connections, as opposed to FTP, but I > don't want > users to be able to log into an interactive shell (only SCP/SFTP) and I > don't > want them to 'escape' out of their home directories. Use ssh2 from the ports collection: cd /usr/ports/security/ssh2 && make install In /usr/local/etc/ssh2/sshd2_config set the ChRootGroups and ChRootUsers directives to chroot the group(s) and/or user(s) that are to have ChRooted access. Turn off the default ssh (OpenSSH) by setting in /etc/rc.conf: sshd_enable=3D"NO" Start the new ssh: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sshd.sh start When you create the user's account, make sure the shell is set to /bin/nologin or something similar. With this setup, they can sftp in and are chroot to the home dir, and they can't get a shell when they connect via ssh. In my opinion, OpenSSH should have this feature. We are told not to use ftp because of clear-text passwords, so we have to use ssh/sftp, but when we do that we can no longer chroot people to their home dirs! And if we're not careful, we end up giving them a login shell. Using ssh2 from the ports gets around this limitation, but just check the licence before you install to make sure that you qualify (otherwise it's not free). Cheers :-) Wincent ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 08:34:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21DB106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F4E8FC14 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2M8YrQs077211; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M8Ypci077210; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:50 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Message-ID: <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , "Randal L. Schwartz" , Jorge Biquez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:57 +0100 (CET) Cc: Jorge Biquez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:34:59 -0000 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:44:20PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed: > > Postfix has a readable config file (with comments!) that doesn't > require "compiling" into the proper syntax. Here follows a snippets from /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. It's readable and full of comments. A simple "make" will "compile" the file. What are you complaining about? dnl Uncomment to allow relaying based on your MX records. dnl NOTE: This can allow sites to use your server as a backup MX without dnl your permission. dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX) > Postfix understands and plays well with things like content-filters, > RBLs, dovecot (and others) for SSL. And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 08:55:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A27B1065675 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB428FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E227D10E77C; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qfksvV50sUbe; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9702B10E50A; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA73081.4020506@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:55:29 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Modulok References: <64c038661003211419j5815ac92q8d93eb4f9960162b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038661003211419j5815ac92q8d93eb4f9960162b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Wireless access point rc.conf syntax in FreeBSD 8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:55:37 -0000 On 2010-03-21 22:19, Modulok wrote: > I have a wireless network card. But I can't configure it. I read in > UPDATING that this had to do with some split up of the wireless > drivers into software/hardware interfaces? Something to do with me > having to clone the interface before I can configure it? There was no > mention of this in the handbook wireless section that I saw. > > Anyway, I want to run it as an access point, not a client. The ral > driver supports this, but I'm not sure on the rc.conf synax for > creating an access point out of it. Could anyone point to some > access-point-like examples? > > Thanks! > -Modulok- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" What I myself missed when I installed 8.0 was the need for the following line in rc.conf. wlans_iwn0="wlan0" Where iwn0 is the driver for my Intel 5100. You could post your /boot/loader.conf and the lines related networking from your /etc/rc.conf It'll be easier to give you good advise then. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 09:30:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855FC106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CED698FC18 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2010 09:30:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO moby.local) [91.140.121.144] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu004) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 10:30:51 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18TSTgYZmMTLQxIedHfmByB6Pp/lAF1fV6Vz0PuNA YDOqNkwhPCBBDT Message-ID: <4BA738C8.9080407@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:30:48 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Naumov References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.60999999999999999 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:54 -0000 Dan Naumov wrote: > What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed > throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) in > base does not support this directly, so I would have to either use a > custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to GENERIC so > I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too much > configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and throttle it > (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). You could examine the possibility of using ipfw and dummynet: 1) ipfw and dummynet are availabe in the GENERIC kernel. 2) Most of the time you can classify bulk/interactive traffic by examining the packet's length. IP packets carrying sftp traffic tend to be limited by MTU size or PMTU discovery. IP packets carrying ssh traffic tend to be much smaller. Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 09:47:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26917106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E898FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:47:13 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwbAHPZpkvKRa39OWdsb2JhbAAHh1eTWAEBAQE3Brl9hH0Egxw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,286,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10598922" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp4.comclark.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2010 17:47:11 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:47:09 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Shroyer References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:47:14 -0000 Mark Shroyer wrote: > On 3/21/2010 8:21 PM, Aiza wrote: >> Does the ip address notation for the jail include the port number? >> Like 10.0.20.2:80 Nat port forwarding is the long way around just to get >> the correct port number to the jail ip address. > > Nope, jails are assigned one (or more) specific IP addresses, but not > specific port numbers. So if you don't have a separate public IP for > your jail, you'll be relying on some sort of packet filter to redirect > traffic to its private IP address. > > This isn't as big a deal as it may sound, especially if you're already > using PF, which has built-in packet redirection capabilities that do not > require you to run a separate NAT daemon. > > My host 8.0 system is the gateway to the public internet. I have ipfilter running blocking all inbound request for service. I only allow out bound request from the LAN behind the gateway and use keep state to allow the packet conversation to continue. All this has worked fine for years across many releases of Freebsd. Now comes playing with jails. I created 3 jails, www, ftp, telnet and used ip address of 10.0.20.20, 10.0.20.30, 10.0.20.40. The goal is to target those jails from other PC on the private LAN who are using ip address in the 10.0.10.2 through 10.0.10.8 range. I used ezjail-admin onestart and all the jails start. Then did ezjail-admin console ftp.local.com and got logged into that jail. Edited /etc/inetd.conf and uncommented the ftp line. Edited /etc/rc.conf adding inetd_enable="YES" exited the ftp jail. Did ezjail-admin onestop followed by ezjail-admin onestart to cycle the ftp jail to activate the ftp function. ezjail-admin console ftp.local.com to get logged into that jail again. From within the jail did ping -c 2 10.0.10.6 which is a pc on the lan gives me no sockets mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. What is the problem here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 09:56:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB44106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17498FC18 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2M9tkJG077766; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:55:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2M9tker077765; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:55:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:55:46 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Aiza Message-ID: <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Aiza , Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:55:49 +0100 (CET) Cc: Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:56:15 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:47:09PM +0800, Aiza typed: > Mark Shroyer wrote: > >On 3/21/2010 8:21 PM, Aiza wrote: > >>Does the ip address notation for the jail include the port number? > >>Like 10.0.20.2:80 Nat port forwarding is the long way around just to get > >>the correct port number to the jail ip address. > > > >Nope, jails are assigned one (or more) specific IP addresses, but not > >specific port numbers. So if you don't have a separate public IP for > >your jail, you'll be relying on some sort of packet filter to redirect > >traffic to its private IP address. > > > >This isn't as big a deal as it may sound, especially if you're already > >using PF, which has built-in packet redirection capabilities that do not > >require you to run a separate NAT daemon. > > > > > > My host 8.0 system is the gateway to the public internet. > I have ipfilter running blocking all inbound request for service. > I only allow out bound request from the LAN behind the gateway and use > keep state to allow the packet conversation to continue. All this has > worked fine for years across many releases of Freebsd. > > Now comes playing with jails. I created 3 jails, www, ftp, telnet and > used ip address of 10.0.20.20, 10.0.20.30, 10.0.20.40. The goal is to > target those jails from other PC on the private LAN who are using ip > address in the 10.0.10.2 through 10.0.10.8 range. > > I used ezjail-admin onestart and all the jails start. Then did > ezjail-admin console ftp.local.com and got logged into that jail. Edited > /etc/inetd.conf and uncommented the ftp line. Edited /etc/rc.conf adding > inetd_enable="YES" exited the ftp jail. Did ezjail-admin onestop > followed by ezjail-admin onestart to cycle the ftp jail to activate the > ftp function. ezjail-admin console ftp.local.com to get logged into that > jail again. From within the jail did ping -c 2 10.0.10.6 which is a pc > on the lan gives me no sockets mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to > 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. > > What is the problem here? How are we supposed to know? Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 10:24:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604E71065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhenin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f228.google.com (mail-bw0-f228.google.com [209.85.218.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FD18FC1E for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz28 with SMTP id 28so4673282bwz.14 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=gyTUJtVQopY0P2tLOufTCENX38JoW5UXdbFwI0EM8oc=; b=UeI5TNOlX8awEa5uRMaUv1Kg/8HWQsqgwJ8WAVVwg1gZdRyM//cOxPptOx1Zpvuix4 QhaBf9Pe+XqigsJcp5yEGqcPIMIf4o3shLl1CUPbnCMYPwp4fstj3r1dh19aHY58HgIR vonxuEsWedmqX/cVKTsvJNIlTAZ7ATAFrIX8Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=A164krkY92OxoAb7nKVts5XVWu/YEbQRXfiEKXbUMSwL69FGgE5DJjyoZPs3uHWv/+ 3wFycjYz2vzY11v0CsUXo1+mXk8g71rR76qDIiN33BprOUTZUbm5gFrKEoGZUDK5J5Zo Z9tiDhOmHORP1E7zPzqOz30VJ3DHlx8oUWzXk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dhenin@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.75.35 with SMTP id w35mr5272508bkj.194.1269253454156; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dh=E9nin_Jean=2DJacques?= Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:23:54 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d742f8a29d1cdc2b Message-ID: <12437d831003220323o4463044bu416f994f0129b459@mail.gmail.com> To: Ruben de Groot , Aiza , Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jj@dhenin.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:24:17 -0000 2010/3/22 Ruben de Groot > > > > > My host 8.0 system is the gateway to the public internet. > > I have ipfilter running blocking all inbound request for service. > > I only allow out bound request from the LAN behind the gateway and use > > keep state to allow the packet conversation to continue. All this has > > worked fine for years across many releases of Freebsd. > > > > Now comes playing with jails. I created 3 jails, www, ftp, telnet and > > used ip address of 10.0.20.20, 10.0.20.30, 10.0.20.40. The goal is to > > target those jails from other PC on the private LAN who are using ip > > address in the 10.0.10.2 through 10.0.10.8 range. > > > > I used ezjail-admin onestart and all the jails start. Then did > > ezjail-admin console ftp.local.com and got logged into that jail. Edite= d > > /etc/inetd.conf and uncommented the ftp line. Edited /etc/rc.conf addin= g > > inetd_enable=3D"YES" exited the ftp jail. Did ezjail-admin onestop > > followed by ezjail-admin onestart to cycle the ftp jail to activate the > > ftp function. ezjail-admin console ftp.local.com to get logged into tha= t > > jail again. From within the jail did ping -c 2 10.0.10.6 which is a pc > > on the lan gives me no sockets mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to > > 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. > > > > What is the problem here? > > > How are we supposed to know? > > Ruben > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > add sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=3D1 or in /etc/sysctl.conf on the host (not in in the jail) Cordialement --------------------------------------------------------- (=B0> Dh=E9nin Jean-Jacques / ) 48, rue de la Justice 78300 Poissy ^^ Jean-Jacques@dhenin.fr --------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 11:15:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD1B1065673 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:15:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557998FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2MBFXpu062502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:15:38 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:15:33 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Lewis References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:15:44 -0000 On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: > Hello BSD hackers, > I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in > through ssh , everything's fine. > But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: > > no home directory > Logging in with home dir "/" > > Does anyone has any ideas ? > > > Here's some debug information > ========================================= > %> grep aaron /etc/passwd > aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash > > %> ls -ladh /home/aaron/ > drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron > ============================================ What are the settings for ChallengeResponseAuthentication UsePam in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 11:23:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C10D1065672 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F9F8FC13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2MBMaHO078372; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:22:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2MBMZqH078371; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:22:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:22:35 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: jj@dhenin.fr Message-ID: <20100322112235.GA78247@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , jj@dhenin.fr, Aiza , Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> <12437d831003220323o4463044bu416f994f0129b459@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12437d831003220323o4463044bu416f994f0129b459@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_23 autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:22:39 +0100 (CET) Cc: Aiza , Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:23:14 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:23:54AM +0100, Dh?nin Jean-Jacques typed: > > > on the lan gives me no sockets mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to > > > 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. > add > > sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 > or in /etc/sysctl.conf > on the host (not in in the jail) This will enable him to ping another host from within the jail. I won't do anything for ftp. OP: what exact error do you get? And does ftp work *within* the jail (ftp localhost)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 11:33:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88CF106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B5F8FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so48311gyh.13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tVbxANJmKEFZoJEb4IhJQctyPKTA0Z92W5Ht068KK+I=; b=uvzOihYvjFv+c4hO3UFpL/KIEQj3LQ0hnOqV43c0ijRSaD7PIR93UUvYq8RKa8wTVl Q/qT7Gr4RzEqsEbgDhMPIYTPjLFEcI+0iR4AP7uEtkdBHeMvNuafh/oc9IKnSJQkdrIz wPsQWJ6FOzYr67Twf9+Lu1ywe08UwdpcQbRWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mJ6gl1TSvVRB/PRCc9sr26hoNB/svPEnVazQGxIEOmCVB+UF5jDLwqD7GG6FXaP31i 8eYgtxQnCuYCeurEhjld6circLzjefNSTWpMoRiIIjXdh3+E77ipptZFlKD0RPlCCyRL KUMgkThuHj0OM3yLh4NfI9Bpw+8YzYDe+q4WU= Received: by 10.150.162.3 with SMTP id k3mr303046ybe.318.1269257610591; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aryeh-desktop.istudentunion.com ([208.253.138.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c21sm1549446ibr.4.2010.03.22.04.33.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:33:28 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: how to compare permissions between two dirs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:33:31 -0000 In switching to a new make file for a personal project I have run into the problem of under the old makefile everything works (web site) and under the new one it does not... when manually looking at the two dirs they appear identical in layout, sizes and perms (dir and file level) but I want to make sure... is there any way to compare two diff dirs and see if they only differ in date stamps? (note since there are several developers working on this project I need to compare even if the owners are diff) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 11:42:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78051065672 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1988FC24 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2MBfu0U084897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:41:56 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA75784.6070409@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:41:56 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to compare permissions between two dirs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:42:00 -0000 On 22/03/2010 11:33:28, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > In switching to a new make file for a personal project I have run into > the problem of under the old makefile everything works (web site) and > under the new one it does not... when manually looking at the two dirs > they appear identical in layout, sizes and perms (dir and file level) > but I want to make sure... is there any way to compare two diff dirs and > see if they only differ in date stamps? (note since there are several > developers working on this project I need to compare even if the owners > are diff) Something like: rsync -nva old-dir/ new-dir/ Should tell you about any files where there is a difference either in contents or in meta-data between the two directories. Unfortunately, it doesn't tell you exactly what the difference is, so you'll have to use ls(1) etc. to examine the files it highlights in more detail. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 11:53:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27A610656C0 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from ghirai.com (ghirai.com [91.204.208.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAB08FC16 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ghirai.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BD7C16F47; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:53:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:53:10 +0200 From: Ghirai To: Vincent Hoffman Message-Id: <20100322135310.93d206ce.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA67994.1000506@unsane.co.uk> References: <4BA67994.1000506@unsane.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:53:22 -0000 On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:00 +0000 Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 21/03/2010 13:53, Dan Naumov wrote: > > What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed > > throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) > > in base does not support this directly, so I would have to either > > use a custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to > > GENERIC so I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too > > much configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and > > throttle it (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). > > > > Are there any sftp servers with directly built-in functionality for > > this? I just would to be able to set limits for upload speed > > globally for the entire server and preferably to also be able to do > > speed settings on a per-user basis. > > > A quick google indicates there are at least 2 sftp servers with this > functionality, > http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html > http://mysecureshell.sourceforge.net/en/index.html > > Proftpd with mod_sftp needs the proftp-devel port so I'm guessing its > still in testing but at least its in ports. > No idea about the mysecureshell program, its not in ports. > > I havent actually tried with of these so no idea how well they work, > good luck. > I used pure-ftpd, and it's pretty awesome. http://www.pureftpd.org/project/pure-ftpd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 12:03:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A377106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99FA8FC0A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (184.67-246-213.ippool.namesco.net [213.246.67.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2MC3LbW077023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:03:22 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA75C89.9040607@unsane.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:03:21 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ghirai References: <4BA67994.1000506@unsane.co.uk> <20100322135310.93d206ce.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <20100322135310.93d206ce.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sftp server with speed throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:03:24 -0000 On 22/03/2010 11:53, Ghirai wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:00 +0000 > Vincent Hoffman wrote: > > >> On 21/03/2010 13:53, Dan Naumov wrote: >> >>> What are my options if I want to run an sftp server with speed >>> throttling? My understanding is that openssh (which includes sftp) >>> in base does not support this directly, so I would have to either >>> use a custom kernel with ALTQ (and I would really rather stick to >>> GENERIC so I can use freebsd-update) which sounds like a bit too >>> much configuration work or pass sftp traffic through PF and >>> throttle it (ugly, would also affect ssh traffic). >>> >>> Are there any sftp servers with directly built-in functionality for >>> this? I just would to be able to set limits for upload speed >>> globally for the entire server and preferably to also be able to do >>> speed settings on a per-user basis. >>> >>> >> A quick google indicates there are at least 2 sftp servers with this >> functionality, >> http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html >> http://mysecureshell.sourceforge.net/en/index.html >> >> Proftpd with mod_sftp needs the proftp-devel port so I'm guessing its >> still in testing but at least its in ports. >> No idea about the mysecureshell program, its not in ports. >> >> I havent actually tried with of these so no idea how well they work, >> good luck. >> >> > I used pure-ftpd, and it's pretty awesome. > > http://www.pureftpd.org/project/pure-ftpd > Unfortunately pureftpd doesn't do sftp as far as I'm aware (it does do ftps/ftp with tls but thats not the same thing.) Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 12:24:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A208106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunckell@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE58D8FC13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so73094bwz.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jDRZb3EgzcyTaoiWzfbhReyC34In8+OnhCWnZd8YR10=; b=q3tJ5G2WgC76JA2Kd3aWsmvb2B07db9JfC5xgA9QLWiqTmGj2gAkLJebVkX+sAiSNL Y6HelIZ0bENGSXm4JTTLEN7CUxrsqSpijKeix/imqF7T6phP1tM6pjNZ3RDqSJ3JGc92 OBH2vV4sH27780GDFsa4w0n8vSP9xwPDh9tA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Vaa7YGZsfPkGwIpk6I4ZpOJ5grbk+ZezXuOsnLX/YBKPRehju+ul4CYCVjyldnne3Q jJNPjExMwLWhRT/DTaSkq3r1hxheYde3r5OcXZJUyIkfbOmb5ymT9vas75CtFpQ2F64L KDgcJcliGhZXuXT68Q1jnbDEwJPjKonyIhU08= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.141.67 with SMTP id l3mr3146803bku.38.1269259363971; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:02:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> References: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:02:43 -0400 Message-ID: <21bb29221003220502q29634386w3e84d432136ad0dc@mail.gmail.com> From: Chad Kellerman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how to compare permissions between two dirs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:24:31 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > In switching to a new make file for a personal project I have run into the > problem of under the old makefile everything works (web site) and under the > new one it does not... when manually looking at the two dirs they appear > identical in layout, sizes and perms (dir and file level) but I want to make > sure... is there any way to compare two diff dirs and see if they only > differ in date stamps? (note since there are several developers working on > this project I need to compare even if the owners are diff) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I have done this in the past.... You can write a script that writes the 'stats' that you want about each directory to a file, then compare the two. ---------------------------------------------------- #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use Fcntl ':mode'; use File::Find (); use Digest::MD5; use Getopt::Std; $|++; my %opts; getopts('d:l:v', \%opts); my $dirname = $opts{'d'} ? $opts{'d'} : die "Please provide a Snap Shot directory\n"; my $log = $opts{'l'} ? $opts{'l'} : "/tmp/$0.$$"; my $verbose = $opts{'v'}; # for the convenience of &wanted calls, including -eval statements: use vars qw/*name *dir *prune/; *name = *File::Find::name; *dir = *File::Find::dir; *prune = *File::Find::prune; sub wanted; # Traverse desired filesystems File::Find::find({wanted => \&wanted}, "$dirname"); exit; sub wanted { my ($dev,$ino,$mode,$nlink,$uid,$gid); (($dev,$ino,$mode,$nlink,$uid,$gid) = lstat($_)) && -f _ && process( "$uid", "$gid", "$mode", "$name"); } sub process { my ($u, $g, $m, $n) = @_; my $user = getpwuid($u); my $group = getgrgid($g); my $perms = sprintf "%04o", S_IMODE($m); my $file = $n; open FILE, $file or die "Can't open $file: $!\n"; binmode(FILE); my $md5 = Digest::MD5->new->addfile(*FILE)->hexdigest, " $file\n"; close FILE; print " $user $group $perms $md5 $n\n" if ($verbose); open LOG, ">>$log" or die "Can't open log file: $!\n"; print LOG "$user $group $perms $md5 $n\n"; close LOG; } -------------------------------------------------------------- name the above script dirSnapShot.pl and run it like so: perl dirSnapShot -d /dir1 then run it again perl dirSnapShot.pl -d /dir2 run a diff on the two log files in tmp to see the difference. Chad -- A grasshopper walks into a bar and the bartender says "Hey, we have a drink named after you." And the grasshopper says "Really, You have a drink named Murray?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 12:28:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35652106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.halliday@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f201.google.com (mail-yx0-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC168FC17 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe39 with SMTP id 39so2305406yxe.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=BI19hs9nBtRYu3LcfHZ32sCOcYb616PQzXfkZPGKIdQ=; b=piyMMCI4vOXOvJQd9csYFJJ0ume4DWmGdYc9ritfzUoo8sFYrMq1nJ1IVkZ2pL/8FH 2xeCPeXaeCbBin/J6mgXGn9OyvnHUG+j2GKkO4C0Plr71Hk1JBnVOzC3X4w2rHiGQu+h Px55skujorrDQeMVkB5FoI4IapVGuB89gzMGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hChTAFzX+uEOKUL2nsNNmW9L9ByXbUxz9kM5THx5IkMlGbE6eZA3uka6rHMo9yXOJK /965xTdSwM8k7SD90jK2FlksE2UxsQVOKohMe0o1spX/3ILiLpz6fZcoUlg95Vxz07UL v+1+xuhaQ6V9iwjLM3htLhM99Jkwd/fH1XB3Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.40.31 with SMTP id n31mr4296149agn.76.1269260903781; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:28:23 -0300 Message-ID: <2dab70a31003220528u449a8988hec7d2959572bd6f@mail.gmail.com> From: Paul Halliday To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: panic: sleeping thread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:28:25 -0000 I have a couple VM's that randomly halt with this error: Sleeping thread (tid 10018, pid 1058) owns a non-sleepable lock panic: sleeping thread cpuid = 0 Uptime 11h14m31s Cannot dump. Device not defined or unavailable. FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 UTC 2009 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 These systems run nightly Nessus scans and these halts are very sporadic; I can go a week w/o seeing one. What should I do to start to troubleshoot this? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 12:41:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F7D1065678 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724148FC26 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:41:23 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwbAHcCp0vKRa39OWdsb2JhbAAHh1eTWAEBAQE3BrpPhH0Egxw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,287,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10623980" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp2.comclark.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2010 20:41:21 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA7655A.70604@comclark.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:40:58 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruben de Groot , jj@dhenin.fr, Aiza , Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> <12437d831003220323o4463044bu416f994f0129b459@mail.gmail.com> <20100322112235.GA78247@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20100322112235.GA78247@ei.bzerk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:41:24 -0000 Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:23:54AM +0100, Dh?nin Jean-Jacques typed: > >>>> on the lan gives me no sockets mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to >>>> 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. > >> add >> >> sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 >> or in /etc/sysctl.conf >> on the host (not in in the jail) > > This will enable him to ping another host from within the jail. I won't > do anything for ftp. > > OP: what exact error do you get? And does ftp work *within* the jail > (ftp localhost)? with sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 done on the host. From within the jail did ping -c 2 10.0.10.6 which is a pc on the lan gives me socket: Operation not permitted mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. Just how am i to determine if ftp work *within* the jail ftp localhost? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 12:45:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC7C106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aaron.lewis1989@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451CA8FC08 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so91899bwz.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n8buoIhTuXHpeQun9CNPJMv8GJRKwpFiFV/e+cnRVCg=; b=kbHHRAUFvwVfEZGqdqAodD/fk3J8sCQA0wRF3g/VK7Mq4dUoNb1PI4wwcHbvHRaQ35 ToKMnKI0CKPUClXEeoGDD8urPQhWP3qWAKwm4Hmr7Y0Dxql6Wn5V0FUM5n9NwHpAeB6v 1g8tLsJtpO+p8lSXNK1wcnJQgxRZEh3ugJh+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RCQIYpwDuuIpxrIoD8+KvGB6zv4h9WF1L693IYER4vGi72tPsQlTwNbyAlNU2XzYfS oQGgGOrNBcJpiK5K7iuOkYanpledSomlp4CbXBat4fuw38d9aT3OZQOxNpjRVFTgoogB xsUCA2CuGf9JqR8OF+7VuD5oHes/oOu1sp1ZE= Received: by 10.204.145.14 with SMTP id b14mr4473909bkv.142.1269261939086; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.101.38.167] ([117.136.9.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm2340052bwz.15.2010.03.22.05.45.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:46:06 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:45:40 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: > >> Hello BSD hackers, >> I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in >> through ssh , everything's fine. >> But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: >> >> no home directory >> Logging in with home dir "/" >> >> Does anyone has any ideas ? >> >> >> Here's some debug information >> ========================================= >> %> grep aaron /etc/passwd >> aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash >> >> %> ls -ladh /home/aaron/ >> drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron >> ============================================ >> > > What are the settings for > > ChallengeResponseAuthentication > UsePam > > in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? > Nothing found , or commented out. > What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? > # grep -v -e "^#" /etc/pam.d/sshd | sed '/^$/d' auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass account required pam_nologin.so account required pam_login_access.so account required pam_unix.so session required pam_permit.so password required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # grep -v -e "^#" /etc/pam.d/login | sed '/^$/d' auth sufficient pam_self.so no_warn auth include system account requisite pam_securetty.so account required pam_nologin.so account include system session include system password include system It's all fresh install , did i do something wrong ? It's really strange .. never met before. > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 13:05:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57CB106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from n26.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n26.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 436A98FC18 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.182.178] by n26.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2010 13:05:11 -0000 Received: from [87.248.110.109] by t4.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2010 13:05:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp214.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2010 13:05:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 163821.32029.bm@omp214.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 1839 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Mar 2010 13:05:22 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1269263122; bh=4FEnE0YWl6K6+CNC5ITsd3fLXGiaHvx9y2f1/MaeQ1I=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f1gttMfpc/DzF55ylJ5velhf6Uo5H3URtaL48U1Sso73H6AkBFAMo2iV7c2nDEqhF+gHDomeZ4VbZyWEollFmraQqkF4A2/TELkIip3pqZhXZQMbpQhtbJfemAtWVV76zJ1hgB00RpN1YmtxL02VaMueHKkSJyI79sYxRmHsjd8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oCsyqwcIJBikIVQaYgceGpvmUBO6q/NelMPIk65wk4dXk4l5Wakzu8CQlY9pnGV4acA4j0mOouHbO/uzmqKWzCFdTV72wCRz/oufbZHnx80gfi2a6XC+aXXGDcjiqF3X8blw0o/KpjVnUPX4saR8eopOdTlAXgjRiMMJRjzBVHE=; Message-ID: <5176.1310.qm@web24805.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: vwlP7k8VM1mz2y15WViNRkYUVCFfyra6Yh.kfJYxMydkZ0B cV2kL2La30MHgbs4XFwJG8jNhrvPKZ7L9SW08yy_4yaB47j.4HO35v3dzspM XruEVX0MgVlNRlqM234OL5eAGXRswSvRFODqSmAb9dnRZUoMC6TfIUD3pK84 xDM08rBMrcbHVJXhdxs_6ffHzTl1O7j92YWFxVwL0z5UF1lAUFkG.RfD8rfe 4P3WC8eOPIF337HQ8mAUWkhPp58irnD9qhQ-- Received: from [192.196.142.20] by web24805.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:05:21 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:05:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Alexandre L." To: FreeBSD Questions , Frank Shute In-Reply-To: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re : OT: dead box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:05:24 -0000 My brother has got the same case : Antec Sonata II. It has been delivred wi= th the power supply. =0AThe power supply has exploded capacitors on the mob= o (Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe).=0AThe LED on the mobo was lightening up but we can= 't power up the workstation.=0AFor your problem, I suggest you to see if th= is LED is lightening up or not.=0AIf not, you can replace it. If yes, you m= ight test with another one. After that, the mobo could have been take a blo= w.=0AA CPU or RAM problem is reported by the mobo with a sound (BIP).=0A=0A= I hope this could help you.=0A=0AAlexandre.=0A=0A--- En date de=A0: Dim 21.= 3.10, Frank Shute a =E9crit=A0:=0A=0A> De: Frank Shute= =0A> Objet: OT: dead box=0A> =C0: "FreeBSD Questions" = =0A> Date: Dimanche 21 mars 2010, 10h11=0A> = Sorry if this is a bit off-topic.=0A> =0A> I came in the other day to find = my workstation powered off.=0A> Hitting=0A> the power on button had no effe= ct as did using another=0A> known working=0A> outlet. I checked all the cab= les and they seem attached.=0A> =0A> I thought my power supply must have di= ed so I got another,=0A> screwed it=0A> in and again no joy - no sign of li= fe.=0A> =0A> Anybody got any ideas what the problem may be? I'm thinking=0A= > possibly=0A> the power on switch but that seems a long shot and there=0A>= seems no easy=0A> way to replace it.=0A> =0A> My hardware:=0A> =0A> Antec = Sonata case.=0A> Gigabyte board.=0A> Core 2 duo=0A> =0A> TIA,=0A> =0A> Rega= rds,=0A> =0A> -- =0A> =0A> Frank =0A> =0A> =0A> Contact info: http://www.= shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html=0A> =0A> =0A> ______________________________= _________________=0A> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> ht= tp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To unsubscrib= e, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A=0A= =0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 13:30:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3493D1065672 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF198FC16 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 445F21DE251; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:30:21 -0700 (PDT) To: Ruben de Groot References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.3.15; tzolkin = 13 Men; haab = 13 Cumku Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:30:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> (Ruben de Groot's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:34:50 +0100") Message-ID: <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jorge Biquez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:30:22 -0000 >>>>> "Ruben" == Ruben de Groot writes: Ruben> And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased. I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering postfix. And now I use postfix, and you can't *make* me use sendmail again. Of course I'm biased. I prefer postfix now. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:08:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEE3106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:08:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordi@msdi.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA148FC1B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:08:24 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from server2.msdi.local ([96.20.178.197]) by VL-MR-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KZO00G4BSEHTPC0@VL-MR-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:03:53 -0400 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-id: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: 12 TB Disk In freebsd AMD 64 ? Thread-index: AcrJyICxr8uVRu5uQ7Kv5V0GUbOQRQ== From: Ian Lord To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 12 TB Disk In freebsd AMD 64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:08:25 -0000 Hi, =20 I am planning to build a 12x 1TB array RAID 6 on a hardware = controller... I will use it as a nfs server for archiving files (we need = to keep legal files for 6 years)... =20 Raid 6 will give me a 10 TB drive approx... =20 Reading these pages: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html = =20 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-adding.ht= ml = =20 I kinda understand freebsd is not well suited for that. I can read = between the lines that we shouldn't go over 2TB. Is this information = still exact or outdated ? =20 I'm pretty sure I won't be able to boot on that megadrive so I planned = on having 2 smaller disk on raid 1, but I want to make sure the big disk = will work and will be reliable. =20 Could someone comment please ? =20 Thanks in advance =20 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ian Lord MSD Informatique 143 Rue des Fauvettes St-Colomban (Qu=E9bec) J5K 0E2 T=E9l: (514) 776-MSDI -> (514) 776-6734 Sans Frais: 1(877) 776-MSDI -> 1(877) 776-6734 http://www.msdi.ca =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:11:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB99106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BD08FC08 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1011935qwi.7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.131.39 with SMTP id v39mr4929915qcs.66.1269267072781; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:11:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:11:12 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8c4f901bf482796f Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:11:16 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>> "Ruben" =3D=3D Ruben de Groot writes: > > Ruben> And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased. > > I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering > postfix. =A0And now I use postfix, and you can't *make* me use sendmail > again. > > Of course I'm biased. =A0I prefer postfix now. (sorry I answered directly to Randal by mistake): I second you! I also use Postfix on FBSD and refuse to use any default MTA whether is the imposed Sendmail on FBSD or Exim on Debian, etc. There should be no default MTA in Open Source OSs. Best, Alejandro Imass > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 00= 95 > > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussi= on > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:25:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDFD1065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from ns.kfs.ru (kfs.kfs.ru [194.186.81.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623448FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bsam by ns.kfs.ru with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NtiZE-0002mb-TT; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:25:20 +0300 To: Aiza References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:25:20 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> (Aiza's message of "Sun\, 21 Mar 2010 13\:10\:43 +0800") Message-ID: <88406719@serv3.int.kfs.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:25:26 -0000 Aiza writes: > Now I would like to play with jails. One for postfix, apache, and ftp. > My reading of EZJAIL and the jails section of the handbook lead me to > believe I need a unique IP address for each jail. Is that correct? No. As long as you use different ports for different jails/services you may use one ip-address for those jails: ----- % jls JID IP Address Hostname Path 1 192.168.100.10 ftp.xxx.ru /jails/ftp.xxx.ru 2 192.168.100.10 mx.xxx.ru /jails/mx.xxx.ru 3 192.168.100.10 http.xxx.ru /jails/http.xxx.ru ----- -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:26:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6536106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30B18FC25 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2MEQdAW045645; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:26:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o2MEQdX0045642; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:26:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:26:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Aaron Lewis In-Reply-To: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:26:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:26:41 -0000 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Aaron Lewis wrote: > Hello BSD hackers, > I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through > ssh , everything's fine. > But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: > > no home directory > Logging in with home dir "/" > > Does anyone has any ideas ? > > > Here's some debug information > ========================================= > %> grep aaron /etc/passwd > aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash > > %> ls -ladh /home/aaron/ > drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron > ============================================ Have you set up a jail? The "no home directory" message appears in usr.sbin/jail/jail.c in 8-stable. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:30:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056E0106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65548FC1D for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntidm-0001hR-2X; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:30:07 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE093D414BA; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:30:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BA77EEF.5020004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:30:07 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA75588.4090107@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to compare permissions between two dirs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > In switching to a new make file for a personal project I have run into > the problem of under the old makefile everything works (web site) and > under the new one it does not... when manually looking at the two dirs > they appear identical in layout, sizes and perms (dir and file level) > but I want to make sure... is there any way to compare two diff dirs and > see if they only differ in date stamps? (note since there are several > developers working on this project I need to compare even if the owners > are diff) Hi Aryeh, I haven't tested this extensively, but it looks promising: mtree -c -n -i -p /path/to/directory/one > /tmp/dirlist1.txt mtree -c -n -i -p /path/to/directory/two > /tmp/dirlist2.txt diff /tmp/dirlist[12].txt Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/sourcehosting/ - Follow me, follow you -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFLp37v0sRouByUApARAm6sAJ9OIXbr7uSJ9PeH4RPf3EwxPmJPiwCcC8Sb TzWV52qn1cx00sypkngObXs= =r1W2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:51:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C861065678; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722188FC08; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 218FE46B7E; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40B748A021; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:51:06 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Rick Macklem Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:46:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <4BA432C8.4040707@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003220946.57087.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:51:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:51:07 -0000 On Friday 19 March 2010 11:27:13 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: > > [good stuff snipped] > > > > This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed transmitting > > "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE instead; it sounds > > more correct than marking it a general IO error. Also, the NFS server is > > serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, if it makes any difference. I > > suppose ZFS could be talking to the NFS server threads with some mismatched > > language, but I doubt it. > > > Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return > ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever > error it has returned. > > So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which > would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS > OR > ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. > > Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error > returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. > > --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 > +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 > @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ > } > } > error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp, &fhp->fh_fid, vpp); > + if (error != 0) > + error = ESTALE; > vfs_unbusy(mp); > if (error) > goto out; > > Please let me know if the patch helps, rick I can confirm that ZFS's FHTOVP() method never returns ESTALE. Perhaps this patch would fix it? It changes zfs_fhtovp() to return ESTALE if the generation count doesn't match. If this doesn't help, you can try changing some of the other return cases in this function to ESTALE (many use EINVAL) until you find the one that matches this condition. Index: zfs_vfsops.c =================================================================== --- zfs_vfsops.c (revision 205334) +++ zfs_vfsops.c (working copy) @@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ dprintf("znode gen (%u) != fid gen (%u)\n", zp_gen, fid_gen); VN_RELE(ZTOV(zp)); ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs); - return (EINVAL); + return (ESTALE); } *vpp = ZTOV(zp); -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:52:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF04106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CE68FC1A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wBqR1d0071HzFnQ56Esl7Y; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:45 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.51] ([71.199.122.142]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wEsk1d00D34Sj4f3aEskB9; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4BA78444.4040707@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:52:52 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Macklem References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003190831.00950.jhb@freebsd.org> <4BA37AE9.4060806@comcast.net> <4BA392B1.4050107@comcast.net> <4BA3DEBC.2000608@comcast.net> <4BA432C8.4040707@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions , John Baldwin Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:46 -0000 On 3/19/2010 11:27 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: > > [good stuff snipped] >> >> This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed >> transmitting "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE >> instead; it sounds more correct than marking it a general IO error. >> Also, the NFS server is serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, if >> it makes any difference. I suppose ZFS could be talking to the NFS >> server threads with some mismatched language, but I doubt it. >> > Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return > ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever > error it has returned. > > So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which > would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS > OR > ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. > > Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error > returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. > > --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 > +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 > @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ > } > } > error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp, &fhp->fh_fid, vpp); > + if (error != 0) > + error = ESTALE; > vfs_unbusy(mp); > if (error) > goto out; > > Please let me know if the patch helps, rick > > The patch seems to fix the bad behavior. Running with the patch, I see the following output from my patch (return code of nfs_doio from within nfsiod): nfssvc_iod: iod 0 nfs_doio returned errno: 70 Furthermore, when inspecting the transaction with Wireshark, after deleting the file on the NFS server it looks like there is only a single error. This time there it is a reply to a V3 Lookup call that contains a status of "NFS3ERR_NOENT (2)" coming from the NFS server. The client also does not repeatedly try to complete the failed request. Any suggestions on the next step here? Based on what you said it looks like ZFS is falsely reporting an IO error to VFS instead of ESTALE / NOENT. I tried looking around zfs_fhtovp() and only saw returns of EINVAL, but I'm not even sure I'm looking in the right place. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 14:52:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B076106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18AB8FC27 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2MEqgjv087073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:42 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:42 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Lewis References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:52:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/2010 12:46:06, Aaron Lewis wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: >> >>> Hello BSD hackers, >>> I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in >>> through ssh , everything's fine. >>> But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: >>> >>> no home directory >>> Logging in with home dir "/" >>> >>> Does anyone has any ideas ? >>> >>> >>> Here's some debug information >>> ========================================= >>> %> grep aaron /etc/passwd >>> aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash >>> >>> %> ls -ladh /home/aaron/ >>> drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron >>> ============================================ >>> >> >> What are the settings for >> >> ChallengeResponseAuthentication >> UsePam >> >> in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? >> > Nothing found , or commented out. Commented out means using the default setting -- which is 'yes' for both of those. ie. sshd is using the PAM system. Which means that PAM is probably working just fine. >> What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? >> > # grep -v -e "^#" /etc/pam.d/sshd | sed '/^$/d' > auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts > auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local > auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass > account required pam_nologin.so > account required pam_login_access.so > account required pam_unix.so > session required pam_permit.so > password required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass These are also the default settings for sshd -- which as you say is working. > # grep -v -e "^#" /etc/pam.d/login | sed '/^$/d' > auth sufficient pam_self.so no_warn > auth include system > account requisite pam_securetty.so > account required pam_nologin.so > account include system > session include system > password include system Again, this is the default for login. I should have asked you for the contents of /etc/pam.d/system as well, but if you say it's not been modified I'll believe you. Hmmmm... > It's all fresh install , did i do something wrong ? It's really strange > .. never met before. Something is a bit fubar somewhere, yes. From the symptoms you described, the immediate suspect would be the PAM system, but there are no obvious configuration problems with what you've shown me. Is there anything notable in /var/log/auth.log from the failed console logins? Can you try gratuitously creating another user account and seeing if that is affected in the same way, or indeed if it makes any difference to the original user account? Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkunhDoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwzBQCfccc1KXwscGDrHV2wn5Zr8xnO pMAAnjJVpjZc39wczR4u8nYo/Kxpvivl =3oJZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 15:09:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542A5106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DDE8FC13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2MF9TWE087342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:09:30 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA78829.5070002@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:09:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lord References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 12 TB Disk In freebsd AMD 64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:09:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/2010 14:03:53, Ian Lord wrote: > I kinda understand freebsd is not well suited for that. I can read > between the lines that we shouldn't go over 2TB. Is this information > still exact or outdated ? Outdated. The 2TB limit comes from the old-style DOS/fdisk(8) mbr and bsdlabel(8)[*]. Nowadays you can use gpart(8) instead and set up your disks using GPT, which doesn't have the same limitations. Given you're going to have a separate RAID1 mirror for system disks, you'll be able to get the machine up and running first, then build the filesystems for the data partition without having to faff around at install time. Even though you have a hardware RAID controller, it still might benefit you to look at ZFS. You can put a 'zpool disk' on top of a RAID6 created by your hardware, which will let you use all of the available space easily, and give you various other advantages through the integrated checksumming etc. built into ZFS. Cheers, Matthew [*] bsdlabel(8) has been modified to allow more than 8 partitions -- the bigdisk article is a bit behind the times there -- but the 32-bit size limit still applies. - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuniCkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwLVwCfUHnREj6ATinA9GTigrQJREDK InsAn03HRRNbNHxavbfZFY9E4KlNXC/j =LD41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 15:25:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0CF1065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjk32@cam.ac.uk) Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3988FC0A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from nat1.cjkey.org.uk ([88.97.163.220]:43896 helo=[192.168.2.59]) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:cjk32) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1NtjVc-0002tv-GJ (Exim 4.70) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (return-path ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4BA78BF3.2090102@cam.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:39 +0000 From: Christopher Key User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Unable to boot FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:41 -0000 Hello, I'm using FreeBSD 7.2, and am attempting to update to 8.0. I've been through the standard, make buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel but cannot get the newly installed kernel to boot. The system freezes as soon as the loader tries to boot the kernel. It doesn't even get as far as the copyright message: Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK boot -Dd \ I've tried a custom kernel based upon my 7.2 config, a generic config and most recently a generic config with KDB and DDB enable all with the same result. The 7.2 kernel continues to work normally. This is an amd64 system booting from two gmirrored disks The mirror is partitioned using gpt. Included below is the output from pciconf -lv (under 7.2). I don't know what other information may be relevant, nor the commands to obtain it. I'm not quite sure how to proceed with debugging this. Any thoughts or suggestions would be much appreciated. Kind regards, Christopher Key # pciconf -lv hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x29908086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Q963/Q965 Memory Controller Hub' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI pcib1@pci0:0:1:0: class=0x060400 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x29918086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Q963/Q965 PCIe Root Port' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x29928086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Q963/Q965 Integrated Graphics Controller' class = display subclass = VGA none0@pci0:0:3:0: class=0x078000 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x29948086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '0x8086 Intel(R) Management Engine Interface' class = simple comms em0@pci0:0:25:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00018086 chip=0x104a8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82566DM Gigabit Network Connection' class = network subclass = ethernet uhci0@pci0:0:26:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28348086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci1@pci0:0:26:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28358086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci0@pci0:0:26:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x283a8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '81EC1043 (?) ICH8 Enhanced USB2 Enhanced Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB pcib2@pci0:0:28:0: class=0x060400 card=0x283f8086 chip=0x283f8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCIe Port 1' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib3@pci0:0:28:1: class=0x060400 card=0x28418086 chip=0x28418086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCIe Port 2' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib4@pci0:0:28:2: class=0x060400 card=0x28438086 chip=0x28438086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCIe Port 3' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib5@pci0:0:28:3: class=0x060400 card=0x28458086 chip=0x28458086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCIe Port 4' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib6@pci0:0:28:4: class=0x060400 card=0x28478086 chip=0x28478086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) PCIe Port 5' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI uhci2@pci0:0:29:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28308086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci3@pci0:0:29:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28318086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci4@pci0:0:29:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28328086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci1@pci0:0:29:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28368086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI' class = serial bus subclass = USB pcib7@pci0:0:30:0: class=0x060401 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x244e8086 rev=0xf2 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801 Family (ICH2/3/4/4/5/5/6/7/8/9,63xxESB) Hub Interface to PCI Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28148086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801HO (ICH8DO) LPC Interface Controller' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA atapci1@pci0:0:31:2: class=0x010601 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x28218086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'ICH8R (ICH8 Family) SATA AHCI Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SATA none1@pci0:0:31:3: class=0x0c0500 card=0x4f438086 chip=0x283e8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801H (ICH8 Family) SMBus Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus hptrr0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x010000 card=0x11ab11ab chip=0x23101103 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Triones Technologies Inc. (HighPoint)' device = 'RocketRAID 231x SATA Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI atapci0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x01018f card=0x610111ab chip=0x610111ab rev=0xb1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device = '6101 SATA2 Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 15:47:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FD41065672 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9662F8FC08 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.164] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:02:43 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::1476 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Message-ID: <4BA7911F.5060905@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:47:43 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100311 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003190831.00950.jhb@freebsd.org> <4BA37AE9.4060806@comcast.net> <4BA392B1.4050107@comcast.net> <4BA3DEBC.2000608@comcast.net> <4BA432C8.4040707@comcast.net> <4BA78444.4040707@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA78444.4040707@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem , User Questions , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:47:46 -0000 On 03/22/10 10:52, Steve Polyack wrote: > On 3/19/2010 11:27 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: >> >> [good stuff snipped] >>> >>> This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed >>> transmitting "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE >>> instead; it sounds more correct than marking it a general IO error. >>> Also, the NFS server is serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, >>> if it makes any difference. I suppose ZFS could be talking to the >>> NFS server threads with some mismatched language, but I doubt it. >>> >> Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return >> ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever >> error it has returned. >> >> So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which >> would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS >> OR >> ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. >> >> Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error >> returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. >> >> --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 >> +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 >> @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ >> } >> } >> error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp, &fhp->fh_fid, vpp); >> + if (error != 0) >> + error = ESTALE; >> vfs_unbusy(mp); >> if (error) >> goto out; >> >> Please let me know if the patch helps, rick >> >> > The patch seems to fix the bad behavior. Running with the patch, I > see the following output from my patch (return code of nfs_doio from > within nfsiod): > nfssvc_iod: iod 0 nfs_doio returned errno: 70 > > Furthermore, when inspecting the transaction with Wireshark, after > deleting the file on the NFS server it looks like there is only a > single error. This time there it is a reply to a V3 Lookup call that > contains a status of "NFS3ERR_NOENT (2)" coming from the NFS server. > The client also does not repeatedly try to complete the failed request. > > Any suggestions on the next step here? Based on what you said it > looks like ZFS is falsely reporting an IO error to VFS instead of > ESTALE / NOENT. I tried looking around zfs_fhtovp() and only saw > returns of EINVAL, but I'm not even sure I'm looking in the right place. Further on down the rabbit hole... here's the piece in zfs_fhtovp() where it's kicking out EINVAL instead of ESTALE - the following patch corrects the behavior, but of course also suggests further digging within the zfs_zget() function to ensure that _it_ is returning the correct thing and whether or not it needs to be handled there or within zfs_fhtovp(). --- src-orig/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c 2010-03-22 11:41:21.000000000 -0400 +++ src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c 2010-03-22 16:25:21.000000000 -0400 @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ dprintf("getting %llu [%u mask %llx]\n", object, fid_gen, gen_mask); if (err = zfs_zget(zfsvfs, object, &zp)) { ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs); - return (err); + return (ESTALE); } zp_gen = zp->z_phys->zp_gen & gen_mask; if (zp_gen == 0) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 16:02:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F53F106566C; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE258FC08; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76A6D46B2D; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:02:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AE9ED8A021; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:02:43 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Steve Polyack Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:00:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <4BA78444.4040707@comcast.net> <4BA7911F.5060905@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA7911F.5060905@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:02:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem , User Questions , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:02:45 -0000 On Monday 22 March 2010 11:47:43 am Steve Polyack wrote: > On 03/22/10 10:52, Steve Polyack wrote: > > On 3/19/2010 11:27 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: > >> > >> [good stuff snipped] > >>> > >>> This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed > >>> transmitting "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE > >>> instead; it sounds more correct than marking it a general IO error. > >>> Also, the NFS server is serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, > >>> if it makes any difference. I suppose ZFS could be talking to the > >>> NFS server threads with some mismatched language, but I doubt it. > >>> > >> Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return > >> ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever > >> error it has returned. > >> > >> So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which > >> would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS > >> OR > >> ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. > >> > >> Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error > >> returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. > >> > >> --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 > >> +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 > >> @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ > >> } > >> } > >> error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp, &fhp->fh_fid, vpp); > >> + if (error != 0) > >> + error = ESTALE; > >> vfs_unbusy(mp); > >> if (error) > >> goto out; > >> > >> Please let me know if the patch helps, rick > >> > >> > > The patch seems to fix the bad behavior. Running with the patch, I > > see the following output from my patch (return code of nfs_doio from > > within nfsiod): > > nfssvc_iod: iod 0 nfs_doio returned errno: 70 > > > > Furthermore, when inspecting the transaction with Wireshark, after > > deleting the file on the NFS server it looks like there is only a > > single error. This time there it is a reply to a V3 Lookup call that > > contains a status of "NFS3ERR_NOENT (2)" coming from the NFS server. > > The client also does not repeatedly try to complete the failed request. > > > > Any suggestions on the next step here? Based on what you said it > > looks like ZFS is falsely reporting an IO error to VFS instead of > > ESTALE / NOENT. I tried looking around zfs_fhtovp() and only saw > > returns of EINVAL, but I'm not even sure I'm looking in the right place. > > Further on down the rabbit hole... here's the piece in zfs_fhtovp() > where it's kicking out EINVAL instead of ESTALE - the following patch > corrects the behavior, but of course also suggests further digging > within the zfs_zget() function to ensure that _it_ is returning the > correct thing and whether or not it needs to be handled there or within > zfs_fhtovp(). > > --- > src-orig/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c > 2010-03-22 11:41:21.000000000 -0400 > +++ src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c > 2010-03-22 16:25:21.000000000 -0400 > @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ > dprintf("getting %llu [%u mask %llx]\n", object, fid_gen, gen_mask); > if (err = zfs_zget(zfsvfs, object, &zp)) { > ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs); > - return (err); > + return (ESTALE); > } > zp_gen = zp->z_phys->zp_gen & gen_mask; > if (zp_gen == 0) So the odd thing here is that ffs_fhtovp() doesn't return ESTALE if VFS_VGET() (which calls ffs_vget()) fails, it only returns ESTALE if the generation count doesn't matter. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 16:44:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243371065675 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7598FC15 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.164] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:59:04 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::1403 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Message-ID: <4BA79E54.5030504@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:44:04 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100311 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <4BA78444.4040707@comcast.net> <4BA7911F.5060905@comcast.net> <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem , User Questions , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:44:06 -0000 On 03/22/10 12:00, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 22 March 2010 11:47:43 am Steve Polyack wrote: > >> On 03/22/10 10:52, Steve Polyack wrote: >> >>> On 3/19/2010 11:27 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: >>>> >>>> [good stuff snipped] >>>> >>>>> This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed >>>>> transmitting "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE >>>>> instead; it sounds more correct than marking it a general IO error. >>>>> Also, the NFS server is serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, >>>>> if it makes any difference. I suppose ZFS could be talking to the >>>>> NFS server threads with some mismatched language, but I doubt it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return >>>> ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever >>>> error it has returned. >>>> >>>> So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which >>>> would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS >>>> OR >>>> ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. >>>> >>>> Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error >>>> returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. >>>> >>>> --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 >>>> +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 >>>> @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ >>>> } >>>> } >>>> error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp,&fhp->fh_fid, vpp); >>>> + if (error != 0) >>>> + error = ESTALE; >>>> vfs_unbusy(mp); >>>> if (error) >>>> goto out; >>>> >>>> Please let me know if the patch helps, rick >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> The patch seems to fix the bad behavior. Running with the patch, I >>> see the following output from my patch (return code of nfs_doio from >>> within nfsiod): >>> nfssvc_iod: iod 0 nfs_doio returned errno: 70 >>> >>> Furthermore, when inspecting the transaction with Wireshark, after >>> deleting the file on the NFS server it looks like there is only a >>> single error. This time there it is a reply to a V3 Lookup call that >>> contains a status of "NFS3ERR_NOENT (2)" coming from the NFS server. >>> The client also does not repeatedly try to complete the failed request. >>> >>> Any suggestions on the next step here? Based on what you said it >>> looks like ZFS is falsely reporting an IO error to VFS instead of >>> ESTALE / NOENT. I tried looking around zfs_fhtovp() and only saw >>> returns of EINVAL, but I'm not even sure I'm looking in the right place. >>> >> Further on down the rabbit hole... here's the piece in zfs_fhtovp() >> where it's kicking out EINVAL instead of ESTALE - the following patch >> corrects the behavior, but of course also suggests further digging >> within the zfs_zget() function to ensure that _it_ is returning the >> correct thing and whether or not it needs to be handled there or within >> zfs_fhtovp(). >> >> --- >> src-orig/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c >> 2010-03-22 11:41:21.000000000 -0400 >> +++ src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c >> 2010-03-22 16:25:21.000000000 -0400 >> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ >> dprintf("getting %llu [%u mask %llx]\n", object, fid_gen, gen_mask); >> if (err = zfs_zget(zfsvfs, object,&zp)) { >> ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs); >> - return (err); >> + return (ESTALE); >> } >> zp_gen = zp->z_phys->zp_gen& gen_mask; >> if (zp_gen == 0) >> > So the odd thing here is that ffs_fhtovp() doesn't return ESTALE if VFS_VGET() > (which calls ffs_vget()) fails, it only returns ESTALE if the generation count > doesn't matter. > > It looks like it also returns ESTALE when the inode is invalid (< ROOTINO || > max inodes?) - would an unlinked file in FFS referenced at a later time report an invalid inode? But back to your point, zfs_zget() seems to be failing and returning the EINVAL before zfs_fhtovp() even has a chance to set and check zp_gen. I'm trying to get some more details through the use of gratuitous dprintf()'s, but they don't seem to be making it to any logs or the console even with vfs.zfs.debug=1 set. Any pointers on how to get these dprintf() calls working? Thanks again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 16:57:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3CE106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809038FC0A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2MGvRrN080116; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:57:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2MGvQAJ080115; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:57:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:57:26 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Aiza Message-ID: <20100322165726.GA80072@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Aiza , jj@dhenin.fr, Mark Shroyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> <12437d831003220323o4463044bu416f994f0129b459@mail.gmail.com> <20100322112235.GA78247@ei.bzerk.org> <4BA7655A.70604@comclark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA7655A.70604@comclark.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:57:30 +0100 (CET) Cc: Ruben de Groot , Mark Shroyer , jj@dhenin.fr, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:57:43 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:40:58PM +0800, Aiza typed: > > > >This will enable him to ping another host from within the jail. I won't > >do anything for ftp. > > > >OP: what exact error do you get? And does ftp work *within* the jail > >(ftp localhost)? > > with sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 done on the host. From > within the jail did ping -c 2 10.0.10.6 which is a pc on the lan gives > me socket: Operation not permitted mesg. weird. did you actually execute the sysctl statement or just put it in /etc/sysctl.conf? > And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection > error. This is not helpfull. Copy/paste the exact error message (and what you did. We are not psychics). > Just how am i to determine if ftp work *within* the jail ftp localhost? As I said: from within the jail, execute the command "ftp localhost". No rocket science involved. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 17:41:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D51065679; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF52A8FC14; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D6A646B2D; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 477F58A027; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:41:02 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Steve Polyack Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:39:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> <4BA79E54.5030504@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA79E54.5030504@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:41:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem , User Questions , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:04 -0000 On Monday 22 March 2010 12:44:04 pm Steve Polyack wrote: > On 03/22/10 12:00, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday 22 March 2010 11:47:43 am Steve Polyack wrote: > > > >> On 03/22/10 10:52, Steve Polyack wrote: > >> > >>> On 3/19/2010 11:27 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: > >>>> > >>>> [good stuff snipped] > >>>> > >>>>> This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed > >>>>> transmitting "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE > >>>>> instead; it sounds more correct than marking it a general IO error. > >>>>> Also, the NFS server is serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, > >>>>> if it makes any difference. I suppose ZFS could be talking to the > >>>>> NFS server threads with some mismatched language, but I doubt it. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return > >>>> ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever > >>>> error it has returned. > >>>> > >>>> So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which > >>>> would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS > >>>> OR > >>>> ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. > >>>> > >>>> Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error > >>>> returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. > >>>> > >>>> --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 > >>>> +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 > >>>> @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ > >>>> } > >>>> } > >>>> error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp,&fhp->fh_fid, vpp); > >>>> + if (error != 0) > >>>> + error = ESTALE; > >>>> vfs_unbusy(mp); > >>>> if (error) > >>>> goto out; > >>>> > >>>> Please let me know if the patch helps, rick > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> The patch seems to fix the bad behavior. Running with the patch, I > >>> see the following output from my patch (return code of nfs_doio from > >>> within nfsiod): > >>> nfssvc_iod: iod 0 nfs_doio returned errno: 70 > >>> > >>> Furthermore, when inspecting the transaction with Wireshark, after > >>> deleting the file on the NFS server it looks like there is only a > >>> single error. This time there it is a reply to a V3 Lookup call that > >>> contains a status of "NFS3ERR_NOENT (2)" coming from the NFS server. > >>> The client also does not repeatedly try to complete the failed request. > >>> > >>> Any suggestions on the next step here? Based on what you said it > >>> looks like ZFS is falsely reporting an IO error to VFS instead of > >>> ESTALE / NOENT. I tried looking around zfs_fhtovp() and only saw > >>> returns of EINVAL, but I'm not even sure I'm looking in the right place. > >>> > >> Further on down the rabbit hole... here's the piece in zfs_fhtovp() > >> where it's kicking out EINVAL instead of ESTALE - the following patch > >> corrects the behavior, but of course also suggests further digging > >> within the zfs_zget() function to ensure that _it_ is returning the > >> correct thing and whether or not it needs to be handled there or within > >> zfs_fhtovp(). > >> > >> --- > >> src-orig/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c > >> 2010-03-22 11:41:21.000000000 -0400 > >> +++ src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c > >> 2010-03-22 16:25:21.000000000 -0400 > >> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ > >> dprintf("getting %llu [%u mask %llx]\n", object, fid_gen, gen_mask); > >> if (err = zfs_zget(zfsvfs, object,&zp)) { > >> ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs); > >> - return (err); > >> + return (ESTALE); > >> } > >> zp_gen = zp->z_phys->zp_gen& gen_mask; > >> if (zp_gen == 0) > >> > > So the odd thing here is that ffs_fhtovp() doesn't return ESTALE if VFS_VGET() > > (which calls ffs_vget()) fails, it only returns ESTALE if the generation count > > doesn't matter. > > > > > It looks like it also returns ESTALE when the inode is invalid (< > ROOTINO || > max inodes?) - would an unlinked file in FFS referenced at > a later time report an invalid inode? > > But back to your point, zfs_zget() seems to be failing and returning the > EINVAL before zfs_fhtovp() even has a chance to set and check zp_gen. > I'm trying to get some more details through the use of gratuitous > dprintf()'s, but they don't seem to be making it to any logs or the > console even with vfs.zfs.debug=1 set. Any pointers on how to get these > dprintf() calls working? That I have no idea on. Maybe Rick can chime in? I'm actually not sure why we would want to treat a FHTOVP failure as anything but an ESTALE error in the NFS server to be honest. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 18:13:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E34B106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318A98FC20 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so431283bwz.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:13:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=NbYqbqyko04DidvWfcIkAwhQhtb6RoiOBBRFV+iPJPM=; b=o9I5QnvsQRBN3XTfEh5McmCs3MIPVwUlOrO/CNzp0rj/MQr3GSbqO3t5t/iBlnMuRu V3F5qGFhl7xy1bptBGYFimVzL1KQAfCqTuJEijsI/9viJYo4To4sMF5zuDMH+WHkj5IM I4tPB6Z1RbkP6sWHqhzkWfk125EeKXMsdKp5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rn1y28P5/3R8IwNannAEqhA5B1VBhkYBieCklRneYy9atyrdMpHoIlQD8Ety9lrYiS kbPF8BLoLxOmuMhIIqy0y8hd5hFQUhIlDeyJrGmcdhwWf4d+4yJDA2NK9ygiduk2FvyY G/xmZF9Kumf47MxJ3KADiKMWQQpLiSgdjHwr8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.39.198 with SMTP id h6mr4358245bke.182.1269281624533; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:13:44 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: RE: 12 TB Disk In freebsd AMD 64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:13:46 -0000 MBR can only work with 2TB volumes, however, we are no longer limited to MBR. With GPT, we can have really really big volumes. That being said, I really don't think you should be using a single 12TB volume with UFS, even if you have underlying redundancy provided by a hardware raid device. Have you ever had to fsck a 2TB volume or bigger? It's not fun. My recommendation would be to use ZFS. Use it to manage your array and filesystems and use it on top of individual raw disk devices, if you must use your raid controller, use it in JBOD mode. If you want a relatively technical introduction to ZFS and why it's good for you, read up here: http://www.slideshare.net/relling/zfs-tutorial-usenix-june-2009 - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 19:33:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0B9106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCEF8FC16 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2MJXf7o080936; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:33:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2MJXdmj080935; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:33:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:33:39 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Message-ID: <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , "Randal L. Schwartz" , Jorge Biquez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:33:45 +0100 (CET) Cc: Ruben de Groot , Jorge Biquez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:33:47 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:30:21AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed: > >>>>> "Ruben" == Ruben de Groot writes: > > Ruben> And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased. > > I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering > postfix. And now I use postfix, and you can't *make* me use sendmail > again. I'm not making you use anything. Just commenting on your assessment that sendmail cannot do something, while I know it can. > Of course I'm biased. I prefer postfix now. Nice for you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 19:57:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6A91065677 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CAE8FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2ADD61DE327; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:57:33 -0700 (PDT) To: Ruben de Groot References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.3.15; tzolkin = 13 Men; haab = 13 Cumku Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:57:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> (Ruben de Groot's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:33:39 +0100") Message-ID: <86k4t486z6.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jorge Biquez , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:57:34 -0000 >>>>> "Ruben" == Ruben de Groot writes: Ruben> I'm not making you use anything. Just commenting on your assessment that Ruben> sendmail cannot do something, while I know it can. I never said it couldn't. So let's not be making something up here. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 19:57:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD331065732 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christophertheodore.rhodes@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com (mail-ew0-f227.google.com [209.85.219.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E311C8FC18 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so674600ewy.13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jYqcAgFEW/7RjavvwOlx5tdgtTpgMZMKPyHDo0WXQZM=; b=VPgH4HQIhsoQpPZJwsAZykVFaOt0mYMOC5pAcv0RWjLcE4MA7O0X1tKdjSWUgFaUU4 U/ptVuFqtEf7/OQReOhEDsU1HrwUIyTR9UTJORQ1ac9iU9pFgTMLEQ6p6mYaSxunTr1t hG+AMBh1O+YNCvCpsS2Ntj8+leK8Y9D9mqPG4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LT+m5dw4OjFxqADsdVVkdaD/zl+CRGO7R94Qtw0Fpds3ql9Srv//86Aa9UgJfySVEV BGZy0Jtm8y3MLG6LsvutTi0RWDZuW1b0cyNth97Yui2pxNLn1eN24+Q8V48fpUkbTqCx iz4PSlUVBt1J4NlLlrYboCAna5POHzrtzRz6I= Received: by 10.213.41.3 with SMTP id m3mr206638ebe.93.1269286359625; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaio.network.ukg (ip24-56-47-177.ph.ph.cox.net [24.56.47.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm3117892ewy.8.2010.03.22.12.32.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA7C5D1.7050301@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:32:33 -0700 From: "Christopher Theodore; RHODES" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Setting ucastrate in /etc/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:57:45 -0000 Hello; $ uname -rs FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 I have setup ral0/wlan0 in /etc/rc.conf thusly: wlans_ral0="wlan0" create_args_wlan0="wlanmode sta mcastrate 54 ssid linksys channel 6" ifconfig_wlan0="inet 10.0.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" This provides a working interface but ucastrate is not being set and I have to manually set it after I login with: # ifconfig wlan0 ucastrate 54 How can I effectively set ucastrate in rc.conf? Magnanimously, Christopher Theodore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 19:59:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5B1106578E for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f184.google.com (mail-qy0-f184.google.com [209.85.221.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49088FC1C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3776879qyk.9 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:59:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.251.72 with SMTP id mr8mr1015217qcb.30.1269287946653; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:59:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:59:06 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 996db68b8922f010 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:59:08 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:30:21AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed: >> >>>>> "Ruben" =3D=3D Ruben de Groot writes: >> >> Ruben> And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased. >> >> I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering >> postfix. =A0And now I use postfix, and you can't *make* me use sendmail >> again. > > I'm not making you use anything. Just commenting on your assessment that > sendmail cannot do something, while I know it can. > As stated in my previous response I second Randal's opinion. I am sure that sendmail can and in fact probably does do anything that Postfix can do, nevertheless, there are core differences that make Postfix (and for that matter QMail) a better choice for small to medium implementations, in fact large ones, but I don't want to get into that right now. The main difference is that Sendmail and the vast majority of MTAs are monolithic and usually very hard to configure. Postfix on the other hand is a bunch of different programs (non-monolithic) and extremely easy to configure. There is a lot of debate of which MTA model is better in general, but I think that non-monolithic allow to play well and integrate with almost anything and very easily, whereas in the monolithic model you may even have to recompile to get something simple working. Furthermore Sendmail's legacy configuration methods via m4 are really hard for the non-experts and with all the administration ordeals that a modern admin has to deal with, banging your head with m4 and restarts is not very comforting. Again IMHO. BTW, I think that Randal is more known as Perl guy, more than a Linux-guy ;-) Anyway, my point is that an Operating System should not impose a specific MTA by default, and let the installer chose their favorite MTA. From what I understand you can't even remove Sendmail from standard FBSD and must only be de-activated. I personally think that sucks (if it's true anyway). Note that it is not my intention to start a flame MTA-war here. I think that Sendmail is exclellent if you like it, but Postfix is excellent as well, and we should be eventually able to install FBSD with Postfix as default MTA. >> Of course I'm biased. =A0I prefer postfix now. > > Nice for you. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 20:30:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C961065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com (mail-ew0-f223.google.com [209.85.219.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195448FC14 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so880319ewy.34 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:30:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zDf2zRaDh04BT/lbBBScAfyZQWrI72FpKURaF5Acpi8=; b=h0UxRMHED4kInD7Bu49E89YFULmOTdPgEmqoNoDBkDA0Qo/WL9MCaP5FibOUO1n8I2 6LWGh/JMPD58jVgrqyRi6fWAwvrgIks+iaqmRfUq7PJhpm77EKYJuBa6ZIo56JgWaKia 8NarNDQB9m9KZg3F51U9JQOMpkBk2Fnpy5Pmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OPGnlnBjIr6tkE0yRLidI8tcMpw2AhMxiiYlnNXiqt9Z3vsbqaWxlg1dv2Vwctameg 6EwnO4AK9mugFAABwnA957NdcvQzLF7rAENFlbZvmfZ4/2fS2HS/UuEsAZZF7jhyXWin I+Lz61OtGJllbRal7sSDSklK6geXR9KzhWyrw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.193.84 with SMTP id h20mr268471hbi.8.1269289817812; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:30:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 Message-ID: <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> From: Alberto Mijares To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:30:19 -0000 > Anyway, my point is that an Operating System should not impose a > specific MTA by default, and let the installer chose their favorite > MTA. From what I understand you can't even remove Sendmail from > standard FBSD and must only be de-activated. I personally think that > sucks (if it's true anyway). Note that it is not my intention to start > a flame MTA-war here. I think that Sendmail is exclellent if you like > it, but Postfix is excellent as well, and we should be eventually able > to install FBSD with Postfix as default MTA. I could be wrong, but I think you can build the world without sendmail passing the propper flags to make. In the other hand, sendmail is a piece of the operative system; so you could end up with some broken features. There are some other apps that belong to the OS as well, like bind9 for DNS, sh and csh for the shell and so on... It would be very difficult to let the user choose their favorite applications in an OS install. As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of FreeBSD. I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if I don't need exotic features. My point is that Sendmail doesn't hurt anyone as part of the FreeBSD Operative System; unlike some Linux based distros, which really impose default MTA's without the need. Best regards. Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 21:01:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44425106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mats.w.lindberg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com (mail-ew0-f227.google.com [209.85.219.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDDD8FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so734879ewy.13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nypcWHjhhiUxyMW/Luiyx4JxoQePZZ/e2SzzJtjgP0Q=; b=BlaPpHjxc73Rfs1K4ulD6Bqlgee9LUnFroY6UlImB5Nfu/ka2ffmXLt/yKxiIsA+MY FE8FJ6WPJyL8lhDHX1pUlTRVW+A/boKfyKTg7SowKwlkSIsm7Ka/koB9f93gZQX3S4il NM/4HJN722FcXucyjRhCuk4p0VeB28MhR6ssw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PDRUdMXAXC4I3dKihEkhAmWXkfln/NBgPAJVBzA6YPkf/1c6AOVYR41PtclqegeWV/ z0Ua2erDOtOfeJM/CHoru/H7eDRdFv0/Lr5CgBuCEU40UFIgxWvysEjrE9rqw0L/urRw nhLWPwQSJGPtqqsADMl+gVnmXgIiYZo3LskAM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.207 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:35:44 +0100 Received: by 10.213.63.12 with SMTP id z12mr255059ebh.68.1269290144046; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5e91cf2e1003221335x4afb161ib9fd565b97beb20a@mail.gmail.com> From: Mats Lindberg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: diskless & dhclient X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:01:44 -0000 Hi all, I've tried to get my freebsd diskless system to get hold of some of the dhcp-options. E.g. my dhcp-server will always be the nfs-server as well. So I was hoping to create the /etc/fstab with the the dhcpd's ip as the nfs server. Thus not needing to have the hard coded nfsroot:/conf/'ip-address'/etc. Instead i'm looking for having almost all necessary files in the nfsroot:/conf/base/etc directory. I've tried to set ifconfig_ETHDEV="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf and creating a bourne shell script /etc/dhclient_enter_hooks, but as far as I can detect the script is never run. I guess since the kernel already got the ip-address during pxeboot it does not care about renewing the ip-address, or?? I'm running a legacy FreeBSD 6.4. So - not really a specific question, more like a cry for guidance - anyone? /Mats From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 21:22:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C9C1065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com (mail-fx0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918358FC19 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1172932fxm.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.63.208 with SMTP id c16mr3474768fai.29.1269292977291; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm731118fka.44.2010.03.22.14.22.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7E6122834 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:22:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:22:53 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:22:59 -0000 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 Alberto Mijares articulated: > As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by > default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some > limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of > FreeBSD. > > I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if I > don't need exotic features. Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Small is beautiful. Schumacher's Dictum From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 21:26:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5451D106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f184.google.com (mail-qy0-f184.google.com [209.85.221.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B23C8FC26 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3854996qyk.9 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:26:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.224.149 with SMTP id io21mr2250366qcb.94.1269293188930; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:26:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:26:28 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 22fafa7ed20d5451 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:26:30 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 > Alberto Mijares articulated: > >> As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by >> default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some >> limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of >> FreeBSD. >> >> I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if I >> don't need exotic features. > > Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? Yes! Another Postfix fan! - or not... > > -- > Jerry > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > Small is beautiful. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Schumacher's Dictum > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 21:38:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790F4106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328D28FC08 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.164] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:53:14 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::1864 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Message-ID: <4BA7E349.3080804@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:38:17 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100311 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> <4BA79E54.5030504@comcast.net> <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem , User Questions , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:38:19 -0000 On 03/22/10 13:39, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 22 March 2010 12:44:04 pm Steve Polyack wrote: > >> On 03/22/10 12:00, John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> On Monday 22 March 2010 11:47:43 am Steve Polyack wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 03/22/10 10:52, Steve Polyack wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 3/19/2010 11:27 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> [good stuff snipped] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> This makes sense. According to wireshark, the server is indeed >>>>>>> transmitting "Status: NFS3ERR_IO (5)". Perhaps this should be STALE >>>>>>> instead; it sounds more correct than marking it a general IO error. >>>>>>> Also, the NFS server is serving its share off of a ZFS filesystem, >>>>>>> if it makes any difference. I suppose ZFS could be talking to the >>>>>>> NFS server threads with some mismatched language, but I doubt it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, now I think we're making progress. If VFS_FHTOVP() doesn't return >>>>>> ESTALE when the file no longer exists, the NFS server returns whatever >>>>>> error it has returned. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, either VFS_FHTOVP() succeeds after the file has been deleted, which >>>>>> would be a problem that needs to be fixed within ZFS >>>>>> OR >>>>>> ZFS returns an error other than ESTALE when it doesn't exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Try the following patch on the server (which just makes any error >>>>>> returned by VFS_FHTOVP() into ESTALE) and see if that helps. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c.sav 2010-03-19 22:06:43.000000000 -0400 >>>>>> +++ nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c 2010-03-19 22:07:22.000000000 -0400 >>>>>> @@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@ >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>>> error = VFS_FHTOVP(mp,&fhp->fh_fid, vpp); >>>>>> + if (error != 0) >>>>>> + error = ESTALE; >>>>>> vfs_unbusy(mp); >>>>>> if (error) >>>>>> goto out; >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know if the patch helps, rick >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> The patch seems to fix the bad behavior. Running with the patch, I >>>>> see the following output from my patch (return code of nfs_doio from >>>>> within nfsiod): >>>>> nfssvc_iod: iod 0 nfs_doio returned errno: 70 >>>>> >>>>> Furthermore, when inspecting the transaction with Wireshark, after >>>>> deleting the file on the NFS server it looks like there is only a >>>>> single error. This time there it is a reply to a V3 Lookup call that >>>>> contains a status of "NFS3ERR_NOENT (2)" coming from the NFS server. >>>>> The client also does not repeatedly try to complete the failed request. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions on the next step here? Based on what you said it >>>>> looks like ZFS is falsely reporting an IO error to VFS instead of >>>>> ESTALE / NOENT. I tried looking around zfs_fhtovp() and only saw >>>>> returns of EINVAL, but I'm not even sure I'm looking in the right place. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Further on down the rabbit hole... here's the piece in zfs_fhtovp() >>>> where it's kicking out EINVAL instead of ESTALE - the following patch >>>> corrects the behavior, but of course also suggests further digging >>>> within the zfs_zget() function to ensure that _it_ is returning the >>>> correct thing and whether or not it needs to be handled there or within >>>> zfs_fhtovp(). >>>> >>>> --- >>>> src-orig/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c >>>> 2010-03-22 11:41:21.000000000 -0400 >>>> +++ src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vfsops.c >>>> 2010-03-22 16:25:21.000000000 -0400 >>>> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ >>>> dprintf("getting %llu [%u mask %llx]\n", object, fid_gen, >>>> > gen_mask); > >>>> if (err = zfs_zget(zfsvfs, object,&zp)) { >>>> ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs); >>>> - return (err); >>>> + return (ESTALE); >>>> } >>>> zp_gen = zp->z_phys->zp_gen& gen_mask; >>>> if (zp_gen == 0) >>>> >>>> >>> So the odd thing here is that ffs_fhtovp() doesn't return ESTALE if >>> > VFS_VGET() > >>> (which calls ffs_vget()) fails, it only returns ESTALE if the generation >>> > count > >>> doesn't matter. >>> >>> >>> >> It looks like it also returns ESTALE when the inode is invalid (< >> ROOTINO ||> max inodes?) - would an unlinked file in FFS referenced at >> a later time report an invalid inode? >> >> But back to your point, zfs_zget() seems to be failing and returning the >> EINVAL before zfs_fhtovp() even has a chance to set and check zp_gen. >> I'm trying to get some more details through the use of gratuitous >> dprintf()'s, but they don't seem to be making it to any logs or the >> console even with vfs.zfs.debug=1 set. Any pointers on how to get these >> dprintf() calls working? >> > That I have no idea on. Maybe Rick can chime in? I'm actually not sure why > we would want to treat a FHTOVP failure as anything but an ESTALE error in the > NFS server to be honest. > > I resorted to changing dprintf()s to printf()s. The failure in zfs_fhtovp() is indeed from zfs_zget(), which fails right at the top where it calls dmu_bonus_hold(): Mar 22 16:55:44 zfs-dev kernel: zfs_zget(): dmu_bonus_hold() failed, returning err: 17 Mar 22 16:55:44 zfs-dev kernel: zfs_fhtovp(): zfs_zget() failed, bailing out with err: 17 errno 17 seems to map to EEXIST. in zfs_zget(): err = dmu_bonus_hold(zfsvfs->z_os, obj_num, NULL, &db); if (err) { ZFS_OBJ_HOLD_EXIT(zfsvfs, obj_num); printf("zfs_zget(): dmu_bonus_hold() failed, returning err: %d\n", err); return (err); } dmu_bonus_hold() calls dnode_hold_impl(), which seems to be who is returning EEXIST (17). It's probably not kosher to modify such returns, so I suspect fixing this within the NFS server may be the only option. Regardless, is it safe to just treat any other error from VFS_FHTOVP() as ESTALE within the NFS code? This is what Rick's testing patch does, but it leaves me curious as to how it would act when other real errors returned from an _fhtovp() call. Perhaps zfs_fhtovp() is the place to handle it, translating the error appropriately for the VFS_FHTOVP() caller within the NFS server code. This could avoid any nasty side effects for NFS operations on other filesystems where things are already working "fine". This is the point where I'm lost as to where to go next. I'll try the experimental NFS server switches soon just to see if it handles it any better, but based on the findings so far I would think that it would act the same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 21:50:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438D3106568B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f184.google.com (mail-qy0-f184.google.com [209.85.221.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514B88FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3873353qyk.9 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:50:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.97.147 with SMTP id l19mr513967qcn.24.1269294603347; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:50:03 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 04497425de6bd74c Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Patch Submission to a Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:50:10 -0000 Hi, I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends To whon or where should I submit it? Thanks in advance, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 22:05:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2194B1065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:05:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7598FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so281850fxm.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:05:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=T+GXeMHFlz6IW528CtbKMTEu8GEDmf/P1toj3pd2Puo=; b=AWe8UjDipr3oGZI0AtIsoeUsnHYJiwdl8+0TYO4zbHD8EZ6hPNEQTAucMUCMwAiCwz VkfvnAZbr6j3SaWrR960kbd7QR/Ha8McLzD4TR9wYzlU41gugfYKDwGe0UMSNYCuJ5QT 8ZjoJ/dmpCBJ5K8YUop0GPre52k+8jufFCx3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iR4MLGEIEAKBSMuxkMoC04tI5JO7QBdfkBsN4nEq72JbUP/M1Y/vGViT/0Y3SyIKyi CGBM9srP4lOqIU9ooplpFwyIvDWZ4jnRoFmJlHYX4mLKEAFMV1dXEoZGYh6AcZupsa9m CRUBRTj33iHs3hfHgITwvDOFZgAG68k1aA9Ss= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.137.199 with SMTP id m7mr530495hbm.92.1269295526400; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:05:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:35:26 -0430 Message-ID: <286906751003221505v6bff6d8fu61e772672c65ec3a@mail.gmail.com> From: Alberto Mijares To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Patch Submission to a Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:05:28 -0000 > I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends > > To whon or where should I submit it? > There's no specific maintainer for this port. Write to ports@freebsd.org and submit the patch. Regards Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 22:08:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9397106566B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16C58FC15 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wCy21d0051GXsucA5N8ncz; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:08:47 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wN8l1d00B1f6R9u8TN8lX8; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:08:47 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:08:43 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:08:43 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100322220843.GB52032@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Patch Submission to a Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:08:46 -0000 On Mon 22 Mar 2010 at 14:50:03 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote: >Hi, > >I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends > >To whon or where should I submit it? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 22:11:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CD9106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7E48FC0A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.local (ppp-88-217-17-18.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.17.18]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4FEC1C0871 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:11:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA7EAF3.6050208@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:10:59 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5e91cf2e1003221335x4afb161ib9fd565b97beb20a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5e91cf2e1003221335x4afb161ib9fd565b97beb20a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: diskless & dhclient X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:11:04 -0000 On 22/03/10 21:35, Mats Lindberg wrote: > I've tried to get my freebsd diskless system to get hold of some of the > dhcp-options. > E.g. my dhcp-server will always be the nfs-server as well. So I was hoping > to create the /etc/fstab with the the dhcpd's ip as the nfs server. > Thus not needing to have the hard coded nfsroot:/conf/'ip-address'/etc. > Instead i'm looking for having almost all necessary files in the > nfsroot:/conf/base/etc directory. you only need /conf/'ip-address' if you need different configurations for different clients. The ip-address is that of the diskless client, not the server. > I've tried to set ifconfig_ETHDEV="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf and creating a > bourne shell script /etc/dhclient_enter_hooks, but as far as I can detect > the script is never run. > > I guess since the kernel already got the ip-address during pxeboot it does > not care about renewing the ip-address, or?? No, when the client detects it is a diskless client, /etc/rc.initdiskless is executed. See documentation in that file. Anyway, iirc you can find the dhcp options with kenv(1). BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 22:13:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1351065674 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192DF8FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wJ6v1d00h0bG4ec5ENDA9T; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:13:10 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wND81d00K1f6R9u3PND8Aa; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:13:10 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:13:06 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:13:06 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100322221306.GC52032@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100322220843.GB52032@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100322220843.GB52032@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Patch Submission to a Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:13:10 -0000 On Mon 22 Mar 2010 at 15:08:43 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: >On Mon 22 Mar 2010 at 14:50:03 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends >> >>To whon or where should I submit it? > > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html > Sorry, wrong link. That one's for submitting new ports. Here's one for the section of the handbook that describes how to submit a patch: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 22:25:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4281065670 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@buildingonline.com) Received: from mail.buildingonline.net (mail.buildingonline.net [12.130.64.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D6F8FC13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.225] (busarow.beach.net [209.200.204.135]) by mail.buildingonline.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o2MLpB2B070847 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:51:14 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Busarow Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:51:01 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:25:10 -0000 On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 > Alberto Mijares articulated: > >> As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by >> default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some >> limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of >> FreeBSD. >> >> I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if I >> don't need exotic features. > > Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? UUCP for one. I *think* you can also get sendmail to do other transports via mailertable that would not be possible with postfix. Example, an scp to another server that doesn't have an MTA running. Dan > > -- > Jerry > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > Small is beautiful. > > Schumacher's Dictum > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 22:39:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73361065672 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f178.google.com (mail-ew0-f178.google.com [209.85.219.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC638FC1A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so1594265ewy.13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.52.141 with SMTP id i13mr347164ebg.62.1269297544493; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm3252727ewy.8.2010.03.22.15.39.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03F6F2285B for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:39:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:39:01 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100322183901.090dbfaf@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:39:07 -0000 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:51:01 -0600 Dan Busarow articulated: > > On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 > > Alberto Mijares articulated: > > > >> As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by > >> default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some > >> limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of > >> FreeBSD. > >> > >> I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if > >> I don't need exotic features. > > > > Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? > > UUCP for one. > > I *think* you can also get sendmail to do other transports via > mailertable that would not be possible with postfix. Example, an > scp to another server that doesn't have an MTA running. Is this what you are referring to: http://www.postfix.org/UUCP_README.html -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 23:09:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F0B106564A for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@buildingonline.com) Received: from mail.buildingonline.net (mail.buildingonline.net [12.130.64.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D268FC14 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.225] (busarow.beach.net [209.200.204.135]) by mail.buildingonline.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o2MN9GZa088088 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:16 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <20100322183901.090dbfaf@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100322183901.090dbfaf@scorpio.seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7E066EFC-7674-4E2A-93D1-0C3D1AF86FAA@buildingonline.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Busarow Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:09:15 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:18 -0000 On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:51:01 -0600 > Dan Busarow articulated: > >> >> On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 >>> Alberto Mijares articulated: >>> >>>> As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by >>>> default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some >>>> limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of >>>> FreeBSD. >>>> >>>> I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if >>>> I don't need exotic features. >>> >>> Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? >> >> UUCP for one. >> >> I *think* you can also get sendmail to do other transports via >> mailertable that would not be possible with postfix. Example, an >> scp to another server that doesn't have an MTA running. > > Is this what you are referring to: > > http://www.postfix.org/UUCP_README.html Well I'll be. I didn't think postfix would do UUCP. I stand corrected. Dan > > -- > Jerry > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson > Crusoe. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 23:33:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED4E106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A405B8FC0C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (mailhost2.waddell.com [10.1.10.30]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC81263657; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:30:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DC6A72F8003; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:32:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from advpexv0.wradvisors.com (advpexb1.wradvisors.com [192.168.203.21]) by emlpfilt2.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B432F8006; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:32:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) by advpexv0.wradvisors.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:21:27 -0500 Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.205]) by ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) with mapi; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0500 From: Gary Gatten To: "'dan@buildingonline.com'" , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:21:25 -0500 Thread-Topic: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix Thread-Index: AcrKFVcOnCr9JhVmRZSaUu1Gch4JYwAAQ206 Message-ID: <26434_1269300768_4BA7FE20_26434_54_2_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434994A334338@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Mar 2010 23:21:27.0315 (UTC) FILETIME=[656C0630:01CACA16] Cc: Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:33:00 -0000 SG9seSAkaGl0ISBJIHRoaW5rIHNvbWVvbmUganVzdCBhZG1pdHRlZCB0aGV5IHdlcmVuJ3QgYWxs IGtub3dpbmchICBUaGlzIGlzIHlldCBhbm90aGVyIHNpZ24gb2YgdGhlIHBlbmRpbmcgYXBvY29s eXBzZSENCg0KLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZSAtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogb3duZXItZnJlZWJz ZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgPG93bmVyLWZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qu b3JnPg0KVG86IGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIDxmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9u c0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6IE1vbiBNYXIgMjIgMTg6MDk6MTUgMjAxMApTdWJqZWN0OiBS ZTogU3BhbWFzc2FzaW4sIHNlbmRtYWlsLCBQb3N0Zml4DQoNCg0KT24gTWFyIDIyLCAyMDEwLCBh dCA0OjM5IFBNLCBKZXJyeSB3cm90ZToNCg0KPiBPbiBNb24sIDIyIE1hciAyMDEwIDE1OjUxOjAx IC0wNjAwDQo+IERhbiBCdXNhcm93IDxkYW5AYnVpbGRpbmdvbmxpbmUuY29tPiBhcnRpY3VsYXRl ZDoNCj4NCj4+DQo+PiBPbiBNYXIgMjIsIDIwMTAsIGF0IDM6MjIgUE0sIEplcnJ5IHdyb3RlOg0K Pj4NCj4+PiBPbiBNb24sIDIyIE1hciAyMDEwIDE2OjAwOjE3IC0wNDMwDQo+Pj4gQWxiZXJ0byBN aWphcmVzIDxhbWlqYXJlc3BAZ21haWwuY29tPiBhcnRpY3VsYXRlZDoNCj4+Pg0KPj4+PiBBcyBJ IHNlZSBpdCwgRnJlZUJTRCBpcywgaW4gZmFjdCwgYSBETlMgc2VydmVyIG9yIGEgbWFpbCBzZXJ2 ZXIgYnkNCj4+Pj4gZGVmYXVsdCwgYmV0d2VlbiBvdGhlcnMgYW5kIGlmIEkgd2FudC4gQW5kIHNp bmNlIFBvc3RmaXggaGFzIHNvbWUNCj4+Pj4gbGltaXRhdGlvbnMgdnMuIFNlbmRtYWlsLCBJJ20g Z2xhZCB0aGF0IGlzIHNlbmRtYWlsIHRoZSBjaG9pY2Ugb2YNCj4+Pj4gRnJlZUJTRC4NCj4+Pj4N Cj4+Pj4gSSBhbHNvIG11c3Qgc2F5IHRoYXQgSSBmcmVjdWVudGx5IHVzZSBQb3N0Zml4IGZvciBN YWlsIFNlcnZlcnMsIGlmDQo+Pj4+IEkgZG9uJ3QgbmVlZCBleG90aWMgZmVhdHVyZXMuDQo+Pj4N Cj4+PiBPdXQgb2YgbW9yYmlkIGN1cmlvc2l0eSwgd2hhdCBsaW1pdGF0aW9ucyBhbmQgZXhvdGlj IGZlYXR1cmVzPw0KPj4NCj4+IFVVQ1AgZm9yIG9uZS4NCj4+DQo+PiBJICp0aGluayogeW91IGNh biBhbHNvIGdldCBzZW5kbWFpbCB0byBkbyBvdGhlciB0cmFuc3BvcnRzIHZpYQ0KPj4gbWFpbGVy dGFibGUgdGhhdCB3b3VsZCBub3QgYmUgcG9zc2libGUgd2l0aCBwb3N0Zml4LiAgRXhhbXBsZSwg YW4NCj4+IHNjcCB0byBhbm90aGVyIHNlcnZlciB0aGF0IGRvZXNuJ3QgaGF2ZSBhbiBNVEEgcnVu bmluZy4NCj4NCj4gSXMgdGhpcyB3aGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgcmVmZXJyaW5nIHRvOg0KPg0KPiBodHRw Oi8vd3d3LnBvc3RmaXgub3JnL1VVQ1BfUkVBRE1FLmh0bWwNCg0KV2VsbCBJJ2xsIGJlLiAgSSBk aWRuJ3QgdGhpbmsgcG9zdGZpeCB3b3VsZCBkbyBVVUNQLiAgSSBzdGFuZCBjb3JyZWN0ZWQuDQoN CkRhbg0KDQoNCg0KDQo+DQo+IC0tICANCj4gSmVycnkNCj4gRnJlZUJTRC51c2VyQHNlaWJlcmNv bS5uZXQNCj4NCj4gRGlzY2xhaW1lcjogb2ZmLWxpc3QgZm9sbG93dXBzIGdldCBvbi1saXN0IHJl cGxpZXMgb3IgZ2V0IGlnbm9yZWQuDQo+IFBsZWFzZSBkbyBub3QgaWdub3JlIHRoZSBSZXBseS1U byBoZWFkZXIuDQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPg0KPiBUaGUgb25seSBwZXJzb24gd2hvIGFsd2F5cyBn b3QgaGlzIHdvcmsgZG9uZSBieSBGcmlkYXkgd2FzIFJvYmluc29uDQo+IENydXNvZS4NCj4gX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1x dWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IGh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlYnNk Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zDQo+IFRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJl LCBzZW5kIGFueSBtYWlsIHRvICJmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucy0gDQo+IHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZy ZWVic2Qub3JnIg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fXw0KZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpodHRwOi8v bGlzdHMuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucw0KVG8g dW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gImZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLXVuc3Vic2Ny aWJlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIg0KCgoKCgo8Zm9udCBzaXplPSIxIj4KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0nYm9yZGVy Om5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLWJvdHRvbTpkb3VibGUgd2luZG93dGV4dCAyLjI1cHQ7cGFkZGluZzowaW4g MGluIDEuMHB0IDBpbic+CjwvZGl2PgoiVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpcyBpbnRlbmRlZCB0byBiZSByZXZp ZXdlZCBieSBvbmx5IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQKIGFuZCBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBpbmZv cm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IGlzIHByaXZpbGVnZWQgYW5kL29yIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbC4KIElmIHlvdSBh cmUgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQsIHlvdSBhcmUgaGVyZWJ5IG5vdGlmaWVkIHRo YXQKIGFueSByZXZpZXcsIHVzZSwgZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBvciBjb3B5aW5n IG9mIHRoaXMgZW1haWwKIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMsIGlmIGFueSwgaXMgc3RyaWN0bHkg cHJvaGliaXRlZC4gIElmIHlvdSBoYXZlCiByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBw bGVhc2UgaW1tZWRpYXRlbHkgbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYnkKIHJldHVybiBlbWFpbCBhbmQg ZGVsZXRlIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgZnJvbSB5b3VyIHN5c3RlbS4iCjwvZm9udD4KCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 23:40:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D751065672; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE0E8FC12; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:40:26 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAK6cp0uDaFvK/2dsb2JhbACbKXO9G4R9BA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,290,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="69919885" Received: from fraser.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.91.202]) by esa-annu-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2010 19:40:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fraser.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB40E109C2EF; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:40:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fraser.cs.uoguelph.ca Received: from fraser.cs.uoguelph.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fraser.cs.uoguelph.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8txDjRB+Ab4p; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:40:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.102]) by fraser.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9CF109C2F4; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:40:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (rmacklem@localhost) by muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id o2MNrNa22445; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:53:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca: rmacklem owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:53:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem X-X-Sender: rmacklem@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> <4BA79E54.5030504@comcast.net> <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:40:27 -0000 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, John Baldwin wrote: >> It looks like it also returns ESTALE when the inode is invalid (< >> ROOTINO || > max inodes?) - would an unlinked file in FFS referenced at >> a later time report an invalid inode? >> I'm no ufs guy, but the only way I can think of is if the file system on the server was newfs'd with fewer i-nodes? (Unlikely, but...) (Basically, it is safe to return ESTALE for anything that is not a transient failure that could recover on a retry.) >> But back to your point, zfs_zget() seems to be failing and returning the >> EINVAL before zfs_fhtovp() even has a chance to set and check zp_gen. >> I'm trying to get some more details through the use of gratuitous >> dprintf()'s, but they don't seem to be making it to any logs or the >> console even with vfs.zfs.debug=1 set. Any pointers on how to get these >> dprintf() calls working? I know diddly (as in absolutely nothing about zfs). > > That I have no idea on. Maybe Rick can chime in? I'm actually not sure why > we would want to treat a FHTOVP failure as anything but an ESTALE error in the > NFS server to be honest. > As far as I know, only if the underlying file system somehow has a situation where the file handle can't be translated at that point in time, but could be able to later. I have no idea if any file system is like that and I don't such a file system would be an appropriate choice for an NFS server, even if such a beast exists. (Even then, although FreeBSD's client assumes EIO might recover on a retry, that isn't specified in any RFC, as far as I know.) That's why I proposed a patch that simply translates all VFS_FHTOVP() errors to ESTALE in the NFS server. (It seems simpler than chasing down cases in all the underlying file systems?) rick, chiming in:-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 23:47:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DD1106566C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aaron.lewis1989@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com (mail-pz0-f196.google.com [209.85.222.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E328FC08 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so11220pzk.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:47:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SSv/9f9wAsEJl06VY0mPjb2FoDWrqG37JjGNXKh8mAs=; b=VDNE68Cn/6TycATXfJ7rELgtgfQLMph9NQ1HNzyZdcJNbXGlPXb4nNehgZqI5umgtP pl24r30ffjn33p0tb0qroTFfX93+ESmxo8n2sUkXL2BabL71MdkxcAAq276dyDirsu2E I2kNQKtB4/jGPfwtm8cl6+G4ArYTiDvoNPXu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EUSx+xlMyl1kmL5t+I2ejDGq+A4m404LRq11mjgKEptzvRx049XLJ/lRf/dtRCiOZV NoAWFVx/iMkRt2P7ppT2ELy3s2ZlkK/3mVFt6hbO75BVI9xH5OFCAUdmrBekUmzUcnbH xoiwDhb3P9bsrx8RjAAVSJsbROpf/pcUHWPGc= Received: by 10.141.106.8 with SMTP id i8mr3376403rvm.30.1269301636965; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.7.16.42] ([58.58.36.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm77890pzk.10.2010.03.22.16.47.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:47:44 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:47:17 -0000 Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home directory. So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below // I don't know why `stat' function fails .. $ ls -ld /home/frozen drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 22/03/2010 12:46:06, Aaron Lewis wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >>> On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hello BSD hackers, >>>> I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in >>>> through ssh , everything's fine. >>>> But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: >>>> >>>> no home directory >>>> Logging in with home dir "/" >>>> >>>> Does anyone has any ideas ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Here's some debug information >>>> ========================================= >>>> %> grep aaron /etc/passwd >>>> aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash >>>> >>>> %> ls -ladh /home/aaron/ >>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron >>>> ============================================ >>>> >>>> >>> What are the settings for >>> >>> ChallengeResponseAuthentication >>> UsePam >>> >>> in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? >>> >>> >> Nothing found , or commented out. >> > > Commented out means using the default setting -- which is 'yes' for both > of those. ie. sshd is using the PAM system. Which means that PAM is > probably working just fine. > > >>> What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? >>> >>> >> # grep -v -e "^#" /etc/pam.d/sshd | sed '/^$/d' >> auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts >> auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local >> auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass >> account required pam_nologin.so >> account required pam_login_access.so >> account required pam_unix.so >> session required pam_permit.so >> password required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass >> > > These are also the default settings for sshd -- which as you say is working. > > >> # grep -v -e "^#" /etc/pam.d/login | sed '/^$/d' >> auth sufficient pam_self.so no_warn >> auth include system >> account requisite pam_securetty.so >> account required pam_nologin.so >> account include system >> session include system >> password include system >> > > Again, this is the default for login. I should have asked you for the > contents of /etc/pam.d/system as well, but if you say it's not been > modified I'll believe you. Hmmmm... > > >> It's all fresh install , did i do something wrong ? It's really strange >> .. never met before. >> > > Something is a bit fubar somewhere, yes. From the symptoms you > described, the immediate suspect would be the PAM system, but there are > no obvious configuration problems with what you've shown me. > > Is there anything notable in /var/log/auth.log from the failed console > logins? Can you try gratuitously creating another user account and > seeing if that is affected in the same way, or indeed if it makes any > difference to the original user account? > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkunhDoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwzBQCfccc1KXwscGDrHV2wn5Zr8xnO > pMAAnjJVpjZc39wczR4u8nYo/Kxpvivl > =3oJZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 00:41:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535171065674 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258288FC1F for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc7 with SMTP id 7so1869732pvc.13 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=H8bBPYDhcEQk2zodVtpX2RTR4YUnT6+LkXEH7aVZ0rk=; b=CAYrO2goS14qhBNxmB0pcEHGLcuhtfIsB63NR6T/85DqZ6AFD3semqB+yWfoGnDMQP HbzlKrTrccLJqEC38H0AU9poHG1RDJFsuVYIfQl3FGDYXkhNDMk/D00CcZoamyAwkYPL TODByzNcZjd44MPPXN7HwQu6jACt9WjfFA8ag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OmcKIRKQZgXPGZ2Zbo55D4AEZZv1pGy9TVPh2SzcPR8uPLRVI/LR+ey7Rx1jNI1cti YQZgQVB9QD41QlqI139kTaO24V4yj9LONUC+9qjOgKnv6iBf906cXx5++g1A7ZpI6YSq lJDqDEI7PKJoSsO8bXhaMPtcfb7OtfHUIxz3Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.58.7 with SMTP id g7mr6446238rva.37.1269304865620; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:41:05 -0500 Message-ID: <6201873e1003221741l72597295h99e72497b3d97057@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Aaron Lewis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:41:06 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Aaron Lewis wrote: > Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. > > I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? > That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home > directory. > So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. > > $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log > login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission > denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below > > // I don't know why `stat' > function fails .. > > $ ls -ld /home/frozen > drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ > $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf > > BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. > > Maybe you could bottom post? Thanks, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mac-troubleshoot.html -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 00:41:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5302106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f199.google.com (mail-pz0-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F1B8FC08 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so39804pzk.7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d2JV9V+BY7MJs96ZelQ8aJhJSeG1l8n437eutfo3hvk=; b=fzBlhx9QZ9i54M3VdyPQNT+J6zUaQylJPyW5jMBpHKKGjuJp1Z18OtESjYjK+12/u3 +QEHpsb9vm+7+dvUBw93ZAs+vMHkoRkO+LOavh7pqLdyMmgEhGfLi4mrGiszgfJGsdfD L0qIbM49oAjiU03CFqD7tLiAmlrA1SampxIzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sBXo8GbgDLG+Rrel9dY74n+yk3sj6bvaBm41R3T/btT6AZ4RTvcubcEsHIznb3cd13 S4gwChxY1YlgwLiG6XsO84M7WFnumo8hXCYyRwpjc+eb+kCivqr/OjxeU3pBW1VaQyc+ ypgxhlvL73wjlXe6qNx97eMeiDpkqkZtgx2aw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.134.12 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA2D7A7.1020009@rawbw.com> References: <4BA2D7A7.1020009@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:16 -0700 Received: by 10.141.23.20 with SMTP id a20mr51803rvj.1.1269304877004; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b91003221741l2a6b2a77pf609a5718ff7a5f4@mail.gmail.com> From: Steve Franks To: yuri@rawbw.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processes left running around X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:41:19 -0000 /usr/ports/www/xpi-noscript is another option, not without caveats... Steve On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yuri wrote: > Sometimes after some flash object is displayed firefox gets frozen for ma= ny > few seconds,maybe ~20sec. > Do you see the same? Is there anyfix for this? > > In additions I have 54 processes like this one > 50006 =A0?? =A0I =A0 =A0 =A00:00.00 > /usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin > /usr/local/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so --connection > hanging around even after firefox process exits. > > linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r45 > nspluginwrapper-1.2.2_5 > firefox-3.5.8,1 > > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 00:45:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26ED106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6010C8FC0A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so435128fxm.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:45:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LKbfJolnCHFCCU4gij5NlajvKCxObUdauJxzRELBOik=; b=iyzorruP8Ok91nAmcmt9NR1rm5upx4RBdmG2GgnFgio4ZX2i4pptdqppkF20zHJAxg qNZKiOEO94Exz6RtQWc+cFkkNt6LBmOsJ4hGA40lnPg+Vp0tY3oXcQGmYJByGNOHzp+w Ij3ah7om4lnuupYsae+demmzrf+QMY+vIjizU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kSOwyn9D9z1eJJpH9vLYzn5TrbKMv5kXCmA0RrtXUZiuOx1CBJH5u8nFCBJk53+zwm vSc+/jdYulvuzRRUUULFP3F7Q7N6zT4uvrqOBxIeS1Fq8CE3AQKE92Xhy920kaVVzrX/ 8NNtcqhb7tIYbs+KAFzVnOcufVNCxmMGCeaNE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.188.67 with SMTP id o3mr551746hbh.209.1269305123151; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:45:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <3352047511-2078122571@intranet.com.mx> <86vdcp9r57.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322083450.GA77075@ei.bzerk.org> <86aau0a3gy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20100322193339.GB80072@ei.bzerk.org> <286906751003221330k4851a69et4365577195bda8cd@mail.gmail.com> <20100322172253.28ca2aa4@scorpio.seibercom.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:15:23 -0430 Message-ID: <286906751003221745k3d2e4fe9k1bd8a7ffc97bdcd9@mail.gmail.com> From: Alberto Mijares To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:45:24 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430 > Alberto Mijares articulated: > >> As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by >> default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some >> limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of >> FreeBSD. >> >> I also must say that I frecuently use Postfix for Mail Servers, if I >> don't need exotic features. > > Out of morbid curiosity, what limitations and exotic features? > > -- > Jerry Hi Jerry, You can achieve some kind of dynamic rules by using "lookup tables" or the pipe(8) daemon in Postfix. However, Sendmail has many more predefined macros, which can be used in rule sets for handle dynamic routing, headers-rewrites, queues, milters, MDA's, etc, for example. That's what I meant when said "limitations and exotic features". Not saying that Postfix is "bate quebrado" ;-) Without being a fan, I rise the flag for Postfix; I just know the power of Sendmail too. Best regards Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 01:00:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABC61065672 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aaron.lewis1989@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f185.google.com (mail-iw0-f185.google.com [209.85.223.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FCB8FC0A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn15 with SMTP id 15so1232206iwn.7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:00:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jWbpHUYbMS+o1sQ5VpM1dBZ57V0b+Onv5n0cFG0W84M=; b=j4/AOKHpvJldx/pnM2uwH3Nm0o3W4M7JbGthuD2oprsRD2dRjB1RtGtkeIR1xS6vTZ 4VCaopFzEiuAP0x2PpLiQ/f/zlEC87fFVcLQByzx0x+0EhivtVCTFUkrEqHQjQsHt3HT Bc5OK18KoHoRgBG9aMI8oGC8vhZJbRhL1KqVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rCRX6rmfhKFsfYJRayKwNd+XBlouk9oYVCFAajw6pTv+wFjL0KejUkX91slmM6toPV 0AkY3wibS48Ez52ie9u+mkBJ4eXgimZEfwIRWDbanYeZjIGzjQ3wc0omD2QmHS37X/ju wT3GQwAJ4fkumIgdT9tMyehMzsGqQwhfv+9y8= Received: by 10.231.173.129 with SMTP id p1mr368754ibz.85.1269306052746; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.7.16.42] ([58.58.36.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c21sm2025150ibr.4.2010.03.22.18.00.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA812DF.2010202@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:01:19 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> <6201873e1003221741l72597295h99e72497b3d97057@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6201873e1003221741l72597295h99e72497b3d97057@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:00:53 -0000 Oh , thanks Adam , i shouldn't be so lazy , I'll check that page. Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Aaron Lewis > > wrote: > > Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. > > I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? > That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no > home directory. > So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. > > $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log > login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: > Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions > below > > // I don't > know why `stat' function fails .. > > $ ls -ld /home/frozen > drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ > $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 > /home/frozen/.login_conf > > BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. > > > Maybe you could bottom post? Thanks, > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mac-troubleshoot.html > > -- > Adam Vande More -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 02:36:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD401065673 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeep@skywolf.net) Received: from manticore.skywolf.net (skywolf.net [72.249.145.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDF18FC22 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.65.91.58] (c-71-204-3-155.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [71.204.3.155]) by manticore.skywolf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE501838017 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BA82824.4050207@skywolf.net> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:32:04 -0400 From: Brian Wolman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 8, serial console problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:36:05 -0000 FreeBSD 8 uses the uart system to handle serial consoles, I changed mine over and I've been running into problems since. I have serial console access during the loader and boot process, but it freezes right after boot and posting of the date: Mon Mar 22 22:18:08 EDT 2010 Well, the kernel still outputs to the console, as evident when I plugged in a keyboard into the usb slot: ugen1.2: at usbus1 uhub5: on usbus1 (server.example.com) (ttyu0) login: uhub5: 4 ports with 2 removable, bus powered I typed 'root' and then it froze. Again, I plugged in the keyboard, but this time I couldn't type anything despite getting another login prompt. I even echoed to the console and it worked. Finally I typed kldload uart into my ssh terminal and poof: FreeBSD/i386 o(server.example.com) (ttyu0) u login: jjjjjhlgf e_register: module isa/uart already exists! Module isa/uart failed to register: 17 module_register: module pci/uart already exists! Module pci/uart failed to register: 17 I was able to login and everything worked fine. Notice how uart already exists.. it's compiled into the kernel. Right now the only way I've come up with to fix my broken console is to kldload, but I can only do it once per boot. If it breaks after that, I'm out of luck until I reboot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 07:26:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8737106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7B68FC1A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:26:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAfACMKqEvKRa39OWdsb2JhbAAHh1iTUwEBAQE3BrpDhH0Egxw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,293,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10752393" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp5.comclark.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2010 15:26:01 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA86D06.8040609@comclark.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:25:58 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA5AA53.5030503@comclark.com> <4BA69566.2040504@markshroyer.com> <4BA6B80F.7050806@comclark.com> <4BA6CB8B.8070309@markshroyer.com> <4BA73C9D.7090900@comclark.com> <20100322095545.GA77714@ei.bzerk.org> <12437d831003220323o4463044bu416f994f0129b459@mail.gmail.com> <20100322112235.GA78247@ei.bzerk.org> <4BA7655A.70604@comclark.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA7655A.70604@comclark.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ezjail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:26:03 -0000 Aiza wrote: > Ruben de Groot wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:23:54AM +0100, Dh?nin Jean-Jacques typed: >> >>>>> on the lan gives me no sockets mesg. And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to >>>>> 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection error. >> >>> add >>> >>> sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 >>> or in /etc/sysctl.conf >>> on the host (not in in the jail) >> >> This will enable him to ping another host from within the jail. I >> won't do anything for ftp. >> >> OP: what exact error do you get? And does ftp work *within* the jail >> (ftp localhost)? > > with sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 done on the host. From > within the jail did ping -c 2 10.0.10.6 which is a pc on the lan gives > me socket: Operation not permitted mesg. > > And ftp from 10.0.10.6 to 10.0.20.30 the ftp jail gives me no connection > error. > > Just how am i to determine if ftp work *within* the jail ftp localhost? For the archives. This is the results from the original poster. My original goal was to test jails on the gateway for access only from the lan users. To wanted a jailed ftp service for LAN users to upload and download stuff between them selfs. I already have a working lan users ftp setup on the gateway server so this jail setup is not really needed. So it's not a problem of knowing how to setup ftp. My main vehicle of jail management was ezjail. Did not play with the native jail command. The final outcome is I could not get jails to communicate over the private LAN. Seeing as jails design uses public ip address, it's little wonder it wont work with private LAN ip address. In time jails and ezjail will mature and maybe evolve into working with jails with private ip address. But for now jails don't serve my purposes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 07:33:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43094106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruinermailchucker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f185.google.com (mail-yx0-f185.google.com [209.85.210.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED16A8FC15 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so3507976yxe.7 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:33:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:subject:from :reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JTbfNsxd93CFpCBLDgg7lgEnhWA/d8mPsnbRe0f/7RA=; b=uTs0egdCt7rjNMeaJnFFJQcD9GrJdlbE6Q5vIDEwVggk6sFaenmgGJ2Q329UaNJ/GK C/M7HF7/RA50OgXu6kWw8N+LDPopdnDsRdMMYkdifvX1JR8gVojv+dGamjIRmWsqiigk m44iE7N+1uVY33e6efFTEYMiq/AdLhaqWTFBc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=mXn2HBQVe2cwV5zekE6g3LgS32KikCLVWZ35gU8nupKjG/E60YRjkNG0pSTbJL2JS6 BJK5kZMKaWqH4s0IrBx3ZV0hzYCOhWqmlxGbayCjMBwfnZBvCpdNjr6qKh1q5UphtQDr QxM35s7AUTg+SDo3RWHRBIGAZQZDoyQ6chOfQ= Received: by 10.150.127.5 with SMTP id z5mr4634609ybc.275.1269327956416; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ruiner.mine.nu (173-16-22-10.client.mchsi.com [173.16.22.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm5669342iwn.10.2010.03.23.00.05.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [192.168.0.100]) by ruiner.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151634D9172 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:05:54 -0500 (CDT) From: Corey John Bukolt To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:05:49 -0500 Message-Id: <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 4096@gmx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:12 -0000 On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: > When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan > spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged > in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. > > Chris Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. Can anyone else confirm this? ~Corey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 07:36:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34827106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D598E8FC0A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE013A3870; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:36:31 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269329791; x= 1271144191; bh=/6IhuGJUlY0kDsIyo5gC97u9OcvnBqEmZmnRwMCwq5w=; b=R CN0pupI339l5MHeQf3oIH/0sYoUCyuyYMIn7C7oLD9S2qKGQT9i8ehABF1xhGCaj 2EGbj094iJnNBfeL6whPFfBrsXkW3znm/XBpS8gwi/Nsr1lH4kfZWFukyykECNlj 1Oah1T7FZL6HS3MyaRHlOuC9d6jSJ4foED0R1Yk0iQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sKwdA+sPitYL; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:36:31 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 218973A386C; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:36:31 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2N7aRo1049638; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:36:27 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:36:27 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003230736.o2N7aRo1049638@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: 4096@gmx.com In-reply-to: <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> (message from Corey John Bukolt on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:05:49 -0500) References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:36:33 -0000 > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > Can anyone else confirm this? Hummm, I think that is the CPU is missing/dead, you would get no beep. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 07:41:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263F9106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E698FC08 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o2N7f5B3020493; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:41:05 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:41:05 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-Reply-To: <20100322120021.C2A26106571B@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20100323181056.I85436@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100322120021.C2A26106571B@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to compare permissions between two dirs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:41:08 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 303, Issue 2, Message: 11 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:33:28 -0400 "Aryeh M. Friedman" > In switching to a new make file for a personal project I have run into > the problem of under the old makefile everything works (web site) and > under the new one it does not... when manually looking at the two dirs > they appear identical in layout, sizes and perms (dir and file level) > but I want to make sure... is there any way to compare two diff dirs and > see if they only differ in date stamps? (note since there are several > developers working on this project I need to compare even if the owners > are diff) % diff dir1 dir2 should do what you need, to compare file existence and contents. % ls -lrt bittorrent bittorrent2 bittorrent2: total 82 -rw-r----- 1 smithi smithi 81110 Nov 22 2004 bittorrentecon.pdf -rw-r----- 1 smithi smithi 0 Jun 9 2006 not_in_1 -rw-r----- 1 smithi smithi 49 Jun 9 2006 differingfile bittorrent: total 82 -rw-r----- 1 smithi smithi 81110 Nov 22 2004 bittorrentecon.pdf -rw-r----- 1 smithi smithi 0 Jun 9 2006 not_in_2 -rw-r----- 1 smithi smithi 28 Jun 9 2006 differingfile % diff bittorrent bittorrent2 diff bittorrent/differingfile bittorrent2/differingfile 1,2c1,3 < this one in bittorrent dir < --- > this one in bittorrent2 dir > with an extra line > Only in bittorrent2: not_in_1 Only in bittorrent: not_in_2 Then to just compare (eg) permissions and names, something like: ls -la dir1 | awk '{print $1,$9}' >/tmp/lsd1 ls -la dir2 | awk '{print $1,$9}' >/tmp/lsd2 diff /tmp/lsd1 /tmp/lsd2 cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 08:10:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC511065673 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B80D8FC18 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtzBm-0005Rq-4F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:10:14 +0100 Received: from pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.134.186]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:10:14 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:10:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:09:31 -0400 Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:10:15 -0000 Corey John Bukolt wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan >> spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged >> in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. >> >> Chris > > Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all > brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After > sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the > green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power > button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. > The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get > it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. > We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. > > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > Can anyone else confirm this? > Beep codes may be available, but the nature will depend upon the manufacturer and the BIOS. Different manufacturers will produce different products. In the bad old days the most common beep codes were designed to indicate a video BIOS did not initialize, and then the main area of codes indicated something wrong in the memory subsystem. Pretty much if they made it past these two points the board would boot. And, of course, you need a speaker hooked up which I commonly don't because I don't want any beeps. One thing to be aware of with regard to modern day motherboards and power supplies. I don't recall the exact standards nomenclature, but they are spelled out in a spec. Modern day motherboards will have a main power connector with either 20 or 24 pins. Some are wired so that a 20 pin power supply cable can only go into some of the pins of a 24 pin connector, leaving 4 open. Some power supplies have a split cable which has a 20 pin and a 4 pin that can be hooked together and will occupy all 24 pins of a 24 pin connector. In either case, there is also another second power connector which is usually fairly close nearby to the CPU socket. With slightly older boards this will be a 4 pin and newer boards it will be an 8 pin. On older power supplies there may be only one 4 pin cable designed to plug into this connector. Newer models will usually have a cable that splits into two 4 pin plugs, so as to be able to plug both into an 8 pin socket while retaining backwards compatibility with the older 4 pin boards. This second connector goes to a high current 12volt rail within the power supply and drives all those 'multi-phase' regulators near the CPU. One thing that is consistent is motherboards will not even attempt to boot if this second power cable is not connected or cannot supply sufficient amps. Some power supplies may even beep or have an LED that flashes red. Overlook this and the board will never boot. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 08:36:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62678106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wtf.jlaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35E78FC16 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1302461fxm.14 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:36:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=nMWddkmFsyOPUALuyS6I27YhHCBlqUx1YnScObnYszw=; b=Jx/OvEClyubqJcs6Sv53dRtL112Dkaboc32aNCHmj2CSAxkA5MicZ2hSnLywoxp3C2 0Ufybu5HhmbPkHhIknB47i3i68x8TLZw5Ry+QOv6doL/AJhOISPzVuFRrpWlmNMTCnou +P/kAHl6hasvPMUYQkEgYjytGEAeKYcpNoboA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=sDos2g46HpLGhe6dx8KV6lx+cxbGKH4j0B2vhJKYaWt0oLtFZg8ZVJX/2w1/jnnKqE eGQ+O7ZSqFT4m0fDOZRjF6WJ5aStfcJSEZeutFGLmq2plQPLIAWlm+AhANQCw0JwuV3y jBOCWr8otX8u8J7cA3YMLTFv8Tkmnv/0Gacjs= Received: by 10.223.2.198 with SMTP id 6mr3284830fak.100.1269333398813; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aperture_lab ([77.66.146.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm866563fxm.7.2010.03.23.01.36.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by aperture_lab (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:36:34 +0300 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:36:34 +0300 From: Jeff Laine To: Steve Franks Message-ID: <20100323083634.GA40654@free.bsd.loc> References: <4BA2D7A7.1020009@rawbw.com> <539c60b91003221741l2a6b2a77pf609a5718ff7a5f4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <539c60b91003221741l2a6b2a77pf609a5718ff7a5f4@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processes left running around X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:36:40 -0000 On Mon,22-03-2010 [17:41:16], Steve Franks wrote: > /usr/ports/www/xpi-noscript is another option, not without caveats... > > Steve > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yuri wrote: > > Sometimes after some flash object is displayed firefox gets frozen for many > > few seconds,maybe ~20sec. > > Do you see the same? Is there anyfix for this? > > > > In additions I have 54 processes like this one > > 50006  ??  I      0:00.00 > > /usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin > > /usr/local/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so --connection > > hanging around even after firefox process exits. > > > > linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r45 > > nspluginwrapper-1.2.2_5 > > firefox-3.5.8,1 > > > > Yuri Hi! There was a workaround for this issue published by DutchDaemon on forums.freebsd.org. I'm too lazy today to seek for that thread, sorry :) What he suggested is a simple cronjob script intended to constantly check process list and kill any single remaining proccess of npviewer.bin It works, but you should check every minute or so. -- Best regards, Jeff | "Nobody wants to say how this works. | | Maybe nobody knows ..." | | Xorg.conf(5) | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 08:37:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2301065670 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from n22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2DF18FC21 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.182.179] by n22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 08:37:13 -0000 Received: from [87.248.110.205] by t5.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 08:37:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp235.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 08:37:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 788226.369.bm@omp235.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 46932 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Mar 2010 08:37:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1269333433; bh=PyjUW5fpP7HJIR2jEuqJry8u9YBEetpAoVaQWDwLvcs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Etk+m4ZyWkhHJS/NbT0K5I7kJUP686OJFhhO/LhJNEOwdfD0cjEyrDg8fRkW36a81ADgGew7q4cdSPtHXrISg+U5ru/NidXGlc4GT+owCBh50Cq/+5tnu0y2UojEzWwNDdE2EUIVjF0wPhUEiKoQVqCJo+Uesf4zV9d++n3iCUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=P8efZGdiulJVrc2cYgfqaR7SHtlPuA0AJhjzpO9NJxTKxZcOQ+riz5UwYgexOzUsE4qIHQ+GCV2xa98VGTXp/MBeEOumG7ZaOnUtsEBJxcOiocVQXKEOzZgvX0aBEJRaqc8I/CV3Iaw3mib8+2la9xNq1h/WI+GAByRaNBhPkUE=; Message-ID: <581797.46700.qm@web24817.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xQ9M9HIVM1kBVW4Cauv_LHzNWCyUXQ8o8GuSBNMxnY7fy.I RWXpm.Swpj8KUCKLPR0nBVgF39XAvkInBrDxZfVwa6isWf7AigMwsXorvWsu ipZKKUoGMUxZ5yftQFevCSHpSnZDc8QZ2b5IeOPzqAhjJi7Bn750beWgaUhX BweItwslu.28PyFSBtQHW0kXR717YsBu0FlKy6acJfTOz7R29GkB3XUNaIkQ s3fmvkvDz7kzkOhYEQhAHHApzJ2x2Ogiu2hRRrad3bCW.9s5AWBagFFWXKjX kAyMwsi5o_48- Received: from [192.196.142.20] by web24817.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:37:13 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:37:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Alexandre L." To: yuri@rawbw.com, Steve Franks In-Reply-To: <539c60b91003221741l2a6b2a77pf609a5718ff7a5f4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processes left running around X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:37:15 -0000 No, the addon called "NoScript" is used to block JavaScript, Flash and co. = But here the problem is the npviewer and/or the Flash plugin that is/are bu= ggy.=0AIf you want to see a video on Youtube for example, you must allow Ja= vaScript and Flash for Youtube in "NoScript". Otherwise you can't see the v= ideo.=0AI use this addon in Firefox 3.6 to block unwanted scripts but when = I use Flash I got the same problem.=0A=0A--- En date de=A0: Mar 23.3.10, St= eve Franks a =E9crit=A0:=0A=0A> De: Steve Franks = =0A> Objet: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, a= lso many npviewer.bin processes left running around=0A> =C0: yuri@rawbw.com= =0A> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Mardi 23 mars 2010, 0h41= =0A> /usr/ports/www/xpi-noscript is=0A> another option, not without caveats= ...=0A> =0A> Steve=0A> =0A> =0A> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yuri =0A> wrote:=0A> > Sometimes after some flash object is displaye= d firefox=0A> gets frozen for many=0A> > few seconds,maybe ~20sec.=0A> > Do= you see the same? Is there anyfix for this?=0A> >=0A> > In additions I hav= e 54 processes like this one=0A> > 50006 =A0?? =A0I =A0 =A0 =A00:00.00=0A> = > /usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin=0A> --plugin=0A> >= /usr/local/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so=0A> --connection=0A= > > hanging around even after firefox process exits.=0A> >=0A> > linux-f10-= flashplugin-10.0r45=0A> > nspluginwrapper-1.2.2_5=0A> > firefox-3.5.8,1=0A>= >=0A> > Yuri=0A> > _______________________________________________=0A> > f= reebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> > http://lists.freebsd.or= g/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to= "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> >=0A> ____________________= ___________________________=0A> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing l= ist=0A> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To = unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= =0A> =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 08:47:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7700B106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miki@ceti.pl) Received: from relay.ceti.pl (relay.ceti.pl [62.121.128.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C888FC14 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tau.ceti.pl (tau.ceti.pl [62.121.128.11]) by relay.ceti.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1FDD53C8 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:47:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.20.64.84] (unknown [89.174.237.33]) by tau.ceti.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF5A202FEF for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:47:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA8801B.50700@ceti.pl> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:47:23 +0100 From: Mikolaj Rydzewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: freebsd-update insists on updating fresh system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:47:26 -0000 Hi all, I've performed system upgrade last night, then I wanted to give a try to freebsd-update tool. If I understand it correctly, it should fetch only updates to my currently working system (unless -r option was given). But now it insists to upgrade my 6.4-p9 system to 6.4-p9 system: k2# uname -a FreeBSD k2.xxx 6.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Mar 22 17:21:50 CET 2010 miki@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/K2 i386 k2# freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 6.4-RELEASE from update4.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.4-RELEASE-p9: /usr/src/contrib/lukemftpd/src/ftpd.c /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist /usr/src/lib/libc/db/btree/bt_split.c /usr/src/lib/libc/db/hash/hash_buf.c /usr/src/lib/libc/db/mpool/mpool.c /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/extern.h /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c /usr/src/sys/netinet6/in6.c /usr/src/sys/sys/event.h /usr/src/sys/sys/pipe.h /usr/src/usr.sbin/freebsd-update/freebsd-update.sh k2# Why is it doing it so? On the other hand, what is the suggested way to upgrade a system with custom kernel? Since freebsd-update cannot upgrade custom kernel, I have to build it on my own. And it says, that I have to install new kernel before I run 'freebsd-update install'. Does that mean, that I have to fetch source tree, build/install new kernel, and then fetch world binary updates? -- Mikolaj Rydzewski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 08:54:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0693B106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from n24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B55A8FC17 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.182.177] by n24.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 08:54:39 -0000 Received: from [87.248.110.201] by t3.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 08:54:40 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp231.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 08:54:40 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 790133.78078.bm@omp231.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 93665 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Mar 2010 08:54:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1269334480; bh=l8GJSXvhKpOnsvcnyL+cmBS4hY02/dsiclhhdEeqKm0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QKHqxvzkyDpzK57mCuqUpVsgxQ5x+iLVspte9HccOaqVjzB9mzUkGzyFN2dc8+CvcA5u6b85+S2VavvrQLR80at7rs6Gx2zKBXIdphKVHEDjUUPRY3uuetY4W62tXNBx/hvoK5btNMFuxdKftizUuB3g3X0LZn2OWGCILF+BuhI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ay4PMtw/k+s0Q2DBXAS92FLWy3t505MiwMGNzMvTF+LrE3wPG+fCVdsV68ZF9J75j6KbaASWqBZ7IusQutVGsR9N2Nbu2BgnBZeyC+LpBvc7VE4YxXvN2a+0NZNjXNkVQd59FlSOsx5cMvDz/0xMG+38cw7C1cVRh0nP6OfOMlg=; Message-ID: <621993.92243.qm@web24808.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: toED8h4VM1mqngNE8FgmLdfurbHTesi2hVSSYsEX_flaDZx Y5nX8QUPiEcKP7bmn37pxgJC283KnLKad.BNVmHBPE62hA4Qza_wN43TMa0W kJBG0bUCWh0kqR6r.oL_JYXpL1W5KDXD3LBHBTgaTZ3XUJUuK32PI.4tU.PJ jQZMVwsVosXgyDC7l6uOPkHS9ulWt4xRo0r19A2WxQlsd4ehqIW9TcJvrqNA 85qTqGQajsXHlLb1HJdJe4QdFkcVn.xADwYgFD.GUusPG Received: from [192.196.142.20] by web24808.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:54:40 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:54:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Alexandre L." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Rydzewski In-Reply-To: <4BA8801B.50700@ceti.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re : freebsd-update insists on updating fresh system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:54:42 -0000 Hi,=0A=0AI have experienced this when you use csup to sync your sources. Yo= u have to use one or other but not twice.=0AThere is a difference of the da= te on the files, because freebsd-update patches are created before the CVS = commits are done.=0Asee this thread on FreeBSD Forums : =0Ahttp://forums.fr= eebsd.org/showpost.php?p=3D30920&postcount=3D9=0A=0A--- En date de=A0: Mar = 23.3.10, Mikolaj Rydzewski a =E9crit=A0:=0A=0A> De: Mikolaj = Rydzewski =0A> Objet: freebsd-update insists on updating fres= h system=0A> =C0: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Mardi 23 mars 201= 0, 8h47=0A> Hi all,=0A> =0A> I've performed system upgrade last night, then= I wanted to=0A> give a try to freebsd-update tool. If I understand it=0A> = correctly, it should fetch only updates to my currently=0A> working system = (unless -r option was given). But now it=0A> insists to upgrade my 6.4-p9 s= ystem to 6.4-p9 system:=0A> =0A> k2# uname -a=0A> FreeBSD k2.xxx 6.4-RELEAS= E-p9 FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p9 #0:=0A> Mon Mar 22 17:21:50 CET 2010=A0=0A> =A0= =A0=A0miki@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/K2=A0=0A> i386=0A> k2# freebsd-update f= etch=0A> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.=0A> Fetc= hing metadata signature for 6.4-RELEASE from=0A> update4.FreeBSD.org... don= e.=0A> Fetching metadata index... done.=0A> Inspecting system... done.=0A> = Preparing to download files... done.=0A> =0A> The following files will be u= pdated as part of updating to=0A> 6.4-RELEASE-p9:=0A> /usr/src/contrib/luke= mftpd/src/ftpd.c=0A> /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist=0A> /usr/src/lib/libc/= db/btree/bt_split.c=0A> /usr/src/lib/libc/db/hash/hash_buf.c=0A> /usr/src/l= ib/libc/db/mpool/mpool.c=0A> /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/extern.h=0A> /usr/src/li= bexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y=0A> /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/conf/= newvers.sh=0A> /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/kern/ke= rn_event.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_for= k.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c=0A= > /usr/src/sys/netinet6/in6.c=0A> /usr/src/sys/sys/event.h=0A> /usr/src/sys= /sys/pipe.h=0A> /usr/src/usr.sbin/freebsd-update/freebsd-update.sh=0A> k2#= =0A> =0A> Why is it doing it so?=0A> =0A> On the other hand, what is the su= ggested way to upgrade a=0A> system with custom kernel? Since freebsd-updat= e cannot=0A> upgrade custom kernel, I have to build it on my own. And it=0A= > says, that I have to install new kernel before I run=0A> 'freebsd-update = install'. Does that mean, that I have to=0A> fetch source tree, build/insta= ll new kernel, and then fetch=0A> world binary updates?=0A> =0A> -- Mikolaj= Rydzewski =0A> =0A> ________________________________________= _______=0A> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> http://lists= .freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To unsubscribe, send an= y mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 09:03:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D1F106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruinermailchucker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395848FC19 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so3425133gwj.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:03:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:subject:from :reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CG51E9YSCsVq/1YLMyx1qHmvYxLZsyANDe6f1ukhzMY=; b=DdsaL2mlYTs0TH32nmkLkVcf+LDxFtH/u7p9iB2Jj1g80PfR+buG2bipv4hezzGCmD yDABj9rxz2dQiwy+Nw/pxetnI9O9wYaEw7HEYAkTIsnkNYaEzhQedNjpel6tGMSDzAZd uSJyN/ZNXeV53aAwHytwmARqKyVxnL6x1LLyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=SdwPEe2MORNcTpbeBKpyycuHIZvTLBmVPOZfzAdLNzMtZJgL9bDvepXdhqw7qkrQfI KFsO1bsDkgqjNAojevz5d/vlnxJHL5dho8gI14OIShSie3FVTTm//dAHk9ArzL4gBCle GKVgxdVInHH17slei9jQ9HoYfPd9p/Bcdbrr0= Received: by 10.150.93.21 with SMTP id q21mr6333176ybb.147.1269335036458; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ruiner.mine.nu (173-16-22-10.client.mchsi.com [173.16.22.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm4781333iwn.15.2010.03.23.02.03.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.250] (revenant [192.168.0.250]) by ruiner.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF6A4DA117; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:03:54 -0500 (CDT) From: Corey John Bukolt To: Olivier Nicole In-Reply-To: <201003230736.o2N7aRo1049638@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> <201003230736.o2N7aRo1049638@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:04:14 -0500 Message-ID: <1269335054.48845.12.camel@ignis.bukolt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 4096@gmx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:03:57 -0000 On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 14:36 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > > > Can anyone else confirm this? > > Hummm, I think that is the CPU is missing/dead, you would get no beep. > > Olivier I thought this as well, although googling shows that quite a few motherboard BIOSes will beep if there is a missing or dead CPU. I'll have to double check this, since I don't know the model number of the board. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 10:09:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FC5106566B; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6938FC14; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Nu12m-0004iV-SC>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:09:04 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Nu12m-00078U-QA>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:09:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:10:56 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:09:06 -0000 I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the error below. On another box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much less memory (2GB, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same error. Any suggestions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I need OO, so deinstallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)? Regards, Oliver [...] ----------------------------- SHL2FILTERFILE not set! ----------------------------- dummy file to keep the dependencies for later use. ------------------------------ Making: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../ure-link/lib' -shared -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/open ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L/usr/ports/e itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lo al/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads -L/usr/local/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_dflt_version.o -o ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o ../unxfbs x.pro/slo/clippingfunctor.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fourboxwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/iriswipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r ndomwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o ./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/snakewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro slo/doublediamondwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygonfactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidetransitionfactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/slidechangebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytimeactivitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcommandnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s o/animationcolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationpathmotionnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset ode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransitionfilternode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltimecontainer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sequentialtimecontainer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/appletshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/mediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewappletshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewmediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/delayevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/expressionnodefactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/rehearsetimingsactivity.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/screenupdater.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeattributelayer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapesubset.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidebitmap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowcontext.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideview.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/smilfunctionparser.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/soundplayer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/tools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/unoviewcontainer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/usereventqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waitsymbol.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/wakeupevent.o -ltlfx -luno_cppu -luno_sal -lvclfx -lcomphelp4gcc3 -luno_cppuhelpergcc3 -lbasegfxfx -lcanvastoolsfx -lcppcanvasfx -lutlfx -lgofx -lavmediafx -pthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic -lstlport_gcc rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so Checking DLL ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so ...-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4671468 Mar 23 10:56 ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so ------------- Running processes: 0 deliver -- version: 275594 Module 'slideshow' delivered successfully. 2 files copied, 2 files unchanged 1 module(s): nss need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/nss/ Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your the build issuing command "build --from nss" rmdir /tmp/vIzUvGYiHu *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20100323-62447-12jdfhd-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=de-openoffice.org-3.1.1_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3.1.1_1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. [...] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 10:29:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4078106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from n26.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n26.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83DFB8FC15 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.12.4.215] by n26.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 10:28:48 -0000 Received: from [87.248.111.148] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 10:28:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2010 10:28:59 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 475830.25562.bm@omp205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 75851 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Mar 2010 10:28:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1269340139; bh=3dV3efpTNUKAOnykN77tY91aXh8nhYBq0F8610CX/5I=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rJD8fA2sFnMFe3i/uf4qMiJjQXdwS1k+VU2+xW2lb6VMJmQArM+csOD3bwhfQi3sIDGsVudkcNXfHcsOvardm6Jsk7GBlYZH3QM4wImux14d0OgJ+EcOkCl7wmuBQ16GGJhRe5LNtQYHsY25PZMeL6xkWLxQcYExWIxrO1GT+Nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Oq29RlcWibe19zBp/WQuMLZHOlkOcQ4QkDzNiD9L9HAGMchrm3R3Jwx4p4Bf2jLvVdbZExZHK3cv4ij/wzYDvsrBfYdMPU0d35chR57DGaif4plHv10bJWQ2p22W9jI4Pj+BH1gsx8/b6yrSidW4K//IvuSfC6hvCcouujVgAVg=; Message-ID: <292822.75810.qm@web24816.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xTgiVZcVM1kVWGrC13Dj9uAPQ4ok9M2_ZrSQL8BKK4GAQJr 7GAUXIqmqB.QmgAWweiEGiDOwXWXrhfS_pDwp8MwY4BOeijLJkNJpD668asr btbh_sOuUklyDJ5CwClvHp5a.tHmZaxEeVmfna4hUQ7kTAbhe_1JcQg.Y5t5 GVpaX7ThFSixvWPdSN6rEXLtRXMrWClcSFz32ZtAM7CDCXhCawxPqsbsmEbs lr6xbu56BLz.YGTxsCKjkHpLFE8OEzrMrATPA65z6U0ZwnBoq6DB5GKahMS7 .hQNZDXwAPAlr Received: from [192.196.142.20] by web24816.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:28:59 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:28:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Alexandre L." To: Steve Franks , Jeff Laine In-Reply-To: <20100323083634.GA40654@free.bsd.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processes left running around X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:29:01 -0000 Here the link to this workaround by DutchDaemon : =0Ahttp://forums.freebsd.= org/showpost.php?p=3D67155&postcount=3D15=0A=0A--- En date de=A0: Mar 23.3.= 10, Jeff Laine a =E9crit=A0:=0A=0A> De: Jeff Laine <= wtf.jlaine@gmail.com>=0A> Objet: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also = many npviewer.bin processes left running around=0A> =C0: "Steve Franks" =0A> Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.or= g=0A> Date: Mardi 23 mars 2010, 8h36=0A> On Mon,22-03-2010 [17:41:16], Stev= e=0A> Franks wrote:=0A> > /usr/ports/www/xpi-noscript is another option, no= t=0A> without caveats...=0A> > =0A> > Steve=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > On Thu, Mar= 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yuri =0A> wrote:=0A> > > Sometimes af= ter some flash object is displayed=0A> firefox gets frozen for many=0A> > >= few seconds,maybe ~20sec.=0A> > > Do you see the same? Is there anyfix for= this?=0A> > >=0A> > > In additions I have 54 processes like this one=0A> >= > 50006 =A0?? =A0I =A0 =A0 =A00:00.00=0A> > >=0A> /usr/local/lib/nspluginw= rapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin=0A> --plugin=0A> > >=0A> /usr/local/lib/linu= x-mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so=0A> --connection=0A> > > hanging around= even after firefox process exits.=0A> > >=0A> > > linux-f10-flashplugin-10= .0r45=0A> > > nspluginwrapper-1.2.2_5=0A> > > firefox-3.5.8,1=0A> > >=0A> >= > Yuri=0A> =0A> Hi!=0A> =0A> There was a workaround for this issue publish= ed by=0A> DutchDaemon on forums.freebsd.org. =0A> I'm too lazy today to see= k for that thread, sorry :) =0A> What he suggested is a simple cronjob scri= pt intended to=0A> constantly check process list and =0A> kill any single r= emaining proccess of npviewer.bin=0A> It works, but you should check every = minute or so.=0A> =0A> =0A> -- =0A> Best regards,=0A> Jeff=0A> =0A> | "Nobo= dy wants to say how this works.=A0=A0=A0 |=0A> |=A0 Maybe nobody knows ..."= =A0=A0=A0=0A> =A0=A0=A0 |=0A> |=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=0A> =A0=A0=A0 Xorg.c= onf(5)=A0=A0=A0 |=0A> _______________________________________________=0A> f= reebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> http://lists.freebsd.org/= mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr= eebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 10:38:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD461065674 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from atmail-10.bnguk.net (atmail-10.bnguk.net [80.74.253.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FFD8FC0C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 77-44-105-82.xdsl.murphx.net ([77.44.105.82] helo=melon.esperance-linux.co.uk) by atmail-10.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu1V0-0006LD-OH; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:14 +0000 Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 78E02FCA4B4; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:14 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:14 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: 4096@gmx.com Message-ID: <20100323103814.GA27023@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: 4096@gmx.com, freebsd-questions References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 i386 X-Organisation: 'http://www.shute.org.uk/' Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:25 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:05:49AM -0500, Corey John Bukolt wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan > > spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged > > in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. > > > > Chris > > Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all > brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After > sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the > green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power > button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. > The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get > it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. > We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. > > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > Can anyone else confirm this? > Did you have a monitor attached? Anything posted to the screen? My nephew had similar symptoms and it was because his heatsink on his CPU wasn't seated properly. The system would boot like yours but then die. He managed to catch on the screen a message like "CPU temp exceeded" which clued him in. BTW, your "Reply to:" is different from your "From:" which is confusing. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 12:16:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DAB1065672 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43BF8FC1D for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2NCG9XV002690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:16:10 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA8B109.3060006@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:16:09 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Lewis References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:16:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/2010 23:47:44, Aaron Lewis wrote: > Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. > > I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? > That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home > directory. > So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. pw user add is fine for creating accounts. It should create the home directory for you if given the right arguments. Even so, just creating the home directory by hand after creating the account should not be a problem. > $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log > login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission > denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below This means that the ownership/permissions of one of the directories in the path up to /home/frozen is wrong. Implied is that it is possible for non-root to substitute their own copy of /home/frozen/.login_conf somehow. What's the output from: ls -ld / /home (Add /usr/home to that list if /home is a sym-link) Is there anything unusual about how the filesystem is mounted? > > // I don't know why > `stat' function fails .. > > $ ls -ld /home/frozen > drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ > $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf > > BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Which is a little disconcerting, because ssh is pretty anal about file permissions itself, but it isn't triggering the problem here. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuosQkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyL+QCgib3JZkMQDsa1JmKg8rqFiIIp EIYAniLNsh/lMANiJsFSbdx8oekEpMNR =NlkH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 12:29:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF693106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8836A8FC2A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu3Ed-0002tG-Mk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:27 +0100 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2NCTRtO004108 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2NCTRum004107 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:27 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100323122927.GA4059@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: sendmail && UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:29:32 -0000 Hello, I want to sendout mail the following way: sendmail -t < filename where the file 'filename' contains some header lines, especially To: Subject: and From: and as well the body of the mail; all is in UTF-8 and I know I have to encode the header lines and says something about the body. With Perl it goes like this: #!/usr/bin/perl use utf8; use Encode; open (MAIL, "|/usr/lib/sendmail -t"); $x="Subject: ... with some UTF-8 chars"; $x_for_header = Encode::encode('MIME-Q', $x); print MAIL "From: .......\n"; print MAIL "To: .......\n"; print MAIL $x_for_header."\n"; print MAIL "Content-type: text/xml\;charset=UTF-8\n"; print MAIL "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"; print MAIL "\n"; ... now the plain UTF-8 body follows close(MAIL) || warn "Error closing mail: $!"; } How can I encode the header lines (like the above Subject: line) not using Perl, i.e. with plain shell tools; I've checked out metamail and such stuff, but they don't help. Any idea? Thanks in advance matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the imperialistic Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con el imperialismo de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 12:57:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B04106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f185.google.com (mail-iw0-f185.google.com [209.85.223.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAF38FC1C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn15 with SMTP id 15so1755724iwn.7 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:57:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=otLHLoM68KP58gEOSwEHr4RlRnC01lUfcOKx4tvsMLc=; b=OpkajaPJgT8ThkL61fNnTUYB35W7ibGzyIZAMAZCBEj7aILm4EowptmOiObxoixeak q7bStZIxV3TWoW2GKJSRrHetWIMJKc0eQsJzcbhXZ9YDTxNSjsi+lVE6yr41tE4VEIyv yBXLYVg/xUxY/bDdiXXFEW+1wyqiKanTXnb3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=loUqQULADtuWorOD+DvER4RAJAqs6pDvw506hRY7l6ne9p1EpnKcvlVFn+mGXgcclN vxOY9qg/MI6n90TijQaGRgM29pwA0vYwKlREPdu7aWdDvijIL3fLTMbCU0vj2qJuFLcd QMVn55VX1eL15NGUcoVMKMPElbVeAsUyOJNSI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.172.203 with SMTP id m11mr1606299ibz.15.1269349040520; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:57:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:57:20 -0600 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: 4096@gmx.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:57:21 -0000 On 3/23/10, Corey John Bukolt wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan >> spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged >> in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. >> >> Chris > > Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all > brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After > sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the > green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power > button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. > The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get > it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. > We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. > > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > Can anyone else confirm this? > > ~Corey Best way to confirm a dead board in any case is those POST diagnosis cards. They have a dual-digit LED output that changes depending on the signal on the wire. If at any time those dual-digit LEDs stay permanently on anything OTHER THAN 00 is a failed POST. If it fails before it gets a shot at testing RAM or anything, there may be no beep codes. Always good to have one in a toolkit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 13:37:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A841065675 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF00F8FC28 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.164] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:52:46 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::1526 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Message-ID: <4BA8C434.30805@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:37:56 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100311 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Macklem , John Baldwin , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <4BA8B2CB.1090905@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA8B2CB.1090905@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: User Questions , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:37:59 -0000 On 03/22/10 19:53, Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, John Baldwin wrote: > > >> It looks like it also returns ESTALE when the inode is invalid (< > >> ROOTINO ||> max inodes?) - would an unlinked file in FFS referenced at > >> a later time report an invalid inode? > >> > > I'm no ufs guy, but the only way I can think of is if the file system > on the server was newfs'd with fewer i-nodes? (Unlikely, but...) > (Basically, it is safe to return ESTALE for anything that is not > a transient failure that could recover on a retry.) > > >> But back to your point, zfs_zget() seems to be failing and returning the > >> EINVAL before zfs_fhtovp() even has a chance to set and check zp_gen. > >> I'm trying to get some more details through the use of gratuitous > >> dprintf()'s, but they don't seem to be making it to any logs or the > >> console even with vfs.zfs.debug=1 set. Any pointers on how to get these > >> dprintf() calls working? > > I know diddly (as in absolutely nothing about zfs). > > > > That I have no idea on. Maybe Rick can chime in? I'm actually not sure why > > we would want to treat a FHTOVP failure as anything but an ESTALE error in the > > NFS server to be honest. > > > As far as I know, only if the underlying file system somehow has a > situation where the file handle can't be translated at that point in time, > but could be able to later. I have no idea if any file system is like that > and I don't such a file system would be an appropriate choice for an NFS > server, even if such a beast exists. (Even then, although FreeBSD's client > assumes EIO might recover on a retry, that isn't specified in any RFC, as > far as I know.) > > That's why I proposed a patch that simply translates all VFS_FHTOVP() > errors to ESTALE in the NFS server. (It seems simpler than chasing down > cases in all the underlying file systems?) > > rick, chiming in:-) > > > Makes sense to me. I'll continue to bang on NFS with your initial patch in my lab for a while. Should I open a PR for further discussion / resolution of the issue in -CURRENT / STABLE? Thanks, Steve Polyack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 13:57:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE3A106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD188FC1F for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDD6128DC2 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:55:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rDRqVdwm1DJ2 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:55:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from jamms-MacBook.local (catv-80-98-233-66.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.233.66]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589F0128DC1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:55:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA8C8C9.5050700@wooh.hu> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:57:29 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA7C5D1.7050301@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA7C5D1.7050301@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Setting ucastrate in /etc/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:57:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/22/10 8:32 PM, Christopher Theodore; RHODES wrote: > Hello; > > > $ uname -rs > FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 > > > I have setup ral0/wlan0 in /etc/rc.conf thusly: > > wlans_ral0="wlan0" > create_args_wlan0="wlanmode sta mcastrate 54 ssid linksys channel 6" > ifconfig_wlan0="inet 10.0.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > > This provides a working interface but ucastrate is not being set and I > have to manually set it after I login with: > > # ifconfig wlan0 ucastrate 54 > > > How can I effectively set ucastrate in rc.conf? is this a typo? mcastrate != ucastrate Have you tried this one create_args_wlan0="wlanmode sta ucastrate 54 ssid linksys channel 6" instead this? create_args_wlan0="wlanmode sta mcastrate 54 ssid linksys channel 6" - -- Adam PAPAI -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqMjJAAoJEGq0EWvh5uiI89AIAL/zRdFyBi0ZsF/jZTwN3ndL rMlli/x4W+i9q1F3vjc5jVhMC80xexw2qsionnqqRRooq8ptE40+1WD0o2XKi26v vbcrGJw5Mns/IefwjKUBwVNjnkmbODuUDhRYfSR38e4M3BkikUPgGQoCSUTrOYRt OAAj4n0aaFwzMnh6IuVlmqtrwUR4R8Xbr9rZjFNYNSvajHBnwerOOfSssoZXVsDd 3E874lHIwiNXKbEo00tWzn94dnQQJ6XP5+8vdGj0nHmkP+ZVddY0l3v3jsT/z0uc wwqCkwyy84qLa+i9evUzMtvv/GetK4XFRi9YgxVqknuyFZwG/Ck25vlck79NUgU= =5Fkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 14:10:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF1D106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aaron.lewis1989@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9BA8FC14 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so466254fgb.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type; bh=ismt9KHjC4PYd8IevrK3PsS7tcbtbg47WQ0uKTi1t/0=; b=dsEDwYAF5nF5DHTdnz70FTBcJ0q76mF/RZV5u+l27rAdYW0mKN5/khgsN+l9r544QB Rg+2EUO/Hs38E2Kyy7ujrM8+1j1kzImnNpt4DV/sgXn8dnbMejRmBhx8XIFSGrrrjHL2 ImT606+7QEMCCQUwKp4/ythtKzTRLT9auHeoE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; b=TkGffeTEOVdU1CZoHEGoWoilzniw6fowAaO0koFEqOBxIHDbR+e41GwmOfa3P/O2R+ uYqH9jtoWUyroswjeFoyNhTMzRgL2S/paK2QP0+RW9CqruevXU02Rt6yZtTlmGx9CZmt bvSF7QcKR/qS7w501JtW549kx4tsv3g2REl5U= Received: by 10.87.47.32 with SMTP id z32mr2117443fgj.36.1269353413209; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.101.90.67] ([117.136.9.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm6164739fgg.27.2010.03.23.07.10.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA8CBDF.7090809@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:10:39 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4BA7181B.7070708@gmail.com> <4BA75155.8090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA7668E.3000200@gmail.com> <4BA7843A.30201@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BA801A0.9090305@gmail.com> <4BA8B109.3060006@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BA8B109.3060006@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000002010600000800010102" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:10:15 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000002010600000800010102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log >> login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission >> denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below >> > > This means that the ownership/permissions of one of the directories in > the path up to /home/frozen is wrong. Implied is that it is possible for > non-root to substitute their own copy of /home/frozen/.login_conf > somehow. What's the output from: > > ls -ld / /home > > (Add /usr/home to that list if /home is a sym-link) > > Is there anything unusual about how the filesystem is mounted? > > Oops , it's a symbol link. [frozen@*** ~]$ ls -ld / /home /usr/home drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel 512 Mar 23 07:48 / lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8 Dec 3 14:34 /home -> usr/home drwxr-x--- 4 root wheel 512 Mar 23 07:39 /usr/home I've just read sth. about Biba Model , `no read down, no write up' , It's default installation with a Custom Kernel , MAC enabled. Attached Kernel Config File. >> >> // I don't know why >> `stat' function fails .. >> >> $ ls -ld /home/frozen >> drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ >> $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf >> -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf >> >> BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. >> > > Which is a little disconcerting, because ssh is pretty anal about file > permissions itself, but it isn't triggering the problem here. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkuosQkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyL+QCgib3JZkMQDsa1JmKg8rqFiIIp > EIYAniLNsh/lMANiJsFSbdx8oekEpMNR > =NlkH > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode --------------000002010600000800010102 Content-Type: text/plain; name="AARON" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="AARON" Y3B1CQlJNjg2X0NQVQppZGVudAkJQUFST04KCiMgVG8gc3RhdGljYWxseSBjb21waWxlIGlu IGRldmljZSB3aXJpbmcgaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAvYm9vdC9kZXZpY2UuaGludHMKI2hpbnRzCQki R0VORVJJQy5oaW50cyIJCSMgRGVmYXVsdCBwbGFjZXMgdG8gbG9vayBmb3IgZGV2aWNlcy4K CiMgVXNlIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgdG8gY29tcGlsZSBpbiB2YWx1ZXMgYWNjZXNzaWJsZSB0 byB0aGUga2VybmVsCiMgdGhyb3VnaCBnZXRlbnYoKSAob3Iga2VudigxKSBpbiB1c2VybGFu ZCkuIFRoZSBmb3JtYXQgb2YgdGhlIGZpbGUKIyBpcyAndmFyaWFibGU9dmFsdWUnLCBzZWUg a2VudigxKQojCiMgZW52CQkiR0VORVJJQy5lbnYiCgptYWtlb3B0aW9ucwlERUJVRz0tZwkJ IyBCdWlsZCBrZXJuZWwgd2l0aCBnZGIoMSkgZGVidWcgc3ltYm9scwoKb3B0aW9ucyAJU0NI RURfVUxFCQkjIFVMRSBzY2hlZHVsZXIKb3B0aW9ucyAJUFJFRU1QVElPTgkJIyBFbmFibGUg a2VybmVsIHRocmVhZCBwcmVlbXB0aW9uCm9wdGlvbnMgCUlORVQJCQkjIEludGVyTkVUd29y a2luZwpvcHRpb25zIAlJTkVUNgkJCSMgSVB2NiBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucyBwcm90b2NvbHMK b3B0aW9ucyAJU0NUUAkJCSMgU3RyZWFtIENvbnRyb2wgVHJhbnNtaXNzaW9uIFByb3RvY29s Cm9wdGlvbnMgCUZGUwkJCSMgQmVya2VsZXkgRmFzdCBGaWxlc3lzdGVtCm9wdGlvbnMgCVNP RlRVUERBVEVTCQkjIEVuYWJsZSBGRlMgc29mdCB1cGRhdGVzIHN1cHBvcnQKb3B0aW9ucyAJ VUZTX0FDTAkJCSMgU3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgYWNjZXNzIGNvbnRyb2wgbGlzdHMKb3B0aW9ucyAJ VUZTX0RJUkhBU0gJCSMgSW1wcm92ZSBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBvbiBiaWcgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMK b3B0aW9ucyAJVUZTX0dKT1VSTkFMCQkjIEVuYWJsZSBnam91cm5hbC1iYXNlZCBVRlMgam91 cm5hbGluZwpvcHRpb25zIAlNRF9ST09UCQkJIyBNRCBpcyBhIHBvdGVudGlhbCByb290IGRl dmljZQpvcHRpb25zIAlORlNDTElFTlQJCSMgTmV0d29yayBGaWxlc3lzdGVtIENsaWVudApv cHRpb25zIAlORlNTRVJWRVIJCSMgTmV0d29yayBGaWxlc3lzdGVtIFNlcnZlcgpvcHRpb25z IAlORlNMT0NLRAkJIyBOZXR3b3JrIExvY2sgTWFuYWdlcgpvcHRpb25zIAlORlNfUk9PVAkJ IyBORlMgdXNhYmxlIGFzIC8sIHJlcXVpcmVzIE5GU0NMSUVOVApvcHRpb25zIAlNU0RPU0ZT CQkJIyBNU0RPUyBGaWxlc3lzdGVtCm9wdGlvbnMgCUNEOTY2MAkJCSMgSVNPIDk2NjAgRmls ZXN5c3RlbQpvcHRpb25zIAlQUk9DRlMJCQkjIFByb2Nlc3MgZmlsZXN5c3RlbSAocmVxdWly ZXMgUFNFVURPRlMpCm9wdGlvbnMgCVBTRVVET0ZTCQkjIFBzZXVkby1maWxlc3lzdGVtIGZy YW1ld29yawpvcHRpb25zIAlHRU9NX1BBUlRfR1BUCQkjIEdVSUQgUGFydGl0aW9uIFRhYmxl cy4Kb3B0aW9ucyAJR0VPTV9MQUJFTAkJIyBQcm92aWRlcyBsYWJlbGl6YXRpb24Kb3B0aW9u cyAJQ09NUEFUXzQzVFRZCQkjIEJTRCA0LjMgVFRZIGNvbXBhdCAoc2d0dHkpCm9wdGlvbnMg CUNPTVBBVF9GUkVFQlNENAkJIyBDb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggRnJlZUJTRDQKb3B0aW9ucyAJ Q09NUEFUX0ZSRUVCU0Q1CQkjIENvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBGcmVlQlNENQpvcHRpb25zIAlD T01QQVRfRlJFRUJTRDYJCSMgQ29tcGF0aWJsZSB3aXRoIEZyZWVCU0Q2Cm9wdGlvbnMgCUNP TVBBVF9GUkVFQlNENwkJIyBDb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggRnJlZUJTRDcKb3B0aW9ucyAJU0NT SV9ERUxBWT01MDAwCQkjIERlbGF5IChpbiBtcykgYmVmb3JlIHByb2JpbmcgU0NTSQpvcHRp b25zIAlLVFJBQ0UJCQkjIGt0cmFjZSgxKSBzdXBwb3J0Cm9wdGlvbnMgCVNUQUNLCQkJIyBz dGFjayg5KSBzdXBwb3J0Cm9wdGlvbnMgCVNZU1ZTSE0JCQkjIFNZU1Ytc3R5bGUgc2hhcmVk IG1lbW9yeQpvcHRpb25zIAlTWVNWTVNHCQkJIyBTWVNWLXN0eWxlIG1lc3NhZ2UgcXVldWVz Cm9wdGlvbnMgCVNZU1ZTRU0JCQkjIFNZU1Ytc3R5bGUgc2VtYXBob3JlcwpvcHRpb25zIAlQ MTAwM18xQl9TRU1BUEhPUkVTCSMgUE9TSVgtc3R5bGUgc2VtYXBob3JlcwpvcHRpb25zIAlf S1BPU0lYX1BSSU9SSVRZX1NDSEVEVUxJTkcgIyBQT1NJWCBQMTAwM18xQiByZWFsLXRpbWUg ZXh0ZW5zaW9ucwpvcHRpb25zIAlQUklOVEZfQlVGUl9TSVpFPTEyOAkjIFByZXZlbnQgcHJp bnRmIG91dHB1dCBiZWluZyBpbnRlcnNwZXJzZWQuCm9wdGlvbnMgCUtCRF9JTlNUQUxMX0NE RVYJIyBpbnN0YWxsIGEgQ0RFViBlbnRyeSBpbiAvZGV2Cm9wdGlvbnMgCUhXUE1DX0hPT0tT CQkjIE5lY2Vzc2FyeSBrZXJuZWwgaG9va3MgZm9yIGh3cG1jKDQpCm9wdGlvbnMgCUFVRElU CQkJIyBTZWN1cml0eSBldmVudCBhdWRpdGluZwpvcHRpb25zIAlNQUMJCQkjIFRydXN0ZWRC U0QgTUFDIEZyYW1ld29yawpvcHRpb25zCQlGTE9XVEFCTEUJCSMgcGVyLWNwdSByb3V0aW5n IGNhY2hlCiNvcHRpb25zIAlLRFRSQUNFX0hPT0tTCQkjIEtlcm5lbCBEVHJhY2UgaG9va3MK CiMgVG8gbWFrZSBhbiBTTVAga2VybmVsLCB0aGUgbmV4dCB0d28gbGluZXMgYXJlIG5lZWRl ZAojb3B0aW9ucyAJU01QCQkJIyBTeW1tZXRyaWMgTXVsdGlQcm9jZXNzb3IgS2VybmVsCiNk ZXZpY2UJCWFwaWMJCQkjIEkvTyBBUElDCgojIENQVSBmcmVxdWVuY3kgY29udHJvbAojZGV2 aWNlCQljcHVmcmVxCgojIEJ1cyBzdXBwb3J0LgpkZXZpY2UJCWFjcGkKZGV2aWNlCQllaXNh CmRldmljZQkJcGNpCgojIEZsb3BweSBkcml2ZXMKI2RldmljZQkJZmRjCgojIEFUQSBhbmQg QVRBUEkgZGV2aWNlcwpkZXZpY2UJCWF0YQpkZXZpY2UJCWF0YWRpc2sJCSMgQVRBIGRpc2sg ZHJpdmVzCmRldmljZQkJYXRhcmFpZAkJIyBBVEEgUkFJRCBkcml2ZXMKZGV2aWNlCQlhdGFw aWNkCQkjIEFUQVBJIENEUk9NIGRyaXZlcwpkZXZpY2UJCWF0YXBpZmQJCSMgQVRBUEkgZmxv cHB5IGRyaXZlcwpkZXZpY2UJCWF0YXBpc3QJCSMgQVRBUEkgdGFwZSBkcml2ZXMKb3B0aW9u cyAJQVRBX1NUQVRJQ19JRAkjIFN0YXRpYyBkZXZpY2UgbnVtYmVyaW5nCgojIFNDU0kgQ29u dHJvbGxlcnMKZGV2aWNlCQlhaGIJCSMgRUlTQSBBSEExNzQyIGZhbWlseQpkZXZpY2UJCWFo YwkJIyBBSEEyOTQwIGFuZCBvbmJvYXJkIEFJQzd4eHggZGV2aWNlcwpvcHRpb25zIAlBSENf UkVHX1BSRVRUWV9QUklOVAkjIFByaW50IHJlZ2lzdGVyIGJpdGZpZWxkcyBpbiBkZWJ1ZwoJ CQkJCSMgb3V0cHV0LiAgQWRkcyB+MTI4ayB0byBkcml2ZXIuCmRldmljZQkJYWhkCQkjIEFI QTM5MzIwLzI5MzIwIGFuZCBvbmJvYXJkIEFJQzc5eHggZGV2aWNlcwpvcHRpb25zIAlBSERf UkVHX1BSRVRUWV9QUklOVAkjIFByaW50IHJlZ2lzdGVyIGJpdGZpZWxkcyBpbiBkZWJ1ZwoJ CQkJCSMgb3V0cHV0LiAgQWRkcyB+MjE1ayB0byBkcml2ZXIuCiNkZXZpY2UJCWFtZAkJIyBB TUQgNTNDOTc0IChUZWtyYW0gREMtMzkwKFQpKQpkZXZpY2UJCWhwdGlvcAkJIyBIaWdocG9p bnQgUm9ja2V0UmFpZCAzeHh4IHNlcmllcwpkZXZpY2UJCWlzcAkJIyBRbG9naWMgZmFtaWx5 CiNkZXZpY2UJCWlzcGZ3CQkjIEZpcm13YXJlIGZvciBRTG9naWMgSEJBcy0gbm9ybWFsbHkg YSBtb2R1bGUKZGV2aWNlCQltcHQJCSMgTFNJLUxvZ2ljIE1QVC1GdXNpb24KI2RldmljZQkJ bmNyCQkjIE5DUi9TeW1iaW9zIExvZ2ljCmRldmljZQkJc3ltCQkjIE5DUi9TeW1iaW9zIExv Z2ljIChuZXdlciBjaGlwc2V0cyArIHRob3NlIG9mIGBuY3InKQpkZXZpY2UJCXRybQkJIyBU ZWtyYW0gREMzOTVVL1VXL0YgREMzMTVVIGFkYXB0ZXJzCgpkZXZpY2UJCWFkdgkJIyBBZHZh bnN5cyBTQ1NJIGFkYXB0ZXJzCmRldmljZQkJYWR3CQkjIEFkdmFuc3lzIHdpZGUgU0NTSSBh ZGFwdGVycwpkZXZpY2UJCWFoYQkJIyBBZGFwdGVjIDE1NHggU0NTSSBhZGFwdGVycwpkZXZp Y2UJCWFpYwkJIyBBZGFwdGVjIDE1WzAxMl14IFNDU0kgYWRhcHRlcnMsIEFJQy02WzIzXTYw LgpkZXZpY2UJCWJ0CQkjIEJ1c2xvZ2ljL015bGV4IE11bHRpTWFzdGVyIFNDU0kgYWRhcHRl cnMKCmRldmljZQkJbmN2CQkjIE5DUiA1M0M1MDAKZGV2aWNlCQluc3AJCSMgV29ya2JpdCBO aW5qYSBTQ1NJLTMKZGV2aWNlCQlzdGcJCSMgVE1DIDE4QzMwLzE4QzUwCgojIFNDU0kgcGVy aXBoZXJhbHMKZGV2aWNlCQlzY2J1cwkJIyBTQ1NJIGJ1cyAocmVxdWlyZWQgZm9yIFNDU0kp CmRldmljZQkJY2gJCSMgU0NTSSBtZWRpYSBjaGFuZ2VycwpkZXZpY2UJCWRhCQkjIERpcmVj dCBBY2Nlc3MgKGRpc2tzKQpkZXZpY2UJCXNhCQkjIFNlcXVlbnRpYWwgQWNjZXNzICh0YXBl IGV0YykKZGV2aWNlCQljZAkJIyBDRApkZXZpY2UJCXBhc3MJCSMgUGFzc3Rocm91Z2ggZGV2 aWNlIChkaXJlY3QgU0NTSSBhY2Nlc3MpCmRldmljZQkJc2VzCQkjIFNDU0kgRW52aXJvbm1l bnRhbCBTZXJ2aWNlcyAoYW5kIFNBRi1URSkKCiMgUkFJRCBjb250cm9sbGVycyBpbnRlcmZh Y2VkIHRvIHRoZSBTQ1NJIHN1YnN5c3RlbQojZGV2aWNlCQlhbXIJCSMgQU1JIE1lZ2FSQUlE CiNkZXZpY2UJCWFyY21zcgkJIyBBcmVjYSBTQVRBIElJIFJBSUQKI2RldmljZQkJYXNyCQkj IERQVCBTbWFydFJBSUQgViwgVkkgYW5kIEFkYXB0ZWMgU0NTSSBSQUlECiNkZXZpY2UJCWNp c3MJCSMgQ29tcGFxIFNtYXJ0IFJBSUQgNSoKI2RldmljZQkJZHB0CQkjIERQVCBTbWFydGNh Y2hlIElJSSwgSVYgLSBTZWUgTk9URVMgZm9yIG9wdGlvbnMKI2RldmljZQkJaHB0bXYJCSMg SGlnaHBvaW50IFJvY2tldFJBSUQgMTgyeAojZGV2aWNlCQlocHRycgkJIyBIaWdocG9pbnQg Um9ja2V0UkFJRCAxN3h4LCAyMnh4LCAyM3h4LCAyNXh4CiNkZXZpY2UJCWlpcgkJIyBJbnRl bCBJbnRlZ3JhdGVkIFJBSUQKI2RldmljZQkJaXBzCQkjIElCTSAoQWRhcHRlYykgU2VydmVS QUlECiNkZXZpY2UJCW1seQkJIyBNeWxleCBBY2NlbGVSQUlEL2VYdHJlbWVSQUlECiNkZXZp Y2UJCXR3YQkJIyAzd2FyZSA5MDAwIHNlcmllcyBQQVRBL1NBVEEgUkFJRAoKIyBSQUlEIGNv bnRyb2xsZXJzCiNkZXZpY2UJCWFhYwkJIyBBZGFwdGVjIEZTQSBSQUlECiNkZXZpY2UJCWFh Y3AJCSMgU0NTSSBwYXNzdGhyb3VnaCBmb3IgYWFjIChyZXF1aXJlcyBDQU0pCiNkZXZpY2UJ CWlkYQkJIyBDb21wYXEgU21hcnQgUkFJRAojZGV2aWNlCQltZmkJCSMgTFNJIE1lZ2FSQUlE IFNBUwojZGV2aWNlCQltbHgJCSMgTXlsZXggREFDOTYwIGZhbWlseQojZGV2aWNlCQlwc3QJ CSMgUHJvbWlzZSBTdXBlcnRyYWsgU1g2MDAwCiNkZXZpY2UJCXR3ZQkJIyAzd2FyZSBBVEEg UkFJRAoKIyBhdGtiZGMwIGNvbnRyb2xzIGJvdGggdGhlIGtleWJvYXJkIGFuZCB0aGUgUFMv MiBtb3VzZQpkZXZpY2UJCWF0a2JkYwkJIyBBVCBrZXlib2FyZCBjb250cm9sbGVyCmRldmlj ZQkJYXRrYmQJCSMgQVQga2V5Ym9hcmQKZGV2aWNlCQlwc20JCSMgUFMvMiBtb3VzZQoKZGV2 aWNlCQlrYmRtdXgJCSMga2V5Ym9hcmQgbXVsdGlwbGV4ZXIKCmRldmljZQkJdmdhCQkjIFZH QSB2aWRlbyBjYXJkIGRyaXZlcgoKZGV2aWNlCQlzcGxhc2gJCSMgU3BsYXNoIHNjcmVlbiBh bmQgc2NyZWVuIHNhdmVyIHN1cHBvcnQKCiMgc3lzY29ucyBpcyB0aGUgZGVmYXVsdCBjb25z b2xlIGRyaXZlciwgcmVzZW1ibGluZyBhbiBTQ08gY29uc29sZQpkZXZpY2UJCXNjCgpkZXZp Y2UJCWFncAkJIyBzdXBwb3J0IHNldmVyYWwgQUdQIGNoaXBzZXRzCgojIFBvd2VyIG1hbmFn ZW1lbnQgc3VwcG9ydCAoc2VlIE5PVEVTIGZvciBtb3JlIG9wdGlvbnMpCiNkZXZpY2UJCWFw bQojIEFkZCBzdXNwZW5kL3Jlc3VtZSBzdXBwb3J0IGZvciB0aGUgaTgyNTQuCiNkZXZpY2UJ CXBtdGltZXIKCiMgUENDQVJEIChQQ01DSUEpIHN1cHBvcnQKIyBQQ01DSUEgYW5kIGNhcmRi dXMgYnJpZGdlIHN1cHBvcnQKI2RldmljZQkJY2JiCQkjIGNhcmRidXMgKHllbnRhKSBicmlk Z2UKI2RldmljZQkJcGNjYXJkCQkjIFBDIENhcmQgKDE2LWJpdCkgYnVzCiNkZXZpY2UJCWNh cmRidXMJCSMgQ2FyZEJ1cyAoMzItYml0KSBidXMKCiMgU2VyaWFsIChDT00pIHBvcnRzCmRl dmljZQkJdWFydAkJIyBHZW5lcmljIFVBUlQgZHJpdmVyCgojIFBhcmFsbGVsIHBvcnQKZGV2 aWNlCQlwcGMKZGV2aWNlCQlwcGJ1cwkJIyBQYXJhbGxlbCBwb3J0IGJ1cyAocmVxdWlyZWQp CmRldmljZQkJbHB0CQkjIFByaW50ZXIKZGV2aWNlCQlwbGlwCQkjIFRDUC9JUCBvdmVyIHBh cmFsbGVsCmRldmljZQkJcHBpCQkjIFBhcmFsbGVsIHBvcnQgaW50ZXJmYWNlIGRldmljZQoj ZGV2aWNlCQl2cG8JCSMgUmVxdWlyZXMgc2NidXMgYW5kIGRhCgojIElmIHlvdSd2ZSBnb3Qg YSAiZHVtYiIgc2VyaWFsIG9yIHBhcmFsbGVsIFBDSSBjYXJkIHRoYXQgaXMKIyBzdXBwb3J0 ZWQgYnkgdGhlIHB1Yyg0KSBnbHVlIGRyaXZlciwgdW5jb21tZW50IHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcK IyBsaW5lIHRvIGVuYWJsZSBpdCAoY29ubmVjdHMgdG8gc2lvLCB1YXJ0IGFuZC9vciBwcGMg ZHJpdmVycyk6CiNkZXZpY2UJCXB1YwoKIyBQQ0kgRXRoZXJuZXQgTklDcy4KI2RldmljZQkJ ZGUJCSMgREVDL0ludGVsIERDMjF4NHggKGBgVHVsaXAnJykKZGV2aWNlCQllbQkJIyBJbnRl bCBQUk8vMTAwMCBHaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0IEZhbWlseQojZGV2aWNlCQlpZ2IJCSMgSW50 ZWwgUFJPLzEwMDAgUENJRSBTZXJ2ZXIgR2lnYWJpdCBGYW1pbHkKI2RldmljZQkJaXhnYgkJ IyBJbnRlbCBQUk8vMTBHYkUgRXRoZXJuZXQgQ2FyZAojZGV2aWNlCQlsZQkJIyBBTUQgQW03 OTAwIExBTkNFIGFuZCBBbTc5Qzl4eCBQQ25ldAojZGV2aWNlCQl0aQkJIyBBbHRlb24gTmV0 d29ya3MgVGlnb24gSS9JSSBnaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0CiNkZXZpY2UJCXR4cAkJIyAzQ29t IDNjUjk5MCAoYGBUeXBob29uJycpCiNkZXZpY2UJCXZ4CQkjIDNDb20gM2M1OTAsIDNjNTk1 IChgYFZvcnRleCcnKQoKIyBQQ0kgRXRoZXJuZXQgTklDcyB0aGF0IHVzZSB0aGUgY29tbW9u IE1JSSBidXMgY29udHJvbGxlciBjb2RlLgojIE5PVEU6IEJlIHN1cmUgdG8ga2VlcCB0aGUg J2RldmljZSBtaWlidXMnIGxpbmUgaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gdXNlIHRoZXNlIE5JQ3MhCmRldmlj ZQkJbWlpYnVzCQkjIE1JSSBidXMgc3VwcG9ydAojZGV2aWNlCQlhZQkJIyBBdHRhbnNpYy9B dGhlcm9zIEwyIEZhc3RFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQlhZ2UJCSMgQXR0YW5zaWMvQXRoZXJv cyBMMSBHaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0CiNkZXZpY2UJCWFsYwkJIyBBdGhlcm9zIEFSODEzMS9B UjgxMzIgRXRoZXJuZXQKI2RldmljZQkJYWxlCQkjIEF0aGVyb3MgQVI4MTIxL0FSODExMy9B UjgxMTQgRXRoZXJuZXQKI2RldmljZQkJYmNlCQkjIEJyb2FkY29tIEJDTTU3MDYvQkNNNTcw OCBHaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0CiNkZXZpY2UJCWJmZQkJIyBCcm9hZGNvbSBCQ000NDB4IDEw LzEwMCBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQliZ2UJCSMgQnJvYWRjb20gQkNNNTcweHggR2lnYWJp dCBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQlkYwkJIyBERUMvSW50ZWwgMjExNDMgYW5kIHZhcmlvdXMg d29ya2FsaWtlcwojZGV2aWNlCQlldAkJIyBBZ2VyZSBFVDEzMTAgMTAvMTAwL0dpZ2FiaXQg RXRoZXJuZXQKI2RldmljZQkJZnhwCQkjIEludGVsIEV0aGVyRXhwcmVzcyBQUk8vMTAwQiAo ODI1NTcsIDgyNTU4KQojZGV2aWNlCQlqbWUJCSMgSk1pY3JvbiBKTUMyNTAgR2lnYWJpdC9K TUMyNjAgRmFzdCBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQlsZ2UJCSMgTGV2ZWwgMSBMWFQxMDAxIGdp Z2FiaXQgRXRoZXJuZXQKI2RldmljZQkJbXNrCQkjIE1hcnZlbGwvU3lzS29ubmVjdCBZdWtv biBJSSBHaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0CiNkZXZpY2UJCW5mZQkJIyBuVmlkaWEgbkZvcmNlIE1D UCBvbi1ib2FyZCBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQluZ2UJCSMgTmF0U2VtaSBEUDgzODIwIGdp Z2FiaXQgRXRoZXJuZXQKIyNkZXZpY2UJCW52ZQkJIyBuVmlkaWEgbkZvcmNlIE1DUCBvbi1i b2FyZCBFdGhlcm5ldCBOZXR3b3JraW5nCiNkZXZpY2UJCXBjbgkJIyBBTUQgQW03OUM5N3gg UENJIDEwLzEwMCAocHJlY2VkZW5jZSBvdmVyICdsZScpCiNkZXZpY2UJCXJlCQkjIFJlYWxU ZWsgODEzOUMrLzgxNjkvODE2OVMvODExMFMKI2RldmljZQkJcmwJCSMgUmVhbFRlayA4MTI5 LzgxMzkKI2RldmljZQkJc2YJCSMgQWRhcHRlYyBBSUMtNjkxNSAoYGBTdGFyZmlyZScnKQoj ZGV2aWNlCQlzaXMJCSMgU2lsaWNvbiBJbnRlZ3JhdGVkIFN5c3RlbXMgU2lTIDkwMC9TaVMg NzAxNgojZGV2aWNlCQlzawkJIyBTeXNLb25uZWN0IFNLLTk4NHggJiBTSy05ODJ4IGdpZ2Fi aXQgRXRoZXJuZXQKI2RldmljZQkJc3RlCQkjIFN1bmRhbmNlIFNUMjAxIChELUxpbmsgREZF LTU1MFRYKQojZGV2aWNlCQlzdGdlCQkjIFN1bmRhbmNlL1RhbWFyYWNrIFRDOTAyMSBnaWdh Yml0IEV0aGVybmV0CiNkZXZpY2UJCXRsCQkjIFRleGFzIEluc3RydW1lbnRzIFRodW5kZXJM QU4KI2RldmljZQkJdHgJCSMgU01DIEV0aGVyUG93ZXIgSUkgKDgzYzE3MCBgYEVQSUMnJykK I2RldmljZQkJdmdlCQkjIFZJQSBWVDYxMnggZ2lnYWJpdCBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQl2 cgkJIyBWSUEgUmhpbmUsIFJoaW5lIElJCiNkZXZpY2UJCXdiCQkjIFdpbmJvbmQgVzg5Qzg0 MEYKI2RldmljZQkJeGwJCSMgM0NvbSAzYzkweCAoYGBCb29tZXJhbmcnJywgYGBDeWNsb25l JycpCgojIElTQSBFdGhlcm5ldCBOSUNzLiAgcGNjYXJkIE5JQ3MgaW5jbHVkZWQuCiNkZXZp Y2UJCWNzCQkjIENyeXN0YWwgU2VtaWNvbmR1Y3RvciBDUzg5eDAgTklDCiMgJ2RldmljZSBl ZCcgcmVxdWlyZXMgJ2RldmljZSBtaWlidXMnCiNkZXZpY2UJCWVkCQkjIE5FWzEyXTAwMCwg U01DIFVsdHJhLCAzYzUwMywgRFM4MzkwIGNhcmRzCiNkZXZpY2UJCWV4CQkjIEludGVsIEV0 aGVyRXhwcmVzcyBQcm8vMTAgYW5kIFByby8xMCsKI2RldmljZQkJZXAJCSMgRXRoZXJsaW5r IElJSSBiYXNlZCBjYXJkcwojZGV2aWNlCQlmZQkJIyBGdWppdHN1IE1CODY5NnggYmFzZWQg Y2FyZHMKI2RldmljZQkJaWUJCSMgRXRoZXJFeHByZXNzIDgvMTYsIDNDNTA3LCBTdGFyTEFO IDEwIGV0Yy4KI2RldmljZQkJc24JCSMgU01DJ3MgOTAwMCBzZXJpZXMgb2YgRXRoZXJuZXQg Y2hpcHMKI2RldmljZQkJeGUJCSMgWGlyY29tIHBjY2FyZCBFdGhlcm5ldAoKIyBXaXJlbGVz cyBOSUMgY2FyZHMKI2RldmljZQkJd2xhbgkJIyA4MDIuMTEgc3VwcG9ydAojb3B0aW9ucyAJ SUVFRTgwMjExX0RFQlVHCSMgZW5hYmxlIGRlYnVnIG1zZ3MKI29wdGlvbnMgCUlFRUU4MDIx MV9BTVBEVV9BR0UgIyBhZ2UgZnJhbWVzIGluIEFNUERVIHJlb3JkZXIgcSdzCiNvcHRpb25z IAlJRUVFODAyMTFfU1VQUE9SVF9NRVNICSMgZW5hYmxlIDgwMi4xMXMgZHJhZnQgc3VwcG9y dAojZGV2aWNlCQl3bGFuX3dlcAkjIDgwMi4xMSBXRVAgc3VwcG9ydAojZGV2aWNlCQl3bGFu X2NjbXAJIyA4MDIuMTEgQ0NNUCBzdXBwb3J0CiNkZXZpY2UJCXdsYW5fdGtpcAkjIDgwMi4x MSBUS0lQIHN1cHBvcnQKI2RldmljZQkJd2xhbl9hbXJyCSMgQU1SUiB0cmFuc21pdCByYXRl IGNvbnRyb2wgYWxnb3JpdGhtCiNkZXZpY2UJCWFuCQkjIEFpcm9uZXQgNDUwMC80ODAwIDgw Mi4xMSB3aXJlbGVzcyBOSUNzLgojZGV2aWNlCQlhdGgJCSMgQXRoZXJvcyBwY2kvY2FyZGJ1 cyBOSUMncwojZGV2aWNlCQlhdGhfaGFsCQkjIHBjaS9jYXJkYnVzIGNoaXAgc3VwcG9ydAoj b3B0aW9ucyAJQUhfU1VQUE9SVF9BUjU0MTYJIyBlbmFibGUgQVI1NDE2IHR4L3J4IGRlc2Ny aXB0b3JzCiNkZXZpY2UJCWF0aF9yYXRlX3NhbXBsZQkjIFNhbXBsZVJhdGUgdHggcmF0ZSBj b250cm9sIGZvciBhdGgKI2RldmljZQkJcmFsCQkjIFJhbGluayBUZWNobm9sb2d5IFJUMjUw MCB3aXJlbGVzcyBOSUNzLgojZGV2aWNlCQl3aQkJIyBXYXZlTEFOL0ludGVyc2lsL1N5bWJv bCA4MDIuMTEgd2lyZWxlc3MgTklDcy4KI2RldmljZQkJd2wJCSMgT2xkZXIgbm9uIDgwMi4x MSBXYXZlbGFuIHdpcmVsZXNzIE5JQy4KCiMgUHNldWRvIGRldmljZXMuCmRldmljZQkJbG9v cAkJIyBOZXR3b3JrIGxvb3BiYWNrCmRldmljZQkJcmFuZG9tCQkjIEVudHJvcHkgZGV2aWNl CmRldmljZQkJZXRoZXIJCSMgRXRoZXJuZXQgc3VwcG9ydApkZXZpY2UJCXR1bgkJIyBQYWNr ZXQgdHVubmVsLgpkZXZpY2UJCXB0eQkJIyBCU0Qtc3R5bGUgY29tcGF0aWJpbGl0eSBwc2V1 ZG8gdHR5cwpkZXZpY2UJCW1kCQkjIE1lbW9yeSAiZGlza3MiCmRldmljZQkJZ2lmCQkjIElQ djYgYW5kIElQdjQgdHVubmVsaW5nCmRldmljZQkJZmFpdGgJCSMgSVB2Ni10by1JUHY0IHJl bGF5aW5nICh0cmFuc2xhdGlvbikKZGV2aWNlCQlmaXJtd2FyZQkjIGZpcm13YXJlIGFzc2lz dCBtb2R1bGUKCiMgVGhlIGBicGYnIGRldmljZSBlbmFibGVzIHRoZSBCZXJrZWxleSBQYWNr ZXQgRmlsdGVyLgojIEJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIHRoZSBhZG1pbmlzdHJhdGl2ZSBjb25zZXF1ZW5j ZXMgb2YgZW5hYmxpbmcgdGhpcyEKIyBOb3RlIHRoYXQgJ2JwZicgaXMgcmVxdWlyZWQgZm9y IERIQ1AuCmRldmljZQkJYnBmCQkjIEJlcmtlbGV5IHBhY2tldCBmaWx0ZXIKCiMgVVNCIHN1 cHBvcnQKZGV2aWNlCQl1aGNpCQkjIFVIQ0kgUENJLT5VU0IgaW50ZXJmYWNlCmRldmljZQkJ b2hjaQkJIyBPSENJIFBDSS0+VVNCIGludGVyZmFjZQpkZXZpY2UJCWVoY2kJCSMgRUhDSSBQ Q0ktPlVTQiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgKFVTQiAyLjApCmRldmljZQkJdXNiCQkjIFVTQiBCdXMgKHJl cXVpcmVkKQojZGV2aWNlCQl1ZGJwCQkjIFVTQiBEb3VibGUgQnVsayBQaXBlIGRldmljZXMK ZGV2aWNlCQl1aGlkCQkjICJIdW1hbiBJbnRlcmZhY2UgRGV2aWNlcyIKZGV2aWNlCQl1a2Jk CQkjIEtleWJvYXJkCmRldmljZQkJdWxwdAkJIyBQcmludGVyCmRldmljZQkJdW1hc3MJCSMg RGlza3MvTWFzcyBzdG9yYWdlIC0gUmVxdWlyZXMgc2NidXMgYW5kIGRhCmRldmljZQkJdW1z CQkjIE1vdXNlCiNkZXZpY2UJCXJ1bQkJIyBSYWxpbmsgVGVjaG5vbG9neSBSVDI1MDFVU0Ig d2lyZWxlc3MgTklDcwojZGV2aWNlCQl1cmFsCQkjIFJhbGluayBUZWNobm9sb2d5IFJUMjUw MFVTQiB3aXJlbGVzcyBOSUNzCiNkZXZpY2UJCXVhdGgJCSMgQXRoZXJvcyBBUjU1MjMgd2ly ZWxlc3MgTklDcwojZGV2aWNlCQl6eWQJCSMgWnlEQVMgemIxMjExL3piMTIxMWIgd2lyZWxl c3MgTklDcwojZGV2aWNlCQl1cmlvCQkjIERpYW1vbmQgUmlvIDUwMCBNUDMgcGxheWVyCiMj IFVTQiBTZXJpYWwgZGV2aWNlcwojZGV2aWNlCQl1M2cJCSMgVVNCLWJhc2VkIDNHIG1vZGVt cyAoT3B0aW9uLCBIdWF3ZWksIFNpZXJyYSkKI2RldmljZQkJdWFyawkJIyBUZWNobm9sb2dp ZXMgQVJLMzExNiBiYXNlZCBzZXJpYWwgYWRhcHRlcnMKI2RldmljZQkJdWJzYQkJIyBCZWxr aW4gRjVVMTAzIGFuZCBjb21wYXRpYmxlIHNlcmlhbCBhZGFwdGVycwojZGV2aWNlCQl1ZnRk aQkJIyBGb3IgRlRESSB1c2Igc2VyaWFsIGFkYXB0ZXJzCiNkZXZpY2UJCXVpcGFxCQkjIFNv bWUgV2luQ0UgYmFzZWQgZGV2aWNlcwojZGV2aWNlCQl1cGxjb20JCSMgUHJvbGlmaWMgUEwt MjMwMyBzZXJpYWwgYWRhcHRlcnMKI2RldmljZQkJdXNsY29tCQkjIFNJIExhYnMgQ1AyMTAx L0NQMjEwMiBzZXJpYWwgYWRhcHRlcnMKI2RldmljZQkJdXZpc29yCQkjIFZpc29yIGFuZCBQ YWxtIGRldmljZXMKI2RldmljZQkJdXZzY29tCQkjIFVTQiBzZXJpYWwgc3VwcG9ydCBmb3Ig RERJIHBvY2tldCdzIFBIUwojIyBVU0IgRXRoZXJuZXQsIHJlcXVpcmVzIG1paWJ1cwojZGV2 aWNlCQlhdWUJCSMgQURNdGVrIFVTQiBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQlheGUJCSMgQVNJWCBF bGVjdHJvbmljcyBVU0IgRXRoZXJuZXQKI2RldmljZQkJY2RjZQkJIyBHZW5lcmljIFVTQiBv dmVyIEV0aGVybmV0CiNkZXZpY2UJCWN1ZQkJIyBDQVRDIFVTQiBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNl CQlrdWUJCSMgS2F3YXNha2kgTFNJIFVTQiBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQlydWUJCSMgUmVh bFRlayBSVEw4MTUwIFVTQiBFdGhlcm5ldAojZGV2aWNlCQl1ZGF2CQkjIERhdmljb20gRE05 NjAxRSBVU0IKIwojIyBGaXJlV2lyZSBzdXBwb3J0CiNkZXZpY2UJCWZpcmV3aXJlCSMgRmly ZVdpcmUgYnVzIGNvZGUKIyNkZXZpY2UJCXNicAkJIyBTQ1NJIG92ZXIgRmlyZVdpcmUgKFJl cXVpcmVzIHNjYnVzIGFuZCBkYSkKI2RldmljZQkJZndlCQkjIEV0aGVybmV0IG92ZXIgRmly ZVdpcmUgKG5vbi1zdGFuZGFyZCEpCiNkZXZpY2UJCWZ3aXAJCSMgSVAgb3ZlciBGaXJlV2ly ZSAoUkZDIDI3MzQsMzE0NikKI2RldmljZQkJZGNvbnMJCSMgRHVtYiBjb25zb2xlIGRyaXZl cgojZGV2aWNlCQlkY29uc19jcm9tCSMgQ29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBST00gZm9yIGRjb25zCmRl dmljZQkJZHJhZ29uX3NhdmVyCm9wdGlvbnMgCVNDX0tFUk5FTF9DT05TX0FUVFI9KEZHX1JF RHxCR19CTEFDSykKb3B0aW9ucyAJU0NfS0VSTkVMX0NPTlNfUkVWX0FUVFI9KEZHX0JMQUNL fEJHX1JFRCkK --------------000002010600000800010102-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 14:28:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3E0106566C; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F229F8FC0A; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2D3B46B92; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:28:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EEBEF8A026; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:28:02 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Rick Macklem Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:27:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003231027.25874.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:28:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:28:04 -0000 On Monday 22 March 2010 7:53:23 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > That I have no idea on. Maybe Rick can chime in? I'm actually not sure why > > we would want to treat a FHTOVP failure as anything but an ESTALE error in the > > NFS server to be honest. > > > As far as I know, only if the underlying file system somehow has a > situation where the file handle can't be translated at that point in time, > but could be able to later. I have no idea if any file system is like that > and I don't such a file system would be an appropriate choice for an NFS > server, even if such a beast exists. (Even then, although FreeBSD's client > assumes EIO might recover on a retry, that isn't specified in any RFC, as > far as I know.) > > That's why I proposed a patch that simply translates all VFS_FHTOVP() > errors to ESTALE in the NFS server. (It seems simpler than chasing down > cases in all the underlying file systems?) Ah, I had read that patch as being a temporary testing hack. If you think that would be a good approach in general that would be ok with me. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:15:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B041065673 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id) Received: from mx2.ITB.ac.id (mx2.itb.ac.id [IPv6:2001:d30:3:5::67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAAB8FC1F for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx3.itb.ac.id (mx3.itb.ac.id [167.205.1.68]) by mx2.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A3B2E370 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:42 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx4.itb.ac.id ([167.205.1.69] helo=mx4.ITB.ac.id) by mx3.itb.ac.id with ESMTP id oMGBCGAn27269; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:16:11 +0700 Received: from www.arc.itb.ac.id (arc.itb.ac.id [167.205.3.3]) by mx4.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E66B662 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:42 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:40ce:b5a9:abb4:42ca] (unknown [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:40ce:b5a9:abb4:42ca]) by www.arc.itb.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2756F743F for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:38 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:06 +0700 From: "m.anis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 12816 [Mar 22 2010] X-SpamTest-Info: {FROM: real name seems fake} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0285], KAS30/SDK/Release X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Mail Gateway, version: 5.6.28/RELEASE, bases: 20100317T152331 #3814691, check: 20100318 clean Subject: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:15:32 -0000 Please help, mysql can't running i had installed it and using phpmyadmin when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status it says mysql is not running when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe & startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid 100323 22:09:46 mysqld ended -- -- Terima Kasih Muhammad Anis Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Bandung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:16:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF25C106566C; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=691a0532e=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2CB8FC1F; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:16:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4FAENxqEuBbgogTmdsb2JhbACbNwEBIkS7foR9BIMe X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,295,1267423200"; d="scan'208";a="27444407" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd65257.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Mar 2010 09:47:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:47:49 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <83BEEB5783CC06E1C802658D@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <4BA40295.4090006@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100319170159.GB71392@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100319200130.GE265@comcast.net> <3D386E86A152519AA850205C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <8B123BA51B43B4AAC86E0F3C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20100319220126.GH265@comcast.net> <2C40431FF3AE42C7B0234A97@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20100319222143.GI265@comcast.net> <4BA40295.4090006@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) X-Munged-Reply-To: Figure it out MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Paul Schmehl , "corky1951@comcast.net >> Charlie Kester" Subject: Re: Elegant way to hack port source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:16:51 -0000 --On Friday, March 19, 2010 19:02:45 -0400 Greg Larkin wrote: > > Here's something else that I've found really useful as a port creator, > maintainer and troubleshooter. If I want to make some additional > changes to a source file that is patched by a file stored in > files/patch-...., I'll do this: > > make patch # extracts source and patches files > cd work/foobar/... ># Now make additional edits in patched file, leaving the ># .orig file alone > cd ../back/to/port/directory > make makepatch > > The makepatch target recurses through the work/foobar directory and > creates diffs for all file.ext/file.ext.orig pairs. It writes them to > the files/ directory with the patch- prefix on each so the patch target > processes them. > > The only thing to watch out for here, is that makepatch has its own file > naming convention that doesn't always mirror the port creator's. For > instance, some ports have patch files named "patch-aa", "patch-ab", etc. > The makepatch target will recreate them with filenames based on the > directory and filename of the file to be patched during the build. > > Hope that helps, Man, does it ever. Thanks for that. Which brings me to an obvious question. Where can I go to find out what all of the make targets are? Is it in /usr/ports/Mk/? -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:24:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4579106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:24:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@icsmx.com) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD6C8FC13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC.icsmx.com (189.144.54.69) by icsmx.com with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:25:01 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:24:18 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3352202701-2078123415@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:24:21 -0000 Hello. WHat version of Freebsd are you using? I hacve the same issue in a recnet installed and updated Freebsd 7.3 At 09:15 a.m. 23/03/2010, you wrote: >Please help, mysql can't running >i had installed it and using phpmyadmin >when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status >it says mysql is not running >when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe & >startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql >STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid >100323 22:09:46 mysqld ended > >-- >-- >Terima Kasih >Muhammad Anis >Teknik Informatika >Institut Teknologi Bandung > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:28:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4385F1065670 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristiano.deana@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com (mail-ew0-f227.google.com [209.85.219.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928108FC1F for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so1165797ewy.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:28:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QKyNJAXFha5LGjNLBY0AJ8JPbTqtByrjlkv/G7o95co=; b=L8ItGXl05163dFSeubZm4FzgbbFawBX5eAtUYbfzyxCLJJ/70m7VYkrJUnnbpSg+XD tLm9NW4EdkYtqCZuK2E749ELfrUWt8GTrmy9/35c15vxOj0sfQgOHSFWXZBhjILbvDts BYY8jNpDxKb80VnSybRYb9JL15Fy7bbmheRLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SnQihaJYmp49SYk1HKF8I8VrfVpMlM7X0fSdpHJpKpmOY/vG2fYN+LuZu6P7Dq9Spr 2TTTvEnG+2CaUf1e8Ip50+6rp5A9mb0T2YnxtoJkrFcfwvyLuA6kT3xI04h+dbsq2EnY zy5efztU6zE9z6KZiTuaLDywGsPVV08YOOy/E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.190.65 with SMTP id w1mr370486hbh.126.1269358131108; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:28:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:28:51 +0100 Message-ID: From: Cristiano Deana To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:28:53 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:15 PM, m.anis wrote: > Please help, mysql can't running > i had installed it and using phpmyadmin > when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status > it says mysql is not running if you installed it from ports you must have and use /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql start|stop and of course you should have mysql_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:31:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7DB106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BAF8FC23 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1772044fxm.14 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5LPAS4xIxVUmQJo+YMAfF1mED0Ih4hICasFFOCdSTuU=; b=h1ywS6i4L1hH7swlIQtOE79e6wMsTzX8wyTfZqDBlbjklMbD0fkg7MxN7u4ID+RNeB cTG21Hb7ON4y+aXB61g/Quiv9v+6u9XHTBfSs7l82eRFmaSUD86XXFZ+2tLXoskYb/hn HJG3+vsI4wJlGmG+uowjJe4VkwVcoaUvBKAWc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=yHGgt2xhCz1UeMJMynVSZ+6ySkCZ6o+ph3S5wNjaMoW+mXKg0T9cZsAHqGDSKpG2/u ObKTGRYN0M9tse7242cZ+8XOkg3njFlsO42clZi3zL/G5u1u4OY6Ot0sdXYvuNsLgoZb 8AMLaaL/wJMox0WCUJ8ko8VBk/xw4dIKzaXx0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.161.201 with SMTP id s9mr2973400fax.7.1269358296239; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3352202701-2078123415@intranet.com.mx> References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> <3352202701-2078123415@intranet.com.mx> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:31:16 +0300 Message-ID: <991123401003230831n5064e0c9w9310d84b991c035d@mail.gmail.com> To: Jorge Biquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:31:38 -0000 I thought mysql is controlled from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server. At least that is what I have. I am running FreeBSD 8.0, 7.x and some 6.x and 5.5 and all are the same. It runs! You need some lines in /etc/rc.conf to make the syatem start mysql server! On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello. > > WHat version of Freebsd are you using? > I hacve the same issue in a recnet installed and updated Freebsd 7.3 > > At 09:15 a.m. 23/03/2010, you wrote: > >> Please help, mysql can't running >> i had installed it and using phpmyadmin >> when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status >> it says mysql is not running >> when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe & >> startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql >> STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid >> 100323 22:09:46 mysqld ended >> >> -- >> -- >> Terima Kasih >> Muhammad Anis >> Teknik Informatika >> Institut Teknologi Bandung >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:32:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3320F1065674 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03458FC26 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so74078qyk.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:32:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.222.205 with SMTP id ih13mr970766qcb.73.1269358331141; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:32:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:02:11 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 53e418c0447edf5a Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: "m.anis" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:32:13 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, m.anis wrote: > Please help, mysql can't running > i had installed it and using phpmyadmin > when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status > it says mysql is not running > when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe & > startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql > STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid > 100323 22:09:46 =A0mysqld ended What is the result of: 1) /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server onestart 2) tail /var/log/messages > > -- > -- > Terima Kasih > Muhammad Anis > Teknik Informatika > Institut Teknologi Bandung > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:43:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF6F106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id) Received: from mx2.ITB.ac.id (mx2.itb.ac.id [IPv6:2001:d30:3:5::67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D677B8FC16 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx3.itb.ac.id (mx3.itb.ac.id [167.205.1.68]) by mx2.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F752E827 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:43:19 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx4.itb.ac.id ([167.205.1.69] helo=mx4.ITB.ac.id) by mx3.itb.ac.id with ESMTP id oMhlCe0g12441; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:43:47 +0700 Received: from www.arc.itb.ac.id (arc.itb.ac.id [167.205.3.3]) by mx4.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012E2B834 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:43:18 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:40ce:b5a9:abb4:42ca] (unknown [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:40ce:b5a9:abb4:42ca]) by www.arc.itb.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8389F741D; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:43:14 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <4BA8E176.5080009@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:42:46 +0700 From: "m.anis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 12816 [Mar 22 2010] X-SpamTest-Info: {FROM: real name seems fake} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0285], KAS30/SDK/Release X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Mail Gateway, version: 5.6.28/RELEASE, bases: 20100317T152331 #3814691, check: 20100318 clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:43:08 -0000 On 23/03/2010 22:32, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, m.anis wrote: > >> Please help, mysql can't running >> i had installed it and using phpmyadmin >> when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status >> it says mysql is not running >> when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe& >> startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql >> STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid >> 100323 22:09:46 mysqld ended >> > What is the result of: > > 1) > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server onestart > > 2) > > tail /var/log/messages > > > > > >> -- >> -- >> Terima Kasih >> Muhammad Anis >> Teknik Informatika >> Institut Teknologi Bandung >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server onestart Starting mysql. there is no messages in /var/log/messages one thing i realize after looking through the internet i had no /tmp/mysql.sock -- -- Terima Kasih Muhammad Anis Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Bandung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 16:12:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976B2106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id) Received: from mx2.ITB.ac.id (mx2.itb.ac.id [IPv6:2001:d30:3:5::67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B09D8FC1D for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx3.itb.ac.id (mx3.itb.ac.id [167.205.1.68]) by mx2.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82322EB6B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:12:27 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx4.itb.ac.id ([167.205.1.69] helo=mx4.ITB.ac.id) by mx3.itb.ac.id with ESMTP id oNCuCe2p53290; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:12:56 +0700 Received: from www.arc.itb.ac.id (arc.itb.ac.id [167.205.3.3]) by mx4.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72AAB9EF for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:12:25 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:40ce:b5a9:abb4:42ca] (unknown [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:40ce:b5a9:abb4:42ca]) by www.arc.itb.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D65EF743F; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:12:22 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <4BA8E84A.3040704@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:11:54 +0700 From: "m.anis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 12816 [Mar 22 2010] X-SpamTest-Info: {FROM: real name seems fake} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0285], KAS30/SDK/Release X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Mail Gateway, version: 5.6.28/RELEASE, bases: 20100317T152331 #3814691, check: 20100318 clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:12:17 -0000 On 23/03/2010 22:32, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, m.anis wrote: > >> Please help, mysql can't running >> i had installed it and using phpmyadmin >> when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status >> it says mysql is not running >> when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe& >> startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql >> STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid >> 100323 22:09:46 mysqld ended >> > What is the result of: > > 1) > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server onestart > > 2) > > tail /var/log/messages > > > > > >> -- >> -- >> Terima Kasih >> Muhammad Anis >> Teknik Informatika >> Institut Teknologi Bandung >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > hei i just restart my system and it goes well but i still don't know why thanks for all your answer -- -- Terima Kasih Muhammad Anis Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Bandung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 16:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413B01065675 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D688FC1B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so110287qyk.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:13:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.251.69 with SMTP id mr5mr87275qcb.91.1269360818268; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:13:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA8E176.5080009@arc.itb.ac.id> References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> <4BA8E176.5080009@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:38 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 35c1f505c0de9646 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: "m.anis" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:13:40 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:12 AM, m.anis wrote: > On 23/03/2010 22:32, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, m.anis =A0wrote: >> >>> [..] > /tmp/mysql.sock I think that is created in the fly is you are using unix sockets. I think it depends on your my.cnf configuration (listen param). Anway, check that you have in fact /var/db/mysql and check the error file inthere and tell me if you see something of interest there. > > -- > -- > Terima Kasih > Muhammad Anis > Teknik Informatika > Institut Teknologi Bandung > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 16:27:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995EB106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D6F18FC13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20121 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Mar 2010 16:27:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1269361646; bh=cpG5/yB0HKa54jP915Mmp7iifNsfsJxgIu0mNLjBti8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CP8JvmFuXOzwOftrPHiuebIXOCvIAWFM6V+bwGyXCLuXynJQhEqlYnmojp0dOhxvT3h65U9I7oRAplVEKkLsLDuaeShS1qAo/nu795VuJKiuT3vpU8DyzuNz6ZhuXsLx4da+RiPaeLl8D+nU5L8UNymbULgARb75WgBXWD47lqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Dj3feHfMmmEcty67JSYrfnJgbxgd/6Y5K2wQMi5arpY59vqIqKGPgMcUlkNpVAO5hWpUKJP/oSKw9aslWNvtZVFHUsd4ahE4NlLVubVhKWf5EGe9MaV+80/HRyEf9vs9dTyoryHMvQvXwpEXEYMmowN/+kGr/orq9iOV/IAud+I=; Message-ID: <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: P4X5GIoVM1lD5YCGA6MUYRTyR61h7HpwWRhqQAkwohFxiWE kp6HWnsYk.nSdnxKXaj_1FxLDpdV_DpvG6xGfjIwIggA3frwE3aVmc9MR8b0 pxW2MroYX163DW6TcHxqnGIinvO5ncW4Xv6E0ai6DZhl.1NckcFemtpfl.xl 0tnLAKhaZoUkh_wSSlQFEBluJDi5f23KtE8.W7iQ9ljvi.cUv.MSzrmV8GcK Yep4DlESFe9uz8_zjCXj9Ojkghj2td2Znnp7dvXP.T3qtHRGdq.BwK33MGiQ 2EJB4klFlkJ34O0B1kxgn6xSDh79yxxCDiw-- Received: from [94.21.228.238] by web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:27:26 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/324.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:27:26 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E1nielisz_L=E1szl=F3?= To: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:27:27 -0000 Hi,=0A=0ADid you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?=0A= =0A=0AL=E1szl=F3=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: O. Har= tmann =0ATo: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; fr= eebsd-ports@freebsd.org=0ASent: Tue, March 23, 2010 11:10:56 AM=0ASubject: = OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64=0A=0AI have troub= le building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running FreeBSD 8.0-STABL= E/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an existing installation = of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the error below.=0A=0AOn another = box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much less memory (2G= B, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same error.=0A=0AAny suggest= ions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I need OO, so deins= tallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)?=0A=0ARegards,=0AOliver=0A=0A= =0A[...]=0A-----------------------------=0ASHL2FILTERFILE not set!=0A------= -----------------------=0Adummy file to keep the dependencies for later use= .=0A------------------------------=0AMaking: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslidesh= owtestfx.so=0Ac++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGI= N/../ure-link/lib' -shared -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/edit= ors/open ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib -L/usr/ports/edito= rs/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L/usr/port= s/e itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib -L/usr/local= /diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lo a= l/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib= /amd64/native_threads -L/usr/local/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_df= lt_version.o -o ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so ../unxfbsdx.pro/s= lo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o ../unxfbs x.pro/slo/c= lippingfunctor.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/f= ourboxwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/iriswip= e.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r ndomwipe.o ..= /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o ../unxfbs= dx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o ./unxfbsdx.pro/slo= /snakewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe= .o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro slo/doublediamondwipe.o= ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygon= factory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/= slidetransitionfactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o ../unxf= bsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/slidechangebase.o ../unx= fbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o ../unx= fbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytim= eactivitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/= slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcomm= andnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s o/anima= tioncolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/= slo/animationpathmotionnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset ode.o ../unx= fbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransit= ionfilternode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo= /basenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltim= econtainer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/sl= o/sequentialtimecontainer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx= .pro/slo/appletshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pr= o/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o ../unxfbsdx.p= ro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o ../unx= fbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/media= shape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewapplets= hape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewme= diashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../u= nxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o ../un= xfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o ../unxfbsd= x.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o ../unxfb= sdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o ../unxf= bsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo= /delayevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ev= entqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/expressionnodefactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/= rehearsetimingsactivity.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/screenupdater.o ../unxfbsdx.p= ro/slo/shapeattributelayer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapesubset.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidebitmap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowcontext.o .= ./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideview.o ../unxfb= sdx.pro/slo/smilfunctionparser.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/soundplayer.o ../unxfb= sdx.pro/slo/tools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/unoviewcontainer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/= slo/usereventqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waitsymbol.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/w= akeupevent.o -ltlfx -luno_cppu -luno_sal -lvclfx -lcomphelp4gcc3 -luno_cppu= helpergcc3 -lbasegfxfx -lcanvastoolsfx -lcppcanvasfx -lutlfx -lgofx -lavmed= iafx -pthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic -lstlport_gcc=0Arm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/c= heck_libslideshowtestfx.so=0Amv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so .= ./unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so=0A/usr/ports/editors/openoff= ice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L/u= sr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/l= ib ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so=0AChecking DLL ../unxfb= sdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so ...-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 46714= 68 Mar 23 10:56 ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so=0A-------------= =0ARunning processes: 0=0Adeliver -- version: 275594=0AModule 'slideshow' d= elivered successfully. 2 files copied, 2 files unchanged=0A=0A1 module(s):= =0A nss=0Aneed(s) to be rebuilt=0A=0AReason(s):=0A=0AERROR: error 65= 280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m= 12/nss/=0A=0AAttention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you ma= y prolongue your the build issuing command "build --from nss"=0A=0Armdir /t= mp/vIzUvGYiHu=0A*** Error code 1=0A=0AStop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice= .org-3.=0A** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupg= rade20100323-62447-12jdfhd-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=3D= de-openoffice.org-3.1.1_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D3.1.1_1 make=0A** Fix the prob= lem and try again.=0A[...]=0A=0A___________________________________________= ____=0Afreebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=0Ahttp://lists.freebsd.or= g/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0ATo unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr= eebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A=0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 16:58:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9F4106564A; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBEF8FC1E; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Nu7RK-0004iM-O0>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:58:50 +0100 Received: from e178050004.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.50.4] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Nu7RK-0000mm-Hu>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:58:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4BA8F34A.5040908@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:58:50 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100308 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?D=E1nielisz_L=E1szl=F3?= References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 85.178.50.4 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:58:53 -0000 On 03/23/10 17:27, D=E1nielisz L=E1szl=F3 wrote: > Hi, > > Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one? > > > L=E1szl=F3 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= - > *From:* O. Hartmann > *To:* freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > *Sent:* Tue, March 23, 2010 11:10:56 AM > *Subject:* OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 > > I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running > FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an > existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the > error below. > > On another box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much > less memory (2GB, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same erro= r. > > Any suggestions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I > need OO, so deinstallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)? > > Regards, > Oliver > > > [...] > ----------------------------- > SHL2FILTERFILE not set! > ----------------------------- > dummy file to keep the dependencies for later use. > ------------------------------ > Making: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin > -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../ure-link/lib' -shared > -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/open > ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbs= dx.pro/lib > -L/usr/ports/e > itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib > -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib > -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lo > al/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server > -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads > -L/usr/local/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_dflt_version.o -o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o > ../unxfbs x.pro/slo/clippingfunctor.o > > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fourboxwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/iriswipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r ndomwipe.o= > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o > ./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/snakewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro slo/doublediamondwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.= o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygonfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidetransitionfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd > .pro/slo/slidechangebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytimeactivitybase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcommandnode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s > o/animationcolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationpathmotionnode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset ode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransitionfilternode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basenode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltimecontainer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sequentialtimecontainer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/appletshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/mediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewappletshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewmediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/delayevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o= > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventqueue.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/expressionnodefactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/rehearsetimingsactivity.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/screenupdater.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeattributelayer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapesubset.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidebitmap.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowcontext.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideview.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/smilfunctionparser.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/soundplayer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/tools.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/unoviewcontainer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/usereventqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waitsymbol.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/wakeupevent.o -ltlfx -luno_cppu -luno_sal -lvclfx > -lcomphelp4gcc3 -luno_cppuhelpergcc3 -lbasegfxfx -lcanvastoolsfx > -lcppcanvasfx -lutlfx -lgofx -lavmediafx -pthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic > -lstlport_gcc > rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/bin/checkdll= =2Esh > -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbs= dx.pro/lib > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > Checking DLL ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > ...-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4671468 Mar 23 10:56 > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > ------------- > Running processes: 0 > deliver -- version: 275594 > Module 'slideshow' delivered successfully. 2 files copied, 2 files unch= anged > > 1 module(s): > nss > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/nss/ > > Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may > prolongue your the build issuing command "build --from nss" > > rmdir /tmp/vIzUvGYiHu > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade20100323-62447-12jdfhd-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade= > UPGRADE_PORT=3Dde-openoffice.org-3.1.1_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D3.1.1_1 mak= e > ** Fix the problem and try again. > [...] As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO=20 first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2. Regards, O. Hartmann From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:13:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26710106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tam.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37018FC12 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so3243591wyb.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:13:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CzfVs6w3ffRQXsxwTM/hQlTEemPZv3AOdE42NCWxie8=; b=GRI3YC62TibnQeoNIjXke5ERnK8cmvbeIqvcteJbJN3E2Iw/u+KdAEYVCKH4QUoaAf KFAdAOJQaAiGnVit+G9CXkPdFd6IgfUbOpBEBUe5gwkRDPvYv/kfg7RUe2R0nimcLtOy fkctCi8Htvu0/C5rmvRBf8OofKFjbCW0WGuQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KkareVv/8ulIHEw2FJAQIs5+fdgLzapwGlZdauuoRdZeN/E5mLsOyKqGbozMUCiPux kFO2pMbhBOIAuGEKQsVLaBUA4MlfS4f5N0t8OCpbT96d3aBJbIDrxc+mZRMtMXHr+ywa kpNOSfk6A1Z/5kofM/zBi8RD3A3DpyCB2dCzE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.177.82 with SMTP id c60mr3403630wem.25.1269364413710; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:13:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA8E84A.3040704@arc.itb.ac.id> References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> <4BA8E84A.3040704@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:13:33 -0600 Message-ID: From: Sergio Tam To: "m.anis" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:13:35 -0000 >> > > hei i just restart my system and it goes well > but i still don't know why > thanks for all your answer > > -- > -- Hi You dont need restart your system just type rehash. Check on the handbook; Note: Some shells keep a cache of the commands that are available in the directories listed in the PATH environment variable, to speed up lookup operations for the executable file of these commands. If you are using one of these shells, you might have to use the rehash command after installing a port, before the newly installed commands can be used. This command will work for shells like tcsh. Use the hash -r command for shells like sh. Look at the documentation for your shell for more information. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:21:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D2F1065670 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825798FC12 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (184.67-246-213.ippool.namesco.net [213.246.67.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2NHLDDJ090547 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:21:14 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA8F889.2080207@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:21:13 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: lighttpd in a jail says address is already in use (its not) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:21:16 -0000 Hi all, I'm hoping i'm doing something silly. I have an 8.0-RELEASE machine with one jail that i'm intending to run lighttpd. I have nothing running on the host other than sendmail on 127.0.0.1 and sshd bound to the primary IP. The jail is also now running sshd fine. when i try and start lighttpd i get Starting lighttpd. 2010-03-23 17:13:35: (network.c.345) can't bind to port: 192.168.10.221 80 Address already in use /usr/local/etc/rc.d/lighttpd: WARNING: failed to start lighttpd however [root@krill /usr/ports/www/lighttpd]# netstat -an netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem: No such file or directory Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) tcp4 0 0 192.168.10.221.25 *.* LISTEN tcp4 0 0 192.168.10.221.22 *.* LISTEN udp4 0 0 192.168.10.221.514 *.* and i can make nc listen on port 80 using nc -l 192.168.10.221 80 and make connections to it from remote vincenthoffman@macbook (17:18:13 <~>) 130 $ telnet 192.168.10.221 80 Trying 192.168.10.221... Connected to jail.home.unsane.co.uk. Escape character is '^]'. So the port definitely isnt in use. Any suggestions if there is a sysctl or anything i need to change to get this to work? Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:24:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C97106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CB78FC15 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (184.67-246-213.ippool.namesco.net [213.246.67.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2NHOnSL090589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:49 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA8F961.1000304@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:49 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA8F889.2080207@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BA8F889.2080207@unsane.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: lighttpd in a jail says address is already in use (its not) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:51 -0000 Sorry for noise, pebkac I had defined $SERVER["socket"] == "192.168.10.221:80" { } but not server.bind bahh. Vince On 23/03/2010 17:21, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > Hi all, > I'm hoping i'm doing something silly. I have an 8.0-RELEASE > machine with one jail that i'm intending to run lighttpd. > I have nothing running on the host other than sendmail on 127.0.0.1 and > sshd bound to the primary IP. The jail is also now running sshd fine. > when i try and start lighttpd i get > Starting lighttpd. > 2010-03-23 17:13:35: (network.c.345) can't bind to port: 192.168.10.221 > 80 Address already in use > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/lighttpd: WARNING: failed to start lighttpd > > however > [root@krill /usr/ports/www/lighttpd]# netstat -an > netstat: kvm not available: /dev/mem: No such file or directory > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > tcp4 0 0 192.168.10.221.25 *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 192.168.10.221.22 *.* LISTEN > udp4 0 0 192.168.10.221.514 *.* > > and i can make nc listen on port 80 using > nc -l 192.168.10.221 80 > and make connections to it from remote > vincenthoffman@macbook > (17:18:13 <~>) 130 $ telnet 192.168.10.221 80 > Trying 192.168.10.221... > Connected to jail.home.unsane.co.uk. > Escape character is '^]'. > > > So the port definitely isnt in use. > > Any suggestions if there is a sysctl or anything i need to change to get > this to work? > > Vince > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:41:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43A11065672 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smcafee@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9473C8FC1E for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightbird.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (nightbird.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.163]) (AUTH: LOGIN smcafee, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:31:03 -0400 id 0003F409.000000004BA8FAD7.00007984 Message-ID: <4BA8FAD7.6000902@collaborativefusion.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:31:03 -0400 From: Sean McAfee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4BA8F34A.5040908@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4BA8F34A.5040908@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:41:07 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO > first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2. > > Regards, > > O. Hartmann You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary backup. If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add on the resulting tbz and you're back in business. I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything other program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile. -- Sean McAfee Senior Systems Engineer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:54:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E6F106564A; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508E08FC17; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so5058931pwj.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rIVD1SajjsXbifdPDzvl9ipjaFb1ve4E7Go5fAdWoGA=; b=xrIURGexlapKLkNiEEuF+tS/End7pFuLrYeIF0aFu1rgftGEqBQL1nWtC+GliVfSX3 a8pOKxI/aP/lj0VKPrhIrLamcM3ijSeLX+0sh8Og4VnReB/bSKIhHZshyXBPeyiTyhZl ouI46cgmyA4CGG6XNG4zBrFGgG67g/7h4EX5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=k9TbdnnrfbD+hTFIFglexHiv1gvF/Ab0Eicy4idCPWHtCn35HdqNPHzjxQMC2I7kN8 /8lbGg1b8QwEaujRSIM7sPzpWlb8G3xVF0UkCOXsN/RIO93+9BR0jEbgEy1kqM4rEAHw Q8a7dd0UTnhc0hZPwTZ3Hj5D7LFW/3kpN4bo0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.53.5 with SMTP id f5mr4149891rvk.178.1269366859131; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:54:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA8FAD7.6000902@collaborativefusion.com> References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4BA8F34A.5040908@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4BA8FAD7.6000902@collaborativefusion.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:54:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:54:21 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Sean McAfee < smcafee@collaborativefusion.com> wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: > >> As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO >> first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2. >> >> Regards, >> >> O. Hartmann >> > > You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary > backup. If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add on the > resulting tbz and you're back in business. > > I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything other > program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile. portmaster and portupgrade both include a -b switch as well, which will create a backup package before uninstalling the port to install the new version. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:54:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CE7106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meediake@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE15F8FC18 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so4410803fxm.35 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:54:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+3TJ5dhXKK54eu+5yNWArhsYMbl1kwuccp8/aI1dNI4=; b=GUyd5wee7QS+JAxp0eEzNlYUxeUq30W0gndxZ2eTAY6V6xXGwvmLw7I6HgetDWOxP/ LczWeHhwfVzROWuYyPZ3rEdpBXgvxeqvXcXZ+osfJeA3S5mjQALm8LBzqgyboIiNSoam J8l9CAOTN24OQt5JlJZz5i1KYKpKXTfzUQKQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sEAE0FUCyaVazOeL5CSbfnOtmQ+ZEeWAjj/JeqjzD9EPwqdxlaQUswQNV9h/DODHsx eUmNzaB/T95f/uAvS4LES7tyQysLmqmf8o9UclPWIaQGXkstcktKnbZOu8NITG0bwaHl 4Lka7Ajr3aH6kJR8REWMyaefL/I0MI92zmk9I= Received: by 10.204.33.215 with SMTP id i23mr1300694bkd.86.1269365437426; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.198] (118.192.50.195.sta.estpak.ee [195.50.192.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g18sm27643980bkw.7.2010.03.23.10.30.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA8FABB.6090908@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:30:35 +0200 From: Sigmar Muuga User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; et; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Diablo JDK & Undefined symbol "gethostbyname_r" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:54:23 -0000 Hello, my freebsd version is 6.1-RELEASE, I have installed diablo jdk1.6 and when I run maven, I got the following error: Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/2.2/maven-clean-plugin-2.2.pom /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/libnet.so: Undefined symbol "gethostbyname_r" What may be the cause of this? Sigmar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 17:58:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60730106566B; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pukruppa@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24278FC25; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1081951fga.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:58:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tu8HYBnh+DEuGDCPbthWP3/fta4mHBWeRNdxIFVnI+c=; b=Qh4hfM7NimCLjec/2PtyMtWko9tCNQRXOKTfXNHT60pr+Tw7BzpjMG9f1kXcTo/E77 jbaM750y7NbiAVyTuTF+x3wAbPV6BwxYS/M3ySEjVepSakaOACTGM31x/KPw7DazT8oZ wDYG5n3NPmjf/xvqxHyLAcfAPPmH9g6L6aYDQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eVeeij4pXg6ejJcttrVMIbr6rKF3wDS+YgoWdFQxlfkB+9io7tcgiQwNlWcVnMiGfp Bi6QTy7s+C0GViCBXtMCcx1ypR2YAtZYvkzcVvLjoCVjkemNJSV8XENac0nZq1ZnqzL4 ON90fKRupS6kJJSAtDpjIeB5VFW7BGHGrB51E= Received: by 10.87.73.40 with SMTP id a40mr11841018fgl.41.1269365485045; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pukruppa.net (p4FCD7F09.dip.t-dialin.net [79.205.127.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm726436fga.13.2010.03.23.10.31.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA8FB6C.806@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:33:32 +0100 From: "Kruppa, Peter Ulrich" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-DE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100314 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:58:18 -0000 On 23.03.2010 11:10, O. Hartmann wrote: > I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running > FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an > existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the > error below. > > On another box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much > less memory (2GB, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same error. > > Any suggestions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I > need OO, so deinstallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)? It seems the OOO-building process is very sensitive about (its hundreds of ) dependencies. If you can afford the disk-space I would recommend to set up a simple "jail" and start the build inside your jail with a fresh portstree and without any userland-applications installed. If you need help setting up a jail, I can assist you or you just read and work out http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html yourself. When your build is ready you create a package, copy it to your main file-system and pkg_add it there. Gretings Uli. > Regards, > Oliver > > > [...] > ----------------------------- > SHL2FILTERFILE not set! > ----------------------------- > dummy file to keep the dependencies for later use. > ------------------------------ > Making: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin > -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../ure-link/lib' -shared > -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/open > ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib > -L/usr/ports/e > itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib > -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib > -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lo > al/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server > -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads > -L/usr/local/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_dflt_version.o -o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o > ../unxfbs x.pro/slo/clippingfunctor.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fourboxwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/iriswipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r > ndomwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o ./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/snakewipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro > slo/doublediamondwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygonfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidetransitionfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd > .pro/slo/slidechangebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytimeactivitybase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcommandnode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s > o/animationcolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationpathmotionnode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset ode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransitionfilternode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basenode.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltimecontainer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sequentialtimecontainer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/appletshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/mediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewappletshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewmediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/delayevent.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventqueue.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/expressionnodefactory.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/rehearsetimingsactivity.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/screenupdater.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeattributelayer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapesubset.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidebitmap.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowcontext.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideview.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/smilfunctionparser.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/soundplayer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/tools.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/unoviewcontainer.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/usereventqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waitsymbol.o > ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/wakeupevent.o -ltlfx -luno_cppu -luno_sal -lvclfx > -lcomphelp4gcc3 -luno_cppuhelpergcc3 -lbasegfxfx -lcanvastoolsfx > -lcppcanvasfx -lutlfx -lgofx -lavmediafx -pthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic > -lstlport_gcc > rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh > -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > Checking DLL ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libslideshowtestfx.so > ...-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4671468 Mar 23 10:56 > ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so > ------------- > Running processes: 0 > deliver -- version: 275594 > Module 'slideshow' delivered successfully. 2 files copied, 2 files > unchanged > > 1 module(s): > nss > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/nss/ > > Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may > prolongue your the build issuing command "build --from nss" > > rmdir /tmp/vIzUvGYiHu > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade20100323-62447-12jdfhd-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=de-openoffice.org-3.1.1_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3.1.1_1 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > [...] > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 18:32:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9941C106564A for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6627D8FC14 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BA51CDAA; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:32:10 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4BA90929.5000702@hdk5.net> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:32:09 -1000 From: Al Plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Judd References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 4096@gmx.com, freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:32:11 -0000 Tim Judd wrote: > On 3/23/10, Corey John Bukolt wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: >>> When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan >>> spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged >>> in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. >>> >>> Chris >> Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all >> brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After >> sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the >> green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power >> button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. >> The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get >> it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. >> We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. >> >> Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there >> were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. >> >> Can anyone else confirm this? >> >> ~Corey > > > Best way to confirm a dead board in any case is those POST diagnosis > cards. They have a dual-digit LED output that changes depending on > the signal on the wire. If at any time those dual-digit LEDs stay > permanently on anything OTHER THAN 00 is a failed POST. If it fails > before it gets a shot at testing RAM or anything, there may be no beep > codes. > > > Always good to have one in a toolkit. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Aloha, If it shuts off as described check for a power supply that tests ok but is NOT compatible with the motherboard. Many high end mobo's need a power supply that feeds a steady current. The component detection on the better mobos will shut the board down if it is not the quality tolerance it likes. We just experienced this here two weeks ago with all new components and the supplier of the components replaced the brand new Power Supply with a better quality one at their expense and the box works fine now. This was a mother board that was not cheap. My wife needed to upgrade for video editing etc. The supplier said they had this problem with several of the better boards. ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* + < email: noc@hdk5.net > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 15:05:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A96106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com) Received: from secvs02.rockwellcollins.com (secvs02.rockwellcollins.com [205.175.225.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A590B8FC17 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secvs02.rockwellcollins.com (secvs02.rockwellcollins.com [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B42FB217 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:40:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from collinscrsmtp02.rockwellcollins.com (collinscrsmtp02.rockwellcollins.com [131.198.63.133]) by secvs02.rockwellcollins.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD12FB202 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:40:17 -0500 (CDT) To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF1303 November 21, 2007 From: jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:40:15 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CollinsCRSMTP02/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins(Release 8.5.1FP1|January 05, 2010) at 03/23/2010 09:40:17 AM, Serialize complete at 03/23/2010 09:40:17 AM X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:12:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Free BSD Licensing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:05:43 -0000 Free BSD representative, I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the requester of this software as coming through our subcontracts division. Jack Guelff Subcontracts Administrator Software and Intellectual Property Licensing Office: (319) 263-0985 Fax: (319) 295-2075 jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 19:35:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DFC1065678 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41F88FC08 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (mailhost2.waddell.com [10.1.10.30]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27852263966; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:35:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BB142F8002; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:35:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com (wadphtcas0.waddell.com [192.168.203.229]) by emlpfilt2.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94972F8001; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:35:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.205]) by WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com ([192.168.203.229]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:35:40 -0500 From: Gary Gatten To: "'jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com'" , "'questions@FreeBSD.org'" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:35:40 -0500 Thread-Topic: Free BSD Licensing Thread-Index: AcrKv5dfV+PeBIJRS5iKisrYyHR8AAAAG3n4 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 5.5.8.383112, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.3.23.192423 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' BODY_SIZE_1300_1399 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, RDNS_NXDOMAIN 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, TO_NO_NAME 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CANPHARM_UNSUB_LINK 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NS ' Cc: Subject: Re: Free BSD Licensing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:35:52 -0000 RkJTRCBoYXMgaXQncyBvd24gbGljZW5zaW5nLiAgSSdsbCBkZWZlciB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgdG8g dGhlIGRldGFpbHMsIG9yIHZpc2l0IHd3dy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZw0KDQotLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5hbCBN ZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBvd25lci1mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyA8 b3duZXItZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc+DQpUbzogcXVlc3Rpb25zQEZyZWVC U0Qub3JnIDxxdWVzdGlvbnNARnJlZUJTRC5vcmc+DQpTZW50OiBUdWUgTWFyIDIzIDA5OjQwOjE1 IDIwMTAKU3ViamVjdDogRnJlZSBCU0QgTGljZW5zaW5nDQoNCkZyZWUgQlNEIHJlcHJlc2VudGF0 aXZlLA0KDQpJIGFtIGlucXVpcmluZyBpZiBGcmVlIEJTRCBpcyBpbnN0YWxsYWJsZSB1bmRlciB0 aGUgVGhlIEdOVSBHZW5lcmFsIFB1YmxpYyANCkxpY2Vuc2UgKHNob3J0OiBHTlUgR1BMIG9yIHNp bXBseSBHUEwpPyAgTmVlZCB0byB2ZXJpZnkgdGhhdCBmb3IgdGhlIA0KcmVxdWVzdGVyIG9mIHRo aXMgc29mdHdhcmUgYXMgY29taW5nIHRocm91Z2ggb3VyIHN1YmNvbnRyYWN0cyBkaXZpc2lvbi4N Cg0KDQpKYWNrIEd1ZWxmZg0KU3ViY29udHJhY3RzIEFkbWluaXN0cmF0b3IgDQpTb2Z0d2FyZSBh bmQgSW50ZWxsZWN0dWFsIFByb3BlcnR5IExpY2Vuc2luZyANCk9mZmljZTogKDMxOSkgMjYzLTA5 ODUgDQpGYXg6ICgzMTkpIDI5NS0yMDc1IA0KamVndWVsZjVAcm9ja3dlbGxjb2xsaW5zLmNvbSAN Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpmcmVlYnNk LXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlYnNk Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zDQpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwg c2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5v cmciDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 19:41:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAB51065670 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3F8FC08 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2NJfD2L010449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:14 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA91959.6060201@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:13 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Free BSD Licensing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:18 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23/03/2010 14:40:15, jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com wrote: > Free BSD representative, > > I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public > License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the > requester of this software as coming through our subcontracts division. Mostly FreeBSD uses the FreeBSD license: http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html This is an open-source license according to the OSI terms. Some software within the FreeBSD distribution is licensed under the GPL or LGPL. As the FreeBSD license is less restrictive than the GPL, it's pretty much safe to say that wherever you are permitted install GPL'd software, you could substitute FreeBSD licensed software without legal penalty. (Note: *install* -- redistribution is a different matter) Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkupGVkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx/EACghGCkDasLFw/1tVlBO/mlZR3f P0UAn0iZDeRfWg8t30lPXfHSgo+NycHx =QjnI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 19:45:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75654106566C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAC08FC18 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NuA2x-000D7T-5e; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:45:56 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130693D50AD3; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:45:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BA91A6B.3030001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:45:47 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <20100319170159.GB71392@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100319200130.GE265@comcast.net> <3D386E86A152519AA850205C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <8B123BA51B43B4AAC86E0F3C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20100319220126.GH265@comcast.net> <2C40431FF3AE42C7B0234A97@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20100319222143.GI265@comcast.net> <4BA40295.4090006@FreeBSD.org> <83BEEB5783CC06E1C802658D@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <83BEEB5783CC06E1C802658D@utd65257.utdallas.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Elegant way to hack port source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:45:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Friday, March 19, 2010 19:02:45 -0400 Greg Larkin > wrote: >> >> Here's something else that I've found really useful as a port creator, >> maintainer and troubleshooter. If I want to make some additional >> changes to a source file that is patched by a file stored in >> files/patch-...., I'll do this: >> >> make patch # extracts source and patches files >> cd work/foobar/... >> # Now make additional edits in patched file, leaving the >> # .orig file alone >> cd ../back/to/port/directory >> make makepatch >> >> The makepatch target recurses through the work/foobar directory and >> creates diffs for all file.ext/file.ext.orig pairs. It writes them to >> the files/ directory with the patch- prefix on each so the patch target >> processes them. >> >> The only thing to watch out for here, is that makepatch has its own file >> naming convention that doesn't always mirror the port creator's. For >> instance, some ports have patch files named "patch-aa", "patch-ab", etc. >> The makepatch target will recreate them with filenames based on the >> directory and filename of the file to be patched during the build. >> >> Hope that helps, > > Man, does it ever. Thanks for that. > > Which brings me to an obvious question. Where can I go to find out what > all of the make targets are? Is it in /usr/ports/Mk/? > Hi Paul, Yes, that's the first place to look, and there's a lot of documentation about the different variable that control the build process at the top of that file, too. Here's a command that gives a rough list of the available targets: egrep '^[a-zA-Z0-9-]+:$' /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk | sort -u bsd.port.mk includes various other .mk files depending on what flags are set in the port Makefile, /etc/make.conf and the environment. Hmm, I just found a new target named "update-patches", and I have to go investigate what that does! Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/sourcehosting/ - Follow me, follow you -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFLqRpr0sRouByUApARAskmAJ93A205wIVNU4Mj6IHR7ZxDWFGn8gCfdWch OtQ1c5gbRGeKecdLutJG+JE= =xBkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 20:00:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD57106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madunix@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com (mail-ew0-f223.google.com [209.85.219.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34CB8FC15 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so278317ewy.34 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:00:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=IhA1/q5xR2q+xM2DTfLhPvuzg8FtTYF4HQ3/2/GA3XU=; b=PTtXMhuz/HmTSsudusE/qQpdgnF7uXsZd6Q1s11J69myvyU27QNr4M6g4ky5Xnf74I 24vYjwfhEMLG2plYee+iuR2YfIKvPiJOKrogNlgaNObUhfDJ87dEAH2We6FbvOXOUPZ2 rwg/gJHCrp3nGy+kVM2MTmrOT0Mm2l3A+DREA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lGFIZqjTLRKGMKwfir+beT7IQMmiRcVVbt0WFnIxYxuS8b3PZLHiiCe3VRv3h76fCO G/M7sWr61nZBg2mLZPmH21XFSFUYoFU65US8gGMAjnyA+2iC+fmkKMw4PCc08FeNTlQF 9sPjBmMd6+MFI4EUgn8P+y1ySpBpVBQpU/ZWc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.76.20 with SMTP id d20mr7816328mul.120.1269373003095; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:36:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4d3f56c91003231236r379f9112v203a1d744169d64b@mail.gmail.com> From: madunix To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: checkup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:00:12 -0000 Dear bsd's I want to create checkup script bash/perl to run on daily basis in order to do checkup routine for a multiple 20xlinux server (centos/rhel/suse/freebsd). Some kind of a list, making sure all of the relevant services are working properly: hardware, filesystens mounted, ip address, hostname, login user, cpu, network services, databases oracle, mysql, ftp, http, samba,quota, log all these output into file and mail it to admin daily. can you help. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 20:05:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F311065676 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f199.google.com (mail-pz0-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6208FC1E for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so624551pzk.7 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EPINktCUmQcsZjGVyLj4PkIRoS82JyQUK1yd0EkPGKw=; b=JZap8buns0T9484tDAzVWnN/u/dSAJYoGMM8yCSiQVZuukSbHEv7S0LU9TDytrgfb0 6TDjjHWrjT0dXUh2rXXx7/STD8x67qqAXqWqgYVXmADPe4jE04em9WV8F30ALiYmZ14S VRYowK82NFIUUTmtNlQxds/DtNXznEmTJ7ijM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Ryb4XHTy96Z0hzpt2K7zIiqde+EsCh04/8N1n8zd6pdGbbZ95VY67nq4Gw+XFJqKXt 8BozrfNI5QITkeqHm+4zMUeoEzY1QyhysR4GVYNYSGjou+ZI4JzfwZuXg50A9WvTBjdr M4ERWQRzRh1/klzwK2h/Zmd9KGggQnGI34CM4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.188.23 with SMTP id l23mr4331037waf.40.1269374725066; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:05:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <581797.46700.qm@web24817.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <539c60b91003221741l2a6b2a77pf609a5718ff7a5f4@mail.gmail.com> <581797.46700.qm@web24817.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:05:25 -0700 Message-ID: <539c60b91003231305t24e35dadkdcf2abb7649b5ad@mail.gmail.com> From: Steve Franks To: "Alexandre L." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash sometimes freezes firefox, also many npviewer.bin processes left running around X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:05:25 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Alexandre L. wrote: > No, the addon called "NoScript" is used to block JavaScript, Flash and co. But here the problem is the npviewer and/or the Flash plugin that is/are buggy. > If you want to see a video on Youtube for example, you must allow JavaScript and Flash for Youtube in "NoScript". Otherwise you can't see the video. > I use this addon in Firefox 3.6 to block unwanted scripts but when I use Flash I got the same problem. Well, yeah. But if it's blocked, it doesn't get run, and if it doesn't run, it doesn't consume 100% of your cpu. I find it's usually advertisements anyway. If you really need to watch a youtube, you click the noscript icon and unblock it, then when you're done, you execute killall npviewer.bin. That's the best solution I've found yet, and it bites, just like flash bites, and gnash bites, all in their own extra special way. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 20:10:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BC31065675 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com (mail-ew0-f223.google.com [209.85.219.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005F48FC12 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so289317ewy.34 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:10:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zGJF1UHZc6+0nRqHN+jZ3J0eesz4YbvfFHwtWVlvvQ4=; b=J0V9+aOM+bCYClUCZ3BHpGH20pHrGeD4K1IB7UEVZBxqAnIJ+I4dMTvY6o4obENYUm UzCeJY+eHbK8Ag1uJgefAqQyL/xGVOdRovIeYzE60qM0brM5rS+6Z9RtRgZQvDihaAJX cloWEykmj1oIoXax5ZhN0OSVG6gNd/tP9ICRw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sk6C1/D9ycQrcALx3hFLhQZaXRMvKr+yXH1uR9kX7HoGu92225g4qMuHt5ERkjIkYY BJ7wOx5Cqh0XzxkqnoVFxUWA/W99ZBntxEVewglEGsfa2P3PVItUJEaDFUAIwcjgoFx9 hET3jNU6G9x6dpmt4qmOv8siteVbjP21lQg6g= Received: by 10.102.226.1 with SMTP id y1mr3691282mug.0.1269375023661; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net (c-71-230-240-241.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.230.240.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm2582232mul.16.2010.03.23.13.10.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:06:59 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: madunix Message-ID: <20100323200659.GA75792@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> References: <4d3f56c91003231236r379f9112v203a1d744169d64b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4d3f56c91003231236r379f9112v203a1d744169d64b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: checkup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:10:25 -0000 Hi, madunix wrote: > Dear bsd's > I want to create checkup script bash/perl to run on daily basis in > order to do checkup routine for a multiple 20xlinux server > (centos/rhel/suse/freebsd). Some kind of a list, making sure all of > the relevant services are working properly: hardware, filesystens > mounted, ip address, hostname, login user, cpu, network services, > databases oracle, mysql, ftp, http, samba,quota, log all these output > into file and mail it to admin daily. > > can you help. > Unless you have a reason to reinvent the wheel, you might have a look at ports/net-mgmt/nagios. Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 20:12:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4612A1065674 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rhavenn.net) Received: from smtp124.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp124.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EC58FC1B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay2.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BC8AEC93070; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:55:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay2.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rhavenn-AT-rhavenn.net) with ESMTPSA id 8E1C0C92F93; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:55:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by alucard.rhavenn.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7B6C510C581; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:55:58 -0800 (AKDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:55:58 -0800 From: Henrik Hudson To: jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com Message-ID: <20100323195558.GA24445@alucard.int.rhavenn.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Free BSD Licensing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:12:38 -0000 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com wrote: > Free BSD representative, > > I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Public > License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the > requester of this software as coming through our subcontracts division. How do you install something "under" a license? FreeBSD is developed and distributed using the BSD license. More information is available at www.freebsd.org If you're wondering whether or not FreeBSD is freely available and can be installed in a commerical environment then the short answer would be yes. However, I encourage you to read the licensing clauses available on www.freebsd.org, specifically here: http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html This wiki gives a decent overview of the differences: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_licence Henrik -- Henrik Hudson lists@rhavenn.net ----------------------------------------- "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr; UF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 21:31:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD271065674 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruinermailchucker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB708FC1C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so383896qyk.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:subject:from :reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=stOXg6Vh8ME8bxViAfOpLUwfLKyIqg/EmljIyhQT8IM=; b=NnIHeM6K3xoeY90y2oMlij9bDycuHgZs1TFn3IyXyrT6Ppg2T4hxJz/bxuPfsxDEtz 5BYn/1Qw5yHM5EQ9DesoIDHJojmq/jlnGubjfNQwvFUrdgeu+cg+qc9C1oYgzB05rTcp vcurew3jIh8ClOIUm5RXteaZNzYItRwsD/15I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=GcL3BCA60RE6CgKyOF2oKp/fYHrh0RKeO0xY0qyfv9Kqz0x9vgAD54jOzvy8AtiyeF oO3QD1sgJMoMThFTGYO8h87Mglx6isPHqhXdfA4b1ewn69jSjtC2NmqVr20GiL4aCXzl Q+tbD833nGO0gCp9rPxkzjBnCMiXzA/B6j5Gc= Received: by 10.229.222.8 with SMTP id ie8mr1449332qcb.16.1269379894555; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ruiner.mine.nu (173-16-22-10.client.mchsi.com [173.16.22.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm5351176iwn.11.2010.03.23.14.31.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.250] (revenant [192.168.0.250]) by ruiner.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0904D82B1; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:31:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Corey John Bukolt To: Frank Shute In-Reply-To: <20100323103814.GA27023@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> <20100323103814.GA27023@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:31:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1269379913.48845.35.camel@ignis.bukolt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 4096@gmx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:31:36 -0000 On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:38 +0000, Frank Shute wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:05:49AM -0500, Corey John Bukolt wrote: > > > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > > When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan > > > spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged > > > in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. > > > > > > Chris > > > > Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all > > brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After > > sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the > > green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power > > button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. > > The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get > > it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. > > We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. > > > > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > > > Can anyone else confirm this? > > > > Did you have a monitor attached? Anything posted to the screen? > We did have a monitor attached, only the system stays running for less then a second, not even enough time for the monitor to turn on. > My nephew had similar symptoms and it was because his heatsink on his > CPU wasn't seated properly. > > The system would boot like yours but then die. He managed to catch on > the screen a message like "CPU temp exceeded" which clued him in. > > BTW, your "Reply to:" is different from your "From:" which is > confusing. > "From:" is the address for automated emails from my mailserver and relaying my personal email (I have a dynamic IP). I don't want any automated emails directly attached to my personal address in the "Reply To:", hence multiple accounts. I blindly assumed that clients/people would just use "Reply To:" and ignore "From:" but I can see that's not the case. I'll have to fix that so that there is only one address. Apologies for the confusion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 21:38:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7511065678 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruinermailchucker@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D7E8FC14 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1501530qwi.7 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:subject:from :reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kcl+IxFRGpHekRLLnXYBX3mxsaTZ6O2y3kHNNIOf9k=; b=HddBEHZTw3Po30zoKeqMCbjx+ls1c1F+L9XkVGU8mnSggujgQMfMSBCuIqh2Ec2gzi B4xu+mwXfPcGeaIsVi1QoQtEOl4AfhNw+yh/RbM/yt1FHBLvDy5j6raebHgEfDst8Acv qbBY5tLqRzqztnNmGPu7qWeIArNkBqSZHUMfw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=qEz+zkEhN2jCV3wsAd+qCVLVCz0fP+DDYu7nWctYBqhiafmdjkc2Ot9h5GDv/pHkrc 5kuPocezuNcysE1SNMeJ+uXMXsyupay4g+MJkk9cz0TucyoWr/EiFTpPzov3T9nz/g4Y pfsp2rMdfxSTp6AP29c4y4w0Gi7vbPE4C0ByQ= Received: by 10.229.104.195 with SMTP id q3mr7132832qco.56.1269380329147; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ruiner.mine.nu (173-16-22-10.client.mchsi.com [173.16.22.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm4484902iwn.9.2010.03.23.14.38.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.250] (revenant [192.168.0.250]) by ruiner.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B714DA042; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:38:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Corey John Bukolt To: Tim Judd In-Reply-To: References: <20100321101137.GA8202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4BA601B6.1050807@onetel.com> <1269327949.3708.75.camel@redwood.bukolt.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:39:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1269380349.48845.41.camel@ignis.bukolt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Also have a dead box [ WAS: Re: OT: dead box ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 4096@gmx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:38:50 -0000 On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 06:57 -0600, Tim Judd wrote: > On 3/23/10, Corey John Bukolt wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:23:34 +0000 (06:23 CDT) Chris Whitehouse wrote: > >> When you press the power button does the cpu fan or the power supply fan > >> spin for a moment then stop? That's a sign that something on or plugged > >> in to the motherboard has blown. Unplug things and test again. > >> > >> Chris > > > > Just a few days ago, I was helping a friend build a system (with all > > brand new components, I might add) and we had this very problem. After > > sticking in the CPU and RAM and hooking up and turning on the PSU, the > > green LED on the motherboard turns on. However, the second the power > > button is pressed, everything flashes for a second, then turns back off. > > The green LED on the motherboard also remains on. The only way to get > > it to flash again is to turn off the PSU, wait, then turn it back on. > > We tried re-seating everything, to no avail. > > > > Reading this thread, someone else mentioned beep codes and that if there > > were none, it's most likely a fried motherboard. > > > > Can anyone else confirm this? > > > > ~Corey > > > Best way to confirm a dead board in any case is those POST diagnosis > cards. They have a dual-digit LED output that changes depending on > the signal on the wire. If at any time those dual-digit LEDs stay > permanently on anything OTHER THAN 00 is a failed POST. If it fails > before it gets a shot at testing RAM or anything, there may be no beep > codes. > > > Always good to have one in a toolkit. So that's what those damn things were for......I have three rack mounted servers sitting in my basement and they each have an on board dual digit readout. I figured they had something to do with the BIOS, but I was just too lazy to find out. ;) Learn something new everyday. Thanks for the advice, I'm going shopping for one right now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 22:04:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149D106566B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B222A8FC12 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so4700485fxm.35 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=E2F3h6psGQHHbmBzkkx5inCSgtQEO+I33gkZZ8+HhRc=; b=BZLa9KkZExUMsQxsUNebb4t+i+o8VgOuJni+ijbDi19XiClQUxv8b0AMGzD0WBMcEV bG7qWC+36lITvyquAmVI2vrwYJ84CT51jeGvmXKpZ3UAgohXmp/0m21zRf8+rBkYcstv ciCCPCDh7hOn8IVML7T6RRzJ03Eqf80mR05zA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZB69DkxgqjZRLpPRDsdz6NUtYxFtVwAF6nMVOGKrFluWPBtbo4mdC0FgwBHeA2Ryiq bfpDH/NuOHA2vWKbvPH5FY7Q8S3jkNQURPaK5WAFrsbusxm8G31iJEfOId9nueh8AClc vmd/+BrgYS0dY7HwahNRcuJUzU2Hbb5gn0soo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.182.5 with SMTP id o5mr136832hbg.160.1269380339594; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:38:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD Licensing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:04:03 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, wrote: > Free BSD representative, > > I am inquiring if Free BSD is installable under the The GNU General Publi= c > License (short: GNU GPL or simply GPL)? Need to verify that for the > requester of this software as coming through our subcontracts division. > > > Jack Guelff > Subcontracts Administrator > Software and Intellectual Property Licensing > Office: (319) 263-0985 > Fax: (319) 295-2075 > jeguelf5@rockwellcollins.com > ____________________________ I am NOT a lawyer , therefore my views can not be considered a legal advice . I think , your best action would be to ask to a lawyer ( being expert on copyright and licensing issues ) for legal issues of such a question to be answered properly . If you consider GPL , its most important requirement is that when a GPL licensed software is distributed to others , the source is also should be supplied with respect to GPL license rules . A BSD licensed software can be used in ANY WAY without removing its license and copyright terms . If you study http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#OrigBSD you will see that it is not possible to combine each free and permissive licensed software with a GPL licensed software . Therefore , for FreeBSD , it is necessary to review each file with respect to GPL combination . Another point is that GPL license can cover only USED parts within a GPL licensed software . If FreeBSD is not , let=C2=B4s say , called by , or lin= ked into a GPL licensed software , it will NOT be GPL license covered . It is obvious that any software with its own license terms can NOT be re-licensed as GPL licensed software , at least because GPL can NOT remove its own license , but it can or can not be utilized within a GPL licensed software = . As a result , my opinion is that FreeBSD can NOT be re-licensed as a GPL licensed software as a whole . In reality , this is not necessary also because FreeBSD sources are open to public through its source repositories = . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 22:50:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD64106564A; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815258FC12; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:50:17 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAO/iqEuDaFvG/2dsb2JhbACbJnO/VIR9BA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,297,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="69706999" Received: from amazon.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.91.198]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2010 18:50:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by amazon.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F83D2101A8; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:50:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amazon.cs.uoguelph.ca Received: from amazon.cs.uoguelph.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amazon.cs.uoguelph.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JHbjhQhLoy4; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:50:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.102]) by amazon.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C360F210182; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:50:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (rmacklem@localhost) by muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id o2NN36623075; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:03:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca: rmacklem owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:03:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem X-X-Sender: rmacklem@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <201003231027.25874.jhb@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> <201003231027.25874.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:50:18 -0000 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, John Baldwin wrote: > > Ah, I had read that patch as being a temporary testing hack. If you think > that would be a good approach in general that would be ok with me. > Well, it kinda was. I wasn't betting on it fixing the problem, but since it does... I think just mapping VFS_FHTOVP() errors to ESTALE is ok. Do you think I should ask pjd@ about it or just go ahead with a commit? Thanks for the help, rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 00:13:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51650106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E738FC12 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuEDZ-0003uf-Sf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:05 +0100 Received: from pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.134.186]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:05 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:12:26 -0400 Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:13:10 -0000 m.anis wrote: > Please help, mysql can't running > i had installed it and using phpmyadmin > when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status > it says mysql is not running phpMyAdmin will not work until you have configured config.inc.php correctly. > when i tried /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe & > startting mysqld daemon with database from /var/db/mysql > STOPPING server from pid file /var/db/mysql/.pid > 100323 22:09:46 mysqld ended This is not the correct method to start mysql. You will need to place mysql_enable="YES" into /etc/rc.conf for the startup scripts to work properly. It will also require typing the entire path to the startup script on the command line as well, such as: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start. Or stop, or restart, as you may need. This should occur automatically when booting the machine and this command line is only necessary should you desire to start, stop, or restart without a reboot. Since it said it was 'STOPPING' the server above, how do you know it wasn't running? Instead of phpMyAdmin why not simply do a ps -ax? If mysql is running you will see a couple of line such as: 725 v0- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults- extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --user=my 858 v0- I 0:20.83 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra- file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --basedir=/usr/loc Lines are cut and word-wrapped, but you get the idea. More information may be gleaned from /var/db/mysql/.err, this is the mysql error log. Determine properly first whether mysql is actually running, or not. The installation procedure (if done properly, and NOT just simply unzipping a tarball somewhere and doing ./configure && make && make install, e.g either using the ports building or package installing process) will also create a mysql user and group entry. The mysql subdirectory and all files under it should be owned by this user:group, e.g.: mysql:mysql. If you did NOT use the ports or package install process, just stop, back up the train and remove whatever you did. Start over and use the ports or package install procedure. The config file is named my.cnf and lives in /usr/local/etc. MySQL will ignore this file if it is world writable. It should fall back to using one located elsewhere if it can locate one. Not sure as I don't believe I've ever attempted starting MySQL with no my.cnf at all, but I believe it may start whether this file is present, or not. Could be wrong about that. If you should find that it is actually running but you are having difficulty communicating with it you may need to do an initial configuration to it to allow logins. Initially when first installed there is no root password and the first step involves setting a password and setting up some basic grant permissions. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 00:29:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B33106566B for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aiza21@comclark.com) Received: from avmxsmtp1.comclark.com (avmxsmtp1.comclark.com [202.69.191.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932F48FC18 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:29:46 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgseADL5qEvKRa39OWdsb2JhbAAHh2KTSQEBAQE3Br87hH0Egxw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,298,1267372800"; d="scan'208";a="10881847" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.10.3]) ([202.69.173.253]) by avmxsmtp3.comclark.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2010 08:29:44 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:29:41 +0800 From: Aiza User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: delete directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:29:47 -0000 This directory named empty has read/exec permissions. How do I delete it? # /usr/jails/newjail/var >ls -l total 2 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 21 22:53 empty # /usr/jails/newjail/var >cd empty # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >ls -l total 0 # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >cd .. # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rmdir empty rmdir: empty: Operation not permitted # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rm -rf empty rm: empty: Operation not permitted # /usr/jails/newjail/var >chmod 777 empty chmod: empty: Operation not permitted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 00:42:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411AC1065670 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00788FC23 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuEgP-0007hE-TN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:42:53 +0100 Received: from pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.134.186]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:42:53 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:42:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:42:14 -0400 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: delete directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:42:55 -0000 Aiza wrote: > This directory named empty has read/exec permissions. > How do I delete it? > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >ls -l > total 2 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 21 22:53 empty > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >cd empty > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >ls -l > total 0 > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >cd .. > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rmdir empty > rmdir: empty: Operation not permitted > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rm -rf empty > rm: empty: Operation not permitted > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >chmod 777 empty > chmod: empty: Operation not permitted Usually when I see this I think flags are set. See man chflags. Used to be it was something like chflags -R noschg , then you could do the usual rm -rf once the immutable flag was unset. Don't know if has changed. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 00:57:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCCA106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2776E8FC1E for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuEup-0003xn-2k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:57:47 +0100 Received: from pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.134.186]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:57:47 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:57:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:57:03 -0400 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <4BA8DAFA.3030107@arc.itb.ac.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-134-186.washdc.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: mysql can't running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:57:48 -0000 Michael Powell wrote: > m.anis wrote: > >> Please help, mysql can't running >> i had installed it and using phpmyadmin >> when i check /etc/rc.d/mysql-server status ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This indicates to me that you just unzipped a tarball and did ./configure && make && make install. This is not how you install software on FreeBSD. Please read the pertinent sections of the Handbook to learn how to install software. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 01:31:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5350B106566C; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [IPv6:2001:470:a803::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF66C8FC19; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB160A5F0FB; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:31:11 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([211.166.10.233]) by mail.geekcn.org (mail.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dt-cq+MAjBLr; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:31:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from delta.delphij.net (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA428A596AB; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:31:04 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent: mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fdiotUH4cvCS3Tb5DIndy8K93wnJrc0rpk59V8gsF0k/14u3nIVDiypxCABa2jIM6 x4B6Fi97Z1sEQRYf8iAOA== Message-ID: <4BA96B54.60608@delphij.net> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:31:00 -0700 From: Xin LI Organization: The Geek China Organization User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100304 Thunderbird/3.0.3 ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen References: <4BA08538.3050901@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4BA08538.3050901@eskk.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: kernel panic when if_lagg is not loaded. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:31:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/03/17 00:31, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I have set upp aggregation of my wlan and and wired NIC following the > instructions in the handbook. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-aggregation.html > > I "forgot" to add the if_lagg_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf. When I > rebooted I got a kernel panic. > > Should this be considerd normal or is it something I should report? > > > > Secondly I see there'a a reference to the lagg(4) man page. I think it > would help future readers of the above page if a comment about loading > if_lagg_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf would be added. Panics can hardly be considered normal... I was unable to reproduce the issue though, is it possible for you to get a backtrace and tell us what release are you using? Cheers, - -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqWtUAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBHSkIAJC1Ooov8JiddJk+3cw9uZsK f2LvLoQerHY+NVwG0yjdXjhj67FWht4piXewNngePzOzjcXJQybfbrFUxW2zDc3X LSrOLSLtf8CKDhdVK+octUUjYyT1lbkeoyf1Ci1y2h/DE7QY360rzfXhA1VfHJCr 3PTcaHsony3AD6Fwcg3U+7hGseL+zxLfV0DwUtyNIhVZHIrp5hElPseVXnxVPFTT nKaaw4AldH6JYOhT1IZWQObMNJgVhCs48LdAwSCCg7x9Bjias606yY3C1RNupXPM 5TxjmMpiQUhBc/MIAU7mAb27SQY2Lwx6+S9S+4HJoVgr2/eMwjCCOYvXxIt5hXs= =BGMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 01:52:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E80B106567E for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3878FC19 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B91119C09 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:52:05 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:52:05 -0600 Message-Id: <20100324014614.M64872@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.52 20060502 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.0.2 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Subject: amd64 8.0 with zfs root and raidz ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:52:07 -0000 Hi: I want to install amd64 8.0, using zfs (root included) on a fresh system containing 3 drives, ad0, ad1, ad2. I'm looking at this from the wiki: http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot I'm still working out just what everything does, but the one thing I've noticed is that it doesn't address raidz at all. Can anyone direct me to any docs that might help? Or does anyone know where in the wiki page's intructions raidz might be set up? Thanks IHN, Gene -- To everything there is a season, And a time to every purpose under heaven. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 02:12:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCEA1065679 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3307D8FC21 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 999431DE598; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:12:15 -0700 (PDT) To: "Gene" References: <20100324014614.M64872@brightstar.bomgardner.net> From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.3.16; tzolkin = 1 Cib; haab = 14 Cumku Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:12:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100324014614.M64872@brightstar.bomgardner.net> (fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:52:05 -0600") Message-ID: <86y6hi4ge8.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64 8.0 with zfs root and raidz ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:12:16 -0000 >>>>> "Gene" == Gene writes: Gene> I'm still working out just what everything does, but the one thing I've Gene> noticed is that it doesn't address raidz at all. Can anyone direct me to any Gene> docs that might help? Or does anyone know where in the wiki page's intructions Gene> raidz might be set up? You're not going to be raidz'ing your boot disk, which is why that doesn't address it there. Data disks can be raidz'ed just fine, using the normal documentation. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 07:35:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728641065670 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A03A8FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2961286F6; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:33:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsMcEmSX5Vww; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:33:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.113] (catv-89-134-206-111.catv.broadband.hu [89.134.206.111]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51684125504; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:33:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:35:08 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:35:18 -0000 I feel that the FreeBSD project doesn't have enough sparc64 build machine. Is this the reason why binary freebsd-update is not available for sparc64 arch? The only methods for upgrading sparc64 are reinstall or build from source? -- Adam PAPAI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 07:57:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235591065670; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056B58FC08; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 996218C085; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:57:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:57:09 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Adam PAPAI Message-ID: <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:57:10 -0000 You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. Right now I'd just be happy if I can get all the major ports to work :-) mcl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 08:02:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B781065670; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4DD8FC0A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C4B128DC8; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:00:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHcyMn7EH-Dp; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:00:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.113] (catv-89-134-206-111.catv.broadband.hu [89.134.206.111]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D42128DD4; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:00:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA9C719.9090601@wooh.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:02:33 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:02:38 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, > and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. > > Right now I'd just be happy if I can get all the major ports to work :-) > > mcl If I can do something for this project, please tell me what to do :) I have 2xNetra T1, 1xNetra X1, 1xFire V100, so I have some sparc64 machines to test/build if this could help. -- Adam PAPAI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 09:53:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F51065670 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meediake@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8908FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so931611bwz.3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:53:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AVdLHuLpV31ebBCysGkrykuleFoCbCGMzMIAEjfH90U=; b=Dq+dx/iIJxNvG2fCiknW0HFecLlXvmiUoGNMQ5SEa8F+qe5k6vHCIM93RpQIaNgqlW arThoP1khd6DRm5lCgcVBhHNlVGCMjKkCV+8WNWteKTfyrbUQk3hv6UXfNCdsGIkCxNq SC5wXLRy/CkYOa2wLyEQSpTrF16MEIZmH4Pck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xP5G4gkGMZxlyd5BgAeOA77hYkEE7irF0ruaUnw0KvlLd14eHOLXCq0TCSfIvcfLvq zKUy+UVc+FNAY47ag/ktaSkjD74qyELkHc1BM5gZPZJ1n4PiFLWH5AOHhK1iIMEz7Iwc 7z7gkleXZFFo0NHQMCOfiPC1dDeMr8Q7JGank= Received: by 10.204.21.195 with SMTP id k3mr6614724bkb.4.1269424427919; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.198] (118.192.50.195.sta.estpak.ee [195.50.192.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a11sm34224911bkc.9.2010.03.24.02.53.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:53:43 +0200 From: Sigmar Muuga User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; et; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Upgrading from 6.1 to 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:53:49 -0000 Hello, have anybody done something like this? Is it reasonable or is it better to make a "clean install"? Sigmar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 09:58:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42418106566B for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12AA8FC1E for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644EF128D90 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:55:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id olEbWf3c5vjw for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:55:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from jamms-MacBook.local (catv-89-134-206-111.catv.broadband.hu [89.134.206.111]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF6E128DA3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:55:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA9E229.20404@wooh.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:58:01 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.1 to 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:58:05 -0000 On 3/24/10 10:53 AM, Sigmar Muuga wrote: > Hello, > have anybody done something like this? Is it reasonable or is it better > to make a "clean install"? You should read this: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/upgrade/freebsd-upgrade-6x-7x.txt -- Adam PAPAI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:03:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61250106567C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65738FC1C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so4903961fxm.35 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5irB1OIy+Kww6oZjvvYxfHaaH/0tWkISAWlCKVOrHR8=; b=Kokbdviq6v7IXqzYZC5f9gH9SmOExHKwXeDDY4GR0jh9ixMKsLSS30kdn5uEwrFyts nxoeG+Ns2Znzla+cwXFAPYc1qejmVgy2jJI6yBJvFlfaZ4uGznLcHfouOeYl7PhcRr79 mAdlRZE5FVltqkTyR17qUMbzSlC/ucZQ0oRyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=svE3uRfDlgb3n9NR6gdCs0uOap64q40iNvUFOKt1U9RgvIJyhBNNwJmkBdW+Vtl6i9 CFhEk3k5axC0eAxUvucr3HjCEKA8ALASN3jo+djeG+5HuFUNxke19Unqu4kvFIjy+4xd XXwuuR/oTcmpNhpi5Td6lHH3tTklKvTYCf/9o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.177.197 with SMTP id w5mr709277hbf.79.1269425021389; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:03:41 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Michael Powell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: delete directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:03:43 -0000 On 24 March 2010 00:42, Michael Powell wrote: > Aiza wrote: > > > This directory named empty has read/exec permissions. > > How do I delete it? > > > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >ls -l > > total 2 > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 21 22:53 empty > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >cd empty > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >ls -l > > total 0 > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >cd .. > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rmdir empty > > rmdir: empty: Operation not permitted > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rm -rf empty > > rm: empty: Operation not permitted > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >chmod 777 empty > > chmod: empty: Operation not permitted > > Usually when I see this I think flags are set. See man chflags. > > Used to be it was something like chflags -R noschg , then you could > do > the usual rm -rf once the immutable flag was unset. Don't know if > has > changed. > > -Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > sounds about right From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:07:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C936F1065675; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8028C8FC12; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NuNV2-0004KP-F7>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:07:44 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NuNV2-0006AA-DD>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:07:44 +0100 Message-ID: <4BA9E4E0.2040305@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:09:36 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean McAfee References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4BA8F34A.5040908@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4BA8FAD7.6000902@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA8FAD7.6000902@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:07:46 -0000 On 03/23/10 17:31, Sean McAfee wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: >> As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working >> OO first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2. >> >> Regards, >> >> O. Hartmann > > > You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a > binary backup. If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add > on the resulting tbz and you're back in business. > > I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything > other program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile. > Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before. Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:18:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656CD1065676 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miki@ceti.pl) Received: from relay.ceti.pl (relay.ceti.pl [62.121.128.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D50F8FC46 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tau.ceti.pl (tau.ceti.pl [62.121.128.11]) by relay.ceti.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EE0D542D for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:18:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.20.64.84] (unknown [89.174.237.33]) by tau.ceti.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0A1202FE4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:18:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BA9E6D8.7010703@ceti.pl> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:18:00 +0100 From: Mikolaj Rydzewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.1 to 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:18:05 -0000 Sigmar Muuga wrote: > have anybody done something like this? Is it reasonable or is it > better to make a "clean install"? I've performed successfull upgrade from 6.x to 7.x a few days ago, there's no need for any special hacks. Just cvsup to latest 6.4-REL, build from sources, just like /usr/src/UPDATING says. Then cvsup to latest 7.2-REL and again build from sources. -- Mikolaj Rydzewski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:33:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FDE1065674 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F068FC08 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1646059qwi.7 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.104.195 with SMTP id q3mr7850818qco.56.1269426834257; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1952051qwh.5.2010.03.24.03.33.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D229F2283B for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:33:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:33:51 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100324063351.0d134325@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA9E4E0.2040305@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4BA893B0.90608@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <785019.20087.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4BA8F34A.5040908@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4BA8FAD7.6000902@collaborativefusion.com> <4BA9E4E0.2040305@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:55 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:09:36 +0000 O. Hartmann articulated: > Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to > install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before. OO creates files in the $HOME and other directories that are not automatically removed by "pkg_delete". Use "pkg_delete" with the "-dfv" option to delete as much as possible. Then move or delete the other OO files/directories. You will probably have to search for them. Finally, update your ports tree and try reinstalling OO again. If you have "portmanager" installed, you could try this: portmanager editors/openoffice.org-3.2.0 -l -y -p Good Luck! -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ When a person goes on a diet, the first thing he loses is his temper. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:34:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DA9106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comp.john@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B838FC1E for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so960410bwz.3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=GSZ95gidGnzd2sc2P9Qpf3ML0Kyw3FlWIaJfwsPNcCc=; b=BjFE6odJQwNPkj7J8FOVUgg8m6v4HFnFoMQ1Y9wyhctURk06AeQmbK510FDCgDVJxZ a6wkuMsqbdjJQ1BGmbs9jarZTvSJ4wjKink104fr90jOWl4sVDjLXYCB2z+qxRawhPzu U3n9bBzmsEGH8tOvTnv3ud/c/t4Wk0jsuQa8I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=PrlOedWVrPSf8EcPLgyicm6Ab+G4Kufy0KgfBw0ekcz8smqEXgJRi8Oa2z35AI+gIa SyQRARHAtvlMIYE3jp4Nngv/C5ASgxx0XHOTH3evpFGRHBpFDlMyDdHLRIUuQVIa+r05 SsvFlvwLIonhZI47FZkm6Apwj/BzR6ojz3mA0= Received: by 10.204.6.210 with SMTP id a18mr2927930bka.136.1269426838543; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from potato (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1sm34485997bkl.20.2010.03.24.03.33.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:31:51 +0000 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: simple zfs query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:34:01 -0000 Hello list, With ZFS and 3x 2Tb SATA disks, what percentage of theoretical diskspace would I realise? I'm hoping at least 5Tb would be usable? thanks -- John - comp dot john at googlemail dot com OpenBSD firewall | FreeBSD desktop | Ubuntu Karmic laptop GPG: 0xF08A33C5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:48:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A281065670 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@inf.ed.ac.uk) Received: from treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk (treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk [129.215.16.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067498FC17 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.33.33]) by treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o2OAmdG8000404 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:39 GMT Received: from macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk (macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.197.24]) by nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2OAmdte002035 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:39 GMT Received: by macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 26013) id EE89D80697E; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Richard Tobin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Matthew Seaman's message of Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:13 +0000 Organization: just say no X-Mailer: Ream 5.1.51-richard-mac Message-Id: <20100324104838.EE89D80697E@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.60, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.60 on 129.215.16.102 Subject: Re: Free BSD Licensing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:48:43 -0000 > As the FreeBSD license is less restrictive than the GPL, it's pretty > much safe to say that wherever you are permitted install GPL'd software, > you could substitute FreeBSD licensed software without legal penalty. > (Note: *install* -- redistribution is a different matter) You do not have to agree to the GPL to use GPL'd software: it explicitly says that it only covers "copying, distribution and modification" and not "running the program". The FreeBSD licence on the other hand only allows you to use the software if you agree to the conditions - which only affect redistribution, so if you do not redistribute it, the licence terms do not affect you. I suppose a theoretical difference is that if you redistribute FreeBSD in violation of the conditions you no longer have the right to use it, which is not true for the GPL. -- Richard -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 11:33:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4635F106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7198FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2OBXI0J097838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:19 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BA9F87E.7050205@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:18 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John References: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> In-Reply-To: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple zfs query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:25 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24/03/2010 10:31:51, John wrote: > With ZFS and 3x 2Tb SATA disks, what percentage of theoretical diskspace > would I realise? I'm hoping at least 5Tb would be usable? That depends on how you configure your zpool. The choices are: disk -- just uses the disk directly as a vdev. Means you can use 100% of the space, but you have absolutely no resilience mirror -- for which you'ld need an even number of disks and you get 50% of the raw as usable space. Can survive at least one disk failure, and possibly up to as many as half of the disks failing. raidz -- single parity (equivalent to RAID5). For N disks, 1 disk worth is used for parity data, leaving N - 1 disks' worth as the actual capacity. So you'ld get 66% of raw in your case. Can survive failure of any one disk. raidz2 -- double parity (equivalent to RAID6). For N disks, 2 disks worth are used for parity data, leaving N - 2 disks worth as actual capacity. Or 33% of raw in your case. Can survive failure of any two disks. Note that 3 drives is the minimum for either of the raidz types, and won't give you the best performance. See zpool(1M) for details. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkup+H4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx8HQCfcGTI3wh3QsxNmDS1nPkbw8WU cWIAoJO8rys1R7SfasVkse2htfqOqVrF =AWpE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 11:40:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EB3106566C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C763C8FC15 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NuOwO-0001UT-Nr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:40:04 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:40:04 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100324114004.GA2585@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: delete directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:40:06 -0000 On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 08:29:41AM +0800, Aiza wrote: > This directory named empty has read/exec permissions. > How do I delete it? > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >ls -l > total 2 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 21 22:53 empty > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >cd empty > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >ls -l > total 0 > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >cd .. > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rmdir empty > rmdir: empty: Operation not permitted > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rm -rf empty > rm: empty: Operation not permitted > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >chmod 777 empty > chmod: empty: Operation not permitted I'd suggest you don't remove it - from sshd(8): /var/empty chroot(2) directory used by sshd during privilege separation in the pre-authentication phase. The directory should not contain any files and must be owned by root and not group or world- writable. If you intend to run sshd in your jail, you'd be better off leaving it. Dan -- Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 11:44:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5260106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@m2.vidican.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8638B8FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1773148wwf.13 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:44:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nvidican@m2.vidican.com Received: by 10.216.87.83 with SMTP id x61mr1865008wee.7.1269431091011; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:44:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [136.2.1.101] In-Reply-To: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> References: <4BA95CF5.7090401@comclark.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:44:50 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3b70869c9ffdd790 Message-ID: <795fc2b81003240444u24ed0ee3r7ac4ee6628898c20@mail.gmail.com> From: Nathan Vidican To: Aiza Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: delete directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:44:53 -0000 Check the chflags; 'man chflags' On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Aiza wrote: > This directory named empty has read/exec permissions. > How do I delete it? > > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >ls -l > total 2 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 21 22:53 empty > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >cd empty > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >ls -l > total 0 > # /usr/jails/newjail/var/empty >cd .. > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rmdir empty > rmdir: empty: Operation not permitted > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >rm -rf empty > rm: empty: Operation not permitted > # /usr/jails/newjail/var >chmod 777 empty > chmod: empty: Operation not permitted > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com (519) 962-9987 (Canada) (313) 586-1982 (USA) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 12:14:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEF6106566C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DD88FC22 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: o2OCDmNZ007140 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp-94-64-232-168.home.otenet.gr [94.64.232.168]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1) with ESMTP id o2OCDmNZ007140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:13:54 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2OCDgLw045022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:13:43 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2OCDggA045019; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:13:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Matthias Apitz References: <20100323122927.GA4059@current.Sisis.de> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:13:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100323122927.GA4059@current.Sisis.de> (Matthias Apitz's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87mxxxudc9.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail && UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:14:02 -0000 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:29:27 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > I want to sendout mail the following way: > > sendmail -t < filename > > where the file 'filename' contains some header lines, especially To: > Subject: and From: and as well the body of the mail; all is in UTF-8 > and I know I have to encode the header lines and says something about > the body. With Perl it goes like this: > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > use utf8; > use Encode; Since you are using perl, it may be more useful to start from something like mail/p5-MIME-Lite instead of rolling your own. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 13:30:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE6C1065675; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96858FC1B; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NuQfY-0005RR-QD>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:30:48 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NuQfY-0003UM-OQ>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:30:48 +0100 Message-ID: <4BAA1478.9020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 +0000 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: Firefox 3.6.X and Thunderbird 3.0.X crashing with Radeon graphics on FBSD 8.0-STABLE SMP/sm64 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:30:50 -0000 Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform. The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04 CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, QuadCore Intel Q6600 on a P35-based motherboard. Thunderbird 3 crashes rarely compared to Firefox 3. The longer the application thunderbird runs, the higher the likelyhood the app crashes and vanishes. Sometimes this happens immediately after starting thunderbird, sometimes it takes its few minutes or half an hour. Firefox 3 is sensitive to its pull-down menus or requester showing up in some situations. I can provoke a crash by clicking onto a pull-down-menu in firefox 3, it immediately dumps a core. Well, I wouldn't write s cross-posting if I would be sure this behaviour is due to some oddities in my installation, but since this odd behaviour occured both on Firefox 3.6 and Thunderbird 3 in several situations and with several tries to get a workaround, I feel desperately lost. What I did so far: - Recompiling EVERY port on my box (four times in a row to make sure everything is right, its a pain with nearly 950 ports). - Deinstalling both Firefox 3 and Thunderbird 3 and installing the binary packages from FreeBSD.ORG I have a private UP box, running the same OS FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 on a single core Athlon 3500+ with only 2GB of RAM. There I use both Thunderbird 3.0.3 and Firefox 3.6.2 without any problem. I suspect the X11 server or some part of the accelerator stuff triggering the crashes. On the both machines, WITHOUT_NOUVEAU = YES is defined. On the UP box at home, I utilise a HD4830 graphics accelerator with DR enabled. The lab's box have had both HD4670 and now HD4770 accelerators, both do not work properly with the state-of-the-art drivers supported by the official pots collection. HD4670 never got to work since the new RadeonHD driver 1.3 was introduced (prior to that it worked), the new HD4770 works with explicitely disabling DRI and crashes whenever I leave a session (quit windowmaker). Well, this is another story, but I suspect the Radeon driver infrastructure causing the problems - but I'm not sure. I use perl-threaded 5.10, but I guess this is not a problem since the problems occur whether I have threaded perl or not. As I said, I feel like a dead man in the water ... Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 14:06:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A9E106564A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31418FC08; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.18] (helo=8.mx.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1NuREU-0002G1-Cf; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:06:54 +0100 Received: from p57ae0c82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.12.130]:18145 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 8.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1NuRET-0006U0-Sh; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:06:54 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:06:53 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20100324150653.3a447c98@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4BAA1478.9020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4BAA1478.9020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox 3.6.X and Thunderbird 3.0.X crashing with Radeon graphics on FBSD 8.0-STABLE SMP/sm64 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:06:56 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 +0000 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see > spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly > Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform. > > The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04 > CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, QuadCore Intel Q6600 on a P35-based > motherboard. > > Thunderbird 3 crashes rarely compared to Firefox 3. The longer the > application thunderbird runs, the higher the likelyhood the app crashes > and vanishes. Sometimes this happens immediately after starting > thunderbird, sometimes it takes its few minutes or half an hour. > > Firefox 3 is sensitive to its pull-down menus or requester showing up in > some situations. I can provoke a crash by clicking onto a pull-down-menu > in firefox 3, it immediately dumps a core. > If you suspect the graphics card's driver is at fault then I would try linux-opera or even linux-firefox and see whether it also dies when you use a drop-down menu. Another possibility would be to set hw.physmem to say 3G or 4G in loader.conf and see whether that affects thunderbird/firefox. Who knows, there may some weird problem caused by all that memory? That would a fairly quick and cheap way to test this. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 14:15:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7D4106566C; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCD68FC33; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 094FB46B8A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:15:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6E4D18A029; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:15:44 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Rick Macklem Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:06:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003231027.25874.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003241006.23347.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:15:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack , bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:15:46 -0000 On Tuesday 23 March 2010 7:03:06 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > Ah, I had read that patch as being a temporary testing hack. If you think > > that would be a good approach in general that would be ok with me. > > > Well, it kinda was. I wasn't betting on it fixing the problem, but since > it does... > > I think just mapping VFS_FHTOVP() errors to ESTALE is ok. Do you think > I should ask pjd@ about it or just go ahead with a commit? Go ahead and fix it I think. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 16:18:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CF2106564A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED428FC08; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bw0-f216.google.com with SMTP id 8so1281969bwz.3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=9WvB4PoqQfeDySwmu/Qx5SY+cwfQ4ZQUlX+qo91boXw=; b=t+Fn5mNa+uyo9kEJ2zKWlcdTZONRCWhENN83VgF8rr7gfLBX7G5mySXU+PU0w3+iPF hWpDNtlIyskVTpWMIAYCxSbRXgKjCNI/KA+OriuC+tY0L1s4ep8zvm02ruj2sKOb+tVT hvMaFH2C+bN1Ns9owH2gE7nUsZ8+ZiQscsdO8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cdxgD/dKonmgwFRvm11dBZ2Jo5zHK7O2ocoI3uOHMmPNYGSBxriIwlBY8ESsoFjw1M ULgd3i+a4V4I//k7yfVnbJFhIIblP5DLLD3ii3N9s84qId5MyKKFjJ21OG8tgxVtqLXl ZcBFulu6LGmGpppnn3OmVJY+2XM9ey1CIGXEM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.134.70 with SMTP id i6mr7528622bkt.74.1269447532762; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:18:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: tuning vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending and solving the issue of ZFS writes choking read IO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:18:54 -0000 Hello I am having a slight issue (and judging by Google results, similar issues have been seen by other FreeBSD and Solaris/OpenSolaris users) with writes choking the read IO. The issue I am having is described pretty well here: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=106453 It seems that under heavy write load, ZFS likes to aggregate a really huge amount of data before actually writing it to disks, resulting in sudden 10+ second stalls where it frantically tries to commit everything, completely choking read IO in the process and sometimes even the network (with a large enough write to a mirror pool using DD, I can cause my SSH sessions to drop dead, without actually running out of RAM. As soon as the data is committed, I can reconnect back). Beyond the issue of system interactivity (or rather, the near-disappearance thereof) during these enormous flushes, this kind of pattern seems really ineffective from the CPU utilization point of view. Instead of a relatively stable and consistent flow of reads and writes, allowing the CPU to be utilized as much as possible, when the system is committing the data the CPU basically stays IDLE for 10+ seconds (or as long as the flush takes) and the process of committing unwritten data to the pool seemingly completely trounces the priority of any read operations. Has anyone done any extensive testing of the effects of tuning vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending on this issue? Is there some universally recommended value beyond the default 35? Anything else I should be looking at? - Sincerely, Dan Naumov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 16:36:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1786106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E068FC17 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o2OGWPjX075779; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:32:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id o2OGWPda075778; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:32:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:32:25 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Sigmar Muuga Message-ID: <20100324163225.GC75569@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA9E127.40202@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.1 to 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:22 -0000 On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:53:43AM +0200, Sigmar Muuga wrote: > Hello, > have anybody done something like this? Is it reasonable or is it better > to make a "clean install"? It is always good to make a 'clean install' but upgrading from some 6x to 7.3 should be reasonably doable. (Note, you failed to put all of your information in the body of the message. It is not helpful to put relevant information only in the subject line) ////jerry > > Sigmar > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 17:23:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7B7106566B; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E6B8FC15; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2OHNn9v013305; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:23:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:23:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Dan Naumov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:23:49 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tuning vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending and solving the issue of ZFS writes choking read IO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:23:50 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: > Has anyone done any extensive testing of the effects of tuning > vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending on this issue? Is there some universally > recommended value beyond the default 35? Anything else I should be > looking at? The vdev.max_pending value is primarily used to tune for SAN/HW-RAID LUNs and is used to dial down LUN service time (svc_t) values by limiting the number of pending requests. It is not terribly useful for decreasing stalls due to zfs writes. In order to reduce the impact of zfs writes, you want to limit the maximum size of a zfs transaction group (TXG). I don't know what the FreeBSD tunable is for this, but under Solaris it is zfs:zfs_write_limit_override. On a large-memory system, a properly working zfs should not saturate the write channel for more than 5 seconds. Zfs tries to learn the write bandwidth so that it can tune the TXG size up to 5 seconds (max) worth of writes. If you have both large memory and fast storage, quite a huge amount of data can be written in 5 seconds. On my Solaris system, I found that zfs was quite accurate with its rate estimation, but it resulted in four gigabytes of data being written per TXG. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 17:33:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5D51065673 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjk32@cam.ac.uk) Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B3C8FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from nat1.cjkey.org.uk ([88.97.163.220]:28395 helo=[192.168.2.59]) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:cjk32) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1NuUSM-0005Yx-Gj (Exim 4.70) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (return-path ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:33:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4BAA4CE5.7030104@cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:33:25 +0000 From: Christopher Key User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA78BF3.2090102@cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BA78BF3.2090102@cam.ac.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Unable to boot FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:33:27 -0000 Christopher Key wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using FreeBSD 7.2, and am attempting to update to 8.0. > > > I've been through the standard, > > make buildworld > make buildkernel > make installkernel > > but cannot get the newly installed kernel to boot. The system freezes > as soon as the loader tries to boot the kernel. It doesn't even get as > far as the copyright message: > > Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. > OK boot -Dd > \ > > Problem solved. Hopefully the answer might be of use to others, as it doesn't seem too uncommon a situation. I'm using a serial console. By default, FreeBSD 7 had both uart and sio compiled into the kernel, but device.hints gave configuration info for sio only. FreeBSD 8 removed sio support completely, leaving uart only. As device.hints contains nothing about uart, there was no serial device available for the console. The system was infact starting to boot quite happily, albeit without any console output, but wasn't completeing due to geom_mirror not having been loaded. The solution was simply to change hint.sio.[01].* to hint.uart.[01].* in device.hints, and to change ttyd0 to ttyu0 in /etc/ttys. Christopher Key From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 17:55:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACAD1065674 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE228FC17 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o2OHtlYn034757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:55:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2OHtkxO031149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:55:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o2OHtkJ1031147; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:55:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:55:46 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Bob Friesenhahn Message-ID: <20100324175546.GF12330@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:55:47 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tuning vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending and solving the issue of ZFS writes choking read IO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:55:49 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 24), Bob Friesenhahn said: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Dan Naumov wrote: > > Has anyone done any extensive testing of the effects of tuning > > vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending on this issue? Is there some universally > > recommended value beyond the default 35? Anything else I should be > > looking at? > > The vdev.max_pending value is primarily used to tune for SAN/HW-RAID LUNs > and is used to dial down LUN service time (svc_t) values by limiting the > number of pending requests. It is not terribly useful for decreasing > stalls due to zfs writes. In order to reduce the impact of zfs writes, > you want to limit the maximum size of a zfs transaction group (TXG). I > don't know what the FreeBSD tunable is for this, but under Solaris it is > zfs:zfs_write_limit_override. There isn't a sysctl for it by default, but the following patch will enable a vfs.zfs.write_limit_override sysctl: Index: dsl_pool.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/dsl_pool.c,v retrieving revision 1.4.2.1 diff -u -p -r1.4.2.1 dsl_pool.c --- dsl_pool.c 17 Aug 2009 09:55:58 -0000 1.4.2.1 +++ dsl_pool.c 11 Mar 2010 08:34:27 -0000 @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ uint64_t zfs_write_limit_inflated = 0; uint64_t zfs_write_limit_override = 0; extern uint64_t zfs_write_limit_min; +SYSCTL_DECL(_vfs_zfs); +SYSCTL_QUAD(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, write_limit_override, CTLFLAG_RW, + &zfs_write_limit_override, 0, + "Force a txg if dirty buffers exceed this value (bytes)"); + kmutex_t zfs_write_limit_lock; static pgcnt_t old_physmem = 0; > On a large-memory system, a properly working zfs should not saturate > the write channel for more than 5 seconds. Zfs tries to learn the > write bandwidth so that it can tune the TXG size up to 5 seconds (max) > worth of writes. If you have both large memory and fast storage, > quite a huge amount of data can be written in 5 seconds. On my > Solaris system, I found that zfs was quite accurate with its rate > estimation, but it resulted in four gigabytes of data being written > per TXG. I had similar problems on a 32GB Solaris server at work. Note that with compression enabled, the entire system pauses while it compresses the outgoing block of data. It's just a fraction of a second, but long enough for end-users to complain about bad performance in X sessions. I had to throttle back to a 256MB write limit size to make the stuttering go away completely. It didn't affect write throughput much at all. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 19:02:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986CA106566C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjk32@cam.ac.uk) Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9398FC14 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from nat0.cjkey.org.uk ([88.97.163.219]:46883 helo=[192.168.2.59]) by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:cjk32) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1NuVr0-0001yF-3g (Exim 4.70) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (return-path ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:02:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4BAA61E1.4090501@cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:02:57 +0000 From: Christopher Key User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA78BF3.2090102@cam.ac.uk> <4BAA4CE5.7030104@cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BAA4CE5.7030104@cam.ac.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Unable to boot FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:02:59 -0000 Christopher Key wrote: > Christopher Key wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm using FreeBSD 7.2, and am attempting to update to 8.0. >> >> >> I've been through the standard, >> >> make buildworld >> make buildkernel >> make installkernel >> >> but cannot get the newly installed kernel to boot. The system freezes >> as soon as the loader tries to boot the kernel. It doesn't even get as >> far as the copyright message: >> >> Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. >> OK boot -Dd >> \ >> >> >> > Problem solved. Hopefully the answer might be of use to others, as it > doesn't seem too uncommon a situation. > > Had I read /usr/src/UPDATING more carefully however, I might have spotted, 20080713: The sio(4) driver has been removed from the i386 and amd64 kernel configuration files. This means uart(4) is now the default serial port driver on those platforms as well. To prevent collisions with the sio(4) driver, the uart(4) driver uses different names for its device nodes. This means the onboard serial port will now most likely be called "ttyu0" instead of "ttyd0". You may need to reconfigure applications to use the new device names. When using the serial port as a boot console, be sure to update /boot/device.hints and /etc/ttys before booting the new kernel. If you forget to do so, you can still manually specify the hints at the loader prompt: set hint.uart.0.at="isa" set hint.uart.0.port="0x3F8" set hint.uart.0.flags="0x10" set hint.uart.0.irq="4" boot -s which is probably why noone else has suffered from this problem. Christopher Key From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 19:08:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75440106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id) Received: from mx2.ITB.ac.id (mx2.itb.ac.id [IPv6:2001:d30:3:5::67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1378FC08 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx3.itb.ac.id (mx3.itb.ac.id [167.205.1.68]) by mx2.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364573716E for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:08:17 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx4.itb.ac.id ([167.205.1.69] helo=mx4.ITB.ac.id) by mx3.itb.ac.id with ESMTP id o28dCeMY29314; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:08:39 +0700 Received: from www.arc.itb.ac.id (arc.itb.ac.id [167.205.3.3]) by mx4.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9361DB272 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:08:09 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:808a:35bf:bc09:ca11] (unknown [IPv6:2403:8000:1:1880:808a:35bf:bc09:ca11]) by www.arc.itb.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DE3F741D for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:08:14 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <4BAA62F8.8080400@arc.itb.ac.id> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:07:36 +0700 From: "m.anis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: m.anis@arc.itb.ac.id X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 12869 [Mar 24 2010] X-SpamTest-Info: {FROM: real name seems fake} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0285], KAS30/SDK/Release X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Mail Gateway, version: 5.6.28/RELEASE, bases: 20100317T152331 #3814691, check: 20100318 clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Pure-ftpd non anonymous X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:05 -0000 Hi all, i'm still new on freebsd, please help me. i had installed pure-ftpd. it is working with the anonymous login. i'd like to make it non anonymous login, so only authenticated user can log in. here what i did : # Don't allow authenticated users - have a public anonymous FTP only. AnonymousOnly no # Disallow anonymous connections. Only allow authenticated users. NoAnonymous yes i think with this i had set no naonymous login (that what i got after reading the manual) but this is appear: 220-You are user number 1 of 50 allowed. 220-Local time is now 01:53. Server port: 21. 220-*Only anonymous FTP is allowed here* (why this could happen? what is wrong?) 220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server. 220 You will be disconnected after 15 minutes of inactivity. Name (localhost:):newftp 421 Unable to set up secure anonymous FTP ftp: Login failed. i had made the newftp user with password, but it still can.t login. anyone can help me? Thanks before -- -- Best Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 19:08:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886F81065675 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr) Received: from franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr (franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr [194.187.193.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBB48FC1B for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr [127.0.0.1]) by franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0D310128D for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:44:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper use of control character (char 0D hex): From: Mrs margret Kane \r Received: from franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sDbSP-S3jkJ2 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:44:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id B31F8101284; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:43:53 +0100 (CET) To: questions@freebsd.org From: Mrs margret Kane MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20100324184404.B31F8101284@franceloc-postfix.filnet.fr> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:43:53 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Canadian Cruise Employment Opportunity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: royalcruiseshipping@cabbies.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:51 -0000 Training /Employment Programme Starboard Cruise Services, 2364 7th Concession, Site , 6 Comp 10 RR 8 Msc Millarville Millarville Ab Tol 1k0 Directory: 568512457 Toll Free For US/Canada:615-468-8961 Canada Canadian Cruise Employment Opportunity Dearest One, I Am Mrs Margret, the Manager Royal CruiseShip International Services Canada. Our company need's worker's both men and women from all part's of the World to work and live on board Ship, We will help to bring you over here in Canada through the Authority of the Canadian Labours Organization .We will pay for your ticket and you will get your Visa from our Canadian Embassy in your country, Our company will help you and send an invitation letter to you so that you will be able to get Employment visa there in our Embassy in your country, If you are interested Kindly contact us via mail : royalcruiseshipping@yahoo.ca Thanks from Royal Cruise Shipping line Mrs.Margret Kane . Manager. CSL Canada. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 19:35:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB09E106566C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65278FC0C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787F2128AD4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:32:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koaF4ysAuVPE for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:32:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from jamms-MacBook.local (catv-89-133-92-209.catv.broadband.hu [89.133.92.209]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB96C127FE1 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:32:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BAA6966.4060602@wooh.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:35:02 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BAA62F8.8080400@arc.itb.ac.id> In-Reply-To: <4BAA62F8.8080400@arc.itb.ac.id> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Pure-ftpd non anonymous X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:35:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/24/10 8:07 PM, m.anis wrote: > # Disallow anonymous connections. Only allow authenticated users. Did you restart pure-ftpd after the changes? /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pure-ftpd stop /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pure-ftpd start - -- Adam PAPAI -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqmlmAAoJEGq0EWvh5uiIh04H/i3SHxeW3X9mgHpoLJThDrDm nQMmrME2lWo6IFvlG4A0vzuM/KQ4qLcAW5i6FWwjRETre9n44vMosB2uKK2botE5 hF0F7WLPJsJqZYzXptlGLTgIu5wNl9Ois/KlggxoIgwJ+5UgvlkS8IZO7J8A9dax Lgb/BrPDyM069M3KbWgvnh43duKCTY6gAFQ134D8wRKahrG9VP4bQU05C8DpYRUn aT6bWmpRDx+sMlm7s9F8Aq4guX+8RnutK2faQFxpR0OYfNKL/fvDJuy1NndhmYo4 N+y7gERG32MXfb1Nqw3lbcFUlJWW8kpOWnqVoqGcAHmOXi0XTT+VbWixoa7XCA4= =QoKC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 20:48:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099141065670; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24138FC1B; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2OKlx3Y015304; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:47:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:47:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20100324175546.GF12330@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: References: <20100324175546.GF12330@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:47:59 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dan Naumov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tuning vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending and solving the issue of ZFS writes choking read IO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:48:09 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Dan Nelson wrote: > > I had similar problems on a 32GB Solaris server at work. Note that with > compression enabled, the entire system pauses while it compresses the > outgoing block of data. It's just a fraction of a second, but long enough > for end-users to complain about bad performance in X sessions. I had to > throttle back to a 256MB write limit size to make the stuttering go away > completely. It didn't affect write throughput much at all. Apparently this was a kernel thread priority problem in Solaris. It is apparently fixed in recent versions of OpenSolaris. The fix required adding a scheduling class which allowed the kernel thread doing the compression to be less than the priority of normal user processes (such as the X11 server). Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 21:23:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE626106566C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A928FC0C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1169128fgb.13 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1jUljovol7I5ynDm0YLMgEQo2Vk2lh/rL6XCc1P43X0=; b=AYQQCDZnmtw2usE917sGYzkDVHJhJ7nQJuQss48xxsL3PDq5NhaOkQNCspDwDxzclq SC7OavcjCPycpLseXY0swCt3/c+dcNlpRLka8qbmrbQYO4Q8iUJ0xg2PBqaaL3I8sAUS ab6/8jrvn9xwaZgI6mipkRQzrIdvLdBbOx08g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ajiScg2uJ9p2sm4bVKPh064Euxqw5vyV7eSad4VXKu8+DrrlkifaYcT+boLmzF8ys0 LOECAoYconfr5mr9jfWbORZrOE051uqZq2kYh4PFm2A9IgTJxsaYgL8xZa2Leei4Li+C AhHaJeFHIHIMdQZh7bK+/a8gnPAxqhK91pesw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.183.146 with SMTP id u18mr1037680hbg.174.1269465834203; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:23:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA9F87E.7050205@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> <4BA9F87E.7050205@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:23:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: John , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple zfs query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:23:56 -0000 On 24 March 2010 11:33, Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24/03/2010 10:31:51, John wrote: > > With ZFS and 3x 2Tb SATA disks, what percentage of theoretical diskspace > > would I realise? I'm hoping at least 5Tb would be usable? > > That depends on how you configure your zpool. The choices are: > > disk -- just uses the disk directly as a vdev. Means you can use 100% > of the space, but you have absolutely no resilience > > mirror -- for which you'ld need an even number of disks and you get 50% > of the raw as usable space. Can survive at least one disk > failure, and possibly up to as many as half of the disks > failing. > > raidz -- single parity (equivalent to RAID5). For N disks, 1 disk > worth is used for parity data, leaving N - 1 disks' worth as > the actual capacity. So you'ld get 66% of raw in your case. > Can survive failure of any one disk. > > raidz2 -- double parity (equivalent to RAID6). For N disks, 2 disks > worth are used for parity data, leaving N - 2 disks worth as > actual capacity. Or 33% of raw in your case. Can survive > failure of any two disks. > > Note that 3 drives is the minimum for either of the raidz types, and > won't give you the best performance. See zpool(1M) for details. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkup+H4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx8HQCfcGTI3wh3QsxNmDS1nPkbw8WU > cWIAoJO8rys1R7SfasVkse2htfqOqVrF > =AWpE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If you want 100% of the drives you could have a pool per drive. Its not as nice as one big pool, but its less risky than one big raid0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 21:32:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6221065670 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E872B8FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303B7119CF5 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:32:40 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:32:40 -0600 Message-Id: <20100324212032.M14419@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.52 20060502 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.0.2 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Subject: 8.0 amd64 - Royally screwed up MBR (My own fault) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:32:41 -0000 Greetings - (not a draft notice) First thanks to those who responded to my previous question. Next... I was attempting to install 8.0 amd64 w/ZFS. I used instructions from the wiki and when I had trouble, I decided to beat a strategic retreat and just do a "vanilla" install. Problem was that either fdisk didn't recognize the mbr after all the 'gpart create'-ing or simply couldn't start newfs. (Something about not being able to find an initial inode.) I figured 'gpart destroy ad0' might fix things but no such luck. fdisk -I ad0 also errors out saying "unable to locate class". Does anyone know of a simple (brute force?) way to restore simple. standard MBRs without having to resort to a hex editor? (I will if I have to, but I'd rather not.) Thanks for any assistance... IHN, Gene -- To everything there is a season, And a time to every purpose under heaven. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 22:27:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00F31065672 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97B38FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuZ2t-00081Q-V5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:27:28 +0100 Received: from 78-1-170-106.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.170.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:27:27 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 78-1-170-106.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:27:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:27:12 +0100 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-170-106.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090612) In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tuning vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending and solving the issue of ZFS writes choking read IO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:27:30 -0000 Dan Naumov wrote: > Hello > > I am having a slight issue (and judging by Google results, similar > issues have been seen by other FreeBSD and Solaris/OpenSolaris users) > with writes choking the read IO. The issue I am having is described > pretty well here: > http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=106453 It seems that > under heavy write load, ZFS likes to aggregate a really huge amount of > data before actually writing it to disks, resulting in sudden 10+ > second stalls where it frantically tries to commit everything, > completely choking read IO in the process and sometimes even the > network (with a large enough write to a mirror pool using DD, I can > cause my SSH sessions to drop dead, without actually running out of > RAM. As soon as the data is committed, I can reconnect back). Mostly a wild guess, but can you test if this patch will help with choking your network and ssh: http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/spa.c.diff ? You can then fiddle with the vfs.zfs.zio_worker_threads_count loader tunable to see if it helps more. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 22:33:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7C106564A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:33:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rhavenn.net) Received: from smtp114.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp114.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE528FC0C for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay11.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay11.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B94A617FF5A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay11.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rhavenn-AT-rhavenn.net) with ESMTPSA id 8372417FFC0 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by alucard.rhavenn.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A53DC100087; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:33:08 -0800 (AKDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:33:08 -0800 From: Henrik Hudson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100324223308.GA6309@alucard.int.rhavenn.net> References: <20100324212032.M14419@brightstar.bomgardner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100324212032.M14419@brightstar.bomgardner.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: 8.0 amd64 - Royally screwed up MBR (My own fault) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:33:11 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Gene wrote: > Greetings - (not a draft notice) > > First thanks to those who responded to my previous question. > > Next... > > I was attempting to install 8.0 amd64 w/ZFS. I used instructions from the wiki > and when I had trouble, I decided to beat a strategic retreat and just do a > "vanilla" install. Problem was that either fdisk didn't recognize the mbr > after all the 'gpart create'-ing or simply couldn't start newfs. (Something > about not being able to find an initial inode.) I figured 'gpart destroy ad0' > might fix things but no such luck. fdisk -I ad0 also errors out saying "unable > to locate class". > > Does anyone know of a simple (brute force?) way to restore simple. standard > MBRs without having to resort to a hex editor? (I will if I have to, but I'd > rather not.) This will wipe the MBR: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=446 count=1 replace of=/dev/sdb without whatever /dev/sd? you need. henrik -- Henrik Hudson lists@rhavenn.net ----------------------------------------- "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr; UF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 22:38:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D14106564A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C538FC1A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id o2OMc96w034539; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:38:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2OMc9H3034538; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:38:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:38:09 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Mark Linimon , kensmith@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Adam PAPAI , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:38:12 -0000 On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, > and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able to run buildworld in 1 hour at most (unfortunately I currently just can't find that email). My 4x1.5GHz V440 I originally intended for this purpose unfortunately still takes 72 minutes last time I checked. I suspect a 8x1.2GHz V880 would be able to meet this requirement but I simply can't afford the housing for such a beast. Ken, did the V880s at your university become available as intended some time ago? Marius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 23:47:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F256106567B; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5308FC1A; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NuaI4-0000aU-Se>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:47:12 +0100 Received: from e178057006.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.57.6] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1NuaI4-0001nS-Pt>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:47:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4BAAA480.5060307@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:47:12 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100308 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de References: <4BAA1478.9020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20100324150653.3a447c98@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100324150653.3a447c98@ernst.jennejohn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.57.6 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox 3.6.X and Thunderbird 3.0.X crashing with Radeon graphics on FBSD 8.0-STABLE SMP/sm64 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:47:14 -0000 On 03/24/10 15:06, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 +0000 > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > >> Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see >> spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly >> Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform. >> >> The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04 >> CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, QuadCore Intel Q6600 on a P35-based >> motherboard. >> >> Thunderbird 3 crashes rarely compared to Firefox 3. The longer the >> application thunderbird runs, the higher the likelyhood the app crashes >> and vanishes. Sometimes this happens immediately after starting >> thunderbird, sometimes it takes its few minutes or half an hour. >> >> Firefox 3 is sensitive to its pull-down menus or requester showing up in >> some situations. I can provoke a crash by clicking onto a pull-down-menu >> in firefox 3, it immediately dumps a core. >> > > If you suspect the graphics card's driver is at fault then I would try > linux-opera or even linux-firefox and see whether it also dies when you > use a drop-down menu. > > Another possibility would be to set hw.physmem to say 3G or 4G in > loader.conf and see whether that affects thunderbird/firefox. Who > knows, there may some weird problem caused by all that memory? That > would a fairly quick and cheap way to test this. > > -- > Gary Jennejohn You're right, I'll test this as soon as I'm back in my lab. Oliver Hartmann From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 01:39:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFB2106566C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjk32@cam.ac.uk) Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341E68FC08 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:39:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from nat1.cjkey.org.uk ([88.97.163.220]:63629 helo=[192.168.2.59]) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:cjk32) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1Nubin-0006j2-IX (Exim 4.70) for questions@freebsd.org (return-path ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4BAAB9FD.5040303@cam.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:53 +0000 From: Christopher Key User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: sysinstall: "You need to assign disk labels before you can proceed with the installation" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:39:27 -0000 Hello, Having run into various problems trying to upgrade from 7.2 to 8.0, I'm instead trying to perform a clean install using sysintall. I've downloaded 8.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img, modifed it to use a serial console and flashed it to a USB drive. This boots quite happily, and presents me with the sysintall screen. I'm intending to install to a pair of drives, mirrored with gmirror and partitioned with GPT. I therefore immediately drop into the fixit shell, create the mirror, partition it, and mount the new partitions under /newroot/, /newroot/usr etc. I then exit back to sysinstall, select custom install, point install root to /newroot and choose distribution, media. On selecting commit, sysinstall immediately presents the message "You need to assign disk labels before you can proceed with the installation", and won't proceed. It seems this only happens when sysinstall is running in single user mode. I have manged to make some progress with tricking sysintall into getting past this message. If I run sysinstall within the fixit shell (rather than exiting), I get a new instance of sysinstall with a pid other than 1. Symlinking /usr/bin to /stand, seems to provide most of the binaries it needs, and it proceeeds part of the way through installing the system before getting stuck on the documentation. I avoided this problem when installing 7.2 by creating an mfsbsd image, booting that, and then running sysinstall from there, but I'd rather not have the hassle of doing this for every future release. Moreover, creating an mfsbsd image may not even be an option in the event of a diasaster. Is anyone aware of any way of installing using sysintall from the standard FreeBSD media, but without using sysintall to partition and label the target disks? Kind regards, Christopher Key From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 01:56:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E8F106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100478FC13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so1449927gyh.13 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.165.5 with SMTP id s5mr9566623ano.134.1269482209114; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([189.70.164.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm150581ywf.10.2010.03.24.18.56.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:56:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:58:05 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.5; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> Cc: Subject: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:56:50 -0000 Hi; I followed the instructions from http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html to see if I can achieve some performance gain (8-STABLE r205630 amd64) and also get a more modern instruction set for my Phenom II (amdfam10), so I've done the following config settings: make.conf .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*) && exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc43) CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc43 CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++43 CPP=/usr/local/bin/cpp43 CFLAGS+=-mssse3 CPUTYPE=amdfam10 .endif libmap.conf libgcc_s.so.1 gcc43/libgcc_s.so.1 libgomp.so.1 gcc43/libgomp.so.1 libobjc.so.3 gcc43/libobjc.so.2 libssp.so.0 gcc43/libssp.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 gcc43/libstdc++.so.6 buildworld goes on normally it seems, but when I tried to build the kernel, the first stop came from the option used by the kernel build "-fformat- extensions", which is not accepted by gcc43, so I took it out of /usr/src/sys/conf/kern.mk, the ONLY place I found it. It seemed to solve the problem until gcc43 stopped because of the "-Werror" option, which is all over the place!. Funny that gcc42 (used by default) doesn't stop because of this option. Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 02:09:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DE1106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52AD8FC08 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C98C3A385A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:09:56 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1269482995; x=1271297395; bh=X/tdz0LoI OGtqA2ek0aUc6gfnxYNUIkPVZLTUBVTrEY=; b=dWniggtTK1ye2EXjklFSmivYG 9sE98Y2+53FczSkS1FN/CrFzldVTNozcBicit+kHBsHxLN5cHl6LmlheaLQcfqRT aQZ9D+H/9pybw49zic8idPhXQyTOhFjbiC5/yGTnN4lpjCLROdh2ohcIhjJjnAf7 KrRF6DzbawoLDuBdso= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WAdrKJeUth2m for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:09:55 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E6E3A3856 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:09:55 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2P29stg081087; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:09:54 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:09:54 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003250209.o2P29stg081087@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: OT: Rhyme X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:09:58 -0000 Hi, I am in deep need of help right now. I am preparing some training about using email and am looking for that small rhyme saying that you should reply after the quote of the original message, not before it. That rhyme is written backward saying something like "why whouldn't you back quote, because it is difficult to read". But of course I cannot find it now that I need it. I know some people here use it as signature so my hope is in your hands :) TIA, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 02:15:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F255E1065673 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@fiberuplink.com) Received: from mail.fiberuplink.com (b08s23le.corenetworks.net [64.85.165.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A87748FC13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52574 invoked by uid 1004); 25 Mar 2010 01:48:44 -0000 Received: from 96.2.86.226 by core.fiberuplink.com (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.94.2/9059. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(96.2.86.226):SA:0(4.0/10.0):. Processed in 6.729274 secs); 25 Mar 2010 01:48:44 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 X-Spam-Level: ++++ X-Antivirus-FiberUplink-Mail-From: rob@fiberuplink.com via core.fiberuplink.com X-Antivirus-FiberUplink: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(96.2.86.226):SA:0(4.0/10.0):. Processed in 6.729274 secs Process 52529) Received: from host-226-86-2-96.midco.net (HELO ?192.168.0.254?) (rob@fiberuplink.com@96.2.86.226) by mail.fiberuplink.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 01:48:37 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 9.0.791 [271.1.1/2768]); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:48:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4BAAC0F4.9080101@fiberuplink.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:48:36 -0500 From: Rob Weissenburger Organization: FiberUplink Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Install of Apache 2.2.15 after installing ssl lastes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rob@fiberuplink.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:15:32 -0000 I have been picking my brain apart trying to figure this one out. Any help is appricated. ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --mandir=/usr/local/man --enable-ssl --enable-suexec --enable-cgi --enable-rewrite --enable-so --enable-modules=most --enable-mods-shared=max --sysconfdir=/etc/apache --with-apr=/usr/local/ --with-apr-util=/usr/local/ /usr/local/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -L/usr/local/lib -o ab ab.lo -lm /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/srclib/pcre/libpcre.la /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.la -lexpat -liconv /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.la -lcrypt -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lcrypt -lpthread .libs/ab.o(.text+0xb7): In function `ssl_print_cb': /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:409: undefined reference to `BIO_get_callback_arg' .libs/ab.o(.text+0x25e3): In function `start_connect': /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:1204: undefined reference to `BIO_set_callback' .libs/ab.o(.text+0x25f1):/usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:1205: undefined reference to `BIO_set_callback_arg' .libs/ab.o(.text+0x4e2f): In function `main': /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:2278: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_set_info_callback' *** Error code 1 # openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8m 25 Feb 2010 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 02:47:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83270106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E788FC0A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id 83954DA8CB; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:51:59 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100325025159.GA97702@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: hoope THIS works... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:47:42 -0000 for reasons that are beyond me, a few hours ago i stopped being able to connect with my mail server. mutt tells me "(connection refused)"; the other GUI mailer say zip; they simply do not connect. i rebooted my HUB among other things; before that, i could not get outside my network; nor could i even get to ethic [my Server]. since the only thing i did was powercycle my linksys hub, i figure that did it. right now i am continuing the portupgrade on my mail/web/dns server in the hopes that when that is done, mail will work again. if not, what else could it be? directories/files/links i need to check/? tx, gary -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 03:00:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B90106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94668FC12 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C8A3A3871; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:00:09 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269486008; x= 1271300408; bh=jaYb6OQ7Q5yH1JH5iw7kcpYKeyW7sj4gHWI1aHRukXg=; b=F 5xy4xuxVXNmg0y3e8v08/JU3w12GNgw3cESHaaVV60KdZTsxmSDnGaK/KsViz795 3SJe2yrST7kD9oQXLqraDYxjUO34UWzTQMEifEdCWYUgJt9T3QA/ZQm9TV8inzWt En55SWBsqoZK3hMOFcGxFAJs1oHOHeT1RFoarPHuqM= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id T2yUfl1d-upk; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:00:08 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2DB3A3863; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:00:08 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2P305Kb081641; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:00:05 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:00:05 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003250300.o2P305Kb081641@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: kline@magnesium.net In-reply-to: <20100325025159.GA97702@thought.org> (message from Gary Kline on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:51:59 -0700) References: <20100325025159.GA97702@thought.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hoope THIS works... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:00:11 -0000 > for reasons that are beyond me, a few hours ago i stopped being able to > connect with my mail server. mutt tells me "(connection refused)"; > the other GUI mailer say zip; they simply do not connect. > > i rebooted my HUB among other things; before that, i could not get outside my > network; nor could i even get to ethic [my Server]. since the only thing i > did was powercycle my linksys hub, i figure that did it. > > right now i am continuing the portupgrade on my mail/web/dns server in > the hopes that when that is done, mail will work again. if not, what else > could it be? directories/files/links i need to check/? It seems the reboot of your Linksys switch helped some how. Before portupgrading randomly this or that application, you should try to understand what is going wrong. Upgrade of DNS should go easily, but when you start upgrading web or mail, you are talking about tens or hunderds of applications, you are very likely something goes wrong and you break a system that was working before. When you say you could not "get" to ethic, what do you mean? - Cannot ping? - Cannot ssh? - Cannot telnet port 22, 25, 80? - Cannot traceroute (if your station and the server are on different LAN)? - Cannot ping another machine on your LAN? - Are you sure it was not your desktop that was faulty? - Etc. You should make a diagnostic before trying to apply any solution. As the reboot of thw switch did it, to me it looks like a network issue: bad switch, bad cable, some highly infected machine on your LAN that is stressing the swtich, rather than a server/service issue. Good luck, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 03:14:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB651106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjg@soe.ucsc.edu) Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76C38FC1A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617221008999 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:14:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIG+r-jxwJVj for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.32]) by mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834231008992 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:14:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Gustafson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2092844706.52171269486849103.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> In-Reply-To: <286165196.52121269486793612.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_864_1693119008.1269486849102" X-Originating-IP: [98.234.59.118] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.20_GA_3127.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 ([unknown])/5.0.20_GA_3127.RHEL5_64) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD 8 / amd64 / Xorg / nvidia GeForce 5200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:14:11 -0000 ------=_Part_864_1693119008.1269486849102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, My workstation runs FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64. I have Xorg 1.6.5 and an nVidia GeForce 5200 dual head video card. Currently the first head of the card is operating well using the "nv" driver. I tried to compile the nvidia-driver port, but it tells me that I need nvidia-driver-173 because the 5200 chipset isn't supported by the current driver. When I go to compile nvidia-driver-173 it tells me that it is not supported under the amd64 architecture. I can't switch to an i386 kernel because I need the amd64 architecture to take advantage of all my RAM and also because I am using ZFS on this workstation, which more or less requires the amd64 architecture. So, I have two questions: 1. Is there any way to get the nvidia-driver-173 port to work with my amd64 OS? 2. Is there any way to get the second head of the 5200 video card to work using the nv driver? I tried adding a second device section to xorg.conf but the system errors out telling me that it tried to use conflicting hardware. I've attached both my xorg.conf and my Xorg.0.log file to this message. Or am I stuck buying a newer card? Tim Gustafson Baskin School of Engineering UC Santa Cruz tjg@soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 ------=_Part_864_1693119008.1269486849102 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=xorg.conf.2010-03-24 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=xorg.conf.2010-03-24 Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Layout0" Screen "Screen0" Screen "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" Option "Xinerama" "1" EndSection Section "Files" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "NEC" ModelName "MultiSync LCD 195VX" HorizSync 30.0 - 50.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 63.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Device0" Driver "nv" VendorName "NVIDIA" BoardName "GeForce 5200" Screen 0 BusID "PCI:3:2:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Device0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor1" VendorName "NEC" ModelName "MultiSync LCD 195VX" HorizSync 30.0 - 50.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 63.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Device1" Driver "nv" VendorName "NVIDIA" BoardName "GeForce 5200" Screen 1 BusID "PCI:3:2:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen1" Device "Device1" Monitor "Monitor1" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection ------=_Part_864_1693119008.1269486849102-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 03:45:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1835F106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B700E8FC13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED9E3A38D4; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:44:57 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269488697; x= 1271303097; bh=4XAFsjG48Ya4UHSoNs0s4HCfBR3SqonvzaRQC+T694k=; b=J skynGyC4Fy+/83kE1hZLXbP6P6n91tAN9hZ+Moaz3yctgSHCOk1pAAXNZNnx7nua ItRroKomQQAHaXOdfD4mMJD22WdUxR9eYndOvZZcj4JMMnJkLvw4B6PjvWPv7Jxz Is8eiXrwjUgqQmma0aXXzBFEjKLwWj+A6Fdb7JSdxc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ldaRQfiDw951; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:44:57 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B8AE3A38D1; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:44:57 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2P3iuFC082086; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:44:56 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:44:56 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003250344.o2P3iuFC082086@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: contact@endlessforms.com In-reply-to: <1269487930.29044.1366608875@webmail.messagingengine.com> (contact@endlessforms.com) References: <201003250209.o2P29stg081087@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <1269487930.29044.1366608875@webmail.messagingengine.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Rhyme X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:45:02 -0000 Hi, > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > Is this the one you mean? Top posting, that's the word I was missing, now I could find that: A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? Thanks, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 03:51:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7224C106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contact@endlessforms.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429358FC18 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82043E92D9; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:32:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web7.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.216]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:32:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=TBqaM1l6uJVhmHpeqpZcpuMimOA=; b=k2lqXG+XyHUu+3yd5HeFQc96Lj/IFWNyGXg3qaucP1ta4HN9SXtrBc5/j63rxgM2BNM6hLjMn9EruCvMlCSEZvrv2n2/nlk5j26CmaXokWjxDG+mHiR1OQmUp66PBP7wPHrAWtnvGbeEkdDFP/gKL8+20uqY6X9c4RG8LoN8kVQ= Received: by web7.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 63F59105636; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:32:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1269487930.29044.1366608875@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: HzcpCoRGSnYp6BZwgnR0x57Kb8xu3aeJIOzRH2ev2rdR 1269487930 From: "Arun S" To: "Olivier Nicole" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface In-Reply-To: <201003250209.o2P29stg081087@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <201003250209.o2P29stg081087@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:02:10 +0530 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Rhyme X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:51:04 -0000 > That rhyme is written backward saying something like "why whouldn't > you back quote, because it is difficult to read". > It's not a rhyme, but it reminds me of this quote: A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Is this the one you mean? -Arun From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 05:28:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E3F106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tam.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E74F8FC23 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so585650wwi.13 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:28:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lmR7F/aqtgf1GNvGwRgq69TT5uisyvaEGjVbZAYb50s=; b=svhCcBXQ2PTKI87osDI+yqUz+dPMddlUYpd1EybvVQMR13qbSftAV3X3Y4uWVF6Vvs UP1z2QaoPNVp62gEsRLQLKICUfGOudXJSBOWQuzYSvIOSnbs8TWldPY35hI06pzIisU0 9gnuzoMrfEKQYtSsNyqkdcCeLdfJ0rnN2S+9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FO7KUQWZmjIKE5RmXt60mzi7lFIXTWuGtIfrGrXf0Z7yrcZMkDcaPJnbLiR890n66A 8S4bcQqTX8b8FFkM3PdJbBOA1GtnoHH30kxYNYp2B2aYagVOi6p2vubG+GX4h1YjijmD TdHlV8pFBv1L4bSDClb1BuyGSpmJa7O6SwEuI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.130 with SMTP id u2mr4972340wee.49.1269494888781; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:28:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003250344.o2P3iuFC082086@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <201003250209.o2P29stg081087@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <1269487930.29044.1366608875@webmail.messagingengine.com> <201003250344.o2P3iuFC082086@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:28:06 -0600 Message-ID: From: Sergio Tam To: Olivier Nicole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: OT: Rhyme X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:28:11 -0000 2010/3/24 Olivier Nicole : > Hi, > >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> Is this the one you mean? > > Top posting, that's the word I was missing, now I could find that: > > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > > Hi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 07:24:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C33F106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t.who@lycos.com) Received: from mail-outfilter4.bo3.lycos.com (mail-outfilter4.bo3.lycos.com [209.202.249.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAACE8FC18 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail-outfilter4.bo3.lycos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F801209700 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:57:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lycos.com Received: from mail-outfilter4.bo3.lycos.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-outfilter4.bo3.lycos.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id praY5j8Cf-4T for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wwl10.lycosmail.com (beta-backnet-proxy.bo3.lycos.com [10.126.32.9]) by mail-outfilter4.bo3.lycos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129B2209697 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from hanadmin@localhost) by mail-wwl10.lycosmail.com (8.12.9/8.9.1) id o2P6v8wJ019057 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:57:08 +0900 X-Originating-IP: [118.172.68.118] From: "trevor who" Priority: Normal To: X-Mailer: Lycos Web Mailer 1.1 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:57:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20100325025706.HM.00000000000022S@t.who.mail-wwl10.bo3.lycos.com.lycos.com> Errors-To: X-HM-TU: Ojc1eNFwHJwpTSHRoH4ByW8fOG1HQuY3J3uewBklszY= X-Hanmail-Attr: fc=1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: The download file is corrupt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:24:22 -0000 Hi guy's, I downloaded the DVD version freeBSD version 8 and went to unpack it and got these messages from winrar. ! D:\FreeBSD\8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz: Unexpected end of archive ! D:\FreeBSD\8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz: CRC failed in 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso. The file is corrupt Can you let me know when it will be fine to download. Regards, Trevor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 07:29:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E2F1065670 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FA78FC0C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.local (ppp-88-217-13-177.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.13.177]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BFAE1C0871 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:29:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BAB10C8.1080004@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:29:12 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100325025706.HM.00000000000022S@t.who.mail-wwl10.bo3.lycos.com.lycos.com> In-Reply-To: <20100325025706.HM.00000000000022S@t.who.mail-wwl10.bo3.lycos.com.lycos.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: The download file is corrupt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:29:16 -0000 On 25/03/10 07:57, trevor who wrote: > Hi guy's, > I downloaded the DVD version freeBSD version 8 and went to unpack it > and got these messages from winrar. > ! D:\FreeBSD\8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz: Unexpected end of archive > ! D:\FreeBSD\8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz: CRC failed in > 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso. The file is corrupt > Can you let me know when it will be fine to download. > Regards, > Trevor There could have been a problem during download, try again. This is a lot of data, maybe just download the bootonly iso and install using ftp. BR, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 07:32:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42166106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B7C8FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377E0128D22 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:30:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.44 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.44 tagged_above=0.1 required=4 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.001, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRaNGEF4tD2k for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:30:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from apn-89-223-147-17.vodafone.hu (apn-89-223-147-17.vodafone.hu [89.223.147.17]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E19128CB3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:30:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BAB1186.8070904@wooh.hu> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:32:22 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:32:31 -0000 On 3/24/10 11:38 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: >> You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, >> and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. >> > > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some > interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that > cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported > by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able > to run buildworld in 1 hour at most (unfortunately I currently > just can't find that email). My 4x1.5GHz V440 I originally > intended for this purpose unfortunately still takes 72 minutes > last time I checked. I suspect a 8x1.2GHz V880 would be able > to meet this requirement but I simply can't afford the housing > for such a beast. > Ken, did the V880s at your university become available as > intended some time ago? Yeah on a v100 the make buildworld takes more than 486m7.660s ~ 8 hours. -- Adam PAPAI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 08:18:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090DC106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09A78FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2P8IEpi086234; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:14 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Olivier Nicole Message-ID: <20100325081813.GA21086@thought.org> References: <20100325025159.GA97702@thought.org> <201003250300.o2P305Kb081641@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201003250300.o2P305Kb081641@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. Cc: kline@magnesium.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hoope THIS works... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:18:28 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:00:05AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > for reasons that are beyond me, a few hours ago i stopped being able to > > connect with my mail server. mutt tells me "(connection refused)"; > > the other GUI mailer say zip; they simply do not connect. > > > > i rebooted my HUB among other things; before that, i could not get outside my > > network; nor could i even get to ethic [my Server]. since the only thing i > > did was powercycle my linksys hub, i figure that did it. > > > > right now i am continuing the portupgrade on my mail/web/dns server in > > the hopes that when that is done, mail will work again. if not, what else > > could it be? directories/files/links i need to check/? > > It seems the reboot of your Linksys switch helped some how. yes; and it seems likely that the reason ii could not get to my email was that {for unknown reasons} my dovecot has failed to initialize. note that i did not configure my new setup like this. now i have one mail server and dovecot is used to distribute mail to my other unix servers. i barely understand sendmail; i do NOT understand dovecot... . > > Before portupgrading randomly this or that application, you should try > to understand what is going wrong. > > Upgrade of DNS should go easily, but when you start upgrading web or > mail, you are talking about tens or hunderds of applications, you are > very likely something goes wrong and you break a system that was > working before. it seems that mail my daughter sent me from hotmail did not pass muster because it lacked a subject. i was advised to portupgrade {or at least upgrade my spamblocker}. i did this. during the upgrade of either dovecot or spamassassin i was asked to kill one or both. i figured a reboot would reinstantiate everything. it may have; but things were not restarted correctly. bind9 is current; i am extremely careful with that; i just didn't realize that i've got to approach everything with the same caution. > > When you say you could not "get" to ethic, what do you mean? > > - Cannot ping? > > - Cannot ssh? > > - Cannot telnet port 22, 25, 80? > > - Cannot traceroute (if your station and the server are on different > LAN)? > > - Cannot ping another machine on your LAN? > > - Are you sure it was not your desktop that was faulty? my firewall was the give-away. i run pfSense and it told me that the host was down. the real gotcha is that my KVM wires are not plugged in correctly. so i could not even get to the serve until i messed with that. when i was able to type at the console of my server, i did a therapeutic reboot. ---altho, the was power-cycling my switch that really did the trick. i was about to call it a century when i tried mail. mutt failed again; that turned out to be that dovecot had failed to restart. Now everything is working. but it's only temporary. back in the mid-90s a systems admin friend said that computers/networks/<> are always breaking down. it's the sysadmin's job to do his best to keep things going. i get an F- for that today/tonight..... FWIW, i don't even pretend to be a syste,s admin! > > - Etc. > > You should make a diagnostic before trying to apply any solution. > > As the reboot of thw switch did it, to me it looks like a network > issue: bad switch, bad cable, some highly infected machine on your LAN > that is stressing the swtich, rather than a server/service issue. the power line was bent to the switch; but not that badly. [[i'm keeping a Printed list of things-to-do-before-i-hit-PANIC.]] appreciate your mail! gary > > Good luck, > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 7.79a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 08:25:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461E8106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24428FC1F for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836C3128D62 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:23:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2m+4c-BYiLCv for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from apn-89-223-147-17.vodafone.hu (apn-89-223-147-17.vodafone.hu [89.223.147.17]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A10125504 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:23:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BAB1E00.3040504@wooh.hu> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:25:36 +0100 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:25:49 -0000 On 3/24/10 11:38 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some > interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that > cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported > by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able > to run buildworld in 1 hour. And what about ccache? I'll try it. -- Adam PAPAI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 09:06:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25081065670 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8718FC13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2P95tBP013652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:05:56 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BAB2773.5060503@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:05:55 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: krad References: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> <4BA9F87E.7050205@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: John , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple zfs query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:06:04 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24/03/2010 21:23:54, krad wrote: > If you want 100% of the drives you could have a pool per drive. Its not as > nice as one big pool, but its less risky than one big raid0 Errr... no it's not. The risk of something going wrong is exactly the same. The only advantage is that you may have less data to restore when things do go wrong. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkurJ3MACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyjLwCfdkpLP2MvtWPWBOE4Db/bJRNR tBkAnRA2ZcoGN/LwGaoY9gfkNkdOq6kE =O87f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 09:17:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EB3106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E80B8FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2010 05:17:56 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.8-GA) with ESMTP id LMQ46073; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:17:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2010 05:17:31 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19371.10794.722647.643272@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:17:30 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: ipv6 changes in src/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:57 -0000 I am updating a system: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64 and failing to understand the (practical) consequences of UPDATING entries 20090926 and 20091202. The system runs ipv6, but external connectivity is though a v6-over-v4 tunnel (net/gateway6). rc.conf currently has: huff@>>grep v6 /etc/rc.conf ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" # Set to YES if this host will be a gateway. ipv6_firewall_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable IPv6 firewall ipv6_firewall_type="UNKNOWN" # see /etc/rc.firewall6 ipv6_firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.v6.set" # Which script to run to set up the IPv6 firewall ipv6_firewall_flags="" # see /etc/rc.firewall6 gateway6_enable="YES" Um ... er ... ah ... what needs to change? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 10:11:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7C6106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3458FC16 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2PAB6t4014355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:07 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BAB36BA.3050806@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:06 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <19371.10794.722647.643272@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19371.10794.722647.643272@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipv6 changes in src/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/03/2010 09:17:30, Robert Huff wrote: > > I am updating a system: > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64 > > and failing to understand the (practical) consequences of > UPDATING entries 20090926 and 20091202. The system runs ipv6, but > external connectivity is though a v6-over-v4 tunnel (net/gateway6). > rc.conf currently has: > > huff@>>grep v6 /etc/rc.conf > ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" # Set to YES if this host will be a gateway. > ipv6_firewall_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable IPv6 firewall > ipv6_firewall_type="UNKNOWN" # see /etc/rc.firewall6 > ipv6_firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.v6.set" # Which script to run to set up the IPv6 firewall > ipv6_firewall_flags="" # see /etc/rc.firewall6 > gateway6_enable="YES" > > Um ... er ... ah ... what needs to change? None of the above, probably. As you're using a custom firewall initialisation script, you don't need to worry about the variables for controlling the various pre-canned scripts. The text in UPDATING seems fairly clear to me: for the 20090926 update, various rc.conf variables prefixed by ipv6 are deprecated in favour of similar variables *suffixed* by ipv6 -- this is a simple matter of editing to sort out. There is also a new overall control knob for turning on or off IPv6 capability entirely. The new thing here is that it allows you to make that change per-interface rather than for the whole machine. Given you want IPv6 capability on all interfaces, just use ipv6_prefer="YES" You need to look at the ifconfig_ifX* or ipv6_addrs_ifX variables. Given that you've said your machine is a router for ipv6, you can't use rtsol(8), so you should be manually configuring addresses on your interfaces. You may not need to make any changes there: even so, shouldn't be too hard to debug. For the 20091202 update, again it is pretty much a replacement of variables with an ipv6 prefix, to ones with an ipv6 suffix. All the variables mentioned just detail the local IP addresses and networks, and let you select which firewall script you want to use. As it says, the ipv6 configuration exactly parallels the ipv4 configuration now. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkurNroACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwfGwCfWJ6ZGlerqj3yMNrNaqY/SOyp LIoAn0+dT9Bp3YKnrP6dz9kGV2FZKXUg =kAQt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 10:22:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD85A106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162038FC0A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2PAMNDG014506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:22:23 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4BAB395E.908@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:22:22 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rob@fiberuplink.com References: <4BAAC0F4.9080101@fiberuplink.com> In-Reply-To: <4BAAC0F4.9080101@fiberuplink.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install of Apache 2.2.15 after installing ssl lastes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:22:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/03/2010 01:48:36, Rob Weissenburger wrote: > I have been picking my brain apart trying to figure this one out. Any > help is appricated. > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --mandir=/usr/local/man > --enable-ssl --enable-suexec --enable-cgi --enable-rewrite --enable-so > --enable-modules=most --enable-mods-shared=max --sysconfdir=/etc/apache > --with-apr=/usr/local/ --with-apr-util=/usr/local/ > > /usr/local/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 > -L/usr/local/lib -o ab ab.lo -lm > /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/srclib/pcre/libpcre.la > /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.la -lexpat -liconv > /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.la -lcrypt -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lcrypt > -lpthread > .libs/ab.o(.text+0xb7): In function `ssl_print_cb': > /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:409: undefined reference to > `BIO_get_callback_arg' > .libs/ab.o(.text+0x25e3): In function `start_connect': > /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:1204: undefined reference to > `BIO_set_callback' > .libs/ab.o(.text+0x25f1):/usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:1205: > undefined reference to `BIO_set_callback_arg' > .libs/ab.o(.text+0x4e2f): In function `main': > /usr/local/httpd-2.2.15/support/ab.c:2278: undefined reference to > `SSL_CTX_set_info_callback' > *** Error code 1 > > # openssl version > OpenSSL 0.9.8m 25 Feb 2010 Looks like you're linking against one version of the OpenSSL shlibs, but configuring/compiling using headers from a different one. Can't tell for sure from the small snippet of output you've given there though. Are you trying to build apache from source outside the ports? Not using the ports implies that you like sitting down and beating your brains out over all these sorts of problems yourself, rather than just using the solution provided for you by the port maintainer. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkurOV4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyslQCbBwsyzUnZf/Fi9/j09nzlRfDp QNYAnjWYcrkehGXYwgx0zzNpW4G90ld7 =SOmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 11:45:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77285106566B; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kensmith@buffalo.edu) Received: from localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.5.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312FB8FC18; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A84C49E8; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:36:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935F39EC; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mweb2.acsu.buffalo.edu (mweb2.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.5.239]) by localmailB.acsu.buffalo.edu (Prefixe) with ESMTP id 7F16C8D2; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ken-smiths-macbook-pro.local (cpe-76-180-182-44.buffalo.res.rr.com [76.180.182.44]) by mweb2.acsu.buffalo.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09045207A9; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:36:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BAB4AB9.2090908@buffalo.edu> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:36:25 -0400 From: Ken Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Strobl References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PM-EL-Spam-Prob: XX: 27% X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:50:39 +0000 Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, kensmith@freebsd.org, Adam PAPAI Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:45:52 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/24/10 6:38 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: >> You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, >> and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. >> > > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some > interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that > cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported > by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able > to run buildworld in 1 hour at most (unfortunately I currently > just can't find that email). My 4x1.5GHz V440 I originally > intended for this purpose unfortunately still takes 72 minutes > last time I checked. I suspect a 8x1.2GHz V880 would be able > to meet this requirement but I simply can't afford the housing > for such a beast. I have none that are faster than 900MHz processors, and the one with the most processors in it is 6x750MHz. > Ken, did the V880s at your university become available as > intended some time ago? At the moment there are two - one being used by portmgr@ for package builds which is the 6x750MHz machine. The other I do the monthly snapshots and release builds on, it's 4x900MHz. This was its performance on the world built of 7.3-RELEASE: >>> World build started on Sat Mar 20 23:34:54 EDT 2010 >>> World build completed on Sun Mar 21 00:50:58 EDT 2010 - -- Ken Smith - - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkurSrkACgkQ/G14VSmup/aDPACeM4Whnkrn2UfQys/22Y4qTCOa 7soAnAnjusO81m0q/9fvMBDTYR9LjUgj =l35W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 13:59:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991FF106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630E38FC0A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so2032439qwi.7 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:59:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.235.1 with SMTP id ke1mr1517453qcb.3.1269525558166; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:29:18 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fd22f66781b6079f Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Telephony Hardware Support in FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:59:19 -0000 Hello, I have searched the Hardware FAQ and Release Notes on the main FBSD portal and I can't seem to find a list of supported Telephony devices for Asterisk sucha as those produced by Digium, Rhino, Sangoma, Voicetronix, Pika, etc. Does anyone happen to know if there is a FBSD Telephony group/page/list/forum where I can find a list of compatible HW for FBSD? Thanks in advance, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 14:20:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72695106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C548FC0C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so3147460fxm.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g4Gh2z11qSDa/wXW8o2jXJLrg69J2YAe2VnH+OfZi0M=; b=MJpVSi8Zk569IjUx3uznlGzfP9tmq1rWEgP5FnAtFC1Vs7w1RXTU7994Cypwe08j9E w8YaD/KKx0JuqXTjm64bf2yyBLs/3k+gyAxehhW+1V4RpH2TsYMzGRqjzHN85xf0CSc0 PXIz8QyniEfbwrv5xl39XmvyA6t1kr5tQ+lbI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YP+DofQRFWYX44nLc23NvZoiot96fnfZ3Tg0d+I/HuIBpc/z6kRMPsvsWloAEmhwn5 1p/tkptgdEwsG3gX6ctJJ8GpDo4Rbdyi/dPElRWg4XJOw1KIIkn/xFQ6vOzNv6mIIbA7 +zJqRIp77wrs/uYjR1liS3zCZmYOoWSyDCBiI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.150.201 with SMTP id o9mr1833834hbb.151.1269526845192; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BAB2773.5060503@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20100324103151.GA2598@potato> <4BA9F87E.7050205@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4BAB2773.5060503@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:20:45 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: John , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple zfs query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:20:49 -0000 On 25 March 2010 09:05, Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24/03/2010 21:23:54, krad wrote: > > If you want 100% of the drives you could have a pool per drive. Its not > as > > nice as one big pool, but its less risky than one big raid0 > > Errr... no it's not. The risk of something going wrong is exactly the > same. The only advantage is that you may have less data to restore when > things do go wrong. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkurJ3MACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyjLwCfdkpLP2MvtWPWBOE4Db/bJRNR > tBkAnRA2ZcoGN/LwGaoY9gfkNkdOq6kE > =O87f > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > That was my point. Less to restore, less risk of stuff being out of date or corrupt. So less risk than a stripe. Marginal maybe i agree, but less all the same. You could also make copies=2 on the root pool fs if you are using one big stripe, to try and reduce the risk. However this is more wasteful than raidz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 15:34:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1800106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0498FC19 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAFQfq0tR88u2/2dsb2JhbACbJHS/Q4R9BI5K Received: from 182.203-243-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.243.203.182]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2010 16:34:35 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2PFYYSK007991; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:34:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: Tim Gustafson Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:34:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <2092844706.52171269486849103.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> In-Reply-To: <2092844706.52171269486849103.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201003251634.34130.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8 / amd64 / Xorg / nvidia GeForce 5200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:46 -0000 On Thursday 25 March 2010 04:14:09 Tim Gustafson wrote: > My workstation runs FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64. I have Xorg 1.6.5 and > an nVidia GeForce 5200 dual head video card. > > Currently the first head of the card is operating well using the "nv" > driver. I tried to compile the nvidia-driver port, but it tells me > that I need nvidia-driver-173 because the 5200 chipset isn't > supported by the current driver. When I go to compile > nvidia-driver-173 it tells me that it is not supported under the > amd64 architecture. I can't switch to an i386 kernel because I need > the amd64 architecture to take advantage of all my RAM and also > because I am using ZFS on this workstation, which more or less > requires the amd64 architecture. > > So, I have two questions: > > 1. Is there any way to get the nvidia-driver-173 port to work with my > amd64 OS? > > 2. Is there any way to get the second head of the 5200 video card to > work using the nv driver? I tried adding a second device section to > xorg.conf but the system errors out telling me that it tried to use > conflicting hardware. I've attached both my xorg.conf and my > Xorg.0.log file to this message. For dual head you need xrandr 1.2 I believe and I'm not sure the nv driver supports that for your card. You could check by running xrandr in a terminal window. It should list the different outputs of your graphics card. In my case: Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 1280 x 1280 VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm 1280x800 60.0*+ 1280x720 59.9 1152x768 59.8 1024x768 60.0 59.9 800x600 60.3 59.9 640x480 59.9 59.4 S-video disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) This means I have outputs "VGA-0", "LVDS" and "S-video". All you need in xorg.conf is a monitor section for each of these outputs with the Identifier string matching an output name. Section "Monitor" Identifier "Ouput0" # set this to an output like "VGA-0" VendorName "NEC" ModelName "MultiSync LCD 195VX" HorizSync 30.0 - 50.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 63.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Output1" # set this to an output like "VGA-1" VendorName "NEC" ModelName "MultiSync LCD 195VX" HorizSync 30.0 - 50.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 63.0 Option "DPMS" Option "RightOf" "Output0" # set this to an output like "VGA-0" EndSection If the nv driver doesn't seem to support xrandr 1.2, you could give the nouveau driver a try. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 15:36:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8541106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAE58FC16 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so2068605qwi.7 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:36:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.242.85 with SMTP id lh21mr1244824qcb.67.1269531364265; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:36:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2b677bda1003250749i5b3209b9i8b6b12b8a6fbef3e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b677bda1003250749i5b3209b9i8b6b12b8a6fbef3e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:06:04 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bc89aef6654e2809 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Telephony Hardware Support in FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:36:05 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jerry B. Altzman wrot= e: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:59, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> >> Hello, >> I have searched the Hardware FAQ and Release Notes on the main FBSD >> portal and I can't seem to find a list of supported Telephony devices >> for Asterisk sucha as those produced by Digium, Rhino, Sangoma, >> Voicetronix, Pika, etc. >> > > There's an asterisk-bsd mailing list: > > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > I use asterisk 1.2 on BSD 6.1 with digium tdm31 card and it works pretty > well. >> >> Does anyone happen to know if there is a FBSD Telephony >> group/page/list/forum where I can find a list of compatible HW for >> FBSD? >> > > see above. digium is OK, but linux is better supported. Thanks Jerry. I am looking into a Openvox A400p01 FXO board but dunno if it's supported in FBSD. Being that a list run by Digium I dunno if it's wise to ask questions about competing cards? Thanks, Alejandro Imass > >> >> Alejandro Imass > > //jbaltz > -- > jerry b. altzman =A0 =A0jbaltz@gmail.com =A0www.jbaltz.com > foo mane padme hum > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 15:50:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF117106567D for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from s2m-is-001.service2media.com (rev-130-102.virtu.nl [217.114.102.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655368FC19 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kaas.localnet ([10.0.1.77] RDNS failed) by s2m-is-001.service2media.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:50:51 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:50:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-20-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <2092844706.52171269486849103.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> In-Reply-To: <2092844706.52171269486849103.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003251650.48726.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2010 15:50:51.0666 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2289F20:01CACC32] Cc: Tim Gustafson Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8 / amd64 / Xorg / nvidia GeForce 5200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:50:54 -0000 On Thursday 25 March 2010 04:14:09 Tim Gustafson wrote: > 1. Is there any way to get the nvidia-driver-173 port to work with my amd64 > OS? I'm afraid it's not possible. > 2. Is there any way to get the second head of the 5200 video card to work > using the nv driver? I tried adding a second device section to xorg.conf > but the system errors out telling me that it tried to use conflicting > hardware. I've attached both my xorg.conf and my Xorg.0.log file to this > message. Did you try xrandr? It should report multiple heads (run the command without arguments). You can then enable the second monitor using something like: xrandr --output DVI1 --auto - Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 16:24:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A51065670 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6208FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so221568wwb.13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:24:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.154.208 with SMTP id h58mr241585wek.46.1269534250273; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:24:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:24:10 -0300 Message-ID: <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> From: Mario Lobo To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:24:13 -0000 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo > Hi; > > I followed the instructions from > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > to see if I can achieve some performance gain (8-STABLE r205630 amd64) and > also get a more modern instruction set for my Phenom II (amdfam10), so I've > done the following config settings: > > make.conf > > .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*) && exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc43) > CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc43 > CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++43 > CPP=/usr/local/bin/cpp43 > CFLAGS+=-mssse3 > CPUTYPE=amdfam10 > .endif > > libmap.conf > > libgcc_s.so.1 gcc43/libgcc_s.so.1 > libgomp.so.1 gcc43/libgomp.so.1 > libobjc.so.3 gcc43/libobjc.so.2 > libssp.so.0 gcc43/libssp.so.0 > libstdc++.so.6 gcc43/libstdc++.so.6 > > > buildworld goes on normally it seems, but when I tried to build the kernel, > the first stop came from the option used by the kernel build "-fformat- > extensions", which is not accepted by gcc43, so I took it out of > /usr/src/sys/conf/kern.mk, the ONLY place I found it. > > It seemed to solve the problem until gcc43 stopped because of the "-Werror" > option, which is all over the place!. Funny that gcc42 (used by default) > doesn't stop because of this option. > > Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with > gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league? > > Thanks, > -- > Mario Lobo > > Any suggestions/Comments? Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm? I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang. Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 16:30:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421C7106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5848FC22 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so3291730fxm.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=3SXKHIHf8Ldk7ROxpVhbROH2Ze9jNxonB3WFtXKWJwo=; b=ZU5cMrgX1LVri9BXjWC7YiZhg0gaq0nULiAQExiAlYBkFJLmxKGwc9oXzMeCxoiHwx EzGx+jAE5nmD3WHOHABAcmk3LdG7ZZ0hpqDa1le5PduElJUeNGTWe1hzMhDk1aMNyHOw L9g5+5pDQbwhCHdPnj3nuX3AhAHxNtbgtDTQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=DRLc2XzzmRTShg0oIAPLj+RfBNqX6aPsFToDbOzpW48o36e1pNH+rEiiWpeAv68XRf JFE4/Bx2g+HaLdvpkYXRGeF8Il0WHOs/rH3oq/0RbtR5fAt942T5D7KRfwvAqqr5r2ZF GAI445I3YXV3nBic8Ru/zbkZQ7ITjBX7uydqw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.182.5 with SMTP id o5mr435512hbg.160.1269534616567; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:29:56 +0200 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: creating a socket for use with nc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:30:18 -0000 I have a program which reads from stdin. I'd like to be able to close the terminal it is running in and interact with it via nc -U. How can I create a socket which I attach to the stdin of the program? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 16:41:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4D71065672 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EB68FC0C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-100-7.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.100.7]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E081E761; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:41:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o2PGfVdF002146; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:41:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:41:30 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Eitan Adler Message-Id: <20100325174130.fd9be132.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating a socket for use with nc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:41:34 -0000 On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:29:56 +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: > I have a program which reads from stdin. I'd like to be able to close > the terminal it is running in and interact with it via nc -U. > How can I create a socket which I attach to the stdin of the program? I think what you want - I'm not sure I understood you corretly - is a combination of a named pipe created by the mkfifo program, and the detach program from the ports collection. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 13:11:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BB81065674; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8961B8FC19; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (orac.jarasoft.net [10.10.10.10]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9204D23440; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from jarasc430 (unknown [10.10.10.100]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 55A9022905; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4FBFE9F90804409B855AD118FE27B11E@jarasc430> From: "Jack Raats" To: , , Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:00 +0100 Organization: JaRaSoft, Steenbergen, Nederland MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Relayed-By: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on orac.jarasoft.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:42:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Exchange ActiveSync account X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:11:09 -0000 Hi, I have an Exchange ActiveSync account and I would like to get this mail = on my freebsd 7.3-stable server. I donn't haven an imap or pop account, only the information of the = activesync account. Can anyone give me a clue how to achieve this? Thanks for your time! Jack Raats From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 14:11:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6A61065670 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BAD8FC08 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92865 invoked by uid 98); 25 Mar 2010 14:26:17 +0000 Received: from 192.168.0.2 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.95.1/9971. hbedv: 7.9.1.53/7.1.6.174. spamassassin: 3.2.5. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.2):. Processed in 0.058801 secs); 25 Mar 2010 14:26:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (192.168.0.2) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 14:26:17 +0000 From: Craig Butler To: Ken Smith In-Reply-To: <4BAB4AB9.2090908@buffalo.edu> References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> <4BAB4AB9.2090908@buffalo.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:00 +0000 Message-ID: <1269526260.2007.3.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:52:37 +0000 Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, kensmith@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:11:09 -0000 On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 07:36 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 3/24/10 6:38 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, > >> and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. > >> > > > > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some > > interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that > > cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported > > by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able > > to run buildworld in 1 hour at most (unfortunately I currently > > just can't find that email). My 4x1.5GHz V440 I originally > > intended for this purpose unfortunately still takes 72 minutes > > last time I checked. I suspect a 8x1.2GHz V880 would be able > > to meet this requirement but I simply can't afford the housing > > for such a beast. > > I have none that are faster than 900MHz processors, and the > one with the most processors in it is 6x750MHz. > > > Ken, did the V880s at your university become available as > > intended some time ago? > > At the moment there are two - one being used by portmgr@ > for package builds which is the 6x750MHz machine. The > other I do the monthly snapshots and release builds on, > it's 4x900MHz. This was its performance on the world > built of 7.3-RELEASE: > > >>> World build started on Sat Mar 20 23:34:54 EDT 2010 > >>> World build completed on Sun Mar 21 00:50:58 EDT 2010 > Can we bend the rules a little ?? Who set the requirement of an hour ? freebsd-update might be a good thing to have.. Cheers Craig B From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 16:55:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407001065676 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95CC8FC13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so3318763fxm.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lUZnVV8C2QOP21aJmZTxJeqyfQwGKykYZni+MuKV1/U=; b=Mhx9d3vkrGri0qh3aEEisPmE7uCffbscUp8OhvTNlQWJ7wzEe+Y8sDmJi3DgIYj/nJ JuVTTzquHeBsHsOHXGUzOnbZd+Zul0gu7c0h9Kv6ImKSFKS3rVGdsSa1vvqbxwhVWTcV fhy4rMKFrsz2xwIj2SBEUv+8QUHarTencDHxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=trSkFKF254za367/aRjUoLEUicoYvgCWQZRZinOb1Zt+rXqXRy/Enf87Wi3HFGjaMl LUw9zAjXouhXYbdaXNiLpRZm8P/Yz5B6E9doCQ2PLdohT1E7csxorxb3sorUE+s0sJah RyO0rcSJJ4CwOX+Zx9uXXFFqVWP4E5ChZh0fg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.182.5 with SMTP id o5mr439379hbg.160.1269536124610; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100325174130.fd9be132.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20100325174130.fd9be132.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:55:04 +0200 Message-ID: To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating a socket for use with nc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:55:26 -0000 > I think what you want - I'm not sure I understood you > corretly - is a combination of a named pipe created by > the mkfifo program, and the detach program from the > ports collection. Either I don't understand how to use mkfifo or it is not what I want. mkfifo ppp; cat ppp; cat /dev/urandom |nc -U ppp; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 17:04:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A41065678; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCE08FC08; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so253322wwb.13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PW6qRl84kF0msL5j+jubKb/FmZ2ekLm+LNbaRzxpxHA=; b=Ohue8W1XHjegGq6K6r/hlEErAYEK+3ebDAmqDW4thsQ9UKLNfObzE2jKqvLCmeunad jaZEwr4+u7G9wnbmRPvBchS78YQCn7h58cZXdLuMECD1oWSee/OOEUsOhu6hnwLmJPFu aotqr0BPykEVB87RtiTTQUw2uIk8HrZCWVoUQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=pgQMCPDYhcpv0UXKMTRm5Jf3k4A7hBXTOrbsSvZnyhNX+8JmvYIRQEt/mIXoKbQvxB HDeQNt3N1kgTnniCQhPAIyW4pnbrg9b/FiCHT0Wm12ZOsbQXUupmYpwwge4eEkoaURD1 vibZIBzcPdTVxF4d2k9D0fVQffWsTUWKB4t5Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.213 with SMTP id c63mr5491123wef.8.1269536657905; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:04:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:04:17 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: Mario Lobo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:04:19 -0000 If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't be able to build the kernel with -Werror. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 17:18:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3B6106567B; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D488FC33; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so264551wwb.13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:18:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.83 with SMTP id x61mr3099855wee.7.1269537514874; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:18:34 -0300 Message-ID: <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> From: Mario Lobo To: Ryan Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:18:37 -0000 2010/3/25 Ryan Stone > If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own > build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the > gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so > until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't > be able to build the kernel with -Werror. > All right !! Thanks for replying ! There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is enabled How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for world/kernel? will this "damage" the resulting kernel/world binaries? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 17:30:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4986106564A; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117018FC1A; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id d26so646435eyd.9 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:30:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wO1MCFAFV2YHxyzEurZCiLSrunlip8Icf1IYdkMrtps=; b=IBi5UxqiX6Si8o7Q0OjzAyfzHIJZop3eY7X1rwG75U3dPhdfNOrX9Jaq8FPiC3Pht6 FuAYtrkRmwikTHFIj+wUZrQNVauFmvx1uR1IkNrrtDtkh6GfkO5c9JmOiuGDI+BFj50A 90OE1fkpuvxMU6wF1DNiGsXw6dDif5U7uER3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u9g6VGwyZpSCiZO+ts/oHhMZMqFNjiKn1FoQgP8KVjilmGMUHBX7Ek02NujhoJUT4V +k7jRaI2GXrvBNFmeeVg9YG6IGyp8QtugvJQV2otiLeVuL5uWfbgzrbcaBlbV5bnCzeq Xh3amwDuZK9zmDcIvLuPib5gWDXgYA9fmi6aU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.55.79 with SMTP id t15mr2737421ebg.19.1269538229902; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:30:29 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: Mario Lobo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:31 -0000 -Wnoerror should disable it, but I don't know enough about the FreeBSD build infrastructure to tell you where it needs to go. Worst comes to worst you can just delete all of the -Werrors. Disabling -Werror will not cause any problems. -Werror means "treat warnings as errors". It's very useful for development but in your case, where you're starting with a known good source tree with no warnings with earlier compilers, it's not necessary to have the option enabled. If the warnings are pointing to legitimate bugs, those bugs also exist in a kernel built by gcc 4.2, so your kernel can't be any worse than what you already have. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 17:39:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36C9106566B; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hinokind@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (mail-ew0-f214.google.com [209.85.219.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199908FC1B; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so2411245ewy.4 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:39:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:to:cc:subject :references:date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=NmdXkf3z8GXP5YSKHhvKdpAzO3QJ3gD3mPviz79nRDE=; b=rO2MdrcwGhB999dpy5PWx0akzbhgnpwlfp++opqhaGLCNIdPg6a99a1MvwE1F8KGgi dqkGYAJu823DtgbUO0bJOlt3y/wLHaSkD9qx7Zl/ooEhv0AiJsH9rsApbRyqIDr5M4mW NA1EkiyNBarE7awAQ50uJGE1ARKW97SE4ZR10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=W8t69+e6wlDs5t5A3g1Hvzq3EiLA364n48BS5bAjbm2PPS4NKh1OfAZTeNfBXIpykG s1wl2Sax90TD60PSTuhojI6PaV91L0DKCV5KEWGUHAMQ4bq41N3u6Jw9QfUaRPcc9858 Wj3mmSFT6ol2sJVr+VDD3+JYuy8cUb8xhjsE4= Received: by 10.213.109.201 with SMTP id k9mr3079598ebp.95.1269537165949; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klevas (hst-17-80.splius.lt [77.79.17.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm949990ewy.5.2010.03.25.10.12.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Mario Lobo" , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:12:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcml1cyBNb3JrxatuYXM=?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:39:50 -0000 On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:24:10 +0200, Mario Lobo wrote: > Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm? > > I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang. > > Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports? ClangBSD had little to no runtime testing, so you should be careful with it. I'm not saying it won't work, but make sure you have backups in case something goes wrong. Also, if you just want to build the kernel, you don't need ClangBSD, you can just install llvm-devel from ports and use > make CC=/usr/local/bin/clang buildkernel Some people ran or are running their systems with clang compiled kernel. You should still be careful, and some things (like snd_hda on amd64) are known to have problems. -- Andrius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 18:00:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC30106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FF78FC18 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so3703731wyb.13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/BMP9I+cuOKAUFqIDhh81SmytxyS1jyn+P5bZOTSw6o=; b=kyvmnmp0Tvbf08+WNQNgVgXt2piq1XUbpmt8fmXz8HDYn++OS0KZlrNnm9IxDnm378 yB0qbN9oDgGF+knepzzbGGZXOwENxx6RILyZZWdxkU8DvhgxErxUxan99Hhh/xs2Nzyb TdMKafd4VC7/X6Fy4cCgNvAisrb+c4Mh3d79U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GUTZ9uRm0/e23LnC6vRcYvy6zWdZhJbPLcm+WFMID7uQ+dGSSn0onlJDEJPu+jIxy5 MLbDK7KZPFHuAkArF7gNBjrZcJ+kxGt2xDvuNpzv12rtVtcsBEyrAZ6LTKnlT3BD79t7 9giHaUlsNYgqlSb/LtQ6LXbODx7thspuBo61g= Received: by 10.216.86.129 with SMTP id w1mr1147865wee.174.1269540054486; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm3785256gvf.27.2010.03.25.11.00.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:00:51 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100325180051.6e965320@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100325174130.fd9be132.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20100325174130.fd9be132.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: creating a socket for use with nc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:00:56 -0000 On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:41:30 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > and the detach program from the ports collection. Is there a reason for preferring that over daemon(8) in the base system? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 18:01:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355F8106566C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f199.google.com (mail-pz0-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095588FC0C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so2040221pzk.7 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DTmGVZyNxhGkVKd/mb9+YUhtlDMesHk2/L9FXv+r2HE=; b=CZHQg0xmSY6yHPpTJyrdkFP58ZCOLaPEPq70IPsh3frNUtZnf2Uf0+v3Pf0oviqT9m A1vZIMHZqfkNW9cRNXYq9FZCorhY6+s07ZFuVd+R2ZtMSSRSepcGC5dN3gSSvdyjv3Md vfg1N098SEhYfMvNwl/9PNSIcrrOjtIyGBQe8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aFMcpptsYIRMGn3hZcpWYUGNwv9/63mxaGe0dzAvBmVPbb7eU9V93YN1ZzFXwaLKWQ 1EXFYV/YCcMVdU8RNEs68TYiCVJsv5mqUPnk4hjfbmCmYSTemlzpysj6WWIdiYGUTHya 5kOcEBTTzSjZ3flHbREovcyDdtzIElSq2ysmc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.237.24 with SMTP id k24mr163096wah.29.1269538267206; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:31:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:31:07 -0700 Message-ID: <7d6fde3d1003251031v3564bc5q6ecea8de125947f5@mail.gmail.com> From: Garrett Cooper To: Mario Lobo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ryan Stone , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:01:06 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Mario Lobo wrote: > 2010/3/25 Ryan Stone > >> If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own >> build. =A0The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the >> gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so >> until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't >> be able to build the kernel with -Werror. >> > > All right !! Thanks for replying ! > > There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is > enabled > How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for > world/kernel? > will this "damage" the resulting kernel/world binaries? -Wno-error . -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 18:30:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3797D106566B; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brucec@muon.cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:679::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CAF8FC1D; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 434B89565; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:21 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Mario Lobo Message-ID: <20100325183020.GA24363@muon.cran.org.uk> References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9884b5281003251018g2599bfc9nec53b84253372e42@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ryan Stone , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:22 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:18:34PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: > All right !! Thanks for replying ! > > There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is > enabled > How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for > world/kernel? > will this "damage" the resulting kernel/world binaries? You should be able to use NO_WERROR in src.conf to prevent -Werror being used. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 18:30:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5981065672 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156CC8FC0C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so2237666qyk.13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.232.137 with SMTP id ju9mr5876218qcb.54.1269541827133; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:30:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FBFE9F90804409B855AD118FE27B11E@jarasc430> References: <4FBFE9F90804409B855AD118FE27B11E@jarasc430> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:00:26 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3b1ae6a6e520d86b Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Jack Raats Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Exchange ActiveSync account X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:34 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Jack Raats wrote: > Hi, > > I have an Exchange ActiveSync account and I would like to get this mail on my freebsd 7.3-stable server. > I donn't haven an imap or pop account, only the information of the activesync account. > > Can anyone give me a clue how to achieve this? Please avoid cross-posting without a good reason, or at least ask pardon for it. msynctool and/or fetchmail might be an option. In any case you need an agent who can pop the mail and push it to another place, it has nothing to do with your MTA. It's more like MUA to MUA, pardon my french. That is precisely whet fetchmail was created for, but I don't know anything about the Exchange ActiveSync protocol(s) to know if fetchmail could directly use it. AFAIK the Exchange ActiveSync protocol was built for high latency low bandwith networks, so maybe you need something more specific and _perhaps_ you can interface _that_ to fetchmail somehow. Maybe something that sits in between Exchange ActiveSync and delivers an off-the-shelf protocol such as imap (if you want to manage folders you will need imap or better), somthing like: [ Exchange Active Sync ] <--EASP--> [X agent]<--IMAP-->[fetchmail] Now all you need to find is that X agent ;-) Best, Alejandro Imass > > Thanks for your time! > > Jack Raats > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 18:46:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641471065675 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glimp@live.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6FF8FC1A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP46 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:46:07 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [151.49.231.128] X-Originating-Email: [glimp@live.com] Message-ID: Received: from aodai.collidiamo.net ([151.49.231.128]) by BLU0-SMTP46.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:46:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:45:31 +0100 From: daniele User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2010 18:46:06.0805 (UTC) FILETIME=[6DAB8050:01CACC4B] Subject: ooops ! 'ls' & "last modified" column X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:46:08 -0000 Hello People ! I just finished installing FreeBSD on a "machine" whose CMOS time is not set to UTC. The System time is reported correctly (using 'date') but, suprisingly (?), 'ls -la' reports that, among others, the files belonging to "the skeleton" in the user home have been modified... in the future (1 hour later) ! No problems with new files or modifying already existing files . Is there a problem somewhere ? d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 18:48:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1061065672 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645398FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2PImwrt004549 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4BABB01A.4080901@rawbw.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:48:58 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: xterm: why after I put gdb in background, Ctrl-X stops working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:48:59 -0000 I have code window showing in gdb (Ctrl-X a), and all is fine. After I put gdb into background (Ctrl-Z) and back (fg) Ctrl-X stops working. Pressing Ctrl-X just causes ^X to appear. I think some terminal settings aren't right after coming back from background. How to fix this? I use kde4 and konsole. Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 19:41:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6E3106566C; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D1F8FC14; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so13924fxm.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:41:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=wQQLrsIVREf/5lFkSZ1GHOoeU8EirT8Y9bwll+G4ljg=; b=tuqhtxfCLo1/1ceF6oHf3mQpKLt/kE9GfAWsIahp3Kldf9e9B064BFmK2s9M4f392B 8BpvmXOBGGGUqTHFhm7wpe7PQHPiewROOcKsv1XKWPk+yLzKDEBviHIwwu8P0LH/rkPn T13Nu3w+9WdyhwrXZ70MqA/Dxx4d/8ShnXuvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=ASJ8yuXB7+5mLFYm6t0dSeWLSujbuXEjpyv1MQljoTfkXbpkXk8UeSuNvI2nzyTOoF Xqe0zRLU8Tl1ANwhO6kcc3duFb0MqmUq+37OfuKj4Cw0ZPFoLuF3R8UAoS8ztBiHvBhh 3Ns4r39L5xLRQa+lZaaDKm/lMz/Z9ibmZxVeQ= Received: by 10.102.7.12 with SMTP id 12mr3190216mug.104.1269544332150; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (45.81.datacomsa.pl [195.34.81.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm100850mue.34.2010.03.25.12.12.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Napiera=C5=82a?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= In-Reply-To: <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:12:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <52C0E835-3C10-47B6-9607-485502D2AB9D@FreeBSD.org> References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> To: Mario Lobo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:41:48 -0000 Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. = 17:24: > 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo >>=20 >> Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel = with >> gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my = league? This is what I use to compile kernel on 9.0-CURRENT/amd64: CC=3D /usr/local/bin/gcc44 CXX=3D /usr/local/bin/g++44 CWARNFLAGS=3D -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs = -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual = \ -Wno-pointer-sign -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=3D0 \ -Wno-unused-function -Wno-inline -Wno-format \ -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-array-bounds = -Wno-missing-prototypes Note that this is GCC 4.4.4, installed from ports. Also, this will not compile the world - only the kernel. Also, they were a few fixes to = make this work; they were not MFC-ed, iirc; removing -Werror altogether = should work around these problems. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 20:53:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1262106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A330D8FC17 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2PKqlNY018362 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:52:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201003252052.o2PKqlNY018362@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:52:47 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: popd to send Mail to a Mac X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:53:02 -0000 I like to receive mail on a FreeBSD system and want to continue to do so but occasionally, I have a message that needs to be forwarded to a Macintosh in my office. It turns out that Mac's do not do normal smtp mail like sendmail but one of the options is pop. I installed popd on the FreeBSD server and want to be able to feed messages meant for the Mac to popd at which point, I should be able to retrieve them on that mac. The normal scenario is: Mail comes in and I read it. One message has a 20-mile-long url to a javascrypt-infested web site that lynx can't handle. I should forward this message to the Mac and there, I can use safari to handle that message. Those are the only messages that will need to go through popd so I need a simple way to feed them in so the Mac can get them out. Thanks. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 21:01:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD34106566B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0B58FC19 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (Kerio Connect 7.0.0 patch 1) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:01:42 -0400 References: <201003252052.o2PKqlNY018362@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Message-Id: <046F1D9E-1A59-4FB7-95E7-3CA97CFD7D24@olivent.com> From: mikel king To: Martin McCormick In-Reply-To: <201003252052.o2PKqlNY018362@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:01:43 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: popd to send Mail to a Mac X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:01:52 -0000 On Mar 25, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: > I like to receive mail on a FreeBSD system and want to > continue to do so but occasionally, I have a message that needs > to be forwarded to a Macintosh in my office. It turns out that > Mac's do not do normal smtp mail like sendmail but one of the > options is pop. > > I installed popd on the FreeBSD server and want to be > able to feed messages meant for the Mac to popd at which point, > I should be able to retrieve them on that mac. > > The normal scenario is: > > Mail comes in and I read it. One message has a 20-mile-long url > to a javascrypt-infested web site that lynx can't handle. I > should forward this message to the Mac and there, I can use > safari to handle that message. > > Those are the only messages that will need to go through > popd so I need a simple way to feed them in so the Mac can get > them out. > > Thanks. > > Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK > Systems Engineer > OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services > Group Why not just roll out IMAP and then it won't matter? Actually if you wanted to use fancy postfix server side filtering I'd recommend you go IMAP anyway. Filter the 'bad' messages into their own folder. Honestly that seems more trouble than it's worth. Regards, Mikel King CEO, Olivent Technologies Senior Editor, BSD News Network Columnist, BSD Magazine 6 Alpine Court, Medford, NY 11763 o: 631.627.3055 c: 631.796.1499 skype:mikel.king http://olivent.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikelking http://twitter.com/mikelking From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 21:42:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA12106566B; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8468FC14; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so731489vws.13 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.47.220 with SMTP id o28mr3290521vcf.126.1269553343471; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([189.70.155.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm4267376vws.8.2010.03.25.14.42.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:42:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:43:36 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201003242258.05830.lobo@bsd.com.br> <9884b5281003250924i462eee68uf2a7eba7dd864033@mail.gmail.com> <52C0E835-3C10-47B6-9607-485502D2AB9D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <52C0E835-3C10-47B6-9607-485502D2AB9D@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201003251843.36898.lobo@bsd.com.br> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:42:25 -0000 On Thursday 25 March 2010 19:12:09 Edward Tomasz Napiera=B3a wrote: > Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24: > > 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo > > > >> Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel > >> with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my > >> league? >=20 > This is what I use to compile kernel on 9.0-CURRENT/amd64: >=20 > CC=3D /usr/local/bin/gcc44 > CXX=3D /usr/local/bin/g++44 > CWARNFLAGS=3D -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-protot= ypes > \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual \ > -Wno-pointer-sign -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=3D0 \ > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-inline -Wno-format \ > -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-array-bounds -Wno-missing-prototyp= es >=20 > Note that this is GCC 4.4.4, installed from ports. Also, this will not > compile the world - only the kernel. Also, they were a few fixes to make > this work; they were not MFC-ed, iirc; removing -Werror altogether should > work around these problems. >=20 > -- > If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my > body? >=20 Adding=20 NO_WERROR=3D WERROR=3D to src.conf did it. It's compiling right now. I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right afte= r=20 the next reboot. Thanks for all the help and info, Guys !! =2D-=20 Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br =46reeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 01:33:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D0B106566B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DCB8FC08 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA4E3A3839; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:33:44 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269567224; x= 1271381624; bh=nPRCxcR1DIEJcuZF5JzFT7FAj9piKFlKHc4lqXyTmXY=; b=e 2zwaCa3kh8zq1bovdoJFaDKmtm1+uMo1rfsawamkLQCRTDaxw96R/93FGwBGWYOZ qMXQLY3yoQ7AZHPolersXS6UbMTm6uFsBBstTp2WMcBUEubax0eG62WLqwCmmDxU cEJhMKT40ATQKXosgtdna1GabdqQUJufY/6rd68Lv8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CoGSddJiOzH0; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:33:44 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0983A3832; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:33:44 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2Q1XgFq094042; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:33:42 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:33:42 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003260133.o2Q1XgFq094042@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu In-reply-to: <201003252052.o2PKqlNY018362@dc.cis.okstate.edu> (message from Martin McCormick on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:52:47 -0500) References: <201003252052.o2PKqlNY018362@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: popd to send Mail to a Mac X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:33:47 -0000 Hi, > Mail comes in and I read it. One message has a 20-mile-long url > to a javascrypt-infested web site that lynx can't handle. I > should forward this message to the Mac and there, I can use > safari to handle that message. You do not forward anything via pop. Instead you filter and save the message to a mailbox. You have popd on your FreeBSD machine set-up to serve this mailbox. On your Mac you use a mail client, that read the mailbox with pop. Pop is a pull service: the client is requesting to read the new messages. You should be able to configure your mail client to search for new messages every now and then, but that will still be initiates by the client. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 01:37:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC161065680 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481648FC0C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7503A3839; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:37:33 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:from:from:message-id:date :date:received:received:received; s=selector1; t=1269567453; x= 1271381853; bh=5UXYUcWzYMAT2t9oKdvdQqXDm5bLbm7fac6y/6wUVV0=; b=K rloJ9YX9xvF9LGeAhGKYdANwfDi4AgbrqKOcJl3/RMHX7YP5DV7Nq3owU5bsazj4 7S0cK+bqoT2hjSGvBGH88QNiEAGUBGRp5DWjhOS6LjqlOCH0Qx1p/pcjV6dqqE9H rJp0ZPkOnCX7nIxMCJnX1n3P+q24hPCwEVB6wjclY8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id b5XV2Vs4Q6xi; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:37:33 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F1953A3832; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:37:33 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2Q1bXBr094059; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:37:33 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:37:33 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <201003260137.o2Q1bXBr094059@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: glimp@live.com In-reply-to: (message from daniele on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:45:31 +0100) References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ooops ! 'ls' & "last modified" column X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:37:36 -0000 Hi, > I just finished installing FreeBSD on a "machine" whose CMOS time is not > set to UTC. > > The System time is reported correctly (using 'date') but, suprisingly > (?), 'ls -la' reports that, among others, the files belonging to "the > skeleton" in the user home have been modified... in the future (1 hour > later) ! Wait one hour :) I had a stange behaviour with some release of FreeBSD (around 7). We are 7 hours ahead of UTC; after a fresh install I usually do a system upgrade to be sure to be up with every patches. It occured to me a couple of times that the installworld would not work, even though I adjkerntz before. The only way I had was to change the CMOS clock to the local time and change it back to UTC after installing world. Of course, after 7 hours the problem would disappear. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 23:36:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4211065672; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146DA8FC08; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id o2PNZwEG044317; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:35:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o2PNZwED044316; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:35:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:35:58 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Craig Butler , cperciva@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100325233558.GI20888@alchemy.franken.de> References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> <4BAB4AB9.2090908@buffalo.edu> <1269526260.2007.3.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1269526260.2007.3.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:37:53 +0000 Cc: Mark Linimon , kensmith@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, Ken Smith , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:36:01 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:11:00PM +0000, Craig Butler wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 07:36 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 3/24/10 6:38 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > >> You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small, > > >> and developer time is limited, we've never set it up. > > >> > > > > > > The last time this topic came up IMO there was quite some > > > interest in getting this running but the showstopper was that > > > cperciva@ said that a requirement for any platform supported > > > by freebsd-update(8) would be that the build server is able > > > to run buildworld in 1 hour at most (unfortunately I currently > > > just can't find that email). My 4x1.5GHz V440 I originally > > > intended for this purpose unfortunately still takes 72 minutes > > > last time I checked. I suspect a 8x1.2GHz V880 would be able > > > to meet this requirement but I simply can't afford the housing > > > for such a beast. > > > > I have none that are faster than 900MHz processors, and the > > one with the most processors in it is 6x750MHz. > > > > > Ken, did the V880s at your university become available as > > > intended some time ago? > > > > At the moment there are two - one being used by portmgr@ > > for package builds which is the 6x750MHz machine. The > > other I do the monthly snapshots and release builds on, > > it's 4x900MHz. This was its performance on the world > > built of 7.3-RELEASE: > > > > >>> World build started on Sat Mar 20 23:34:54 EDT 2010 > > >>> World build completed on Sun Mar 21 00:50:58 EDT 2010 > > > > Can we bend the rules a little ?? Who set the requirement of an hour ? > freebsd-update might be a good thing to have.. > IIRC it was Colin who once mentioned that this was decided by the Security Officers in order to be able to react to high impact security issues affecting multiple branches in a timely manner should the need ever arise. In any case he should be the right person to talk to about this so I CC'ed him. Marius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 04:54:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3756B1065670 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505a.appriver.com [98.129.35.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F308FC1D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:54:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.15 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht02.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G179 G180 G181 G182 G186 G187 G198 G285 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.15] (HELO ht02.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTPS id 33974409 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:54:28 -0500 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.132]) by ht02.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.15]) with mapi; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:54:28 -0500 From: Peter Steele To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:54:27 -0500 Thread-Topic: Very suspicious stack trace Thread-Index: AcrMoGm0gzb64YXNRuGkcS3QvYpxLQ== Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAC95@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Very suspicious stack trace X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:54:30 -0000 We had an app crash and the resulting core dump produced a very suspicious/= confusing stack trace: #0 0x00000008011d438c in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x00000008012722bb in abort () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2 0x00000008011fb70c in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #3 0x00000008011fbb95 in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #4 0x00000008011fdaea in _malloc_thread_cleanup () from /lib/libc.so.7 #5 0x00000008011fdc86 in _malloc_thread_cleanup () from /lib/libc.so.7 #6 0x00000008011fc8e9 in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #7 0x00000008011fccc7 in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #8 0x00000008011ffe8f in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.7 #9 0x000000080127374b in memchr () from /lib/libc.so.7 #10 0x000000080125e6e9 in __srget () from /lib/libc.so.7 #11 0x00000008012352dd in vsscanf () from /lib/libc.so.7 #12 0x0000000801220087 in fscanf () from /lib/libc.so.7 This trace resulted from a call to fscanf, as follows: char sensor[21]; fscanf(in, "%20s", sensor); We've verified that the data being read was correct, and clearly the buffer= in which fscanf is storing the string it reads is valid (i.e., it's not NU= LL). So what would lead malloc() into calling abort()? Everything seems to = be in order. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 07:53:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9656D106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tongai@yoafrica.com) Received: from ns2.yoafrica.com (ns2.yoafrica.com [66.135.41.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644ED8FC08 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zwsmtp2.yoafrica.com ([41.190.32.2]) by ns2.yoafrica.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Nv3QI-0001mq-82 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:53:38 +0200 Received: from [196.44.176.58] (helo=cafemol.yoafrica.com) by zwsmtp2.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Nv3OK-00088m-HJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:51:36 +0200 Received: from zion.yoafrica.com ([196.44.177.43]) by cafemol.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Nv3Pr-000PNH-SK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:53:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4BAC59D4.8050605@yoafrica.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:53:08 +0200 From: "Tongai. T Zimbiti" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ipfw and ssh problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:53:34 -0000 Hi guys, I have searched everywhere and failed to find a solution, hence I write you. I have installed 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 UTC 2009 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 together with ipfw. The problem I have is this, if I am on the box I can restart my firewall with no problem, but when I log in remotely and restart the firewall for reason I am locked out and can not ssh into it. Below is the messages log: Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, nat loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging disabled Mar 25 14:51:06 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP Mar 25 14:51:16 panadine ntpd[645]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) Mar 25 14:51:17 panadine nrpe[698]: Starting up daemon Mar 25 14:51:25 panadine ntpd[646]: kernel time sync status change 2001 Mar 25 14:51:32 panadine su: systz to root on /dev/pts/0 Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to DOWN Mar 25 15:01:47 panadine sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission denied Mar 25 15:01:48 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP Here is a few lines from my /etc/firewall_rules # vim: set syntax=pf : -f flush # Let me talk out add 100 allow all from me to any out keep-state add 101 allow icmp from any to any via any add 102 allow udp from any to any 33434-33523 # Deal with loopback #add 1000 allow all from any to any via lo0 add 1001 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 add 1002 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any # Allow established and fragmented sessions add 2000 allow tcp from any to any established add 2001 allow ip from any to any frag add 2002 check-state add 2003 allow icmp from any to any I have enabled net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf please help regards Tongai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 08:01:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025D8106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D227D8FC17 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o2Q8187E028046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:01:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o2Q818T4028045; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18186; Thu, 25 Mar 10 23:55:29 PST Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:55:15 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: psteele@maxiscale.com Message-Id: <4bac6863.tRIjBQNjM5YzAEsl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAC95@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAC95@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very suspicious stack trace X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:01:12 -0000 Peter Steele wrote: > what would lead malloc() into calling abort()? > Everything seems to be in order. Something may have trashed its internal data structures. I'd suggest a close look for things like buffer overflows. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 08:02:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32FA1065673 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D30C8FC14 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3612 invoked by uid 89); 26 Mar 2010 08:02:21 -0000 Received: from poshta.pknet.net (HELO pop.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 08:02:21 -0000 Received: from 216.241.170.11 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by pop.pknet.net with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:02:21 -0600 Message-ID: <234590d29118c497875b08b14aea2560.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> In-Reply-To: <4BAC59D4.8050605@yoafrica.com> References: <4BAC59D4.8050605@yoafrica.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:02:21 -0600 From: "Peter" To: "Tongai. T Zimbiti" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20-RC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and ssh problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:02:23 -0000 > Hi guys, > > I have searched everywhere and failed to find a solution, hence I write > you. > I have installed 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 > UTC 2009 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > together with ipfw. The problem I have is this, if I am on the box I can > restart my firewall with no problem, but when I log in remotely and > restart the firewall for reason I am locked out and can not ssh into it. > > Below is the messages log: > Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a > Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert > loadable, nat loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, > logging disabled > Mar 25 14:51:06 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP > Mar 25 14:51:16 panadine ntpd[645]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) > Mar 25 14:51:17 panadine nrpe[698]: Starting up daemon > Mar 25 14:51:25 panadine ntpd[646]: kernel time sync status change 2001 > Mar 25 14:51:32 panadine su: systz to root on /dev/pts/0 > Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed > Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to DOWN > Mar 25 15:01:47 panadine sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission denied > Mar 25 15:01:48 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP > > Here is a few lines from my /etc/firewall_rules > > # vim: set syntax=pf : > > -f flush > > # Let me talk out > add 100 allow all from me to any out keep-state > add 101 allow icmp from any to any via any > add 102 allow udp from any to any 33434-33523 > > # Deal with loopback > #add 1000 allow all from any to any via lo0 > add 1001 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > add 1002 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > # Allow established and fragmented sessions > add 2000 allow tcp from any to any established > add 2001 allow ip from any to any frag > add 2002 check-state > add 2003 allow icmp from any to any > > > I have enabled net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf > > please help > > > regards > > > Tongai ipfw -f flush - deletes all rules except the default which is usually 'deny from any to any' As soon as that gets processed, your sshd connection is killed as seen in the message up there: sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission denied With ssh dead, your shell is terminated and the rest of the script is never ran, so you are stuck with a firewall that did not get any rules added to it. Using quiet 'ipfw -q' or doing 'sh /etc/rc.firewall > /dev/null ; sleep 3' is what I've usually done. or my favorite is to do the firewall from 'local console' using 'watch -W v4' so even if ssh is killed, the console is up to finish up the script. [ this works great for 'buildworld' too where I want to start it, pack my laptop and and leave, reconnecting later ] With quiet mode, ssh is not sending anything back, so the connection is not terminated. ]Peter[ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 08:13:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B59F106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuanxuqiang@ceopen.cn) Received: from ent.ce.net.cn (hw.ce.net.cn [74.86.116.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D20358FC18 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (ce send program); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:02:47 +0800 Received: from 123.100.7.27 (HELO powermail.ce.net.cn) (123.100.7.27) by 74.86.116.115 with SMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:02:47 +0800 Received: (ce send program); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:02:45 +0800 X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yuanxuqiang@ceopen.cn Received: from 202.10.76.42 (HELO 62a3d0007abe447) (202.10.76.42) by 121.14.3.185 with SMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:02:45 +0800 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:02:38 +0800 From: "yuanxuqiang" To: "questions" Message-ID: <201003261602378286864@ceopen.cn> Organization: =?us-ascii?B?1tC5+sr9wus=?= X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Install httpd.2.2.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuanxuqiang@ceopen.cn List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:13:47 -0000 Hello, I use FreeBSD 7,and install httpd2.2.14; but use MPM "prefork",perl cgi don't well run.when runing cgi,would appear : Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. apache's err_log : Out of memory during request for , referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] 28, referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] bytes, total sbrk() is , referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] 3166208, referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] bytes!, referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ if use MPM "worker" ,cgi is normal runing. why ? think you answer me. best wishes! yuanxuqiang 2010-02-26 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 10:02:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C792106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A2D8FC1A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so157798fxm.3 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KbslrvGNxgrH/8VURC3YUoaLhs1sPDrzt8/pYdY9KAo=; b=Oo6Xzg25FW15trfYDXunZksqQuWpl0dj1of3nOrvN3PLqbTmSgs+hYQkY4T1b5ZpYB nI7z6ronNcrvJJDGajPoh6gpEUDg9q7PMWSCZYcNRM7rKgAObR7EmG0/BYeRO9Do+rU3 zsM8EiGGtnrPN8rbv8M63Wdl10Zbx2wp35Npc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Oldeys2tO6Vf0pa/uc6V+oCRBQr8ioqAuDPx+DQ4Ewv4C7MFMomEKBLonaHKJtrob8 nc5uzCKJR6FCax4H5OieTXDG1G/PJiQNF1S6jVNFugRAlGHpIAlDtA+N4WH3ygn/iokm xcD1gpg8esoHKQ1UXOBcu3jKO5whVlqaVhRnA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.164.199 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <234590d29118c497875b08b14aea2560.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> References: <4BAC59D4.8050605@yoafrica.com> <234590d29118c497875b08b14aea2560.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:02:33 +0000 Received: by 10.239.183.147 with SMTP id u19mr67768hbg.106.1269597753224; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: krad To: Peter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Tongai. T Zimbiti" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and ssh problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:02:35 -0000 On 26 March 2010 08:02, Peter wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I have searched everywhere and failed to find a solution, hence I write > > you. > > I have installed 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 > > UTC 2009 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > amd64 > > together with ipfw. The problem I have is this, if I am on the box I can > > restart my firewall with no problem, but when I log in remotely and > > restart the firewall for reason I am locked out and can not ssh into it. > > > > Below is the messages log: > > Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: Trying to mount root from > ufs:/dev/ad4s1a > > Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert > > loadable, nat loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, > > logging disabled > > Mar 25 14:51:06 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP > > Mar 25 14:51:16 panadine ntpd[645]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) > > Mar 25 14:51:17 panadine nrpe[698]: Starting up daemon > > Mar 25 14:51:25 panadine ntpd[646]: kernel time sync status change 2001 > > Mar 25 14:51:32 panadine su: systz to root on /dev/pts/0 > > Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed > > Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to DOWN > > Mar 25 15:01:47 panadine sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission > denied > > Mar 25 15:01:48 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP > > > > Here is a few lines from my /etc/firewall_rules > > > > # vim: set syntax=pf : > > > > -f flush > > > > # Let me talk out > > add 100 allow all from me to any out keep-state > > add 101 allow icmp from any to any via any > > add 102 allow udp from any to any 33434-33523 > > > > # Deal with loopback > > #add 1000 allow all from any to any via lo0 > > add 1001 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > add 1002 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > > > # Allow established and fragmented sessions > > add 2000 allow tcp from any to any established > > add 2001 allow ip from any to any frag > > add 2002 check-state > > add 2003 allow icmp from any to any > > > > > > I have enabled net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf > > > > please help > > > > > > regards > > > > > > Tongai > > ipfw -f flush - deletes all rules except the default which is usually > 'deny from any to any' > > As soon as that gets processed, your sshd connection is killed as seen in > the message up there: > sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission denied > With ssh dead, your shell is terminated and the rest of the script is > never ran, so you are stuck with a firewall that did not get any rules > added to it. > > Using quiet 'ipfw -q' or doing 'sh /etc/rc.firewall > /dev/null ; sleep 3' > is what I've usually done. > > or my favorite is to do the firewall from 'local console' using 'watch -W > v4' so even if ssh is killed, the console is up to finish up the script. > [ this works great for 'buildworld' too where I want to start it, pack my > laptop and and leave, reconnecting later ] > > With quiet mode, ssh is not sending anything back, so the connection is > not terminated. > > ]Peter[ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > the default deny can be a pain, there are two ways around it i have used in the past. 1. Compile the kernel module with the the following options options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT 2. Install screen open a screen session and run "ipfw -f ; ipfw add 1 allow all from any to any", the screen session is important as it will guarantee the completion of the command. Its also worth looking at pf, as its configuration is a lot easier than ipfw, especially nating. The macros and table functions are also very good way to right small compact rule sets. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 10:11:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5161B1065674 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tongai@yoafrica.com) Received: from ns2.yoafrica.com (ns2.yoafrica.com [66.135.41.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41CE8FC19 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zwsmtp2.yoafrica.com ([41.190.32.2]) by ns2.yoafrica.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Nv6VK-0008Hd-4Z; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:11:03 +0200 Received: from [196.44.176.58] (helo=cafemol.yoafrica.com) by zwsmtp2.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Nv6Sw-000Gul-CH; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:09:16 +0200 Received: from zion.yoafrica.com ([196.44.177.43]) by cafemol.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Nv6SX-0006SQ-TI; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:08:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4BAC8786.6020004@yoafrica.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:08:06 +0200 From: "Tongai. T Zimbiti" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter References: <4BAC59D4.8050605@yoafrica.com> <234590d29118c497875b08b14aea2560.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> In-Reply-To: <234590d29118c497875b08b14aea2560.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and ssh problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:11:27 -0000 Thanks Peter, will give that a try. regards Tongai Peter wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I have searched everywhere and failed to find a solution, hence I write >> you. >> I have installed 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 >> UTC 2009 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> amd64 >> together with ipfw. The problem I have is this, if I am on the box I can >> restart my firewall with no problem, but when I log in remotely and >> restart the firewall for reason I am locked out and can not ssh into it. >> >> Below is the messages log: >> Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a >> Mar 25 14:51:04 panadine kernel: ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert >> loadable, nat loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, >> logging disabled >> Mar 25 14:51:06 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP >> Mar 25 14:51:16 panadine ntpd[645]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) >> Mar 25 14:51:17 panadine nrpe[698]: Starting up daemon >> Mar 25 14:51:25 panadine ntpd[646]: kernel time sync status change 2001 >> Mar 25 14:51:32 panadine su: systz to root on /dev/pts/0 >> Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed >> Mar 25 15:01:46 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to DOWN >> Mar 25 15:01:47 panadine sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission denied >> Mar 25 15:01:48 panadine kernel: ae0: link state changed to UP >> >> Here is a few lines from my /etc/firewall_rules >> >> # vim: set syntax=pf : >> >> -f flush >> >> # Let me talk out >> add 100 allow all from me to any out keep-state >> add 101 allow icmp from any to any via any >> add 102 allow udp from any to any 33434-33523 >> >> # Deal with loopback >> #add 1000 allow all from any to any via lo0 >> add 1001 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >> add 1002 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >> >> # Allow established and fragmented sessions >> add 2000 allow tcp from any to any established >> add 2001 allow ip from any to any frag >> add 2002 check-state >> add 2003 allow icmp from any to any >> >> >> I have enabled net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf >> >> please help >> >> >> regards >> >> >> Tongai >> > > ipfw -f flush - deletes all rules except the default which is usually > 'deny from any to any' > > As soon as that gets processed, your sshd connection is killed as seen in > the message up there: > sshd[829]: fatal: Write failed: Permission denied > With ssh dead, your shell is terminated and the rest of the script is > never ran, so you are stuck with a firewall that did not get any rules > added to it. > > Using quiet 'ipfw -q' or doing 'sh /etc/rc.firewall > /dev/null ; sleep 3' > is what I've usually done. > > or my favorite is to do the firewall from 'local console' using 'watch -W > v4' so even if ssh is killed, the console is up to finish up the script. > [ this works great for 'buildworld' too where I want to start it, pack my > laptop and and leave, reconnecting later ] > > With quiet mode, ssh is not sending anything back, so the connection is > not terminated. > > ]Peter[ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 10:24:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C921065675 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glimp@live.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s19.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s19.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47278FC1B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP92 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s19.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:24:48 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [151.49.231.39] X-Originating-Email: [glimp@live.com] Message-ID: Received: from aodai.collidiamo.net ([151.49.231.39]) by BLU0-SMTP92.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:24:47 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:24:14 +0100 From: daniele User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201003260137.o2Q1bXBr094059@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <201003260137.o2Q1bXBr094059@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Mar 2010 10:24:47.0979 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FB4A3B0:01CACCCE] Subject: Re: ooops ! 'ls' & "last modified" column X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:24:50 -0000 On 03/26/10 02:37, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > >> I just finished installing FreeBSD on a "machine" whose CMOS time is not >> set to UTC. >> >> The System time is reported correctly (using 'date') but, suprisingly >> (?), 'ls -la' reports that, among others, the files belonging to "the >> skeleton" in the user home have been modified... in the future (1 hour >> later) ! > > Wait one hour :) > > I had a stange behaviour with some release of FreeBSD (around 7). > > We are 7 hours ahead of UTC; after a fresh install I usually do a > system upgrade to be sure to be up with every patches. > > It occured to me a couple of times that the installworld would not > work, even though I adjkerntz before. The only way I had was to change > the CMOS clock to the local time and change it back to UTC aftergive > installing world. > > Of course, after 7 hours the problem would disappear. > > Bests, > > Olivier Hi, Thank you for your interest in my question and related answer :-) I did not have any problem during the installation or the following start-up. I just noticed those "strange" timestamps. But I think that now I understand the behaviour of the installation process (at least in FreeBSD 8.0-Release) as for the timestamps. Basically it is simple: when booting for installation, the system silently (?) thinks the CMOS time is set to UTC and uses the user input for setting _a_ local time. Then it "happens" this local time is the timestamp for _some_ newly created files. After all files have been copied the actual configuration of the clock occurs so that the newly created system will report the correct local time. Later, when the new system boots up, in some cases one can find timestamps in the future for _some_ files and a correct local time. :-) If something (but the local time :-)) is not correct , feel free to send a feedback d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:12:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97B9106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320768FC1C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so2347978qwi.7 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.194 with SMTP id f2mr248224qam.350.1269601971908; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm1959050qwa.3.2010.03.26.04.12.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8D612280C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:12:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:12:48 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:12:53 -0000 I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several directories, actually a parent direct and several sub-directories simultaneously; however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories under it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, foo-2, foo-3} and several other variants and they all failed. I could easily write a simple script to accomplish it; however, I thought I could do it directly from the command line. -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ The only real way to look younger is not to be born so soon. Charles Schulz, "Things I've Had to Learn Over and Over and Over" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:15:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BF91065672 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:20c:29ff:fece:79f3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD778FC16 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:b84a:c6a:44c7:b976] (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:b84a:c6a:44c7:b976]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id 8D7EC23 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:15:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BAC9738.8080305@stillbilde.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:15:04 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:15:06 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26.03.2010 12:12, Jerry wrote: > I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several directories, > actually a parent direct and several sub-directories simultaneously; > however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. > > Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories under > it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, foo-2, foo-3} > and several other variants and they all failed. I could easily write a > simple script to accomplish it; however, I thought I could do it > directly from the command line. > did you try "mkdir -p dirtest/dir1 dirtest/dir2 dirtest/dir3" ? //Svein - -- - --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg Østli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE - --------+-------------------+------------------------------- If you really are in a hurry, mail me at svein-mobile@stillbilde.net This mailbox goes directly to my cellphone and is checked even when I'm not in front of my computer. - ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ - ------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuslzgACgkQODUnwSLUlKT2hwCaAuTsd/NUacDAMYWW6vYFNl2S qykAnRT8ox6UMTO1OsnCvVfg18CF/Qi7 =nPew -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:25:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98253106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543C18FC35 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nv7ex-0005D3-Fk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:25:03 +0100 Received: from nat01.di.fc.ul.pt ([194.117.22.71]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:25:03 +0100 Received: from nmarques by nat01.di.fc.ul.pt with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:25:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Nuno Marques Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nat01.di.fc.ul.pt User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:25:06 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:12:48 -0400, Jerry wrote: > I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several directories, > actually a parent direct and several sub-directories simultaneously; > however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. > > Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories under > it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, foo-2, foo-3} > and several other variants and they all failed. I could easily write a > simple script to accomplish it; however, I thought I could do it > directly from the command line. try mkdir -p foo{,-1,-2,-3} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:33:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63445106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1444B8FC13 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Nv7mc-000P2x-QU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:32:58 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:32:58 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:33:00 -0000 --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:12:48AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several directories, > actually a parent direct and several sub-directories simultaneously; > however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. >=20 > Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories under > it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, foo-2, foo-3} Almost. $ mkdir -p FOO/{foo-1,foo-2,foo-3} --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkusm2oACgkQixf5fBYiFmqDmgCdGO9ZuSoKI/TcP65C93eUPPjT GpQAoIbOOX8jcUlEQSm+iIxNGb/lMoL2 =oMgp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:36:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AB51065675 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C7B8FC1E for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so1382528qyk.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.22.204 with SMTP id o12mr263950qab.261.1269603415209; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm530308qyk.13.2010.03.26.04.36.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EB852280C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:36:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:36:51 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326073651.65ed1d63@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4BAC9738.8080305@stillbilde.net> References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4BAC9738.8080305@stillbilde.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:36:56 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:15:04 +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) articulated: > did you try "mkdir -p dirtest/dir1 dirtest/dir2 dirtest/dir3" ? Yes, and of course it works. I just thought that I had once seen a faster method of accomplishing the same feat. Perhaps I was mistaken. -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ The meek shall inherit the Earth. (But they're gonna have to fight for it.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:45:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB75106567C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872928FC29 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so1388634qyk.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.99.143 with SMTP id u15mr884511qcn.105.1269603899626; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm539727qyk.2.2010.03.26.04.44.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E73D22841 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:44:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:44:56 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326074456.7139c3da@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:45:01 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:32:58 +0000, Daniel Bye articulated: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:12:48AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > > I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several > > directories, actually a parent direct and several sub-directories > > simultaneously; however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. > > > > Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories > > under it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, > > foo-2, foo-3} > > Almost. > > $ mkdir -p FOO/{foo-1,foo-2,foo-3} Thank you; that is exactly what I was looking for. I knew I had seen it somewhere before. -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Blessed are the meek for they shall inhibit the earth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 11:56:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ADE106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jarek@miszczak.eu) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CD28FC1A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so788254wwb.13 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:56:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.28.74 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> From: Jaroslaw Miszczak Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:24:31 +0100 Received: by 10.216.164.132 with SMTP id c4mr447176wel.15.1269602691384; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9a4b16bb1003260424t2a2e1d77h5b73b10c029355fb@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:56:10 -0000 Hi, maybe you need mkdirhier dirtest/dir1 dirtest/dir2 dirtest/dir3 Cheers, Jarek Miszczak On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:12, Jerry wrote: > I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several directories, > actually a parent direct and several sub-directories simultaneously; > however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. > > Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories under > it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, foo-2, foo-3} > and several other variants and they all failed. I could easily write a > simple script to accomplish it; however, I thought I could do it > directly from the command line. > > -- > Jerry > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > The only real way to look younger is not to be born so soon. > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Charles Schulz, "Things I've Had to Learn Over and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Over and Over" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 12:57:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ED6106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505e.appriver.com [98.129.35.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00BC8FC14 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:57:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.45 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht03.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G179 G180 G181 G182 G186 G187 G198 G285 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.45] (HELO HT03.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTPS id 30010283 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:57:42 -0500 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.132]) by HT03.exg5.exghost.com ([10.242.228.75]) with mapi; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:57:43 -0500 From: Peter Steele To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:57:42 -0500 Thread-Topic: Very suspicious stack trace Thread-Index: AcrMoGm0gzb64YXNRuGkcS3QvYpxLQAQ3LOg Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC7@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAC95@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAC95@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Very suspicious stack trace X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:57:45 -0000 I've moved this to freebsd-hackers... -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter Steele Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:54 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Very suspicious stack trace We had an app crash and the resulting core dump produced a very suspicious/= confusing stack trace: #0 0x00000008011d438c in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x00000008012722bb in abort () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2 0x00000008011fb70c in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #3 0x00000008011fbb95 in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #4 0x00000008011fdaea in _malloc_thread_cleanup () from /lib/libc.so.7 #5 0x00000008011fdc86 in _malloc_thread_cleanup () from /lib/libc.so.7 #6 0x00000008011fc8e9 in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #7 0x00000008011fccc7 in malloc_usable_size () from /lib/libc.so.7 #8 0x00000008011ffe8f in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.7 #9 0x000000080127374b in memchr () from /lib/libc.so.7 #10 0x000000080125e6e9 in __srget () from /lib/libc.so.7 #11 0x00000008012352dd in vsscanf () from /lib/libc.so.7 #12 0x0000000801220087 in fscanf () from /lib/libc.so.7 This trace resulted from a call to fscanf, as follows: char sensor[21]; fscanf(in, "%20s", sensor); We've verified that the data being read was correct, and clearly the buffer= in which fscanf is storing the string it reads is valid (i.e., it's not NU= LL). So what would lead malloc() into calling abort()? Everything seems to = be in order. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman= /listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 13:00:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C999B106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505c.appriver.com [98.129.35.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927F08FC19 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:00:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.14 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht01.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G179 G180 G181 G182 G186 G187 G198 G285 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.14] (HELO ht01.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTPS id 34000945 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:00:47 -0500 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.132]) by ht01.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.14]) with mapi; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:00:48 -0500 From: Peter Steele To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:00:46 -0500 Thread-Topic: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller Thread-Index: AcrM5Foa+RjIbmIoRWKO1SoFEdVWSQ== Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:00:50 -0000 Does FreeBSD 8 support the Dell H700 RAID controller? We've been using a 3W= are controller but may need to switch to this controller. What we'd like to= have is a command line interface similar to the tw_cli command so we can c= reate RAID sets on a booted system instead of doing it in the BIOS. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 13:21:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E651A106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdoe6545@yahoo.it) Received: from smtp113.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com (smtp113.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.102.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 780288FC1F for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23593 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 12:54:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date:Message-Id:To:Mime-Version:X-Mailer; b=5sCtOkklcOI4ax+YrLKQpNzX5ZToNggfZRRyUeJy9xwrZMWqLXJSNWM+pQ5f1ZQSRS2KYUcvyhG65c7AuCY8mvS5/uJYv8kU+Lk25FJaGafpN4b3mvvIUO9CBjmcMxcGUuqz6Z110wasWLG2kBTJce0ao4SxrmWb7ux2PYdYvpU= ; Received: from 81-174-13-193.static.ngi.it (gdoe6545@81.174.13.193 with plain) by smtp113.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 05:54:34 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Ldxj1OSswBDyaOddJO96A9qtUCYq X-YMail-OSG: ywfm4f4VM1moLBvbICThqZfkUTL2Eggo.EhxbEffmQa8CnSbgxKeo6S1VSifun0Zf3puck9oco9trVT58Vc_AV6JaY1v39gU7r.LiO6L0sYeFS.YVguw.bmn_fa7zA4sWcIAYPTD74Lkdgf0SPNTk3iS8aCdkPBrGNzvcMmukOgufaLBa.gnzbOBinPtHNgDHnA3txc18bhsbUv6yY7HzE2d6C55p4nilZWlDtFHNjDs42w7OL5KGnB0hEa4AYaHdJw_cXwIemyFckjBMNZgGSWJM1bbjqmax10ysZFh9LaB.gdZKlIvRJ0PlKInNhWyYsnm8y4QpeqRuPQr6eQsgDE3EtK_pm96JRrOjQAHLtpXGo6AAuG6dOsdBc1zc5JjxnrLRqRkhWWdahRgnmTMgYly66CwDKw- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Gianni Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:54:32 +0100 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Subject: ZFS root BTX Loader very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:21:17 -0000 I've installed root on ZFS according to the Wiki. http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror I rebuilt world yesterday and upgraded my zfs pool to version 14 and = also upgraded the bootcode with: gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad4 gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad8 Now on boot the system waits for about 70 seconds at the following = screen: BTX Loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.02 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive A: is disk0 BIOS drive C: is disk1 BIOS drive D: is disk2 BIOS drive E: is disk3 BIOS drive F: is disk4 BIOS drive G: is disk5 _ No errors appear and eventually the system boots normally from the zfs = root. Any ideas why it's taking so long at this stage? what is actually going = on at this point? Thanks Gianni= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 13:42:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57500106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f188.google.com (mail-px0-f188.google.com [209.85.216.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA8E8FC13 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi26 with SMTP id 26so4214372pxi.13 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iWfVCNwJcSZ7WlMoYCX4w1VSxO/e4QO9qg+bFu6c6I0=; b=ObEjvstRrjspzFyPKUjVo+OPoHWZ8XkK3ACtZVI97KAUw+PJ14DQEEHAFuSpHPJXCY MOt61361wCdNzNtywFfLmkeX669WjVqnk5sXYkl1Zq1NzGAsqrVbOcA/kokGor7Or2re BwCVYmtJ2oL5OEI8Vn+CG8RjZnYEzIqujUHJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dnqWxeCZcCpQx+rJYHItHt6HhNLl5r8nqRNzwUXeXUtRCb/khM/S4OY+pvg5HObjf0 peQQCrHeBx5QQ+483VPTBmd1OiQdb8XryWzSOhcFw4Rka2DSE42jTsZn+oAILo0Z2VQc PL6a6wxG/LSEYXbxDeTqN3gInh4CeuMtlABic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.126.16 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:42:20 +0100 Received: by 10.141.89.14 with SMTP id r14mr883695rvl.33.1269610940596; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: gnome gdm diable_user_list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:42:21 -0000 FreeBSD8.0, gnome2-2.28.2_1, using gdm to login. Gdm login screen presents a list of all users on the system to choose from. I don't want the list, just a prompt for a username and password. I tried # gconf-editor this graphical config program allows to set in apps / gdm / simple-greeter the setting 'disable_user_list' to checked (default is not checked) after setting it to checked, closing the program, rebooting I still have the user list at the gdm login window. I verified with starting the gconf-editor again: the option is still checked .. (also $ gconftool-2 -R /apps/gdm/simple-greeter shows: disable_user_list = true ) Why do I still have the user list? How to fix? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 14:00:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC29F1065673 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88458FC1C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.164] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:14:49 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::2 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Message-ID: <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:00:33 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100311 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Steele References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:00:34 -0000 On 03/26/10 09:00, Peter Steele wrote: > Does FreeBSD 8 support the Dell H700 RAID controller? We've been using a 3Ware controller but may need to switch to this controller. What we'd like to have is a command line interface similar to the tw_cli command so we can create RAID sets on a booted system instead of doing it in the BIOS. > > I'm not sure about the H700, but for the PERC5 and PERC6 (previous models...) you can use mfiutil(8) to manage the adapter and create/configure/destroy RAID sets on FreeBSD 8. It's actually pretty nice in comparison to MegaCLI - the LSI provided management utility. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 14:11:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC751065670 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:20c:29ff:fece:79f3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C81A8FC1D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:10e9:f69c:ad15:2e16] (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:10e9:f69c:ad15:2e16]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id 118CC23 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:11:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BACC075.9080606@stillbilde.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:11:01 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:03 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26.03.2010 15:00, Steve Polyack wrote: > On 03/26/10 09:00, Peter Steele wrote: >> Does FreeBSD 8 support the Dell H700 RAID controller? We've been using >> a 3Ware controller but may need to switch to this controller. What >> we'd like to have is a command line interface similar to the tw_cli >> command so we can create RAID sets on a booted system instead of doing >> it in the BIOS. >> >> > I'm not sure about the H700, but for the PERC5 and PERC6 (previous > models...) you can use mfiutil(8) to manage the adapter and > create/configure/destroy RAID sets on FreeBSD 8. It's actually pretty > nice in comparison to MegaCLI - the LSI provided management utility. The only thing mfiutil isn't in all ways superior to both the "webbios" and megacli for, is when setting up cache info. It lacks the "I know what I'm doing, allow me to set writeback for this array even if you don't find a battery for the cache!" as an option. (useful for things like /tmp) //Svein - -- - --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg Østli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE - --------+-------------------+------------------------------- If you really are in a hurry, mail me at svein-mobile@stillbilde.net This mailbox goes directly to my cellphone and is checked even when I'm not in front of my computer. - ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ - ------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuswHUACgkQODUnwSLUlKSDJwCeJeWzr7Zx5Uaje51N7Qwp8N8j BtEAn2os/uG3H5mCjYuIZAk7g/pfVvPX =xH6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 14:11:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0754D1065670 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglas.j.schmidt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD28F8FC1F for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so1181129vws.13 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CFjmV7QjgrrRT3fS6v13C52tuk8xdPFPomvHpO67EB0=; b=wbhUew735WvHXzhW8MtFmuH7utRcH9g7rmomqFzNAow26xIGWEZ+X5OoZiBgQZBz1V 1i7qI9/YxaR7Y80bPGPB9n1fDZx8vpvHtfkB7pAOq6KMGqdUpZqcgviqp67ga+HaxkhP +lHKsnHkrX4VbphiWNk9l67C5C/vm/mbkiIKU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=B81Pyde79rWhbi3UG4SeGmYNBbEm4njm+s6FkGHUExFul6Lok39bGhl8bvi07GMuTp Xh6BGdXpT54M2LdLCWsE3wd9l0N8+s36GOm6ze/bm04TK5M8Av+sI8901PxxujVZXs9J eDlr8bOrbQzPWHFxoKaXknGHfF0wULjZH4Xro= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.15.7 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:11:18 -0400 Received: by 10.220.4.21 with SMTP id 21mr564925vcp.222.1269612678753; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <320306641003260711k687456d5u8a878f472c9b7da6@mail.gmail.com> From: doug schmidt To: Steve Polyack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Peter Steele , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:20 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: > On 03/26/10 09:00, Peter Steele wrote: >> >> Does FreeBSD 8 support the Dell H700 RAID controller? We've been using a >> 3Ware controller but may need to switch to this controller. What we'd li= ke >> to have is a command line interface similar to the tw_cli command so we = can >> create RAID sets on a booted system instead of doing it in the BIOS. >> >> > > I'm not sure about the H700, but for the PERC5 and PERC6 (previous > models...) you can use mfiutil(8) to manage the adapter and > create/configure/destroy RAID sets on FreeBSD 8. =A0 It's actually pretty= nice > in comparison to MegaCLI - the LSI provided management utility. mfiutil(8) has also been added to FreeBSD 7.3 >From 7.3 Release notes: The mfi(4) driver now supports LSI MegaRAID SAS 1078 and Dell PERC6. [...] A userland utility mfiutil(8) for the mfi(4) devices has been added. This includes basic features to monitor controller, array, and drive status, change basic attributes, create/delete arrays and spares, and flush the controller firmware. Note that this is a small utility, not a replacement of MegaCLI in the Ports Collection which is supported officially and provides more functionality. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 14:24:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452E91065672 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBBD8FC1D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so2396731qwi.7 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.98.138 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:59:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003261602378286864@ceopen.cn> References: <201003261602378286864@ceopen.cn> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:29:29 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 16441278e6956b37 Received: by 10.229.14.157 with SMTP id g29mr1289076qca.57.1269611969821; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: yuanxuqiang@ceopen.cn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions Subject: Re: Install httpd.2.2.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:24:57 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:32 AM, yuanxuqiang wrote: > Hello, > =A0 =A0 I use FreeBSD 7,and install httpd2.2.14; but > use MPM "prefork",perl cgi don't well run.when runing > cgi,would appear : > Internal Server Error > The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unab= le to complete your request. > apache's err_log : > Out of memory during request for , referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ > [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] 28, referer: ht= tp://www.la-bbs.com/ > [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] =A0bytes, total= sbrk() is , referer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ > [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] 3166208, refere= r: http://www.la-bbs.com/ > [Fri Mar 26 15:12:38 2010] [error] [client 61.155.152.26] =A0bytes!, refe= rer: http://www.la-bbs.com/ > > =A0 =A0if use MPM "worker" ,cgi is normal runing. > why ? Now _that_ is very odd! People usually have more problems with worker! The diference between mod_prefork and mod_worker is that the latter is multi-process and multithreaded while the former is just multi-process. Now with you matter at hand, are you sure you are takling about CGI?, I mean are you positive that you are in fact forking the slave process as a separate program? That question is just out of curiosity because your problem reminds me of mod_perl problems with large application where it may make sense to run with worker... Yes, I know, people will tell you stay away from perl threads like the page, but in fact I have found situations where it makes perfect sense to use worker with mod_perl instead of prefork. In any case, from your log snip, it seems obviuos that Apache is running out of memory wher trying to fork. Maybe you have no swap in that machine? Please check with top and look at swap usage. On linux top shows a wa parameter which will hint that the cpu is waiting (%wa), on FBSD I _think_ you have to enable process accounting and use sa, but I'm just a noob in FBSD so perhaps others can ...[fill in here]..... Every OS has a virtual mem manager logic, (side note: I have found that vanilla FBSD is way more stable in vm mgmt than vanilla Linux 2.6 and not so freaking optimistic!). Anyway, check your mod_prefork section in the apache conf and make sure you are not trying to fork more processes than the memory you have available, this includes also complete copies of your cgi application. So figure out how much memory each apache process takes up (unload unnecessary modules, etc.) and add to each apache process the amount of memory your cgi app uses. Also, you should leave the OS with at least a couple of free megabytes of RAM, although as I stated earlier FBSDs vm mgmt is so awesome that you can really swap to the limit, but I wouldn' t recommend that anyway. If you are really planing on using plain'ol CGI you could recompile apache and make it very lean for your needs. If your app is too fat, maybe you try to move to fast-cgi, threaded or forked so you can keep as much code segments shared between the childs, or look into mod_perl and mod_morker, but be warned leakage is inevitable so you have to control the life of each process carefully (max req per child param). Hope this helps, Alejandro Imass > =A0 =A0 think you answer me. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0best wishes! > > yuanxuqiang > 2010-02-26 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 14:28:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD8C106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DCC8FC1D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so1586323qyk.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.98.138 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:01:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201003261602378286864@ceopen.cn> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:31:42 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 145dbd5e58840f1b Received: by 10.229.211.140 with SMTP id go12mr1237078qcb.49.1269612102312; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Install httpd.2.2.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:28:54 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:32 AM, yuanxuqiang wrot= e: >> Hello, >> =A0 =A0 I use FreeBSD 7,and install httpd2.2.14; but >> use MPM "prefork",perl cgi don't well run.when runing >> cgi,would appear : [..] > Yes, I know, people will tell you stay away from perl threads like the > page, but in fact I have found situations where it makes perfect sense I meant to write "the plague" ;-) > to use worker with mod_perl instead of prefork. > > In any case, from your log snip, it seems obviuos that Apache is [...] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 15:11:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC44C106566B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6466F8FC12 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2QFBU3c084753 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:11:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201003261511.o2QFBU3c084753@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:11:30 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: popd to send Mail to a Mac; I Really Appreciate this list. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:11:42 -0000 It looks like imap is more suitable for what I am trying to do than pop. There may be a slight issue in the fact that I use .forward to trigger procmail which has the effect of instantly snatching up every piece of incoming mail and putting it in to a nmh folder that resides in /home/%user/Mail/%folder which means /var/mail is always empty. I just created another user which won't have any .forward or procmail attention. Forwarding messages to this user will make them hang in /var/mail/%user and those should be available to imap. On the Mac, I will be reading that user's mail via imap to retrieve the messages. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 15:19:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF526106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342108FC15 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (Kerio Connect 7.0.0 patch 1) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:19:24 -0400 References: <201003261511.o2QFBU3c084753@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Message-Id: From: mikel king To: Martin McCormick In-Reply-To: <201003261511.o2QFBU3c084753@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:19:26 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: popd to send Mail to a Mac; I Really Appreciate this list. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:19:36 -0000 On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > It looks like imap is more suitable for what I am trying > to do than pop. There may be a slight issue in the fact that I > use .forward to trigger procmail which has the effect of > instantly snatching up every piece of incoming mail and putting > it in to a nmh folder that resides in /home/%user/Mail/%folder > which means /var/mail is always empty. I just created another > user which won't have any .forward or procmail attention. > Forwarding messages to this user will make them hang in > /var/mail/%user and those should be available to imap. > > On the Mac, I will be reading that user's mail via imap > to retrieve the messages. > > Martin McCormick You should be able to subscribe to the folder in question directly under IMAP for the specific account. I used to do this all the time. It really depend on how you roll out your IMAP service, and which one you go with. Either way procmail can filter can sort the message into IMAP folders so that you can just pick them up via an IMAP client. Cheers, Mikel King CEO, Olivent Technologies Senior Editor, BSD News Network Columnist, BSD Magazine 6 Alpine Court, Medford, NY 11763 o: 631.627.3055 c: 631.796.1499 skype:mikel.king http://olivent.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikelking http://twitter.com/mikelking From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 15:49:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84A1106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4468FC1C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xqwY1d0021wfjNsA6rpBNe; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:49:11 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xrp91d00t1f6R9u8jrpAE8; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:49:11 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:49:08 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:49:08 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326154907.GC84718@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20100326074456.7139c3da@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100326074456.7139c3da@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:49:11 -0000 On Fri 26 Mar 2010 at 04:44:56 PDT Jerry wrote: >On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:32:58 +0000, Daniel Bye > articulated: > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:12:48AM -0400, Jerry wrote: >> > I could have sworn that I saw a method of creating several >> > directories, actually a parent direct and several sub-directories >> > simultaneously; however, I cannot fine the documentation any longer. >> > >> > Assume I want to create a directory: FOO with three directories >> > under it, foo-1, foo-2 and foo-3. I tried: mkdir -p foo {foo-1, >> > foo-2, foo-3} >> >> Almost. >> >> $ mkdir -p FOO/{foo-1,foo-2,foo-3} > >Thank you; that is exactly what I was looking for. I knew I had seen it >somewhere before. Or, for even less typing: $ mkdir -p FOO/foo-{1,2,3} Understand how this works, however, so you won't need to look it up again, but can apply it yourself in whatever variation is needed. It's called brace expansion. Here's the first hit that comes up in Google, which describes it fairly well: http://snap.nlc.dcccd.edu/reference/bash1/features_11.html This page is about the bash shell, but brace expansion works the same way in tcsh. It is NOT supported in tne Bourne shell. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 15:00:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C111065673 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from xps.daemonology.net (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDC3A152B5F for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64336 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 15:00:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xps.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 15:00:28 -0000 Message-ID: <4BACCC0C.7010401@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:00:28 -0700 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Strobl References: <4BA9C0AC.3080801@wooh.hu> <20100324075709.GC13561@lonesome.com> <20100324223809.GA34342@alchemy.franken.de> <4BAB4AB9.2090908@buffalo.edu> <1269526260.2007.3.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> <20100325233558.GI20888@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20100325233558.GI20888@alchemy.franken.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:12:17 +0000 Cc: Ken Smith , Craig Butler , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, kensmith@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update(8) under sparc64? Why is it not available? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:00:39 -0000 Hi all, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:11:00PM +0000, Craig Butler wrote: >>>>>> World build started on Sat Mar 20 23:34:54 EDT 2010 >>>>>> World build completed on Sun Mar 21 00:50:58 EDT 2010 >> Can we bend the rules a little ?? Who set the requirement of an hour ? >> freebsd-update might be a good thing to have.. > > IIRC it was Colin who once mentioned that this was decided > by the Security Officers in order to be able to react to > high impact security issues affecting multiple branches in > a timely manner should the need ever arise. In any case > he should be the right person to talk to about this so I > CC'ed him. The can-buildworld-in-an-hour is a rough rule of thumb, but it's pretty good. The issue here, as Marius said, is that we want to be able to push out advisories promptly; this isn't a problem when we're only dealing with one branch, but sometimes we have issues which affects all the releases -- currently we support {6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0}, which is a fairly typical set -- and each run of patch builds requires two complete buildworlds plus some other stuff (kernel builds, comparing bits between builds, shuffling them around, building binary patches)... so I imagine that a 1.5 hour sparc64 buildworld time would put us at over 24 hours for a complete set of patch builds. And that's not counting the fact that every new FreeBSD release takes longer to build. Some people have suggested in the past that we could do sparc64 update builds but not hold up advisories waiting for them -- but I really don't like that option, since it would "train" people to use binary updates rather than source updates, and the times when they would need to wait -- time-sensitive security advisories -- are exactly the times when they shouldn't wait. (As a side note, for obvious security reasons I don't want to add hardware outside of the established FreeBSD.org datacenters for this sort of thing.) I think the best approach towards having FreeBSD Update support for sparc64 is to get release cross-building working; that way we would be able to use amd64 hardware, which I think we can safely assume will continue to be available in ever-increasing speeds. -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 16:22:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D095B1065732 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505e.appriver.com [98.129.35.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9786C8FC15 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:22:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.45 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht03.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G179 G180 G181 G182 G186 G187 G198 G285 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.45] (HELO HT03.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTPS id 30057328; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:22:09 -0500 Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.132]) by HT03.exg5.exghost.com ([10.242.228.75]) with mapi; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:22:10 -0500 From: Peter Steele To: "Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:22:09 -0500 Thread-Topic: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller Thread-Index: AcrM7kNsWvXWdy9ASViedpouSbuNJwAEb9AQ Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAE0A@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> <4BACC075.9080606@stillbilde.net> In-Reply-To: <4BACC075.9080606@stillbilde.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: RE: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:22:11 -0000 I see that these PERC controllers are all SAS instead of SATA. What kind of= cost differential is there between SAS and SATA disks? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 16:23:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8A61065672 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:20c:29ff:fece:79f3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F9B8FC37 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:35d8:e48b:a30c:137e] (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:35d8:e48b:a30c:137e]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id D734023; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:23:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BACDF99.50909@stillbilde.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:23:53 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Steele References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACC8@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <4BACBE01.8040800@comcast.net> <4BACC075.9080606@stillbilde.net> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAE0A@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AAE0A@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Support for Dell PERC H700 RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:23:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26.03.2010 17:22, Peter Steele wrote: > I see that these PERC controllers are all SAS instead of SATA. What kind of cost differential is there between SAS and SATA disks? If it's a megaraid sas controller, you can still use SATA disks. I know I do. (8x 1T5 barracudas in raid 50 on an 8308) //Svein - -- - --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg Østli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE - --------+-------------------+------------------------------- If you really are in a hurry, mail me at svein-mobile@stillbilde.net This mailbox goes directly to my cellphone and is checked even when I'm not in front of my computer. - ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ - ------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkus35kACgkQODUnwSLUlKTdygCghb1VGILXxd7K3A4AQG2j12Qv IZYAn3btxeYUXBpAei7kOBegCCpLAkkY =+oJ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 16:28:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CA71065674 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDAF8FC22 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.44]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xoZg1d0060x6nqcA3sUK4h; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:19 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xsUH1d00A1f6R9u8YsUHxh; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:18 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:28:15 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:28:15 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326162815.GD84718@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20100326074456.7139c3da@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326154907.GC84718@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100326154907.GC84718@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:18 -0000 On Fri 26 Mar 2010 at 08:49:08 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: >Understand how this works, however, so you won't need to look it up >again, but can apply it yourself in whatever variation is needed. It's >called brace expansion. For extra credit, and to test your understanding, see if you can explain how the following work: $ mkdir -p FOO/{foo-,bar-}{1,2,3} $ cp foo{,.bak} Others might have some even more complicated examples worth exploring. (It sucks, btw, that most of what Google finds pertaining to brace expansion is about bash, when the feature was actually introduced by csh.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 16:48:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0A7106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from web52306.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52306.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06C628FC17 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7829 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Mar 2010 16:48:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1269622098; bh=A1sjAkV2w1ZueH/elFwdRrJ5FGArLGYiTIhpyUmrVwE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lMm7MU+JlA/fWvY0Qu004UyTt+fKfvLsRXep59Wdv11UUljPjHLBjH2k3pkSSes28TQeGU6U4k1JKySC7PpAnjgb9GVX+JK0loaZKCesASFIxfVbpXO5wdpJcVsbLgmUTffc+3RcvNU3y0Rk4U2H8U6MeNaR0PJ92O6EYyislko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=o+rpaNPDj4/QJJXb89KlEbuZ6aqXZ75ZDdPIEc6W/8ilENReDPR2IcSAXbyjPU/oSzWhk4rv7tBzLx2CaUlXTGJL6x0MdmJIP7ZhqgUtumWpNH8ng2+nMH+o7LJ42qSQ4iNEg+yVlDu+dELL9ravjpeWvz2AFoSFp5uVFG1OBoo=; Message-ID: <326735.6860.qm@web52306.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4zhKaxwVM1nrVelMoCNBG20q5CkqLvsKgXQNxTXbld.Pp3n JWkdcAKutWKAjnl6MEFHM6Mf4PEfqAQD76.nJYZ2Ev36q10pHNzvIVTSVL3K _muPsmJoPUu2v707PtSwQSs._zn4kPZWkuDbzecK4FRc7cT4Jh4w_NCPWUPp OC7ZrfRNhcZp4VnQl3Blg35LnKPKjkylnn_ipftOjS3rbIadCDJrzTsdXgfR wKZy.Vp.npwrWtow0QeaWhfhGO37FvSOSaSoY9SHG4gMbzeQBtzZqs7KfO7A dOVhBkwr1Bo3EnAgQuJTwJEqPZhN3okAFWCzmUO53a.kz0oYXUy9PxcT0.oV peW4gzwGU58G6lpacu5oPWitATGlvO7YIe7HDnhmOLw-- Received: from [134.207.53.14] by web52306.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:48:18 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:48:18 -0700 (PDT) From: gahn To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: multicast support and mgen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:48:19 -0000 Hi, all: I am trying to get mgen to work my freebsd 7.2 box. the customized kernel has "options MROUTING" compiled in. Assume that would make sure the kernel support multicast traffic the mgen seems to be working fine with any unicast address it can reach. but it just doesn't bind the multicast group address to its socket: user@lab:~/scripts:$ mgen event "ON 1 UDP DST 225.0.0.1/3000 PERIODIC [10 64] INTERFACE bge0 TTL 32" mgen: version 4.2b6 mgen: starting now ... 16:46:01.651464 START MgenFlow::OnTxTimeout() socket_item->SendTo() error: Network is unreachable MgenFlow::OnTxTimeout() socket_item->SendTo() error: Network is unreachable MgenFlow::OnTxTimeout() socket_item->SendTo() error: Network is unreachable MgenFlow::OnTxTimeout() socket_item->SendTo() error: Network is unreachable MgenFlow::OnTxTimeout() socket_item->SendTo() error: Network is unreachable any gurus here have any ideas on this issue? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 17:01:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431691065674 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B280E8FC31 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3176882bwz.3 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.48.144 with SMTP id r16mr1432883bkf.176.1269622884810; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net [67.189.160.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1sm9159647bkl.2.2010.03.26.10.01.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FC5E2280C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:01:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:01:21 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326130121.61267cd4@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20100326162815.GD84718@comcast.net> References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20100326074456.7139c3da@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326154907.GC84718@comcast.net> <20100326162815.GD84718@comcast.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:01:27 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:28:15 -0700, Charlie Kester articulated: > For extra credit, and to test your understanding, see if you can > explain how the following work: > > $ mkdir -p FOO/{foo-,bar-}{1,2,3} > > $ cp foo{,.bak} Maybe I am doing this wrong; however, I had to use the "-R" flag with 'cp' to make it work. I also assume you meant "FOO" and not "foo" unless I am completely misunderstanding this exercise. cp -R FOO{,.bak} FOO -> FOO.bak/FOO FOO/foo-1 -> FOO.bak/FOO/foo-1 FOO/foo-2 -> FOO.bak/FOO/foo-2 FOO/foo-3 -> FOO.bak/FOO/foo-3 FOO/bar-1 -> FOO.bak/FOO/bar-1 FOO/bar-2 -> FOO.bak/FOO/bar-2 FOO/bar-3 -> FOO.bak/FOO/bar-3 -- Jerry FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Please remain calm, it's no use both of us being hysterical at the same time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 17:19:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BF6106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947178FC0A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xpLk1d0011ZXKqc51tKFnA; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:15 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xtNV1d0031f6R9u3htNVXC; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:22:30 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:19:12 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:19:12 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326171912.GE84718@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100326071248.4ec4ea5e@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326113258.GA9957@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20100326074456.7139c3da@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100326154907.GC84718@comcast.net> <20100326162815.GD84718@comcast.net> <20100326130121.61267cd4@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100326130121.61267cd4@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Creating multiple directories simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:16 -0000 On Fri 26 Mar 2010 at 10:01:21 PDT Jerry wrote: >On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:28:15 -0700, Charlie Kester > articulated: > >> For extra credit, and to test your understanding, see if you can >> explain how the following work: >> >> $ mkdir -p FOO/{foo-,bar-}{1,2,3} >> >> $ cp foo{,.bak} > >Maybe I am doing this wrong; however, I had to use the "-R" flag with >'cp' to make it work. I also assume you meant "FOO" and not "foo" >unless I am completely misunderstanding this exercise. Sorry, pedagogical error. I didn't intend that to operate on the results of any of the other examples. I probably should have chosen something other than 'foo' in order to avoid that misunderstanding. The point was simply to explore what happens when one of the terms inside the braces is an empty string. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 20:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750C81065670 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jindrich@kana.at) Received: from relay.web4ce.cz (relay.web4ce.cz [93.190.48.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380E98FC12 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [81.0.202.202] (mail2.web4ce.cz [93.190.48.66]) by relay.web4ce.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2C01A406D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:26:57 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1504 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 20:26:57 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1]) by msrv4.web4ce.cz ([127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP via TCP; 26 Mar 2010 20:26:57 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0A76BF1B-ED28-4088-A46B-7918E5291ADC@kana.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jind=C5=99ich_K=C3=A1=C5=88a?= Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:26:46 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Subject: Grub demage my boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:42:11 -0000 Hello, I am new in this mailing list and my english is very poor :) I have installed FBSD 8.0 on my first SATA disk. I downloaded Ubuntu 9.10 CD and boot into the Ubuntu installation. After booting proces a choose 4GB USB memory for installation as hard drive. There is option: delete and use whole disk for Ubuntu. After installation and reboot I have error message - error: no such disk and something like CLI (grub rescue). A tried steps by this link: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ freebsd-questions/2004-May/047549.html but without luck - there is still Grub! Also I tried step from this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ Grub2 but advices/commands (like boot, normal or dump, etc) doesn't work! Is there any way to solve my issue? Thank you very much for any advices! Jindra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 21:14:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA249106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@mailnewsrss.com) Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (mail.theindiecompanyllc.com [173.13.167.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8CB8FC0A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807A36830030 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.theindiecompanyllc.com Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indie.theindiecompanyllc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8sLBv16P+nyj for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (indie.theindiecompanyllc.com [173.13.167.209]) by indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16069683000B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Slack-Moehrle To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1184682835.44.1269637715797.JavaMail.root@indie.theindiecompanyllc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [173.13.167.221] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64) Subject: Where are my drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:14:43 -0000 Hi All, I have not really used FreeBSD in a very long time. FreeBSD 8. 500gb boot 8 x 1.5tb drives installed connected to a 3ware 9500S-8 card I am trying to see what the 8 x 1.5tb drives are called and if they are recognized. I read that FreeBSD 8 has the driver for 3ware by default. I added a twa_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf as well as lines for ZFS I do a: egrep 'ad[0-9]|cd[0-9]' /var/run/dmesg.boot and I just see my DVD (acd0) and my 500gb SATA (ad4) How to I add these drives? When I start the machine, I see the 8 drives listed during BIOS post, attached to the 3ware card. What do I do to get my drives recognized? -Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 21:20:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37C1106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dak.col@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f183.google.com (mail-iw0-f183.google.com [209.85.223.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7794B8FC1C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn13 with SMTP id 13so7040371iwn.14 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CAIsCdKCZFOuPya71d4Wwxxz/yY3NtVOkfWmxkqF08Q=; b=HqCqG0qj5A3mGZVmeJqZYNqeQPAnpRylXRPcqat7n71IgITxxaPn9aq48mJfT3XRxW 3MTWoKrT4qjp9QVjn8uNQN5gtw9v1BWDQg3lbjsVJq2onN6dWrdlq8hlotp91dPfRRjy YCCQwY/RK9hNO/xpIVm0RGuQBOsqjjq7TSjV8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=AVsVp74Clvkr2pVjs+G9opMXc/0DxyUcC1IBKPnWxLyzsda/2UdIbOAdWIjKsPMh/c 55ziR+mOxTJdieWUs0+dWHkzCYx4hlLOpMCogHt/jgsaRFDX9NcIYhDj7IRCMYflUh+m 4wXA9/9fg6JuC5QAJJQiRjampADWSiZGJcgcw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.187.144 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1184682835.44.1269637715797.JavaMail.root@indie.theindiecompanyllc.com> References: <1184682835.44.1269637715797.JavaMail.root@indie.theindiecompanyllc.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:20:26 -0500 Received: by 10.231.153.205 with SMTP id l13mr696128ibw.64.1269638426598; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3b93bd111003261420j673b1719g4910cfed03fddfdb@mail.gmail.com> From: "Diego F. Arias R." To: Slack-Moehrle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where are my drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:27 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote: > Hi All, > > I have not really used FreeBSD in a very long time. > > FreeBSD 8. > 500gb boot > 8 x 1.5tb drives installed connected to a 3ware 9500S-8 card > > I am trying to see what the 8 x 1.5tb drives are called and if they are > recognized. > > I read that FreeBSD 8 has the driver for 3ware by default. > > I added a twa_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf as well as lines for ZFS > > I do a: egrep 'ad[0-9]|cd[0-9]' /var/run/dmesg.boot > and I just see my DVD (acd0) and my 500gb SATA (ad4) > > How to I add these drives? When I start the machine, I see the 8 drives > listed during BIOS post, attached to the 3ware card. > > What do I do to get my drives recognized? > > -Jason > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi: Can you please paste your dmesg? Do you create an array on the 3ware? -- mmm, interesante..... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 21:32:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B259C1065670 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537818FC1B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so2166308qyk.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:32:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.98.138 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:02:41 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0f7ed3fc9a759633 Received: by 10.229.222.14 with SMTP id ie14mr480810qcb.95.1269639161416; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: xptioctl pass driver usb scsi driver problem (solved) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:32:42 -0000 Hello, Just wanted to share with the list that I solved this problem today, and looking at the recent archives this has come up recently without any solutions so here it is. FYI, there was an answer by Andrew Thompson in the thread "USB2 vs SCSI pass-through?" of Feb 25th 2010 which hinted at the solution but the OP never manifested if he had actually solved the problem. If you get this in dmesg when you plug in your usb mass storage device: xptioctl: pass driver is not in the kernel xptioctl: put "device pass" in your kernel config file It probably means that HAL (you are probably running Gnome) has interfered with the assigning if dev by the kernel. All you have to do is disable hal for a moment, unplug and replug and voila! it' s fixed. Then you safely start HAL back up again. There is no doubt, a better solution, like fixing the root of the HAL problem but this simple workaround will avoid ruining your day. 1) /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald stop 2) unplug and re-plug the device 3) dmesg, camcontrol, mount, etc. 4) /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald stop Best, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 21:45:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208AA106566B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF438FC1D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so2525116qwi.7 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:45:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.229.98.138 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:45:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0A76BF1B-ED28-4088-A46B-7918E5291ADC@kana.at> References: <0A76BF1B-ED28-4088-A46B-7918E5291ADC@kana.at> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:15:51 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 296175a0d9813bd5 Received: by 10.229.213.133 with SMTP id gw5mr686735qcb.13.1269639952119; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Grub demage my boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:45:56 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Jind=C5=99ich K=C3=A1=C5=88a wrote: > Hello, I am new in this mailing list and my english is very poor :) > > I have installed FBSD 8.0 on my first SATA disk. I downloaded Ubuntu 9.10= CD > and boot into the Ubuntu installation. After booting proces a choose 4GB = USB > memory for installation as hard drive. There is option: delete and use wh= ole > disk for Ubuntu. After installation and reboot I have error message - err= or: > no such disk and something like CLI (grub rescue). > > A tried steps by this link: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-May/047549.html > but without luck - there is still Grub! > > Also I tried step from this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2 > but advices/commands (like boot, normal or dump, etc) doesn't work! > > Is there any way to solve my issue? > Looks like you are not that fluent in dual/multiple boot schemes. I would suggest that you buy another sata disk and install FBSD in one and Linux on the other and boot selection with your BIOS. Either that, or RTFM on multiple boot systems, whether it's booting FBSD from Linux (grub) or the other way around. You could start by Googling this: "dual boot linux freebsd" there are many references on the list archives on the subject and many other references as well. Best, Alejandro Imass > Thank you very much for any advices! > Jindra > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 21:53:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF051065672 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7DD8FC12 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (mailhost.waddell.com [10.1.10.26]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F445095F; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:53:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 841D2578824; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:53:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com (wadphtcas0.waddell.com [192.168.203.229]) by emlpfilt4.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64621578822; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:53:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.205]) by WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com ([192.168.203.229]) with mapi; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:53:14 -0500 From: Gary Gatten To: 'Alejandro Imass' , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:53:14 -0500 Thread-Topic: Grub demage my boot loader Thread-Index: AcrNLciYxL58tyf/ScyeLHmswwT1rAAALoiQ Message-ID: References: <0A76BF1B-ED28-4088-A46B-7918E5291ADC@kana.at> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 5.5.8.383112, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.3.26.213624 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' AT_TLD 0.5, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, RDNS_NXDOMAIN 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CANPHARM_UNSUB_LINK 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS ' Cc: Subject: RE: Grub demage my boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:53:28 -0000 I love the "RTFM" - who came up with that anyway? That said Jind=F8ich, your English is more than passable! Have a good weekend! G -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Imass Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:46 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Grub demage my boot loader On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Jind=F8ich K=E1=F2a wro= te: > Hello, I am new in this mailing list and my english is very poor :) > > I have installed FBSD 8.0 on my first SATA disk. I downloaded Ubuntu 9.10= CD > and boot into the Ubuntu installation. After booting proces a choose 4GB = USB > memory for installation as hard drive. There is option: delete and use wh= ole > disk for Ubuntu. After installation and reboot I have error message - err= or: > no such disk and something like CLI (grub rescue). > > A tried steps by this link: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-May/047549.html > but without luck - there is still Grub! > > Also I tried step from this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2 > but advices/commands (like boot, normal or dump, etc) doesn't work! > > Is there any way to solve my issue? > Looks like you are not that fluent in dual/multiple boot schemes. I would suggest that you buy another sata disk and install FBSD in one and Linux on the other and boot selection with your BIOS. Either that, or RTFM on multiple boot systems, whether it's booting FBSD from Linux (grub) or the other way around. You could start by Googling this: "dual boot linux freebsd" there are many references on the list archives on the subject and many other references as well. Best, Alejandro Imass > Thank you very much for any advices! > Jindra > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 21:56:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2E1106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lee_shackelford@dot.ca.gov) Received: from trmx001.dot.ca.gov (svhqsacsmtp01.dot.ca.gov [149.136.17.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BF48FC18 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:56:48 +0000 (UTC) To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: From: Lee Shackelford Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:46:39 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SACSMTP01/SVR/Caltrans/CAGov(Release 8.0.2HF1052 | May 15, 2009) at 03/26/2010 14:56:45 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: Routers, switches, and networking hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:56:48 -0000 Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any brand name of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments are appreciated. Yours truly, L e e _ S h a c k e l f o r d AT d o t dot c a dot g o v From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 22:05:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D39106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f183.google.com (mail-iw0-f183.google.com [209.85.223.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E3D8FC18 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn13 with SMTP id 13so7090732iwn.14 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:05:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sHLO8PllRkg6B0IMdeUKCC5uWwBgFT7/vYjqzfeBNAU=; b=cNcmfQDyk4RbDUUvPh4wf5CAaCtqcHwDJYKCljQlutc3l/w7gZS/IVnwBaFfN/w0Bn iFUhCROdwu8HM9522yeEkUGy6kjYpCvNJEh6Tg/yqoRt6zNF3LjuRKf+g1maGHYbUlks sbXZ12SdaGmy2W9AY9eIGapdAx4Fvf3apyef8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UNCY7rIsK3GaYwiGuFVb7HPWNZeTCzc4CXIP/Nwk+z10qWjNkOyG/k6Bt1YUiUKALt FtGpfFVBismHbd4T1idyYib1NQWBkKrPZLx7Sr+xBG6gT96lAAOvoxz9+PMoGyHrAt6x JmYOhGdNo4+tgEGQwa6Jr3L+HyVogu+9eY+4I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.15.140 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:05:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:05:19 -0700 Received: by 10.231.60.17 with SMTP id n17mr753851ibh.24.1269641119078; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: Lee Shackelford Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routers, switches, and networking hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:05:21 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:46, Lee Shackelford wrote: > > Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. =C2=A0Is anyone aware of any bra= nd name > of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on > any variant of the BSD operating system? =C2=A0Any comments are appreciat= ed. > Yours truly, L e e _ S h a c k e l f o r d =C2=A0 =C2=A0AT =C2=A0 d o t = =C2=A0 dot =C2=A0 c a =C2=A0 =C2=A0dot > g o v Unless memory fails me, F5, Juniper, and for sure Sidewinder (now McAfee) firewalls, among others. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 22:37:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F021106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@mailnewsrss.com) Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (mail.mailnewsrss.com [173.13.167.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5CD8FC22 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A086830020; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.theindiecompanyllc.com Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indie.theindiecompanyllc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aR-lzvPeZDWu; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (indie.theindiecompanyllc.com [173.13.167.209]) by indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D432683000D; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:36:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Slack-Moehrle To: "Diego F. Arias R." Message-ID: <766339826.50.1269643019825.JavaMail.root@indie.theindiecompanyllc.com> In-Reply-To: <3b93bd111003261420j673b1719g4910cfed03fddfdb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [173.13.167.221] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where are my drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:37:02 -0000 Diego, >> I am trying to see what the 8 x 1.5tb drives are called and if they are recognized. >>I read that FreeBSD 8 has the driver for 3ware by default. >>I added a twa_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf as well as lines for ZFS >>I do a: egrep 'ad[0-9]|cd[0-9]' /var/run/dmesg.boot >>and I just see my DVD (acd0) and my 500gb SATA (ad4) >>How to I add these drives? When I start the machine, I see the 8 drives listed during BIOS post, attached to >>the 3ware card. >Can you please paste your dmesg? Do you create an array on the 3ware? My dmesg shows the 3ware card installed (twa0)and shows ZFS running. I have not created an array on the card because I want to do RAIDZ3 so wouldn't the card just ask as pass through? If I go into the card when the system boots, I see all of my drives, but I only have option for RAID 5, 10, 50. Do you have more thoughts? -Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 23:07:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EDD106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@mailnewsrss.com) Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (mail.theindiecompanyllc.com [173.13.167.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8670C8FC19 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB1D683002C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.theindiecompanyllc.com Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indie.theindiecompanyllc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJshzJg03Dot for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (indie.theindiecompanyllc.com [173.13.167.209]) by indie.theindiecompanyllc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772EE683000D for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Slack-Moehrle To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <853062763.53.1269644859219.JavaMail.root@indie.theindiecompanyllc.com> In-Reply-To: <766339826.50.1269643019825.JavaMail.root@indie.theindiecompanyllc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [173.13.167.221] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64) Subject: Re: Where are my drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:07:40 -0000 Well, going into the card Bios and creating each drive as a single drive seems to have done the trick, FreeBSD now sees them. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slack-Moehrle" To: "Diego F. Arias R." Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:36:59 PM Subject: Re: Where are my drives? Diego, >> I am trying to see what the 8 x 1.5tb drives are called and if they are recognized. >>I read that FreeBSD 8 has the driver for 3ware by default. >>I added a twa_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf as well as lines for ZFS >>I do a: egrep 'ad[0-9]|cd[0-9]' /var/run/dmesg.boot >>and I just see my DVD (acd0) and my 500gb SATA (ad4) >>How to I add these drives? When I start the machine, I see the 8 drives listed during BIOS post, attached to >>the 3ware card. >Can you please paste your dmesg? Do you create an array on the 3ware? My dmesg shows the 3ware card installed (twa0)and shows ZFS running. I have not created an array on the card because I want to do RAIDZ3 so wouldn't the card just ask as pass through? If I go into the card when the system boots, I see all of my drives, but I only have option for RAID 5, 10, 50. Do you have more thoughts? -Jason _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 23:10:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55193106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nevans@talkpoint.com) Received: from mailbox.talkpoint.com (mailbox.talkpoint.com [204.141.10.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C4B8FC1A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailbox.talkpoint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBAC2F6808F; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:52:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailbox.talkpoint.com Received: from mailbox.talkpoint.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailbox.talkpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enk8FY0hWhLG; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:52:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.57.134.74] (mobile-166-137-137-091.mycingular.net [166.137.137.91]) by mailbox.talkpoint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3772F6803D; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:52:26 -0400 (EDT) References: Message-Id: <2E5E953A-CCFC-43C4-A345-E934E9D7C5B7@talkpoint.com> From: Nick Evans To: Kurt Buff In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7D11) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7D11) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:52:16 -0400 Cc: Lee Shackelford , "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Routers, switches, and networking hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:10:31 -0000 On Mar 26, 2010, at 18:05, Kurt Buff wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:46, Lee Shackelford > wrote: >> >> Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any >> brand name >> of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is >> based on >> any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments are >> appreciated. >> Yours truly, L e e _ S h a c k e l f o r d AT d o t dot c >> a dot >> g o v > > Unless memory fails me, F5, Juniper, and for sure Sidewinder (now > McAfee) firewalls, among others. > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " F5 is now Linux. Used to be BSDi. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 23:31:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0BB106566C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com [209.85.211.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2890C8FC0C for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so4203899ywh.3 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wOX/6FDt4xkExu9Z0YZiNv4gLraYrM4gGPemgH9SO3w=; b=eUIMi82QuiyQuDC5XpzbwmYvvcrd1mMZOouBX+KXPyqfW7BCWyisEiH3NeRNCtj1Uh cAMEYllRAtI/30xbYTkviRAMcGKvrKPz7KwxIH2T3xT2iCKdBEB6DLKpd81jqCN2p0wN QagS0NbbpEwpMr4zzRBCl9SkSnVZfGmVrnr8I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hK54Fhtug7UvowxroLIIwb1VHFKqdFZSSHhlhlvFw10bdon8UwafQuOxyksyYgJUT+ firkJW8koILoPYmgzPd21ZljtVZA/ncrvJMuoVaq3kh4tl1RqOdhcv5fYBzrqlLa+pMS Bq2hb6zvZXEQoXatCIerm/SFKiGVqJBxnFr0o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.15.140 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2E5E953A-CCFC-43C4-A345-E934E9D7C5B7@talkpoint.com> References: <2E5E953A-CCFC-43C4-A345-E934E9D7C5B7@talkpoint.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:31:49 -0700 Received: by 10.151.87.14 with SMTP id p14mr2195289ybl.195.1269646309210; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Routers, switches, and networking hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:50 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 15:52, Nick Evans wrote: > On Mar 26, 2010, at 18:05, Kurt Buff wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:46, Lee Shackelford >> wrote: >>> >>> Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. =C2=A0Is anyone aware of any b= rand >>> name >>> of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based o= n >>> any variant of the BSD operating system? =C2=A0Any comments are appreci= ated. >>> Yours truly, L e e _ S h a c k e l f o r d =C2=A0 =C2=A0AT =C2=A0 d o t= =C2=A0 dot =C2=A0 c a >>> =C2=A0dot >>> g o v >> >> Unless memory fails me, F5, Juniper, and for sure Sidewinder (now >> McAfee) firewalls, among others. >> >> Kurt > > F5 is now Linux. Used to be BSDi. OK - that's news to me. Good to know. Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 23:55:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55009106566B for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8048FC0A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so2281565qyk.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:55:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zc5nGtiS5+fdKSOe3lnlbLu9GYAis0M51jPpH8PciAY=; b=TYkBx6WUVGvoe9nTeznH+7MHeNM8hzyEWE5oTXVxzZYNpQfSpDbNTVegBs3kg74Rfz ikjBp6P8reZd/7F/qbxxilw7zbIYKHNnGUanyy7U+4rMhCOJyaRdLOom40lcE5a+Qzx0 zJrR+7W3RPEQcDKItppumHY3lq21MiGLvD/pM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iuR1qaDf3xxm1p+vn02NCCtuGLJrZp2otFPtCjKFdimT3I0JgfPkLTWXIXhlS0PQof sB4QYrF6WF6oQcxzpl9ztY0oaP3vkfFlPLdBqyuo3rdnn14sdHV5Lgbee92l+YKLo0Xt ACVlSR915uzgVf/1g8EPtK5sgpWMdGcMJXrQA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.82.14 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:54:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:54:58 -0600 Received: by 10.229.219.143 with SMTP id hu15mr710586qcb.12.1269647698525; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6201873e1003261654s7b274e87o96658bd656857ad2@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Lee Shackelford Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routers, switches, and networking hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:55:01 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Lee Shackelford wrote: > > Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any brand name > of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on > any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments are appreciated. > http://www.ironport.com/products/ironport_asyncos_operating_system.html http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/04/is_data_ontap_b.html http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/2007Dec-newsletter.shtml#Isilon http://www.scmagazineuk.com/netasq-u6000/review/2642/ http://www.web-filters.stbernard.com/technology/operating_system.shtml Not specifically based on BSD's, but BSD compatible products. http://www.soekris.com/ -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 00:18:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C7A106567D for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4594A8FC15 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (localhost.ccsf.cc.ca.us [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o2R0IDmF053702 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id o2R0IDer053699 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100326162738.E48194@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: OT: Keystrokes stick every ~1500 strokes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:18:13 -0000 Hi, Since last Monday my ssh connections started working erraticly. Today I tested it by holding down a key until it stops printing, and made several itterations; it turns out that ~1500 key strokes print on the screen; then it stops responding for several seconds; then it spits out ~25 missed keystrokes. It's probably not the number of key strokes but the length of time it takes to hold down a key until characters stop showing on the screen; the number turns out to be ~1500. I have the same problem on several different servers, Solaris, HP Unix, FreeBSD, Linux, so it's definitely not the server setup; it's the network. Last Monday our netadmin retired from networking and we got a new netadmin. I have already reported it to the new netadmin, but he doesn't seem to know what he's done wrong. Is there anything I can check from my servers to figure out what the new netadmin has done wrong? Here's the ifconfig output of my FreeBSD server's active interface: # ifconfig bce0 bce0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=3b inet netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast ether 00:3e:0c:bc:c5:13 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) status: active Please advise. Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 00:31:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC58106566B for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFC78FC12 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:31:40 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [17.151.77.194] by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KZX00LM004RUF10@asmtp025.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:31:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1003260210 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20100326162738.E48194@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:31:38 -0700 Message-id: References: <20100326162738.E48194@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> To: "Joe R. Jah" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Keystrokes stick every ~1500 strokes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:31:40 -0000 On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Joe R. Jah wrote: > Since last Monday my ssh connections started working erraticly. Today I > tested it by holding down a key until it stops printing, and made several > itterations; it turns out that ~1500 key strokes print on the screen; then > it stops responding for several seconds; then it spits out ~25 missed > keystrokes. Sounds like a path MTU problem; perhaps something thinks it should be doing Jumbo frames and can't, or perhaps VLAN tagging or something else is being used.... ping -s 1480 hostname and similar can be helpful. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 01:15:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EF31065674 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4648FC18 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (localhost.ccsf.cc.ca.us [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o2R1FMmN059656; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:15:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id o2R1FLqI059652; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:15:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:15:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20100326175316.M58183@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> References: <20100326162738.E48194@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Keystrokes stick every ~1500 strokes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:15:21 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:31:38 -0700 > From: Chuck Swiger > To: Joe R. Jah > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: OT: Keystrokes stick every ~1500 strokes > > On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Joe R. Jah wrote: > > Since last Monday my ssh connections started working erraticly. Today I > > tested it by holding down a key until it stops printing, and made several > > itterations; it turns out that ~1500 key strokes print on the screen; then > > it stops responding for several seconds; then it spits out ~25 missed > > keystrokes. > > Sounds like a path MTU problem; perhaps something thinks it should be doing Jumbo frames and can't, or perhaps VLAN tagging or something else is being used.... > > ping -s 1480 hostname and similar can be helpful. Thank you Chuck for the suggetion; here's the ping response from three different servers: HP Unix server # ping ip 1480 -n 3 PING ip: 1480 byte packets 1480 bytes from ip: icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms 1480 bytes from ip: icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms 1480 bytes from ip: icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms ----ip PING Statistics---- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/0 Solaris server: # ping -s ip 1480 3 PING ip: 1480 data bytes 1488 bytes from ip: icmp_seq=0. time=1. ms 1488 bytes from ip: icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms 1488 bytes from ip: icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms ----ip PING Statistics---- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/1 FreeBSD server: # ping -s 1480 ip ping: packet size too large: 1480 > 56: Operation not permitted Any ideas? Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 06:31:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D40106566B for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from invalid.pointer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27338FC0C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so5260523gwj.13 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tGA0Y3QRPqvgIv1xcWYM17R/xMHqpUwyPs7DxySH0TQ=; b=uqI/GkiYIu+Ogwwgu94e5Q0G5INcA+OfzcJzPCIMnDVxPDz1Vr6Bv+klsmCTswj0D2 8t7w/6LvAwovRr2+WY/ni3qYlAzjytFMhLl5qAHaBT7hFI8caAC8MUXl8fPhn9mUX/BV sbG3iP3hKdk3ShZ5YoLzZsDbJMygPZ1iwkoz4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vNSMmCwRYCvOfM0SxLNhPO1Uc2GqEtLDIZccK2ra3pX905DDhkooG9Ng3t8LH+mJ7g 0yjd2oU7t/bk0UXAFb4iBUkAxRE3e0bBHPHLuqw5RfdksLxA+QeTUccBqtU2aNoEd8rX 9giwlAq65WokhRBFYWaOnfGsN/CkbZ/J2e1BE= Received: by 10.150.180.2 with SMTP id c2mr2419088ybf.314.1269671481879; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.78] ([122.177.190.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1524698iwn.0.2010.03.26.23.31.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BAE5627.5010802@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:01:59 -0700 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Question about expr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:31:23 -0000 Hello all, I am used to the normal GNU-version of expr (also available on Solaris) and much prefer it over the FreeBSD version. The GNU version allows internal commands like length, substring and others which make it much easier to work with. Is there any way I can replace FreeBSD's native expr with the GNU version ? Since I believe expr does not normally ship as a shell-builtin, I don't think the shell can of much help in the matter. Actually, I think it might not be a bad idea to place a port of GNU-expr in the ports directory. This would allow a lot a scripts to be readily portable to multiple environments. Thanks for any help. Regards Manish Jain invalid.pointer@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 06:37:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86B5106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [83.235.67.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAE28FC1D for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pulstar.local (athedsl-4556543.home.otenet.gr [94.70.83.7]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id o2R6awSZ030964; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:36:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4BADA78A.4090507@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:36:58 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: n dhert References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome gdm diable_user_list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:37:02 -0000 On 26/03/2010 3:42 ?.?., n dhert wrote: > FreeBSD8.0, gnome2-2.28.2_1, using gdm to login. > Gdm login screen presents a list of all users on the system to choose from. > I don't want the list, just a prompt for a username and password. > I tried > # gconf-editor > this graphical config program allows to set in apps / gdm / simple-greeter > the setting 'disable_user_list' to checked (default is not checked) > after setting it to checked, closing the program, rebooting > I still have the user list at the gdm login window. > I verified with starting the gconf-editor again: the option is still checked > .. > (also $ gconftool-2 -R /apps/gdm/simple-greeter shows: disable_user_list = > true ) > > Why do I still have the user list? > How to fix? > gconf-editor changes the settings of the current user, the gdm settings are global (system) so should be changed by root or the user gdm is running in. I don't currently have gdm on any of my systems but AFAIR there is a gdm user created for running the greeter. You should be able to change the disable_user_list setting for this user which will have the desired effect. Something along the lines of this blog post http://lionlix.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/hack-ubuntu-9-10-disabling-userlist-in-gdm-login-screen/ should work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 06:51:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034D6106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4BE8FC14 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o2R6p2gd039391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:51:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2R6p2av059367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:51:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o2R6p1Xa059366; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:51:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:51:01 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Manish Jain Message-ID: <20100327065100.GA4806@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4BAE5627.5010802@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BAE5627.5010802@gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:51:02 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about expr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:51:06 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 27), Manish Jain said: > I am used to the normal GNU-version of expr (also available on Solaris) > and much prefer it over the FreeBSD version. The GNU version allows > internal commands like length, substring and others which make it much > easier to work with. Is there any way I can replace FreeBSD's native expr > with the GNU version ? Since I believe expr does not normally ship as a > shell-builtin, I don't think the shell can of much help in the matter. > > Actually, I think it might not be a bad idea to place a port of GNU-expr > in the ports directory. This would allow a lot a scripts to be readily > portable to multiple environments. It's part of the coreutils package. If you install the sysutils/coreutils port, you can symlink /bin/expr over to it (or make a copy). I don't know if it's 100% compatible with BSD expr, though, so you may end up breaking scripts in the base system. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 07:17:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504E5106564A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from invalid.pointer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A2A8FC12 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so5273348gwj.13 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:17:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hjATGsy9T3UjKf7MLtYQmdQh4uJfuGDyTlArQPu+bvI=; b=W5ZYf/b72KQYe8UtRXi/jrtBYMcCvpgcmxV0i2DbRzE7DlqR+Sw5YvatdqkJ1dchiG eXWnjceARHf4NPmpc7wHfXi1AoTUZqVfRyVWTKgrN6PH8xIHgzN2wqTaOtojzekq9ZW2 29emQtQxRmbLA3G/CYT/nNS/dqNvjgrF3EpVI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WBCzf/CgpPQl/3hLy9qMSz/+dbeBuOiX5jkh9vuEBP8vffAtpUB0t/Uak9I9Kiz3Hk HQf3BhMDF+JDEIjKKf59MP+wzsAfFt8UKdJTSw9khS8SIvWgYkgtQGsXli0mVbkngMvF lX47veuLE+DdGdXGyue5BmVoRF4ZBZ274z2XY= Received: by 10.100.243.29 with SMTP id q29mr2983288anh.210.1269674248322; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.78] ([122.177.190.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1548624iwn.8.2010.03.27.00.17.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BAE60F6.1010003@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:48:06 -0700 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <4BAE5627.5010802@gmail.com> <20100327065100.GA4806@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20100327065100.GA4806@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about expr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:17:29 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Mar 27), Manish Jain said: >> I am used to the normal GNU-version of expr (also available on Solaris) >> and much prefer it over the FreeBSD version. The GNU version allows >> internal commands like length, substring and others which make it much >> easier to work with. Is there any way I can replace FreeBSD's native expr >> with the GNU version ? Since I believe expr does not normally ship as a >> shell-builtin, I don't think the shell can of much help in the matter. >> >> Actually, I think it might not be a bad idea to place a port of GNU-expr >> in the ports directory. This would allow a lot a scripts to be readily >> portable to multiple environments. > > It's part of the coreutils package. If you install the sysutils/coreutils > port, you can symlink /bin/expr over to it (or make a copy). I don't know > if it's 100% compatible with BSD expr, though, so you may end up breaking > scripts in the base system. > Hello Dan, Thanks for the info. But I don't intend to symlink /bin/expr over to it. Instead I'll just create an alias in bash's profile and my scripts. That should let core scripts execute with /bin/expr and my scripts to use the GNU-version. Which actually leads me to second question : When you execute a script, it will automatically pick up the exports in .bash_profile. But even if you manually source bash's profile at the start of your script, only the exports get picked up and the aliases are ignored. Is there some way to fix this so that I don't have to set an alias for expr at the top each time I write a script ? Thanks & Regards Manish Jain invalid.pointer@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 10:28:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8D7106566B for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A308FC15 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.local (ppp-88-217-6-23.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.6.23]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 145B01C0871 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:28:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BADDDE2.60608@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:28:50 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: OT: Programming perl, BerkeleyDB/MLDBM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:28:54 -0000 Hi: I have been searching for the appropriate perl mailing list, but no avail. I'm trying to build a database with Berkeley DB and MLDBM for a multi dimensional hash structure, my $hdbm = tie %host, 'MLDBM', -Filename => "$dbdir/host.db", -Flags => DB_CREATE|O_RDWR or die "Cannot open database '$dbdir/host.db: $!\n"; but I have some problems: I can read entries and create new ones, but I can't update existing entries. And I have a problem untieing cleanly: untie attempted while 1 inner references still exist at bin/smtp_reject.pl line 175. untie attempted while 1 inner references still exist at bin/smtp_reject.pl line 176. Any hints? or which mailing list should I post to? Thanks, Erik -- Erik Nørgaard Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 12:07:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CA3106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jozsi.avadkan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6438FC0A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so371039fxm.3 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:07:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l0XJlm52FKeoIOEznQHnRV93v3DM1Y3Eac3GJc93bWE=; b=QY9JI399byGdXj+j6bMIb4eqbn32SLqFbsXD1U03ZfAqJAGVlx5lJZzAQbnFi2kWiW foXRc2FSVptamTt+svJWEycnz3VcKDa8+x7JKOMKIcbvOn2NNBkVvdFcNPhp2tPqSUiN drGcn75FrtrF1oiTy+Z+/fcv/MbCYuE4qEMJ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=t5M69Hj9Vdi2ssQYbL8H3lMoZMx+mQrJTI32B2jnQ04VVeMnOLHhFbCUymZisCcHkD t4G/jMrkMS4CcMVqDs3SI+2UfE2l/G4ZrosktpeGI/E5Q8cXPnyXyt8zLc3PkjLFlesc h+Pww/515LyXrpOPistlyNAfYlf4s9vxcnBO4= Received: by 10.223.100.150 with SMTP id y22mr2147335fan.99.1269691644380; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (92-249-200-2.pool.digikabel.hu [92.249.200.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm1411964fxm.0.2010.03.27.05.07.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:07:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jozsef Vadkan To: FreeBSD Mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:07:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1269691634.12702.11.camel@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: "internet connection tester script" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:07:26 -0000 Why doesn't my "internet-connection" script work? When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits... The script: http://pastebin.com/AE9U1qdL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 12:22:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A81106564A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756D98FC0C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-100-7.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.100.7]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A293D8DB; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:22:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o2RCMEHM001772; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:22:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:22:14 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jozsef Vadkan Message-Id: <20100327132214.c414f2d2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1269691634.12702.11.camel@debian> References: <1269691634.12702.11.camel@debian> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: "internet connection tester script" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:22:16 -0000 On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:07:14 +0100, Jozsef Vadkan wrote: > Why doesn't my "internet-connection" script work? > > When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits... It doesn't even work correctly: Now as I definitely have Internet connection, it prints "NO INTERNET CONNECTION". Allow me a comment: #!/bin/bash This is Linux. It is not portable. FreeBSD is NOT Linux. In FreeBSD, the standard scripting shell is the Bourne shell /bin/sh. Unless you don't require things that are specific to bash, use the correct shebang for shm which is #!/bin/sh If you intendedly want to use bash, specify it correctly: #!/usr/local/bin/bash The bash is an additional package for FreeBSD, it does not belong to the OS itself. It needs to be installed. Of course, there's a way to make bash available as /bin/bash statically linked, but with all thoughts to interoperability, I wouldn't rely on this. Let me bring the script into a more easily readable form and allow me to say something about it: #!/bin/sh function internet_connection_ok { echo "Testing internet connection....please wait..." if ping -W 1 -c 4 bix.hu | grep -q "4 received"; then if ping -W 1 -c 4 www.yahoo.com | grep -q "4 received"; then echo "NET is OK" else echo "NO INTERNET CONNECTION" exit 1 fi else echo "NO INTERNET CONNECTION" exit 1 fi } internet_connection_ok Basically, you're relying on a 100 % correct reception of pings from two specified host to see if Internet is up and running. In case of package loss, even with running Internet (e. g. 4 sent, 3 received), the script would say that there's no Internet connection, which is false. Additionally, you're giving only 1 ms for reply, which may not be enough for a slow (but stable) connection. Finally, you're relying on DNS to get the IPs to ping for bix.hu and www.yahoo.com. I'm not sure if this resolve time is important here, too. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 12:46:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602D1106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42F48FC08 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3653887bwz.3 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:46:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RiZr3icC5dmsQEIxWxkN28OR/0LbQdgIwEGkY7sRrI8=; b=wItTnAXe3aDWsvvAUuvEBrIwV4DwOq1NpNUnMbee7+YDP0OYdwiujSkhtckGUVAPtT tdC7/7Mviit9E7MsiE7H4zEHC3BVJwGNf6KWtoZ5lhboTKLa7SZlza7SMYXwaiwzHVhH PxPVny5ayIeRgxlnNZkyeO9Xx9t/piDd+0f5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=NcrCqSNDT12LFfFgiWu4UteqCq+0hi4xicMDzIVGoMqBf5Y7dB9TkExa0xsZQq+ZkN ga60XYa79fEUpadY6eucVAjWP/b+ONX0YiyeqE/Ih66ASLbopUgaOJDqiFJLGBhr09z1 pcjE7cNf2HeO0m/mNbnfeyQpnOVPjY3+8M9q0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.61.5 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100327132214.c414f2d2.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1269691634.12702.11.camel@debian> <20100327132214.c414f2d2.freebsd@edvax.de> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:46:29 +0100 Received: by 10.204.9.134 with SMTP id l6mr3425455bkl.83.1269694009202; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jozsef Vadkan , FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: "internet connection tester script" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:46:51 -0000 I prefer to use `host' command ping take time to run, especially when it do not respond... here's my script root@omega ~ : cat /usr/local/bin/check_connectivity 13:43 #!/bin/sh # checks local and internet connectivity # faust - 2010/02/17 host google.com >/dev/null if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then net=3D1 echo "Internet connection is UP" else net=3D0 echo "Internet connection is DOWN" fi host alpha.faust-network >/dev/null if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then local=3D1 echo "Local network is UP" else local=3D0 echo "local network is DOWN" fi case `expr $local '*' 2 + $net` in 0) exit 2 ;; # big nothing 1) exit 42 ;; # just internet (uhu?) 2) exit 1 ;; # just local 3) exit 0 ;; # all right! *) exit 43 ;; # divided by zero? esac Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek4 CamTrace S.A.S On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:07:14 +0100, Jozsef Vadkan > wrote: > > Why doesn't my "internet-connection" script work? > > > > When I plug the ethcable out, it just waits...and waits...and waits... > > It doesn't even work correctly: Now as I definitely have > Internet connection, it prints "NO INTERNET CONNECTION". > > Allow me a comment: > > #!/bin/bash > > This is Linux. It is not portable. FreeBSD is NOT Linux. > > In FreeBSD, the standard scripting shell is the Bourne > shell /bin/sh. Unless you don't require things that are > specific to bash, use the correct shebang for shm which is > > #!/bin/sh > > If you intendedly want to use bash, specify it correctly: > > #!/usr/local/bin/bash > > The bash is an additional package for FreeBSD, it does not > belong to the OS itself. It needs to be installed. Of > course, there's a way to make bash available as /bin/bash > statically linked, but with all thoughts to interoperability, > I wouldn't rely on this. > > Let me bring the script into a more easily readable form > and allow me to say something about it: > > #!/bin/sh > > function internet_connection_ok > { > echo "Testing internet connection....please wait..." > if ping -W 1 -c 4 bix.hu | grep -q "4 received"; then > if ping -W 1 -c 4 www.yahoo.com | grep -q "4 received"; > then > echo "NET is OK" > else > echo "NO INTERNET CONNECTION" > exit 1 > fi > else > echo "NO INTERNET CONNECTION" > exit 1 > fi > } > > internet_connection_ok > > Basically, you're relying on a 100 % correct reception of > pings from two specified host to see if Internet is up and > running. In case of package loss, even with running Internet > (e. g. 4 sent, 3 received), the script would say that there's > no Internet connection, which is false. Additionally, you're > giving only 1 ms for reply, which may not be enough for a > slow (but stable) connection. Finally, you're relying on > DNS to get the IPs to ping for bix.hu and www.yahoo.com. > I'm not sure if this resolve time is important here, too. > > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 12:55:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B56106564A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com (cl-52.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:33::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728188FC08 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AE0841DE27D; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:55:17 -0700 (PDT) To: Erik Norgaard References: <4BADDDE2.60608@locolomo.org> From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.4.0; tzolkin = 5 Ahau; haab = 18 Cumku Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:55:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4BADDDE2.60608@locolomo.org> (Erik Norgaard's message of "Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:28:50 +0100") Message-ID: <86iq8hzzyi.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Programming perl, BerkeleyDB/MLDBM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:55:18 -0000 >>>>> "Erik" == Erik Norgaard writes: Erik> I have been searching for the appropriate perl mailing list, Perl questions are best asked at perlmonks.org or Stack Overflow. Or you can join the beginners list at http://lists.perl.org/ for ongoing discussion and help by email if you prefer. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 17:20:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAF1106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C40C8FC13 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 319 invoked by uid 0); 27 Mar 2010 17:20:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2010 17:20:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=YEz6Dbw52qppEyzsmlVQB3WJapdwPaG88qmKfyzsEQWyz7WvBTAUYVZDInrzcBa+ZZgBUEC6vkBc/1Xwe89//RP0RWjDe2oeewMKdZ+xO7RifjhrG6EkOBvBxRLMLYvr; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvZgl-0008Tj-TP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:20:48 -0600 Message-ID: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:20:28 -0500 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100324 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB8E16764C1C13E7349CB2563" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:20:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB8E16764C1C13E7349CB2563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ever since I installed jpeg-8 I have had nothing but problems. I ran portupgrade -a hoping to take care of all those problems, well no such luck. Let's start with the first error I caught: libqt /usr/bin/ld: warning: libjpeg.so.10, needed by /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_start_decompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_resync_to_restart@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_read_scanlines@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_start_compress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_finish_compress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_finish_decompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_CreateCompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_set_defaults@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_read_header@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_CreateDecompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_std_error@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_destroy_compress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_destroy_decompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_write_scanlines@LIBJPEG_7.0' /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `jpeg_set_quality@LIBJPEG_7.0' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools/designer/uic. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools/designer/uic. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools/designe= r. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20100324-4351-6tihzj-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=3Dqt-copy-3.3.8_10 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D3.3.8_10 make ** Fix the problem and try again. The next error was for OOo (for which I need to follow the directions and email the maintainer). After portupgrade -a reaches the end (apparently, as it exits): ---> Skipping 'editors/openoffice.org-3' (openoffice.org-3.1.1) because it has already failed ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - textproc/docbook-xml-440 (docbook-xml-4.4_1) - textproc/docbook-sk (docbook-sk-4.1.2_4) ! x11-toolkits/qt33 (qt-copy-3.3.8_10) (linker error) * audio/arts (arts-1.5.10_2,1) * devel/sdl12 (sdl-1.2.14,2) * graphics/sdl_image (sdl_image-1.2.10) - textproc/docbook-xml-430 (docbook-xml-4.3) * multimedia/ffmpeg (ffmpeg-0.5_2,1) * multimedia/vlc (vlc-1.0.5,3) * graphics/gegl (gegl-0.0.22_6) * graphics/gimp-app (gimp-app-2.6.8,1) * graphics/py-gimp (py26-gimp-app-2.6.8) * print/gimp-gutenprint (gimp-gutenprint-5.2.4) * print/scribus (scribus-1.3.3.13_1) * security/pinentry (pinentry-0.7.6_2) * sysutils/k3b (k3b-1.0.5_2) * multimedia/libxine (libxine-1.1.16.3_2) * multimedia/phonon-xine (phonon-xine-4.3.1_3) * games/gcompris (gcompris-8.4.12_3) ! editors/openoffice.org-3 (en-openoffice.org-US-3.1.1) (configure error) * editors/openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.1.1) A good deal of these (including Scribus and GIMP and a few others I believe) are from errors with my upgrading from jpeg-7 to jpeg-8. I was ready for many, many days of compiling (mainly because of OOo). Instead I'm lucky to go 36 hours total. Why has upgrading my jpeg library completely BROKEN so many apps? I cannot even start scribus now. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libjpeg.so.10" not found, required by "scribus" Enough is enough. I've been trying to fix this problem on my own and I cannot. It is not from a lack of trying or looking to solve this issue. --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content copyright under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org Please do not CC me. If I'm posting to a list it is because I am subscrib= ed. --------------enigB8E16764C1C13E7349CB2563 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLrj5pAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0jXsH/iXkYUKWyixbxMtHxJCJvK0y q7ffzmoLJ+UQKv1j/J+Qngg9bwrH4TxDbPoenB4ACvomMR9954+4R5FrJtr1WXn4 0XB0i/pDA1TdYBQgWKtQ6OeNRVNW5mDW0J7kEyM3Hcr2i/hMC0TqJNfxobMYvy9V PCKu4StvCNNGP8i00mGiO9DzkLGqlpRo+ZYMXuueOw8lzfyFI+cOGEisjunzaQ2k Tt1d09KP5fzV98lHNFwDfTJYoJt7zsRiYGk24pH+rHMS6B/FVxnurBkTKJIiMkyP qY07x/O5mLT28SKW37ZSBGe4HFdt1y128mY2bCoJ4Qn49ggmg5Ez8FrZhCLMYM8= =SFhT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB8E16764C1C13E7349CB2563-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 18:06:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F448106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1488FC0C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:06:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEACLmrUtR9Su6/2dsb2JhbACbLXS9eoUBBA Received: from 186.43-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.245.43.186]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2010 19:06:25 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2RI6PZs054543; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:06:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: Programmer In Training Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:06:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> In-Reply-To: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:06:27 -0000 On Saturday 27 March 2010 18:20:28 Programmer In Training wrote: > Ever since I installed jpeg-8 I have had nothing but problems. > > I ran portupgrade -a hoping to take care of all those problems, well > no such luck. > > Let's start with the first error I caught: > > libqt > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libjpeg.so.10, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_start_decompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_resync_to_restart@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_read_scanlines@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_start_compress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_finish_compress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_finish_decompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_CreateCompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_set_defaults@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_read_header@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_CreateDecompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_std_error@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_destroy_compress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_destroy_decompress@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_write_scanlines@LIBJPEG_7.0' > /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to > `jpeg_set_quality@LIBJPEG_7.0' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools/designer/uic. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools/designer/uic. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools/designer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8/tools. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.8. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade20100324-4351-6tihzj-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=qt-copy-3.3.8_10 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3.3.8_10 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > > The next error was for OOo (for which I need to follow the directions > and email the maintainer). After portupgrade -a reaches the end > (apparently, as it exits): > > ---> Skipping 'editors/openoffice.org-3' (openoffice.org-3.1.1) because > it has already failed > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > - textproc/docbook-xml-440 (docbook-xml-4.4_1) > - textproc/docbook-sk (docbook-sk-4.1.2_4) > ! x11-toolkits/qt33 (qt-copy-3.3.8_10) (linker error) > * audio/arts (arts-1.5.10_2,1) > * devel/sdl12 (sdl-1.2.14,2) > * graphics/sdl_image (sdl_image-1.2.10) > - textproc/docbook-xml-430 (docbook-xml-4.3) > * multimedia/ffmpeg (ffmpeg-0.5_2,1) > * multimedia/vlc (vlc-1.0.5,3) > * graphics/gegl (gegl-0.0.22_6) > * graphics/gimp-app (gimp-app-2.6.8,1) > * graphics/py-gimp (py26-gimp-app-2.6.8) > * print/gimp-gutenprint (gimp-gutenprint-5.2.4) > * print/scribus (scribus-1.3.3.13_1) > * security/pinentry (pinentry-0.7.6_2) > * sysutils/k3b (k3b-1.0.5_2) > * multimedia/libxine (libxine-1.1.16.3_2) > * multimedia/phonon-xine (phonon-xine-4.3.1_3) > * games/gcompris (gcompris-8.4.12_3) > ! editors/openoffice.org-3 (en-openoffice.org-US-3.1.1) > (configure error) > * editors/openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.1.1) > > > A good deal of these (including Scribus and GIMP and a few others I > believe) are from errors with my upgrading from jpeg-7 to jpeg-8. > > I was ready for many, many days of compiling (mainly because of OOo). > Instead I'm lucky to go 36 hours total. > > Why has upgrading my jpeg library completely BROKEN so many apps? I > cannot even start scribus now. > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libjpeg.so.10" not found, > required by "scribus" > > Enough is enough. I've been trying to fix this problem on my own and > I cannot. It is not from a lack of trying or looking to solve this > issue. In /usr/ports/UPDATING look for the 20100205 entry for "users of Qt 3 and KDE 3". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 18:28:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C916B106564A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 976848FC12 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30757 invoked by uid 0); 27 Mar 2010 18:28:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2010 18:28:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=BiziBDuIHSoRjv9sdCUXGX4kmIoDBj3mRfKlYZGTtfnVkXvUab7wNgwDbZ3qyJaeFv9C0UsneO/YUWaP0W0EzgPHZiOYMPm8yKFAK0TY7TMdmj7QrgNZW22Dz+r03Y3v; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvakY-0001lA-36 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:28:55 -0600 Message-ID: <4BAE4E4A.4000002@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:28:26 -0500 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100324 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB465CBAF1E0DE1199F4A5740" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:28:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB465CBAF1E0DE1199F4A5740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/27/10 13:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > In /usr/ports/UPDATING look for the 20100205 entry for "users of Qt 3 > and KDE 3". Pointless in as far as that does not address the underlying problem of rebuilding EVERYTHING that needs to link against the jpeg library. GIMP and gegl failed because a dependency for it is linked against jpeg-7 and not jpeg-8. If I cannot basically reinstall the entire system via portupgrade -a I'm reduced to fixing the problem ad-hoc and that is unacceptable because eventually I'll have to deal with programs that link to whatever just got rebuilt. In essence, this is a problem that is not easily solved just by reading /usr/ports/UPDATING for Qt because it involves more than Qt (by the way, thanks for the hat tip on Qt, but it's not high on my priority list for being fixed right now, GIMP, Scribus and possibly a few other apps that I'm currently unaware of there being an issue with ARE). When jpeg-x (not a typo) is built, the port needs to be automatically looking forward to see what all depends on it (and if anything depends on that) and possibly asking the user if they want to upgrade all those programs to ensure they link to the proper version of jpeg at all times. Or they could all statically compile in jpeg support (as I assume FF does because I can still see jpegs in the file upload preview pane) so this is never an issue at all. I am currently able to manipulate any jpeg at all (and now unable to use an increasing number of apps) which is crippling my ability to edit images for any use. I'm really loving FreeBSD, but I can no longer use The GIMP to open JPEG's (and this is really the biggest issue I'm having as I need to be able to edit jpeg's so I can continue on with designing the site on my box, otherwise I will have to move back over to another computer (and right now the only one available is running WinXP, something I'd rather avoid using if I can), I cannot even launch Scribus (and a few other apps whose names escape me at the moment). Other apps open but have loads of errors regarding jpeg. I'm unable (as of about a month ago) to install Filezilla because of this (it stopped launching when I upgraded jpeg, so I uninstalled and reinstalled thinking that would work). Every time I think I've tracked down the one other library or whatever that something links against and needs jpeg, something new crops up and stops me from building. Again. Anyway, time I got off the comp. I'll be back later this evening to finish this discussion. --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content copyright under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org Please do not CC me. If I'm posting to a list it is because I am subscrib= ed. --------------enigB465CBAF1E0DE1199F4A5740 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLrk5XAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0+O0H/33a+Bx4KVpIaLh0Ao4wzagJ 2pzSkAQPkzvphiXoIWn6E+RpzL4CPkk748sjGpmUlEiT4uWrQSN3GdBjv8SpTrw+ 4oTcnhfQJNcPgq9XgPt49uHmgnu/wombDG1LGXLugy0M8+d9JvKCWtXp75BLuFl+ lYfff3+RTAvLYvFrgw3wVwt8lFda0+T18FAihVGCkFW//dhpjlN7jkdvvmiTuPMc QhFpwEiGDzz3iq5acZM0riO96y8ybdXCv89gE+eRGhn8yB7cWV6/ODnbAWFuKTk0 QZE2QLwPV2pT0EdcDvfCrFbsVIBsjJybHF8DNTF/PdOF3wnCUarWS/fpYuTsmI4= =TfKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB465CBAF1E0DE1199F4A5740-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 18:35:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA8D106566B for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f185.google.com (mail-yx0-f185.google.com [209.85.210.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BF68FC15 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so5579474yxe.7 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:35:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=txmYHtf5CC1EEZYMOsPFuTgcpufeSMKgNPxNANISMpk=; b=KNpH8oGO9/E8bBc4PMlUXYdjEqFQ2GicR+8NA+WmrdTFP16++rxxquPDAKlMUIsW0r I0A7d9zVw5u7glriJt4Zyrm1zGGjq78O+rZu7A6y47U+74UvLCIznIhN9xv4LHBYI/7w 7D1L7TgVMLP6J/pIQpwCRK6HrXxtM85bYYgfk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PCdSco4HbICmfBX6TwDrwhiXrcLKedSS6dZ4M5+R/DmNdEwomTcEM99268P/CvFZsA 0nYWX82XZM0ieAKPmEDTLLc2YG490xdFw/Ps7frNeGkCimmSxpU46Ai+RFM6Us9+scmz pXB4fnFnVkHjnGjf6ZOUqaXIQuPJ+J/d3+tB8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.78.9 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:35:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:35:46 -0400 Received: by 10.90.59.15 with SMTP id h15mr2082230aga.117.1269714946121; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Programmer In Training Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:35:47 -0000 On 27 March 2010 13:20, Programmer In Training wrote: > Ever since I installed jpeg-8 I have had nothing but problems. > > I ran portupgrade -a hoping to take care of all those problems, well no > such luck. > portupgrade -fa -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 19:00:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4204C1065675 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4718FC1A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvbEm-0007bZ-TM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100 Received: from pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net ([70.21.1.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:59:23 -0400 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> <4BAE4E4A.4000002@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:03 -0000 Programmer In Training wrote: [snip] > > When jpeg-x (not a typo) is built, the port needs to be automatically > looking forward to see what all depends on it (and if anything depends > on that) and possibly asking the user if they want to upgrade all those > programs to ensure they link to the proper version of jpeg at all times. > Or they could all statically compile in jpeg support (as I assume FF > does because I can still see jpegs in the file upload preview pane) so > this is never an issue at all. I am currently able to manipulate any > jpeg at all (and now unable to use an increasing number of apps) which > is crippling my ability to edit images for any use. > So man portupgrade and see what the -r and -R switches do. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 19:11:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5769106564A for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE018FC17 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-48-78.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.48.78]:50130 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1NvbPA-0005IT-4U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:10:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 9225 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2010 20:10:41 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2010 20:10:41 +0100 Received: (qmail 66123 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Mar 2010 20:10:41 +0100 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:10:41 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Programmer In Training Message-ID: <20100327191041.GA66104@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> <4BAE4E4A.4000002@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BAE4E4A.4000002@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.48.78 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1NvbPA-0005IT-4U. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1NvbPA-0005IT-4U e8369356d3222dece871b245c41d9df1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:11:15 -0000 On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Programmer In Training wrote: > On 03/27/10 13:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > In /usr/ports/UPDATING look for the 20100205 entry for "users of Qt 3 > > and KDE 3". > > Pointless in as far as that does not address the underlying problem of > rebuilding EVERYTHING that needs to link against the jpeg library. GIMP > and gegl failed because a dependency for it is linked against jpeg-7 and > not jpeg-8. > > If I cannot basically reinstall the entire system via portupgrade -a I'm > reduced to fixing the problem ad-hoc and that is unacceptable because > eventually I'll have to deal with programs that link to whatever just > got rebuilt. In essence, this is a problem that is not easily solved > just by reading /usr/ports/UPDATING for Qt because it involves more than > Qt (by the way, thanks for the hat tip on Qt, but it's not high on my > priority list for being fixed right now, GIMP, Scribus and possibly a > few other apps that I'm currently unaware of there being an issue with > ARE). So don't use portupgrade if doesn't do what is needed. The simple solution is to *first* deinstall *all* ports (or at least all ports that depend, directly or indirectly, on jpeg in this case) and then reinstall them all. This might require a bit more manual intervention than using portupgrade would have, but on the other hand it is almost guaranteed to work correctly every time. The problems you are running into is essentially due to trying to build updated binaries while still having old binaries installed (and having this trigger bugs in the build mechanism of various ports.) If you first remove all the old binaries and then build new ones you avoid many potential problems. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 19:28:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B16106566C for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:20c:29ff:fece:79f3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110D98FC1B for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:30ac:a3a3:37e9:5f85] (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:30ac:a3a3:37e9:5f85]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id 4E2B023 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:28:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4BAE5C54.7060304@stillbilde.net> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:28:20 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4BAE3E5C.8020905@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <201003271906.24857.tijl@coosemans.org> <4BAE4E4A.4000002@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100327191041.GA66104@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20100327191041.GA66104@owl.midgard.homeip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8778BDD35052CFFBFF0E7C8D" Subject: Re: Enough Is Enough X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8778BDD35052CFFBFF0E7C8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27.03.2010 20:10, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Programmer In Training wrote:= >> On 03/27/10 13:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> >>> In /usr/ports/UPDATING look for the 20100205 entry for "users of Qt 3= >>> and KDE 3". >> >> Pointless in as far as that does not address the underlying problem of= >> rebuilding EVERYTHING that needs to link against the jpeg library. GIM= P >> and gegl failed because a dependency for it is linked against jpeg-7 a= nd >> not jpeg-8. >> >> If I cannot basically reinstall the entire system via portupgrade -a I= 'm >> reduced to fixing the problem ad-hoc and that is unacceptable because >> eventually I'll have to deal with programs that link to whatever just >> got rebuilt. In essence, this is a problem that is not easily solved >> just by reading /usr/ports/UPDATING for Qt because it involves more th= an >> Qt (by the way, thanks for the hat tip on Qt, but it's not high on my >> priority list for being fixed right now, GIMP, Scribus and possibly a >> few other apps that I'm currently unaware of there being an issue with= >> ARE). >=20 > So don't use portupgrade if doesn't do what is needed. >=20 > The simple solution is to *first* deinstall *all* ports (or at least > all ports that depend, directly or indirectly, on jpeg in this case) > and then reinstall them all. This might require a bit more manual > intervention than using portupgrade would have, but on the other hand > it is almost guaranteed to work correctly every time. >=20 > The problems you are running into is essentially due to trying to build= > updated binaries while still having old binaries installed (and having > this trigger bugs in the build mechanism of various ports.) > If you first remove all the old binaries and then build new ones you > avoid many potential problems. >=20 >=20 >=20 portupgrade -afr jpeg-8 there, done. //Svein --=20 --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg =D8stli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- If you really are in a hurry, mail me at svein-mobile@stillbilde.net This mailbox goes directly to my cellphone and is checked even when I'm not in front of my computer. ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------enig8778BDD35052CFFBFF0E7C8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkuuXFcACgkQODUnwSLUlKQtjwCfQrB9cib+0PlqdUauOxHozIWU 2o0An2pnCWGITHtUMIixftt2LQe3uizk =O3Ep -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8778BDD35052CFFBFF0E7C8D--