From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 00:06:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D19F1065672 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrapar1@tigers.lsu.edu) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32298FC14 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so2406802wwb.31 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:06:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.165.77 with SMTP id d55mr2753628wel.23.1287272478117; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.68.137 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:41:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: Vishwanadh To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Seung-Jong Park Subject: Transmission Queue Length X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:06:18 -0000 Hello, I have a question regarding the variable ifq_maxlength. Is there any way that I can tune that variable? If yes, can you please tell me how and also specify the maximum value of that variable. Vishwanadh Raparthi Graduate Student, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA-70802 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 03:16:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF18C106566B for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yxy.716@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870F18FC12 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so904699yxn.13 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:16:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=02zx/gRDVJagD1OY5/oGNouaW5rKSY9+KOXGY9AI9BQ=; b=d+axZYaEqiptpjYaNuiFrIDz/F8qucwpfwEldq9x6CLAsiauHvUn1vMGm0B9z8dBV9 rZrEV1Yi+el7WArRAStZbtlt9p7QSzEd0ypeP9f2UjWlPZJ4IXycRhSNPKXnQh9JJmX3 cos8aDmun6MQR6TYqM0zanw1TMk5++1ucHjn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=T+QgU+n3FNzDq6+ZzO+EqVt32dgLQh4ZicGHQ9ciuTEEJSN4ffbFl7DLWP76x5siFs 3FBYrxR54EhoYuTT62m0gqjCTxNXskggbSbjKZsgQqVGze9Zb6f9vZAxmlo7lN79oQQz 5tMow2xHzMID0BjS+ST6jn3zeTBwn6y2OsN8Y= Received: by 10.100.110.18 with SMTP id i18mr1388969anc.189.1287285359869; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([119.98.61.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w32sm17263244ana.17.2010.10.16.20.15.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:15:58 -0700 (PDT) From: yanxinyou To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20101014120034.4802D10656FA@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20101014120034.4802D10656FA@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:15:48 +0800 Message-ID: <1287285348.5538.4.camel@yanxinyou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:16:01 -0000 when i exit X environment , the console show : xauth: (argv):1: bad display name "yanxinyou.org:0" in "remove" command my /etc/rc.conf hostname="yanxinyou.org" ifconfig_re0="DHCP" linux_enable="YES" my /etc/hosts ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 04:30:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4710106566C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:30:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C25D8FC0A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9B9BDC34 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:51:48 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:51:48 -0700 Message-ID: <64507.1287287508@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Build Perl with newer version of Berkeley/Sleepycat/Oracle DB -- How? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:30:57 -0000 The subject line says it all... well... pretty much. I have Sleepycat/Oracle DB 4.something installed, and I really would like to rebuild and reinstall the standard DB_File package so as to get it to use the 4.something version of DB, rather than the 1.85 version that's in my libc.a. But I really have no idea how to go about this, so any hints would be apreciated. Oh! And one other thing. I was just running a modest sized new Perl program I've been writing that uses DB_File and that ties a %hash to a Berkeley DB file. Basically, I've debugged it and it _had_ seemed to be working well, but I just ran it on a bit more input data and this time, Perl itself crashed rather mysteriously. I'm including the gdb traceback for the resulting perl5.8.9.core corefile, in case anybody wants to speculate on the case here, or maybe help me to kill whatever bug caused this. (Should the Perl interpreter EVER crash with a SIGSEGV?) ============================= (gdb) where #0 0x2828f70d in arc4random_addrandom () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x2828bafd in dbopen () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2 0x2828a4ff in __srget () from /lib/libc.so.7 #3 0x2828bbc9 in dbopen () from /lib/libc.so.7 #4 0x2828a21f in __srget () from /lib/libc.so.7 #5 0x2828d290 in __hash_open () from /lib/libc.so.7 #6 0x282ef5f2 in XS_DB_File_STORE () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/auto/DB_File/DB_File.so #7 0x280fbaf2 in Perl_pp_entersub () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #8 0x280fa245 in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #9 0x280f2d80 in S_call_body () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #10 0x280f54bc in Perl_call_sv () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #11 0x280f5da4 in Perl_call_method () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #12 0x280ea8b7 in S_magic_methcall () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #13 0x280eac8a in Perl_magic_setpack () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #14 0x280ed3c8 in Perl_mg_set () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #15 0x28103078 in Perl_pp_sassign () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #16 0x280fa245 in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #17 0x280f6304 in perl_run () from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so #18 0x0804892e in main () (gdb) quit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 05:27:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E66106566C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 05:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B508FC08 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 05:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so2397865qyk.13 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 22:27:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5MbEkjmbh+T2lHGTvZjOjLU34pRTc47Pl2T9EJ0sHpg=; b=AMCt7xkQ+/ZfYmifRYTU/WnvDgalskN/IFHydiHB6YnUj6A0C3XlMPTqInlhQXcLkQ lHjqtukAy9B6EB/mhZE1YUacr86pjrIOYmwhPG93ZOqKlpUSaU/xEoc9HmBHaL/5NwMy UtfLjDftV/kv3jy6uF0PqE2AXk8g6I1T9Jaqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WDATHSUmSNmjvvz13G4ZUSSk/oyLaQMbT9845iWTQir13eXjrTYYgtB6MuwPabyvON xnsY60iL4LWeukXDGj6Na1FIjsQnIFAmGAlvKuKu0fx7v2TyVzV6Ay7OGqXVIiIx+Y6E HRdohXzdZQUS/DiKgb2/+7Fewx2ymMXanb7lM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.105.103 with SMTP id s39mr776960qao.7.1287291412975; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.219.74 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:56:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Nerius Landys To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 05:27:53 -0000 This is really more of a networking question. I'm wondering, in a typical scenario, for example my server is in a data center with a typical colocation company. I am editing someone else's code, and this code handles incoming UDP packets. The code handles UDP packets that have a source address being from the LAN differently. It gives those packets special treatment. To check whether a source address is a LAN address, it does the typical checks for 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0, 127.0.0.0, and it also checks every assinged IP address with netmask to see if the source address on the UDP packet came from that network. My question is - how possible (in these typical environments) is it to send a UDP packet from far away that claims to have a source address being a LAN address? Will such a packet typically make it to my server, or will a router along the way stop it from arriving? Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? - Nerius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 06:12:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE991065672 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5139C8FC12 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81EE5737B; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:12:05 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=soyeomul; i=bh@izb.knu.ac.kr; bh=G MDcAk1NKcYomCpUejS8/JN9HwHSEkufG0bpvHyyEEs=; b=UZKB5YMhXzotWzmYl FWbBX/BLioT4Nm1v/nzFwzRyzGE4SNYkhBCi5TdjWUBZv+WV1LabZC9vlD67r1/W 3ua+Sx10zGozqyHvBUECRD7OHXfHWcsEJ9w1Rfeb9N19NF8aEiD6z+udZ4QPUooD 2c9y9zb4zneIDBa6Qa9QCmZwXk= Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAB557379; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:12:05 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.home (unknown [59.24.179.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412AB1CCF0; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:12:05 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: Marco Beishuizen Organization: GR References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEVMM2UIAhGJrpkJDwsD AwgJAggKPnwFBAIEBAQJAjTkRM0eAAACN0lEQVQ4jW3Tv2sbMRQHcPnSDt78bMWctkOBgDc7 10I8Cl6DOpZm6RgPBx4LgbrjUbVVNiuXHNF/2yfJzqnEwmDfffyV9PSD2UNTfuu9A/65cT39 AnZ4j8pTcxzM/HlO4F8BnAcHCK14CuBeQXAFAJwbg/MmS2igEDWtrfZ9PyQiiJCxei1o+CNY bUJX4J1Cr8TQlbWmFZ3vijFwT58c7kW3Z3K84oJrFAPYds8Yk6zmwnGLGai9rApZnaGgBbAZ wF6GdoY3DiADA74IMMa5KzFPGEWDSLmAiSttDkhTqUVxAX+c/g9ER7BeVnzyZAdA5Go9Y+OC ydXNXZlDCetJtfpWyXp6xzNQmkA+i0J+nI7jGJjKVjPfXYUKpXtc3AbQR2CraazQP17StKgr /QpXEZrNAdIY7Wx/HmHR91U2K8XP10BLSEvS94scoPUJvN/mCVSqxiVBBdCzAbDkeG2/XlVy BCA8ZoD4AZdUxYsiABPABNCIhsagnng4LDvL0LYYijdWCZrsRTx3YUnQGh46+0sZ2tv3MZ1A xdKNxnuYFO9onTEClYZpHX//LNjyOiRs2ihzhO9MVnYACqo051YUZwMYhXEW1L7s2XU6LxZv I6g4L1NTeSm7+wUBlCpD3Cyl3KXEqq5ZG+8RhEfBqsN2jrqaQYQ2PH/qRqmnh4auGgjnXPrj j1udunqg887i/daHXTlA+Gbgm8aX9k1jvifQp2Ajm+2pRL+hk3QKGikv3dv3IdE4cwL+ATzH tMu8OktOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-Window-System: GNU Network Object Model Environment OpenPGP: id=96B196FE (expiration: 2013-10-26); perference=sign Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:11:47 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Marco Beishuizen's message of "Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:24:58 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <86hbgll55o.fsf@betla.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: chromium crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:12:09 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marco Beishuizen writes: > Hi, > > I tried to run chromium as browser today but it crashes immediately: > > ... > [1016/211130:WARNING:base/debug_util_posix.cc(228)] Don't know how to > do this > The program 'chrome' received an X Window System error. > This probably reflects a bug in the program. > The error was 'BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied)'. > (Details: serial 741 error_code 10 request_code 139 minor_code 1) > (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; > that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. > To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line > option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful > backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() > function.) > marco@yokozuna:~% opera > opera [crash logging]: Can't read kernel memory: : /dev/mem: > Permission denied > opera [crash logging]: CRASH!! > got signal SIGSEGV at address 298C9B5D > ... > > Has anyone else has this too? > Thanks in advance. > Regards, > Marco Chrome runs without errors on my desktop (8.1-RELEASE i386). There is only one message at the start time. // [1017/150910:WARNING:base/debug_util_posix.cc(228)]=20 Don't know how to do this // Sincerely, =2D-=20 =EC=86=8C=EC=97=AC=EB=AC=BC =ED=99=A9=EB=B3=91=ED=9D=AC(=E9=BB=83=E7=82=B3= =E7=86=99) | .. =EC=B6=9C=ED=95=AD 15=EB=B6=84=EC=A0=84.. "I wanta see more of the kids too. I want to settle down a little bit." -- Johnny Fontane, "Chapter 12", page 161 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAky6k64ACgkQsCouaZaxlv5HKwCgxb8LFon5hfm+T8m4KPlyxhel tEcAn0u2qyfT+fDU6VK0t6a6KNyBAXG5 =EMZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 11:14:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DE1106564A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederic.praca@freebsd-fr.org) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B76A8FC18 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from coruscant.dnsalias.net (unknown [88.169.125.217]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD4C4C806C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:16:46 +0200 From: Frederic Praca To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101017131646.514aea0f@coruscant.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20101016124725.63a7ac5a@coruscant.dnsalias.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Strange PAM message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:14:24 -0000 Well in fact, I guess this is an automated break-in attempt coming from a virus or troyan. But, I already got such attacks in the past and never had this strange PAM message. > You probably have somebody trying (succeeding?, I have no idea,) to > break in. >=20 > I have one machine for the net, but none of the machines I do my work > in ever get connected to the internet. It's like the old west, still > -- there really is no law enforcement. >=20 > --jg >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Frederic Praca < > frederic.praca@freebsd-fr.org> wrote: >=20 > > Hello guys, > > has anyone got these messages : > > Oct 16 11:24:54 coruscant sshd[2690]: User root from 89.211.244.245 > > not allowed because none of user's groups are listed in AllowGroups > > Oct 16 11:24:55 coruscant sshd[2690]: fatal: Internal error: PAM > > auth succeeded when it should have failed > > > > FYI, I have a sshd server prohibiting root logins so the second log > > made me think about a possible break-in attempt and maybe a > > succeeding one :-( > > > > Any idea about what these messages mean ? > > > > Fred > > -- > > Ce serait beau, l'honnetet=E9 d'un avocat qui demanderait la > > condamnation de son client ! > > -+- Jules Renard -+- > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --=20 Voici nos mythes, nos erreurs que nous e=FBmes tant de peine =E0 dresser contre les pr=E9c=E9dentes ! ... Tout n'est pas faux dans ce qui fut abandonn=E9. Tout n'est pas vrai dans ce qui se r=E9v=E8le. -+- Paul Val=E9ry -+- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 11:19:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94779106564A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1648FC1A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (213-84-73-82.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9HBJd8n093245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:19:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9HBJd9Z005804 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:19:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:19:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: chromium crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:19:41 -0000 On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to run chromium as browser today but it crashes immediately: > > ... > [1016/211130:WARNING:base/debug_util_posix.cc(228)] Don't know how to do this > The program 'chrome' received an X Window System error. > This probably reflects a bug in the program. > The error was 'BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied)'. > (Details: serial 741 error_code 10 request_code 139 minor_code 1) > (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; > that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. > To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line > option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful > backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) > ... > > Has anyone else has this too? > Thanks in advance. > Regards, > Marco It seems that I had to reboot first in order to run Chromium. Strange that rebooting is required. Thanks for the answers though. Regards, Marco -- A bureaucrat's idea of cleaning up his files is to make a copy of everything before he destroys it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 13:36:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E474F106566B for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BE08FC0C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o9HDa2dc072358; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:36:02 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:36:01 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: bf1783@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20101017223443.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101014120034.B794D10656D8@hub.freebsd.org> <20101015012001.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Yuri , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too many binary packages are missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:36:06 -0000 On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, b. f. wrote: > On 10/15/10, Ian Smith wrote: > ... > > > > > http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable works, > > it's what portupgrade looks at on an 8.1-STABLE system, but it's a bit > > sad finding the last directory updated at 1st October. I checked just > > one subdir, sysutils, and the newest file there is 30th September. > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html > http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portsuploadstatus.py Ah, ta .. hours of fun to be had in there, bookmarked this time. It sure helps toward appreciating the magnitude and scope of the task. > > Er, 8-STABLE (packages) is for currently 8.1-STABLE (world/kernel), no? > > No. I thought the 8-STABLE packages were from a recent snapshot of > 8-STABLE, because that's the way that tinderboxes are set up. > However, I checked, and actually a version of the last supported > stable branch of 6.*, and some versions of the _oldest_ supported > stable branches of 7,8 are used. Right now, for i386 it's: > > 6.x-stable --> 6.4-RELEASE-p9 > 7.x-stable --> 7.1-RELEASE-p12 > 8.x-stable --> 8.0-RELEASE-p2 > 9.x-current --> a snaphot of 9-CURRENT > > Other architectures may use slightly different versions. This is an > attempt to build packages that work on the all stable branches of all > supported releases, although obviously this may occasionally fail. Just to check that I get it .. for packages-8-stable, an 8.0-RELEASE-p2 kernel + world is used to _build_ these, is that right? So they should then install fine on any later 8.x system too? > > however looking at the (preserved by fetch) dates these packages were > > built, it's clear that building (eg here for 8-stable i386) is done in > > batches that run for several hours, but are only done several times per > > month, at best. > > On some architectures, the building seems to be done more often than > the uploading to the ftp server. (Perhaps some of these are > incomplete builds.) So in some cases you can actually get more recent > packages directly from pointyhat, but I think that they are only > intended for testing purposes, and not for mass distribution. Pav > told me that he uploads amd64 packages within 24 hours of the > completion of a build, although it takes further time for them to > propagate to the mirrors. Ok, I'll bear that in mind for needed packages that 'should' be there. I don't mind building lots of stuff from source but the idea of building xorg or kde on a 1.1 MHz processor is scary, given using it meanwhile :) > > The last time I noticed such big delays between updated ports and their > > packages (IIRC, 2007) Kris Kennaway put in a successful word to someone > > .. who should we be bugging these days? > > portmgr@ -- I think linimon@, pav@, and a few others are in charge of > the package-building machines. On some architectures (e.g., ia64, > powerpc and sparc64), I think that the paucity of available hardware > limits the frequency of the builds, but I'm not sure about i386. The > available logs show that the last builds for 8.x-stable i386 were on: > > 20100804 > 20100808 > 20100815 > 20100820 > 20100821 > 20100823 > 20100908 > 20100927 > 20101007 > > I don't know the rationale behind the schedule, although I heard that > some work was recently being done on parts of the cluster, and that > some exp-runs were made. I vaguely recall a discussion about prioritising 'more popular' package building at one stage, but it looks like just keeping up is fun enough. Thanks for the detail and pointers, cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 14:06:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97351106564A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz) Received: from smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (smtprelay-b11.telenor.se [62.127.194.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF358FC26 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (ipb2.telenor.se [195.54.127.165]) by smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C35FEBE53 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:06:14 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.226.59.55] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvEuAB6gukxV4js3PGdsb2JhbAChKgwBAQEBNS3AfYVJBI1P X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,342,1283724000"; d="scan'208";a="141017718" Received: from c-373be255.107-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO gatekeeper.pp.dyndns.biz) ([85.226.59.55]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2010 16:06:14 +0200 Received: from [192.168.69.70] ([192.168.69.70]) by gatekeeper.pp.dyndns.biz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9HE6DCb084107; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:06:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz) Message-ID: <4CBB02D4.7080707@pp.dyndns.biz> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:06:12 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101016 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nerius Landys References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:06:17 -0000 On 2010-10-17 06:56, Nerius Landys wrote: > This is really more of a networking question. > I'm wondering, in a typical scenario, for example my server is in a data > center with a typical colocation company. > > I am editing someone else's code, and this code handles incoming UDP > packets. The code handles UDP packets that have a source address being from > the LAN differently. It gives those packets special treatment. To check > whether a source address is a LAN address, it does the typical checks for > 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0, 127.0.0.0, and it also checks every > assinged IP address with netmask to see if the source address on the UDP > packet came from that network. > > My question is - how possible (in these typical environments) is it to send > a UDP packet from far away that claims to have a source address being a LAN > address? Will such a packet typically make it to my server, or will a > router along the way stop it from arriving? > > Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to > check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? > > - Nerius Section 3 of RFC1918 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1918.txt) states the following, and I quote: "Routers in networks not using private address space, especially those of Internet service providers, are expected to be configured to reject (filter out) routing information about private networks." This makes it _highly_ unlikely that your server will be hit by spoofed packets with a source address belonging to any of those private IP ranges. However, if your data center use some of these addresses internally, their internal routers will still forward such packages making your server vulnerable for spoofed packages emanating from another server within the same data center. If, on the other hand, they're using public IP ranges internally, there's also the possibility that your server could be hit by a spoofed packet using an address from one of those internal nets as its source address. This could possibly result in a DoS attack against the poor server that IP address really belongs to. It's up to your data center's firewall to block those packets. It should _never_ pass any packet coming from the outside with a source address belonging to any network on the inside, since they're obviously spoofed. A professional data center should already have taken care of this but you need to ask them to make sure. Regards Morgan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 14:39:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB91106564A; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4218FC20; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.57.70] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7UO8-0003v9-Vc; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:39:05 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9HEd2RW071219; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:39:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o9HEd1Lg071218; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:39:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:39:01 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: bdsfbsd@att.net Message-ID: <20101017143901.GA71132@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101004233302.GA62267@takino.homeftp.org> <20101004195012.GA2023@tiny> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.57.70 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netbooks & BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:39:08 -0000 El día Wednesday, October 06, 2010 a las 09:33:08AM -0400, bdsfbsd@att.net escribió: > +1 on EeePC, mine being the 1000. This uses a not-yet-supported wireless > card (rt2860), but a driver is available and seems to work fine: > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=7010 > http://repo.or.cz/w/ralink_drivers.git > (Contrary to the troll-bait happening in a similar thread right now..) > > Matthias took the plunge for KDE, which I do like, but for my Eee I went > with Xfce. Matthias' work and documentation is more thorough than mine, so > I'm looking thorough it for ideas. > > BTW, the specs on the 900AX make me think that Asus is using the model to > offload old hardware. But if the price is very low, it still may be worth > it. Personally I prefer to have an SSD instead of HDD, and I wouldn't want > a screen any smaller than the 10". > > Brian Well, I'm a poor stupid. I damaged the display of my EeePC 900 and I'm now thinking to get it replaced (for around 135 euro) or to buy a new netbook. I don't even see the EeePC 1000 here in Germany in the market, only the 1000H which seems to have a 160 GB hard disk, and I would like to stay with SSD... Any alternative netbooks outside Asus which run FreeBSD? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 16:01:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A4F106566B for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:01:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A1B8FC1A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o9HG1cTR081087; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:01:39 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:01:38 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Nerius Landys In-Reply-To: <20101017120030.357E710656FF@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101018022532.X2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101017120030.357E710656FF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:01:42 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 332, Issue 11, Message: 15 On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:56:52 -0700 Nerius Landys wrote: > This is really more of a networking question. > I'm wondering, in a typical scenario, for example my server is in a data > center with a typical colocation company. > > I am editing someone else's code, and this code handles incoming UDP > packets. The code handles UDP packets that have a source address being from > the LAN differently. It gives those packets special treatment. To check > whether a source address is a LAN address, it does the typical checks for > 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0, 127.0.0.0, and it also checks every > assinged IP address with netmask to see if the source address on the UDP > packet came from that network. > > My question is - how possible (in these typical environments) is it to send > a UDP packet from far away that claims to have a source address being a LAN > address? Will such a packet typically make it to my server, or will a > router along the way stop it from arriving? Very possible, yes, and usually not. IP routes by destination address. Forged source addresses are common for the likes of DNS amplification attacks, where you (in your thousands :) will reply to the supplied source address, which is probably the _victim_ of the attack. You may even complain to the admin of victim-net, compounding the mischief. OTOH, forged local (eg RFC1918) source addresses are presumably either designed to target likely LAN addresses, or - probably as commonly - just incorrectly configured NAT setup on the source. Bad either way. > Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to > check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? This is a job for your firewall, which needs imlicit or explicit rules to drop spoofed packets, ie here packets with local addresses arriving on the wrong (outside) interface, or for that matter, any response or originating packets having such source addresses leaving your system on its outside interface. See /etc/rc.firewall for ipfw(8) examples. Of course your application can double-check, but if your firewall is correctly configured, the application should never see such packets. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 16:47:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84411065672 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nekoexmachina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF738FC0A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so74861ewy.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=fz3zVd/VhxmlNuwAsYdf7HqgLNs16avE4otYx22S/uU=; b=T5yowuTKaRBgvSONqFkResb0FRW1M+WIGxeXkfKraPVFTXlyNoAFlgbPOB6lFlxMC3 WP3wUxQx33IEPO1mCZHq6K9UpFs0qIpDARpVkJClBTDhFId5O3gTFGMqpG4BZ6QKCZtH wy1UB2PYqufmhtDEIYOk5BXgMGu4sVpfot6vg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=CWzMau/IU01rlvbUvwk7BTu9qofjmNcIiHzKC7pODAZ6BTHqVOYu3NNl34AyMesu8x jQflMuoLHT8QhzQ5bNGCdByqYP0A+y422WZ2a8e0knGy4WydFtnpSi67hgd+SLg88hVF d1ovfvGS5sfC+CEGQ6ZvXkEoja0mV0E823cdI= Received: by 10.14.119.140 with SMTP id n12mr1942855eeh.0.1287334020154; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([188.134.12.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm11266554eeh.5.2010.10.17.09.46.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:44:07 +0000 From: Mikle Krutov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101017204407.GA80547@takino.homeftp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Ubuntu mirror using freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:02 -0000 Hello, list! I've googled around a little and did not find an answer to the question. I want to create ubuntu mirror using freebsd, but not the 'global' one with all the architectures and releases, the 8.04-i386+amd64 only. Any tool in ports for achieving that? -- Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup. With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 16:47:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F72610656C3 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B915F8FC0A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so74102bwz.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:47:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gxvZl4DuldWeK3JJTk5unc/sPOGihXNJBVLVub5VYJM=; b=VUa5Xu91vmyTg4kHBjoTLpPOH9Cv6btKuoKXuu2zBa8ruYB+nCldFEoXY1ZceZE3Ss RxG3ySfJZVmgXIEeT/IbuwOHb4jkCCLI5MN9jt86uTUaN8PmgNZo5M8NkGntu6D7wdxx GAN0ZtlU+xA4AnPr54obTFWygPxvIZuccRIbs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wm9K3uEqLc6ezCZJcMiG7G/7xrBAg+LXIuFkxqvggX41XCZcd5xPzLxZzEkMJl8g6T 6ytrLn+wJ6PLTox5AtKzbKdXJvCC4x02ZlR2Nc7F+1hr9/jqzr0gn3RYP6yjKXcMtbvs BtVOaHfiwd3CTb+SvS8YSCbjajMwxZgn2RWCQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.133 with SMTP id l5mr3355505bkd.180.1287334029569; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.82 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:47:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Rob Farmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:11 -0000 2010/10/16 Rob Farmer : > 2010/10/16 Fernando Apestegu=EDa : >> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough me= mory. >> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the >> ports from a "fresh" >> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm gettin= g the >> same error. >> >> Any VM tuning I can try? > > I'm not really knowledgeable about that kind of thing. > > However, the port is marked MAKE_JOBS_SAFE which means that it will > try to run multiple compiler instances in parallel, to speed things up > if you have multiple CPUs/cores. You can try running with "make > -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS" to just run one at a time - maybe you have enough > memory for that but not multiple jobs at once? Hi Rob, The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the thing, compiling the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 optimization flag. With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few seconds. Without the flag, the file is compiled without any problems and quite fast. Should this issue be a candidate for filing a PR? Cheers. > > -- > Rob Farmer > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 17:20:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490AA106564A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDF38FC1C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id o9HHISJq003050; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:18:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:18:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201010171718.o9HHISJq003050@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nlandys@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:20:30 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 00:26:19 2010 > Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:56:52 -0700 > From: Nerius Landys > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? > > This is really more of a networking question. > I'm wondering, in a typical scenario, for example my server is in a data > center with a typical colocation company. > > I am editing someone else's code, and this code handles incoming UDP > packets. The code handles UDP packets that have a source address being from > the LAN differently. It gives those packets special treatment. To check > whether a source address is a LAN address, it does the typical checks for > 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0, 127.0.0.0, and it also checks every > assinged IP address with netmask to see if the source address on the UDP > packet came from that network. > > My question is - how possible (in these typical environments) is it to send > a UDP packet from far away that claims to have a source address being a LAN > address? *VERY* possible. in fact -trivially- easy. Note: its trivial to do with TCP packets as well. however those are usually less worrisime because the connection set-up 'handshake' fails. > Will such a packet typically make it to my server, or will a > router along the way stop it from arriving? Almost invariably, it -will- reach your network, *unless8 YOU do 'ingess filtering' at your border to block it. Doing such ingress filtering is a GOOD IDEA(tm), Also strongly recommended: 'egress filtering' to trap anything that tries to exit with an RFC-1918 source address, or a source address that is -not- part of your assined netblock. to your netork. > Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to > check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? 'netcat' has the capability built in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 17:38:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE16F106564A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1328FC0A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id o9HHaOc6003135; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:36:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:36:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201010171736.o9HHaOc6003135@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz, nlandys@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:38:26 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 09:04:59 2010 > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:06:12 +0200 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= > > To: Nerius Landys > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? > > On 2010-10-17 06:56, Nerius Landys wrote: > > This is really more of a networking question. > > I'm wondering, in a typical scenario, for example my server is in a data > > center with a typical colocation company. > > > > I am editing someone else's code, and this code handles incoming UDP > > packets. The code handles UDP packets that have a source address being from > > the LAN differently. It gives those packets special treatment. To check > > whether a source address is a LAN address, it does the typical checks for > > 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0, 127.0.0.0, and it also checks every > > assinged IP address with netmask to see if the source address on the UDP > > packet came from that network. > > > > My question is - how possible (in these typical environments) is it to send > > a UDP packet from far away that claims to have a source address being a LAN > > address? Will such a packet typically make it to my server, or will a > > router along the way stop it from arriving? > > > > Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to > > check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? > > > > - Nerius > > Section 3 of RFC1918 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1918.txt) states the > following, and I quote: > > "Routers in networks not using private address space, especially those > of Internet service providers, are expected to be configured to reject > (filter out) routing information about private networks." > > This makes it _highly_ unlikely that your server will be hit by spoofed > packets with a source address belonging to any of those private IP > ranges. Wrong _WRONG_, *W*R*O*N*G*!!!! THAT STATEMENT IS ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT. "routing informatin" works on _destination_ addresses *ONLY*. The RFC languate means thhat you cannot -reach- an RFC-1918 *destination* address over the public internet. because no routing for those DESTINATION addrsses ic carried in the routing tables. The rest of your analysis is similarly similarly flawed. As a matter of 'reality' *NOBODY* providing 'transit' services filters on source addresses. 'Leaf' networks -- those with 'upstream' connectivity, but no 'downstream' clients -- are well advised to -themseleves- implement ingress/egress filtering at their border to block packets with 'inappropriate' _source_ addresses. This blocking has to be done with considerable care, however. There are some types of packets with 'un-routable' source addresses that *are* absolutely legitimate, and tht you -have- to let through, or you will have _major_ usability problems. It is also a GOOD IDEA to filter traffic, in _and_ out, to certain ports that are 'meaningful' *only* in a LAN environment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 17:57:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA07C106566B for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6048FC0C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id o9HHtH1N003230; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:55:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:55:17 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201010171755.o9HHtH1N003230@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com, rfarmer@predatorlabs.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:57:19 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010 > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= > To: Rob Farmer > Cc: User Questions > Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem > > 2010/10/16 Rob Farmer : > > 2010/10/16 Fernando Apestegu=EDa : > >> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough me= > mory. > >> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the > >> ports from a "fresh" > >> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm gettin= > g the > >> same error. > >> > >> Any VM tuning I can try? > > > > I'm not really knowledgeable about that kind of thing. > > > > However, the port is marked MAKE_JOBS_SAFE which means that it will > > try to run multiple compiler instances in parallel, to speed things up > > if you have multiple CPUs/cores. You can try running with "make > > -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS" to just run one at a time - maybe you have enough > > memory for that but not multiple jobs at once? > > Hi Rob, > > The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the > thing, compiling > the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 > optimization flag. > With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few > seconds. Without > the flag, the file is compiled without any problems and quite fast. > > Should this issue be a candidate for filing a PR? *ONLY* if you can provide a 'fix' _with_ the report! (Make sure the fix works on a machine with only 64mb ram and 256m swap. ) Turning on optimization virtually _always_ results in the compiler needing more resources. "How much" more depends on the size, complexity, and ' optimizability' of the code being compiled. The "simple" fix for your problem is to add swap space to the system. swap space does -not- have to be in a dedicated partition, see 'man swapon' for how to use a -file- as temporary swap space. Note: if you find someting that won't compile, given a combined 4 gigs of RAM and swap space, and the build isthe only thing running beyond core system services, *then* you've got the basis for 'good' PR filing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 18:05:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F081065672 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1928FC17 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732DE5737B; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:05:09 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=soyeomul; i=bh@izb.knu.ac.kr; bh=d u07zlM/xNkMQXWjWfAjd77heGdbAI9AdJ2hyBgpDTg=; b=DIf2PIptEThHpYQ95 +5tDkfyNCgDANq315PV/LnUptbjE4xQdctUgsXKxrUw7KHzePI2MkGmu60YjVKBm DttcPVjUDQX+pjZxeTwAGXYWtaLVOPd1CbwvMryheMNtjQYUS1rYOrM/ajcKSkzb lBTCHfy+4AigDbeYPrqTkY98Rg= Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F5D57379; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:05:09 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.home (unknown [59.24.179.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FF21CCF0; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:05:08 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: Mikle Krutov Organization: GR References: <20101004233302.GA62267@takino.homeftp.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEVMM2UIAhGJrpkJDwsD AwgJAggKPnwFBAIEBAQJAjTkRM0eAAACN0lEQVQ4jW3Tv2sbMRQHcPnSDt78bMWctkOBgDc7 10I8Cl6DOpZm6RgPBx4LgbrjUbVVNiuXHNF/2yfJzqnEwmDfffyV9PSD2UNTfuu9A/65cT39 AnZ4j8pTcxzM/HlO4F8BnAcHCK14CuBeQXAFAJwbg/MmS2igEDWtrfZ9PyQiiJCxei1o+CNY bUJX4J1Cr8TQlbWmFZ3vijFwT58c7kW3Z3K84oJrFAPYds8Yk6zmwnGLGai9rApZnaGgBbAZ wF6GdoY3DiADA74IMMa5KzFPGEWDSLmAiSttDkhTqUVxAX+c/g9ER7BeVnzyZAdA5Go9Y+OC ydXNXZlDCetJtfpWyXp6xzNQmkA+i0J+nI7jGJjKVjPfXYUKpXtc3AbQR2CraazQP17StKgr /QpXEZrNAdIY7Wx/HmHR91U2K8XP10BLSEvS94scoPUJvN/mCVSqxiVBBdCzAbDkeG2/XlVy BCA8ZoD4AZdUxYsiABPABNCIhsagnng4LDvL0LYYijdWCZrsRTx3YUnQGh46+0sZ2tv3MZ1A xdKNxnuYFO9onTEClYZpHX//LNjyOiRs2ihzhO9MVnYACqo051YUZwMYhXEW1L7s2XU6LxZv I6g4L1NTeSm7+wUBlCpD3Cyl3KXEqq5ZG+8RhEfBqsN2jrqaQYQ2PH/qRqmnh4auGgjnXPrj j1udunqg887i/daHXTlA+Gbgm8aX9k1jvifQp2Ajm+2pRL+hk3QKGikv3dv3IdE4cwL+ATzH tMu8OktOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-Window-System: GNU Network Object Model Environment OpenPGP: id=96B196FE (expiration: 2013-10-26); perference=sign Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:04:52 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20101004233302.GA62267@takino.homeftp.org> (Mikle Krutov's message of "Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:33:02 +0000") Message-ID: <86k4lg1yrf.fsf@betla.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netbooks & BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:05:12 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mikle Krutov writes: > Hello, list! > I'm going to buy a netbook soon, so a question is which one. > The choice is between > 1) Samsung N127 > 2) ASUS Eee PC 900AX > 3) MSI U120-094 > Which one is the best for running FreeBSD? > "The best" mainly is for opensource (e.g. not ndis) & stable wireless > drivers. > So, any good experience and suggestions? This is question, too. Are there drivers for netbook?=20 If it is OK, i'll go to market with money, right now! =2D-=20 =EC=86=8C=EC=97=AC=EB=AC=BC =ED=99=A9=EB=B3=91=ED=9D=AC(=E9=BB=83=E7=82=B3= =E7=86=99) | .. =EC=B6=9C=ED=95=AD 15=EB=B6=84=EC=A0=84.. "I have to gamble, I have to drink, I have to go out with the boys." -- Johnny Fontane, "Chapter 1", page 37 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAky7OswACgkQsCouaZaxlv6NlACfceSWr6tTKaAXNl8/mVqS1mNn cpgAoLikeNUQI8XlwvoBpb7DnknKu98c =/iNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 18:17:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6EC10656C2 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B888FC39 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9HIHGNp096668; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:17:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o9HIHGl7096665; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:17:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:17:16 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20101017143901.GA71132@current.Sisis.de> Message-ID: References: <20101004233302.GA62267@takino.homeftp.org> <20101004195012.GA2023@tiny> <20101017143901.GA71132@current.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:17:16 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, bdsfbsd@att.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netbooks & BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:17:19 -0000 On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Any alternative netbooks outside Asus which run FreeBSD? Of course. The Acer Aspire models vary, but the D250 is nice. http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 20:23:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF8F106566C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8832A8FC23 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so117647vws.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:23:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.185.135 with SMTP id co7mr870249vcb.209.1287347000667; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.188.3 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:23:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.53] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:23:20 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:23:22 -0000 2010/10/17 Fernando Apestegu=EDa : > The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the > thing, compiling > the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 > optimization flag. > With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few > seconds. Without > the flag, the file is compiled without any problems and quite fast. > > Should this issue be a candidate for filing a PR? It's hard to say whether this is really a bug or not - I still think your overall memory is low - 1 GB of RAM should be a supported configuration, but that assumes a decent amount of swap - I'll bet sysinstall's recommended partitioning would give you 2 GB. Try mailing the maintainers (gecko@freebsd.org) and see what they say. --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 21:59:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC01110656B6 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4A8FC2D for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so116674qwe.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dz+AsgW1WV9rYdPjLGasgR6uM6gdoxeuEmOBxia5n7s=; b=iBbvCGw3b9JP0jvalH9cE5wQD+IFrf4i///UR/HdLRtn9oAPKTCXzod34usSDcQ8SI 5V7PWVT/uYira4VYA6X5blT19PHNtnq9hzIhM0UlIiTbc+H17dqHHECl0nODZ9p3gAi8 kUi+wLCzLyBUEfjJR0jFZ0qzTOHIoqMOLI2fk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u2LZiWPrFiySWei0Ljza1f+827H17/mjYGEg61ZLoc2PnpwTFkeDATlzHW2YVLt0rl +jzfhj3REn9si1/n1gyNIzHEFD4XKZkcARXBOLheZqPWTVFtJ0cZBbaVFQU6TN5jgott x21mcIOT1wocXQBMvZApZo5Tcu4q45Eg7UDdY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.249.198 with SMTP id ml6mr3159605qcb.117.1287352773180; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.219.74 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:59:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201010171718.o9HHISJq003050@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201010171718.o9HHISJq003050@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:59:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Nerius Landys To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:59:35 -0000 > > > > Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to > > check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? > > 'netcat' has the capability built in. > > root# echo "hi" | nc -u -w 1 -p 30002 -s 64.156.193.115 daffy 30001 nc: bind failed: Can't assign requested address I don't seem to be able to spoof a source address using netcat, unless I'm missing something in the man page. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 23:37:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4052106564A for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4F28FC1D for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so445778wyb.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:37:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MePFe0SEAXnRCoqcYviEbg2hBj6NKpvlUkSUyyQFuF8=; b=KLAhpmKQH/PMPEpiGEuQcK5hY5lDr484ke4bPNh2y0cGQmFJeI4Tp3xXFA1ztrKoJQ SSlMM6FufdDISkaLKSqxThaAUJyK8dMJ6eRgypYvKIrOrZMenMmCm4CrAHWlP3uzSe6K QUTIKp46ZJvKC9ti0uJCQwCW7VZKhKchV8Was= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=cwM226Spdqgj5xxYQVN7rfgSvYrmMxoA26raDS+xOStgKok0Vx7po9TY3fQB64ob3S A5CrGWi7lCuxj0jwcVjVfY6buOeXGCqDtwWcXsRhBkke7MV3scMh6CTKUOJlo17CmkDz XTK8TBP0HOj350xxHMWhhjd4goBFBEou4VcAY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.140.37 with SMTP id d37mr4503339wej.31.1287358638233; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.131.207 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:37:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201010171718.o9HHISJq003050@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:37:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Nerius Landys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:37:20 -0000 On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Nerius Landys wrote: >> >> >> > Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to >> > check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? >> >> 'netcat' has the capability built in. >> >> > root# echo "hi" | nc -u -w 1 -p 30002 -s 64.156.193.115 daffy 30001 > nc: bind failed: Can't assign requested address > > I don't seem to be able to spoof a source address using netcat, unless I'm > missing something in the man page. I think you need to have the IP address you wish to spoof bound to an interface. -Brandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 02:27:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52771106566C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emailrob@emailrob.com) Received: from mx01.dls.net (mx01.dls.net [216.145.245.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AA98FC17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.145.235.208] (helo=emailrob.com) by mx01.dls.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7fRN-000219-9V; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:27:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4CBBA26C.9030701@emailrob.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:27:08 +0100 From: spellberg_robert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd_questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [fbsd_questions] 7.3 , 8.1 , je_malloc , mmap , brk , gcc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:27:11 -0000 greetings, all --- this is a follow_up to my recent inquiry. a while back, i took apart mr. kamp's malloc(3), so, i have a fair idea of its operation. i have not, as yet, done the same for its replacement. therefore, treat these questions, regarding je_malloc(3), as coming from a user. q: given that brk(2) and sbrk(2) can fail due to an interaction with the swapper, does mmap(2) suffer from the same issue, given that it has to "look up" the things that brk(2) already knows about ? q: if mmap(2) does not have this problem, then does that mean that if i use only the "m" option to je_malloc(3), it will fail only when it --really_is-- out_of_memory, including insufficient data_size resource_limit [ increasing resource_limits are a separate topic ] ? q: if mmap(2) --does-- still have this interaction, then should i continue to check resource_limits to be sure ? separately, q: is gcc(1) still at 4.2.1 ? q: if so, what plans are there for which next_version and when ? tia. rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 02:52:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163FD106566C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5798FC17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [66.253.36.39]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60C35295FF; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:52:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CBBB686.6000100@cyberleo.net> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:52:54 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100911 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Gooch References: <201010171718.o9HHISJq003050@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Bonomi , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nerius Landys Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:52:57 -0000 On 10/17/2010 06:37 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Nerius Landys wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to >>>> check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? >>> >>> 'netcat' has the capability built in. >>> >>> >> root# echo "hi" | nc -u -w 1 -p 30002 -s 64.156.193.115 daffy 30001 >> nc: bind failed: Can't assign requested address >> >> I don't seem to be able to spoof a source address using netcat, unless I'm >> missing something in the man page. > > I think you need to have the IP address you wish to spoof bound to an interface. Or use Nemesis as root. [0] http://nemesis.sourceforge.net/ -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 03:44:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F492106566C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B018FC08 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so309870bwz.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:44:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aNAYEaqC2LMfQitsatz9bQEEtR3BQuaC4ij/IDl4mKU=; b=JlA0UfKb0Z423alGFu/jio/bzpSl/hLkdQuMO/eG85tsDuQ2HrMVOJdcLQiUHDMw3h 5hmNzF2Qs6g7y1gNw1NKjPVynWxD5YvvxTEuAQlcbB/gqDKCJW4ob9l/OAnM6zYh5INz 39QOGjT+Bjz85vJq3NaypWEG+1urAFaPfIok4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=C1QzGi/ZI22piAN9Ma8gu7nY9IyFKh46TK3bwSQ0GidT/wFbB2r2GinsEDbCsbW+7H a7YJCkywReEBW1dvuObrCKSRxbNk16v3PJCeyk19h5NQqIK//oFxorJqAZyPmZn358EE 4br93QpgQ+G/iO2TVV+ahWXuFlWTaVzZvTpmQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.117.136 with SMTP id r8mr3884724bkq.119.1287373482654; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.69.144 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:44:42 -0400 Message-ID: From: Tim Dunphy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: download cvsup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:44:45 -0000 hello, I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already installed. it wasn't. :( I seem to be having a little trouble resolving external hosts tho my trusty named server on this host is working fine to resolve the local network. I need to reinstall my ports with sysinstall but to do that i need to resolve externally of course. I think this problem could use a fresh set of eyes. [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/etc/rc.d/netif restart Stopping Network: lo0 bge0 plip0. lo0: flags=8048 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 bge0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:14:22:38:9e:eb inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fe38:9eeb%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier plip0: flags=8810 metric 0 mtu 1500 Starting Network: lo0 bge0. lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:14:22:38:9e:eb inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fe38:9eeb%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.44 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#cat /etc/resolv.conf domain summitnjhome.com nameserver 192.168.1.44 nameserver 151.202.0.84 nameserver 4.2.2.2 [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#ping yahoo.com ping: cannot resolve yahoo.com: Host name lookup failure [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#host bsd2 bsd2.summitnjhome.com has address 192.168.1.44 I've cycled the network interface (bge0) several times now and even bounced the host to no avail. Thoughts? thanks! -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 05:47:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59650106566B for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA58D8FC08 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so378873ewy.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=GVVFEd8s3aXh+6E+P5Jg/5nSjeenFAJeVeVpw0NsJ4Q=; b=oQa8dO4Xr9wUsPu+7vpSNh1Fl1/nJn8EXunyl1s8hMYTIwGzCJSA7hekUhuBvfego7 EbXEUKsydSyWR7nLyM60F80yw5DJ5tqeMTF6qZtf35k6k1vODWxG4eO9nW+XNfQXYvep 68mqXbZnVIBPkbeaK+sKbSieL5CpA+JE2SSSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=nZ3PMN62LVarcJGsLdugOq9rvyXqw7UUPp4/4PCo6ZCV18LqpZbWbz7PIlmKeD55DU 3T8l3kWTGM5YTIHewv9YumvVeps4c8kgi/X2tbivqzFQbQ5ekjEOVoE7u/MEmEkALMKN wpEJUb0IRNe5Hp8lP9wdmehtS/rSbdLc7cZdw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.79 with SMTP id f15mr2994327eba.58.1287380836478; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.53.70 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:47:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CB8AB15.7000805@rawbw.com> References: <20101014120034.B794D10656D8@hub.freebsd.org> <20101015012001.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4CB89FB4.4020907@rawbw.com> <4CB8AB15.7000805@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:47:16 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Yuri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too many binary packages are missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:47:18 -0000 On 10/15/10, Yuri wrote: > On 10/15/2010 11:54, b. f. wrote: > That's quite a delay. This makes it very visible to users. Well, yes, to some. As to whether it's an unreasonably long delay, I'm not sure, considering the amount of work and resources required. After all, we're talking about lag of less than three weeks. You can always talk to the committers doing the work, to get a better idea of the schedule, and if it can be accelerated. >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-packages-latest/misc/kdeutils-4.5.2.tbz >> >> or, better yet, build your own. >> > > See, this is a problem. I only have one very slow i386 and it takes forever. Well, I have similar problems. I go to the trouble of building from source during periods of low use, after having chosen and configured my software so that I am installing as little as possible, but it still takes longer than I would like on my older i386s. You could configure pointyhat as a secondary source for new packages, and look into whether you could get access to a faster i386/amd64 machine that could be used to make packages for your slower computer. Or you could try to speed builds using devel/ccache and/or, if you can set up a cluster, devel/distcc. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 05:49:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315C0106564A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF1B8FC12 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7iav-0002bK-DX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:49:13 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:49:13 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:49:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:56:42 -0400 Lines: 83 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: download cvsup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:49:15 -0000 Tim Dunphy wrote: > hello, > > I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already > installed. it wasn't. :( csup is cvsup rewritten with C and exists in the base system. You no longer need to install cvsup, just use csup. > I seem to be having a little trouble resolving external hosts tho my > trusty named server on this host is working fine to resolve the local > network. I need to reinstall my ports with sysinstall but to do that i > need to resolve externally of course. I think this problem could use a > fresh set of eyes. You do not have to use sysinstall just to install ports. It is available as a tarball you can download and decompress. Use csup afterwards for an update to ensure you have pulled in any changes which may have occurred after the tarball was generated. You will, of course, need to get your network working first. > [root@LBSD2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/etc/rc.d/netif restart > Stopping Network: lo0 bge0 plip0. > lo0: flags=8048 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=3 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > bge0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=9b > ether 00:14:22:38:9e:eb > inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fe38:9eeb%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > plip0: flags=8810 metric 0 mtu 1500 > Starting Network: lo0 bge0. > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=3 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=9b > ether 00:14:22:38:9e:eb > inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fe38:9eeb%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.1.44 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Your network interface isn't connecting to anything, such as a hub, switch, or another computer via crossover cable at the physical layer. You need to fix this first, then worry about why the DNS is not working. Start with simple things such as substituting a known good cable from a working machine. Examine the LEDs on both the NIC and the hub/switch. Usually these will not be lit if there is no link. Is the hub/switch defective? Or locked up? I've seen hubs and switches lock up and a power cycle would make them operate again, for a while. Hubs or switches that lock up have an intermittent defect and should not be depended upon for the long run. Verify if you are using the correct driver. What version is the OS? Search bug reports and mail lists for known issues, e.g. such as someone else reported a problem with quite similar symptoms and the devs have already addressed it in HEAD and possibly MFC'd it to STABLE. Of course, if there is a fix you can't get at it until your network works. But you can also back up the train and tell us things like: did it used to work? and what did you do, or change, that made it begin not working? Some more details might give the 'fresh set of eyes' more to work with. [snip] -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 05:53:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFC5106566C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F004B8FC19 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so380471ewy.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=26nH76JPJrWpQcd9X8FK228nAs1RHsojqrnFOPg0xgk=; b=GijExDSGgf5OZSUj7WTQyST/lsZyMhGVeYOcUYgNwclWEP19vNNxPt6HbM+fFBuiNB 3efX4Q8yOY9f9f9pENJ+WyNJVMDewWAbz5Iyz5fl3aeXK4RCJsELs/caK7aE/nNwOjCy HIUzFEffJh2pvXIMgRrbz60MA0ls+oreff2gY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=XI0sIzTWoof7ZApz4eBNSEwXGX9Di188DLCFBvKc7+UOedC6lgUE5huwvt0AMkIeQ4 j8McKkPNWDf8Zyv4AZHRNwnKcQWVUVjbfp+ltl8vBTzF3iyqfxrhl82YG3nByhyyMP92 bGsvjD9K4/4yORAevngb17/zt8skivtv0SBcI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.13.80 with SMTP id b16mr867483eba.89.1287381192824; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.53.70 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101017223443.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101014120034.B794D10656D8@hub.freebsd.org> <20101015012001.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101017223443.F2036@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:53:12 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Ian Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Yuri , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too many binary packages are missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:53:14 -0000 On 10/17/10, Ian Smith wrote: > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, b. f. wrote: > > On 10/15/10, Ian Smith wrote: ... > Just to check that I get it .. for packages-8-stable, an 8.0-RELEASE-p2 > kernel + world is used to _build_ these, is that right? Yes, on i386, although this will change as some stable branches reach their end-of-life. >So they should > then install fine on any later 8.x system too? Yes, most of the time, although there may be uncommon cases in which they will not work as expected. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 05:57:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C819E106566C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D7FA8FC21 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2010 05:30:54 -0000 Received: from port-92-206-80-251.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO core2duo) [92.206.80.251] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 07:30:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19oYVtrRatoERJ3SOcG92dFQmzwZCh1bNwJUYBGwY izX6z0hY1271bc Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:30:48 +0200 From: Andreas Rudisch To: Tim Dunphy Message-Id: <20101018073048.18201e53.cyb.@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__18_Oct_2010_07_30_48_+0200_tcJqMc5NbhCVt+uD" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: download cvsup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:57:36 -0000 --Signature=_Mon__18_Oct_2010_07_30_48_+0200_tcJqMc5NbhCVt+uD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:44:42 -0400 Tim Dunphy wrote: > I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already > installed. it wasn't. :( csup is part of the system, no need to use cvsup from the ports any longer. > I seem to be having a little trouble resolving external hosts tho my > trusty named server on this host is working fine to resolve the local > network. I need to reinstall my ports with sysinstall but to do that i > need to resolve externally of course. I think this problem could use a > fresh set of eyes. For a start take a look at the cable/connection. > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/ Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 --Signature=_Mon__18_Oct_2010_07_30_48_+0200_tcJqMc5NbhCVt+uD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAky724gACgkQ8P3NNypXNWWbPgCgtSq43kOMOKtijZ+2pl6Q9Q8/ +BIAnj9bWVhztjZy7vmlMp33OApsbC+B =f17J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__18_Oct_2010_07_30_48_+0200_tcJqMc5NbhCVt+uD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 06:25:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454E106564A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6338FC17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so360005bwz.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7N9r97pCpm99CYpad6cBpN8NvhPKItELTl3SR+uLXXQ=; b=dZzemG9+pCdw2MPG+qAKkU9rm1iHYdah+XTUK85+nG70CW0NW/j4F3JdZ1BgTQNzh0 SW6wf0FgEdv1jK31zoolfRi+vtbX3JakZXtsWXlS7Ykqxhxy/JKpHghmi6CsNGy62saV dq0imZIP2m+dpmzERgiOhOuZz19u6atvVSXcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SIQ/wIg1hLydkZAdN5m37J9a0/InsfSSPXj64M5yPUVZV+arGovUcgFG5CuM0T1LNi D0hAXhDeUc+MA4ra7OPolR0LdkhY6jp4fMsn3Dwdxr75xlJIVzjzF19FWZqYDgXe9SsX Wof2eat16mw+weBMwUX96/aXM6jlLqqUrtkBw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.120.194 with SMTP id e2mr3893188bkr.200.1287383120809; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.82 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201010171755.o9HHtH1N003230@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201010171755.o9HHtH1N003230@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: rfarmer@predatorlabs.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:25:22 -0000 On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Robert Bonomi w= rote: >> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org =A0Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010 >> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200 >> From: =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=3DEDa?=3D >> To: Rob Farmer >> Cc: User Questions >> Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem >> >> 2010/10/16 Rob Farmer : >> > 2010/10/16 Fernando Apestegu=3DEDa : >> >> I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough= me=3D >> mory. >> >> In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the >> >> ports from a "fresh" >> >> running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm get= tin=3D >> g the >> >> same error. >> >> >> >> Any VM tuning I can try? >> > >> > I'm not really knowledgeable about that kind of thing. >> > >> > However, the port is marked MAKE_JOBS_SAFE which means that it will >> > try to run multiple compiler instances in parallel, to speed things up >> > if you have multiple CPUs/cores. You can try running with "make >> > -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS" to just run one at a time - maybe you have enough >> > memory for that but not multiple jobs at once? >> >> Hi Rob, >> >> The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the >> thing, compiling >> the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 >> optimization flag. >> With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few >> seconds. Without >> the flag, the file is compiled without any problems and quite fast. >> >> Should this issue be a candidate for filing a PR? > > *ONLY* if you can provide a 'fix' _with_ the report! =A0 > (Make sure the fix works on a machine with only 64mb ram and 256m swap. ) Hehe, OK, I'll try to have a look at it. > > Turning on optimization virtually _always_ results in the compiler needin= g > more resources. =A0 "How much" more depends on the size, complexity, and = ' > optimizability' of the code being compiled. > > The "simple" fix for your problem is to add swap space to the system. > swap space does -not- have to be in a dedicated partition, see 'man swapo= n' > for how to use a -file- as temporary swap space. I had done it if disabling the optimization wouldn't have changed anything.= The main problem was that I didn't know how much swap I had to add. Right now I have an updated system but I will have a look at how much RAM this takes using -O2. > > > Note: if you find someting that won't compile, given a combined 4 gigs of > RAM and swap space, and the build isthe only thing running beyond core > system services, *then* you've got the basis for 'good' PR filing. Thanks! > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 06:28:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B297D106564A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385BB8FC13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so361382bwz.13 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:28:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D4wHyl69qHgO8DVf8I2Z9vylEXUvpadAYQEOx5bLacQ=; b=ZPdbzY2J1twMslWAZXoNaUspngmQttyxtPcD+CGkuQgV5doKQPa+M4fHzSLWcdq07z 8swO8OIcyHi0CGiF2Gf3e6F5Iegzt81v9gWs0AepWrVPLi8mCnnmfKMZIeby4tH1Z9Kq ID+ct3AbGHDtHzUyNRYsWjiWQjKkdqjY+fU+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K1vDeKTHFz0A96XXU7VvhfIosEVrOybwJkmzn2Fhmcxs3D1l5+loQNAE5oCHhxZHub zwqMQyLPQBITkzXTsDaH1Xof6bkNV7Gu+qjgQSfdUqKal6at6qDUuCSonAYcYJh3M9ym d90kGJgVZ0UghASUdDrurnK2dhk2KYsYK4ywk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.211 with SMTP id n19mr3934173bkj.146.1287383295390; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.82 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:28:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Rob Farmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:28:17 -0000 2010/10/17 Rob Farmer : > 2010/10/17 Fernando Apestegu=EDa : >> The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the >> thing, compiling >> the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 >> optimization flag. >> With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my system in a few >> seconds. Without >> the flag, the file is compiled without any problems and quite fast. >> >> Should this issue be a candidate for filing a PR? > > It's hard to say whether this is really a bug or not - I still think > your overall memory is low - 1 GB of RAM should be a supported > configuration, but that assumes a decent amount of swap - I'll bet > sysinstall's recommended partitioning would give you 2 GB. I still refuse to think 1GB is low ;) though I could be wrong. > > Try mailing the maintainers (gecko@freebsd.org) and see what they say. I'll do it. Thanks for your advices. Cheers. > > -- > Rob Farmer > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 09:24:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30D81065673 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926FF8FC0A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so353270qwe.13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:24:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0JAkQQjD1q2bk31KpwtAKouY9iZ7Ngqob+/hOxqiOlk=; b=MDiDq2oRMJ/nBK292LZcMjiNtd8PVz+Z2hk3OhTtSF/SCvYkfhXpOauMQfwTmHtgSH TplU0ODl1wCjfXcNT6EXVCMcBcDm4C8kdmQemSvchbSPcoHG5cjQAO4aAncQGPkQg/YL 6dUFmo4QGoOzV0+wY3kwhenyMqeVbNV2ljLXo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=CuY6/+3t0qeiKtWOsAF3iXiSJ8N1/Ag9ahjyclBTtwsm2w1koBeFWLO5FKc+YQ92Sq 2Ylc9ug8MDq591XZtc0blON7DF44+WGr7rIuQzEtCqsvZyyGJUTGmoqQkgyCz7h4SRPL tIewBq5Xe9WJTJ3AMVSEAXrliSQbpmOOXOgFs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.233.80 with SMTP id jx16mr3667009qcb.62.1287393896607; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.224.21 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:24:53 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: archivers/xz still needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:25:00 -0000 when doing portupgrade, I get - archivers/xz (marked as IGNORE) since it is now in the base system But # pkg_info -R xz-4.999.9_1 Required by: gtar-1.23_3 kdeutils-3.5.10_6 # pkg_info -R gtar-1.23_3 Required by: kdeutils-3.5.10_6 I indeed still use kedutils and want to keep that version (3.5). Is there a way to do some recompilation so that gtar and kdeutils do no longer user xz that I can do, to get rid of the the IGNORE ? How would that exactly be? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 11:02:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37718106566B for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz) Received: from smtprelay-h32.telenor.se (smtprelay-h32.telenor.se [213.150.131.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24C28FC14 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb4.telenor.se (ipb4.telenor.se [195.54.127.167]) by smtprelay-h32.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B2BEB65B for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:02:55 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.226.59.55] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqwxAAbGu0xV4js3PGdsb2JhbAChKgwBAQEBNS29JoVJBI1Pgmc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,345,1283724000"; d="scan'208";a="1682619513" Received: from c-373be255.107-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO gatekeeper.pp.dyndns.biz) ([85.226.59.55]) by ipb4.telenor.se with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2010 13:02:55 +0200 Received: from [192.168.69.70] ([192.168.69.70]) by gatekeeper.pp.dyndns.biz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9IB2r4J082467; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:02:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz) Message-ID: <4CBC295D.80002@pp.dyndns.biz> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:02:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101016 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Bonomi References: <201010171736.o9HHaOc6003135@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <201010171736.o9HHaOc6003135@mail.r-bonomi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nlandys@gmail.com Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:02:59 -0000 On 2010-10-17 19:36, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 09:04:59 2010 >> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:06:12 +0200 >> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= >> >> To: Nerius Landys >> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List >> Subject: Re: UDP packet spoofed LAN source address? >> >> On 2010-10-17 06:56, Nerius Landys wrote: >>> This is really more of a networking question. >>> I'm wondering, in a typical scenario, for example my server is in a data >>> center with a typical colocation company. >>> >>> I am editing someone else's code, and this code handles incoming UDP >>> packets. The code handles UDP packets that have a source address being from >>> the LAN differently. It gives those packets special treatment. To check >>> whether a source address is a LAN address, it does the typical checks for >>> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0, 127.0.0.0, and it also checks every >>> assinged IP address with netmask to see if the source address on the UDP >>> packet came from that network. >>> >>> My question is - how possible (in these typical environments) is it to send >>> a UDP packet from far away that claims to have a source address being a LAN >>> address? Will such a packet typically make it to my server, or will a >>> router along the way stop it from arriving? >>> >>> Maybe, is there a simple 10 line C program that I can run and compile to >>> check if this scenario is possible on _my_ server? >>> >>> - Nerius >> >> Section 3 of RFC1918 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1918.txt) states the >> following, and I quote: >> >> "Routers in networks not using private address space, especially those >> of Internet service providers, are expected to be configured to reject >> (filter out) routing information about private networks." >> >> This makes it _highly_ unlikely that your server will be hit by spoofed >> packets with a source address belonging to any of those private IP >> ranges. > > > Wrong _WRONG_, *W*R*O*N*G*!!!! > > THAT STATEMENT IS ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT. > > "routing informatin" works on _destination_ addresses *ONLY*. The RFC > languate means thhat you cannot -reach- an RFC-1918 *destination* address > over the public internet. because no routing for those DESTINATION addrsses > ic carried in the routing tables. > > > The rest of your analysis is similarly similarly flawed. > > As a matter of 'reality' *NOBODY* providing 'transit' services filters on > source addresses. > > 'Leaf' networks -- those with 'upstream' connectivity, but no 'downstream' > clients -- are well advised to -themseleves- implement ingress/egress > filtering at their border to block packets with 'inappropriate' _source_ > addresses. > > This blocking has to be done with considerable care, however. There are > some types of packets with 'un-routable' source addresses that *are* > absolutely legitimate, and tht you -have- to let through, or you will have > _major_ usability problems. > > > It is also a GOOD IDEA to filter traffic, in _and_ out, to certain ports > that are 'meaningful' *only* in a LAN environment. > > Robert, I have 3 comments: 1) RFC1918 does _not_ explicitly define routing information as only destination address. 2) Cisco recommend themselves to filter out RFC1918 based on _source_ address as described here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_white_paper09186a00801a1a55.shtml#ex If you're unfamiliar with Cisco's standard ACL syntax you can find it described here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps1018/products_tech_note09186a00800a5b9a.shtml#standacl I don't claim that every router out there is configured this way (I have no way to verify that) but if you were employed by me and didn't follow basic Cisco recommendations, you would have to look for a new employer. 3) Shouting does _not_ make a false statement correct, even if I'm fully aware that there are people that believe so. Also, if you chose to argue in demeaning wordings like "your analysis is flawed", on a public mailing list, please atleast try to explain why the analysis is flawed. It's generally a very good idea to always provide references to what you claim if you want to be taken seriously. Just a friendly suggestion. Have a pleasant day. Morgan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 11 11:13:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7721065729 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414088FC1B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so135206qyk.13 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:13:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BTWGcMCuh89AQBfRsaSfd+OCKhR+Xw8/RYpBsldcNuc=; b=YGzGiBl5llaMrCJHPdV/zHZHqiOjU5T9q9BpeF4K5x7V7gloCCWG/z/785fk6kgQr+ M8AXaa+EY6HZhesG/6Evoc7xtw1SWlxGPe+xmIC6U8M32R3Ln6Kv85i0n/Be0D5R1RRe P5qbmT+1wDPnCHjV/T3icjuueB0TRgTJuQfKA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lR205CyY4pWccLXx5M9bBujSgRMThUVl1fo39J2o98sIbsko6qUUZOLNy6gahO5441 gIUQvSK6EkBsvDolthhuKMVOOTGyx2ngMLsUTDPF7bTtaR5vruhQbMXOE2oQ+4U72Csq 3b9TYxZVO3m9Qsu4ORfauBhYxf42bo4l4Tyfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.231.11 with SMTP id jo11mr4916661qcb.66.1286793909686; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.88.145 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:45:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1286463446.8004.5.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> <0B26C158-127F-45AD-B2F3-D287F222AB91@cwis.biz> <72172F50-1BC8-42CC-AE55-5BF83CC1867C@cwis.biz> <4A031AD6-9E27-48E0-90F5-D1B6C3A892DF@cwis.biz> <44y6a93lhd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:09 +1100 Message-ID: From: David N To: Phan Quoc Hien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:42:23 +0000 Cc: Craig Butler , Lowell Gilbert , Ryan Coleman , ale@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can not install ZendOptimizer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:13:54 -0000 On 11 October 2010 21:25, Phan Quoc Hien wrote: > ZendOptimizer seem not support FreeBSD? > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Lowell Gilbert < > freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Ryan Coleman >> wrote: >> > >> >> Phan, >> >> >> >> The solution looks like install PHP 5.2 (/usr/ports/lang/php52) and t= hen >> >> install /usr/ports/devel/ZendOptimizer. >> >> >> Phan Quoc Hien writes: >> >> > Yes, Thank Ryan. But it's not clearly solution. >> >> The reason it is a little unclear is that the port warns you about the >> problem, but the warning sounds like all of 5.x is incompatible with >> ZendOptimizer (when 5.2 is actually fine). =A0I spent a few minutes >> looking at the port, but I couldn't come up with a quick fix for the >> error message. >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Mr.Hien > E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com > Website: www.mrhien.info > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Zend Optimiser seemed to have dropped support for FreeBSD starting from FreeBSD >=3D 7.0 and PHP >=3D 5.3 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058016.html http://www.zend.com/en/products/guard/system-requirements From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 12 10:39:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FA31065673 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kshetrisujan@yahoo.com) Received: from n1-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (n1-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.23.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0CB98FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [67.195.9.81] by n1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2010 10:27:02 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.97] by t1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2010 10:27:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2010 10:27:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 538724.94205.bm@omp101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 86596 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Oct 2010 10:27:01 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286879221; bh=4ht9G50SlYlr7BPTCuy+KjNotHQlLEXbSKghIYlF3TI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z0T/KJjYh2JZ6R7jIaEm2s/NMfoE3hwvYy6KGXdVONGjKPxEP4varj2qFIrP/rU+mE9NSjWi736Uisu3dE+k1+n+oVyI3JDbKXMhaS/+6b4/Ew3aum+BiK+vnupXN4WGo91ZPswaEekbNXrsOMEt2E5fsWSD1teHNmW+KR5ncHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SbOSDe5sE8eLjis4Fgbmj0IAGvhQaDapD+Co/tRZc3PvoC0FZl3DoEvrDKr5W71/wcemfBMUPI2Goz61Eg8rWstp+SPhOKAmt8gZ26qHOv5eRhPF2AdiByTMapOxGJjRGBf63Y56PN/eZkzW7pLJZbgl6dzkhoxb/s4LZqz2BMs=; Message-ID: <853118.76155.qm@web120314.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: WRiEXckVM1nt5EBc5OtO0T5uUoJy8EwT8Rf3.bneNYJvi3G WUePqoIj7D8088yomvUMXi77NNnk6iNA4YUZjlIbQYiib.cDpgaMlmgsuyn5 PUxoIeu6RDeLUnMX60uBOyPfsewKKxMLoKKAsUe7pVrXbuU5N4DO3kdqyER0 gQoC9IXq5DVbs9DGyHhpkfEElAO4DZlJizu33.Q-- Received: from [113.199.151.207] by web120314.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:27:01 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.106.282862 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:27:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Sujan To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:42:48 +0000 Subject: wireless driver for dell latitude d505? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:39:52 -0000 Sent from my iPhone From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 05:31:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D47106566C for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yxy.716@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606928FC16 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe42 with SMTP id 42so2159214yxe.13 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nA9UfwI2ksJoKS/y9vpym96L56vpxq3SEm36QJ6KA6c=; b=dkkjjR/KtwrebK3mol8Go3Y6OF8GbtC4CQhHp9Xveh4ahlni2ttjHpf/D9h4s1QsWo UI520qQp1nX3eFctpUBh4AeWD2CDmLSW+keTyZk8w16TJ8u5SYAmqxAjZNwaKguM24jb uaMFVzy10ZYwzcFhKdOGqaLsxpQwLlAvpWT6c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=mWODgTOLlRrRNJIC897KVXHQIgnqQV1BM2kipT60mm4g+NADUjP5FnhbFWNaV6RUa2 LcaY+98xzpvVVXQ9sG9lmpar/gwWg0Ncq9tGjcmratmyZmJcdKVqjWhKKrNwFFGoqAI6 T2fXCl/l8/t2BOlG0Bw6ia9cxvK6YJrANlSjw= Received: by 10.150.190.16 with SMTP id n16mr2531600ybf.357.1287032960824; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([59.174.51.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q23sm476039yba.5.2010.10.13.22.09.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:09:20 -0700 (PDT) From: yanxinyou To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:34:28 +0800 Message-ID: <1286980468.3505.2.camel@yanxinyou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:18 +0000 Subject: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:31:02 -0000 may be i can't send the email ; if i sent , how i install the firefox flash plugins -- yanxinyou From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 05:51:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8ECD1065670 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout011.mac.com (asmtpout011.mac.com [17.148.16.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16748FC1E for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:51:30 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Received: from Blue-Star.local ([24.237.92.79]) by asmtp011.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LA900G8EMXRX200@asmtp011.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:51:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010130254 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-14_03:2010-10-13, 2010-10-14, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:51:29 -0800 From: "Peter A. Giessel" To: yanxinyou X-Priority: 3 In-reply-to: <1286980026.3500.0.camel@yanxinyou.org> Message-id: X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.2.5 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:29 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:51:30 -0000 On 2010/10/13 at 6:27, yxy.716@gmail.com (yanxinyou) wrote: >how to install the flash plugin to firefox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 15:25:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E582106566B for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikeo.veterantutors@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354258FC08 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so63069gwb.13 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:25:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lts8cXxWESGC7tG6qDzASLYAN0PsqAx2Hi/fr+dGcKM=; b=NPsupO5uh1xTAruvoBzkEBb0Yo4afv5Yl/wqR4pofOE40wncPnEyr6UJFq4TiAxQzR CeH3y3L00Y8SXqy/Siat3L1If3Q53fIYdjve7ky1ySe1mS14ePx7YL5kPncqi1uELCmF xzuG9GAcMQMLzF3makWYTV6OfiFSKld+okwVA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O917m1tpfGqgIB+AXrrIvCn803q7TGEfdqBX4DRHcMKNgGgXadX/u4m+OC5ZljevNf NTd2M/dXX+7n9aMXjOCsqSyf2Fud7b5kET34JqmyBVrSul/vz3IQM8vPEPwWRUCYyGe/ 5aBM5knjiPUjZrOsmKeYyzyZ2hOXXkw3paymg= Received: by 10.151.147.20 with SMTP id z20mr3542016ybn.53.1287068143902; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [11.168.0.101] (rrcs-97-77-159-195.sw.biz.rr.com [97.77.159.195]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i10sm12753483ane.9.2010.10.14.07.55.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CB719ED.70602@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:55:41 -0500 From: Mike Overton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:52 +0000 Cc: Richard Ehrlich Subject: Problem Installing freeBSD 8.1 on Dell Poweredge T110 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:56 -0000 (New Dell Poweredge T110, X3430 Xeon, 4GB 1333MHz ). Machine replaces operating freeBSD 8.1 Dell 686 machine with active Internet connection. When trying to load freeBSD 8.1 from a boot only i386 ISO disc, which installed with no problems on Dell 686 Pentium machine, new machine is not accepting network configuration loaded via Sysinstall and cannot find freeBSD download site. Dell Support refused help, stating "we do not support freeBSD". Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 13:54:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6946A106566B for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66C48FC18 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6kk6-0002a1-M3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:42 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:42 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:35 +0200 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:53:12 +0000 Subject: Re: Jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:54:45 -0000 On 10/14/10 18:20, Matthew Law wrote: > I have a single box on which I would like to run openvpn, smtp (postfix, > dspam, greylist, clamav), imap (dovecot) apache22 and bind. This box also > acts as a network gateway so it would give an attacker carte blanche to > the internal nets if it was compromised, which makes me nervous. The plan > is to run openvpn as the only unjailed service and the rest of the > services in a single jail or their own jails. > > I have never touched jails before and I'm a bit unsure of the best way to > go. I realise that I can jail a service or a copy of the whole system > (service would be preferable for space efficiency) but I am unclear on how > to deal with IP addresses in jailed environments and if I should create > individual jails or a single jail for all services. At the moment I am > leaning toward a single system jail for everything so I can keep the space > in which openvpn runs as uncluttered as possible and also have a single > postgres instance shared by the other services. Basically, if any of the > public services in the jail are compromised I would like to make it very > hard for the attacker to see the internal network. Since jails can do many things there are many "helper" utilities that can do much to simplify the process. If you can hack python, you can, for example, modify my script at http://ivoras.sharanet.org/stuff/mkjails.py which I've used to create a thousand very light-weight jails which are started and managed using only standard FreeBSD tools. In any case, read rc.conf(5) man page for the jail_* settings. > If I use this scheme must I use separate public IPs for openvpn and the > services jail or is it possible to use a single IP or some NAT/PAT scheme? > -this box currently has 4 x NICs split into 2x lagg interfaces in failover > mode (one public, one private), if that makes any difference.... This is the more complex question; I think that everything which needs direct access to the NIC (i.e. BPF, DHCP, IPFW, etc.) will need to be run on the host system. TCP services will work inside jails without problems, but with jails it's almost the same as if they were on another system. If you do use NAT you will have to configure it on the host. Instead, you can also use TCP proxies (like bsdproxy). It's up to you how much complexity do you want in your system, but for simplicity I would set up a single outward-facing IP address and then proxy TCP services where I need them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 18:04:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A33106566C for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdsfbsd@att.net) Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4E548FC12 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99057 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 17:38:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1287164298; bh=lWYGyGd0aruBVE0D3SVvE9dglpsVOsUGobN0AJrbL8k=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:To:Subject:References:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=tr05QRIc2eseHvIOflTpyoBFxu+Vy1hi4DOWbIUOQjYYAv0x/EXbJ3IJZRT6jwGk2n6JJ9h506AXd/0t4TJxwWLpqsfi/WKL9azxPBckefGvaKA9R+CdMbi6YKDkpkSL6+VFSO99/G5QvS0t/ahwwo8MX5RkyyXUTYe0SOzJ+K4= Received: from ack5833s2.ad.service.osu.edu (bdsfbsd@128.146.175.36 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 10:38:18 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: d5tX3UiswBBe7eAro3WwBCIcMc7tMmv23kUXyA-- X-YMail-OSG: orun2F4VM1nNFEBx1ZOgBEj6TyNs9.TOSy33BnVXLvUFQkV mP4PkcpxeHsG3YSHctf5PLiWBjJ3r0JvDsz3Ec5tHxddM.l5DrBSNiIPn9BE VZxahsw1FWROrRhO7l7pgtNpRavZsWVB2FHARlgS2TO_Gfwex.kjCI4sXKxW aYqPYYxIUg3KDRqhX13xwTsM5i5yX4E8g5r6fLHP1KNFU2IopYr6I8DXaZl6 RSrbdHvkMSfRNV1lDkH.1mpxh8UTStwigsuKkJxFL94iF2cpmrhjeayseUqZ qq1L59ga0gA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: FreeBSD References: <4CB84A9B.7080605@a1poweruser.com> <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: bdsfbsd@att.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:53:28 +0000 Subject: Re: Jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:59 -0000 On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry = wrote: > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400 > Fbsd8 articulated: > >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports >> collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task >> of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get >> qjail from here. http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/files/ > > I have submitted new ports in the past and they were usually accepted > and posted within a short period of time; usually 2 weeks or so. Perha= ps > there is a specific reason why this port has not been accepted/release= d > into the ports system. Have you, or whom ever submitted the port, > requested clarification as to why it has not been accepted/released? > Before issuing a blank condemnation of the port's department it would > seem like the logical course of action. If you don't receive a > satisfactory reply with two weeks, then it might be worth escalating > the matter. > > Just my 2=A2. > I'm pretty sure I've seen this conversation between the same people befo= re. Ah, yes: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg235282.html= Noting that Aiza =3D FBSD8... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 12:28:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F266B106564A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C678FC17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so327419gwb.13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.79.19 with SMTP id g19mr6797554ybl.51.1287404916914; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x51sm7859061yhc.19.2010.10.18.05.28.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5925EE54875 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:29 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101018082829.297fed2d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4CB719ED.70602@gmail.com> References: <4CB719ED.70602@gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAG1BMVEX3/uPVnZf2/v9ejGkqHB74++H///+cHCT3m6cgqYvfAAACbElEQVQ4jWXTQW/bIBQAYJLJuRMn8TVCss9zTdrrXJ6bHe1Ej/bossF9EpJ3nbapf3sP8JxOQ4qV8OU9HvjBROWcYNlKHtxlQ1/huBaOBiMwQtgHhbokMLIT76Acps5hvy61+6WsjkCZzNEW0+fcQ7Nl5uoPCegjjjhN5/MEABd89k9hXkQoX6cwPIDKCt8tYG5wpmdrxAyuolTPqpiVoEpVCWvl6e00RAD4JBJQnO4lvv0O4Cnd3WUGevYNFohxFYAy7jCCtW39LaQK8BgDAgiHVinVJlCiFKlcqgEHfwb1EuG+DwFGMO3oCIuJIEYoa8KJECBB+UBldgm0MQmEGz7GQr8XYRPKzYNO1zZ8mgdAu4BG5Ke/4KFboM8458UScViAAvYD93OAsu+Bc3zxCU7ZAjT74+dQv9K7oO0d1wuscop48Pc50O5bcVwgGzh/mXzaizJuAWERh8k3eaxKmxu4kV1p2XOEg3i3c8M+EKR93P0D1KATpC55vMHaGqFf5f/AwhlrhHgg8DTezopt6I3o3Qx4q4q6YaPxK8RxcClXeFGhTTS++QR6TS/oBs7l4WhzuNMubZG6hIBkF4qqZVdWczIqSrjKVF/i4o26IP2oElBGFy5CXKSnf6UWDTC6zKSqoAvzsakjjBvdzLKnmxdhY8eRsX7VSCUBdgD1hVJpx6y2OOS1DNDILYmqdWUJ+oHvd0rRvAqX5kpxQMR6yxHzPV6VlPFyWE7LKc36keNQI64gLP8Ybgtmg+zYuBl4fuI8VqW2RqDGE8Uzu7GxGa803whDdxx3bSZbRhfQUSxvmnpLZWpRFqHz7v8AvsBe0S1zv9UAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Problem Installing freeBSD 8.1 on Dell Poweredge T110 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:38 -0000 On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:55:41 -0500 Mike Overton articulated: > (New Dell Poweredge T110, X3430 Xeon, 4GB 1333MHz ). Machine > replaces operating freeBSD 8.1 Dell 686 machine with active Internet > connection. > > When trying to load freeBSD 8.1 from a boot only i386 ISO disc, which > installed with no problems on Dell 686 Pentium machine, new machine > is not accepting network configuration loaded via Sysinstall and > cannot find freeBSD download site. > > Dell Support refused help, stating "we do not support freeBSD". > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. What error messages are displayed? Is this a hard wired or wireless connection? -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ 1st graffitiest: QUESTION AUTHORITY! 2nd graffitiest: Why? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 12:42:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A35106564A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B318FC26 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so330655ywh.13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.209.142 with SMTP id gg14mr2219835icb.529.1287405749094; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h70sm12253330yha.46.2010.10.18.05.42.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E708E54875 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:42:25 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101018084225.2b53e065@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <4CB84A9B.7080605@a1poweruser.com> <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:42:31 -0000 On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 bdsfbsd@att.net articulated: > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry > wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400 > > Fbsd8 articulated: > > > >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports > >> collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their > >> task of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you > >> can get qjail from here. > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/files/ > > > > I have submitted new ports in the past and they were usually > > accepted and posted within a short period of time; usually 2 weeks > > or so. Perhaps there is a specific reason why this port has not > > been accepted/released into the ports system. Have you, or whom > > ever submitted the port, requested clarification as to why it has > > not been accepted/released? Before issuing a blank condemnation of > > the port's department it would seem like the logical course of > > action. If you don't receive a satisfactory reply with two weeks, > > then it might be worth escalating the matter. > > > > Just my 2¢. > > > > I'm pretty sure I've seen this conversation between the same people > before. > > Ah, yes: > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg235282.html > > Noting that Aiza = FBSD8... That PR would be: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148777, originally submitted on Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:47:18 GMT by Joe Barbish There was a posting to it on October 15, 2010 sans reply. One would be led to believe that there is a specific reason that it is stuck in the queue. Perhaps "makc@FreeBSD.org" would care to respond. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 13:44:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D679D106564A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6115F8FC0A for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so632468bwz.13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:44:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CB3m+WEAAs9nXfkQlLJbfRcemKlDDYaRTbrpUhlPKfQ=; b=XgBM2QopWqDGJmkWvy+Ks1bNRbiVvBPE4s80zZZVx+waVTMPmmEvqCpfpe4xx9wGWo 2s05Zj8N7GUTj7IYP1CNIdUqD7FC3MY/Iw77a8cbM1LT0C6Bdbw+2CGcXUXorwaa8ldf T/OAFiB+o+JZPgCyNS9jgRhvYkAUtvfa37Szc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eB+0dxT03uH0xezPckjgxZekTlQvpPkYvRC1BwNvnsJqkoFBgLO/a3bOIcrBx0gg69 rlgZlkBZqpTMfRN9mhDlFc78e0U6uYUuBW1isorZlvs0phPRqUOSo17CFsqF3TvWLOrf aF7EoW6mm3ldGhBYVtXsjvI/FUF1nE/3tV2P0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.211 with SMTP id n19mr4343840bkj.146.1287409462552; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.82 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:44:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:44:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: n dhert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: archivers/xz still needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:44:37 -0000 On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:24 AM, n dhert wrote: > when doing portupgrade, I get > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0- archivers/xz (marked as IGNORE) > since it is now in the base system > But > # pkg_info -R xz-4.999.9_1 > Required by: > gtar-1.23_3 > kdeutils-3.5.10_6 > > # pkg_info -R gtar-1.23_3 > Required by: > kdeutils-3.5.10_6 > I indeed still use kedutils and want to keep that version (3.5). > Is there a way to do some recompilation so that gtar and kdeutils do no > longer user xz > that I can do, to get rid of the the =A0IGNORE ? > How would that exactly be? Please, CMIIW, but can't you just use portupgrade -f to force the installation? (or use FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=3Dyes). Cheers > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 14:26:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A0C106566B for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A893D8FC17 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so457173vws.13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:26:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zlArthUaYBWkk29NDIcpLENZkI3yGidHDU7JSb2eV90=; b=fXB40WMwiUQkTHZivrumCEPxGF61zfOCAW1FTY76PUGCxbnwzXe1HBuFtfKtL9ASn4 LnRUvX+GJ/BNiwPfrFA0stMuxWLZ2MIoMlWzxad0QeHQv1MgTR40xyh8U2EQzwQC7ZMM 9ChZxp2wVft9+OV9Nkgs8gQPu/JRRynFqTo9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=e+z6WZeaj8D2PW5L5HkwRt5Ks55cR1xe3AXGQ34uW4lz63IEcNdHswF/wsSi4f6BDf Xo1IIH4SSxmMllfgGk1QNSXhM5GJ2NvlFko+A+/fsBCCNOVLlEsZSUeDpLestwpkErLg UFuixlpe1xb04T79q9p7Eb/Z3xvFpcP79wlVA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.161.18 with SMTP id n18mr2433160muo.31.1287411980303; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.104.200 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:26:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CB719ED.70602@gmail.com> References: <4CB719ED.70602@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:26:20 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Mike Overton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Richard Ehrlich , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing freeBSD 8.1 on Dell Poweredge T110 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:26:23 -0000 On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Mike Overton wrote: > (New Dell Poweredge T110, X3430 Xeon, 4GB 1333MHz ). Machine replaces > operating freeBSD 8.1 Dell 686 machine with active Internet connection. > > When trying to load freeBSD 8.1 from a boot only i386 ISO disc, which > installed with no problems on Dell 686 Pentium machine, new machine is not > accepting network configuration loaded via Sysinstall and cannot find > freeBSD download site. > > Dell Support refused help, stating "we do not support freeBSD". > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > 1. Don't do a net install. 2. If you must do a net install, use Passive FTP. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 17:55:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010501065672 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A41428FC22 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18489 invoked by uid 0); 18 Oct 2010 17:55:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 17:55:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=lYFpiijNj0taozwqe3d2+Yn6v/degZYoB2yEcwsTAFbT9unoM2az4hTbmlbyRf/MqGV7zZvnQmeHCo+i2a4TVXm9cKv0Wei/wVTwnesLQRe80zNP+43jeICzKMNM+yq/; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7tvo-0003rl-Nc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:55:34 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:50:27 -0600 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:50:27 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101018175027.GA27855@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: chromium crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:55:35 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The problem I'm having is that I can't get a vi-like keybindings extension to work. I guess it's likely that most extensions haven't been tested for compatibility on FreeBSD, though. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAky8iOMACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVE+wCeNUZvzXGMKV9dxCnlTFwQzbeb LjEAn3B5cZfivYdovaVVdKQdEOMNRGIV =iLE/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 17:57:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2728106566B for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C83A8FC1F for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so30649gxk.13 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:57:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rSfbQsgjIdfojBeZqItFSnFqck01G+7tgbAIuBKP49g=; b=t88jxh4NOZxZaYkBI4QY4+A1U4AfBmt7AHQw9lfXdi7wDfXru/Jn3XE7RCd6OwN1lN lL6oAr9QBxFn2OyN7GfkjiXps8k510HTnFXuBccZonTdOdTf5CIBCrNord6xcka6IGAr KjEzQhvFxejmEsk2J1ZpJxBbcG/GF6bY9YArM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bQKhAsJBdOGIB9GgpxguGWtyaACVB/2UzYOTcTz0t9TyCpf7PKrZu8dNBc4d8Kzwcy iZJxJ6e+Ms7pJZzlS72mQjGivT0VJcsfTCaZW6948KR/S2nkot/a+7thQvIYHJKij++1 teJWfko/AGnB8iSWIOfNGcKgXURl8zoHCC6W0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.49.1 with SMTP id w1mr2065307agw.154.1287424644811; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.10.19 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:57:24 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: Free BSD Questions list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: pf + NAT + log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:57:25 -0000 Hi everyone. This is probably better suited for freebsd-pf@ but I'll give it a go before spamming YAML. I'm testing NAT on FreeBSD 8.1. My setup is very simple: My workstation -> { internal network switch } -> FreeBSD 8.1routing firewall with squid 3 -> { switch going to Internet } My pf configuration is a bare minimum for passing everything and logging at every stage I can think of. I'll start filtering after I get this sorted out. pf.conf: ======================= ext_if=bge0 int_if=bge1 rdr pass log(all) on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 3128 nat pass log(all) on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) pass log(all) on $int_if pass log(all) on $ext_if ======================= If my internal workstation is 10.201.201.1, the external interface on my FreeBSD machine is 10.100.100.1 and I ssh to a server at 10.1.1.1, the connection works. On the server I get a connection on port 22 from the FreeBSD router on source port 30000. This is confirmed by netstat and tcpdump on the server. On the workstation, tcpdump and netstat confirm a connection from the workstation to the server; destination port is 22, source port is 10000. On the FreeBSD router, 'pfctl -s s' confirms: all tcp 10.201.201.1:10000 -> 10.100.100.1:30000 -> 10.1.1.1:22 ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED Here is where my problem sits. If I do a tcpdump of the pflog, I get an entry from my workstation to the server showing communication from port 10000 to port 22. I get an entry from the FreeBSD router to the server, from port 30000 to port 22. What I don't get, and what I desperately need, is a way to show that the connection from the FreeBSD router to the server is on behalf of my workstation. Have I missed something in the NAT configuration that logs the actual translations? Can you configure pf to log similar to the output of pfctl where it shows something like: