From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 00:33:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBEA10656A6 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32CB48FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97637 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Aug 2010 00:06:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283040391; bh=vK06Mr4oJLF8vprZyeK3MzjXanCy1W4cMAblk43fgDc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vgklZonQ5t/Lgdw1fbSvG2c/fqI1/+kglrqxT7Zy8BK7kjFgdFkM871uY26oSMyf4zoOzM7659NDALi1RHwQ3wWJ4mShtjwPHi2feIp78xXo0bWPBX0nEOJZBs1s5hfJXthqQ+A2nTXWHM2Nsvsi4zkzqqlcwNPmBKUk9D7niIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YdvCZkqTwNnt/nF2SmY9pdzzeIhTY24D5NJOrIsOH6lPlgjseeavDyN5vE3asEOczOU01upq1E9Ibt22Gz/DDGz4CI2d1c/f/ZeabY9fX6v3J9lM2rrAsME9yKk4aYk/25e1bKyj3KbvQHtwy/4adi+0rZuv9wfVn8xajti7oIg=; Message-ID: <692882.97604.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: rlhTm98VM1nsTeWR665QcgquQURv_PqwRkKkixmuXtlvHNl B0dEXM6sBkjxizcsYqw1GPSClvl8n2XyAmu4oAZLx5tzyCuX9PPDlNbzLCJa ndxHTVFASljTrWRsrLqQEdup15ZJrIuy_B9rfQRbE62b2pOmcGF.gJVu0Hd2 ATAlUCwtMlFVeGR1RKhnfCF5YpCHRdS8a7LxbpJC7Ldtm.ROb9MZ5WtWpjH1 rffV2_bihkfrE7zK26qah45OMYxBk4hPl6CPRDSNWUOJhHYSaVSawIdEuL5D D9oU4AJerG4yzP9aiwcffQhfWl2GEQaUJEo.N8AuQa_.nXAOJduZQ5KwKgF7 V3nQHoHM1aQaquusbLWSIC3XjHiwQaXFUg36quvbdy9XEpHGAVGVd4S3U Received: from [201.235.209.134] by web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:06:31 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:06:31 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: autoconf 2.63 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:33:12 -0000 Hi, while trying to compile Firebird 2.1.x from sources I got this error:= =0A=0A**Error**: You must have autoconf 2.63 or later installed.=0A=0AMy fi= rst reaction was looking at /usr/ports/devel, but found that the highest ve= rsion of autoconf available is 2.62. How can I get 2.63?=0A=0AThanks, in ad= vance.=0A=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 01:05:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D4810656AB for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FED8FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7T15WRO009863; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:05:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:05:31 -0700 From: "'Gary Kline'" To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Gary Gatten , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:05:41 -0000 On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:29:29AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 28/08/2010 08:02:31, 'Gary Kline' wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten wrote: > >>> Rename them, copy, then rename them back? > >> > >> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together, > >> transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-) > >> > > > > If i'm going to rename, say, ~/.Plans to ~/Plans and ~/.HowtoI18 to > > ~/HowtoI18, I may just scp -rp every ~/[.] file. the idea of using > > find to collect a tarball may work. > > I've been reading this thread, and I'm somewhat at a loss as to why you > need to rename all of the dotfiles at all, Gary. Dotfiles are just > ordinary files, and programs like find(1), scp(1) or tar(1) will handle > them just like any other file. The only difference is that shells by > default don't include dotfiles in some glob expansions and ls(1) doesn't > include them in directory listings. Of course, either of the above can > be overridden: 'echo * .*' or 'ls -a' will show all files including > dotfiles. > > The one slightly tricky thing about dealing with dotfiles is the > presence of '..' -- the standard link to the directory above the current > one. If you accidentally include that in a list of directories to > recurse through, then you'll end up affecting a bunch of stuff that > maybe you didn't expect. So long as you are aware of the possibility > it's pretty easy to avoid this problem. > > To make a copy of your home directory on tao to a temporary directory on > ethic, personally I'd use rsync(1) [in ports as net/rsync]. Then you > can just do: > > % rsync -avx --delete ~/ ethic:/home/kline/ > > It will default to running over ssh(1), so you need to make sure you can > ssh from tao to ethic before you begin. > > The neat thing is that you run that command repeatedly, and each > subsequent time it will copy only what has changed on tao over to ethic. > > I see someone has given instructions for setting up anonymous rsync -- > that's another possibility, but probably a bit OTT for this particular > job. Anonymous rsync is probably best thought of as a superior > replacement for anonymous FTP. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > at least for me, gtar fails to pick up dotfiles. rsynx copies =everything=, and it looks like the test rsync script i posted last night was working all along. it was So fast that i assumed it was bombing entirely. i will 2-ck a few more files before i am sure. a question to the list is how can i copy ALL of /home to my new server? and to you, matthew, does --delete rm out of date files or directories? what about ?VS, given that i have virtually everything under [CR]VS control? slightly offtopic is that i accidently rm'd a file on tao one morning after a few minutes work. a copy was safely croned to ethic..... (yes, i needed mmore coffee, but i was giving thanks to zeus that hours of research and writing were safe!) gary > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 02:40:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE66210656AD for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C718FC20 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4346261iwn.13 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:40:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iQfhSKAqqQqGdiTcKfVXYs7fX/jNfOwPJjbgT0sxPxA=; b=NTVtVIUWmkDon2Lsw3BJYl5+l+JQe74+Fxu/gcUGFd1RYqQ5Xasr9h1izsOV+Wx31f Hqv7WzkYO+IFn3iTXtsAZb89sz86UzdKXJLRFL8Ya7AyfRSxwQ5BjQyLGn02dRPddCL0 Ipm0NIMmqCYsFi/yCs/qbgF/TjwpMrk/nQnok= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OQ4dZQ22O0zCHg8MWsnCSg8lm9lmYjFmfPKFba19UaTYQyTxAAIaOOMWeSel4T1Ilu YX5w5b2LtUJJmka9nc9kT++iEBvP5YWlT4VyOZxJdeWCnOKp4Bi6vOUQ4B3yLkuGe9tz irZBTq10c1fA1H2D8cBzZbETTk2j7oE6Indck= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.149.207 with SMTP id u15mr3267811ibv.13.1283049635892; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.188.81 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:40:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:40:35 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:40:36 -0000 Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that. There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a feature. Kurt On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:06, Ryan Coleman wrote: > > > portupgrade, perhaps? > > > On Aug 28, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > >> Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move >> to the 3.1 branch. >> >> I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do >> 'make install' in the 3.1 port, but I'm wondering if there's a smarter >> way to do this. >> >> Kurt >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 02:42:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEE810656A9 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6887C8FC14 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4347164iwn.13 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:42:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=szGVR3V4BnpTaszSoAHC7b0Ttpg1PKcBq3GkvA5ROIg=; b=q1x67IT668DMUAmEu9tOFeiOBNRb7nkQ0ASjS2IiN+M16ZZ4Q4qp8y0omqoNeG5kEo G8i9STn/9u92rYZPZ06a3VMHADTF/EouVgOomMLHA95/N0rLjkjZ+K+k12K1WRUg46vE eJY+EsG6H3CP+S4WRd8xUMgoEVhvanWE2YgKs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jDjEb9eNNpDrb9sF80YZWgNWaIRnDgpWksKZKKna01ICI3BIswUVbn6cqifMvpcMnz XA3s6Mwzomi0hdOsQTaLSlSWiz18/7FUkpYfzKAxQzAxGW0CRgQ4TiT1iXfpZWjyV8jy fee2GaO22B6CXZ422Jb4y0aZss0KlmMIxco70= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.75 with SMTP id b11mr3042251ibd.162.1283049743194; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.188.81 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:42:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100828223317.6b3aae15@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20100828223317.6b3aae15@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:42:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:42:24 -0000 On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:33, RW wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:56:09 -0700 > Kurt Buff wrote: > >> Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move >> to the 3.1 branch. >> >> I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do >> 'make install' in the 3.1 port, but I'm wondering if there's a smarter >> way to do this. > > Not much smarter. You might want to use portupgrade or portmaster to > make any ports that depend on squid30 depend on the new port - it > doesn't really matter much in the case of squid. Kinda what I thought, but worth asking. Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 02:55:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AE41065695 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E3B8FC0C for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2876576ewy.13 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xGgaiL/CToAAo9Cb1S54xqMyBDPa3GCt+nAePzvwIrM=; b=mH847FwnynW2FWt9BLmIMR22TXXZV0KG4Lcg/saKjYGy1M6QQZ/fPLVZB3ySbhSIlS 3rk1niQoLBaA8GEWXRRAUM9CpMR/OCxdtXpaJb9YdRy3ALsYJCGp4YsuQ18i04wm/uxm nRDI5YsLcy1enX0iUrYmoK19NIId5ASvV7QEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y/YRcLRFtvqddQXtUi+7LPuucN5oI0fhwPDhxi5PQ0bCb2YM51oVgpQEcPLf2wLS0A VMjjNmjcxSwuE9u4LgJAwo09gce58nGBh6yHwiRVunbX/kVVGaBDJdN3H+FR2Plf1/GJ LWkRc0RCnRnXCwn2EF2bTv/CZ69koifLVKYJU= Received: by 10.213.6.210 with SMTP id a18mr5437339eba.32.1283050529085; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([68.71.46.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z55sm9284806eeh.21.2010.08.28.19.55.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:55:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: Leonardo M. =?utf-8?Q?Ram=C3=A9?= References: <692882.97604.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:55:22 +0400 In-Reply-To: <692882.97604.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> ("Leonardo M. =?utf-8?Q?Ram=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:06:31 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <861v9i161x.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:55:30 -0000 Leonardo M. Ram=C3=A9 writes: > Hi, while trying to compile Firebird 2.1.x from sources I got this error: > > **Error**: You must have autoconf 2.63 or later installed. > > My first reaction was looking at /usr/ports/devel, but found that the > highest version of autoconf available is 2.62. How can I get 2.63? The patch in ports/149861 contains autoconf-2.67. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/149861 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 03:25:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AC01065698 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail17.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE9D8FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.24.0.9] (unverified [203.122.194.109]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 36760564-1927428 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:40:32 +0930 (CST) From: Indexer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:40:24 +0930 Message-Id: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:25:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have been trying to setup DHCPV6 between two systems. I have my = gateway, with a correctly assigned prefix from my ISP, and a client who = has ipv6 enabled, and dhcp6c installed. When i activate the dhcpd, it starts correctly but when i try to gain a = lease from my client, it recieves the solicit message, but does not = appear to send a response. Client Aug/29/2010 12:34:12: extracted an existing DUID from = /var/db/dhcp6c_duid: 00:01:00:01:14:0b:f3:79:64:b9:e8:b7:b4:6a Aug/29/2010 12:34:12: failed to open /usr/local/etc/dhcp6cctlkey: No = such file or directory Aug/29/2010 12:34:12: failed initialize control message authentication Aug/29/2010 12:34:12: skip opening control port Aug/29/2010 12:34:12: cfparse: fopen(/usr/local/etc/dhcp6c.conf): No = such file or directory Aug/29/2010 12:34:12: reset a timer on en1, state=3DINIT, timeo=3D0, = retrans=3D383 Aug/29/2010 12:34:13: a new XID (74e55f) is generated Aug/29/2010 12:34:13: set client ID (len 14) Aug/29/2010 12:34:13: set elapsed time (len 2) Aug/29/2010 12:34:13: send solicit to ff02::1:2 Aug/29/2010 12:34:13: reset a timer on en1, state=3DSOLICIT, timeo=3D0, = retrans=3D1088 Aug/29/2010 12:34:14: set client ID (len 14) Aug/29/2010 12:34:14: set elapsed time (len 2) Aug/29/2010 12:34:14: send solicit to ff02::1:2 Aug/29/2010 12:34:14: reset a timer on en1, state=3DSOLICIT, timeo=3D1, = retrans=3D2151 Aug/29/2010 12:34:16: set client ID (len 14) Aug/29/2010 12:34:16: set elapsed time (len 2) Aug/29/2010 12:34:16: send solicit to ff02::1:2 Aug/29/2010 12:34:16: reset a timer on en1, state=3DSOLICIT, timeo=3D2, = retrans=3D4283 Server Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server 4.1.1-P1 Copyright 2004-2010 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/ WARNING: Host declarations are global. They are not limited to the = scope you declared them in. Wrote 0 deleted host decls to leases file. Wrote 0 new dynamic host decls to leases file. Wrote 0 leases to leases file. Bound to *:547 Listening on Socket/5/em0/fe80:1::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e/128 Sending on Socket/5/em0/fe80:1::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e/128 Solicit message from fe80::226:bbff:fe1a:2d2e port 546, transaction ID = 0x5FE57400 Solicit message from fe80::226:bbff:fe1a:2d2e port 546, transaction ID = 0x5FE57400 Solicit message from fe80::226:bbff:fe1a:2d2e port 546, transaction ID = 0x5FE57400 I have tried this, having disabled PF on both systems to make sure that = it was not that as an issue. the results were the same in both cases (my = pf rules allow all outgoing traffic, and all from fe80 regardless). Here is my dhcpd config option domain-name "chocolate.lan"; option domain-search = "chocolate.lan","dhcp.chocolate.lan","concrete.lan"; option domain-name-servers nemo.chocolate.lan; option dhcp-server-identifier nemo.chocolate.lan; default-lease-time 129600; max-lease-time 1296000; authoritative; subnet6 fe80:1::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e/128 { range6 2001:44b8:7988:c60::10 2001:44b8:7988:c60::110; prefix6 2001:44b8:7988:c60:: 2001:44b8:7988:c60:: /64; host mai { host-identifier option dhcp6.client-id = 00:01:00:01:14:0b:f3:79:64:b9:e8:b7:b4:6a; fixed-address6 2001:44b8:7988:c60::9; } } So my questions are thus What have i missed or done wrong to prevent replies being sent to the = client, and have i done anything wrong with this dhcpd config? = Documentation about this subject is also rather sparse, especially about = errors and configurations.=20 William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMec+kAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JqY8QAIMKq+V0PRoslFwgy53lVvkj +SZ5Q09ObD3I4MoU2fn9T+m1boTP2m65IpceXi9E2ZaT57v5HrqDr0ubUVE+D9KX tA/Xc5U5etdXaV/Ebw0B9gpTA84K/JSwcw8GRurpWkP8MBN2tmI7r2Q2DTEmukMn /8/3fx76x7Vvh47QruwIGI0A3pBlW5s9vV5DYM39cRMHLNZ26sgUa1smAbynZhJH tVVUsarfQMcr5+671m643y2L7VbARVJqh/2jN24muMtdUw2DhWy8aSxocZRF41Ee hqJUqHkyyaHWaX/jpDsbToCejiokzpcNOt4hwyUm7+WHmGOF7PIptij8lOl/fs3/ cU3hbkl1iNc3qN20jZzVlC/aAM/R2ewG2ZKbbOsyKOsA2JAeMJ9QQafGrxql17ef vZMWLOkbb9WCTfk6ZeaHyb2hSyKHy7YXF1UAGGsiUprYE5LlHIa/yMZMFqneRqC5 XU3+vswbKV87ftVVj53kwQ+X8OXKX3CMpmDFRbWmePigIJz/zMeOJLMcR8ugwikf CuMQ88hg5ki3r+39AfrE54ie2icYS8HH9SINC7/3Xi7DiDTLjWJMBaybUJL+STG+ OFoO6dyJNPsJBSbJfxZEt+Z5DDAgq2c7zAOpG5zNMBzxqkRUQSi02Zb4M6kDmP29 sZ++zRJcJFApMJCx12/f =3DnOJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 04:52:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016A106566B for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95858FC1E for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4408795iwn.13 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.13.130 with SMTP id c2mr3356323iba.24.1283057530175; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:52:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.150.135 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:51:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:51:50 -0400 Message-ID: To: Kurt Buff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:52:11 -0000 On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that. > > There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in > /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a > feature. > > Kurt portmaster -o www/squid31 www/squid30 -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 05:08:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0071065672 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348A58FC16 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4416247iwn.13 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tGyYkoLDixhA5azh4GDrEvmgtBiwy0SI0gAMZYhYTvA=; b=qVOTt0mjIVYEI5Otnr4gX8LSa7xP4B9xCwPqPmaK7E0ksDwkrEvL1P5yfJXe5LjaNJ 7qH0tFuYmiIoNBKE4ITHl6V4tUGhV5icLKvd40gcCtbLDs6t7F+TAc1mJSS+YiOLCcJA KtD1yDYkBvYOweoI/U4l1dPRmCokFO8Ej/TfY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wLlQma+0TZd1BVRh97f0hqwqk3SuSC1vUQvJ2GWPDiYTZWl3M9HIm3btdHxcIPJmSZ 3BTOaZgidsfG1tiRQQM60KQ/DubCltY6CF/yrlY9UtSm1JYBnq42PkVMNOU45bBVECvY qlUujlotmB0Q3i4KvwxwM6qo/xtuMFdUVJkys= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.11.71 with SMTP id s7mr3354119ibs.85.1283058515455; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.188.81 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:08:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:08:35 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:08:36 -0000 On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 21:51, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that. >> >> There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in >> /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a >> feature. >> >> Kurt > > portmaster -o www/squid31 www/squid30 Well, that's certainly worth investigating! I haven't used portmaster, so that's definitely new to me. Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 06:58:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003FA1065695 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618788FC14 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7T6wBCV058125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:58:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:58:04 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Indexer References: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig24583DBD5FC2482A4370CFAD" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:58:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig24583DBD5FC2482A4370CFAD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/2010 04:10:24, Indexer wrote: > subnet6 fe80:1::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e/128 { That's your problem. That's a link-local address. It should be your network address -- which I think is probably 2001:44b8:7988:c60::/64 For testing purposes, I'd also take out the host {} block giving mai a fixed address. Once mai is picking up an address successfully, then try again with the fixed address stuff. Finally, you do know about SLAAC? (StateLess Address AutoConfiguration) An IPv6 machine can automatically pick up the local network prefix and create itself an address from that range by combining it with its MAC address. To enable, you simply need to run rtadvd on your server, and rtsold on your client. It only deals with IP address and default gateway -- other things you'll have to either configure manually, or use DHCP for, or even set up Bonjour/Avahi. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig24583DBD5FC2482A4370CFAD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx6BQMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzlBwCffyUY7OJtArdRzJxqdI/Z8R88 /G8AnAuO9YEuzGDIox7anoywI7WJQ38G =mp8/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig24583DBD5FC2482A4370CFAD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 07:30:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9A01065694 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277598FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id o7T7Tew3027097; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:29:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:29:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201008290729.o7T7Tew3027097@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com, dnelson@allantgroup.com Cc: kamikaze@bsdforen.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: change file creation time on msdosfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:30:41 -0000 > From dan@dan.emsphone.com Fri Aug 27 23:38:08 2010 > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:51:47 -0500 > From: Dan Nelson > To: Robert Bonomi > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kamikaze@bsdforen.de > Subject: Re: change file creation time on msdosfs > > In the last episode (Aug 27), Robert Bonomi said: > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 26 14:33:04 2010 > > > Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:06:04 +0200 > > > From: Dominic Fandrey > > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > Subject: change file creation time on msdosfs > > > > > > I need to change the file creation time of some files on an msdosfs file > > > system. > > > > > > Is there any other way to do this than copying the file and deleting the > > > original? > > > > There are _always_ alternative ways. With suffficient knowledge, oue > > could, for example, use 'dd' to copy the required two bytes to the > > appropriate position on the raw device holding the filesystem. This > > approach is, however, not likely to be at all 'reasonable' for the average > > user. > > > > > The usual suspects like touch and mv do not work. > > > > yup. 'creation' timestamp is intended to be more-or-less immutable in the > > Unix world. And that 'viewpoint' carries over to other kinds of > > filesysems grafted onto a Unix host. > > No; the utimes() syscall can be used to easily set the creation time (called > birth time so it doesn't get confused with the "ctime" file metadata change > time). More likely is that whoever added birthtime to ufs didn't bother > updating the msdosfs code. If one of the other BSD's has implemented it, it > should be relatively easy to import the changes. Otherwise you'll probably > have to look at how birthtime is currently handled in ufs, and make it work > in msdosfs. I repeat my previous. it is intended to be 'more-or-less' immutable. The FFS designers recognized that there would be occasions where it was _necessary_ to do so, and built the capability into the OS. The *omission* of user-tools that use that hook is/was =intentional=. A means of saying 'you really *shouldn't* do this", without absolutely prohibiting it. It _isn't_ "impossbile", but the 'bar' is deliberately/intentionally out of the reach of the casual user. A backup/resture utility has good reason to muck with the 'birth date', but hardly anything else does. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 07:37:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEE010656B0 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DF58FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.141] (helo=smtp10.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpcSF-00022D-Oj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:37:27 +0200 Received: from [84.25.59.18] (helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp10.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpcSD-00032Y-VO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:37:26 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6AF39856 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:37:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7A0E2C.5050705@boosten.org> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:37:16 +0200 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <874453.45134.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20100826215346.7aaba141.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828170745.GA88025@guilt.hydra> <20100828203618.45fd6be8.freebsd@edvax.de> <4c7994cd.zZBjSuPFSUYKdCmf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4c7994cd.zZBjSuPFSUYKdCmf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1OpcSD-00032Y-VO X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=0.577, vereist 5, BAYES_50 0.00, CM_META_TB_NOARR 0.50, SPF_PASS -0.00, TW_ZC 0.08) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: ports database X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:37:32 -0000 On 29-8-2010 0:59, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > >>> tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port >> >> It should be, better suited: >> >> # cd /usr >> # tar cf ports.tar ports >> >> So one could do "tar xf ports.tar" in the target machine's /usr >> ... > > Better put the created tarfile somewhere other than in the directory > that is being tarred :) That's the case in the above example... > and it might as well be compressed, something like: > > # cd /usr > # tar cf - ports | gzip > /var/tmp/ports.tgz how about: tar zcf ports.tar.gz ports ;-) Peter -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 07:44:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB5B1065697 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail19.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8CE8FC19 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mai.dhcp.chocolate.lan (unverified [203.122.194.109]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 36812623-1927428 for multiple; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:14:17 +0930 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Indexer In-Reply-To: <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:14:08 +0930 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net> References: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:44:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29/08/2010, at 4:28 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 29/08/2010 04:10:24, Indexer wrote: >> subnet6 fe80:1::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e/128 { >=20 > That's your problem. >=20 > That's a link-local address. It should be your network address -- = which > I think is probably 2001:44b8:7988:c60::/64 >=20 > For testing purposes, I'd also take out the host {} block giving > mai a fixed address. Once mai is picking up an address successfully, > then try again with the fixed address stuff. >=20 > Finally, you do know about SLAAC? (StateLess Address = AutoConfiguration) > An IPv6 machine can automatically pick up the local network prefix and > create itself an address from that range by combining it with its MAC > address. To enable, you simply need to run rtadvd on your server, and > rtsold on your client. It only deals with IP address and default > gateway -- other things you'll have to either configure manually, or = use > DHCP for, or even set up Bonjour/Avahi. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew Yes, i already run radvd at home. I have temporarily disabled it because = i wanted to experiment with DHCP6 for some business work ( and general = curiosity ). When i change the subnet block to subnet6=20 2001:44b8:7988:c60::/64 { The client still sends solicits to the server, but now the server no = longer receives them. Checking wether the client could connect to = ff02::1:2 came back with " UDP connect: No route to host"=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMeg/OAAoJEHF16AnLoz6Jx4MP/2eDRe6+DzU4yxABaPDs7eGz OdNasU2HTN/tqW0UM9yk5uDCLXvBjhQcgEy8TrYuv9c0CiY5nptvfuKg/9d2citB Kns5lVtLZw7km+wU8QDHC83BB6PfkH/xAbj9n3ViCtQ977aC71cLqBe8cEyEwxHj lyV969JY2zVAYdBTdi3W0N4DtCkmG/GG4arT+gyYs5bGch3yEb6pE0pu7qmpQFiB dnJHVrjTIFenYuxWd0Ilw3ZzrfO28g2B1bxeOyGOuJ4sHHK0iJq36d/pbkBLWVaS lv/Dvq48LGV4hgsMxtYBZlL81B8SDASMpqM82y2NDnSfD969rPBaGbNhituuYd2r phmqtE0Bl6tBIAunFLE9eCpn+6InSXw3nBgdZaZMju+UaFbjfcoLLF6pjVV8i5Me 9O9T5LdbVH/v4OKKJv8y3Jcs+mPXkhwRAG1rGQt8B7OfywZKCj0GeJ0kVPnLfnn3 GU1IgsKdCYiRJ0zTnJUtwhfblwSpGRy6qN0WRtZLNWk95wZpzpguFnnEz1+8UnA6 YlirNlSTkmqPu4AtE+sCxB6JWQITj+2kHeua7i90XAYX33FPzw9jzxkpwaYI2fd8 Iz/o/OHd9Ec8awwGaKeTd/4En0+sCA+JPOQYTV8X2oSgf3EEMdhQRV8OS8zw9SIw n51EFA6oRTyK5mBjRkPN =3DKRG7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 10:38:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF3D1065670 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from offers@herotec.net) Received: from milan.hostgo.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:c9:a6ba:dbff:fe21:e417]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950F08FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [41.233.150.12] (helo=her0tec-PC) by milan.hostgo.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpfHR-0008Q6-EZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:38:34 -0400 Organization: HeroTec Message-ID: <89fdf7f383e254cb8bf5286250fd1ddb@her0tec-pc> From: "HeroTec" To: Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:33:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - milan.hostgo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - herotec.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: HeroTec training courses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: herostec@gmal.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:38:34 -0000 =20 =FDHero Tec training center is serving Egypt and Arab market via a set = of training=20 programs with the aim of preparing professional IT people up to the = international=20 Standards to compete with the major players in the international market = whether=20 you are searching for basic training or anyone needs to go in depth in = training=20 experience that will lead to a certification=2E Exams =20 MCITP: Enterprise Administrator =20 Hours =20 Fees 70-680 =20 Windows 7 Configuration =20 =A0 220 =20 =A0 2500=20 70-640 =20 Windows Server 2008 Active Directory Configuration 70-642 =20 Windows Server 2008 Network Infrastructure Configuration 70-643 =20 Windows Server 2008 Applications Infrastructure Configuration 70-647 =20 PRO: Windows Server 2008, Enterprise Administrator =A0 =20 Workshop=20 Exams =20 Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 =20 Hours =20 Fees 70-662 =A0 =20 TS: Exchange Server 2010, Configuring =20 24 =20 650 Exams =20 ForeFront TMG 2010 =20 Hours =20 Fees =A0 =20 Microsoft Forefront TMG 2010 =20 24 =20 600=20 Exams =20 Microsoft Windows SharePoint 2007 =20 Hours =20 Fees=20 70-631 =20 TS: Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0, Configuring =20 32 =20 1000=20 Exams =20 CCNA =20 Hours =20 Fees 640-802 =20 Interconnecting Cisco Networking Devices =20 60 =20 900=20 Interconnecting Cisco Networking Devices=20 Exams =20 Linux =20 Hours =20 Fees RH033 =20 Linux Essential =20 30 =20 1300=20 RH131 =20 Linux Administration =20 35 =20 1600=20 RH253 =20 Linux network & Security =20 35 =20 1600=20 =A0 =20 Web Design =20 Hours =20 Fees =A0 =20 HTML =20 =A0 =A0 40 =20 =A0 =A0 500 Dream Weaver JAVA SCRIPT CSS Photoshop for web =A0 =20 Web Develop =20 Hours =20 Fees =A0 =20 Introduction =20 =A0 30 =20 =A0 500 PHP My sql =20 =A0 =20 Tel: 22751834 - 0107988776 Email: info@herotec.nethttp://www.herotec.net =20 =A0= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 11:20:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B33A10656A3 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADF88FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7TBKHkM063330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:20:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C7A426C.1060305@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:20:12 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Indexer References: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> <780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig97D83C27791F3485ACE1D304" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:20:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig97D83C27791F3485ACE1D304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/2010 08:44:08, Indexer wrote: > When i change the subnet block to subnet6=20 >=20 > 2001:44b8:7988:c60::/64 { >=20 > The client still sends solicits to the server, but now the server no > longer receives them. Checking wether the client could connect to > ff02::1:2 came back with " UDP connect: No route to host" As far as I can tell, the subnet6 statement was the only error in the config you posted. Hmmm... I'm thinking the problem is perhaps your firewall. ... but you've tried disabling the firewall completely. Probably not that then. Connecting to [ff02::1:2]:547 (link-scoped All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers) or [ff05::1:3]:547 (site-scoped All_DHCP_Servers) should get some sort of answer. Check the routing table on server and client -- on a FreeBSD box, I get: % netstat -r | grep ff02 ff02::%re0 fe80::e2cb:4eff:fe U re0 ff02::%fwe0 fe80::1e:8cff:fec2 U fwe0 ff02::%fwip0 fe80::21e:8c00:c2: U fwip0 ff02::%lo0 localhost U lo0 ff02::%gif0 fe80::e2cb:4eff:fe U gif0 (ie. a route for all network interfaces known on the system, whether active or not) The next step in debugging is to start capturing packet traces (tcpdump(1), wireshark(1)) on both client and server and hunting in there for clues. I know some IPv6 traffic won't get through my wireless router, but that device is IPv4 only and the poor thing gets easily confused by all this new-fangled IPv6 stuff... Cheers, Matthew PS. On the off chance that it is the firewall. A good debugging trick with pf is to add a 'log' clause to any rule that has a block or reject action. Eg. in lines like the following: block log all block in log quick from no-route to any block in log quick from urpf-failed to any antispoof log quick for lo0 block in log quick on $ext_if from etc. etc. Then run tcpdump on the pflog0 interface: # tcpdump -i pflog0 -vv and make your client request a new lease. In the IPv4 case, the first packets the client sends are not *IP* packets -- they are pure ethernet packets, sent to the broadcast MAC address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, and don't necessarily have any IP address data (either IPv4 or IPv6) in them at all. If MAC-broadcast fails, then dhcp client will fall back to using the IPv4 link-local address range 169.254.0.0/16 (RFC3927). However, if your dhcp client does that, then it's usually an indication you aren't going to get an address. Now, with IPv6, link-local addresses are always configured, and there are a whole new set of prefixes for local-, site- and global- scope addresses. I don't know if dhcp client tries using MAC-broadcast at all in the IPv6 case (I would think dhcpd should answer if it does) but the link-local address stuff is possibly what's being blocked somewhere. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig97D83C27791F3485ACE1D304 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx6QnEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwJuACeP/S/GwJkdrFIQ/Dtzu1+z4dK /Z0An0XMX+482Rjbd8ueyiCiIUtjY8Jx =sNcu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig97D83C27791F3485ACE1D304-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 12:43:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D461065674 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2E08FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4644418iwn.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:43:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=Ax6C0FSdjM9Jn1vakhP5sf3dQgOJFMGjEY+3PyOMK6s=; b=Lh+YatbQvJuB8k4ma+HceTUhRse6M3cZbMAOnRXgsrM9v9rg1vN3btBKeyHRQZw1Ef XhsCpc25zh3MqF47dvRKG/wF6nO1rCe2B+q8Q2FMIx2bCTaZsd7VOao+X8EFnktennNP t/6yDuWKcUdmbWh6aXHC1GFw5l8ZDw5P8OquI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=VhZBfH5S3EtepFOn4OJgX0/e7cYL82DJPHnFs1QCRMMvDH9EtYVBfgbC/8SRMkIiD6 fhOXuIS/0dlGU1wpSrQeSynB6EjyuI+xXysCyKaNv63e+ysyewj4wMbKSYh4gjj+eT39 3HFDZ13ddZ+xB3ITz9rbe6kN+FiIlZ/ecgbGg= Received: by 10.231.148.20 with SMTP id n20mr3640943ibv.196.1283085784672; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athena.wi.rr.com (CPE-65-29-60-73.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.60.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm6139338ibh.10.2010.08.29.05.43.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:43:03 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:42:53 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.4.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008290742.53971.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: oss settings X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:43:05 -0000 My system: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 #0, KDE 4.4.5 I installed oss from ports, sound works but problem is with microphone. Settings in Kmix are very low 1:1. If I put higher than I get very loud sound from speakers. ossmix shows: Selected mixer 0/SB Live (EM28028) Known controls are: line [:] (currently 40:40) line.rec ON|OFF (currently OFF) mic (currently 1) mic.rec ON|OFF (currently ON) cd [:] (currently 75:75) cd.rec ON|OFF (currently OFF) igain [:] (currently 49:49) aux1 [:] (currently 1:1) aux1.rec ON|OFF (currently OFF) phone [:] (currently 26:26) phone.rec ON|OFF (currently OFF) rear [:] (currently 71:71) center [:] (currently 63:63) autorese ON|OFF (currently ON) spkmode (currently FRONT+SURR) pcm.main (currently 100) vmix0-enable ON|OFF (currently ON) vmix0-rate (currently 48000) (Read-only) vmix0-src (currently Fast) vmix0-outvol (currently 24.7 dB) vmix0-invol (currently 25.0 dB) vmix0.pcm1 [:] (currently 25.0:25.0 dB) vmix0.pcm2 [:] (currently 25.0:25.0 dB) vmix0.pcm3 [:] (currently 25.0:25.0 dB) vmix0.pcm4 [:] (currently 25.0:25.0 dB) pcm2 [:] (currently 60:60) vol [:] (currently 38:38) equalizer.prescale (currently 100) equalizer.lo (currently 128) equalizer.mid (currently 128) equalizer.hi (currently 128) equalizer.xhi (currently 128) equalizer.bypass ON|OFF (currently OFF) front.spdif (currently 100) front.digcd (currently 100) front.ac97 (currently 0) front.pcm (currently 100) front.aux (currently 100) front.vol [:] (currently 100:100) surr.spdif (currently 0) surr.digcd (currently 0) surr.ac97 (currently 0) surr.pcm (currently 100) surr.aux (currently 0) surr.vol [:] (currently 100:100) record.spdif (currently 100) record.digcd (currently 100) record.ac97 (currently 100) record.pcm (currently 0) record.aux (currently 100) record.vol [:] (currently 100:100) ossinfo shows:ossinfo -v3 Version info: OSS 4.2 (b 2003/201008282217) (0x00040100) BSD Platform: FreeBSD/i386 8.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jul 12 20:22:27 UTC 2010 root@i386- builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC (athena.wi.rr.com) Number of audio devices: 5 Number of audio engines: 9 Number of MIDI devices: 1 Number of mixer devices: 1 Device objects 0: oss_sblive0 SB Live interrupts=2446043 (2632294) MIDI devices (/dev/midi*) 0: SB Live external MIDI (MIDI port 1 of device object 0) Device file /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/mid0, Legacy device /dev/midi00 Modes: IN/OUT , Available for use Caps: Minimum latency: Not indicated Device handle: OSS-PCI-md01 Mixer devices 0: SB Live (EM28028) (Mixer 0 of device object 0) Device file /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/mix0, Legacy device /dev/mixer0 Priority: 2 Caps: Device handle: OSS-PCI-mx01 Device priority: 2 Audio devices SB Live main /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm0 (device index 0) Legacy device /dev/dsp0 Caps: DUPLEX TRIGGER MMAP Modes: IN/OUT Engine 1: 0/SB Live main Available for use Engine 2: 1/SB Live main (vmix) Available for use Engine 3: 2/SB Live main (vmix) Available for use Engine 4: 3/SB Live main (vmix) Available for use Engine 5: 4/SB Live main (vmix) Available for use Input formats (0x00000010): AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian Output formats (0x00000418): AFMT_U8 - 8 bit unsigned AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian AFMT_AC3 - AC3 (Dolby Digital) encoded audio Device handle: OSS-PCI-au01 Related mixer dev: 0 Sample rate source: 0 Preferred channel configuration: Not indicated Supported number of channels (min - max): 1 - 2 Native sample rates (min - max): 8000 - 48000 (8000,11025,16000,22050,24000,32000,44100,48000) HW Type: Not indicated. Minimum latency: Not indicated SB Live front out /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm1 (device index 1) Legacy device /dev/dsp1 Caps: TRIGGER MMAP Modes: OUTPUT Out engine 1: 5/SB Live front out Available for use Input formats (0x00000010): AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian Output formats (0x00000418): AFMT_U8 - 8 bit unsigned AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian AFMT_AC3 - AC3 (Dolby Digital) encoded audio Device handle: OSS-PCI-au02 Related mixer dev: 0 Sample rate source: 0 Preferred channel configuration: Not indicated Supported number of channels (min - max): 1 - 2 Native sample rates (min - max): 8000 - 48000 (8000,11025,16000,22050,24000,32000,44100,48000) HW Type: Not indicated. Minimum latency: Not indicated SB Live side out /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm2 (device index 2) Legacy device /dev/dsp2 Caps: TRIGGER MMAP Modes: OUTPUT Out engine 1: 6/SB Live side out Available for use Input formats (0x00000010): AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian Output formats (0x00000418): AFMT_U8 - 8 bit unsigned AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian AFMT_AC3 - AC3 (Dolby Digital) encoded audio Device handle: OSS-PCI-au03 Related mixer dev: 0 Sample rate source: 0 Preferred channel configuration: Not indicated Supported number of channels (min - max): 1 - 2 Native sample rates (min - max): 8000 - 48000 (8000,11025,16000,22050,24000,32000,44100,48000) HW Type: Not indicated. Minimum latency: Not indicated SB Live center/lfe out /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm3 (device index 3) Legacy device /dev/dsp3 Caps: TRIGGER MMAP Modes: OUTPUT Out engine 1: 7/SB Live center/lfe out Available for use Input formats (0x00000010): AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian Output formats (0x00000418): AFMT_U8 - 8 bit unsigned AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian AFMT_AC3 - AC3 (Dolby Digital) encoded audio Device handle: OSS-PCI-au04 Related mixer dev: 0 Sample rate source: 0 Preferred channel configuration: Not indicated Supported number of channels (min - max): 1 - 2 Native sample rates (min - max): 8000 - 48000 (8000,11025,16000,22050,24000,32000,44100,48000) HW Type: Not indicated. Minimum latency: Not indicated SB Live 5.1 output device /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm4 (device index 4) Legacy device /dev/dsp4 Caps: TRIGGER MMAP Modes: OUTPUT Out engine 1: 8/SB Live 5.1 output device Available for use Input formats (0x00000010): AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian Output formats (0x00000010): AFMT_S16_LE - 16 bit signed little endian Device handle: OSS-PCI-au05 Related mixer dev: -1 Sample rate source: 5 Preferred channel configuration: MULTICH Supported number of channels (min - max): 2 - 6 Native sample rates (min - max): 8000 - 48000 HW Type: Not indicated. Minimum latency: Not indicated Nodes /dev/dsp -> /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm0 /dev/dsp_in -> /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm0 /dev/dsp_out -> /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm0 /dev/dsp_ac3 -> /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm0 /dev/dsp_mmap -> /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm0 /dev/dsp_multich -> /dev/oss/oss_sblive0/pcm4 ...and mixer: mixer Mixer vol is currently set to 38:38 Mixer pcm is currently set to 60:60 Mixer line is currently set to 40:40 Mixer mic is currently set to 1:1 Mixer cd is currently set to 75:75 Mixer igain is currently set to 49:49 Mixer line1 is currently set to 1:1 Mixer phin is currently set to 26:26 Recording source: mic Thank you very much. Mitja -------- http://starikarp.redbubble.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 12:53:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4469F1065674 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DDE38FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27901 invoked by uid 0); 29 Aug 2010 12:53:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 12:53:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=bCsvYeBRLz5oCaWXtk8GGblGvQFHSvv0wshFBBgxTpbLRwCJD3j1Iu6FjFYexoPxTsv+1uLbcANj4IDOqhtFYcfwLjv3cllx1KDq9IcN+3RaseVVj7oWVGrsRfB27YZN; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OphOB-0001TD-6g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:53:36 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:50:42 -0600 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:50:42 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd general questions Message-ID: <20100829125042.GB91865@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd general questions References: <874453.45134.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20100826215346.7aaba141.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828170745.GA88025@guilt.hydra> <20100828203618.45fd6be8.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100828203618.45fd6be8.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: ports database X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:53:37 -0000 --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:36:18PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:07:45 -0600, Chad Perrin wro= te: > >=20 > > Is that supposed to say this? > >=20 > > tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port >=20 > I think the - infront of the options string isn't neccessary for > tar, but it's optional in this case. So it is. All these years, I've completely overlooked the COMPATIBILITY section of the tar manpage. Thanks for the wake-up call. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkx6V6IACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXVyQCgk6kFByi6v3/0gE6huduGzg2l msAAoKNh1Vtxc+3BPtcG/h4PYJ9dCw/5 =v2G/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 13:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38BF10656C2 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FB78FC19 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798F63D1DD; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7TD7iqm001484; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:44 +0200 From: Polytropon To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-Id: <20100829150744.1a29c3d8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4c7994cd.zZBjSuPFSUYKdCmf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <874453.45134.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20100826215346.7aaba141.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828170745.GA88025@guilt.hydra> <20100828203618.45fd6be8.freebsd@edvax.de> <4c7994cd.zZBjSuPFSUYKdCmf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports database X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:07:47 -0000 On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:59:25 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > > > tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port > > > > It should be, better suited: > > > > # cd /usr > > # tar cf ports.tar ports > > > > So one could do "tar xf ports.tar" in the target machine's /usr > > ... > > Better put the created tarfile somewhere other than in the directory > that is being tarred :) In thic case, the tarfile is created outside ports/, so it's not within the directory it is created in. But of course it's right: the resulting archive can be better picked up from a directory like /tmp, it should just have enough space available (allthough a compressed ports tree should be less than 500 MB). > and it might as well be compressed, something like: > > # cd /usr > # tar cf - ports | gzip > /var/tmp/ports.tgz That is possible - if space is an issue (and not time); it is also possible to do like this: # cd /usr # tar cjf /tmp/ports.tar.bz2 ports I think it will even be better compression ratio using the BZip2 algorithm (tar option j instead of z). One thing worth mentioning: The ports tree should be "clean" before transfering (which is not a problem if it has just been fetched). If you have already worked with it, make sure to have been running # make clean in the ports main directory, or simply delete all work/ subdirs that might contain tons of files not needed. The directories ports/distfiles/ and ports/packages should also be checked. As they contain compressed stuff, compressing them won't be much helpful. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 13:41:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863F410656B2 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1309E8FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537213CCA6; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7TDfOd8009672; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:41:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:41:24 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "'Gary Kline'" Message-Id: <20100829154124.dc213f18.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:41:27 -0000 On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:05:31 -0700, "'Gary Kline'" wrote: > at least for me, gtar fails to pick up dotfiles. rsynx copies > =everything=, and it looks like the test rsync script i posted > last night was working all along. it was So fast that i assumed > it was bombing entirely. i will 2-ck a few more files before i > am sure. > > a question to the list is how can i copy ALL of /home to my new > server? If it is the 1st copy, I'd suggest using dump + restore. This of course will only work if your /home is a separate partition on both systems. Partition size doesn't matter as long as the size of the target partition is at least the size of the used data on the source partition. You basically umount /home and then use # dump -Lauf0 home.dump /dev/ad0s1f to obtain the data; you can also use - instead of the actual file home.dump to pipe the data directly to a transfer via scp. On the target machine, # cd /home # restore -rf /where/is/home.dump You can connect both commands with ssh so you can directly dump + restore from machine A to machine B, given that SSH is possible. It then would be something like this: # dump -0Lauf - /dev/ad0s1f | ssh 10.0.0.10 "cd /home && cat | restore -rf -" In this example, 10.0.0.10 is the IP of the target machine, and you're issuing the command from the source machine, with /home unmounted. Note that dump requires the DEVICE NAME of the device where /home is mounted on, and restore will put everything into the CURRENT DIRECTORY. The source device must NOT be mounted, but the target directory must be mounted and accessible. You CAN, however, leave /home mounted, and dump will create a snapshot that identifies /home as at the starting point in time; changes during backup won't be reflected in the target. It CAN be possible get inconsistencies during creation of the snapshot if there's heavy activity on /home, so it's usually "the safe way" to umount /home before reading from the device file. This method makes sure you will get ALL files with their exact properties (permissions, flags, dates). See 18.2.1 here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/backup-basics.html For any further synchronisation, I would go with rsync. There is also another interesting tool in ports: It is called cpdup. It can also be used for synchronisation, and it has the interesting feature (can be configured of course) that it won't delete files in the target that have been deleted in source since the last run. In this case, your target data will always grow, and if you acciden- tally deleted something, it will sill be there. > and to you, matthew, does --delete rm out of date files > or directories? The --delete parameter will have rsync delete files on the target that are NOT part of the source files, but only relative to the subtree you are transfering. E. g. on your target machine you already have src/foo.tex src/bar.tex src/meow.c from last time you synchronized, and you have the files src/foo.tex src/bar.tex as never versions in the source, and you also deleted meow.c here because you don't need it anymore. Now if you rsync the src/ dir to the target machine, --delete will remove meow.c from the target, and rsync will of course update foo.tex and bar.tex. The --delete makes sure that the copy is of 1:1 kind, instead of incremental. > what about ?VS, given that i have virtually > everything under [CR]VS control? slightly offtopic is that i > accidently rm'd a file on tao one morning after a few minutes work. > a copy was safely croned to ethic..... A good suggestion. I did use cvsup (from ports) in the past for revision control and "idiotproof storage" for most stuff that I created. It is very helpful, not just for "recovering" accidentally deleted files, but also for progress check and "rewinding" changes. It's a great tool for keeping configuration files also. Backing it up gives you a versioned, ordered, one-tree consistent file collection. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 14:06:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9327510656B1 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788118FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A3BC4DF03; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:06:34 -0700 (PDT) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: "'Gary Kline'" References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.11.15; tzolkin = 4 Men; haab = 8 Mol Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:06:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> (Gary Kline's message of "Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:05:31 -0700") Message-ID: <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gary Gatten , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:06:34 -0000 >>>>> "'Gary" == 'Gary Kline' writes: 'Gary> at least for me, gtar fails to pick up dotfiles. How did you invoke it? There's a big difference between: cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything and cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles Did you do the latter, by chance? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 14:28:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBEE10656AD for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail17.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793AD8FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mai.dhcp.chocolate.lan (unverified [203.122.194.109]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 36798845-1927428 for multiple; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:58:38 +0930 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Indexer In-Reply-To: <4C7A426C.1060305@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:58:30 +0930 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <37A6A2B2-7C31-450D-A9B1-76D990E4DA79@internode.on.net> References: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> <780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net> <4C7A426C.1060305@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:28:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Connecting to [ff02::1:2]:547 (link-scoped > All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers) or [ff05::1:3]:547 (site-scoped > All_DHCP_Servers) should get some sort of answer. I can ping6 to ff02::1:2 successfully. >=20 > Check the routing table on server and client -- on a FreeBSD box, I = get: >=20 > % netstat -r | grep ff02 > ff02::%re0 fe80::e2cb:4eff:fe U re0 > ff02::%fwe0 fe80::1e:8cff:fec2 U fwe0 > ff02::%fwip0 fe80::21e:8c00:c2: U fwip0 > ff02::%lo0 localhost U lo0 > ff02::%gif0 fe80::e2cb:4eff:fe U gif0 Here is my routing table on my gateway system, using the same command as = yours.=20 ff02::/16 ::1 UGRS = lo0 ff02::%em0/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%em0 U = em0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 U = lo0 ff02::%tun0/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun0 UGS = tun0 ff02::%tun2/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun2 U = tun2 ff02::%tun3/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun3 U = tun3 ff02::%tun1/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun1 U = tun1 That ff02::/16 does not look quite right .....=20 >=20 > (ie. a route for all network interfaces known on the system, whether > active or not) >=20 > The next step in debugging is to start capturing packet traces > (tcpdump(1), wireshark(1)) on both client and server and hunting in > there for clues. I know some IPv6 traffic won't get through my = wireless > router, but that device is IPv4 only and the poor thing gets easily > confused by all this new-fangled IPv6 stuff... Thankfully, all my gear is quite new, and IPV6 runs happily on it with = radvd. I at least know its not my networking gear :) . I also, luckily, = have two wireless APs to test (one on RADIUS, one without) so i can rule = that out as the cause of the issue as well >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > PS. On the off chance that it is the firewall. A good debugging trick > with pf is to add a 'log' clause to any rule that has a block or = reject > action. Eg. in lines like the following: >=20 > # tcpdump -i pflog0 -vv >=20 > and make your client request a new lease. Did all of this to be 100% sure about this. No ip6 traffic was blocked. > Now, with IPv6, link-local addresses are always configured, and there > are a whole new set of prefixes for local-, site- and global- scope > addresses. I don't know if dhcp client tries using MAC-broadcast at = all > in the IPv6 case (I would think dhcpd should answer if it does) but = the > link-local address stuff is possibly what's being blocked somewhere. >=20 Yes, the new ipv6 stuff is very interesting. In fact Internode my ISP, = use DHCP6 for router prefix advertisement on the pppoe session. In fact, could that be the issue? I have dhcp6c running from my pppoe = session (tun0), and it assigns the prefix to em0. I also am trying to = use em0 as the DHCP6 server. This shouldn't be breaking it, but it = *could* be? > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 Thanks again, its greatly appreciated. William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMem6SAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JmV0P/i9ZbOD1vUx0x5V5jG31smoP cDlkREQJWHxeHKROoe4/Em24Djk07iUtOkmSyHQjh7Lq7mAyqDiJfp/8CfCs+Z4a I0/6kmWrZ6ojoqMbFRD01yQ9PubwS1pEbZxSEJnh503G5B/dy0mDCUIXRQtsfppP EJBhg0F2rw95NV4dtNtLHvJUxppWXqiLDOHoBWwa443rkgIziWi9ZkEUjcm+0x5f uOKD1Fiv9Wqua+4HWDR1IVLjHiIGO1AlLnPHVwH4T2/k63xj1fFKXT7hmQ8+i2jn FptT9T5kAPzbjO474YblyI/n7qGMzhTDuvqY9IZkycrNG/vpI7TlCP/YeI6XhIgx cO+ZlU+XUxzd1l1YcB9ipzGW0aEJcKWwmB/d4XzHoEcA/EzTS0vgmEE6ToHJBxSZ nYFMJ2OuD4ojYcrkF45+kefgA/JCH4SJk0W6qoWTzopY5yuq0pSXY7PpknwKNZlu M2YxIXWkfjdZRzItbgylSGurHcEXBwr9/Rbg5glOZ/Zkf7znTfZzG25psjy9SCCp aiNNU/Rhh5wbbn8GY8CeLXPVDgOybbx1C+zLeH5n/yqakrl9v5O5FwF5qDs7uvX5 hdc9UDKAaJBdgX3YsLecyhSt9ekmPxLY4tEvLUXsf1YUJX5J+HcUoE+ke0uzEqu1 vgnIJiUzdYP/hR0X4BHc =3DxWfb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 14:48:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC051065695 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0458B8FC19 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33591 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Aug 2010 14:48:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283093318; bh=elAG34DN3ia3/Zvpju0FiM9yBiG0KfImG7cR1yTU3Uw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nTRmuz4JIhzXUaiALGUFAfu827wwc/+SbMuq1EmZ0KlKrUySSMOMclURjnm7a4pUgEBYEudZgUSxRtq92h9xi9be3Ljd/xDihULZM2hYs9vEtpJD6TK92OsvbFtYHTv9Xh1aF8e+0gdFzgNe3VagWQnirePGMUKijKqG9buAh9U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EJru7JY1NrSrN3WS/OyYXs5rwrruY9Dfv7893RSGF2j+hdqbgn1P5Dqyqy8fLJSyLe6BuwrljNeoYQSYzXwihJc8snh/gYIofpPwNkzXQnCrqvlqqWGYzPlTh3Ez8KTda2/IzMpmVRVBKrlUhRgPih0r0zuCspfWTVtStvl6V6s=; Message-ID: <593560.33365.qm@web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1u4_wXwVM1mLPamHqJ8q4hzREygH4C9LddDPEl8KJXqUZ0r 9uT22Xe8NPuYutDGkfCwl463Z9wkfIZaV7FWlVZSVTn061R6_DyFk.JnrGle RFmc3ZRaE62064Msi_EgO4eac55mbeGCDo1PN91EckBmkxEeEv6_Z3mh99qj C69uoHDpaQZ2y50Neg6g3bY3Bjz1HJZmTRINm8MEhBX_rgyKn1COjXLqKjk5 Alj0qqgTjQosjD0KeiFfUP0peyQlUUZFUJ92B5jm1arBGi7ysyXhmCrRptmr 1TGCuY0zjIDze5jRnA1IeQb00AeC9AO4TKMxsqFVQqCE65n9Nh.Xi6njWZbH EYyh192gv7HISVyc- Received: from [201.235.209.134] by web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:48:38 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:48:38 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <861v9i161x.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:48:39 -0000 Thanks, but I did a "portsnap fetch update" and the autotools wasn't update= d.=0A=0AHow can I get the correct port?=0A=0A=0Auname -a:=0AFreeBSD server.= rame.local 8.1-RC2 FreeBSD 8.1-RC2 #0: Tue Jun 29 20:21:55 UTC 2010 root@ma= son.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64=0A=0ALeonardo M. Ra= m=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A--- On Sat, 8/28/10, Anonym= ous wrote:=0A=0A> From: Anonymous = =0A> Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63=0A> To: "Leonardo M. Ram=E9" =0A> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Saturday, August 2= 8, 2010, 11:55 PM=0A> Leonardo M. Ram=E9 =0A> writes:= =0A> =0A> > Hi, while trying to compile Firebird 2.1.x from=0A> sources I g= ot this error:=0A> >=0A> > **Error**: You must have autoconf 2.63 or later= =0A> installed.=0A> >=0A> > My first reaction was looking at /usr/ports/dev= el, but=0A> found that the=0A> > highest version of autoconf available is 2= .62. How can=0A> I get 2.63?=0A> =0A> The patch in ports/149861 contains au= toconf-2.67.=0A> =A0 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/149= 861=0A> =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 14:56:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF65106567A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4EF8FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8815810EDFF for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:56:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJT1jUc1nN0f for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:56:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899E210E50A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:56:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7A74F8.2010501@eskk.nu> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:55:52 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problems with portmaster after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:56:02 -0000 Hello list. I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-) Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports. When I try to do portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` I get a prompt CORRECT>portmaster `cut ~/installed-port-list` (y|n|e|a)? I choose n and hit enter and get cat: Command not found. portmaster: Command not found. I've done cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make deinstall make clean make install clean rehash And stil the problem persists! Portmaster is the only installed port Also: portmaster --check-port-dbdir gives Illegal option --check-port-dbdir $PATH gives /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin: Command not found. again the command not found! I'm a little lost, any suggestions? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:07:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8BE10656A5 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684738FC1E for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7TF7HXs022405; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:07:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE031BAA2; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:07:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:07:16 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Leslie Jensen Message-ID: <20100829150716.GA99969@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <4C7A74F8.2010501@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C7A74F8.2010501@eskk.nu> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with portmaster after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:20 -0000 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Hello list. >=20 > I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-) >=20 > Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports. Why? You only have to re-install all ports when changing between major releases e.g. 7.x to 8.x. Point releases are binary compatible. =20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkx6d6QACgkQEnfvsMMhpyV39wCff4WqT64ahkW3BPnEwsvyf4aM T/UAnjqTJ25my5fydYrF0r4AIB/OdBCU =vvXU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:07:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6C91065701 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no.molas@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD558FC16 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1370819yxn.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:07:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2EBy3nHRSuif6f991O53wZnbXLqRgmlPygf3VkGpD4k=; b=HS1ZK9vp1CUJx7VgUQj/l5ALHo8rHUa8H6DCFUstw0xfFrtjz9RfOs0UsnP78ChQxN 1osu9O+snNVJuoIHqrg5OssXvErjibJPgLvzIalHhHy3VhGPSu29ZWH4li+JqlgWvY6d AoD2VVfP7GYCxKIQtP3y2b3GKxuF9wwjYmWMs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QJ3+4gU4cV4cQi9W8H8yQtCi9dKFxjbapv9eJqBi3IBBLIvbQiyhScXz9HGRk+6kVw PwqRqqaR4JRcg/JyK4SB610o97xkCwOo2yW6Fula6au9ihUkKsG+L9DjQU5Yiy7gfCgt 9RWbxQvHUul4pzBTfqvuzNOADlCR0i1I1sRes= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr2835534agb.158.1283092672030; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.178.15 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:37:51 -0300 Message-ID: From: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mirror Freebsd - Doubts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:30 -0000 I am wanting to mount a mirror, to place repositories of debian / ubuntu, because many machines in my company update the repositories and doing so will improve the process performance. However, I do this in FreeBSD (with spegla, ftpmirror ...), and was wondering if it is possible, if not I will take issue with that. I'm new here on the list, so excuse me if the correct place to ask that is not here. Grateful for the cooperation, Felipe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:10:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18E81065693 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6196F8FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DAE10EE05 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:10:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qj88JPHCIsfV for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD0210EDFF for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7A7865.6060008@eskk.nu> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:10:29 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C7A74F8.2010501@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4C7A74F8.2010501@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SOLVED.....Re: Problems with portmaster after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:10:36 -0000 On 2010-08-29 16:55, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Hello list. > > I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-) > > Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports. > > When I try to do portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` I get a prompt > I tried the same commands using ssh from another machine and I could see that the commands in my history was garbage. Giving the commands from the remote machine works flawlessly :-) Sorry for the noise! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:11:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61E81065698 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A179C8FC1C for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1713410EDFF; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:12:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YONeE99dvFuT; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:12:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692AA10E50A; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:12:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7A78B3.8030302@eskk.nu> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:11:47 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <4C7A74F8.2010501@eskk.nu> <20100829150716.GA99969@slackbox.erewhon.net> In-Reply-To: <20100829150716.GA99969@slackbox.erewhon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with portmaster after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:11:57 -0000 On 2010-08-29 17:07, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: >> Hello list. >> >> I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-) >> >> Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports. > > Why? > > You only have to re-install all ports when changing between major releases > e.g. 7.x to 8.x. Point releases are binary compatible. > Because I had not updated the ports on that machine since march this year :-o /L From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:14:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203491065697 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAA88FC1D for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so3737337bwz.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:14:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lQEJCSCvgcMqo7DOs+4OkahdRjTVS+s2UkKDY2bEzqw=; b=YC/x3AEeBpv/5WRKUhpHSKgOGdskhgp4pPBJbt7W6Djeyi4ZrxZTntuDeHGGNogTtS o9IBZEkYnDBna8vYXb7SNRihtNuUnEln/BGGAq/UkHRy0JryUw+0V+mPpPijtiaqnFNi VzmO3OfZS/xtn+bxS6xCsbl1Lu4kuowMvWk94= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CpEsso1tW8fCy6IlP0IsVsqRnrKYy+obrnlMmR/zpoXU94rU03uPbZA7ASLAf7Mmd9 6eIv/tV5OfKXT2etGLrqlYp2h/9fNVWg8Vuswca5/yl2nFIWAd3K7rg6Y+t88+Yx/Lr/ FBEtIj5xHWu2sF7jiBKerjaLmHcan1QqZ8hNU= Received: by 10.204.127.10 with SMTP id e10mr2289758bks.136.1283094869477; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([188.72.225.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f10sm4371824bkl.17.2010.08.29.08.14.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:14:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: Leonardo M. =?utf-8?Q?Ram=C3=A9?= References: <861v9i161x.fsf@gmail.com> <593560.33365.qm@web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:14:13 +0400 In-Reply-To: <593560.33365.qm@web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> ("Leonardo M. =?utf-8?Q?Ram=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:48:38 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <86aao5bge2.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:14:31 -0000 Leonardo M. Ram=C3=A9 writes: > Thanks, but I did a "portsnap fetch update" and the autotools wasn't upda= ted. > > How can I get the correct port? The PR is not vetted by exp-run yet. If you're not gonna test the patch then better just wait for it to hit the ports tree. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:16:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420BF10656A3 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1456B8FC20 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13995 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Aug 2010 15:16:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283094989; bh=+IXKZeYbdZNMNRmO0BX2vyXYpCkMcvgxG/6LN5ZVs8Y=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=x/0EgXrfLK6zYE8NOAQNq9dVunMaQ8X4HrC83Z+TuSvD8hACVzF0rVH9hUudDw8Yx5Oq4lf4k2lxU1d3GAVZvF5zBLXogYZtFjQY5yJrqUPRLKTkKQOYQbPZP93Igko9nKuWr5ayHbR+mWkyKr1EtE0Z12/k+AN+5/Y7JqX5BPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JWmdAkPV0eFHZ+Ls4Tv+BnycD/uCsk42WZ4tdcorURXaOQ1U0/WLCS8Gefu85LPEMD5t9hM18xQ+x+72SbyGD/HN0m7UFyFf2On7n30DH1mlXkUiSPwDbW88Cf69zGSRE1EiV931Kuy+1KveIU0zfmFSUWAlVJEtuL4UX1HWTOg=; Message-ID: <372326.12617.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 7GhcUL4VM1m.1Tqms0zPnbere6iuqcrdZcvgKo.bCEJmshv 8.XlYDMbqEycHvmMgEyveyTV9Y8Y7Vjv_sl8N.ykNGiSoo0R8fv.7v4b8G2H JvvOTOEk8RBBmApuu6iTc4XfukdAMM3j_DtBXvgG6FeTVz4.2PcNZ9.e0sIy jsQXvGRnZTJIrOA5LMOKOtTfbGCQzIYFr0dcGQQaeOu3SXdHsGLBdIYeYOP0 YvwSm.PrlcixYOm4vZZP8rTgYWaZAGZ1WFNUgoYMo54gadRMbji3hU5dBOJi hNzhmSjAGKzOm3YdpGGVbgqsM7Rb5Ds0bKCUNW.hRPoureCJLtoHmYz8rDAu qE_XJ8cI6vFWsiZg- Received: from [201.235.209.134] by web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:16:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:16:29 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <86aao5bge2.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:16:30 -0000 I don't have any problem in testing the patch, but...how can I do that?=0A= =0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A--- On Sun= , 8/29/10, Anonymous wrote:=0A=0A> From: Anonymous =0A> Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63=0A> To: "Leonardo M. Ram=E9"= =0A> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Sun= day, August 29, 2010, 12:14 PM=0A> Leonardo M. Ram=E9 =0A> writes:=0A> =0A> > Thanks, but I did a "portsnap fetch update" and th= e=0A> autotools wasn't updated.=0A> >=0A> > How can I get the correct port?= =0A> =0A> The PR is not vetted by exp-run yet. If you're not gonna=0A> test= the patch=0A> then better just wait for it to hit the ports tree.=0A> =0A= =0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:21:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EE2106564A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hidden.node@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B598FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2972260ewy.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:21:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=UeixiL1/DGtadx+ywTHVY4cV/JmKtmwpBQYlpEC0RAo=; b=dEeCN9BWe/D7MvZoNsB7serEgxfhCeg1pwcrtvho5KE05xLQzZusJwQIY9vZuwrSLZ iZ9eoTst6VAzoXHtF+b7K8Dqw69oDo1LDhGDaao+2VDAj7+JH2kBbA3/1RABVCTMi+cu O2VCp3xAjelmNELBPsWR+NDFRbxeo7xvILjvU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=mDRi50Gj5mPXkXUfO4PiO8OIXcrn0KdGFrf3O97ZNXqwG9jJEpX6H7CmJkv0Dgv8Ak TwLNZs81iuCam8+XSQc8iOYMNgw4p32m4/HECZ5H9rBcgBpxtaoAlTnDDdHG2MjsD8rl ncsPGn0gDumPY1ES8CvW6ph9YXI8/NOzTSOFc= Received: by 10.213.35.72 with SMTP id o8mr6165098ebd.80.1283095310190; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eternity ([84.51.106.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm10294509eei.13.2010.08.29.08.21.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:21:49 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mikhail" To: Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:21:46 +0400 Message-ID: <00a201cb478d$e620a110$b261e330$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: ActHjb3Go6IaJRyZTrKcrBt9M0VyVA== Content-Language: ru Subject: Effective FreeBSD installation on several servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:51 -0000 Hello, I have three servers which I'm going to use for dynamips setup, so I basicly need only computing power of those machines. What would be the most effective way to install/upgrade FreeBSD on servers? I think about PXE booting through the network and mounting /,/home over NFS - is it possible? Has anyone done such thing before? Or maybe there are more effective way for such installation? Be well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 15:45:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A0A1065698 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EED8FC24 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7TFQiLg090855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:26:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4C7A7C34.4040006@tundraware.com> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:26:44 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <00a201cb478d$e620a110$b261e330$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00a201cb478d$e620a110$b261e330$@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:26:44 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: o7TFQiLg090855 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Effective FreeBSD installation on several servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:45:14 -0000 On 8/29/2010 10:21 AM, Mikhail wrote: > Hello, I have three servers which I'm going to use for dynamips setup, so I > basicly need only computing power of those machines. > > What would be the most effective way to install/upgrade FreeBSD on servers? > I think about PXE booting through the network and mounting /,/home over NFS > - is it possible? > > Has anyone done such thing before? Or maybe there are more effective way for > such installation? > > Be well. I wrote my own backup script to create file-level images which can then be used to populate a new installation. Process described at: http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tbku/Imaging-FreeBSD-With-tbku.html -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 17:23:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E9810656A4 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6E78FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:23:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AogFAGIzekxbsYVL/2dsb2JhbACTJI0lcrkahTcE Received: from 75.133-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.133.75]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2010 19:23:16 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7THNF4q004576; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:23:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:23:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.4.5; i386; ; ) References: <4C78AEC1.1090304@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <4C78AEC1.1090304@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart17578175.aE40ymNMRI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008291923.14570.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: Yuri Subject: Re: Why compositing gets disabled in KDE4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:23:21 -0000 --nextPart17578175.aE40ymNMRI Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 28 August 2010 08:37:53 Yuri wrote: > It worked before on the same system (~3 months ago). But after some > updates of everything (kernel/nvidia driver/kde4) it gets disabled > from kde4 startup. Pressing 'Resume Compositing' doesn't help. >=20 > Message pops up that some application disabled compositing, press > Alt-Shift-F12. But this doesn't help either. >=20 > Any idea why this feature is broken? >=20 > FreeBSD-8.1-STABLE amd64 > nvidia-driver-195.36.15 > GeForce 9400GT > kde-4.4.5 You should post your /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /etc/X11/xorg.conf to the list. --nextPart17578175.aE40ymNMRI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAkx6l4IACgkQfoCS2CCgtitZ5QD+NB3Wyu0aMgpNdnx/HKjshtLS xaODLaLiKlT13s5c804A/3tN3ccu1RnFDgVyLFByh9juYUXssvST5/1Cyuwv13sV =3PfI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart17578175.aE40ymNMRI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 17:37:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BF01065679 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF978FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7THbAte067162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:37:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C7A9ABE.1010108@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:37:02 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Indexer References: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> <780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net> <4C7A426C.1060305@infracaninophile.co.uk> <37A6A2B2-7C31-450D-A9B1-76D990E4DA79@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <37A6A2B2-7C31-450D-A9B1-76D990E4DA79@internode.on.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE53C319CE6574FCC7B75AD63" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:37:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE53C319CE6574FCC7B75AD63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/2010 15:28:30, Indexer wrote: >> Connecting to [ff02::1:2]:547 (link-scoped >> > All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers) or [ff05::1:3]:547 (site-scoped >> > All_DHCP_Servers) should get some sort of answer. > I can ping6 to ff02::1:2 successfully. Can you tell if it's your DHCP6 server responding? >> > Check the routing table on server and client -- on a FreeBSD box, I = get: >> > >> > % netstat -r | grep ff02 >> > ff02::%re0 fe80::e2cb:4eff:fe U re0 >> > ff02::%fwe0 fe80::1e:8cff:fec2 U fwe0 >> > ff02::%fwip0 fe80::21e:8c00:c2: U fwip0 >> > ff02::%lo0 localhost U lo0 >> > ff02::%gif0 fe80::e2cb:4eff:fe U gif0 >=20 > Here is my routing table on my gateway system, using the same command a= s yours. >=20 > ff02::/16 ::1 UGRS = lo0 > ff02::%em0/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%em0 U = em0 > ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 U = lo0 > ff02::%tun0/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun0 UGS = tun0 > ff02::%tun2/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun2 U = tun2 > ff02::%tun3/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun3 U = tun3 > ff02::%tun1/32 fe80::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e%tun1 U = tun1 > That ff02::/16 does not look quite right ..... It's different, yes. That could be due to running DHCP6 -- after all, the daemon has to have some way of receiving all the DHCP traffic to the various site- and link- local addresses. You can test that by turning off dhcpd and checking the routing table with it not running. If the route doesn't disappear, try disabling dhcpd in /etc/rc.conf, rebooting and then see if that route is still present. Either way, re-enable dhcpd in rc.conf and re-start the daemon: if the route appears then it's required by dhcpd and everything looks to be in order. > In fact, could that be the issue? I have dhcp6c running from my > pppoe session (tun0), and it assigns the prefix to em0. I also am tryin= g to > use em0 as the DHCP6 server. This shouldn't be breaking it, but it > *could* be? Ah. Yes, this might cause you problems. Possibly. If Internode DHCP6 has been configured as authoritative for your address range and if the query packets from your client can reach Internode's DHCP6 server then you probably will have trouble. I shouldn't think its likely though -- your client's DHCP6 initial queries will be to find a server on the same network segment, and to reach the Internode servers it would have to hop through your gateway machine, which is your DHCP6 server anyhow. If your network prefix is dynamically assigned, then I don't think there is a way to have a DHCP6 server be a DHCP6 client as well, and pass on the prefixes it has obtained dynamically. BICBW. If your ISPs policy is actually to assign you a particular prefix permanently rather than give you one out of some dynamically assigned pool, then it's worth a try using a static configuration on your gateway machine -- I believe you said this was a test setup to see if it could be rolled out on a customer network? Should be fine to try static configuration like that for a limited time even supposing it's all dynamically assigned. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE53C319CE6574FCC7B75AD63 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx6msYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz7qQCfR1kK7vsdW7BUEOAnmWPVFEjN OuwAn00gHVuA01acjZajVqdEBxnbFX63 =etfz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE53C319CE6574FCC7B75AD63-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 17:58:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1B6106564A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4C08FC12 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7THwUZq076090; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4C7A9FC6.5030200@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:58:30 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100815 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tijl Coosemans References: <4C78AEC1.1090304@rawbw.com> <201008291923.14570.tijl@coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <201008291923.14570.tijl@coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why compositing gets disabled in KDE4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:58:34 -0000 On 08/29/2010 10:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Saturday 28 August 2010 08:37:53 Yuri wrote: > >> It worked before on the same system (~3 months ago). But after some >> updates of everything (kernel/nvidia driver/kde4) it gets disabled >> from kde4 startup. Pressing 'Resume Compositing' doesn't help. >> >> Message pops up that some application disabled compositing, press >> Alt-Shift-F12. But this doesn't help either. >> > You should post your /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /etc/X11/xorg.conf to the > list. > Thank you, I figured this out. This happens when kernel was rebuilt after nvidia module. Even presumably minor updates in kernel (8.1-STABLE updates) cause this: X works fine except for compositing is broken. Thank you, Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 18:02:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A2B10656A3 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49DE8FC0C for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7TI2ZYk067538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:02:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C7AA0B6.3010703@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:02:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE8CE354BB6050351EE952692" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror Freebsd - Doubts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:40 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE8CE354BB6050351EE952692 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/2010 15:37:51, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa wrote: > I am wanting to mount a mirror, to place repositories of debian / ubunt= u, > because many machines in my company update the repositories and doing s= o > will improve the process performance. > However, I do this in FreeBSD (with spegla, ftpmirror ...), and was > wondering if it is possible, if not I will take issue with that. > I'm new here on the list, so excuse me if the correct place to ask that= is > not here. >=20 > Grateful for the cooperation, Sure, this is certainly possible with FreeBSD. You can run a FTP mirror on it quite happily. That's the sort of thing that would work pretty well on any unixoid system to be frank, so your choice of FreeBSD might need justifying by some external criterion: "FreeBSD runs ZFS", "We get better network performance with FreeBSD" or even "I'm the sysadmin around here, and I like FreeBSD, so nyer." Check the ports for ftp mirroring programs. Both the ones you mention are available. Another approach is to use a caching proxy -- squid will do this for ftp URLs, as will apache (using mod_proxy). You can even be completely evil and set it up as a transparent proxy with a little work. The advantage of using a caching proxy is that over time it will pretty much auto-tune itself to contain the distfiles your users are interested in without your having to have any prior knowledge. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE8CE354BB6050351EE952692 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx6oLsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxvqwCfZnlwdUb7Rzkj5wNaFxh4Mi9O 1UYAn3+4inslHr0jcYcmkyufnFhmIb7P =Yb0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE8CE354BB6050351EE952692-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:07:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA2D10656A4 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0978FC13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7TJ7mIC023290; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:07:47 -0700 From: "'Gary Kline'" To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Message-ID: <20100829190747.GB4151@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Gary Gatten , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:57 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 07:06:33AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "'Gary" == 'Gary Kline' writes: > > 'Gary> at least for me, gtar fails to pick up dotfiles. > > How did you invoke it? > > There's a big difference between: > > cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything > > and > > cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles > > Did you do the latter, by chance? Sure. my default is the asterisk. ...Anyway, i used matthew's -r for recursion [with rsync] and even tested --delete on some junk ~kline/.4kde/* stuff. then slowly, got rid of more junk [[unused for =years=]] directories and files. pretty soon i'll be ready to save everything from here [tao/present/oldtao] to ethic. then i'll move everything to the newtao. then i'll give away my '03 tower. "do unto others... " or whatever:) gary PS: thanks for the tip, randal! i may have that somewhere in some obscure ~/.notesfile. > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:08:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D924C1065675 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD5F8FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-5.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.5] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oplur-0002k8-Il for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:43:38 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:59:33 -0700 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:59:33 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100829175933.GB44409@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Cc: Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:08:34 -0000 --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Eitan Adler on Sunday, 29 August 2010: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > > Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about= that. > > > > There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in > > /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a > > feature. > > > > Kurt >=20 > portmaster -o www/squid31 www/squid30 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Eitan Adler So, if I understand correctly, I could use this to upgrade from python26 to python27? Or perl 5.8.9 to perl 5.12? and everything that depended on the former will be upgraded to the latter? Can I say "sweeeeet" in advance? Is there a way to do that with portupgrade, or is this one of those features that makes portmaster a better mousetrap? --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMeqAFAAoJEIpckszW26+Rf7oH/jE12mPmYGJfskFWXazNhY9C FkY8BlBXKw7PporjyHKDFv/KGtvv1mWP97qeK+XzaZ44FfpWi+F1ByqmGyz8DlhX hlXzyYjdJ6ZvHk8fK3/HS+UJr8udGmmNkmszbAdbcFn8Q+jHVJRGSV/rBGsxRzGs F/EUKozKSzFtu1DM+uq1eUYJq8HwU0xpIMBBtzrQeOqQqSCA/+ftMgg+7SaeorH5 4wtkdayuzRe8cJh7ru0sz3UxtbMhyiIZrTn81KXa9sO5ne2s5kn+LKqRJlK9p4CR Yh5/r7h5W58Ud03PATiXN9Wvq03exfdsR3OHMg/eIn/VFySvdTVLFUGPSKUAFDc= =WuIF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:11:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2F91065679 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anonymous@dusk.parklogic.com) Received: from dusk.parklogic.com (allmail.0b2.net [64.38.11.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FBC88FC1C for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6344 invoked by uid 511); 29 Aug 2010 17:53:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20100829175320.6343.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> From: "Indexer" To: "Matthew Seaman" In-Reply-To: 4C7A9ABE.1010108@infracaninophile.co.uk References: 141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net 4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk 780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net 4C7A426C.1060305@infracaninophile.co.uk 37A6A2B2-7C31-450D-A9B1-76D990E4DA79@internode.on.net 4C7A9ABE.1010108@infracaninophile.co.uk Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:53:20 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="1283104400.8a1BD320.6304"; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:11:47 -0000 Dear Sir/Madam, Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: [1]Click here for our website We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards, Webmaster References 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:12:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9333410656BD for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F928FC08 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4F941427D0; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:12 -0700 (PDT) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: "'Gary Kline'" References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20100829190747.GB4151@thought.org> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.11.15; tzolkin = 4 Men; haab = 8 Mol Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100829190747.GB4151@thought.org> (Gary Kline's message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:07:47 -0700") Message-ID: <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gary Gatten , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:12:12 -0000 >>>>> "'Gary" == 'Gary Kline' writes: >> There's a big difference between: >> >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything >> >> and >> >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles >> >> Did you do the latter, by chance? 'Gary> Sure. my default is the asterisk. Well, there's your problem. Sometimes, you have to actually think about what you're doing. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:20:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1214610656A7 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A949B8FC14 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7TJKp9r052168; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:20:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o7TJKpDn052165; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:20:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:20:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Chip Camden In-Reply-To: <20100829175933.GB44409@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Message-ID: References: <20100829175933.GB44409@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:20:51 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:20:56 -0000 On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Eitan Adler on Sunday, 29 August 2010: >> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >>> Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that. >>> >>> There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in >>> /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a >>> feature. >> >> portmaster -o www/squid31 www/squid30 > > So, if I understand correctly, I could use this to upgrade from python26 > to python27? Or perl 5.8.9 to perl 5.12? and everything that depended > on the former will be upgraded to the latter? Can I say "sweeeeet" in > advance? Is there a way to do that with portupgrade, or is this one of > those features that makes portmaster a better mousetrap? portupgrade has had it for a long time: man portupgrade | less '+/-o ORIGIN' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:35:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030A610656AA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50AC8FC0A for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAECF3D531; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7TJYxcC011121; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:34:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:34:59 +0200 From: Polytropon To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Message-Id: <20100829213459.ba11c3b8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20100829190747.GB4151@thought.org> <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:35:03 -0000 On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:11 -0700, merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > >>>>> "'Gary" == 'Gary Kline' writes: > > >> There's a big difference between: > >> > >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything > >> > >> and > >> > >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles > >> > >> Did you do the latter, by chance? > > > 'Gary> Sure. my default is the asterisk. > > Well, there's your problem. Sometimes, you have to actually think > about what you're doing. :) The "problem" (i. e. a convention) is that .* is not part of *, which includes everything else, even "nothing", and the form *.* (that looks like the DOS equivalent of "all files") does seem to omit .*; the spaced form * .* would work as it contains * (which does not contain .*) and .* (not in *). :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:41:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC7A10656A3 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DCD78FC0C for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89474 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Aug 2010 19:41:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283110890; bh=7y7hxoz4n4TzMd6tqpRTuYgxR5Uvc1X9MV7uMhc/BAk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5NLZ4nCv5cma+2nUXdm0RrM0RODV3wxiMHoji1Do2ttApP7IaBk3YE+IiX0XM+P7hrl4xIVmqUFv8+vhywgx9+2nMVAyLWPFNLD0IES59Snpwl4r428YExENiPo4qmGvBy7dayrdrh1ItKwdl3HPP7rE5yfAiZvybBavwSjGUAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jbuOFZv0TSUrA8LTCRmNCai2PF0Eyb1rWtB8g7OQ9ZxeDXebc8ea6Lee8YPZL/QyEIWqKFZXELywwxTAgGfF/v05swy49A+fW7QGyZ6bm35zYE6a8oUBU2S+ucHAE3GrcHalD4b0fh0NTCyx/W6Mqdxb0YTjdzBK5N1Z+Pp+49o=; Message-ID: <47491.89435.qm@web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: wZUXB2wVM1nAd6ypxX1C7gOcr4rIjsa2WWDRyd7u6l2BSHb xzvF99MaCYgo287lkFsMWHgr7SOrrHFNVfqrG9KhaXVDWYqYG8B7Jph2K6mp a1ukVl1nMyDGxl_s0RlkQ_RD4QRgSndGO9U8XF5nFfInZtJIH_mQlZF.Jt1n 4rNRqqBnlxZ.Dy3vSil8ZtseIQr.qe2t0xz0wG331fXFA_E8kzLngIPd41Sp W..mqWQpiNFEyLi7bNPasMi_hQfHPI4naRQW4TVu7oaqka.mv6Uf_t_UoUHR fE4uTnz_Awc0_Bjig6cKPOwuZvtwyp1ZLnIAwC1.h3ptri44I_TY0u_ZRb8F THDnlFq_SSbrMzS8- Received: from [201.235.209.134] by web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:41:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:41:29 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <372326.12617.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:41:30 -0000 It was easier than I tought:=0A=0Awget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/auto= conf-2.67.tar.gz=0Atar xvfz autoconf-2.67.tar.gz=0Acd autoconf-2.67=0A./con= figure=0Agmake=0Asudo gmake install =0A=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leona= rdorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A--- On Sun, 8/29/10, Leonardo M. Ram=E9 wrote:=0A=0A> From: Leonardo M. Ram=E9 =0A> Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63=0A> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A= > Date: Sunday, August 29, 2010, 12:16 PM=0A> I don't have any problem in t= esting=0A> the patch, but...how can I do that?=0A> =0A> Leonardo M. Ram=E9= =0A> http://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A> =0A> =0A> --- On Sun, 8/29/10, An= onymous =0A> wrote:=0A> =0A> > From: Anonymous =0A> > Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63=0A> > To: "Leonardo M. Ram=E9" = =0A> > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> > Date: = Sunday, August 29, 2010, 12:14 PM=0A> > Leonardo M. Ram=E9 =0A> > writes:=0A> > =0A> > > Thanks, but I did a "portsnap fetch upd= ate" and=0A> the=0A> > autotools wasn't updated.=0A> > >=0A> > > How can I = get the correct port?=0A> > =0A> > The PR is not vetted by exp-run yet. If = you're not=0A> gonna=0A> > test the patch=0A> > then better just wait for i= t to hit the ports tree.=0A> > =0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> ________________________= _______________________=0A> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list= =0A> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To uns= ubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> = =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:46:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEC710656B7 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1698FC1D for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7TJkAjH068544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:46:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C7AB8FB.5000706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:46:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <20100829175933.GB44409@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD694D761063F91B01337C48F" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Chip Camden , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:46:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD694D761063F91B01337C48F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/2010 20:20:51, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote: >> Quoth Eitan Adler on Sunday, 29 August 2010: >>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wro= te: >>>> Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong >>>> about that. >>>> >>>> There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in >>>> /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a >>>> feature. >>> >>> portmaster -o www/squid31 www/squid30 >> >> So, if I understand correctly, I could use this to upgrade from python= 26 >> to python27? Or perl 5.8.9 to perl 5.12? and everything that depende= d >> on the former will be upgraded to the latter? Can I say "sweeeeet" in= >> advance? Is there a way to do that with portupgrade, or is this one o= f >> those features that makes portmaster a better mousetrap? >=20 > portupgrade has had it for a long time: >=20 > man portupgrade | less '+/-o ORIGIN' Yes. portmaster has pretty much the same '-o' flag. However, it's not quite so "sweeeeet" (sic) as all that -- all the '-o' flag does, in either portmaster or portupgrade is transfer the dependencies to the new package. In very many cases you would still have to reinstall everything that depends on the replaced package. Sometimes that's because shlibs have different versions -- eg. if you upgrade from mysql-5.0.x to mysql-5.1.x[*], then the ABI version changes and you need to reinstall everything that links against libmysql. With perl, the reason is even simpler -- the perl version number is embedded in the library search path, so until you reinstall, even pure-perl modules are going to be inaccessible. XS modules need relinking in any case. Not entirely sure of the details with python, but certainly any module which is available as dynamically loadable object code will need relinkin= g. Generally, the advice is to forcibly reinstall everything that depends on the package you replaced: portmaster -f -R -r example/port portupgrade -f -r example/port Cheers, Matthew [*] Which is a slightly trickier exercise than most, given you've got to update both mysql-client and mysql-server ports using the '-o' thing. Possibly even the mysql-scripts port if installed. And then you've got to deal with all the dependencies too. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigD694D761063F91B01337C48F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx6uQIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwMyACeJGXvJSqwvQBrIo+zOzvXOOc+ 0IMAnijvfQTnM2tg8Zu1O8o+HfT/YqHz =yHLx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD694D761063F91B01337C48F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:54:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BC610656AA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B90D8FC14 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7TJsMNE023571; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:54:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:54:21 -0700 From: "'Gary Kline'" To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Message-ID: <20100829195421.GA21994@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20100829190747.GB4151@thought.org> <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Gary Gatten , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:54:30 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:12:11PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "'Gary" == 'Gary Kline' writes: > > >> There's a big difference between: > >> > >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything > >> > >> and > >> > >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles > >> > >> Did you do the latter, by chance? > > > 'Gary> Sure. my default is the asterisk. > > Well, there's your problem. Sometimes, you have to actually think > about what you're doing. :) > LOL! man, when i get into hackery mode--especially playing at being a system admin-- i just go into autopilot. well, live and learn. this stuff has been a good reminder. hope it helps a few others listmembers. (FWIW,I actually did find the dot vs asterisk note in a old howto file. i dont know if i ought to fess up, but i am.) here's another fwiw before i really launch: it pays to do a du from $HOME every few [n] months. i'm finding so much unused crud, e.g. ~/.wine from 2004, that my drive is going to weigh a few pounds less... > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 20:00:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D705910656AA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642598FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7TK05fl023638; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:00:04 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20100829200004.GB21994@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100828070231.GA98502@thought.org> <4C78E509.6020701@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100829010531.GA1471@thought.org> <86iq2tms2e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20100829190747.GB4151@thought.org> <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20100829213459.ba11c3b8.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100829213459.ba11c3b8.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , "Randal L. Schwartz" Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:00:12 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:11 -0700, merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > > >>>>> "'Gary" == 'Gary Kline' writes: > > > > >> There's a big difference between: > > >> > > >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything > > >> > > >> and > > >> > > >> cd $HOME && gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles > > >> > > >> Did you do the latter, by chance? > > > > > > 'Gary> Sure. my default is the asterisk. > > > > Well, there's your problem. Sometimes, you have to actually think > > about what you're doing. :) > > The "problem" (i. e. a convention) is that .* is not part of *, > which includes everything else, even "nothing", and the > form *.* (that looks like the DOS equivalent of "all files") > does seem to omit .*; the spaced form * .* would work as it > contains * (which does not contain .*) and .* (not in *). :-) > ouvh, ouch, ouch!1 running away, pulling out my one remaining hair:) ...and now, no mo' mail until, oh, around 02:15 -g > > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 20:08:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D3B1065673 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69A8FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:08:12 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AogFAP5aekxUXebj/2dsb2JhbACTI40mcbk2hTcE Received: from outmx01.plus.net ([84.93.230.227]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2010 21:08:12 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1OpoAl-0004fP-Ud for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:08:12 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OpoAk-0001Qz-L7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:08:10 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:08:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <864oedkzck.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20100829213459.ba11c3b8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100829213459.ba11c3b8.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201008292108.10551.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:08:13 -0000 On Sunday 29 August 2010, Polytropon wrote: > The "problem" (i. e. a convention) is that .* is not part of *, > which includes everything else, even "nothing", and the > form *.* (that looks like the DOS equivalent of "all files") > does seem to omit .*; the spaced form * .* would work as it > contains * (which does not contain .*) and .* (not in *). :-) The problem with using .* as a wildcard for hidden files is that it will include .. which is almost certainly not what you want. For example rm -r .* can be disastrous. A safer wildcard for hidden dotfiles and everything else could be .[^.]* * -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 01:05:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7063F1065674 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail19.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3AF8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mai.dhcp.chocolate.lan (unverified [203.122.194.109]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 36877808-1927428 for multiple; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:35:28 +0930 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Indexer In-Reply-To: <4C7A9ABE.1010108@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:35:20 +0930 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A8A6DDE-D203-4738-826A-379A678D02C2@internode.on.net> References: <141EE0AF-42C0-4455-BB4A-85C07ED784C0@internode.on.net> <4C7A04FC.3020301@infracaninophile.co.uk> <780515BD-59CE-4507-B472-029578CC9E39@internode.on.net> <4C7A426C.1060305@infracaninophile.co.uk> <37A6A2B2-7C31-450D-A9B1-76D990E4DA79@internode.on.net> <4C7A9ABE.1010108@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC-DHCP6 does not send replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:05:30 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >=20 > It's different, yes. That could be due to running DHCP6 -- after all, > the daemon has to have some way of receiving all the DHCP traffic to = the > various site- and link- local addresses. You can test that by turning > off dhcpd and checking the routing table with it not running. If the > route doesn't disappear, try disabling dhcpd in /etc/rc.conf, = rebooting > and then see if that route is still present. Either way, re-enable > dhcpd in rc.conf and re-start the daemon: if the route appears then = it's > required by dhcpd and everything looks to be in order. I removed this route, and it did not reappear when i restarted the DHCP6 = server. It also did not affect the situation, i still get no leases. > Ah. Yes, this might cause you problems. Possibly. If Internode = DHCP6 > has been configured as authoritative for your address range and if the > query packets from your client can reach Internode's DHCP6 server then > you probably will have trouble. I shouldn't think its likely though = -- > your client's DHCP6 initial queries will be to find a server on the = same > network segment, and to reach the Internode servers it would have to = hop > through your gateway machine, which is your DHCP6 server anyhow. Well, it seems that the packets are all being sent to my gateway, not = internode. >=20 > If your network prefix is dynamically assigned, then I don't think = there > is a way to have a DHCP6 server be a DHCP6 client as well, and pass on > the prefixes it has obtained dynamically. BICBW. If your ISPs policy > is actually to assign you a particular prefix permanently rather than > give you one out of some dynamically assigned pool, then it's worth a > try using a static configuration on your gateway machine -- I believe > you said this was a test setup to see if it could be rolled out on a > customer network? Should be fine to try static configuration like = that > for a limited time even supposing it's all dynamically assigned. I tried, but the moment i turned off dhcp6c, i lost ipv6 connectivity, = so no go sadly.=20 Well, now i have a server that listens properly, but when my client = sends it solicits, it dosen't pick them up at all. might be time to = start playing with wireshark and tcpdump I guess.=20 >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMewPVAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JUfIQAIXkS5ocTuI+cf8kuB/ByNC/ wkybfdFoqh3ac1c2v1q/KD0ZhPWKGTN93x5f9rmdDO1BiCrBvDQGONh32xOImgt+ a/XuGL5kNZi24iW5JRHSHgS5hJmLqtZpuN2nYG28WBQJzSTfKEi61lMq55EFcAL5 VKUTTvSv9i3us5WbuzdjPoP0VScjkJjhycOYZW4YmWVbcnVdl4xdfqkZr1qevRE3 /d3YO4GO++ZsY7y6Ria1WDt6ckP2Arf2zic8UTSGJnv1h1GHo+iU6KSGpbCFqnNW XcR7ics/cUwjCiyG870EBWBTtHM45+WC1JhTHUUI4UQmPCv+Ux7cTI3j0/JHQE/r sgAgBiloi5qRrNntOVZwIhtGCilGj2ZWR+3C/HMb9YbBkKGQTYzd60Madj4L2dWQ XVKAakV4HOvC/+vv5r7nsZLv2OFRNmEoHIybfE++uXGl+YZ5iK+Cyh/ziRhsp8ji XoViwmINSm04cz+6V/bkzhSh84OYf+iIWLKPLT9fuyFU3jQtSmXX9N4UTmLKp2Xx Ps48wfv+sZi7P2Ho74dGxrh8vmZnYsTpGR0x4q/eMNY+gD3IsF/tIlYsnwqxxGqt vpUdP3d40OLFDoM+ncsJS1bLL/qshZCJDXeuiUuzsW6kUkAt/cFhAeNRgF7O5gLP rNlJwiTGlUADar6hPi6O =3DRIEP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 02:27:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1199106566B for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:27:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6646A8FC15 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-5.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.5] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Optpn-0008Cw-3y for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:10:56 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:26:53 -0700 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:26:53 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100830022653.GG44409@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100829175933.GB44409@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X+8siUETKMkW99st" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Cc: Subject: Re: Moving from one port to another X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:27:00 -0000 --X+8siUETKMkW99st Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Warren Block on Sunday, 29 August 2010: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote: > >Quoth Eitan Adler on Sunday, 29 August 2010: > >>On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > >>>Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong abou= t=20 > >>>that. > >>> > >>>There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in > >>>/usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a > >>>feature. > >> > >>portmaster -o www/squid31 www/squid30 > > > >So, if I understand correctly, I could use this to upgrade from python26 > >to python27? Or perl 5.8.9 to perl 5.12? and everything that depended > >on the former will be upgraded to the latter? Can I say "sweeeeet" in > >advance? Is there a way to do that with portupgrade, or is this one of > >those features that makes portmaster a better mousetrap? >=20 > portupgrade has had it for a long time: >=20 > man portupgrade | less '+/-o ORIGIN' > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" OK, I just upgrade to python27 using this approach, and everything seemed to work OK. The only oddity is that now two of my ports are ahead of the curve: py27-gdbm-2.7 > succeeds port (port has 2.6.5)=20 py27-sqlite3-2.7_1 > succeeds port (port has 2.6.5_1)=20 I'm not going to worry about that unless someone or something tells me I should. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --X+8siUETKMkW99st Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMexbtAAoJEIpckszW26+RDWkH+QEW2RiYsXZPbwIok9ITHsx+ NdtNmfTTF3cvftPbmOW6acETS6itQ/2u7sPK5EaHyxDC2qTxsDKXN2cqAvrZOBER d2mPIIsiAYaeLZuopwm9jddQRy1liIE77Myo4FMg71Y6NxzuuCX9mQ0S4eEEAQrn JHqbs7Yxsg9ga51FpZGchJ1/e/qjvahi+mha1McEr19pfBvrHhTcdrFa/Hu4CAOk lxcqca9BxCTPKOKu9vPbP2eFYKXbHfDpBFwC8OeBC9a4dl35+HkS8pa8/wzqHnhr SZc1bN3UkYQ0kCnstJXImKAh2hr2XWM9eb+noZ0Afx+WWJjFli0lvo9Ceb/GS8M= =y0cM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X+8siUETKMkW99st-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 02:58:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B7E1065695 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC6C8FC21 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so3478738fxm.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:58:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=y1foeRoEwH6zXD4BRZVsss6xK47zMvOw+qTjJ6aZBTQ=; b=WAIq0BMtTYlD4SBNm9mq2HJVvgJGkBbS0JUtz8WL8Icz2iFudCGxDwM323hv1f2kFV TRT/bczbMnHpFPbFVP/F94Wdyp/dj0W6rZGB8qttP7lfW6DIQmePIso+zCR6XJc10quC UUEvTRauA88EhwF/jgB+D67WRTc5yXKSjFhEQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=wd59GeiDeF7Wp6V+beUErzEBTnMLgIcwXIdMuMNy1JF4R6EtmyfGR41a7j9V5kR2Nr WsD97Hs1Vufu2Wv6PiXm1g0F5EISULmiwY7+9g/L0MCDaEyjr4gU7Fs9M4fSHIe3wlz+ YJ17TC6TJzGxoFlSdri0q8VSH39GwQyr+jRNk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.247.11 with SMTP id u11mr89403muh.72.1283137081883; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.240.19 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:58:01 +0000 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "ml@distasis.com" Subject: wvstreaams + wvdial on FreeBSD 8.1 AMD 64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:58:04 -0000 Dear FreeBSD users, I have run out of ideas to troubleshoot a difficult task: get wvstreams and wvdial to work on FreeBSD 8.1. I have tried without success to get the code to compile and I encounter the following error: ..... ./CXX -c utils/strcrypt utils/strcrypt.cc:3:21: warning: crypt.h: No such file or directory ./CXX -c utils/verstring ./CXX -c utils/wvargs -Iargp ./CXX -c utils/wvassert ./CXX -c utils/wvbase64 ./CXX -c utils/wvcrash ./CXX -c utils/wvdiriter ./CXX -c utils/wvglob ./CXX -c utils/wvglobdiriter ./CXX -c utils/wvgzip ./CXX -c utils/wvhex ./CXX -c utils/wvmagiccircle ./CXX -c utils/wvmatrix ./CXX -c utils/wvpam ./CXX -c utils/wvrateadjust ./CXX -c utils/wvserialize ./CXX -c utils/wvshmzone ./CXX -c utils/wvstringtable ./CXX -c utils/wvsubproc ./CXX -c utils/wvsubprocqueue ./CXX -c utils/wvsystem ./CXX -c utils/wvtest ./CXX -c utils/wvtr1 ./CXX -c utils/wvuid ./CXX -c utils/wvwordwrap linking libwvutils.so... /usr/bin/ld: argp/libargp.a(argp-help.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC argp/libargp.a: could not read symbols: Bad value gmake: *** [libwvutils.so] Error 1 [olivares@ ~/Downloads/wvstreams-4.6.1]$ I applied the patches suggested here: http://www.distasis.com/cpp/patches.htm#wvdial See the following threads for reference in case this is needed. http://groups.google.com/group/wvstreams-devel/t/fca414e7fea9a727?hl=en http://groups.google.com/group/wvstreams-devel/t/2e70344a504b6a58?hl=en and a nice person, Laura, has helpred tremendously, but still can't get past that error. She encouraged me to ask, but I was hesistant to do so. I have gotten help with LaTeX/TeX issues and with autologin in with both KDE and in XFCE and I appreciate the help I have gotten. I tried downloading the i386 version of 8.1-RELEASE and the special XFCE variant but downloads got corrupted and md5 did not match so I gave up. Tried it about 3 times and same result :( What should I try or do to get this going? In case anyone out there wonders, FreeBSD 8.1 does not have kppp by default. I need a dialer to be able to use my FreeBSD box to connect to outside world. To use this machine, I have Slax/Slax-Remix LiveCD to connect but I would really like to use FreeBSD since it has been a long time since I was able to connect from a FreeBSD box at home (FreeBSD 6.X). Thank you in advance for advice/suggestions/comments in this matter. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 03:15:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6826610656BD for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ACD8FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so3482438fxm.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:14:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BmcOM6BXFSh3cQPRNc+xWF2RVCWfBFZ6mI8Qnieyblc=; b=YaA29HYSiU/uDzJujIlBp1QYY3ksGk/PpRHvJwlVG7LO3AeznSjThohbJIc+hvMv1j VHm9+HQ8vPFIu3XEWfcdTR80O0o6pY6Zo5DatYT6nbZiDXk5KIgW9Ly9z0zi2gJAv0T+ JZQGoYr1UBHyGm0kD3+zV+m5gpA3r/Zc58gsI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pIr1RZ+1iN2j4la8y4yYuzjZU25kEgbbH9+TPiiP0k3+wHmYR6Rm9v3pHFbnLd1UAw N7nB9JVe4ABwy6H6QC9tp4wauqLZrXVg75sb2RKrHTKSjkH1PsgJbmE+f8/dUYKPF9/C xf+WoikfhB1T+Gl0sfleUs9IG09GobDIJ0iLo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.175.13 with SMTP id c13mr91700mup.86.1283138098426; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.240.19 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:14:58 +0000 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: killall -9 program-name does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:15:00 -0000 Dear fellow FreeBSD users, I have a cron script that plays music in the morning when I arrive at work. in ~/.xalarm I have two lines, one that calls xterm and one that calls mplayer and plays a series of music files in a playlist crontab -l has the following # min hour day-of-month month day-of-week command # 0-59 0-23 1-31 1-12 0-6 0=sun 1=mon 00 07 * * 1-5 ~/.xalarm >/dev/null 2>&1 30 07 * * 1-5 killall -9 /usr/local/bin/mplayer >/dev/null 2>&1 and ~/.xalarm has #!/bin/sh # /usr/local/bin/xterm -display :0 -bg black -fg white \\ echo "-e /usr/local/bin/mplayer -really-quiet -shuffle -playlist ~/.playlist The music starts playing at 7:00 AM, but it does not stop at 7:30. I have a similar setup at home and I did not notice, since I altered root crontab to shutdown machine automatically at 6:00 am. I check manually with top and see that mplayer runs and I try to kill it from command line and I see that I am not the owner of that process so nothing happens. I get the pid of the process and apply killall -9 pid but it does not do it either. How can I stop mplayer from playing at 7:30 am? should I edit ~/.xalarm and remove the xterm command since I have xterm running before it calls out mplayer? Thanks in Advance for suggestions/advice/comments in this matter. Regards, Antonio Math Teacher New Grulla High School http://olivares14031.741.com/index.html , , /( )` \ \___ / | /- _ `-/ ' (/\/ \ \ /\ / / | ` \ O O ) / | `-^--'`< ' (_.) _ ) / `.___/` / `-----' / <----. __ / __ \ <----|====O)))==) \) /==== <----' `--' `.__,' \ | | \ / /\ ______( (_ / \______/ ,' ,-----' | `--{__________) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 04:50:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DAD1065694 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anonymous@dusk.parklogic.com) Received: from dusk.parklogic.com (allmail.0b2.net [64.38.11.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8648C8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10397 invoked by uid 511); 30 Aug 2010 03:22:38 -0000 Message-ID: <20100830032238.10396.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> From: "Matthew Seaman" To: "krad" In-Reply-To: AANLkTinrmv3u_ddC2u-3m=PuwVXtudO7hiE+_qySeC2t@mail.gmail.com References: AANLkTikvteMWrwHxqAmva4_uxtR2KWapOs6KxXL=qcUj@mail.gmail.com 4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk AANLkTinrmv3u_ddC2u-3m=PuwVXtudO7hiE+_qySeC2t@mail.gmail.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:38 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="1283138558.3eBf0.10333"; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ed Flecko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:50:36 -0000 Dear Sir/Madam, Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: [1]Click here for our website We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards, Webmaster References 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 05:00:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482BF1065695 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70548FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so2714825qyk.13 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:00:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=//n0uExBLhL9YLEBxKl537fWtgu0lQM8JSmh3dj5jWQ=; b=KuwxL7jk4QX7uu1uEWK5L4uKjZZDF7zxGSn6JzcObxgAs/WQkyduucinJozs6QO3zh +jaQ6uxY2NWRngj4I0mLxGKsufl0+gZTkvegXolN6VHQIzQi07zyDJH77swBjI76LvCj tgqGbGJtQ1azJq//OQJFnyfixSJUWacnFtBqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Iar/E0DGSqneXpgX/p/2k87oF57jclGo1mtW+dwNvNfLYxGRTnTFNoVrLgSXUixJIY yWtVb/FQuxBByekr3OQZYo/Km0h46V1ExmJtmofkRxNEOjEpxmOjLkaSqv4Lbs/EQFlk DUaK1XRaX7oDdizBtuLyjt5uL77hqhztqZuo0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.66.216 with SMTP id o24mr2465223qai.296.1283144401061; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.76 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:00:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ed Flecko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:00:02 -0000 On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:39 AM, krad wrote: > > SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users > dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP system. > As > mentioned above dont confuse sftp with ftps/ftp-ssl > /usr/ports/shells/scponly -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 07:04:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE649106564A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5428FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so2771056qyk.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:04:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ltDGegLZcTklloh0tfX86s51MLa6P/UfFNlLrxl/pyY=; b=TG2Zqo7giJHPt0gLcK5oDDp65Sf1Z3c9dZcCACjh4/ezmDW8IQVPbqLKw1rhdb7xvv tWtyc22W2jLE3hEWMv13BMt9dTtQq0US8elIATDND4qo1Fnx9U03DyFwtM2hzpjT/+IQ hSHe5tBHEDhjHon25O21RpAnZYT+t2oO4R8/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kh/VOl4QE51U72IKdaoeWDsqkv+gLYGk0LRcMzstulRJPH3jvNjrUdjjcB/mFjWADu BDsYVDpO+dzM3McpxOQGsscV10HPL6fD+Hz0gvBPlosfPZ6IOy9PmHsCiAEa785Tg5gq bJrJEubPvfOwTmhsEVI50uFH8jccNe+sC1LI8= Received: by 10.224.101.10 with SMTP id a10mr2526732qao.230.1283150281156; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:38:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.78.90 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:37:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:37:31 +0300 Message-ID: To: Antonio Olivares Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "ml@distasis.com" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: wvstreaams + wvdial on FreeBSD 8.1 AMD 64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:04:57 -0000 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear FreeBSD users, > > I have run out of ideas to troubleshoot a difficult task: > > get wvstreams and wvdial to work on FreeBSD 8.1. > > Why don't you just use the native ppp in FreeBSD? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 09:34:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0494110656A5 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806738FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq0km-0003PL-Vn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:34:13 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7U9VD6v003160 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o7U9VDN5003159 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:31:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:31:13 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100830093112.GA3071@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100823070819.GB2539@current.Sisis.de> <4C7241C2.2000305@otenet.gr> <20100823112621.GA4367@current.Sisis.de> <4C725BFC.90006@otenet.gr> <20100824084225.GA2160@current.Sisis.de> <4C739A78.4070303@otenet.gr> <20100827072416.GA2516@current.Sisis.de> <4C778001.3030809@otenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4C778001.3030809@otenet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: Re: installing FreeBSD in VMWare-player X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:34:16 -0000 El día Friday, August 27, 2010 a las 12:06:09PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias escribió: > On 27/08/2010 10:24 ??.??., Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > Is it possible that the data gets corrupt on an USB key after some time? > > I'm wondering why the system even is intact to be booted from... > > > > Will prepare the key again or just fill in the dumps I have... > > > > matthias I prepared another USB key which boots fine in my laptop, boots fine in the other laptop native (i.e. without VM-player); but in the VM-player and in an older laptop of my wife it can't mount the root file system on boot; it says: ... umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x000 Root mount waiting for; usbus1 aumass0:1:0:-1 Attached to scbus1 uhub_explore:592: illegal enable change, port 1 da0at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Remobeable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 40.000MB/s travsfer da0: 7701MB (... byte per sector info) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Manual root file system specification... when I specify manually the root as 'ufs:/dev/da0s1a' the same message comes again; looks like some timing problem, or? this is with 8-CURRENT based on CVS of March 2009. Any hints? matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 09:59:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8039D106573B for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531D88FC1F for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7U9xEAS009965 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:59:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4C7B80F2.3050301@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:59:14 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100815 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Can I know how many bytes were allocated by malloc in my process? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:59:15 -0000 google-perftools malloc library has such feature. But does FreeBSD system allocator have it? Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 10:21:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B8E106566C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE888FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq1UI-0007HM-QU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:21:14 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:21:14 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:21:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:21:06 +0200 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <4C7B80F2.3050301@rawbw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4C7B80F2.3050301@rawbw.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: Can I know how many bytes were allocated by malloc in my process? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:21:16 -0000 On 08/30/10 11:59, Yuri wrote: > google-perftools malloc library has such feature. > But does FreeBSD system allocator have it? Maybe getrusage(2) can help you, though it also counts non-malloc() allocations. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 10:42:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177631065698 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90A28FC15 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq1oj-0001Gb-UV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:42:21 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:42:21 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:42:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:42:11 +0200 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20100827142311.GY10153@gremlin.foo.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <20100827142311.GY10153@gremlin.foo.is> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: IBM server SAS controller support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:42:27 -0000 On 08/27/10 16:23, Baldur Gislason wrote: > I have an IBM 7945 server with an LSI Logic ServeRAID (MegaRAID) M1015 controller > and I'm wondering if there's any way to install FreeBSD on this box? So you have tried and failed? There are lists of devices here: http://man.freebsd.org/mfi http://man.freebsd.org/amr but they are incomplete. FWIW, I've successfuly used IBM x3650 M3 with the controller which identifies itself as: mfi0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0x9f940000-0x9f943fff,0x9f900000-0x9f93ffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 mfi0: Megaraid SAS driver Ver 3.00 mfi0: 498 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware initialization started (PCI ID 0079/1000/03b2/1014) mfi0: 499 (boot + 3s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 2.0.03-0689 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 11:00:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B62310657E2 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089788FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so5064174wwb.31 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/NSvdVZ0pBcqZl+fy5D0hNB+RdeGx8yoY5opaYE7dkE=; b=B81YXQea4fs9RHwBht/MEsbfJgZlHtqvxFwnuzfIpSDpPX2D8zXp4GGrgVyx8hBHUc SujPx3yXhOUIFiqLtYKuBN5bqEwl5Xs746VOkX0/aqrUlSPr+e+FEPuApgns/AgR7PYJ KdokUCCYSoad62ywpJcu6rpfWz8nj2Qm/xT6U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CyF8UNv7W88AGBQnC1Xgj6kzrS5QUyHdOvXAYuCti8JN9zALLi+FVjoC91sBM+A2pu rhg/7vznCVNoPNXVa5tcTONQxANVKtYd+48b+O3ZmLGoIJOnBiXja5x8xGYkGTP5H17W gSXbiQ+jRqEMhjH3t6RMbRh6PbAjrxkIf8b9s= Received: by 10.227.145.148 with SMTP id d20mr4328599wbv.117.1283166011813; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b23sm6380196wbb.10.2010.08.30.04.00.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:00:07 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100830120007.543fa5dd@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: killall -9 program-name does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:00:26 -0000 On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:14:58 +0000 Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear fellow FreeBSD users, > > I have a cron script that plays music in the morning when I arrive at > work. > > in ~/.xalarm I have two lines, one that calls xterm and one that calls > mplayer and plays a series of music files in a playlist > > crontab -l > has the following > # min hour day-of-month month day-of-week command > # 0-59 0-23 1-31 1-12 0-6 0=sun 1=mon > 00 07 * * 1-5 ~/.xalarm >/dev/null 2>&1 > 30 07 * * 1-5 killall -9 /usr/local/bin/mplayer >/dev/null 2>&1 You don't need the path to mplayer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 12:05:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592E91065674 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E5D8FC1F for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so7573238wyb.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:05:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iAPL2+GUwtKUnJMArArYRlnLx5wk13ZHwDDo1h150vw=; b=t1sBcRZsH354ULAbAw7xc+UKrTsNRe51gxrFL/00UH6PIGtO2BoYZQ25Azsa0rhynt gtdBt3tYHpiZm8WbtF+PbZ5P1jePm57InVuaGVtcnKV6k/Q3g0LTFJsDTFd/SDLDe6+R uxRbvu4sbRPUgJftqGoxE6mQWe82q37x5Q7ec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nWdWS3lDz78FMNsJHic5mSQspxEn7Hj+q9VgSBokruYJkKGyvMpAEpjAPrgZFSltLz zB3PToWtSV0MEulPSlLWwDJFmfAOcl/tIz5FjhpuQO7MD7OPMyH73hk/QI3kDAvHMR9T xPibJkg+86kp6QDHY9QFnGz1t/s3ReJwh9YrU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.12.139 with SMTP id 11mr4838601wez.63.1283169908989; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.183.149 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:05:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:05:08 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "ml@distasis.com" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: wvstreaams + wvdial on FreeBSD 8.1 AMD 64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:05:10 -0000 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Antonio Olivares > wrote: >> >> Dear FreeBSD users, >> >> I have run out of ideas to troubleshoot a difficult task: >> >> get wvstreams and wvdial to work on FreeBSD 8.1. >> > > Why don't you just use the native ppp in FreeBSD? Don't have experience with it :( Have used kppp in FreeBSD and Linux, but also use wvdial. I prefer those tools and examples in FreeBSD Handbook have not worked for me before sadly. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 12:27:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E68106564A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0FD8FC21 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so5163866wwb.31 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:27:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uzoaYofYY8B7JUVdz4p2nJf1cgHSkfPtPLjUTtDvN/I=; b=CrqhLdAtEVhDJhgke8bEIzkqpfUpqoXwigxfYNICJ5sTNvvMWE9qZ5H/I2GzkkSCvS dfEZVaY6Cfk4TSKZ2vg/L0T8PZXWBfw9n+gbuA2jNELDi5SbX1QS67h/kbqol5KdPYjn WnZOJVpI61O+2l4eCVr/8n5PY4YzjXWkKXFsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WOjs2c4OqgM6VCIVkYAtqUH/sMMmZ/CT1qbWPxSTVCcBIcUYfCdibPTQWcjgR13nob UramCNh40QQks/QbtjmZeDaYchuSyApZ5UCMRTQJyb4BkqdOECT/+WgZF3wRVHoMuo6v h3o5kTQgx9UtjeE6InpQ4gO1/8bKCPjS6ufiQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.10.145 with SMTP id 17mr4864003wev.27.1283171267773; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.183.149 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:27:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:27:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: wvstreaams + wvdial on FreeBSD 8.1 AMD 64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:27:49 -0000 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Odhiambo Washington w= rote: > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Antonio Olivares > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Odhiambo Washington >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Antonio Olivares >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear FreeBSD users, >> >> >> >> I have run out of ideas to troubleshoot a difficult task: >> >> >> >> get wvstreams and wvdial to work on FreeBSD 8.1. >> >> >> > >> > Why don't you just use the native ppp in FreeBSD? >> >> Don't have experience with it :( =A0Have used kppp in FreeBSD and Linux, >> but also use wvdial. =A0I prefer those tools and examples in FreeBSD >> Handbook have not worked for me before sadly. >> >> Regards, >> >> Antonio > > Did you try PC-BSD? > No :( Had tried it before, but I read that it too lacks kppp and that the port is broken with no apparent fix in sight. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 13:06:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE1106566C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:06:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631168FC0A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ED410EE04 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:06:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDZdScy0Kmre for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:06:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AEF10E50A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:06:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:06:32 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cleaned out /usr/local when reinstalling ports, now keyboard in X is not localized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:06:39 -0000 Hello After upgrading to xorg-7.5 on 8.1-RELEASE I've got a problem with X not reading my /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi --------------------------------------------------- terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp< /merge> logiitc se -------------------------------------------------------- So I get a US keyboard layout instead of SE. My /var/log/Xorg.0.log ---------------------------------------------------- (II) config/hal: Adding input device AT Keyboard (II) LoadModule: "kbd" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so (II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.7.5, module version = 1.4.0 Module class: X.Org XInput Driver ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0 (**) AT Keyboard: always reports core events (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" (**) AT Keyboard: Protocol: standard (**) Option "XkbRules" "base" (**) AT Keyboard: XkbRules: "base" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" (**) AT Keyboard: XkbModel: "pc105" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" (**) AT Keyboard: XkbLayout: "us" (**) Option "CustomKeycodes" "off" (**) AT Keyboard: CustomKeycodes disabled (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "AT Keyboard" (type: KEYBOARD) (II) 3rd Button detected: disabling emulate3Button -------------------------------------------------------- I've checked permissions and file content from a machine running 8.0-RELEASE with xorg-7.4_3 and they are the same. Any suggestions on how to fix this? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 12:44:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D6E10656BB for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:44:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexkwan@pacific.net.hk) Received: from sms.pacific.net.hk (sms.pacific.net.hk [202.14.67.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB118FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hanghau.pacific.net.hk (hanghau.pacific.net.hk [202.64.33.147]) by sms.pacific.net.hk with ESMTP id o7UCVNMS015964 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:31:23 +0800 (HKT) Received: from fzorgb44a90a14 (n11648169112.netvigator.com [116.48.169.112]) by hanghau.pacific.net.hk with SMTP id o7UCVL7Y011714 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:31:21 +0800 Message-ID: <0EA0E178F98443D2949B15A0B4F5608F@fzorgb44a90a14> From: "Alex Kwan" To: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:31:10 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100829-1, 29/08/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:08:19 +0000 Subject: How to make ushare support ape format music file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:44:55 -0000 Hi! I'd like to build a upnp server with ushare in my FreeBSD box. Also, my multimedia player can play the ape format music file, how to make ushare support the ape format file,? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 13:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2761065679 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sabbasth@semene.fr) Received: from mail.semene.fr (mail.semene.fr [91.121.170.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841768FC12 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.8.123] (LAubervilliers-153-52-12-153.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.107.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bastien@semene.fr) by mail.semene.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED9349247E1 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7BA892.1040705@semene.fr> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:18 +0200 From: Bastien Semene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Add a SSL certificate authority X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:08:16 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to add a certificate authority unsuccessfully. The Equifax certificates authority seems not to be registered in FreeBSD, so I tried to add it on my server. I'm logged in root and in its homedir. #uname -a FreeBSD svn.cyanide-studio.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Fri Aug 6 09:37:33 CEST 2010 root@dungeon2.cyanide-studio.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GEOM i386 #fetch -o Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.pem http://www.geotrust.com/resources/root_certificates/certificates/Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.cer #cd /usr/src/crypto/openssl/tools #chmod u+x c_rehash #./c_rehash ~/ Doing /root/ Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA-1.pem => 74c2 6bd0.0 My goal being to checkout an SVN repository, I re-launch the command : # svn co https://svn.cyanide-studio.com/admin admin-svn [root@backup] Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.cyanide-studio.com:443': - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! Certificate information: - Hostname: *.cyanide-studio.com - Valid: from Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:04:24 GMT until Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:05:01 GMT - Issuer: Equifax Secure Certificate Authority, Equifax, US - Fingerprint: ed:6d:1f:6c:d4:93:e9:68:44:1c:b2:68:a1:bb:50:b5:af:0e:16:12 (R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? R svn: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.cyanide-studio.com/admin': Server certificate verification failed: issuer is not trusted (https://svn.cyanide-studio.com) I've also seen this in the source code of c_rehash : while(exists $hashlist{"$hash.r$suffix"}) { # Hash matches: if fingerprint matches its a duplicate cert if($hashlist{"$hash.r$suffix"} eq $fprint) { print STDERR "WARNING: Skipping duplicate CRL $fname\n"; return; } $suffix++; } But if I launch the command twice, it still seems to indicate that it's adding the CA. I'm not sure if I do it correctly, but found nothing more relevant on google and in the freebsd's handbook. Can someone point me a good way to add a CA ? Best Regards, Bastien Semene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 13:18:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529B3106564A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vfemail.net) Received: from vfemail.net (dotsevenfive.vfemail.net [69.11.239.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B028FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98077 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2010 13:17:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 13:17:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 76741 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2010 11:24:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www-52-2.vfemail.net) (vfemail@172.16.100.52) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 11:24:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 58242 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2010 11:25:18 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 58194, pid: 58235, t: 0.2750s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO Bacchus.vfemail.net) (cGV0ZXJAdmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=@67.101.12.44) by 172.16.100.52 with ESMTPA; 30 Aug 2010 11:25:18 -0000 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:24:55 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: peter@vfemail.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20100830131822.529B3106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: What made my FreeBSD server freeze? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:18:22 -0000 When I awoke this morning my FreeBSD box was frozen -- completely unresponsive at the console -- and displayed these messages on the console: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 -resetting ata0: resetting devices ad0: removed from configuration done Aug 30 03:09:25 abc sm-mta 88427 xyz SYSERR(root): collect: Cannot write: ./xyz (fsync uid=o, gid=25): Device not configured The box has been in continuous operation for years, and I've never seen this behavior before. I rebooted the machine this morning and, thank God, it came back to life. Is this an early warning that the hard drive is failing and should be replaced this week? Is there anything else I should explore or do at this time? ------------------------------------------------- This message sent via VFEmail.net http://www.vfemail.net $14.95 Lifetime accounts - 1GB disk, No bandwidth quotas! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 13:26:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16921065695 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA108FC29 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq4N6-00075N-8F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:26:00 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:26:00 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:26:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:25:53 +0200 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20100830131822.529B3106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <20100830131822.529B3106564A@hub.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: What made my FreeBSD server freeze? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:26:03 -0000 On 08/30/10 13:24, peter@vfemail.net wrote: > > When I awoke this morning my FreeBSD box was frozen -- completely unresponsive at the console -- and displayed these messages on the console: > > ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 -resetting > ata0: resetting devices > ad0: removed from configuration > done > Aug 30 03:09:25 abc sm-mta 88427 xyz SYSERR(root): collect: Cannot write: ./xyz (fsync uid=o, gid=25): Device not configured > > The box has been in continuous operation for years, and I've never seen this behavior before. > > I rebooted the machine this morning and, thank God, it came back to life. > > Is this an early warning that the hard drive is failing and should be replaced this week? Very probably! > Is there anything else I should explore or do at this time? If not the drive, check drive cables, the power supply and motherboard/CPU overheating. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 14:00:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E392106564A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.barnardq@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422C48FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so5898093vws.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:00:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iSrePRromG8GszSdt6hO6Yv98zTvY4fhcK87rVJZLiw=; b=nRT7GjSgJehs5/PBlkdXGAyM5p98quM1ntwN8PsLVStZCOaOW9DNqbG2erx9bjwiIA alMnGRgX23C9KjNachlPf2VKuYWkONifZVYrZVQbSKAGnodxN90JrVSE5SYFKqOX3IMo s9HKIzJycUtQ6bU1l62ERPRGiVmSLUvbN9XO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LmsHOJ32VUh1XS/aFdvnwWnwtsGlyMvcA3ILmNLEJkQzGVDBf0ximo2uRRGyAC/ZWY HT74uTZAM9NTBCMfG8J3g3kf4JSNblwqKzF9YwDxRu9Ywkpo3AizfBmj4zrAyCuCgRFu PDojsUSO3pb7HzWpoh/msJZs48+WrBOADmbUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.122.95 with SMTP id k31mr2967859vcr.153.1283176795898; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.163.135 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:59:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:59:55 +0300 Message-ID: From: Mike Barnard To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Dell Latitude E6400 and Touchpad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:00:05 -0000 anyone on this... Synpatics Touchpad on FreeBSD 64-bit? On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Mike Barnard wrote: > Hi, > > I have a dell as mentioned in the subject. I have been trying to get the > touchpad horizontal scroll and vertical scroll to work with no avail. > > I have hw.psm.synaptics_support="1" entered in loader.conf but all my > sysctl.conf variables that pertain to the touchpad dump error on boot. It > appears that the synaptics support is not loaded at boot time. > > I am running FreeBSD 8.1 RC1 amd64. > > Any one experience this or know how to get the synaptics touchpad working > > > -- > Mike > > Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in > a million chances happen 99% of the time. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Mike Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a million chances happen 99% of the time. ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 15:14:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ED310656AA for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emss.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3EA8FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so3645371eyx.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received :x-virus-scanned:received:received:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to :references:x-operating-system:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3O7tZK4o6+SWZ4wTed6CZEsbyBhYUCWwKBliWVeABGY=; b=v+S87EhUlTg9Vyni1ENVxre+STucvi1TOGEocOGENd9SOptfD1V0lPTdc3hkvZbk7f K8ol1vnjsEakV4KvNxF+7NZfZoM1/FazWaGj4Ibqq2aTcf7o7/vMBlb7qDPeNYS3mqzX zMSB1bWLKInKwt8NFxYxgW7vqXvRliyPgCoX8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:x-virus-scanned:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :x-operating-system:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HpB/h0b6PUTZhdCMkCuOVeKwErSXao/6WTMeXS27+YqBKZTpua9lrIO4tXVqfcJya0 zykbZQZ8iFIxJaVRqVvoBciw74u4NLZMmMUHr4WsTS1i+r0ODcnK+WwwkPKpKgFIQR0i zGBkw3TZAj5Vyd8DtALP/8auKImBwfk1GK+nw= Received: by 10.216.30.207 with SMTP id k57mr4956130wea.88.1283179879264; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (LCaen-151-92-21-48.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.200.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm4500192wej.2.2010.08.30.07.51.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Eric Masson Received: from srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9511CD0C; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at interne.associated-bears.org Received: from srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org ([127.0.0.1]) by srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDppy1NMqJ4F; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F153B1CC7D; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:06 +0200 (CEST) To: Bastien Semene From: Eric Masson In-Reply-To: <4C7BA892.1040705@semene.fr> (Bastien Semene's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:18 +0200") References: <4C7BA892.1040705@semene.fr> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <86vd6s17dx.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.5-b28 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Add a SSL certificate authority X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:14:03 -0000 Bastien Semene writes: Hi, > I'm trying to add a certificate authority unsuccessfully. > The Equifax certificates authority seems not to be registered in > FreeBSD, so I tried to add it on my server. You can use the security/ca_root_nss port to retrieve the Mozilla Project root CA list and then configure the apps that need/require it. > I'm not sure if I do it correctly, but found nothing more relevant on > google and in the freebsd's handbook. This is a svn issue, not a FreeBSD one, check this section of the svn book : http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.confarea.html#svn.advanced.confarea.opts.servers or http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/fr/svn.advanced.confarea.html#svn.advanced.confarea.opts.servers Then adapt ssl-authority-files directive in [global] section of your local or system-wide subversion "servers" file. Éric Masson -- > Seriez gentils de garder "Hordes" ou "moutons" dans le sujet de vos > enfilades "débiles" ; comme ça, je peux demander à OE de les > filtrer. -+- NM in Guide du linuxien pervers - "Bien configurer sa secrétaire" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 15:44:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B4710656C0 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB9C8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so7839440wyb.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bWiQEhbdNa6Te2GM8tXpLt978w/nViu/cN9BelGMHjw=; b=Qkg4V4RGdCEkr0PeZSYtEsz/ADfhLu+wKQQhsGNRX5XKlID0A82rZ5vFuguCeEQ8h+ pxxoaNI3lhzDOGb1+9VsRg6j4BnZC6T7oOU04YPlfiixQrzKlde4/Yi0ACQHoYClN7p0 eK3uGvqG63zAIG4cSGZ4V5vIYIemu7CU25800= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=U0px3qIpSpHfTUvk9X2bCKWOP4Uk0BtTT8zZTbSN5+mFYBRMTzPjfbDawBlMFb5DfC hHsZdAyFxAgRCksiNou3WrKZrAnmDOL5J5GrodZkj6zG0pwPlNZhaS9xHk8q1nm8LYJX 8ilZE15e+/bp6u0ktX06hTxId/R6Vrp9xafXo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.69.195 with SMTP id a3mr5226166wbj.58.1283183046779; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.179.201 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:44:06 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: jail devfs.rules not loaded at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:44:08 -0000 Hello fellas, I have a 8.0-RELEASE, i386 box with 2 jails. Here is my rc.conf: jail_enable="YES" # Set to NO to disable starting of any jails jail_list="dns www" # Space separated list of names of jails jail_dns_rootdir="/jails/dns" # jail's root directory jail_dns_hostname="dns" # jail's hostname jail_dns_ip="192.168.0.254" # jail's IP address jail_dns_devfs_enable="YES" # mount devfs in the jail jail_dns_devfs_ruleset="dns_ruleset" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail jail_dns_exec_start="/bin/sh /etc/rc" # command to execute in jail for starting jail_dns_exec_stop="/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown" # command to execute in jail for stopping jail_www_rootdir="/jails/www" # jail's root directory jail_www_hostname="www" # jail's hostname jail_www_ip="192.168.0.253" # jail's IP address jail_www_devfs_enable="YES" # mount devfs in the jail jail_www_devfs_ruleset="www_ruleset" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail jail_www_exec_start="/bin/sh /etc/rc" # command to execute in jail for starting jail_www_exec_stop="/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown" # command to execute in jail for stopping /etc/devfs.rules: [www_ruleset=1] add hide add path null unhide add path zero unhide add path random unhide add path urandom unhide add path crypto unhide add path stdin unhide add path stdout unhide add path stderr unhide [dns_ruleset=2] add hide add path null unhide add path zero unhide add path random unhide add path urandom unhide add path crypto unhide add path stdin unhide add path stdout unhide add path stderr unhide df -h: devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /jails/dns/dev devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /jails/www/dev The problem: At boot, the devfs.rules rules are not loaded and if I drop into the jail and do a ls in /etc, I can see everything the host machine has. However, if I manually restart the jails, the devfs rules are loaded. I tried putting the rules in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules too (and removed them from /etc/devfs.rules) but didn't work. The behavior is the same. An I doing something wrong here ? -- Best regards, Claudiu Vasadi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 17:30:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99241106566C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE1D8FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so57523qwg.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:30:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OvbtX9tX4A7d3r32C7Kd1N3yzIw9J/PKeFfFxihw+N4=; b=MpdR9naM3pLf4f0HV3mQYMrrBOwsFX6GVF5uj+60r09FrIYwf1FCosRApxi/6sN5Yx oPoFQAWNeqqyqH4rCv71bAWBElNffK/eUgctHP766yHf6pR5mJXBm3JQ+fEYN0v1C54x Pz2EKPNkXdQ/fdYTXkaVb5R2bQkfI6RbTMbtM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tbJRg3aukN694ZI949cKthg5t9Og4FbsBVE/f9jF8yx40ueCy8SHx3g+fXKQfZJBvR yp+2km3dOtXDQxUZG+o/KDfKzUp4GTav/jJGWH/LQZ+gaW3Nhy+23ZNhEeEGzo+qLMr9 62PuKx+EEx4SVtVriRTXJ3KdMPxTxPTMT1Wb0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.67.82 with SMTP id q18mr3201164qai.85.1283189447183; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.70 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:30:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:30:47 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ed Flecko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:30:55 -0000 On 30 August 2010 06:00, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:39 AM, krad wrote: > >> >> SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users >> dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP system. >> As >> mentioned above dont confuse sftp with ftps/ftp-ssl >> > > /usr/ports/shells/scponly > > -- > Adam Vande More > sounds like a bodge to me From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 17:37:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A81106566C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0168FC1E for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so5820994qyk.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:37:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ey+3xUezAKBINsxuh7FVhGOcXVjUyxxgU+VIw2rqpJo=; b=cLSuAjifMm8jNocSKEzdUIZ7LiL7VFAuLPpJTQwQ+OuKUNsJnzz79Gq1VBMBKZG5DW MFiacrRMDWXsXG0h5wvw/kZ9ZTpfWVaAZAynMskohyoCi8sRTQqfLca7zoQD1m2eSxwW B8PUc4FjXLKPjkjysgimJHdMBPQjsoCjOxpbY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GvDAtYygr8Gr5ej3G9Il5CbNvj42ZQFafTJ8hKzRKm26rjw5E1iafoljbZEWujD1YO SXMQXTwJOJBnCj9HSD+dbbWZdBeQWvpX3k0fNcWVhHoeNjSnNDWqw7Kp1hhXcD/LeSSS FVy8EVhEEFAf2jCZIYWgZJ2NThRDLel3nYenY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.213.199 with SMTP id gx7mr3287144qcb.141.1283189854086; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.70 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:37:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gary Gatten , Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:37:35 -0000 On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten > wrote: > > Rename them, copy, then rename them back? > > Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together, > transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-) > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > or sudo tar cf - /somepath | ssh x@y " sudo tar xvf - -C somepath " I agree with other posts though rsync is the easiest From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 17:38:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D8E1065695 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D4F8FC17 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so64953qwg.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:38:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RaJGibBXld1KeLkGMrogf3mH026xwQBARlXJ45NMZPE=; b=HgJVeNETkEdCNBkdYqCVrbUJD+Iz/qS/dShsBD9tk9YbLvJ70pzw6fpQrMs3xEppjE uCIjAUECTdb80gyU6qhGOW4yjhTX/VXMOGy9/qo0Tqzn6vMXbFhR9/INK1ODoyZiqEU6 oYPYixc+ghVTD22IAcD7X6g+X6vFqEczM3j3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iPxFtbyyqSwEVapGX6Dno1duAsKE61MejwAAiQ7id0Sq9wCYIb88n2OvoPoIck2j99 u0RJl6nsrL7Se0ayzstXljOfc4s5L47iPAk8mXwk47Ki1XVwRvAf29wvEFb0Be8oJl3X zXkVIz50ezCN3R6dmmMsiqHDdXdZaR/KSS1vA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.116.85 with SMTP id l21mr3245823qcq.263.1283189898868; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.76 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:38:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:38:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:38:20 -0000 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad wrote: > > sounds like a bodge to me > Sounds like FUD to me. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 17:47:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309601065670 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A5B8FC18 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so75606qwg.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=91Mckzhpr+/vpStGfOTcqPkuOZjlMfP3oA60Svk8eYA=; b=aL2nz2rgOgzX4C4/l8v7OWtvjWoBjk1XqmJKb+EyFLZ34LNKRjzyYm7voz0sJa4R/q LA+g6nEaJPtAOtmIZtPotx2QsSkeakTP3/AXLHsK1MfT+Pmco+y3rh/byvYeOQtc83Qq HKauY/Jj6ACdEIYz9JBjPYJ4bHiI56XQ3A1as= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LDuJNuUq9I/ykeEivhqXe505xqFlvOBkCz7Dpa5WBZvtIfwO52GiOtuTChM4nBEDJp XY2d+A3+TZ9R5ph0dSgNfHGFHDIcrnRCROr0JCIFVOVwo0gi1j3eXTD8y+k81dU+3urz KigXizzV9/s5ryU0VMqMIHoGUMI1+lcVy2+Fk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.238.197 with SMTP id kt5mr3392279qcb.25.1283190461525; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.70 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100827181515.GA96499@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <4C77F3AC.8020908@gmail.com> <20100827102501.79222db6@eggman> <20100827175141.GB96341@thought.org> <20100827175452.GD53891@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <20100827181515.GA96499@thought.org> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:47:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Gary Kline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jason , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:47:43 -0000 On 27 August 2010 19:15, Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:54:52AM -0700, Jason wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:51:41AM -0700, Gary Kline thus spake: > > >On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:25:01AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > > >>On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:19:40 -0400 > > >>Glen Barber wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 8/27/10 1:07 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > guys, > > >>> > > > >>> > this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say, > > >>> > ~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other > > >>> > dot files? scp doesn't do it. > > >>> > > > >>> > tx, > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> scp user@foo:\.dotfile .dotfile > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >> > > >>Use rsync over ssh. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > i've already done 98 or so straight scp copies. the thing is how > > > to use rsync over to an empty ethic? [[ empty == "there are no \ > > > dot files not .directories"] i want EVERYTHING from this desktop, > > > tao, temp on ethic. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > You can just use rsync in cooperation with find command. > > > > I've used it before, but found this as an example with a web search. > > rsync -avR remote:'`find /home -name "*.[ch]"`' /tmp/ > > > > Just reverse the order. > > > > this may be close. use the unix tools and glue them together:-) > > i have this, cobbled together from a prev script: > > > > echo "rsync with checksum from directory [${PWD}] to > [kline@ethic:${EPWD}]"; > > rsync --perms --times --update --compress --verbose \ > --checksum -e "ssh -i /home/kline/.ssh/tao_nopasswd-id" \ > ${PWD} kline@ethic:${EPWD}; > if [ $? = 0 ] > then > echo "rsync transfer went okay, tao to ethic"|mail > kline@thought.org > else > echo "rsync failed to ethic from /home/kline"|mail > kline@thought.org > fi > > exit; > > but this fails ...... > > any clues?? > > > > -jgh > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service > Unix > The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php > http://journey.thought.org > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > rsync is probably trying to chown files to ownerships it cant. The best way I have found to do this and keep things fairly secure it to run an rsync server on the source machine but bind it to loopback. Then tunnel the the server over ssh when you go into the box. This allows things to run relatively safely as root. eg ssh -R 873:127.0.0.1:873 " sudo rsync -aP --numeric-ids 127.0.0.1::HOME/ /home/ " if you just want certain user dirs then add some include and exclude flags eg --include="/home/kline" -- include="/home/kline/**" --exclude="/home/**" ordering is important here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 18:43:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E6510656AA for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF55B8FC1F for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-5.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.5] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq94t-0001Lr-CP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:27:32 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:43:33 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:43:33 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100830184333.GA2137@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: reboot options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:43:39 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there a way to specify which boot option to choose on the next reboot? I often find that I'll start a reboot and then get distracted by something else and miss my chance to specify which way to boot before the beastie screen times out. A nit, I know -- but bothersome to a nitwit such as I. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMe/vVAAoJEIpckszW26+R1BAIAK37Qu6itmW8vdiVKp47eeS9 qkIfyp8K929fLleck7Htxx3s1vepIQ0RdYRDxtBxQBlznNrrwWOtVMXuPNtbURXd i5/PLYLG+5yWdAF98HH2c16p5SkpEwpCxVXQ0bOITTPCpSLzk5f+yoO46jS+dcAO xFXYyne2nnkej/dhp4iHbveUhjuQdluwnCMQ7NEO23tM93tNNovY93O3eopyDvcC J+RYc8BSISYNmuBb+n+E7srgVskLb7DjUnGQF8jwUp5Vvxn97OeZcCa9g3LxnjCq TMVSOKqSgIQ6XLu2QvPLHPcJNTeN3D1wtmgiEXshctMApocUGZVPV+LX4qW7xjI= =hOv2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 18:46:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBB310656AC for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85A68FC08 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq9N5-0006bJ-G9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:46:19 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:46:19 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100830184619.GC88476@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100830184333.GA2137@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100830184333.GA2137@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: reboot options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:46:21 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:43:33AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote: > Is there a way to specify which boot option to choose on the next reboot? > I often find that I'll start a reboot and then get distracted by > something else and miss my chance to specify which way to boot before the > beastie screen times out. >=20 > A nit, I know -- but bothersome to a nitwit such as I. A nit by which others have obviously been irritated - nextboot(8) is probably what you're looking for! Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkx7/HsACgkQixf5fBYiFmqo8QCcCJ7eK9Sk3jQ4lcAjjPO2o4oZ OP0An0C0VR+6haYW/4gAySsK0X13Sl3C =BAVe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 18:59:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E9A1065674 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ED08FC1B for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0cc61f0081u4NiLADiznSY; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:59:47 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0izm1f00946zqiB8hiznw7; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:59:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:59:46 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100819 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:59:48 -0000 At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, which is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have system mail delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or Mutt? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 19:02:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F2A10656A3 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245DE8FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-68-0.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.68.0] (may be forged)) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7UJ2qwL005197; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:02:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4C7C005C.7070108@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:02:52 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100817 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen References: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Cleaned out /usr/local when reinstalling ports, now keyboard in X is not localized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:02:55 -0000 Put this in your .xinitrc setxkbmap se 2010-08-30 15:06, Leslie Jensen skrev: > Hello > > After upgrading to xorg-7.5 on 8.1-RELEASE > > I've got a problem with X not reading my > > /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > type="string">terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp< > /merge> > logiitc > se > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > So I get a US keyboard layout instead of SE. > > > My /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > (II) config/hal: Adding input device AT Keyboard > (II) LoadModule: "kbd" > (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so > (II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > compiled for 1.7.5, module version = 1.4.0 > Module class: X.Org XInput Driver > ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0 > (**) AT Keyboard: always reports core events > (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" > (**) AT Keyboard: Protocol: standard > (**) Option "XkbRules" "base" > (**) AT Keyboard: XkbRules: "base" > (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > (**) AT Keyboard: XkbModel: "pc105" > (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" > (**) AT Keyboard: XkbLayout: "us" > (**) Option "CustomKeycodes" "off" > (**) AT Keyboard: CustomKeycodes disabled > (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "AT Keyboard" (type: KEYBOARD) > (II) 3rd Button detected: disabling emulate3Button > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > I've checked permissions and file content from a machine running > 8.0-RELEASE with xorg-7.4_3 and they are the same. > > > Any suggestions on how to fix this? > > > Thanks > > > /Leslie > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 19:03:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40E1065698 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCBA8FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so4692502bwz.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:03:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=VT69Zp1oFWYmkUHcJ/Dp49kkAgFtm7NxKqTWxdKpV8w=; b=ufmYpkmAQFCAf26FTPklC/99ViVFl+dFidgdsrpRGnbDKqs7WFps0387r90BA5szU7 gORqSUSnMVyTl9jljPd0g5aCxeaaWkZMvHOBdcc9vbgPy3nktLJgLi7gC+anMQA9KNKa DsCuVXCGTcwha9eYtFkR86pBeiIPTgfnb8jUY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=BTTwI9IXABOMsIGdoga4IyjCfMCh2N+rMrkyqb/oLCz5kK0osRPuqP2UYozMLPZWjH XsSITVD2txLVI/faGB+YyDYxSu5W79YhjZvIe6eDDKfED5Rrbc3qy/7dSfCc3RZFyOsl PzK/WkKlvJCpMqx/MD54iFiWRwKvsszDxhxe8= Received: by 10.204.59.69 with SMTP id k5mr2811231bkh.195.1283194993164; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:03:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.78 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:02:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:02:43 +0100 Message-ID: To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Gary Gatten , Gary Kline , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:03:15 -0000 On 30 August 2010 18:37, krad wrote: > On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten >> wrote: >> > Rename them, copy, then rename them back? >> >> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together, >> transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-) > > or > > sudo tar cf - /somepath | ssh x@y " sudo tar xvf - -C somepath " > > I agree with other posts though rsync is the easiest Why sudo with tar? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 19:05:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347CB106566B for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11028FC19 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-5.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.5] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq9Pk-0007oe-7w for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:49:05 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:05:06 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:05:06 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100830190506.GB2137@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100830184333.GA2137@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20100830184619.GC88476@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100830184619.GC88476@catflap.slightlystrange.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: reboot options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:05:12 -0000 --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Daniel Bye on Monday, 30 August 2010: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:43:33AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote: > > Is there a way to specify which boot option to choose on the next reboo= t? > > I often find that I'll start a reboot and then get distracted by > > something else and miss my chance to specify which way to boot before t= he > > beastie screen times out. > >=20 > > A nit, I know -- but bothersome to a nitwit such as I. >=20 > A nit by which others have obviously been irritated - nextboot(8) is > probably what you're looking for! >=20 > Dan >=20 > --=20 > Daniel Bye > _ > ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) > - against HTML, vCards and X > - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ That's precisely what I was seeking -- thanks! --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMfADiAAoJEIpckszW26+RA1oH/iIvhmg9DBaYiCVV6qP/mfLk IUP0zxGElr7lXRhJQy31cec0FVYy7X6VilhjUKOWuPqm5pHCZMVTbdqOqqdqvcXM PxTrjG312YEzEmWZZt98Huc0kmXufThQRlNdWiA8CTfgMIqfEg1Sk+3CWdE8Q3qR UoTcGhwNi7bR/Fp7jjwKn/7/Zey0UJ5opdbjByibw7SJc75E3F16LnZB5Cin/eEh 69l6Nwm/OmtdqGl/+Z1/3YqDJMTEPaz7Ho6XEaZJmhI9EH3EqBHOSVCuw96LkOy3 MpWBRkmBmpkqYZmakqEH4Nd44Bc6cP26o/JrHoI0mi/RlgTqXPRiKFV/ZhQ9oRg= =kHah -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 19:21:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A3210656AC for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD48F8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9F33D1DF; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:21:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7UJLnCW003487; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:21:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:21:49 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Rem P Roberti Message-Id: <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:21:53 -0000 On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:59:46 -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: > At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, which > is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have system mail > delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or Mutt? No. Per definition, a mail client (mail user agent - MUA) can not be the target of mail delivery. It can act on is own to incorporate mail from a mail spool, e. g. /var/mail/. This is often done by a kind of "local mailbox" selection (in opposite to incorporation from a distant mail box via POP3). For example, I have my system mail delivered to /var/mail/poly. This is the local mail box I check using the Sylpheed MUA (comparable to Thunderbird in many ways). You just need to configure your actual MUA to get mail from the system's mail spool. An extension of this concept, just as a sidenote: I use fetchmail to obtain the mail from my distant mail box via POP3. This mail is then placed into /var/mail/poly - the spool where Sylpheed reads from. This way, I have separated mail incorporation from mail processing. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 20:37:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086C010656C6 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4EFB8FC1D for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42867 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Aug 2010 20:37:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283200654; bh=g34EZHTt7+DA2B2oAtAU3Jd8bur4ZbDAU4Vs9dHKDqA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=omjsUkpZaLMz4cZIhCL+nypXST7k5pUwxTUk5O7x8VbXy+gXgyZV58tvvDlWbU33LPqx3KfYGPs/CXZKu1juzX/VCxgZ1FkxhqFLBKIGe8/Y6QZp5OUWT2c9sLzP8VMhTYsrYR2QW3o4Y8+2SfocJ2CoXhlxvsTd1NjezlNoIFo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AGHJxfRtZTheJXZKCor7ydXJhNwS5A13WaUh6dZFEVMmeF9f5q8aLU2dXGbLRTzcIQo88AXtYuOZvOCv4FbQwIUGfD1/hMBUvQXnMSgwx/AuionfE6TMst6FBcLG+1iIArhPEHbvTO91i72uGvtTdE70ZxkpvUH0AQFn0w+ufO8=; Message-ID: <272773.42704.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: RgN.20QVM1lBNP7z62uDrUi3Kv4OSmb8x0qCUj6hnr3hRkF QyRe9_BUb0FZMTzuvOGMJpkjyKACzbgMHkQaUXKsNiJxa3orHGX7dDU7.W.A 8vVxAC2Onu2cEPOOxe_NZ6RUYUZeTM.5khxqsM1aACq_GD.WgRdfkqgnFJMR lymTvFEL5g68s6DJ4.Qy9AffRIwv8mCd9dLxm_chRvqcjTq9idA8NpK.d7yV IEbI0SJ41hn56ZksPSYaLJZMYt50yJmqbT8BjnmSE32dOjgJ8iYVvARcdxwL GLsyUDGIoFfZLthTK91DqIrAIM.4aAo7WYAnazdrlgcDHk9ON1qdKFBp8cTZ Bevi2KGnUaxE1M9c2HQxt420gqnSCKbf0JOYCs32dgB5LFS7PxSjPe58- Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:37:33 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:37:35 -0000 Hi, does anyone successfully compiled Firebird 2.1.3+ on FreeBsd 7.2 or sup= erior?.=0A=0AI'm on 8.1 amd64 and can't compile it.=0A=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9= =0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 20:39:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3026B10657C2 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA94C8FC21 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so3526577qyk.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:39:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v/H0iZH+DMiK+DiDsRMVgXsWW2EsibYBl5i4668KCi4=; b=RFNSudRHBE4EsvonmalTep5ZzllpWKEokAplXHNylqUmqHBxiUV1XR4QeriDrsMb4K Hrh8oaHrSv3/bEr47cx3bIWpvW7mTJkXLqrt7AiVE9tCLKrTIGaA20gp9US9IHkeoBNq DJTxUaQDhqBiCOVHZXtvgecLmZePVvBa0ozLw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZFvINjpQjjb6Mxj+nhQmhhCzT5C+Lr9kiuCbJW+VThGsRTan+Vv/qVxUDDvKa8+3Ru LFkdfog5uc3i1dwrZeFR5o0buAZRikg7xa4EPipxCnqUxMeMDYtL+JnUdsdtCyJa7pPS maZ4MC95e3+o6A+PH2Cw4RwQOxdAPdAKYfVNc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.105.146 with SMTP id t18mr3219148qao.363.1283199325476; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.28.207 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:15:25 -0700 Message-ID: From: Nerius Landys To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: DHCP server and bridge, mixed w/ some static IP assignments X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:39:33 -0000 I'm trying to add some sort of DHCP server functionality to my router box running FreeBSD 7.1. First, let me explain the current network. This is how my rc.conf is currently configured, and everything is running smoothly: gateway_enable="YES" hostname="speedy.i" ifconfig_fxp2="DHCP" # Connecting to the outside internet via AT&T UVerse cloned_interfaces="bridge0" ifconfig_bridge0="addm re0 addm ath0 addm fxp0 addm fxp1 up" # Bridge consisting of four interfaces ifconfig_re0="up" # My gigabit wired interface ifconfig_ath0="ssid speedy.i mode 11g mediaopt hostap up" # Wireless interface ifconfig_fxp0="up" # 100 megabit wired ifconfig_fxp1="up" # 100 megabit wired ipv4_addrs_bridge0="192.168.0.254/24" ipnat_enable="YES" hostapd_enable="YES" So as you can see, I have an internal network with 192.168.0.0/24 IP addresses. Both the wired and wireless are in the same network, and this is the way I've decided that I want it. All the machines connected to this internal network are using static IP addresses, even the wireless laptops. Now, I'd like to add a DHCP server capability to the 192.168.0.0/24 network, but I'd like to allow some machines to still connect with static IP addresses (of their own choice, not controlled by the router via MAC address lookups for example). So, I'm reading this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dhcp.html under the server section. And I have a few questions. First, I look in /usr/ports/net/ and I find both isc-dhcp31-server and isc-dhcp41-server. The manual says to use the 31 version. Q1: Which do you recommend? I know that the manual is oftentimes out of date. I'm on FreeBSD 7.1. Next, would it be possible to, for example, DHCP-lease out IP addresses above 192.169.0.127, but leave IP addresses below that as statically assigned? For example my plan for dhcpd.conf: option domain-name "i"; option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.254; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; default-lease-time 3600; max-lease-time 86400; ddns-update-style none; subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.128 192.168.0.253; option routers 192.168.0.254; } And in my rc.conf I plan to add: dhcpd_enable="YES" dhcpd_ifaces="bridge0" Q2: Now is it legal to assign a bridge to a dhcpd interface? That would be nice, because then both wired and wireless machines could connect via DHCP. If it's not possible to do this, can I at least assign the ath0 (my wireless interface) to the dhcpd interface, even though ath0 is part of a bridge? Q3: I have some machines connected via static IP addresses, e.g. 192.168.0.9 and 192.168.0.10. I would like to keep it this way, and let the clients themselves control which IP addresses they want to use. Am I allowed to mix DHCP leases with static assignments on the same network like this? I'm afraid to get locked out of my router, because right now it's only accessible over the network. If I get locked out I'll have to hook up either the serial console via null modem cable or a monitor/keyboard, which could be a pain. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 22:24:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFBB1065694 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84DB8FC0A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7UMOXoo022863; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:33 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7UMOWon022859; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:33 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A291833C3D; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:32 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:32 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Mike Barnard Message-ID: <20100830222432.GA38520@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Dell Latitude E6400 and Touchpad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:24:37 -0000 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:59:55PM +0300, Mike Barnard wrote: > > anyone on this... Synpatics Touchpad on FreeBSD 64-bit? > Mike, since you haven't received a reply from this list, your best bet is probably to post to the freebsd-mobile list. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 22:33:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCE11065694 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D6D68FC19 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28512 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Aug 2010 22:33:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283207603; bh=1c4fRraC4gWUPK0tbVDRQnxyyVZDdVWUSD5n7uPHVDA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HfqsC1X2IaN2bzU62csYNeF0zCJp/LOry2suUG4oplQERU0hCiJqJZsep++UoCIXkfpugjlvXu20/YcnLzy7t6yATNvagADjssp5TfhMlrXWxt7KOuvHtj97ELECdXmKE3iDnzUDxS/7xa7hm1RX/QhiLGg6gvvSmXScyF8qa4c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2A6JguUB5eeUdu2e5hSqnsIIQOOU1E6O1Z65scZz1E/QF29+7EBxxVuU7sgrxN0Lb9bhQiVijlaGsjXQWli6E0noRvdzc6zUnHMcLNUN40+M/CiDjSb7bU7H7xZL+hTV6/DVTNeGUjNsUga/Nfos5Oi2QiiUbPDfQmp0GK9ssTo=; Message-ID: <517200.25415.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: fxJcPAQVM1kLdET6LVJcUmlP2C.KsKR2Q0KWXcxkoPFrel8 pBOdU9e5q2YOJlSprkWPKpwEwkwyFhAdc3fzEDR.oP9lqPay1iz20bRPhQSg T1sr5dcD9PTIsZN.TWLarrwVUjT43V_9OABwP8M26fUaeVvH1eKHNkWK6H6_ _S.3OjK95d1Fgnw584Doy9fzdSM.v94QNN3QQbt6uEx9YhsiwS94r.qp21s8 fpWVkGnr5VVtkDr_k74kdfj.S92.KmElv1zkQvLRrbhnbIe70zexqs4osNNS fq1n0Qd7qM656OV6ZFQca0VZS79imdWM7NI2VtmoFGrRuslRMiN1T2jL2K9V mC1eTXoxKAcRmk.8e5x.rUBR9XTgj Received: from [201.235.209.134] by web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:33:23 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:33:23 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <272773.42704.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:33:24 -0000 This is my procedure to compile it:=0A=0Aexport CFLAGS=3D"-DAMD64"=0A./conf= igure --without-editline=0Agmake=0A=0A... and after a while I get this:=0A= =0A...=0A/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libsupc++.a(tinfo2.o): relocation R_X86_64_3= 2S can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC=0A/usr= /lib/libsupc++.a: could not read symbols: Bad value=0Agmake[2]: *** [../gen= /firebird/lib/libfbclient.so.2.1.3] Error 1=0Agmake[2]: Leaving directory `= /usr/home/martin/desarrollo/Firebird-2.1.3.18185-0/gen'=0Agmake[1]: *** [li= bfbclient] Error 2=0Agmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/martin/desarrol= lo/Firebird-2.1.3.18185-0/gen'=0Agmake: *** [firebird] Error 2=0A=0AAny hin= t?=0A=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A--- O= n Mon, 8/30/10, Leonardo M. Ram=E9 wrote:=0A=0A> Fro= m: Leonardo M. Ram=E9 =0A> Subject: Firebird 2.1.3=0A= > To: "FreeBSD" =0A> Date: Monday, August 30= , 2010, 5:37 PM=0A> Hi, does anyone successfully compiled=0A> Firebird 2.1.= 3+ on FreeBsd 7.2 or superior?.=0A> =0A> I'm on 8.1 amd64 and can't compile= it.=0A> =0A> Leonardo M. Ram=E9=0A> http://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A> = =0A> =0A> =0A> _______________________________________________=0A> freebsd-= questions@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman= /listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-q= uestions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 22:43:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3574F10656B1 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D658FC0A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-5.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.5] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqCp7-0004Ir-PV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:27:31 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:43:33 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:43:33 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100830224333.GF24753@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100830222432.GA38520@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100830222432.GA38520@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Dell Latitude E6400 and Touchpad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:43:39 -0000 --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Frank Shute on Monday, 30 August 2010: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:59:55PM +0300, Mike Barnard wrote: > > > > anyone on this... Synpatics Touchpad on FreeBSD 64-bit? > >=20 >=20 > Mike, since you haven't received a reply from this list, your best bet > is probably to post to the freebsd-mobile list. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Frank >=20 > Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html >=20 >=20 My ASUS K72F has a touchpad, but I don't know if it's Synaptics. Any way I can tell? In any case, it worked automagically with FreeBSD 8.0 and 8.1 amd64. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMfDQVAAoJEIpckszW26+RUBIH+QEzRyaAdjDAIDgOISpkOCtJ RysJ8hfY5A3DuW2FQgjD6pdV2aHR9TpLop4HD8nbOi4TwhXf1Xl6ITPd5y1fS6xN 36zePMD3/kn8diK5ke77rckg/DVrDZTRgFdYl1DwzPrePbyOUrEm/K665GNessiV RZ/GtBqSBaeWv0lHzpji4DfdCafc5mE6q7lDBBZxWKvxRaknkvgCkP+RSmQNqZwl ULECUSZ3RdelvLwqWH4UaZcdWGAkeUfPyc3/0JHA9XlHq11VGjNQMX4z26MmzJA7 zCeIRfp5lxUFp1tOXnAU7UUI4ayFtYaMLJJaII2MUoHEEvz5PTsgDRLk1pIB1D8= =enHJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 22:44:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D3B10656A6 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A996E8FC15 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7UMi3Wt006223 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:44:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:44:02 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100830224400.GA39912@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Subject: nopassword ssh/scp going from freebsd to ubuntu linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:44:08 -0000 can anybody point me to the web directions of howto automate the % ssh -i /home/kline/.ssh/Zeropasswd-id zen so i can get around with fewer keystrokes? and automate some backup stuff? tia, guys. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 22:58:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F410656CC for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89728FC14 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7UMvvVC006341 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:57:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:57:56 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100830225753.GA39971@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Subject: Sorrrrry! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:58:02 -0000 i got it. i got confused by known_keys and authorized_keys.... yes it is tim e for french roast:_) *sigh* -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 23:24:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402B81065698 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DAA8FC0C for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj23 with SMTP id 23so2582190gwj.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.181.14 with SMTP id d14mr936699ybf.32.1283210645587; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-144-046.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.144.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5sm4082496ybi.9.2010.08.30.16.24.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [71.70.144.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22395E5480D for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:24:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:23:52 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100830192352.0826f885@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/t9g7eS_lcjjcg5tES/37UkQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Error message with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:24:07 -0000 --Sig_/t9g7eS_lcjjcg5tES/37UkQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Portsnap, which had always worked flawlessly on my FreeBSD-8.1 / amd64 machine, had suddenly started spewing out this error message(s): =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... fetch: http://portsnap6.FreeBSD.org/t/1ad44e5= 25a0145a9daea915d8a8827be69a292caf91f9e22aac825eed3be2e41: No address record sha256: 1ad44e525a0145a9daea915d8a8827be69a292caf91f9e22aac825eed3be2e41: N= o such file or directory [: !=3D: unexpected operator mv: rename 1ad44e525a0145a9daea915d8a8827be69a292caf91f9e22aac825eed3be2e41= to tINDEX.new: No such file or directory done. grep: tINDEX.new: No such file or directory look: tINDEX.new: No such file or directory Portsnap metadata appears bogus. Cowardly refusing to proceed any further. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Has anyone else experienced similar behavior? --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/t9g7eS_lcjjcg5tES/37UkQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMfD2SAAoJEHdwsA8xwKhF4H4IANN8U3OZDtUhtHhwpDBOlLy0 NY0FudmjBOjuhqnDnH0QZW/fTecc/IiGQ9rcuTCs/fi0yBZNWjw9Vmto25uhSvB3 PLACn8WO+37Ri5Y47dV7OcFGJbAlf4klfOykAAB/sCWgLv4yn4VXK1N/o57I3Zmh DtFsVUFb2OjgtG5ybGtGOe5M5T85nqNkj8AaYtkRt0qmoHLUAbTUVk5QosJbLB/s VSjMTZUEFkWw76R3Eyg8x/FCUyYpRLV3uKrFzCv76DKUimtxJ5mztgaA4xR9DytA RMTx4qsEG7AYGAcyiYzdZl/jGTIiOnVd6FepfLJ8xC/ynp1/+ktFDyC/gNwkrH0= =/4m6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/t9g7eS_lcjjcg5tES/37UkQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 23:51:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB0B10656B3 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABAF8FC16 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so6019079iwn.13 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Cw8KzOkwei/V8eo9qQ98vcnGhWG5u47rsYZHRN7VQTE=; b=MOWa8toieJqpGfkIn7elotur7w5b9LjWk6f4QQgngnuRCvzNwFdSnwWS5G0+jkShuL yhcp0XBeAo36TsSn8GhatC3jDQiO1GlVpBDAubKDJnpdAq5UKLsbq6ISVm80VO4yiNDU Ee4FagAtXgh3LRZrKADraZfnBFRFIad25VQ4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WffSxu+RZskmcES6cgro3CQTFX4sysOf5i2/V8/FO0wTlS/1PMH3XIPUNtfXnMEANj du4UHpA6Ppy7+dV5dSQVj7at67rb/5vSVVL4nMC3XpRRHo1B1tm6ta+uF1tU6mn5zNM/ EZcm8mI/KTKHDQbCO4kSdBue7410QPbdUEuN0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.75 with SMTP id w11mr5887015ibd.45.1283212292879; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.153.12 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Steve Franks To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: howto un-chmod 755 /usr/local? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:51:34 -0000 Would you believe me if I said a script I use daily went awry? Is there a list of the proper permission modes for things in /usr/local to get a working system back, aside of starting over? Is there a better way? I've already tried and "upgrade" from the 8.1 cd, which doesn't seem to have affected /usr/local permissions much (which sort of makes sense), as well as a portupgrade -akfO, which didn't seem to have much traction either. Symptoms: XOrg gives some rather uninteresting info and hangs while still in text mode. Sudo compalins about needing chroot, etc. etc. Thanks, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 00:06:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F3510656AE for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED9D8FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AA7314EBB9; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:06:12 -0700 (PDT) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Steve Franks References: x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.11.16; tzolkin = 5 Cib; haab = 9 Mol Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:06:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Steve Franks's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:32 -0700") Message-ID: <86fwxvd4sr.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: howto un-chmod 755 /usr/local? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:06:13 -0000 >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Franks writes: Steve> Is there a list of the proper permission modes for things in Steve> /usr/local to get a working system back, aside of starting over? I think you can use mtree(8) to repair your system, with the masters in /etc/mtree/*. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 00:42:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9237D106564A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor2.peak.org (redcondor2.peak.org [69.59.192.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B398FC0A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peak-mail-gateway.peak.org ([69.59.192.42]) by redcondor2.peak.org ({e8dac926-1ec8-47e6-b410-31008b345fb7}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20100831004237616 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:42:37 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from oak.localnet (207.55.91.197.peak.org [207.55.91.197] (may be forged)) by peak-mail-gateway.peak.org (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o7V0gbWE095146 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9200FC085 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7V0gVAk006891; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:42:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201008151938.o7FJc7vD001866@mist.nodomain> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:42:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: <201008151938.o7FJc7vD001866@mist.nodomain> (Dan Strick's message of "Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:38:07 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87vd6r7gug.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: fetchmail ssl certificate verification problem in FreeBSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:42:39 -0000 Dan Strick writes: > I just installed FreeBSD release 8.1 and rebuilt the fetchmail port. > Now I get messages like these when I run fetchmail: > --- snip --- > > I can get rid of the message by removing the ssl option from the user > line but then fetchmail would not even try to use ssl. Why would the > old fetchmail be better able to verify the server's ssl certificate? > Has openssl changed? Where is the openssl certificate directory and why > should the information needed to verify the server's certificate be > found on my machine? Doesn't the openssl library contain something > like a hardwired list of well known certificate authority systems? You already got replies about using the sslcertfile option pointing to /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt. The problem is that only fixes fetchmail and must be duplicated for each application. I finally got around to looking into how to integrate those certificates into the openssl configuration for FreeBSD, and the following is what I came up with. The openssl configuration in /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf expects all certificates and hashes to be in /etc/ssl/certs, so the certificate file must be split into individual certificates there, and hashes generated. The following steps will handle that. Some of these steps must be performed as root, so all of them might as well be. cd /etc/ssl/certs # create if necessary split -p '^Certificate:' /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt cert rm certaa # just the file header for file in cert* ; do mv $file $file.pem ; done # rename to certxx.pem perl /usr/src/crypto/openssl/tools/c_rehash . # generate the hashes The above steps are for a FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE, so they might not work exactly for other versions. This also assumes that you trust the certificates in the ca_root_nss package, so you will have to decide that for yourself. I have seen several questions and problems about ssl certificates, so hopefully others will find this useful. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 05:24:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E71D1065697 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04CD8FC13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7V5ON58009000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:24:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C7C9200.1070604@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:24:16 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100830192352.0826f885@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20100830192352.0826f885@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig94906A2DB2460E069A0418BE" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Jerry Subject: Re: Error message with "portsnap" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:24:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig94906A2DB2460E069A0418BE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 31/08/2010 24:23:52, Jerry wrote: > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... fetch: http://portsnap6.FreeBSD.org/t/1ad= 44e525a0145a9daea915d8a8827be69a292caf91f9e22aac825eed3be2e41: No address= record Looks like a transient problem with the DNS. It should fix itself once the correct data for portsnap6 propagates properly. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig94906A2DB2460E069A0418BE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx8kgcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyJNgCgkflgzdHtZtL+crq8MkdghZEa cyoAoIxlPq3h+iZIekUzUFAem0eHwFAT =vABN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig94906A2DB2460E069A0418BE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 08:11:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C936610656A4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81D58FC24 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o7V8BN27000540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:11:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o7V8BNMS000539; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA03090; Tue, 31 Aug 10 01:00:31 PDT Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:00:27 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd@edvax.de, remegius@comcast.net Message-Id: <4c7cb69b.7tFBWEqVHvBjt0Xt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:11:32 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:59:46 -0700, > Rem P Roberti wrote: > > At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, > > which is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have > > system mail delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or > > Mutt? > > No. Per definition, a mail client (mail user agent - MUA) can not > be the target of mail delivery ... Depending on what the OP had in mind, ports/mail/procmail might turn out to be (at least part of) a solution. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 08:29:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9693E106564A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565928FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8D510EDFF; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:30:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zfCJznOw3uyz; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:30:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEAD10E50A; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:30:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7CBD7F.8070504@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:29:51 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson References: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> <4C7C005C.7070108@bah.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <4C7C005C.7070108@bah.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Cleaned out /usr/local when reinstalling ports, now keyboard in X is not localized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:29:58 -0000 On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Put this in your .xinitrc > setxkbmap se > > Thanks for the suggestion! I wonder, is this metod the correct way. According to the handbook one should use the /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi file. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 08:47:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E656B10656AB for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@debank.tv) Received: from smtpout01.onlinespamfilter.nl (smtpout01.onlinespamfilter.nl [217.21.240.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C62B8FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.onlinespamfilter.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.onlinespamfilter.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEE42520C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:28:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.debank.tv (59-80-ftth.onsneteindhoven.nl [88.159.80.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.onlinespamfilter.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:28:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.debank.tv (smtp.debank.tv [172.16.143.25]) by smtp.debank.tv (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56551DB4179 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jupi.debank.tv (121-73-247-214.broadband.telstraclear.net [121.73.247.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rob) by smtp.debank.tv (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA1B01DB417A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:28:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9,4C7CBD43.1050302@debank.tv> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:28:51 +1200 From: mailinglists User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @ debank.tv X-OSF-Virus: CLEAN X-OSF-Outgoing: Innocent X-OSF-SUM: 824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9 X-OSF-Info: Checked for spam and viruses Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:47:46 -0000 On 31/08/10 8:00 PM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:59:46 -0700, >> Rem P Roberti wrote: >>> At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, >>> which is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have >>> system mail delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or >>> Mutt? >> No. Per definition, a mail client (mail user agent - MUA) can not >> be the target of mail delivery ... > Depending on what the OP had in mind, ports/mail/procmail might turn > out to be (at least part of) a solution. > Actually Mutt can read directly from a mbox file like in /var/mail/ ***deze e-mail is gescand door Onlinespamfilter.nl*** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 08:55:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521DC10656A9 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D536F8FC15 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so5127299bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:55:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ceJLrUQ97ijZjBr5M+kl1niFoGzHWWJcOsIaPK6RupQ=; b=CQGLhHAEMkb1hhqnwen/6CkFEzEXbpZPu74B0JgsqzGZ0EftDWa+jA1fSmhgiinWGh oQX4TMz+7UXiXEK6De5Dz1bZk4MuufEIJhMx/AnmprC10Op1mtgECq6Zj4fnwf8dATHk PtcG813s3k1UK/KrSfykqJ5SxG+U+Hq73w7MA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tLTTg+RVBizL7euMfB0/k4hwxzYd+LHk4Rj8qY7kWZEfxIYfNlobvP5OvD/E+Iymgb FCf6ys153xVRRSM/C1+466miJDv6cX11sdyxInfyVFpTmOWXGnOCaZsFIzIDYCj0jVpE jKyvNIPPrqOPC5RgowVT3PSjp3aPuTyfnhtEQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.223 with SMTP id d31mr4146468bks.146.1283244941758; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.75.6 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:55:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100830184619.GC88476@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20100830184333.GA2137@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20100830184619.GC88476@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:55:41 +0200 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Daniel Bye , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: reboot options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:55:43 -0000 2010/8/30 Daniel Bye : > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:43:33AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote: >> Is there a way to specify which boot option to choose on the next reboot= ? >> I often find that I'll start a reboot and then get distracted by >> something else and miss my chance to specify which way to boot before th= e >> beastie screen times out. >> >> A nit, I know -- but bothersome to a nitwit such as I. > > A nit by which others have obviously been irritated - nextboot(8) is > probably what you're looking for! > > Dan > > -- > Daniel Bye > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 _ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - agains= t HTML, vCards and =C2=A0X > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0- proprietary attachments in e-mail /= \ > If you don't remember a command, and knows the subject and what the command is supposed to do try the command apropos. $ apropos boot Shows many intersting things :-). --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 09:10:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C8310656AA for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF7C8FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so6933023qyk.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:10:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=a1l5moHVMZPspaw4K6w3JJsOui3ELLosE5cQE1dIX/M=; b=MiarBjMaN1A/Dj0eTC/qxUFOKQEPxmk0S7UyvoF0bTH2lLNSG7UfYuqsK0WCRC9doR qtJ3B/y6liBZEhGaofK4HtOlz0WUvjmv9d3VGLUIgiT1MAxBUdELw1gC40+Fc0DLh85/ B7FMGg/yoEuFQZ4jub0CPiJmopRspGKvkqU+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=U/rkrjSAlLWk6RIlyA5/7ozpEwIu+PKCdsU9xQjvWNKosdkFeUPb8eEaHESvG/iZ5t mCLIpD8vNh4aHATOnzPkuRu3RYaBaza7PR5eIKtQREynImLkHfV9I2TpM4sjqQYg3nnZ OcTkpSYqWg/+jVuV/DJv3b+idxbtQ65M3XuGY= Received: by 10.224.71.151 with SMTP id h23mr3711031qaj.219.1283245826100; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:10:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.78.90 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:09:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <517200.25415.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <272773.42704.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <517200.25415.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:09:56 +0300 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=C3=A9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:10:27 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Leonardo M. Ram=C3=A9 wrote: > This is my procedure to compile it: > > export CFLAGS=3D"-DAMD64" > ./configure --without-editline > gmake > > ... and after a while I get this: > > ... > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libsupc++.a(tinfo2.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can > not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/lib/libsupc++.a: could not read symbols: Bad value > gmake[2]: *** [../gen/firebird/lib/libfbclient.so.2.1.3] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/home/martin/desarrollo/Firebird-2.1.3.18185-0/gen' > gmake[1]: *** [libfbclient] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/home/martin/desarrollo/Firebird-2.1.3.18185-0/gen' > gmake: *** [firebird] Error 2 > > > Any hint? > Yes. If it is not in the ports, you are pretty much on your own with firebird! --=20 Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 09:16:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911081065698 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2038FC1E for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so4404099fxm.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:16:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4mjUoZYPfmNgoiEvIz23yIAblsF+gapNHsbwrNhJ0SQ=; b=Ddfou1W272qX0bWcTAMEGWcyRXjrl2bifAsnR17JroyEas5qAYRNjOYh09ajfMNylZ nxwy+didFLDrTYcau2o7IK2tcDJGnNKKqL1RoGQ/Etx14x0V8/AF0O51naAJtqWRNrU7 uqFxNhVweqTJn/Fg1rtrb5FVMsm6jzxOHNxKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VtlHy3yPqawL9yMgqogZUz+PPT77S1J2NAnj9AO/OSxFXBFfJauJRDQqXi95P/eYak tO0TzQqr7mOgBuNuHp7vGbB3vJLpglGC/0oHb5OWhx0zqD6M9sLqCDMjP9+qJJtsze3K aP8F+QlGRFTHQxrhYaFNWW2APKGlOZuLn7f3s= Received: by 10.223.123.145 with SMTP id p17mr5016345far.90.1283246212002; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from limbo.lan ([193.33.173.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r10sm3848404faq.5.2010.08.31.02.16.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7CC881.7050609@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:16:49 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100807 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Ikxlb25hcmRvIE0uIFJhbcOpIg==?= References: <272773.42704.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <517200.25415.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <517200.25415.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:16:53 -0000 31.08.2010 01:33, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > This is my procedure to compile it: > > export CFLAGS="-DAMD64" > ./configure --without-editline > gmake > > ... and after a while I get this: > > ... > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libsupc++.a(tinfo2.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Here you go, linker says you what to do. > /usr/lib/libsupc++.a: could not read symbols: Bad value > gmake[2]: *** [../gen/firebird/lib/libfbclient.so.2.1.3] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/martin/desarrollo/Firebird-2.1.3.18185-0/gen' > gmake[1]: *** [libfbclient] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/martin/desarrollo/Firebird-2.1.3.18185-0/gen' > gmake: *** [firebird] Error 2 > > Any hint? try CFLAGS="-DAMD64 -fPIC" -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 09:24:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE11E10656B1 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0238FC18 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so6459607iwn.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:24:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/jG5lWC1DlYzVI9gAYVXdb6S8MfbjF70ciiV3brBxqQ=; b=NIVyQ4bTOsrjwUvJY8nzsDw1959drX0dxR600KshqoqOctQFsb/d0kgPy6/uZWAMm6 Dt9+f8ooDdyqNgLr3Nshbq4lpww3pCn3rLEQ/OR0GkEOdLpUjKo2R+HY81u5JDRdpWrD pWY6X9rQqv1EHAJ+M9rBCYi5EmToWAlHBkNtM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=dSlCaNei4PtU7OtC86hRNKKJ4vb3PjIjijBu6fPt3b9cpbo/RsqVVeaIRx/onIbisl hQpztx/agxP+Du/2jNlFAYloUBV5Tn9DX6ItKWLin6lnnMKwzDsBa54jU/+w1ioydps1 5lJVzzb1Pf4MYyP1w6JhfH8RGbEVm1uxyZN6o= Received: by 10.231.19.198 with SMTP id c6mr6505150ibb.140.1283246654708; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from centel.dataix.local (adsl-99-181-137-20.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.181.137.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n20sm8603569ibe.11.2010.08.31.02.24.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <4C7CCA3B.70809@DataIX.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:24:11 -0400 From: jhell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington References: <272773.42704.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <517200.25415.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?UTF-8?B?Ikxlb25hcmRvIE0uIFJhbcOpIg==?= , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:24:26 -0000 On 08/31/2010 05:09, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Yes. If it is not in the ports, you are pretty much on your own with > firebird! That is why he had asked on questions@ instead of ports@. "To see if" anyone else had any luck compiling it on a version of FreeBSD over 7.3. -- I really need to discard this list. jhell,v From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 10:39:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878AA10656B0 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22528FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-68-0.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.68.0] (may be forged)) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7VAcvwY021732; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:38:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4C7CDBC1.7070702@bah.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:38:57 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100817 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen References: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> <4C7C005C.7070108@bah.homeip.net> <4C7CBD7F.8070504@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4C7CBD7F.8070504@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Cleaned out /usr/local when reinstalling ports, now keyboard in X is not localized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:39:02 -0000 2010-08-31 10:29, Leslie Jensen skrev: > > > On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> Put this in your .xinitrc >> setxkbmap se >> >> > Thanks for the suggestion! > > I wonder, is this metod the correct way. I think so, as long X is concerned. > According to the handbook one > should use the > > /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi file. There are no *.fdi files on this machine, and I don't feel like fiddling with hal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 10:49:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479351065693 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE088FC1E for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (phenom.otrada.od.ua [10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7VAnBBv070213 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:49:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) X-Authentication-Warning: otrada.od.ua: Host phenom.otrada.od.ua [10.0.0.10] claimed to be [10.0.0.10] Message-ID: <4C7CDE02.10309@ukr.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:48:34 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: The limit on the length of the login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:49:16 -0000 pw: name too long `sdgkjdsfgkjdfghkdjsfgfsdjghdjks' (max is 16) Crutches pam_mysql and pam_ldap does not offer :) regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 11:03:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9131065694 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40348FC27 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so2845068gxk.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.14.9 with SMTP id r9mr1501883ybi.111.1283252599883; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-144-046.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.144.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q17sm8777559ybk.5.2010.08.31.04.03.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [71.70.144.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C961E5480D for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:03:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:03:16 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100831070316.495eee75@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4C7CDBC1.7070702@bah.homeip.net> References: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> <4C7C005C.7070108@bah.homeip.net> <4C7CBD7F.8070504@eskk.nu> <4C7CDBC1.7070702@bah.homeip.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Cleaned out /usr/local when reinstalling ports, now keyboard in X is not localized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:03:22 -0000 On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:38:57 +0200 Bernt Hansson articulated: > 2010-08-31 10:29, Leslie Jensen skrev: > > > > > > On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> Put this in your .xinitrc > >> setxkbmap se > >> > >> > > Thanks for the suggestion! > > > > I wonder, is this metod the correct way. > > I think so, as long X is concerned. > > > According to the handbook one > > should use the > > > > /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi file. > > There are no *.fdi files on this machine, and I don't > feel like fiddling with hal. No one in their right mind likes messing with hal. HAL is now (at least on other OSs) deprecated, since it has become a large monolithic unmaintainable mess, and also duplicates a lot of functionality which are nowadays provided by udev and the kernel itself. Hopefully, FreeBSD will soon free itself from its clutches. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Take Care of the Molehills, and the Mountains Will Take Care of Themselves. Motto of the Federal Civil Service From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 12:23:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9818106566B for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.barnardq@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B828FC18 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so6177782vws.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:23:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZkscHfK3e/JBkt1oK/8D14mUyJs5wEAEJcVrJu+awrI=; b=hCm0ZyGfhQPjLaOYLWilHc0d4MAO+PWM9vTXugtHt4dqRZgR2g3VfI3HnKPlK3vYTu bjFfuegCCcgobYFqxfZ10hSqboWCVWFcVpcToNTcWu12jtPOlFgIPCwt91ExKPdy7reu rY+dz6KQ27d+Cu9xmlLfu2UROqlhWYNpsBUvg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=P87yOQH6mxmhGRCVFXX74lMIrUDqHlxKT2Ijk01PhLo1Z3b+PV6mSi7HE0vlCvg/vk KBdhqOTJbnnhUESH5FljRgu9TGZBAbtN9mKvYrpOiySBNHTc6t9FomKevXWfg9BWWUmK IR76+4tdWEXWMcmql9uaTtMK052DdMIXdBXfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.158.11 with SMTP id d11mr449589vcx.91.1283257411406; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.95.80 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:23:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100830224333.GF24753@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <20100830222432.GA38520@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100830224333.GF24753@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:23:31 +0300 Message-ID: From: Mike Barnard To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Dell Latitude E6400 and Touchpad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:23:32 -0000 Thanks Frank. I'll try asking there. Chip, my touchpad works.. the only features I want are vertical and horizontal scrolling. Do those work for you? On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Frank Shute on Monday, 30 August 2010: > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:59:55PM +0300, Mike Barnard wrote: > > > > > > anyone on this... Synpatics Touchpad on FreeBSD 64-bit? > > > > > > > Mike, since you haven't received a reply from this list, your best bet > > is probably to post to the freebsd-mobile list. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > > > Frank > > > > Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html > > > > > > My ASUS K72F has a touchpad, but I don't know if it's Synaptics. Any way > I can tell? In any case, it worked automagically with FreeBSD 8.0 and > 8.1 amd64. > > -- > Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F > http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | > http://chipsquips.com > -- Mike Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a million chances happen 99% of the time. ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 12:24:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF6F10656C9 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D9728FC15 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1935 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Aug 2010 12:24:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283257468; bh=uojH67mcNqcbBd1+oq1QuvWaDVvC/c3DJRFGBwYm3HE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=S3OC+ymzLHbW4G0FyMLZEik3hA/1rhbCaU3vY8XemEM6auOG5y/NouvroWlvm5PirvpIH0A0YbkA5QH0OhnSop/tYWcZKNc2dU4H1PWe931NwobBCYCck80Yv7zefFvtu2JhX/qajefArc61RsRdCGk9NLtj6W8jMiG0ydE6Uw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WxVWUTw0DFGT3vGl3uXhaDap3+NzPmEVm/VrG9s5uWCdhbn5irNonMx+QFZoE/ctbz/viMHMtEB9ZnEy0affKgbXtV55aL25/8gpD8l3Tsz/WKzAFQrxFgiAIdyBWMockmFBRNIV3bIyCqyS7YJUJ1DGraNJr8Ahiqn/deSEDck=; Message-ID: <614493.702.qm@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: IcscqvoVM1nxHZGk5q3a4L0uXZtYknyW_G3Lm0JNZXvMjyj TKa3h.9Wb9uINQ_QTV5VQ.SmUVMmXNFrZ1TnAM7u0BK7wHfzcNHxz.KLk2rO vBkY3qPSrkL3nGxsB.VqGpoSLcW2WhnkIsFomKiYkwzeKie1sMwvheafCVQl 1AsdVFTImOGbhUniLPqXuY7GAOy661o.j4yxk2SAc8sm92Z9xY9FxOPVZdhh F0e8LsNABXug6Un.Bg7PJNKyd_teM0FspX_hVs5N5d8tBqj6yUIoAR8pBFxv bGpfdJ2B4soFcXlp7SMR51kP9OTmlxtmkcvIqDmnzlpgJ4qkuNfKJPnlwGk. YzuFAlfsbFMIWD1cxSNSQzw6YT8c- Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:24:28 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:24:28 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <4C7CCA3B.70809@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:24:29 -0000 > Washington wrote:=0A> > Yes. If it is not in the ports, you are pretty mu= ch on=0A> your own with=0A> > firebird!=0A> =0A> That is why he had asked o= n questions@ instead of ports@.=0A> "To see if"=0A> anyone else had any luc= k compiling it on a version of=0A> FreeBSD over 7.3.=0A> =0A> -- =0A=0AI go= t the solution in the firebird-devel list, it's an easy one, just apply thi= s patch:=0A=0Ahttp://git.debian.org/?p=3Dpkg-firebird/2.1.git;a=3Dblob;f=3D= debian/patches/no-static-linkage.patch;hb=3DHEAD=0A=0A=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9= =0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 12:45:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7E2106566C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out9.libero.it (cp-out9.libero.it [212.52.84.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160FD8FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (151.51.63.247) by cp-out9.libero.it (8.5.107) id 4C6EB96E012E82CA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:45:01 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7VCiobm022468 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:44:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:44:52 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13 Subject: Speeding up (caching?) shared libraries loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:45:04 -0000 Hello. Suppose I have an executable which I need to invoke repeatedly (e.g. to run tests in a makefile). This executables spend most of its time loading (rather than processing), due to the need of several huge shared libraries. I'd welcome an hint on how to speed this up. Possible thing would be to "cache" these shared libraries (and possibily the executable too) in memory, so that any invocation after the first is faster. Is this possible at all? Any other idea? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 12:53:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36C61065694 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2F68FC08 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF30010EDFF; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXjvFaUoSBnH; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C7310E50A; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C7CFB3D.3070708@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:17 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100302 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson References: <4C7BACD8.3010001@eskk.nu> <4C7C005C.7070108@bah.homeip.net> <4C7CBD7F.8070504@eskk.nu> <4C7CDBC1.7070702@bah.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <4C7CDBC1.7070702@bah.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Cleaned out /usr/local when reinstalling ports, now keyboard in X is not localized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:53:25 -0000 On 2010-08-31 12:38, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2010-08-31 10:29, Leslie Jensen skrev: >> >> >> On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> Put this in your .xinitrc >>> setxkbmap se >>> >>> >> Thanks for the suggestion! >> >> I wonder, is this metod the correct way. > > I think so, as long X is concerned. > > > According to the handbook one >> should use the >> >> /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi file. > > There are no *.fdi files on this machine, and I don't > feel like fiddling with hal. OK, thank you. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 13:13:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5A810656A7 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3372E8FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqQeu-00076V-41 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:13:52 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7VDDpjF003647 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:13:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o7VDDpUo003646 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:13:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:13:51 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100831131351.GA3592@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100823070819.GB2539@current.Sisis.de> <4C7241C2.2000305@otenet.gr> <20100823112621.GA4367@current.Sisis.de> <4C725BFC.90006@otenet.gr> <20100824084225.GA2160@current.Sisis.de> <4C739A78.4070303@otenet.gr> <20100827072416.GA2516@current.Sisis.de> <4C778001.3030809@otenet.gr> <20100830093112.GA3071@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100830093112.GA3071@current.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: Re: installing FreeBSD in VMWare-player X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:13:55 -0000 El día Monday, August 30, 2010 a las 11:31:13AM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > El día Friday, August 27, 2010 a las 12:06:09PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias escribió: > > > On 27/08/2010 10:24 ??.??., Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > > > Is it possible that the data gets corrupt on an USB key after some time? > > > I'm wondering why the system even is intact to be booted from... > > > > > > Will prepare the key again or just fill in the dumps I have... > > > > > > matthias > > I prepared another USB key which boots fine in my laptop, boots fine in > the other laptop native (i.e. without VM-player); but in the > VM-player and in an older laptop of my wife it can't mount the root file > system on boot; it says: ... Because the USB key was not booting in the VM I've now used a 8.0 livefs ISO to boot from. I used this livefs for the 1st time, I think, and even beeing an experienced FreeBSD user for more than 15 years it is not easy to understand how the livefs should be best use to 1) partition the slice and install boot manager 2) restore dumps from the USB disk I have The livefs brings you into the same menu like any other install CD. I was awaiting a straight forward boot into a multiuser run level and then do the work from there. Ofc you can user the installer and dont install anything (because there is nothing in this moment on the CD), and then jump to the shell. In this case the created file systems are already poluted with some stuff and are mounted together. I found no way to unmount /mnt/ad0s1a (todo newfs again). It always said 'busy'. So I booted a 2nd time the livefs and went right away to the shell... Now I have already again my 'old' root partition booting to single user mode and I'm filling in the 120 GByte dump of the /usr ... The 1st try crashed the Win7 to blue screen over the night :-( matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 13:20:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210E510656B2 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arundel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEB68FC17; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7VDK1tc016505; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:20:01 GMT (envelope-from arundel@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from arundel@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7VDK1FO016498; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:20:01 GMT (envelope-from arundel) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:20:01 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <20100831132001.GA15235@freebsd.org> References: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speeding up (caching?) shared libraries loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:20:02 -0000 On Tue Aug 31 10, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Suppose I have an executable which I need to invoke repeatedly (e.g. to > run tests in a makefile). > This executables spend most of its time loading (rather than > processing), due to the need of several huge shared libraries. > > I'd welcome an hint on how to speed this up. > Possible thing would be to "cache" these shared libraries (and possibily > the executable too) in memory, so that any invocation after the first is > faster. > Is this possible at all? > Any other idea? i don't think there's an out-of-the-box solution. have you checked out ports to see if there's something there which might do what you're looking for? another possibility would be to use tmpfs and store the files and libraries on a memory based partition. you could write a script which would copy files/libs to the tmpfs partition during boot time e.g. cheers. alex > > bye & Thanks > av. -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 13:42:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A5A10656BB for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD73C8FC1C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqR6Z-0008Os-Qd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:42:27 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:42:27 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:42:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:42:21 +0200 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: Speeding up (caching?) shared libraries loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:42:32 -0000 On 08/31/10 14:44, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Suppose I have an executable which I need to invoke repeatedly (e.g. to > run tests in a makefile). > This executables spend most of its time loading (rather than > processing), due to the need of several huge shared libraries. > > I'd welcome an hint on how to speed this up. > Possible thing would be to "cache" these shared libraries (and possibily > the executable too) in memory, so that any invocation after the first is > faster. > Is this possible at all? Normal file system caching will cover this case (unless you have very little memory available). The only other thing you might do to speed this up is prebinding / prelinking but if you are often rebuilding the project it might not help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 13:48:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297B610656A7 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AE58FC1F for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj23 with SMTP id 23so2955632gwj.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3+XT5NmyvGf8y01R2JBVLZrYPuZpww2Quhit5LWTQT0=; b=Pz14icEI4WAHuwzqHZtUqiJrufdcy6Jmk1tVO86AcVDixYyIEnPYW7kQCrGQuShJv1 dQ5haCK1XHmPAUtUWiKgpcfvf3zLRHvzC+ZxNrS8UuPcRZtXN2f30cWpGcEk9zB98Txv urb4/GU0ypn4q+bY/Oe21PUDbc/6ZNYwk15kY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XVIBu/WpJiqgL60T9G0Omp2jqtpal4vmTEAtuihVF0Rh9Dsl8zeHQvJWzeiJQWPthd rTNMeHmy1fL4b9XOX1CvpPXYSHSP+gkUb28DgiFXEVKXArruqA3iLBBdkKuVy9Ci3Swm WKMJHVc7E6/4ZuY65JBrSCxd2zjgbEpEzQzU4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.75.1 with SMTP id w1mr4228642qcj.100.1283262509187; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.70 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:48:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: utisoft@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gary Gatten , Gary Kline , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:48:30 -0000 On 30 August 2010 20:02, Chris Rees wrote: > On 30 August 2010 18:37, krad wrote: > > On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten > >> wrote: > >> > Rename them, copy, then rename them back? > >> > >> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together, > >> transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-) > > > > or > > > > sudo tar cf - /somepath | ssh x@y " sudo tar xvf - -C somepath " > > > > I agree with other posts though rsync is the easiest > > > Why sudo with tar? > > Chris > make sure all perms correct and can read all files From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 13:51:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED141065697 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83D98FC13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so2958975gyg.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4qcq2KL7kCMd1pX02dc9irZuHie5YmUsPHXy/RhuA0o=; b=Y7ymHIc5QF5u0ACjfuPGg9VsW+sNnQAYgXHS/+S5F7Ft7/zAzshN6MMx00bziQMnvG Gwp1SEwyFBaw/HVtdwTbD8vWGlffID+i49/uCYBt99KSViPZBWj05fXNtUI+I4vOzFec hW7NzvFrsm9w50IJKp9fBF9ubVvDNaWgJOlTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=r1FdH04JPXAzH+h3YGDPwumrGTymaihkq3Ul23q4jQ65LGJ2yhjkYjN/Yft4FhanRN 0MgBhl98q9M4xMIuoUykqFbzkZjfvvLkk4BWlV3KwW44jOulPL1kfeeN2qEoxJd8yHmW fKCODn/VXxhzKOqF+0KVB5s919qsBYack9p4Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.229.18 with SMTP id jg18mr4188174qcb.156.1283262709119; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.70 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:51:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:51:50 -0000 On 30 August 2010 18:38, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad wrote: > >> >> sounds like a bodge to me >> > > Sounds like FUD to me. > > -- > Adam Vande More > maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 13:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B35210656B1 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbergstrom@pathscale.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C2C8FC13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so4558411fxm.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.116.193 with SMTP id n1mr5441605faq.77.1283262887102; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.149] ([119.42.86.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m17sm391370fag.0.2010.08.31.06.54.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7D09BC.7050806@pathscale.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:55:08 +0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speeding up (caching?) shared libraries loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:54:48 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > On 08/31/10 14:44, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Suppose I have an executable which I need to invoke repeatedly (e.g. to >> run tests in a makefile). >> This executables spend most of its time loading (rather than >> processing), due to the need of several huge shared libraries. >> >> I'd welcome an hint on how to speed this up. >> Possible thing would be to "cache" these shared libraries (and possibily >> the executable too) in memory, so that any invocation after the first is >> faster. >> Is this possible at all? > > Normal file system caching will cover this case (unless you have very > little memory available). The only other thing you might do to speed > this up is prebinding / prelinking but if you are often rebuilding the > project it might not help. With the PathScale compiler we tightly integrate hugetblfs support on linux. (At some point we'll likely adapt this approach to work with FBSD superpages) It can provide significant speed-up in some cases. (Like the initial loading of Firefox and some SPEC benchmarks) I would give that a try and see what sort of results you get.. (Not exactly what you were asking about, but could help) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:18:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D1010656A7 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC1D8FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so5343751bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5QlZ/bqerclN7aDv0Wmm9byNA8w1Rcra5x4VwQE0Bag=; b=T9AN10lz04hxZNNwwHJm5SRf7jDSbGvt2fSJVLxaU9czy6ZtNOjQj70dv8PcCPwJ4j +3Dvm45tsygZhmKS9z+CMyfnzXaIiIbnZagONC2pUtnWfatlrGzRtRxNwaX7lY5w9QRs 4xWMhvZt95MH+TH8wKaj5unqur0A+jqOgqpwc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KiNzIEue+OqRyGpJ7qyjbR59pdsv08bkQvX0wNefQuyaHHn3baHEf2pAFrZhe0wgfm FuT2INWzfuvdr/9pSnT2mxJGry0jiojj91gJ3+O+csgmjk8FHJTQrPw9RjU34R8EisTY yywzKXvAXuYGkEHJNIifS/aXigeKXLKU8VUDI= Received: by 10.204.57.130 with SMTP id c2mr4450881bkh.110.1283264327163; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:18:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.78 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:18:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:18:17 +0100 Message-ID: To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:18:48 -0000 On 31 August 2010 14:51, krad wrote: > On 30 August 2010 18:38, Adam Vande More wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad wrote: >> >>> >>> sounds like =A0a bodge to me >>> >> >> Sounds like FUD to me. >> >> -- >> Adam Vande More >> > > > maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to. Because this allows people to use scp and nothing else; mooting your argume= nt: ''SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP system. [snip]'' How difficult is it to install a port, really? Do you ever run with just the base system? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:19:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747941065693 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyle@engr.uky.edu) Received: from spitfire.ecc.engr.uky.edu (spitfire.ecc.engr.uky.edu [128.163.144.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6BC8FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poohawk.smtp ([192.168.0.77] helo=poohawk.ecc.engr.uky.edu) by spitfire.ecc.engr.uky.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1OqRJz-000Ecl-Gk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400 Received: from kyle by poohawk.ecc.engr.uky.edu with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1OqRJz-0009xA-GN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400 From: Kyle Dippery To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Scan-Signature: 203b0ee3ccdda5068008e82feda2e061 Subject: freebsd-update newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:19:55 -0000 Hello, I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system, well, updated. First try, 'freebsd-update fetch' yielded a number of failure messages regarding the public key. Found a fetch address to get the key manually, put it in /var/db/freebsd-update, and ran again. Now I get: hostname# freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update5.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update2.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update3.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. This is the case even when rule 1 of ipfw is 'allow all from any to any'. What am I missing? Thanks, Kyle -- Kyle Dippery Engineering Computing Services Phone: (859) 257-1346 280 FPAT 0046 Fax: (859) 323-3848 UK - One Great Place to Work From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:27:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5982106564A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791AA8FC0A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F413D371; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7VERW3x001701; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:31 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Kyle Dippery Message-Id: <20100831162731.217ffb74.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> References: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:27:34 -0000 On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400, Kyle Dippery wrote: > Hello, > > I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable > with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system, > well, updated. That won't work. The freebsd-update program is used to track RELEASE (including the security patches) in a binary way, bringing you from 8.1-RELESE to 8.1-RELESE-p1 to 8.1-RELESE-p2 and so on. STABLE is not supported by freebsd-update. If you want to track STABLE, you need to compile stuff yourself from sources updated via cvsup or csup (see instructions in the FreeBSD handbook and additionally /usr/src/Makefile). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:35:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2550D106566C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0098FC1C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o7VEZkvc083026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7VEZkOV095210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o7VEZjns095209; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:45 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <20100831143545.GB5913@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:46 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speeding up (caching?) shared libraries loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:35:50 -0000 In the last episode (Aug 31), Andrea Venturoli said: > Suppose I have an executable which I need to invoke repeatedly (e.g. to > run tests in a makefile). This executables spend most of its time loading > (rather than processing), due to the need of several huge shared > libraries. Link your program statically and bypass the dynamic linker completely. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:48:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF3E10656BB for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C434F8FC08 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 126H1f0050mlR8UA92ooTw; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:48 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 12om1f00346zqiB8X2onuu; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4C7D164D.1010003@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:48:45 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100819 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> <4c7cb69b.7tFBWEqVHvBjt0Xt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4c7cb69b.7tFBWEqVHvBjt0Xt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@edvax.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:48 -0000 >>> At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, >>> which is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have >>> system mail delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or >>> Mutt? >> No. Per definition, a mail client (mail user agent - MUA) can not >> be the target of mail delivery ... > Depending on what the OP had in mind, ports/mail/procmail might turn > out to be (at least part of) a solution. > Actually, I do have procmail installed for use with Mutt, but I have never been able to create a recipe that works. Cheers... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:52:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747E510656B4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8778FC17 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 119s1f0080S2fkCA92soNN; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:52:48 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 12sm1f00C46zqiB8V2snMA; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:52:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4C7D173D.7050100@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:52:45 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100819 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mailinglists References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> <824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9, 4C7CBD43.1050302@debank.tv> In-Reply-To: <824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9,4C7CBD43.1050302@debank.tv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:52:48 -0000 >>>> At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, >>>> which is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have >>>> system mail delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or >>>> Mutt? >>> No. Per definition, a mail client (mail user agent - MUA) can not >>> be the target of mail delivery ... >> Depending on what the OP had in mind, ports/mail/procmail might turn >> out to be (at least part of) a solution. >> > > Actually Mutt can read directly from a mbox file like in /var/mail/ > You are quite right. I was thinking more on the lines of having system mail read by Thunderbird. Cheers.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 14:56:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171D110656B3 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594CF8FC19 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7VEukXU075769; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:56:46 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:56:45 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Antonio Olivares In-Reply-To: <20100831004300.14BA410656EF@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20100901002142.R29840@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100831004300.14BA410656EF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-709418500-1283266605=:29840" Cc: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wvstreaams + wvdial on FreeBSD 8.1 AMD 64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:51 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-709418500-1283266605=:29840 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 326, Issue 2, Message: 2 On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:27:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Antonio Olivares > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Odhiambo Washington > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Antonio Olivares > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dear FreeBSD users, > >> >> > >> >> I have run out of ideas to troubleshoot a difficult task: > >> >> > >> >> get wvstreams and wvdial to work on FreeBSD 8.1. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Why don't you just use the native ppp in FreeBSD? > >> > >> Don't have experience with it :(  Have used kppp in FreeBSD and Linux, > >> but also use wvdial.  I prefer those tools and examples in FreeBSD > >> Handbook have not worked for me before sadly. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Antonio > > > > Did you try PC-BSD? > > > > No :( > > Had tried it before, but I read that it too lacks kppp and that the > port is broken with no apparent fix in sight. It's not just that kppp, from KDE's linuxcentricity, only supported pppd & not FreeBSD's ppp(8), but that pppd on FreeBSD received scant attention in recent years and was dropped altogether in FreeBSD 8.0 ppp(8) works fine and is well supported and well documented in the man page and Handbook. You shouldn't have any trouble gaining experience with it, and if you do, lots of people here can help with config. Having delved into the complexities of pppd setup on a Linux system myself, I quite understand why people preferred a front-end for it :) ppp(8) needs one config file and is easily managed by simple script/s. cheers, Ian --0-709418500-1283266605=:29840-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:01:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D719210656B4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A9A8FC12 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEB81E82F; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:01:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7VF10wi001820; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:01:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:01:00 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Rem P Roberti Message-Id: <20100831170100.f0dadfd8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4C7D173D.7050100@comcast.net> References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> <824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9, 4C7CBD43.1050302@debank.tv> <4C7D173D.7050100@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:02 -0000 On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:52:45 -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > >>>> At this time system mail is being delivered to /var/mail/, > >>>> which is the normal way of doing things. Is it possible to have > >>>> system mail delivered to an email client, such as Thunderbird or > >>>> Mutt? > >>> No. Per definition, a mail client (mail user agent - MUA) can not > >>> be the target of mail delivery ... > >> Depending on what the OP had in mind, ports/mail/procmail might turn > >> out to be (at least part of) a solution. > >> > > > > Actually Mutt can read directly from a mbox file like in /var/mail/ > > > > You are quite right. I was thinking more on the lines of having system > mail read by Thunderbird. In this case, configuring the system's mail delivery to a local account instead of directly to root, and then have Thunderbird incormporate mail from local spool will easily do the trick. I don't have Thunderbird installed, but you should be able to find the correct setting. However, one *could* bypass the incorporation process and find a way to write the system messages DIRECTLY into Thunderbird's user mail storage, but I think that would be a crazy idea. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:01:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D1D10656B6 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0412C8FC21 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-101-5.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.101.5] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqSDk-00075K-TS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:53:58 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:01:43 -0700 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:01:43 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100831150143.GD34936@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20100830222432.GA38520@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100830224333.GF24753@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Dell Latitude E6400 and Touchpad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:01:49 -0000 --llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Mike Barnard on Tuesday, 31 August 2010: > Thanks Frank. I'll try asking there. >=20 > Chip, my touchpad works.. the only features I want are vertical and > horizontal scrolling. Do those work for you? >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chip Camden wrote: >=20 > > Quoth Frank Shute on Monday, 30 August 2010: > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:59:55PM +0300, Mike Barnard wrote: > > > > > > > > anyone on this... Synpatics Touchpad on FreeBSD 64-bit? > > > > > > > > > > Mike, since you haven't received a reply from this list, your best bet > > > is probably to post to the freebsd-mobile list. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html > > > > > > > > > > My ASUS K72F has a touchpad, but I don't know if it's Synaptics. Any w= ay > > I can tell? In any case, it worked automagically with FreeBSD 8.0 and > > 8.1 amd64. > > I don't even know how to do that with a mouse that doesn't have a third button, short of clicking on a scroll bar. I generally avoid the mouse where I can. Can you instruct me? --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMfRlXAAoJEIpckszW26+R1YkH/0Yr1S4t+Up0sKuo2kqlY237 +xZIHqTVB2l4/n01GrMcSM6lCKBkInR+mMyyM/Xe+7kMOEitFTTxIXHnhVqsP+d+ fWJTPhsAGuenWVOwjVw6nSARryZ1XUpJixlM3mSJOHbZ8xR23fUc1/IynBs26CLF AsHaPIF0oyh2nEG1uOXareX1hYSTsvNfJrJm6rT7rvcE0RoyeiLoizu6DL20HPkr NyYWSpUtGa+WgNKL03/Pij55JoVyg+EEx3wlQjFzMAZBCYG+b2YV2i5QJIXkJVtq LUWxVHCzLIryUbdBodOkLrRH/9PatHurFxbYbClkYyO6+cOnSfVGsY1pALtYkJ0= =AL9P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:04:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6571065697 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from extmail-03.people.net.au (extmail-03.people.net.au [202.154.122.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68EE08FC0A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13737 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 14:37:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO extmail-01.people.net.au) (202.154.123.98) by extmail-03.people.net.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 14:37:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 21535 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 14:37:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) (218.215.180.178) by extmail-01.people.net.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 14:37:23 -0000 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F099F17528; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:37:25 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:37:25 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: Kyle Dippery Message-ID: <20100831143725.GA39500@ozzmosis.com> References: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:04:06 -0000 On Tue 2010-08-31 09:56:19 UTC-0400, Kyle Dippery (kyle@engr.uky.edu) wrote: > hostname# freebsd-update fetch > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update5.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update2.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update3.FreeBSD.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. Short answer: freebsd-update doesn't support updating systems running -STABLE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:25:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FB510656BA for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689478FC26 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:25:06 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAG67fExUXebj/2dsb2JhbACgZnG/K4U3BIki Received: from outmx01.plus.net ([84.93.230.227]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2010 16:25:05 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1OqSht-0007VB-Bj; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:25:05 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OqShs-0001DZ-1e; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:25:04 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:25:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> In-Reply-To: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201008311625.03931.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Kyle Dippery Subject: Re: freebsd-update newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:25:07 -0000 On Tuesday 31 August 2010, Kyle Dippery wrote: > I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable > with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system, > well, updated. > > First try, 'freebsd-update fetch' yielded a number of failure > messages freebsd-update will only track the RELEASE branch. If you want to track STABLE you'll have to use csup and rebuild the entire system from source each time. Unless you really want to track the latest developments in STABLE you can stay with RELEASE and use freebsd-update to ensure that you get all the security patches. See section 24.5.2 in the FreeBSD Handbook to help you decide if you really need STABLE If you choose to stick with RELEASE then it's worth subscribing to the FreeBSD Security Advisories mailing list and only running freebsd-update after any updates have been announced. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:27:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DE810656A6 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E958FC17 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so1128220qyk.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IkwbcAXGG7HoYQQGm2Wy6yDH/kSD4qGRPBzVxGjuu4Q=; b=s1SnFkDQdpJviCLlv3iWZ1MN/ak5MiDjjrVDgdjRx+h3RGvvf7ySNalgTKwaoN0Lkz bdrrnQZabRSSCuyBbhsEzR68xWYluvk3cMLjJQBu61QrjhLQKtxHSPTzqIOdlSagfXuA SV7EjBOOLsZQwP/wQIN89CYEUWwOIznzvIeUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KjzFqUX9bLy+bjpqLmi0xjGf1U5zO4DOnsY+zQIyBaIgkj7LwTPlhQ+mTZbZAjUXUA TfHwKQMjlLctWIpEInSBSX8RYnvns6Rp3Ss3taZ2GIfvv46KspmTXGPnctc+Y8Est3Qc 5Isi4BhDgUYJgdPaWB5rUOCIJ605zzE0V5zEQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.37.134 with SMTP id x6mr4142439qad.172.1283268469324; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.70 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:27:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: utisoft@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:27:50 -0000 On 31 August 2010 15:18, Chris Rees wrote: > On 31 August 2010 14:51, krad wrote: > > On 30 August 2010 18:38, Adam Vande More wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> sounds like a bodge to me > >>> > >> > >> Sounds like FUD to me. > >> > >> -- > >> Adam Vande More > >> > > > > > > maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to. > > Because this allows people to use scp and nothing else; mooting your > argument: > > ''SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users > dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP > system. [snip]'' > > How difficult is it to install a port, really? Do you ever run with > just the base system? > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ill repeat "but why install extra things when you dont have to?". I dont think i mentioned difficulty did i? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:38:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79BD10656A8 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DB38FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so5431161bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:38:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8TaxLQsQbWY1M1fFijQvOBqzoUB8VApHH5F+sFKpwJY=; b=XN06DupKkto60htfXF7Kzl6VPGIoSLW5UXS7MC3IcxxHizURMLvRRSuXaahhtppiNR zokM8/09P+VcA+vFFlNi+gIrWqKx7oglYAY7GPRQby5ssU7k0vsIoLnOxJTLq1wWrdJQ ybCoV6egsUBav5yTkJPN/vhDB2YJr7tNVo4L4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dGEP/HavJl0TavkDsdbLWBFczhlhHnj4+LUWmfHASWztfdiep5/w6jYVCITzg06Qul B7tkpM2M5MTropYomFKiRaRIcpw8KZLW0dB6WPuxHs0VV5DDLQTnk/W48OD0HigmmPdB /xI3nPPmYLX4gy5X9PcCrRJM9CWtx20CZh6X8= Received: by 10.204.127.141 with SMTP id g13mr4547905bks.54.1283269104114; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:38:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.78 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:37:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:37:53 +0100 Message-ID: To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:38:26 -0000 On 31 August 2010 16:27, krad wrote: > On 31 August 2010 15:18, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 31 August 2010 14:51, krad wrote: >> > On 30 August 2010 18:38, Adam Vande More wrote= : >> >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad wrote: >> >>> sounds like =A0a bodge to me >> >> Sounds like FUD to me. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Adam Vande More >> > maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to. >> >> Because this allows people to use scp and nothing else; mooting your >> argument: >> >> ''SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the use= rs >> dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP >> system. [snip]'' >> >> How difficult is it to install a port, really? Do you ever run with >> just the base system? >> > ill repeat "but why install extra things when you dont have to?". I dont > think i mentioned difficulty did i? So what's the problem? It allows you to use whatever protocol you like, without worrying about shell access. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 16:07:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3692A10656A4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB66B8FC24 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so2403150yxn.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yLruY286SAwf1TkxQc8IC7J9ujz/b1EK0flNN+qFsb4=; b=jLBSFB9WUVuAZdO3/NZuyu5tUIg/p1waLEO475WUOUum9Ga6NSEvqgIeKDIZVoFgGF ksV0edaIuMfnIn4s8NzUYQlvS9rHOPkFhPRJTGo9puVg8b2XKBpA4cdegzDaIpsJWM9I nagj99FaOTNxyvkxSeV0azG/A2AdgI7tOCBgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iCjRfzNyMYgdHq4/a6krl4gsihveM5Kx5Umf2f1gyXuT4oS6goViToZpmYCv7ehNW5 GCghPglqjDCE/aAchR1MybDUFItBN/f2JOsURF7fA6Y/4ku3l9SXREBHraFiWkyYZf3f QTOiMJt0tscm1qz2JGe5wOHA2V9wik89FXyQM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.51.206 with SMTP id e14mr4230235qcg.232.1283270849868; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.76 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C774AE1.2040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:07:29 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:07:31 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:27 AM, krad wrote: > ill repeat "but why install extra things when you dont have to?". I dont > think i mentioned difficulty did i? > In addition to moving to a more tightly integrated OpenSSL derivative and the benefits from such a move, SCP performance greatly exceeds FTP based solutions IME. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 16:11:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8DF10656B3 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B177A8FC25 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so7076209wwb.31 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:11:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eWSXkweaffRtZdOZmDt1ReEzcD97yF0w6RJuF7S9gGs=; b=x85pxzTl6iKLIrSm0UZEU0/66RChQSDCJSv80QFxshe28KZP1PQNbxcYR+09OYwd1r /Zm6x19h/W/gzL0xtFr1lHsPgeljCxA2zBzxg2uyRFoQU2lW81D9QUnv2HkbTWFaDHQA IKRCFsmsLZArHpQdtliYOfPCoc1KpvWZCgib8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l9WULC7dxoRN40TILYlCeMsk2E8LMV6iVI/slEd5A9JkKzsO5zMgfWKotQo/K3BzXl Qpqbokq3v7LJqZAaEBPTCLQVeFBBXDa95HVJDb4/8vqaz2PeXBszyEgg0d3FZ2MeyvMM 5e7oEe1k6r6V49s1Te58gHlKdUQfgrYXQO798= Received: by 10.227.127.194 with SMTP id h2mr6790866wbs.74.1283271082119; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p82sm5397260weq.3.2010.08.31.09.11.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:11:16 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100831171116.4110bc69@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100831162731.217ffb74.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20100831135619.GA37924@engr.uky.edu> <20100831162731.217ffb74.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd-update newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:11:24 -0000 On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:31 +0200 Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400, Kyle Dippery > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable > > with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system, > > well, updated. > > That won't work. The freebsd-update program is used to track > RELEASE (including the security patches) in a binary way, > bringing you from 8.1-RELESE to 8.1-RELESE-p1 to 8.1-RELESE-p2 > and so on. And to upgrade between two such branches. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 16:15:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2C210656B5 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0A8FC08 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so2407432yxn.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.215.9 with SMTP id n9mr2246798ybg.221.1283271309005; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:15:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.150.135 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:14:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:14:48 -0400 Message-ID: To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: getting eclipse to recognize that devel/subsclipse is installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:15:13 -0000 I installed eclipse and subclipse via ports. When I start eclipse I do not see svn as an option in the preferences menu nor or do any of subclipse's features. How can I tell eclipse that I installed subclipse? -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 16:19:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AE310656B5 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out9.libero.it (cp-out9.libero.it [212.52.84.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CA88FC0A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (151.51.63.247) by cp-out9.libero.it (8.5.107) id 4C6EB96E0139CA4B; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:19:15 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7VGJ9F2058517; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:19:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4C7D2B7F.7080207@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:19:11 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <4C7CF944.7030709@netfence.it> <20100831143545.GB5913@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20100831143545.GB5913@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speeding up (caching?) shared libraries loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:17 -0000 Il 08/31/10 16:35, Dan Nelson ha scritto: > In the last episode (Aug 31), Andrea Venturoli said: >> Suppose I have an executable which I need to invoke repeatedly (e.g. to >> run tests in a makefile). This executables spend most of its time loading >> (rather than processing), due to the need of several huge shared >> libraries. > > Link your program statically and bypass the dynamic linker completely. Then my binary would be more than 200MB and it wouldn't load that fast either. Besides I have several binaries using the same libraries and linking them all statically would take up a lot more time. bye & Thanks anyway av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 17:00:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1070210656B5 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E684D8FC1F for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 10qJ1f0060mlR8UA250oZY; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:00:48 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 150m1f00Q46zqiB8X50n0t; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:00:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4C7D353E.2020209@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:00:46 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100819 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> <824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9, 4C7CBD43.1050302@debank.tv> <4C7D173D.7050100@comcast.net> <20100831170100.f0dadfd8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100831170100.f0dadfd8.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:00:49 -0000 > However, one *could* bypass the incorporation process and find > a way to write the system messages DIRECTLY into Thunderbird's > user mail storage, but I think that would be a crazy idea. :-) > > Agreed! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 17:38:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DBB10656A3 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amaechler@gmx.ch) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 271D18FC1D for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2010 17:11:25 -0000 Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (EHLO mail-gy0-f182.google.com) [209.85.160.182] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 19:11:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2351487 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/EZ6kXgFzEZy8Fz132D8E5hGVhUHBWIfaQjmOseX +Osm5HwHVSkfNl Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so3090325gyg.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.5.3 with SMTP id 3mr6783752ane.153.1283274684433; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:11:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.106.4 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:11:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andreas Maechler Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:11:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting eclipse to recognize that devel/subsclipse is installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:38:08 -0000 I've always installed Subclipse directly through the Eclipse' plugin manager, which works very well. Andy On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > I installed eclipse and subclipse via ports. When I start eclipse I do > not see svn as an option in the preferences menu nor or do any of > subclipse's features. > > How can I tell eclipse that I installed subclipse? > > -- > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:15:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E9910656B3 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CA08FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so7649911qyk.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:15:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.222.76 with SMTP id if12mr4545616qcb.17.1283280760919; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.51.2 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:52:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:52:40 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: NFSv4 shows all ZFS filesystems as being owned by root X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:15:02 -0000 When a ZFS filesystem mountpoint is owned by someone other than root, this is not depicted properly on NFSv4 clients: On the server (FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE): temp-nfs# zfs create tank/test/testfs temp-nfs# chown brodbd:brodbd /tank/test/testfs temp-nfs# touch /tank/test/testfile temp-nfs# chown brodbd:brodbd /tank/test/testfile temp-nfs# ls -l /tank/test total 2 -rw-r--r--=A0 1 brodbd=A0 brodbd=A0 0 Aug 31 04:48 testfile drwxr-xr-x=A0 2 brodbd=A0 brodbd=A0 2 Aug 31 04:48 testfs On the client (RedHat Linux 5.4): root@dryas:~# mount temp-nfs:/tank/test /test root@dryas:~# ls -l /test total 2 -rw-r--r-- 1 brodbd brodbd 0 Aug 31 04:48 testfile drwxr-xr-x 2 root=A0=A0 root=A0=A0 2 Aug 31 04:48 testfs The same sequence works as expected when the server runs OpenSolaris. Am I missing something? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:20:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECFA10656A6 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C17C8FC1B for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so1409100qyk.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.19.132 with SMTP id a4mr4398598qab.62.1283282407282; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.51.2 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Mirror mounts not available on FreeBSD? (was: Re: NFSv4 shows all ZFS filesystems as being owned by root) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:20:08 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:52 AM, David Brodbeck wrote: > When a ZFS filesystem mountpoint is owned by someone other than root, > this is not depicted properly on NFSv4 clients: After playing around a bit more, it appears the problem is that ZFS filesystems under an NFSv4 mountpoint are not auto-mounted by Linux clients of a FreeBSD server the way they are when they're clients of an OpenSolaris server; if I mount them manually, the ownership is correct. I think OpenSolaris calls this functionality "mirror mounts." Is there a way to get mirror mounts to work on FreeBSD, or is it necessary to mount every sub-filesystem manually? The intended application here is a server hosting user home directories, where each user has their own ZFS filesystem. Having to list every user in /etc/fstab on every client is not really workable. With an OpenSolaris server, I can have the Linux clients mount /tank/home, and all the filesystems under /tank/home come along for the ride; I'm trying to duplicate this with a FreeBSD server. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:34:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D24A10656B3 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297038FC0A for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.12]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 10271f0080FhH24A27aNAf; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:34:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([67.180.204.190]) by omta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 17aM1f00Z46zqiB8U7aNUS; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:34:22 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:34:21 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:34:23 -0000 In attempting to install /usr/ports/print/dvips I got the error message that dvips is an interactive port, and I can't remember how to handle that. Could I please get a heads up there. Thank you. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:37:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BBE10656C1 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:37:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0378FC08 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28180 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 19:37:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 31 Aug 2010 19:37:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 992BE5084D; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:37:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: FreeBSD References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:37:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> (Rem P. Roberti's message of "Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:34:21 -0700") Message-ID: <44occiefq3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:37:10 -0000 Rem P Roberti writes: > In attempting to install /usr/ports/print/dvips I got the error message > that dvips is an interactive port, and I can't remember how to handle > that. Could I please get a heads up there. Thank you. Just install it without BATCH. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:39:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED51810656AC for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E428FC08 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 11D51f0031HpZEsAF7fc9M; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([67.180.204.190]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 17fb1f00E46zqiB8a7fcjh; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:36 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:39:35 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:37 -0000 On 2010.08.31 12:34:21 -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: > In attempting to install /usr/ports/print/dvips I got the error message > that dvips is an interactive port, and I can't remember how to handle > that. Could I please get a heads up there. Thank you. > OK...I commented out the 'batch' entry in make.conf. Now I get this error message: ===> dvips-5.76 conflicts with installed package(s): teTeX-base-3.0_20 teTeX-texmf-3.0_6 The whole problem is that I am trying to get muttprint to work, and my understanding is that it is dependent on teTeX for its operation. But when I tried to print I got an error message telling me that the print operation needs to see dvips. So I'm not exactly sure what is going on here. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 19:39:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26F310656C1 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843BC8FC0C for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so31599qwg.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:39:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ofddtgAu6xUn3YgojW9VQZCljNqW/JhcW4fSseA0B7E=; b=BGgZ+uP12KlM9vconMmXhApcLE/dHtuNj0RcEl4kNUwPuIfOTyAz8VpgC0XNsnkmiW rhBYBc6c8xu1u6B6Hbhk3DTFrOqR34RaV7iqKDdo8CVDrjG5AunjwusUR9AdbWQz+y0H f6RVB2QxleLJOdVXyPMbDApJhSj6MMIbbnQKE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=eKX+IEGcZB3K/AzIL5tCXG3MZHQZuOtgdMc0tFZCcHSOjrcfN81Mx/zt+73HzAPKoT OgoHjTDUiV2HzB1S6V8Gk5W0LeCp0zrWQTUOKSfK4hML4Cy9N/fbLrJDNiEFdxHXFxZ7 cjqef9k+D5+KNQ2dQf4LnIWLuWlkg79RfHelI= Received: by 10.224.6.145 with SMTP id 17mr4420641qaz.140.1283283576927; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm10077812qcr.17.2010.08.31.12.39.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7D5A75.7050107@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:39:33 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rem Roberti References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> In-Reply-To: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:39:57 -0000 Hi Rem, On 8/31/10 3:34 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote: > In attempting to install /usr/ports/print/dvips I got the error message > that dvips is an interactive port, and I can't remember how to handle > that. Could I please get a heads up there. Thank you. > I suspect you have BATCH=yes in /etc/make.conf; if so, comment out that line and run make(1) again. Cheers, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 20:00:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3471010656AC for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78568FC12 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 4so7703854qyk.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:00:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6OdW3Qgbw4a4xj7b+0krH+I5R2+ahwvekVlXgNOavE0=; b=TfzsBTr5ZoZ/EfUzheTZdm1miv1heUAplzAunzX2JDo05LZP45UNDf80azXO0gKlSD wsa2Mk6fPHS61Iq601MABBAIrhlpZnDSSZ95DrPK8R35gUF56l5bl3z6ivehwGpKK0O2 X6RiKurOLh86h9p5nN/uavHFj8IZVUxBluxGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=vD7Gq5REclsQNQTRxi9OIrfwTikUd18yOpl+zuS6VF6HnkHcdmu18T2twqXbgj/2rL MjzV6CoKPXymi26/t5qh4HhdbOZ3WQjFpWjX1HSnjceC+szhmwULkm0WuYcnR3q86hqT 9uEaOTURWJUFWDoG7af+nwgOOT13J5DlSlcYk= Received: by 10.224.53.161 with SMTP id m33mr4281308qag.356.1283284834591; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm10106460qck.18.2010.08.31.13.00.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7D5F5F.7060206@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:00:31 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> In-Reply-To: <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:00:35 -0000 On 8/31/10 3:39 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote: > On 2010.08.31 12:34:21 -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: >> In attempting to install /usr/ports/print/dvips I got the error message >> that dvips is an interactive port, and I can't remember how to handle >> that. Could I please get a heads up there. Thank you. >> > > OK...I commented out the 'batch' entry in make.conf. Now I get this > error message: > > ===> dvips-5.76 conflicts with installed package(s): > teTeX-base-3.0_20 > teTeX-texmf-3.0_6 > > The whole problem is that I am trying to get muttprint to work, and my > understanding is that it is dependent on teTeX for its operation. But > when I tried to print I got an error message telling me that the print > operation needs to see dvips. So I'm not exactly sure what is going on > here. Looking at the Makefile for the port, all teTeX ports conflict with dvips. Deinstalling teTeX-* from your system will allow this port to build/install; I'm not familiar enough with muttprint enough to be of much more help with it though. Cheers, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 20:07:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F85310656B2 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francis@optiksecurite.com) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4388FC22 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:07:04 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Received: from [31.33.7.200] ([69.70.93.206]) by VL-MR-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L8100HQ26FB9PE1@VL-MR-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:06:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <4C7D5356.9030101@optiksecurite.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:09:10 -0400 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Francis_Dub=E9?= Organization: Optik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9curit=E9?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ACLs inheritance problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: francis@optiksecurite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:07:05 -0000 Hi list, Here's my case. We have 3 web developpers creating files and folders in our main "web" folder. We would like to setup ACLs allowing them to modify each others file. So this is what I'm doing : # mkdir web #setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,g:web:rwx web # setfacl -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rx,g:test1:rwx web # getfacl -d web # file: web # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::rwx group:web:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x # getfacl web # file: web # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::rwx group:web:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x Now, when I create a subfolder or a file in the "web" folder, I would expect them to have theses ACLs. # mkdir web/subfolder # touch web/file # getfacl web/file # file: web/file # owner: root # group: wheel user::rw- group::rwx # effective: r-- group:web:rwx # effective: r-- mask::r-- other::r-- # getfacl web/subfolder # file: web/subfolder # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::rwx # effective: r-x group:web:rwx # effective: r-x mask::r-x other::r-x Where is that new mask coming from ? Shouldn't it be the same as the default mask from it's parent directory ? I need the new files to be writable by the "web" group by default, am I missing something ? We are using FreeBSD 8.1 Released on AMD64. Any pointer would be appreciated, thanks a lot. Francis Dubé . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 20:23:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588DC10656A4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinrame@yahoo.com) Received: from web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.167.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F2108FC15 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93316 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Aug 2010 20:23:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283286214; bh=ORZFrL+p4du39cQkU7mBMShDTR2PH4PAScxpgpK1TPM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vgQorisqYnK345O2oie6PzZTh54eShI+e7h3C750RYj3N81So4vDLPum8Q6j9c7eVpanTATk33hiFoc5L8q5gSPHzPXN0Qz4jPftyJPTRccErOEx4cTqtQMPOVpVBAtnTwstSDdn/WZ3xy3BOndSagl6Nv/wpPPlkjSFkGrRlaQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y3MQF1QyGUDxJtnxWHN9bi13Girq1S1fnT9cgx61rCAWtwSKgEX5cxMwat931ddWRISLfJcpyZhEIgcxjn0X9fbrDhM8IkZQp/3kvL7t2/9N0PqVoQ6eyuzOJ4SQO+AfH5wvz8TpEqRr7eP9nb4B9kenlea9tt7LwoK6Ozm+Y6U=; Message-ID: <580860.93239.qm@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: rcpcZc8VM1lhS1tG0hiWsFttCdJaN98MBbOUpRA_V0PGp2L tEUQOM7boxdusu3dI6fhR84mQJW5Bug2coKD1GjMrYfsvTskbhxO5Lxeue6X isIkHqin9ApQBs_Znm8EVtUyWLmWu1k4bzI2B33CQXcGfRRPesZblpc2ohpP CMdEu1qns7CpOUSHsAfXUC71ZRXDuT6KOd8eGS.mnXv2_bHj5AUiqplY5DfI iAHyBZF83dNqIzIbAYycH_WMl.Kp5BdaTuwqvPyZX4IrOxJI6TSLREZmC9Vi UGUq0QhY0o.qVspRwbybpJqjlnkiUl396ELWXAyVMT1ZdFfs1KoarLixAsoz zoGPLaF9.vtAtiv8ZmriKAYvTa6pHfcNNgT5IIRgSjiKwnOnSaWOLnukw Received: from [200.80.219.194] by web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:23:34 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:23:34 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <1137500294.20100831214418@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Firebird 2.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:23:35 -0000 > LMR> Hi, does anyone successfully compiled Firebird=0A> 2.1.3+ on FreeBsd= 7.2 or superior?.=0A> =0A> LMR> I'm on 8.1 amd64 and can't compile it.=0A>= on amd64 there some problems=0A> you can contact to ICQ:382796339=0A> =0A= =0ACould you tell me what are those problems in amd64?=0A=0AP.S.: better if= we talk in this public mailing list, this way others can learn from us!.= =0A=0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A=0A = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 20:56:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823B21065693 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:56:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440418FC19 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3F11E551; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:56:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7VKuhkh002712; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:56:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:56:43 +0200 From: Polytropon To: francis@optiksecurite.com Message-Id: <20100831225643.b2437d48.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4C7D5356.9030101@optiksecurite.com> References: <4C7D5356.9030101@optiksecurite.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACLs inheritance problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:56:49 -0000 Sorry for not being able to answer your question, but please allow me to mention one thing - it's about correct terminology: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:09:10 -0400, Francis Dub=E9 wrote: > We have 3 web developpers creating files and folders in=20 > our main "web" folder. We would like to setup ACLs allowing them to=20 > modify each others file. > [...] > Now, when I create a subfolder or a file in the "web" folder, I would=20 > expect them to have theses ACLs. > [...] > Where is that new mask coming from ? Shouldn't it be the same as the=20 > default mask from it's parent directory ? FreeBSD, as UNIX in general, has directories, not "folders". In the last line quoted, you used the correct term. It's not that you also called files "sheets of paper", and hard disks "drawers for putting folders in" :-) I know that I sound picky, but using proper terminology is important. Please don't feel offended personally - I'm correcting nearly everyone who talks about "folders" on this list. --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 22:54:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC33410656B4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C7C8FC13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7VMsYB1002152 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:35 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7VMsTml002146 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:30 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E41BE33C3D; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:28 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100831225428.GA42850@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:54:38 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:39:35PM -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > On 2010.08.31 12:34:21 -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > In attempting to install /usr/ports/print/dvips I got the error message > > that dvips is an interactive port, and I can't remember how to handle > > that. Could I please get a heads up there. Thank you. > > > > OK...I commented out the 'batch' entry in make.conf. Now I get this > error message: > > ===> dvips-5.76 conflicts with installed package(s): > teTeX-base-3.0_20 > teTeX-texmf-3.0_6 > > The whole problem is that I am trying to get muttprint to work, and my > understanding is that it is dependent on teTeX for its operation. But > when I tried to print I got an error message telling me that the print > operation needs to see dvips. So I'm not exactly sure what is going on > here. > teTeX comes with dvips IIRC, which is why you're getting the error. For printing from mutt, I use the following in ~/.muttrc set print_command="a2ps -1 > ~/mail.ps; gv ~/mail.ps" Obviously, that views the postcript file first & then I print from gv. gv & a2ps are in ports. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 23:11:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B191065697 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F808FC08 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-116-86.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.116.86]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AA33D59F; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o7VNBkA3008939; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:11:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:11:46 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Frank Shute Message-Id: <20100901011146.24d3436f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100831225428.GA42850@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831225428.GA42850@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:11:49 -0000 On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:28 +0100, Frank Shute wrote: > For printing from mutt, I use the following in ~/.muttrc > > set print_command="a2ps -1 > ~/mail.ps; gv ~/mail.ps" > > Obviously, that views the postcript file first & then I print from gv. What about "lpr ~/mail.ps" instead of "gv ~/mail.ps"? This would actually send the output PS to the default printer queue, causing the message to be printed. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 23:29:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E031065697 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894348FC15 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 19S91f0050cQ2SLA3BVhzV; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:29:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([67.180.204.190]) by omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1BVf1f00C46zqiB8WBVga7; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:29:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:29:39 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20100831232939.GD2818@bsd.remdog.net> Mail-Followup-To: Polytropon , Frank Shute , FreeBSD References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831225428.GA42850@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100901011146.24d3436f.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100901011146.24d3436f.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Frank Shute , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:29:41 -0000 On 2010.09.01 01:11:46 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:28 +0100, Frank Shute wrote: > > For printing from mutt, I use the following in ~/.muttrc > > > > set print_command="a2ps -1 > ~/mail.ps; gv ~/mail.ps" > > > > Obviously, that views the postcript file first & then I print from gv. > > What about "lpr ~/mail.ps" instead of "gv ~/mail.ps"? This would > actually send the output PS to the default printer queue, causing > the message to be printed. Nothing is working, regardless of whether I try to print from Muttprint, or with Frank's setup. In either case I get this error message: Press any key to continue...cannot remove path when cwd is /tmp/muttprint-GOauzJ for /tmp/muttprint-GOauzJ: at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/File/Temp.pm line 902 I'm beginning to wonder if this doesn't have something to do with the fact that my printer is installed via CUPS. There may need to me a special parameter set up in .muttprintrc. But so far I haven't found any info on it. Rem > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 00:04:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E59610656B6 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E448FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 11ZV1f0010vp7WLA9C4F1k; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:04:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([67.180.204.190]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1C4D1f00E46zqiB8RC4Ef7; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:04:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:04:13 -0700 From: Rem P Roberti To: Polytropon , Frank Shute , FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100901000413.GA1559@bsd.remdog.net> Mail-Followup-To: Polytropon , Frank Shute , FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:04:15 -0000 Brother! Muttprint is now working fine. The problem: the printer was offline! Now, before you go accusing me of being a complete dufus, let me say that I had no way of knowing that that condition existed. The printer itself indicated that it was online---no problem. What happened is that somehow, and I'm not sure what caused this, the printer became disengaged from its usb port. Weird. I noticed that this had happened when I tried to print from another program without success. The only way that I could get it talking again to usb was by doing a reboot. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 02:59:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64B310656A5 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5A28FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o812xquY018637; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:59:52 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o812xq12018633; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:59:52 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6B0D33C3D; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:59:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:59:51 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20100901025951.GA44144@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100831193421.GA2695@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831193935.GA1427@bsd.remdog.net> <20100831225428.GA42850@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100901011146.24d3436f.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100901011146.24d3436f.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:59:55 -0000 On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:11:46AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:54:28 +0100, Frank Shute wrote: > > For printing from mutt, I use the following in ~/.muttrc > > > > set print_command="a2ps -1 > ~/mail.ps; gv ~/mail.ps" > > > > Obviously, that views the postcript file first & then I print from gv. > > What about "lpr ~/mail.ps" instead of "gv ~/mail.ps"? This would > actually send the output PS to the default printer queue, causing > the message to be printed. > I like to view it first. Make sure there are no orphaned/widowed paragraphs etc. If so, then I might cat it to plain ascii, edit it & then run it through a2ps. Works for me! Not often that I print email. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 07:45:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFC110656A4 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38C38FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj23 with SMTP id 23so3379662gwj.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+sbfPi+rRdCx3CRvbSKYVW3Vmq4SvM2UEcd3gvzy/uU=; b=Sa4D9bax1xzbR3wdB0mk+/rI8AGeXJYvbMf39d4P1RaQpmeO1KWXwRTRpFswOrUH9p inBvbqKsaFb1LPgCUu8E2GZtjkI1s6/pUht3INXj3BOB0VcwpNmpYjdLvVourIdKT1OQ DlGJHwAXG46mfmzkT+/ObgtayXgXpB6FbzF0c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JTmp9IL5a8FTXah7KxmXWQrwY4DcEBj8LAC8t/qxVSZ1gm/wMuwnDJGqMlk9fSWjHu K/sbkNvr0Yguciek18z9IhtAYez/Dd/zIW9/RKz1P4M7kQ5rHGyH3g1KyOUltg28FHjX Bjsjqr6x4tw0y4ADXmblTwmnCFLgN6yxWo2kk= Received: by 10.90.34.18 with SMTP id h18mr1608377agh.174.1283327154062; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c-24-14-170-47.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.14.170.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm9797981ibk.3.2010.09.01.00.45.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7E04B3.60005@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:45:55 -0500 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C7BFFA2.2070309@comcast.net> <20100830212149.19359d5c.freebsd@edvax.de> <824d2cbe5c0a6bb162552ca01f32dfc9, 4C7CBD43.1050302@debank.tv> <4C7D173D.7050100@comcast.net> <20100831170100.f0dadfd8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100831170100.f0dadfd8.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: System mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:45:55 -0000 On 8/31/2010 10:01 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:52:45 -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > In this case, configuring the system's mail delivery to a local > account instead of directly to root, and then have Thunderbird > incormporate mail from local spool will easily do the trick. > # echo "myusername" >> /root/.forward Then all mail for root, like system logs, will be redirected to a different system user. man 5 forward From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 08:01:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A10A10656B2; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079818FC15; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o8181uDN096220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:01:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o8181u2n096219; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA07247; Wed, 1 Sep 10 00:57:22 PDT Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:57:15 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: remegius@comcast.net Message-Id: <4c7e075b.8edSaF5Xw9mGHkRS%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20100901000413.GA1559@bsd.remdog.net> In-Reply-To: <20100901000413.GA1559@bsd.remdog.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:01:59 -0000 Rem P Roberti wrote: > Brother! Muttprint is now working fine. The problem: the printer > was offline! Now, before you go accusing me of being a complete > dufus, let me say that I had no way of knowing that that condition > existed. The printer itself indicated that it was online---no > problem. What happened is that somehow, and I'm not sure what > caused this, the printer became disengaged from its usb port. I'd call it a bug in the printer that it continues to indicate online when it has lost its connection to its host (unless it also has a network connection, and in that case I imagine you'd be using the network instead of USB). > ... The only way that I could get it talking again to usb was by > doing a reboot. Now _that_ sounds like a possible bug in the USB subsystem, since USB is supposed to be completely hot-pluggable and should not need a reboot to get itself straightened out after a mishap. Cc-ing usb@ list. One question which will surely arise is, which FreeBSD version are you using? The USB stack was completely rewritten in 8.0. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 09:16:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5878710656B2 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0D38FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqjR3-0007KT-NV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:16:50 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o819GnsL003462 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:16:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o819GnVL003461 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:16:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:16:49 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100901091649.GA3409@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100823070819.GB2539@current.Sisis.de> <4C7241C2.2000305@otenet.gr> <20100823112621.GA4367@current.Sisis.de> <4C725BFC.90006@otenet.gr> <20100824084225.GA2160@current.Sisis.de> <4C739A78.4070303@otenet.gr> <20100827072416.GA2516@current.Sisis.de> <4C778001.3030809@otenet.gr> <20100830093112.GA3071@current.Sisis.de> <20100831131351.GA3592@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100831131351.GA3592@current.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: Re: installing FreeBSD in VMWare-player X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:16:55 -0000 El día Tuesday, August 31, 2010 a las 03:13:51PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > Now I have already again my 'old' root partition booting to single user > mode and I'm filling in the 120 GByte dump of the /usr ... The 1st try > crashed the Win7 to blue screen over the night :-( The 2nd try was successfull. It took 9 hours to get the dump restored. The system now boots fine, even of course slower than native. I still strougle with some smaller issues: Xorg uses only 1280x720, while the full host display is NVidia support 1920x1200; I can't get sound to work; the sound device is attached to the VM, the kernel loads snd_emu10k1.ko and sound.ko, but no device shows up. Any ideas? matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 13:04:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1625106564A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@socket.net) Received: from mf3.socket.net (mf3m.socket.net [216.106.88.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F6E8FC18 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [216.106.88.17]) by mf3.socket.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B2607ECAA6 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:49:48 -0500 (CDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jhall@socket.net X-Apparently-from: jhall@mail.socket.net X-Remote-Host: 216.106.19.47 User-Agent: Socket WebMail Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:49:48 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20100901124948.B2607ECAA6@mf3.socket.net> Subject: GnuPG not allowing passphrase entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jhall@socket.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:04:18 -0000 Ladies and Gentlemen, I an attempting to decrypt a file using the following command line. /usr/local/bin/gpg --output /usr/local/scripts/test. --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring 09-2010.sec --keyring 09-2010.pub --always-trust --decrypt --recipient Wed_Sep_1_00_01_00_CDT_2010@abc.org /usr/local/scripts/test.gpg When doing so, I receive the following output. You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Wed_Sep_1_00_01_00_CDT_2010 (Monthly Archive Encryption Key) " 1024-bit ELG key, ID E8E5F849, created 2010-09-01 (main key ID 557E7C04) gpg: cancelled by user gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID E8E5F849, created 2010-09-01 "Wed_Sep_1_00_01_00_CDT_2010 (Monthly Archive Encryption Key) " gpg: public key decryption failed: General error gpg: decryption failed: No secret key While the prompt to enter a passphrase does appear, it is skipped without allowing me to enter anything. gpg-agent is running. I am running FreeBSD 8.0. My GnuPG version is 2.0.14 I have also tried adding the public and secret keys to the default keyring and receive the same result. Thanks for your help. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 14:51:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC1210656A6 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from ks200575.kimsufi.com (ks200575.kimsufi.com [91.121.111.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186C48FC17 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ramattack.net (unknown [127.0.0.50]) by ks200575.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F93A8EE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 192.148.167.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user egoitz@ramattack.net) by mail.ramattack.net with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:29:41 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9a3047eb390bd04a13f539e0a8acc4f6.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:29:41 -0000 (UTC) From: egoitz@ramattack.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: RELENG_8_1 Release build fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:51:00 -0000 Hi all, I'm trying to make a release from RELENG_8_1 branch because of mbuf bug and so... and wanted to make my own freebsd cds (updated)... I have downloaded the whole freebsd cvs, later with cvs create the snapshot under /usr/src and later under /usr/src/release done a : make release CHROOTDIR=/datos001/81release CVSROOT=/datos001/ncvs RELEASETAG=RELENG_8_1 MAKE_ISOS=1 But it fails with : -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Installing everything -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install ===> share/info (install) install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /datos001/81release/usr/share/info/dir install:No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/share/info. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 After entering INSTALL=/usr/bin/install in /etc/make.conf... it continues but stops later because it doesn't build some object files for being copied to /datos001/81release/... in /usr/src/lib/csu/amd64/... after building them by hand, later again stops because libc is not compiled... Seems like there's a problem in some Makefiles... am I wrong?. Will be this corrected the next days in the cvs?. Thanks a lot really. Bye!. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 16:02:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E2C106566C for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF528FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so7709329vws.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:02:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L/BSS6IN3CKdgHTlqe5d2pA7f67F1+ysXkeJkWcfQsg=; b=dSFXojoJMagoFu671Mu4bQnNjAH682UPghRxO1fyFvzD3ckN25PAYzLgj5dKCk9dj9 eeEayqklYRojvWtcjqdblXMWJNYUuj2fZllHvyS4kZSvXY6YE1cJROKqzd9eTdbvw+sB UyMVlvoGE3CV+codatsbwW/5optoo3PTTWR9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=s+cN1aOcZUnE737v2//hpVxPOp3QZDsa7OmBfJDcOY0rmYK86RQDA6pesLsp5oDCw3 DuMYeQZsa52gPr1PDByzHhC5hZteaZm0R7S6Uf/DARxBe5KeB+CP+KrENOOe9oV2/Vw+ RC91AkhsQxEbxnLZzI2lRtrEFtWwX1oSUDHaA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.163.10 with SMTP id y10mr5526854vcx.63.1283356965332; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.45.67 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:02:45 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:02:49 -0000 Hi folks, I'm looking in some documentation for Squid, which I'm installing on a FBSD 8.1 server, and it says I need to create a squid user and a squid group because I'm building/installing from source. I see to create the squid user, I user the (of course) "adduser" command (there isn't a default squid user with the base install, is there?). 1.) When I use the adduser command, from a security perspective, should the squid user have a shell? What should it be? 2.) How do I create a squid group and add the squid user to it? 3.) Since the squid user needs full access to the squid directory and all of its files, what the easiest way to give the appropriate permissions? Thank you, Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 16:38:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8315106567A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from extmail-03.people.net.au (extmail-03.people.net.au [202.154.122.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2045A8FC1A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3905 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 16:38:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO extmail-01.people.net.au) (202.154.123.98) by extmail-03.people.net.au with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 16:38:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 3899 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 16:38:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) (218.215.180.178) by extmail-01.people.net.au with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 16:38:03 -0000 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0011F171EA; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:38:07 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:38:07 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: Ed Flecko Message-ID: <20100901163807.GA80024@ozzmosis.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:38:05 -0000 On Wed 2010-09-01 09:02:45 UTC-0700, Ed Flecko (edflecko@gmail.com) wrote: > I'm looking in some documentation for Squid, which I'm installing on a > FBSD 8.1 server, and it says I need to create a squid user and a squid > group because I'm building/installing from source. All of this is done automatically if you build Squid from source using the Ports tree - probably www/squid, or www/squid31. Are you sure you want to do it manually? Regards Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 16:38:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAE01065696 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759558FC1B for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi8 with SMTP id 8so3513520pwi.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:38:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z6NqaQzbo9mHr/wWZg+3FyYx3grMHbK/SpUFTuSRlDs=; b=FCOHQLnEWyd/1X6UyXj6J4ELOa1maWRAuSyCqK89b2+UhA5fp6+dhIxy1y0T0WDkp/ j7Yf3LUkgWWgMvpBDGlW5fVjdJnifqKQhx3gXyBlbLtDNExCdkITeVbEalKezYDqjHXp 7bgoqFttBdtmWyp22B6fAWR5ej2/2pwXw3oyQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JdXmrJr4CFd/nIl5nuwEj7m9bhpYgdsfrC07iTEgw/CQo/ItZfbkuSqw++9v6muI3r fRuT/vuYibwWOCjbukF2x/i8q+NQ0DjHISy78ynr6nf9W6uedD70YX/cIyh4v6tLhDN/ z72Xu1OC1Vkp8oH+6TguyJJfMnCv2AKkfakp8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.46.3 with SMTP id t3mr9035057wat.103.1283359084641; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.45.67 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:38:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:38:03 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:38:17 -0000 Thank you Jerry. The only reason I'm not using the squid port is because I found a website ( http://teklimbu.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/enterprise-freebsd-squid-proxy-server/ ) that has detailed instructions on installing squid for an Enterprise environment claiming the performance is very good. Since I'm new to using squid and using squid on FreeBSD, I'm simply trying to duplicate his setup. It's quite possible that I could achieve the same performance results from using the port install of squid...but maybe I wouldn't. :-) Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 17:49:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B31065696 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62F38FC17 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so8846385qyk.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:49:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.11.141 with SMTP id t13mr5275827qat.307.1283363360770; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.51.2 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:49:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.159.188] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:49:20 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Mirror mounts not available on FreeBSD? (was: Re: NFSv4 shows all ZFS filesystems as being owned by root) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:49:22 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:20 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:52 AM, David Brodbeck wrote: >> When a ZFS filesystem mountpoint is owned by someone other than root, >> this is not depicted properly on NFSv4 clients: > > After playing around a bit more, it appears the problem is that ZFS > filesystems under an NFSv4 mountpoint are not auto-mounted by Linux > clients of a FreeBSD server the way they are when they're clients of > an OpenSolaris server; if I mount them manually, the ownership is > correct. =A0I think OpenSolaris calls this functionality "mirror > mounts." =A0Is there a way to get mirror mounts to work on FreeBSD, or > is it necessary to mount every sub-filesystem manually? The answer is I didn't RTFM carefully enough, and forgot to specify 'nfsd_flags=3D"-e"' and 'mountd_flags=3D"-e"' in my /etc/rc.conf. It's working now. Sorry for the unnecessary thread, but hopefully it'll help someone else searching for the same info in the future. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 19:38:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2CD10656B6 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EBA8FC0A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so7901583vws.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:38:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.158.11 with SMTP id d11mr4121676vcx.231.1283369913860; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.8 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.1.133.114] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:38:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Ed Flecko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:38:35 -0000 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Ed Flecko wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm looking in some documentation for Squid, which I'm installing on a > FBSD 8.1 server, and it says I need to create a squid user and a squid > group because I'm building/installing from source. > > I see to create the squid user, I user the (of course) "adduser" > command (there isn't a default squid user with the base install, is > there?). > > 1.) When I use the adduser command, from a security perspective, > should the squid user have a shell? What should it be? > > 2.) How do I create a squid group and add the squid user to it? > > 3.) Since the squid user needs full access to the squid directory and > all of its files, what the easiest way to give the appropriate > permissions? Service accounts shouldn't have a password (their password field should be "starred out") and should have a shell of /usr/sbin/nologin (this program logs any attempt to run it and exits). The port using the following commands to set this up: pw groupadd squid -g 100 -q pw useradd -q -n squid -u 100 -g squid -c "Squid caching-proxy psuedo user" -d "/var/squid" -s "/usr/sbin/nologin" -h - This assumes data is in /var/squid. You can create this directory and use chmod/chown to give the user and group necessary permissions. The UID and GID (100 and 100 in this case) come from the lists in /usr/ports and are reserved for squid to avoid conflicts. -- Rob Farmer > > Thank you, > Ed > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 19:46:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DC110656D1 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BF88FC0A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so7911362vws.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:46:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.162.148 with SMTP id v20mr5863940vcx.36.1283370387016; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.8 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.1.133.114] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:46:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Ed Flecko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:46:29 -0000 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Ed Flecko wrote: >> Hi folks, >> I'm looking in some documentation for Squid, which I'm installing on a >> FBSD 8.1 server, and it says I need to create a squid user and a squid >> group because I'm building/installing from source. >> >> I see to create the squid user, I user the (of course) "adduser" >> command (there isn't a default squid user with the base install, is >> there?). >> >> 1.) When I use the adduser command, from a security perspective, >> should the squid user have a shell? What should it be? >> >> 2.) How do I create a squid group and add the squid user to it? >> >> 3.) Since the squid user needs full access to the squid directory and >> all of its files, what the easiest way to give the appropriate >> permissions? > > Service accounts shouldn't have a password (their password field > should be "starred out") and should have a shell of /usr/sbin/nologin > (this program logs any attempt to run it and exits). > > The port using the following commands to set this up: > > pw groupadd squid -g 100 -q > pw useradd -q -n squid -u 100 -g squid -c "Squid caching-proxy psuedo > user" -d "/var/squid" -s "/usr/sbin/nologin" -h - Addendum: the "-q" flag suppresses output/errors - good for a script, but you probably want to remove it for interactive use. -- Rob Farmer > > This assumes data is in /var/squid. You can create this directory and > use chmod/chown to give the user and group necessary permissions. > > The UID and GID (100 and 100 in this case) come from the lists in > /usr/ports and are reserved for squid to avoid conflicts. > > -- > Rob Farmer > >> >> Thank you, >> Ed >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 19:58:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156E110656BD for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9976E8FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so5910342fxm.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:58:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Qz9gInJooiqd/i2QZc9W6mo3ARDqdDiAWO5J3r54Itc=; b=jkeqVX6jyjdduhDs6FGlnLVGKPMWHJFJfHFjhn1hsqK42/eLWXJn1Y1Ho3sZ0NjlND JQCJjrIgS08Gyedj1YCj9r5ChWYPPpMA14HsbIWbqqoRlHOIvi+1n27igPZmUvngpRZR 4jVGDjP2hCKK1IPDcRSBAbQuvfURI8tyI2NRM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nDKv2AOkkM3q4Ar6C4y3KBwOC9eUJAQjFw4wg88gsWWx7exWIWsGXgDgdToJfzPlkr G+GHU8Mvg+EMlucSjqyAh/bIDKOvrMtWO1i5FeGTfPgrYphDCLdoFcO45Qp5H6mE3RcH i69dIuS0Bt8zOOsPUpul78jtMddMgzhqbrVXo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.13 with SMTP id y13mr1939561fap.10.1283371083354; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.147 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:58:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:58:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Ed Flecko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:58:05 -0000 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Ed Flecko wrote: > Thank you Jerry. > > The only reason I'm not using the squid port is because I found a > website ( > http://teklimbu.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/enterprise-freebsd-squid-proxy-server/ > ) that has detailed instructions on installing squid for an Enterprise > environment claiming the performance is very good. > > Since I'm new to using squid and using squid on FreeBSD, I'm simply > trying to duplicate his setup. It's quite possible that I could > achieve the same performance results from using the port install of > squid...but maybe I wouldn't. > If you are looking for a high performance reverse proxy cache, look at varnish instead of squid. That being said, squid will work fine too. If you don't know what you need, it's probably better to always stick with ports rather than compiling yourself. A lot of bug fixes, FreeBSD specific patches, and testing goes into the ports tree -- that's why it's such a useful package management system. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 23:03:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712FE10656BB for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F241E8FC19 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so9273981wwb.31 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:03:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tFBGnjPt94tpJVhwImx37mZTs9rbvYEtfseXQ2FnLdE=; b=Ou7qlATF4Z3cb+xdJaSpe8Et+62NWjejV/lUbAhkiYuAERKGBVeOV3BDWVFNXb9u/w hTkZj0XSEy6yKec2K6ORRJX8Rb1wUVPiZwP32TICtqaiaDn3t+VkbkYAHcbWM6LoR42y Z/5/ReGbYprgaj4gtdGUfrTFuahShaAtjDEjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ya6mJE6y5V93deKbeCPbNQQr86Y1mGLeLQzlmSRJ8l2ZATmQ5fFDpA6JVHeYAHkM9Z iTVnYJbRXdJp/glQbIJVGthVf/XjlxmOPxPL2YOUPRp6D/1TTZ/qNJnaRwEcciiJakQy cagOgc4U+eRhkWnulDRqGB1D6P5wfPKuQ2dRA= Received: by 10.227.151.148 with SMTP id c20mr8473962wbw.15.1283382201235; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i14sm9296383wbe.18.2010.09.01.16.03.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 00:03:16 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100902000316.5a5cf931@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:03:27 -0000 On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:38:03 -0700 Ed Flecko wrote: > Thank you Jerry. > > The only reason I'm not using the squid port is because I found a > website > ( http://teklimbu.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/enterprise-freebsd-squid-proxy-server/ ) > that has detailed instructions on installing squid for an Enterprise > environment claiming the performance is very good. > > Since I'm new to using squid and using squid on FreeBSD, I'm simply > trying to duplicate his setup. It's quite possible that I could > achieve the same performance results from using the port install of > squid...but maybe I wouldn't. You might as well build the port. There's nothing special in his configure settings - although the squid port provides a variable for this if you if you want to add extra configure settings not supported by the port options. The port will apply some patches to the code that may, or may not, be need. It will also provide an rc script and create the user/group. Either way you need to run squid -z to create the directories. IIRC this will create the directories with the correct ownership if the effective user/group is correct in squid.conf. That just leaves squid.conf which you have to setup anyway, since the port defaults to a small "ufs" cache. I'd suggest taking the default and stripping out the very lengthy comments, and them merging in any settings you want from his file - having looked-up what they actually do. Some of his setting are sensible, such as using diskd, some less so, such as the acl to deny query url caching, which more efficiently handled through refresh patterns in the default file. Also I'd suggest not using heap GDSF/LFUDA cache replacement until you have established you can't get a week's retention from the default lru policy. The suggestion of running a local dns cache shouldn't make much difference since squid does it own caching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 23:52:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A343510656C2 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EF78FC16 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so11522162wyb.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c5vKhzlB0ewthkzw7IiNwGMpRj5q7Ov808enHjBKPV8=; b=apoqGe3VK9wUtgUczIgv/dKpBFyx0yRCiFx26fyfGjgMlrrUJr1taV64jmy99pR4Wy YCUPmpc4817RVXBheEPsX7ga7tkqWGoWouzNeG0sztI8MJknspAgEghYiMDo55vV+PW2 kGmTW+e3k5A5C2iRc2WzWtiBnzuQTX+NXsEzQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uqDlhAnNhXH4awoVUKZmqKTMN3JM8DQKq918plQZL3gT/hpSXdOaUi1iWhnn4h/1Hi EFeOMJm33l0HHf+lS+DYPW8/yq0bPax+Jd6rGcFiIhOP0oFXexBfL4REvkqkPe540Qac mbgUsWF2zPONkGt9YxfGZimPKMg3LBhx3gv+0= Received: by 10.227.156.66 with SMTP id v2mr8362185wbw.136.1283385133489; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm9329286wbb.8.2010.09.01.16.52.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 00:52:09 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100902005209.7bf86664@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20100902000316.5a5cf931@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:52:16 -0000 On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:14:38 -0700 Ed Flecko wrote: > Thanks RW! > > How do I make the changes you've suggested, i.e., like changing from > the small UFS cache, etc.; that can all be done by altering the > squid.conf file? Yes, take a look at the cache_dir lines in in the squid.conf file in the howto link. You don't need two cache_dir entries, unless you have two separate disks (usuall non-raid). You do need to modify the size field (documented in squid.conf.default). > Also, what do you mean about the variable to change some of the > ./configure options that are not part of the default? Take a look at SQUID_CONFIGURE_ARGS in the squid port Makefile. BTW The last I heard, the 2.7 branch in www/squid is still faster than the later 3.x branches. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 01:32:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BD110656B8 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 01:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C94B8FC12 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 01:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so14107275wyi.17 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:32:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7qB6BAk8O8gxgwZPV2nGB+o2lryKzu9bYsTwxbabFUs=; b=P3iX2+4iaFes6H0ZLCMOPr/tpVmoF5jPw8D7ImOR8ULJH9QEEGM/bNOp5lBIRpzbmf fnuvjbElsSiMwnGUmQzRwQe1kKEifaklnjAucJsaP84I36vhLH94L0HxgD4H6xnmuDgJ rPZvZPIsLAl+PpluqSV3HqWD5P9f4XHM90AY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=EW6vmRMzXUu7/M8NCa6Oyh3p5v/JJXSr8q+YvxCmYyJugKAKiBfHl2bkjUuos/nhJD moPsVmzw6bO/0RCfv8ZJFpf3mJcVsGBED1j6LFzmsu5euMYu7uvEEgXBn+A8U5vfBbCq 4O6wSlY7Vs+8ThMtZfp3GTWPXf8+OabmubBFg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.234.93 with SMTP id r71mr1017122weq.104.1283391176235; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.169.211 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 18:32:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100830120007.543fa5dd@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20100830120007.543fa5dd@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 20:32:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: killall -9 program-name does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:32:57 -0000 On 8/30/10, RW wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:14:58 +0000 > Antonio Olivares wrote: > >> Dear fellow FreeBSD users, >> >> I have a cron script that plays music in the morning when I arrive at >> work. >> >> in ~/.xalarm I have two lines, one that calls xterm and one that calls >> mplayer and plays a series of music files in a playlist >> >> crontab -l >> has the following >> # min hour day-of-month month day-of-week command >> # 0-59 0-23 1-31 1-12 0-6 0=sun 1=mon >> 00 07 * * 1-5 ~/.xalarm >/dev/null 2>&1 >> 30 07 * * 1-5 killall -9 /usr/local/bin/mplayer >/dev/null 2>&1 > > You don't need the path to mplayer. It makes no difference. This does not stop mplayer from playing :( Thanks though for trying to help. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 02:09:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1B510656FD for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E229E8FC15 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so1558514iwn.13 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.166.9 with SMTP id k9mr9772434iby.127.1283393343316; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:09:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.150.135 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:08:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:08:28 -0400 Message-ID: To: Andreas Maechler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting eclipse to recognize that devel/subsclipse is installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:09:04 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Andreas Maechler wrote: > I've always installed Subclipse directly through the Eclipse' plugin > manager, which works very well. > > Andy > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> I installed eclipse and subclipse via ports. When I start eclipse I do >> not see svn as an option in the preferences menu nor or do any of >> subclipse's features. >> >> How can I tell eclipse that I installed subclipse? I'll try that next - but I'd still like to know what step I am missing if I use the ports version. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 02:23:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1A810656B3 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com (mailout-us.gmx.com [74.208.5.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBB5B8FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Sep 2010 02:23:35 -0000 Received: from pool-173-67-1-8.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net (EHLO router1.verzon.com.home) [173.67.1.8] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us005) with SMTP; 01 Sep 2010 22:23:35 -0400 X-Authenticated: #50283380 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX180NAA48lM0vD6Ij+BKBI6EfuODMYQ9UPDr45PfG1 tO2nrINvAJGRRF Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:29:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Xihong Yin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: error - ad2: FAILURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:23:37 -0000 Hi, I received the following error when I try to access files in some of the directories in /usr and when the computer boots. ad2s1f is mounted on /usr. ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40 LBA=37370159 g_vfs_done():ad2s1f[READ(offset=15415558144, length=16384)]error = 5 Is this a sign of hard drive failure? Can I fix the error or do I have to replace the hard drive? Regards, Xihong From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 02:49:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA42210656DA for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A0A48FC1E for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81030 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 02:49:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=hmnGV8M5UIZPKkKMhey1DpNQ83Y3mOrerkEiVdWrklgtz80CYHIW/nFsGSPeVmhJBGMKMyXM97rxlc2zBZ609uhav8ssllt2Qvll1msI9lviMImw8X5PvPuTlu302hmlpVbN4L2d3R3hGFa+jEMSMWLJL6CfRCz6+oT9KYZTZeI= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1283395758; bh=LF72MeGSGn0UPK4dGnq8Laa67JbgB+xcpfPNAjt9Hy0=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=KBJvIDUsLFQByVLhl4hejrFTeBHg9dkSHHN882cjnvwwQbqFVGPQpGS2dOTtKRGjZjoaZyrV96dfRrwdG6Wr45s0+2nOgut1CCjHYX8tkJ8E080OaLMXykWd7XYiWF0nmcEWsrp+ng/XgeIn8M9YwU9iog31bsvXN7kuNPns7FA= Received: from napoleon.localnet (mike.jeays@99.224.61.141 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Sep 2010 19:49:17 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- X-YMail-OSG: FoX_33kVM1l9o29NXQQSqFt3jIoVcEMgRGru8g2Wh3u.wRQ 1DsRqeGPceMqSrhSpkaZ6TZV06cTvCrqs6DMq9nDdeI8JG.2YDQ6Xbc.GuZU LBgW5Qbaab94I_IShyNdg1T.dkzkwJJm5bdkNeWKmcKH.fE5fZGclkwSzPnH jIr_.qMJlkf1HxNIOU9X4K4nKH7SbKsIV0Wh1YyDJOe.zIq51RPyh20nEcHi N3yWOWbqLG9hhBUFeyOHfZIjD_QJHR17quVXm7gCtR3DH0eam4B1YgPl8qi5 gQXCjETTbA2E_3pXydCrCQ5yr1kLZCup2qbtXyNErpy1vwc5U.4vwJ4AODBL 374mNGXBy5jtda3qfXejYkpc_BlO7ra0045iVYoVgxnoIBq8lnUu9PrmU84Y t5lMSTv1cNnpPHjA- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:43:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-24-generic; KDE/4.4.2; i686; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009012243.57415.mike.jeays@rogers.com> Subject: Re: error - ad2: FAILURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:49:24 -0000 On September 1, 2010 10:29:42 pm Xihong Yin wrote: > Hi, > > I received the following error when I try to access files in some of the > directories in /usr and when the computer boots. ad2s1f is mounted on > /usr. > > ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40 > LBA=37370159 g_vfs_done():ad2s1f[READ(offset=15415558144, > length=16384)]error = 5 > > Is this a sign of hard drive failure? Can I fix the error or do I have to > replace the hard drive? > > Regards, > Xihong > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I would think it is a hardware error, and the disk has run out of replacement sectors. If possible, it should be replaced, and any valuable data copied to somewhere safe, as soon as possible. -- http://www.jeays.ca http://www.rotarycpmm.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 06:24:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF2F10656AD for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from ks200575.kimsufi.com (ks200575.kimsufi.com [91.121.111.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CED8FC26 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ramattack.net (unknown [127.0.0.50]) by ks200575.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788EAA8EE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 192.148.167.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user egoitz@ramattack.net) by mail.ramattack.net with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:24:41 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9f94dad1bb8811d5b2434671ceafc6e1.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> In-Reply-To: <9a3047eb390bd04a13f539e0a8acc4f6.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> References: <9a3047eb390bd04a13f539e0a8acc4f6.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:24:41 -0000 (UTC) From: egoitz@ramattack.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: RELENG_8_1 Release build fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:24:28 -0000 > Hi all, > > I'm trying to make a release from RELENG_8_1 branch because of mbuf bug > and so... and wanted to make my own freebsd cds (updated)... I have > downloaded the Hi!, Perhaps this is not the proper mailing list for asking this kind of questions? perhaps should I write to freebsd-hackers or any other one?. Thanks a lot for you're help. Bye!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 07:13:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BB71065672 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6178FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Or3z4-0001id-HM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:13:18 -0700 Message-ID: <29601273.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 00:13:18 -0700 (PDT) From: zaxis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Nabble-From: z_axis@163.com Subject: What's the best way to upgrade 8.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:13:19 -0000 >uname -a FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jul 1= 4 15:35:26 CST 2010 =20 root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 Now i want to upgrade it to 8.1 realease. thanks! ----- e^(=CF=80=E2=8B=85i) + 1 =3D 0 --=20 View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/What%27s-the-best-way-t= o-upgrade-8.0---tp29601273p29601273.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 08:50:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069C9106570F for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@itsacon.net) Received: from rs2cruz.nexcess.net (rs2cruz.nexcess.net [69.39.81.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37F68FC18 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18010 invoked by uid 108); 2 Sep 2010 04:24:07 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.80.100.183?) (77.60.216.169) by rs2cruz.nexcess.net with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 04:24:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:24:05 +0200 From: Bernard Scharp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Multiple mount_smbfs commands fail in bash script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:50:49 -0000 Hi all, I'm having some problems with a bash script. It's a backup script that periodically checks if a list of systems is online, and if so, uses samba to mount a specified list of shares, rsyncs them to a local directory and unmounts again. This used to run fine till a few months ago (I don't know what the trigger was that caused them to first fail). Now, when the script is run, it gives the following error when mounting the shares: mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) Which is strange, as there are (by last count) 1170 /dev/nsmb* devices in /dev/ (is that normal?) Searching the internet, FreeBSD and Samba mailing lists gave me no recent info, and the old info wasn't helpful. I've narrowed it down to the point where I think it's caused by one process trying to open two (or more) shares at the same time. (a simple script mounting two shares gives the same error). I can mount the shares from the command line without problems, it's only in the bash script it gives me problems. ~/.nsmbrc and /etc/nsmb.conf are correct, smbd, nmbd and winbindd are running. The system is FreeBSD 8.0 Stable. Anyone got any suggestions? Regards, Bernard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 10:24:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DFC1065783 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mixmaster@remailer.org.uk) Received: from remailer.org.uk (remailer.org.uk [109.109.241.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE17B8FC18 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mixmaster by remailer.org.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or6IL-0002br-K6 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:41:21 +0000 From: Anonymous Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at . To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <118047d89bed4da459667460baf75502@remailer.org.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:41:21 +0000 Cc: Subject: Thank you all for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:24:42 -0000 Thanks to all people who program, develop and h/-\ck for FreeBSD - it is a great free system and best choice ... Thanks! - anonymous From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 11:12:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D966D10656A7 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from ks200575.kimsufi.com (ks200575.kimsufi.com [91.121.111.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA538FC12 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ramattack.net (unknown [127.0.0.50]) by ks200575.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E275EA8EE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 192.148.167.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user egoitz@ramattack.net) by mail.ramattack.net with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:13:11 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9f94dad1bb8811d5b2434671ceafc6e1.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> References: <9a3047eb390bd04a13f539e0a8acc4f6.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> <9f94dad1bb8811d5b2434671ceafc6e1.squirrel@mail.ramattack.net> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:13:11 -0000 (UTC) From: egoitz@ramattack.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: RELENG_8_1 Release build fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:12:58 -0000 >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to make a release from RELENG_8_1 branch because of mbuf bug >> and so... and wanted to make my own freebsd cds (updated)... I have >> downloaded the > > Hi!, > > Perhaps this is not the proper mailing list for asking this kind of > questions? perhaps should I write to freebsd-hackers or any other one?. Hey mates, Sorry for the noise I had forgotten the make buildworld before the make release... I though buildworld was integrated inside make release... as said... very sorry for the noise. Bye!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 11:16:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8857610656D4 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC558FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Or7m7-000G4l-Dg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:16:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:16:11 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100902111611.GC7607@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <29601273.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+g7M9IMkV8truYOl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29601273.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: What's the best way to upgrade 8.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:16:12 -0000 --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:13:18AM -0700, zaxis wrote: >=20 > >uname -a > FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jul= 14 > 15:35:26 CST 2010 =20 > root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 >=20 > Now i want to upgrade it to 8.1 realease. Since you appear to be running a custom kernel, building from source is the way to go. Chapter 24 of the handbook will be helpful. Dan=20 --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkx/h3sACgkQixf5fBYiFmocLgCeJZZin/MhSex4C+tdWadiNR/w ZfEAn33L3VlUyjgwCilHRJyzWycvOzCB =Nh8h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 11:50:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E32106587B for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DCA8FC12 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywt2 with SMTP id 2so153607ywt.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.144.11 with SMTP id w11mr5856610ybn.327.1283428257158; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-144-046.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.144.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5sm904472ybi.9.2010.09.02.04.50.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [71.70.144.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D0F4E54826 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:50:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:50:53 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100902075053.4bdb443b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> References: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Multiple mount_smbfs commands fail in bash script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:50:58 -0000 On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:24:05 +0200 Bernard Scharp articulated: > Hi all, > > I'm having some problems with a bash script. > > It's a backup script that periodically checks if a list of systems is > online, and if so, uses samba to mount a specified list of shares, > rsyncs them to a local directory and unmounts again. > > This used to run fine till a few months ago (I don't know what the > trigger was that caused them to first fail). > > Now, when the script is run, it gives the following error when > mounting the shares: > > mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) > > Which is strange, as there are (by last count) 1170 /dev/nsmb* devices > in /dev/ (is that normal?) > > Searching the internet, FreeBSD and Samba mailing lists gave me no > recent info, and the old info wasn't helpful. > > I've narrowed it down to the point where I think it's caused by one > process trying to open two (or more) shares at the same time. (a > simple script mounting two shares gives the same error). > > I can mount the shares from the command line without problems, it's > only in the bash script it gives me problems. > > ~/.nsmbrc and /etc/nsmb.conf are correct, smbd, nmbd and winbindd are > running. The system is FreeBSD 8.0 Stable. > > Anyone got any suggestions? Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You also might consider posting this on the "BASH" mail forum: bug-bash@gnu.org although you might have to subscribe first: http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving from where you left them to where you can't find them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 12:02:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887D810656AA for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@itsacon.net) Received: from rs2cruz.nexcess.net (rs2cruz.nexcess.net [69.39.81.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E758FC38 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9111 invoked by uid 108); 2 Sep 2010 08:02:36 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.80.100.183?) (77.60.216.169) by rs2cruz.nexcess.net with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 08:02:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7F925B.9010807@itsacon.net> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200 From: Bernard Scharp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> <20100902075053.4bdb443b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20100902075053.4bdb443b@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Multiple mount_smbfs commands fail in bash script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:02:37 -0000 > > Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You Well, I can recreate it with something as simple as: #!/usr/local/bin/bash mount_smbfs //user@remotehost/share1/ /tmp/mnt/ mount_smbfs //user@remotehost/share2/ /tmp/mnt2/ > also might consider posting this on the "BASH" mail forum: > > bug-bash@gnu.org > > although you might have to subscribe first: > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash > I'l look into that, (though I doubt this is a bash issue). Thanks! Bernard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:19:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4A610656E4 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3D88FC08 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9hA-000632-KD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:19:12 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o82DJCux004398 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:19:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o82DJC14004397 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:19:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:19:12 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100902131912.GA4381@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C7241C2.2000305@otenet.gr> <20100823112621.GA4367@current.Sisis.de> <4C725BFC.90006@otenet.gr> <20100824084225.GA2160@current.Sisis.de> <4C739A78.4070303@otenet.gr> <20100827072416.GA2516@current.Sisis.de> <4C778001.3030809@otenet.gr> <20100830093112.GA3071@current.Sisis.de> <20100831131351.GA3592@current.Sisis.de> <20100901091649.GA3409@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100901091649.GA3409@current.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: Re: installing FreeBSD in VMWare-player X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:19:16 -0000 I wrote a small howTo for such a migration for others in the same situation. Comments/Impromvements are welcome; Thanks matthias $Id: moveFreeBSDintoVM.txt,v 1.2 2010/09/02 10:55:29 guru Exp $ How to move a complete FreeBSD installation into a VM Matthias Apitz 1. Preparations in the running FreeBSD system Save the current FreeBSD partition layout to paper, i.e. print: - /etc/fstab - output of 'df -kh' - output of 'bsdlabel ad8s4' (or whatever your disk is) so you later know the sizes you will need in the new VM. Reboot the system to single user mode, run fsck(8) in all file systems and mount them read only, while staying single user. Do dump(8) of all the partitions to some external media you later can use in the VM a) physically and b) could be mounted in FreeBSD. I used an USB disk with an UFS file system on it as /dev/da0s1a: # mount -t ufs /dev/da0s1a /mnt # dump -0au -f /mnt/usr.dump /usr # dump -0au -f /mnt/var.dump /var # dump -0au -f /mnt/root.dump / Finally shutdown the system. 2. Prepare the VM Attach resources big enough to reflect your real system to the VM. I used: RAM: 2 GByte IDE: 164 GByte (as one file in the host) Make sure that the VM's boot order is: 1st CD/DVD, 2nd disk, so you later can easy decide from where to boot by just attaching or not the CD/DVD to the VM, even if the disk has already a MBR. Copy an ISO image of the so called "FreeBSD livefs" to the host and attach this as CD/DVD to the VM 3. Partitioning of the disk This part is a bit tricky because the "FreeBSD livefs" does not really guide through it. Boot from "FreeBSD livefs" and - define country and keyboard - run "standard installation" from the menu - fdisk(8) the disk, use entire disk for FreeBSD - let it install FreeBSD's boot manager - partition the slice to the layout of your old system, i.e. to the following result: /dev/ad0s1a 1 GByte / /dev/ad0s1b 4 GByte swap /dev/ad0s1d 2 GByte /var /dev/ad0s1e 6 GByte /tmp /dev/ad0s1f (rest 146 GByte) /usr - commit the "last chance before scribbling on disk" The installer will now do the real fdisk(8) and BSD-label of the partitions. It will newfs(8) the above file system and try to install FreeBSD in it, which is not on the CD/DVD and which is not what we want. Answer all questions as "NO" to get finally back to the main menu of sysinstall(8) tool. Reboot again into the "FreeBSD livefs" and go to the fixit repair mode menu, start a shell. The above mentioned file systems are created fine and even the boot manager is fine in place (ofc it would not find anything to boot). The file systems are already polluted which things we don't want (because we later will restore from dumps). Run newfs(8) in all file system devices again: # newfs -m 0 -o space /dev/ad0s1a # newfs -m 0 -o space /dev/ad0s1b # newfs -m 0 -o space /dev/ad0s1d # newfs -m 0 -o space /dev/ad0s1e # newfs -m 0 -o space /dev/ad0s1f We now have clean file systems (and boot manager installed). 4. Restore the dumps First restore the old root file system using the booted "FreeBSD livefs", mount the new root as /mnt and the USB disk containing the dumps as /usb: # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt # mkdir /usb # mount -t usf -o ro /dev/da0s1a /usb # cd /mnt # restore rf /usb/root.dump # cd / # umount /mnt One could as well restore the other dumps the same way, but it's better to see if the new root file system already boot fine, because restoring the /usr dump will take many hours (in my case 9 hours for 120 GByte), Reset the VM (no need to worry, nothing is mounted), detach the CD/DVD and reboot the old/new root file system into single user mode. Remount the /root writable and restore the /usr dump: # mount -o rw / # mount -t usf -o ro /dev/da0s1a /mnt # mount /dev/ad0s1f /usr # cd /usr # restore rf /mnt/usr.dump (after 9 hours) # mount /dev/ad0s1d /var # cd /var # restore rf /mnt/var.dump Check and edit the /etc/fstab to reflect the new device names (in my original system the disk was /dev/ad0s8 and not /dev/ad0s1). Make /tmp writable for all users # mount /dev/ad0s1e /tmp # chmod 1777 /tmp The system is now installed and should be boot up fine to normal multi user mode, just reboot normally. 5. Final changes Edit some system files to reflect the new VM environment: /etc/rc.conf: - network interface is now em0, and not wlan0 /boot/loader.conf - sound (still not working) /etc/X11/xorg.conf - recreate the X11 config file the normal way install the vmware-tools for FreeBSD (still pending) 6. Some notes about performance The host is Dell Precision M4400 with Dual Core CPU of 3.09 GHz and runs Windows 7 Professional. It took 9h to restore a dump of /usr which was produced in ~2h. The compared write performance for a copy of a 8 GByte file is: native in the same hardware as well: $ date ; dd if=XPdisk of=XPdisk.copy ; date jueves, 2 de septiembre de 2010, 08:25:53 CEST 16777216+0 records in 16777216+0 records out 8589934592 bytes transferred in 419.996931 secs (20452375 bytes/sec) jueves, 2 de septiembre de 2010, 08:32:53 CEST VM: $ date ; dd if=XPdisk of=XPdisk.copy ; date jueves, 2 de septiembre de 2010, 08:25:17 CEST 16777216+0 records in 16777216+0 records out 8589934592 bytes transferred in 1491.054456 secs (5760980 bytes/sec) jueves, 2 de septiembre de 2010, 08:50:08 CEST i.e. 7 minutes ./. 25 minutes, three times slower. The boot times are like this (min:secs): 0:56 Windows 7 is ready for login 1:22 Windows desktop is up to launch VM 3:15 FreeBSD is booted to login: 4:42 KDE-3 desktop is up The felt performance in KDE (start of windows, terminals, Evolution, Firefox) is reasonable well. -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:29:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3FA10656EA for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB98FC1A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-157-147.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.157.147]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8F43CC36; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:29:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o82DT5wd001538; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:29:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:29:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Bernard Scharp Message-Id: <20100902152905.905caea1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4C7F925B.9010807@itsacon.net> References: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> <20100902075053.4bdb443b@scorpio> <4C7F925B.9010807@itsacon.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple mount_smbfs commands fail in bash script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:29:08 -0000 On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200, Bernard Scharp wrote: > > > > > Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You > > Well, I can recreate it with something as simple as: > > #!/usr/local/bin/bash > mount_smbfs //user@remotehost/share1/ /tmp/mnt/ > mount_smbfs //user@remotehost/share2/ /tmp/mnt2/ Excuse me, it may just be a stupid question... but... why do you use bash for this purpose? Do you require any special bash feature that cannot be done using the standard shell, sh? I often see the urge to use bash for scripting as a typical "Linuxism", which is usually non-portable (if that was your goal). FreeBSD's standard scripting shell is sh, so why not use it until you reach the ends of its functionality? Just a guess, regarding your initial question, as I don't have experience with "Windows" related things: Did you have the chance to monitor correct operations of your script in the past? Did the mound and umount (!) calls work properly? Have you checked your commands running them in the standard dialog shell (csh)? I assume you're running them as root (or at least with sufficient permissions), so I don't think the problem is there, as the error message mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) doesn't look like refering to that problem. The error message originates from /usr/src/contrib/smbfs/lib/smb/ctx.c; having a look around, and remembering that you said > [...] there are (by last count) 1170 /dev/nsmb* devices > in /dev/ (is that normal?) I found smb_ctx_gethandle() near line 600 (version 7 OS here): /* * well, no clone capabilities available - we have to scan * all devices in order to get free one */ for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) { snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/dev/%s%d", NSMB_NAME, i); fd = open(buf, O_RDWR); if (fd >= 0) { ctx->ct_fd = fd; return 0; } } The limit seems to be 1024, if I read that correctly - allthough I'm considered a "C hacker", I'm no "OS-level C hacker". :-) Afterwards, smb_ctx_lookup() fails and gives the error message mentioned earlier. Remove the /dev/nsmb* devices and try again. Make sure no other SMB stuff is currently mounted, just to be sure, as I don't have any idea what could fail. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:51:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF5610657CE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692EE8FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6463 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 13:51:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Sep 2010 13:51:00 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A7E2C50852; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:50:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Xihong Yin , Mike Jeays References: <201009012243.57415.mike.jeays@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:50:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201009012243.57415.mike.jeays@rogers.com> (Mike Jeays's message of "Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:43:56 -0400") Message-ID: <44tym89rul.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error - ad2: FAILURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:51:01 -0000 Mike Jeays writes: > On September 1, 2010 10:29:42 pm Xihong Yin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I received the following error when I try to access files in some of the >> directories in /usr and when the computer boots. ad2s1f is mounted on >> /usr. >> >> ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40 >> LBA=37370159 g_vfs_done():ad2s1f[READ(offset=15415558144, >> length=16384)]error = 5 >> >> Is this a sign of hard drive failure? Can I fix the error or do I have to >> replace the hard drive? > I would think it is a hardware error, and the disk has run out of replacement > sectors. If possible, it should be replaced, and any valuable data copied to > somewhere safe, as soon as possible. Not necessarily. This is a read error, so replacement sectors wouldn't help anyway. The problematic files might get fixed by the disk if they were rewritten. A SMART report (e.g., from sysutils/smartmontools) might give more information about the condition of the drive. None of which is to say that it isn't worrying, or that backing up valuable data isn't called for (even more so than usual). Make sure you have good backups before you do anything else. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:52:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9821065703 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@itsacon.net) Received: from rs2cruz.nexcess.net (rs2cruz.nexcess.net [69.39.81.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0458FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5183 invoked by uid 108); 2 Sep 2010 09:52:26 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.80.100.183?) (77.60.216.169) by rs2cruz.nexcess.net with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 09:52:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7FAC19.9090309@itsacon.net> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:52:25 +0200 From: Bernard Scharp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> <20100902075053.4bdb443b@scorpio> <4C7F925B.9010807@itsacon.net> <20100902152905.905caea1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100902152905.905caea1.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Multiple mount_smbfs commands fail in bash script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:52:27 -0000 On 02/09/2010 15:29, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200, Bernard Scharp wrote: >> >>> >>> Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You >> >> Well, I can recreate it with something as simple as: >> >> #!/usr/local/bin/bash >> mount_smbfs //user@remotehost/share1/ /tmp/mnt/ >> mount_smbfs //user@remotehost/share2/ /tmp/mnt2/ > > Excuse me, it may just be a stupid question... but... why do > you use bash for this purpose? Do you require any special > bash feature that cannot be done using the standard shell, > sh? I often see the urge to use bash for scripting as a > typical "Linuxism", which is usually non-portable (if that > was your goal). FreeBSD's standard scripting shell is sh, > so why not use it until you reach the ends of its functionality? The script above is a (heavily) reduced version, used to isolate the problem. The real script is much longer, and uses a bunch of logic to walk through a list of different systems (each with their own lists of shares, loaded from external files), taking snapshots of the previous backup, logging which systems were backed up, rolling back operations if a backup fails, etc. > Just a guess, regarding your initial question, as I don't have > experience with "Windows" related things: Did you have the > chance to monitor correct operations of your script in the > past? Did the mound and umount (!) calls work properly? Have > you checked your commands running them in the standard dialog > shell (csh)? I assume you're running them as root (or at least > with sufficient permissions), so I don't think the problem > is there, as the error message > > mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) > > doesn't look like refering to that problem. I am running it as root, and I just tried running the (test)script (without the bash reference) under a csh shell, and got the same error, so it's not a bash problem. As for monitoring the operations of the script, it has worked fine before (for several years), so I'm pretty sure the code is correct. > > The error message originates from /usr/src/contrib/smbfs/lib/smb/ctx.c; > having a look around, and remembering that you said > >> [...] there are (by last count) 1170 /dev/nsmb* devices >> in /dev/ (is that normal?) > > I found smb_ctx_gethandle() near line 600 (version 7 OS here): > > /* > * well, no clone capabilities available - we have to scan > * all devices in order to get free one > */ > for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) { > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/dev/%s%d", NSMB_NAME, i); > fd = open(buf, O_RDWR); > if (fd >= 0) { > ctx->ct_fd = fd; > return 0; > } > } > > The limit seems to be 1024, if I read that correctly - allthough > I'm considered a "C hacker", I'm no "OS-level C hacker". :-) Neither am I. Hadn't even thought of grepping in /usr/src for the error message :-) > > Afterwards, smb_ctx_lookup() fails and gives the error message > mentioned earlier. > > Remove the /dev/nsmb* devices and try again. Make sure no other > SMB stuff is currently mounted, just to be sure, as I don't have > any idea what could fail. > Can I just `rm /dev/nsmbX` them? (messing in /dev/ is a level of FreeBSD I'm not familiar with) Thanks for all your help! Bernard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:55:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30BE1065696 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3768FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so182099gyg.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:55:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DqdlEYk3kql51kSj6EkGthKYPA7yBmw+gPHrHKLpbTA=; b=desZAQVWOFKSnP9SYQTbrBMVztMPioTWeCZ2MOHgTygyYGeuHp5Coih2VlyRnFP3Mw k4IcQgJZOa6LdoKJm6b8EfXRLkkMFvGrU1oWGcSbRxYhc4xPJn2EdhdX6OvMG8qLCiVR dV1PI55DDapc75NqlvRsYaPefiGII+Lr5dhYI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T5l0btAvDQyhcG1pnH8z13LzLMiZ7qVDyye7psT/TDbXWoDr+QMBfm140pqpumNdJO rDAfGF/JozK6ZqcTZ4uyq1KtzWuOEOgGN3ZkaG3Q+koPv1ZjCJn9SFllul6tTDvqNxIW 70ObO33ttVzRzh6pU9y/q4Cuf6Arf9YJv79oI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.88.1 with SMTP id l1mr34817agb.170.1283435704787; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.205 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:55:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100902005209.7bf86664@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20100902000316.5a5cf931@gumby.homeunix.com> <20100902005209.7bf86664@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:55:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Should a "squid" user have a shell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:55:07 -0000 Excellent! Thanks for the tips! Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:01:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9147E10657B8 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259DA8FC16 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o82E1IAZ023613; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:01:18 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o82E1Dsd023568; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:01:17 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A387833C3D; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:01:13 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:01:13 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Antonio Olivares Message-ID: <20100902140113.GA69315@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100830120007.543fa5dd@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: killall -9 program-name does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:01:20 -0000 On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:32:56PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > On 8/30/10, RW wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:14:58 +0000 > > Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > >> Dear fellow FreeBSD users, > >> > >> I have a cron script that plays music in the morning when I arrive at > >> work. > >> > >> in ~/.xalarm I have two lines, one that calls xterm and one that calls > >> mplayer and plays a series of music files in a playlist > >> > >> crontab -l > >> has the following > >> # min hour day-of-month month day-of-week command > >> # 0-59 0-23 1-31 1-12 0-6 0=sun 1=mon > >> 00 07 * * 1-5 ~/.xalarm >/dev/null 2>&1 > >> 30 07 * * 1-5 killall -9 /usr/local/bin/mplayer >/dev/null 2>&1 > > > > You don't need the path to mplayer. > > It makes no difference. This does not stop mplayer from playing :( > > Thanks though for trying to help. > > Regards, > > Antonio Use the command: killall -d mplayer & see what it's saying. ie. don't direct stout & sterr to /dev/null Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:20:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A701510656ED for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683468FC13 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-157-147.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.157.147]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9073CF97; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o82EKuOE001678; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:20:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:20:56 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Bernard Scharp Message-Id: <20100902162056.7d890888.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4C7FAC19.9090309@itsacon.net> References: <4C7F5F25.2010604@itsacon.net> <20100902075053.4bdb443b@scorpio> <4C7F925B.9010807@itsacon.net> <20100902152905.905caea1.freebsd@edvax.de> <4C7FAC19.9090309@itsacon.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple mount_smbfs commands fail in bash script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:20:58 -0000 On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:52:25 +0200, Bernard Scharp wrote: > Neither am I. Hadn't even thought of grepping in /usr/src for the error > message :-) It's often a good starting point to see where problems might be caused from. > Can I just `rm /dev/nsmbX` them? (messing in /dev/ is a level of FreeBSD > I'm not familiar with) Yes, I would guess so. The content of /dev/ is dynamically generated since FreeBSD 5, if I remember correctly. As the nsmb nodes don't seem to be in use any longer, it would be no problem to remove them. The mount_smbfs program will generate them if needed. Just as an addition: After your script successfully performed the operations needing the mounted SMB shares, it could remove the corresponding device files. Still, this looks like a bug to me, a "can't image anybody needs more than 1024 of them" kind of bug. I would have imagined that IF a program needs files in a temporary way, it removes them after use. Just to be sure, unmount all SMB related things, as I can't predict what would happen if a nsmb device disappears when in use. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:27:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C3B10656D8 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737028FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o82DrqZp053228 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:53:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:53:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: What's up with cvsup.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:27:37 -0000 This has been happening for several days. Is cvsup dead vs SVN? Cvsup is still listed in the handbook. CVSup update begins at 2010-09-02 04:40:00 Updating from cvsup.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup.freebsd.org Premature EOF from server CVSup update ends at 2010-09-02 04:40:00 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:29:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E1A1065710 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425248FC08 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so182166gwb.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:29:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=88ZveY3y8SYiAeq2VXY5Sa779DnpLbUk/qnDc0QX4hY=; b=PGorzl5qJbVIkXTqC6C899IsaTyTRtw0km1Q8a5nxdUwzVz5FQYbTFrR3SprjM3eHs CNMmBxqXfWjP+qcboVtZe8+VDFSUZJClNi5c4TuStg+XwZU10td4iOZNre1e0OvHarTm 8YSfuHlQWnJA8yYSua3eaxEeim2izyg5fGrx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Sx7rbC4xBFeGOYUvylKdS5nRNSze6QLkeEFdFfkGy4Ka0frol8w/jv4WYg/t/2QDS9 oVcTQ8CInZXH2VCAViYwf4t+zBjW7r7fA5zwe3Z1548w+oDmTWxQ2mT/mIiDSjNt+QHl BacMsCnZr9MmmI7JGlL/E9c7D4tuiTCglh2Pw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.49.12 with SMTP id w12mr158136ybw.251.1283437795283; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.205 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:29:55 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Which specific version will be installed via pkg_add or via the port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:29:56 -0000 Hi folks, When you're installing software via the pkg_add command or building from source, how do you what specific version you'll be installing BEFORE you actually install it? Ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:36:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858CE1065703 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659228FC15 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13136 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 14:36:28 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Sep 2010 14:36:28 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 79B545084D; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:36:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Dennis Glatting References: Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:36:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dennis Glatting's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:53:52 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <44lj7k9pqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with cvsup.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:36:34 -0000 Dennis Glatting writes: > This has been happening for several days. Is cvsup dead vs SVN? Cvsup > is still listed in the handbook. cvsup is still fine. Please (as recommended in the handbook) use a mirror closer to you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:43:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A99A10657AF for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8ABB8FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30501 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 14:43:42 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Sep 2010 14:43:42 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5B0445084D; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:43:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Ed Flecko References: Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:43:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ed Flecko's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:29:55 -0700") Message-ID: <44hbi89peq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which specific version will be installed via pkg_add or via the port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:43:43 -0000 Ed Flecko writes: > When you're installing software via the pkg_add command or building > from source, how do you what specific version you'll be installing > BEFORE you actually install it? By reading the port's Makefile, in my case. Other common options are "make packagename" in the port's directory http://www.freebsd.org/ports http://www.freshports.org/ There are probably more ways in ports(7), as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 14:56:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D93210656D7 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F50F8FC1F for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so709300qyk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:56:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FfsKFct6rwN+fD4z5M3ZOPT+DAW/32VhfIC3geVyNvM=; b=KJC7hiZ2410UTm671P73vRJAPBm4BsARf9l0adKKuE3OSioqLcCZOMlQ6fgNAv8qEZ Kj7UHzz6lJcK/JpnjbIzl2z/t8EgpHWeov0I8/+44NCh6Gzqk1s33kfWE3gpgC/Bqh9n 4B+v3GZIw5OonFxFvwWxhffbAp6Tlh21hDUmQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cFndnkNW2Gi+XDgAGFG2yDtsZ/1VVlT9RTejxk08dC3Mwl/gr7LV5ezlt4OM3PnT/G u0LPcbY4a/kvxNpxneSFH6hCc0fcoOPkvbhQwfZ5mu9Rc1cejcHXqo9tcAUPjDpt2sKi nE3UmKPYQmWjBYWzZCB6BnWUhXtC6OVCWrgUU= Received: by 10.224.34.212 with SMTP id m20mr175740qad.397.1283439391232; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r38sm535245qcs.38.2010.09.02.07.56.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7FBB1B.3090604@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:56:27 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Flecko References: <44hbi89peq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44hbi89peq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which specific version will be installed via pkg_add or via the port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:56:32 -0000 On 9/2/10 10:43 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Ed Flecko writes: > >> When you're installing software via the pkg_add command or building >> from source, how do you what specific version you'll be installing >> BEFORE you actually install it? > > By reading the port's Makefile, in my case. > Other common options are > "make packagename" in the port's directory > http://www.freebsd.org/ports > http://www.freshports.org/ > Adding onto Lowell's response, you can see which version of the port was packaged at release time by logging directly into the FTP server: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD and take a look at what is in the package directory. For example: ls ports/${ARCH}/packages-X.Y-release/${CATEGORY}/${PORT} replacing ${ARCH}, ${CATEGORY}, and ${PORT} as appropriate, and replacing X and Y with your current release version (for example, 8.1). Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 15:15:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A831065818 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enlil65@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED3D8FC18 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so373534eyx.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:15:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z6lvKczJ6RLCdg+/RKYPnDdCe5nU0dNDFyvG7WeyByA=; b=AZjEZcd4qBKJi6zgKqimREg3G1qtu6sjL1of+XvJRCBKpNGpIsS2zX1QvJXgEkL+xz AaE2jGX8zLTIIfeTFOvQDtwSF3p4G38ZUjxpTkZ/01ot7pFpKIFfyvyS1ChBjOn87L41 C6uyoRl0a9PVXcCQxZl8BwbBVvtiA+CIWqGe0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UC8cqam9DJTSzth5l4cyVhR6+1jtFP4cvbXXo5/+doU3EXLSDEnCJDg2pgr83Rz8PK jARDKS4URJnkEGNOLXH/ERoBF2SPfxtEaoqXLx0k9pu0hsHNT9AHCniOjBoqVVEeU4pe AlVszHyjQ/E7SX8CHFVmNxie/oLRm+8FLot2o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.67.6 with SMTP id i6mr99303wed.44.1283438702850; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.165.211 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C1B20F0.2090804@mapper.nl> References: <4C1B20F0.2090804@mapper.nl> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:45:02 -0500 Message-ID: From: Peggy Wilkins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: network deamons starting before network! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:15:46 -0000 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Mark Stapper wrote: > Since updating to 8.X I noticed that network services were started > before the network was up! > I use lagg failover configuration on both my FreeBSD boxes. > First, boot fails on mounting my nfs-shares. > After entering and exiting the "rescue" shell, the system boots as normal= . > > uname -a > FreeBSD mario 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #4: Fri Jun 18 > 07:46:01 CEST 2010 =A0 =A0 ****@mario:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mario =A0amd64 > What could I do to fix this? > > Here's an exerpt from /var/log/messages: > > Jun 18 09:10:25 =A0ntpd[1376]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) > Jun 18 09:10:25 =A0kernel: fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8 > Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0ntpd_initres[1412]: host name not found: yoshi > Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0kernel: nfe0: link state changed to UP > Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0kernel: lagg0: link state changed to UP > Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0kernel: nfe1: link state changed to UP > Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0ntpd_initres[1412]: couldn't resolve `yoshi', giving u= p > on it > Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Hostname (lagg0): mario > Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New IP Address (lagg0): 10.58.235.6 > Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Subnet Mask (lagg0): 255.255.255.0 > Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Broadcast Address (lagg0): 10.58.235.255 > Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Routers (lagg0): 10.58.235.1 I upgraded my amd64 FreeBSD-8.0-RELEASE-p4 system to FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE earlier this week. After completing the upgrade and rebooting, I also am having the above reported problem. I am not using dhcp, I have configured a static IP address. My system also has nfe NIC. I wonder if this problem is specific to systems using nfe network driver. The problem was not occuring on my 8.0 system, before the upgrade to 8.1. Here are my boot messages that display this problem. (I will note that nfe0 shows "no carrier".) Setting hostname: capricorn.lib.uchicago.edu nfe0: link state changed to DOWN Starting Network: lo0 nfe0. lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D3 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=3D3 nfe0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 150= 0 options=3D80008 ether 00:1a:92:45:c5:25 inet 128.135.53.92 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 128.135.53.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier add net default: gateway 128.135.53.1 Starting devd. Mounting NFS file systems: mount_nfs: quarto: hostname nor servname provided, or not known [snip -- this is repeated for every NFS mount we have configured] ELF ldconfig path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg /usr/local/kde4/lib /usr/local/lib/qt4 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox /usr/local/lib/zsh 32-bit compatibility ldconfig path: /usr/lib32 Creating and/or trimming log files . Starting syslogd. Starting rpcbind. NFS access cache time=3D60 rpc.umntall: quarto: MOUNTPROG: RPC: Unknown host [snip -- repeated errors again] Starting amd. Sep 1 17:49:11 capricorn amd[1017]/info: using configuration file /etc/amd.conf Clearing /tmp (X related). Starting mountd. Sep 1 17:49:12 capricorn mountd[1091]: can't get address info for host mozart.lib.uchicago.edu Sep 1 17:49:12 capricorn mountd[1091]: bad host mozart.lib.uchicago.edu, skipping Sep 1 17:49:12 capricorn mountd[1091]: bad exports list line /disk/1 -alldirs mozart.lib.uchicago.edu [snip -- repeated errors for each line in /etc/exports and /etc/zfs/exports= ] Starting nfsd. Starting statd. Starting lockd. NLM: failed to contact remote rpcbind, stat =3D 7, port =3D 28416 Sep 1 17:49:12 capricorn rpcbind: connect from ::1 to getport/addr(status): request from unauthorized host Sep 1 17:49:12 capricorn kernel: NLM: failed to contact remote rpcbind, stat =3D 7, port =3D 28416 Starting local daemons: . Starting lpd. Updating motd: . Mounting late file systems: mount_nfs: quarto: hostname nor servname provided, or not known [snip repeated errors] Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! Sep 1 17:49:12 capricorn init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh : # nfe0: link state changed to UP =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D END boot messages excerpt At this point I can fix all issues by killing mountd and syslogd and then exiting single user. The reason to kill mountd is that without doing this two mountd's will be running. The reason to kill syslogd is that if I don't kill it before exiting single user: Starting syslogd. Sep 1 17:53:17 syslogd: bind: Address already in use Sep 1 17:53:17 syslogd: bind: Address already in use syslogd: child pid 1910 exited with return code 1 /etc/rc: WARNING: failed to start syslogd This also causes errors later because there is no /var/run/syslog.pid written (it gets deleted). I also get these warnings (after exiting single user): rpcbind already running? (pid=3D990). amd already running? (pid=3D1028). Clearing /tmp (X related). Starting mountd. nfsd already running? (pid=3D1101 1102). statd already running? (pid=3D1109). lockd already running? (pid=3D1116). Starting local daemons: . lpd already running? (pid=3D1162). But these are not problematic. It is pretty clear that the network services are all getting started twice, once before dropping to single user shell, and a second time after exiting single user. It is also pretty clear that "nfe0: link state changed to DOWN" is happening at a bad time; and nothing that requires network to be up is waiting for it to change to UP. Is this a clear enough report? Time for a send-pr? (I haven't done that in many years.) plw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 15:35:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962BE10656E8; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0339F8FC1A; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: FROM itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu [141.213.135.249]) By hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4C7FC455.63230.13908 ; Authuser web; 2 Sep 2010 11:35:49 EDT Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:31:15 -0400 From: William Bulley To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100902153115.GA85154@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions , x11@FreeBSD.org, steve@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org, steve@FreeBSD.org Subject: SOLVED: serious (for me) Xorg 7.5 mouse/kbd problem in 8.1-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:35:51 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline See below for details of solution. ----- Forwarded message from William Bulley ----- To: FreeBSD Questions From: William Bulley Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:38:34 -0400 Subject: serious (for me) Xorg 7.5 mouse/kbd problem in 8.1-STABLE For years I have run Open-Motif on FreeBSD without issue. I use a USB keyboard and a USB three button mouse attached to a Dell Optiplex 960. This combination has worked fine for the past year. This week I upgraded from 8.0-STABLE circa January 2010 to 8.1-STABLE. I do this by doing a buildworld/installworld sequence after csup-ing stable-supfile and rebooting. In this case I also pkg_deleted all of my ports and am rebuilding them from source. Building Xorg is one of the very first ports I attempt since I prefer to work in xterms not virtual terminals. This upgrade moved me from Xorg 7.3 to Xorg 7.5, but Open-Motif stayed the same - open-motif-2.2.3_6 - it hasn't changed in years. After building Xorg, as root, I ran the "Xorg -configure" command to generate my xorg.conf.new file. Since a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf file was still around after the upgrade from 8.0-STABLE/Xorg 7.3, I felt no need to change anything in that file (later file comparisons confirmed that nothing had changed). My only relevant additions to /etc/X11/xorg.conf are these: Section "ServerFlags" Option "AutoAddDevices" "off" Option "DontZap" "false" EndSection In my /etc/rc.conf file I have dbus and hald enabled, and that has not changed since the beginning of 2010 after the confusion abated. As a normal user, I start Xorg using /usr/local/bin/xinit as always. I have several xterms configured in my ~/.xinitrc file. All those came up in the correct location and state. I was able to open those that started in iconic mode. In an open/raised xterm I could enter carriage returns and see my shell prompt move down the window. But when I tried to close/minimize an open/raised xterm, things failed. I use the following keyboard/mouse combination (configured in my .mwmrc file) to close (minimize) an xterm (and other applications): Shift window f.minimize This is also unchanged for some years. This particular setting has no bearing on the problem I came across yesterday. I merely state it for the record. However, this configuration triggers the "bug". The problem is as soon as I use that Shift/Btn3Click combination, my arrow cursor disappears, then I cannot move to or select other xterms - I am frozen, or locked, into the xterm I was trying to close/minimize. All I can do at this point is to kill(1) the /usr/local/bin/xinit command to return to the virtual terminal where I launched my Xorg session. I am now reluctantly using the good old /usr/local/bin/twm which is always built when Xorg is built from source. I am at a loss as to what to look for next. I suspect Xorg, or the keyboard and mouse driver, not the video driver, that came with. It might be a problem with hald(8), but again, I don't know how to debug this. Any help with this very odd bug would be greatly appreciated. ----- End forwarded message ----- This problem is known (and fixed) in newer versions of xorg-server. See this URL for details of the problem. I have also attached the changes I made to the dit/events.c file. After rebuilding xorg-server with those patches, the Open Motif (mwm) window manager now works with the above minimize keyboard and mouse squence. Thanks for all the help. Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patches.for.xorg.server.7.5" for (; grab; grab = grab->next) { DeviceIntPtr gdev; XkbSrvInfoPtr xkbi = NULL; /* 3471 Mask mask = 0; */ gdev= grab->modifierDevice; =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= } xE = &core; count = 1; /* 3586 mask = grab->eventMask; */ } else if (match & XI2_MATCH) { =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= count = 1; /* 3599 * FIXME: EventToXI2 returns NULL for enter events, so * dereferencing the event is bad. Internal event types are * aligned with core events, so the else clause is valid. * long-term we should use internal events for enter/focus * as well * if (xE) mask = grab->xi2mask[device->id][((xGenericEvent*)xE)->evtype/8]; else if (event->type == XI_Enter || event->type == XI_FocusIn) mask = grab->xi2mask[device->id][event->type/8]; */ } else { rc = EventToXI((InternalEvent*)event, &xE, &count); =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= "(%d, %d).\n", device->name, event->type, rc); continue; } /* 3618 mask = grab->eventMask; */ } (*grabinfo->ActivateGrab)(device, grab, currentTime, TRUE); =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= if (xE) { FixUpEventFromWindow(device, xE, grab->window, None, TRUE); /* 3627 TryClientEvents(rClient(grab), device, xE, count, mask, */ TryClientEvents(rClient(grab), device, xE, count, GetEventFilter(device, xE), GetEventFilter(device, xE), grab); } if (grabinfo->sync.state == FROZEN_NO_EVENT) --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 16:15:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F0610656E0 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nekoexmachina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881008FC1C for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so446490eyx.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:15:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jVM2SN/Av7+v/2FFhB/XENXSbXt7YUvH2rE6Y+52+HU=; b=mOThDykji/IcbPR+7UfzuCipfbFAMzS0Zcf4kBd7e0igOpAKzKTvr2FNMF1XzEdy4w BEqjm2lEqcncYDhR/W/cs+f94+Xi/Qqd/UDKAnITSjQFWFiVUMAl6Ri64OOFzoGpBdyU Iljdi46CFH2CpIWLKP46X+2k9zcKwoDFUslSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lVwFEu3SE+4u0rOLvMA451Ps+l5Fhy9T/NC+y83a6DiI6r5gNeOEdw/WMw/BPEQuAs Ys9t7b1Q0QsOb1SmemcZYPYw2R4DQc9Jjc2vdqeqRsYLz9+q0ITh+k2ife01l82m+TTn +ea0O6kBdwZrwdFddNfdEso4tgQ4bM76QxVvI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.141 with SMTP id p13mr1829483ebp.23.1283442560310; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.192.195 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:49:19 +0000 Message-ID: From: Mikle Krutov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Linux emu: ELF file OS ABI invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:15:31 -0000 Hello, list! Got a strange problem with some linux binaries (utilset for Dwarf Fortress game, DFHack): file reports them all as 'ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, not stripped' All are brandelf'd as in handbook. Utilset requires two libraries, libdfhack.so and libdfconnect.so, that are reported as 'ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, not stripped'; both of them are brandelf'd, too. So, i've put libs into /compat/linux/usr/lib/ and tried to run one of tools and got: ./dfprospector: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libdfhack.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid What could be the source of the problem? I'm running 32-bit 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD right now. -- with best regards, Krutov Mikle From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 16:52:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE4910656A7 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050518FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o82GpqwA074380; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:51:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:51:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44lj7k9pqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: References: <44lj7k9pqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with cvsup.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:52:08 -0000 On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Dennis Glatting writes: > >> This has been happening for several days. Is cvsup dead vs SVN? Cvsup >> is still listed in the handbook. > > cvsup is still fine. Please (as recommended in the handbook) use a > mirror closer to you. > cvsup1, which has the same IP address as cvsup, /is/ listed as the server closest to me in the handbook. More specifically: /usr/local/etc/cvsup/update.sh -L2 CVSup update begins at 2010-09-02 09:46:13 Updating from cvsup1.freebsd.org Parsing supfile "/usr/local/etc/cvsup/supfile" Connecting to cvsup1.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup1.freebsd.org Premature EOF from server CVSup update ends at 2010-09-02 09:46:15 Something has changed in the past several days and I'm now getting Premature EOF. (I operate a mirror within our enterprise.) If the server /is fine/, then why have I been getting this message for the past several days? Nothing has changed on my end. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 17:47:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDC3106586D for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766268FC23 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1OrDsL-000EMV-9q; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:47:07 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C25E446744F; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:47:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C7FE30F.80603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:46:55 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dennis Glatting References: <44lj7k9pqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with cvsup.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:47:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Glatting wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Dennis Glatting writes: >> >>> This has been happening for several days. Is cvsup dead vs SVN? Cvsup >>> is still listed in the handbook. >> >> cvsup is still fine. Please (as recommended in the handbook) use a >> mirror closer to you. >> > > cvsup1, which has the same IP address as cvsup, /is/ listed as the > server closest to me in the handbook. More specifically: > > /usr/local/etc/cvsup/update.sh -L2 > CVSup update begins at 2010-09-02 09:46:13 > Updating from cvsup1.freebsd.org > Parsing supfile "/usr/local/etc/cvsup/supfile" > Connecting to cvsup1.freebsd.org > Connected to cvsup1.freebsd.org > Premature EOF from server > CVSup update ends at 2010-09-02 09:46:15 > > Something has changed in the past several days and I'm now getting > Premature EOF. (I operate a mirror within our enterprise.) If the server > /is fine/, then why have I been getting this message for the past > several days? Nothing has changed on my end. > Hi Dennis, Instead of relying on a particular cvsup server, how about installing fastest_cvsup (http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fastest_cvsup)? If you run it in your script and pass the resulting hostname to csup, you'll get the server with the best response at that time. Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/sourcehosting/ - Follow me, follow you -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFMf+MP0sRouByUApARAlIwAJ0fAI9fPVzMbJnx9GUxQR+z5YBkuQCfVPcM AJ12xqKEXwKs88l3hYlMNS8= =xr6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 17:52:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945E21065695 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6B38FC13 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o82HqL4Q031124; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:52:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:52:20 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: krad Message-ID: <20100902175220.GA81006@thought.org> References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Gary Gatten , Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List , utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:52:31 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:48:28PM +0100, krad wrote: > On 30 August 2010 20:02, Chris Rees wrote: > > > On 30 August 2010 18:37, krad wrote: > > > On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten > > >> wrote: > > >> > Rename them, copy, then rename them back? > > >> > > >> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together, > > >> transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-) > > > > > > or > > > > > > sudo tar cf - /somepath | ssh x@y " sudo tar xvf - -C somepath " > > > > > > I agree with other posts though rsync is the easiest > > > > > > Why sudo with tar? > > > > Chris > > > > make sure all perms correct and can read all files Just to make =sure= about this: can using tar/gtar as root [or sudo] make sure that all the permissions are correct? It =may= save me keystrokes, :_) gary > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 18:01:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DE310656AA for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E78C8FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19231 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 18:01:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Sep 2010 18:01:07 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9E91F5084D; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:01:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Dennis Glatting References: <44lj7k9pqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:01:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dennis Glatting's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:51:52 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <44vd6om3dp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with cvsup.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:01:08 -0000 Dennis Glatting writes: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Dennis Glatting writes: >> >>> This has been happening for several days. Is cvsup dead vs SVN? Cvsup >>> is still listed in the handbook. >> >> cvsup is still fine. Please (as recommended in the handbook) use a >> mirror closer to you. >> > > cvsup1, which has the same IP address as cvsup, /is/ listed as the > server closest to me in the handbook. More specifically: > > /usr/local/etc/cvsup/update.sh -L2 > CVSup update begins at 2010-09-02 09:46:13 > Updating from cvsup1.freebsd.org > Parsing supfile "/usr/local/etc/cvsup/supfile" > Connecting to cvsup1.freebsd.org > Connected to cvsup1.freebsd.org > Premature EOF from server > CVSup update ends at 2010-09-02 09:46:15 > > Something has changed in the past several days and I'm now getting > Premature EOF. (I operate a mirror within our enterprise.) If the > server /is fine/, then why have I been getting this message for the > past several days? Nothing has changed on my end. Sorry for being unclear; I wasn't saying the server was fine, I was saying that the protocol was fine and still fully supported. I'd say that you have two main options for now; track down the person responsible for cvsup1.freebsd.org (hubs@ list might help), or use another server for the time being. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 18:45:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC3710657B7 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe06.swip.net [212.247.154.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A00A8FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=skgvEfutgnGSr0/z2w9BnbiJ4B+NZJZqOB5vgMWy4GQ= c=1 sm=1 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=M8b_wTzEtboA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=GKysJfYJAAAA:8 a=C_IRinGWAAAA:8 a=ovCXebbxOOWB07kr6n4A:9 a=tGt-r7Yszt1pGkdDLvcA:7 a=av5ks0yT_aX0cqz5eDPVjihx1aYA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=si9q_4b84H0A:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:117 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 14751112; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:35:20 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:31:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20100901000413.GA1559@bsd.remdog.net> <4c7e075b.8edSaF5Xw9mGHkRS%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4c7e075b.8edSaF5Xw9mGHkRS%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA: hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009022031.24920.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: remegius@comcast.net, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interactive Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:45:35 -0000 On Wednesday 01 September 2010 09:57:15 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Rem P Roberti wrote: > > Brother! Muttprint is now working fine. The problem: the printer > > was offline! Now, before you go accusing me of being a complete > > dufus, let me say that I had no way of knowing that that condition > > existed. The printer itself indicated that it was online---no > > problem. What happened is that somehow, and I'm not sure what > > caused this, the printer became disengaged from its usb port. > > I'd call it a bug in the printer that it continues to indicate > online when it has lost its connection to its host (unless it > also has a network connection, and in that case I imagine you'd > be using the network instead of USB). > > > ... The only way that I could get it talking again to usb was by > > doing a reboot. > > Now _that_ sounds like a possible bug in the USB subsystem, since > USB is supposed to be completely hot-pluggable and should not need > a reboot to get itself straightened out after a mishap. Cc-ing usb@ > list. > > One question which will surely arise is, which FreeBSD version are > you using? The USB stack was completely rewritten in 8.0. If the USB application does not close the /dev/XXX handles, it will block the enumeration of new USB devices on that bus. Also see "usbconfig -d X.Y reset" --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 19:25:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA5A10657F7 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73C08FC21 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so1022788qyk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:25:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.114.89 with SMTP id d25mr267814qaq.132.1283455502079; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.214.199 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:25:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:25:02 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Weird Linux - FreeBSD/ZFS NFSv4 interoperability problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:25:04 -0000 While doing some interoperability testing between Linux and FreeBSD, I came up with this unusual issue. I could use some help figuring out if this is a bug, and if so, where to file it. Here's the scenario: - FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE server, sharing a ZFS filesystem via NFSv4. - Linux client (I've tested with RHEL 5.4 and Debian Lenny) mounting said filesystem with NFSv4. - A user on the Linux client does a Subversion checkout onto the mounted filesystem. At the end of the checkout, access to the filesystem hangs. nfsd on the FreeBSD server and rpciod on the Linux client seem to be in a tight loop, and there's lots of network traffic between them. I can reproduce this every time. The problem does not occur if the backing filesystem is UFS instead of ZFS, if NFSv3 is used instead of NFSv4, or if the client is FreeBSD instead of Linux. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 20:10:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67303106580D for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ED48FC1A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so1001111qwg.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hPgYqORSnTnTSCDFLTVlyVMr6Jv+dW7IK/EydJJNVXo=; b=wJors8wEs6lmyqEu455XxzOQMt9zE9VbJAiBTFU4sNxf5VwF48/tR0aWqg7j7CxzA8 W116PnSk5qk2PSou/wOlMsQT/ri0UqvLXv/8wyzXA3FMAlsLWyDgcLFkUSq3RDrM1BuW F60eRsJOfKiqJKO9UoiVZPnl8q7Kn6g6g13tA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=phHy3icnzWIeQirEjyrixGNwh8y+rUaA309AdtSun6IBMsPXjKjUMpW7uNRh/RFit1 LMCJkH/GIA7XBGqlXm3O0kzDePb7+kYj8yKtMYdsk9QVlRAJxXVnuk7POB6Rqcopkl9e DLaNy6TDAfE2D70nANlDtWbFpC9RhXgaorYZA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.6.136 with SMTP id 8mr41326qaz.149.1283456554673; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.20.74 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:42:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: patrick To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: 8.1: Cron ignoring crontab updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:10:37 -0000 I recently upgraded a FreeBSD 7.0 system to 8.1-RELEASE (via freebsd-update) and am experiencing the strangest cron problem I have ever seen. My cron jobs run, but if I make any changes to my crontab, cron does not pick them up; it continues to operate based on the snapshot of crontabs it loaded when cron was started up. If I restart cron (/etc/rc.d/cron restart), the changes are then picked up, but again, any subsequent changes are ignored. I don't see any issues with the permissions, and when I edit a crontab, it says "crontab: installing new crontab", and the /var/log/cron log shows BEGIN EDIT, REPLACE, and END EDIT. I'm somewhat at a loss to figure out where the disconnect is, and it's impractical for me to have to restart cron any time any user updates their crontab. Has anyone come across this? Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 21:51:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E4210656AD for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D958FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so1232721bwz.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:51:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=LxnraxrqCPNBrJVYSgs91z6g2/54PpDKZy8v2IZ1GmY=; b=JXz/5yj8xMLjb8uXpbOyJoFvboEfUIlxCeNcmrZU3R75ZvrkVmQBkJSNQu4SfqkKK6 f+ZFMEG4ECPbb6F8EtRDxi9vD+/5lhYO621W07cu+0Cfh5t9e64dMfepRYe0T5zc8/Mo wJq4VbAdlqrBo6nfkoUhUi1wJNDBtum+O8Of0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=f2ICAVIiyMW8r/Gble1tbVoCnjF9UZH5xWYU4wGs4o5hkZnedlG46Wst+aAzkS/LJc IKBgGzcCb/J3hywaumxIwh0/csofJwZSqjh2wNwpXw6TAIA2kg8Xas1YbdMD23ixKw0H DmAqJw4X18nXA6KiSztiDHNNeM5tdobUXcs7k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.92 with SMTP id b28mr7162770bks.47.1283464317146; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.123.78 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.123.78 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:51:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:51:57 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: patrick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: 8.1: Cron ignoring crontab updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:51:59 -0000 You have to SIGHUP cron, not restart it. # killall -HUP cron Chris -------- Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 2 Sep 2010 21:11, "patrick" wrote: I recently upgraded a FreeBSD 7.0 system to 8.1-RELEASE (via freebsd-update) and am experiencing the strangest cron problem I have ever seen. My cron jobs run, but if I make any changes to my crontab, cron does not pick them up; it continues to operate based on the snapshot of crontabs it loaded when cron was started up. If I restart cron (/etc/rc.d/cron restart), the changes are then picked up, but again, any subsequent changes are ignored. I don't see any issues with the permissions, and when I edit a crontab, it says "crontab: installing new crontab", and the /var/log/cron log shows BEGIN EDIT, REPLACE, and END EDIT. I'm somewhat at a loss to figure out where the disconnect is, and it's impractical for me to have to restart cron any time any user updates their crontab. Has anyone come across this? Patrick _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 00:03:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8B61065858 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD508FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5235 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 00:03:34 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2010 00:03:34 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D755E5081F; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:03:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1D2191CCDD; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:03:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Gary Kline References: <20100827170737.GA96063@thought.org> <26118_1282929673_4C77F409_26118_366_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B434999FDCA57D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20100827211306.68e261be.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100902175220.GA81006@thought.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:03:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100902175220.GA81006@thought.org> (Gary Kline's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:52:20 -0700") Message-ID: <44occf4rsi.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: how do i scp .dotfiles?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Mailing List List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:03:35 -0000 Gary Kline writes: > Just to make =sure= about this: can using tar/gtar as root [or > sudo] make sure that all the permissions are correct? It =may= > save me keystrokes, :_) Permissions, yes. If you want flags, you'll need the base system tar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 05:03:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4159D10657FD for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 05:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012408FC1F for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 05:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1OrOQn-0002iC-JT; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:03:17 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov To: Mikle Krutov References: Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:03:17 +0400 In-Reply-To: (Mikle Krutov's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:49:19 +0000") Message-ID: <61270570@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emu: ELF file OS ABI invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:03:19 -0000 On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:49:19 +0000 Mikle Krutov wrote: > Got a strange problem with some linux binaries > (utilset for Dwarf Fortress game, DFHack): > file reports them all as > 'ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, > version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses > shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, not stripped' > All are brandelf'd as in handbook. Good. > Utilset requires two libraries, libdfhack.so and > libdfconnect.so, that are reported as > 'ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, > version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, not > stripped'; both of them are brandelf'd, too. Not good. The FreeBSD Handbook (section 10.2.3, Installing a Random Linux RPM Based Application) forbids library branding. > So, i've put libs into /compat/linux/usr/lib/ and tried > to run one of tools and got: > ./dfprospector: error while loading shared libraries: > /usr/lib/libdfhack.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid > What could be the source of the problem? > I'm running 32-bit 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD right now. Please try native linux libraries and report back if that helps. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 06:12:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EF81065721 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1A68FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o836BgPG061610; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:11:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:11:42 -0600 (MDT) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: Greg Larkin In-Reply-To: <4C7FE30F.80603@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <44lj7k9pqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4C7FE30F.80603@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What's up with cvsup.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:12:02 -0000 On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Greg Larkin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dennis Glatting wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >>> Dennis Glatting writes: >>> >>>> This has been happening for several days. Is cvsup dead vs SVN? Cvsup >>>> is still listed in the handbook. >>> >>> cvsup is still fine. Please (as recommended in the handbook) use a >>> mirror closer to you. >>> >> >> cvsup1, which has the same IP address as cvsup, /is/ listed as the >> server closest to me in the handbook. More specifically: >> >> /usr/local/etc/cvsup/update.sh -L2 >> CVSup update begins at 2010-09-02 09:46:13 >> Updating from cvsup1.freebsd.org >> Parsing supfile "/usr/local/etc/cvsup/supfile" >> Connecting to cvsup1.freebsd.org >> Connected to cvsup1.freebsd.org >> Premature EOF from server >> CVSup update ends at 2010-09-02 09:46:15 >> >> Something has changed in the past several days and I'm now getting >> Premature EOF. (I operate a mirror within our enterprise.) If the server >> /is fine/, then why have I been getting this message for the past >> several days? Nothing has changed on my end. >> > > Hi Dennis, > > Instead of relying on a particular cvsup server, how about installing > fastest_cvsup (http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fastest_cvsup)? > > If you run it in your script and pass the resulting hostname to csup, > you'll get the server with the best response at that time. > That was interesting. From one site there isn't a significant difference between 1/4/10 -- at least anything worth noteing. From this site, with multiple exit points (different vendors) and depending on the BGP bounce of the day, I see: >> Speed Daemons: - 1st: cvsup14.us.freebsd.org 6.22 ms - 2st: cvsup4.us.freebsd.org 30.29 ms - 3st: cvsup17.us.freebsd.org 44.45 ms >> Speed Daemons: - 1st: cvsup15.us.freebsd.org 20.96 ms - 2st: cvsup18.us.freebsd.org 31.66 ms - 3st: cvsup9.us.freebsd.org 31.80 ms Thanks for the pointer. BTW, cvsup was 51 ms from the first and 100 ms from the second. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 07:59:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9587106564A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E44D8FC23 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrRBC-0003uC-AT; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:59:22 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o837xPan003159; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:59:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o837xPCA003158; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:59:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:59:25 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, matusita@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, matusita@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Cc: Subject: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:59:24 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to install the port /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 (even the freshest from FreeBSD server) in 8-CURRENT: current# pwd /usr/ports/emulators current# mv vmware-guestd6 vmware-guestd6.old current# tar xzf ~guru/vmware-guestd6.tar.gz current# cd vmware-guestd6 current# make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ======================================================================== Choose "VM" -> "Install VMware Tools..." from VMware Workstation menu to connect VM's CD-ROM drive and installation CD image temporary. Press "Install" button when a dialog pops up. ======================================================================== This port mounts /dev/acd0 to /mnt. Are you ready? [Y/n]: y /bin/mkdir -p /mnt /sbin/umount /mnt 2>&1 >/dev/null umount: /mnt: not a file system root directory *** Error code 1 (ignored) /sbin/umount /dev/acd0 2>&1 >/dev/null umount: /dev/acd0: unknown file system *** Error code 1 (ignored) /sbin/mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt ===> Extracting for vmware-guestd-6.0.3.80004_2 /sbin/umount /mnt (cd /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work; /usr/bin/tar xf /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/modules/source/vmmemctl.tar) ===> Patching for vmware-guestd-6.0.3.80004_2 LC_ALL=C /usr/bin/sed -i.bak "`/usr/bin/printf 's|\0152\013\0350|\0152\\\n\0350|g'`" /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sbin32-6/vmware-checkvm sed: /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sbin32-6/vmware-checkvm: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6. there is no directory work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sbin32-6 but only work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sbin32-63 creating a symlink helps a bit but later it can't find vmware-guestd for installation which is not there, i.e. not in the tar file of the vmware-tools; Any ideas? matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 08:11:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD801065840 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A0F8FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3739C78C2A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:53:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id v0pTNkIblXiM for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:53:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2F9978C28 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:53:20 +0200 (CEST) From: bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:53:19 +0200 Message-Id: <4AB42548-002B-41A5-8603-638CF97DC7E9@todoo.biz> To: Liste FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: Applying a patch to a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:11:57 -0000 Hello,=20 I have a patch for clamav that was submited by a developer of clamav.=20 I don't know how to apply It to the source code of the port.=20 What I would like to do:=20 1. Get the source code=20 2. cd to the source directory=20 3. Apply the patch=20 4. Recompile=20 5. Test=20 If this is ok, then as an option:=20 6. validate changes & updates=20 7. submit patch to the FBSD port Thanks for your support.=20 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 08:14:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50B210657C6; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF828FC1A; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so1591007qwg.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:14:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.1.162 with SMTP id 34mr256345qcf.226.1283501640397; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.8 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:14:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.1.133.114] In-Reply-To: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:14:00 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, matusita@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:14:07 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 00:59, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Hello, > > I'm trying to install the port /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 (even > the freshest from FreeBSD server) in 8-CURRENT: Do you have a particular reason for using this port? Assuming you mean 8.X, the Tools that ship on this iso with Vmware will work (assuming your copy of vmware isn't too old) if you install misc/compat6x or you can try emulators/open-vm-tools (open sourced copy of Vmware Tools that you build). If you meant 9-CURRENT, things may be more difficult since Vmware only ships binaries for releases and open-vm-tools is marked broken on current. --=20 Rob Farmer > > current# pwd > /usr/ports/emulators > current# mv vmware-guestd6 vmware-guestd6.old > current# tar xzf ~guru/vmware-guestd6.tar.gz > current# cd vmware-guestd6 > current# make > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Choose "VM" -> "Install VMware Tools..." from VMware Workstation > menu to connect VM's CD-ROM drive and installation CD image temporary. > Press "Install" button when a dialog pops up. > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > This port mounts /dev/acd0 to /mnt. > > Are you ready? [Y/n]: y > /bin/mkdir -p /mnt > /sbin/umount /mnt 2>&1 >/dev/null > umount: /mnt: not a file system root directory > *** Error code 1 (ignored) > /sbin/umount /dev/acd0 2>&1 >/dev/null > umount: /dev/acd0: unknown file system > *** Error code 1 (ignored) > /sbin/mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Extracting for vmware-guestd-6.0.3.80004_2 > /sbin/umount /mnt > (cd /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work; /usr/bin/tar xf /usr/ports/= emulators/vmware-guestd6/work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/modules/source/vmmem= ctl.tar) > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Patching for vmware-guestd-6.0.3.80004_2 > LC_ALL=3DC /usr/bin/sed -i.bak "`/usr/bin/printf 's|\0152\013\0350|\0152\= \\n\0350|g'`" =A0/usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work/vmware-tools-dist= rib/lib/sbin32-6/vmware-checkvm > sed: /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6/work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sb= in32-6/vmware-checkvm: No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6. > > there is no directory work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sbin32-6 but only > work/vmware-tools-distrib/lib/sbin32-63 > > creating a symlink helps a bit but later it can't find vmware-guestd for > installation which is not there, i.e. not in the tar file of the > vmware-tools; > > Any ideas? > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0matthias > > -- > Matthias Apitz > t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 > e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ > Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? =A0 Not in my =A0name! > =BFSolidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? =A1No en mi nombre! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 08:23:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A953110658C3 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DC88FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o838NVX1068594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:23:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o838NUO9068593; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA15804; Fri, 3 Sep 10 01:19:36 PDT Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:19:29 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: utisoft@gmail.com Message-Id: <4c80af91.0XK7R1NzplpVQC/a%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gibblertron@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1: Cron ignoring crontab updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:23:32 -0000 Chris Rees wrote: > You have to SIGHUP cron, not restart it. > > # killall -HUP cron Isn't crontab(1) supposed to do that, without separate intervention? > On 2 Sep 2010 21:11, "patrick" wrote: > > I recently upgraded a FreeBSD 7.0 system to 8.1-RELEASE (via > freebsd-update) and am experiencing the strangest cron problem > I have ever seen. > > My cron jobs run, but if I make any changes to my crontab, > cron does not pick them up; it continues to operate based on > the snapshot of crontabs it loaded when cron was started up ... > Has anyone come across this? Yes, so long ago I no longer remember which Unix flavor it was on. Could have been SunOs 3.5 or 4.x, some version of Solaris, UnixWare, or even FreeBSD 4.x. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 08:31:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26DB1065770; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:31:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6ED8FC19; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrRgV-0007oz-JU; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:31:44 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o838VhxC003415; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:31:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o838VhpR003414; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:31:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:31:43 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Rob Farmer Message-ID: <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Rob Farmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, matusita@freebsd.org References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Cc: matusita@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:31:47 -0000 El día Friday, September 03, 2010 a las 01:14:00AM -0700, Rob Farmer escribió: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 00:59, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to install the port /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 (even > > the freshest from FreeBSD server) in 8-CURRENT: > > Do you have a particular reason for using this port? Assuming you mean > 8.X, My FreeBSD is a CVS 8-CURRENT from May 2009 to be exactly, i.e. after 8-RELEASE but before 8.1. > the Tools that ship on this iso with Vmware will work (assuming > your copy of vmware isn't too old) if you install misc/compat6x or you > can try emulators/open-vm-tools (open sourced copy of Vmware Tools > that you build). The VM is a VMware player 3.0.0 which says about itself Workstation 6.5-7.0 in the overview about the VM setup for FreeBSD; is this fine enough for the emulators/open-vm-tools? Thanks for your hint in any case matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 09:32:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD0A1065674 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20238FC2A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o839W3U1073535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 02:32:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o839W3ia073534 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 02:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16027; Fri, 3 Sep 10 02:13:37 PDT Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:13:33 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4c80bc3d.2IdRE/sO1uaSgnX1JIBscLoMl1gOz1+qwhAQwBYaONqlBXuO" Subject: two ata-related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:32:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_4c80bc3d.2IdRE/sO1uaSgnX1JIBscLoMl1gOz1+qwhAQwBYaONqlBXuO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Two questions about installing FreeBSD 8.1 on a Dell Precision 420 (yes, I know it's old): 1. Should FreeBSD 8.1 be able to recognize a 100MB ATAPI Zip drive? I'm not finding it in the dmesg, although BIOS Setup recognizes it. (It and a CDROM are on the secondary IDE channel; I've tried with each of them as master and either way the CD is recognized but the Zip is not.) 2. It currently has the original A01 BIOS. I'm going to have to update that, because it doesn't recognize the 320GB drive I've added as a new boot drive. With the 320GB installed as unit 0 (master) on the primary IDE channel, the A01 BIOS won't even recognize the previously-working 40GB drive which is now unit 1; so the BIOS disables that channel entirely keeping FreeBSD from seeing those drives either. A BIOS upgrade should be straightforward, but while Googling I ran into a posting where someone apparently had a lot of trouble with a BIOS upgrade for one of these of boxes. Thus the question: Has anyone here had any experience, either good or bad, with running FreeBSD on one of these with an upgraded BIOS? If so, which version? I found A06, A07, A10, A11, and A13 on Dell's FTP site. dmesg (from a USB boot) attached. The reported 320GB (on an add-in card) is a twin of the one described above that isn't recognized on the primary on-board channel. I want them on separate channels to improve mirroring performance. --=_4c80bc3d.2IdRE/sO1uaSgnX1JIBscLoMl1gOz1+qwhAQwBYaONqlBXuO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg" Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC 2010 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (731.47-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Family = 6 Model = 8 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 536870912 (512 MB) avail memory = 506056704 (482 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, f00000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 1000000, 1ef9e000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: on hostb0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: mem 0xf4000000-0xf5ffffff,0xfcffc000-0xfcffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc7fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xdc80-0xdcff mem 0xf8fffc00-0xf8fffc7f irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2 miibus0: on xl0 xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> PHY 24 on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:22:5a:14 xl0: [ITHREAD] pci2: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0xdc70-0xdc7f,0xdc50-0xdc5f,0xdc30-0xdc3f,0xdc10-0xdc1f,0xd8e0-0xd8ff,0xd400-0xd4ff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci2 atapci0: [ITHREAD] ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci0 ata4: [ITHREAD] pcib3: at device 14.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 ahc0: port 0xec00-0xecff mem 0xfafff000-0xfaffffff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci3 ahc0: [ITHREAD] aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs ahc1: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfaffe000-0xfaffefff irq 19 at device 10.1 on pci3 ahc1: [ITHREAD] aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci1 ata1: [ITHREAD] uhci0: port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 uhci0: [ITHREAD] uhci0: LegSup = 0x2f00 usbus0: on uhci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) atrtc0: port 0x70-0x7f irq 8 on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FILTER] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 uart0: [FILTER] uart1: <16550 or compatible> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 uart1: [FILTER] ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppc0: [ITHREAD] ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 plip0: [ITHREAD] lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: [ITHREAD] lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xcdfff,0xce000-0xcffff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 731471411 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec md0: Preloaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xc0fb5504 usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered device_attach: afd0 attach returned 6 ugen0.2: at usbus0 umass0: on usbus0 umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 ad4: 61136MB at ata2-master UDMA100 SATA 1.5Gb/s acd1: DVDR at ata3-master UDMA66 SATA 1.5Gb/s ad8: 305245MB at ata4-master UDMA133 umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2 da0 at ahc0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 127, 16bit) da0: Command Queueing enabled da0: 8683MB (17783249 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 da1: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 1.000MB/s transfers da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) GEOM: da1: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 64h,32s). GEOM: da1: media size does not match label. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/md0 --=_4c80bc3d.2IdRE/sO1uaSgnX1JIBscLoMl1gOz1+qwhAQwBYaONqlBXuO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 09:37:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F37106573A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E708FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o839bQq5052514; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:37:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4C80C1D6.2050104@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:37:26 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100727 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gibblertron@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4c80af91.0XK7R1NzplpVQC/a%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4c80af91.0XK7R1NzplpVQC/a%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: 8.1: Cron ignoring crontab updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:37:28 -0000 On 09/03/10 09:19, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Chris Rees wrote: > >> You have to SIGHUP cron, not restart it. >> >> # killall -HUP cron > > Isn't crontab(1) supposed to do that, without separate intervention? From man cron > Additionally, cron checks each minute to see if its spool directory's > modification time (or the modification time on /etc/crontab) has changed, > and if it has, cron will then examine the modification time on all > crontabs and reload those which have changed. Thus cron need not be > restarted whenever a crontab file is modified. Note that the crontab(1) > command updates the modification time of the spool directory whenever it > changes a crontab. From the original post crontab seems to be working, so all I can suggest is to "ls -ld /var/cron/tabs" before and after using crontab -e and see if the modtime is being changed correctly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 09:41:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE39910657E1 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B2D8FC1C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so925246wwb.31 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:41:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w08Fa7srp33NwfcAlzpaSQrVxT9802OuD7zWTJ18JtI=; b=uLFPDzzJhpmsXcbhuLsHUNiBhPc7IuN0zYL+WWtCYE1yeWbIQkApOitmFykn5MqRv7 vRY1gMVINO5ToNELjhD20KaFiW00d1XXUtnJAMcR8yev0yXj2yJQI2C5kIrWOx1NXNu5 pL1SecfRo3Wp5ADFtpKXAMtDenwfKMsmbgtK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=N3lXIVDrS8tBbK5/B8TTOzxeshi7pz4g2xEofx0tbz6ZDCDKTJOP0X4MCrcmDZvY08 qnWPnxm+bjcGfn2g3cZgGzSKKx5FO7KKZuGq/pfJgfR9zz/7TsdDMyNEBapd0rph8Vtd 5DGCiJ9Fy3YBrQS4gIZbYbbHn8dtjdOWlu3gY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.37.193 with SMTP id y43mr394542wea.59.1283506895468; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.179.201 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 02:41:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:41:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: perryh@pluto.rain.com, FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: two ata-related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:41:37 -0000 Hi, For point no. "1" you can check if the drive is supported @ http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/hardware.html. Sorry, no idea about point no. "2" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 09:57:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EDD1065821 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04BA8FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrT1h-0007Rl-Qv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:57:41 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:57:41 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:57:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:57:30 +0200 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: Weird Linux - FreeBSD/ZFS NFSv4 interoperability problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:57:47 -0000 On 09/02/10 21:25, David Brodbeck wrote: > While doing some interoperability testing between Linux and FreeBSD, I > came up with this unusual issue. I could use some help figuring out > if this is a bug, and if so, where to file it. Here's the scenario: > > - FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE server, sharing a ZFS filesystem via NFSv4. I think that this is the beginning of your problems - even the developer who is working on NFSv4 says it's too experimental to be used in real world. > - Linux client (I've tested with RHEL 5.4 and Debian Lenny) mounting > said filesystem with NFSv4. > - A user on the Linux client does a Subversion checkout onto the > mounted filesystem. > > At the end of the checkout, access to the filesystem hangs. nfsd on > the FreeBSD server and rpciod on the Linux client seem to be in a > tight loop, and there's lots of network traffic between them. I can > reproduce this every time. > > The problem does not occur if the backing filesystem is UFS instead of > ZFS, if NFSv3 is used instead of NFSv4, or if the client is FreeBSD > instead of Linux. ... but you may have stumbled on something specific. I recommend you repeat this same post (and others you have on the similar topic) on the freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list, the developer (Rick Macklem) reads it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 10:19:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1756110657F9; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968FA8FC12; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrTN7-0002M5-Qo; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:19:50 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o83AJnvg004493; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:19:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o83AJnAE004492; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:19:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:19:49 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100903101949.GA4476@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Rob Farmer References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Cc: Rob Farmer Subject: emulators/open-vm-tools do not compile (was: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:19:53 -0000 El día Friday, September 03, 2010 a las 10:31:43AM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > The VM is a VMware player 3.0.0 which says about itself > Workstation 6.5-7.0 in the overview about the VM setup for FreeBSD; > is this fine enough for the emulators/open-vm-tools? > emulators/open-vm-tools does not compile: ... cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Werror -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c vfsops.c vfsops.c:118: error: conflicting types for 'VMBlockVFSMount' vfsops.c:70: error: previous declaration of 'VMBlockVFSMount' was here vfsops.c:259: error: conflicting types for 'VMBlockVFSUnmount' vfsops.c:74: error: previous declaration of 'VMBlockVFSUnmount' was here vfsops.c:343: error: conflicting types for 'VMBlockVFSRoot' vfsops.c:71: error: previous declaration of 'VMBlockVFSRoot' was here vfsops.c:379: error: conflicting types for 'VMBlockVFSStatFS' vfsops.c:73: error: previous declaration of 'VMBlockVFSStatFS' was here vfsops.c:389:64: error: macro "VFS_STATFS" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 vfsops.c: In function 'VMBlockVFSStatFS': vfsops.c:389: error: 'VFS_STATFS' undeclared (first use in this function) vfsops.c:389: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once vfsops.c:389: error: for each function it appears in.) vfsops.c: At top level: vfsops.c:429: error: conflicting types for 'VMBlockVFSSync' vfsops.c:72: error: previous declaration of 'VMBlockVFSSync' was here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-tools/work/open-vm-tools-2009.03.18-154848/modules/freebsd/vmblock. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-tools/work/open-vm-tools-2009.03.18-154848/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-tools/work/open-vm-tools-2009.03.18-154848. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-tools. Thanks for a hint matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 10:56:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02078106570C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4948FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbooklocal.local (lonfw01.namesco.net [195.7.254.100] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o83Au4IL018321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:56:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C80D443.3040409@unsane.co.uk> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:56:03 +0100 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsd References: <4AB42548-002B-41A5-8603-638CF97DC7E9@todoo.biz> In-Reply-To: <4AB42548-002B-41A5-8603-638CF97DC7E9@todoo.biz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Applying a patch to a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:56:09 -0000 On 03/09/2010 08:53, bsd wrote: > Hello, > > I have a patch for clamav that was submited by a developer of clamav. > I don't know how to apply It to the source code of the port. > > What I would like to do: > > 1. Get the source code > 2. cd to the source directory > 3. Apply the patch > 4. Recompile > 5. Test > > If this is ok, then as an option: > > 6. validate changes & updates > 7. submit patch to the FBSD port > Not too hard, the infrastructure for patching ports is there already. 1) cd /usr/ports/catagory/portname (obviously make this the port directory you want 2) make patch (this will fetch the source if you need it and extract it and apply any patches already needed/supplied ) 3) cd work (this is where the tarball is extracted.) and possibly into the clamav-$version directory 4) apply your patchfile :) 5) cd back into the port directory 6) make (or make install if you want to install it. All current patches are in the files directory of the port so you can use them as a template for naming etc so the port can automatically use you patch once your happy its working. The porters handbook is well worth a look though if your planing on doing much with a port. (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/) Vince > Thanks for your support. > > > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 12:51:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103B910657C4 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEDC8FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so1848041qwg.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:51:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l9MOMPwY6DEUc4eh2eREuQVpgkAlHhrh3T6rpPtT/ZY=; b=SAblHik3MK7nyViCdK+oOk4oX20e4E7/YSBgabSp7aYnlr1S9eIV3U9cs5IiNIwapu 1iDf4D2DFmt1bvhG7m4bZtDh95xL/kigGfHppTVco1WmZXoTjiyLt32o5vpcH7xYB3AJ eqnSPAydETxUyRoPyDNAutQOiUUyepRLD/FWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=L8Kl5jBdNxSNjui+B5Wnutso6gRNleUgyyEWRb40Fs+R36jds5yJXcL3YRMsNPeAkj 2P/B5XP1cD2GV5/xF8uVqikL1ICscOpzx1Se3w+yKlZcW+LN+t19UoStv5hWEvsLd5+7 NsRCOmbIjMRFlu9FOOH5JkhdiXFhhq/ZpxdRg= Received: by 10.229.250.203 with SMTP id mp11mr575742qcb.173.1283518272328; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f15sm1853481qcr.1.2010.09.03.05.51.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C80EF3C.8050509@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:51:08 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz , Rob Farmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, matusita@freebsd.org References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:51:14 -0000 Hi, On 9/3/10 4:31 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>> I'm trying to install the port /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 (even >>> the freshest from FreeBSD server) in 8-CURRENT: >> >> Do you have a particular reason for using this port? Assuming you mean >> 8.X, > > My FreeBSD is a CVS 8-CURRENT from May 2009 to be exactly, i.e. after > 8-RELEASE but before 8.1. > 9-CURRENT was after 8.0-RELEASE. Can you provide the output of 'uname -a'? Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 13:01:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6312B10656CA; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FDC8FC27; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrVtb-000254-CK; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:01:31 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o83D1U1N005383; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:01:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o83D1UVw005382; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:01:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:01:30 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100903130130.GA5324@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> <4C80EF3C.8050509@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4C80EF3C.8050509@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Cc: Subject: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:01:34 -0000 El día Friday, September 03, 2010 a las 08:51:08AM -0400, Glen Barber escribió: > Hi, > > On 9/3/10 4:31 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >>> I'm trying to install the port /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 (even > >>> the freshest from FreeBSD server) in 8-CURRENT: > >> > >> Do you have a particular reason for using this port? Assuming you mean > >> 8.X, > > > > My FreeBSD is a CVS 8-CURRENT from May 2009 to be exactly, i.e. after > > 8-RELEASE but before 8.1. > > > > 9-CURRENT was after 8.0-RELEASE. Can you provide the output of 'uname -a'? Of course: guru@current:~> uname -a FreeBSD current.Sisis.de 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #5: Sun Jan 10 09:55:14 CET 2010 guru@current.Sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 guru@current:~> ls -l /usr/src/CVS total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 654 28 may 2009 Entries -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4 19 may 2009 Repository -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 51 19 may 2009 Root -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 660 19 may 2009 Template As I said, the kernel and user land is based on what was in CVS in May 2009. Later I incorparated some new USB stuff, that's why the build is from Januar 2010. I tried to install the vmware-freebsd-tools.tar.gz directly as VMWare.com it provides (I have compat6x already installed for some other reason). But in vmware-freebsd-tools.tar.gz there are only kernel modules for FreeBSD 6 and 7 and using the modules for 7 it crashes, ofc. Who can I get the tools installed? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 13:11:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B994B10658AA for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D918FC1C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 13:11:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2010 13:11:04 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 983835084D; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:11:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:11:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> (perryh@pluto.rain.com's message of "Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:13:33 -0700") Message-ID: <44mxrzvuop.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: two ata-related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:11:04 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com writes: > Two questions about installing FreeBSD 8.1 on a Dell Precision 420 > (yes, I know it's old): I have a similar machine running as a lab tool. > 1. Should FreeBSD 8.1 be able to recognize a 100MB ATAPI Zip drive? > I'm not finding it in the dmesg, although BIOS Setup recognizes > it. (It and a CDROM are on the secondary IDE channel; I've tried > with each of them as master and either way the CD is recognized > but the Zip is not.) The default kernel definitely won't, but with the vpo device enabled, it probably will. There's a kernel module for that, so you can try "kldload vpo". > 2. It currently has the original A01 BIOS. I'm going to have to > update that, because it doesn't recognize the 320GB drive I've > added as a new boot drive. With the 320GB installed as unit 0 > (master) on the primary IDE channel, the A01 BIOS won't even > recognize the previously-working 40GB drive which is now unit 1; > so the BIOS disables that channel entirely keeping FreeBSD from > seeing those drives either. > > A BIOS upgrade should be straightforward, but while Googling > I ran into a posting where someone apparently had a lot of > trouble with a BIOS upgrade for one of these of boxes. Thus > the question: Has anyone here had any experience, either good > or bad, with running FreeBSD on one of these with an upgraded > BIOS? If so, which version? I found A06, A07, A10, A11, and > A13 on Dell's FTP site. A01 gave me a bunch of problems, although I don't really remember the details (it was more than five years ago!) at this point. BIOS upgrades were no problem at all. I stopped upgrading the BIOS once everything worked -- at least, everything I noticed. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 12:53:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C533F10656C3 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ltsampros@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AB68FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so767314yxn.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:53:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=kTKVuljLTX279BwB8dvnswJ9g6g/TvZrgJU9tuBuVJI=; b=cpfJu6ItpRiIHnJOgIwMu7ZuJPV04R3eBerQMtafUYsxhWVILa1oVpi0HspbKvPPlS GmKLODsrevk0dZslTDW/1UXE4cPOCqhZWfCn2Up8EYVfLf0FkePt583ayoGH93z2GV3o X2pkJigBsjiJ4CzHIMSN8vTj7sVph8L4ZCM9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=ZkUDh/2gRhUkyJOz9BAA63CGPTUC5BqWvIbScWYbS1K9ftBUtorpQ63th9Cy2QGlcP W/AP7kTPrxNPfl8gajh4VN4m97IK+PhRKGWuuURCNAbtgDl8Mw8o6yG+5Vxd3cC6AuXW AZb45tHZdyeWeuHA38gnYklwH23D+GNQ2nSQQ= Received: by 10.100.6.2 with SMTP id 2mr859868anf.39.1283516702936; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ltsampros-laptop (vader.bytemobile-rio.ondsl.gr [83.235.57.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a33sm688752vco.41.2010.09.03.05.24.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Leonidas Tsampros Received: from ltsampros-laptop (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ltsampros-laptop (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA5940383; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:20:40 +0300 (EEST) From: Leonidas Tsampros To: bsd In-Reply-To: <4AB42548-002B-41A5-8603-638CF97DC7E9@todoo.biz> (bsd@todoo.biz's message of "Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:53:19 +0200") References: <4AB42548-002B-41A5-8603-638CF97DC7E9@todoo.biz> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:20:31 +0300 Message-ID: <8762ynxblc.fsf@ltsampros-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:26:09 +0000 Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Applying a patch to a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:53:18 -0000 bsd writes: > Hello, > > I have a patch for clamav that was submited by a developer of clamav. > I don't know how to apply It to the source code of the port. > > What I would like to do: > > 1. Get the source code > 2. cd to the source directory > 3. Apply the patch > 4. Recompile > 5. Test Hi, as a starting point you could follow this procedure: a) cd /usr/ports/security/clamav b) make extract c) cd work/clamav-whatever-version d) patch -p0 < the.patch.file.provided.by.the.clamav.developer.diff e) cd ../.. f) make install (as usual) Hope this helps. Best Regards Leonidas Tsampros From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 13:29:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A752B1065842 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EEF8FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-61-120.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.61.120]:38255 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1OrWKe-0008Ca-Cd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:29:31 +0200 Received: (qmail 71579 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 15:29:25 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 3 Sep 2010 15:29:25 +0200 Received: (qmail 71089 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Sep 2010 15:29:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:29:25 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100903132925.GA71022@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <44mxrzvuop.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44mxrzvuop.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.61.120 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1OrWKe-0008Ca-Cd. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net 1OrWKe-0008Ca-Cd 816a52f64420542813b6ebe5552eef0b Subject: Re: two ata-related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:29:37 -0000 On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:11:02AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > perryh@pluto.rain.com writes: > > > Two questions about installing FreeBSD 8.1 on a Dell Precision 420 > > (yes, I know it's old): > > I have a similar machine running as a lab tool. > > > 1. Should FreeBSD 8.1 be able to recognize a 100MB ATAPI Zip drive? > > I'm not finding it in the dmesg, although BIOS Setup recognizes > > it. (It and a CDROM are on the secondary IDE channel; I've tried > > with each of them as master and either way the CD is recognized > > but the Zip is not.) > > The default kernel definitely won't, but with the vpo device enabled, it > probably will. There's a kernel module for that, so you can try > "kldload vpo". Why would you need vpo for an ATAPI device? It is only for parallell devices. You should only need the 'ata' and 'atapifd' devices (both of whoch are included in GENERIC) to handle an ATAPI Zip drive. So, yes, FreeBSD 8.1 *should* be able to recognize an ATAPI Zip drive. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 13:56:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2674D106580E for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com (mailout-us.gmx.com [74.208.5.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D68948FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Sep 2010 13:56:05 -0000 Received: from 205-156-36-56.ssmcnet.noaa.gov (EHLO OHD12-8384.nws.noaa) [205.156.36.56] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us005) with SMTP; 03 Sep 2010 09:56:05 -0400 X-Authenticated: #50283380 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX182gCc/mPw2OHrae9V8GTXaZcwV4rNrKWLhMid7Fb KoGc229EDdrZmV Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:55:59 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) From: Xihong Yin To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44tym89rul.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: References: <201009012243.57415.mike.jeays@rogers.com> <44tym89rul.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Mike Jeays , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error - ad2: FAILURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:56:07 -0000 Thanks for the info. Now I am getting more such error messages and the disk fails at boot when trying to mount on /usr. Xihong On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Mike Jeays writes: > >> On September 1, 2010 10:29:42 pm Xihong Yin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I received the following error when I try to access files in some of the >>> directories in /usr and when the computer boots. ad2s1f is mounted on >>> /usr. >>> >>> ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40 >>> LBA=37370159 g_vfs_done():ad2s1f[READ(offset=15415558144, >>> length=16384)]error = 5 >>> >>> Is this a sign of hard drive failure? Can I fix the error or do I have to >>> replace the hard drive? > >> I would think it is a hardware error, and the disk has run out of replacement >> sectors. If possible, it should be replaced, and any valuable data copied to >> somewhere safe, as soon as possible. > > Not necessarily. This is a read error, so replacement sectors wouldn't > help anyway. The problematic files might get fixed by the disk if they > were rewritten. A SMART report (e.g., from sysutils/smartmontools) > might give more information about the condition of the drive. > > None of which is to say that it isn't worrying, or that backing up > valuable data isn't called for (even more so than usual). Make sure you > have good backups before you do anything else. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 14:04:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C7F10656AB for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C378FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13932 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 14:04:49 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2010 14:04:48 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8FABD5084D; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:04:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Xihong Yin References: <201009012243.57415.mike.jeays@rogers.com> <44tym89rul.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:04:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Xihong Yin's message of "Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:55:59 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)") Message-ID: <44eidax6rk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error - ad2: FAILURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:04:49 -0000 Xihong Yin writes: > Thanks for the info. Now I am getting more such error messages and the > disk fails at boot when trying to mount on /usr. On the chance the disk can be saved, you may want to try the manufacturer's diagnostics. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 14:10:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A69B10657CD for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9C38FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o83EAfOB020540 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:10:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009031410.o83EAfOB020540@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20535.1283523041.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:10:41 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Boot Drive Nomenclature and How to Figure it out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:10:51 -0000 I have been writing a script to build a system from a mfsboot startup and it is going well but I want to revisit part of the script that I don't think I did a very good job with. Is there an automatic way to tell which of the devices shown in /dev is a likely system drive? This is before anything is mounted. We can usually figure it out ourselves, but is there a way for a script to figure out automatically which character device could be the one we are going to put the OS on and use as our boot drive? I know this sounds really obvious and you can tell scripts not to use /dev/acdx as they are CDROM devices, but system drives can actually take many different names depending on whether they are RAIDs SCSI IDE, etc. Any good suggestions are appreciated. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 14:10:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84EA10657ED for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+568311.35247039.273946@icpbounce.com) Received: from drone6.rtp.icpbounce.com (drone6.rtp.icpbounce.com [74.202.227.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859E28FC19 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drone6.rtp.icpbounce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B46D8E316 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:51:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:51:30 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: "Louie Bernstein" Message-ID: <5915c5906dc90bbc6bdd19f5182c4738@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer (phpmailer.codeworxtech.com) [version 2.2] Errors-To: bounces+568311.35247039.273946@icpbounce.com X-List-Unsubscribe: X-Unsubscribe-Web: X-ICPINFO: X-Return-Path-Hint: bounces+568311.35247039.273946@icpbounce.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FWD: High Performance Custom Fields for Multi-Tenant SaaS Architectures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:10:52 -0000 Thought you might find this interesting and, hopefully helpful Subscriber. Another article written by our CEO, Sanjay Bhatia. High Performance Custom Fields for Multi-Tenant SaaS Architectures This article shows a simple way to give applications with [1]multi-tenant architectures the ability to add custom fields while keeping the performance, type safety and [2]reporting capabilities of the relational model and SQL language. SaaS Takes Over the ASP Model In the late 90's application service providers started leveraging the availability of abundant bandwidth and the popularity of the web to deliver applications in an [3]ASP model. Essentially the application would be hosted on a shared server and managed by the ASP. While this was a step in the right direction, there were still significant challenges with this approach. These models evolved into what is now knows as Software as a Service or [4]SaaS. SaaS architectures introduced multi-tenancy which allowed pools of high powered resources to be shared in a different way. Rather than customers having their own web server and database, a shared infrastructure served dozens or sometimes thousands of customers. The Customization Requirement Businesses generally need some level of customization for all their software. The most common need is to store information that is specific to that business, but may not be something every single customer needs to have. For instance, we are a [5]salesforce.com customer. For all our leads, we track the download date so when know when a lead has [6]downloaded a trial of our [7]self-service reporting product for evaluation purposes. Since most [8]salesforce.com customers do not have downloadable trials, it would not make sense for them add this just for us. If you did that in a multi-tenant environment, you'd quickly end up with a data architecture that is unwieldy from a maintenance perspective. Instead, salesforce let's us add custom fields that are relevant to us. They've done a great job of engineering the system so the custom fields work pretty much like a stock field that the system ships with. If you are working on a SaaS application, you will likely run into the same scenario. Inevitably, customers needed the ability to extend the applications. Since there was a shared code base and schema, vendors needed to find a way to deliver this functionality without changing the database schema which was shared across all customers. Two main approaches became popular. Two Popular Methods Method Description Advantages Disadvantages [9]Entity Attribute Value(EAV) This method uses name-value pairs Single universal schema across all tenants. Eliminates all advantages of using a relational database. Special Code must be written to access the data. Significant performance and scalability problems with large data sets or objects with a large number of fields. Reporting becomes nearly impossible Custom Joined Table This method adds a secondary table per tenant and which will be joined. Relatively high performance Retains the benefits of SQL technology Does not scale to a large number of tenants. The number of custom tables becomes impossible to manage and administer. The application schema must change at run time. There Is A Better Way One way to retain all the benefits of the relational model without adding lots of customer-specific tables is to use a single, generic table to store the data and a second table to map it to customer specific fields. Since databases optimize types differently, we will create a set of columns for each time. Note that under this approach we do have a limit to the number of maximum fields there are. For extrely large systems, you may want to break each type up into a separate table. Create script for custom fields table. CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CustomFields]( [TenantID] [int], [TableName] [varchar](50), [EntityID] [int], [Int1] [int] NULL, [Int2] [int] NULL, [Int3] [int] NULL, [String1] [varchar](50) NULL, [String2] [varchar](50) NULL, [String3] [varchar](50) NULL, [DateTime1] [datetime] NULL, [DateTime2] [datetime] NULL, [DateTime3] [datetime] NULL ) ON [PRIMARY] This table will store the actual data. The TenantID field locks the data to that particular account or customer in a multi-tenant system with a shared database. TableName represents the name of the table where the entity is stored. The EntityID is the primary key of whatever object this links to. The rest of the fields store actual data based on the type of the field. So if we just created a Lead in our [10]CRM system and needed to record a download date as a custom field our insert would look something like this. INSERT INTO CustomFields( TenantID, TableName, EntityID, DateTime1) VALUES (1,'Leads',1,'08/18/2010') To retrieve the data we would do a LEFT JOIN. This lets us retrieve any custom fields. SELECT * FROM Leads LEFT JOIN CustomFields ON Leads.TenantID=CustomFields.TenantID AND TableName='Leads' AND EntityID=LeadID Next we need the ability to map or alias the name into a more meaningful label. We would do this in the user interface or reporting tool [11]dynamically . To do so we'd need to store the "metadata" whenever a custom field is created. Here's what our tracking table looks like. CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CustomFieldNames]( [TenantID] [int] NULL, [TableName] [varchar](50) NULL, [FieldIndex] [int] NULL, [Type] [varchar](50) NULL, [Label] [varchar](50) NULL ) ON [PRIMARY] To setup our "Download Date" field, we would use an insert like this the first time the field is setup. INSERT INTO CustomFieldNames( TenantID, TableName, FieldIndex, [Type], Label) VALUES (1,'Leads',1,'datetime','Download Date') Essentially this would map to DateTime1 and the application UI or [12]reporting tool would [13]alias the field name dynamically based on which tenant the user belonged to. Conclusion We now have the entire data architecture capable of storing custom fields for our multi-tenant application. Each customer can have their own set of custom fields. Best of all, we keep all the benefits of the relational model and can plug this directly into a reporting tool like Izenda. The only overhead is a single join and adding an index will remove most of that. Could you use a better Ad Hoc Reporting platform? To download a fully-functional version of Izenda Reports and Dashboards [14]click here. (C)opywrite 2010 Izenda LLC References 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-tenant 2. http://www.izenda.com/ 3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_service_provider 4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SaaS 5. http://www.salesforce.com/ 6. http://www.izenda.com/Site/ContentReg.aspx?rt=Download 7. http://www.izenda.com/ 8. http://salesforce.com/ 9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity-attribute-value_model 10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_relationship_management 11. http://www.izenda.com/Site/KB/CodeSamples/Create-Custom-Field-Aliases?Keywords=fieldaliases 12. http://www.izenda.com/ 13. http://www.izenda.com/Site/KB/CodeSamples/Create-Custom-Field-Aliases?Keywords=fieldaliases 14. http://www.izenda.com/ This message was sent by: Izenda, 75 5th Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30308 To be removed click here: http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=35247039&l=10516&s=X0JT&m=273946&c=568311 Forward to a friend: http://app.icontact.com/icp/core/message/forward?m=273946&s=35247039&c=X0JT&cid=568311 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 14:33:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46301065747 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554448FC19 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1290688fxm.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:33:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MmFOxNv8fglnFawk5m9OU8R1raa54ahIUCGwfWhhfGI=; b=Fo2y1YdTKCud9VrPKk/3kLI4D14DJ33U6bY64YVZWSUYHrBPY/kDl3GXgjUfNSvjLT aNoIBpIXt+GXHWLlD3lRt8Pevevw7dxfmfosMSqMhFWiDDi0tumjo4qYEnzIe3yFeNxp 9Abtg6RM3j6ABGyxz2Pi0Zl4S0032T16PBtY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TK2yKNMbyQIJhBU6XWfbY6zjUSZMSzw4BSvJf18J35TauAzlrRMCvAp7qsmyCDyRFs RmoXXSEuaQvkeT1hl0oRC0z9O3JlArtqU3mpJpDOtK9gz8aQiO+0neesz+tWJZyC63Rj CVcIL2no6pnrHGtH4bWm+t9Fe+oRvtiMzoHWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.121.136 with SMTP id h8mr820635far.17.1283524401309; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.147 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:33:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009031410.o83EAfOB020540@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <201009031410.o83EAfOB020540@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:33:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Martin McCormick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot Drive Nomenclature and How to Figure it out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:33:23 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > I have been writing a script to build a system from a > mfsboot startup and it is going well but I want to revisit part > of the script that I don't think I did a very good job with. > > Is there an automatic way to tell which of the devices > shown in /dev is a likely system drive? This is before anything > is mounted. > > We can usually figure it out ourselves, but is there a > way for a script to figure out automatically which character > device could be the one we are going to put the OS on and use as > our boot drive? > > I know this sounds really obvious and you can tell > scripts not to use /dev/acdx as they are CDROM devices, but > system drives can actually take many different names depending > on whether they are RAIDs SCSI IDE, etc. > > Any good suggestions are appreciated. > Would doing something like: gpart list help? -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 14:37:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935771065713 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25EC18FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27760 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Sep 2010 14:37:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283524638; bh=Yp35fvjoqj54MCSKD8ECm8zUGU5qzBDv8R1GQuRBUGk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MONtyp3RJo9uTvbjQMQVt0YkKY+pgfxcMJdcj2choHn5qxpy117ijA81jwGZS7itzkyRMEe+9VdpAkulel305e8HU7KckqIqZqbg5+Q7ERkvCjdhPyCHJlYCcJozeqgjLSAziJAymFsj+fzRyLQ49pwueE+fUbYqNblLAkwN7gE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uXIXfhlycMWlqKhYogBmmGIrPoA98RHgBL033v9zdjpj22q0U1eTJlWdW4LgR6NtGTOCPbsSZoA1bm5SitZ7cC7BJ8hJqKZIVZGGSsh5QxBH/ZsM67Ve6pfa/goxI/yr19LIy+zDQLaNj71Yiau/HTtdxAtFvpHS2lhUZLio+4c=; Message-ID: <182172.27725.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4kXZl_4VM1lw48a8kZrVZGdaFIHHd_PKcs8A2z0DJmM84tw q2l153Yk0spv9BT5ZEWTRgZpK_q.D.n2UhYDR97DEfhUSMlpnUxwCj1yO183 6AIBFgcGsaVUpbelSpRgz6q33NgPSgCvIhqk7kYvXw524hwIWyLsjXqZOngI t_2lax4Ev0RZbBJNfVEoexzd79snhJgVR5NylnYEwCoK5ZImRxcNTKiaXkvz PByRbERl1zNrf2QE7BW6hgkpSAJD51qM829uYi_Y45iGmfWJC7fAKge0Bt0L voqFylMDvh24w83ZYs8Vha2tieaKyQA-- Received: from [209.22.88.90] by web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:37:17 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:37:17 -0700 (PDT) From: gahn To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: CARP and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:37:25 -0000 Hi, all: Is carp a part of freebsd 8.1? or I have to download from somewhere and install it? Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 15:13:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E341065740 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashley@cpufight.com) Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com (hapkido.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6E8FC1A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.5]) by hapkido.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B4517AE64 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C6DB8074 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:48:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cpufight.com; h=message-id :in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=cpufight.com; b=MgGoe6gur4QVTm37v7CD5CJlnTnjfqLW3YbSpnAbo8bahdqQabWeZN8PCMgum a/vMree6euVFYN0G9zy9e8E7Jh26xwdO0tdSibMEAWJcpYEysNfZGKL2w0xo+F9M KrNmoMOB9/SX9gkQKL9V8PbklKZ/7Rq0Bwy0sGrLaIKst8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cpufight.com; h=message-id :in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=cpufight.com; bh=LEtn AXy0BLw1HOdUERjsmBqrmJs=; b=AvyYZ8NMm2zkSbsHdq79ogY3eRsj/Cf/BeXv Tpfk7ViVNWpXlU3G3MVOhywXlKASmoX1iev2Z/LwFJMn+LVWY32jhmxy6luiJzji ore53/A5aGVj2GovsVMi82Ws8fXzlSCz7U57/cNGRUZz3VzRaeeLJ94FZGCjOokT FkDCWkc= Received: from webmail.cpufight.com (caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.207]) (Authenticated sender: ashley@cpufight.com) by homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 80220B8072 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 96.236.157.212 (proxying for 96.236.157.212) (SquirrelMail authenticated user ashley@cpufight.com) by webmail.cpufight.com with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:48:28 -0700 Message-ID: <8697205d22ac213b7e3794537eabd92f.squirrel@webmail.cpufight.com> In-Reply-To: <182172.27725.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <182172.27725.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:48:28 -0700 From: ashley@cpufight.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: CARP and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:13:38 -0000 > Hi, all: > > Is carp a part of freebsd 8.1? or I have to download from somewhere and > install it? > > Thanks in advance > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The FreeBSD hand book says: To enable support for CARP, the FreeBSD kernel must be rebuilt with the following option: device carp (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/carp.html) It's indicated as covering FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE and FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE so you should be OK. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 15:14:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493FF10656FA for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@x.it.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195D88FC1D for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o83F4Hdt097382 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:04:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@x.it.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009031504.o83F4Hdt097382@x.it.okstate.edu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <97380.1283526256.1@x.it.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:04:17 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Boot Drive Nomenclature and How to Figure it out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:14:50 -0000 Adam Vande More writes: > Would doing something like: > > gpart list > > help? Thank you. I have never heard of gpart before so I gave it a try and that helps very much if the drive is already formatted. Most of these drives I plan to encounter will be formatted so this basically solves the problem but it raises a new question. If one does gpart list as suggested and the disk is formatted, one gets exactly the information necessary. I believe it is even the first line of output. It doesn't get better than that. If the disk is not corrected formatted such as might happen with corruption or maybe a new drive, gpart list executes silently and prints nothing on the output. As I said, you answered my question so many thanks. The new question might best be put: Okay, if nothing is there, where did gpart look to see nothing? Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 15:16:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4E410656C2 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8BA8FC1D for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so921459gxk.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:16:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LiDH64vySYtBlOvffyE8RIJDJAeLtvfZBqYmqbuR0aU=; b=SN35nbJeYSb2SVYXZKurzsKjJOiEwryLO5T9spkW+nGPSVaPpQG2kMa/H0mWHkIF3l /U0R2rjGkUnFqJNnos0G4oyQZtZufyHlJh4WSF7Wo5X1+gX514YCC0PT/GwIKf9nTZqp 7el7bkfO3KLWjCyq5dE7Sld5o9zkczhxDNJJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UeXE0i6LyR3G3klpCf+CgOBE4H/hF6GFVeVnsAB8m49hCgHlv5aqW26SRg7bUo/EwS 1Ic1WZHYlwmroC5gRWPrHT4eAcakMLa720XV2gNstYriIFFquX0jyPbkY0eYtHMy0N8H PZNeCQO95AeMxn7lICIWffCQemrOFxDFcQiZc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.32.17 with SMTP id f17mr22281agf.173.1283525362816; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.215.3 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:49:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <182172.27725.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <182172.27725.qm@web52302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:49:22 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: gahn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: CARP and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:16:36 -0000 On 3 September 2010 10:37, gahn wrote: > Is carp a part of freebsd 8.1? or I have to download from somewhere and install it? Everything you could want to know about CARP and FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/carp.html On my 8.1 box - fbsdsroute0# sysctl net.inet.carp.allow sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.carp.allow' So I can't say for certain but I would hazard the guess that it is not included in the GENERIC kernel. Alas, there is documentation for rebuilding your kernel, too: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig.html kmw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 15:41:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F2A1065895 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DD48FC22 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1368262fxm.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:41:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AEp//7DwwMSXfUSeKqjHO70f9lfvc4JLtDHzt2jPIes=; b=mm3adefMxwQ/w6vIk0fXfSHEBo4NAtTWXdJzvI6J3FF//G7XEoCldbv7XFSYHFORnT 1CVsbnGXnHds/Nfjd9dWRZVf9qE+TdfY/FZt7sDF2cvjnzEEq8bIwggJO1av6Of2R/xl qa+KyGJF8oQ7HDZoUwxIIMDYh2hh7c9rdyQL0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=W8ztWrdr9m/1W3x501txoCAd+tqjvrAzB+s5NZ1DDOCAI2wHHqb/X6ynegqaK1h4sC 5JKCzFSInJh/rLrfLrv22d9P4VQr06UTomaOLqQ46HMNdey+Sd6GZaPL0bO4eqFMPVo1 e24SzoEl3UGQjuxIJbQpi8FDdGMzI9+vVYBUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.116.6 with SMTP id k6mr28880faq.49.1283528473178; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.147 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:41:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009031504.o83F4Hdt097382@x.it.okstate.edu> References: <201009031504.o83F4Hdt097382@x.it.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:41:13 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Martin McCormick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot Drive Nomenclature and How to Figure it out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:41:15 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > Thank you. I have never heard of gpart before so I gave > it a try and that helps very much if the drive is already > formatted. Most of these drives I plan to encounter will be > formatted so this basically solves the problem but it raises a > new question. If one does > > gpart list as suggested and the disk is formatted, one gets > exactly the information necessary. I believe it is even the > first line of output. It doesn't get better than that. If the > disk is not corrected formatted such as might happen with > corruption or maybe a new drive, gpart list executes silently > and prints nothing on the output. > > As I said, you answered my question so many thanks. The > new question might best be put: > > Okay, if nothing is there, where did gpart look to see nothing? > I believe gpart checks the geom sector which the last one of a particular geom class. The sector is written anytime the geom device is added or updated. This applies only to geom devices which are hardcoded. For example, /dev/ad0 and /dev/ad0p1 would both be seperate geom classes and have their own meta-data sector. FWIW, the only suitable hard disk devices I know of are: /dev/ad{0-9} /dev/ada{0-9} /dev/da{0-9} If you're writing a test, I would probably grep dmesg for the presence of one of them. The first device appearance is probably a prime candidate for installation target. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 15:57:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2CC1065874 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6214D8FC21 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so2140364qyk.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.80.15 with SMTP id r15mr889974qck.95.1283529453463; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.214.199 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.158.135] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:57:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Weird Linux - FreeBSD/ZFS NFSv4 interoperability problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:57:34 -0000 Thanks, Ivan. I'll pursue it there. If it's not ready for prime time yet, I understand, but I'd also like to help nudge it in that direction. :) On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 09/02/10 21:25, David Brodbeck wrote: >> >> While doing some interoperability testing between Linux and FreeBSD, I >> came up with this unusual issue. =A0I could use some help figuring out >> if this is a bug, and if so, where to file it. =A0Here's the scenario: >> >> - FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE server, sharing a ZFS filesystem via NFSv4. > > I think that this is the beginning of your problems - even the developer = who > is working on NFSv4 says it's too experimental to be used in real world. > >> - Linux client (I've tested with RHEL 5.4 and Debian Lenny) mounting >> said filesystem with NFSv4. >> - A user on the Linux client does a Subversion checkout onto the >> mounted filesystem. >> >> At the end of the checkout, access to the filesystem hangs. =A0nfsd on >> the FreeBSD server and rpciod on the Linux client seem to be in a >> tight loop, and there's lots of network traffic between them. =A0I can >> reproduce this every time. >> >> The problem does not occur if the backing filesystem is UFS instead of >> ZFS, if NFSv3 is used instead of NFSv4, or if the client is FreeBSD >> instead of Linux. > > ... but you may have stumbled on something specific. I recommend you repe= at > this same post (and others you have on the similar topic) on the freebsd-= fs > at freebsd.org mailing list, the developer (Rick Macklem) reads it. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 15:58:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C268810656DE for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from editor@d3photography.com) Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4B08FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2E0D1f0061wfjNsA2FyHeh; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:58:17 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2FyB1f00E02K3z28jFyFz2; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:58:16 +0000 From: Ryan Coleman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:58:10 -0500 Message-Id: To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: Which of these NICs will work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:58:17 -0000 Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new system but = I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet. = http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=3DENE&N=3D100010064+= 600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=3D&ShowDeactivatedMark=3DFalse&Confi= gurator=3D&IsNodeId=3D1&Subcategory=3D27&description=3D&Ntk=3D&CFG=3D&SpeT= abStoreType=3D&srchInDesc=3D Basically, this machine will have two external (real-world) IPs and one = network LAN (10.0.1.0/24) address, finding three-NIC motherboards is not = exactly possible so this is my alternative. I'm looking for FreeBSD 7-9 support. Rather run 8.1-RELEASE (same as my = other two machines right now). Thanks, Ryan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 16:08:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2784710656BF for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:08:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elifan2007@ya.ru) Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [95.108.253.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3C88FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (smtp19.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.19]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id E64DA5D11329 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:52:31 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1283529151; bh=jlsjdJIX4aVTAO4d28ul64FidfMHLcIREuJJYBkJTCY=; h=Date:From:Message-ID:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bhvnT1tnUb+Z5L6obv0Q7bfnfh9h1ObPWPc4/59+tmwhGj85H8fVvGDHsQSSf+pI/ kn1RvLm3kURBlxXraQkPllT8Q3TpeDTYmAWSqpD+QFEknbgQ7NA+6g0vBPKbIqqLCq IPK/yus/quUxl+VEOui9al6Hi/v4IP4mnamt/H3Q= Received: from [88.85.88.6] (unknown [94.76.233.167]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 4957628700A0 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:52:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:52:20 +0300 From: Elifan X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <84614688.20100903185220@ya.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1283529151 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp19.mail.yandex.net Subject: i386 to amd64 migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:08:08 -0000 Hello, I have experience in freebsd but never did such system architecture migration. Is it possible to do safely with only SSH access (or IP-KVM)? I'm planning to upgrade system from 7.2 to 7.3 but it's i386.. Regards, Elifan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 16:26:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911C2106585F for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B3A8FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1419473fxm.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:26:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TXEnuWj5IMMIO+tLyrYVfQboCaKBFVZGMwj0YOmw1xQ=; b=eyEsXOARDD1S9BiM1wFIOiUA8pwAdMT309nhvcdTI7QAqxW4ydN2mbJhRyJLM+Xyad 5RU+NZcyM3zHWPcKgGmv6X50vvfaq+s/0Yap4qiv5G/0h/6cq0/7SIMDztuCMzGayz0x IEYVe6jaTzNfROPIoloql5b+gylPSJ0q2pQjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vEdP1NzhSJHM4IbeZzdCGDEEOBdpfI1BEyzbBYJJV9fOe6uSjNy/x18uCtBCxEq6TP 8XWr7PIFWJyhTzQjCMyf8XXHmEx9h1kieCApYnWTPlLQ5hzm/55B/JmSpvtjQW5TOG5b wHusOTOES1h0OOHdVyhoPtF2KAtzwc8SxKw7A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.161.71 with SMTP id v49mr847042wek.94.1283531186907; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.179.201 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84614688.20100903185220@ya.ru> References: <84614688.20100903185220@ya.ru> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:26:26 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: Elifan , FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: i386 to amd64 migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:26:28 -0000 AFAIK,basically .... no x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64 Non-basically ... yes but it's a real pain in the @$$ and you will definitely run in all kinds of trouble. ip you have KVM access, just put a x64 DVD inside and do a clean install (it will keep your sanity intact) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 17:27:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00ACD10656B0 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43B78FC15 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so2160972qwg.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tkloA6Xrtv4V3eFEprKKLoIr2AHmHkmYD5lP2VzNvF4=; b=XW1SuKr/NYWgtNaAgLgv6j9bm5voB6HPd/n2PYLjB87DZjfnfPeM+3FD9K659sC9Mi OyIchE15/ekpDW3MqQGM4gsiz/9422Pi9SEXZgSPTy6gIWdPo4Nt8/vOccS5C4G6bcDX p1GR6WbmtpUf309z/3Hn1OhcIK4oboRK5Lsy0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sDok3zgZZOCOUHBRP/Sv/qfEILwmjHLkjEDYFyGmmMfM9veX5njQze0rO4nVCEgShy 4JE2q5pzdJLsDWJyFET44cx+Ko9QQgQF4RZLpzpJq00jXTsz1QchOzWNU232aLx7TcwK 56Qz/kgP/ih1Sat2AvAvKXBzQm5VZkCA4jg/k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.104.4 with SMTP id m4mr216142qao.76.1283534843542; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.20.74 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C80C1D6.2050104@qeng-ho.org> References: <4c80af91.0XK7R1NzplpVQC/a%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4C80C1D6.2050104@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:27:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: patrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: 8.1: Cron ignoring crontab updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:27:25 -0000 Yes, it's definitely updating: [root@juno /var/cron/tabs]# ls -ald /var/cron/tabs drwx------ 2 root wheel 512 Sep 2 12:49 /var/cron/tabs And after editing my crontab: [root@juno /var/cron/tabs]# ls -ald /var/cron/tabs drwx------ 2 root wheel 512 Sep 3 10:25 /var/cron/tabs I've been using FreeBSD since version 4, and this has never once been an issue, nor is this an issue on a system with a fresh install of 8.1. Patrick On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 09/03/10 09:19, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> >> Chris Rees =A0wrote: >> >>> You have to SIGHUP cron, not restart it. >>> >>> # killall -HUP cron >> >> Isn't crontab(1) supposed to do that, without separate intervention? > > From man cron > >> =A0 =A0 Additionally, cron checks each minute to see if its spool direct= ory's >> =A0 =A0 modification time (or the modification time on /etc/crontab) has >> changed, >> =A0 =A0 and if it has, cron will then examine the modification time on a= ll >> =A0 =A0 crontabs and reload those which have changed. =A0Thus cron need = not be >> =A0 =A0 restarted whenever a crontab file is modified. =A0Note that the >> crontab(1) >> =A0 =A0 command updates the modification time of the spool directory whe= never >> it >> =A0 =A0 changes a crontab. > > From the original post crontab seems to be working, so all I can suggest > is to "ls -ld /var/cron/tabs" before and after using crontab -e and see > if the modtime is being changed correctly. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 17:32:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C73810656C3 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434E78FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2010 13:32:54 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AOQ17942; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:32:53 -0400 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2010 13:32:53 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19585.12609.782477.654588@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:32:49 -0400 To: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Which of these NICs will work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:32:55 -0000 Ryan Coleman writes: > Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new > system but I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet. > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&IsNodeId=1&Subcategory=27&description=&Ntk=&CFG=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc= > > Basically, this machine will have two external (real-world) IPs > and one network LAN (10.0.1.0/24) address, finding three-NIC > motherboards is not exactly possible so this is my alternative. Intel network cards have a very good reputation; I have been running a dual-port Pro/1000 GT for years and the thing is still a rock. Others will have a better opinion on performance issues. The Intel employee who maintains the driver is frequently seen on current@ and occasionally on questions@. Nice guy, very responsive. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 18:40:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D2410656A8 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56AB8FC14 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so2165974bwz.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:40:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kyo/03deT9lHO2RrxDh/9d+Lj3ZccHhOxdr7u//1KL4=; b=PzIWe85NcMLdj204CUlEPDAt6E66rOsOkDJkvkKr7JYmGTbHxSQ6Bu2gD53p0YJoYV 7mjxBMriGq7KJAsRAp5qXJQamSxicwk+V87DOQKW6Y4wGrs0hXn5Gj5HV7NYcojg7t8p RYrqnfd2UKsitLD6ueb2F5xqRdg80Y23pTGzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eWpmJFHHnbefUH7W33PzBXGfPPriOXVCk0JNM4QLeTjESgPCYUThj4yohjeF2mkOye urq/4Iyxc8V5VYJulK3/HRBMIxKxr+u7+lAwuj5K+RF1CUQ/hFlV+jc8u8YbloNYfjqZ 4q4c39nHOjlYIpW3VOxSPXC1p4U80Egs4z1uQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.160.90 with SMTP id m26mr63510bkx.45.1283539201363; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.80.167 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:40:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100816225715.GA35248@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20100816181703.GB66710@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100816225715.GA35248@slackbox.erewhon.net> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Roland Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watch(8) does not work in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:40:04 -0000 2010/8/17 Roland Smith : > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:09:23AM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> > Does /dev/pts/0 actually exist in the jail's devfs instance, and are i= ts >> > permissions correct? >> > >> >> (In jail) : >> >> # ls -l /dev/pts/* >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A094 17 Aug 00:= 06 /people/dev/pts/0 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A096 17 Aug 00:= 06 /people/dev/pts/1 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 101 21 Jul 00:= 07 /people/dev/pts/2 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 108 17 Aug 00:06 /p= eople/dev/pts/3 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A099 16 Aug 01:= 28 /people/dev/pts/4 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 112 17 Aug 00:05 /p= eople/dev/pts/5 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 111 17 Aug 00:= 06 /people/dev/pts/6 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 114 16 Aug 23:= 53 /people/dev/pts/7 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 100 17 Aug 00:= 06 /people/dev/pts/8 > > I think you mounted your devfs incorrectly or you started the jail in the > wrong directory. If ls is run inside the jail, it should be /dev/pts/N, n= ot > /people/dev/pts/N! > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.xs4all.n= l/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 =C2=A0B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321= A725) > Sorry I made a mistake while I was writing. In fact there is the permissions in the jail : markand@Orange ~ $ sudo jexec 1 tcsh # su - People# ls -l /dev/pts/* crw--w---- 1 zazak tty 0, 118 3 Sep 20:39 /dev/pts/0 crw--w---- 1 zazak tty 0, 99 3 Sep 07:07 /dev/pts/4 crw--w---- 1 zazak tty 0, 94 3 Sep 20:39 /dev/pts/6 People# who zazak pts/0 1 Sep 19:07 (92.147.166.20:S.) zazak pts/4 10 Aug 16:00 (92.147.166.20:S.) People# watch pts/0 watch: fatal: cannot open snoop device And that's it. --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 18:41:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C916710656B1 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526F08FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so2167616bwz.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5msdxBE7LHE+B/0GOVYZPAgdRMOPzo6j4zpADVuBNhE=; b=wggjLcpVqn+0s9TW/8sqq0O2twbVX+jXjPCBMZUxO0jvWYzMP47pNcGXl4p3cuYN/a 30nWN6aqFJHZfq4WA70Lu9Mo8AP9I1Kizrh2mR+hEJ948lhgdktB16Ln2y94UiP47dM0 xPo1gRXT/bUH4G+lz8VpF/0/aA4wF0zCx0lsE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lz/c4ljtxX4GLJZ+a9txxfh3D30YYVIGf9+nFIqPH3vUoAvmCalv4L/jVg1K6+s2E2 1FAklByFxIEZypGWqyjtoZq04UCufI5E9gMRotIz/F92n6Dqk8R1Uvc5AP5Pnn3srfw4 n0F6v71zTsawfFCDKepxCqPEfX36eKce/lAso= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.146 with SMTP id w18mr891638bkp.16.1283539302383; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.80.167 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100816181703.GB66710@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100816225715.GA35248@slackbox.erewhon.net> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:41:42 +0200 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Roland Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watch(8) does not work in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:41:44 -0000 2010/9/3 David DEMELIER : > 2010/8/17 Roland Smith : >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:09:23AM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >>> > Does /dev/pts/0 actually exist in the jail's devfs instance, and are = its >>> > permissions correct? >>> > >>> >>> (In jail) : >>> >>> # ls -l /dev/pts/* >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A094 17 Aug 00= :06 /people/dev/pts/0 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A096 17 Aug 00= :06 /people/dev/pts/1 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 101 21 Jul 00= :07 /people/dev/pts/2 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 108 17 Aug 00:06 /= people/dev/pts/3 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A099 16 Aug 01= :28 /people/dev/pts/4 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 markand =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 112 17 Aug 00:05 /= people/dev/pts/5 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 111 17 Aug 00= :06 /people/dev/pts/6 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 114 16 Aug 23= :53 /people/dev/pts/7 >>> crw--w---- =C2=A01 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 100 17 Aug 00= :06 /people/dev/pts/8 >> >> I think you mounted your devfs incorrectly or you started the jail in th= e >> wrong directory. If ls is run inside the jail, it should be /dev/pts/N, = not >> /people/dev/pts/N! >> >> Roland >> -- >> R.F.Smith =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.xs4all.= nl/~rsmith/ >> [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated= ] >> pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 =C2=A0B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C32= 1A725) >> > > Sorry I made a mistake while I was writing. In fact there is the > permissions in the jail : > > markand@Orange ~ $ sudo jexec 1 tcsh > # su - > People# ls -l /dev/pts/* > crw--w---- =C2=A01 zazak =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 118 =C2=A03 Sep 20:39 = /dev/pts/0 > crw--w---- =C2=A01 zazak =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A099 =C2=A03 Sep 0= 7:07 /dev/pts/4 > crw--w---- =C2=A01 zazak =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A094 =C2=A03 Sep 2= 0:39 /dev/pts/6 > People# who > zazak =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 pts/0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 Sep 19:07 = (92.147.166.20:S.) > zazak =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 pts/4 =C2=A0 =C2=A010 Aug 16:00 = (92.147.166.20:S.) > People# watch pts/0 > watch: fatal: cannot open snoop device > > And that's it. > > -- > Demelier David > People# write pts/0 write: /dev/pts/7: No such file or directory Then I really don't understand. --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 18:46:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84E31065698 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from smtp1.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 821E78FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14062 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 11:41:13 -0700 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 14058, pid: 14059, t: 0.1839s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 spam: 3.1.7-deb X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on smtp1.surewest.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=13.5 tests=RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7-deb X-Spam-CMAE-Analysis: _CMAETAG_ Received: from unknown (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) (69.62.230.77) by smtp1 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 11:41:13 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bigdaddy.mykitchentable.net [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889B51657C9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mykitchentable.net; s=default; t=1283539557; bh=S6G9CKT0IGzgDE+YEScUyh73p1NSQFW68aeOVnhDRpg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=r4g4si3QtBcPfPCjzm0PBq7vb/0p6RIE/K/BkJRA5wE/YCceGXZr1t+Tj+ilNcwva HBG1qUKgfy9gAXcXn2YZhzGe6fGFnhyXcJ2kNkpTGsRBs37U53ztXrDkGvA+e24FPD 6+PLzpw/GbJkW13Z+jg82JnE85k6zY1o0+pkDjzM= Message-ID: <4C814262.5060504@mykitchentable.net> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:45:54 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100903-1, 09/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Regex Help For Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:46:03 -0000 I use procmail for mail delivery and I'm trying to concoct the right regex to match From: headers and deliver to a folder. However mail is sent from various addresses so I want to match all that end with "famous-smoke.com>". Here's an example of a header: From: "Famous Smoke Shop" Because I also occasionally order, I don't want to catch mail from anything that has the word "Orders" and "Famous" in the From field. Thus here is my procmail recipe: # Deliver order info to inbox :0 *^From:.[Ff]amous.*[Oo]rder.*famous-smoke.com>$ "${HOME}/Maildir/new/" # Deliver other email to folder :0 *^From:.*famous-smoke.com>$ "${HOME}/Maildir/.Shopping/Famous Smoke/Email/" According to my procmail log, the From: header does not match. I would expect the example From: header above to match the second regex and be delivered to the specified folder. Where is my error? Thanks, Drew -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:02:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0CA10656B0 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD8C8FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so2346692qyk.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:02:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KevrpOo19wZYX8OZNSVgg1GvTTDHTB0OzEZv2CQW6EU=; b=GmREoYdBNb5+zA+O66eNLdyW0lvgkMGRFksZUtMS/tZAWNmb69if19YK70eqr34SZS Slkj9V+tLMClaofdlHsm9u5hSNO3Gx0+ldNfo0lAssbP59i/ZM9zZi2ARQ/rPdP85yVj fFk/Y+Ue4KbxACm4pIxBoazJRj10TsqEcJy8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bm/hcy/h7+u2AYDHVsudY2D/sozTHNvF6QbdPZbGVsi1Xj0QdATFhpLbfBYcGjl89U n/++OBHeBgz7HOFDs2Me4vxZjPQtym4lGyWdo/fOCT7XChRmFSGTmn2HySuwaaBjFdVQ 4qtgQ9Bu4m+wvCBo8+6f395EON0kvtftuxwis= Received: by 10.229.51.215 with SMTP id e23mr593249qcg.231.1283540536138; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm2272861qcr.17.2010.09.03.12.02.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C814634.1000003@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:02:12 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Tomlinson References: <4C814262.5060504@mykitchentable.net> In-Reply-To: <4C814262.5060504@mykitchentable.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regex Help For Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:02:39 -0000 Hi Drew, On 9/3/10 2:45 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I use procmail for mail delivery and I'm trying to concoct the right > regex to match From: headers and deliver to a folder. However mail is > sent from various addresses so I want to match all that end with > "famous-smoke.com>". Here's an example of a header: > > From: "Famous Smoke Shop" > > Because I also occasionally order, I don't want to catch mail from > anything that has the word "Orders" and "Famous" in the From field. > Thus here is my procmail recipe: > > # Deliver order info to inbox > :0 > *^From:.[Ff]amous.*[Oo]rder.*famous-smoke.com>$ > "${HOME}/Maildir/new/" > Is this supposed to be "match Famous OR Order"? This currently matches "Famous AND Order". > # Deliver other email to folder > :0 > *^From:.*famous-smoke.com>$ > "${HOME}/Maildir/.Shopping/Famous Smoke/Email/" > Going by your examples, you want to catch "Famous OR Order" and place that in Maildir/new, and all other email from this address to go to Maildir/.Shopping/... Try this: # catch "famous" or "order" :0 * ^From:.*([Ff]amous|[Oo]rder).*famous-smoke.com>$ "$HOME/Maildir/new" # catch everything else from this sender :0 * ^From:.*famous-smoke.com>$ "$HOME/Maildir/.Shopping/Famous Smoke/Email/" > According to my procmail log, the From: header does not match. I would > expect the example From: header above to match the second regex and be > delivered to the specified folder. Where is my error? > If my assumption above is incorrect, could you paste a snippet from your procmail log and point out what should be matching so we can have a specific example? Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:13:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC9010656B6 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134518FC1D for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o83JDXOt054359 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:13:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009031913.o83JDXOt054359@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <54357.1283541213.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:13:33 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:13:48 -0000 I seem to recall that there is some sort of stub that will let one execute a script which runs at the last stage of the boot process but I can't seem to remember enough to look it up. I need to run a small script to do pwd_mkdb just once to sync the passwd data base after booting a 8.1 system for the first time. The system is being built via script and /etc/master.passwd has a couple of accounts that the data base doesn't know about. After running pwd_mkdb against /etc/master.passwd, all is well but we are locked out of the system until this happens. I may even make the script destroy itself after launching since it never needs to run after that one time. Thanks. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:18:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3554710656C9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6B08FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so2282131qwg.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:18:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DawIY5ujZ0Ci+Z6/fOTTlpdJpaIgWv8PfnnEqy7bYxM=; b=L5vOTROAyIHGeQ9VrmLOhHVcjZfXG8wdC33pPRns84UuTHROuZwumGaIhPlBVdrkR+ oQ50F1jN1gV5Tat1FiywfgrtB/BTQp7N/PxzbrshPngx7f1CMQGBNMRJrZZDDH6hrFNf I6C5PHox7e8EdWAkkjBRq8FjNbD7+pfP8z/lo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Qj/uXDrnHv7bYkL8TiYv7n5KVLK9Ln5Hh7lYNk283kNcaQVIxEfEyTHC065zTWjwGK d+H+4eSj48VwLXoc6oMfscn0o0RxzMhIFlmmVp3Hx6bpx+zmkfxbKg5VChLaT8znkQfz PQFau8iaOZSMh8RiCTcFq8FmtXdsdsLANr+D0= Received: by 10.224.19.103 with SMTP id z39mr258009qaa.348.1283541525885; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:18:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.213.203 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009031913.o83JDXOt054359@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <201009031913.o83JDXOt054359@dc.cis.okstate.edu> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:18:14 +0200 Message-ID: To: Martin McCormick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:18:47 -0000 creating a /etc/rc.local that rm itself? or, if you already have a rc.local, calling there a script that would self desctruct after beeing launched. Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek4 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: > I seem to recall that there is some sort of stub that > will let one execute a script which runs at the last stage of > the boot process but I can't seem to remember enough to look it > up. > > I need to run a small script to do pwd_mkdb just once to > sync the passwd data base after booting a 8.1 system for the > first time. The system is being built via script and > /etc/master.passwd has a couple of accounts that the data base > doesn't know about. After running pwd_mkdb against > /etc/master.passwd, all is well but we are locked out of the > system until this happens. > > I may even make the script destroy itself after > launching since it never needs to run after that one time. > > Thanks. > > Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK > Systems Engineer > OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:33:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6293C106566C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECA18FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id o83JX7XP010818; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:33:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:33:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201009031933.o83JX7XP010818@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu Cc: Subject: Re: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:33:58 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Sep 3 14:13:18 2010 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:13:33 -0500 > From: Martin McCormick > Subject: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 > > I seem to recall that there is some sort of stub that > will let one execute a script which runs at the last stage of > the boot process but I can't seem to remember enough to look it > up. /etc/rc.local maybe? contrary to the 'rc.d' way of doing things, but 'simple'. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:51:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008C410656A3 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B7D8FC14 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o83Jom6b092378 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:51:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009031951.o83Jom6b092378@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <92376.1283543448.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:50:48 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:51:23 -0000 Robert Bonomi writes: > /etc/rc.local maybe? contrary to the 'rc.d' way of doing things, but > 'simple'. :) Thanks so much to both people who answered. I thought there was more to it than that but I may be thinking of the rcx.d directories in Linux. If you don't watch out, you can be scratching your head all day trying to figure out why the job isn't getting done. I use and like both FreeBSD and Linux but some things are easier in one than the other. Again, many thanks. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:53:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925501065670; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327C58FC1B; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so1101284gxk.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:53:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.107.8 with SMTP id j8mr702481anm.166.1283543616229; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.8 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:53:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.1.133.114] In-Reply-To: <20100903130130.GA5324@current.Sisis.de> References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> <4C80EF3C.8050509@gmail.com> <20100903130130.GA5324@current.Sisis.de> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:53:35 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:53:37 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 06:01, Matthias Apitz wrote: > I tried to install the vmware-freebsd-tools.tar.gz directly as > VMWare.com it provides (I have compat6x already installed for some other > reason). But in vmware-freebsd-tools.tar.gz there are only kernel > modules for FreeBSD 6 and 7 and using the modules for 7 it crashes, ofc. > > Who can I get the tools installed? My EULA says: 3.4 VMware Tools. You may distribute the VMware Tools to any third party provided that (i) you only distribute the VMware Tools as a whole in object code format whether or not as part of, the Virtual Machine you create with the Software; (ii) you do not use VMware's name, logo or trademarks to market the VMware Tools, except you may refer to VMware names, logos or trademarks to indicate that the VMware Tools are compatible with or designed for use with the Software and (iii) you agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend VMware from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise or result from your use or distribution of VMware Tools. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may distribute and modify the Open Source Software of VMware Tools; however, VMware may not provide any support, pursuant to Section 5, for such modified VMware Tools. Assuming you aren't in a US export restricted country (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria) I should be able to give you a legal copy. This is the ISO that ships with Workstation 7.1.1 build-282343. It has kernel modules for 8.0 i386 & amd64. http://www.predatorlabs.net/dl/vmware-tools-freebsd-711.iso -- Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:54:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D0B10656A6 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd_user@guice.ath.cx) Received: from guice.ath.cx (wsip-98-191-59-226.ri.ri.cox.net [98.191.59.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862188FC23 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wtp1.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guice.ath.cx (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o83JPxuS052718 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:25:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd_user@guice.ath.cx) Received: from 98.191.59.226 (SquirrelMail authenticated user email) by wtp1.ath.cx with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:25:59 -0400 Message-ID: <89096821fdf9098c09c610c1c3434d63.squirrel@wtp1.ath.cx> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:25:59 -0400 From: freebsd_user@guice.ath.cx To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Custom Kernel -- Module exclusion by association X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:54:21 -0000 My meaning in the 'subject' is: Currently we want to: 'options QUOTA' in the kernel. We do not want to compile any modules that we don't have to (effort to save time). If adding support for 'QUOTA' doesn't require any module rebuilding, how do we specify/exclude 'all' module building using 'WITHOUT_MODULES' in the /etc/make.conf? In addition, if there are modules that need to be rebuilt in 'association' with the 'options QUOTA', or any other kernel addition, how are we to tell 'what is' needed and/or what 'is not' needed before blindly omitting modules from the kernel build process? 2) The "man make.conf" shows a listing for 'KERNCONF', the installed (7.3) file: /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf makes no mention of this. Should we decide to employ the use of 'KERNCONF' within our /etc/make.conf, does this get auto-magically read if we only type: env -i make buildkernel KERNCONF <--without typing a configuration filename? Assuming of course we saved the named file in /usr/src/sys//conf. Thanks for taking the time to read my msg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 19:56:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D834210656BD for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enlil65@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5888FC1C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so2366571wyb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:56:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sez3ahgIOyUpaDRlyIG7pHlubpoI2I8O/V+xUBt+58c=; b=SeIr5MOYs3d0q/9AB6dO5HNoUwuWdOvW8EPkNk5n9vRfJjhcLi1/zVx/whch5yDI15 qVZOMJzA4UVMA24G/RFRu4rudbYesWQM3wVJrCegc1UDCNIyn7OeMRB1b1eMKXNJsLPS RgsDgBlgFT3sgwbI90VwuZPburtDT8/DXcD0I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J1dLWC9q2/0txhxKBJ/DvVRA177I3bQGcULGbOijCJrk0aRrviqdhB7vyaXWg/UXr3 k98tqVkoZ3JGL1WhOR4wXPH4N5UQF6QxBR0QlJRyylf7aNJ9M79z2tF+1pCv3tzmGs50 24dRgKOQrySxbrh3BQknp+BM1LiZD/Cst7Bt0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.148.2 with SMTP id n2mr239600wbv.216.1283543778165; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.165.211 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:56:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C1B20F0.2090804@mapper.nl> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:56:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: Peggy Wilkins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: network deamons starting before network! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:56:19 -0000 On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Peggy Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Mark Stapper wrote: > >> Since updating to 8.X I noticed that network services were started >> before the network was up! >> I use lagg failover configuration on both my FreeBSD boxes. >> First, boot fails on mounting my nfs-shares. >> After entering and exiting the "rescue" shell, the system boots as norma= l. >> >> uname -a >> FreeBSD mario 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #4: Fri Jun 18 >> 07:46:01 CEST 2010 =A0 =A0 ****@mario:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mario =A0amd6= 4 >> What could I do to fix this? >> >> Here's an exerpt from /var/log/messages: >> >> Jun 18 09:10:25 =A0ntpd[1376]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) >> Jun 18 09:10:25 =A0kernel: fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8 >> Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0ntpd_initres[1412]: host name not found: yoshi >> Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0kernel: nfe0: link state changed to UP >> Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0kernel: lagg0: link state changed to UP >> Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0kernel: nfe1: link state changed to UP >> Jun 18 09:10:27 =A0ntpd_initres[1412]: couldn't resolve `yoshi', giving = up >> on it >> Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Hostname (lagg0): mario >> Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New IP Address (lagg0): 10.58.235.6 >> Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Subnet Mask (lagg0): 255.255.255.0 >> Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Broadcast Address (lagg0): 10.58.235.25= 5 >> Jun 18 09:10:28 =A0dhclient: New Routers (lagg0): 10.58.235.1 > > I upgraded my amd64 FreeBSD-8.0-RELEASE-p4 system to > FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE earlier this week. =A0After completing the upgrade > and rebooting, I also am having the above reported problem. > > I am not using dhcp, I have configured a static IP address. > > My system also has nfe NIC. =A0I wonder if this problem is specific to > systems using nfe network driver. =A0The problem was not occuring on my > 8.0 system, before the upgrade to 8.1. > > Here are my boot messages that display this problem. [snip] > It is pretty clear that the network services are all getting started > twice, once before dropping to single user shell, and a second time > after exiting single user. > > It is also pretty clear that "nfe0: link state changed to DOWN" is > happening at a bad time; and nothing that requires network to be up is > waiting for it to change to UP. I have a workaround for this problem, albeit an ugly workaround. I edited /etc/rc.d/netif to add a 10 second sleep as each network interface is brought up: if [ -n "${_ok}" ]; then case ${_func} in ifn_start) _str=3D'Starting' ;; ifn_stop) _str=3D'Stopping' ;; esac echo "${_str} Network:${_ok}." if check_startmsgs; then for ifn in ${_ok}; do /sbin/ifconfig ${ifn} sleep 10 done fi fi This is probably overkill, and for me it adds 20 seconds to boot time, but it works for me until the general problem is solved. I think there is a general bug with the rc.d/rcorder framework, because even outside this weird case with nfe NIC if any network mount fails during the early part of rc processing it is repeated in the late part via "mount -a" in the second passthrough. This results potentially in multiple mounts of the same remote filesystem (e.g. if mount_nfs is backgrounded in the first pass mount_nfs will be run a second time in the second pass; and if the first problem isn't resolved the second mount_nfs is also backgrounded. For me this usually results in two mounts of the same remote filesystem, after the (presumably temporary) network mounting problem resolves). plw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 20:02:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB4C10656D9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3484E8FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AD6F2F338; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:02:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1283544169; x=1285358569; bh=8miMSBVaFavCk6cGFqCmz8WYG9swNQL1F6o ItLmrXL0=; b=mVbR6QOjG1pwo6KunnGoBZvjrS7QCQ2FqscDKNjVPBj1FPiBy7P 9hUxpq3ezWVGoG8pVc6TJqLgrZp0OwGGgHUZaaX2+oYk64Lgf9xG4L+FjpEB/dVJ AOqt9dM9qzcocp98xBHy5avc4BMtm85XqlTncp92myHegVRDJNOFiO0M= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ib39z2QFHrzD; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72EEFF2F2CF; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:00:09 -0700 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:00:09 -0700 From: Jason To: Martin McCormick Message-ID: <20100903200009.GA94476@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <201009031951.o83Jom6b092378@dc.cis.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009031951.o83Jom6b092378@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p1 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:02:50 -0000 On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:50:48PM -0500, Martin McCormick thus spake: >Robert Bonomi writes: >> /etc/rc.local maybe? contrary to the 'rc.d' way of doing things, but >> 'simple'. :) > > Thanks so much to both people who answered. I thought >there was more to it than that but I may be thinking of the >rcx.d directories in Linux. If you don't watch out, you can be >scratching your head all day trying to figure out why the job >isn't getting done. I use and like both FreeBSD and Linux but >some things are easier in one than the other. > > Again, many thanks. man 5 crontab has: @reboot Run once, at startup > >Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK >Systems Engineer >OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 20:23:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB66910656D9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2DD8FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o83KNWam007183; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:23:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 380C2BAA4; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:23:32 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: David DEMELIER Message-ID: <20100903202331.GA19492@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20100816181703.GB66710@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100816225715.GA35248@slackbox.erewhon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watch(8) does not work in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:23:34 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 08:40:01PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: > Sorry I made a mistake while I was writing. In fact there is the > permissions in the jail : >=20 > markand@Orange ~ $ sudo jexec 1 tcsh > # su - > People# ls -l /dev/pts/* > crw--w---- 1 zazak tty 0, 118 3 Sep 20:39 /dev/pts/0 > crw--w---- 1 zazak tty 0, 99 3 Sep 07:07 /dev/pts/4 > crw--w---- 1 zazak tty 0, 94 3 Sep 20:39 /dev/pts/6 That looks OK. > People# who > zazak pts/0 1 Sep 19:07 (92.147.166.20:S.) > zazak pts/4 10 Aug 16:00 (92.147.166.20:S.) > People# watch pts/0 > watch: fatal: cannot open snoop device For watch(1) to work, you need the device snp(4) either loaded as a module = or built into the kernel. It's not in the GENERIC kernel. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyBWUMACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUGPACeO6ZcZMKF8cUt64AxkUzl+Irn SlwAn1/jRLgoUXEzBr82TQC9ff3f6M/A =pYmN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 20:25:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AF210656B8 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@m2.vidican.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DC08FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so2399950wyb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:25:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.18 with SMTP id d18mr158910wbt.33.1283544069413; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: nvidican@m2.vidican.com Received: by 10.216.170.134 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [136.1.1.105] In-Reply-To: <19585.12609.782477.654588@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <19585.12609.782477.654588@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:01:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: w4FpDBYWZIPUmobnWoKNscFUR_o Message-ID: From: Nathan Vidican To: Robert Huff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ryan Coleman , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Which of these NICs will work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:25:17 -0000 I have several Intel multi-port, (2 port, 4 port and even some 2 port fibre-optic), cards in use. All have been rock-solid, stable performers, and have hardware VLAN tagging and trunking capability. I have some 4 port cards in use with LACP+VLAN Trunking, and then use vlan interfaces in FreeBSD configured per vlan. This allows many networks to share the same interface and is great for virtualization type situations too. Just my two cents - but I'd pay the extra for the Intel because I know it just works predictably and reliably. -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com Happy FreeBSD'er since 2.2.1:) On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Ryan Coleman writes: > > > Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new > > system but I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet. > > > > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&IsNodeId=1&Subcategory=27&description=&Ntk=&CFG=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc= > > > > Basically, this machine will have two external (real-world) IPs > > and one network LAN (10.0.1.0/24) address, finding three-NIC > > motherboards is not exactly possible so this is my alternative. > > Intel network cards have a very good reputation; I have been > running a dual-port Pro/1000 GT for years and the thing is still a > rock. Others will have a better opinion on performance issues. > The Intel employee who maintains the driver is frequently seen > on current@ and occasionally on questions@. Nice guy, very > responsive. > > > Robert Huff > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 20:51:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8B310656E1 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A8D8FC1A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so2288885bwz.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zV//ybgSjpywaF2Fk7zncvBu5l2qB1EEfKdRGdCXWl4=; b=E9EGrDCFOqMNWV2x+AdWlnow8j+vPM37ZMrugJ0HvrDRlPMVDjwvGUXRJjPOfc9Xw+ drlb8BjqPlTmaUDwfx/mjEjDsnOfEF9YpxpHm+YY8Ha3wFU7JbIfdE1nW7pmkbFd8/dN l5eGtLi2t+bKnacr7eGflzm4Tg0qqogSoX8q8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LLWpB4s96GbR9K9sDXgdYnrkNWkLwXlgHptPfPS1LQ2vjnvu/ouhD7CCs3aLEB14sl vaffjhgYZVjlJd1bSfQ1T+RPKeDenDGhCKvq62bdHC+pFyCf0vml1EPgdJn086ZgkPfL w8H0f6aFT4+6AUxURtXtiV5wKPt+1mcYk/xfo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.160.90 with SMTP id m26mr159139bkx.45.1283547071934; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.80.167 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100903202331.GA19492@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20100816181703.GB66710@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100816225715.GA35248@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100903202331.GA19492@slackbox.erewhon.net> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:51:11 +0200 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Roland Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watch(8) does not work in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:51:14 -0000 2010/9/3 Roland Smith : > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 08:40:01PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> Sorry I made a mistake while I was writing. In fact there is the >> permissions in the jail : >> >> markand@Orange ~ $ sudo jexec 1 tcsh >> # su - >> People# ls -l /dev/pts/* >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 zazak =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, 118 =C2=A03 Sep 20:39= /dev/pts/0 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 zazak =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A099 =C2=A03 Sep = 07:07 /dev/pts/4 >> crw--w---- =C2=A01 zazak =C2=A0tty =C2=A0 =C2=A00, =C2=A094 =C2=A03 Sep = 20:39 /dev/pts/6 > > That looks OK. > >> People# who >> zazak =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 pts/0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 Sep 19:07= (92.147.166.20:S.) >> zazak =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 pts/4 =C2=A0 =C2=A010 Aug 16:00= (92.147.166.20:S.) >> People# watch pts/0 >> watch: fatal: cannot open snoop device > > For watch(1) to work, you need the device snp(4) either loaded as a modul= e or > built into the kernel. It's not in the GENERIC kernel. > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.xs4all.n= l/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 =C2=A0B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321= A725) > As I said in the first post it's present in my kernel config. I did not built as module. --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 21:12:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FEF10656C9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from smtp2.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD008FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12822 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 14:21:10 -0700 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 12813, pid: 12815, t: 0.7362s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 spam: 3.1.7-deb X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on smtp2.surewest.net. X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=13.5 tests=RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7-deb X-Spam-CMAE-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=jDt-9pEAAAAA:8 a=OW5hAIbIZPz45uZ5U_sA:9 a=8Z6o6Fqo6_tKvdNTfCUA:7 a=PWbOD-5iqVu3sS1qIR3DzkQXmBUA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=-Bmh7uUyL5QA:10 Received: from unknown (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) (69.62.230.77) by smtp2 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 14:21:09 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bigdaddy.mykitchentable.net [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E87165803; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:12:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mykitchentable.net; s=default; t=1283548363; bh=hqTpgq3U1GSnapNCHh1mqJ1+caLdEevZ4SGddSwJU/c=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=20RcXtTKtUlvGrDdbUILMHGMorn7SUsmRCDCwE+kgnU4ndANmBy2i+8eEcm2mODZ+ Je3+cMYcrBDIcBBjbKJNV/iM9MEtN8cec1LJXlyI6lMs+veFcnIYAyspcSv7rvqk2J 7SKQFYucqDmSarhNKDMa3nJe9SKTRYASLggpSQ9A= Message-ID: <4C8164C7.9000107@mykitchentable.net> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:12:39 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber References: <4C814262.5060504@mykitchentable.net> <4C814634.1000003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C814634.1000003@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100903-1, 09/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regex Help For Procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:12:51 -0000 Hi Glen, Thank you for your reply. On 9/3/2010 12:02 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > Hi Drew, > > On 9/3/10 2:45 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> I use procmail for mail delivery and I'm trying to concoct the right >> regex to match From: headers and deliver to a folder. However mail is >> sent from various addresses so I want to match all that end with >> "famous-smoke.com>". Here's an example of a header: >> >> From: "Famous Smoke Shop" >> >> Because I also occasionally order, I don't want to catch mail from >> anything that has the word "Orders" and "Famous" in the From field. >> Thus here is my procmail recipe: >> >> # Deliver order info to inbox >> :0 >> *^From:.[Ff]amous.*[Oo]rder.*famous-smoke.com>$ >> "${HOME}/Maildir/new/" >> > Is this supposed to be "match Famous OR Order"? This currently matches > "Famous AND Order". No, I want "Famous AND Order". >> # Deliver other email to folder >> :0 >> *^From:.*famous-smoke.com>$ >> "${HOME}/Maildir/.Shopping/Famous Smoke/Email/" > Going by your examples, you want to catch "Famous OR Order" and place > that in Maildir/new, and all other email from this address to go to > Maildir/.Shopping/... > > Try this: > > # catch "famous" or "order" > :0 > * ^From:.*([Ff]amous|[Oo]rder).*famous-smoke.com>$ > "$HOME/Maildir/new" > > # catch everything else from this sender > :0 > * ^From:.*famous-smoke.com>$ > "$HOME/Maildir/.Shopping/Famous Smoke/Email/" >> According to my procmail log, the From: header does not match. I would >> expect the example From: header above to match the second regex and be >> delivered to the specified folder. Where is my error? > If my assumption above is incorrect, could you paste a snippet from your > procmail log and point out what should be matching so we can have a > specific example? This is the actual log entry from the example I used in this email: From Announce@email.famous-smoke.com Fri Sep 3 10:11:08 2010 Subject: Another Must-Attend Event at Famous! Folder: /home//Maildir/new/1283533874.95147_0.blacklamb. 8161 procmail: [95164] Fri Sep 3 10:13:05 2010 procmail: Assigning "NL= " procmail: Assigning "LOG= /home//Procmail/famous_smoke.rc" /home//Procmail/famous_smoke.rc procmail: No match on "^From:.[Ff]amous.*[Oo]rder.*famous-smoke.com>$" procmail: No match on "^From:.*famous-smoke.com>$" procmail: Assigning "VERBOSE=OFF" I think my problem is that I was missing a "space" between "*" and "^From:". Your example shows a space and a reply from Brent Bloxam suggests this is the problem as well. I don't quite understand the difference between the two but have made the change and I'll see if it works. I'm also going to hit Google and see if I can understand. Thanks again for your help! Cheers, Drew -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 21:19:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B071010656A9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vfemail.net) Received: from vfemail.net (dotsevenfive.vfemail.net [69.11.239.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB908FC1B for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 579 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2010 21:17:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 21:17:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 562 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2010 21:17:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www-51-2.vfemail.net) (vfemail@172.16.100.51) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 21:17:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 69869 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2010 21:19:36 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 69861, pid: 69864, t: 0.1939s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO Bacchus.vfemail.net) (cGV0ZXJAdmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=@67.101.12.44) by 172.16.100.51 with ESMTPA; 3 Sep 2010 21:19:36 -0000 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:19:02 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: peter@vfemail.net In-Reply-To: References: <20100830131822.529B3106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20100903211954.B071010656A9@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What made my FreeBSD server freeze? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:19:54 -0000 Thanks. I cloned the hard drive and replaced the old drive with the new drive this afternoon. ------- At 09:25 AM 8/30/2010, Ivan Voras wrote: >On 08/30/10 13:24, peter@vfemail.net wrote: >> >>When I awoke this morning my FreeBSD box was frozen -- completely unresponsive at the console -- and displayed these messages on the console: >> >> ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 -resetting >> ata0: resetting devices >> ad0: removed from configuration >> done >> Aug 30 03:09:25 abc sm-mta 88427 xyz SYSERR(root): collect: Cannot write: ./xyz (fsync uid=o, gid=25): Device not configured >> >>The box has been in continuous operation for years, and I've never seen this behavior before. >> >>I rebooted the machine this morning and, thank God, it came back to life. >> >>Is this an early warning that the hard drive is failing and should be replaced this week? > >Very probably! > >>Is there anything else I should explore or do at this time? > >If not the drive, check drive cables, the power supply and motherboard/CPU overheating. > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------------------------------------------------- This message sent via VFEmail.net http://www.vfemail.net $14.95 Lifetime accounts - 1GB disk, No bandwidth quotas! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 23:27:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A42310656D4 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2648FC1D for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o83NRHxw074912 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4C818455.1080805@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:27:17 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100815 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Why skype can't see webcam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:27:18 -0000 I have webcamd running and can see my webcam using mplayer like this: mplayer tv:// -tv driver=v4l2:width=640:height=480:fps=30:device=/dev/video0 But skype can't see the video. It only sees /dev/video0 device but when I try testing it image is black. v4l support was recently added into 8.1: http://www.leidinger.net/blog/2010/07/29/v4l-support-in-the-linuxulator-mfced-to-8-stable/, this is related. Anybody knows why skype can't use video? On the other hand, I tried to debug this with 'truss -f', but -f flag doesn't follow descendants of the linux process for some reason as it should. Any way to work around this? Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 02:12:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D7C1065675 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 02:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA9B8FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 02:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so106727wwb.31 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:12:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.188.209 with SMTP id a59mr2105124wen.87.1283564677871; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.216.183.76 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C818455.1080805@rawbw.com> References: <4C818455.1080805@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:44:37 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1eRE0tzMQ0bRXHQKKxN0VDdfA4s Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Why skype can't see webcam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:12:29 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Yuri wrote: > I have webcamd running and can see my webcam using mplayer like this: > mplayer tv:// -tv driver=v4l2:width=640:height=480:fps=30:device=/dev/video0 I think this has come up a few times recently on the list, check the archives to see if it was solved. Could be mistaken, but I have a faint memory someone said it was working for them. Best, Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 03:17:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F95C106566B for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 03:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D538FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 03:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so2410096iwn.13 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:17:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SeGaEtxjX6IVxvukQXmcxLdlNdz/PkvrpRNHf2TScNQ=; b=ndwlPEDF7ZPALuiBYjS4/yivMR3dGLysgUg0hHxdv9/MC4IDI91BeSrpan77MtZUDo sFgemeGlA+DJLv/z4a0ZHhCp9eCrwOgRiPW8929lJ+yXVyJwpX0V4cx/QgrByn9jncKt L4oh7iVAi4Ut6EnQkVM1B/T0KCR44jDERfjps= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ENzWcL104fC3hr+eN+vT7an4D1/qyvJ2pNYcK49fcBXQRoZAsOClcJECiYJIkmlZMn Xr0aBZ64UyPjHvE4Fq6TxH22rwJqmC83a924oaOndsWeSgPz0MjYvewaD+KQxQNtrlcL XCGz90PY8mBSsxjH3FCQWpUhQt7m1lE8SNV5g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.33.67 with SMTP id g3mr2077653ibd.31.1283570224615; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.162.3 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:17:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C818455.1080805@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:17:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why skype can't see webcam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:17:07 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Yuri wrote: >> I have webcamd running and can see my webcam using mplayer like this: >> mplayer tv:// -tv driver=v4l2:width=640:height=480:fps=30:device=/dev/video0 > > I think this has come up a few times recently on the list, check the > archives to see if it was solved. Could be mistaken, but I have a > faint memory someone said it was working for them. > > Best, > Alejandro Imass This has came up a few times, but I cant confirm that there was a solution found for 8.1 Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks http://www.fourmannetworks.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 06:36:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E2710656DB for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB6E8FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o846atIG032567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:36:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o846atoq032566; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA19541; Fri, 3 Sep 10 23:24:54 PDT Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:24:49 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: ertr1013@student.uu.se Message-Id: <4c81e631.zkcvAwK0iwezhj6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4c80bc3d.bsLwHSU5+KZyQFD6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <44mxrzvuop.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20100903132925.GA71022@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20100903132925.GA71022@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two ata-related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:36:57 -0000 Erik Trulsson wrote: > So, yes, FreeBSD 8.1 *should* be able to recognize > an ATAPI Zip drive. No great urgency -- I won't need it during the install and no specific plans even after that -- but any ideas how to go about tracking this down? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 06:36:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F77D10656DD for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0C48FC16 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o846auhM032572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:36:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o846auGP032571; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA19555; Fri, 3 Sep 10 23:34:38 PDT Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:34:33 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd@qeng-ho.org Message-Id: <4c81e879.vT3c8HBQCXR5AwE5%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4c80af91.0XK7R1NzplpVQC/a%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4C80C1D6.2050104@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <4C80C1D6.2050104@qeng-ho.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gibblertron@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1: Cron ignoring crontab updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:36:57 -0000 Arthur Chance wrote: > On 09/03/10 09:19, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Chris Rees wrote: > >> You have to SIGHUP cron, not restart it. > >> # killall -HUP cron > > > > Isn't crontab(1) supposed to do that, without separate > > intervention? > > From man cron > > > Additionally, cron checks each minute to see if its spool > > directory's modification time (or the modification time on > > /etc/crontab) has changed, and if it has, cron will then > > examine the modification time on all crontabs and reload > > those which have changed. Thus cron need not be restarted > > whenever a crontab file is modified. Note that the > > crontab(1) command updates the modification time of the > > spool directory whenever it changes a crontab. OK, I had the mechanism wrong. The main point is, it should not require manual intervention by an administrator to get cron(8) to notice when crontab(1) has revised a crontab. The one thing I can think of, short of a bug, is that a change made less than 1 minute before the newly-added or -removed event might not be noticed in time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 06:50:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D93510656AE; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7318FC19; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.120.218] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrmZz-00074R-JL; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:50:23 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o846oOnu002322; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:50:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o846oNLI002321; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:50:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:50:23 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Rob Farmer Message-ID: <20100904065023.GA2247@current.Sisis.de> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Rob Farmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20100903075925.GA3116@current.Sisis.de> <20100903083143.GA3316@current.Sisis.de> <4C80EF3C.8050509@gmail.com> <20100903130130.GA5324@current.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.120.218 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware-guestd6: error during make install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:50:26 -0000 El día Friday, September 03, 2010 a las 12:53:35PM -0700, Rob Farmer escribió: > Assuming you aren't in a US export restricted country (Cuba, Iran, > North Korea, Sudan, and Syria) I should be able to give you a legal > copy. ... Rob, Thanks for this. Btw: It's a pity that I'm not in Cuba, I'm living in the cold and rainy Germany :-) Meanwhile I have updated the port emulators/open-vm-tools to version 253928 which compiles, installs and works just fine in my system. The vmware driver for Xorg gives you a lot of very high resolutions which hides all the Win shit behind the FreeBSD VM. I could also solve the sound problem. In VMware you need the driver snd_es137x. I need this for Skype. I still have to figure out how my USB video cam will work, the rest works now again as it was working in the real laptop. Thanks again for your help matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name! ¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 09:02:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9D010656EC for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 09:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4A28FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 09:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8492ZVd082336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Sep 2010 10:02:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C820B24.9080200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:02:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <19585.12609.782477.654588@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19585.12609.782477.654588@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig39B84B2D6DC12CFA6F633232" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Ryan Coleman , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Which of these NICs will work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:02:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig39B84B2D6DC12CFA6F633232 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/09/2010 18:32:49, Robert Huff wrote: >=20 > Ryan Coleman writes: >=20 >> Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new >> system but I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet.=20 >> =20 >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=3DENE&N=3D10001= 0064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=3D&ShowDeactivatedMark=3DFalse= &Configurator=3D&IsNodeId=3D1&Subcategory=3D27&description=3D&Ntk=3D&CFG=3D= &SpeTabStoreType=3D&srchInDesc=3D=20 >> =20 >> Basically, this machine will have two external (real-world) IPs >> and one network LAN (10.0.1.0/24) address, finding three-NIC >> motherboards is not exactly possible so this is my alternative.=20 >=20 > Intel network cards have a very good reputation; I have been > running a dual-port Pro/1000 GT for years and the thing is still a > rock. Others will have a better opinion on performance issues. > The Intel employee who maintains the driver is frequently seen > on current@ and occasionally on questions@. Nice guy, very > responsive. I second all the other respondents praise of the Intel cards. Intel is a safe choice of NIC -- basically you can be sure that it will not only be supported, but it will work very well. Of the other branded NICs there, unfortunately it is impossible to say much about them based on the manufacturers name. The important thing is the chipset. If the chipset is supported then you can be 99% certain the card will work. (The other 1% are manufacturers who do stupid things to the card firmware.) Unfortunately that is the sort of useful information that vendors almost never tell you on a website. Probably because they think all those letters and numbers will scare people away. They're right of course: that sort of cheap card tends to use chipsets from people like RealTek, many of whose products attract a wholly justified level of opprobrium. [Definitely avoid things that use the rl(4) driver. Stuff that uses re(4) is passable for some uses.] Also "working well" is quite subjective. It depends on the sort of traffic patterns and load levels you need to deal with. Cheaper NICs will not be able to cope with sustained mega-bit levels of traffic and complicated networking layouts, but they will be fine for occasional light use in a desktop box. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig39B84B2D6DC12CFA6F633232 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyCCysACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy20gCeLVm4BU2LO71ynNTG+TLBTdg4 BnQAoJKqFviSONoBEAe6CIcLJLMhHAow =SiPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig39B84B2D6DC12CFA6F633232-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 09:58:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F3A1065694 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 09:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090108FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 09:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E027B78C2A; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:58:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5J2BAvjxvFrJ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:58:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A204D78C28 ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:58:27 +0200 (CEST) From: bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:58:26 +0200 Message-Id: <5B9C0579-D94B-48C9-9F34-A5458C723BE5@todoo.biz> To: support@pfsense.com Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Benchmark tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:58:29 -0000 Hi,=20 I am looking for a tool (or a configuration setup) that will allow me to = benchmark (performance test) couple of firewall based on pfSense, and = eventualy to compare them with other software / hard solution.=20 Any idea, clue, link will be highly appreciated.=20 Thanks=20 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 10:32:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5979410656C4 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 10:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C0F8FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 10:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so2874278qwg.13 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:32:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rqNQhPN7OuGdJKEA72CL2TBABnCFNa3/QFgdlhyuoM4=; b=tZvtZJRLooyvvH95ZiDJBmknbm2f9LjnfBCy/TLULj+jdn/L7z2os4KCgfv6dLbLEN jY+dCBG04zjtgAolj8Frkh00Ch7Vl0g5VKMluwiY7AgCuzp+lGG6TpMPX0kj5fZwY83J XWgnEUvyayAKFa3WHy+MsFbU4Q9yuzxapCg2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=C5cWrU4JG5dnkXEVLTQ9QG6vI0HMdHdtpKnK4u3vpCYLfGz9hfxw/XBl3NXAxfF3dG rE9lpxkcdbJQ+q+SicwGCq9a6e/RG90f4JRgsls8d9SqxTqMnPUBNw1MqTMmdMWgi4Rd nctCrxDBj3pQZmS5DRhgdX00RSa+FrvZnoJVM= Received: by 10.229.233.10 with SMTP id jw10mr1590667qcb.110.1283596345233; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:32:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.78.90 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 03:31:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100903200009.GA94476@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <201009031951.o83Jom6b092378@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20100903200009.GA94476@eggman.experts-exchange.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 13:31:55 +0300 Message-ID: To: Jason Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to run a Command Once on Boot. FreeBSD8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:32:26 -0000 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Jason wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:50:48PM -0500, Martin McCormick thus spake: > > Robert Bonomi writes: >> >>> /etc/rc.local maybe? contrary to the 'rc.d' way of doing things, but >>> 'simple'. :) >>> >> >> Thanks so much to both people who answered. I thought >> there was more to it than that but I may be thinking of the >> rcx.d directories in Linux. If you don't watch out, you can be >> scratching your head all day trying to figure out why the job >> isn't getting done. I use and like both FreeBSD and Linux but >> some things are easier in one than the other. >> >> Again, many thanks. >> > > man 5 crontab has: > > @reboot Run once, at startup But this will always run every reboot, no? I think there used to be something along the lines of rc.early which could do what he wants. Then you can schedule a task to delete rc.early once it's served it's purpose:) > > > >> Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK >> Systems Engineer >> OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 11:31:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B3010656AC for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8578FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1342746gyg.13 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.170.5 with SMTP id x5mr1120919ano.29.1283599878656; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-144-046.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.144.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u14sm4635373ann.20.2010.09.04.04.31.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [71.70.144.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 921DCE54879 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:31:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:31:15 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100904073115.1fdf5efd@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Updating KDE4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:31:20 -0000 =46rom the UPDATING file: 20100902: AFFECTS: users of KDE4 AUTHOR: kde@FreeBSD.org KDE SC ports has been updated to 4.5.1. A number of files were moved between packages, manual intervention into update procedure is required: # pkg_delete -f kdehier4\* kdelibs-4\* kdebase-4\* kdebase-runtime-4\* kd= ebase-workspace-4\* # rm -rf /usr/local/kde4/share/PolicyKit/policy # cd /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4 && make install clean # portmaster -a I don't use 'portmaster'. I am assuming that 'portupgrade -a' would accomplish the same thing. Would that be correct? --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 14:09:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EBF10656C3 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 14:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Received: from sepehrs.com (sepehrs.com [213.217.59.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D528FC0C for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 14:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.3.10]) by sepehrs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o84DPIpZ017848; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:55:18 +0430 (IRDT) Message-ID: <4C8249B7.8060006@sepehrs.com> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:59:27 +0430 From: "H.Fazaeli" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Coleman References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Which of these NICs will work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:09:25 -0000 based on 10+ exprience and working with a dozen models, I recommend intel cards: - Intel explicitly supports freebsd. - the cards are highly stable - have best performance among all other cards on freebsd and if you look for best performance, buy a card based on 82575 or 82576 controllers. On 9/3/2010 8:28 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new system but I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet. > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&IsNodeId=1&Subcategory=27&description=&Ntk=&CFG=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc= > > Basically, this machine will have two external (real-world) IPs and one network LAN (10.0.1.0/24) address, finding three-NIC motherboards is not exactly possible so this is my alternative. > > I'm looking for FreeBSD 7-9 support. Rather run 8.1-RELEASE (same as my other two machines right now). > > Thanks, > > Ryan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 19:59:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D86B10656C7 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 19:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@i2bnetworks.com) Received: from i2bnetworks.com (odyssey.prod.i2bnetworks.com [66.181.0.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3B88FC1A for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 19:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i2bnetworks.com (webmail.dev.i2bnetworks.com [66.181.0.26]) by i2bnetworks.com (8.14.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id o84JYVqF089855 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:34:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from troy@i2bnetworks.com) X-Mailer: AfterLogic WebMail Pro PHP X-Originating-IP: 66.181.2.185 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1cko7im.9c7bda5a0b3dad896e76c5f12d237fd7@webmail.dev.i2bnetworks.com> From: troy@i2bnetworks.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-SpacelinkPC: LL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD8.1 AMD64 UFS2 file system size issues. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:59:45 -0000 Hello. I am having a problem with a fresh install onto a = raid5 file system that is 9TB in size. during the initial install, the syste= m shows the correct disk size and partition sizes, but after it has complete= d and rebooted it shows the the large partition as only 1TB. I am using a 3w= are raid controller and even when I look at the boot message, it shows that = the entire drive is of the correct size. On initial install, this is= how I have setup the drive. Total disk size: Sep 4 12:17:51 fi= leserv kernel: da0: 9536640MB (19531038720 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1215= 750C) 1G da0s1a /&nbs= p; UFS 4G da0s1b &nb= sp; swap 2G da0s1d = /var UFS2+S 36G da0s1e &n= bsp; /usr UFS2+S remainder da0s1f &nbs= p; /big UFS2+S Upon completion of insta= ll and a reboot, The drive partitions show up as this: Filesystem&nbs= p; 1K-blocks Used Avai= l Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 1012974 2= 72248 659690 29% = / devfs = ; 1 1 = ; 0 100% &n= bsp; /dev /dev/da0s1f 1094909108 4 10= 07316376 0% /big /dev/da0s1e&nb= sp; 36558732 1486022 32148012 4%&n= bsp; /usr /dev/da0s1d 2026030 &n= bsp; 550 1863398 0% &nb= sp; /var It was my understanding that UFS2 supports drive s= izes well above what I am trying to use. Is there something that I am doing = wrong? Thanks, -Troy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 22:30:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE9910656A7 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@paz.bz) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [207.34.147.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227858FC1F for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [209.53.164.100] (helo=[192.168.1.6]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Os0lg-000O92-26 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:59:25 -0700 Message-ID: <4C82C13B.7080108@paz.bz> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:59:23 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (100) Subject: proper way to setup laptop with apache22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:30:43 -0000 I'm setting up a laptop with apache, just to play, basically. But apache doesn't like the fact that it can't resolve the lappy's hostname to an IP number and it will not load. The laptop gets its IP # via DHCP so it changes at various locations. I could use the localhost name & IP #, which should work. My laptop is named 'laptop' (laptop.mydomain.com) Is there a way to have the system utilize it's assigned IP #? Or do I have to change my apache config to "localhost" ? thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 22:33:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C508010656A3 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423C68FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-68-0.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.68.0] (may be forged)) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o84MWtnR007898; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 00:32:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4C82C917.8000305@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:32:55 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100817 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timm Wimmers References: <4C729C29.2090206@ticore.de> In-Reply-To: <4C729C29.2090206@ticore.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Directory Encryption? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:33:01 -0000 2010-08-23 18:04, Timm Wimmers skrev: > Am 23.08.2010 16:36, schrieb Chris Maness: >> What is a good tool to encrypt a directory? I need an application >> that is also readily available for Apple OSX, and that does not get >> mangled when transferring via rsync. > > How about "openssl'? > > Encrypt a TARed directory: > > $ tar cjf - /path/to/source/folder | \ > openssl enc -e -bf -out OUTFILE.tgz.enc -pass pass:MYSILLYPASS > > > Decrypt: > > $ openssl enc -d -bf \ > -in OUTFILE.tgz.enc \ > -out OUTFILE.tgz \ > -pass pass:MYSILLYPASS > > There are also ways to encrypt with keys, see manpage. Or A single file Encrypt and decrypt: # openssl aes-128-cbc -salt -in file -out file.aes # openssl aes-128-cbc -d -salt -in file.aes -out file Note that the file can of course be a tar archive. tar and encrypt a whole directory # tar -cf - directory | openssl aes-128-cbc -salt -out directory.tar.aes # Encrypt # openssl aes-128-cbc -d -salt -in directory.tar.aes | tar -x -f - # Decrypt tar zip and encrypt a whole directory # tar -zcf - directory | openssl aes-128-cbc -salt -out directory.tar.gz.aes # Encrypt # openssl aes-128-cbc -d -salt -in directory.tar.gz.aes | tar -xz -f - # Decrypt * Use -k mysecretpassword after aes-128-cbc to avoid the interactive password request. However note that this is highly insecure. * Use aes-256-cbc instead of aes-128-cbc to get even stronger encryption. This uses also more CPU. http://cb.vu/unixtoolbox.xhtml#crypt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 22:34:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6344610656B4 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E628FC16 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so3217331qwg.13 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:34:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fpOPElvqP1OXimZmtLxmoXKWtXYg+de/5H6AytQu4JM=; b=cmlyMVAal/unTQE3jUXPhRJNgdOgTI/WMjyl4UQkFPHrVhWfhHYCKSwgEdAXK/E8Gi aFIKE4AWTVDBr0zTyCXXtCl/QG44fdSrtiELgCQVVEUYAnZWfV5PjQ+X6qnFs+DG1nJt Bxoh/MYEavduMPDBqFdslZX0P6RvTb8HbXV88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=M2rriC/n9omvTu8ep77/pwrM64hh/YHwIJT+/+PHeJS70eYQuUDRL4KHJWu/sKZMCr iPBlQ7f2qK69G660bLrD99yePh7NiXr0+gjSCTH/Y5XH0dO4s49jGBAgt/9G828oS0vK AoRKcX7iZm2Yswo0CD8t9K6x+Kf3zF0dQjyPM= Received: by 10.229.52.8 with SMTP id f8mr1607292qcg.286.1283639646844; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r38sm3757888qcs.2.2010.09.04.15.34.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C82C95B.5020609@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:34:03 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Pazarena References: <4C82C13B.7080108@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <4C82C13B.7080108@paz.bz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proper way to setup laptop with apache22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:34:08 -0000 On 9/4/10 5:59 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote: > I'm setting up a laptop with apache, just to play, basically. > > But apache doesn't like the fact that it can't resolve the > lappy's hostname to an IP number and it will not load. The laptop > gets its IP # via DHCP so it changes at various locations. > > I could use the localhost name & IP #, which should work. > > My laptop is named 'laptop' (laptop.mydomain.com) > > Is there a way to have the system utilize it's assigned IP #? > Or do I have to change my apache config to "localhost" ? > Hi, You can enter (assuming 'lappy' is the hostname): 127.0.0.1 localhost lappy in /etc/hosts and set the ListenAddress directive in Apache to bind to that IP. Regards, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 22:35:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240E610656E5 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBF28FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so3217761qwg.13 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h1KJeyDmTchl/wF/WWeNFV5NkEiNt1CJ0taMbjpwDzY=; b=oJygOc7NPR6JnblRKdAXqxsOdapNY8wRWFtKHEnLRJxfyTz7GCEbDaY6R896g2mAZo HO5gVz5nAiL/rClZhyCmo5u/1wZwKa1RMFcL2cmO+WNoAxY4ruzMEbwOcKaKP/CTjCd9 vgqjzrYKRWB65RSDPtWVWnCAe/HZqWxmFOKsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=V6XTdcyltxW2g/KD70dNTONSF+NIhCIOSnSONaeMLTDKM7VNaeWyDIaxc8ej5HmepM hPHmQaA9+vYX079oo6kyJjyDkeYucv1xxKxBUwLSBJdJWDDB84DtEzzAUXFheSZkJKuK SFAoPVav/f+3wVQrt6lngS1Xpe1z9P8c/GpNs= Received: by 10.224.67.75 with SMTP id q11mr824524qai.289.1283639713546; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75.97.128.170.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.128.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm3744846qcs.45.2010.09.04.15.35.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C82C99F.1050003@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:35:11 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Pazarena References: <4C82C13B.7080108@paz.bz> <4C82C95B.5020609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C82C95B.5020609@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proper way to setup laptop with apache22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:35:15 -0000 On 9/4/10 6:34 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On 9/4/10 5:59 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote: >> I'm setting up a laptop with apache, just to play, basically. >> >> But apache doesn't like the fact that it can't resolve the >> lappy's hostname to an IP number and it will not load. The laptop >> gets its IP # via DHCP so it changes at various locations. >> >> I could use the localhost name & IP #, which should work. >> >> My laptop is named 'laptop' (laptop.mydomain.com) >> >> Is there a way to have the system utilize it's assigned IP #? >> Or do I have to change my apache config to "localhost" ? >> > > Hi, > > You can enter (assuming 'lappy' is the hostname): > > 127.0.0.1 localhost lappy > > in /etc/hosts and set the ListenAddress directive in Apache to bind to > that IP. > Oops. Listen 127.0.0.1:80 Too much SSH config-ing for me lately. :) -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 23:12:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360EA10656B7 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC1CF8FC0C for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19966 invoked by uid 0); 4 Sep 2010 23:12:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2010 23:12:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=QYJg8FWqe64vZsEh6RNGpqr01oK+f4yz11i3rgqFCyZ2MF7Ue0Q0JdF5CkN92H3LxgGxDtSjlEZOt8CrIizKRSEHUAcnF4VUJLLyeo9oV1Yfb1NHs+0+sVzkMPri1wdA; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Os1uQ-0001Ys-MW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:12:31 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:09:20 -0600 Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:09:20 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20100904230920.GA20735@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: PDF to HTML translations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:12:33 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What PDF to HTML translators, other than pdftohtml, am I likely to be able to find in ports? I went looking for pdf2html, expecting to find that there, but no luck. Before I spend hours sifting through, still without knowing whether I missed something that should be obvious, I figured I'd ask here whether anyone knows of something off the top of his/her head. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyC0aAACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKU6xgCeMCOfOzF7WKWH1Xpx6MAyGyCg 9iAAn13eXv0Gsm2jxjw/ixvWfusoOTwE =FgZN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--