From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 00:26:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47FA1065673 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 00:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9A68FC24 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 00:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 943A7E80AA3; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:26:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:26:08 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:26:09 -0000 Gang, I was tried to find Jeffrey Friedl's email to figure out some quick regex when it struck me that the list can clue me in.... [[I have figured this out myself several times--well, 3 or 4 anyway--but it was more trial/error than I need.]] I have a file with ints from 0 to some N. What is the regex for vi or vim to use that will catch them all in one substititon command? I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g or things very close to that. Zip. I could have sworn that I noted it dow n somewhere; cannot find. tia. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 01:00:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A65106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgimer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270888FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6590846wwf.31 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:00:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=32MQcoVdpJQeSKF+CUyPXbfgADhGELrHESIqQm1ANdg=; b=J1KvMqhCcDtqc1VbiR/YlroKmJkJWQT+mtK1sAtoK6hUPAZmrDIViyJQgJv0NX+rpl AKFz3AKtmxNVYvHz3a+9GDRqVYIGO75tz9ykHvi/ZS9cXb/GpeFkqJOH4HR0UkM0KjQt cdsg/DYOie0XZC0do1PMMReSfv/aE6gxKaBqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QusgyuK1rDSnSiWrMt580gQdLAVUMFjjkD6UTOhMCUPxOw0+bwTYjlwmnv5QgE1vcs fjwWWJ1TbWiwBnG5qeb8L/6ZGMEd+PYftB+LpSXRgJWzzxTjQTqvMYhBIuTxVQ9tluHx a0dgw0vk3QxqbcZH7dAVHyAAdznWKxLHli15o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.47.140 with SMTP id t12mr3438355web.102.1291508989922; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.28.137 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:29:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: From: Joshua Gimer To: Gary Kline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:00:56 -0000 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g -- Thanks, Joshua Gimer --------------------------- http://www.linkedin.com/in/jgimer http://twitter.com/jgimer http://itsecops.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 01:24:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B55106564A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5638FC15 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D7ADE80AA3; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:24:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:24:30 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Joshua Gimer Message-ID: <20101205012430.GA29153@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:24:31 -0000 On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:29:49PM -0700, Joshua Gimer wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g > > Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g > So I just missed the "*"? Didn't need to escape the [ or ] ? ---I'll give it a try, thanks! gary PS: See, this is why I keep cheatsheets. ;) > -- > Thanks, > Joshua Gimer > > --------------------------- > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/jgimer > http://twitter.com/jgimer > http://itsecops.blogspot.com/ -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 01:32:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0BB106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16DB8FC0A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276533D2F8; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:32:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB51WciH003284; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:32:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:32:38 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Message-Id: <20101205023238.0ffcef3e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101205012430.GA29153@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <20101205012430.GA29153@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:32:41 -0000 On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:24:30 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > So I just missed the "*"? Yes. In regex, * means "any amount of", if I remember correctly. So you don't have to specify precisely how many numbers there are. How many lights? :-) > Didn't need to escape the [ or ] ? No, as you want them in their regex meaning, "in the range of", not literal [ and ]. > PS: See, this is why I keep cheatsheets. ;) That's the fat green book on my shelf. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 02:01:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE00106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC538FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oB521Ya9045893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:01:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oB521XpZ045892; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA29241; Sat, 4 Dec 10 17:57:30 PST Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:56:59 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: jgimer@gmail.com Message-Id: <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kline@thought.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:01:34 -0000 Joshua Gimer wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g > Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g Too broad -- it will match the null string. (* means "zero or more instances of" whatever preceded it.) Best RE I know for integers is [1-9][0-9]* (or replace the 1 with a 0 if the strings in question might have leading zeros). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 02:23:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B59F1065672 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D918FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B829E80AA3; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:23:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:23:08 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20101205022307.GB29153@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: jgimer@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:23:09 -0000 On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:56:59PM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Joshua Gimer wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g > > Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g > > Too broad -- it will match the null string. (* means "zero or more > instances of" whatever preceded it.) > > Best RE I know for integers is > > [1-9][0-9]* > > (or replace the 1 with a 0 if the strings in question might have > leading zeros). YES, and Perry get an A+; the numbers do start with 1; no leading 0's. FWIW, the last time I Did this I was editina t text with almost 500 pages and didn't know that the "*" trick applied to the vi/vim world, so it saved me some typing. Thanks, gents. gary said before getting into the real work. HMMm, no, first need a cup of joe........ -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 02:49:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A017F1065674 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xsappyx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324D48FC13 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so10991751wyf.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:49:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mX2xKGZwA5G+88eL+kaZjWFOODMmPeHa91jQ/ufJzgY=; b=h98U3qJDOjdkgwshvkemZJpN3127jY+LR/TrVnYSu3Ak9tAHS5oOq5lTptyotf6jYt kAnp4YpXp4bOLMSOPU1BHJKiSUvzkAELBXw9D7NnTydc0cqrMGqGQ+5MSSMxnYrgeV5w 5RdRyQZkmvBJaVZzzkXSlt8AucJ7LL4Kd2+RI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cORIR0F7hmo2VOg05XrAS/O/3KxqWwEZup2JSMzsbLeUIm/yPz7lc/El1fI93IK6jb vs/RN2lHIi4vTo7YY1Rrumed2fCv3+ovuvRtmwkW3Pbs06ZtMv4ypaC2mTsFbu7ykdck 2sswbzLQFBeQfda3iT5Gz8rbybpZOshlSKu34= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.239.199 with SMTP id c49mr3443388wer.12.1291517385802; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.88.138 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:49:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:49:45 -0800 Message-ID: From: xSAPPYx To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kline@thought.org, jgimer@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:49:47 -0000 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 17:56, wrote: > Joshua Gimer wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: >> > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g >> Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g > > Too broad -- it will match the null string. =C2=A0(* means "zero or more > instances of" whatever preceded it.) > > Best RE I know for integers is > > =C2=A0[1-9][0-9]* > > (or replace the 1 with a 0 if the strings in question might have > leading zeros). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Also, the + operator means '1 or more' but needs escaped: %s/[0-9]\+/foo/g From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 04:32:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415E9106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 04:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9888FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 04:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B63A4E80AA3; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:57 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: xSAPPYx Message-ID: <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, jgimer@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:32:59 -0000 On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:49:45PM -0800, xSAPPYx wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 17:56, wrote: > > Joshua Gimer wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > >> > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g > >> Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g > > > > Too broad -- it will match the null string.  (* means "zero or more > > instances of" whatever preceded it.) > > > > Best RE I know for integers is > > > >  [1-9][0-9]* > > > > (or replace the 1 with a 0 if the strings in question might have > > leading zeros). > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Also, the + operator means '1 or more' but needs escaped: %s/[0-9]\+/foo/g Okay. I thought that the + must be perl-only regex... . Then, nutshell, the most simple expression [fewest keystrokes] would be: %s/[1-0][0-9]*/foo/g > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 07:36:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0931D1065672 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 07:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yxy.716@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f68.google.com (mail-ew0-f68.google.com [209.85.215.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AA88FC16 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 07:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so2910226ewy.7 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 23:36:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=b22R2ne3/Mi3NX3HIbqUNMTuxTLDrZQdhZQHO6R4kU0=; b=hLGjxCZwU3eiB8Tr1kyfs9u+G8TImlwABS+9Cq2oipTOYsxWQuWvZIO4VCkVs3SVb0 PbQZWp7v7bC6awUg/lDgzo3z7SUP94L5gKJBYr2zXSbkZu4FTDgJvDUkdEs/mRnVlH48 XBfS5YALkmeBAna4VWF3CKVzxL7eclDrR/P+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Jz8THf5YjN8VlhaZg8hh0Cpi7Km6f7NWbAvWkqIlrVM9PNt84ooJ6h+4u2aRptiT57 EHwoqSb/+ex9JmFD1h+Sf2S14elOubb1z5mlrxy2CyVtDoAkO42pEQLH84b+1u4itjdf jYn7Z6K+5UcOaUzCv5F2GQvKY+1Eyl6WPeL58= Received: by 10.213.9.135 with SMTP id l7mr4435363ebl.37.1291534562400; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 23:36:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.25.131 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 23:35:42 -0800 (PST) From: xinyou yan Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:35:42 +0800 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: gedit 's problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 07:36:05 -0000 hello freebsd 8.1 afer i su to root after i beat gedit GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) (gedit:75122): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_is_ancestor: assertion `ancestor != NULL' failed (gedit:75122): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_is_ancestor: assertion `ancestor != NULL' failed (gedit:75122): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_is_ancestor: assertion `ancestor != NULL' failed (gedit:75122): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_is_ancestor: assertion `ancestor != NULL' failed when i back to normal user it shows GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) Launching a SCIM daemon with Socket FrontEnd... Loading simple Config module ... Creating backend ... Loading socket FrontEnd module ... Starting SCIM as daemon ... GTK Panel of SCIM 1.4.7 Fontconfig error: "local.conf", line 2: XML or text declaration not at start of entity GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 08:44:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F832106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25DA8FC1D for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6764893wwf.31 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:44:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+sJxpZemPSsVj1RT3U5deMasoQ97moXvog1AALu8cag=; b=xYgsKCWq5zpdxsGWwJMMqn82qUd2kePLWzakL7G3Ia1EqlcOuo9dmf3OL6fT/LAg1r mpt6wqv/eDpkExwYxyU0HhyFVEcTjXZomkXVFZhWgTazO3cLjG3uDFQw3QB40uOx315h y8CHQa00mb1UhRqlqU/veaapBcD01p7eG7n/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q8q0eIdiS0TMuLlDCbh0pPQJcYpmvudLICR6XUGHKeakGcOLfoWlK/n1nlOaDVpPSD cFpiIzIsQWxwNZS/N3t72WioWDqmRx/QhICQSMcv2LQNWv/tNdCHttS6BLh2J270rVrO vo1UCbujsRlDMEc8nAlXqK1jXc8x6DAJ7sy04= Received: by 10.227.129.9 with SMTP id m9mr4124115wbs.116.1291538647785; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:44:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm2566294wbc.21.2010.12.05.00.44.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:44:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:44:03 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101205084403.59ad70e7@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:44:09 -0000 On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:57 -0800 Gary Kline wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:49:45PM -0800, xSAPPYx wrote: > > Also, the + operator means '1 or more' but needs escaped: > > %s/[0-9]\+/foo/g > > > Okay. I thought that the + must be perl-only regex... . It's from "Extended" REs rather than perl specifically, it works with sed -E but not plain sed. Not sure about vi. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 08:56:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541EC106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A0D8FC15 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB58uUkh060607; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:56:31 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:56:30 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20101205073614.AE4C01065785@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101205194739.U20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101205073614.AE4C01065785@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:56:35 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 339, Issue 11, Message: 30 On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:23:08 -0800 Gary Kline wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:56:59PM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Joshua Gimer wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g > > > Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g > > > > Too broad -- it will match the null string. (* means "zero or more > > instances of" whatever preceded it.) > > > > Best RE I know for integers is > > > > [1-9][0-9]* > > > > (or replace the 1 with a 0 if the strings in question might have > > leading zeros). > > > YES, and Perry get an A+; the numbers do start with 1; no > leading 0's. Except 0 itself? :) You originally specified "ints from 0 to some N." I think you want either [0-9][0-9]* or just [0-9]+ (one or more digits) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 10:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA4106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82208FC1D for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7CCDDE80AA3; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:13:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:13:38 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20101205101338.GA13114@thought.org> References: <20101205073614.AE4C01065785@hub.freebsd.org> <20101205194739.U20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205194739.U20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:13:40 -0000 On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 07:56:30PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 339, Issue 11, Message: 30 > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:23:08 -0800 Gary Kline wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:56:59PM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > Joshua Gimer wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g > > > > Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g > > > > > > Too broad -- it will match the null string. (* means "zero or more > > > instances of" whatever preceded it.) > > > > > > Best RE I know for integers is > > > > > > [1-9][0-9]* > > > > > > (or replace the 1 with a 0 if the strings in question might have > > > leading zeros). > > > > > > YES, and Perry get an A+; the numbers do start with 1; no > > leading 0's. > > Except 0 itself? :) You originally specified "ints from 0 to some N." > > I think you want either [0-9][0-9]* or just [0-9]+ (one or more digits) > > cheers, Ian Well, sorry, this is part of my text-to-speech stuff and I admit to be stuck in C. [Heart-throb.] It was late last August when we were all sweltering and I mentioned having had a file of 130 :abbrvs that fit vi. Somebody said that he would like to see my list and a search couldn't find it. I did find lists of the top-N most frequently used words in English, but the rest of it was gone. I Spent a few hours today re-creating the abbreviations as they were back in the late 90's. Back then I was interested in saving my keystrokes. So that I might type: "i wll kEp trak v m hrs evry wk." and vi would translate that to "I will keep track of my hours every week." Overall, tests found that clever abrevs would save around 31% if you learns ~130 words. Now my goal is to output words that festival and ktts will turn into sounds. This will let me use homonyms, since the output will be spoken rather than read. So "thr taking thr stuf ovr the." would translate to: "They're taking their stuf over there." Anybody interested in this, please take it Off-Line, okay. And thax for yer regex help :-) gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 10:23:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09AB106564A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903E48FC13 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0323D5C21 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:28:32 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFB6754.8030704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:20:04 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101204172534.1258.qmail@joyce.lan> In-Reply-To: <20101204172534.1258.qmail@joyce.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:23:47 -0000 On 12/05/10 03:25, John Levine wrote: >>> My printer is a sturdy old Lexmark Optra T610. CUPS has a driver, >>> which does duplex, N-up, and so forth. Each toner cartridge is good >>> for over 10K pages, so I buy one about every two years, and I can >>> usually find one for $100, making the per page cost very low. >>> > >> Lexmarks are very badly designed (but very slowly getting better >> ergonomically), expensive to run, and crap themselves with generic >> toner. ... >> > So, just to be clear, you're telling me that I am imagining the fact > that my printer has worked reliably for ten years? > > You got galactically lucky. > I can believe that Lexmark has made bad printers, but if you can > still find an Optra T, they're great. > Having recently spent some time in a place where I fixed Lexmarks on a regular basis I'd find that very had to believe. I'd steer clear of any Lexmark printer, but the T's were the biggest white elephant I've ever come across- and I have worked on just about every make known. I'd repair around 100 a week, and many I'd seen the previous week with a different error. The error codes are enigmatic, and the repair procedures (by Lexmark themselves) have no clue as to what is really happening. You just get used to whats what and fix it. And that was just recent experience. My longer term experience shows me that this is not an age related problem but an inherent lack of experience in building printers. IBM make computers- they make very shit printers, but they were tired of losing to the competition who were good at making printers, so they decided to throw their hat in the ring as well. Quality wise they don't even rate either. I'd say Xerox, HP, Canon are competitive- at the higher end are good photo laser. Kyocera, HP make the most durable and reliable workgroup class- Kyocera offer a cheaper rate than any. Oki... not entirely sure. They used to make cheap photocopiers which were reasonable. Canon and Kyocera SOHO personal lasers are neck and neck. The rest are so so. But by far my worst experience has been pretty much anything with Lexmark on it- ink or laser. Inkjets its between Epson and Canon, Epson are good to OSS and Canon are cheap to run. Epson definitely produce a better photo though. But an Epson laser is very expensive to fix. I have a Samsung colour laser which I had some driver issues with (but got it working very well now), and I've used Canon inkjets and Xerox personal lasers. I am a tech and I know what runs and what the monthly output ratings are, as well as service counters. The monthly output of a workgroup Lexmark is not even a third of the Kyocera SOHO laser- that should tell you something: 100,000 pages a month for a Kyocera 1020D (personal/SOHO), compared to 30,000 for a Lexmark T630 (workgroup). Ridiculous to think they'd even compete! Plus the Kyocera is around $500-600 compared to $3000 for Lexmark? I've seen the Lex get replaced by 2 1020D's- redundancy and duplexing for 1/3 the price! Not even a second thought... Good luck to you, but I wouldn't bother looking to repair the T610... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 13:52:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73B41065679 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA1B8FC1F for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB5DqrvF076055; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:52:54 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:52:53 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: John Levine In-Reply-To: <20101205073614.AE4C01065785@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101206003156.F20283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101205073614.AE4C01065785@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:52:57 -0000 On 4 Dec 2010 17:25:34 -0000 John Levine wrote: > >> My printer is a sturdy old Lexmark Optra T610. CUPS has a driver, > >> which does duplex, N-up, and so forth. Each toner cartridge is good > >> for over 10K pages, so I buy one about every two years, and I can > >> usually find one for $100, making the per page cost very low. > > >Lexmarks are very badly designed (but very slowly getting better > >ergonomically), expensive to run, and crap themselves with generic > >toner. ... > > So, just to be clear, you're telling me that I am imagining the fact > that my printer has worked reliably for ten years? > > I can believe that Lexmark has made bad printers, but if you can > still find an Optra T, they're great. Yeah, but perhaps they don't work as well in the Queensland sun? South of the border, some say the same can be said of people :-) > R's, > John cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 15:17:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABD4106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7448FC0A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3DAE716D; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:17:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=RrYTawsxSLr1 phZvq5EeywZ+mRo=; b=jidJp0ynu/9RWL+RRPYAXbXnb6L8KtIAFqND50UuT6pM WSmkXCu9y5xnPrGjk7QFN42o/+CVXWLe/AAzSE0OkbdrTfiOVNZ6uqnETPTfb7Tm Eq0ioL2qMtCy7BHzwulurOK/Hqp+2TTPVi/F3HeKusleNXR5Cw73klK9pS+cAZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Zv13vt f+XZgtIB7zPKs2PqSc96/02pBiuMU72+cUCCNBevdPESTLPWHU5YX51CCLRQ/FEU BkC1/stE5CQ0RvCPhKgYy85JSO9UuurJZoNR1mU2yNXFRGgXaNSXxS5DR5zVBCbp pYlvfoQjD6RZYLVQ2vNBuLiCFkOSQ3lmtYwFw= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-31-8-12.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.8.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9D66E716C; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:17:32 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:17:08 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Message-ID: <20101205151708.4c6226b6@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <86r5e2cnbg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <20101201010048.GB18296@muon.cran.org.uk> <86r5e2cnbg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpt zfs booting - loader takes 25s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:17:35 -0000 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:08:03 -0800 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > I imagine something high-up in the kernel is asking the ZFS for the > first block of a file, and only at that point does all the paperwork > processing for consistency check come into play, so there are no > messages, just a pause. It seems you're right: I checked and the HDD light is permanently on during the pause. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 16:45:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753E1106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470F78FC13 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15850 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2010 16:45:39 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Dec 2010 16:45:39 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6074E5080B; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:45:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 86B571CC95; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:45:30 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Yuri References: <4CF9C1E5.3070101@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:45:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CF9C1E5.3070101@rawbw.com> (yuri@rawbw.com's message of "Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:21:57 -0800") Message-ID: <44r5dw88yd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade causes kernel message: maxproc limit exceeded by uid 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:45:40 -0000 Yuri writes: > Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such > message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like > this: > kern.maxproc: 6164 > kern.maxprocperuid: 5547 > > What may be causing such condition? limits(1), perhaps? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 17:37:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BB91065675 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92338FC0C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9A68E16B2; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:37:30 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Joshua Gimer References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.16.13; tzolkin = 11 Ben; haab = 6 Mac Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:37:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Joshua Gimer's message of "Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:29:49 -0700") Message-ID: <864oas6rz9.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:37:31 -0000 >>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua Gimer writes: Joshua> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote: >> I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g Joshua> Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g Because that would turn a line of "fred" into "foofred". :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 17:37:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81AE1065674 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA528FC16 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9506616B5; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:37:58 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Gary Kline References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.16.13; tzolkin = 11 Ben; haab = 6 Mac Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:37:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> (Gary Kline's message of "Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:57 -0800") Message-ID: <86zksk5de1.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, perryh@pluto.rain.com, xSAPPYx , jgimer@gmail.com Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:37:58 -0000 >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Kline writes: Gary> %s/[1-0][0-9]*/foo/g Except 1-0 is an empty set. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 17:40:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A270B1065670 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748728FC19 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.144.46.90) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:41:02 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:39:59 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3374415662-437629193@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Need to compile kernel for 2 or more processors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:40:06 -0000 Hello all. I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I am sorry in advance. I am doing my guideline of the activities I need to do to change an old 2 processors INtel 386 machine with 1GB of ram and 30GB of hard disk. The machine is working fine but after more than 10 years of working will be replaced for a new machine (could be an i3, i7, or xeon maybe). This one will be honored and will continue working as our secondary DNS. Actually is running Freebsd version 7.3 PRERELEASE . I will updated to 7.3 RELEASE. This machine has 2 physical processors and I remember that on old version of FreeBSD I have to compile the kernel so the second processor could be seen. I still do not know aht processor will be but I am looking for the strongest and cheapest combination of motherboard and processor. Anyway, I was wondering, if it is only one physycal processor with 2-4 embedded (xeon by exmaple) I guess that actually we do not have to change the kernel so all processors can be seen? Am I right ? By the way, if you can suggest based on experience the best combination on price performance of motherboard/processor to follow (not necessary the latest one) please let me know. Thanks in advance Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 17:55:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8988D1065696 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206BA8FC25 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so8644299ewy.10 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:55:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.9.15 with SMTP id j15mr1257789ebj.51.1291571752684; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:55:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:55:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3374415662-437629193@intranet.com.mx> References: <3374415662-437629193@intranet.com.mx> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:55:32 -0500 Message-ID: To: Jorge Biquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to compile kernel for 2 or more processors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:55:55 -0000 On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I am sorry in advance. > > I am doing my guideline of the activities I need to do to change an old 2 > processors INtel 386 machine with 1GB of ram and 30GB of hard disk. The > machine is working fine but after more than 10 years of working will be > replaced for a new machine (could be an i3, i7, or xeon maybe). This one > will be honored and will continue working as our secondary DNS. Actually is > running Freebsd version 7.3 PRERELEASE . I will updated to 7.3 RELEASE. > This machine has 2 physical processors and I remember that on old version > of FreeBSD I have to compile the kernel so the second processor could be > seen. I still do not know aht processor will be but I am looking for the > strongest and cheapest combination of motherboard and processor. Anyway, I > was wondering, if it is only one physycal processor with 2-4 embedded (xeon > by exmaple) > > I guess that actually we do not have to change the kernel so all > processors can be seen? Am I right ? > > By the way, if you can suggest based on experience the best combination on > price performance of motherboard/processor to follow (not necessary the > latest one) please let me know. > > Thanks in advance > > Jorge Biquez > > IIRC, FreeBSD7+ kernels are compiled w/ SMP already, atleast I know my FBSD7.3 box is compiled w/ it and it's been that way since I installed it like 3 years ago. Multicore CPU's are realistically cheap, Dual and Quad Core CPU's would run you somewhere between $50-$100 in the U.S. Now as for a Multi-Core/Multi-CPU setup, that would cost you considerably more. Especially if you want more then 2 Multi-Core CPU's. pricewatch.com is a great place to judge prices (again, in the U.S.) HTH, C- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 18:01:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1292B106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:01:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from fep28.mx.upcmail.net (fep28.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9888FC0C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge05.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101205174452.GUIA29594.viefep16-int.chello.at@edge05.upcmail.net> for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:44:52 +0100 Received: from bps.jodocus.org ([24.132.166.223]) by edge05.upcmail.net with edge id fVkq1f02v4pXSfL05VksbR; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:44:52 +0100 X-SourceIP: 24.132.166.223 Received: from jodocus.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bps.jodocus.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB5HioUE001771 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:44:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from 192.168.100.227 (SquirrelMail authenticated user joost) by jodocus.org with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:44:50 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:44:50 +0100 From: joost@jodocus.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bps.jodocus.org [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:44:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at bps.jodocus.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=vUpxTctd+kpWCBtSXXIkt5ll4Z8E5Qu9nLREXC/hfIo= c=1 sm=0 a=lqPAQrc-_1gA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=HBAPT1by9gk4mNcKcv0A:9 a=fEkMzaz7Xyaxsu8fPEsgKb_4NckA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Subject: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:01:42 -0000 Hi I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads (I'm using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded manually) It then claims it can't mount / One thing that's odd is that instead of finding ad4s1a it finds ad4a. Same for the other filesystems. It however can't find init on this device. Did I miss something important in src/UPDATING? Thanks Joost Bekkers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 18:11:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ABB1065673 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A938FC1A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPJrP-0007o7-So for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:03:01 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:11:34 -0800 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:11:34 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101205181134.GB39513@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <20101205012430.GA29153@thought.org> <20101205023238.0ffcef3e.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205023238.0ffcef3e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:11:40 -0000 --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Polytropon on Sunday, 05 December 2010: >=20 >=20 > > PS: See, this is why I keep cheatsheets. ;) >=20 > That's the fat green book on my shelf. :-) >=20 For regex reference, I find this site helpful: http://www.regular-expressions.info/reference.html =2E.. especially regarding differences between regex flavors: http://www.regular-expressions.info/refflavors.html --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM+9XWAAoJEIpckszW26+R1moH/RGnbE72BXOUN/zD7j1NOdZG N9xKrJzbV1cqxV5OcRJfd6IbuytjnYZEOnhkkzz2g1HExIvEZmtah4chdk38+XIA XnxOre08OE2HTa7nwBU3IoSiKjVYNzPWxLtLBWOsIoGtu1qfAVumc8VwHoK/3KGd hUOKPzFtDc0Ri7InNWg1jSikTAVmgJQAVTQehpE46A6AWp/n6kwJe4CgxQh+5EJV 1wecDFydw3x/DeeUSl3RHw/uJbHNnJHYHnIWRvyUG8tJzFXOKovGsxx8bdlpPM9L r4SfudXKvGykfz6dGsyV403S8jOGIFtbW/upF9JkPQ55sRFQFJtg9O20xaLIZxA= =xBj/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 18:19:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5BF106564A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C295A8FC12 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPJzK-0000tI-H9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:11:11 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:19:45 -0800 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:19:45 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101205181945.GC39513@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> <20101205084403.59ad70e7@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205084403.59ad70e7@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:19:51 -0000 --Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth RW on Sunday, 05 December 2010: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:57 -0800 > Gary Kline wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:49:45PM -0800, xSAPPYx wrote: >=20 > > > Also, the + operator means '1 or more' but needs escaped: > > > %s/[0-9]\+/foo/g > >=20 > >=20 > > Okay. I thought that the + must be perl-only regex... . >=20 > It's from "Extended" REs rather than perl specifically, it works > with sed -E but not plain sed. Not sure about vi. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" For me in works in vim but not in vi. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM+9fBAAoJEIpckszW26+RaFIH/jPRK5Sr48O1kxu8TjOcMeg6 IurCDaTzRkeslSZfoGj8LMJQNu7ZIjxB02fr0axvwlUc0iyV7xeAmBi1HDwePgJi EVxeGjlk+VkZQy7snd4jhRWWoUh6rypU38ZroSD2DFDj0KFGXHyrgvINDrplmVk2 gwORLBqVAgEA4me1NL5hHaflWSggDBuR+dGycVbaevAktJZedIj9s3dvtxuKYIeU p8tHBtP6MjfkC2NOi59EBNNPw7ficmBl8Ac7GP+6m8Jj1MniUjtVH8/LTaGLgiRF EDijVv6geP2PvaqDREp9kP6fuSlCk4yNPsa8Ys5+bAhdIeIgq4lSutVZN3vjImQ= =Bt3r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 18:40:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E42106566B for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCDA8FC18 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB5I9j6N008156 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:09:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:09:45 -0700 (MST) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Any work to update the RealTek Drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:40:48 -0000 Is there any work going on with the RealTek drivers? The RealTek devices I am using support a 9k MTU but the code limits the MTU to the default. Over gigabit, a larger MTU is desirable. Specifically, on one of several machines I am using: re0: port 0xde00-0xdeff mem 0xfbcff000-0xfbcfffff,0xfbcf8000-0xfbcfbfff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci7 re1: port 0xce00-0xceff mem 0xfbaff000-0xfbafffff,0xfbaf8000-0xfbafbfff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci8 Trying to set the MTU: btw# ifconfig re1 mtu 4096 ifconfig: ioctl (set mtu): Invalid argument Looking at the source sys/dev/re/if_re.c /*- * Copyright (c) 1997, 1998-2003 * Bill Paul . All rights reserved. (snip) case RL_HWREV_8168CP: case RL_HWREV_8168D: case RL_HWREV_8168DP: sc->rl_flags |= RL_FLAG_PHYWAKE | RL_FLAG_PAR | RL_FLAG_DESCV2 | RL_FLAG_MACSTAT | RL_FLAG_CMDSTOP | RL_FLAG_AUTOPAD; /* * These controllers support jumbo frame but it seems * that enabling it requires touching additional magic * registers. Depending on MAC revisions some * controllers need to disable checksum offload. So * disable jumbo frame until I have better idea what * it really requires to make it support. * RTL8168C/CP : supports up to 6KB jumbo frame. * RTL8111C/CP : supports up to 9KB jumbo frame. */ sc->rl_flags |= RL_FLAG_NOJUMBO; break; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 20:43:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418D3106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A7F8FC14 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so6515994gxk.17 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:43:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IU0IRPaSKNBjfyQiw+CJmye0dNiAnBEEsoGah6frAnw=; b=SAughkDF27wWWqZKPac8VgBGxKFqhsUcPvvM8jjX911wqARzzX/xDuOrZHLNGPBJq0 CiFjCVPcfrGFhZQyPYUxI0qJfYNYoYlzB3wNJKvP8dggKCycYgDlEpBQhxBrAUzpQtzd nTMpqhgW2EYveoHoEW+1lPXQgDEZOuQo3EiTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=MkdFu7ymhectGpww7HW5IoGsiNVSUmyyBFkHYhr/p9RNSBs4TKpt9Kc3A+FJRzjQ2g eFsfGEIAEgynddKEYSLovkSgeY8rIEUu0Z2U3DjFD9pcMp7y0c/3hN4Jx1RfTPKeq6Qe 8A1G64Pv0WWOxpxR4awGbOqhKSLa1e5ZWQZtQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.101.12 with SMTP id y12mr6606292agb.185.1291581787933; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.73.18 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:43:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:43:07 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: joost@jodocus.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:43:09 -0000 2010/12/5 : > Hi > > I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with > freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads (I'm > using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded > manually) > It then claims it can't mount / > > One thing that's odd is that instead of finding ad4s1a it finds ad4a. Same > for the other filesystems. It however can't find init on this device. > > Did I miss something important in src/UPDATING? > > > Thanks > > > Joost Bekkers > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Here : http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html GEOM_PART becomes the default slicer Status: Committed to -CURRENT Will appear in 8.0: sure Author: Marcel Moolenaar & others Web: commit message GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and utility that rolls up support for many partitioning formats (MBR, BSD, GPT etc.) into a single code base. NOTE: Caveat when upgrading! GEOM_PART might interpret existing partition tables (especially if many operating systems are present - multi boot) differently than the previous classes. Your devices might get renamed. NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kernel doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes. In other words, bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART. Maybe you're encountering this trouble right now. what I would advise you is using labels. Please do the following : tunefs -L root /dev/ad4a tunefs -L var /dev/ad4e (assuming it's e on your system ?) and for usr, tmp, etc ... >From a fixit environment. then edit your /etc/fstab and place /dev/ufs/root /dev/ufs/var instead of hardcoding the device node. Cheers, -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 21:51:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136C1106567A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8D68FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 09D93E80B10; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:51:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:51:22 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Message-ID: <20101205215122.GA26300@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> <86zksk5de1.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86zksk5de1.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, perryh@pluto.rain.com, xSAPPYx , jgimer@gmail.com Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:51:24 -0000 On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:37:58AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Kline writes: > > Gary> %s/[1-0][0-9]*/foo/g > > Except 1-0 is an empty set. :) > Ya, sure, you-betcha! I really did mean a '9'there. For some reason, what I'm thinking sometimes fails to get translated into what I type. Like my fingers have a mind of their o wn... I do Not watch the display; just the keybd. ...... > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 22:10:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913910656B4 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5088FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D1727E80B10; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:10:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:10:12 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101205221012.GB26300@thought.org> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <20101205012430.GA29153@thought.org> <20101205023238.0ffcef3e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101205181134.GB39513@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205181134.GB39513@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:10:13 -0000 On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 10:11:34AM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Polytropon on Sunday, 05 December 2010: > > > > > > > PS: See, this is why I keep cheatsheets. ;) > > > > That's the fat green book on my shelf. :-) > > > > For regex reference, I find this site helpful: > http://www.regular-expressions.info/reference.html > > ... especially regarding differences between regex flavors: > http://www.regular-expressions.info/refflavors.html > Ah, super. I google around until I find *something* that answers my question. YEsterday, I thought it "[1-9][0-9]" was simple enough. Blah *3 .... But rather than _find_ my regex books, stand up and take them, and search thru them... Much easier to ask the wisdom of this list. I have another question or three about vi, nvi or vim. But I'll start another post rather than hijack this on e. (Besides, my drive is starting to tilt it is so full of electrons....) > -- > Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F > http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips.com -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 22:21:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC381065670 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153958FC0C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so10486187bwz.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:21:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pKZ1cShqoPdjA5OIlUbgH1yZxfL96TP7ZGZEGGPj43Y=; b=s30IEhpEBsWSZbayDKV6knNY3FMLewTfzzdqsKlWx4lgwPB5JKXmjfAfOXHCaJBHer ieobK39SV3QgC0Lg6WdeqMmIL4COUGFzSyXYjB2ywoaiyULcm70wtA9qUwhDSt2vxWf0 Wum5zhJauBfLquLKfgDyDm5BheDFEP11RJoHI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k8Yl7+zy4h8ttM5NrpBn9q+kAxqlA+f6TYYNpVKUNQA1OnPvHjNAd3O4I8UkbFC/Ov cTjGrqm1xNRop8QwH27raeW+U7GdvQZQswdeaeTBCPIe9ABMMuL/BpVj6u+V1EdUQ/2V tYtTIxqDhwKg4OjYFwVD+GZVQ0kWpsAI8MVTA= Received: by 10.204.68.81 with SMTP id u17mr5011311bki.207.1291585837354; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:50:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.0.66] ([78.189.216.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g8sm2121196bkg.23.2010.12.05.13.50.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:50:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CFC0908.9020602@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:50:00 +0200 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: syslogd not writing to file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:21:15 -0000 Hi, I've got a weird problem that might be a bug with the 64bit RELEASE edition of FreeBSD 8.0. The issue is this: I provisioned 2 servers on two separate networks; one a 32bit system and the other a 64bit in order to log information coming from Cisco network equipment. The 32bit build works perfectly using the config below, however the 64bit version won't write the files as needed??? The /etc/syslog.conf file looks as such: # $FreeBSD: src/etc/syslog.conf,v 1.30.2.1.2.1 2009/10/25 01:10:29 kensmith Exp $ # # Spaces ARE valid field separators in this file. However, # other *nix-like systems still insist on using tabs as field # separators. If you are sharing this file between systems, you # may want to use only tabs as field separators here. # Consult the syslog.conf(5) manpage. +Zeta-Ray.optiplex-networks.com *.err;kern.warning;auth.notice;mail.crit /dev/console *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;lpr.info;mail.crit;news.err /var/log/messages security.* /var/log/security auth.info;authpriv.info /var/log/auth.log mail.info /var/log/maillog lpr.info /var/log/lpd-errs ftp.info /var/log/xferlog cron.* /var/log/cron *.=debug /var/log/debug.log *.emerg * # uncomment this to log all writes to /dev/console to /var/log/console.log #console.info /var/log/console.log # uncomment this to enable logging of all log messages to /var/log/all.log # touch /var/log/all.log and chmod it to mode 600 before it will work #*.* /var/log/all.log # uncomment this to enable logging to a remote loghost named loghost #*.* @loghost # uncomment these if you're running inn # news.crit /var/log/news/news.crit # news.err /var/log/news/news.err # news.notice /var/log/news/news.notice !ppp *.* /var/log/ppp.log !* +192.168.1.1 *.* /var/log/cisco857w.log !* +172.16.0.1 *.* /var/log/cisco1801w.log With the files having these permissions: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Dec 5 17:02 cisco1801w.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Dec 5 19:32 cisco857w.log I also added these lines to the /etc/rc.conf file: syslogd_enable="YES" #syslogd_flags="-d -b 192.168.1.120 -a 192.168.1.1/32:* -a 172.16.0.1/32:* -vv" syslogd_flags="" Using debugging by putting -d -vv within the comments of the last line I was able to see information get transferred to my server from the devices in question, however the FILE parameter was never specified meaning that nothing was getting written to the files created. The 32bit build works perfectly on a different network with the same config just different device IP's. The system hasn't had any packages updated though unlike the 64bit edition which might interfere with the build somehow. I also run BSD Jails on the 64bit server too so I don't know if something from that part is affecting things? It's a very odd problem and I don't know if anyone can give me any insight into this? I mean information is getting to the server as I can see it while running the debug with the -d -vv flags set in place, however nothing is being written! Can anyone help or suggest anything? Thanks, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 22:56:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283AB1065672 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stageline@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4AA8FC12 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so6020999gyf.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:56:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0UgPNxyAnMn16NmQoG3dMcgO8mViZ27ARwPZ6QYzkRY=; b=Ic1/qbFDMKDyIpQlGkEqGYcHR0eU+UwKGz3FlyQVtkxRulY+fIxq8qlIqp3h3gIE5x FPAeTZyEA1rrNxbyQV2UDWuYayrkjyM+a1QE3cdsucBBixbiDM3z/mbFqhkZNJLKewZ2 UleX5ZwHdgbEcuC7eebcS1J49rGobnK0iQbwg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=RlguGeLjP6D9z8GM1X3DyN0vzWxCG3HbiJDgB5qlF5tzI1zlaRIp1ejcB5ITZHMay/ ysfBABZUZym2vYlEmMok94SSpBbw7Dt4sEYu1rE3Grk1IDgDJYIJ3oVIlk13pam9Ip4N D1HtH4RMXa5gbtXTAOXg9UeSed7dkeOvzZ6wM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.153.8 with SMTP id a8mr1083450ane.226.1291588428076; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.240.12 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:33:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:33:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: Gabor Illo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:56:09 -0000 Hello List! I install FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE to friend server. I use this cool wiki post. http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror But i don't know 2.2 point. (Install FreeBSD to zroot) Fixit# cd /dist/8.0-* no such directory Fixit# cd /dist/8.1-* no such directory thx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 23:45:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EB5106564A for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ADA8FC0C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 848792185; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:45:58 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Gabor Illo References: x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.16.13; tzolkin = 11 Ben; haab = 6 Mac Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:45:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Gabor Illo's message of "Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:33:48 +0100") Message-ID: <86ei9v237t.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:45:58 -0000 >>>>> "Gabor" == Gabor Illo writes: Gabor> Hello List! Gabor> I install FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE to friend server. I use this cool wiki post. Gabor> http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror Gabor> But i don't know 2.2 point. (Install FreeBSD to zroot) Gabor> Fixit# cd /dist/8.0-* no such directory Gabor> Fixit# cd /dist/8.1-* no such directory What did you boot? I used a full release disk, and it worked fine. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 00:11:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198EA1065693 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733658FC13 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB5NsX2V022572 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:54:33 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-11.forthnet.gr (mx-in-11.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.31]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB5NsX7Y010785 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:54:33 +0200 Received: from pluto.universe (46.12.45.238.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [46.12.45.238]) by MX-IN-11.forthnet.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB5NsWma028816 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:54:32 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-11.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-11.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:54:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012060154.31496.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:11:07 -0000 On Monday 06 of December 2010 00:33:48 Gabor Illo wrote: > Hello List! > > I install FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE to friend server. I use this cool wiki post. > http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror > > But i don't know 2.2 point. (Install FreeBSD to zroot) > > Fixit# cd /dist/8.0-* no such directory > Fixit# cd /dist/8.1-* no such directory > > thx > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" As far as I can see, the correct command is Fixit# cd /8.1-RELEASE and then do the rest as described in the article. Regards Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 00:22:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB3D1065670 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3BE8FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB60MSiK024196 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:22:28 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.30]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB60MS2M021118 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:22:28 +0200 Received: from pluto.universe (46.12.45.238.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [46.12.45.238]) by MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB60MRbS020855 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:22:27 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:22:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012060222.26584.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:22:30 -0000 On Monday 06 of December 2010 00:33:48 Gabor Illo wrote: > Hello List! > > I install FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE to friend server. I use this cool wiki post. > http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror > > But i don't know 2.2 point. (Install FreeBSD to zroot) > > Fixit# cd /dist/8.0-* no such directory > Fixit# cd /dist/8.1-* no such directory > > thx > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry, my mistake... I used cd without the / when I was in the dist directory... So I cannot see why it does not work for you... What disk are you trying to use? Is it the official DVD? Regards Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 00:13:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60681065672; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326B8FC0C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oB60D6JH091686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:13:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oB60D653091685; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02778; Sun, 5 Dec 10 16:11:07 PST Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:11:10 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: xcllnt@mac.com, bu7cher@yandex.ru, demelier.david@gmail.com Message-Id: <4cfc2a1e.rR/F7W1rhymw3F2n%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:13:58 +0000 Cc: joost@jodocus.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:13:10 -0000 David DEMELIER wrote: > Here : http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html > > GEOM_PART becomes the default slicer > > Status: Committed to -CURRENT > Will appear in 8.0: sure > Author: Marcel Moolenaar & others > Web: commit message > > GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and > utility that rolls up support for many partitioning formats > (MBR, BSD, GPT etc.) into a single code base. > ... > NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kernel > doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes. In other > words, bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART. Does this mean that, in 8.1-RELEASE, bsdlabel/disklabel will not work with the GENERIC kernel (which includes GEOM_PART_GPT and GEOM_LABEL, but no other GEOM_ pieces AFAICT)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 01:15:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26642106566C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8558FC18 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:15:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApEBAEPC+0yWZWdv/2dsb2JhbAAH4VCFSQQ Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.144]) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 11:29:38 +1030 From: Wayne Sierke To: Chip Camden In-Reply-To: <20101205181945.GC39513@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <20101205002602.GA27499@thought.org> <4cfaf16b./uHAeLS0wfpxq8FB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101205043257.GA3854@thought.org> <20101205084403.59ad70e7@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101205181945.GC39513@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:29:36 +1030 Message-ID: <1291597176.2045.18.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:15:28 -0000 On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 10:19 -0800, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth RW on Sunday, 05 December 2010: > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:32:57 -0800 > > Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:49:45PM -0800, xSAPPYx wrote: > > > > > > Also, the + operator means '1 or more' but needs escaped: > > > > %s/[0-9]\+/foo/g > > > > > > > > > Okay. I thought that the + must be perl-only regex... . > > > > It's from "Extended" REs rather than perl specifically, it works > > with sed -E but not plain sed. Not sure about vi. > For me in works in vim but not in vi. In vi it requires setting the "extended" option which is unset by default - "set all" will display "noextended". In POSIX "extended" REs '+' is a metacharacter so the expression for "sed -E" and vi with "extended" enabled is simply "[0-9]+" (likewise for "grep -E" etc). It seems to be a "gnuism" that an escaped "+" works in "basic" REs, so it works in grep, gnu sed (gsed) etc. -- Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 03:00:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5661065673 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 03:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AA58FC17 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 03:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so8506826qyk.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 19:00:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B4ONch/NBJElGxXGxRNIfUqN6Me94/Su5BFnCD0z7fo=; b=gd3Sv+RZ6EmGsslBbtEHUunVH5uZFUtZopUKKIM3bFcc1uWZ38dJHHI+d6E5YcfypG huLeWLznxPk5GVAOqLhXlT1oL2nFbeJHZ2WTBsl2gkzRDN/qFjj/V3XDJ8FgwUQkGQrN AYrejb6FX0DV94E3k+2p8b4Obfg0Pp/QGMqYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Ud3wnrTR1xcFbK1ovajowb4UkqwDdKsG1+mbN8z+CGX+MSE0+m7YvPxFBoaHrvKEcu Qh6m8wCMd1QKSyWXv8F+xjz8tdHG2jYeYMEwwV5qwdrjSj5ZZtigC2vy49c7YyM6d/qp oAUDQkb8Vq+wFPXUWoMn3sBjcZfQKBpEKvR1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.218.210 with SMTP id hr18mr3889998qcb.78.1291602590145; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.230.131 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:29:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 21:29:50 -0500 Message-ID: From: Xn Nooby To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Can a home LAN server use a jail as a router? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:00:39 -0000 Hello. Is it possible to use FreeBSD to create three "jails" on one box, so that one jail can be a router to the internet, and the other two can be webservers? I wanted to create an environment where if one webserver got compromised, the other webserver would be unaffected. I have old hardware, so I do not have hardware VT in the chip. I thought I previously read that a jail could only have 1 NIC, but I have not been able to confirm that. That would spoil my router plan, if true. I'm more familiar with Linux than FreeBSD, but Linux seems to be moving from Xen towards KVM (which requires VT). I could use Xen, probably on Debian if I did. Xen seems to require a specially built Linux kernel on Debian, and I'm not sure I like that. I'd also like to set up a personal samba file-server, but I'm deathly afraid the machine would get hacked while wired to the net. So I would also like to make a jail to be a samba server. All these jails are predicated on one of them being able to act as a router between the internet and my home LAN. I want some "jails" to talk the internet (via the router jail), and some "jails" to only be available in my house. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 03:57:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFCD106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 03:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705588FC0A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 03:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B45C21 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:02:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFC5E3A.6050202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:53:30 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can a home LAN server use a jail as a router? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:57:19 -0000 On 12/06/10 12:29, Xn Nooby wrote: > Hello. Is it possible to use FreeBSD to create three "jails" on one > box, so that one jail can be a router to the internet, and the other > two can be webservers? I wanted to create an environment where if one > webserver got compromised, the other webserver would be unaffected. I > have old hardware, so I do not have hardware VT in the chip. I thought > I previously read that a jail could only have 1 NIC, but I have not > been able to confirm that. That would spoil my router plan, if true. > > I'm more familiar with Linux than FreeBSD, but Linux seems to be > moving from Xen towards KVM (which requires VT). I could use Xen, > probably on Debian if I did. Xen seems to require a specially built > Linux kernel on Debian, and I'm not sure I like that. > > I'd also like to set up a personal samba file-server, but I'm deathly > afraid the machine would get hacked while wired to the net. So I would > also like to make a jail to be a samba server. > > All these jails are predicated on one of them being able to act as a > router between the internet and my home LAN. I want some "jails" to > talk the internet (via the router jail), and some "jails" to only be > available in my house. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You can have more than one IP, but the actual config of specific NICs is done by the host. As for being a router I don't know- I'm not sure you can access the sysctl needed, or whether the sysctl will affect the host (and therefore other services and jails). And thirdly I'm not sure of the validity of it. Jail your services and run a firewall (pf?) on the host. That will control who can get to what, and allow you to 'route' your network the way you want to. I'm sure someone else could point out any security flaws in this scenario, but it should do what you want and be relatively secure. I'd be reading up on Jails and understanding exactly what they are and what they are not too. They aren't actual 'emulators' per se, they are more a locked up chroot system. Make sure that is exactly what you want/need. HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 04:46:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC9A106566B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf13.insightbb.com (mxsf13.insightbb.com [74.128.0.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4028FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:46:55 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,304,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="262781528" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf13.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2010 23:46:54 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj06AN74+0xKgCiCPGdsb2JhbACIH4x+jhMMAQEBATUtvGqFSQSEXw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,304,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="419267404" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2010 23:46:54 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:46:53 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012052346.53454.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS 1.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:46:55 -0000 Build of kdebase4-workspace claims: -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS 1.x I have the xmms port installed and I rebuilt kdelibs. Why won't it see it? -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 04:51:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0893E106566C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987618FC0C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so8810065ewy.10 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:51:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.76 with SMTP id m12mr4991166ebb.25.1291611083034; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:51:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:51:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012052346.53454.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> References: <201012052346.53454.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:51:02 -0500 Message-ID: To: Steven Friedrich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS 1.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:51:25 -0000 On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > Build of kdebase4-workspace claims: > > -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS 1.x > > I have the xmms port installed and I rebuilt kdelibs. > > Why won't it see it? > > > xmms or xmms2? IIRC, xmms was discontinued a long time ago lol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 05:10:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D79106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AD08FC12 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so9066144fxm.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:10:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9LHXUWiyqD+kzSGRZDz4T5ualgfZHc8JdGvrg4kiZf8=; b=K040BJiIHKWxF9HaChbWrJKYQpeX90bwp1giplZCGpH35/cuKPQod+7ZPGIqEbdZkJ VEsSs2tURL7bzrm6L6gW3JtttGFMd8pBezG9EsCXxXiWgAkrk++ii5cm4qVZ7wxaq4NS E9dL2INneZebYo19V6Fg+PLvnMT9edjdzbvOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pWZ5FfVBlf+u/CK1JwqjTrrZC2/6+AyLYvZSugRpcc6Rqv7hGhzjaqJByenCU1vcp6 0x7ImiCs2sisYhmv2UCwfYvZ7N7ITe5wV0fOT7mhS7rQys2fE5eo0MwCps30S9/bNxnW 9Eux0T6WWKMhqQmzZqJO+8NB+7mi9Jse342mk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.112.71 with SMTP id v7mr5127381fap.60.1291610422594; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.78.205 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:40:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3374415662-437629193@intranet.com.mx> References: <3374415662-437629193@intranet.com.mx> Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:40:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Jorge Biquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to compile kernel for 2 or more processors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:10:41 -0000 On 5 December 2010 12:39, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. Hello. > > I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I am sorry in advance. > Well, that's life. > > =A0I guess that actually we do not have to change the kernel so all proce= ssors > can be seen? Am I right ? http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/7.3/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC?revisio= n=3D203736&view=3Dmarkup or http://tinyurl.com/28km4fc shows that --- # To make an SMP kernel, the next two lines are needed options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel device apic # I/O APIC --- is part of GENERIC on 7.3, ergo you needn't recompile to enjoy multiple processing joy in all(most of) its glory. HTH --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 05:24:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6F6106567A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4B98FC0A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so9070919fxm.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:24:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1OF7TFgB5wiJ/ZxOyyDPf5NBNnYp/LTE9rG7F6XkETs=; b=YXto/WaSBOMCl4p02yCDeyeMSTyAgxWh2JQgnj3I5NlERYh6CKJvkYqXL6RJT4T4Dg IsTXmKb8eEoKljZAYrp328fMWYKmD5Plaz7fAG658lBnTaYvqXWOxhXyGlBEgOKJxvPP TWELi3w+hx4m4mEO4zhhq6sC083FCH+TS6yR8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dhhcQC2i1Hq1hDZoHp9s9y1RVQ9SG+unWZHOB/aPtoZsbZWFaXlWTngA3a4StoGQ7g E+VWfq/23oS2fk3QnQQjza8whyNSwGB3ogaoWiEYXlqffwsbTZrK46QqrtcZ1ny6TxKy zOMesMULED7RpZrzYbjxUAOm6qj+iCSkepIZA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.70.136 with SMTP id d8mr5174440faj.3.1291611552042; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:59:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.78.205 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:59:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:59:11 -0500 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Peter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to trace /dev/gpt/label to adaX to conroller? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:24:05 -0000 On 8 November 2010 12:19, Peter wrote: > iH, > =A0Is there any easy straight forward way to trace my /dev/gpt/data.zfs > disk to what ada device it is, and on what controller? > > I've traced it manually by doing a gpart list adaX |grep data.zfs on each > adaX device, then somehow I found out what controller it is on [I think b= y > manually looking at serial number of the disk, and tracing cables]. =A0Th= is > was easy when I had 2 disks, but now I have 4, and figure there could be > an easier way instead of doing a 'for i' loop on each adaX device, tracin= g > cables, etc. > > FreeBSD 8-STABLE if it makes a difference. > > ]Peter[ > =A0I'm prolly doing something wrong. Variations on # gpart list do you any good? --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:08:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEB3106566C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from basilkurian@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278378FC22 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so8652558qyk.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:08:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Uj53tN34hL2/kV99Fom0+7zUMC6Dgkbgshujpxy+EzY=; b=rvHBapEj7xhY0oi697hKpIehVzm3lOFXl7JjHRqyflxhFZH8fKVKCn1GQ+vGFTbR2i PlTbg7p3V/ebkAp1PgXYAC2lJtDPDjSfyu/boUoRxq+YviMPW/42soToQe8q7HQQNsdy gGAaM+4svW4NQ0q0lBmmOkAN/xgrhyKQhXODQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=YwMUC5XIIm+okkClaJqQPKzwuVlhFO+lLfZc2zGWdgSkuuYLArxCHv7JroW4h3tA+p vd4w+/1+hNr0wwFO+x2VDt4Camn98/cjEyluIpWg6FWFXm2yf01RGETIZW6EkQRwhUB7 g8Bwn1DrkVuAALQp8+KEsxkU/cVLH3S0Zq7vc= Received: by 10.229.109.213 with SMTP id k21mr4159817qcp.69.1291617861432; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:44:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.15 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:43:41 -0800 (PST) From: Basil Kurian Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:13:41 +0530 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Qmail installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:08:34 -0000 I installed Qmail according to this tutorial http://www.unixmexico.org/files/html/qmail-how-to/qmail-how-to.html . It was succesful. Now I would like to install the rest of the related application like vqadmin, vpopmail, courier IMAP etc. Please give me a link to some good 'how to' or tutorail. -- Regards Basil Kurian http://basilkurian.tk RSA Public key : gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 41005549 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:24:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F122106566B; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4E48FC16; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oB67OYvK029827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oB67OYDh029826; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:24:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA03864; Sun, 5 Dec 10 23:22:10 PST Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:22:13 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bu7cher@yandex.ru Message-Id: <4cfc8f25.jTD+vTDyy5VPuqYn%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4cfc2a1e.rR/F7W1rhymw3F2n%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4CFC7E70.7000405@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4CFC7E70.7000405@yandex.ru> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xcllnt@mac.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:24:36 -0000 "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: > >> NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the > >> kernel doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes. > >> In other words, bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART. > > > > Does this mean that, in 8.1-RELEASE, bsdlabel/disklabel will > > not work with the GENERIC kernel (which includes GEOM_PART_GPT > > and GEOM_LABEL, but no other GEOM_ pieces AFAICT)? > > No, It doesn't. You can create partitions with fdisk/bsdlabel. > They do write directly to device and this does initiate tasting. > And GPART detects created partitions. Thanks, that's what I had hoped (but had noticed a few things lately that had me wondering whether they might perhaps not be working entirely _correctly_ -- I need to do some more experimentation). The next question then is, when _does_ the kernel need to include added options like GEOM_BSD and/or GEOM_PART_BSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:30:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04780106566C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFCF8FC14; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CC41C2210B6C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:30:51 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1291620651; bh=QSh16XF9+R4fIYVRDMS05oTfsYV6vtmR6tXmnDhJkIg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=PFvI94U51ZGcXeNy53Hw6+GmSfiNYihOy+HMdtzpNkUBBf3+GVQ8xGTpPMfQnHxqE ZV67mLQYOJchT1b7MRm3x9mbDlJS3PSi/O/LAgx/3RfEzFCbyjPwqKZKsyAp7nzRWV hHO7VGtQT+MKo+bhTHZfVPtTpuqfuf6rtVuUo4uM= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ns.kirov.so-cdu.ru [77.72.136.145]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 6955C13E809E; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:30:51 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4CFC9126.80801@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:30:46 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4cfc2a1e.rR/F7W1rhymw3F2n%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4CFC7E70.7000405@yandex.ru> <4cfc8f25.jTD+vTDyy5VPuqYn%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4cfc8f25.jTD+vTDyy5VPuqYn%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig333741D242FC5A8C459FB011" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:30:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig333741D242FC5A8C459FB011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.12.2010 10:22, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Thanks, that's what I had hoped (but had noticed a few things lately > that had me wondering whether they might perhaps not be working > entirely _correctly_ -- I need to do some more experimentation). >=20 > The next question then is, when _does_ the kernel need to include > added options like GEOM_BSD and/or GEOM_PART_BSD? GEOM_BSD is deprecated in FreeBSD 8.x+ and should not be included. GEOM_PART_BSD is already included in DEFAULTS config. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --------------enig333741D242FC5A8C459FB011 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM/JEqAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6H/YIAIEEXO1OzYEi+xgSPCO7+EIy urA/bZqB7Wwx61IaVwe8bpQrMygdJ/qaxacOXHF1eemRhGEmOHZNUIehlaQonKaI /QOmhp4wFBdvU75MTNlnGn1go1MZRdIHYuHrIgupa6bseYZcrqZbhYnxVuP9Du3B 38yYUsHYUqvET14FoyrVPB3Jor+ul+W7JhEQHMQqniaSVTrXaODBxWLcPjMxCVuB H/vbvPC/IOmeiRiDHsIqtxa7J1yuBTJy8Pb+eVKoxWANzJL6dagz01RYuPSHtpV5 2I7hah68rVpL4hnwH4v7aEshyZSyc3Y6W29Tsmc/CHYO8lFu308zRh22ilw1WME= =QgLc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig333741D242FC5A8C459FB011-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:41:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8BB1065672 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4A68FC18 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so14339143iwn.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:41:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0EXU/ZlO38N/4iIIy6wqj5OfoehmtZsdeRDqCLGMnVI=; b=apqmTUTnSi+KlTL64UagjJWqOZ6wbvoCDpYXApOPodCCyNE+J8jJ833Mq7x0mG4eg5 GpnEkAWOHtCAWY6yP6Rr8iOeEv5Wi13htGu+aAGuwa/d8/cU0vZcvWHP1JkOnx0G6OU3 DG6ldF/YKY4AjVioE3MLjKjg+e0qzjyidb6NU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nPTiSmVkJUWprOkqg7MjX8z78RAei4xAcAwOeQ9iSM7NAnKMYHHaG+KqvUnUudsRiR mjGqGdxbq2Y6x0/YwQkrCEgbNt6yLye4WlPao6O9PckVnthkVNWdUGTualDnc/1zgR+n SOe1bnJ9p/EzGBFB/K3oh+/pJQ5G50cDwAvxU= Received: by 10.231.30.204 with SMTP id v12mr5007232ibc.10.1291619852906; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:17:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.199.211 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:17:17 -0800 (PST) From: Zbigniew Szalbot Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:17:17 +0100 Message-ID: To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:41:41 -0000 Dear=C2=A0all, >From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin up with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if there is a way to end up with a zip file? Or are there any windows tools to unzip and/or extract content from tar.gz files? Many thanks in advance! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:45:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624BA106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2396A8FC12 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928713D229; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:45:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB67jSDJ006533; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:45:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:45:28 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-Id: <20101206084528.7423067a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:45:31 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:17:17 +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wr= ote: > Dear=A0all, >=20 > From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to > download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin > up with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a > unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the > content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if > there is a way to end up with a zip file? You can install the "zip" program: # pkg_add -r zip and then use it recursively, e. g. % zip -r9 stuff.zip dir1 dir2 dir3 fileX fileY If there is no need for compression, change 9 to 0. Also see "man zip" for details. > Or are there any windows > tools to unzip and/or extract content from tar.gz files? There should be a TAR.EXE program, at least it existed as an addition to DOS. I'm not sure this exists for "Windows", or if you need some additional program for that. --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 08:23:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF96E106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D368FC14 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so14377031iwn.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:23:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k4ygYn/936nSnpjRLYCv/ogZRP16Mos8psOGDx4U4/w=; b=kSovAq+SSMEDH8tItagkogETTTK8Ft00KMukMf4LxbLLQo8M962NHEjElCmHA6X1Cj esR1hxeiy3rDw8KhqRc5Mv6adRr/h64koOggLslQvKR/cVkQb4TGG0a2op8eIQh+lKVj s4K3ULTQYRBd89L3HQhS6e6gICpC8PxnBC1uA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gq6QpzDDuWz9m9cDpMNqy2jIfngaRMqeugJVWWn31gu/XpsoDAVwZ2yYbpj/Di12Dr 0gd8n7XG1GAkYUvKR/ZvZlM1Yp4T2VtlDV+C4Sa2MaNRcMuibNdhPJx3Rr8Jqox2ZvyP mdqRZlWWMFBNhjDiK6ocBroRiKRBvTZy6SVOQ= Received: by 10.231.157.14 with SMTP id z14mr5639339ibw.85.1291623828826; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:23:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.199.211 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:23:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101206084528.7423067a.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20101206084528.7423067a.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Zbigniew Szalbot Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:23:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:23:49 -0000 Hello, On 6 December 2010 08:45, Polytropon wrote: > You can install the "zip" program: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0# pkg_add -r zip > > and then use it recursively, e. g. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0% zip -r9 stuff.zip dir1 dir2 dir3 fileX fileY > > If there is no need for compression, change 9 to 0. Also > see "man zip" for details. Great! Thanks so much! I occasionally need to extract a few files from the archive so this is very useful. Thank you! All the best from Poland. Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 09:01:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921841065670 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:01:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out2.iinet.net.au (outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out2.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012918FC0C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:01:42 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAAIv/Ex8qF++/2dsb2JhbACjMXG8TYVJBI11JoJY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,305,1288540800"; d="scan'208";a="715090463" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([124.168.95.190]) by outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out2.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 16:33:42 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 67261171F1; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:33:42 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:33:42 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20101206083342.GA16636@ozzmosis.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:01:43 -0000 On Mon 2010-12-06 08:17:17 UTC+0100, Zbigniew Szalbot (zszalbot@gmail.com) wrote: > From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to > download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin > up with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a > unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the > content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if > there is a way to end up with a zip file? As somebody else already mentioned there is zip/unzip in the FreeBSD Ports tree. There's also a BSD port of rar/unrar if you'd like to use the .rar format instead of .zip. > Or are there any windows tools to unzip and/or extract content from > tar.gz files? In Windows I use 7-Zip. It's open source and supports .tar.gz, .tar.xz, .zip, .rar and a number of other archive formats. http://www.7-zip.org/ On the BSD side you can also use p7zip to create .7z archives that can be opened with 7-Zip. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 09:45:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD61106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371A98FC18 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB69j8rS000742; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:45:08 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB69j7BP019632; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:45:07 +0200 Received: from pluto.universe (46.12.51.175.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [46.12.51.175]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB69j6CT022478; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:45:07 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: Gabor Illo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:45:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201012060222.26584.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012061145.05971.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Cc: Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:45:10 -0000 On Monday 06 of December 2010 02:38:12 Gabor Illo wrote: > 2010/12/6 Elias Chrysocheris : > > Sorry, my mistake... I used cd without the / when I was in the dist > > directory... So I cannot see why it does not work for you... What disk > > are you trying to use? Is it the official DVD? > > > > Regards > > Elias > > I use livefs sysinstall FIXME option (defined wiki 1.2 step), fixme > shell only works livefs CD. Well.. I thing that in livefs cd there are no installation packages of the release. I thing it contains only the necessary software for the livefs system. It is better to use the installation DVD that also contains the livefs and Fixme console and all the necessary system's packages. That will do. I don't know if the installation CD also works, but the DVD is OK. I've done it many times before... Regards, Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 09:53:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0BF1065672 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@fletchermoorland.co.uk) Received: from hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk (hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk [78.33.209.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09E88FC29 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from demophon.fletchermoorland.co.uk ([192.168.0.154]) by hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB69rQHm064515; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:53:26 GMT (envelope-from paul@fletchermoorland.co.uk) Message-ID: <4CFCB296.8080103@fletchermoorland.co.uk> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:53:26 +0000 From: Paul Wootton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100817 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <20101206083342.GA16636@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <20101206083342.GA16636@ozzmosis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk Cc: andrew clarke , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:53:29 -0000 On 12/06/10 08:33, andrew clarke wrote: > In Windows I use 7-Zip. It's open source and supports .tar.gz, > .tar.xz, .zip, .rar and a number of other archive formats. > > http://www.7-zip.org/ For Windows, I use use WinRAR for .tar and .tar.gz files Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 09:55:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA13106566B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E1F8FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:55:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oB69tIe5027614 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oB69tIe5027614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:55:24 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:55:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Zbigniew Szalbot's message of "Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:17:17 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:55:39 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:17:17 +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wr= ote: > Dear=A0all, > > From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to download > them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin up with a > tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a unix machine > at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the content, there is > no easy way to do that. My question basically is if there is a way to end > up with a zip file? Or are there any windows tools to unzip and/or > extract content from tar.gz files? You can use the archivers/zip port, which installs a zip(1) utility with a command-line syntax vaguely similar to the pkzip/pkunzip tools from old DOS days. Then again you can keep using tar.gz or tar.bz2 archivers, like you do now. WinZip and WinRar tools can deal quite fine with these two compression formats, Linux machines also have tar/gzip/bzip2 and the rest of the platforms out there (e.g. MacOS) may have tools similar to WinZip / WinRar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 10:07:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7BE106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost05.isp.att.net (fmailhost05.isp.att.net [204.127.217.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB1D8FC13 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mueller6722.bellsouth.net (adsl-80-80-105.sdf.bellsouth.net[65.80.80.105]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc05) with SMTP id <20101206100744H0500hmq59e>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:07:44 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [65.80.80.105] Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:09:00 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4cfcb63c.7mrjI+NXXOf2oMKR%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:07:45 -0000 Is there any intent to modify, hopefully improve, the installer program (sysinstall) for FreeBSD-9.0? I noticed something on the freebsd-questions emailing list about a pc-sysinstall, but downloaded a snapshot .iso of CURRENT-9.0 mainly to see what was there, not planning to install; am already running 8.1-RELEASE. Installer looked the same as for recent releases through 8.1; installation sets were broken into base.aa, base.ab, etc. (floppy-sized or a little less), rather than the easier-to-handle base.tbz (or .tgz), etc. Man page for sysinstall (FreeBSD 8.1) says it is overdue for end of life. Options are confusing. What is a "standard installation"? How many users are going to be able to get together enough good floppies to install that way? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 10:21:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB0F106566C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf02.insightbb.com (mxsf02.insightbb.com [74.128.0.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E878FC1C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:21:35 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,305,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="919655906" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf02.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 05:21:34 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Asl4ANtH/ExKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIH5sRDAEBAQE1KAW9DIVJBIRf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,305,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="196947356" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 05:21:34 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:21:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201012052346.53454.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Undisclosed.Recipients: Message-Id: <201012060521.28482.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Re: -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS 1.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:21:36 -0000 On Sunday 05 December 2010 11:51:02 pm Chris Brennan wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > Build of kdebase4-workspace claims: > > > > -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS > > 1.x > > > > I have the xmms port installed and I rebuilt kdelibs. > > > > Why won't it see it? > > xmms or xmms2? IIRC, xmms was discontinued a long time ago lol I'm using: xmms-1.2.11_11 X Multimedia System -- An audio player with Winamp GUI This is xmms 1.x, right? It appears to work. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 10:31:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49951065672 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B0B8FC1C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107ABE7161; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=Tp1oMqJHeqTI nUA8oOZZHqqAJGw=; b=nKqISqaXZsdXmUxwpwD3TFNZK5z9GrxRJBJcORTiy8jr lrWPQimLgJ1vB25Mk6I2Pl3bgfkV4mXMLfsKTFiHmCxeRnqIJa8qzMBh9NrrVdZv j70Jn+vuGKACgsx02aq81xD0qw/NGyUqPLWCC0Px6AH0q0+9bqwI3ok0hU/dVi8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=cxQSUC ZzfNOsvhtKkWULhhlmwhlAvxu31GDnnylRBSxnNyB0yaEqyNt4yfUr+sB+FEaiu5 eZmA59Gl/1fL9LPtFXuzJnnLNqpZ9tcmSwIJzWVpkoRA34GyIViD92yA6ZBZ7RmC EXXZ31pWKzmzOBjAKAtlS6z7GuYi9FBA56UAo= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-25-14-189.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.25.14.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2A57E613F; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:26 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-ID: <20101206103126.400dc085@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <4cfcb63c.7mrjI+NXXOf2oMKR%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4cfcb63c.7mrjI+NXXOf2oMKR%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:31:54 -0000 On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:09:00 +0000 "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > Is there any intent to modify, hopefully improve, the installer > program (sysinstall) for FreeBSD-9.0? There's a plan to replace sysinstall with pc-sysinstall, the PCBSD installer in 9.0. Currently the backend has been committed and people are working on a web interface frontend to allow people to do installations via a web browser. Meanwhile I'm hoping to find some time to improve sysinstall now that we don't support installation from floppies: I know there are some big improvements that can be made while not taking on the work of a complete rewrite. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 06:11:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49BA1065673 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 06:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward1.mail.yandex.net (forward1.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5388FC0A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 06:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.mail.yandex.net (smtp2.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.102]) by forward1.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 45DBF69E8910; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:10:58 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1291615858; bh=pztSEz6Nj4rKB1cwBPbLe4eswJ/ms5fSNjK0Z3nXCNg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SjxkpXSTvMMJ9XAtdYayrz0+JdY4+BrBZgpkRpB4ANwNvWmqoMbMAGCj4nfqSPnUu sxwjb/7rYQbBJ8zXuCAZuREnk7xhc+bn4yRKXgJ5zVzxlBB9NSN55oSl1GOYZvybfw ZXQsCTHVOA7ReIBmEXUr38rPib56hbf7b7g9GTyA= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ns.kirov.so-cdu.ru [77.72.136.145]) by smtp2.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id A87E1528085; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:10:57 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4CFC7E70.7000405@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:10:56 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4cfc2a1e.rR/F7W1rhymw3F2n%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4cfc2a1e.rR/F7W1rhymw3F2n%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:11:34 +0000 Cc: demelier.david@gmail.com, joost@jodocus.org, xcllnt@mac.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:11:00 -0000 On 06.12.2010 3:11, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and >> utility that rolls up support for many partitioning formats >> (MBR, BSD, GPT etc.) into a single code base. >> ... >> NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kernel >> doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes. In other >> words, bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART. > > Does this mean that, in 8.1-RELEASE, bsdlabel/disklabel will not work > with the GENERIC kernel (which includes GEOM_PART_GPT and GEOM_LABEL, > but no other GEOM_ pieces AFAICT)? No, It doesn't. You can create partitions with fdisk/bsdlabel. They do write directly to device and this does initiate tasting. And GPART detects created partitions. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 08:30:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C634106566C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE778FC13; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([unknown] [173.70.194.135]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LCZ0062LWU4Q5R0@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:30:04 -0600 (CST) Message-id: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:30:18 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101114 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-version: 1.0 To: hardware@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:11:51 +0000 Cc: netchild@FreeBSD.org Subject: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:30:15 -0000 Hello! I have a server (Dell Poweredge 2900), that's loaded with sensors. While it was in Windows-mode, a utility was able to tell me not only the temperature of each CPU-core, but also that of every DIMM!.. One of them was running far hotter than others, and I'd like to continue keeping an eye on it now that the box run FreeBSD. In FreeBSD there is coretemp(4), which is nice, but nothing else... There is no hw.acpi.thermal hierarchy either on this box... Yet, the box has 6 fans, two power-supplies, plus DIMMs -- all of them with sensors, that I can't read... It seems, in 2007, there was an attempt to introduce OpenBSD's sensor-framework: http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/BSDCan_2008_Hardware_Sensors_Framework but it was backed-out after being declared a "pile of crap" and "festering junkpile" by our most mirthful contributor: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=193129+0+archive/2007/cvs-all/20071021.cvs-all "until a proper architectural solution has been found". Has that happened in the three years, that passed since that lovely discussion? Or are we still waiting for someone to design and implement it not merely "adequately", but "perfectly"? If the three other BSD-cousins have had this for a while (NetBSD -- for 10 years, apparently), continuing to insist on some future perfection seems wrong -- we should have this "adequate but imperfect" method if only for cross-BSD compatibility. Is there, perhaps, a set of patches still secretly maintained by some die-hard? I'd love to try it here, and will be very thankful, if it gives me the monitoring, that I can not obtain otherwise... Thanks! Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 12:38:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0049106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cronfy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848248FC19 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so6283759gyf.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:38:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=OLaKVzrNrNbnxa5na3jO0fp3uIMgm0wfkiMn5iFvYcM=; b=A3PhlpvUiaWYYJN+2Rw50+hRulh13HFobfBnVgm5XPOc34F1vLhXvORfAAcdWCw4VD g6Z+JxFp5KMmrORGHlFnevLnvn/zvgv0+4gOphs6p+iXP2+Qv271SbjFaKrZ7vhPqb1y 0SBbUsAgyL/Lc+uYAX9frPeIlXC7oZBjbd33s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=hdw6v38o0tcsfwa/GTZCspOLNA9dPKP9NQacqQVvkrclWY7liuRVNWBVNFBSCPU1Zp jBfY8K0zvMFFkSsGBUf1Pq8pt2g67NKYTaXHM0xhZckzo+t1gTPlR99Qy3jTrmQ/A47W KShoXh5yrbxcWbbAOOGKiub1ytnO3DrWwmxlY= Received: by 10.91.51.22 with SMTP id d22mr7639619agk.175.1291639103445; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:38:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.175.18 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:37:53 -0800 (PST) From: cronfy Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:37:53 +0300 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: memoryuse vs vmemoryuse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:38:24 -0000 Hello! I am trying to set user limits in login.conf, and I see there are 'memoryuse' and 'vmemoryuse'. Handbook describes only the former.. What is the difference between them? -- // cronfy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 12:49:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97494106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hasse@thorshammare.org) Received: from smtprelay-b12.telenor.se (smtprelay-b12.telenor.se [62.127.194.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CFE8FC13 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (ipb2.telenor.se [195.54.127.165]) by smtprelay-b12.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADBBD47F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:49:37 +0100 (CET) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.225.121] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQxAAJr/ExT4+F5PGdsb2JhbACDUJJ2jG8MAQEBATUtrGGQEoEhgzVzBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,305,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="155913987" Received: from ua-83-227-225-121.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO odin.thorshammare.org) ([83.227.225.121]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 13:49:37 +0100 Received: from Obah ([192.168.1.100]) by odin.thorshammare.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB6Cnrag092098; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:49:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hasse@thorshammare.org) From: "Hasse Hansson" To: "'Zbigniew Szalbot'" , "'User Questions'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:49:23 +0100 Organization: The Valhalla Project Message-ID: <000701cb9544$057cf0a0$1076d1e0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcuVGSbtqebPb2oSS6ml/bUI7mwcbAAKkbyg Content-Language: sv X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on odin.thorshammare.org Cc: Subject: SV: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:49:39 -0000 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org = [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] P=C3=A5 vegne af Zbigniew = Szalbot Sendt: den 6 december 2010 08:17 Til: User Questions Emne: Archiving directories / zip format Dear all, >From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin up with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if there is a way to end up with a zip file? Or are there any windows tools to unzip and/or extract content from tar.gz files? Many thanks in advance! Zbigniew Szalbot _______________________________________________ For windows I've used this program for years, http://www.ghisler.com/ Total Commander. Also good for moving around files. Even contain a FTP = client. /hasse=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 12:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5929106566C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648068FC0C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 07:55:23 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id APR28388; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:54:41 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 07:54:42 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19708.56560.298779.542234@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 07:54:08 -0500 To: Steven Friedrich In-Reply-To: <201012060521.28482.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> References: <201012052346.53454.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201012060521.28482.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: "Undisclosed.Recipients:"@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS 1.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:55:24 -0000 Steven Friedrich writes: > > > -- Could NOT find XMMS: the nowplaying dataengine will NOT support XMMS > > > 1.x > > > > > > I have the xmms port installed and I rebuilt kdelibs. > > > > > > Why won't it see it? > > > > xmms or xmms2? IIRC, xmms was discontinued a long time ago lol > > I'm using: > xmms-1.2.11_11 X Multimedia System -- An audio player with Winamp GUI > > This is xmms 1.x, right? It appears to work. XMMS-1.2.11.11 works for me stand-alone as well. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 13:06:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87531065674 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay011.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay011.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7058FC1A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:06:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAFtt/Exbsc6j/2dsb2JhbACjNXK8boVJBJYO Received: from 163.206-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.206.163]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 14:06:34 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB6D6XGi003333; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:06:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: Anton Shterenlikht Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:06:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.5.2; i386; ; ) References: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2169787.mSeIB6y8Ly"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:06:36 -0000 --nextPart2169787.mSeIB6y8Ly Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 29 November 2010 14:04:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar ----- >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> [ia64] >>> ia64% file a.out=20 >>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically >>> linked, not stripped >>>=20 >>> [amd64] >>> amd64% file a.out=20 >>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), >>> statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped >>=20 >> The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being >> a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's >> properly declared as FreeBSD. >>=20 >> This is a binutils problem. > > Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant > by "binutils problem", and how to fix it? >=20 > I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. As a workaround you could manually brand the executable: brandelf -f 9 a.out --nextPart2169787.mSeIB6y8Ly Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAkz839cACgkQfoCS2CCgtiuD8QD9F/67z7Ono8aNV++ShoFSr/Ma t0a9B1oPrsWI//nOU7AA/0UU0dHcQmhmf4DIdFKw014y14DpYOfXMFdhhHJ/EdWq =Qgu7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2169787.mSeIB6y8Ly-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 13:30:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D38A1065670 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B058FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so6316426yxh.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:30:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.13.4 with SMTP id q4mr2856868ybi.242.1291642240391; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:30:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x42sm252029yhc.11.2010.12.06.05.30.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A5CE54824 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:30:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:30:37 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101206083037.6caeba9e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <000701cb9544$057cf0a0$1076d1e0$@org> References: <000701cb9544$057cf0a0$1076d1e0$@org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:30:43 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:49:23 +0100 Hasse Hansson articulated: > >From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to > download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin > up with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a > unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the > content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if > there is a way to end up with a zip file? Or are there any windows > tools to unzip and/or extract content from tar.gz files? The basic "WinZIP" program can handle that. A list of all the formats supported is available here: . I had the "7z" format added a few years ago. Handling of the "xz" format should be included in the next major update of the utility. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 13:32:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392F6106566B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gorgarath@xsmail.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D478FC14 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376D41A1 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:32:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from oldweb1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.31]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:32:34 -0500 Received: by oldweb1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 15FE75EC001; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:32:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1291642354.4382.1408875309@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: /k/hathBZeCy9jynacU4Ky0Y+JDHu7e9lvC4l5sNOzEy 1291642354 From: "John D McDonnell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:32:34 -0500 Subject: RE: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:32:35 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > On Behalf Of Zbigniew Szalbot > Dear all, > >From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to > download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin up > with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a > unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the > content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if > there is a way to end up with a zip file? Or are there any windows > tools to unzip and/or extract content from tar.gz files? > > Many thanks in advance! > > Zbigniew Szalbot In Windows, I used to use PowerArchiver, which supports pretty much everything under the sun, until it was no longer freeware and have since found ZipGenius (free) which also seems to do the same. I have some issues with it crashing now and then and it doesn't seem as stable as PowerArchiver was, but the worst that has happened to me is having to force ZipGenius to close and then re-open the archived file. http://www.zipgenius.com/ -- John D. McDonnell gorgarath@xsmail.com http://www.gorgarath.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 13:38:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8D2106566C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903418FC14 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so4692306vws.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:38:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3eDuGldPXjt6ZwtQqX7bqKg6s1FBpUVVuZrHsBIwccA=; b=qgI1TdrA00FgA8U3tOtqrO0yOO4Y6Hl71ZJ8QsVgdhWFnwuNCyjOsM0u6+1uTpKUlU yLpqDgdWyagqZVeRNMeZcj9SHyhE17cWPz3zM7Qez+ipz3mOfOLpi5+oVSWTdxwveNDL HVqSIz5bl6AMTEzrzOnP9Tw1st+/9NVT70rKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kJPCypn5g0MZD0vuufAMmcTdcJ4GkCU84yOemiQoNMrxGqKGHqAtntOdCmwgtm6r4D y0q+HWR10I8Wn3NL71IbHHwzxrQ9ITDsrm4+YjQ/c8lfhPCEW1OFDUsXjpWhRW9aTy1Q GjPo9n0TkCheIQXW0zTP/5vlkLnG1FiXjyvMk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.142 with SMTP id kg14mr4285197qcb.42.1291642721247; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:38:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:38:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:38:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: Zbigniew Szalbot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:38:42 -0000 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote= : > Dear=A0all, > > >From time to time I want to archive a quite a few directories to > download them conveniently. I have been using tar to do it, endingin > up with a tar.gz file. But the problem with it is that I do not have a > unix machine at home so if I want to extract something or unpack the > content, there is no easy way to do that. My question basically is if > there is a way to end up with a zip file? Or are there any windows > tools to unzip and/or extract content from tar.gz files? > > Many thanks in advance! > For Windows I use 7zip - www.7-zip.org - it gets the job done. It takes tarballs (.bz2 and .gz) zip, rar, and whatever I ever come around. Take a look at it. --=20 chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 15:16:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F2B10656AC for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCB28FC0C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPcnm-0006Lc-Tb; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:16:30 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PPcnm-0005aV-If; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:16:30 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB6FGUIW055463; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:16:30 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB6FGUEG055462; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:16:30 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:16:30 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Tijl Coosemans Message-ID: <20101206151630.GB55368@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Tijl Coosemans , Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:16:32 -0000 On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Monday 29 November 2010 14:04:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar ----- > >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>> [ia64] > >>> ia64% file a.out > >>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically > >>> linked, not stripped > >>> > >>> [amd64] > >>> amd64% file a.out > >>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), > >>> statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped > >> > >> The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being > >> a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's > >> properly declared as FreeBSD. > >> > >> This is a binutils problem. > > > > Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant > > by "binutils problem", and how to fix it? > > > > I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. > > As a workaround you could manually brand the executable: > brandelf -f 9 a.out this works fine. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 16:24:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6C31065673 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE57D8FC15 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oB6GLgWo006444; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:21:42 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:21:42 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012061621.oB6GLgWo006444@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: cronfy@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: memoryuse vs vmemoryuse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:24:01 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 6 06:36:38 2010 > From: cronfy > Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:37:53 +0300 > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: memoryuse vs vmemoryuse > > Hello! > > I am trying to set user limits in login.conf, and I see there are > 'memoryuse' and 'vmemoryuse'. Handbook describes only the former.. What is > the difference between them? 'physical memory' and 'virtual memory', respectively. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:00:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329571065694 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB84A8FC14 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so6881831qwj.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:00:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R0/JJOsUFTFX3zJharsjWJc2fCqXDVMiGy2sUKy4wyY=; b=TH4nKFFK7KpoLfyGeFQiY1XoE0JJDk/u2OX2rDJ7Zh+J2Qb/15B0kjXltdklhmI/wx WzpwtyHzOg/jgVdxZcEJ9Zj5DCzM4c4NZ7QBQh0ZStd37TxSqOEjaTxzqzZ6TL1+a11F fOS+psv3FwVlKPYIF/+SyNKAe4EPRZFJ306XI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Pl0ERmZws0j6b8XY32nN21eg/wXQZz68cUEoEcfYQqn23E5roQsnPe3EZADONlHaSi AHi5VnpZpMDJ7Ve1bqk7Bid/jDhvi0e9KIJ8LqP0KmVBTbs2BYsy/6YCSvqzt56H7JqE EwkIk4T6MKxd2jn4daSDHnbfgBYbuQQlQnc1w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.144 with SMTP id hy16mr4629885qcb.259.1291658406765; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:00:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:00:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: questions , jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:09:19 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:00:08 -0000 Greetings! Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some software that only works on 32-bit. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:32:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8969E1065675 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350D98FC1D for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so3580640qyk.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:32:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=CvNgCP0I9lwH4icU2WUvopxBDXywpVIXh7/OLAwwnvo=; b=UIRp3UinaHBuDDpgo73KT1SwdPnTh7uCZ59c0CaXqn8cFheZgS+0IGAbnLoCST5faP LLFGcFnPnyrpyd2ZYTDAB/ZiCALbBDgeULV0YfixDBS6XTS2s9jOPHhUvAh0J9sl3DA/ y+kMUuwgMOYZaGL4VBVMyov/SZRL6MVzbFslQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; b=Cs6wHd6p3VfycB8d6/RYldWobCA8C/Fcd6ti1SvSBj9ttWiHu/FlFwPRtXwJLCWfH5 GbTbr2sQ1yvuvJQ+5/m0My5whMwBwnh2zexnmkGQEI9OVyr+fNWXAnL0Ml2WsX2qo4Uu leWl8JektEvof9MK/OKz1315Ue7FgJrgmWrSw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.144 with SMTP id hy16mt5975362qcb.259.1291660336508; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:32:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:32:16 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:32:18 -0000 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Nerius Landys wrote: > I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit > FreeBSD without even using a jail. > Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for > example if you rebuild world/kernel following this: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > and if you don't inhibit the installation of /usr/lib32 by setting > some conf file flag somewhere. > > There are probably other ways to "get" /usr/lib32 on your system, but > I usually rebuild world to make it happen. > Hey man! Matter of fact - yeah - I do have /usr/lib32. So that's all I need or do I need to activate something in rc.conf or whatever? Much obliged! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:41:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B54E1065679; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393D48FC2A; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so4991997vws.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:41:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LJsXpbzeTbp/TQpxqDWOMXgBDBT8dR3RJ/Mk5Aw3CAg=; b=xX4Knu7B70YD2qoCxaoOaZS7z7Rz9Mt7x2prxKWQSxYDh4AjUepYJZkT2tHRTjk5Jy Wi6OlxyE2JUq6viV7pntWSZfPU+PYh/n7MWJrQJhqeivPX452H52YU15MGdoCOF+mZN0 61G7nNgV9xjctnTOtCbIcDwKlqxQxJ556kUfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jeGDbck+OGh2QOUO39ZuedrgufWXFkcYWTkg9fV7SiPKWGOeJmReRWt6GAERFb2DWa XjfoWRvDge5fEwk0oHtJ3SNOoeNLRLFgmhSEaci/4efat/hoiT2CGSotqpGP+N/SMlLx IlHwYDFTbLDuSiJ2kzDNF+eWKS803FnOXKagg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.4 with SMTP id ke4mr5091263qcb.201.1291660498832; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.230.201 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:34:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:34:58 -0800 Message-ID: From: Nerius Landys To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:41:35 -0000 >> I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit >> FreeBSD without even using a jail. >> Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? =A0This would get installed for >> example if you rebuild world/kernel following this: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html >> and if you don't inhibit the installation of /usr/lib32 by setting >> some conf file flag somewhere. >> >> There are probably other ways to "get" /usr/lib32 on your system, but >> I usually rebuild world to make it happen. >> > > Hey man! > > Matter of fact - yeah - I do have /usr/lib32. So that's all I need or do = I > need to activate something in rc.conf or whatever? > > Much obliged! /usr/lib32 should be all you need [I think]. However you won't be able to correctly compile 32 bit software on your 64 bit system. For compiling, you _should_ use a jail, or compile on a 32 bit system. They're addressing this cross-compiling issue in the latest FreeBSD sources I think. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:52:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055931065675; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@chaoticsystems.org) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6108FC19; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so9380112ewy.10 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:52:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.50.147 with SMTP id z19mr382185web.38.1291660081257; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:28:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.64.196 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:28:01 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [163.185.131.36] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:28:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike Bregg To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0000 Yes, I believe this has been possible since 7.2. Mike On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Greetings! > > Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use > some > software that only works on 32-bit. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:56:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8FC106566C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CA38FC0C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so6939185qwj.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:56:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WbCq+VmvdVngWuRUoFrOp01CXOOjt3Yl+XVt7I1g7pk=; b=V9L2A1KPbmwYLFzIoiOMT4Xuntd3SJFKtKHO1jjHSJd2wu4ORIk2FlDnTDvfRuUHiV NigWGI7NF8opoL6dMDeh7d65X6SQTQ4/2C4jCHuqMvLDKFgpbmfO3erSTTzLsGoz9ntA gSkS6046xa7G0OsCzsSUeNZVs++U542gvN0Ks= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ihdS2odpkA1LaGloWPR2wLZUExFYglZUiW5O++LmJTg9H2+7A9MaFFo4wJny7XPC5n UNTsv3v21s41LVRTyjYAKHt76+iq2U2rK5JZsDz56WNYGZqbt/9FpVyDpo5eZdu4BVPM N+CF4zhwFGvA8/fftZxK9JcCRi1YvUfOqUj2A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.246.145 with SMTP id ly17mr5119311qcb.11.1291659946246; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:25:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.230.201 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:25:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:25:46 -0800 Message-ID: From: Nerius Landys To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:56:04 -0000 I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit FreeBSD without even using a jail. Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for example if you rebuild world/kernel following this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html and if you don't inhibit the installation of /usr/lib32 by setting some conf file flag somewhere. There are probably other ways to "get" /usr/lib32 on your system, but I usually rebuild world to make it happen. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Greetings! > > Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some > software that only works on 32-bit. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:58:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3249A1065670; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF708FC1B; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so9300884qyk.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:58:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YK4p9f4gLdbZ5FRQja6yTJu1RRPnCyE0QqWcda2qPrA=; b=Nu5Lbhjt56a/43pB2JzLX9A4LmZhtY4w7Ug/gixEebXzABhS1j0STtIW03Z2avdQvs WDDGT31A9i5NzvitEaIzizdp+eEGP09JB7iSvGPLxZv53UusI8Q2HdzP15rypYpWBTMD MqDXcH90PeuJlfVIydN3bPcsAE6qog+70TG7c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=imkr8yAHgbMGQFOVA71NYzq/es/usCkA+/OgX7uBRyE8Fyvi+fZmyIeZTWqMpMFyJp l8RIzVrBW2lJ4br759aq0IBWo+51HuMf9FnZRbx6Mnar4X838ym/Ki1zPLkr5ukLD57V Vp7mhGgAo/aMep8DWdXrjEdVDaS+cCImlQQ4g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.109.213 with SMTP id k21mr4834198qcp.69.1291661905875; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:58:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:58:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:58:25 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: Nerius Landys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:58:27 -0000 Thanks a lot guys - I really appreciate it. Redd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 19:01:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348A21065679; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88488FC1E; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so6566655ywp.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:01:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wXeNuBkWJ20+rbmg/92v6XvraxqDBfe38HP8381/Emw=; b=x3EL+dZ50MxDumdHCRH2bOQ8HFw3A9tAVKLuopQu3KaprOpV0BTu2vOrVVqBU/wROj GTrx8Olpso5GtExPayP3L4SXvKzFe//oSZlbfbh5ipgFnJtzxazmhccDu5uagt1KTVME sOqNMZqbRrhc0GELRuwQ0Te815D7ulj6ki1VE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Fa5Zh3ris8nJpAcVkrBlTdf1U8NnrGjra4FjmDUrU2M6Nw64ds0fq570PFfvdyOTll qAiG0W0z+OEmahAsIvlboL3M2OidlJbfXpzMOQ/Y0yMyvGdo+UYX2/NyRdzguEu5bylr ljuEns2ELjrXJLbAAQUEsW0K2v6/GOhNszW88= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.101.12 with SMTP id y12mr8160999agb.185.1291660423340; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.73.18 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:33:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:01:25 -0000 2010/12/6 Redd Vinylene : > Greetings! > > Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some > software that only works on 32-bit. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hello, Since this question is asked a lot of time I think we should update the handbook to say `yes' it's possible ! :-) http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2010-January/001139.html http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg01201.html -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 19:14:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C71106566C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000538FC1F; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so3621313qyk.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:14:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iyRQlfNwTfx9Ar0gYDo/7G54TiHn8wzupDFkm3vU/98=; b=QLcovKjdo2uny20xUr/46Nwhx/OBnm2uXFa1pECDkQKTcK3JdfG371JfqsVFIAek8Y 7oPDFM2GaC+BWrNvzLkDqlcGNnxWzl5Kid//JBLenjhaMZo6gW4ZhvoxfPEvkr29tpcA MOZXX9FIMge6KY3ffC5FWlekUX20riAdirm9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PC1sl5Rfyqa1cg4Bgmo99gAzTIhbkmrtvEAYl0ufefZIMd0uRNV3Z9oolMB6R3J8tW 2usSdAy/xL6YRkY1gbkWHlOnhuKNHzN1jWFIu8/2FI6VtrUP/KjmF5Q3cmIlLM4Kem6l jRApyci65NUy79HbW7KMKEKsDP/F0K9FzuZ00= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.15.195 with SMTP id l3mr4816616qca.221.1291662861916; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:14:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:14:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: Nerius Landys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:14:23 -0000 How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then? http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3744 did not tell me much. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 19:27:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81EC106564A; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F8C8FC13; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so3633878qyk.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:27:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IvbHzVXNiV/AXyb2DNzkxbAir7JBmto26PbajOaaIVo=; b=QY3DZ7SUiy4PigucULSlTAADB2ZQUL+EDZq1v0kRlPSmEGHCjlSt+Y/Wcg2QSnY78Z iNhNER/Pgf/7PbyoxbPPv2wqMfdUdKiHXBwVFqne4HV8B8kOGARr5w378FvSrSqHv1f3 LIr5RwjeX2qBou7D/32RvIxxOa91sjr7eOX7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aTuWWwMopP6AEM7rqHc2nicf7G8C8qOPWNpIu82UH4pKxSrwew10uHFu5sC/zXdHEF nCntdDTXyoO2hAhq004/Yk8aD7ex9PryuNFI9WLni79q9WVSHEGXjpjL7df+a1YZZy3Y L0sBk3KGKi9XDs37A5G+JburSk8PPsx/uGWcs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.134 with SMTP id kk6mr1303917qcb.49.1291663648442; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:27:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.230.201 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:27:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:27:28 -0800 Message-ID: From: Nerius Landys To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:27:29 -0000 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then? > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3744 did not tell me much. > > Thanks! > Use this as a start: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Then you have to specify target arch = i386 or something in the make buildworld etc. steps. I don't remember the exact syntax for the make flags off hand. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 20:09:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AC510656F9; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:09:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@fuckner.net) Received: from dedihh.fuckner.net (dedihh.fuckner.net [81.209.183.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410338FC16; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dedihh.fuckner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dedihh.fuckner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5CD2B1F7; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:51:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fuckner.net Received: from dedihh.fuckner.net ([127.0.0.1]) by dedihh.fuckner.net (dedihh.fuckner.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 2Q7vGjxeoCXB; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:51:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from c64.rebootking.de (e176141081.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.176.141.81]) by dedihh.fuckner.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F02482B1ED; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:51:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:51:28 +0100 From: Michael Fuckner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101101 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:09:12 -0000 On 12/06/10 08:30, Mikhail T. wrote: Hi! > In FreeBSD there is coretemp(4), which is nice, but nothing else... > There is no hw.acpi.thermal hierarchy either on this box... Yet, the box > has 6 fans, two power-supplies, plus DIMMs -- all of them with sensors, > that I can't read... did you try to read the data via IPMI? kldload ipmi;ipmitool sdr Regards, Michael! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 20:19:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A1E1065670; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21B48FC08; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.134.187] (port=50123 helo=[192.168.1.118]) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPhEx-0003ig-Pu; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:00:54 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:00:51 -0800 Message-Id: <64AF25A6-F9F2-4A4C-A47D-0E80C367C7CB@vicor.com> References: To: Redd Vinylene X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Scan-Signature: 8ab399610c508a33cd3fcb541ad584b9 X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions , Nerius Landys Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:19:30 -0000 I wrote a utility (attached) to make the process really fast and easy: jail_build(8): Build FreeBSD jails from binary distributions Here's a simple howto: Step 1: Create a landing zone for your binary distribution = (jail_build(8) looks in `/usr/repos' for binary distributions)... sudo mkdir -p /usr/repos sudo cd /usr/repos Step 2: Download one or more binary FreeBSD distributions (any version, = any platform)... wget -r = ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.1-RELEASE Step 3: Download jail_build(8)... cd wget http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/jail_build.txt mv jail_build.txt jail_build chmod +x jail_build Step 4: Build your jail(s)... ./jail_build -- Devin (full sig at bottom) P.S. Feedback welcome. On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then? >=20 > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D3744 did not tell me = much. >=20 > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-jail-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 21:01:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14034106566B; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BF58FC17; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1C9E26011; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:01:14 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Devin Teske References: <64AF25A6-F9F2-4A4C-A47D-0E80C367C7CB@vicor.com> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.16.14; tzolkin = 12 Ix; haab = 7 Mac Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:01:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: <64AF25A6-F9F2-4A4C-A47D-0E80C367C7CB@vicor.com> (Devin Teske's message of "Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:00:51 -0800") Message-ID: <86oc8yzkdi.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions , Redd Vinylene , Nerius Landys Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:01:15 -0000 >>>>> "Devin" == Devin Teske writes: Devin> sudo cd /usr/repos This is pretty useless. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 21:58:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFB5106564A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D19D8FC12 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971EA3D8F0; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:58:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB6Lwcqk001570; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:58:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:58:38 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Hasse Hansson" Message-Id: <20101206225838.a9f342e9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <000701cb9544$057cf0a0$1076d1e0$@org> References: <000701cb9544$057cf0a0$1076d1e0$@org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Zbigniew Szalbot' , 'User Questions' Subject: Re: SV: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:58:41 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:49:23 +0100, "Hasse Hansson" wrote: > For windows I've used this program for years, http://www.ghisler.com/ > Total Commander. Also good for moving around files. Even contain a FTP client. Allow me to mention a program called "FAR manager": If I remember correctly, it has FTP and archiver support, and comes in a handy text mode application. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 22:13:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CC8106566B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1487C8FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F733D72E; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:13:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB6MDJVo001614; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:13:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:13:19 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Bruce Cran Message-Id: <20101206231319.f368e2ec.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101206103126.400dc085@core.draftnet> References: <4cfcb63c.7mrjI+NXXOf2oMKR%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <20101206103126.400dc085@core.draftnet> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:13:21 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:26 +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > There's a plan to replace sysinstall with pc-sysinstall, the > PCBSD installer in 9.0. Currently the backend has been committed and > people are working on a web interface frontend to allow people to do > installations via a web browser. Does this imply that the installation requires running X plus a web browser, or a "hard to use" text mode web browser? Or is this intended to be used for remote installation only? Will the installer therefore be unusable for specific settings (headless, serial, text)? > Meanwhile I'm hoping to find some time to improve sysinstall now that > we don't support installation from floppies: I know there are some big > improvements that can be made while not taking on the work of a complete > rewrite. I agree that sysinstall could benefit from some improvements, especially the incorporation of the "new partitioning methods", involving labels, ufsids, GEOM, GPT and PMBR, keeping the traditional methods MBR, fdisk, bsdlabel and newfs available for those systems that the user INTENDEDLY wants to install with those methods (e. g. older hardware). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 21:05:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7811065741; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net (vms173013pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB9F8FC13; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([unknown] [173.70.194.135]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LD000905YK76754@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:05:00 -0600 (CST) Message-id: <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:05:10 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101114 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Michael Fuckner References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> In-reply-to: <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:15:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:05:14 -0000 On 06.12.2010 14:51, Michael Fuckner wrote: > did you try to read the data via IPMI? > kldload ipmi;ipmitool sdr Interestingly, I was doing just that, when your e-mail arrived... ipmitool was impressive enough and I'm building openipmi to take a look at that too. I don't see information on each DIMM (yet?), but other information is quite useful... One of the fans, for example, was listed as "cr" (rather than "ok") -- which was, apparently, causing all other fans to run at maximum speed (*very* noisy fans in poweredge 2900). I reset it (by pulling it out and back again), and now the box is quieting back down... The sensors-patches did not add any new entries under hw.sensors hierarchy :( The coretemp(4) stopped functioning, unfortunately... Whereas before, when I simply kldload-ed it, it was reporting reasonable temperatures, now that I have the sensors-patch merged in, I see nonsense like: hw.sensors.cpu0.temp0: -1282,97 degC hw.sensors.cpu1.temp0: -1272,97 degC hw.sensors.cpu2.temp0: -1282,97 degC hw.sensors.cpu3.temp0: -1262,97 degC Seems like some kind of calibration issue -- the numbers differ from each other and change with time... I think, I'll back the patch out as it did not give me any new information -- the it- and lm-devices aren't found on this box :-( Anyway, sdtemp(4) -- or equivalent -- is something, I'd like to have... Thanks! Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 22:20:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A57D106566B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A11B8FC16 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2275FE7170; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:20:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=kg4p08RnbyIM CNCNY7C5lbR4yRc=; b=iIswowspK3C75bNw6T0IfEK/q++REyP9bkznxwWipkph +15A/nc9NBUO6+v5Wu4pIS3j5lhAQ58pKPPEzTmMq4CZtMQDYl75Acz6buEp1lhH emUw8e5Pq0qO1T+EgI9ehQAIzDXh9ec/liEKyXTxojdMcD0RamIVXxkf6yH8gJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=LBp/+5 tTHhnJFZO0VwNzUEUmfe/B7jjSP66HqvcaRtTidnhHzvuzy+JWLXf73pjmJUh5IA AkdR6duZ73En8gBjNSsgtqe1vt/pWSTVNJRLusbyRh+JjEeT7BOwTRIynugQOoSs TEFdEI2JUFdyUu+1mwYPM9uMxDdeSFIYPMj/g= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-25-14-189.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.25.14.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBA58E6025; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:20:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:20:07 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20101206222007.4876c00a@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101206231319.f368e2ec.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4cfcb63c.7mrjI+NXXOf2oMKR%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <20101206103126.400dc085@core.draftnet> <20101206231319.f368e2ec.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:20:38 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:13:19 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > Does this imply that the installation requires running X > plus a web browser, or a "hard to use" text mode web browser? > Or is this intended to be used for remote installation only? > Will the installer therefore be unusable for specific > settings (headless, serial, text)? There's a discussion including the announcement at http://markmail.org/message/nlmq7yquevkpmb47 . But yes, I think you will need to use some sort of web browser unless someone writes a different frontend. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 23:11:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1753106566B; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08B18FC12; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.82.228.134] (port=50268 helo=[192.168.1.107]) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPkDg-00031R-SW; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:11:46 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <86oc8yzkdi.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:07:42 -0800 Message-Id: References: <64AF25A6-F9F2-4A4C-A47D-0E80C367C7CB@vicor.com> <86oc8yzkdi.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Scan-Signature: 4cd8f1c2a2711dbbdcb118a8b46bde9e X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions , Redd Vinylene , Nerius Landys Subject: Re: Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:11:48 -0000 On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>> "Devin" == Devin Teske writes: > > Devin> sudo cd /usr/repos > > This is pretty useless. :) I'd say it's _absolutely_ useless ^_^ Yes, indeed, the `sudo' should be omitted. -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 23:19:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B241065696; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7898FC25; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA17088; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:19:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1PPkL0-000Ddd-Aw; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4CFD6F75.10003@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:19:17 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD6BA3.7070505@freebsd.org> <4CFD6D2F.6090304@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFD6D2F.6090304@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:19:26 -0000 on 07/12/2010 01:09 Mikhail T. said the following: > On 06.12.2010 18:02, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> BTW, you could probably write a simple script employing smbmsg(1) to query the >> DIMMs based on logic in the sdtemp driver. > From OpenBSD's sdtemp man-page, it would seem, the driver uses the iic framework > (if that's the right word, khmm...) > > And on this server I can't get /dev/iic* (nor smb*) to appear despite loading > everything I could think of (even the viapm): > > 3 1 0xffffffff80c23000 d22 iic.ko > 4 4 0xffffffff80c24000 10e7 iicbus.ko > 5 1 0xffffffff80c26000 f16 iicsmb.ko > 6 5 0xffffffff80c27000 819 smbus.ko > 7 1 0xffffffff80c28000 c02 smb.ko > 8 3 0xffffffff80c29000 114f iicbb.ko > 9 1 0xffffffff80c2b000 1df3 ichsmb.ko > 10 1 0xffffffff80c2d000 1aed intpm.ko > 11 1 0xffffffff80c2f000 e38 pcf.ko > 12 1 0xffffffff80c30000 b83 lpbb.ko > 13 1 0xffffffff80c31000 368b ppbus.ko > 14 1 0xffffffff80c35000 262a viapm.ko > > Could it be, that the motherboard simply does not have the iic-circuitry and > that some other method has to be used? Thanks! Yours, That's quite possible. Another possibility is that a driver that should be able to handle your hardwre just doesn't know the particular IDs. pciconf -lv output could shed some light. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 23:22:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645501065670 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B278FC0C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA16935; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:03:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1PPk5E-000DcF-9L; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:03:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4CFD6BA3.7070505@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:02:59 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:22:39 -0000 on 06/12/2010 23:05 Mikhail T. said the following: > The sensors-patches did not add any new entries under hw.sensors hierarchy :( Oh good, one less potential source of "sensors framework" flames :-) Seriously, the version that was ported to FreeBSD was very desktop-ish, so no miracle was expected and none happened. BTW, you could probably write a simple script employing smbmsg(1) to query the DIMMs based on logic in the sdtemp driver. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 23:09:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AAC106566C; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net (vms173007pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665F78FC0A; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([unknown] [173.70.194.135]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LD100M844BJPC62@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:09:20 -0600 (CST) Message-id: <4CFD6D2F.6090304@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:09:35 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101114 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD6BA3.7070505@freebsd.org> In-reply-to: <4CFD6BA3.7070505@freebsd.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:30:33 +0000 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:09:31 -0000 On 06.12.2010 18:02, Andriy Gapon wrote: > BTW, you could probably write a simple script employing smbmsg(1) to query the > DIMMs based on logic in the sdtemp driver. From OpenBSD's sdtemp man-page, it would seem, the driver uses the iic framework (if that's the right word, khmm...) And on this server I can't get /dev/iic* (nor smb*) to appear despite loading everything I could think of (even the viapm): 3 1 0xffffffff80c23000 d22 iic.ko 4 4 0xffffffff80c24000 10e7 iicbus.ko 5 1 0xffffffff80c26000 f16 iicsmb.ko 6 5 0xffffffff80c27000 819 smbus.ko 7 1 0xffffffff80c28000 c02 smb.ko 8 3 0xffffffff80c29000 114f iicbb.ko 9 1 0xffffffff80c2b000 1df3 ichsmb.ko 10 1 0xffffffff80c2d000 1aed intpm.ko 11 1 0xffffffff80c2f000 e38 pcf.ko 12 1 0xffffffff80c30000 b83 lpbb.ko 13 1 0xffffffff80c31000 368b ppbus.ko 14 1 0xffffffff80c35000 262a viapm.ko Could it be, that the motherboard simply does not have the iic-circuitry and that some other method has to be used? Thanks! Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 02:47:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA3C106566B; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260F08FC0A; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([unknown] [173.70.194.135]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LD100FFXEEGIXD4@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:47:10 -0600 (CST) Message-id: <4CFDA038.3010709@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:47:20 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; uk-UA; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101114 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD6BA3.7070505@freebsd.org> <4CFD6D2F.6090304@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD6F75.10003@freebsd.org> In-reply-to: <4CFD6F75.10003@freebsd.org> Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=------------070603080101070608030509 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:47:31 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070603080101070608030509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06.12.2010 18:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Another possibility is that a driver that should be able to handle your hardwre > just doesn't know the particular IDs. > > pciconf -lv output could shed some light. Attached -- it is a "vanilla" PowerEdge 2900 with just one add-on card -- audio... Thanks! Yours, -mi --------------070603080101070608030509 Content-Type: text/plain; name="PowerEdge2900.pciconf-lv.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PowerEdge2900.pciconf-lv.txt" hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x80868086 chip=0x25c08086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000X Chipset Memory Controller Hub' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI pcib1@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25e28086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset PCIe x4 Port 2' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib8@pci0:0:3:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25e38086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset PCIe x4 Port 3' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib9@pci0:0:4:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25e48086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset PCIe x4 Port 4' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib10@pci0:0:5:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25e58086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset PCIe x4 Port 5' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib12@pci0:0:6:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25f98086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset PCIe x8 Port 6-7' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib13@pci0:0:7:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25e78086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset PCIe x4 Port 7' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI none0@pci0:0:8:0: class=0x088000 card=0x80868086 chip=0x1a388086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset DMA Engine (5000P)' class = base peripheral hostb1@pci0:0:16:0: class=0x060000 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x25f08086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset Error Reporting Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb2@pci0:0:16:1: class=0x060000 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x25f08086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset Error Reporting Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb3@pci0:0:16:2: class=0x060000 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x25f08086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset Error Reporting Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb4@pci0:0:17:0: class=0x060000 card=0x80868086 chip=0x25f18086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset Reserved Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb5@pci0:0:19:0: class=0x060000 card=0x80868086 chip=0x25f38086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset Reserved Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb6@pci0:0:21:0: class=0x060000 card=0x80868086 chip=0x25f58086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset FBD Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb7@pci0:0:22:0: class=0x060000 card=0x80868086 chip=0x25f68086 rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '5000 Series Chipset FBD Registers' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI pcib14@pci0:0:28:0: class=0x060400 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x26908086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 PCIe Root Port 1' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI uhci0@pci0:0:29:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x26888086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset USB Universal Host Controller *1' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci1@pci0:0:29:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x26898086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset USB Universal Host Controller *2' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci2@pci0:0:29:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x268a8086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset USB Universal Host Controller *3' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci3@pci0:0:29:3: class=0x0c0300 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x268b8086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset USB Universal Host Controller *4' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci0@pci0:0:29:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x268c8086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset USB2 Enhanced Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB pcib16@pci0:0:30:0: class=0x060401 card=0x00000000 chip=0x244e8086 rev=0xd9 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801 Family (ICH2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9,63xxESB) Hub Interface to PCI Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x00000000 chip=0x26708086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'LPC Interface Controller (631xESB/6321ESB/3100 )' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA atapci0@pci0:0:31:1: class=0x01018a card=0x01b11028 chip=0x269e8086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Ultra ATA Storage Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA atapci1@pci0:0:31:2: class=0x01018f card=0x01b11028 chip=0x26808086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB/3100 Serial ATA Storage Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA pcib2@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x35008086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB PCIe Upstream Port' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib7@pci0:5:0:3: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x350c8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB PCIe to PCI-X Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib3@pci0:6:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x35108086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB PCIe Downstream Port E1' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib5@pci0:6:1:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x35148086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '631xESB/632xESB PCIe Downstream Port E2' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib4@pci0:7:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x01031166 rev=0xc2 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'ServerWorks (Was: Reliance Computer Corp)' device = 'EPB PCIe to PCI-X Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI bce0@pci0:8:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x164c14e4 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (BCM5708)' class = network subclass = ethernet pcib6@pci0:9:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00101102 chip=0x70061102 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Creative Technology LTD.' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI hdac0@pci0:10:0:0: class=0x040300 card=0x00181102 chip=0x00091102 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Creative Technology LTD.' class = multimedia subclass = HDA pcib11@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x032c8086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PCI Express-to-PCI Express Bridge (6702PXH)' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI mpt0@pci0:2:8:0: class=0x010000 card=0x1f061028 chip=0x00541000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic (Was: Symbios Logic, NCR)' device = 'SAS 3000 series, 8-port with 1068 -StorPort' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI pcib15@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x01031166 rev=0xc2 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'ServerWorks (Was: Reliance Computer Corp)' device = 'EPB PCIe to PCI-X Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI bce1@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x164c14e4 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (BCM5708)' class = network subclass = ethernet vgapci0@pci0:16:13:0: class=0x030000 card=0x01b11028 chip=0x515e1002 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'ATI Technologies Inc. / Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.' device = 'Radeon ES1000 (Radeon ES1000)' class = display subclass = VGA --------------070603080101070608030509-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 03:26:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09023106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 03:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from generalgrowth.com (ggprelay2.generalgrowth.com [12.109.237.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D528FC14 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 03:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1535219517==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1291691343.308905@generalgrowth.com> From: "General Growth AV Engine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:09:03 -0600 Subject: Anti-Virus Notification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:26:17 -0000 --===============1535219517== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 VGhpcyBpcyBhbiBhdXRvbWF0aWNhbGx5IGdlbmVyYXRlZCBBbnRpLVZpcnVzIG5vdGlmaWNhdGlv bi4gQSB2aXJ1cyAoVzMyL015ZG9vbS5vQE1NIXppcCkgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGV0ZWN0ZWQgYnkgdGhl IEFWIGVuZ2luZShNY0FmZWUgRW5naW5lKS4gVGhlIGFjdGlvbiB0cmlnZ2VyZWQgYW5kIGRhdGEg YXJlIGdpdmVuIGJlbG93LiBNZXNzYWdlIGlzIGRyb3BwZWQuLg0K --===============1535219517==-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 04:53:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C629106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla_strick@att.net) Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E9708FC13 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75069 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 04:53:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1291697590; bh=6ex66cqq3ESduPTGjd3HcA8YwIcDwasHFlVkQpkAn/8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Received:Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject; b=RNmIP+CjImH72LfFKgoWHRnv441pxcSakkktyWBgutkc9RspElfqPnCgPRKI5obROIkTkk8beSPW/CjTPpg3Kktv26gLpyv3BEoPxloK+vtIbRKDEWMFR9tRCXjbmLqHSei1KBHUxgdNlCX6zsxqiI1FllppDTuaTcFg3/ztQsA= Received: from mist.nodomain (mla_strick@69.228.199.197 with login) by smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Dec 2010 20:53:10 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: ppEzeiKswBBq7wHVNDEiPbPsAwzyGELyRI8IdiDYGqsxaD5uQA-- X-YMail-OSG: WTxWr3oVM1nraiCEEN8D82btV8bEmygvW8q9YxB4vuZ_t7. sKqFoCwuwSRWFfltWeoNYrWnLKBmLHN5hMzIBzcGSt9MapH6VV3z2mUvlew2 PUk0bW7.yJxJZZxvItXoXpF1YI6TnbscJD4KhB8mkxIqLQAZv8Q7TrGzaKYN esS67QYQmCZHn6E4Ph76rpnMHW32Qb0e5xd31yuqV90HXiK1itUI3kGB8G5u HVZjDbAmJKR75NaaQHIR7_R9xMoqKgDGgUtbX X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB74r7oE012103 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:53:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mla@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB74r21Y012101 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:53:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mla) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:53:02 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <201012070453.oB74r21Y012101@mist.nodomain> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing from inside Linux firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:53:12 -0000 On Fri, 4 Dec 2010, Warren Block responded to my previous email: > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Dan Strick wrote: > > > > I tried /usr/ports/www/firefox which installs as firefox3, a native > > FreeBSD Firefox program. It will print via lpr, but It won't > > do flash. > > Actually, it will. > > > I tried the flashplugin-mozilla port, but it just causes a > > segmentation violation when I visit a page with flash items. > > Yes, that's not the right plugin. Deinstall it and follow the Handbook > Flash instructions: The flashplugin-mozilla port does indeed seem to be the wrong port and the nspluginwrapper port mentioned in the FreeBSD Handbook does indeed work, but there were a couple of glitches: 1) The plugin was installed in $HOME/.mozilla/plugins where Linux firefox executables also find it and then choke on the FreeBSD ELF file. I fixed the problem by moving the plugin to /usr/local/lib/firefox3/plugins. Using a single .directory for multiple browsers is probably a very bad idea if it contains stuff which is not the same for all versions of all browsers. I am not sure what a better alternative should look like. One possibility would be to have directories in $HOME/.mozilla with names like plugins-version-name. 2) The nspluginwrapper produces these warning messages: *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 () in NPN_GetValue() *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 in NPP_GetValue() I can't solve this problem because the nspluginwrapper does not seem to come with any documentation. Documentation would be noce since the nspluginwrapper claims to support other types of plugin but gives no hint about how to install them. Thanks, Dan Strick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 05:17:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0AA1065697 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 05:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla_strick@att.net) Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D99A8FC18 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 05:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99038 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 05:17:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1291699039; bh=1rIkTmASvwMEGuuTRsSYRFQuhwra/QJXArDa2n1RJsg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Received:Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject:Cc; b=y1JVmyuY/ADErI3oaxG1qbgjZhtBb1IlukYaHZDtP5MBZ7CDuMSglRbGwTuMC5KQr+3I94u5yj9kLmFzY3iJGFO0WxVgHpUhascaFSrNZ3pqUqWTDNDezukjeUZCf7fKA2DjPbD4XP6quMn/Gy/QuX7U1xJNNAWqG9bubEU+4nU= Received: from mist.nodomain (mla_strick@69.228.199.197 with login) by smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Dec 2010 21:17:18 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: ppEzeiKswBBq7wHVNDEiPbPsAwzyGELyRI8IdiDYGqsxaD5uQA-- X-YMail-OSG: U_8InzIVM1kSw9YsHI5L1lwmkZB1Kr723YzIS8I1jNroJQV Wf4uH9ZF3tuLXOLhEHB61nxeEd7rYrBLN2M1BKVNkH4W13_48hssBp3jgAgt yHs7Y2zyXJvTAn6KSqb.tcukhLRlXv_UTbF2s7l_5uQNRkTgDNl2Ib8Fu55f OoAunt2uKMEKlVUjeqTp.Xcid0S4j1EoX40eH9_sfY0CjJqAuDgqqxRd7pA4 p X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB75HCGF012228; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:17:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mla@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB75HCeO012227; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:17:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mla) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:17:12 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <201012070517.oB75HCeO012227@mist.nodomain> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: frank@shute.org.uk Subject: Re: printing from inside Linux firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 05:17:19 -0000 On Sat 4 Dec 2010, Frank Shute responded to my previous question: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:22:34PM -0800, Dan Strick wrote: > > > > ... > > > > I tried printing to a file, but both the Linux and FreeBSD Firefox > > programs create slightly strange postscript and pdf files which seem > > to display correctly via the ghostscript and acroread programs but > > won't print correctly on my postscript printer (a Brother HL-1270N). > > Firefox produces OK postscript. Your printer setup is borked. Try > using lpr and doing away with CUPS is my advice. Then you can send ps > directly to the printer. > > Below are the important files for my postscript printer. I just > convert everything to postscript before I lpr it. I don't use CUPS. My only interest in CUPS is that modern Linux binaries often use it and I would like to know how to configure /compat/linux so that printing works. My FreeBSD system uses lpr. My printcap entry looks like this: (the printer has an ethernet interface) ps0|ps|Brother HL-1270N:\ :sh:rw:mx#30000:\ :lp=9100@br-hl-1270n:sd=/var/spool/lp/ps0:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs: I also convert everything to postscript before I lpr it. My printer setup is not borked. All postscript files other than those produced by firefox (e.g. those produced by enscript or groff -Tps) work just fine. My printer may be a little strange. I am not sure its postscript interpreter is precisely correct. Thanks, Dan Strick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 06:01:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8BC106567A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave-freebsd@pooserville.com) Received: from smtp.pooserville.com (mail.pooserville.com [69.26.223.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51688FC13 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.pooserville.com) by smtp.pooserville.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id LD1LWR-000NT4-6U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:29:15 -0600 Received: from [76.183.154.180] (account dave-sa@pooserville.com HELO [192.168.74.51]) by mail.pooserville.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 890259 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:29:15 -0600 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.27.0.100910 Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:29:12 -0600 From: Dave Pooser To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: PostgreSQL + 8.1 RELEASE + DTrace = pain? Thread-Index: AcuVz639rsiDJ1FSPkeg4RO2zsiDiA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: PostgreSQL + 8.1 RELEASE + DTrace = pain? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:01:29 -0000 First off, I'll freely admit I'm a *BSD noob; I've been administering Mac servers for a decade and OpenSolaris and Linux for 3-4 years but this is my first ever attempt to set up a FreeBSD system. The goal is to replace a Linux box that is currently a PostgreSQL database server; I need LDAP authentication and I want DTrace. (I also want GSSAPI, but that's another discussion entirely). (Why FreeBSD? DTrace and ZFS without the Oracle Solaris pricetag. Plus it's a *NIX I haven't used yet.) So I used csup to update to the latest ports, built postgresql90-server from ports with LDAP and no DTrace, and it worked fine. Then I used pkg_delete to remove the postgresql packages (server and client), recompiled the kernel to include DTrace and eliminate some unused drivers, updated loader.conf to bring up dtraceall at boot, did a make clean and a make config to add DTrace, and built postgresql90-server again. It appeared to work fine, but now I'm getting segfaults when I try to launch it. Am I doing something obviously stupid here? Is there a good source for troubleshooting steps? What other information should I be posting to help y'all help me figure this out? -- Dave Pooser Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com "...Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one pretty and well-preserved piece, but to slide across the finish line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, and shouting GERONIMO!!!" -- Bill McKenna From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 06:29:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AC51065673; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F78B8FC15; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id IAA23250; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:29:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1PPr2q-000GOI-04; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:29:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4CFDD42A.9020109@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:28:58 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <4CFC910A.5090806@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD3EC0.1060600@fuckner.net> <4CFD5006.7010303@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD6BA3.7070505@freebsd.org> <4CFD6D2F.6090304@aldan.algebra.com> <4CFD6F75.10003@freebsd.org> <4CFDA038.3010709@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4CFDA038.3010709@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring hardware temperatures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:29:07 -0000 on 07/12/2010 04:47 Mikhail T. said the following: > On 06.12.2010 18:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Another possibility is that a driver that should be able to handle your hardwre >> just doesn't know the particular IDs. >> >> pciconf -lv output could shed some light. > Attached -- it is a "vanilla" PowerEdge 2900 with just one add-on card -- audio... Looks like no SMBus device indeed. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 06:43:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DB01065670 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688078FC18 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB76hRv0026089; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:43:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oB76hRBU026086; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:43:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:43:27 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Dan Strick In-Reply-To: <201012070517.oB75HCeO012227@mist.nodomain> Message-ID: References: <201012070517.oB75HCeO012227@mist.nodomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:43:27 -0700 (MST) Cc: frank@shute.org.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing from inside Linux firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:43:30 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Dan Strick wrote: > My printer setup is not borked. All postscript files other than those > produced by firefox (e.g. those produced by enscript or groff -Tps) > work just fine. > > My printer may be a little strange. I am not sure its postscript > interpreter is precisely correct. PostScript emulations vary in quality. ps2ps or ps2ps2 ("it's like typing 'banana'") may produce output more acceptable to Brother's PS emulator. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 06:56:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE05106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2721C8FC08 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so15652583iwn.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:56:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=G3kJNr8rnrz59cEBGcKz4EekPOE/wQ8soWJ8SIT4CZY=; b=pOUyM5r8TWUR+zbgS+s5UZTf0HOXyN/rlSDGcM0ao2DRD79V6xo2nAiJvao6jbUEDq 0m96Is9CKCkJMOOVGEz8IzQ8d5J8CqA/axgNDQEoeOLhtX7MSkTy6VjdWGkYhaVY/Xtd +kg9mPoYTC/n+SiNSS6HJph54qUcTUk4BW4/g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=GIW6JOhJ2iVU6aN1fdwTwbjjADCNzdMxI9b8MUbLI+gXrnOk8ldojKipVCXX5ecZGM w1GZoz2SQdQhxXhU4Vqhm5x2xMSajKAKB6xfQZiUF9jo87vvhZYsO5tL39ezr6pySr9j Wjcxc0tpZ5DS+xKznHAB2M38rbi5E3pJ71574= Received: by 10.231.30.204 with SMTP id v12mr6595953ibc.10.1291704995570; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:56:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.199.211 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:56:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101206225838.a9f342e9.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <000701cb9544$057cf0a0$1076d1e0$@org> <20101206225838.a9f342e9.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Zbigniew Szalbot Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:56:20 +0100 Message-ID: To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Hasse Hansson , User Questions Subject: Re: SV: Archiving directories / zip format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:56:37 -0000 Dear all, On 6 December 2010 22:58, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:49:23 +0100, "Hasse Hansson" wrote: >> For windows I've used this program for years, http://www.ghisler.com/ >> Total Commander. Also good for moving around files. Even contain a FTP client. > > Allow me to mention a program called "FAR manager": If I > remember correctly, it has FTP and archiver support, and > comes in a handy text mode application. I would like to thank everyone who contributed - I really appreciate all the input I got. In the end I decided to use the zip port because it works fine and I do not have winrar nor winzip installed on my Windows machine. Thank you! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 09:08:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D6B1065670 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.net (mail.mgwigglesworth.net [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D753A8FC1A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:08:52 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:08:09 -0500 Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CFC5E3A.6050202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-ID: <4CFDF979.7000602@mgwigglesworth.net> From: "Martes G Wigglesworth" Received: from devsystem.mgwigglesworth.net (192.168.5.12 [192.168.5.12]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.net; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 05:01:34 -0500 Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can a home LAN server use a jail as a router? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:08:53 -0000 On 12/05/2010 10:53 PM, Da Rock wrote: > Is it possible to use FreeBSD to create three "jails" on one > box, so that one jail can be a router to the internet, and the other > two can be webservers? What you seem to need is to run the host as a router, and create two or three more jails on top of that router kernel. The default should be a router and the secondary functions should be the jail. I think you just need to read a bit more on how jails are used on the BSD platform and it will be clear to you. > I wanted to create an environment where if one > webserver got compromised, the other webserver would be unaffected. This would be the true use of jails in your environment. You want to isolate web services such as Apache installs into jails so if they get compromised then you don't have to worry about the rest of the system becoming completely compromised. > So I would > also like to make a jail to be a samba server. I believe that you can install samba inside a jailed environment as well, however, I have never done this, so I am not familiar with how it will be done, however, I have a Bind-9 environment where the external internet interface serves the internet my public information, and there is a second jail which hosts dns for the internal segment. So I can see how Samba can be installed in a jail, and it would make appropriate sense to do so. I hope this helps you in your investigation(s). -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 11:27:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81119106566B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [204.127.217.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAF98FC12 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mueller6722.bellsouth.net (adsl-18-65-116.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.18.65.116]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20101207112736H0400oavope>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:27:37 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.18.65.116] Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:29:09 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bruce Cran , Polytropon Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:27:38 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:31:26 +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > > There's a plan to replace sysinstall with pc-sysinstall, the > > PCBSD installer in 9.0. Currently the backend has been committed and > > people are working on a web interface frontend to allow people to do > > installations via a web browser. > Does this imply that the installation requires running X > plus a web browser, or a "hard to use" text mode web browser? > Or is this intended to be used for remote installation only? > Will the installer therefore be unusable for specific > settings (headless, serial, text)? > > Meanwhile I'm hoping to find some time to improve sysinstall now that > > we don't support installation from floppies: I know there are some big > > improvements that can be made while not taking on the work of a complete > > rewrite. > I agree that sysinstall could benefit from some improvements, > especially the incorporation of the "new partitioning methods", > involving labels, ufsids, GEOM, GPT and PMBR, keeping the > traditional methods MBR, fdisk, bsdlabel and newfs available > for those systems that the user INTENDEDLY wants to install > with those methods (e. g. older hardware). > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany I guess FreeBSD installation from floppies is no longer supported because of the difficulty of fitting the kernel? Otherwise, it would be theoretically possible to install FreeBSD from a lot of floppies, but finding sufficient errorfree floppies would be practically impossible. I remember I had a substantial percentage of bad floppies when I needed five to install DR-DOS in 1999. Floppies are now eleven years more advanced into deterioration. While installation and update via web browser makes sense as an option, it must not be the only option. What if the user starts with a blank hard drive, nothing installed? Then one needs to be able to install from CD, DVD or USB drive. I remember in the late 1990s updating OS/2 Warp 4 with a Service Pak via web browser (Web Explorer), so the idea isn't new. Yes, there needs to be support for installing into the new partitioning methods. Remember that thread I started about FreeBSD support for hard drive > 2 TB? Western Digital has come out with up to 3 TB Caviar Green drive. Somebody might want to install FreeBSD and run a software repository on such a hard drive. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 11:45:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DA0106566C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brucec@muon.cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C138FC12 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A28A3E7173; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:45:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:45:21 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Thomas Mueller Message-ID: <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> References: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Bruce Cran , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:45:22 -0000 On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:29:09AM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > While installation and update via web browser makes sense as an option, it must not be the only option. What if the user starts with a blank hard drive, nothing installed? Then one needs to be able to install from CD, DVD or USB drive. If the user starts with a blank HDD then the installer loads from the CD/DVD, starts the web server on the disc and the user browses to the machine as normal. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 12:33:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E471065679 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15C48FC08 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C89E7173; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:33:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=W+5zLMSfI/Vg 8baoB5gesYSEZR4=; b=UhtZNanI38qHHD4K7iG1cnapmUROYv46mLYOdeQg4DUT LTBu13r+s+vIvA00J0M6K6XNuPBt8mIyt1YK88EvMNCfk788r4tRYkR63qtX3/0o omeXYeHGmMTM52E7jo0t2sI0dh6PdQojsxrsVmK1zov/60nfO+378fFeMZe7+TE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=DmJxcr u6wWGORwjskNfmk/s+MYwdb+iZI7RdWrWnCHcGvgh8/pzjajYn0qrWzJ8hqd6IE+ crrJLi0YAJqZm6iWGomttLJQtCNPQvIQTsPqRjVQbKxZ3AM9zMm+SUPxi61F2kM6 D7Lyu79kuDhZik91cU/rOzBVvFPTLgdPmP/+U= Received: from unknown (client-86-25-14-189.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.25.14.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D90BE7170; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:33:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:33:05 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-ID: <20101207123305.00004921@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:33:10 -0000 On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:29:09 +0000 "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > Otherwise, it would be theoretically possible to install FreeBSD from > a lot of floppies, but finding sufficient errorfree floppies would be > practically impossible. I remember I had a substantial percentage of > bad floppies when I needed five to install DR-DOS in 1999. Floppies > are now eleven years more advanced into deterioration. It's easy enough to find error-free floppy disks if you don't mind paying for them: http://www.amazon.co.uk/b?ie=UTF8&node=430460031 :) -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 15:28:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2F8106566C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101AB8FC17 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10959 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 15:28:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Dec 2010 15:28:07 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4352E5082D; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:28:01 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Chris Brennan References: Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:28:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Brennan's message of "Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:08:30 -0500") Message-ID: <44fwu9vbzy.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: devel/gobject-introspection throws up because of python X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:28:08 -0000 Chris Brennan writes: > While trying to compile audio/tagtool on a FreeBSD7.3 (x86) machine > devel/gobject-introspection decides to throw up and I got this: (the install > was via portmaster -d) Looks like your python installation is broken. Try rebuilding that first. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 14:07:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31801065672 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from satoyoshi_421@yahoo.co.jp) Received: from web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp (web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp [114.111.99.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69EDF8FC18 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94088 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Dec 2010 13:40:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20050223; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C8Bh++wbG0nwcNfLh2dltQsNPhqdA7TrmTumsNGA40oIkVp/1fl56DSDS5Nks1njP3epd2ByLw4K2Jxy6ldaUrzecLAAH+1AOrOOkOQNR8GMMo0aLt0bq5Bj46ZHOGaE ; Message-ID: <20101207134043.94086.qmail@web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Received: from [218.219.210.161] by web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:40:43 JST Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:40:43 +0900 (JST) From: Kazuhiro Satoyoshi To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:13:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:07:27 -0000 Dear sir, Hi, I'm kazu from Japan. I'd like to install [freebsd 3.5.1-RELEASE] into my PC. (I have no idea wether this version(3.5.1) is proper for my PC...) I browsed around Internet, but I could't find this FILES. How can I do? I need your help! I think my PC is like below: FMV DESKPER ME4/535P sincerely, kazu --------------------------------- Learn more about HIV/AIDS - Red Ribbon Campaign 2010 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 16:16:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B87106566C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9742B8FC13 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oB7GEAup043891; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oB7GEAHW043890; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:10 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Kazuhiro Satoyoshi Message-ID: <20101207161410.GA43854@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101207134043.94086.qmail@web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101207134043.94086.qmail@web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:16:42 -0000 On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:40:43PM +0900, Kazuhiro Satoyoshi wrote: > Dear sir, > > Hi, I'm kazu from Japan. > I'd like to install [freebsd 3.5.1-RELEASE] into my PC. Is there any good reason for installing such an ancient version of FreeBSD? Install the most recent RELEASE you can get to run on it. Try 8.1 now. > (I have no idea wether this version(3.5.1) is proper for my PC...) > I browsed around Internet, but I could't find this FILES. > How can I do? > I need your help! > > I think my PC is like below: > FMV DESKPER ME4/535P I have no idea what an "FMV DESKPER ME4/535P" is. ////jerry > > sincerely, > kazu > > > > --------------------------------- > Learn more about HIV/AIDS - Red Ribbon Campaign 2010 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 16:28:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63081065695 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geoff@apro.com.au) Received: from mail.ricksure.com.au (mail.ricksure.com.au [203.98.89.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF688FC21 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 171.78.233.220.static.exetel.com.au [220.233.78.171] by mail.ricksure.com.au with SMTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 03:28:34 +1100 From: Geoff Roberts Organization: Australian Projects To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 03:28:27 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-26-generic; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20101128163048.21211cl7o3xpi8lc@aprosrv2.apro.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20101128163048.21211cl7o3xpi8lc@aprosrv2.apro.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012080328.27769.geoff@apro.com.au> X-Declude-Sender: geoff@apro.com.au [220.233.78.171] X-Declude-Spoolname: 37770426.eml X-Declude-RefID: X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.6.35 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm" X-Declude-Scan: Outgoing Score [0] at 03:28:36 on 08 Dec 2010 X-Declude-Tests: Whitelisted X-Country-Chain: X-Declude-Code: 0 X-Declude-Recipcount: 1 Organization: Declude, Inc. X-Helo: ubuntutest-01.localnet X-RevDNS: Subject: Re: zpool won't mount as dataset stuck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: geoff@apro.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:28:45 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:30:48 pm Geoff Roberts wrote: > Long and short is I can see the "tank" zpool without a problem, but > whenever I try to import it the disk light flashes every second and > the datasets won't mount. > > I can run a history command on "tank" and that shows the following > repeated every second (tgx keeps incrementing by one): > > 2010-11-28.15:08:33 [internal rollback txg:9645688] dataset = 222 > [user root on systemname.com] > 2010-11-28.15:08:34 [internal rollback txg:9645689] dataset = 222 > [user root on systemname.com] Just for reference, I was able to use the steps below to recover the data of the zpool that was "stuck". The steps below were done using virtual machines. The zpool history command was a great help as well. a) Created a FreeBSD 9.0 system and applied a ZFS v28 patch for a few features that looked useful for my problem. i) Ability to mount zpool in readonly ii) Ability to mount zpool with -N (do not mount datasets) iii) Ability to mount zpool with -T to specify a particular transaction set. In the end I didn't need this feature. b) Took an image of one of the mirror partitions housing the zpool using dd and transferred that to a file on a stand UFS2 file system. This was so I could work on a copy and transfer the data on an external hard disk to the FreeBSD 9.0 virtual machine. c) Used mdconfig to mount the file image on the FreeBSD 9.0 system. d) I was able to use zpool import -o readonly=on -N poolname The readonly option in particular seemed to stop the last transaction continually attempting to run in an endless loop. e) I could then see the datasets. From here I was able to mount them and recover all the data. Geoff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 16:33:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0E71065673 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:33:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4A88FC08 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E84CE7173; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:33:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=v27+b0sU00HJ 58D8EuMm1ghCqhs=; b=t4SIo3iqK6YeQ4mpfUx1miGqsj+yF5BcVJQBB4fp44Ax vNXEbDy83ETMjWFwSy9gNMecfB5+WCjYLM72Lzc3uaQKuWW4CLBFhuC0ENvotNLP trAnUIn9R1kkcPeM+zO4+rxA5uEZN9YDWbvkfBMeejvpz7L/fPtADc2NqUxJHzI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=u73HOC n8amCGA8lL/DwBdu3HsVMaRKXFf75/WM2HzceDWwT5rajCygSr+TBIW0OC+lD69x 2+/sbzMOvjkLb9EmYQyF5qD7vlIXoxZAvhqPfMHoV+fRC6JxWjabv+Na+VOs4Yz8 hwA5xa4qdzAPKwDL/TzxyZfkuUNtV/mA1lwoA= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-25-14-189.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.25.14.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D0ACE7170; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:33:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:33:39 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20101207163339.5639f4aa@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101207161410.GA43854@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101207134043.94086.qmail@web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> <20101207161410.GA43854@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kazuhiro Satoyoshi , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:33:44 -0000 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:10 -0500 Jerry McAllister wrote: > I have no idea what an "FMV DESKPER ME4/535P" is. It looks like one of these: http://www.fmworld.net/product/former/dp0005/m_series.html . They're old, but not so old that 8.1 shouldn't work. If you only have 64MB memory you'll need to build a custom kernel to get the most out of it. I have an equivalent machine with 128MB RAM (EPIA5000 with a 533MHz CPU) and it does routing and runs a DNS server well enough. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 17:11:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EEA106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C808FC1B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so116480gyf.13 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:11:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/fwPz4TQOAsTd8dyZyZeUZe3R3cV0wUga4inN0qxQgg=; b=mLtDnl99n+x9/dtiynBz3BEuZ5yytMvpPe1oytKOuUL+jnzc9tdG/pRMPjVRJNH74p DQFHF+mno/ewpZ/63W81cyZEU6n512z9u3gRh5Ic31vPs3v4HD3QHQiWstFaCusn1YBd zsqhBgIAsU/Pn1uTmZRWlb04t0iNvMh2ckV0k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZijhCnE+4+oOcr1c3kTmeN1jYeTlzLJknKjR1ySIby6wrqE7xxCH+e9CSaphP/YN6+ i0CjeHDDckTaG6mG5DuYQ26SgwOkVL+lGlOpswP/a2861HzdOrC+x909PPQudnhouMZ+ niyijGQxRkspoEB3Cx4OTGpwCzTm2RSqslbEs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.135 with SMTP id b7mr644482wec.29.1291741883809; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:11:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012061145.05971.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> References: <201012060222.26584.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> <201012061145.05971.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:11:23 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Elias Chrysocheris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gabor Illo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:11:25 -0000 On 6 December 2010 09:45, Elias Chrysocheris wrote: > On Monday 06 of December 2010 02:38:12 Gabor Illo wrote: > > 2010/12/6 Elias Chrysocheris : > > > Sorry, my mistake... I used cd without the / when I was in the dist > > > directory... So I cannot see why it does not work for you... What disk > > > are you trying to use? Is it the official DVD? > > > > > > Regards > > > Elias > > > > I use livefs sysinstall FIXME option (defined wiki 1.2 step), fixme > > shell only works livefs CD. > > Well.. I thing that in livefs cd there are no installation packages of the > release. I thing it contains only the necessary software for the livefs > system. It is better to use the installation DVD that also contains the > livefs > and Fixme console and all the necessary system's packages. > > That will do. I don't know if the installation CD also works, but the DVD > is > OK. I've done it many times before... > > Regards, > Elias > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > the easiest way to do zfs root is use the pc-bsd disk but select the freebsd install not the pc bsd one From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 17:37:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48EF106566B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcgovern@spoon.beta.com) Received: from spoon.beta.com (spoon.beta.com [199.165.180.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A98F8FC12 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spoon.beta.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spoon.beta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7H2FOQ002973 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:02:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mcgovern@spoon.beta.com) Received: (from mcgovern@localhost) by spoon.beta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB7H2F03002972 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:02:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mcgovern) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:02:15 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian J. McGovern" Message-Id: <201012071702.oB7H2F03002972@spoon.beta.com> To: questions@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on spoon.beta.com Cc: Subject: USB Stack/# of bytes to read? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:37:31 -0000 All, I have a couple of quick questions about the USB stack in 8.x that I'm hoping someone with a bit more experience than I can answer. I am currently working on a device driver for a Velleman K8055 board. Basically, it does digital and analog I/O under the control of a PC via USB. I've got the basic driver working fine, and I'm moving data back and forth without issue. What I'd like to be able to do, however, is poll the driver to see how much data is sitting in the input buffer, or at least see how many packet/buffers are waiting. Looking through the control structures, it appears that something like sc->fifo.fp[USB_FIFO_TX]->used_q.ifq_len would be the right field, but it never appears to be set anywhere (and is always 0). Using something like USB_IF_POLL() on the used_q suggests there is something to write, but not how much. On a similar line of thinking, how about flushing the queue entirely? Should I call usb_fifo_reset() directly? Or should I just reimplement the logic? -B From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 17:52:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B238106566C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcfarnes@broadpark.no) Received: from thalia-smout.broadpark.no (thalia-smout.broadpark.no [80.202.8.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140D78FC19 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:52:36 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from terra-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.13]) by thalia-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LD2004TCKBNLGC0@thalia-smout.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:52:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown-00-11-09-ab-bf-c1.lan ([80.202.85.193]) by terra-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LD200L3NKBMZ3I0@terra-smin.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:52:35 +0100 (CET) From: Richard T C Farnes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:52:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20101112192954.GB18437@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <201011222229.13827.rcfarnes@broadpark.no> <4CEB0126.7020002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-reply-to: <4CEB0126.7020002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-id: <201012071852.34323.rcfarnes@broadpark.no> Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:52:37 -0000 To Da Rock and others Please feel free to use my text here in any marketing. On Tuesday 23 November 2010 00:47:50 Da Rock wrote: > On 11/23/10 07:29, Richard T C Farnes wrote: > > Why do some people get hung up in some features of our cute little > > mascot that remind them of devils. You must look at it in a positive way > > that represents FreeBSD like a sporting character that has a sporty > > attitude. Just observe the modern running shoes and it has a harpoon in > > its hand to signify being ready to attack all problems on the way. Linux > > has only a lazy penguin that does not seem to be doing anything except > > sitting on its behind. > > > > Hope this answers all questions about this matter > > Sign > > Richard Farnes > > If you don't mind, I'll use that perspective in my marketing. I like > that one :) > > > On Saturday 20 November 2010 09:00:04 Da Rock wrote: > >> On 11/14/10 05:22, Chad Perrin wrote: > >>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:36:29PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > >>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 07:08:51PM -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: > >>>>> Did you know... > >>>>> If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, > >>>>> but what's worse is when you play it forward.... > >>>> > >>>> I like this one - though you could update if from W 2000 to a more > >>>> current one. > >>> > >>> I vote Vista. > >> > >> I vote Winblow$ 7. The bloody "cloud" for photos ad on tv gives me the > >> shits no end. 1) As if you'd need more than one computer to edit a > >> photo, and 2) as if you could solve anything with M$ crap in the first > >> place... > >> > >> And the missus doesn't like the idea of an "unnatural" photo either, so > >> that'd be 2 votes.... > >> > >> Oh and thank you! Finally I have a FreeBSD media system! Hoorah! Now to > >> move forward finally... > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 18:09:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C291065695 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from fep20.mx.upcmail.net (fep20.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1018D8FC08 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101207180955.YJXZ1667.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100 Received: from bps.jodocus.org ([24.132.166.223]) by edge04.upcmail.net with edge id gJ9t1f01L4pXSfL04J9uqU; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100 X-SourceIP: 24.132.166.223 Received: from jodocus.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bps.jodocus.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB7I9q7I003093; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from 88.159.78.64 (SquirrelMail authenticated user joost) by jodocus.org with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:53 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:53 +0100 From: joost@jodocus.org To: "David DEMELIER" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bps.jodocus.org [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:09:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at bps.jodocus.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kR4HTYXl3FXdRAFjS5RpcnDbDNViz/VYMWXR75RtSM0= c=1 sm=0 a=Rit7POsq_2oA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=hYwbykyqAAAA:8 a=TdvLcpxSfV-wO-WfGrgA:9 a=lJ9ZEb9Qe-ue7N60BtQA:7 a=gFPlNDGqlp87qAe-0_i01QXVMhEA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=VIfz433Ik-8A:10 a=3uM_M7QAeSCt-7Pm:21 a=fq-Jh841dpMBAm5Q:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:09:57 -0000 > 2010/12/5 : >> Hi >> >> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with >> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads >> (I'm >> using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded >> manually) >> It then claims it can't mount / >> > > GEOM_PART becomes the default slicer > > Status: Committed to -CURRENT > Will appear in 8.0: sure > Author: Marcel Moolenaar & others > Web: commit message > > GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and utility > that rolls up support for many partitioning formats (MBR, BSD, GPT > etc.) into a single code base. > > NOTE: Caveat when upgrading! GEOM_PART might interpret existing > partition tables (especially if many operating systems are present - > multi boot) differently than the previous classes. Your devices might > get renamed. > > NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kernel > doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes. In other words, > bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART. > > Maybe you're encountering this trouble right now. what I would advise > you is using labels. Please do the following : > > tunefs -L root /dev/ad4a > tunefs -L var /dev/ad4e (assuming it's e on your system ?) > and for usr, tmp, etc ... > >>From a fixit environment. then edit your /etc/fstab and place > /dev/ufs/root /dev/ufs/var instead of hardcoding the device node. > Adding labels to the partitions doesn't help. I've tried both UFS and GEOM labels. You did point me in the right direction though. If I load geom_mbr my partitions show up and all is well. I think it was actually the slice that wasn't recognized. geom_part should have recognized the mbr, right? I've scanned g_part_mbr_probe() and all the checks it does should succeed. DOSMAGIC is there. The first byte of each row in the partition table is either 0x80 of 0x00. geom_part seems to do first match when probing. is there a way for me to find out which geom_part_* module is staking a claim on my mbr? I'm assuming I'm not the first person to try 8.x on amd64 with an mbr on a disk so there must be something 'special' with this system... Joost. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 18:10:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0C1106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ipv6canada.com) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F7368FC15 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66070 invoked by uid 89); 7 Dec 2010 18:10:44 -0000 Received: from sfw.eagle.ca (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with ESMTPA; 7 Dec 2010 18:10:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4CFE788F.3040209@ipv6canada.com> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:10:23 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Coleman References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Silveira?= , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:10:44 -0000 On 2010.11.11 19:44, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Not this shit again... Amen! Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 18:16:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D134106566B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01A68FC14 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so203345vws.13 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:15:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Pgaqz6btDxak5qR2wDG6sTqk3kL7ZYd8PeL3hj/e9YE=; b=IeEtiTC80K0bF9rfS8PXwpXQ7PJ9V8wgLpIw7i3jYRcdOZDf/nx18o+8ji6Gx1I0Vd ny7HNbnfDoQe0da0cmhWMe52N8cWLLrAVFV4TBWDcpex5Ioy/YijTu5UEuzXPxVKCshC J7CO2PwSOjR+CX4eggI4ywMnlGEBClYDAX3aI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KdhNLLB5Gz2SPhYHcUl2QRgV/vPyx32NK/nv3K0OwY4FSRAYPGGa+5Rd8gMpAHXopy pd8TvIB9KzJIYxAKPez5rlDWEYNX0/JyBAKeMILo49mTxxJRWBWiy7WS5/Q7l75y+Ukr a6oOrR5JYwYlPJtNQc5vEWUcxvXT8r8/oCbhc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.218.210 with SMTP id hr18mr5914459qcb.78.1291745758809; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.230.131 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:15:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CFDF979.7000602@mgwigglesworth.net> References: <4CFC5E3A.6050202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4CFDF979.7000602@mgwigglesworth.net> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:15:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: Xn Nooby To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can a home LAN server use a jail as a router? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:16:00 -0000 > I hope this helps you in your investigation(s). Yes, thank you and the previous poster. It sounds like my "outer" box needs to be the router, and everything else should be a jail. I will do some more reading up on jails. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 18:13:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AD8106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ipv6canada.com) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 092518FC14 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66223 invoked by uid 89); 7 Dec 2010 18:13:46 -0000 Received: from sfw.eagle.ca (HELO ?192.168.1.114?) (steve@ibctech.ca@::ffff:208.70.104.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with ESMTPA; 7 Dec 2010 18:13:46 -0000 Message-ID: <4CFE7945.7000806@ipv6canada.com> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:13:25 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <43B0E188-8A80-48A7-9686-B6A9E39FBB13@cwis.biz> <86y68z6tz5.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:20:38 +0000 Cc: Free BSD Questions list , Alejandro Imass , Neal Hogan , Ryan Coleman , "Randal L. Schwartz" Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:13:45 -0000 On 2010.11.11 23:49, Adam Vande More wrote: > I thought I remembered this little gem: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177810.html LMFAO!! Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 19:05:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C717106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637528FC12 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDD45E804A0; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:05:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:05:43 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101207190541.GA16234@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Anybody else have an ASUS 900A? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:05:45 -0000 Well, no wonder it was so cheap; ASUS is going with their 10" model.... Eventually I will put on FBSD; for the time being, if anyone else onlist has this model, please write off list. Trying to find the best way to put on ktts. gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 19:56:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D18106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from srandall52@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBCA8FC0C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so266908gwj.36 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:56:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zR2oNjVxSaXUFfHFMfRr6PfiaoDbn4slJESkY/1MW1E=; b=uhc5DXsaRxMNz7Q2Yp6uaX+/IWr2tZwifGm9e0RYbQXnlkwhW0gF74l8MbUMDqtZbE yqXnrAWgwQ3pYzWd/AmmfxZH5lfgbol54la3sZW36po0IuEM0FAioDoPzguU7tPDxHy+ vh2edww5WWT2O811wmza3xN7DEximQUPmv9ls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MVoVTl5D7za9kG6Su1jum+NSlWbEPHBbDVQhfU+Vpy+OKmG7vYXTJxhc/nTmLi1h56 JomckrTt8S3mcA6dursGg+eEJ6nTzs5JPnsqls/9le52I74YRI6ER1jMD6u9l2raRNO6 m9ELHkNurVoLcWrg3xtxhnTLHMKPY/yU0VjJE= Received: by 10.100.163.15 with SMTP id l15mr5115892ane.125.1291750021078; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:27:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from locust.local (adsl-68-88-175-232.dsl.wchtks.swbell.net [68.88.175.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x39sm6977643ana.6.2010.12.07.11.26.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:26:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0600 From: Steve Randall To: joost@jodocus.org Message-ID: <20101207132656.260bf792@locust.local> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David DEMELIER , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:56:53 -0000 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:53 +0100 joost@jodocus.org wrote: > > 2010/12/5 : > >> Hi > >> > >> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with > >> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads > >> (I'm > >> using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded > >> manually) > >> It then claims it can't mount / > >> > > > > GEOM_PART becomes the default slicer > > > > Status: Committed to -CURRENT > > Will appear in 8.0: sure > > Author: Marcel Moolenaar & others > > Web: commit message > > > > GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and utility > > that rolls up support for many partitioning formats (MBR, BSD, GPT > > etc.) into a single code base. > > > > NOTE: Caveat when upgrading! GEOM_PART might interpret existing > > partition tables (especially if many operating systems are present - > > multi boot) differently than the previous classes. Your devices might > > get renamed. I guess that's the key paragraph. > > > > NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kernel > > doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes. In other words, > > bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART. > > > > Maybe you're encountering this trouble right now. what I would advise > > you is using labels. Please do the following : > > > > tunefs -L root /dev/ad4a > > tunefs -L var /dev/ad4e (assuming it's e on your system ?) > > and for usr, tmp, etc ... > > > >>From a fixit environment. then edit your /etc/fstab and place > > /dev/ufs/root /dev/ufs/var instead of hardcoding the device node. > > > > Adding labels to the partitions doesn't help. I've tried both UFS and GEOM > labels. You did point me in the right direction though. > > If I load geom_mbr my partitions show up and all is well. I think it was > actually the slice that wasn't recognized. > > geom_part should have recognized the mbr, right? I've scanned > g_part_mbr_probe() and all the checks it does should succeed. DOSMAGIC is > there. The first byte of each row in the partition table is either 0x80 of > 0x00. geom_part seems to do first match when probing. is there a way for > me to find out which geom_part_* module is staking a claim on my mbr? You mean "on ad4". $ gpart show ad4 Your disk was at one time "dangerously dedicated" and later converted to MBR. But there is still an obsolete BSD label in block 1 of the disk. # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 seek=1 count=1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 20:10:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF6A10656DD for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA768FC20 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [66.253.36.39]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E846529619; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:10:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFE94AA.7060002@cyberleo.net> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:10:18 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100911 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CF9C1E5.3070101@rawbw.com> <44r5dw88yd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44r5dw88yd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Yuri , Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: portupgrade causes kernel message: maxproc limit exceeded by uid 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:10:20 -0000 On 12/05/2010 10:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Yuri writes: > >> Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such >> message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like >> this: >> kern.maxproc: 6164 >> kern.maxprocperuid: 5547 >> >> What may be causing such condition? > > limits(1), perhaps? I DoSed a remote box building devel/glib20 too. Just now reproduced it locally. It manifested as a forkbomb somewhere in gnome-libtool while building glib-2.26.1 inside a clean chroot (not a jail). The issue seemed to only manifest within the chroot, regardless of whether the configuration was identical to the host or not. It did not occur when attempting to build on the host machine. Every other package I built worked just fine. I eventually tracked it down to a stray colon at the start of the PATH variable in my chroot build environment: PATH=:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin Thus, it might be a good idea to verify that your build environment variables and config files are sane. ========== mv -f .deps/gdatetime.Tpo .deps/gdatetime.Po /bin/sh /usr/obj/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/gnome-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O2 -pipe -O2 -pipe -march=nocona -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -o strfuncs strfuncs.o ../../glib/libglib-2.0.la -lm mv -f .deps/regex.Tpo .deps/regex.Po /bin/sh /usr/obj/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/gnome-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O2 -pipe -O2 -pipe -march=nocona -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -o string string.o ../../glib/libglib-2.0.la -lm printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable printf: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libglib-2.0.so.0" not found, required by "printf" ========== -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 20:37:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10082106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84988FC0A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.241.38.112) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:38:12 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:36:59 -0600 To: Free BSD Questions list From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:37:07 -0000 Hello all. I would like to hear your advice, if possible, based on experience about what Shopping cart other than OSCommerce consider as an excellent choice to be run under FreeBSD. With a provider where I had a dedicated server, not running FreeBsd , the entire server was hacked and before leaving them, the tech support people said that the hacking was because of a problem with some libraries under PHP AND OSCOMMERCE. They never could prove that but I leave them since the entire server was hacked, not information stolen but ONLY that$ all web pages (.html, .php) pages where changed, all under different domains and account jailed (?) using CPANEL. Anyway. I am not sure how sensible is OSCCOmmerce to that since I know it is very popular but I would like to test something else. I know there are tons of options but would like to hear your comments about what are you using and what do you recommend me to try that have proved that runs fine under Freebsd. The idea is to have 4 domains running the same software (could be multiple instances) under different DOMAINS: If possible that would be multilangua or at least that support English and Spanish, free and it does not matter if uses PHP or something else. SOmething important is that my test machine is an old one running Freebsd 7.3, 2 processors 386 with 1 GB of RAM, once I have running all without problems will move to a newer one that will run Freebsd 8.1. Thanks in advance. Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 21:01:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB8B106564A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422118FC14 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:01:20 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LD200JM6T1RDY30@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:01:04 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012070160 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-07_10:2010-12-07, 2010-12-07, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger X-Priority: 1 (Highest) In-reply-to: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:01:02 -0800 Message-id: References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> To: Jorge Biquez X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:01:20 -0000 On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > With a provider where I had a dedicated server, not running FreeBsd , the entire server was hacked and before leaving them, the tech support people said that the hacking was because of a problem with some libraries under PHP AND OSCOMMERCE. They never could prove that but I leave them since the entire server was hacked, not information stolen but ONLY that$ all web pages (.html, .php) pages where changed, all under different domains and account jailed (?) using CPANEL. Anyway. I am not sure how sensible is OSCCOmmerce to that since I know it is very popular but I would like to test something else. 30 seconds with a Google search suggests that osCommerce has unpatched security vulnerabilities which do lead to compromise of admin and arbitrary PHP code execution: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1308/ "Affected By 7 Secunia advisories 44 Vulnerabilities Unpatched 29% (2 of 7 Secunia advisories) Most Critical Unpatched The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting osCommerce 2.x, with all vendor patches applied, is rated Highly critical." http://secunia.com/advisories/33446/ "1) The application allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP requests without performing any validity checks to verify the requests. This can be exploited to e.g. create additional administrator accounts by tricking an administrative user into visiting a malicious web site. 2) An error in the authentication mechanism can be exploited to bypass authentication checks and gain access to the administrative interface in the "admin/" folder. Successful exploitation allows to upload and execute arbitrary PHP code e.g. via the file_manager.php script." In other words, your former site's tech support people were likely right-- the site was almost certainly hacked because of osCommerce. Find something else, preferably something which is not based upon PHP. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 21:26:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29891065670 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04E078FC13 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Dec 2010 21:26:40 -0000 Received: from adsl-52.109.242.26.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.73.197]) [109.242.26.52] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 07 Dec 2010 22:26:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+xhc4or6uxbbQhSeg3QxD6sBnIHJ3/Ibs7Jhvfsm /y0EDcGHbVOM1t Message-ID: <4CFEA646.2090909@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:25:26 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xn Nooby References: <4CFC5E3A.6050202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4CFDF979.7000602@mgwigglesworth.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can a home LAN server use a jail as a router? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:26:42 -0000 On 12/7/2010 8:15 PM, Xn Nooby wrote: >> I hope this helps you in your investigation(s). > > Yes, thank you and the previous poster. It sounds like my "outer" box > needs to be the router, and everything else should be a jail. I will > do some more reading up on jails. Thanks! You can create infinitely complex network topologies, using vnet jails. Check the URLs below to get the picture: http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/eurobsdcon07_tutorial.pdf http://wiki.freebsd.org/Image/VNETSamples Just my 2 cents, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 21:32:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A0D106566B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F818FC0A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.241.38.112) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:33:19 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:32:06 -0600 To: Free BSD Questions list From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:32:14 -0000 Hello all. Thanks for the time and rapid response Mr Chuck. Yes. Seems like the guilty one was OSCommerce. I am looking exactly for other option, as you say maybe not PHP ones and that's why asked for advice based on experinces of what people is using. I am looking for python option also. My needs are very simple, even a catalog of products without the shopping cart will be enough. I am also looking options that let you add modules. I want to continue using Freebsd, continue learning and also solve a personal need. Of course the idea is not to start a war between PHP lovers and any other language, but options and suggestions are very welcome. Anyway. I will continue searching. And when I find the solution will posted here , maybe could be of help to someone. By the way. It is great to receive advise from people like you all guys. I have been on the list for several years and I always learn something , always. Thanks to all Jorge Biquez At 03:01 p.m. 07/12/2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: >On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > > With a provider where I had a dedicated server, not running > FreeBsd , the entire server was hacked and before leaving them, the > tech support people said that the hacking was because of a problem > with some libraries under PHP AND OSCOMMERCE. They never could > prove that but I leave them since the entire server was hacked, not > information stolen but ONLY that$ all web pages (.html, .php) > pages where changed, all under different domains and account > jailed (?) using CPANEL. Anyway. I am not sure how sensible is > OSCCOmmerce to that since I know it is very popular but I would > like to test something else. > >30 seconds with a Google search suggests that osCommerce has >unpatched security vulnerabilities which do lead to compromise of >admin and arbitrary PHP code execution: > > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1308/ > >"Affected By 7 Secunia advisories > 44 Vulnerabilities > >Unpatched 29% (2 of 7 Secunia advisories) > >Most Critical Unpatched >The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting osCommerce 2.x, >with all vendor patches applied, is rated Highly critical." > > http://secunia.com/advisories/33446/ > >"1) The application allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP >requests without performing any validity checks to verify the >requests. This can be exploited to e.g. create additional >administrator accounts by tricking an administrative user into >visiting a malicious web site. > >2) An error in the authentication mechanism can be exploited to >bypass authentication checks and gain access to the administrative >interface in the "admin/" folder. > >Successful exploitation allows to upload and execute arbitrary PHP >code e.g. via the file_manager.php script." > >In other words, your former site's tech support people were likely >right-- the site was almost certainly hacked because of >osCommerce. Find something else, preferably something which is not >based upon PHP. > >Regards, >-- >-Chuck > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:04:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770BB1065673 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188E28FC12 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so306673ywp.13 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.42.18 with SMTP id u18mr2743365ybj.158.1291759485041; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:04:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm4278125yba.3.2010.12.07.14.04.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 477BEE54824 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:04:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:04:41 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101207170441.77f0f6ed@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:04:48 -0000 On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:32:06 -0600 Jorge Biquez articulated: > At 03:01 p.m. 07/12/2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > > > With a provider where I had a dedicated server, not running > > FreeBsd , the entire server was hacked and before leaving them, the > > tech support people said that the hacking was because of a problem > > with some libraries under PHP AND OSCOMMERCE. They never could > > prove that but I leave them since the entire server was hacked, not > > information stolen but ONLY that$ all web pages (.html, .php) > > pages where changed, all under different domains and account > > jailed (?) using CPANEL. Anyway. I am not sure how sensible is > > OSCCOmmerce to that since I know it is very popular but I would > > like to test something else. > > > >30 seconds with a Google search suggests that osCommerce has > >unpatched security vulnerabilities which do lead to compromise of > >admin and arbitrary PHP code execution: > > > > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1308/ > > > >"Affected By 7 Secunia advisories > > 44 Vulnerabilities > > > >Unpatched 29% (2 of 7 Secunia advisories) > > > >Most Critical Unpatched > >The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting osCommerce 2.x, > >with all vendor patches applied, is rated Highly critical." > > > > http://secunia.com/advisories/33446/ > > > >"1) The application allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP > >requests without performing any validity checks to verify the > >requests. This can be exploited to e.g. create additional > >administrator accounts by tricking an administrative user into > >visiting a malicious web site. > > > >2) An error in the authentication mechanism can be exploited to > >bypass authentication checks and gain access to the administrative > >interface in the "admin/" folder. > > > >Successful exploitation allows to upload and execute arbitrary PHP > >code e.g. via the file_manager.php script." > > > >In other words, your former site's tech support people were likely > >right-- the site was almost certainly hacked because of > >osCommerce. Find something else, preferably something which is not > >based upon PHP. > > Thanks for the time and rapid response Mr Chuck. > > Yes. Seems like the guilty one was OSCommerce. I am looking exactly > for other option, as you say maybe not PHP ones and that's why asked > for advice based on experinces of what people is using. I am looking > for python option also. My needs are very simple, even a catalog of > products without the shopping cart will be enough. I am also looking > options that let you add modules. I want to continue using Freebsd, > continue learning and also solve a personal need. > Of course the idea is not to start a war between PHP lovers and any > other language, but options and suggestions are very welcome. Anyway. > I will continue searching. And when I find the solution will posted > here , maybe could be of help to someone. > > By the way. It is great to receive advise from people like you all > guys. I have been on the list for several years and I always learn > something , always. Seriously, have you tried Googling for a potential solution? I just spent a few minutes and found several candidates. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:11:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F23106566B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4412C8FC14 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.241.38.112) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:12:11 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:10:38 -0600 To: FreeBSD From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <20101207170441.77f0f6ed@scorpio> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> <20101207170441.77f0f6ed@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <3374604733-437630128@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:11:10 -0000 At 04:04 p.m. 07/12/2010, you wrote: >On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:32:06 -0600 >Jorge Biquez articulated: > > > At 03:01 p.m. 07/12/2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > >On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > > > > With a provider where I had a dedicated server, not running > > > FreeBsd , the entire server was hacked and before leaving them, the > > > tech support people said that the hacking was because of a problem > > > with some libraries under PHP AND OSCOMMERCE. They never could > > > prove that but I leave them since the entire server was hacked, not > > > information stolen but ONLY that$ all web pages (.html, .php) > > > pages where changed, all under different domains and account > > > jailed (?) using CPANEL. Anyway. I am not sure how sensible is > > > OSCCOmmerce to that since I know it is very popular but I would > > > like to test something else. > > > > > >30 seconds with a Google search suggests that osCommerce has > > >unpatched security vulnerabilities which do lead to compromise of > > >admin and arbitrary PHP code execution: > > > > > > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1308/ > > > > > >"Affected By 7 Secunia advisories > > > 44 Vulnerabilities > > > > > >Unpatched 29% (2 of 7 Secunia advisories) > > > > > >Most Critical Unpatched > > >The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting osCommerce 2.x, > > >with all vendor patches applied, is rated Highly critical." > > > > > > http://secunia.com/advisories/33446/ > > > > > >"1) The application allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP > > >requests without performing any validity checks to verify the > > >requests. This can be exploited to e.g. create additional > > >administrator accounts by tricking an administrative user into > > >visiting a malicious web site. > > > > > >2) An error in the authentication mechanism can be exploited to > > >bypass authentication checks and gain access to the administrative > > >interface in the "admin/" folder. > > > > > >Successful exploitation allows to upload and execute arbitrary PHP > > >code e.g. via the file_manager.php script." > > > > > >In other words, your former site's tech support people were likely > > >right-- the site was almost certainly hacked because of > > >osCommerce. Find something else, preferably something which is not > > >based upon PHP. > > > > Thanks for the time and rapid response Mr Chuck. > > > > Yes. Seems like the guilty one was OSCommerce. I am looking exactly > > for other option, as you say maybe not PHP ones and that's why asked > > for advice based on experinces of what people is using. I am looking > > for python option also. My needs are very simple, even a catalog of > > products without the shopping cart will be enough. I am also looking > > options that let you add modules. I want to continue using Freebsd, > > continue learning and also solve a personal need. > > Of course the idea is not to start a war between PHP lovers and any > > other language, but options and suggestions are very welcome. Anyway. > > I will continue searching. And when I find the solution will posted > > here , maybe could be of help to someone. > > > > By the way. It is great to receive advise from people like you all > > guys. I have been on the list for several years and I always learn > > something , always. > >Seriously, have you tried Googling for a potential solution? I just >spent a few minutes and found several candidates. > >-- >Jerry =E2=9C=8C >FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > >Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. >Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. >__________________________________________________________________ Hello. I have found several already with Google.... just=20 not sure what path to follow and that's why I=20 wanted to know what suggestions other has on what=20 are using actually under Freebsd. Of course there=20 are several ones, some look very good and promising.... yes. Thanks in advance Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:27:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01651065672 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AA08FC18 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7MRQ9v049058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:27:26 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oB7MRQ9v049058 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1291760846; bh=V0h1OFsh9Rrnj5IbQXzhob/jotuS94F2eIH6R/ssiBw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4CFEB4C5.7070509@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T ue,=2007=20Dec=202010=2022:27:17=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.12)=20Gecko/20101027=20Thunderbird/3.1.6|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Shopping=2 0cart=20other=20than=20OSCommerce?|References:=20<3374599093-43763 0056@intranet.com.mx>=09=20<3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx>|In-Reply-To:=20<3374 602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|Open PGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg= 3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D =0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigB87A051C5395C21AC32685D1"; b=rZsuxl3RuXqxjo8y8aE0SB0eLqb5kAWRgdd5luLxjJte+E0kHrK64hDScYkK6JjEF wnUKXO1Q4XugHJjFl9Q/GSTG7OKhdYJZe08iHwe/QXKDYpcWGVtBEMvMNGKM4Kpmr0 TQnGip1aaEAfPVfvmpo6YheEBsX75M+vYwsdyUZk= Message-ID: <4CFEB4C5.7070509@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:27:17 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB87A051C5395C21AC32685D1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:27:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB87A051C5395C21AC32685D1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/12/2010 21:32, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Seems like the guilty one was OSCommerce. I am looking exactly for othe= r > option, as you say maybe not PHP ones and that's why asked for advice > based on experinces of what people is using. Take a look at Magento -- it's in ports: www/magento. Despite being written in PHP, Magento is not bad security wise. There's a company behind it which is very actively developing the application, and they are receptive and responsive to reports of security problems, or bugs in general. Many household name companies are using it. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigB87A051C5395C21AC32685D1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkz+tM0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwlogCfW7yOiREFLAGYoroXSTVw+2yY 0zIAn28HUJD0JLHBOeNxE1Yoi8ENztcY =zfX9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB87A051C5395C21AC32685D1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:42:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBE81065674 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B7F8FC1A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so415007gxk.17 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:42:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.11.2 with SMTP id 2mr1921532ybk.139.1291761744921; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm2719619ybi.0.2010.12.07.14.42.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CC57E54824 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:42:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:42:20 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101207174220.07bc1327@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <3374604733-437630128@intranet.com.mx> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> <20101207170441.77f0f6ed@scorpio> <3374604733-437630128@intranet.com.mx> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:42:26 -0000 On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:10:38 -0600 Jorge Biquez articulated: [snip] > I have found several already with Google.... just > not sure what path to follow and that's why I > wanted to know what suggestions other has on what > are using actually under Freebsd. Of course there > are several ones, some look very good and promising.... yes. I don't think that FreeBSD offers much in that arena in the ports system. A quick perusal only turned up two candidates. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=shopping&stype=all&sektion=all You might be able to locate others though. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ I'm so broke I can't even pay attention. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 23:08:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FC1106566B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB0C8FC15 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5B22FDD5.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.253.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB7N8lQr016019; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:49 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB7N9jxX075391; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:09:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB7N9OMG072737; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:09:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Bruce Cran From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:45:21 GMT." <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Thomas Mueller , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:08:58 -0000 Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:29:09AM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > While installation and update via web browser makes sense as an option, it must not be the only option. What if the user starts with a blank hard drive, nothing installed? Then one needs to be able to install from CD, DVD or USB drive. FreeBSD has no installer@freebsd.org list. Should it ? Only a few people tend to work on & know the constraints of the installer, many people over years have have made suggestions & comments, would it be more efficient if FAQs were auto archived & easily found in an installer@freebsd.org archive ? My comments/ wish list - One text mode (non bitmap graphical) browser: /usr/ports/www/lynx - Still too complex for blind/ partially sighted people with special I/O phsical devs, I guess. - There are small clones of standard vi, with executables no larger than ee, could replace ee. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, or HTML or base 64. Avoid top posting, it cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 23:14:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0AB106566C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E1D8FC24 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252D4E7174; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:14:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=fqq4XfdWx2OI BYPDB12mbNMtqIk=; b=eEFMRoMsMiNCwzu/aI+xR+woWvoDIr1Qee+pVCnwOYiF fKYc7SIW104K3guz/N44aMgjdcGf+/bXni279ROeT5Wzh1Q9PQzjokb7q2l14CPq IALmhvpY4KIWYjEhQGuvbG0ft0WTmEdpY24zCFNlzsFw29UQyH9Rgb734QYnK+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=pzrTjc Wveg7GQHNHSh2xfBmQY4lz0xq2uCzH+ZxwQ+SAQJ5e2o0MVWxU9v6Tz3/69bzeIT EvtlNMVtWDp4ASrPQ60ImsRssh0Vcu6/z41ohuOB/L1iFYIy3eZpym4XjMZ1ucWq Hhdtbgf3N/DVibuzpMAjvxJ9VkfMn+Tx/LgdA= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-25-14-189.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.25.14.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3A42E7173; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:14:05 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:14:02 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: "Julian H. Stacey" Message-ID: <20101207231402.37ed75fc@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Mueller , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:14:07 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > FreeBSD has no installer@freebsd.org list. Should it ? Only a few > people tend to work on & know the constraints of the installer, > many people over years have have made suggestions & comments, would > it be more efficient if FAQs were auto archived & easily found in > an installer@freebsd.org archive ? We've had freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org for a few months now. -- Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 23:29:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596011065672 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [66.147.249.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 270768FC0C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24380 invoked by uid 0); 7 Dec 2010 23:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy1.bluehost.com.bluehost.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 23:29:02 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=oE93BE05vseYTJ7oJTO/4DQEz3x2aFpDiX+zDj7+syj6CmHYJ1W44K0gZHetZMRkelVIn4NvN7FwUpihGt1+hHNdJf9IYBLCWaevuTYI9DIHQEqGENPcZcJIkA+ll6k8; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQ6xx-0008IY-3B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:29:02 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:21:43 -0700 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:21:43 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101207232143.GC51710@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: USB management utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:29:03 -0000 --eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there a simple command line utility that takes the disorganized annoyance out of simple USB device management? For instance, something that comes with simple commands in a unified CLI interface (preferably not curses-style captive interface, though I guess I'll take what I can get) for tasks like listing connected devices, mounting and unmounting, et cetera, would be fantastic. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkz+wYcACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVOQwCfUU/MllAiVHagMb8i2FKX1eQx j80AoJ88/4kpD4PXJedWqSvRwdb2R8gV =kETR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 00:07:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CE5106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4152E8FC1F for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61318E7174; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:07:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=qHutqMveq02j IyIkt9us3Ww7z9E=; b=mylmqiTJryJYWOt3MvKEyE9V0tywFWaS+NE16IMxde+R iSy3Q7YctsSdMMPoAWs+IKmnxOiXD5uDeM2KTY0JCYbDA0uo1H+SPQealwSN7ton 8FN8npC9Qn/RhU9CyYx8481Xpp4NUmy1hkPlRtBBLNuIYzV1iW7icb3EsRBP0zw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=pVhFeR 2aLNn93DhZQRGR6hKOkG68MkadmunyL7bVnZqO2JPKYhcoH6zhUXsdTv7/MpCRgE 7XGJKPJyiQbYAFciW4BMds+6cPZSYesIah5W4Pt8hHWn3qjDUuK5CQL/DewkKhyU MfqSGx2O1LItXwHbTLmjRhVa1/MdIW0rFTQ4A= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-25-14-189.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.25.14.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CB9FE6025; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:07:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:07:35 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Chad Perrin Message-ID: <20101208000735.1af19e4d@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101207232143.GC51710@guilt.hydra> References: <20101207232143.GC51710@guilt.hydra> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: USB management utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:07:40 -0000 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:21:43 -0700 Chad Perrin wrote: > Is there a simple command line utility that takes the disorganized > annoyance out of simple USB device management? usbconfig(8)? -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 00:30:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7383F1065670 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A008FC0A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259165C21 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:35:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:27:00 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:30:42 -0000 On 12/08/10 07:01, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > >> With a provider where I had a dedicated server, not running FreeBsd , the entire server was hacked and before leaving them, the tech support people said that the hacking was because of a problem with some libraries under PHP AND OSCOMMERCE. They never could prove that but I leave them since the entire server was hacked, not information stolen but ONLY that$ all web pages (.html, .php) pages where changed, all under different domains and account jailed (?) using CPANEL. Anyway. I am not sure how sensible is OSCCOmmerce to that since I know it is very popular but I would like to test something else. >> > 30 seconds with a Google search suggests that osCommerce has unpatched security vulnerabilities which do lead to compromise of admin and arbitrary PHP code execution: > > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/1308/ > > "Affected By 7 Secunia advisories > 44 Vulnerabilities > > Unpatched 29% (2 of 7 Secunia advisories) > > Most Critical Unpatched > The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting osCommerce 2.x, with all vendor patches applied, is rated Highly critical." > > http://secunia.com/advisories/33446/ > > "1) The application allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP requests without performing any validity checks to verify the requests. This can be exploited to e.g. create additional administrator accounts by tricking an administrative user into visiting a malicious web site. > > 2) An error in the authentication mechanism can be exploited to bypass authentication checks and gain access to the administrative interface in the "admin/" folder. > > Successful exploitation allows to upload and execute arbitrary PHP code e.g. via the file_manager.php script." > > In other words, your former site's tech support people were likely right-- the site was almost certainly hacked because of osCommerce. Find something else, preferably something which is not based upon PHP. > > Regards, > One to point out the obvious, and two to clarify your view here: why not php? Php was the scripting used, but if used poorly will create a security risk in the web app. That means that the vulnerability is the coder's problem; not php itself. God knows how many references there are to what not to do for security reasons on the php site. Vulnerabilities due to bad coding is not the fault of the language used, otherwise we wouldn't be using c, c++, etc. I ask because I'm coding web apps in php myself, and I'm curious to know if my view is in error... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 00:58:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BD6106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:58:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D97D8FC16 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LD300IC5403YY80@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:57:39 -0800 (PST) From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:57:39 -0800 Message-id: References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: Da Rock X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:58:00 -0000 On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Da Rock wrote: > One to point out the obvious, and two to clarify your view here: why not php? Php was the scripting used, but if used poorly will create a security risk in the web app. That means that the vulnerability is the coder's problem; not php itself. God knows how many references there are to what not to do for security reasons on the php site. > > Vulnerabilities due to bad coding is not the fault of the language used, otherwise we wouldn't be using c, c++, etc. > > I ask because I'm coding web apps in php myself, and I'm curious to know if my view is in error... I would disagree and argue that vulnerabilities due to bad coding often reflect flaws in the language being used. For example, a vast range of buffer overflows, null pointer dereference issues, etc are entirely a consequence of C-based languages which permit arbitrary pointer arithmetic. Tools like valgrind and Purify were later created to help add runtime array and memory buffer bounds-checking to C/C++ which other languages (Java, Python, etc) already provide by raising an "index out of range" exception or similar. As for PHP and security, well, when someone ends up getting married to three abusive drunks in a row, there is more going on with that then random chance or even bad luck. I've got an archive of a couple of years worth of list traffic from full-disclosure & bugtraq@securityfocus, and nearly a third of the messages involve PHP or software written in PHP. That's about twice as many as the next largest category, which is vulnerabilities in Windows (including stuff like Adobe Flash/Reader). Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 00:58:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3152106574D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:58:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50D48FC19 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273043D970; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:58:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB80w50G001523; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:58:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:58:04 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-Id: <20101208015804.d3b54f21.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:58:08 -0000 On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:29:09 +0000, "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > I guess FreeBSD installation from floppies is no longer > supported because of the difficulty of fitting the kernel? I think so, too. My "interest" is to be able to boot a system that does not boot from CD or via LAN. In this case, starting (!) the installation from floppy can work. An example from my own practical use: I wanted to install FreeBSD 4 on a laptop that didn't have network or CD-ROM. I chose to boot from floppy, and then started the install process via parallel cable (printer port) from a second system, already running FreeBSD and "exporting" the install CD via plip. > While installation and update via web browser makes sense > as an option, it must not be the only option. Please don't get me wrong: I see lots of potential in providing a web-based install. The downside, however, is that interaction WITH this frontend is done through the browser that is used, and therefore suffers from the disabilites of the browser. For example, lynx is a text mode browser that works well even via serial console - as soon as you KNOW how to interact with that browser! Keep in mind that the cursor keys often don't do what the novice user might assume they will do! So the accessibility of the browser has impact on how the installation process is performed. > What if the user starts with a blank hard drive, > nothing installed? Then one needs to be able to > install from CD, DVD or USB drive. Exactly that is the usual starting point for a FreeBSD installation. :-) It's also worth mentioning that FreeBSD is considered to be an advanced OS because of the fact that it can turn "old-fashioned" or even "outdated" computers into usable things (routers, servers, workstations). This goal can only be met with providing maximum compatibility: This doesn't only include support for "new" partitioning methods, but also for "old" booting practices. Artificially rising a barrier by saying "You need a graphics card, a mouse and 1 GB RAM to install this" is not an option. As long as CHOICE is provided - no problem. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 01:10:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F03E1065670 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CD78FC0C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so577146ewy.10 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:10:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.37.140 with SMTP id y12mr4407781eea.21.1291770646696; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.53.67 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:10:46 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] In-Reply-To: <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:10:46 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:10:48 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:38:05 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: >> My old HP Laserjet 4+ is broken and I'm thinking about buying a new >> printer. > > In case you have been happy with your 4+, consider getting > a used HP office-class laser printer. I can recommend the > HP LaserJet 4000 (maybe including a duplexer, very handy). > Interfaces are parallel and network - use network if possible. I have a LaserJet 2300n that's also worked out very well. It has about the same footprint as the 4m it replaced, but it's much faster. Good network interface and good Postscript support. The paper trays seem a little flimsy compared to the 4, but I haven't broken one yet. > Used office-class equipment, I can't emphasize it enough. The > HP Laserjet printers have a good "eco-mode standby behaviour", > so even energy costs are low Yup. I checked mine with a Kill-A-Watt and found no measurable power draw (less than 1 watt) in standby. After that I stopped bothering to turn it off. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 01:25:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FC3106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE0F8FC14 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:25:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=baF4SCWlo8luyz7gIc8A:9 a=w8A1enEJyMMxjD4sk1sA:7 a=YM0G-qr4--T5QQu6ZSfxx1wTBPMA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=JMVnWU7lTMiviR6N:21 a=vQuC8Un_FzCF5e-H:21 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:14440] helo=vic-amd) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 00/01-26142-F7EDEFC4; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:25:19 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:25:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "justin v" Organization: EndUser_guy Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) Subject: usb devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:25:24 -0000 Aloha world.. For whatever reason, today, when i plugin my USB devices they are not showing up.. They are just not registering.. Never seen this problem before... Prior to today, I was able to plug my Android phone in and mount it just fine. Prior to today, I was able to plug my usb mouse and keyboard in and type away at the console or in xorg.. so i run tail -f /var/log/messages from my alt. pc and plug in my phone and nothing.. It was working fine the previous days, you can see my phone and logitech keyboard.. Sure I suppose I could reboot but I dont want to... My system: yeaguy# uname -a FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 My WIFI adapter is usb.. I am up and passing traffic on that interface too, so im a little confused.. yeaguy# cat /var/log/messages | grep -i usb Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy kernel: umass0: on usbus2 Dec 6 10:32:39 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ukbd0: on usbus1 Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ums0: on usbus1 Dec 6 11:48:09 yeaguy kernel: uhid0: on usbus1 Dec 6 11:48:09 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x046d product 0xc52b bus uhub1 Dec 6 11:54:35 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 (disconnected) Dec 6 13:06:03 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ukbd0: on usbus1 Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ums0: on usbus1 Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x046d product 0xc52b bus uhub1 Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: uhid0: on usbus1 Dec 6 18:57:23 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 (disconnected) Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy kernel: umass0: on usbus2 Dec 6 19:02:47 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 6 22:39:32 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy kernel: umass0: on usbus2 Dec 7 00:19:51 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 7 00:22:38 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy kernel: umass0: on usbus2 Dec 7 00:23:06 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product 0x0c9e bus uhub2 Dec 7 06:06:07 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) yeaguy# Thanks, justin v. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 01:26:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34361106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85F58FC1F for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C24B3D912; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 02:26:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB81QTXg001592; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 02:26:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 02:26:29 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Julian H. Stacey" Message-Id: <20101208022629.7d106bab.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:26:33 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > My comments/ wish list > - One text mode (non bitmap graphical) browser: /usr/ports/www/lynx The lynx browser, due to its "special" key handling, does not appeal to novice users. NO text mode browser gives a "first sight effect" that will "convince" a user he's installing a modern OS. Sounds stupid, I know. As I said, the way the user interacts with the browser does determine how fast he gets through the installation. Learning the browser (instead of just pressing the keys shown on the screen) could make things look worse. On the other hand, with the ability of X to run without configuration on recent hardware, what's wrong with running X with a graphical web browser - if the user DECIDED that way? Of course, this decision is the FIRST step in the install process: Install method -------------- T -> traditional text mode installer (sysinstall) (this one does not have all the options) W -> web-based installer in text mode (typical for professional users) G -> web-based installer in graphics mode (typical for novice users) R -> remote installation (just starts the server) S -> shell (dialog shell access to live system) Enter choice: _ Just a simple idea. > - Still too complex for blind/ partially sighted people with special I/O > phsical devs, I guess. Very true. The ability of FreeBSD to be a barrier-free (!!!) OS always made it a first class product. It would be sad if it would lose this ability in the future, just to cater the expected "first sight effect" newbies. :-) > - There are small clones of standard vi, with executables > no larger than ee, could replace ee. Allow me a side question, but... what's wrong with ee? (Don't get me wrong, I've been a long-term vi user myself.) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 01:49:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1DD106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4335A8FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB81n6Uv045279; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:49:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:49:06 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: "Julian H. Stacey" In-Reply-To: <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> Message-ID: References: <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Bruce Cran , Thomas Mueller , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:49:26 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Julian H. Stacey wrote: [ snip ] > - There are small clones of standard vi, with executables > no larger than ee, could replace ee. I think ee is actually a good choice for this application. vi can be a little frustrating for those who rarely use it, and it's downright impenetrable to someone who has never seen it before. With ee, a newb has a fighting chance. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 04:52:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB9C1065672 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 04:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CEF8FC12 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 04:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2ml1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.139]) by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2010 21:23:09 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=6EkEX6JM2LCztCEhkE317K9SpBSN4cB8nbuuHVfFIzI= c=1 sm=1 a=kh-3Y9aju0EA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=gP64OGu1Wg00f0IYR0/kpw==:17 a=6_Hfo6qZisi4-CWD4ZkA:9 a=TLWoj7BcVIMedPvif1kA:7 a=EMXhBEJ9InZe8BTK4fAb4Dtq1asA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO DaleHPLaptop) ([68.144.165.249]) by pd2ml1so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2010 21:23:09 -0700 From: "Dale Scott" To: "'Chuck Swiger'" , "'Da Rock'" References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:23:04 -0700 Message-ID: <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-language: en-ca Thread-index: AQH0O4d9zwLcEwxSFOy3nQWcYQFHdAJxrWprAqNBjh0DME+B3ZMCfUzg Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 04:52:06 -0000 > As for PHP and security, well, when someone ends up getting married to > three abusive drunks in a row, there is more going on with that then random > chance or even bad luck. I'll interpret that as saying a large percentage of the PHP apps vying for your attention are crap, but buyer beware. Just be careful, have a healthy level of scepticism, and keep your eyes open. I'm amazed at the ease with which a good looking web app can be created, and with complete and total disregard for the most basic software development best practices. However, that doesn't mean all apps are crap, just like there are still guys & gals out there worth tying your life to. In my experience (which is probably more than some, but certainly not much compared to some others), MediaWiki, MantisBT, Moodle, and Drupal are mature, reliable and generally secure PHP-based applications. They have good documentation, active communities, and are honest and prompt with security advisories (and also pretty prompt with security updates). I'm sure there must be others (e.g., I don't know anything about Facebook other than it's PHP-based, but I'm sure we'd hear about it being hacked on a regular basis if it was). Dale From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 05:06:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC767106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 05:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AB78FC0A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 05:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so647224ewy.10 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:06:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.1 with SMTP id i1mr959967eba.12.1291784805745; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:06:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 00:06:45 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Brennan To: justin v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:06:47 -0000 Does usbconf show that it was indeed registered? The kernel may see it and fail to pass it to the USB subsystem for what ever reason. -- Sent from my Droid On Dec 7, 2010 8:26 PM, "justin v" wrote: > Aloha world.. > > For whatever reason, today, when i plugin my USB devices they are not > showing up.. > > They are just not registering.. Never seen this problem before... Prior to > today, I was able to plug my Android phone in and mount it just fine. > > Prior to today, I was able to plug my usb mouse and keyboard in and type > away at the console or in xorg.. so i run tail -f /var/log/messages from > my alt. pc and plug in my phone and nothing.. > > It was working fine the previous days, you can see my phone and logitech > keyboard.. Sure I suppose I could reboot but I dont want to... > > My system: > > yeaguy# uname -a > FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 > PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 > > My WIFI adapter is usb.. I am up and passing traffic on that interface > too, so im a little confused.. > > > yeaguy# cat /var/log/messages | grep -i usb > Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 > Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy kernel: umass0: 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 > Dec 6 10:32:39 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 > Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ukbd0: rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 > Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ums0: rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 > Dec 6 11:48:09 yeaguy kernel: uhid0: rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 > Dec 6 11:48:09 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x046d product > 0xc52b bus uhub1 > Dec 6 11:54:35 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 (disconnected) > Dec 6 13:06:03 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) > Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 > Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ukbd0: rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 > Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ums0: rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 > Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x046d product > 0xc52b bus uhub1 > Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: uhid0: rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 > Dec 6 18:57:23 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 (disconnected) > Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 > Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy kernel: umass0: 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 > Dec 6 19:02:47 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 6 22:39:32 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) > Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 > Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy kernel: umass0: 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 > Dec 7 00:19:51 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 7 00:22:38 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) > Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 > Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy kernel: umass0: 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 > Dec 7 00:23:06 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product > 0x0c9e bus uhub2 > Dec 7 06:06:07 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) > yeaguy# > > > Thanks, > > justin v. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 07:08:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F4D1065693 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Received: from nm6-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm6-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8FFB8FC14 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2010 07:08:45 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.60] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2010 07:08:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2010 07:08:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 805037.61856.bm@omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78916 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2010 07:08:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291792125; bh=lJduvurNIQQuawiEQAi67dbPxPr7VtAXAP0REnXsuOw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zRnpr0yxwdW8p0yXrhtWlTKCQmJDeobLb6jWDfDS/x55k8uzgo1v+feGLZpqk+z40rh/T4zbu2BZSIkXnMnJe/FRhCnC2WSPEuKHkCviEbniapAW1gJMre7Tqot2Dm2RqrwCCVoLFjY1z5cLqeVtBujWjXAwvAd1sGYMKQ0hfSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rvm5PAJFevXEVpUVT/ypfOcYZWc5XMtIsqcWkA5flGMOm9hLCzE9zQ3AXwqK598A8y9wZahdsO4L2gOtzqnIlc0X6Wy4j7zYrhiyXuFedQ1er4kZVPIBM0jiDZWvWkjvzxAjlKSctx0b7e+f6r5Gb7erU//yS3PxRVTvsfxECaY=; Message-ID: <236959.54029.qm@web110309.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 0z4MkDQVM1l1BuXrBY4i08akNRR4.ylbQ_t2MOHV0GZZOAT AHbLj8EGDFlKiuLzgPoQeBSWLh8A46EkK3rI4lbgxDoCkZHSeVmsm0BV5DzC M5WP3Ayy7.SaHF9WopOWoP334OLJz8HVJOtZIOVjp_ngZUU1IWJkagrE5chY 4lFveNvIb_hCi__.rMnS_xmOsh_5vMFshiykk3b_pDCoOIH90YvzHQhd5jVT g1Oso4IZ7B3tidWeLqIHG6QOc1ejfbRVkoEUm849W_SLCH9i9bCW_Y7.W3Rp .excw4lkr.vp1TRDlPRGfOpA0GM2IWQIpJmlO8YmxTzrUGPP1VgHPrmejlZ3 wWUr9BQ-- Received: from [24.228.57.153] by web110309.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:08:44 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:44 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20101208005814.E810710657DC@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Page faults and threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:08:46 -0000 Hi, Can anyone tell me: when a thread hits a page fault in a multithread program on FreeBSD, is the entire program stopped waiting for the page to be loaded/made ready or just the one thread? Has this changed in recent versions with the changes to the scheduler? And, if you know, do other Open-Source OS's do the same thing, or are they all different? Mark Terribile From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 07:10:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F392B106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CB78FC21 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458FE3D6C7; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:10:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB87Akv6004113; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:10:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:10:45 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <20101208081045.1f339578.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101207161410.GA43854@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101207134043.94086.qmail@web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> <20101207161410.GA43854@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:10:49 -0000 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:10 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > I have no idea what an "FMV DESKPER ME4/535P" is. Fujitsu-Siemens FMV DESKPOWER maybe. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 07:39:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FEA1065672 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F0E8FC16 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA4E1DA9F; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:39:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB87dQv4004206; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:39:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:39:26 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Charlie Kester Message-Id: <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:39:29 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:57:49 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > My LJ4+ was connected via parallel and I never noticed any problems with > error messages or the speed. Speed: It's just faster with PCL than with PS. Given a multi-page output, the printer is in constant action loading paper, duplexing, printing and ejecting, so no big deal. Error messages: This started with FreeBSD 7. The system log gets full of lpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] lpt0: [ITHREAD] when printing. I even have hw.intr_storm_threshold="1000" in /boot/loader.conf. I didn't have this problem with 4 and 5. But hey, the printer works (again), and with my "new" system getting ready for 8 and networked printing, I won't complain. :-) > I'm OK with a printer that's as slow as I am. ;) As long as the printer isn't as tall as you are... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 07:58:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AC2106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yy.guest@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779498FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1059909bwz.8 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:58:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OyhbYgAF/jMRtxM3WO3qUloze08VXjDXSdYdK/FHJf0=; b=T4tFLjGBlR0ortHl3/MO+SzRf1XWLgnI+B4e9Iqh5sIdzDBisx6GBskHYOIA3GewDg m8oUxA9dlyLm3bXoQnYG4568HhiRq7V+evj6Z4iTzMl4/IqPiKDqZg9QIqsSTu8tNk/N imyP1RiTCmRCRCz1tclf04cLGYSIl2PAzEIWs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kMzRBtXzA1fgkuGZgA2UI9zvhQfjkoJL3C8dJMkx9EgcEM2NAwfoE0WMcyz+fr8kjL FSwraqwSlbN8XLPOPvuxWSTzmr2JYOU6QCCXOocw9Pf5kfbG6gr9FkDuPwoOU5AptVFz scK95f0LbXWu1xiV2xktGo1/t3bLNNbc5Pfuk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.81.139 with SMTP id x11mr1498461bkk.155.1291795128198; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:58:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.102.196 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:58:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:58:48 +0300 Message-ID: From: "K. Yura" To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: savemail panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:58:50 -0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD .dlink 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #1: Tue Nov 9 21:13:03 MSK 2010 root@.dlink:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 496M 476M -20M 104% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ad0s1e 496M 12K 456M 0% /tmp /dev/ad0s1f 22G 5.5G 15G 27% /usr /dev/ad0s1d 1.2G 39M 1.1G 3% /var ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I got that error SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere Losing ./qfob86....:savemail panic. How can I fix it? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:17:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CBA1065672 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F2B8FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DB01D954; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:17:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB88Hh1b004325; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:17:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:17:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "K. Yura" Message-Id: <20101208091743.01a2e913.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: savemail panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:17:45 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:58:48 +0300, "K. Yura" wrote: > I got that error SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere > Losing ./qfob86....:savemail panic. How can I fix it? Thanks. See the first line in df -h: > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 496M 476M -20M 104% / Your / partition is full (overful, halfway precisely speaking). 512 MB is a bit small for a 8.1 install. See if you can remove unneeded stuff (for example old kernels). The home directory for root is /root which resides on /. You can create /home/root and specify it (via chsh) as root's new home directory. In this case, it will be on whatever partition /home is on. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:04:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1DB1065670 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3988FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45FBE7175; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:04:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=IZ8sIX7vG2My iEcsidD9G240w/Q=; b=MhQVPTuG2FNu84jWj0MrOq/D2RzZfbez1TtxguI0E4/n KH0IX/00kVNe7ddTOajr8DLQ3I34fqYapZDlPK9safyA/XsFMcKrg1M6ebEJ6LG6 jibr6h2Q1GRFoLPuj06PaGIkb/y5O3FRKSSwsyPnoRLlJABp/Z8adOEOCGuTMQ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=WJvDSb Hnh8WTOpxgyHGU3/RINdmmZNuvvK/F6xkxd1Xv7e9rGulE453DM+9Zk28bGhFmN6 AbEDOhqw5efZMJuDz6Dk9HDoifku5v/DvAbcssiUrqL+SOi++N31MPyTNBGUK4jz +UQKN6AP+eiHRo5VxMDJVVJ9WiLqLRsF+/avY= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-27-21-134.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.21.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62D3BE7170; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:04:26 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:04:16 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20101208090416.2ca8da98@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101208015804.d3b54f21.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <20101208015804.d3b54f21.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:04:29 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:58:04 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > An example from my own practical use: I wanted to install > FreeBSD 4 on a laptop that didn't have network or CD-ROM. > I chose to boot from floppy, and then started the install > process via parallel cable (printer port) from a second > system, already running FreeBSD and "exporting" the install > CD via plip. The argument is normally that even without a CD drive everyone has USB so should install using that instead of floppies. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:27:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAFF106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07128FC0A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C27E3D45B; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:27:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB89RDHh004490; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:27:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:27:13 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Bruce Cran Message-Id: <20101208102713.a446f685.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101208090416.2ca8da98@core.draftnet> References: <4cfe1a85.d3rNX98SaYCaW7+Q%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <20101208015804.d3b54f21.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208090416.2ca8da98@core.draftnet> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:27:16 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:04:16 +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > The argument is normally that even without a CD drive everyone has USB > so should install using that instead of floppies. That's not an argument, that's a dogma. :-) Especially when you want to use AT style hardware, maybe older laptops that should work as a kind of console device (serial console using the cu program), or older PCs that should run as a router, firewall, printer server or anything else that doesn't require a PlentyCore CPU and tenmelonhundred GB of RAM, taking into mind their very low power consumption, then you usually face the situation that you do NOT have - bootable network - USB - DVD (or at least CD-ROM) In such situations, you are happy to be able to boot from floppy (or floppies, that's okay too) and then perform an installation via network (or plip). Traditionally hardware of the AT and the early ATX times do not come with USB. And if they have USB, they can't boot from it. This sounds old-fashioned, I know. The strength of FreeBSD is that you actually COULD install it under this kind of circumstances - a strength other operating systems lack, especially when they call theirselves "advanced". One could argument that it should be possible to extract the hard disk from such a kind of computer and use it in a different system that can boot NOT from floppy. But that may cause other problems (e. g. no (P)ATA connector in a SATA system, can't reach hard disk, can't open laptop, and so on). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:42:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABE71065675 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D968FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gZff1f0040Fqzac51ZiUGw; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:42:28 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gZiS1f0041f6R9u3UZiTfT; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:42:28 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:42:23 -0800 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 01:42:23 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:42:28 -0000 On Tue 07 Dec 2010 at 23:39:26 PST Polytropon wrote: >On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:57:49 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: >> My LJ4+ was connected via parallel and I never noticed any problems with >> error messages or the speed. > > >Error messages: This started with FreeBSD 7. The system >log gets full of > > lpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > lpt0: [ITHREAD] > >when printing. I even have > > hw.intr_storm_threshold="1000" > >in /boot/loader.conf. I didn't have this problem with 4 and 5. Oh yeah, *those* messages. I did have those too. As a last gasp effort, I gave my LJ4+ a thorough cleaning and replaced the rollers for the output feed in the back. And hey, it seems to be working now! The way it had been sounding, I was sure I'd broken something the last time I replaced the toner cartridge after clearing a paper jam. But maybe I just didn't have the cartridge properly seated... So now I'm looking into ways to adapt it to use a network connection. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 10:37:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E718A106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE8A8FC12 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5B22FE3D.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.254.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB8AbI6x029538; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:37:19 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB8AcK2S077560; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:38:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB8Ac03T001316; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:38:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201012081038.oB8Ac03T001316@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Bruce Cran From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:14:02 GMT." <20101207231402.37ed75fc@core.draftnet> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:38:00 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Thomas Mueller , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:37:33 -0000 Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100 > "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > > > FreeBSD has no installer@freebsd.org list. Should it ? Only a few > > people tend to work on & know the constraints of the installer, > > many people over years have have made suggestions & comments, would > > it be more efficient if FAQs were auto archived & easily found in > > an installer@freebsd.org archive ? > > We've had freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org for a few months now. Oh ! Thanks, I'll subscribe, (I checked the list again last night, but me eye was indexing on I not S. Sorry). Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, or HTML or base 64. Avoid top posting, it cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 10:49:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141BD10656C0 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E96F8FC26 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5B22FE3D.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.254.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB8AVNDt029450; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:31:24 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB8AWPS8077538; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:32:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB8AWFhe001184; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:32:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201012081032.oB8AWFhe001184@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Polytropon From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:56:15 +0100." <20101208105615.00bc2799.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:32:15 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:49:45 -0000 Polytropon wrote: To: "Julian H. Stacey" I added back lost Cc: questions@freebsd.org > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:46:29 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > > > Allow me a side question, but... what's wrong with ee? (Don't > > > get me wrong, I've been a long-term vi user myself.) > > > > VI has been on BSD since about 1979 or so I recall. > > EE breaks the principle of least surprise. > > But it as an on-top help screen. :-) Each install I do, ee annoys me at inetd.conf. > If I remember correctly, earlier versions of FreeBSD I > did install did have vi as default editor, I don't think so. I recall FreeBSD installer had no screen editor until Jordan looked for one that would fit the install without executable breaking floppy size constraints. But jkh@ was an emacs user by preference, & had more important install issues, so ee was bundled in. I told him very quickly of 2 small vi clones, but too late. With floppy size constraints disappearing, we'll be free to consider options. > even during > installation. The change must have happened sometimes > in the 5.x era. It obsoleted the initial /bin/ed, the > standard editor ("ed is the standard editor"). > > For those who like to use vi, it's still part of the > base installation. At least I hope this won't change, > and also many system utilities pay attention to $EDITOR, > which defaulted to /usr/bin/vi in the past. > > For those who are familiar with FreeBSD, or with UNIX > in general, there is no problem using either vi or ed. > For novice users, ee is definitely the better choice > as it doesn't require them to learn anything prior to > its use, as learning is generally considered "unpleasant" > these days... :-) > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, or HTML or base 64. Avoid top posting, it cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 11:03:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A09C106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24F878FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.64] by nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2010 10:49:45 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.16] by tm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2010 10:49:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Dec 2010 10:49:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 480675.91583.bm@omp1016.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57005 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2010 10:49:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1291805385; bh=7wPDTET1yeKkVWd+b/csDu27bij1pfyWFzxPuw1aXiU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ysc4qd3QVdbtaQ+TEVzpmG+gMDdr2XwyBmgqQYuZ9fVS6KEnjVlmtV9VvcwDwzQ23McSavzCviBbFMOkeoTTWHWpYdy8v03LOzGNTzf8FtpSbRRZx8tXRn5GYiqISNoULQlDleiNJBD2x/PECiyHJcnOCoD0LsPzmnag0F/cguc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=bellsouth.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OxnaQijcRx7xk8AjJN1lbYnc4dwP910fJybpqMD2MngA7G0USKI+zVJLA3Y+MJ/AdtGlQpm6ZQ2eeRuKEU/Qe1LLS6eTW6gDQMQtl1ZzTSEpZOAfSw359j/Hno6T/1pKoqXXLrIIAL6EBIK/0kiQQUD+ht6KFfif7qHET7ueBzo=; Message-ID: <63713.55480.qm@web180203.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1VeDShgVM1krf19uFsfqYKqYTxWvT4HONjt7cwPBXlfXpxo WJ8Kg22dcP4JIyoclC3LsRh.hdBfhL1JVKoRDRQqX47.wzSYbbzSsLByoFNS 75TsudWcDsdfKZoqwHfvE.Dvvm0HSdlhAj04HZJi7m7smkmk8zcH1lZs8BtS M17RM_0014x3yVU40Hh9OSw6s3X8uAkV6VpUYoLWejdFFqWfObDvsI0X0lJy oosRgRQBJmnCSVqOl1CFCbuz.DHlCRW6LYjm.poyhK2Cfildyl6jO2b0FGfQ jYvWRT5Amnv3XWdo4InTeEwqp69PyNoVhZrnq35flnL_P.vuFxLF.Gg-- Received: from [68.18.76.220] by web180203.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:49:44 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 02:49:44 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Mueller To: Kazuhiro Satoyoshi In-Reply-To: <20101207134043.94086.qmail@web100110.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:03:22 -0000 --- On Tue, 12/7/10, Kazuhiro Satoyoshi wrote: > =A0 Hi, I'm kazu from Japan. > I'd like to install [freebsd 3.5.1-RELEASE] into my PC. > (I have no idea wether this version(3.5.1) is proper for my > PC...) > =A0 I browsed around Internet, but I could't find this > FILES. > =A0 How can I do? > I need your help! =A0=A0=A0 > =A0 I think my PC is like below: > FMV DESKPER ME4/535P =A0=A0=A0 > =A0 sincerely, > =A0 kazu I found it, and you're not limited to 3.5.1. ftp://ftp-archive@freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/ISO-IMA= GES/ You can also get other architectures besides i386, and if you don't want IS= O-images. you can also get it by bits and pieces, which could be useful if = you install through the ftp server. Still, perhaps you don't really need such an old version. I once downloaded the ISO for 2.2.9 for an old computer , Cx486DX-2S at 66 = MHz, 20 MB RAM, hard drive controller apparently went bad, all I have to in= stall onto is a SCSI Iomega Zip 250 on Trantor T130B SCSI card which also r= uns the internal CD-ROM drive, apparently not supported in FreeBSD >=3D 3.0= . I failed to access the CD on the first few tries. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 11:12:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FF21065672 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net (fmailhost01.isp.att.net [204.127.217.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713D78FC14 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mueller6722.bellsouth.net (adsl-18-76-220.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.18.76.220]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20101208111234H0100fe023e>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:12:35 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.18.76.220] Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:14:22 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4cff688e.DMzgcRTJhPHF8CWP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bruce Cran , Polytropon Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:12:36 -0000 > It's easy enough to find error-free floppy disks if you don't mind > paying for them: http://www.amazon.co.uk/b?ie=UTF8&node=430460031 :) > Bruce Cran Are you sure they're error-free? I think most users would prefer USB sticks. > The argument is normally that even without a CD drive everyone has USB > so should install using that instead of floppies. Not true on a very old computer (especially USB) On choice of text editor, I prefer vi, but that might be uncomfortable for users completely unfamiliar with vi: this includes many MS-Windows users as well as users coming from DOS. NetBSD uses ed on installation ramdisk, which leaves me completely floored. vi is heaven compared to ed. IBM had a Tiny Editor, not open-source, dating to 1993, .EXE about 10000 bytes: this was for DOS and 16-bit OS/2 (OS/2 1.x was 16-bit, became 32-bit with v2.0). This was used on OS/2 installation floppies. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 11:27:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C891065673 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8338FC2C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF876E7175; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:27:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=3RvwcuC0kDOq KWPhLxn+JV9Y44M=; b=wFpDtios+dKdJ7dR8zx0ypdqEBnMj3KGoFpWlTsT/kBw WNLcXxFH5ia1zGiEe9+dBTtzogD0K7Y/FdYKPmQ4YiFud8qCHMGfZP7u7BGsh0gF WLYyXv/rZh64GZC1W9tG2VO/e1R9fNXVyjRUGpeUvSyhVenePm8fYJZDNoUA8V0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=FTeR46 c0bx0H9djwJ3NuVwGvIYpogWvw6WTDSymbBje3PIBbqWngh/2Anvq8O9hrO+eQ/8 mBkm/XPLSm/jP5Xge/36MhwWca/q61wwKLqAijMu71x4/EBVyu0AdLBOUNgc67T8 ZT8KTXINAbMpvRxasoGMGXUDqZdRK2NScI6f0= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-27-21-134.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.21.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83E25E7170; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:27:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:27:41 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-ID: <20101208112741.7db7e6ac@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <4cff688e.DMzgcRTJhPHF8CWP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4cff688e.DMzgcRTJhPHF8CWP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:27:48 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:14:22 +0000 "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > > The argument is normally that even without a CD drive everyone has > > USB so should install using that instead of floppies. > > Not true on a very old computer (especially USB) That's why I said "the argument", implying that it's something I don't agree with :) I do think we need to be careful to remember that plenty of people don't have modern setups. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 12:31:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6E9106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E46E8FC1A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8CV6xv064344 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 04:31:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4CFF7AB7.50809@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 04:31:51 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Why gdb-7.1 doesn't set hardware watchpoints on i7 CPU (amd64)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:31:53 -0000 All watchpoints are software. How can I troubleshoot? Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 13:41:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DBA106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652288FC19 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7345C21 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:46:19 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFF8A29.2030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:37:45 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:41:32 -0000 On 12/08/10 10:57, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Da Rock wrote: > >> One to point out the obvious, and two to clarify your view here: why not php? Php was the scripting used, but if used poorly will create a security risk in the web app. That means that the vulnerability is the coder's problem; not php itself. God knows how many references there are to what not to do for security reasons on the php site. >> >> Vulnerabilities due to bad coding is not the fault of the language used, otherwise we wouldn't be using c, c++, etc. >> >> I ask because I'm coding web apps in php myself, and I'm curious to know if my view is in error... >> > I would disagree and argue that vulnerabilities due to bad coding often reflect flaws in the language being used. For example, a vast range of buffer overflows, null pointer dereference issues, etc are entirely a consequence of C-based languages which permit arbitrary pointer arithmetic. Tools like valgrind and Purify were later created to help add runtime array and memory buffer bounds-checking to C/C++ which other languages (Java, Python, etc) already provide by raising an "index out of range" exception or similar. > > As for PHP and security, well, when someone ends up getting married to three abusive drunks in a row, there is more going on with that then random chance or even bad luck. I've got an archive of a couple of years worth of list traffic from full-disclosure& bugtraq@securityfocus, and nearly a third of the messages involve PHP or software written in PHP. That's about twice as many as the next largest category, which is vulnerabilities in Windows (including stuff like Adobe Flash/Reader). > > Regards, > Thanks for the heads up. What language do you recommend then based on these security reports? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 13:51:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E161065803 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFFA8FC26 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1F75C21 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:56:46 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFF8C9B.4060804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:48:11 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> <20101208022629.7d106bab.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101208022629.7d106bab.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:51:59 -0000 On 12/08/10 11:26, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > >> My comments/ wish list >> - One text mode (non bitmap graphical) browser: /usr/ports/www/lynx >> > The lynx browser, due to its "special" key handling, does not > appeal to novice users. NO text mode browser gives a "first > sight effect" that will "convince" a user he's installing a > modern OS. Sounds stupid, I know. > > As I said, the way the user interacts with the browser does > determine how fast he gets through the installation. Learning > the browser (instead of just pressing the keys shown on the > screen) could make things look worse. > > On the other hand, with the ability of X to run without > configuration on recent hardware, what's wrong with running > X with a graphical web browser - if the user DECIDED that > way? Of course, this decision is the FIRST step in the install > process: > > Install method > -------------- > T -> traditional text mode installer (sysinstall) > (this one does not have all the options) > W -> web-based installer in text mode > (typical for professional users) > G -> web-based installer in graphics mode > (typical for novice users) > R -> remote installation > (just starts the server) > S -> shell > (dialog shell access to live system) > > Enter choice: _ > > Just a simple idea. > > > > I like that approach- works for me anyway... >> - Still too complex for blind/ partially sighted people with special I/O >> phsical devs, I guess. >> > Very true. The ability of FreeBSD to be a barrier-free (!!!) > OS always made it a first class product. It would be sad if > it would lose this ability in the future, just to cater the > expected "first sight effect" newbies. :-) > > Accessibility should be foremost at this level and above. The legalities themselves are becoming hairy these days, and considering the point that we are trying to push accessibility in terms of applications (such as issues with flash, to name one) using physical accessibility as a parallel argument we should be setting an example as well. That said, there is no reason why can't make it look as pretty as we can without compromising this principle :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 13:52:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C069D1065694 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7837A8FC14 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9C85C21 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:57:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFF8CCD.2050106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:49:01 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:52:48 -0000 On 12/08/10 11:49, Chris Hill wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > [ snip ] >> - There are small clones of standard vi, with executables >> no larger than ee, could replace ee. > > I think ee is actually a good choice for this application. vi can be a > little frustrating for those who rarely use it, and it's downright > impenetrable to someone who has never seen it before. With ee, a newb > has a fighting chance. I'll second that :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 14:04:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97422106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9138FC0C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20BF5C21 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:08:55 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFF8F74.3080009@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:20 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4cff688e.DMzgcRTJhPHF8CWP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <20101208112741.7db7e6ac@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20101208112741.7db7e6ac@core.draftnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:04:08 -0000 On 12/08/10 21:27, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:14:22 +0000 > "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > > >>> The argument is normally that even without a CD drive everyone has >>> USB so should install using that instead of floppies. >>> >> Not true on a very old computer (especially USB) >> > That's why I said "the argument", implying that it's something I don't > agree with :) > I do think we need to be careful to remember that plenty of people > don't have modern setups. > > Count me for one. I'm using old stuff for routing and what not- and no, they don't even see a usb keyboard let alone boot from usb :) I actually have to disconnect the dud slim cd and and strap in a spare internal cd, and remove it once installed. I could setup lan boot, but believe it or not that would be longer... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 14:18:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79A01065670 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416A98FC14 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8EIRHd093660; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:18:28 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4CFF93B3.7040606@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:18:27 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <3374602400-437630107@intranet.com.mx> <20101207170441.77f0f6ed@scorpio> <3374604733-437630128@intranet.com.mx> <20101207174220.07bc1327@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101207174220.07bc1327@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jbiquez@intranet.com.mx, Jerry Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:18:31 -0000 On 12/07/10 22:42, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:10:38 -0600 > Jorge Biquez articulated: > > [snip] > >> I have found several already with Google.... just >> not sure what path to follow and that's why I >> wanted to know what suggestions other has on what >> are using actually under Freebsd. Of course there >> are several ones, some look very good and promising.... yes. > > I don't think that FreeBSD offers much in that arena in the ports > system. A quick perusal only turned up two candidates. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=shopping&stype=all&sektion=all > > You might be able to locate others though. > This search produces a lot more, including oscommerce and magento http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=commerce&stype=all&sektion=all -- "Although the wombat is real and the dragon is not, few know what a wombat looks like, but everyone knows what a dragon looks like." -- Avram Davidson, _Adventures in Unhistory_ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 14:49:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87403106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AB78FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so905877ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 06:49:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MjLZ42+LxwI/pbiANf0DMtAK0ql/4e0LwLieUyl0BLA=; b=pLswIdqNg5+tVvt2X5IuidCf/cZDtv+MhqWSQxnoyVVBdrqmMvjM8SejC7iFqrwVe1 6nCH89YTfR3J53Fbf20Xlx5V7ML9MRYTPfhIF9NjoryZclDbwtqAQ/si22KtmSRtkTP+ YlqtZ/Xy++1q2/Pq9N/XYIxMxW41Zy4sBr39I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IOWNeke4eCCc0VAEkCtMtNt8UU6elV+cp4kgPdJo9nlvou/CBye3M0tUkUTAekGaNR KfC/PcEJsQftapOjy87RTYlqK6nz/EX57ydcV0ZJPy4zULYfvSDiy/guhFaji4zUcFfS YePrN4U9pJREkQkBSbZ66Fom8liKCrINyFRqM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.140 with SMTP id q12mr1928288wek.14.1291819786849; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 06:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:49:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201012060222.26584.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> <201012061145.05971.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:49:46 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Gautham Ganapathy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gabor Illo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Elias Chrysocheris Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:49:49 -0000 On 8 December 2010 14:27, Gautham Ganapathy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:11 PM, krad wrote: > > > > the easiest way to do zfs root is use the pc-bsd disk but select the > freebsd > > install not the pc bsd one > > I tried that last week with the PCBSD 8.1 DVD. Unfortunately, to > install on ZFS, you need to go to advanced mode when creating > partitions, which did not consider my windows partition and showed the > entire disk as free. I had to abort or wipe windows off my laptop > > Is it possible to have windows and a zfs-based freebsd installation on > the same drive, and dual-boot between them? > > Regards > Gautham > if you you a none gpt layout yes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 14:50:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D01F106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gautham@lisphacker.org) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3152A8FC24 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so725374gyf.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 06:50:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.227.2 with SMTP id z2mr11729464agg.32.1291818474497; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 06:27:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.232.13 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:27:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201012060222.26584.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> <201012061145.05971.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:27:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: Gautham Ganapathy To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Gabor Illo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Elias Chrysocheris Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:50:40 -0000 On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:11 PM, krad wrote: > > the easiest way to do zfs root is use the pc-bsd disk but select the freebsd > install not the pc bsd one I tried that last week with the PCBSD 8.1 DVD. Unfortunately, to install on ZFS, you need to go to advanced mode when creating partitions, which did not consider my windows partition and showed the entire disk as free. I had to abort or wipe windows off my laptop Is it possible to have windows and a zfs-based freebsd installation on the same drive, and dual-boot between them? Regards Gautham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 15:15:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105410656A8 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf11.insightbb.com (mxsf11.insightbb.com [74.128.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1C28FC21 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:15:38 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,316,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="271368258" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf11.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2010 10:15:38 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiY0AP8v/0xKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIJI0SjiMMAQEBATU0wCGFSQSEYosp X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,316,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="317605032" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2010 10:15:36 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:15:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012081015.30910.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Can openoffice 3.3 be built without gnome_vfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:15:39 -0000 gnome_vfs requires kerberos. I don't want it. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 13:21:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7723B106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from satoyoshi_421@yahoo.co.jp) Received: from web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp (web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp [114.111.99.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD07E8FC1A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88114 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2010 13:21:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20050223; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OaGM7BBKaBDDJfeOhw/5yMEIFA9m1JiBvtAIoigZslyntoyv5kDwUc8g1U1lvUDGy1eTTMW0WSyCYNfT8y+Z6HKkjUntD8yuekwJ3c4PcjId1EAIDN54aPuv2foDKBWJ ; Message-ID: <20101208132105.88112.qmail@web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Received: from [218.219.210.161] by web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:21:05 JST Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:21:05 +0900 (JST) From: Kazuhiro Satoyoshi To: Bruce Cran , Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20101207163339.5639f4aa@core.draftnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:52:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:21:07 -0000 >They're old, but not so old that 8.1 shouldn't work. Some day, I tried to install FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE (i386, amd64), but I could't. I did't know the reason why... That's why I though to need old FreeBSD version for my PC. OK, I'll try to install latest version. Thank you very much. kazu --------------------------------- Learn more about HIV/AIDS - Red Ribbon Campaign 2010 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 15:52:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23DE1065702; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5D18FC0A; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1104151vws.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:52:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CyhNdePYyTCBKiQLucEhWZDnbqk3FvP33ydftk5Srkw=; b=FEkzNn/HJFwkTEVQco4rwfZCmQ94X9KpYR2sL10I/NKTlUHLb4aq5wPK3maOBRWcDU 0e0yykv756FzCAc5ba3IC0MJP8JS6oh7/dZ+P3VpIUVC9I0cDhAe/LmhfRe1/Hvy0lWp 91q+HH8rt/bRCLlpnKEqauESEb5ibP3iY4iuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Y7pUDPKScCeMXpPbhzDiufL0Si+aYlVdkvjpGhREjqD8gjNcPBw8xBvLiDk/tzyffK +ETrf37KiU+hQsI0kAMnH7GAMFf8eWWpGEC28tfyMF7B6Wwh9ZDSMgBYtV+4fnGr4dMN GtibArt1heG9YUJy/or/uxKCsBinOA0rhZDYo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.147 with SMTP id n19mr6932296qcm.145.1291823570762; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:52:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:52:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:52:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: questions , jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FTP not working in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:52:53 -0000 Hello! I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so my band can share new tracks, production material or what not, but I'm getting all kinds of strange errors: http://pastie.org/1358536 Anybody know why? I'm using a jail. There are no firewalls on either the host or the jail. I've tried other ftpd's and gotten similar results, so I don't think there's vsftpd there's something wrong with here. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 15:53:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C9810656C3; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E3B8FC16; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8468541C710; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:53:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWhbL1SWUNdM; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:53:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id BD56841C734; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:53:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1974448F3; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Redd Vinylene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:53:26 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so my band can share > new tracks, production material or what not, but I'm getting all kinds of > strange errors: > > http://pastie.org/1358536 > > Anybody know why? The server runs on a jail. There are no firewalls on > either the host or the jail. I've tried other ftpd's and gotten similar > results so I don't think it's vsftpd there's something wrong with here. a) have you tried without SSL? b) have you tried ftpd from base? It pretty much smells like a bug in vsftpd. Out of curiosity - which version of freebsd is that? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 15:55:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4660710656AC for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EC28FC0A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:55:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+c36koQ5Dcj/1qolKHjtkYAGXvrVJRRiKMp+84F5sLg= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=YrkXhp8ipSGSP_FtlZsA:9 a=4vNIkcIuzbhNa1nXHc4A:7 a=yst3BMuJpu7RAaSaL8D8r0bQR90A:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=JLjoLAHwKC9EUz0M:21 a=gOj2Jn-xy7aBcv_0:21 a=K3oiwSFwsX5fJWoDMELOCw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.49.120.184 Received: from [67.49.120.184] ([67.49.120.184:51107] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 69/CF-24070-A5AAFFC4; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:55:07 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:55:04 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Chris Brennan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:55:14 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Chris Brennan wrote: > Does usbconf show that it was indeed registered? The kernel may see it and > fail to pass it to the USB subsystem for what ever reason. > > -- Sent from my Droid > > On Dec 7, 2010 8:26 PM, "justin v" wrote: >> Aloha world.. >> >> For whatever reason, today, when i plugin my USB devices they are not >> showing up.. >> >> They are just not registering.. Never seen this problem before... Prior to > >> today, I was able to plug my Android phone in and mount it just fine. >> >> Prior to today, I was able to plug my usb mouse and keyboard in and type >> away at the console or in xorg.. so i run tail -f /var/log/messages from >> my alt. pc and plug in my phone and nothing.. >> >> It was working fine the previous days, you can see my phone and logitech >> keyboard.. Sure I suppose I could reboot but I dont want to... >> >> My system: >> >> yeaguy# uname -a >> FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 >> PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 >> >> My WIFI adapter is usb.. I am up and passing traffic on that interface >> too, so im a little confused.. >> >> >> yeaguy# cat /var/log/messages | grep -i usb >> Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 >> Dec 6 10:32:38 yeaguy kernel: umass0: > 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 >> Dec 6 10:32:39 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 >> Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ukbd0: > rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 >> Dec 6 11:48:08 yeaguy kernel: ums0: > rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 >> Dec 6 11:48:09 yeaguy kernel: uhid0: > rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 >> Dec 6 11:48:09 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x046d product >> 0xc52b bus uhub1 >> Dec 6 11:54:35 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 (disconnected) >> Dec 6 13:06:03 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) >> Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 >> Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ukbd0: > rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 >> Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: ums0: > rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 >> Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x046d product >> 0xc52b bus uhub1 >> Dec 6 18:47:33 yeaguy kernel: uhid0: > rev 2.00/12.01, addr 2> on usbus1 >> Dec 6 18:57:23 yeaguy kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1 (disconnected) >> Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 >> Dec 6 19:02:46 yeaguy kernel: umass0: > 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 >> Dec 6 19:02:47 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 6 22:39:32 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) >> Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 >> Dec 7 00:19:50 yeaguy kernel: umass0: > 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 >> Dec 7 00:19:51 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 7 00:22:38 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) >> Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 >> Dec 7 00:23:05 yeaguy kernel: umass0: > 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus2 >> Dec 7 00:23:06 yeaguy root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0bb4 product >> 0x0c9e bus uhub2 >> Dec 7 06:06:07 yeaguy kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 (disconnected) >> yeaguy# >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> justin v. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I ended up rebooting.. USB works.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:24:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429F0106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C7E8FC0A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1298947wwf.31 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:24:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PJQjEYpRWJVV3hcth5OHIGkgfybMlj/ZSRZo/5A/WrQ=; b=Ntt1FHwB0pgX2NT4ff5GqMjRbrnRAVORT1Vg1aSdYA+xk6cArHHkdCUyhp25jElP/8 drf3d4N4G+RDMc+1a8jbtgZznc9n2qhpCYZ4vQhh++HguPG9X6xxG3ihqsM0P6BIvaD2 5i2Znu1KVmZeVFap+hauk8rEMYnFeX9tWuRYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Qaa9Az1AlMFuBNr6OFG7+6slFF7jIoeNYiPrtO78D6X8hCHSDVGMJtWss62JCge5Ya iNAeZgrJy2+mo9fxeUosA+iXCsB3oud+rLyc/caroNXKlKHcRYWwJ9ArJ+1/+zu+3CYi GM28PJMBTo3WIBTMdptOnrZob7QBNF1CH88Jw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.0.140 with SMTP id 12mr720665web.29.1291825443526; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:24:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:24:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:24:03 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions , Redd Vinylene Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:24:05 -0000 On 8 December 2010 15:52, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Redd Vinylene wrote: > > Hello! >> >> I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so my band can >> share >> new tracks, production material or what not, but I'm getting all kinds of >> strange errors: >> >> http://pastie.org/1358536 >> >> Anybody know why? The server runs on a jail. There are no firewalls on >> either the host or the jail. I've tried other ftpd's and gotten similar >> results so I don't think it's vsftpd there's something wrong with here. >> > > a) have you tried without SSL? > b) have you tried ftpd from base? > > It pretty much smells like a bug in vsftpd. > > Out of curiosity - which version of freebsd is that? > > /bz > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. > Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > are you sure its not a passive/active ftp issue? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:26:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B503106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivanfrosty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149048FC19 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so787013yxh.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:26:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ghj2LtCaKRBFG9DdOeVGZfF7fFdCTcBEM/ABbJbKSMU=; b=DRsPp7jaoPDIa95Bl4uxjFMdGdc5S0lNmXkZAyjtAaVYRou3hjOTbMhLDZmP4Oq3v8 y4E9g2maEygHZ+PdCA9TyH1CVKx7GLkcuq8zaUNobLa0Xhe3pY7+frN8RpdVDFfjsoaF Rx8xvCicFVLail5mewmHmaD3WgASgK6drGK7A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kwFY7JQfWfvlKFVnQRhzipezb8HRLzY8cWSZ6/PaUSfBTnkbiNzE/aEGppAz/oxj06 pwuUclpnGaqv3lMvoWSSIcEVt5jbHuoWk3XfBGHLuw8+l0XkhhaEgBu1S3GbLleGgtLR 4h5rkCQgHrXwiOhkHqbbJzUdP8mymOQwa6wX8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.134.4 with SMTP id h4mr6199411and.170.1291823713390; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.15.20 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:55:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:55:13 +0300 Message-ID: From: Ivan Frosty To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: libphp5.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:26:03 -0000 isnt it possible for some one to get me their libphp5.so so i can download ? i installed php and all the dependancies but i used pkg_add because i dont have internet apparently. so i cant do make, make install. so is it possible i get that file and simply put it where its supposed to be? my apache wont start because it cant find it. suggestions? -- Frosty-456 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:26:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43071065679 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from mx1.webtent.net (mx1.webtent.net [208.38.145.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05138FC15 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Exchange) with ESMTP id 7E55D84787 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:08:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx1.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81671-01 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:08:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.78] (mail.webtent.org [72.64.244.50]) (Authenticated sender: robert@mx1.webtent.net) by mx1.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Exchange) with ESMTPSA id D94D084798 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:08:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFFAD88.3010005@webtent.net> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:08:40 -0500 From: Robert Fitzpatrick Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Subject: RecursiveDependencyError X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:26:52 -0000 Stuck on this problem. It is not happening for all ports, but for several pear ports. I tried a 'pkgdb -fF' and it reported no errors, what else can I do to find the cause of this when trying to install the pear-Mail and others on this FreeBSD 8.1 server. This is a new install...thanks for any help! [Gathering depends for mail/pear-Mail .........................................................................................../usr/local/sbin/portinstall:854:in `get_all_depends': recursive dependency (RecursiveDependencyError) from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:893:in `get_notinstalled_depends' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:775:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:753:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:753:in `main' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1310:in `call' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1310:in `parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1306:in `catch' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1306:in `parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1254:in `catch' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1254:in `parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1248:in `order!' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1241:in `order' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:559:in `main' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:791:in `initialize' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:231:in `new' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:231:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:2219 -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:27:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138DA10656A5; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BCD8FC28; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1139490vws.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:27:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=p0Wj6EWLpr2QC7u3U33glPPdnGKlplenjU6uYxL5Ui0=; b=Dw15gMjP1zWquF3r8MDEPBCmv+OWswGaFm0j3yu5asKvsoimPo55BoyyUIp+y6ZDyL ypIzown4tWXuMSv6a4A/cVcLsdayRGnt6QY/g9E2ALwZGT9gLtVnT3jh7gARffFtn/5V qmYJuQi9SAHF+l0NGdwolH57QVk8hQcP2uMAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uFh32fyEhejdsm6jprTnaSS07BTgTfke7CTY8bloOJLikbkNiiJLxJGGnCs+WQmBBW n2+RrYcfQWyYpBUygQVhl82VKOGZklM+5x0mVUlr368RW2CrWkuAS4oSUcDfrO1tKDd1 ik2G6j4dykFrVsCd7tOCmR8lhlLTToohJHLF8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.147 with SMTP id n19mr6964653qcm.145.1291825628597; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:27:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:27:08 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:27:10 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > a) have you tried without SSL? > b) have you tried ftpd from base? > > It pretty much smells like a bug in vsftpd. > > Out of curiosity - which version of freebsd is that? > > /bz > > Greetings! a) Good question. Just tested - without a doubt, yes it works perfectly without SSL. But we need SSL though. b) No, because as far as I know, it doesn't allow the kind of virtual setup vsftpd does. The FreeBSD version is 8.2-PRERELEASE. Thanks man. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:28:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184C810656AA; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2378FC33; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1456877qwj.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:28:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=K9BU1Ck0SGHz+1W2unEjWQgPzyPzCEDAoWE7/j47kcY=; b=kVFKNc1fAMBRKY/8FmFpKFekLSBU/Wkp4B32KWdhvjRDDSf2kCFNSgVKJI7qk7LXLt 5FkjDik5Hk/UOf6V5eZYh2ZHBJE4MiLiyXaP8YMGoVYwc9331DFvDb/fdxC0DvD0GGj8 C5eXt4JMG90Y1AbhzmoeyvAE9adSChzxnl7fs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=it/H3ZB4YvCdIvHMw3qJBPAr0+yNU5MsmgnxUrzYooT7/qhxil1PStuqbStq4r0ixC HP497wkIIQ9jxCD1sSsRxqheOw8MYjXja2wrepak4+JFFHqSbwGnOIwMJuqT/qqZztMm 5JvWZuSOQGzZVA4M4QDEUiMQzJSuxOJr+oTl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.147 with SMTP id n19mr6965520qcm.145.1291825685148; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:28:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:28:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:28:05 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , questions , jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:28:07 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, krad wrote: > > are you sure its not a passive/active ftp issue? > Yep, not this time :-) Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:35:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0487106564A; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B2F8FC0A; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B9441C74D; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:35:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLwvjhj186VD; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:35:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id DC5D641C751; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:35:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367DC4448F3; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Redd Vinylene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:35:07 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Redd Vinylene wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < > bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > >> >> a) have you tried without SSL? >> b) have you tried ftpd from base? >> >> It pretty much smells like a bug in vsftpd. >> >> Out of curiosity - which version of freebsd is that? >> >> /bz >> >> > Greetings! > > a) Good question. Just tested - without a doubt, yes it works perfectly > without SSL. But we need SSL though. application or configuration issue unrelated to jails. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:37:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD90F1065693 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2338FC14 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1038835ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.7.2 with SMTP id b2mr2528553ebb.38.1291826267936; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:37:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:37:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:37:27 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:37:49 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Justin V. wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Chris Brennan wrote: > > Does usbconf show that it was indeed registered? The kernel may see it and >> fail to pass it to the USB subsystem for what ever reason. >> >> -- Sent from my Droid >> >> On Dec 7, 2010 8:26 PM, "justin v" wrote: >> > > I ended up rebooting.. USB works.. > Good to know... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:39:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397F71065693; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D228FC1F; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so797766yxh.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:39:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q47M57OB1MlPgoLyHIKxhe6taxe4oikeEjyXEFBKVig=; b=jaBlz5g8jHPh35pQN87E2fMHvECY1Pe8fITQ8pPJq2O8GtVY+2l3jHLFEpRC2G0vx4 Q9kyUy4RlcglkONj3qpy8Uo0icrUZbg7bP6UEo4iUoC7q+qkh3sdQCIKxsltdit//JXu 01JkIUjuk8NBEYkuqp14fgETSQufog0QK2Nho= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=k5Kh5gMj/3M9NRaV/TeaBUSwQKM73IZaxuIOpG5LwFrqkPL9xSD7BRn3QRKhwmJB3h p4IQV0G3jR1LwOUyyPNj/Oq1nbDAjmO4zLC0oR1Nr+TGvnHSS/tbsG9EbdNEtfXXVSYj zigzGQKlGU3FcDyTHyKcTEn7aTACSnunWxQY8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.15.195 with SMTP id l3mr7120751qca.221.1291826350905; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:39:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:39:10 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jail@freebsd.org, questions Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:39:12 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > application or configuration issue unrelated to jails. > > > Absolutely. Thanks for making me realize it though. Peace! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:40:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C4E106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C848FC22 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1041667ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr9632756ebd.38.1291826407671; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:40:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:39:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:39:47 -0500 Message-ID: To: Ivan Frosty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libphp5.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:40:09 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ivan Frosty wrote: > isnt it possible for some one to get me their libphp5.so so i can > download ? i installed php and all the dependancies but i used pkg_add > because i dont have internet apparently. so i cant do make, make > install. so is it possible i get that file and simply put it where its > supposed to be? my apache wont start because it cant find it. > suggestions? > > 'make' 'make install' arn't internet (network) dependant. Are you saying that because your box doesn't have network access, PORTS failed to download the sources? My 'libphp5.so' very likely may not work for you because it was compiled for my specific machine. Can you be a little more explicit in your description? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:43:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649611065695 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3448FC2D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1045434ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr9639302ebd.38.1291826594584; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:43:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:42:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CFFAD88.3010005@webtent.net> References: <4CFFAD88.3010005@webtent.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:42:54 -0500 Message-ID: To: robert@webtent.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: RecursiveDependencyError X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:43:16 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Stuck on this problem. It is not happening for all ports, but for several > pear ports. I tried a 'pkgdb -fF' and it reported no errors, what else can I > do to find the cause of this when trying to install the pear-Mail and others > on this FreeBSD 8.1 server. This is a new install...thanks for any help! > > [Gathering depends for mail/pear-Mail > .........................................................................................../usr/local/sbin/portinstall:854:in > `get_all_depends': recursive dependency (RecursiveDependencyError) > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:877:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each_key' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/set.rb:195:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:876:in `get_all_depends' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:893:in `get_notinstalled_depends' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:775:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:753:in `each' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:753:in `main' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1310:in `call' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1310:in `parse_in_order' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1306:in `catch' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1306:in `parse_in_order' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1254:in `catch' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1254:in `parse_in_order' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1248:in `order!' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1241:in `order' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:559:in `main' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:791:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:231:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:231:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portinstall:2219 > > This looks an aweful lot like the circular dependency issues I've encountered on my gentoo box. Typically that is solved by removing one or more USE flags for the atom. In this case, 'cd /usr/ports/mail/pear-Mail; make config' and deselect some or all options. Rinse and Repeat for each port giving you this issue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:49:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5464110656B3; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:49:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B303E8FC15; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1322567wwf.31 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:49:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wjlz3T+xVkildPT3jmlSYYXAKObXbxbYAV/Yfoukrsk=; b=qzW+MWXaht3FWTrBbfdqFg7lU8lFpXbTFRwM5ORk4g/nUz32WZ5FcTtdrsEz4GeCIG yJzh10K1j5AEaScfvqXHsgIa5NBh+Jl4+eicnY4O9+XUxK4u7J9Jsq8lHWJGZWdUMI1X YXJSA5maxIaGMyC7Bl9RSO1ajgfz5Hcdaz6sM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=RqZLgS2iYpg60V547bciTrdOF2oCebLuKy2zF0PO4NSMulEntwGhan7mKcOJ2IlyB8 t2vhuKKLAkIYSSjktfK4/wyYAg3S/QE+6s7GdRVI7jfTeVLSE9aA4bq10F1SINsSVbF8 ugOMMgroVUXvlh+w1xMHjIYxj9tRstUZBLiGo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.179.149 with SMTP id h21mr833544wem.44.1291826979596; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:49:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:49:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:49:39 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , questions , jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:49:41 -0000 On 8 December 2010 16:39, Redd Vinylene wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < > bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > application or configuration issue unrelated to jails. > > > > > > > Absolutely. Thanks for making me realize it though. > > Peace! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > do you have a personal firewall or are natting at any point on your pc (not the ftp server), as if you do and are using active, the firewall ftp proxy wont be able to read the data stream in SSL mode as its encrypted, and hence setup the needed forwarding rules. WHy not try sftp? Probably more secure and a dam site easier to setup. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:53:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBF8106566C; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3429E8FC1B; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1164846vws.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:53:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JUdsctRydmPdNlgvij9op1/7bAjrdHbi2Qu2i9HQhxs=; b=GPtbOsSRorCh/3BXXM4BxvWLCiOA+e3rgHzrQW9ROFQuTh6GWCW+iOSGeK8FJM/4NI +5d96ZdL+hra/uSGQu4VcwjJaZv+Py3s2bbqEW/qLvKdwWvGocIrAsDnWngtBeggKu1m 5D4ewG5vhZucFLgDv2nOnZfwq2nAy4EcsHyCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ex/IQBf2P5lbaOTCzs9gW9LcuU1XYQp8LN9ZmQn/lVsAo4ZO8Yc4VF26I7gjfdP1YF 2HnrnYYwPH7LB+tNG2w5YQcVU7vpt4MY0w9wcsroNFNRoToTM7NDLhn+xWaOJ7ksz5fw Fpb1s8e1TUtmEy8L8FGWW0zgeoBDQcJLD5tLo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.144 with SMTP id hy16mr6969293qcb.259.1291827190347; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:53:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:53:10 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , questions , jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:53:11 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:49 PM, krad wrote: > > do you have a personal firewall or are natting at any point on your pc (not > the ftp server), as if you do and are using active, the firewall ftp proxy > wont be able to read the data stream in SSL mode as its encrypted, and hence > setup the needed forwarding rules. > > WHy not try sftp? Probably more secure and a dam site easier to setup. > Nope, nothing like that. Thanks though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 16:59:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCF2106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D6B8FC1D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1064073ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr9674495ebd.38.1291827561049; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:59:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:59:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:59:00 -0500 Message-ID: To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , questions , jail@freebsd.org, krad Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:59:23 -0000 > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:49 PM, krad wrote: > > > WHy not try sftp? Probably more secure and a dam site easier to setup. > I second this. SFTP is a ton easier, it's setup by default to work when SSH is setup/installed on any system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 17:07:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D9D106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reed.loefgren@tatteredcover.com) Received: from shiva.tatteredcover.com (shiva.tatteredcover.com [206.124.11.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEFF8FC17 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spender.tatteredcover.com (spender.tatteredcover.com [199.26.174.3]) by shiva.tatteredcover.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B80E9192C166 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:49:15 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4CFFB729.1080604@tatteredcover.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:49:45 -0700 From: Reed Loefgren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101206 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101208132105.88112.qmail@web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20101208132105.88112.qmail@web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:07:01 -0000 On 12/08/10 06:21, Kazuhiro Satoyoshi wrote: >> They're old, but not so old that 8.1 shouldn't work. >> > Some day, I tried to install FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE (i386, amd64), but I could't. > I did't know the reason why... > That's why I though to need old FreeBSD version for my PC. > > OK, I'll try to install latest version. > Thank you very much. > > kazu > > > > --------------------------------- > Learn more about HIV/AIDS - Red Ribbon Campaign 2010 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Here's a guess: You're in Japan perhaps. Does that machine of yours require a pc98-type of release rather than i386? (Maybe there's not even a difference, I've just seen it listed before, distinct from i386/amd64/IA64/PPC, etc.) Glad to help muddy the waters. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 17:07:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C161065674 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3608FC12 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oB8H4xDU049255; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:04:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oB8H4xDs049254; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:04:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:04:59 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Kazuhiro Satoyoshi Message-ID: <20101208170459.GA49208@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101207163339.5639f4aa@core.draftnet> <20101208132105.88112.qmail@web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101208132105.88112.qmail@web100103.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Bruce Cran , Jerry McAllister , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:07:37 -0000 On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:21:05PM +0900, Kazuhiro Satoyoshi wrote: > >They're old, but not so old that 8.1 shouldn't work. > Some day, I tried to install FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE (i386, amd64), but I could't. > I did't know the reason why... > That's why I though to need old FreeBSD version for my PC. > > OK, I'll try to install latest version. > Thank you very much. Good. Try the latest RELEASE version. Then, don't give up if you have a problem. Study and find out what problem is happening and then attack it. Probably the only real problem you might have with the older machine is having enough storage. You might have to add some. ////jerry > > kazu > > --------------------------------- > Learn more about HIV/AIDS - Red Ribbon Campaign 2010 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 17:18:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADBB1065679 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6C78FC12 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1349729wwf.31 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:18:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.202 with SMTP id s10mr7276465wbt.229.1291828684406; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:18:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:18:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <236959.54029.qm@web110309.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <20101208005814.E810710657DC@hub.freebsd.org> <236959.54029.qm@web110309.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:18:03 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ug0jLVIfS1Xs7xck8yInXIrWbNs Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Mark Terribile Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Page faults and threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:18:06 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Mark Terribile wrot= e: > > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me: when a thread hits a page fault in a multithread prog= ram on FreeBSD, is the entire program stopped waiting for the page to be lo= aded/made ready or just the one thread? > > Has this changed in recent versions with the changes to the scheduler? > > And, if you know, do other Open-Source OS's do the same thing, or are the= y all different? > By no means an expert but i think your question is way too broad for a single answer so IMHO it depends on many things like FBSD version, type of threading you are using and how. A short summary to best of my knowledge is that the threading models in FBSD have changed broadly and continuously since FBSD 5 so it really depends... In general I would think that if the model/lib you are using is 1:1 (default from FBSD 7, I think) then a page fault should halt a single thread and no other threads should be affected if no mem is shared between them, although since threads may(usually?) share memory in most popular models (1:1, N:1, N:M) the fault should block all threads that share that memory space. In any case the issue of page faults and blocking is more related to the VM than to the scheduler, again to the best of my knowledge, and there should be a bunch of sysctls to fine-tune / tweak the behavior. The topic is quite interesting to me, sadly don't know enough about the matter (though I use mod_perl/mod_worker a lot on FBSD so I know just enough to get by) and it would be great if some experts jump in and shed some light on the current threading implementations on the 7, 8 and 9 releases. Furthermore, (knowingly a bit OT to the OP) and if some Perl on FBSD experts on this list (merlyn?) would also give their .02 on Perl threading options/details on FBSD 7,8,9 would be even better ;-) best, -- Alejandro Imass > =A0 =A0Mark Terribile > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 18:05:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9D91065670 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5048FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1233900vws.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:05:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.87.75 with SMTP id v11mr6937163qcl.240.1291831512095; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:05:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.220.99.132 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:05:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <592756.11515.qm@web110301.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <592756.11515.qm@web110301.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:05:11 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bxAh_YBYfNZSoJV8ll0GsNzVPcM Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Mark Terribile Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Page faults and threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:05:13 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Mark Terribile wro= te: > [...] Copying the list for this comment... Well I can tell you this much. A while back I carried out some heavy load testing on a Catalyst app on mod_perl, mod_worker apache 2 on FBSD 6.2 and Debian with kernel 2.6.18 both on 64 bits same exact hardware: FreeBSD 6.2 Stable Apache 2.2.3, Server MPM: Worker mod_perl 2.0.4 Perl v5.8.8 built for amd64-freebsd-thread-multi Catalyst 5.7014 mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.45, for portbld-freebsd6.2 (amd64) using 5.2 Debian 4.0 (Etch) Stable Apache 2.2.3, Server MPM: Worker mod_perl 2.0.4 Perl v5.8.8 built for amd64-debian-thread-multi Catalyst 5.7014 mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.45, for Debian (amd64) using 5.2 I can't disclose the official results, but the bottom line was that Linux was generally somewhat faster (61 vs. 72 ms per request on average) but it's over-optimistic memory broke the OS completely when maxing out and consuming the swap, and we concluded that the VM in that version of Linux was particularly broke for our application. Coincidentally you could observe a dramatic difference in the Virtual and Resident size of each Apache process when in peak load: Linux 2.6.18 : 710/130 FreeBSD 6.2: 185/132 (it also proved in both cases that threaded mod_perl (an esoteric mix in the eyes of many an expert) saved tons of RAM and was generally very stable ;-)) Anyway what really caught our attention in these tests is that when the extreme load was removed, FBSD recovered almost immediately like nothing had happened and we had to reboot Linux almost every time, cause it remained very unstable afterwards. We did manage to play with Linux's vm settings especially the over-committal stuff to somewhat behave like FBSD, but vanilla FBSD was always more stable in every test. This told us that the FBSD folks must be doing something right in the standard thread / vm management in FBSD and we switched to it since for our heavy-weight Web deployments. > > I'd like to know if things how things are now on FreeBSD. > Hopefully this thread will catch the eye of some FBSD threading experts ! > =A0 =A0Mark Terribile > > --- On Wed, 12/8/10, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >> From: Alejandro Imass >> Subject: Re: Page faults and threads >> To: "Mark Terribile" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 18:14:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418D41065670 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout030.mac.com (asmtpout030.mac.com [17.148.16.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266628FC16 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LD400IJ0G0XLN80@asmtp030.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:14:57 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012080109 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-08_09:2010-12-08, 2010-12-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4CFF8A29.2030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:14:56 -0800 Message-id: <2BE7EA7A-8604-4D21-801C-309447CD54F9@mac.com> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4CFF8A29.2030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: Da Rock X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:14:58 -0000 On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:37 AM, Da Rock wrote: > Thanks for the heads up. What language do you recommend then based on these security reports? Well, I've been implementing online stores and content-management/publishing systems written in Java and Objective-C for quite a while, so I'm biased towards those. If I were starting over from scratch today, Ruby or Python would probably enter into the picture for consideration. (Of course, Python threading runs into the GIL issue limiting true concurrency, and the only Ruby implementation around which does better is JRuby, which is Ruby implemented on top of Java.) You don't magically get immunity from SQL injection by using JDBC or EOF or whatever, but using bound variables in queries rather than feeding user input into raw SQL, or invoking stored procedures or user-defined functions instead will mitigate one of the more common security problems. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 19:07:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743E106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf10.insightbb.com (mxsf10.insightbb.com [74.128.0.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060BE8FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:07:56 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,316,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="274507247" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf10.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2010 14:07:56 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiY0ACJm/0xKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIJI0ajiMMAQEBATU0wByFSQSEYg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,316,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="197430525" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2010 14:07:55 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:07:54 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012081407.55115.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: mixer -s and multiple dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:07:57 -0000 I want to be able to save, set, and restore the values for vol and pcm only. When I invoke mixer -s vol pcm, it sets the vol to 0. Not what I intended. I AM able to save ALL and restore ALL. But I hope to just be able to save and restore some channels. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 19:49:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FFB1065675 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439DE8FC15 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2572073wwi.1 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G6BVuwRDvAThdob/nOWiySz+K04hm2cIvmeytocGrmk=; b=WOjtDxsNoDTQSn3g/QF2C41Mf6ryfK0FlHymXgK72+WS3uJKSOZMEA2UY+DBW61aQg zaic8jbNnyVvrCwhhAK2hmVVE931Q+OBup+GYhta/xLBgmQryECmTn4jb36bMVGrtrED l0XLSDMWsfXyIGVoTZ5YQUAGoB07S12FZkoH0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HI7uI4lfex7liUp8LDps8csUfmyKLCrddv00GibHX52jy3yB3xdXMPBI/la/BaEjmr oLwL1VwQ3+rex5/rY12myjCwuUyAbEHOMRryLkFF/obwD49ktM5J4RpNAEotO6GAZZoE dPEWWNXAA0XV4vVh7iFVmllBQuu6h0UENQyNU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.167.141 with SMTP id i13mr1000175wel.48.1291837781145; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.164.21 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:49:42 -0000 All, I have a Lenovo T61 with a 100g HD that I dual boot with FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64 and Windows XP. FBSD is on ad0s2a, with ad0s2b as swap, and XP on ad0s1a. Yesterday I booted up FBSD, started xfce4, started a terminal session, su'ed to root and did the following - running a generic kernel: # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel Then I exited xfce4, did sudo shutdown -r now, and got a mountroot prompt that I now can't get past. I can get to the loader prompt, and lsdev shows the following: cd devices: disk devices: disk0: BIOS drive C: disk0s1: NTFS/HPFS disk0s2a: FFS disk02sb: swap when I use '?' at the mountroot prompt I get: List of GEOM managed disk devices: acd0 Loader variables: vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ad0s2a vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw I've tried entering the following at the mountroot prompt, with no success: ufs:/dev/ad0s2a ufs:/ad0s2a ufs:ad0s2a ffs:/dev/ad0s2a and several other variations that I've found while googling, but no success anywhere. Does anyone have thoughts on how to remedy this? Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:24:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F851065673 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from syshackmin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230FE8FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1840357bwz.8 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:24:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Iml+McYRadN/PjirPIE9ybpg0WV3p3EPc0ZkERwe1iA=; b=UcyZK0pYOP9TlA3s64I62qM5bm9y+AS2vvq2ou90pvJSCZ3Iw6znW/Vjsr5E1z3BJA r8IcaYZgtze7/DpFT1CC/hIUO6y6/oYB8/fWwLCSD+awdmpzGo85a6ZLzSmqYlA92zVa bxa8yfrq6pYWUCJ4f5ENpqDvUxRL9kBqZF5is= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YxvxbubKL+vcYBmTCEsY1l98G7TL/Antf5d8gPGg031i6z+JLARmzD24Xzilc3Jn3x VrTkD18fj0hzh0998YgjVT69Em+S55FixA8Fh2hin1PQmy7UKWo87eWDot7GY8xK/1tL 1RbeE3SF1qt+/FApTdug0czXH0r4/q6NgFcLE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.74.69 with SMTP id t5mr2397655bkj.190.1291838468951; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:01:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.56.135 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:01:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:01:08 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Cundiff To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Terrible Clock Skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:24:37 -0000 Hi everyone, I posted this to the forum as well but figured I'd try here since the same people might not subscribe to both. I've been experiencing some terrible clock skew and just can't figure it out. By terrible I mean I'm losing 30 minutes a day. The loss only occurs when I bring the system under heavy load. The load is multiple Rsync backups to a ZFS pool(with gzip compression) backed by a 16 disk Raid50. I'm using a hardware Raid controller for battery backed write caching. Mobo: Supermicro X8DTL CPU: Dual Intel 5620 quad cores Raid: Areca 1620 I have ntp enabled but the skew happens to fast and it stops trying. I've tried a bunch of stuff from the various lists. I tried all my clock sources. TSC(-100) HPET(900) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0). I tried changing the kern.hz flag lower. I also tried disabling the enhanced speed step feature of this chip as per the FAQ on the site. Nothing works. Currently I'm defaults except the following settings. EIST Disabled in BIOS kern.hz="100" kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 Is there anything else I could do to debug this? I can't really blame the hardware because I have these same boards/chips running in Linux with no clock issues. -- Dave Cundiff System Administrator A2Hosting, Inc http://www.a2hosting.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:30:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576BF106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AB08FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1292391ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.15.1 with SMTP id i1mr2154780eba.12.1291840201117; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:30:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:29:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:29:40 -0500 Message-ID: To: Dave Cundiff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terrible Clock Skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:30:03 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Dave Cundiff wrote: > Hi everyone, > bad button battery maybe? when the system is under load, it's diverting what ever processor time to correct for the skew elsewhere (guessing). If it is a bad battery, setup NTP to reset your system clock more frequently. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:34:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561B7106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emailrob@emailrob.com) Received: from mx01.dls.net (mx01.dls.net [216.145.245.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3949E8FC23 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.145.235.76] (helo=emailrob.com) by mx01.dls.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQQMt-00034J-21; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:12:04 -0600 Message-ID: <4CFFE698.5000900@emailrob.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:12:08 +0000 From: spellberg_robert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd_questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [fbsd_questions] mac and windoze formats X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:34:01 -0000 howdy, folks --- this may be a stupid question, but, i figure that it is better to ask than to assume. premise: i was looking at a retail site that is offering a dvd_archive of every issue of a particular magazine back to its beginning, many decades ago [ these have become popular, lately ]. usually, i put these things on my windoze_box, until it was no longer new enough. then, i looked for linux [ aka, "elf" ] compatability, which also works. well, it has finally happened. something i want is only available for windoze and os_x. research: now, freebsd handles all sorts of elf; but, mac is not elf, it is derived from mach [ a long_unused word from my youth ]. so, this question is about "emulation". i found the section in the faq and in the handbook on elf, but, there is no mention of mac, osx, mach or anything else that is not elf, not even wine. i found a recent _questions post that suggested that there is no current ability to run a mach-o binary. because no one challenged this assertion, i take it as true. q: where do things stand regarding the future ability to run either a windoze or mac binary [ as these are the general_public's notion of a "computer" ] ? q: would the present situation be described as closer to " real_soon_now ! ", to " are you kidding ? " or to somewhere between these two endpoints ? happy everything, to everybody, all of the time, even to those who don't celebrate anything, at any time. rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:49:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E9E1065BE2 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout026.mac.com (asmtpout026.mac.com [17.148.16.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2448FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:49:21 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LD4000X5N68BA50@asmtp026.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:49:21 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012080125 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-08_10:2010-12-08, 2010-12-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4CFFE698.5000900@emailrob.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:49:20 -0800 Message-id: <07D5C58D-F23D-4AF9-B927-36BFF0697AF5@mac.com> References: <4CFFE698.5000900@emailrob.com> To: spellberg_robert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: fbsd_questions Subject: Re: [fbsd_questions] mac and windoze formats X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:49:22 -0000 On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:12 PM, spellberg_robert wrote: > premise: > > i was looking at a retail site that is offering > a dvd_archive of every issue of a particular magazine back to its beginning, many decades ago > [ these have become popular, lately ]. If the archive contains this magazine in a common format like PDF, you can view such under nearly any platform (including FreeBSD). > usually, i put these things on my windoze_box, until it was no longer new enough. > then, i looked for linux [ aka, "elf" ] compatability, which also works. ELF is a binary file format. It's used by Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, and other platforms. > research: > > now, freebsd handles all sorts of elf; but, > mac is not elf, it is derived from mach [ a long_unused word from my youth ]. Yes, MacOS X uses the Mach kernel from CMU, also used by NEXTSTEP. The binary file format for the Mac is called MachO. > so, this question is about "emulation". > i found the section in the faq and in the handbook on elf, but, > there is no mention of mac, osx, mach or anything else that is not elf, not even wine. > i found a recent _questions post that suggested that there is no current ability to run a mach-o binary. because no one challenged this assertion, i take it as true. It is. > q: where do things stand regarding > the future ability to run either a windoze or mac binary > [ as these are the general_public's notion of a "computer" ] ? You can use emulation software like VMWare 3 to run a Windows environment under FreeBSD; however, that won't let you run MacOS X or Mac programs. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:56:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C701F1065672 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@bounce.quepasa.com) Received: from sm-70-42-226-216.quepasa.com (sm-70-42-226-216.quepasa.com [70.42.226.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D438FC08 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([10.42.226.54]) by sm-70-42-226-216.quepasa.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1(4.1.1-44201)); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:56:13 -0700 X-VirtualServer: Default, sm-70-42-226-216.quepasa.com, 70.42.226.216 X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::43::8171046 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Mailer: StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1(4.1.1-44201) X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=sm; d=quepasa.com; q=dns; b=a/TpCE71Ae6Xuo/+ITDUBI9CM4r+b9RT8XI8cQrTCkY7H7SHUEQ6R4hahxkXLpRrz2JeFDyEgmsuZUI+525FvdXY8DIk4IeLTEx7S2QO7s5I5XjwA75wAwqRSnYdYOnZgHGHEF+nZIBBrNWhhf5Ck9/8MK42VRfQjN2dvG7GlIM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=quepasa.com; s=sm; i=@quepasa.com; h=To:From:Subject:Date:X-LibVersion:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-QPEmailID: X-QPTemplateID:X-MailLocation:X-VirtualServerGroup:X-ClientID: X-CampaignID:Return-path:Reply-to:Sender:List-Unsubscribe: Message-ID; bh=npffxv4ePwyEr9P4L2PtRmZ+A0E=; b=aehV4aHKlqKsP3VFW hK4QeX3LvhxnroKGo00I64LNmFilDkHYOjNNsqTnt7rmhxXBA3stHdIw2XDR3dA0 LIEhbzWDqUz0/ikPjyXV7FApOHLfjIlG1klsYnRsdkrUcF+JCefzPXYJFNNmAKbm kLqDrXrIzGSBcGoLmTYdqE6XC0= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jarupon Mahiphot Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:56:09 -0700 X-LibVersion: 3.3.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-QPEmailID: 17740395741 X-QPTemplateID: 43 X-MailLocation: Strongmail X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-ClientID: 0 X-CampaignID: 0 Sender: info@quepasa.com Message-ID: <20101208185613.14980.1646328896.swift@te-me-001> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Jarupon has sent you a private message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noreply@quepasa.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:56:16 -0000 = = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:58:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FFA1065673 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:58:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F77F8FC1C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1314286ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.9.15 with SMTP id j15mr2916572ebj.51.1291841920938; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:58:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:58:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101208185613.14980.1646328896.swift@te-me-001> References: <20101208185613.14980.1646328896.swift@te-me-001> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:58:20 -0500 Message-ID: To: noreply@quepasa.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jarupon has sent you a private message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:58:42 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Jarupon Mahiphot wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > umm...... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 21:00:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C9B106566B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8B18FC25 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DB426291A9; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:00:41 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7vxAEwpL-PT; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:00:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D710226291A8; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:00:36 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:00:07 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <279F197D-D014-405F-A262-4EF8772EDB62@cwis.biz> References: <20101208185613.14980.1646328896.swift@te-me-001> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Jarupon has sent you a private message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:00:14 -0000 do what everyone else does: delete them. It's an open list that anyone can email - or spam. On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Jarupon Mahiphot = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 > umm...... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:13:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1580F106566C; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4883F8FC08; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1063725eyh.37 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.80 with SMTP id b16mr9988415ebd.38.1291839226825; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:13:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:13:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:13:26 -0500 Message-ID: To: joseph.bashe@gmail.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:02:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: krad , jail@freebsd.org, questions , Redd Vinylene , owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:13:49 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Joseph Bashe wrote: > But he mentioned he needs some sort of 'virtual' (I'm assuming chroot) > feature; this is not possible with sftp afaik. > > With some clever mapping of $HOME into the chroot, why wouldn't that be possible? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 21:15:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BA1106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vogelke@hcst.net) Received: from beta.hcst.com (beta.hcst.com [192.52.183.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9898FC16 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.hcst.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beta.hcst.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id oB8LF2l6014579 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:15:02 -0500 Received: (from vogelke@localhost) by beta.hcst.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oB8LEwrJ014572; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:14:58 -0500 Received: by kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil (Postfix, from userid 32768) id 0C364BFAA; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:13:25 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> (dalescott@shaw.ca) Organization: Array Infotech X-Disclaimer: I don't speak for the USAF or Array Infotech. X-GPG-ID: 1024D/711752A0 2006-06-27 Karl Vogel X-GPG-Fingerprint: 56EB 6DBF 4224 C953 F417 CC99 4C7C 7D46 7117 52A0 References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> Message-Id: <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:13:25 -0500 (EST) From: vogelke+unix@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vogelke+unix@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:15:04 -0000 >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:23:04 -0700, >> "Dale Scott" said: D> I'll interpret that as saying a large percentage of the PHP apps vying D> for your attention are crap, but buyer beware. Just be careful, have a D> healthy level of scepticism, and keep your eyes open. Yup. D> I don't know anything about Facebook other than it's PHP-based, but I'm D> sure we'd hear about it being hacked on a regular basis if it was. http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403016 Microsoft and Facebook Team Up to Put the Kibosh on Koobface Mon, 6 Apr 2009 Microsoft and Facebook are working together to protect users from the Koobface worm. Koobface spreads through Facebook and MySpace social networking sites and infects users who run vulnerable versions of Windows. It steals login information so it can hijack accounts and spam users' contact lists. The spam usually contains a link to what is billed as a video, but users who click the link are told they must download a program to watch the clip. If users agree to the download, their machines become infected with malware. Microsoft has added Koobface to its Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT), which removed nearly 200,000 instances of Koobface from more than 133,000 computers in two weeks. ------------ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/15/facebook_phishing_scam/ http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6294169.ece Another Phishing Attack Targets Facebook Users Fri, 15 May 2009 Users of the social networking site Facebook have been subjected to another phishing attack. The attackers gained access to the social networking site by using legitimate user accounts and then directing the contacts of the compromised accounts to websites containing malicious software. The attackers ostensibly gained access to the initial accounts by exploiting easy-to-guess passwords. ------------ http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1356896,00.html IT Managers Feel Pressured to Relax Security Policies Wed, 20 May 2009 According to a recent survey of 1,300 IT managers, 86 percent said they were being pressured by company executives, marketing departments, and sales departments to relax web security policies to allow access to web-based platforms such as Google Apps. Nearly half of respondents said some employees bypass security policies to access services like Twitter and Facebook. More than half of the respondents noted that they lacked the means to detect embedded malicious code and prevent URL redirect attacks. ------------ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/07/twitter_attack_theory/ Attack on Twitter and Facebook Was a "JoeJob" 6-10 Aug 2009 The denial-of-service attacks that hobbled Twitter and Facebook last week were not conducted through botnets, but instead were the result of a spam campaign aimed at a taking out accounts that belong to a pro-Republic of Georgia blogger. ------------ http://www.scmagazineus.com/Facebook-to-modify-privacy-practices-after-investigation/article/147556/ http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6812783.ece Facebook Will Strengthen Privacy Practices 27-28 Aug 2009 In response to an investigation launched by Canada's Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Facebook has agreed to give users more control about the information they share with third-party applications. The applications will be required to get permission from users for every category of personal information they want to access. In addition, users will have the option to deactivate or to even to delete their accounts. If users delete their accounts, all information belonging to that user will be deleted from Facebook servers. ------------ http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138780/Facebook_Captchas_broken_?source=rss_security Spammers Break Facebook CAPTCHA Thu, 1 Oct 2009 Malware purveyors have managed to break the Facebook CAPTCHA (completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart), allowing them to automate the creation of Facebook pages. The malicious pages are being used to send links to malicious websites that promote scareware. The pages all have the same photograph, but have different user names. Facebook is taking steps to identify the rogue pages and disable them. ------------ http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/01/facebook-email/ Rogue Marketers Can Mine Your Info on Facebook Ryan Singel Tue, 5 Jan 2010 A marketer can take a list of 1,000 e-mail addresses, either legally or illegally collected -- and upload those to Facebook through a dummy account -- which then lets the user see all the profiles created using those addresses. Given Facebook's ubiquity and most people's reliance on a single e-email address, the harvest could be quite rich. ------------ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/11/facebook_charging_rumour_malfeasance/ http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/fbcharge.asp Facebook Group Page Has Links to Malware-Laced Sites Mon, 11 Jan 2010 Miscreants intent on spreading malware appear to be preying on people's unfounded fears that Facebook plans to begin charging users for its services. A Facebook group that appears to offer a place for people to protest the rumored fees has been shown to contain malware. The group pages themselves appear to be clean, but link to suspicious sites. Snopes.com has posted a warning about the deceptive groups and associated pages. ------------ http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/191847/facebook_users_targeted_in_massive_spam_run.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20000682-245.html Spammers Go After Facebook Users Thu, 18 Mar 2010 Spammers have been targeting Facebook members with data-stealing malware. The malicious messages appear to come from legitimate senders, but the return address is spoofed. The messages tell recipients that their Facebook passwords have been reset and that they need to download an attachment that contains the new password. Although many users may know by now that websites would not reset passwords and email the new ones, because Facebook's user base is so large, the attackers appear to be hoping that at least some will fall for the ruse. ------------ http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-further-reduces-control-over-personal-information Facebook Further Reduces Your Control Over Personal Information Kurt Opsahl Mon, 19 Apr 2010 Today, Facebook removed its users' ability to control who can see their own interests and personal information. Certain parts of users' profiles, "including your current city, hometown, education and work, and likes and interests" will now be transformed into "connections," meaning that they will be shared publicly. If you don't want these parts of your profile to be made public, your only option is to delete them. ------------ http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=6304 1.5 million Facebook accounts offered for sale Dancho Danchev Sat, 24 Apr 2010 VeriSign's iDefense Intelligence Operations Team has spotted an underground market ad offering 1.5 million Facebook accounts for sale. The pricing method is based on the number of contacts per compromised account, presumably with the idea to allow easier spreading of related malicious content across Facebook. ------------ http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/05/facebook-should-follow Facebook Should Follow Its Own Principles Kurt Opsahl Thu, 13 May 2010 If you decide to leave by deactivating your account, information is saved in case you decide to reactivate later. Even if you delete your Facebook account, you have to wait 14 days and even then Messages and Wall posts remain. The Facebook Principles are much clearer: Users have the right to "take [their data] with them anywhere they want, including removing it from the Facebook Service." Facebook is not living up to its promises. ------------ http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2010/10/facebook-may-be-making-strides.ars "Deleted" Facebook photos actually aren't Ars Technica staff Tue, 12 Oct 2010 We wrote a piece more than a year ago examining whether photos really disappear from social network servers when you delete them, and found that Facebook was one of the worst offenders when it came to leaving "deleted" photos online. We decided to revisit the issue recently when readers continued to point out that our deleted photos from that article were still online more than 16 months later. ------------ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304772804575558484075236968.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/18/facebook_apps_privacy_breach http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/11565948 http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=10005 Facebook Faces Another Privacy Breach Mon, 18 Oct 2010 The privacy of many users on Facebook has been compromised by a number of popular applications, or apps, used on the social networking site. An investigation by the Wall Street Journal identified a number of apps that access Facebook members' personal details, even if their privacy settings were set to the most restrictive allowed within the social network. According to the report, up to 25 advertising and data gathering firms were exploiting the issue to enable them access the name of the persons using certain apps, and in some cases the names of those persons' friends. One company, Rapleaf, was also found to have combined the user data accessed in Facebook with its own database of internet users. Rapleaf admitted that some of this information was also transmitted to other third parties, but claimed that this transmission was accidental. Facebook has responded by saying it will implement a solution to prevent this type of access to user data. ------------ http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/10/zynga_facebook_lawsuit.php http://business.financialpost.com/2010/10/22/13072/ http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9192862/Rapleaf_says_it_has_fixed_privacy_issue_with_Facebook?taxonomyId=203 Facebook to Employ Encryption to Protect User IDs Mon, 25 Oct 2010 Facebook says it will use encryption and other data protection measures following reports that users' data were being shared with third parties. Facebook policy forbids application developers from sharing Facebook User IDs (UIDs) with third parties, but the company said that "some developers were inadvertently sharing [the data] via the HTTP Referrer header." ------------ http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9192923/New_Firefox_add_on_hijacks_Facebook_Twitter_sessions?taxonomyId=17 Firefox Extension Makes it Easy to Steal Cookies Mon, 25 Oct 2010 At the ToorCon 12 conference in San Diego, researchers presented a proof-of-concept Firefox extension that is capable of stealing session cookies from Facebook, Twitter and other accounts on unencrypted Web 2.0 sites on open wireless networks. ------------ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11665120 Facebook Bans Developers for Selling User IDs Mon, 1 Nov 2010 Facebook has banned a number of developers from connecting to the social network for six months after it learned that they had been selling user information to data brokers. -- Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 21:30:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E613F10656C2 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB618FC17 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oB8LRr0Q050219; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oB8LRqCp050218; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:52 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Karl Vogel Message-ID: <20101208212752.GA50198@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:30:29 -0000 On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:13:25PM -0500, Karl Vogel wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:23:04 -0700, > >> "Dale Scott" said: > > D> I'll interpret that as saying a large percentage of the PHP apps vying > D> for your attention are crap, but buyer beware. Just be careful, have a > D> healthy level of scepticism, and keep your eyes open. > > Yup. > > D> I don't know anything about Facebook other than it's PHP-based, but I'm > D> sure we'd hear about it being hacked on a regular basis if it was. Interesting. Looks like most of these depend on the bad judgement of the user to respond to phishing and similar attacks rather than a flaw in the php code. - though once the user makes the mistake they [unknowingly] allow the attack to insert malware. ////jerry > http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403016 > Microsoft and Facebook Team Up to Put the Kibosh on Koobface > Mon, 6 Apr 2009 > > Microsoft and Facebook are working together to protect users from the > Koobface worm. Koobface spreads through Facebook and MySpace social > networking sites and infects users who run vulnerable versions of > Windows. It steals login information so it can hijack accounts and spam > users' contact lists. > > The spam usually contains a link to what is billed as a video, but users > who click the link are told they must download a program to watch the clip. > If users agree to the download, their machines become infected with malware. > Microsoft has added Koobface to its Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT), > which removed nearly 200,000 instances of Koobface from more than 133,000 > computers in two weeks. > ------------ > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/15/facebook_phishing_scam/ > http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6294169.ece > Another Phishing Attack Targets Facebook Users > Fri, 15 May 2009 > > Users of the social networking site Facebook have been subjected to another > phishing attack. The attackers gained access to the social networking > site by using legitimate user accounts and then directing the contacts > of the compromised accounts to websites containing malicious software. > The attackers ostensibly gained access to the initial accounts by exploiting > easy-to-guess passwords. > ------------ > > http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1356896,00.html > IT Managers Feel Pressured to Relax Security Policies > Wed, 20 May 2009 > > According to a recent survey of 1,300 IT managers, 86 percent said > they were being pressured by company executives, marketing departments, > and sales departments to relax web security policies to allow access to > web-based platforms such as Google Apps. Nearly half of respondents said > some employees bypass security policies to access services like Twitter > and Facebook. More than half of the respondents noted that they lacked the > means to detect embedded malicious code and prevent URL redirect attacks. > ------------ > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/07/twitter_attack_theory/ > Attack on Twitter and Facebook Was a "JoeJob" > 6-10 Aug 2009 > > The denial-of-service attacks that hobbled Twitter and Facebook last week > were not conducted through botnets, but instead were the result of a spam > campaign aimed at a taking out accounts that belong to a pro-Republic of > Georgia blogger. > ------------ > > http://www.scmagazineus.com/Facebook-to-modify-privacy-practices-after-investigation/article/147556/ > http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6812783.ece > Facebook Will Strengthen Privacy Practices > 27-28 Aug 2009 > > In response to an investigation launched by Canada's Office of the Privacy > Commissioner, Facebook has agreed to give users more control about the > information they share with third-party applications. The applications will > be required to get permission from users for every category of personal > information they want to access. In addition, users will have the option > to deactivate or to even to delete their accounts. If users delete their > accounts, all information belonging to that user will be deleted from > Facebook servers. > ------------ > > http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138780/Facebook_Captchas_broken_?source=rss_security > Spammers Break Facebook CAPTCHA > Thu, 1 Oct 2009 > > Malware purveyors have managed to break the Facebook CAPTCHA (completely > automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart), allowing > them to automate the creation of Facebook pages. The malicious pages are > being used to send links to malicious websites that promote scareware. > The pages all have the same photograph, but have different user names. > Facebook is taking steps to identify the rogue pages and disable them. > ------------ > > http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/01/facebook-email/ > Rogue Marketers Can Mine Your Info on Facebook > Ryan Singel > Tue, 5 Jan 2010 > > A marketer can take a list of 1,000 e-mail addresses, either legally or > illegally collected -- and upload those to Facebook through a dummy > account -- which then lets the user see all the profiles created using > those addresses. Given Facebook's ubiquity and most people's reliance > on a single e-email address, the harvest could be quite rich. > ------------ > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/11/facebook_charging_rumour_malfeasance/ > http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/fbcharge.asp > Facebook Group Page Has Links to Malware-Laced Sites > Mon, 11 Jan 2010 > > Miscreants intent on spreading malware appear to be preying on people's > unfounded fears that Facebook plans to begin charging users for its > services. A Facebook group that appears to offer a place for people to > protest the rumored fees has been shown to contain malware. The group pages > themselves appear to be clean, but link to suspicious sites. Snopes.com has > posted a warning about the deceptive groups and associated pages. > ------------ > > http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/191847/facebook_users_targeted_in_massive_spam_run.html > http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20000682-245.html > Spammers Go After Facebook Users > Thu, 18 Mar 2010 > > Spammers have been targeting Facebook members with data-stealing malware. > The malicious messages appear to come from legitimate senders, but the > return address is spoofed. The messages tell recipients that their > Facebook passwords have been reset and that they need to download an > attachment that contains the new password. Although many users may know > by now that websites would not reset passwords and email the new ones, > because Facebook's user base is so large, the attackers appear to be > hoping that at least some will fall for the ruse. > ------------ > > http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-further-reduces-control-over-personal-information > Facebook Further Reduces Your Control Over Personal Information > Kurt Opsahl > Mon, 19 Apr 2010 > > Today, Facebook removed its users' ability to control who can see their > own interests and personal information. Certain parts of users' profiles, > "including your current city, hometown, education and work, and likes and > interests" will now be transformed into "connections," meaning that they > will be shared publicly. If you don't want these parts of your profile to > be made public, your only option is to delete them. > ------------ > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=6304 > 1.5 million Facebook accounts offered for sale > Dancho Danchev > Sat, 24 Apr 2010 > > VeriSign's iDefense Intelligence Operations Team has spotted an underground > market ad offering 1.5 million Facebook accounts for sale. The pricing > method is based on the number of contacts per compromised account, > presumably with the idea to allow easier spreading of related malicious > content across Facebook. > ------------ > > http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/05/facebook-should-follow > Facebook Should Follow Its Own Principles > Kurt Opsahl > Thu, 13 May 2010 > > If you decide to leave by deactivating your account, information is saved > in case you decide to reactivate later. Even if you delete your Facebook > account, you have to wait 14 days and even then Messages and Wall posts > remain. The Facebook Principles are much clearer: Users have the right to > "take [their data] with them anywhere they want, including removing it from > the Facebook Service." Facebook is not living up to its promises. > ------------ > > http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2010/10/facebook-may-be-making-strides.ars > "Deleted" Facebook photos actually aren't > Ars Technica staff > Tue, 12 Oct 2010 > > We wrote a piece more than a year ago examining whether photos really > disappear from social network servers when you delete them, and found > that Facebook was one of the worst offenders when it came to leaving > "deleted" photos online. We decided to revisit the issue recently when > readers continued to point out that our deleted photos from that article > were still online more than 16 months later. > ------------ > > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304772804575558484075236968.html > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/18/facebook_apps_privacy_breach > http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/11565948 > http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=10005 > Facebook Faces Another Privacy Breach > Mon, 18 Oct 2010 > > The privacy of many users on Facebook has been compromised by a number > of popular applications, or apps, used on the social networking site. > An investigation by the Wall Street Journal identified a number of apps that > access Facebook members' personal details, even if their privacy settings > were set to the most restrictive allowed within the social network. > > According to the report, up to 25 advertising and data gathering firms > were exploiting the issue to enable them access the name of the persons > using certain apps, and in some cases the names of those persons' > friends. One company, Rapleaf, was also found to have combined the user > data accessed in Facebook with its own database of internet users. > Rapleaf admitted that some of this information was also transmitted to > other third parties, but claimed that this transmission was accidental. > Facebook has responded by saying it will implement a solution to prevent > this type of access to user data. > ------------ > > http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/10/zynga_facebook_lawsuit.php > http://business.financialpost.com/2010/10/22/13072/ > http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9192862/Rapleaf_says_it_has_fixed_privacy_issue_with_Facebook?taxonomyId=203 > Facebook to Employ Encryption to Protect User IDs > Mon, 25 Oct 2010 > > Facebook says it will use encryption and other data protection measures > following reports that users' data were being shared with third parties. > Facebook policy forbids application developers from sharing Facebook User > IDs (UIDs) with third parties, but the company said that "some developers > were inadvertently sharing [the data] via the HTTP Referrer header." > ------------ > > http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9192923/New_Firefox_add_on_hijacks_Facebook_Twitter_sessions?taxonomyId=17 > Firefox Extension Makes it Easy to Steal Cookies > Mon, 25 Oct 2010 > > At the ToorCon 12 conference in San Diego, researchers presented a > proof-of-concept Firefox extension that is capable of stealing session > cookies from Facebook, Twitter and other accounts on unencrypted Web 2.0 > sites on open wireless networks. > ------------ > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11665120 > Facebook Bans Developers for Selling User IDs > Mon, 1 Nov 2010 > > Facebook has banned a number of developers from connecting to the social > network for six months after it learned that they had been selling user > information to data brokers. > > -- > Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 20:38:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CEC106564A; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joseph.bashe@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9078FC0A; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1532857wwf.31 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:38:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id :message-id:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:x-priority:references :in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:cc:subject:from:date :content-type:mime-version; bh=lYmvA8z4zpBA3QolR/an8QSSi7ewbbhdSF3bO/egwqw=; b=riaBRKBofuW/SnyGFg6ECS8JXTe/aYmZaW0mcL/r/FDhUgjzsFCJkOL3+erzEnVRFQ N4dxjmOmU8GtXqXskX4wB9dDZllShpL2FxkW+KOnKACiyrMIH57QQi268X1hPFaCbB5q eJ0nAARm4WjH3FUIgkpECJl/3bYEScxeWPb5o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to :x-priority:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:cc :subject:from:date:content-type:mime-version; b=Q6pvH7uz4y8PmrTt8dKUuTU9N6n/TPtHnWCjuqQ8RrTSV8IIOCduxCTerlBcbK/HSG JfxeCPnCMogtXSgztO2wzW+5dLgKq0kyBzSQwiDEKPHN+5uyOYMxlk+oipOVSA0xXdaQ 79FG3tPCfHlwpVVeBZXDRdT2ifJBy67Ruxkgc= Received: by 10.227.138.132 with SMTP id a4mr9513046wbu.143.1291839113559; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:11:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from bda463.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (bda-67-223-89-143.bise.na.blackberry.com [67.223.89.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1sm478806weq.7.2010.12.08.12.11.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:11:52 -0800 (PST) X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 1865384339 Message-ID: <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Priority: Normal References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net><20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal To: "Chris Brennan" , owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, "Redd Vinylene" From: "Joseph Bashe" Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:07:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:38:46 +0000 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , questions , krad , jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joseph.bashe@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:38:06 -0000 QnV0IGhlIG1lbnRpb25lZCBoZSBuZWVkcyBzb21lIHNvcnQgb2YgJ3ZpcnR1YWwnIChJJ20gYXNz dW1pbmcgY2hyb290KSBmZWF0dXJlOyB0aGlzIGlzIG5vdCBwb3NzaWJsZSB3aXRoIHNmdHAgYWZh aWsuDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogQ2hyaXMgQnJlbm5hbiA8eGFl cm9AeGFlcm9saW1pdC5uZXQ+DQpTZW5kZXI6IG93bmVyLWZyZWVic2QtamFpbEBmcmVlYnNkLm9y Zw0KRGF0ZTogV2VkLCA4IERlYyAyMDEwIDExOjU5OjAwIA0KVG86IFJlZGQgVmlueWxlbmU8cmVk ZHZpbnlsZW5lQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4NCkNjOiBCam9lcm4gQS4gWmVlYjxiemVlYi1saXN0c0BsaXN0 cy56YWJiYWRvei5uZXQ+OyBxdWVzdGlvbnM8cXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnPjsgPGphaWxA ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc+OyBrcmFkPGtyYWR1a0BnbWFpbC5jb20+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogRlRQRCBu b3Qgd29ya2luZyBwcm9wZXJseSBvbiBqYWlsDQoNCj4NCj4gT24gV2VkLCBEZWMgOCwgMjAxMCBh dCA1OjQ5IFBNLCBrcmFkIDxrcmFkdWtAZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCj4NCj4gPiBXSHkgbm90 IHRyeSBzZnRwPyBQcm9iYWJseSBtb3JlIHNlY3VyZSBhbmQgYSBkYW0gc2l0ZSBlYXNpZXIgdG8g c2V0dXAuDQo+DQoNCkkgc2Vjb25kIHRoaXMuIFNGVFAgaXMgYSB0b24gZWFzaWVyLCBpdCdzIHNl dHVwIGJ5IGRlZmF1bHQgdG8gd29yayB3aGVuIFNTSA0KaXMgc2V0dXAvaW5zdGFsbGVkIG9uIGFu eSBzeXN0ZW0uDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KZnJlZWJzZC1qYWlsQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZy ZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1qYWlsDQpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwg c2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiZnJlZWJzZC1qYWlsLXVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIg0K Lg0= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 21:40:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812C4106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout030.mac.com (asmtpout030.mac.com [17.148.16.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6463D8FC1F for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LD4000IKMQJQW50@asmtp030.mac.com> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:39:56 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012080123 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-08_10:2010-12-08, 2010-12-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:39:55 -0800 Message-id: References: To: Dave Cundiff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terrible Clock Skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:40:03 -0000 Hi, Dave-- On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Dave Cundiff wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I posted this to the forum as well but figured I'd try here since the > same people might not subscribe to both. I'm not sure which forum you're mentioning here, although it proves you right about the conclusion you'd made here. :-) > I've been experiencing some terrible clock skew and just can't figure > it out. By terrible I mean I'm losing 30 minutes a day. The loss only > occurs when I bring the system under heavy load. The load is multiple > Rsync backups to a ZFS pool(with gzip compression) backed by a 16 disk > Raid50. I'm using a hardware Raid controller for battery backed write > caching. That kind of slew rate is well past what ntpd can deal with; it suggests possibly that you're losing timer interrupts, or maybe that the "time of day" clock on the motherboard is broken or dead. Output of "vmstat -i" might be informative for the former, for the latter check whether the BIOS can keep the clock sane while in the BIOS menu-- there should be a small Li battery on the motherboard which might be replaceable. You might also double-check that you've got the latest BIOS version update, but that's less likely to help. For a workaround, you can fire off "ntpdate -b" from cron every 5 minutes or similar to keep the clock from drifting too far. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 22:30:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4F7106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlmichael70@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104718FC18 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1695608wyf.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:30:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0G/s7ApmfLpBpICfIA5Lx9iQUyVcMv8e3hoORLTtThs=; b=GrxKy10EaetjUW5aX3tNBpJo/Qz0xKc9z4wOlc1BXUAoX7OmgdZ5eE6OBisWoPMeIA Y0RIOHPaplxR486HPWbOB7XpNu0dTrqAMPDpI3hFDN1N0ygYUdR3Gx6WUk0VJCASplA5 Hj4dfwzkCxKKnJMftRvKknEp0MZ1WaOqVcHac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=llBNIQSSgjGsf0NIrSQYfGqleIL1CQf9fifXgCbzauBhLt3GIb8oeSS7T1tuaTIiCO iz4l0fToM4IaEPq2d1MorXWJf93qfS2lQLn+uhNRUm9+98qKppRsJfz7WJQDJZLSK7Q+ YZZVRu7jtil8fxt4kqWO+rkTBRXGXzHgl6btg= Received: by 10.227.151.70 with SMTP id b6mr9586932wbw.205.1291845690735; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from prime.nonspace ([217.98.80.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10sm742113wbc.22.2010.12.08.14.01.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:01:30 +0000 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101203 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:30:15 -0000 Hello, My FreeBSD laptop is unable to get IP address over DHCP but the same network works fine on Windows, Ubuntu and Android so I believe the problem lies in my FreeBSD configuration and not on the router/access point. Problem occurs only for wireless interface. FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 with Atheros interface. Wireless networking was working fine on that system (the same config files) until I had to replace my wireless router. My rc.conf file: wlans_ath0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" I'm using standard dhclient.conf file. My wpa_supplicant.conf file: network={ ssid="wifi" scan_ssid=1 bssid=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX priority=9 mode=0 proto=RSN key_mgmt=WPA-PSK auth_alg=OPEN pairwise=CCMP group=CCMP psk="xxxxx" } Now after reboot I'm geting wlan0 connection (status associated): wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid wifi channel 9 (2452 MHz 11g) bssid d8:5d:4c:ea:cb:ee regdomain 103 indoor ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit txpower 20 bmiss 7 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS wme burst roaming MANUAL But for some reason it doesn't get the IP address! And whrn I manually try to: dhclient wlan0 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 11 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 16 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 21 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 No DHCPOFFERS received. No working leases in persistent database - sleeping. Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP from this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. Any ideas please? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 22:24:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EDC1065695; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19D48FC19; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1690200wyf.13 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:24:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Drmt2hRI/wcchgHlhz+xDnv70PogLcugFraOK+OtBok=; b=Ig4q+P9sQ6l+tjbmQwUpmhfdHAtgTGN5q7TISFb8SrjwAfMmYXpW4JIjN1oU+vWgOX RbhaHWElQTEhd+sTXgvEbMfb5Sf0bhJKBFhUeRb4Ozs0uvjCD1crXoWfIcdeRQmpiEBp uL6duD9sFzifjCOVp96tcAyFT+yajg2EvNX08= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=dY6vX1+5Yt6LHZwNbcxigKJ7DTKfdTTS4Wx6atUVGJPmNzrkTSBQLS3C6IvHshH/+U koLQYt4GSu6EJflFMzzExRQSv9Qb96hMkk/1myQqxYTJ3qgk+3r+xVtqg98M3lntf1CH 4Lxr/qIixLYjuDe1dGzcVE61DcjgJ9UfA8qlE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr2428603wec.44.1291847067671; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:24:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:24:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:24:27 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: joseph.bashe@gmail.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:51:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Chris Brennan , jail@freebsd.org, questions , Redd Vinylene , owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:24:29 -0000 On 8 December 2010 20:07, Joseph Bashe wrote: > But he mentioned he needs some sort of 'virtual' (I'm assuming chroot) > feature; this is not possible with sftp afaik. > . > Its totally possble to chroot the sftp, and I have done it several times. Something like the below will isolate each user Match Group sftponly ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/%u X11Forwarding no AllowTcpForwarding no ForceCommand internal-sftp he might need something more like this so they can share data Match Group sftponly ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/ X11Forwarding no AllowTcpForwarding no ForceCommand internal-sftp From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 23:07:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1126A106566C for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4A78FC13 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB8N7eHw045148; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TbCh+nDLn0CL; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (ezekiel.daleco.biz [66.76.92.18]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB8N7YIC045142; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:07:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4D000FBA.8040908@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:07:38 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4CFF8A29.2030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <2BE7EA7A-8604-4D21-801C-309447CD54F9@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <2BE7EA7A-8604-4D21-801C-309447CD54F9@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:07:42 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > You don't magically get immunity from SQL injection by using > JDBC or EOF or whatever, but using bound variables in queries rather > than feeding user input into raw SQL, or invoking stored procedures > or user-defined functions instead will mitigate one of the more > common security problems. And these practices are "Good Practice" in any language, including PHP. I think a big part of PHP's problem was that in order to have it widely adopted and to be thought "simple enough for $ME to use", the documentation was written in simplest terms, without these types of checks, and inexperienced coders adopted similar practices to write working sites. The real problems with PHP are its ubiquity (not unlike M$ operating systems ... it's an omnipresent target) and the fact that many of the people writing it come from a "design" background instead of a programming one. A man who has no inkling of the existence of carnivorous animals will not build his house in a tree. My $.02, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 23:43:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA1F106564A for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emailrob@emailrob.com) Received: from mx01.dls.net (mx01.dls.net [216.145.245.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516E28FC13 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.145.235.76] (helo=emailrob.com) by mx01.dls.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQTfr-0006YJ-Ft; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:43:53 -0600 Message-ID: <4D00183E.5010109@emailrob.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:43:58 +0000 From: spellberg_robert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger , fbsd_questions References: <4CFFE698.5000900@emailrob.com> <07D5C58D-F23D-4AF9-B927-36BFF0697AF5@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [fbsd_questions] mac and windoze formats - a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:43:56 -0000 chuck --- thank you. your clarity is warmly appreciated. fyi, would that these --were-- pdfs. regrettably, these are not computer people; they are print_the_magazine_on_paper_and_sell_the_paper people. the usual approach is to install a binary on the box that, at the least, requires the presence of the optical_disc in the drive to operate. well, that's what happens when one charges money for something that is easily duplicated. their loss; i didn't include this item in today's order for some single_issues. ciao. rob Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:12 PM, spellberg_robert wrote: > >>premise: >> >>i was looking at a retail site that is offering >> a dvd_archive of every issue of a particular magazine back to its beginning, many decades ago >> [ these have become popular, lately ]. > > > If the archive contains this magazine in a common format like PDF, you can view such under nearly any platform (including FreeBSD). > > >>usually, i put these things on my windoze_box, until it was no longer new enough. >>then, i looked for linux [ aka, "elf" ] compatability, which also works. > > > ELF is a binary file format. It's used by Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, and other platforms. > > >>research: >> >>now, freebsd handles all sorts of elf; but, >> mac is not elf, it is derived from mach [ a long_unused word from my youth ]. > > > Yes, MacOS X uses the Mach kernel from CMU, also used by NEXTSTEP. The binary file format for the Mac is called MachO. > > >>so, this question is about "emulation". >>i found the section in the faq and in the handbook on elf, but, >> there is no mention of mac, osx, mach or anything else that is not elf, not even wine. >>i found a recent _questions post that suggested that there is no current ability to run a mach-o binary. because no one challenged this assertion, i take it as true. > > > It is. > > >> q: where do things stand regarding >> the future ability to run either a windoze or mac binary >> [ as these are the general_public's notion of a "computer" ] ? > > > You can use emulation software like VMWare 3 to run a Windows environment under FreeBSD; however, that won't let you run MacOS X or Mac programs. > > Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 23:57:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0699C1065673 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E268FC17 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4D75C44 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:02:44 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D001AA3.3030408@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:54:11 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:57:57 -0000 On 12/09/10 06:13, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Joseph Bashe wrote: > > >> But he mentioned he needs some sort of 'virtual' (I'm assuming chroot) >> feature; this is not possible with sftp afaik. >> >> >> > With some clever mapping of $HOME into the chroot, why wouldn't that be > possible? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Never been a problem for me. I have a jails to sftp into and out of all the time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 00:11:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BED21065670 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9828FC15 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99305C21 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:16:29 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D001DDD.1040101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:07:57 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> In-Reply-To: <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:11:42 -0000 On 12/09/10 07:13, Karl Vogel wrote: >>> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:23:04 -0700, >>> "Dale Scott" said: >>> > D> I'll interpret that as saying a large percentage of the PHP apps vying > D> for your attention are crap, but buyer beware. Just be careful, have a > D> healthy level of scepticism, and keep your eyes open. > > Yup. > > D> I don't know anything about Facebook other than it's PHP-based, but I'm > D> sure we'd hear about it being hacked on a regular basis if it was. > > http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403016 > Microsoft and Facebook Team Up to Put the Kibosh on Koobface > Mon, 6 Apr 2009 > > ... And thats why Facebook and all those social network sites are bad news. What happened to anonymity on the internet? Everyone I know worth their salt steers well clear of them... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 00:34:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A303106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE918FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so1181477gxk.17 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:34:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.32.10 with SMTP id f10mr4274754anf.201.1291854896938; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e24sm1233093ana.22.2010.12.08.16.34.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80741E54856 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:34:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:34:53 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101208193453.72400740@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4D001DDD.1040101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> <4D001DDD.1040101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:34:58 -0000 On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:07:57 +1000 Da Rock articulated: [snip] > And thats why Facebook and all those social network sites are bad > news. What happened to anonymity on the internet? Everyone I know > worth their salt steers well clear of them... "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool." Or as some say, "Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot." There is nothing inherently bad with Facebook or any of its imitators. The acronym "PEBKAC" accurately describes the true nature of problem. The inclusion of "anonymity" has nothing to do with the problem. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 00:49:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2231065679 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com (mail-iw0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781868FC1D for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so2686829iwn.19 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:49:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aPicOhvH8X5yur2YemGH0OW/M2fKD/AIXIV2L5dSu50=; b=Fvbbor4g+s4N/e/pFBk0qdT8iuvPa0rRk9jPjEwH6acZYyo+8rkb97/mN+UdZRxaiJ DH6UgXjoy3hb0u2NHDKFQEMtJ8vKGqWphmGFl1u50QPCNAN9/2l2Lds0LMC66UA2r3Vt prJ2g6EPu1Fj3/13booNeLYIKFY1uEwB9la1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DMQSZ6/iubnQu0c/C6Xj3YGnThDfU0bbAuRQT8mx/Fk6o5eL8h6vBdF+Rrw1kfRNx4 R1LJv4mh/q0RvmbhvQJif+BcTEHU4rpGwyBMU5Kck6R+c41BjWTyW9lHRBkS1PWWHBY5 z4J72eOAQkyrY5xaFoE4md+Q86xy+LzeKamlI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.59.149 with SMTP id l21mr11103ibh.196.1291854428180; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.13.70 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CFC5E3A.6050202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4CFDF979.7000602@mgwigglesworth.net> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:27:08 -0800 Message-ID: From: patrick To: Xn Nooby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can a home LAN server use a jail as a router? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:49:05 -0000 Be sure to check out the ezjail port in /usr/ports/sysutils/ezjail -- it makes deploying and updating multiple jails really fast; exponentially faster than building a jail as per jail(8). http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/ Patrick On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Xn Nooby wrote: >> I hope this helps you in your investigation(s). > > Yes, thank you and the previous poster. =A0It sounds like my "outer" box > needs to be the router, and everything else should be a jail. I will > do some more reading up on jails. =A0Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 01:01:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B411065693 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 129088FC16 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5976 invoked by uid 0); 9 Dec 2010 01:01:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 01:01:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=OsReS5cQEzxed7pMphC5bt8u6JTwddvHKEePSnH76HaZwQEqgyD83ijdNEQTNE4xLuV6H/eii5HxxLhkN6NwqbM+o3Js0elcJNhesMYJ2z5EEXnWMNDuEMi7keG1HATq; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQUsg-0003Nh-Cq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:01:11 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:53:50 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:53:50 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101209005350.GB56431@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20101207232143.GC51710@guilt.hydra> <20101208000735.1af19e4d@core.draftnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101208000735.1af19e4d@core.draftnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: USB management utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:01:14 -0000 --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:07:35AM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:21:43 -0700 > Chad Perrin wrote: >=20 > > Is there a simple command line utility that takes the disorganized > > annoyance out of simple USB device management? >=20 > usbconfig(8)? Thanks. The manpage for usbconfig is so cryptic and sparse as to be essentially useless, so I had no idea it would accomplish what I asked. I guess I have some research ahead of me. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0AKJ4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWBxACg8nctmPCXK6MwIdEw4HNCj0Zx V90An3lUqNV0QHi+t7oLUG+ziNRNdVX1 =ZY/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 02:30:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156F2106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.p.sullivan@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s14.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s14.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD31E8FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU153-W52 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s14.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:18:51 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [91.9.146.198] From: justin sullivan To: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:18:51 -0500 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2010 02:18:51.0016 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B60A880:01CB9747] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re:anybody else have an asus 900a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:30:53 -0000 >>14 >>Date: Tue=2C 7 Dec 2010 11:05:43 -0800 >>From: Gary Kline >>Subject: Anybody else have an ASUS 900A? >>To: FreeBSD Mailing List >Message-ID: <20101207190541.GA16234@thought.org> >>Content-Type: text/plain=3B charset=3Dus-ascii >>Well=2C no wonder it was so cheap=3B ASUS is going with their 10" >>model.... Eventually I will put on FBSD=3B for the time being=2C if >>anyone else onlist has this model=2C please write off list. >>Trying to find the best way to put on ktts. >>gary Yeah mine was also pretty cheap=2C but thats why I bought it! I wiped the X= andros distro off of it immediately and put Ubuntu netbook remix on it at f= irst. Then moved on to Freebsd. I've had FreeBSD on this machine for almos= t a year now. Everything works well. The only problem I ran into was disk s= pace as it only has a 4gb ssd. I got around this by using a 8 gb sd card f= or my /usr partition. From what I've read online there is also an additiona= l usb slot on the actual mother board=2C so you can use a micro usb key for= storage there as well. Although=2C I haven't checked so I'm not 100% posi= tive on that. I'm currently running 8.1-RELEASE with fluxbox=2C linux-opera= (flash)=2C and about 400 other packages. Wireless works great=2C I don't in= stall from ports unless I absolutely have to because it just takes so damn = long to compile anything on here. Anyways you're wanting to install ktts on= your machine(/usr/ports/accessibility/ktts)? I dont forsee you having any = problems using ktts on it.=20 Regards=2C ~Sully = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 02:43:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F321065694 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9498FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1211445eyh.37 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:43:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.9.15 with SMTP id j15mr25846ebj.51.1291862630963; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:43:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:43:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> References: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:43:30 -0500 Message-ID: To: Michael Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:43:52 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Michael wrote: > > Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP from > this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. > > Any ideas please? > A question first, is this a VirtualBox VM? If so, you'll need to either install the bridging adapter from vBox or use a NAT configuration, in which case you will get a 10.0.0.x IP address. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 02:51:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F771065673 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BDE8FC13 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1741336fxm.36 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:51:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mTfigqWyfDeWxEUEJSO6BH6sA+Cs+uS5pr5ZYA/7gHc=; b=MIG02SY8Ytj7IFr7+UOZ0lwFTx/737F7JkAwZerRcir4pZRYWXmgDLl3PSoyUo3UjE c29ogCJIjaRl+l3Jz6jcaE+fZoHMAtj5R3b7ggypBhl7AqKn8HsxytuzMfVjnrc9LkoZ gOIBw6Yoos8IyzL5veW5YD9NQYfEffVUhV/9U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=keWihfGIpOga5P+SSAlJRoAC+H6igHN8jAbtxyXAmM3lRCIUpz48+dfneQRCf0v7eU T7vUigGWZxpwPyjBZz5ckWxs5SaNgikLhGdl7mMmPj2dDzo4vvrSba1OKKVBditOBZ9U MIEYeN8EZkS2ybbBhoRx396ZjwD/4HbVVL9KQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.97.13 with SMTP id j13mr591117fan.146.1291863062778; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:51:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.107.79 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:51:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> References: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:51:02 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Michael Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:51:04 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Michael wrote: > > Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP from > this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. > > Any ideas please? > Your answer lies within: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 04:34:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A230F106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B548FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from steiner.cc.vt.edu (steiner.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.51]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB94YQou027542; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:34:26 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by steiner.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id MOB82538; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:34:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB94YNDT004215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:34:23 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:34:22 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> To: Timm Wimmers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020209.4D005C52.00BC,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:34:57 -0000 On Dec 3, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Timm Wimmers wrote: > Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang: >> Hi Martes, >>=20 >> I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported = by FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option = "Intel PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! >> Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for = Chris! >=20 > In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get = a > private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM, > because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as = your > HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you = define > routes, but bridging is mostly easier. >=20 > In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and > will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP). >=20 > --=20 > Timm >=20 > [1] HSOT =3D your Ubuntu Workstation >=20 Hi, Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode? I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to = bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of = my system.=20 Then in my virtual machine, I add one line: ifconfig_em0=3D"DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf file. I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I = could not get network access.=20 If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do = need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my = experiment. Hope to hear from you. Thanks in advance. Best, W.W.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 04:47:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E91106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C50D8FC27 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1805601fxm.36 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:47:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VAy/Yd2VLpTme6C6iMf908n9S7CmcIBGOoyW8ugnSwo=; b=qaBycqMu9Nt6GlUd2XBkeROWgKizBOJHPWzb8tZqpEYSJPgVB/e8Ix4KIUKj24rLeI RdoPAGaVHqobcy/rCacg6lMgTGwZfjehmxSgfpoMiIpONT3+13NDbQKn1A+h7cEKRsZY YMGUJDipEtk9SO1MQMtCIp2Ok+rQOk6XLvlkI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CxhEaFeqXV21s6wtcJ2CVQWsPCfTWvXSSDDsSZ6YQZv+ORRG10E912yI/TnjBdojBN h/kpfb8pYUPSbzox+MnnPJbACnEZjbU9WGcCmdu4BniHaq7A09bKuC2ypPLngHFzAer5 GjhdI7F6GNl93W3NPFQ/rE2EbGbH1es9X8Yj0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.106.210 with SMTP id y18mr2608983fao.108.1291870068482; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.107.79 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:47:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:47:48 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:47:50 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode? > Seems like you already know how since you do it below. > I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to > bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my > system. > Then in my virtual machine, I add one line: > ifconfig_em0="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf file. > I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I > could not get network access. > ifconfig_em0="DHCP" would only work for the intel adapters, not amd ones. > If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do > need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my > experiment. > You do have a DHCP server correct? What happens when you do "dhclient em0"? Does bridged networking work with a different guest OS as maybe it's some problem with your host. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 04:49:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD2A106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451048FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1241432eyh.37 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:49:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.8 with SMTP id f8mr1762571ebd.25.1291870167251; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:49:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:49:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:49:06 -0500 Message-ID: To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:49:34 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode? > > I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to > bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my > system. > Then in my virtual machine, I add one line: > ifconfig_em0="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf file. > I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I > could not get network access. > > If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do > need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my > experiment. > > Hope to hear from you. Thanks in advance. > > Weihang, Basically what you want to do is select bridging in your vBox settings for your VM. Then select your real system's ethernet adapter, expand the little drop down below that and it will allow you to choose which vNIC you want. I choose the Intel 82545EM device which gives me an em0 vNIC. in my FreeBSD VM I have the following three lines pertaining to setting up my network sshd_enable="YES" ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" hostname="freebsd-bsd.xaerolimit.net" and of course, that hostname does resolve on my lan, but that's not what this e-mail is about. Hope this helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 05:07:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CA1106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45CB8FC13 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AB21EA88; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:07:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oB957Qds001887; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:07:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:07:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Da Rock Message-Id: <20101209060725.e606cb47.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CFF8C9B.4060804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> <20101208022629.7d106bab.freebsd@edvax.de> <4CFF8C9B.4060804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:07:29 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:48:11 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/08/10 11:26, Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > > > >> My comments/ wish list > >> - One text mode (non bitmap graphical) browser: /usr/ports/www/lynx > >> > > The lynx browser, due to its "special" key handling, does not > > appeal to novice users. NO text mode browser gives a "first > > sight effect" that will "convince" a user he's installing a > > modern OS. Sounds stupid, I know. > > > > As I said, the way the user interacts with the browser does > > determine how fast he gets through the installation. Learning > > the browser (instead of just pressing the keys shown on the > > screen) could make things look worse. > > > > On the other hand, with the ability of X to run without > > configuration on recent hardware, what's wrong with running > > X with a graphical web browser - if the user DECIDED that > > way? Of course, this decision is the FIRST step in the install > > process: > > > > Install method > > -------------- > > T -> traditional text mode installer (sysinstall) > > (this one does not have all the options) > > W -> web-based installer in text mode > > (typical for professional users) > > G -> web-based installer in graphics mode > > (typical for novice users) > > R -> remote installation > > (just starts the server) > > S -> shell > > (dialog shell access to live system) > > > > Enter choice: _ > > > > Just a simple idea. > > > > > > > > > I like that approach- works for me anyway... Let me add that it would be good to default do an action after a certain time (e. g. 60 seconds). This default should be the preparation for remote installation as this is the obvious choice when no interaction is done - because it maybe is not possible (like for headless servers). So you put in the installation media (CD or USB stick), wait a minute, and then remotely access the installer. > Accessibility should be foremost at this level and above. I would also like to see it that way; sadly, "market share" oriented development doesn't share this thought. You can make money on all the healthy users, there's plenty of them. Users with disabilites are uninteresting, from a "marketing" point of view. Users in niche markets are uninteresting, too. > The legalities > themselves are becoming hairy these days, and considering the point that > we are trying to push accessibility in terms of applications (such as > issues with flash, to name one) using physical accessibility as a > parallel argument we should be setting an example as well. Accessibility on the web is just one point. Operating systems, the backbones of all the dancing bunnies, should be a good example of how to make information accessible to the widest amount of people. This includes the idea of NOT cutting out those who do not have the ability to access a graphical installer: Not because they don't want to use it, but because they don't have the means to access it. > That said, there is no reason why can't make it look as pretty as we can > without compromising this principle :) GUI installer, remote access and not rising barriers does not contradict. If done properly, it can benefit both the professional users AND those who judge at first sight. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 05:09:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A7D106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yxy.716@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FFB8FC18 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1502286ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:09:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=LDo8m9yucRhHsnpKRH60VLUl3Elg5Y+hriJEsrlvyEM=; b=UKFP+gO2Gtqgk1XUHx0ITUe6qXGmt0bxpOgTpELPW1j3kj4anCNVim8SwDq0rkvUqj WXWi4kk71R1rFrxh+Dja7DwimJyP3fbgdHbPg//v9b12X2ZqBFUniJhCN9bqLIMSkS4r MESyaNElzkEYqOotbPs+QiTNA1jXVW3ub0Acw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Y5II6rdqUju8nF6WjHwmVmpnAaqr/H5RMkgVyIeGwUWf8NBa5SZjiVaVTC17aW2hp3 8UTGSkIgqzh2DNWLxVmnbPk2/jUzl7j8lStvz+RYYV/XKQtvj9BZ08RwCpHpyaj7uc8Y qgFr88gfS70CrdhS39qTN1Cc3dis++EIpUFmU= Received: by 10.213.28.138 with SMTP id m10mr3680048ebc.57.1291871356849; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:09:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.137 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:08:56 -0800 (PST) From: xinyou yan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:08:56 +0800 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: mbr loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:09:18 -0000 1. when i install freebsd . I can write mbr and not write if i write mbr . freebsd can Identification windows and load it 2 if i do not write . How windows load bsd 3. Can freebsd load linux (fedora)? and how ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 05:20:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9527A106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.homelinux.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com (mail-qy0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551218FC15 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so1555334qyk.15 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:20:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.104.211 with SMTP id q19mr7768215qco.135.1291870327475; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.68.217 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:52:07 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [216.110.94.228] Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:52:07 -0600 Message-ID: From: Andre Goree To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Disk encryption on a headless box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:20:23 -0000 I was looking at encrypting my data on a headless server I have, and found a good tutorial using ZFS+geli. Easy enough to setup, but one thing I just realized is that I wouldn't be able to enter the passphrase on the server since I keep it headless. I wonder if there is some type of encryption I can use that does not require entering a passphrase. For example, perhaps I can set it up in a way that it'll automatically read from certain files on a thumb drive? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 05:41:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C48106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C158FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1511282ewy.10 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:41:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.105.70 with SMTP id s6mr4895388ebo.51.1291873276597; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:41:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <44fwu9vbzy.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <44fwu9vbzy.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:41:16 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Brennan To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: devel/gobject-introspection throws up because of python X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:41:18 -0000 Sadly this didn't work for me. I for the same error. -- Sent from my Droid On Dec 7, 2010 10:28 AM, "Lowell Gilbert" < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Chris Brennan writes: > >> While trying to compile audio/tagtool on a FreeBSD7.3 (x86) machine >> devel/gobject-introspection decides to throw up and I got this: (the install >> was via portmaster -d) > > Looks like your python installation is broken. > > Try rebuilding that first. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 05:45:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765661065673 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA5E8FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1933236wwf.31 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:45:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m8Z25zUTCn/43XvPKtsZGofDrZU91BIxshA2MK7Xc7A=; b=xMFHHvsxHPfeKGhQ2zDENjwEsomjqg5/2rwpIh6M7v5AzzwAX56rvJptc3uSz7iXuL MBcr+bgLq7nY+aq9SAlj74SSdqmyVZ+fJcOpDKXj3PHi1cwuGixN5EW3wBmQcWGZYLNX YxhreqbB3MfrNXb8Wa3sKTyplnR2+NXGHVshA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XeaMzxpQc2eKqcdyw96+6uss1yfECCZVo3GN21yayzSrDmKIkgwKe5rijQ84+xO2CD TTZaA+Y3gKVnHYaGP2taSy/F7uZRvpZOrl+sEgV+3taIKcIaqmBtpRkWFfEw9rfNB57+ BbjoK5YxDhOJVJmDvOxCLx9ZBiPPDXGAN+wK4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.128.131 with SMTP id k3mr9916174wbs.66.1291872171709; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.138.12 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:22:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:22:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Modulok To: Dave Cundiff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terrible Clock Skew X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:45:39 -0000 On 12/8/10, Dave Cundiff wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I posted this to the forum as well but figured I'd try here since the > same people might not subscribe to both. > > I've been experiencing some terrible clock skew and just can't figure > it out. By terrible I mean I'm losing 30 minutes a day. The loss only > occurs when I bring the system under heavy load. The load is multiple > Rsync backups to a ZFS pool(with gzip compression) backed by a 16 disk > Raid50. I'm using a hardware Raid controller for battery backed write > caching. > > Mobo: Supermicro X8DTL > CPU: Dual Intel 5620 quad cores > Raid: Areca 1620 > > I have ntp enabled but the skew happens to fast and it stops trying. > I've tried a bunch of stuff from the various lists. I tried all my > clock sources. TSC(-100) HPET(900) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0). I tried > changing the kern.hz flag lower. I also tried disabling the enhanced > speed step feature of this chip as per the FAQ on the site. Nothing > works. > > Currently I'm defaults except the following settings. > > EIST Disabled in BIOS > kern.hz="100" > kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 > > Is there anything else I could do to debug this? I can't really blame > the hardware because I have these same boards/chips running in Linux > with no clock issues. In the man page for ntpd, you might look into "The huff-n'-puff Filter". Not saying it will help, but it seems like you've tried everything else. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 06:11:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCF4106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC1C8FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1852473fxm.36 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:11:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=X8WDzMK2SPApujzmFVJfx2iJ3O417h3Wbf+mSVH3P6g=; b=hMvYU4YeCOQXUXJI365YIbsNRAa2o8DWhMvo1iynDrIK4VMItt7mgPYAX0hP7L+mkk mTptpcECHGDh9ENKfDHdxCWKJGy1x5N0HJIz2QZZKeleeHgSidZ3jua1CIo+qTAod/8+ OMnajMEaxHFf7awhtrXpUcxmRt/3aAijF3uFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=pVAXz4y2I9YNAgADGp9ItCxVqT1SDBDRwvTtEqLhII24b4IHzXwaeM1kZMWbGVUI5Z aRK9Tvli2S0bpVNB2XAUxzQhcOoICv/dKQf/e8ITNHpu5RzYSaVLb1aXoKGqDVaIFZmL k2DDXJQah1HGshTSD3IbBi2mC8UPtEmDZGL7c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.97.13 with SMTP id j13mr736607fan.146.1291875117427; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.107.79 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:11:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:11:57 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Andre Goree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk encryption on a headless box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:11:58 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Andre Goree wrote: > I was looking at encrypting my data on a headless server I have, and found > a > good tutorial using ZFS+geli. Easy enough to setup, but one thing I just > realized is that I wouldn't be able to enter the passphrase on the server > since I keep it headless. > > I wonder if there is some type of encryption I can use that does not > require > entering a passphrase. For example, perhaps I can set it up in a way that > it'll automatically read from certain files on a thumb drive? > GELI has both man pages and handbook entries. Those should typically be your first line of questioning. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 06:54:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76A5106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.mckeown@ru.ac.za) Received: from d.mail.ru.ac.za (d.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF848FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:54:48 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ru-msa; d=ru.ac.za; h=Received:From:Organization:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:X-Face:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Virus-Scanned:X-Authenticated-User; b=hTQbgWD7conEtJr7N/OUJorgNxt5Js9EwNaheJ1zrjXXNczLVJCtox2lza6BSRWlZdNTNZ/uKZjSCbcHQOpuw7/ARidd5EOfdMYqVVJvU07FIZLDbIZ0oqlcdqTJTw24; Received: from vorkosigan.ru.ac.za ([2001:4200:1010:1058:219:d1ff:fe9f:a932]:61959) by d.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PQaOs-0004hF-BF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:54:46 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Rhodes University To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:54:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <2BE7EA7A-8604-4D21-801C-309447CD54F9@mac.com> <4D000FBA.8040908@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <4D000FBA.8040908@daleco.biz> X-Face: $@VrUx^RHy/}yu]jKf/<4T%/d|F+$j-Ol2"2J$q+%OK1]&/G_S9(=?utf-8?q?HkaQ*=60!=3FYOK=3FY!=27M=60C=0A=09aP=5C9nVPF8Q=7DCilHH8l=3B=7E!4?= =?utf-8?q?2HK6=273lg4J=7Daz?=@1Dqqh:J]M^"YPn*2IWrZON$1+G?oX3@ =?utf-8?q?k=230=0A=0954XDRg=3DYn=5FF-etwot4U=24b?=dTS{i X-Virus-Scanned: d.mail.ru.ac.za (2001:4200:1010::25:4) X-Authenticated-User: s0900137 from vorkosigan.ru.ac.za (2001:4200:1010:1058:219:d1ff:fe9f:a932) using auth_plaintext Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:54:49 -0000 On Thursday 09 December 2010 01:07:38 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > You don't magically get immunity from SQL injection by using > > JDBC or EOF or whatever, but using bound variables in queries rather > > than feeding user input into raw SQL, or invoking stored procedures > > or user-defined functions instead will mitigate one of the more > > > > common security problems. > > And these practices are "Good Practice" in any language, including > PHP. I think a big part of PHP's problem was [... documentation] I don't think it was just documentation. Perl, for example, comes with a standard way to access databases, DBI, which has good practices like binding variables in queries, escaping of input and output and so on, baked in. PHP comes with builtin functions for accessing MySQL databases, which do nothing at all to help the programmer make sensible decisions and follow best practice. There are database abstraction modules for PHP as far as I know, but if someone decides not to use them, is it still as hard as it was to do things safely using the builtin mysql_* functions? Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 07:10:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D089F106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1958FC13 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=bb.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1PQaKM-00097f-ND; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:50:06 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov To: Kurt Buff References: Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:50:05 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Kurt Buff's message of "Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800") Message-ID: <84950898@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:10:45 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: > All, > I have a Lenovo T61 with a 100g HD that I dual boot with FreeBSD > 8.0-STABLE amd64 and Windows XP. > FBSD is on ad0s2a, with ad0s2b as swap, and XP on ad0s1a. > Yesterday I booted up FBSD, started xfce4, started a terminal session, > su'ed to root and did the following - running a generic kernel: > # cd /usr/src > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel > Then I exited xfce4, did sudo shutdown -r now, and got a mountroot > prompt that I now can't get past. > I can get to the loader prompt, and lsdev shows the following: > cd devices: > disk devices: > disk0: BIOS drive C: > disk0s1: NTFS/HPFS > disk0s2a: FFS > disk02sb: swap > when I use '?' at the mountroot prompt I get: > List of GEOM managed disk devices: > acd0 > Loader variables: > vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw > I've tried entering the following at the mountroot prompt, with no success: > ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > ufs:/ad0s2a > ufs:ad0s2a > ffs:/dev/ad0s2a > and several other variations that I've found while googling, but no > success anywhere. > Does anyone have thoughts on how to remedy this? Just for the last question: Try to load an old kernel. (Type "boot /boot/kernel.old" at loader prompt.) -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 07:29:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEFF1065670 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438378FC19 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25415C21 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:33:51 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D008460.7010300@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:25:20 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mbr loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:29:04 -0000 On 12/09/10 15:08, xinyou yan wrote: > 1. when i install freebsd . I can write mbr and not write > if i write mbr . freebsd can Identification windows and load it > > 2 if i do not write . How windows load bsd > > 3. Can freebsd load linux (fedora)? and how ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I can't remember winblow$ method, but I know fedora can load BSD. I have a temporary setup to test my new bright shiny AND STABLE FreeBSD media server (many thanks to all those involved in getting dvb cards working on BSD), but I have left the default F10 setup so I can iron out bugs and still have a tv if it breaks. So I setup grub.conf- the man pages are rather useful, but the long and the short of it is that its simple to work out: Name the system you want to boot, and provide a root for it. Don't chainload. So the core of it (from memory mind, so check the man and anyone else correct the errors) was as follows: title FreeBSD 8.1 root(hd 1,a) Root will vary according to your needs. Mine was on a second disk, slice 1a. I assume from what you have said regarding BSD loading winblow$ that the reverse (BSD load linux) would be true too in the same fashion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 08:11:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2071065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlmichael70@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15B68FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2090129wyf.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:11:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LX07k6NE+Li41aQIUDd/6o2rAZUrAL7/MIeyyPAZS94=; b=BO05HPpweJEgUSpK/J60m4Qcb5bs6aRNPAxobEHP6E4bulu9+DlyKIcvUkIZFfs9kg 5fIVcVkCyl706g5eKHwRry4mmlOSsdI/5bEu4DPY5DsLkqgH8vMKt3pxNbNcpZaVtn9V u5aGErMh2otIMPQjrzVQsiD5hdARCHEDmA5hk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=erNSgSNXQIdNwLbu5xI/8i3qprKgcEVMCqjK1vFEwSYAiYqCLYZbF4qGJhUTuvK9dy 7wJTANM7EnrTKSqMxGlbHe1qwGjpJHYA3xsgYRfekkJ+z6ph6UlQv+YQ7uAtuem93Kel RpCZIIlbDfIjaJv3tQbXNXt9fAEjS1Ua0I0Vs= Received: by 10.227.132.83 with SMTP id a19mr10196884wbt.30.1291882295578; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:11:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from prime.nonspace ([217.98.80.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm1030953wbc.21.2010.12.09.00.11.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:11:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D009D47.4050600@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:11:35 +0000 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101203 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:11:37 -0000 On 09/12/2010 02:51, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Michael wrote: > >> >> Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP from >> this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. >> >> Any ideas please? >> > > Your answer lies within: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi Ok it looks like PR number 145269. Unfortunately there is no fix yet. Thank you for your help, at least I know it's not just me. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 09:51:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D1C106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955C8FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2170202wyf.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:51:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wQF/CosP9bJCS7Kf28VK1H8yaffaAdiTM/fWZScZ0Bc=; b=KRjedwdjOtaawjrfdPxO13g248TRPr8mBZJ1p/lZU4O5KWqYLiKxb8rAiBzy1tA6rj N2KjFyRBV+sb87UjrfeYdTbMl5EL4eQSFc5Ix71Wrc1xmEJsOKa7I+EM3ObEUADoBYLa sbl9ipt5Loy5rmeYUKLpmQp62xHjHaYxbHkgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Heo7iw0sVbTqfwcJxksQV2IsHuJqdJUzFvASFMzEqu9TjPFjDeCCKUbnO6PjT49TIu wGWrXx8qnkzuIVc+925j/sEG9VVoiucTKlPJSlumf3GTRzOQDU798Mj3bfsbkrB7lqS7 7+ZuysgVftCPQ6HKcJWAPkgvBgqMwMvJzVl38= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.186.208 with SMTP id w58mr333873wem.59.1291888273713; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:51:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:51:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D009D47.4050600@gmail.com> References: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> <4D009D47.4050600@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:51:13 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Michael Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:51:17 -0000 On 9 December 2010 09:11, Michael wrote: > On 09/12/2010 02:51, Adam Vande More wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Michael wrote: >> >> >>> Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP >>> from >>> this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. >>> >>> Any ideas please? >>> >>> >> Your answer lies within: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi >> > > Ok it looks like PR number 145269. Unfortunately there is no fix yet. > Thank you for your help, at least I know it's not just me. > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > you could try isc-dhcp31-client or another client as a stop gap until the pr is resolved From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 09:58:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C44106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0B08FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2176035wyf.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:58:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sCucnAwq7EVEWijmzBhxLOKEjHJTGjR+I7duf/iSjwA=; b=eXdh/pdCjJ20Cq+JaIZxLI/cx9+C1DvMEoOnas/Q3HRW+RKnKnJ10/UkNy/E3y4YSW JNhfv01grvIUQXd1IQXlVV/5JFFS+/7mLW3VLKZy4EuzGg8DjhK3yT4H0uwwXTezK7/v jUO1P4eFS3EQ/0EICYbXtNW1yDZMsnBOPcScQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=h3LUhrveWo3u68UP1zq+g2m/nkeJn03RiJ7ED8auCQeHCWzO6UHeVwOGsdiSNmh/CV tkA+pCCGphgIHOG82XHzkiOKPo8ObWxb6NcJA48cIQIX5C3JeSiFThqYeregYoNIDB6g V1B86YW6/HEvaQ470sT0azTmJOzIRxO1Rvupo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.172.65 with SMTP id s43mr1643529wel.14.1291888694533; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:58:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:58:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:58:14 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Andre Goree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk encryption on a headless box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:58:16 -0000 On 9 December 2010 04:52, Andre Goree wrote: > I was looking at encrypting my data on a headless server I have, and found > a > good tutorial using ZFS+geli. Easy enough to setup, but one thing I just > realized is that I wouldn't be able to enter the passphrase on the server > since I keep it headless. > > I wonder if there is some type of encryption I can use that does not > require > entering a passphrase. For example, perhaps I can set it up in a way that > it'll automatically read from certain files on a thumb drive? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Probably worth noting that the latest version of zfs has encryption built in. This isnt available to bsd yet, but i guess theres a good chance it will be in the next few months as a patch. Might take a (big) bit longer to hit stable though From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 10:16:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084DA1065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DC28FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2191453wyf.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:16:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OTk4p9SixiBAHyRm0ObOnD9idompnxn7qbwWBF59q8A=; b=BNuRHqFWbJHY7W1oQY/z4fBw+02Mo/DwwcXx2L5IWpFXBDgki4tJ7u0W/7jbguNOt7 dvMH+8Vn5tSApiOHuvZ6GK9eBneQjVZTkQK5LRXNyG6DZKpY33M8hp1bgs+smDKjhKMV JhrZVE+1NzXAblg30JyMTxL2jh66VuW/aTsgQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JQxHfLw0YAsY6aI4TraPL6iEeHDiuw2O2+kw85w2YYjAR4zRFIroCUNAO77pbXyXiL 2YhulQ90J4Kdq6TchIq/4WVTSu0z464TV6EtzQMjzZp/PAkfs0xX8Pwr5NsOw5Z6y/hp VdChVF1zlXTB3GOYDPSvWSGa3yRQnNNmeMrlg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.23.18 with SMTP id u18mr326741weu.92.1291889775096; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.139 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:16:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D009D47.4050600@gmail.com> References: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> <4D009D47.4050600@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:16:15 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Michael Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:16:18 -0000 On 12/9/10, Michael wrote: > On 09/12/2010 02:51, Adam Vande More wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Michael wrote: >> >>> >>> Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP >>> from >>> this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. >>> >>> Any ideas please? >>> >> >> Your answer lies within: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi > > Ok it looks like PR number 145269. Unfortunately there is no fix yet. > Thank you for your help, at least I know it's not just me. That PR is invalid/useless. If you want feedback give more. You have wpa_supplicant.conf? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 11:17:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF50106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlmichael70@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEF38FC1C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2178202wwf.31 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:17:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/JIoeVx23UIyhTOldET5WUWFyNuZY4avRyXXOCy9Ulo=; b=ocNN1E1ABYFU90ffXO4tyBLvk3Qn9Rgcy2zmj2Y3uDe6pGQsHz/J+YTbqK6AzAaj4+ cZOjlQCJd2oefxsKFJT+0rAzjOvJdUhe12W9FGQO5rXt/Y3SwCXFqjL5q+hEaa1ciPv8 oQngYU5r1pY18QTCzrMORKfbbgcOziLP6s2lM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Mxh/FBaXj+5VGRNI7/551F92eEyO2atuK7+NybVET4oWZfzjE/YYPklADQcK+wqlcV 1Xzwr4gUrWkcD0VcPWnw1QGgnNnvOEgVzjNki2j7IdyuqyKKHhhHlHQ74+/SbkrjoTv9 2WKgGhwti9naGfn1w0KMKyQTfRhK4LJQROZHY= Received: by 10.227.9.148 with SMTP id l20mr10389760wbl.184.1291893422306; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:17:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from prime.nonspace ([217.98.80.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm1148588wbc.3.2010.12.09.03.17.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:17:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D00C8BE.9060009@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:17:02 +0000 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101203 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul B Mahol References: <4D000E4A.2000800@gmail.com> <4D009D47.4050600@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:17:03 -0000 On 09/12/2010 10:16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 12/9/10, Michael wrote: >> >> Ok it looks like PR number 145269. Unfortunately there is no fix yet. >> Thank you for your help, at least I know it's not just me. > > That PR is invalid/useless. If you want feedback give more. > > You have wpa_supplicant.conf? > Yes, this is my wpa_supplicant.conf file: network={ ssid="wifi" scan_ssid=1 bssid=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX priority=9 mode=0 proto=RSN key_mgmt=WPA-PSK auth_alg=OPEN pairwise=CCMP group=CCMP psk="xxxxx" } Just to remind you - ifconfig says that wlan0 is associated with my access point. I'm happy to provide all details needed, just tell me what you need. I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE with all SA+errata patches. Standard dhclient.conf file. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 11:49:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A55106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from fep21.mx.upcmail.net (fep21.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3608FC16 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101209113106.OJGA1458.viefep14-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:31:06 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([86.101.31.185]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id gzX41f02z3zeu1y01zX6aG; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:31:06 +0100 X-SourceIP: 86.101.31.185 Message-ID: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:31:04 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; hu; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=CqMFsqQC4gx7bBgpmnW/wKYuJF/a5pXPeCAfngFtYkU= c=1 sm=0 a=qTPsygnZAIUA:10 a=-CRmgG0JhlAA:10 a=QA7ub1_jAAAA:8 a=7TMH8Dj0QemrVxjM_BYA:9 a=v2-8mLgJQtsv9ewpBXYA:7 a=PIejiXqryNpVDIyiJ-M-pe9LkV8A:4 a=jiObf9B0YAUA:10 a=yDQxzi2QZewA:10 a=BbszvioSQQ1K7JQ0:21 a=sFMlsQsyRNqV2X_c:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: danieleff@gmail.com Subject: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:49:39 -0000 System is FreeBSD shopzeus.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sun Oct 31 02:55:28 EDT 2010 amd64 It has two quad-core Xeon CPUs, 24GB memory, and a RAID 1+0 array with 10 disks + Areca 1680 controller with 2GB write back cache. Server is running: mailscanner + apache multihost + PHP + postgresql. Main load on the server is usually postgresql. Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the web server is now refusing clients with "Cannot connect to database" messages (coming from PHP). This is a typical output from top: last pid: 12789; load averages: 7.77, 10.77, 13.46 up 26+03:00:30 06:22:04 6637 processes: 7 running, 623 sleeping, 7 zombie CPU: 32.9% user, 0.0% nice, 7.6% system, 0.6% interrupt, 58.9% idle Mem: 3885M Active, 15G Inact, 3236M Wired, 627M Cache, 2465M Buf, 656M Free Swap: 12G Total, 12M Used, 12G Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 66834 pgsql 1 118 0 443M 417M CPU2 2 16:17 99.46% postgres 11473 pgsql 1 72 0 441M 242M sbwait 5 0:02 4.59% postgres 11026 pgsql 1 47 0 439M 249M sbwait 7 0:01 3.17% postgres 6642 www 1 48 0 236M 42928K select 0 0:01 2.29% httpd 10147 www 1 48 0 236M 44048K select 6 0:01 2.10% httpd 3961 shopzeus 29 44 0 208M 96364K uwait 4 18.4H 1.37% python Here is what I don't understand. "last pid" is increasing relatively slowly, e.g. there are no hidden processes. Only the first one or two processes are showing CPU load > 10%. The "CPU User%" value is about 50%. We have lots of free memory. I/O load is almost nothing (see iostat below). However, server load is between 7 and 13! In fact sometimes it is above 16. And everybody complains that the server is too slow. How can I find out what is causing the problem? Example gstat output: dT: 1.006s w: 1.000s L(q) ops/s r/s kBps ms/r w/s kBps ms/w %busy Name 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1d 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0s1 1 304 3 34 14.0 301 7522 0.2 5.1| da1 0 2 2 32 11.9 0 0 0.0 2.4| da2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da3 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da4 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0s1a 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0s1b 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0s1d 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0s1e 1 304 3 34 14.0 301 7522 0.3 5.3| da1s1 0 2 2 32 11.9 0 0 0.0 2.4| da2s1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da3s1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da4s1 1 304 3 34 14.0 301 7522 0.4 5.4| da1s1d 0 2 2 32 11.9 0 0 0.0 2.4| da2s1d 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da3s1d Example iostat output: tty ad4 da0 da1 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 349 30.81 16 0.49 16.51 11 0.18 22.56 124 2.72 29 0 9 1 61 0 9282 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 16.00 7 0.11 41 0 11 1 47 0 12520 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 18.00 8 0.14 45 0 14 0 41 0 12205 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 38 0 15 0 47 Example systat output: /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 Load Average >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /0% /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100 pgsql postgres XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX www httpd XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX root idle XXXXXXXX www httpd XXXXXX pgsql postgres XXX pgsql postgres X www httpd X root intr X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X shopzeus python X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X zeusd1 python X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X www httpd X Looks like the server is almost idle. So how can I have load = 12 and similar values? Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 11:55:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3677106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B10E8FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2490469qwj.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:55:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jb8VcjmpJNbWPMpaoNycquvOuNEGoBiI+EUjBCl+B8c=; b=bu8WM13BX+uJp4sQvIpnbPV43L4yxWPaytHgmrkoM/RIxCkH+RLIeVgsquVWngY9ge A5hMqaCtbeHwYDTY49XdQGTxGbWx2FH+K1p+/6u/vNCsen1MV3uE1Va5mqL+ZC1m6cNk Ne3Y4FcaF/IphtFZ6GraCTf2BvhQ2922vOAtY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wMYaY90SVqEKQ19WePiqahozrulyTSgXvnnhzeZIbW5X3mf0i0UeSYqUYtAY9vRWcc q5DlD8UA1syIh/XybfAMC3sXcySjE0HF4flaKl28dURJR3FHGzmboiLD1SvYdsjaFzKf 0YSJJEQ5+/T1CwLtI/EankoZgbxIqxdpvATeM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.147 with SMTP id n19mr7885015qcm.145.1291895707119; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:55:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:55:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: joseph.bashe@gmail.com, questions , Chris Brennan Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:55:08 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:24 PM, krad wrote: > > > On 8 December 2010 20:07, Joseph Bashe wrote: > >> But he mentioned he needs some sort of 'virtual' (I'm assuming chroot) >> feature; this is not possible with sftp afaik. >> . >> > > > Its totally possble to chroot the sftp, and I have done it several times. > Something like the below will isolate each user > > Match Group sftponly > ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/%u > > X11Forwarding no > AllowTcpForwarding no > ForceCommand internal-sftp > > > he might need something more like this so they can share data > > Match Group sftponly > > ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/ > X11Forwarding no > AllowTcpForwarding no > ForceCommand internal-sftp > > > I would love to try that sometime - but right now I have to get this regular ftp working. Just to recap - I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so my band can share new tracks, production material and what not, but my SSL certificate keeps messing it up: http://pastie.org/1358536 - anybody know why? It works just fine when I disable the SSL. Many thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 12:08:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01B61065697 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:08:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DE58FC26 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2503809qwj.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:08:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=l30x09MxD9ZSb4X1JwzgmGP4FpnlQKa7rR4cyUy1EW4=; b=dQJcKBvg2Pi1FeRjViFmCjM7RXcZM+xvYISrH7VLysaDW7tQtXf73aDmnPXw4KYc4j SQrST1vaKIPaZyArP41gb5KkuiTWj5tllyGUWU6YDYs7hrWYZNV6H/aZMQ0DS+7AgpuD hbFgwSF3AS0dDelxruYD5grcmljSOpAeMBGos= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=WXT9a3LGz0njBkuBu9tu4Q+9IanbexiT0Xbu0zuTrMxOH2dV/y7EuMituxOL04tJC4 Bo7MtesUz5qba3fgz2pzajgBR9DdhDaRNDg/eMXIz4iaGdIxLf++hTWx+uTE6Xu8x2Q5 eGEEgWqBtUPq2+2lU0RwNf2vEbJHAiUyZFVH8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.147 with SMTP id n19mr7896696qcm.145.1291896487711; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:08:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:08:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:08:07 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: joseph.bashe@gmail.com, questions , Chris Brennan Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:08:08 -0000 I'll create a new post. This subject is misleading. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:24 PM, krad wrote: > >> >> >> On 8 December 2010 20:07, Joseph Bashe wrote: >> >>> But he mentioned he needs some sort of 'virtual' (I'm assuming chroot) >>> feature; this is not possible with sftp afaik. >>> . >>> >> >> >> Its totally possble to chroot the sftp, and I have done it several times. >> Something like the below will isolate each user >> >> Match Group sftponly >> ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/%u >> >> X11Forwarding no >> AllowTcpForwarding no >> ForceCommand internal-sftp >> >> >> he might need something more like this so they can share data >> >> Match Group sftponly >> >> ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/ >> >> X11Forwarding no >> AllowTcpForwarding no >> ForceCommand internal-sftp >> >> >> > I would love to try that sometime - but right now I have to get this > regular ftp working. > > Just to recap - I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so > my band can share new tracks, production material and what not, but my SSL > certificate keeps messing it up: http://pastie.org/1358536 - anybody know > why? It works just fine when I disable the SSL. > > Many thanks! > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 12:10:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A02E106567A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC328FC1E for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so1938016qyk.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:10:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sU14veJZbG4WJ52izYMQoe1DwLbl6kNt0BIHuM7Li+M=; b=UdIHIMLqTQoc95hEz9JVUVIcZrh0zeRtWGIw9MdWFoz+KN6ysAGRhPkOOh65+XRWhe iAorrvSbRGendV2wccYQegAoOaFgD7zyuFAbZZX3qs1wuCsl+5CUkYcKt1kseSJznUiF O1a+NRjuiKelWsgjwg2BxuHKJvmgzA1yvl2yE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j0ydlFxLJbc7JwDdJivXGWczoHgKgbD/T6PjFebM1ugZd0CjyO2AXVWOljrHQL0j09 mVbaw55d6w4lKrjg1RzPtAoiDeVz/kqUe8Rum/agDodx0yCtAqdGRF5US1sRfzo3dDTv VL7DdNZxUweg5U37T10OjbPv0QsSzJQwTMAnE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.144 with SMTP id hy16mr7878639qcb.259.1291896606686; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:10:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:10:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: vsftpd + SSL not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:10:08 -0000 I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server (FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE) so my band can share new tracks, production material and what not, but my SSL certificate keeps messing it up: http://pastie.org/1358536 - anybody know why? It works just fine when I disable the SSL. I have no firewalls running. I hope this is not too off-topic. I just don't know where else to ask. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 12:11:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDB71065673 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6602F8FC1C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2295383wyf.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:11:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gM1wOcZnNGUdanmwvB8VewiXTSydxo9nIkrLnhSPviQ=; b=vFLVRvqg8GQheYVNz/iuYciMdAoVfCF6vzeRicwvyghJv0zGuLVdcIbRurnNq+r0AW Oft+YWmvToUwoLBBWpy9IhMv69suJ2LqdN+6bSBToSVKeiEjj1Jd/CgYi7lBUC9WCt/P VAKP/nhaGYQtUq+aQdxGhpFgE24XSiPyxSLeg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=jd0mCutaNE2pwTvVlHHPR9xBymwUpjfcSmmkUn+oAPYyb1NuxigrWHh29e50b/HfZh oQXtSpib9vvaVBo1f7wtTlRnWPjgQEmrqNG+HU/p5mGVffQ+VBkGNFs3zbIF8DQzW00q 8jTkMU09msJCOrd/LrY7CHElAiANBtmE+agUU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.140 with SMTP id q12mr489660wek.14.1291896692255; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:11:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101208155125.E6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20101208163047.S6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <1865384339-1291839108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1153938124-@bda947.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:11:32 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: joseph.bashe@gmail.com, questions , Chris Brennan Subject: Re: FTPD not working properly on jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:11:34 -0000 On 9 December 2010 12:08, Redd Vinylene wrote: > I'll create a new post. This subject is misleading. > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:24 PM, krad wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 8 December 2010 20:07, Joseph Bashe wrote: >>> >>>> But he mentioned he needs some sort of 'virtual' (I'm assuming chroot) >>>> feature; this is not possible with sftp afaik. >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> Its totally possble to chroot the sftp, and I have done it several times. >>> Something like the below will isolate each user >>> >>> Match Group sftponly >>> ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/%u >>> >>> >>> X11Forwarding no >>> AllowTcpForwarding no >>> ForceCommand internal-sftp >>> >>> >>> he might need something more like this so they can share data >>> >>> Match Group sftponly >>> >>> ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/ >>> >>> >>> X11Forwarding no >>> AllowTcpForwarding no >>> ForceCommand internal-sftp >>> >>> >>> >> I would love to try that sometime - but right now I have to get this >> regular ftp working. >> >> Just to recap - I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so >> my band can share new tracks, production material and what not, but my SSL >> certificate keeps messing it up: http://pastie.org/1358536 - anybody know >> why? It works just fine when I disable the SSL. >> >> Many thanks! >> > > > > -- > http://www.home.no/reddvinylene > are you sure its ssl and not tls, as they are not the same thing? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 12:39:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5A81065697 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C668FC16 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2533938qwj.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:39:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=8MRY7j1jAXa0Kr3D71C7aNL+beyAAHMkT8yXLXwk5SU=; b=GLpmbaR5vGwy/W72+7yPkgqrLtFB5X+PktqasLhc212V79lGsi7DiFOseqSalZwzvv 9dbZKVDWogbzFbvKkrSaDOHdTyjCD7WTEwlx1Ds7PF/EaE+m5olsSxoSGgqoROnhIREe /GR3WkQD6vMsEdYRa+01h685ECPW2hMdNtvQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=VoBqj149XmPqWwqNvTkR52B1ExideXXGBQWAifq3KtvavgyXEos2oocQ2YTx2NRNVx Chm1kdhX7uWaeTMB10rrGAZ6MyuZQlQQ9frJPt14W1EcXugF51CMXTO3ihSyq9ZumYFv d3xuKmeNJgJY/ba7kr/qwpMFFMqFMEU6OdxZo= Received: by 10.229.97.13 with SMTP id j13mr7754228qcn.251.1291897029518; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:17:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.88.9 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:16:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:16:38 +0300 Message-ID: To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions Subject: Re: vsftpd + SSL not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:39:37 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server (FreeBSD > 8.2-PRERELEASE) so my band can share new tracks, production material and > what not, but my SSL certificate keeps messing it up: > http://pastie.org/1358536 - anybody know why? It works just fine when I > disable the SSL. I have no firewalls running. > > I hope this is not too off-topic. I just don't know where else to ask. > > Would it not be better if you posted your configuration and debug logs for those willing to help you out to see? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Damn!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 13:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505901065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222118FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C49486; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:39 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: SepeMksdyrpTTEC4CXoysIzNhzLM/9pW5rFaQk0usht5 1291900418 Received: from [10.2.4.30] (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C87F5403998; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:13:38 -0500 (EST) References: <20101207114521.GA68479@muon.cran.org.uk> <201012072309.oB7N9OMG072737@fire.js.berklix.net> <20101208022629.7d106bab.freebsd@edvax.de> <4CFF8C9B.4060804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101209060725.e606cb47.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101209060725.e606cb47.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148a) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <5135F7E7-5B4B-4D55-9652-FB09CD8D485B@tcbug.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148a) From: Josh Paetzel Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:13:33 -0800 To: Polytropon Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Da Rock Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:13:40 -0000 On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:48:11 +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> On 12/08/10 11:26, Polytropon wrote: >>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> My comments/ wish list >>>> - One text mode (non bitmap graphical) browser: /usr/ports/www/l= ynx >>>>=20 >>> The lynx browser, due to its "special" key handling, does not >>> appeal to novice users. NO text mode browser gives a "first >>> sight effect" that will "convince" a user he's installing a >>> modern OS. Sounds stupid, I know. >>>=20 >>> As I said, the way the user interacts with the browser does >>> determine how fast he gets through the installation. Learning >>> the browser (instead of just pressing the keys shown on the >>> screen) could make things look worse. >>>=20 >>> On the other hand, with the ability of X to run without >>> configuration on recent hardware, what's wrong with running >>> X with a graphical web browser - if the user DECIDED that >>> way? Of course, this decision is the FIRST step in the install >>> process: >>>=20 >>> Install method >>> -------------- >>> T -> traditional text mode installer (sysinstall) >>> (this one does not have all the options) >>> W -> web-based installer in text mode >>> (typical for professional users) >>> G -> web-based installer in graphics mode >>> (typical for novice users) >>> R -> remote installation >>> (just starts the server) >>> S -> shell >>> (dialog shell access to live system) >>>=20 >>> Enter choice: _ >>>=20 >>> Just a simple idea. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >> I like that approach- works for me anyway... >=20 > Let me add that it would be good to default do an action > after a certain time (e. g. 60 seconds). This default should > be the preparation for remote installation as this is the > obvious choice when no interaction is done - because it > maybe is not possible (like for headless servers). So > you put in the installation media (CD or USB stick), wait > a minute, and then remotely access the installer. >=20 >=20 >=20 >> Accessibility should be foremost at this level and above. >=20 > I would also like to see it that way; sadly, "market share" > oriented development doesn't share this thought. You can > make money on all the healthy users, there's plenty of > them. Users with disabilites are uninteresting, from a > "marketing" point of view. Users in niche markets are > uninteresting, too. >=20 >=20 >=20 >> The legalities=20 >> themselves are becoming hairy these days, and considering the point that=20= >> we are trying to push accessibility in terms of applications (such as=20 >> issues with flash, to name one) using physical accessibility as a=20 >> parallel argument we should be setting an example as well. >=20 > Accessibility on the web is just one point. Operating systems, > the backbones of all the dancing bunnies, should be a good > example of how to make information accessible to the widest > amount of people. This includes the idea of NOT cutting out > those who do not have the ability to access a graphical > installer: Not because they don't want to use it, but because > they don't have the means to access it. >=20 >=20 >=20 >> That said, there is no reason why can't make it look as pretty as we can=20= >> without compromising this principle :) >=20 > GUI installer, remote access and not rising barriers does not > contradict. If done properly, it can benefit both the professional > users AND those who judge at first sight. >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon I'm going to weigh in now. :) If you want to install FreeBSD using X with a pretty GUI, you can do that to= day. Use a PC-BSD install DVD. There is a radio button in the installer to m= ake it install plain FreeBSD.=20 pc-sysinstall is in HEAD now, and it is completely functional. It's been doi= ng PC-BSD and FreeBSD installs for a long time now.=20 The way it works is it does an install based on a config file, so really the= work on the front end is building a tool that will build a config file. The real issue is that you really want a volume and disk layout "wizard" of s= orts. The ability to take some disks, maybe make a gmirror, or a ZFS RAIDZ, o= r even use glabel on a single disk, then layout some filesystems on that, th= en do the install.=20 It turns out that this is really simple to do in a web app, and not quite so= simple to do in curses. You want things like constraining choices based on p= revious input. For instance you can't make a RAID-Z from two devices.=20 As far as floppy based installs and all of that, the last successful install= via floppy that I can find documented was in the 3.x era, in the 90's. That= was over 10 years ago. Booting from floppy is pretty rare these days, and I= submit that a system that has no choice but to boot from floppy isn't going= to be able to run FreeBSD 9 anyways. My Pentium Pro can't boot anything new= er than 4.11, and *that* has USB ports.=20 Anything with a chance of running FreeBSD 9 can boot from USB or PXE. If it'= s a small modern embedded system you're using dd to put an image on it's fla= sh card. Other situations fall in the category of really rare edge cases, a= nd I'm ok with making those people jump through hoops to get FreeBSD running= on their classic pentium if it makes life easier for people attempting to d= o realistic things. I'm a huge proponent of not mixing and matching hardware= and software generations. FreeBSD 2.1.5 ran well enough on our 386's that w= e used them as nameservers for thousands of users at my ISP. FreeBSD 9 works= great on my dual Nehalem. I probably would be as unhappy with FreeBSD 2.x o= n my dual Nehalem as I would be with FreeBSD 9 on a 386....oh, right, it won= 't even install in either case, let alone run.=20 We are very aware that there are people doing CLI installs. Remote serial po= rt, etc, etc, etc, and we are not going to go down a road that raises the ba= rrier to entry very high for them. I think sysinstall proves you can set the= bar pretty high though, and people will figure out a way to make it work.=20= (Try and install FreeBSD to a RAID-Z for example, or use glabel, or install t= o GELI....) At the end of the day, pc-sysinstall needs a plain text config file that you= can write by hand. (It's very well documented) So all this front end talk i= s really about what's the best way to build a config file.=20 Thanks, Josh "Feedback Welcome" Paetzel= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 13:46:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899C4106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f170.google.com (mail-qy0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2752B8FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so7561378qyk.15 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:46:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aq89KI7m0adiyJqOZ2F/6cxCA9Qwrl6EJpgXo4gr5us=; b=KeFN0Pfept5hr/t5MFKBipACuTT/eBBip3zX6ZDR4OPQ4r6gv5/JlT/lcIbQltkuHh 5zmiy0giZP4su5D9Tra4CT2C1UfILGXAa218GYa7nV0jD0hIS/2g9frIhw/57qGAAu9F c05u8tEJm+q1BY438PI7S8i7Wv5A4p00stQ9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=fF0PdrOyvucSfNMtS16UiLsZmvdFmI9SD5RXhnI7RU/TqnaLpmESFQ4EwCx65VXIC1 RQmzy1NwuseQdjc8QSEyPe9gxKPBPZQh/zLR9O47PjuZ9dHebSX2poXSuharvunAGY1J vO9UrwJv8iSqa+SEt3XBrdCMwmlBhuQhgNa5E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.141 with SMTP id ck13mr7998460qcb.107.1291902372062; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:46:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:46:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:46:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions Subject: Re: vsftpd + SSL not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:46:13 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Odhiambo Washington wro= te: > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Redd Vinylene wro= te: > >> I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server (FreeBSD >> 8.2-PRERELEASE) so my band can share new tracks, production material and >> what not, but my SSL certificate keeps messing it up: >> http://pastie.org/1358536 - anybody know why? It works just fine when I >> disable the SSL. I have no firewalls running. >> >> I hope this is not too off-topic. I just don't know where else to ask. >> >> > Would it not be better if you posted your configuration and debug logs fo= r > those willing to help you out to see? > It's all in http://pastie.org/1358536, but incase you don't want to click the link: ## /var/log/vsftpd.conf (FTPRush) Wed Dec 8 11:21:07 2010 [pid 38781] CONNECT: Client "161.149.221.220" Wed Dec 8 11:21:07 2010 [pid 38781] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL version: TLSv1/SSLv3, SSL cipher: DES-CBC3-SHA, not reused, no cert" Wed Dec 8 11:21:08 2010 [pid 38780] [bruner] OK LOGIN: Client "161.149.221.220" Wed Dec 8 11:21:08 2010 [pid 38781] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL version: TLSv1/SSLv3, SSL cipher: DES-CBC3-SHA, not reused, no cert" Wed Dec 8 11:21:08 2010 [pid 38781] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: NONE" Wed Dec 8 11:21:08 2010 [pid 38781] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN" And then the directory listing after 3 minutes: Wed Dec 8 11:24:29 2010 [pid 38781] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: 3" ## /var/log/vsftpd.conf (FlashFXP) Wed Dec 8 11:33:50 2010 [pid 56557] [bruner] OK LOGIN: Client "161.149.221.220" Wed Dec 8 11:33:51 2010 [pid 56558] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL version: TLSv1/SSLv3, SSL cipher: DES-CBC3-SHA, reused, no cert" Wed Dec 8 11:33:51 2010 [pid 56558] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: NONE" Wed Dec 8 11:33:51 2010 [pid 56558] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN" Wed Dec 8 11:33:51 2010 [pid 56558] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN" Wed Dec 8 11:33:51 2010 [pid 56558] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL shutdown state is: SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN" Wed Dec 8 11:33:51 2010 [pid 56558] [bruner] DEBUG: Client "161.149.221.220", "SSL ret: 18446744073709551615, SSL error: error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0), errno: 22" Wed Dec 8 11:33:53 2010 [pid 56559] [bruner] OK DELETE: Client "161.149.221.220", "/bruner_december_2010/track_1.mp3" Wed Dec 8 11:33:53 2010 [pid 56559] [bruner] OK DELETE: Client "161.149.221.220", "/bruner_december_2010/tracks.sfv" Wed Dec 8 11:33:53 2010 [pid 56559] [bruner] OK DELETE: Client "161.149.221.220", "/bruner_december_2010/tracks.txt" Wed Dec 8 11:33:53 2010 [pid 56559] [bruner] OK DELETE: Client "161.149.221.220", "/bruner_december_2010/tracks.m3u" And in FlashFXP: [R] 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. [R] STOR tracks.m3u [R] Transfer Failed! [R] Connection lost: bruner I tried installing OpenSSL 1.0.0b from ports over 0.9.8p that came with FreeBSD - and then recompiling vsftpd (commenting out the .if ${OSVERSION} = < 700000 and the .endif below it in the Makefile to force it to link to the port) - but it made no difference. ## openssl s_client -state -connect :800 (remote box) CONNECTED(00000003) SSL_connect:before/connect initialization SSL_connect:SSLv2/v3 write client hello A SSL_connect:error in SSLv2/v3 read server hello A 3280:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown protocol:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt.c:= 567: ## openssl s_client -tls1 -state -connect :800 (remote box) CONNECTED(00000003) SSL_connect:before/connect initialization SSL_connect:SSLv3 write client hello A SSL3 alert write:fatal:protocol version SSL_connect:error in SSLv3 read server hello A 3392:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_pkt.c:284: ## openssl s_server -cert vsftpd.pem -key vsftpd.pem -accept 4443 (localhost) Using default temp DH parameters Using default temp ECDH parameters ACCEPT -----BEGIN SSL SESSION PARAMETERS----- MHUCAQECAgMBBAIAOQQgMAQ7m6+qXFxEjTGqANwiHnptuHDkR+55xtbmzAhtHDwE MLF1LRUOLLBlR8J9QrkZkiCtBgWC88NwFVX4p9wYtt09Ms0MQm/EuzMB1Jm7uquC taEGAgRM/7XlogQCAgEspAYEBAEAAAA=3D -----END SSL SESSION PARAMETERS----- Shared ciphers:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA25= 6-SHA:DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA:CAMELLIA256-SHA:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-DSS-= DES-CBC3-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA:AES128-SHA:= DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA128-SHA:DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA128-SHA:CAMELLIA128-SHA:RC4-SHA:RC4= -MD5:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA:EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA:DES-CBC-SHA:EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CB= C-SHA:EXP-EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA:EXP-DES-CBC-SHA:EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5:EXP-RC4-MD5 CIPHER is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported ## openssl s_client -tls1 -state -connect :4443 (remote box) CONNECTED(00000003) SSL_connect:before/connect initialization SSL_connect:SSLv3 write client hello A SSL_connect:SSLv3 read server hello A depth=3D0 /C=3DUS/ST=3DCA/L=3DLos Angeles/O=3DBBFTP/CN=3DBruner verify error:num=3D18:self signed certificate verify return:1 depth=3D0 /C=3DUS/ST=3DCA/L=3DLos Angeles/O=3DBBFTP/CN=3DBruner verify return:1 SSL_connect:SSLv3 read server certificate A SSL_connect:SSLv3 read server key exchange A SSL_connect:SSLv3 read server done A SSL_connect:SSLv3 write client key exchange A SSL_connect:SSLv3 write change cipher spec A SSL_connect:SSLv3 write finished A SSL_connect:SSLv3 flush data SSL_connect:SSLv3 read finished A --- Certificate chain 0 s:/C=3DUS/ST=3DCA/L=3DLos Angeles/O=3DBBFTP/CN=3DBruner i:/C=3DUS/ST=3DCA/L=3DLos Angeles/O=3DBBFTP/CN=3DBruner --- Server certificate -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIC5DCCAk2gAwIBAgIJANrpCuP43bQNMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMFYxCzAJBgNV BAYTAk5MMRMwEQYDVQQIEwpTb21lLVN0YXRlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlBbXN0ZXJkYW0x DDAKBgNVBAoTAzc4ODEQMA4GA1UEAxMHSiBEaWxsYTAeFw0xMDEyMDcwOTQxNDFa Fw0xMTEyMDcwOTQxNDFaMFYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAk5MMRMwEQYDVQQIEwpTb21lLVN0 YXRlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlBbXN0ZXJkYW0xDDAKBgNVBAoTAzc4ODEQMA4GA1UEAxMH SiBEaWxsYTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAx78B3EY/eC5iZJVD /+Oczf0hpzFCv9p2Ue9SBVVDQcL0sSkLJASDoiuq57Dz2/zCoNcU9SfCGrXAx6gh 4D7q6beK5m+WZFZSF5//PMqdie4ufNDyUaYZaO+MwLbs2a61HAEVCo167h/CMIVx va1sbVNUIYuLiorMYNJ1OVrRAzECAwEAAaOBuTCBtjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUYbBXLuPC AWa4yOlyKuvAhcFszy8wgYYGA1UdIwR/MH2AFGGwVy7jwgFmuMjpcirrwIXBbM8v oVqkWDBWMaskldHKASkdJQkEhdSTMBEGA1UECBMKU29tZS1TdGF0ZTESMBAGA1UE BxMJQW1zdGVyZGFtMQwwCgYDVQQKEwM3ODgxEDAOBgNVBAMTB0ogRGlsbGGCCQDa 6Qrj+N20DTAMBgNVHRMEBTADAQH/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAAfbkuNOb5N7 AyXsiMLRXkRkWmaampUPuz0zYHn+dYjutV/jowscxc+CHKGHkbfsShSV7eF50k5b YIcsm+E6ftcshcWpreTj6khFmyMBInCKMY1NrHUJcL3f8FgRBB8tS3aX0qcrch45 T+Hp2wku0v34s/eZoLmbulQ6z7x7F30e -----END CERTIFICATE----- subject=3D/C=3DUS/ST=3DCA/L=3DLos Angeles/O=3DBBFTP/CN=3DBruner issuer=3D/C=3DUS/ST=3DCA/L=3DLos Angeles/O=3DBBFTP/CN=3DBruner --- No client certificate CA names sent --- SSL handshake has read 1180 bytes and written 232 bytes --- New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Server public key is 1024 bit Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE SSL-Session: Protocol : TLSv1 Cipher : DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Session-ID: 30043B9BAFAA5C5C448D31AA00DC221E7A6DB870E447EE79C6D6E6CC086D1C3C Session-ID-ctx: Master-Key: B1752D150E2CB06547C27D42B9199220AD060582F3C3701555F8A7DC18B6DD3D32CD0C426FC= 4BB3301D499BBBAAB82B5 Key-Arg : None Start Time: 1291826659 Timeout : 7200 (sec) Verify return code: 18 (self signed certificate) --- ## /usr/local/etc/vsftpd.conf # portinstall pam_pwdfile # gem install htauth # openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -newkey rsa:1024 -keyout vsftpd.pem -out vsftpd.pem # htpasswd-ruby -c -b /usr/home/bruner/users.db anonymous_enable=3DNO listen=3DYES listen_port=3D800 connect_from_port_20=3DYES background=3DYES write_enable=3DYES local_enable=3DYES local_root=3D/usr/home/bruner/content virtual_use_local_privs=3DYES ftpd_banner=3DWelcome to the Bruner Brothers FTP: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D6xQyOR7WBIo ssl_enable=3DYES force_local_data_ssl=3DYES force_local_logins_ssl=3DYES require_ssl_reuse=3DNO rsa_cert_file=3D/usr/local/etc/vsftpd.pem pam_service_name=3Dvsftpd pasv_promiscuous=3DYES port_promiscuous=3DYES xferlog_enable=3DYES xferlog_file=3D/usr/home/bruner/transfers.log debug_ssl=3DYES ## /etc/pam.d/vsftpd auth required /usr/local/lib/pam_pwdfile.so pwdfile /usr/home/bruner/users.db account required /usr/lib/pam_permit.so ## dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Nov 29 12:32:44 CET 2010 bruner@bruner:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3210 @ 2.13GHz (2135.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x6fb Family =3D 6 Model =3D f Stepp= ing =3D 11 Features=3D0xbfebfbff Features2=3D0xe3bd AMD Features=3D0x20100800 AMD Features2=3D0x1 TSC: P-state invariant real memory =3D 4294967296 (4096 MB) avail memory =3D 4093214720 (3903 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 5 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 32-55 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 cpu2: on acpi0 cpu3: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 em0: port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xdfd80000-0xdfd9ffff,0xdfda0000-0xdfdbffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 em0: Using an MSI interrupt em0: [FILTER] em0: Ethernet address: 00:15:17:6b:2c:32 em1: port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xdfdc0000-0xdfddffff,0xdfde0000-0xdfdfffff irq 17 at device 0.1 on pci1 em1: Using an MSI interrupt em1: [FILTER] em1: Ethernet address: 00:15:17:6b:2c:33 pcib2: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 0.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 pcib4: at device 2.0 on pci3 pci4: on pcib4 vgapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xc8000000-0xcfffffff,0xdfef0000-0xdfefffff irq 33 at device 2.0 on pci4 pci4: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) uart2: port 0xd8c0-0xd8ff mem 0xdfeef000-0xdfeeffff,0xc7f80000-0xc7ffffff irq 34 at device 4.1 on pci4 uart2: [FILTER] pci4: at device 4.2 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0xd8a0-0xd8a7,0xd888-0xd88b,0xd8a8-0xd8af,0xd88c-0xd88f,0xd8b0-0xd8bf mem 0xdfeeef00-0xdfeeefff irq 32 at device 7.0 on pci4 atapci0: [ITHREAD] ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] pcib5: irq 16 at device 28.4 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.5 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 uhci0: port 0xbc60-0xbc7f irq 21 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [ITHREAD] usbus0: on uhci0 uhci1: port 0xbc80-0xbc9f irq 20 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [ITHREAD] usbus1: on uhci1 uhci2: port 0xbca0-0xbcbf irq 21 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [ITHREAD] usbus2: on uhci2 ehci0: mem 0xdfcffc00-0xdfcfffff irq 21 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [ITHREAD] usbus3: EHCI version 1.0 usbus3: on ehci0 pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xbc30-0xbc37,0xbc28-0xbc2b,0xbc38-0xbc3f,0xbc2c-0xbc2f,0xbc40-0xbc4f,0xbc5= 0-0xbc5f irq 23 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci1 ata4: [ITHREAD] ata5: on atapci1 ata5: [ITHREAD] acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x7f irq 8 on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: does not respond device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6 uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 uart0: [FILTER] orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcafff,0xec000-0xeffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range est0: on cpu0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 est1: on cpu1 p4tcc1: on cpu1 est2: on cpu2 p4tcc2: on cpu2 est3: on cpu3 p4tcc3: on cpu3 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus2: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus3: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ugen2.1: at usbus2 uhub2: on usbus2 ugen3.1: at usbus3 uhub3: on usbus3 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered device_attach: afd0 attach returned 6 acd0: CDROM at ata2-slave PIO3 ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered ad10: 1907729MB at ata5-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! Root mount waiting for: usbus3 uhub_reattach_port: port 1 reset failed, error=3DUSB_ERR_TIMEOUT uhub_reattach_port: device problem (USB_ERR_TIMEOUT), disabling port 1 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad8s1a ugen0.2: at usbus0 ugen3.2: at usbus3 uhub4: on usbus3 ukbd0: on usbus0 kbd2 at ukbd0 ums0: on usbus0 ZFS NOTICE: Prefetch is disabled by default if less than 4GB of RAM is present; to enable, add "vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=3D0" to /boot/loader.conf. ZFS filesystem version 4 ZFS storage pool version 15 ums0: 3 buttons and [Z] coordinates ID=3D0 uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered em0: link state changed to UP Many thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 13:53:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFD91065694 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4688B8FC27 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-67-171-66-177.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [67.171.66.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C314BF7419; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:38:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:38:18 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Laszlo Nagy Message-Id: <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, danieleff@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:53:26 -0000 On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:31:04 +0100 Laszlo Nagy wrote: > System is FreeBSD shopzeus.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sun Oct > 31 02:55:28 EDT 2010 amd64 > It has two quad-core Xeon CPUs, 24GB memory, and a RAID 1+0 array with > 10 disks + Areca 1680 controller with 2GB write back cache. > > Server is running: mailscanner + apache multihost + PHP + postgresql. > Main load on the server is usually postgresql. > > Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a > result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the > web server is now refusing clients with "Cannot connect to database" > messages (coming from PHP). > > This is a typical output from top: > > last pid: 12789; load averages: 7.77, 10.77, > 13.46 > up 26+03:00:30 06:22:04 > 6637 processes: 7 running, 623 sleeping, 7 zombie > CPU: 32.9% user, 0.0% nice, 7.6% system, 0.6% interrupt, 58.9% idle > Mem: 3885M Active, 15G Inact, 3236M Wired, 627M Cache, 2465M Buf, 656M Free > Swap: 12G Total, 12M Used, 12G Free > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU > COMMAND > 66834 pgsql 1 118 0 443M 417M CPU2 2 16:17 99.46% > postgres > 11473 pgsql 1 72 0 441M 242M sbwait 5 0:02 4.59% > postgres > 11026 pgsql 1 47 0 439M 249M sbwait 7 0:01 3.17% > postgres > 6642 www 1 48 0 236M 42928K select 0 0:01 2.29% > httpd > 10147 www 1 48 0 236M 44048K select 6 0:01 2.10% > httpd > 3961 shopzeus 29 44 0 208M 96364K uwait 4 18.4H 1.37% > python > > > Here is what I don't understand. "last pid" is increasing relatively > slowly, e.g. there are no hidden processes. Only the first one or two > processes are showing CPU load > 10%. The "CPU User%" value is about > 50%. We have lots of free memory. I/O load is almost nothing (see iostat > below). > > However, server load is between 7 and 13! In fact sometimes it is above > 16. And everybody complains that the server is too slow. > > How can I find out what is causing the problem? Step 1, get them to define "server" and "too slow": If you log in and do shell ops, is the system slow to respond? Based on what you've reported, I'd be willing to bet that shell ops are pretty responsive. I can't be 100% sure without more information, but I'm willing to be that what your users are complaining about is your web application being slow. Since you don't say what that application is, I can only provide general advice. I'm guessing that PostgreSQL is the bottleneck. I'm going to first make a few general suggestions, then provide suggestions on how to isolate the problem more specifically. First off, you have 24G of RAM available and PostgreSQL only seems to have access to 400M of it. Bump shared_buffers up to 2 or 3 G at least, and bump up work_mem to at least a few hundred meg, and maintenance_work_mem up to at 1/2G or so. If the top and gstat outputs are typical, it looks like PostgreSQL is doing mostly writes, but is not significantly blocked on writes. It looks like individual PostgreSQL processes are simply taking a long time to do their work. What's in your PostgreSQL log files? If there's nothing, then bump up the logging information in your postgresql.conf. I particularly like log_min_duration_statement at 500 ... any query that takes longer than 1/2 second to execute is suspect in the types applications I work with most frequently. If your application is developed in-house, I'd be willing to bet a paycheck that there are LOTS of indexes missing and that PostgreSQL is doing lots of seq scans where it could run lots faster if it had indexes. Check also your autovacuum settings and ensure that tables are not bloating out of control due to insufficient vacuuming. You may have to vacuum full/ reindex the entire database to get things back under control, which can take a long time if it's badly bloated. Your application may also be suffering from lock contention if there are lots of table locks used. Looking at the pg_locks table while things are slow can quickly identify if this is the case, and looking at pg_stat_activity in conjunction with that table will usually narrow down the problem pretty quickly. Finally, if you find that PostgreSQL is the bottleneck and you can't narrow it down enough to fix, join the PostgreSQL general questions mailing list and ask for help with the same level of detail you did here. You'll find that they're an equally helpful community. Good luck. Hope this helps. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 14:05:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618AA106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:05:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171368FC21 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQh7s-0002Eh-8l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:05:40 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:05:40 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:05:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:05:54 -0500 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:05:43 -0000 Laszlo Nagy wrote: > System is FreeBSD shopzeus.com 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sun Oct > 31 02:55:28 EDT 2010 amd64 > It has two quad-core Xeon CPUs, 24GB memory, and a RAID 1+0 array with > 10 disks + Areca 1680 controller with 2GB write back cache. > > Server is running: mailscanner + apache multihost + PHP + postgresql. > Main load on the server is usually postgresql. > > Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a > result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the > web server is now refusing clients with "Cannot connect to database" > messages (coming from PHP). > > This is a typical output from top: > > last pid: 12789; load averages: 7.77, 10.77, > 13.46 > up 26+03:00:30 06:22:04 > 6637 processes: 7 running, 623 sleeping, 7 zombie [snip] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ First curiosity I would have is these 7 zombies. Which processes are they and how did they get into that state? Might give you a thread to pull on for unraveling. Also, there is some degree of discrepancy present wrt to 6 thousand processes with only 7 running and 623 asleep. I suspect this is just top not getting it right. But it also looks like a forkbomb. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 14:12:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DF7106567A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D82D8FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so1608179gwj.36 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:11:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.91.8 with SMTP id o8mr13490157agb.59.1291903918929; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm1161912yhc.19.2010.12.09.06.11.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73338E54856 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:11:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:11:55 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101209091155.00f86494@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: vsftpd + SSL not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:12:00 -0000 On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:46:11 +0100 Redd Vinylene articulated: > I tried installing OpenSSL 1.0.0b from ports over 0.9.8p that came > with FreeBSD - and then recompiling vsftpd (commenting out the .if > ${OSVERSION} < 700000 and the .endif below it in the Makefile to > force it to link to the port) - but it made no difference. Did you try putting this in the "/etc/make.conf" file: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes Then try doing an R&R on the ports and see what transpires. By the way, the port version of openssl is 1.0.0c, so you might want to update your ports tree before attempting to rebuild the afflicted ports. Also, check the updating file. You will need to rebuild a few files before continuing on with your project. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Virtue is not left to stand alone. He who practices it will have neighbors. Confucius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 14:13:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F311065694 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8DA8FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5B22F514.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.245.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oB9ED1Y8055618; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:13:04 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB9EE947086180; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:14:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB9EDwgB090024; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:14:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201012091414.oB9EDwgB090024@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Andre Goree From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:52:07 CST." Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:13:58 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk encryption on a headless box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:13:13 -0000 Andre Goree wrote: > I was looking at encrypting my data on a headless server I have, and found a > good tutorial using ZFS+geli. Easy enough to setup, but one thing I just > realized is that I wouldn't be able to enter the passphrase on the server > since I keep it headless. > > I wonder if there is some type of encryption I can use that does not require > entering a passphrase. For example, perhaps I can set it up in a way that > it'll automatically read from certain files on a thumb drive? I encrypt my data with gbde, it fetches the passphrase from another host if running. (Mine has a head, but doesnt use it. I don't use ZFS, but I don't see that's necessarily related) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, or HTML or base 64. Avoid top posting, it cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 14:34:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC61106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FE78FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21722 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 14:34:43 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Dec 2010 14:34:43 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1A8685082D; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:34:42 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44fwu9vbzy.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:34:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Brennan's message of "Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:41:16 -0500") Message-ID: <44k4jj10ce.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: devel/gobject-introspection throws up because of python X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:34:44 -0000 Chris Brennan writes: > Sadly this didn't work for me. I for the same error. Oh, well. It's a bit confusing then, since you seem to be the only person with this particular problem. Have you checked whether the "missing" files are on your disk or not? > -- Sent from my Droid > > On Dec 7, 2010 10:28 AM, "Lowell Gilbert" < > freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: >> Chris Brennan writes: >> >>> While trying to compile audio/tagtool on a FreeBSD7.3 (x86) machine >>> devel/gobject-introspection decides to throw up and I got this: (the > install >>> was via portmaster -d) >> >> Looks like your python installation is broken. >> >> Try rebuilding that first. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 17:12:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101791065670 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F678FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix, from userid 12346) id D3EEC16B537; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:12:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.99]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C7BC216B535 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:12:54 -0600 (CST) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:10:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:10:37 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@debranded.6dollardialup.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101209110821.F22520@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sanitizer: Anomy and SpamAssassin mail filter - see http://www.6dollardialup.com/support/spaminfo.html Subject: 7.3 Get uart to grab modem instead of sio X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:12:57 -0000 I am running 7.3. I would like uart to grab the modem, but sio does. I don't want to upgrade to 8.x until I see that things will work with uart. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 17:40:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D90106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1E38FC15 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2001375ewy.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:40:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.136 with SMTP id h8mr294274ebd.51.1291916407996; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:40:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:39:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:39:47 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ivan Frosty Subject: Re: libphp5.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:40:10 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Ivan Frosty wrote: > yeah well ports cant download. i dont have internet, usually i > download packages from a cyber then just do pkg_add when i get home. > so really make doesnt work for me. however i installed php5,mysql and > apache from a cd. but making php work,requires libphp5.so which my > system doesnt have i386 pII. > thanks for your time. > > libphp5.so is built w/ any standard install of php. Lets try this: What version of FreeBSD? What version of PHP? What version of Apache? What version of MySQL? Is this in a VM or not? P.S. off-life replies and an on-list followup. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 17:46:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C380B106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A6D8FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix, from userid 12346) id 13CEB16B53C; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:46:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.100]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CE48916B535 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:46:14 -0600 (CST) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:44:03 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:44:01 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@debranded.6dollardialup.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sanitizer: Anomy and SpamAssassin mail filter - see http://www.6dollardialup.com/support/spaminfo.html Subject: Make gtk widgets use a larger font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:46:16 -0000 How do I make gtk widgets use larger fonts? I found an old linux FAQ on this, but it appears to have nothing to do with the way configuration works on FreeBSD. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 17:46:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831AE1065698 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com (mail-iw0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAA78FC1C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so4133102iwn.19 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:46:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.30.73 with SMTP id t9mr474509ibc.144.1291915430901; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:23:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.79.82 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:23:29 -0800 (PST) From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:23:29 -0500 Message-ID: To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: simple NAT for jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:46:30 -0000 Hi, I want to throw together some jails for friends to play with. I'm not terribly concerned about security on this machine. My goal is to do something like ezjail create james 10.0.0.1 ezjail create jared 10.0.0.2 ezjail create joe 10.0.0.3 ezjail create idaho 10.0.0.4 I have a single IP address for my computer - so I would need some kind of nat to allow these jails to access the outside world - and allow the outside world to access them. I've looked into pf and I guess I would need something like nat on nfe0 from 10.0.0.1 to any -> $external_ip is this correct? Do I need anything in in /etc/pf.conf ? -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 17:56:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B50B1065670 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27ACA8FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9HuAZ5014255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:56:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D011830.5080900@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:56:00 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Eighner References: <20101209110821.F22520@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> In-Reply-To: <20101209110821.F22520@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.3 Get uart to grab modem instead of sio X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:56:12 -0000 On 12/9/2010 12:10 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: > I am running 7.3. I would like uart to grab the modem, but sio does. I > don't want to upgrade to 8.x until I see that things will work with uart. > Hi, Take a look at /boot/device.hints. Replace sio with uart and you can remove sio from the kernel if you are not using it elsewhere. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 18:49:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614E61065674 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D35F8FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zidane.cc.vt.edu (zidane.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.227]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB9ImV4w010939; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:48:31 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by zidane.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id MVJ77683; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB9ImUtO009504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:48:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:48:30 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=zidane.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020207.4D01247F.0299,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:49:03 -0000 On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode? >>=20 >=20 > Seems like you already know how since you do it below. >=20 >=20 >> I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it = to >> bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface = of my >> system. >> Then in my virtual machine, I add one line: >> ifconfig_em0=3D"DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf file. >> I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but = I >> could not get network access. >>=20 >=20 > ifconfig_em0=3D"DHCP" would only work for the intel adapters, not amd = ones. >=20 >=20 >> If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I = do >> need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in = my >> experiment. >>=20 >=20 > You do have a DHCP server correct? What happens when you do "dhclient > em0"? Does bridged networking work with a different guest OS as maybe = it's > some problem with your host. >=20 > --=20 > Adam Vande More >=20 Hi,=20 I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there = are several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER = received. Do I need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP = server? Where it should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as = the host OS, two VMs (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this = two VMs communicate with each other.=20 Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS = FreeBSD 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server = then? When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER = results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received.=20 Thanks, W.W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 18:55:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF457106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf02.insightbb.com (mxsf02.insightbb.com [74.128.0.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5808FC1E for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:55:00 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,321,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="922547533" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf02.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2010 13:54:59 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ato4AEu1AE1KgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIKY0vjiUMAQEBATU0wC+FSgSEZA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,321,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="197600752" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2010 13:54:59 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:54:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012091354.59457.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: autoconf and automake X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:55:12 -0000 I'm having trouble with the latest advice in ports/UPDATING: 20101208: AFFECTS: autotools AUTHOR: autotools@FreeBSD.org Another stage in the autotools cleanup that reduces tree churn whilst updating components, a number of ports have now moved to non-versioned locations since there is now only the concept of legacy and current versions. # portmaster -o devel/autoconf devel/autoconf268 # portmaster -o devel/automake devel/automake111 # portmaster -o devel/libtool devel/libtool22 # portmaster -o devel/libltdl devel/libltdl22 substitute 'portupgrade' for 'portmaster' accordingly if that's your your upgrade tool of choice. If I invoke portupgrade -o devel/autoconf devel/autoconf268 portupgrade doesn't appear to do anything: portupgrade -o devel/autoconf devel/autoconf268 ---> Session started at: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:52:08 -0500 ** None has been installed or upgraded. ---> Saving the results to '/root/done' ---> Session ended at: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:52:08 -0500 (consumed 00:00:00) And pkg_info says there's still an old version of autoconf: pkg_info|grep autoconf autoconf-2.13.000227_6 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.68 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-wrapper-20101119 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf Can anyone help me? I'm thinking that I'm trying to upgrade all ports that depend on autoconf-2.13.000227_6 to depend on autoconf268. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 19:24:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE3A106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2AA8FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9JNuqD071300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:23:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4D012CCC.2000503@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:23:56 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Friedrich , FreeBSD Mailing List References: <201012091354.59457.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201012091354.59457.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:23:56 -0600 (CST) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: oB9JNuqD071300 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: autoconf and automake X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:24:04 -0000 On 12/9/2010 12:54 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I'm having trouble with the latest advice in ports/UPDATING: > > 20101208: > AFFECTS: autotools > AUTHOR: autotools@FreeBSD.org > > Here's how I did it: 1) Delete all the existing ports manually: pkg_delete -f portname 2) Install the new port manually: cd /usr/ports/devel/portname make install clean When you've done them all, then ... 3) Fix the package database: pkgdb -L pkgdb -Fa ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 19:38:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F1A1065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D859B8FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1776047eyh.37 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4vHIFz/gi5JEr0n8QhAquSGNMu+S9RgIhDIAOaUTF+o=; b=o7nQ1iUd8d97Jdl+62coMW4DZpqlkS2xzn0Zz1wYkUKpamJLxzNi7ARQBj1L+fCKm3 y9eMTyC1hGJEkPZ3rHdQlBiNd0Tr4X66xOo6U8598OrPKOB+5pnIC5w4ZQTgTIXIMsTw w54ERkPNS0euHYP7kXGoy2rTuevCabN37dDmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HZbk4Gk0IBH3asuISoTM+HkGMZO4zZ5rJJorhwYs8/TlIUoeZwEJ88J/E+FTImcrWD sdcL6D5Sn9BraRznbGEsMUR6tzDIt6jtYEHUlLksAe38VF8FVHfX1/GxWFHNJdOthqr+ eMzXl1D7LvR10obY9+HIRMUxwo/F+XtoNfYnM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.185.208 with SMTP id u58mr2815982wem.87.1291923509707; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.164.21 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <84950898@bb.ipt.ru> References: <84950898@bb.ipt.ru> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:38:31 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:50, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: > >> All, > >> I have a Lenovo T61 with a 100g HD that I dual boot with FreeBSD >> 8.0-STABLE amd64 and Windows XP. > >> FBSD is on ad0s2a, with ad0s2b as swap, and XP on ad0s1a. > >> Yesterday I booted up FBSD, started xfce4, started a terminal session, >> su'ed to root and did the following - running a generic kernel: > >> # cd /usr/src >> # make buildworld >> # make buildkernel >> # make installkernel > >> Then I exited xfce4, did sudo shutdown -r now, and got a mountroot >> prompt that I now can't get past. > >> I can get to the loader prompt, and lsdev shows the following: > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0cd devices: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0disk devices: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0disk0: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 BIOS drive C: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 disk0s1: NTFS/HPFS >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 disk0s2a: =C2=A0= FFS >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 disk02sb: =C2=A0= swap > >> when I use '?' at the mountroot prompt I get: > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0List of GEOM managed disk devices: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 acd0 >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Loader variables: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0vfs.root.mountfrom=3Dufs:/dev/ad0s2a >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0vfs.root.mountfrom.options=3Drw > > >> I've tried entering the following at the mountroot prompt, with no succe= ss: >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0ufs:/dev/ad0s2a >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0ufs:/ad0s2a >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0ufs:ad0s2a >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0ffs:/dev/ad0s2a > >> and several other variations that I've found while googling, but no >> success anywhere. > >> Does anyone have thoughts on how to remedy this? > > Just for the last question: > Try to load an old kernel. (Type "boot /boot/kernel.old" at loader > prompt.) That worked... I think I'll try the update process again. Anything else you can recommend? Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:03:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F2E106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE748FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQneV-0004Wh-8X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:03:49 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:03:49 -0800 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:03:49 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101209200349.GD89917@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Make gtk widgets use a larger font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:03:56 -0000 --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Lars Eighner on Thursday, 09 December 2010: > How do I make gtk widgets use larger fonts? I found an old linux FAQ on > this, but it appears to have nothing to do with the way configuration wor= ks > on FreeBSD. >=20 > --=20 > Lars Eighner > http://www.larseighner.com/index.html > 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" I've been looking into this, although my intention was to make the fonts smaller. I have yet to be successful. I think the answer should lie in modifying your gtk theme file (.gtkrc-2.0 for GTK 2). I started by copying a theme that I liked (Black Diamond Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48039106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stageline@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0493C8FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so1692688yxh.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:08:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ac1ydoZdS+clK74mAE3EUzB4atvhNaueNT2L5f7JUdk=; b=nnpCIuxG9zeApf2j5nMfhpppoFoRMtIKxc/Zk856zUicaz1B0+8G2uKn+9t941yJZY 26rd5G+6Ej9Pay5R/kFpVQomVLMbWX7bE77cc8QfQJqZIiqnP9gDEHL81cClDv1P6VkR itPq96mvChBxCQveUOIlfmNoLAXW4t2V8dc2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HpSc0J1qlZwvZeVkDlZtUILPAPoupXvAqNgJKIhYEHqGIg2UhmnPCD15ly3ySDgZ01 g4V3+ksYJudSv7zcptx6DtrJy68+3Q0AwxAj2AAeDCGI55XbekMh8sdhEQ7qrmKnpA+p 9V4UuYZcnqZ5bjNQHxTT70R3xuoVlcCp+T+2s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.27.29 with SMTP id a29mr7212976ana.124.1291925295192; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.240.12 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:08:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:08:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Gabor Illo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: sendmail and /etc/hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:08:16 -0000 Hello My problem: sendmail skipping /etc/host and use MX record. Somebody have any ide how use sendmail /etc/host file? Dec 9 20:58:23 www sm-mta[29438]: oB9Fxmx0027174: to=, delay=03:58:35, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=1313137, relay=mail.mouseoleum.hu., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by mail.mouseoleum.hu. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:14:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5539C106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D608FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9JsOdu096642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:54:25 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D0133F0.5020604@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:54:24 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: ultradns issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:14:13 -0000 is anyone seeing dns problems with ultradns.net, I'm seeing lookup problems for several big domains, plus as an impportant aside freebsd uses whois-servers.net cnames such as tld.whois-server.net to the correct whois server many many other companies use them obv too. Paul. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:18:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179CC1065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0198FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2695841wwf.31 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:18:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.134.10 with SMTP id h10mr10955713wbt.200.1291924273892; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:51:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:51:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:51:13 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qDg4vcAxKPInwa8ziB9pksH9yzM Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple NAT for jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:18:37 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hi, > I want to throw together some jails for friends to play with. I'm not > terribly concerned about security on this machine. My goal is to do > something like > ezjail create james 10.0.0.1 > ezjail create jared 10.0.0.2 > ezjail create joe 10.0.0.3 > ezjail create idaho 10.0.0.4 > > I have a single IP address for my computer - so I would need some kind > of nat to allow these jails to access the outside world - and allow > the outside world to access them. > > I've looked into pf and I guess I would need something like > > nat on nfe0 from 10.0.0.1 to any -> $external_ip > > is this correct? > Do I need anything in in /etc/pf.conf ? > you can use natd as well in rc.conf natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="rl1" natd_flags="-dynamic" then as root in the base system kldload ipdivert natd -n rl1 or whatever your interface is > -- > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:40:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2381065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B73A8FC23 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9Kej0S097143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:40:46 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:40:45 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:40:49 -0000 still debugging dns issues that are no doubt to do with wider issues: someone here might know who to tell? #whois amazon.com Whois Server Version 2.0 Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net for detailed information. AMAZON.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM AMAZON.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM AMAZON.COM.IS.N0T.AS.1337.AS.WWW.GULLI.COM AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM AMAZON.COM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:41:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F81D10656A5 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162738FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2204155ewy.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.136 with SMTP id h8mr502070ebd.51.1291927258618; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:40:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:40:38 -0500 Message-ID: To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Adam Vande More , Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:41:00 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: > Hi, > > I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are > several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I > need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? Where it > should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host OS, two VMs > (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs communicate with > each other. > > Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD > 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then? > > When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER > results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received. > It would appear that Ubuntu has not correctly installed the bridging adapter. Did you check out the links I provided on setting up a bridging device on Ubuntu w/ vBox? They worked for me, I set up an Ubuntu VM and in the VM setup a test VM of vBox to boot fbsd (8.1 in my case). NOTE: I do not recoomend setting up a VM within a VM, I did it strictly as a test to boot and get network access. Which it did. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:41:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29D8106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@m2.vidican.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709CC8FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2716765wwf.31 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:41:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.185.76 with SMTP id t54mr2409024wem.6.1291927315469; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:41:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: nvidican@m2.vidican.com Received: by 10.216.188.18 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:41:55 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [136.1.1.105] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:41:55 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IRSAQVgGgyRxcxSEDAgIjAcWQyE Message-ID: From: Nathan Vidican To: Gabor Illo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail and /etc/hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:41:59 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Gabor Illo wrote: > Hello > > My problem: sendmail skipping /etc/host and use MX record. Somebody > have any ide how use sendmail /etc/host file? > > Dec 9 20:58:23 www sm-mta[29438]: oB9Fxmx0027174: > to=, delay=03:58:35, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, > pri=1313137, relay=mail.mouseoleum.hu., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > Connection refused by mail.mouseoleum.hu. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Could you clarify in regards to what you want sendmail to actually use /etc/host for? If your intent is to re-map where mail destined for a given host/domain goes - (ie override DNS MX records) - then /etc/hosts is not going to do what you want. Depending on where you intend to redirect to, you'll need either mailer table, access table entries or to configure your local sendmail to receive for that domain to accomplish that. You might try reading further at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-using.html Specifically in regards to email and DNS relationships. -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:47:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0861065674 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377D38FC15 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2209498ewy.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:47:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.19.7 with SMTP id y7mr1197481eba.25.1291927621707; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:47:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:46:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D012CCC.2000503@tundraware.com> References: <201012091354.59457.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <4D012CCC.2000503@tundraware.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:46:41 -0500 Message-ID: To: Tim Daneliuk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Steven Friedrich , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: autoconf and automake X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:47:03 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 12/9/2010 12:54 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > pkgdb -L > pkgdb -Fa > -o replace the installed port with a port from a different origin (From 'portmaster') -o, --origin=ORIGIN Specify a port to upgrade the following pkg with (from 'portupgrade') It would appear that if the port is already installed, passing '-o' will only update the source location (origin) to prevent breakage in the future. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:51:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419A21065679 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18D88FC16 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2212878ewy.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.4.209 with SMTP id 17mr21851ebs.38.1291927870583; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:51:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:50:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <84950898@bb.ipt.ru> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:50:50 -0500 Message-ID: To: Kurt Buff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:51:12 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > That worked... > > I think I'll try the update process again. > > Anything else you can recommend? > > Thanks, > > Did you read /usr/src/UPDATING ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 20:56:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D365A106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA478FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2217515ewy.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.136 with SMTP id h8mr519583ebd.51.1291928216250; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:56:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:56:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:56:36 -0500 Message-ID: To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:56:57 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > still debugging dns issues that are no doubt to do with wider issues: > > someone here might know who to tell? > > #whois amazon.com > > Whois Server Version 2.0 > > Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered > with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net > for detailed information. > > AMAZON.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM > AMAZON.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM > AMAZON.COM.IS.N0T.AS.1337.AS.WWW.GULLI.COM > AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM > AMAZON.COM > > I'll take a stab in the dark as to the cause, but not to whom is responsible. This looks like an erroneous DNS Injection. An attempt to inject false/misleading dns entries into [or before] a valid dns server serves a reply. This is usually contributed to a bad admin who improperly secured his/her DNS server or a malicious admin with the intent to wreak havoc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:17:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D73B1065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE33B8FC1B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2540:154a:ba54:4afb] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2540:154a:ba54:4afb]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9LGeEC068976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:17:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D01472E.4090509@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:16:30 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Macdonald References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:17:55 -0000 On 12/9/2010 3:40 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > still debugging dns issues that are no doubt to do with wider issues: > > someone here might know who to tell? > > #whois amazon.com > > Whois Server Version 2.0 > > Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered > with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net > for detailed information. > > AMAZON.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM > AMAZON.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM > AMAZON.COM.IS.N0T.AS.1337.AS.WWW.GULLI.COM > AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM > AMAZON.COM The whois query is matching a regex. Its just another form of spam and graffiti. It doesnt really have anything to do with actual DNS lookups / resolution and is just listing all domains/servers that match your query. e.g # whois AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM Whois Server Version 2.0 Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net for detailed information. Server Name: AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM IP Address: 207.171.166.53 Registrar: ENOM, INC. Whois Server: whois.enom.com Referral URL: http://www.enom.com Try whois microsoft.com and so on. Note the output below on how to single out a specific record. MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.THE.BEST.WEBHOSTING.AT.WWW.FATUCH.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.IM.ELITE.WANNABE.TOO.WWW.PLUS613.NET MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.GET.ONE.MILLION.DOLLARS.AT.WWW.UNIMUNDI.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZ.MORE.DETAILS.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZ.IS.0WNED.AND.HAX0RED.BY.SUB7.NET MICROSOFT.COM.WILL.BE.SLAPPED.IN.THE.FACE.BY.MY.BLUE.VEINED.SPANNER.NET MICROSOFT.COM.WILL.BE.BEATEN.WITH.MY.SPANNER.NET MICROSOFT.COM.WAREZ.AT.TOPLIST.GULLI.COM MICROSOFT.COM.TOTALLY.SUCKS.S3U.NET MICROSOFT.COM.SOFTWARE.IS.NOT.USED.AT.REG.RU MICROSOFT.COM.SHOULD.GIVE.UP.BECAUSE.LINUXISGOD.COM MICROSOFT.COM.RAWKZ.MUH.WERLD.MENTALFLOSS.CA MICROSOFT.COM.OHMYGODITBURNS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.MATCHES.THIS.STRING.AT.KEYSIGNERS.COM MICROSOFT.COM.LOVES.ME.KOSMAL.NET MICROSOFT.COM.LIVES.AT.SHAUNEWING.COM MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOT.YEPPA.ORG MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET MICROSOFT.COM.IS.IN.BED.WITH.CURTYV.COM MICROSOFT.COM.IS.HOSTED.ON.PROFITHOSTING.NET MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.STEAMING.HEAP.OF.FUCKING-BULLSHIT.NET MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.MESS.TIMPORTER.CO.UK MICROSOFT.COM.HAS.A.PRESENT.COMING.FROM.HUGHESMISSILES.COM MICROSOFT.COM.FILLS.ME.WITH.BELLIGERENCE.NET MICROSOFT.COM.CAN.GO.FUCK.ITSELF.AT.SECZY.COM MICROSOFT.COM.ARE.GODDAMN.PIGFUCKERS.NET.NS-NOT-IN-SERVICE.COM MICROSOFT.COM To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of the of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look them up with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:24:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412C51065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88888FC12 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9LOu7i097603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:24:57 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D014928.9040709@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:24:56 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Gatten References: <13153_1291929006_4D0145AE_13153_178_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E4E@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> In-Reply-To: <13153_1291929006_4D0145AE_13153_178_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E4E@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:24:59 -0000 On 09/12/2010 21:10, Gary Gatten wrote: > Probably Wikileaks supporters fighting back against the DDoS. Interesting issue, anyone else seeing similar problems? > i came across the amazon whois hack as a result of debugging failed whois lookups (on freebsd obv) given the freebsd method of choosing whois via cnames via from this one domain, it's poss a good idea to at least have some seperate name servers for whois-servers.net. Not great that the whois service is down as a result of 'redundant' dns services in the same place. Name Server: UDNS1.ULTRADNS.NET Name Server: UDNS2.ULTRADNS.NET both down at time of writing, Paul. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:31:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B21A10657DD for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from editor@d3photography.com) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FFE8FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8874E26293B6 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:13:16 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaiLHroa177G for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:13:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.132] (c-76-113-215-212.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [76.113.215.212]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5D0D26293B5 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:13:14 -0600 (CST) From: Ryan Coleman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:12:47 -0600 Message-Id: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com> To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:31:33 -0000 Dear list, Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with = processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and = over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait = and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between = 20% and 80% of my system resources. I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is = causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it = won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my = MBP it will connect in the CLI. It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they = have to upload large numbers of photos. Thanks, Ryan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:40:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517BD1065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0480D8FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zidane.cc.vt.edu (zidane.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.227]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB9LdmMr032000; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:39:49 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by zidane.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id MVL36771; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:39:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB9LdlH3007982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:39:48 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:39:47 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <28A98D03-BDCA-4857-9CE2-4D5DC10E4BBC@vt.edu> References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=zidane.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020202.4D014CA4.0243,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: Adam Vande More , Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:40:20 -0000 On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, = there are >> several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER = received. Do I >> need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? = Where it >> should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host OS, = two VMs >> (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs = communicate with >> each other. >>=20 >> Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS = FreeBSD >> 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then? >>=20 >> When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER >> results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received. >>=20 >=20 >=20 > It would appear that Ubuntu has not correctly installed the bridging > adapter. Did you check out the links I provided on setting up a = bridging > device on Ubuntu w/ vBox? They worked for me, I set up an Ubuntu VM = and in > the VM setup a test VM of vBox to boot fbsd (8.1 in my case). >=20 > NOTE: I do not recoomend setting up a VM within a VM, I did it = strictly as a > test to boot and get network access. Which it did. > ______________________________________________ Hi, I am sorry I don't know which page you refer to... I am confusing now = cause first, I don't know which mode could be best for my needs. What I = need is two VMs on a real machine, these two VMs could communicate with = each other. It seems bridged mode is suitable here. But there is no = network access for bridged mode.=20 BTW, when I use NAT mode, two VMs get the same IP address, and they = could not get to each other. Thanks, W.W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:42:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11519106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3A08FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (emlpfilt2.waddell.com [10.1.10.30]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91C750880; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:10:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BD9362F8001; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:10:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com (advphtcas0.wradvisors.com [192.168.203.228]) by emlpfilt2.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B695B2F8003; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:10:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.151]) by ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:10:06 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: "'paul@ifdnrg.com'" , "'questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:10:06 -0600 Thread-Topic: more dns weirdness Thread-Index: AcuX4XH1GnaPHev3T8ilKxd9pFMphwABAIkS Message-ID: <13153_1291929006_4D0145AE_13153_178_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E4E@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:42:45 -0000 UHJvYmFibHkgV2lraWxlYWtzIHN1cHBvcnRlcnMgZmlnaHRpbmcgYmFjayBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoZSBE RG9TLiAgSW50ZXJlc3RpbmcgaXNzdWUsIGFueW9uZSBlbHNlIHNlZWluZyBzaW1pbGFyIHByb2Js ZW1zPw0KDQotLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBvd25lci1mcmVlYnNk LXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyA8b3duZXItZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5v cmc+DQpUbzogRnJlZUJTRCBRdWVzdGlvbnMgPHF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6 IFRodSBEZWMgMDkgMTQ6NDA6NDUgMjAxMApTdWJqZWN0OiBtb3JlIGRucyB3ZWlyZG5lc3MNCg0K DQpzdGlsbCBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgZG5zIGlzc3VlcyB0aGF0IGFyZSBubyBkb3VidCB0byBkbyB3aXRo IHdpZGVyIGlzc3VlczoNCg0Kc29tZW9uZSBoZXJlIG1pZ2h0IGtub3cgd2hvIHRvIHRlbGw/DQoN CiN3aG9pcyBhbWF6b24uY29tDQoNCldob2lzIFNlcnZlciBWZXJzaW9uIDIuMA0KDQpEb21haW4g bmFtZXMgaW4gdGhlIC5jb20gYW5kIC5uZXQgZG9tYWlucyBjYW4gbm93IGJlIHJlZ2lzdGVyZWQN CndpdGggbWFueSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgY29tcGV0aW5nIHJlZ2lzdHJhcnMuIEdvIHRvIGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cuaW50ZXJuaWMubmV0DQpmb3IgZGV0YWlsZWQgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24uDQoNCkFNQVpPTi5DT00u WlpaWlouR0VULkxBSUQuQVQuV1dXLlNXSU5HSU5HQ09NTVVOSVRZLkNPTQ0KQU1BWk9OLkNPTS5N T1JFLklORk8uQVQuV1dXLkJFWU9ORFdIT0lTLkNPTQ0KQU1BWk9OLkNPTS5JUy5OMFQuQVMuMTMz Ny5BUy5XV1cuR1VMTEkuQ09NDQpBTUFaT04uQ09NLkJMQUNLU1dBTlNCT09LUy5DT00NCkFNQVpP Ti5DT00NCg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpodHRwOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucw0KVG8gdW5z dWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gImZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLXVuc3Vic2NyaWJl QGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIg0KCgoKCgo8Zm9udCBzaXplPSIxIj4KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0nYm9yZGVyOm5v bmU7Ym9yZGVyLWJvdHRvbTpkb3VibGUgd2luZG93dGV4dCAyLjI1cHQ7cGFkZGluZzowaW4gMGlu IDEuMHB0IDBpbic+CjwvZGl2PgoiVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpcyBpbnRlbmRlZCB0byBiZSByZXZpZXdl ZCBieSBvbmx5IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQKIGFuZCBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbiB0aGF0IGlzIHByaXZpbGVnZWQgYW5kL29yIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbC4KIElmIHlvdSBhcmUg bm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQsIHlvdSBhcmUgaGVyZWJ5IG5vdGlmaWVkIHRoYXQK IGFueSByZXZpZXcsIHVzZSwgZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBvciBjb3B5aW5nIG9m IHRoaXMgZW1haWwKIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMsIGlmIGFueSwgaXMgc3RyaWN0bHkgcHJv aGliaXRlZC4gIElmIHlvdSBoYXZlCiByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVh c2UgaW1tZWRpYXRlbHkgbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYnkKIHJldHVybiBlbWFpbCBhbmQgZGVs ZXRlIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgZnJvbSB5b3VyIHN5c3RlbS4iCjwvZm9udD4KCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8F9106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAD08FC13 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so2794089fxm.36 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:55:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iJMYKHB6oCd3PHRRcH4+RHxC9AQnk6NiYKY90z6Sz6s=; b=CN+4N5f5puSwyKTgXlwAqIiv2PlSoNdiOEJ1vy2HhpVPkDckLEuFtbKGzhMcf5sygU pGygQYUxkxJX+PLC0xKynTcMYl/1aMTBZyrXJR2Jj1GeUKVdy6xOy/0e3QgVDeEunwV4 f+0YuTkAr4w3N/00lq8HYsoIe5f2lTn6tTnks= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u0D3BrLzLtxkO7hB8ofmHSzQI9RUEiI4ZUWlI3FqBdp9oVjbu+brKzQ35PYMYhm37q AsK/dA2OcnHnk35E02OwbCIqrPWyYvD2FCXpDr3HTCBAvg9Iaevjr84OSMMZkDE6BmBk +OYIALPKs+Sf71H3ary/Ei3XMqtiIxEbI2byw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.76 with SMTP id g12mr1578971fan.32.1291931722721; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.107.79 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:55:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:55:22 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Weihang Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:55:24 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: > I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are > several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I > need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? Bridged networking makes the guest behave like another physical installation with respect to networking. If your network doesn't have a DHCP server then for DHCP to work one is required. You don't need DHCP for networking however, you could simply assign static addresses. > Where it should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the host > OS, two VMs (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two VMs > communicate with each other. > Why are you using such an old version of FreeBSD? Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS FreeBSD > 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then? > In NAT mode, VirtualBox provides it's internal DHCP server. When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER > results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received. > -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:13:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E912D1065696 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEF98FC16 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 446A4E80DDA; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:56:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:56:17 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Paul Macdonald Message-ID: <20101209215617.GC9775@thought.org> References: <13153_1291929006_4D0145AE_13153_178_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E4E@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <4D014928.9040709@ifdnrg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D014928.9040709@ifdnrg.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Gary Gatten , "'questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:13:11 -0000 On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:24:56PM +0000, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 09/12/2010 21:10, Gary Gatten wrote: > >Probably Wikileaks supporters fighting back against the DDoS. Interesting issue, anyone else seeing similar problems? > > > i came across the amazon whois hack as a result of debugging failed > whois lookups (on freebsd obv) > given the freebsd method of choosing whois via cnames via from this > one domain, it's poss a good idea to at least have some seperate > name servers for whois-servers.net. Not great that the whois > service is down as a result of 'redundant' dns services in the same > place. > > Name Server: UDNS1.ULTRADNS.NET > Name Server: UDNS2.ULTRADNS.NET > > both down at time of writing, > > Paul. This may/may not mean anything. Some days ago I got a brief mail from reminding me to "re-up". I quit them months ago when they wanted to slam me for some absurb amount-- $153.00--to be my secondary. I deleted their email; then in October my ~/Maildir got wiped. (I-done -it[?]) FWIW, I had an Amazona glitch around 16:00 localtime yesterday. Amazon couldn't verify my Visa card. I retried hours later and the DDoS seems to have resolved itself. gary PS: Time to bring back USENET:-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:15:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D94106566B for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6345B8FC16 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB9MFqjt098100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:15:53 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D015517.3000901@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:15:51 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Tornquist References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:15:59 -0000 On 09/12/2010 22:01, Andy Tornquist wrote: > Have you tried a different server to query? > > the wider issue is that freebsd whois will use tld.whois-servers.net cnames to resolve appropriate whois servers and that whois-servers.net has nameservers from one sole provider (ultradns), which is still having problems. I'm not overally bothered about amazons' whois, but i am concerned about freebsd's whois being tied to one NS provider (ultradns) which affects dig's Paul. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:16:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9F1065696 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1792F8FC28 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2884773wyf.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:16:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZC3vEaRG/uy4swLyK97CYt5aSD1pSJe54rM7gLY5J7I=; b=RRqHD3AF7x56Mr5oYlb/C/dgYo3KUDw8Bms9McRdZu53ilWPmFgD68q3RM8Z8O0Woy OuO5DdJAKbFEjBseM4zaJ7k4zuowLkj9F2QrMjMsaWz9nOdDRideFprhUwlLR3cj2kCa EPnJ8dFOvgqXDXHOIXLsHKZEUS0LC7T6QbL4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ActVC5OhbQKo8NhP9LxUgO+CDHKze+NL5RgRVu41HRNB+HmClzho2eEeETJYUdNjgL caoM6LJafnZixugA7SVWjhqnzmeu+CcEFrAQmQMuv7oKB1HjTWPoq6eWJAHgSQ4yroF5 VyzTE0PMf3PNyWTKJ6x0YoryonJ5psDz5lpKQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.141 with SMTP id p13mr1187902wep.102.1291932981861; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.164.21 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:16:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <84950898@bb.ipt.ru> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:16:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:16:23 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:50, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> That worked... >> >> I think I'll try the update process again. >> >> Anything else you can recommend? >> >> Thanks, >> > > > Did you read /usr/src/UPDATING ? Why, yes I did. Didn't see anything in there that looked like it might cause this problem, though. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:26:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42E41065670 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyt@afua.net) Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54ACD8FC18 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from source ([74.125.82.48]) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTQFXkQQYPSruZuGBqNozEwDQ+nMD6fVV@postini.com; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:26:26 PST Received: by mail-ww0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 20so2731134wwd.29 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:26:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.151.69 with SMTP id b5mr11247707wbw.168.1291932084043; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:01:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.141.198 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:01:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:01:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Andy Tornquist To: Paul Macdonald , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:26:27 -0000 Have you tried a different server to query? On 12/9/10, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > still debugging dns issues that are no doubt to do with wider issues: > > someone here might know who to tell? > > #whois amazon.com > > Whois Server Version 2.0 > > Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered > with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net > for detailed information. > > AMAZON.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM > AMAZON.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM > AMAZON.COM.IS.N0T.AS.1337.AS.WWW.GULLI.COM > AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM > AMAZON.COM > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Sent from my mobile device From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:39:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497861065674 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from fep19.mx.upcmail.net (fep19.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48E78FC15 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101209223902.MUSN1944.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:39:02 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([89.132.77.158]) by edge04.upcmail.net with edge id hAf01f03D3QvkXM04Af1BH; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:39:02 +0100 X-SourceIP: 89.132.77.158 Message-ID: <4D015A82.5040605@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:38:58 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; hu; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Nww7yNiXF4C1XGF+VcigPkOcTpD8wJaI1KQuZlH5eEk= c=1 sm=0 a=Xb4xUz3OdD0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=2frQhE18BXCGe4mAu24A:9 a=RySAvreLgEhyWe5TQmUA:7 a=NHVwDOYaibr1vqmw-RDooQ_mBVwA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, danieleff@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:39:04 -0000 > Step 1, get them to define "server" and "too slow": > > If you log in and do shell ops, is the system slow to respond? Based on > what you've reported, I'd be willing to bet that shell ops are pretty > responsive. I can't be 100% sure without more information, but I'm > willing to be that what your users are complaining about is your web > application being slow. Since you don't say what that application is, > I can only provide general advice. Shell response is fast. The application may be slow, but we should see why (high CPU load or high I/O?) > I'm guessing that PostgreSQL is the bottleneck. I'm going to first make > a few general suggestions, then provide suggestions on how to isolate the > problem more specifically. > > First off, you have 24G of RAM available and PostgreSQL only seems to > have access to 400M of it. Bump shared_buffers up to 2 or 3 G at least, > and bump up work_mem to at least a few hundred meg, and > maintenance_work_mem up to at 1/2G or so. Good point. Changed shared_buffers to 4G, work_mem to 512M and maintenance_work_mem to 2G > If the top and gstat outputs are typical, it looks like PostgreSQL is > doing mostly writes, but is not significantly blocked on writes. It looks > like individual PostgreSQL processes are simply taking a long time to do > their work. > > What's in your PostgreSQL log files? If there's nothing, then bump up > the logging information in your postgresql.conf. I particularly like > log_min_duration_statement at 500 ... any query that takes longer than > 1/2 second to execute is suspect in the types applications I work with > most frequently. Thanks for that hint also. We have some programs making huge queries (once in a day or so) so I set this to 3000 for now. > If your application is developed in-house, I'd be willing to bet a paycheck > that there are LOTS of indexes missing and that PostgreSQL is doing lots > of seq scans where it could run lots faster if it had indexes. > > Check also your autovacuum settings and ensure that tables are not bloating > out of control due to insufficient vacuuming. You may have to vacuum full/ > reindex the entire database to get things back under control, which can take > a long time if it's badly bloated. Well, we have tables with 5M+ rows (table size over 4G) and we have 500+ tables. This is probably something that is out of scope - probably you cannot help with that without knowing the structure of the database and how it is used, and it would take a long time to understand. But anyway, if there is a problem with the database (not having indexes), we see heavy I/O or CPU load of the postgresql processes right? I mean, if the bottleneck is postgresql, then we should be able to see it at the OS level. > Your application may also be suffering from lock contention if there are > lots of table locks used. Looking at the pg_locks table while things are > slow can quickly identify if this is the case, and looking at > pg_stat_activity in conjunction with that table will usually narrow down > the problem pretty quickly. We do not issue "lock" statements directly, but we use database transactions. We have a tool for checking the state of those. Most of the time, only a few open database transactions are opened, and usually we don't have locks that are not granted. > Finally, if you find that PostgreSQL is the bottleneck and you can't > narrow it down enough to fix, join the PostgreSQL general questions > mailing list and ask for help with the same level of detail you did > here. You'll find that they're an equally helpful community. I'll do that, but first let me test the new settings. Yes, thank you very much for you help. Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:48:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0E8106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6FD8FC31 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1905135eyh.37 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with SMTP id z17mr85496ebc.12.1291934922026; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:48:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:48:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:48:21 -0500 Message-ID: To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Weihang Wang , Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:48:45 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: > Clipped for brevity. https://help.*ubuntu*.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking https://wiki.*ubuntu*.com/VirtualBox http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=667952 http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#id2741763 Here are the links that should help you, I *suggested* you read them this time and learn how to install, configure and use the bridging adapter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 22:52:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EAA106564A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D518FC14 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1906404eyh.37 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.12.194 with SMTP id y2mr83760eby.25.1291935121774; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:52:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:51:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D015517.3000901@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> <4D015517.3000901@ifdnrg.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:51:41 -0500 Message-ID: To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Andy Tornquist Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:52:03 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > the wider issue is that freebsd whois will use tld.whois-servers.netcnames to resolve appropriate whois servers and that > whois-servers.net has nameservers from one sole provider (ultradns), > which is still having problems. > > I'm not overally bothered about amazons' whois, but i am concerned about > freebsd's whois being tied to one NS provider (ultradns) which affects dig's > Indeed, whois on 2 freebsd boxes reports the faulty search but on my linux box (gentoo) it worked fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 23:01:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86497106566C for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFD18FC12 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so2856422fxm.36 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:01:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kSp8Hvn0W2iebcLmGDa9tF6c3viudRtgDQqbZcYQro=; b=WFDSJUWApva+i+bJFKevoRSAy5/JAGzwztEEMt24riuN5QmtHjokkMK119DYAzh1XE 4vXaSd1CRD/0MtVQwGsxQfHuovzNH3i8xC1dMJdw1VFST1K0CPqdJT46oDMiuJOv4ex2 nCoHhwtfI7xVGTAD/+H1Btl8j9Mcv3dhhlLr8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UdL98LT5HBDXy8Xe+b+9CMRGxcbwKWPXSqrunvpa7tOuoHN5HSRHNqj1XlUv4/GgxZ UUfCbR3qAcSJuQvrUewHpJbaT7I8nZ0SvF862Vvlkr3OBr1EU4sE4p+tWOuCtUbvtHSE DExoCoaQNNwSV9kqAqc7svxBny0Ye/PAA0qXY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.123.209 with SMTP id q17mr4774265far.126.1291934147289; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.78.197 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:35:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D015517.3000901@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> <4D015517.3000901@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:35:47 -0800 Message-ID: From: pete wright To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Andy Tornquist Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:01:13 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 09/12/2010 22:01, Andy Tornquist wrote: >> >> Have you tried a different server to query? >> >> > > the wider issue is that freebsd whois will use tld.whois-servers.net cnam= es > to resolve appropriate whois servers and that whois-servers.net has > nameservers from one sole provider (ultradns), =A0which is still having > problems. > > I'm not overally bothered about amazons' whois, but i am concerned about > freebsd's whois being tied to one NS provider (ultradns) which affects di= g's > according to man 1 whois you can specify alternative hosts to query as well as alternative databases. specifically i think the -h switch will be of interest. -pete --=20 pete wright www.nycbug.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 23:15:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF351065672 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from fep18.mx.upcmail.net (fep18.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442518FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep18-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101209231517.IIKL1353.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:15:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([89.132.77.158]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge id hBFG1f00L3QvkXM02BFHk3; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:15:17 +0100 X-SourceIP: 89.132.77.158 Message-ID: <4D016302.70505@shopzeus.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:15:14 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; hu; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=YkiHm+ATFBqfWDprzc7VyYVud6sOBg0JMTRaeRDeqNo= c=1 sm=0 a=Xb4xUz3OdD0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=-eHe1VUEINe11T5p2yYA:9 a=ZpcxRoL9eozjKB6_42cA:7 a=sK8Nx0HzHcojcPJ4y24AuLofni4A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, danieleff@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:15:20 -0000 > First off, you have 24G of RAM available and PostgreSQL only seems to > have access to 400M of it. Bump shared_buffers up to 2 or 3 G at least, > and bump up work_mem to at least a few hundred meg, and > maintenance_work_mem up to at 1/2G or so. All right. Here is what I did. I setup a new shmmax value this way: sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=8589934592 It is 8G. (By the way I also have kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 1 ) Then I have changed shared_mem to 1024MB in postgresql.conf. Then I tried to start postgresql I got this message in the log: Dec 9 17:53:59 shopzeus postgres[27247]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-1] FATAL: could not create shared memory segment: Cannot allocate memory Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-2] DETAIL: Failed system call was shmget(key=5432001, size=1105051648, 03600). Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-3] HINT: This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. To reduce the request size (currently 1105051648 bytes), reduce PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 131072) and/or its max_connections parameter (currently 203). Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. I do not understand. Doc says these: "max_connections cost ~ 400 bytes of shared memory slot, plus lock space (see max_locks_per_transaction)." Even if I had max_connections = 5000, total shared memory required would be way below shmmax=8G. What am I missing here? Thanks Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 23:17:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557D21065674 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58068FC20 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2306547ewy.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.12.211 with SMTP id y19mr1358982eby.12.1291936638587; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:17:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:16:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D016302.70505@shopzeus.com> References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4D016302.70505@shopzeus.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:16:58 -0500 Message-ID: To: Laszlo Nagy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran , danieleff@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:17:20 -0000 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > I do not understand. > > Doc says these: > > "max_connections cost ~ 400 bytes of shared memory slot, plus lock space > (see max_locks_per_transaction)." > > Even if I had max_connections = 5000, total shared memory required would be > way below shmmax=8G. > > What am I missing here? > > Thanks > > Laszlo > > After killing the process, did you give it time to flush itself from memory before restarting it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 00:55:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC36106566C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB108FC15 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-67-171-66-177.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [67.171.66.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 064B1F7419; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:55:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:55:26 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Laszlo Nagy Message-Id: <20101209195526.e09b488d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4D016302.70505@shopzeus.com> References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> <20101209083818.e622a146.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4D016302.70505@shopzeus.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, danieleff@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:55:23 -0000 On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:15:14 +0100 Laszlo Nagy wrote: > > > First off, you have 24G of RAM available and PostgreSQL only seems to > > have access to 400M of it. Bump shared_buffers up to 2 or 3 G at least, > > and bump up work_mem to at least a few hundred meg, and > > maintenance_work_mem up to at 1/2G or so. > > All right. Here is what I did. I setup a new shmmax value this way: > > sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=8589934592 > > It is 8G. (By the way I also have kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 1 ) Then I > have changed shared_mem to 1024MB in postgresql.conf. > Then I tried to start postgresql I got this message in the log: > > Dec 9 17:53:59 shopzeus postgres[27247]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL > documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-1] FATAL: could not create > shared memory segment: Cannot allocate memory > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-2] DETAIL: Failed system > call was shmget(key=5432001, size=1105051648, 03600). > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-3] HINT: This error > usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared memory segment > exceeded available memory or swap space. To reduce the request size > (currently 1105051648 bytes), reduce PostgreSQL's shared_buffers > parameter (currently 131072) and/or its max_connections parameter > (currently 203). > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL > documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. > > I do not understand. > > Doc says these: > > "max_connections cost ~ 400 bytes of shared memory slot, plus lock space > (see max_locks_per_transaction)." > > Even if I had max_connections = 5000, total shared memory required would > be way below shmmax=8G. > > What am I missing here? Did you bump kern.ipc.shmall? The one you bumped is the maximum size of a single shared memory request, shmall is the maximum amount of shared memory for the entire system. They both have to be increased. To make it more confusing, shmall is in pages, not bytes, so you have to divide by pagesize (sysctl hw.pagesize). -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 01:30:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC11106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C668FC0A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (emlpfilt4.waddell.com [10.1.10.26]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF756508FF; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E5F4B578834; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com (advphtcas0.wradvisors.com [192.168.203.228]) by emlpfilt4.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE814578830; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.151]) by ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: "'wmoran@potentialtech.com'" , "'gandalf@shopzeus.com'" Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 Thread-Topic: What is loading my server so much? Thread-Index: AcuYBPiuDLmoBqjDRBe0HBjnjLM/yAABM70A Message-ID: <29967_1291944608_4D0182A0_29967_949_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E5D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "'questions@freebsd.org'" , "'danieleff@gmail.com'" Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:30:19 -0000 Q291bGQgdGhlcmUgYmUgYSB1bGltaXQgaXNzdWUgYXMgd2VsbD8NCg0KLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwg TWVzc2FnZSAtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogb3duZXItZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcg PG93bmVyLWZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnPg0KVG86IExhc3psbyBOYWd5IDxn YW5kYWxmQHNob3B6ZXVzLmNvbT4NCkNjOiBxdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgPHF1ZXN0aW9u c0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz47IGRhbmllbGVmZkBnbWFpbC5jb20gPGRhbmllbGVmZkBnbWFpbC5jb20+ DQpTZW50OiBUaHUgRGVjIDA5IDE4OjU1OjI2IDIwMTAKU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFdoYXQgaXMgbG9h ZGluZyBteSBzZXJ2ZXIgc28gbXVjaD8NCg0KT24gRnJpLCAxMCBEZWMgMjAxMCAwMDoxNToxNCAr MDEwMA0KTGFzemxvIE5hZ3kgPGdhbmRhbGZAc2hvcHpldXMuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPiANCj4g PiBGaXJzdCBvZmYsIHlvdSBoYXZlIDI0RyBvZiBSQU0gYXZhaWxhYmxlIGFuZCBQb3N0Z3JlU1FM IG9ubHkgc2VlbXMgdG8NCj4gPiBoYXZlIGFjY2VzcyB0byA0MDBNIG9mIGl0LiAgQnVtcCBzaGFy ZWRfYnVmZmVycyB1cCB0byAyIG9yIDMgRyBhdCBsZWFzdCwNCj4gPiBhbmQgYnVtcCB1cCB3b3Jr X21lbSB0byBhdCBsZWFzdCBhIGZldyBodW5kcmVkIG1lZywgYW5kDQo+ID4gbWFpbnRlbmFuY2Vf d29ya19tZW0gdXAgdG8gYXQgMS8yRyBvciBzby4NCj4gDQo+IEFsbCByaWdodC4gSGVyZSBpcyB3 aGF0IEkgZGlkLiBJIHNldHVwIGEgbmV3IHNobW1heCB2YWx1ZSB0aGlzIHdheToNCj4gDQo+IHN5 c2N0bCBrZXJuLmlwYy5zaG1tYXg9ODU4OTkzNDU5Mg0KPiANCj4gSXQgaXMgOEcuICAoQnkgdGhl IHdheSBJIGFsc28gaGF2ZSBrZXJuLmlwYy5zaG1fdXNlX3BoeXM6IDEgKSBUaGVuIEkgDQo+IGhh dmUgY2hhbmdlZCBzaGFyZWRfbWVtIHRvIDEwMjRNQiBpbiBwb3N0Z3Jlc3FsLmNvbmYuDQo+IFRo ZW4gSSB0cmllZCB0byBzdGFydCBwb3N0Z3Jlc3FsIEkgZ290IHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpbiB0aGUg bG9nOg0KPiANCj4gRGVjICA5IDE3OjUzOjU5IHNob3B6ZXVzIHBvc3RncmVzWzI3MjQ3XTogWzEt NF0gICAgICAgICBUaGUgUG9zdGdyZVNRTCANCj4gZG9jdW1lbnRhdGlvbiBjb250YWlucyBtb3Jl IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGFib3V0IHNoYXJlZCBtZW1vcnkgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbi4NCj4gRGVjICA5 IDE3OjU1OjUyIHNob3B6ZXVzIHBvc3RncmVzWzI3MzI4XTogWzEtMV0gRkFUQUw6ICBjb3VsZCBu b3QgY3JlYXRlIA0KPiBzaGFyZWQgbWVtb3J5IHNlZ21lbnQ6IENhbm5vdCBhbGxvY2F0ZSBtZW1v cnkNCj4gRGVjICA5IDE3OjU1OjUyIHNob3B6ZXVzIHBvc3RncmVzWzI3MzI4XTogWzEtMl0gREVU QUlMOiAgRmFpbGVkIHN5c3RlbSANCj4gY2FsbCB3YXMgc2htZ2V0KGtleT01NDMyMDAxLCBzaXpl PTExMDUwNTE2NDgsIDAzNjAwKS4NCj4gRGVjICA5IDE3OjU1OjUyIHNob3B6ZXVzIHBvc3RncmVz WzI3MzI4XTogWzEtM10gSElOVDogIFRoaXMgZXJyb3IgDQo+IHVzdWFsbHkgbWVhbnMgdGhhdCBQ b3N0Z3JlU1FMJ3MgcmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgYSBzaGFyZWQgbWVtb3J5IHNlZ21lbnQgDQo+IGV4Y2Vl ZGVkIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBtZW1vcnkgb3Igc3dhcCBzcGFjZS4gVG8gcmVkdWNlIHRoZSByZXF1ZXN0 IHNpemUgDQo+IChjdXJyZW50bHkgMTEwNTA1MTY0OCBieXRlcyksIHJlZHVjZSBQb3N0Z3JlU1FM J3Mgc2hhcmVkX2J1ZmZlcnMgDQo+IHBhcmFtZXRlciAoY3VycmVudGx5IDEzMTA3MikgYW5kL29y IGl0cyBtYXhfY29ubmVjdGlvbnMgcGFyYW1ldGVyIA0KPiAoY3VycmVudGx5IDIwMykuDQo+IERl YyAgOSAxNzo1NTo1MiBzaG9wemV1cyBwb3N0Z3Jlc1syNzMyOF06IFsxLTRdICAgICAgICAgVGhl IFBvc3RncmVTUUwgDQo+IGRvY3VtZW50YXRpb24gY29udGFpbnMgbW9yZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBh Ym91dCBzaGFyZWQgbWVtb3J5IGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24uDQo+IA0KPiBJIGRvIG5vdCB1bmRlcnN0 YW5kLg0KPiANCj4gRG9jIHNheXMgdGhlc2U6DQo+IA0KPiAibWF4X2Nvbm5lY3Rpb25zIGNvc3Qg fiA0MDAgYnl0ZXMgb2Ygc2hhcmVkIG1lbW9yeSBzbG90LCBwbHVzIGxvY2sgc3BhY2UgDQo+IChz ZWUgbWF4X2xvY2tzX3Blcl90cmFuc2FjdGlvbikuIg0KPiANCj4gRXZlbiBpZiBJIGhhZCBtYXhf Y29ubmVjdGlvbnMgPSA1MDAwLCB0b3RhbCBzaGFyZWQgbWVtb3J5IHJlcXVpcmVkIHdvdWxkIA0K PiBiZSB3YXkgYmVsb3cgc2htbWF4PThHLg0KPiANCj4gV2hhdCBhbSBJIG1pc3NpbmcgaGVyZT8N Cg0KRGlkIHlvdSBidW1wIGtlcm4uaXBjLnNobWFsbD8gIFRoZSBvbmUgeW91IGJ1bXBlZCBpcyB0 aGUgbWF4aW11bSBzaXplIG9mDQphIHNpbmdsZSBzaGFyZWQgbWVtb3J5IHJlcXVlc3QsIHNobWFs bCBpcyB0aGUgbWF4aW11bSBhbW91bnQgb2Ygc2hhcmVkDQptZW1vcnkgZm9yIHRoZSBlbnRpcmUg c3lzdGVtLiAgVGhleSBib3RoIGhhdmUgdG8gYmUgaW5jcmVhc2VkLiAgVG8gbWFrZQ0KaXQgbW9y ZSBjb25mdXNpbmcsIHNobWFsbCBpcyBpbiBwYWdlcywgbm90IGJ5dGVzLCBzbyB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0 byBkaXZpZGUNCmJ5IHBhZ2VzaXplIChzeXNjdGwgaHcucGFnZXNpemUpLg0KDQotQmlsbA0KX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCmZyZWVic2QtcXVl c3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3Jn L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMNClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlLCBzZW5k IGFueSBtYWlsIHRvICJmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucy11bnN1YnNjcmliZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyIN CgoKCgoKPGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0iMSI+CjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9J2JvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1ib3R0 b206ZG91YmxlIHdpbmRvd3RleHQgMi4yNXB0O3BhZGRpbmc6MGluIDBpbiAxLjBwdCAwaW4nPgo8 L2Rpdj4KIlRoaXMgZW1haWwgaXMgaW50ZW5kZWQgdG8gYmUgcmV2aWV3ZWQgYnkgb25seSB0aGUg aW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50CiBhbmQgbWF5IGNvbnRhaW4gaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gdGhhdCBpcyBw cml2aWxlZ2VkIGFuZC9vciBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwuCiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUgaW50ZW5k ZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LCB5b3UgYXJlIGhlcmVieSBub3RpZmllZCB0aGF0CiBhbnkgcmV2aWV3LCB1 c2UsIGRpc3NlbWluYXRpb24sIGRpc2Nsb3N1cmUgb3IgY29weWluZyBvZiB0aGlzIGVtYWlsCiBh bmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzLCBpZiBhbnksIGlzIHN0cmljdGx5IHByb2hpYml0ZWQuICBJZiB5 b3UgaGF2ZQogcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIGltbWVkaWF0ZWx5 IG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGJ5CiByZXR1cm4gZW1haWwgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGlzIGVtYWls IGZyb20geW91ciBzeXN0ZW0uIgo8L2ZvbnQ+Cgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 03:32:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD19106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2958A8FC1A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from steiner.cc.vt.edu (steiner.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.51]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBA3WA59007827; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:32:10 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by steiner.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id MOM88865; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:32:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBA3W4GF012928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:32:04 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:32:04 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020203.4D019F3A.0156,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:32:42 -0000 On Dec 9, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: >=20 >> I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, = there are >> several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER = received. Do I >> need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server? >=20 >=20 > Bridged networking makes the guest behave like another physical = installation > with respect to networking. If your network doesn't have a DHCP = server then > for DHCP to work one is required. You don't need DHCP for networking > however, you could simply assign static addresses. >=20 >=20 >> Where it should be? Now I only have one test machine, Ubuntu as the = host >> OS, two VMs (both are FreeBSD 6.0) on this machine. I want this two = VMs >> communicate with each other. >>=20 >=20 > Why are you using such an old version of FreeBSD? >=20 > Just go back to the DHCP stuff, when I use NAT mode, the guest OS = FreeBSD >> 6.0 could get DHCPOFFER successfully. Who is the DHCP server then? >>=20 >=20 > In NAT mode, VirtualBox provides it's internal DHCP server. >=20 > When running dhclien em0, the results are similar to the DHCPDISCOVER >> results during booting. No DHCPOFFERS received. >>=20 >=20 >=20 Hi, I have to use FreeBSD 6.0 because the network stack I will test is only = based on 6.0. BTW, I am using internal networking mode now, these two = VMs could communicate with each other now. This mode seems could satisfy = my needs, because my VMs only need to communicate with each other, not = with the outside world. Thank you so much for help. Best, W.W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 03:34:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69061106566C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weihang@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADE68FC0C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.cc.vt.edu (vivi.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.43]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBA3XUOm008044; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:33:30 -0500 Received: from auth3.smtp.vt.edu (EHLO auth3.smtp.vt.edu) ([198.82.161.152]) by vivi.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id OPM31621; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:33:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.105] (green.cs.vt.edu [128.173.236.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth3.smtp.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBA3XUC5013072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:33:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Weihang Wang In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:33:29 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4744E49A-A50F-4C5E-B8FA-20C685C7937C@vt.edu> References: <4CF87854.1030103@mgwigglesworth.net> <1291368354.2905.19.camel@SHR-42-002> <9B3337B8-3F20-4369-A637-207DEE43A143@vt.edu> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu weihang@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020205.4D019F8A.009C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: Adam Vande More , Timm Wimmers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Virtualbox: No network access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:34:01 -0000 On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More = wrote: >=20 >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang wrote: >>=20 >=20 >=20 > Clipped for brevity. >=20 > https://help.*ubuntu*.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking > https://wiki.*ubuntu*.com/VirtualBox > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=3D667952 > http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#id2741763 >=20 > Here are the links that should help you, I *suggested* you read them = this > time and learn how to install, configure and use the bridging adapter. >=20 Hi, I do read these documents already. Anyway, I have changed the mode the = internal networking mode, it works fine.Thank you so much for your help. Best, W.W.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 04:47:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D7C106566C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD248FC08 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so109120iyb.13 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.20.68 with SMTP id e4mr121610ibb.194.1291956446185; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:47:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.79.82 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:47:06 -0800 (PST) From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:47:06 -0500 Message-ID: To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Kernel panic on power button X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:47:27 -0000 I just pressed the power button on my desktop computer - it seemed like it was attempting to do an ACPI suspend instead of a power down like I expected - but I'm not sure. Either way: When It got close to the end I got Kernel trap 12: page fault in kernel mode followed by the fault address, instruction pointer, etc. I have the information written it down if it would help. At the end it said "unable to dump - device not configured" uptime: 11d... The current process was listed as 81250 (tmux) if that matter. I then needed to perform a hard shutdown of the computer. uname -a FreeBSD voodoo 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #1 r213338: Fri Oct 1 22:11:41 UTC 2010 eitan@voodoo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 What debugging data should I provide to help fix this issue? -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 05:14:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9091065670 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892858FC13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBA5EoAe005095; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:14:50 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:14:50 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012100514.oBA5EoAe005095@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mlmichael70@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: dhclient doesn't work over wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:14:52 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 8 16:31:12 2010 > Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:01:30 +0000 > From: Michael > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: dhclient doesn't work over wireless > > Hello, > > My FreeBSD laptop is unable to get IP address over DHCP but the same > network works fine on Windows, Ubuntu and Android so I believe the > problem lies in my FreeBSD configuration and not on the router/access > point. Problem occurs only for wireless interface. > > FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 with Atheros interface. Wireless networking was > working fine on that system (the same config files) until I had to > replace my wireless router. you replaced the "wireless router". Presumably this is also the wireless 'Access point', to which the laptop connects. What are the chances that it doesn't support WPA, but *ONLY* supports WPA2? May need to tweak the ifconfig params, and/or the supplicant 'key_mgmt' type. > > My rc.conf file: > wlans_ath0="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" > > I'm using standard dhclient.conf file. > > My wpa_supplicant.conf file: > network={ > ssid="wifi" > scan_ssid=1 > bssid=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > priority=9 > mode=0 > proto=RSN > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > auth_alg=OPEN > pairwise=CCMP > group=CCMP > psk="xxxxx" > } > > Now after reboot I'm geting wlan0 connection (status associated): > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx > inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11g > status: associated > ssid wifi channel 9 (2452 MHz 11g) bssid d8:5d:4c:ea:cb:ee > regdomain 103 indoor ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON > deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit txpower 20 bmiss 7 scanvalid 450 > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > protmode CTS wme burst roaming MANUAL > > But for some reason it doesn't get the IP address! > And whrn I manually try to: dhclient wlan0 > DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7 > DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 11 > DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 16 > DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 21 > DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 > No DHCPOFFERS received. > No working leases in persistent database - sleeping. > > Again, other systems doesn't seem to have any trouble with getting IP > from this DHCP server and wired interface (em0) works fine too. > > Any ideas please? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 05:17:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD49106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDFA8FC19 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBA5HTtm005122 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:17:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:17:29 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012100517.oBA5HTtm005122@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:17:30 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 8 18:35:17 2010 > Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:34:53 -0500 > From: Jerry > To: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] > > On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:07:57 +1000 > Da Rock articulated: > > [snip] > > > And thats why Facebook and all those social network sites are bad > > news. What happened to anonymity on the internet? Everyone I know > > worth their salt steers well clear of them... > > "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool." Or as some > say, "Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot." The "formal" version is: "For any fool-proof system, there exists a =sufficiently-determined= fool capable of breaking it." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 05:27:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920B91065670 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951658FC0C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBFA5C45 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:50 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D01B94C.9030909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:23:24 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Kernel panic on power button X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:27:03 -0000 On 12/10/10 14:47, Eitan Adler wrote: > I just pressed the power button on my desktop computer - it seemed > like it was attempting to do an ACPI suspend instead of a power down > like I expected - but I'm not sure. > > Either way: > When It got close to the end > > I got > > Kernel trap 12: page fault in kernel mode > followed by the fault address, instruction pointer, etc. I have the > information written it down if it would help. > At the end it said "unable to dump - device not configured" > uptime: 11d... > > The current process was listed as 81250 (tmux) if that matter. > > I then needed to perform a hard shutdown of the computer. > > uname -a > FreeBSD voodoo 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #1 r213338: Fri Oct 1 > 22:11:41 UTC 2010 eitan@voodoo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > What debugging data should I provide to help fix this issue? > > > > I've seen that before just a few days ago. Difference was battmond shut it down, but it hasn't done it since so I was worried. I checked my disks and they were fine. Maybe post dmesg and compare similarities? Did I mention mine's a laptop? Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jul 12 20:55:11 UTC 2010 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz (2194.51-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fb Stepping = 11 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xe3bd AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 1073741824 (1024 MB) avail memory = 1009704960 (962 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Cuse4BSD v0.1.13 @ /dev/cuse kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: <_ASUS_ Notebook> on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 3f700000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 vgapci0: port 0xec00-0xec07 mem 0xfeb00000-0xfebfffff,0xd0000000-0xdfffffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 agp0: on vgapci0 agp0: detected 7676k stolen memory agp0: aperture size is 256M acpi_video0: on vgapci0 vgapci1: mem 0xfe900000-0xfe9fffff at device 2.1 on pci0 uhci0: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 16 at device 26.0 on pci0 uhci0: [ITHREAD] uhci0: LegSup = 0x0f30 usbus0: on uhci0 uhci1: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 21 at device 26.1 on pci0 uhci1: [ITHREAD] uhci1: LegSup = 0x0f30 usbus1: on uhci1 ehci0: mem 0xfeaff400-0xfeaff7ff irq 18 at device 26.7 on pci0 ehci0: [ITHREAD] usbus2: EHCI version 1.0 usbus2: on ehci0 hdac0: mem 0xfeaf8000-0xfeafbfff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0 hdac0: HDA Driver Revision: 20090624_0136 hdac0: [ITHREAD] pcib1: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: irq 17 at device 28.1 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: irq 18 at device 28.2 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 age0: mem 0xfdcc0000-0xfdcfffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci3 age0: 1280 Tx FIFO, 2364 Rx FIFO age0: Using 1 MSI messages. miibus0: on age0 atphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0 atphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, auto age0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:c6:13:3d:30 age0: [FILTER] pcib4: irq 19 at device 28.3 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: irq 16 at device 28.4 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: irq 17 at device 28.5 on pci0 pci7: on pcib6 iwn0: mem 0xfe5fe000-0xfe5fffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci7 iwn0: Reg Domain: MoW1, address 00:1f:3b:12:7d:6b iwn0: [ITHREAD] iwn0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps iwn0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps iwn0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps iwn0: 11na MCS: 15Mbps 30Mbps 45Mbps 60Mbps 90Mbps 120Mbps 135Mbps 150Mbps 30Mbps 60Mbps 90Mbps 120Mbps 180Mbps 240Mbps 270Mbps 300Mbps iwn0: 11ng MCS: 15Mbps 30Mbps 45Mbps 60Mbps 90Mbps 120Mbps 135Mbps 150Mbps 30Mbps 60Mbps 90Mbps 120Mbps 180Mbps 240Mbps 270Mbps 300Mbps uhci2: port 0xd880-0xd89f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci2: [ITHREAD] uhci2: LegSup = 0x0f30 usbus3: on uhci2 uhci3: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci3: [ITHREAD] uhci3: LegSup = 0x0f30 usbus4: on uhci3 uhci4: port 0xd480-0xd49f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci4: [ITHREAD] uhci4: LegSup = 0x0f30 usbus5: on uhci4 ehci1: mem 0xfeaff000-0xfeaff3ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci1: [ITHREAD] usbus6: EHCI version 1.0 usbus6: on ehci1 pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci8: on pcib7 fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xfe6ff800-0xfe6fffff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci8 fwohci0: [ITHREAD] fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:1e:8c:00:01:23:ab:c6 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 dcons_crom0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x3d92c000 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:1e:8c:23:ab:c6 fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:1e:8c:23:ab:c6 fwip0: on firewire0 fwip0: Firewire address: 00:1e:8c:00:01:23:ab:c6 @ 0xfffe00000000, S400, maxrec 2048 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000000, SelfID Count=1, CYCLEMASTER mode pci8: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) pci8: at device 1.2 (no driver attached) pci8: at device 1.3 (no driver attached) pci8: at device 1.4 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] atapci1: port 0xe880-0xe887,0xe800-0xe803,0xe480-0xe487,0xe400-0xe403,0xe080-0xe09f mem 0xfeaff800-0xfeafffff irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: [ITHREAD] atapci1: AHCI called from vendor specific driver atapci1: AHCI v1.10 controller with 3 3Gbps ports, PM not supported ata2: on atapci1 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci1 ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci1 ata4: [ITHREAD] acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 battery0: on acpi0 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 cpu0: on acpi0 ACPI Warning: Incorrect checksum in table [ATKG] - FB, should be 59 20090521 tbutils-275 ACPI Warning: \\_PR_.P001._CST: Return Package is too small - found 3, expected 3 20090521 nspredef-841 cpu0: invalid _CST state count (3 != 2) est0: on cpu0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 ACPI Warning: \\_PR_.P002._CST: Return Package is too small - found 3, expected 3 20090521 nspredef-841 cpu1: invalid _CST state count (3 != 2) est1: on cpu1 p4tcc1: on cpu1 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0 cable IRM irm(0) (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus2: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus4: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus5: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus6: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ugen2.1: at usbus2 uhub2: on usbus2 ugen3.1: at usbus3 uhub3: on usbus3 ugen4.1: at usbus4 uhub4: on usbus4 ugen5.1: at usbus5 uhub5: on usbus5 ugen6.1: at usbus6 uhub6: on usbus6 acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33 ad4: 476940MB at ata2-master SATA300 hdac0: HDA Codec #0: Realtek ALC660 hdac0: HDA Codec #1: Unknown Codec pcm0: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0 pcm1: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub5: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Root mount waiting for: usbus6 usbus2 Root mount waiting for: usbus6 usbus2 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered Root mount waiting for: usbus6 usbus2 uhub6: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered ugen2.2: at usbus2 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental feature in FreeBSD. ugen1.2: at usbus1 ugen5.2: at usbus5 wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:c6:13:3d:30 iwn0: need multicast update callback iwn0: need multicast update callback iwn0: need multicast update callback fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8 warp_saver: the console does not support M_VGA_CG320 module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (warp_saver, 0xffffffff81084270, 0) error 19 drm0: on vgapci0 info: [drm] MSI enabled 1 message(s) vgapci0: child drm0 requested pci_enable_busmaster info: [drm] AGP at 0xd0000000 256MB info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 drm0: [ITHREAD] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 05:30:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF71A1065693 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BAD8FC18 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BDB5C21 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:35:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D01BA26.2060605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:27:02 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D013ECD.7090102@ifdnrg.com> <4D01472E.4090509@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <4D01472E.4090509@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: more dns weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:30:40 -0000 On 12/10/10 07:16, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/9/2010 3:40 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > >> still debugging dns issues that are no doubt to do with wider issues: >> >> someone here might know who to tell? >> >> #whois amazon.com >> >> Whois Server Version 2.0 >> >> Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered >> with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net >> for detailed information. >> >> AMAZON.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM >> AMAZON.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM >> AMAZON.COM.IS.N0T.AS.1337.AS.WWW.GULLI.COM >> AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM >> AMAZON.COM >> > The whois query is matching a regex. Its just another form of spam and > graffiti. It doesnt really have anything to do with actual DNS lookups > / resolution and is just listing all domains/servers that match your > query. > > > e.g > # whois AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM > > Whois Server Version 2.0 > > Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered > with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net > for detailed information. > > Server Name: AMAZON.COM.BLACKSWANSBOOKS.COM > IP Address: 207.171.166.53 > Registrar: ENOM, INC. > Whois Server: whois.enom.com > Referral URL: http://www.enom.com > > Try whois microsoft.com and so on. Note the output below on how to > single out a specific record. > > > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.THE.BEST.WEBHOSTING.AT.WWW.FATUCH.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.IM.ELITE.WANNABE.TOO.WWW.PLUS613.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.GET.ONE.MILLION.DOLLARS.AT.WWW.UNIMUNDI.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZZ.MORE.DETAILS.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.ZZZ.IS.0WNED.AND.HAX0RED.BY.SUB7.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.WILL.BE.SLAPPED.IN.THE.FACE.BY.MY.BLUE.VEINED.SPANNER.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.WILL.BE.BEATEN.WITH.MY.SPANNER.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.WAREZ.AT.TOPLIST.GULLI.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.TOTALLY.SUCKS.S3U.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.SOFTWARE.IS.NOT.USED.AT.REG.RU > MICROSOFT.COM.SHOULD.GIVE.UP.BECAUSE.LINUXISGOD.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.RAWKZ.MUH.WERLD.MENTALFLOSS.CA > MICROSOFT.COM.OHMYGODITBURNS.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.MORE.INFO.AT.WWW.BEYONDWHOIS.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.MATCHES.THIS.STRING.AT.KEYSIGNERS.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.LOVES.ME.KOSMAL.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.LIVES.AT.SHAUNEWING.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOT.YEPPA.ORG > MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.IS.IN.BED.WITH.CURTYV.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.IS.HOSTED.ON.PROFITHOSTING.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.STEAMING.HEAP.OF.FUCKING-BULLSHIT.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.MESS.TIMPORTER.CO.UK > MICROSOFT.COM.HAS.A.PRESENT.COMING.FROM.HUGHESMISSILES.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.FILLS.ME.WITH.BELLIGERENCE.NET > MICROSOFT.COM.CAN.GO.FUCK.ITSELF.AT.SECZY.COM > MICROSOFT.COM.ARE.GODDAMN.PIGFUCKERS.NET.NS-NOT-IN-SERVICE.COM > MICROSOFT.COM > > To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of the > of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look them up > with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record. > > > ---Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ROFL Thank you for that late afternoon laugh session, it brightened my day :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 05:55:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3CF106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2248FC12 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so2017184eyh.37 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:54:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.136 with SMTP id h8mr328772ebd.51.1291960498266; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:54:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:54:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101107145424.6972.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> References: <20101107145424.6972.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:54:37 -0500 Message-ID: To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:55:00 -0000 On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > Dear Sir/Madam, > > Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it > to. > For more information on our business please click on the following link: > Click here for our website > We look forward to your continued business in the future. > > Regards, > Webmaster > Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 06:00:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9011065672 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607BD8FC0A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-134-77.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.134.77]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF3B1E62E; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:00:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBA60gA1001571; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:00:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:00:42 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Lars Eighner Message-Id: <20101210070042.619ec6cf.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> References: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Make gtk widgets use a larger font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:00:45 -0000 On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:44:01 -0600 (CST), Lars Eighner wrote: > How do I make gtk widgets use larger fonts? I found an old linux FAQ on > this, but it appears to have nothing to do with the way configuration works > on FreeBSD. I'm not sure if it will still work, but in the past, you could create ~/.gtkrc and override settings as you liked. style "font_1" { font= "-b&h-lucida-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-15" } class "*" style "font_1" widget "*" style "font_1" Then replace "iso8859-15" with the font encoding you need, and of course "12" with any other font size that fits your needs. In order to construct the font determination string based on a visual impression and attribute selection from lists, you can use the % xfontsel program. Attention: Untested. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 06:06:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07807106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3FE8FC0A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CF1F2E80DD9; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:06:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:06:54 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101210060654.GA19910@thought.org> References: <3374599093-437630056@intranet.com.mx> <4CFED0D4.3090108@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <001901cb968f$9bef44b0$d3cdce10$@shaw.ca> <20101208211326.0C364BFAA@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> <4D001DDD.1040101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101208193453.72400740@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101208193453.72400740@scorpio> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Shopping cart other than OSCommerce? [LONG] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:06:56 -0000 On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:34:53PM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:07:57 +1000 > Da Rock articulated: > > [snip] > > > And thats why Facebook and all those social network sites are bad > > news. What happened to anonymity on the internet? Everyone I know > > worth their salt steers well clear of them... > > "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool." Or as some > say, "Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot." > > There is nothing inherently bad with Facebook or any of its imitators. > The acronym "PEBKAC" accurately describes the true nature of problem. > The inclusion of "anonymity" has nothing to do with the problem. > My take on facebook--just joined--that it's an excellent way to waste time if you want to. Maybe reconnect with people you haven't seen for years... . > -- > Jerry ??? > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 06:37:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D7F1065673 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618D68FC0C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBA6bKMM001291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:37:21 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oBA6bKMM001291 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1291963041; bh=ELt11M+NQHV1j6OVNJ2tKUeAhhijiuBli4iyYCxX+DM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D01CA99.9020706@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20F ri,=2010=20Dec=202010=2006:37:13=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.12)=20Gecko/20101027=20Thunderbird/3.1.6|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20Laszlo=20Nagy=20|CC:=20questions@fr eebsd.org,=20danieleff@gmail.com|Subject:=20Re:=20What=20is=20load ing=20my=20server=20so=20much?|References:=20<4D00BDF8.6020206@sho pzeus.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com>|X-Enigma il-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multi part/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applicat ion/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig50929FA3 14BAB869CCC0AA72"; b=D6DJE8afYeojvcNuvDu8r77y+uZvJz2BDbz0PH0xbWr2BZezcGcAGweR6w3lZZREk 7feURoIQd/WnuBwOGiu+hcPeFL1LM9Ev+aGu6eOv4k0Hsa2NZjzxRqwUdTVZpnYUP1 oFuaFnPDk1UIVr1l/d14+BtXZjCIu3cpvNaASpyA= Message-ID: <4D01CA99.9020706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:37:13 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laszlo Nagy References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig50929FA314BAB869CCC0AA72" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org, danieleff@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:37:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig50929FA314BAB869CCC0AA72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/12/2010 11:31, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a= > result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the > web server is now refusing clients with "Cannot connect to database" > messages (coming from PHP). This is a classic scenario. Some burst of traffic causes your apache to spawn more child processes than will all fit in RAM at one time. Consequently, the system starts to swap. Swapping kills performance. This slows everything down so much that there are always requests waiting for apache to process, so apache will never find any idle children to kill off. Result misery. The answer is to limit the number of child processes apache will spawn. Decide how much of your available RAM you can devote to Apache. Look at top(1) to find the maximum size apache processes grow to. The ratio of those two sizes is the maximum number of apache processes your system can support. Limiting the total number of apache processes sounds counter-intuitive. What happens when you get sufficient traffic that apache maxes out? Web queries will generally be queued up until there's an apache child free to handle them. Generally that will take from a few 10s of milliseconds on up -- although if you're regularly getting into a state where your webserver takes seconds to answer, then it's time to get more beefy hardware. Cheers, Mstthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig50929FA314BAB869CCC0AA72 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0ByqAACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx9awCfdRZAjdmSkbPXuX+zOkthi6kQ 7cQAnAsR/awYyqE9q6NuQfI/K57QaIG8 =XO3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig50929FA314BAB869CCC0AA72-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 06:57:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8460A1065673 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D46B8FC0A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:57:45 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AroFAC5YAU29rXwt/2dsb2JhbACVWo4mwDqCcoJYBIRk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,323,1288591200"; d="scan'208";a="127261124" Received: from nlpiport22.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.109]) by nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2010 00:30:20 -0600 Received: from dsl-189-173-124-45-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO morena.maps.net) ([189.173.124.45]) by nlpiport22.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2010 00:30:20 -0600 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:30:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012092330.14702.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> Subject: Re: mbr loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:57:46 -0000 On Wednesday 08 December 2010 22:08:56 xinyou yan wrote: > 1. when i install freebsd . I can write mbr and not write > if i write mbr . freebsd can Identification windows and load it first, you are talking about boot loaders or boot managers; its different from MBR witch means master boot record When you say "FreeBSD can identify windows and load it", you have wrong the concept of FreeBSD can identify, because FreeBSD its not loaded yet, a program called BootEasy its the one identifying windows (an others OS) and display F1: Windows etc.. > > 2 if i do not write . How windows load bsd http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADER > > 3. Can freebsd load linux (fedora)? and how ? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#BOOTEASY- LOADER Look in ports for boot loaders (manager) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=boot+loader&stype=text&sektion=all http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=boot+manager&stype=text&sektion=all Its a good idea to read Chapter 9 (Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders) of FAQ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 08:04:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C11E106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6DA8FC1D for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so3190270fxm.36 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:04:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P8Fdu8BQHeg//RWf60j/8dI3/b21iMaY9gofbKqTTcc=; b=qencKfX3kCP2YzmGkZnElc4K3daGDUjwiv3tZ6a39i+6gu7IOCNb6qqS6tOMRiU1br JxEt9tbKiiMI3TOsDNS6PGNMKPjxyG6GbqgVVHL0Jv9jSetXoF/G5pWiDN0YFZRDSceb C4gz6K3dEniZsiBpnOo2p7Tos5ptfSjbN+SFo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y/vRTd5hr2YYXiultq3pmjiO5ROyvElNqYzAXH0fry2N2F3KgPCZcA5sFaAAWpvhH6 B1AqP0p34+SYITWTD8vMRKYLEp/3XLQ6kSePC8HZ6Bja9WKh+S6HvNXfQSXj1vLvA/jt FRSHk/vhZxCZfwrEzUUQOrvH29DXFQ3EaR0XE= Received: by 10.223.96.197 with SMTP id i5mr471122fan.122.1291966850352; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:40:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from centaur.5550h.net (p5799B501.dip.t-dialin.net [87.153.181.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n15sm795688fam.36.2010.12.09.23.40.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:40:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:40:47 +0100 From: "=?UTF-8?B?5paH6bOl?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101210084047.7cc0e41f@centaur.5550h.net> In-Reply-To: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> References: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Make gtk widgets use a larger font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:04:45 -0000 The fastest solution is probably to install x11/gtk-theme-switch2 and use "switch2" to change the theme and/or font. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 09:07:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320D7106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6F88FC19 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so3235404wwf.31 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hiUxDKLwVtHZYprpXo7mnGg0WK4jD+U4hLYpKjqFnBg=; b=gPDMeipt4KZ3+YHNSahnCiKT5F9nunotgJ6FKD4q4eILP5osvcxEw1UraFyho3vt1g azsfQ7rL+57kBA2CX3WKSbOcujwI88tlqkjK5xRjl03apV48TWqdkwgKDl7H2nWKKZH9 sFIsiFsiKQHH8Nkgqr29+b2wB2rx5aeqe7zP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CqNyF0RWgWRPX0dsCEa+xmZiUAh1EBNpJrbs3hNnos//w5hAqMIc4mcs1Zi19vTSOY EHzRcwRWT6FPubaKMP+jiaio8OaGlxtI/ouzBEkBn6KMC8Pv7rCv5gQwqth+LMGGFYXO pXcw8AyoyrFfl5/YGZGFH98T6vloUxvJhk6SA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.178.137 with SMTP id f9mr424521wem.107.1291972026667; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.139 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:07:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101107145424.6972.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:07:06 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Chris Brennan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:07:08 -0000 On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan wrote: > Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? Not my spam. If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 12:38:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30F6106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AF18FC12 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3774383qwj.13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:38:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XfMwxwDvcRb3YgEAaZivSFBNPRKSCN4UxHT+TDWTAFk=; b=dy1+LPeynbLuBP2qXpFwEJ3Nj1BWkrRIK3dxEosY5PzQy+aLvmVhj578JeKTpYD8sc obr1HErpCHZ8TprIRAOElsrOatYR3v+igOT1ozYD4LwFR9+Y9bSB0XB2E0enlzEOR5D3 sjdEPMnqTz+g4AzY0ziJ2+9Jb75xFmBakHxRE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WdOUR+l9jLN0Hp75X0tM3Z3/UbkKCkJO2QjeupJz0wFzHX9vssFeVi01ppuM8xQTER kTvpGEVz49tDpAI+/GJud9F042dy37er/F+efHN9JlFzSYd1IkOn6JcXZpZcIeOxtZ1v kly4p8yjRS1svch62sCaVPkepoGIJweahwTG0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.86.13 with SMTP id q13mr632362qcl.175.1291984703585; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:38:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.7.9 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:38:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:38:23 +0300 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:38:24 -0000 Hey all! I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like user: user@site1.domain.com user2: user2@site1.domain.com user3: user3@site2.domain.com When someone from Internet send email to user@domain.com with cc: to user3@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they recieve their mail. But I need some additional behavior: user receive that mail with to: user@site1.domain.com cc: user3@domain.com I want that cc would be user3@site2.domain.com, like in aliases file. Because I got problems replying to all (with user3@domain.com included, but it must be user3@site2.domain.com). How this can be achieved? In other words I need some kind of cc: field rewriting regarding to aliases file contents. I have not found such feature in sendmail. So I think this can be done with some milter may be... Anyone has ideas? Any tips, thinks, tricks and etc highly needed! I'm out of ideas at that moment. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 12:50:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D802106566C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBED8FC17 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-67-171-66-177.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [67.171.66.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB765F7419; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:50:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:50:14 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Gary Gatten Message-Id: <20101210075014.b08b5675.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <29967_1291944608_4D0182A0_29967_949_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E5D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <29967_1291944608_4D0182A0_29967_949_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8E5D@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'questions@freebsd.org'" , "'gandalf@shopzeus.com'" , "'danieleff@gmail.com'" Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:50:11 -0000 On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 Gary Gatten wrote: > Could there be a ulimit issue as well? I think shared memory is unaffected by ulimits ... at least, I've never had trouble with ulimit preventing PostgreSQL from allocating gigs and gigs of shared memory, and I don't recall every having to bump ulimits. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Laszlo Nagy > Cc: questions@freebsd.org ; danieleff@gmail.com > Sent: Thu Dec 09 18:55:26 2010 > Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? > > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:15:14 +0100 > Laszlo Nagy wrote: > > > > > > First off, you have 24G of RAM available and PostgreSQL only seems to > > > have access to 400M of it. Bump shared_buffers up to 2 or 3 G at least, > > > and bump up work_mem to at least a few hundred meg, and > > > maintenance_work_mem up to at 1/2G or so. > > > > All right. Here is what I did. I setup a new shmmax value this way: > > > > sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=8589934592 > > > > It is 8G. (By the way I also have kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 1 ) Then I > > have changed shared_mem to 1024MB in postgresql.conf. > > Then I tried to start postgresql I got this message in the log: > > > > Dec 9 17:53:59 shopzeus postgres[27247]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL > > documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. > > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-1] FATAL: could not create > > shared memory segment: Cannot allocate memory > > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-2] DETAIL: Failed system > > call was shmget(key=5432001, size=1105051648, 03600). > > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-3] HINT: This error > > usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared memory segment > > exceeded available memory or swap space. To reduce the request size > > (currently 1105051648 bytes), reduce PostgreSQL's shared_buffers > > parameter (currently 131072) and/or its max_connections parameter > > (currently 203). > > Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL > > documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. > > > > I do not understand. > > > > Doc says these: > > > > "max_connections cost ~ 400 bytes of shared memory slot, plus lock space > > (see max_locks_per_transaction)." > > > > Even if I had max_connections = 5000, total shared memory required would > > be way below shmmax=8G. > > > > What am I missing here? > > Did you bump kern.ipc.shmall? The one you bumped is the maximum size of > a single shared memory request, shmall is the maximum amount of shared > memory for the entire system. They both have to be increased. To make > it more confusing, shmall is in pages, not bytes, so you have to divide > by pagesize (sysctl hw.pagesize). > > -Bill > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > >
>
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 13:47:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A4D106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DA68FC1A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBADlYOL058570; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:47:34 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:47:33 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Chris Brennan In-Reply-To: <20101210060704.A3B641065783@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101211002225.D61647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101210060704.A3B641065783@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: xpbargains.net spam [was: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:47:38 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 11, Message: 27 On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:54:37 -0500 > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: No, he didn't. These mails are FORGED as being from freebsd-questions participants, and on first glance may appear to be list postings. They used to get posted to the list itself also, but postmaster@ blocked the nuisance source back in August. However that doesn't stop them from targetting individual list participants, like you. If you examine the full mail headers, it's likely to have originated from the following IP address. If so, you just need to block that address at your mailserver. But if they've moved, we need to know .. Quoting from a message to postmaster@ in August: > As Roland pointed out, the phishing/virus/whatever referral has switched > from downwind.com.au to xpbargains.net, and possibly some others. > > Here's the business: > > % dig +short -x 64.38.11.26 > allmail.0b2.net. > % dig +short allmail.0b2.net. > 64.38.11.26 > % dig +short dusk.parklogic.com > 64.38.11.26 > > If you can discard by Message-ID then every one of these, including the > privately mailed ones, has @dusk.parklogic.com there. > > If you can block by IP, then that's the one. Or by hostname, every one > so far has been relayed by allmail.0b2.net (that's a zero). So if the full headers reveal coming from that hostname or that IP or any other IP in 64.38.11.26/29, just block that and move on. If it's a different address range now, please provide the full headers for the message you received, with a copy to postmaster@freebsd.org Thanks, Ian (please cc me on any reply, I take this list as a digest) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 13:52:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2BA1065694 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jw011235@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com (mail-iw0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1B88FC1C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so5894356iwn.19 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:52:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=UQCa3RBhHAhD7HMas1mHeAhCW0Rb4MwpMrUgoe20PzI=; b=GqzR2yTyLe1w1CGPuEWykXhoV2Xxnp2SPPLKzdchcqMeampuzC8ZsbtlqIGVEKH2Jf 9S+c5TkcMIOvKJwu/so8G0cfG32oeTQwftzjDEoglGb+80DnNC6n3dXFwJzGhgk6UFlj msCMCI/AW2idykKGDfJVWztzejU/RaTi+hEhA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=q/WtwMO4gY3J7K+7E8UMGPxCfuYqTfCwSwK/a6Hmp7KMaA+f6ickMas/fb+H3Aov+O 9IWwwK758HHuSF05ETB65loAzbIA9Wy+n5XDYLzLbGQjHJejBfQF4akTBw9qFfHXRJJk p5BndKijrRt5ok8Njo94s1coP/bMhH+5C8sKs= Received: by 10.231.144.21 with SMTP id x21mr430297ibu.30.1291988716409; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:45:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.74.35.126] ([129.74.35.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i16sm2683506ibl.12.2010.12.10.05.45.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:45:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: jw011235 To: jw011235 In-Reply-To: <4C4D4C32-2B02-47DF-BE81-0493A65EA409@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:45:12 -0500 References: <4D0133F0.5020604@ifdnrg.com> <4C4D4C32-2B02-47DF-BE81-0493A65EA409@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: Paul Macdonald , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ultradns issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:52:38 -0000 On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:40 AM, jw011235 wrote: > It's possible what you're seeing is related to DDOS attacks by > "anonymous" on UltraDNS (and others) in connection with all the > Wikileaks events this week. It's hard to say for certain given how > poorly most mainstream technical news is reported. > > http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10421577-265.html > > Regards, > Jason > > On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > >> >> is anyone seeing dns problems with ultradns.net, >> >> I'm seeing lookup problems for several big domains, plus as an >> impportant aside freebsd uses whois-servers.net cnames such as >> tld.whois-server.net to the correct whois server >> >> many many other companies use them obv too. >> >> Paul. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >> " > Nevermind. I should have read further down in my mail. I see there's another thread on the same issue. And sorry for top posting earlier. Regards, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 13:53:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDD71065670 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: from bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.18.236.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162D38FC17 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3153 invoked by uid 0); 10 Dec 2010 13:27:11 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by first.magraf.pl (envelope-from , uid 0) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.95.3/12371. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.08995 secs); 10 Dec 2010 13:27:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.magraf.pl (HELO paraklet.net) (127.0.0.1) by bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 13:27:10 -0000 Received: from 85.115.54.180 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tomaszd@paraklet.net) by paraklet.net with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:27:10 -0000 Message-ID: <39dadc79e6794dd92bc2c5b8dfa3ab7b.squirrel@paraklet.net> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:27:10 -0000 From: "tomasz dereszynski" To: "c0re" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:53:53 -0000 Generally reading documentation helps. then google... http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK294&=&q=sendmail+aliases&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= first URL... http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html t > Hey all! > > I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like > > user: user@site1.domain.com > user2: user2@site1.domain.com > user3: user3@site2.domain.com > > When someone from Internet send email to user@domain.com with cc: to > user3@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they > recieve their mail. > > But I need some additional behavior: > user receive that mail with > > to: user@site1.domain.com > cc: user3@domain.com > > I want that cc would be user3@site2.domain.com, like in aliases file. > > Because I got problems replying to all (with user3@domain.com > included, but it must be user3@site2.domain.com). How this can be > achieved? > > In other words I need some kind of cc: field rewriting regarding to > aliases file contents. > > I have not found such feature in sendmail. So I think this can be done > with some milter may be... Anyone has ideas? > > Any tips, thinks, tricks and etc highly needed! I'm out of ideas at that > moment. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- bEsT rEgArDs | "Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem." -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo | "In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different." -- Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 14:05:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A55106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jw011235@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F628FC15 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so2128862yxh.13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:05:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=NHIh7bTlcc9ABQNC6MszwLAAzuRrv+M0tCP8DYMa30M=; b=WImhreY1BX4qGoqUSz+wJcZP+mr4wc5hbO3OiHvaE27+Bjo7mDVlKscXbB0jlQsorY fsCSMDTe9026RapBnaKG1LXrSDTKIPUNSQ9MyeN54CrUd8iShbkOCvQHd2YqnJk+quuy UsCLlOA7wL6JkvDxi+ZvEDbIVmoUjvdKiEE5g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=OL6etmA83mt0NqW6DDaIFaN58JKdrOWA4runPHEUk9VmrfXc5vmhCF5qxDKQJr4BN1 69jT1a9v2CnAYTUIkXi8xSIRI9nXuSgDoZ0zcIyfIg93HF03mapzNmy4xj2uzNvYL4/p /SebRvZonrNPvcbE72eLjXm7jsthU7P3MXX8U= Received: by 10.42.227.202 with SMTP id jb10mr442699icb.475.1291988413858; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.74.35.126] ([129.74.35.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy41sm2679545ibb.11.2010.12.10.05.40.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:40:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4C4D4C32-2B02-47DF-BE81-0493A65EA409@gmail.com> From: jw011235 To: Paul Macdonald In-Reply-To: <4D0133F0.5020604@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:40:09 -0500 References: <4D0133F0.5020604@ifdnrg.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ultradns issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:05:14 -0000 It's possible what you're seeing is related to DDOS attacks by "anonymous" on UltraDNS (and others) in connection with all the Wikileaks events this week. It's hard to say for certain given how poorly most mainstream technical news is reported. http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10421577-265.html Regards, Jason On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > is anyone seeing dns problems with ultradns.net, > > I'm seeing lookup problems for several big domains, plus as an > impportant aside freebsd uses whois-servers.net cnames such as > tld.whois-server.net to the correct whois server > > many many other companies use them obv too. > > Paul. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 14:12:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E0C106566C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E878C8FC21 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so3348030qyk.13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:12:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nZPKphE4U5mC+wy6f1ggB0eDjSTo2NSfgeGgr7tA5eM=; b=BDIO/58/2cIXIX19Lo4ivGJ4VXX7QgXaH3OTbsWSgCF7vdllAhqwJz6wBeAR/oRlsB Fvgd2P9Dw5PAv67/32k4kNDfnPFVtwiKV7Aw22op65pEWtxqEmKrtHgENqTRSk0vlF3+ HYcnME1TF3RwVvkbF2NDUnD9Gg3vfWTKkJukY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DToQe7jDdkdJOHTTDvgekXxC01FgBWzgUjC4C/fN63m1PITctIUyWku1mO8pQuZBfE 3E8YD1QNzc1fzUV7M5/7wiSnm2FDvbQiLOe/c4xnlvn69ASY4EgDeXl/4oyYfaHi2na+ ypx57Ene9CJWtM62K2+2hcfqNkX8v1fJlWXAg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.232.133 with SMTP id ju5mr705327qcb.213.1291990337955; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.7.9 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:12:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <39dadc79e6794dd92bc2c5b8dfa3ab7b.squirrel@paraklet.net> References: <39dadc79e6794dd92bc2c5b8dfa3ab7b.squirrel@paraklet.net> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:12:17 +0300 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tomasz dereszynski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:12:19 -0000 2010/12/10 tomasz dereszynski : > > Generally reading documentation helps. > then google... > > http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=3Dig&hl=3Den&rlz=3D1G1GGLQ_ENUK294&= =3D&q=3Dsendmail+aliases&btnG=3DGoogle+Search&aq=3Df&oq=3D > > first URL... > http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html > > t > >> Hey all! >> >> I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like >> >> user: user@site1.domain.com >> user2: user2@site1.domain.com >> user3: user3@site2.domain.com >> >> When someone from Internet send email to user@domain.com with cc: to >> user3@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they >> recieve their mail. >> >> But I need some additional behavior: >> user receive that mail with >> >> to: user@site1.domain.com >> cc: user3@domain.com >> >> I want that cc would be user3@site2.domain.com, like in aliases file. >> >> Because I got problems replying to all (with user3@domain.com >> included, but it must be user3@site2.domain.com). How this can be >> achieved? >> >> In other words I need some kind of cc: field rewriting regarding to >> aliases file contents. >> >> I have not found such feature in sendmail. So I think this can be done >> with some milter may be... Anyone has ideas? >> >> Any tips, thinks, tricks and etc highly needed! I'm out of ideas at that >> moment. >> >> Thanks! >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > -- > bEsT rEgArDs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| =A0 =A0 =A0 "Confidence is what you= have before you > tomasz dereszynski =A0 =A0 =A0| =A0 =A0 =A0 understand the problem." -- W= oody Allen > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| > Spes confisa Deo =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| =A0 =A0 =A0 "In theory, theory and prac= tice are much > numquam confusa recedit | =A0 =A0 =A0 the same. In practice they are very > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| =A0 =A0 =A0 different." = -- Albert Einstein > > > I do use aliases file and I know what is it. But it looks like not this case. I want Cc: be rewritten like in aliases file defined in Cc: header, not only those one that comes in "RCPT TO:". And sendmail does not do it with Cc: field. Yes, recipient that in Cc: field do receive this mail, all ok in this way, but I want in MY mail Cc: field been rewritten as it is in aliases. I want to see in my mail this email headers to: user@domain.com cc: user3@site2.domain.com Not this one: to: user@site1.domain.com cc: user3@domain.com Looked at postfix - same thing, no such feature saw there in documentation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 14:24:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454CE1065672 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sa@mbg.se) Received: from server3.mbg.se (c-7-202-233-83.cust.bredband2.com [83.233.202.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C8F8FC0A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dator6.hbg.mbg.se (server7 [83.233.202.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server3.mbg.se (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBADvweb072246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:57:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sa@mbg.se) Message-ID: <4D0231E1.6010105@mbg.se> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:57:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven-=C5ke_Svensson?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101112 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on server3.mbg.se Subject: ZFS over nfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:24:11 -0000 Hi I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using "zfs nfsshare...." as it says in the documentation. Then the system use the file /etc/zfs/exports. But I find out that I also can share this directories using the standard /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares in the same place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this way? Anybody know? System is Freebsd 8.1. Best regards Sven-Åke Svensson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 14:42:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876831065696 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2465C8FC22 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2674765ewy.10 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.4.209 with SMTP id 17mr946039ebs.38.1291992127798; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:42:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.209 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:41:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101107145424.6972.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:41:46 -0500 Message-ID: To: Paul B Mahol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:42:09 -0000 On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan wrote: > > Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? > > Not my spam. > > If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help > you. > Well no Paul, I wasn't blaming you directly, I I just noticed that a lot of mail last night had that message attached to it, even mail from me. By the time I realized that, I was too tired to care. But either way, I'm still curious, does this list generate that message? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 14:46:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9093A106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623D38FC19 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FD826296D4; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:46:56 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2r5+qR+GnClH; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:46:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE09926296D3; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:46:54 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:46:52 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20101107145424.6972.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Paul B Mahol , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: THE SPAM WE GET [stop fretting and read] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:46:55 -0000 No, this list does not. As I mentioned yesterday, this is an unmonitored, unnannyed list that = accepts emails from addresses without checking authenticity... meaning I = can post from 4 emails (and I have) and not be subscribed on each = address. Spoofing email addresses has happened for years, and with this list's = archives being publicly available online it's been happening for a while = and will continue to happen until the rules may or may not be changed. -- Ryan=20 On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Paul B Mahol = wrote: >=20 >> On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan wrote: >>> Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? >>=20 >> Not my spam. >>=20 >> If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not = help >> you. >>=20 >=20 > Well no Paul, I wasn't blaming you directly, I I just noticed that a = lot of > mail last night had that message attached to it, even mail from me. By = the > time I realized that, I was too tired to care. But either way, I'm = still > curious, does this list generate that message? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:09:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7241065694 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E138FC16 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so3639051wyf.13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:09:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g/TkWLUe/jQjDgjgUPFKjDmmyTJ/jkw4utYQ5dRrIK0=; b=W1+AI0V3pnKhh2yLYwguS3IUlEgxhZQQYY2ELYHGjk9Y+MsqOx0q5F8bvnwgunviS5 6zQzzWpqh1fcR2y5vb3paByw+Az4raK5sNjY34xZUlosAymO61ArkYZ5zfAbKn7WgbKt heuX26EEkrcXGijc97wUN3HSOqEPGIkaoAFks= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Hgiv9rYaLR4gU+S+ZpU1btHOd8PjoLPQGDhPPqG4dfkWuERuDqxvNSaC4UUdips93s yTNTnURku7sZUPKSOuprmO2vEI6AoTCRTU+5eIZPuLyDwseQGwjPay68+k3WdV4hP3LM tJ/eSMd+WyuMfVu9XS9rcW0tDI+YvGUToyv+g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr2334783wec.44.1291993772920; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:09:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D0231E1.6010105@mbg.se> References: <4D0231E1.6010105@mbg.se> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:09:32 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven=2D=C5ke_Svensson?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: ZFS over nfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:09:34 -0000 On 10 December 2010 13:57, Sven-=C5ke Svensson wrote: > Hi > > > I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using > "zfs nfsshare...." as it says in the documentation. Then the system use t= he > file /etc/zfs/exports. > > But I find out that I also can share this directories using the standard > /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares in the same > place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this way? Anybody know? > > System is Freebsd 8.1. > > > Best regards > > Sven-=C5ke Svensson > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > if you put it in exports zfs cant manage it, therefore the zfs filesystem set command becomes redundent and inoperative, so it doesnt fit in with zfs standard way of doing things. Not really an issue but possibly a little confusing. I know its not necessary the case for bsd yet, but on solaris if you have made the jump to zfs, you have most likely gone for a pure zfs installation= , therefore it all hangs together nicely. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:19:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451B1106566B for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3A58FC13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9966969; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:19:34 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9966967; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:19:26 -0500 Message-ID: <4D0244FD.9010706@radel.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:19:25 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101107145424.6972.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020504090905020708020905" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ryan.coleman@cwis.biz, xaero@xaerolimit.net Subject: Re: THE SPAM WE GET [stop fretting and read] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:19:36 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020504090905020708020905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/10/10 9:46 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > No, this list does not. > > As I mentioned yesterday, this is an unmonitored, unnannyed list that a= ccepts emails from addresses without checking authenticity... meaning I c= an post from 4 emails (and I have) and not be subscribed on each address.= > > Spoofing email addresses has happened for years, and with this list's a= rchives being publicly available online it's been happening for a while a= nd will continue to happen until the rules may or may not be changed. > > -- > Ryan > If this discussion is about the same wave of spam I've been getting=20 examples of in the last couple of days, it should be noted that the mail = isn't coming via the mailing list at all. Somebody is harvesting e-mail = addresses and subject lines from a month or more ago and sending the=20 spam directly. Folks, you have to read the headers if you want to have a sensible=20 discussion about specific instances of spam. If you don't, you're=20 simply sending yet more noise that's kinda sorta pretending to be signal.= My personal rule of thumb with spam is to assume that absolutely=20 everything involved is a lie, this leading to a more accurate overall=20 assessment than the naive thought that any of it might possible be true=20 just because of some social contract. After careful analysis, you=20 *might* conclude that a few things actually are true, but that's=20 different than assuming they are. So, Subject: that look like they're=20 from the FreeBSD mailing list: lie. From: address that of somebody you=20 discussed that topic with on the mailing list: lie. Date:: lie. All=20 lies with one goal, to get you to click through on a URL that is *not*=20 (another lie, get it?) in your self-interest to visit. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms020504090905020708020905-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:22:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C981065697 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF75C8FC27 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PR4nw-0003FT-Tg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:40 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:40 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:22:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:22:59 -0500 Lines: 59 Message-ID: References: <4D00BDF8.6020206@shopzeus.com> <4D01CA99.9020706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:22:43 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/12/2010 11:31, Laszlo Nagy wrote: >> Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a >> result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the >> web server is now refusing clients with "Cannot connect to database" >> messages (coming from PHP). > > This is a classic scenario. Some burst of traffic causes your apache to > spawn more child processes than will all fit in RAM at one time. > Consequently, the system starts to swap. Swapping kills performance. > This slows everything down so much that there are always requests > waiting for apache to process, so apache will never find any idle > children to kill off. Result misery. > > The answer is to limit the number of child processes apache will spawn. > Decide how much of your available RAM you can devote to Apache. Look at > top(1) to find the maximum size apache processes grow to. The ratio of > those two sizes is the maximum number of apache processes your system > can support. > > Limiting the total number of apache processes sounds counter-intuitive. > What happens when you get sufficient traffic that apache maxes out? Web > queries will generally be queued up until there's an apache child free > to handle them. Generally that will take from a few 10s of milliseconds > on up -- although if you're regularly getting into a state where your > webserver takes seconds to answer, then it's time to get more beefy > hardware. > The quintessential "first-try" for this has historically been to set keepalives to "Off". Not a solution, just an interim stop gap. If this makes any discernible improvement (however small) it confirms the situation. What I did was switch to the event mpm and FastCGI. Fewer processes, but each process spawns lots of threads . Each of the threads within a process can reuse the database connection previously established by a different thread. Saves connection create/build-up/tear-down cycles as well as RAM. Then throw libmemcached into the mix, if possible. To properly utilize memcached your PHP has to have some code inserted so it will talk. This sets aside a cached buffer pool of RAM for database connections , similar to the connection pool you would find in use by a Java servlet container such as Tomcat or Resin. If unable to refactor code, in lieu of this you can enable MySQL SQL data cache. Not as effective, but if you get a lot queries which are the same SQL it saves cycles. The amount of YMMV here would depend upon how many queries are repetitive. If each and every query is unique it won't do much. So some fictitious example would be like start with some small number of stand-by processess such as 8,16,32, etc. Each process might have a thousand threads. When this thousand threads is reached Apache opens another process with a thousand more. You would still want to set a max-child/max-thread count along the lines you previously described. However, this approach gets you more headroom at the PHP data access wall of hanging doom. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:26:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E96210657C0 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF80B8FC1C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.52]) by hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20101210150949239.WGKC18851@hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com> for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:09:49 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=9nblukrRGzYA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=x70CTr1ZZrJ3fMZmolv2ow==:17 a=fPIMVpmNc5VW3AZyDrMA:9 a=jUtjwKygXnndotxKIDAA:7 a=1Kn8zijsTa3P97DMszU7vhIb9TEA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=x70CTr1ZZrJ3fMZmolv2ow==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 70.95.170.229 Received: from [70.95.170.229] ([70.95.170.229:63727] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 52/E1-14897-E72420D4; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:08:47 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E0CF5CF9; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:09:30 -1000 (HST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:09:30 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Lars Eighner Message-ID: <20101210150930.GA1985@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Lars Eighner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Make gtk widgets use a larger font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:26:53 -0000 in message <20101209114208.C1131@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>, wrote Lars Eighner thusly... > > How do I make gtk widgets use larger fonts? I found an old linux > FAQ on this, but it appears to have nothing to do with the way > configuration works on FreeBSD. In ~/.gtkrc-2.0, I have ... style "default" { #font="-adobe-new century schoolbook-medium-r-normal--14-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1" #font_name="New Century Schoolbook 12" font_name="Bitstream Vera Sans 10" } style "user-tooltip" { font_name="Screen 15" } # 'gtk-font-name' property is needed for damned Firefox 1.5 as # 'font_name' property alone didn't work, but does for Gimp 2.2. # Anti-aliased fonts are used though i would love to use # non-anti-aliased font in order to get New Century Schoolbook 14 # font. #gtk-font-name = "Bitstream Vera Serif 12" #gtk-font-name = "New Century Schoolbook 12" gtk-font-name = "Bitstream Vera Sans 10" widget "*" style "default" widget "*tooltip*" style "user-tooltip" ... and in ~/.gtkrc ... style "default" { font="-adobe-new century schoolbook-medium-r-normal--18-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1" } style "user-tooltip" { font="-sgi-screen-bold-r-normal--16-*-*-*-*-0-iso8859-1" } widget "*" style "default" widget "*tooltip*" style "user-tooltip" - parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:33:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8E3106566B for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E119B8FC17 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:33:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oBAFXH5B021535 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oBAFXH5B021535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:33:29 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: c0re References: <39dadc79e6794dd92bc2c5b8dfa3ab7b.squirrel@paraklet.net> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:33:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (c0re's message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:12:17 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tomasz dereszynski Subject: Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:33:39 -0000 On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:12:17 +0300, c0re wrote: > I do use aliases file and I know what is it. > But it looks like not this case. > I want Cc: be rewritten like in aliases file defined in Cc: header, > not only those one that comes in "RCPT TO:". > And sendmail does not do it with Cc: field. > Yes, recipient that in Cc: field do receive this mail, all ok in this > way, but I want in MY mail Cc: field been rewritten as it is in > aliases. > > I want to see in my mail this email headers > to: user@domain.com > cc: user3@site2.domain.com > > Not this one: > to: user@site1.domain.com > cc: user3@domain.com > > Looked at postfix - same thing, no such feature saw there in documentation. That's because aliases do not actually 'rewrite' anything. They merely redirect the message. Have a look at: FEATURE('masquerade_envelope') FEATURE(`allmasquerade') But pay careful attention to the warning about `allmasquerade' in the docs at `/usr/share/sendmail/cf/README'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:36:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBFD106566B for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kma@mrecic.gov.ar) Received: from mx1.mrecic.gov.ar (mx1.mrecic.gov.ar [200.16.99.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75A08FC13 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:36:31 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkEEAJLVAU2MvzAmgWdsb2JhbACCD4FNoCcVAQEWIimuU5BVhFZ0BIp9g0c X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,324,1288580400"; d="scan'208,217";a="22070602" Received: from mrelmx07.mrec.ar ([140.191.48.38]) by mx1.mrecic.gov.ar with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2010 12:26:10 -0300 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mrelmx07.mrec.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F2977D81; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:26:10 -0300 (ART) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mrelmx07.mrec.ar Received: from mrelmx07.mrec.ar ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mrelmx07.mrec.ar [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0-0r2oeL6Kf; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:26:07 -0300 (ART) Received: from mrelmx06.mrec.ar (mrelmx10.mrec.ar [140.191.48.45]) by mrelmx07.mrec.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A7071E35; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:26:06 -0300 (ART) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:26:06 -0200 (ARST) From: Kevin Mai To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org Message-ID: <1294039617.42493.1291994766801.JavaMail.root@mrelmx10.mrec.ar> In-Reply-To: <1416738542.42422.1291994310297.JavaMail.root@mrelmx10.mrec.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [140.191.48.38] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.6_GA_2330.DEBIAN5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.6_GA_2330.DEBIAN5_64) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Issues when running Heartbeat on FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:36:41 -0000 Hi folks,=20 I'm trying to build a failover solution using FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE and Heart= beat from ports (v2.1.4-10).=20 I've already configured heartbeat in the two peers, but once I start the da= emon using the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/heartbeat script, either CRM and CIB fai= l to start.=20 I've already found out that the issue is appearing with CIB: when the daemo= n runs CIB it doesn't start, but if I run it using some flags, it starts, a= nd them I'm able to run CRM too.=20 IE:=20 heartbeat[12539]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 info: Starting "/usr/local/lib/heartb= eat/cib" as uid 275 gid 275 (pid 12539)=20 heartbeat[12540]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 info: Starting "/usr/local/lib/heartb= eat/attrd" as uid 275 gid 275 (pid 12540)=20 heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 WARN: Managed /usr/local/lib/heartbea= t/cib process 12539 exited with return code 2.=20 heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 ERROR: Client /usr/local/lib/heartbea= t/cib "respawning too fast"=20 heartbeat[12541]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 info: Starting "/usr/local/lib/heartb= eat/crmd" as uid 275 gid 275 (pid 12541)=20 heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 WARN: Managed /usr/local/lib/heartbea= t/attrd process 12540 exited with return code 2.=20 heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 ERROR: Client /usr/local/lib/heartbea= t/attrd "respawning too fast"=20 heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 WARN: Managed /usr/local/lib/heartbea= t/crmd process 12541 exited with return code 2.=20 heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 ERROR: Client /usr/local/lib/heartbea= t/crmd "respawning too fast"=20 but if I run it from command line=20 [root@mrefns09 /usr/ports]# /usr/local/lib/heartbeat/cib -s -VVV &=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: main: Retrieval of a per-action CIB: = disabled=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: retrieveCib: Reading cluster configur= ation from: /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml (digest: /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/= cib.xml.sig)=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: file2xml: Reading 3538 bytes= from file=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 WARN: validate_cib_digest: No on-disk diges= t present=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: update_quorum: CCM quorum: old=3D(nu= ll), new=3Dfalse=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: update_counters: Counters updated by= readCibXmlFile=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 notice: readCibXmlFile: Enabling DTD valida= tion on the existing (sane) configuration=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: startCib: CIB Initialization complete= d successfully=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Liste= ning on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_callback=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Liste= ning on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_ro=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Liste= ning on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_rw=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Liste= ning on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_rw_syncronous=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Liste= ning on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_ro_syncronous=20 cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: cib_init: Starting cib mainloop=20 [root@mrefns09 /usr/local/lib/heartbeat]# /usr/local/lib/heartbeat/crmd -VV= V=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: main: Enabling coredumps=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : digraph "g" {=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : size =3D "30,30"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : graph [=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontsize =3D "12"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontname =3D "Times-Roman"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontcolor =3D "black"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : bb =3D "0,0,398.922306,478.927856"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : color =3D "black"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : node [=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontsize =3D "12"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontname =3D "Times-Roman"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontcolor =3D "black"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : shape =3D "ellipse"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : color =3D "black"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : edge [=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontsize =3D "12"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontname =3D "Times-Roman"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontcolor =3D "black"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : color =3D "black"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : // special nodes=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_PENDING"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : [=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : color =3D "blue"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontcolor =3D "blue"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_TERMINATE"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : [=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : color =3D "red"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : fontcolor =3D "red"=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : // DC only nodes=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_INTEGRATION" [ fontcolor =3D "green" ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_POLICY_ENGINE" [ fontcolor =3D "green" ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_TRANSITION_ENGINE" [ fontcolor =3D "green" ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_RELEASE_DC" [ fontcolor =3D "green" ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace= : "S_IDLE" [ fontcolor =3D "green" ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: crmd_init: Starting crmd=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: register_fsa_input_adv: crmd_init a= ppended FSA input 1 (I_STARTUP) (cause=3DC_STARTUP) without data=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: register_fsa_input_adv: Que= ue len: 1=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: FSA invoked wit= h Cause: C_STARTUP State: S_STARTING=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: Checking messag= es (1 remaining)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: get_message: Processing inp= ut 1=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: log_fsa_input: Processing q= ueued input 1=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: log_fsa_input: FSA processi= ng input from crmd_init=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: s_crmd_fsa: Processing I_STARTUP: [= state=3DS_STARTING cause=3DC_STARTUP origin=3Dcrmd_init ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_LOG (1000000000000000)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= LOG=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: do_log: [[FSA]] Input I_STA= RTUP from crmd_init() received in state (S_STARTING)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_LOG (1000000000000000)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: actions:trace: = // FSA input: State=3DS_STARTING Cause=3DC_STARTUP Input=3DI_STARTUP Origin= =3Dcrmd_init() id=3D1=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_STARTUP (0000000000000001)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= STARTUP=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_startup: Registering Signal Hand= lers=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: G_main_add_SignalHandler: Added sign= al handler for signal 15=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: G_main_add_TriggerHandler: Added sig= nal manual handler=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_startup: Creating CIB and LRM ob= jects=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: G_main_add_SignalHandler: Added sign= al handler for signal 20=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_STARTUP (0000000000000001)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_CIB_START (0000020000000000)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= CIB_START=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: init_client_ipc_comms_nodis= patch: Attempting to talk on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_rw=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: init_client_ipc_comms_nodis= patch: Processing of /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_rw complete=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: init_client_ipc_comms_nodis= patch: Attempting to talk on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_callback=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: init_client_ipc_comms_nodis= patch: Processing of /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_callback complete=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: init_client_ipc_comms: Addi= ng dispatch method to channel=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_client_connect_common: C= onnecting channel=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_client_connect_common: C= reated channel 0x802841958 for channel cib_rw=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_client_connect_common: C= hannel cib_rw connected for client (null)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D IPC[outbound] message start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D#=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG: Dumping message with 3 fields= =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[0] : [cib_op=3Dregister]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[1] : [cib_clientid=3D4821470c-0a= ac-4bd6-9d5b-f4a15fdd063c]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[2] : [cib_callback_token=3De87ce= ee6-3043-4c2d-b183-b3adeca43683]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D IPC[outbound] message start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D#=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug3: cib_client_connect_common: Connecting channel=20 debug: MSG: Dumping message with 3 fields=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[0] : [cib_op=3Dregister]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_client_connect_common: C= reated channel 0x802841dd8 for channel cib_callback=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[1] : [cib_callback_token=3De87c= eee6-3043-4c2d-b183-b3adeca43683]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[2] : [cib_clientname=3Dcrmd]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_client_connect_common: C= hannel cib_callback connected for client (null)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_null_callback: Registere= d e87ceee6-3043-4c2d-b183-b3adeca43683 on cib_callback channel=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D IPC[outbound] message start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D#=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG: Dumping message with 2 fields= =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: cib_native_signon: Connection to CI= B successful=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[0] : [cib_op=3Dregister]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_native_set_connection_d= notify: Setting dnotify=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[1] : [cib_clientid=3De87ceee6-30= 43-4c2d-b183-b3adeca43683]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_client_add_notify_callb= ack: Adding callback for cib_refresh_notify events (0)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D IPC[outbound] message start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D#=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG: Dumping message with 3 fields= =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[0] : [cib_op=3Dcib_notify]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: cib_= null_callback: Setting cib_refresh_notify callbacks for crmd: on=20 debug: MSG[1] : [cib_notify_type=3Dcib_refresh_notify]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[2] : [cib_notify_activate=3D1]= =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_client_add_notify_callb= ack: Callback added (1)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: do_cib_control: CIB connection estab= lished=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_native_perform_op: Send= ing cib_query message to CIB service=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D IPC[outbound] message start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D#=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG: Dumping message with 5 fields= =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[0] : [__name__=3Dcib_command]= =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_common_callback: Callbac= k for 4821470c-0aac-4bd6-9d5b-f4a15fdd063c on cib_rw channel=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[1] : [t=3Dcib]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[2] : [cib_op=3Dcib_query]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Client[inbound] mess= age start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D#=20 debug: MSG[3] : [cib_callid=3D2]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG= : Dumping message with 5 fields=20 debug: MSG[4] : [cib_callopt=3D256]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG= [0] : [__name__=3Dcib_command]=20 debug: debug3: cib_native_perform_op: Message sent=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG= [1] : [t=3Dcib]=20 debug: debug3: cib_native_perform_op: Async call, returning=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[2] : [cib_op=3Dcib_query]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_CIB_START (0000020000000000)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[3] : [cib_callid=3D2]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_HA_CONNECT (0000000000000004)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[4] : [cib_callopt=3D256]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= HA_CONNECT=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_common_callback_worker: = Processing cib_query operation from -1/cib_rw=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: reg= ister_with_ha: Signing in with Heartbeat=20 debug: debug2: cib_process_request: Processing local message (localhost) fo= r master...=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: parse_local_options: Process= ing locally scoped cib_query op from -1=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_process_request: Finishe= d determining processing actions=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_process_request: Perform= ing local processing: op=3Dcib_query origin=3D(null)/4821470c-0aac-4bd6-9d5= b-f4a15fdd063c,2 (update=3D(null))=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_process_query: Processin= g "cib_query" event for section=3D=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_process_request: Process= ing complete=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_process_request: process= ing response cases=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: do_local_notify: Performing = notification=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_local_notify: Sending cal= lback to request originator=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: do_local_notify: Sending an = a-sync response to -1=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: send_via_callback_channel: D= elivering msg 0x802895538 to client e87ceee6-3043-4c2d-b183-b3adeca43683=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: send_via_callback_channel: D= elivering reply to client e87ceee6-3043-4c2d-b183-b3adeca43683=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 ERROR: register_with_ha: Cannot sign on wi= th heartbeat:=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: register_fsa_input_adv: register_fs= a_error_adv prepended FSA input 2 (I_NULL) (cause=3DC_STARTUP) without data= =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: register_fsa_input_adv: Add= ing actions 0180001000000002 to input=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: register_fsa_input_adv: Pre= pending input=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: register_fsa_input_adv: Que= ue len: 1=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: register_fsa_input_adv: Tri= ggering FSA: register_fsa_input_adv=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: register_fsa_input_adv: do_ha_contr= ol prepended FSA input 3 (I_FAIL) (cause=3DC_FSA_INTERNAL) without data=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: register_fsa_input_adv: Pre= pending input=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: register_fsa_input_adv: Que= ue len: 2=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: register_fsa_input_adv: Tri= ggering FSA: register_fsa_input_adv=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_HA_CONNECT (0000000000000004)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: Checking messag= es (2 remaining)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: get_message: Processing inp= ut 3=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: log_fsa_input: Processing q= ueued input 3=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: log_fsa_input: FSA processi= ng input from do_ha_control=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: s_crmd_fsa: Processing I_FAIL: [ st= ate=3DS_STARTING cause=3DC_FSA_INTERNAL origin=3Ddo_ha_control ]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_WARN (4000000000000000)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= WARN=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: crm_log_message_adv: #=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D IPC[outbound] message start =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D#=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 WARN: do_log: [[FSA]] Input I_FAIL from do= _ha_control() received in state (S_STARTING)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG: Dumping message with 7 fields= =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_WARN (4000000000000000)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[0] : [t=3Dcib]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug2: do_state_transition: actions:trace: S_STARTING -> S_STOPPING [ label= =3DI_FAIL cause=3DC_FSA_INTERNAL origin=3Ddo_ha_control ]=20 debug: MSG[1] : [cib_clientid=3D4821470c-0aac-4bd6-9d5b-f4a15fdd063c]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: do_s= tate_transition: State transition S_STARTING -> S_STOPPING [ input=3DI_FAIL= cause=3DC_FSA_INTERNAL origin=3Ddo_ha_control ]=20 debug: MSG[2] : [cib_callopt=3D256]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug2: crm_timer_stop: Election Timeout (I_ELECTION_DC:-1ms) already stopped= =20 debug: MSG[3] : [cib_callid=3D2]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: crm_timer_stop: PEngine Rec= heck Timer (I_PE_CALC:-1ms) already stopped=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[4] : [cib_op=3Dcib_query]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 0000000000000200 (A_DC_TIMER_STOP) New action= s=20 debug: MSG[5] : [cib_rc=3D0]=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 00= 00000000000020 (A_INTEGRATE_TIMER_STOP) New actions=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 00= 00000000000080 (A_FINALIZE_TIMER_STOP) New actions=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: MSG[6] : [(2)cib_calldata=3D0x8028a6= 5f8(4108 5133)]=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_DC_TIMER_STOP (0000000000000200)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_= fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_DC_TIMER_STOP=20 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug2: crm_timer_stop: Election Trigger (I_DC_TIMEOUT:-1ms) already stopped= =20 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_DC_TIMER_STOP (0000000000000200)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_INTEGRATE_TIMER_STOP (0000000000000020)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= INTEGRATE_TIMER_STOP=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: crm_timer_stop: Integration= Timer (I_INTEGRATED:-1ms) already stopped=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action compl= ete: A_INTEGRATE_TIMER_STOP (0000000000000020)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Invoking act= ion A_FINALIZE_TIMER_STOP (0000000000000080)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: do_fsa_action: actions:trace: // A_= FINALIZE_TIMER_STOP=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: crm_timer_stop: Finalizatio= n Timer (I_ELECTION:-1ms) already stopped=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 debug: debug3: do_fsa_action: Action complete: A_FINALIZE_TIMER_STOP (00000= 00000000080)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: Checking messages (1 remaining)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: get_message: Processing inp= ut 2=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: log_fsa_input: Processing q= ueued input 2=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: log_fsa_input: FSA processi= ng input from register_fsa_error_adv=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 debug: debug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 0080000000000000 (A_READCONFIG) Cle= ared Actions=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: deb= ug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 0000000000000002 (A_STARTED) Cleared Actions= =20 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 01= 00000000000000 (A_LRM_CONNECT) Cleared Actions=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: fsa_dump_actions: Action 00= 00001000000000 (A_CCM_CONNECT) Cleared Actions=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: actions:trace: = // FSA input: State=3DS_STOPPING Cause=3DC_STARTUP Input=3DI_NULL Origin=3D= register_fsa_error_adv() id=3D2=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: s_crmd_fsa: Exiting the FSA= =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 debug: fsa_dump_inputs: Added input: 0000000000000004 (R_SHUTDOWN)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 debug: fsa_dump_inputs: Added input: 0000000000000100 (R_CIB_CONNECTED)=20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 ERROR: crm= d_init: Startup of crmd failed. Current state: S_STOPPING=20 debug: =20 crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 info: crmd_init: [crmd] stopped (1)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: =20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_process_request: Complet= ed slave update=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_common_callback: Process= ed 1 messages=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_common_callback: Callbac= k for 4821470c-0aac-4bd6-9d5b-f4a15fdd063c on cib_rw channel=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_common_callback: Process= ed 0 messages=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_common_callback: Client = disconnected=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_process_disconnect: Clea= ning up after client disconnect: -1/cib_rw/4821470c-0aac-4bd6-9d5b-f4a15fdd= 063c=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_ipc_connection_destroy: = Destroying -1 (0x802841958)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_ipc_connection_destroy: = Num unfree'd clients: 1=20 [root@mrefns09 /usr/local/lib/heartbeat]# cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 d= ebug: debug2: cib_null_callback: Client disconnected=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_process_disconnect: Clea= ning up after client disconnect: crmd/cib_callback/e87ceee6-3043-4c2d-b183-= b3adeca43683=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: cib_ipc_connection_destroy: = Destroying crmd (0x802841dd8)=20 cib[14871]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: cib_ipc_connection_destroy: = Num unfree'd clients: 0=20 If I'm not mistaken, running as root allos CIB/CRMD to speak through socket= , but if they are run through the rc script, they can't, even though the so= cket has=20 [root@mrefns09 /var/run/heartbeat/crm]# ls -lrtah=20 total 4=20 srwxrwxrwx 1 hacluster haclient 0B Dec 10 15:13 cib_rw_syncronous=20 srwxrwxrwx 1 hacluster haclient 0B Dec 10 15:13 cib_rw=20 srwxrwxrwx 1 hacluster haclient 0B Dec 10 15:13 cib_ro_syncronous=20 srwxrwxrwx 1 hacluster haclient 0B Dec 10 15:13 cib_ro=20 srwxrwxrwx 1 hacluster haclient 0B Dec 10 15:13 cib_callback=20 drwxr-x--- 2 hacluster haclient 512B Dec 10 15:13 .=20 drwxr-xr-x 6 hacluster haclient 512B Dec 10 15:21 ..=20 Since both processes are started by the heartbeat binary, it's not an optio= n to change the rc script to run both binaries by hand..=20 Any suggestions?=20 Kind Regards,=20 Kevin Mai=20 Direcci=C3=B3n de Tecnolog=C3=ADas de la Informaci=C3=B3n=20 y las Comunicaciones Asociadas=20 Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto=20 Esmeralda 1212 Piso 3=20 Tel: +54 011 5555-8900 (int. 3077)=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:26:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAD71065670 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716BE8FC12 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTDESKTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PR4rC-00073w-HR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:26:02 -0500 Message-ID: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:26:01 -0500 Organization: The Net Now Internet Services. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3502.922 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:44:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Updating 1 single port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:26:05 -0000 Hi all, I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At = Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I = would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? = (Proftpd 1.3.3c) -G From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:53:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FAE1065694 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: from bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.18.236.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1A28FC22 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15259 invoked by uid 0); 10 Dec 2010 15:53:20 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by first.magraf.pl (envelope-from , uid 0) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.95.3/12371. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.073358 secs); 10 Dec 2010 15:53:20 -0000 Received: from localhost.magraf.pl (HELO paraklet.net) (127.0.0.1) by bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 15:53:19 -0000 Received: from 208.87.233.180 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tomaszd@paraklet.net) by paraklet.net with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:53:20 -0000 Message-ID: <7b346a94d33ec70d17910eb1ad08b5c1.squirrel@paraklet.net> In-Reply-To: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> References: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:53:20 -0000 From: "tomasz dereszynski" To: "Grant Peel" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 1 single port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:53:22 -0000 > Hi all, > > I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At > Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I > would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. > > What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? > (Proftpd 1.3.3c) > portupgrade --OPTION PORT_NAME -- bEsT rEgArDs | "Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem." -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo | "In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different." -- Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:54:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE4C1065670 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EB68FC28 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PR5J1-0003Uw-Ho for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:54:47 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:54:47 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:54:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:55:04 -0500 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Updating 1 single port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:54:49 -0000 Grant Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At > Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I > would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. > > What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? > (Proftpd 1.3.3c) > Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make && make deinstall && make reinstall. Most ports will not munge your config files by this process. Just in case, I always set aside a copy of the relevant .conf file as insurance. This is the "manual" do it yourself way. Portupgrade and others can accomplish the same. But this is quick and simple for just doing one port. Also don't forget to restart the daemon afterward. :-) -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 16:11:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B305510656C0 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8CA8FC23 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1PR5ZZ-000BSF-9V; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:11:53 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov To: Kurt Buff References: <84950898@bb.ipt.ru> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:11:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Kurt Buff's message of "Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800") Message-ID: <36779191@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:11:54 -0000 On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:50, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: > > > >> All, > > > >> I have a Lenovo T61 with a 100g HD that I dual boot with FreeBSD > >> 8.0-STABLE amd64 and Windows XP. How and to which version did you upgrade? > >> FBSD is on ad0s2a, with ad0s2b as swap, and XP on ad0s1a. > > > >> Yesterday I booted up FBSD, started xfce4, started a terminal session, > >> su'ed to root and did the following - running a generic kernel: > > > >> # cd /usr/src > >> # make buildworld > >> # make buildkernel > >> # make installkernel > > > >> Then I exited xfce4, did sudo shutdown -r now, and got a mountroot > >> prompt that I now can't get past. > > > >> I can get to the loader prompt, and lsdev shows the following: > > > >>    cd devices: > >>    disk devices: > >>          disk0:     BIOS drive C: > >>             disk0s1: NTFS/HPFS > >>                 disk0s2a:  FFS > >>                 disk02sb:  swap Is it a typo? (seems should be "disk0s2b: swap" > >> when I use '?' at the mountroot prompt I get: > > > >>    List of GEOM managed disk devices: > >>       acd0 Hm, ad0s2a should be listed here. Seems that the new kernel doesn't detect a disk adapter. Your kernel config and may be helpful. BTW, dmesg for both successful and unsuccessful boot may give us some tips too. > >>    Loader variables: > >>    vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > >>    vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw > > > >> I've tried entering the following at the mountroot prompt, with no success: > >>    ufs:/dev/ad0s2a That is the right one. > >>    ufs:/ad0s2a > >>    ufs:ad0s2a > >>    ffs:/dev/ad0s2a > > > >> and several other variations that I've found while googling, but no > >> success anywhere. > > > >> Does anyone have thoughts on how to remedy this? > > > > Just for the last question: > > Try to load an old kernel. (Type "boot /boot/kernel.old" at loader > > prompt.) > That worked... > I think I'll try the update process again. > Anything else you can recommend? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 16:23:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3A2106564A for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE498FC1D for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBAFsmsN012653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:54:49 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D024D46.4030609@ifdnrg.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:54:46 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> In-Reply-To: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Updating 1 single port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:23:19 -0000 On 10/12/2010 15:26, Grant Peel wrote: > Proftpd 1.3.3c portupgrade proftpd 1.3.3c or delete the port from /usr/ports/distfiles, do a portsnap update, portsnap fetch index then make deinstall && make install clean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 21:12:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06B810656A4 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696228FC0C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRAGf-0005WK-Px for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:12:41 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:12:41 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:12:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:13:02 -0500 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Updating 1 single port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:12:43 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote: > >> Grant Peel wrote: >> >>> I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At >>> Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I >>> would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. >>> >>> What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? >>> (Proftpd 1.3.3c) >> >> Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to >> /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make && make deinstall && make reinstall. > > make clean deinstall install > > is a little safer. But the problem that many people run into is that > they haven't updated other installed ports, including infrastructure > like the autotools ports that were updated today. So when they try to > update a single port, things it depends on are missing or outdated. Excellent point indeed! The autotools "fun" - a perfect case in point. While you may be able to get away with a simple update some of the time, that is certainly not true all of the time. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 21:39:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534DA1065789 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BB78FC1E for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7912629783; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:39:11 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fOWUAoKrWG7j; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:39:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0758D2629782; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:39:10 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:39:07 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com> To: Ryan Coleman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:39:11 -0000 Does anyone have any ideas? On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Dear list, >=20 > Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with = processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and = over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait = and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between = 20% and 80% of my system resources. >=20 > I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is = causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it = won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my = MBP it will connect in the CLI. >=20 > It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when = they have to upload large numbers of photos. >=20 > Thanks, > Ryan >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 22:00:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCDB1065693 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@nrdx.com) Received: from www3.stelesys.com (www3.stelesys.com [69.61.23.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605D08FC18 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-76-17-97-137.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([76.17.97.137] helo=[192.168.0.108]) by www3.stelesys.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PRAor-000BzJ-Sl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:48:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:47:30 -0500 From: Jerry Bell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com> <740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> In-Reply-To: <740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - www3.stelesys.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [26 6] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nrdx.com Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:00:44 -0000 I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just be because no one has tried again yet. Jerry On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Does anyone have any ideas? > > On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between 20% and 80% of my system resources. >> >> I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my MBP it will connect in the CLI. >> >> It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they have to upload large numbers of photos. >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 00:25:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585F9106566B for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C918FC13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4045568wwf.31 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:25:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AX537nslTtyrWUUt+1Ck/FeK36eniFrlOjSl+9wrW7k=; b=KYL4jufPPTpt27IScVyLNd0iyZfaAIH1Lqwn6uw+avGbzahj2/Puf5i3zIlOKO28am D0gfTZdSvjVYL1A05QNcOtsIvajvo6DUNdxO1pUoFgGXgIxvg5zPZTwDHHwSn7hMw3/G ertvOPmnIvIMyJ7ndVV5uEaI570uYLQNDMv30= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xi5vwqTpFlfbENdjinHsQzqVTKQj9TWE7IdUFmT6onSnYYhd8BpsFhlV66jB3ibKm/ rRAwQZuVY7rsZth4h843RhIFlhXjwmuVj+djdqx952YW1WwuzyfuLkK7EeFpDnF2medA U9Jrf4KZiQJCznXhMMpD5ETiTre8Eei9w0S8k= Received: by 10.216.17.204 with SMTP id j54mr68516wej.108.1292027102945; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:25:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1sm1797594weq.31.2010.12.10.16.25.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:25:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:24:58 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101211002458.2f2e7cb7@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2084B8F03D9B43BF90E12CAAA0E0CC1B@GRANTDESKTOP> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Updating 1 single port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:25:05 -0000 On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:07:00 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote: > > > Grant Peel wrote: > > > >> I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it > >> quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, > >> but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. > >> > >> What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port > >> updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) > > > > Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to > > /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make && make deinstall && make > > reinstall. > > make clean deinstall install > > is a little safer. And I would suggest running pkg_create -b, in advance, just in case the install fail and you are left with a deinstalled port. Portupgrade does that automatically. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 04:00:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81BE106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@sanbe-farma.com) Received: from kikazu.sanbe-farma.com (kikazu.sanbe-farma.com [202.6.239.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC68FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sanbe-farma.com (gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com [202.6.239.18]) by kikazu.sanbe-farma.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id oBB3XsT9093726 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:33:54 +0700 (WIT) (envelope-from thomas@sanbe-farma.com) Received: (qmail 58850 invoked by uid 98); 11 Dec 2010 10:35:19 +0700 Received: from 192.168.16.75 (thomas@192.168.16.75) by gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.96.1/11194. spamassassin: 3.3.1. Clear:RC:1(192.168.16.75):. Processed in 0.02705 secs); 11 Dec 2010 03:35:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (thomas@192.168.16.75) by gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2010 10:35:19 +0700 Message-ID: <4D02F17C.3090606@sanbe-farma.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:35:24 +0700 From: Thomas Wahyudi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com> <740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> In-Reply-To: <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:00:02 -0000 On 11/12/2010 4:47, Jerry Bell wrote: > I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few > weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I > noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a > vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. > > When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, > each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. > I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on > wood, I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that > may just be because no one has tried again yet. > > Jerry yeap, thats correct according to proftpd website news, I upgrade using latest port but still get attacking, I change to pure-ftpd then everything fine -- Thanks& Regards, Thomas Wahyudi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 04:53:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83864106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (constellation.thenetnow.com [207.112.4.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B798FC15 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANTLAPTOP) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PRHSI-0003oM-R4; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:53:10 -0500 Message-ID: <92849C6B31FD4396BBF187F9A6A9E655@GRANTLAPTOP> From: "Grant Peel" To: "Jerry Bell" , References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com><740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> In-Reply-To: <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:53:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Cc: Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:53:12 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Bell" To: Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? >I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks. >I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that >there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a vulnerability that they >may have been trying to exploit. > > When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, each > with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. I'd > firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, I > have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just be > because no one has tried again yet. > > Jerry > On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> Does anyone have any ideas? >> >> On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> >>> Dear list, >>> >>> Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with >>> processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and >>> over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait >>> and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between >>> 20% and 80% of my system resources. >>> >>> I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is >>> causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it >>> won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my >>> MBP it will connect in the CLI. >>> >>> It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they >>> have to upload large numbers of photos. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ryan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Indeed, this Proftpd 1.3.3a vulnerability is exactly what my post on upgrading a single port is all about. I can say for a fact that the botnets are trying to use the vulnerability and that you are quite correct that the CPU / ZOMBIE processes are exploit related. I just upgraded today and so far so good. \FYI for anyone that is following my thread on updating one single port: I must have a somwhat busted installation. Using port upgrade failed ... sorry I did not remember to keep the output, but, I was able to download the source from proftpd.org and install it from scratch. -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 04:59:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364761065670 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FBD8FC12 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D998A26297E4; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:59:28 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id faQhHrWuHu9e; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:59:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C606F26297E3; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:59:26 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <92849C6B31FD4396BBF187F9A6A9E655@GRANTLAPTOP> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:59:23 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com><740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> <92849C6B31FD4396BBF187F9A6A9E655@GRANTLAPTOP> To: Grant Peel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Jerry Bell , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:59:27 -0000 I have not been able to get portsnap to work at all today. On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Grant Peel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Bell" > To: > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM > Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? >=20 >=20 >> I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few = weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed = today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a = vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. >>=20 >> When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, = each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. = I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, = I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just = be because no one has tried again yet. >>=20 >> Jerry >> On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>> Does anyone have any ideas? >>>=20 >>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Dear list, >>>>=20 >>>> Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with = processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and = over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait = and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between = 20% and 80% of my system resources. >>>>=20 >>>> I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is = causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it = won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my = MBP it will connect in the CLI. >>>>=20 >>>> It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when = they have to upload large numbers of photos. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ryan >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 > Indeed, this Proftpd 1.3.3a vulnerability is exactly what my post on = upgrading a single port is all about. I can say for a fact that the = botnets are trying to use the vulnerability and that you are quite = correct that the CPU / ZOMBIE processes are exploit related. >=20 > I just upgraded today and so far so good. >=20 > \FYI for anyone that is following my thread on updating one single = port: I must have a somwhat busted installation. Using port upgrade = failed ... sorry I did not remember to keep the output, but, I was able = to download the source from proftpd.org and install it from scratch. >=20 > -Grant=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 06:01:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872BE106566B for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D188FC13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E4871E805BA; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:01:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:01:10 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20101211060107.GA13746@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: vi/vim questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:01:12 -0000 This may apply to other systems that can use a vi clone, not just the BSD's. I am looking for an easy way of turning on/off my list of homonyms that I am trying to set up for my ":abbreviation" list. So, is there a failsafe way of (1) including my ~150 :ab list in vim and turning it on and then (2) turning the vim list off so that, What I-Type-Is-what-I-See [?] In other words, dis-including my list of abbrevs. I tried this with ten or fifteen words last summer in nvi, and it worked very well with my ktts/festival suite. I was able, using my Thinkpad as a testbed, have the computer talk clearly for me. A day or two later I went into C mode for a day or three. After a few hours of enjoying my hacking, I had to stop, remove the :ab words from my ~/.nexrc and continue. For anyone who hasn't read my ideas about this, I am attempting to collect the 130+ most commonly used words and create "natural" or "common sense" abbreviations for each word. Obv'ly, this would be unnecessary for people who have no trouble typing accurately and rapidly. I have decided to use vim because is it widely used as the next step in a text editor based on vi, and because it may allow me to simply include a file in ~/vimrc; I'm not sure how far the improvements go. thanks, everybody, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 07:17:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E57106566C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yxy.716@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BA68FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so2643633eyh.37 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:17:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=//yBdgrTSh1XATWlHRMovp2Ay1a85EiMPSFKWzIiJg0=; b=kd04rD7MVKdwrrzR6vuDiqcL5TWkABdTlVYOh5VInaK+rpqY90vLbva+CE73lwNVCj 0YUqjRd/izAvccrD6uEmFa+4ZnhRvB4tFIv3KyKu0RLAiN+8k1ET96p9CD0TfZsjZQyu cYp74a+8iPI9JbhW6azOuHwBy6h6lsIzTGUrY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=OBGTVlg4ygagMSv4oeduh3o1PHuxhdACnSR/ZBhrMijjRTs1JoD0a33OnrGtb47H/9 MsGHwq9GVyk1gPme/7Uo3oocSp1Ole44ivWa40mzQj22kYYHgAkApc5U0pv19gK57ksl HLOMm+5GKTSEplHdOWnhnRqTC8aK4ovfgmGr0= Received: by 10.213.4.144 with SMTP id 16mr1507367ebr.70.1292051836540; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:17:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.137 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:16:56 -0800 (PST) From: xinyou yan Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:16:56 +0800 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: umask .ape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:17:18 -0000 1. In my system umask enter 022 I want to know why i do the commander umask -S it show Improper mask not u=rwx,g=..... 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 11:30:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06B7106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2D88FC22 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FA45C21 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:35:01 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D035FF2.40806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:26:42 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: umask .ape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:30:14 -0000 On 12/11/10 17:16, xinyou yan wrote: > 1. > In my system > umask enter > 022 > > I want to know why i do the commander > > umask -S > it show Improper mask > not u=rwx,g=..... > > 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac > > flac will play with mplayer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 11:33:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0409C1065674 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47D18FC25 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120905C21 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:38:40 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D0360CC.6030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:30:20 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: linux-kvm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:33:52 -0000 I've been snooping around and found linux kvm, and wondered if it had been ported. I found a GSOC project from 07 but the code is dated still then. Anyone know what the status of this is? Any further work on it? Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 12:15:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68369106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E4B8FC12 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4354247wwf.31 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:15:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zMzxPL+mWCulrQ27EayxOQFEa1YIuOOyx2SBROZGZFE=; b=bRnBfr9Gqrg3v56wxiJMxA7sFi/n/VCh71StiSZCTVbfE2TgE8jDS3L598ixrd/o3z 8hGKAJyViyzy34C57PjbON5ORRYvoxjCt4BhYYcaEsiC0v4yRtFfVCKOH3BuT+pvwKcS Yn2ZO2VU1VpngalQNSXmy67cLdrmRkMSw4t/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lSDli1I/sdn1ubTLRtPOCM2IXYeByH4stVetcb60j1zsGjCHN7XGh5RJbj39CQ59bU 3AgAzvEjxxy8bxInzHl37gCx91a6UOgk7GMmjQMgq1xSEZRfJuE55nAfwKKAQmfIWzkz qhliIwdrEt9JwsCcJOI6ZJfkVg3aBUs7RXX2c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.71 with SMTP id r49mr2138079wek.77.1292069731600; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.139 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:15:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D035FF2.40806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D035FF2.40806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:15:31 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umask .ape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:15:33 -0000 > On 12/11/10 17:16, xinyou yan wrote: > 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac Any player which use libavcodec. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 14:20:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7851065673 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smathias1972@yahoo.com) Received: from nm17.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm17.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BB808FC17 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.55] by nm17.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2010 14:07:11 -0000 Received: from [98.138.86.156] by tm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2010 14:07:11 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2010 14:07:11 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 480330.31942.bm@omp1014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 71670 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Dec 2010 12:17:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1292069866; bh=xqGxKreCO1zUBwjyRgpbCZkDAkgoMCtvPpR/nBfx3F4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dPNU4ADSoKg36ZaUVrZxrraqdJXX4lHd7P4phK3s6CoYd4VKH9IiTcglNP027O+IexBeO53Kl+8A3ZAj4eY9LT54l9ihRdFf6cuxYndyZDe3NbneURr5gZ+usq3snVe7TBQW5Ggs2d/kN4HAGhJUT5A8vKlkJudZ2U7b+fXMFk0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UwB+OOK4zUiyiVEwyzltCStKAyQR7Z0ZjahMzaiZ5Y/ZUIpNgMlbqWoIpsl1pTF6TOe1QRYILzuuhfdZmLKTSIc9fATXIHF3ofr1dj24v9lAH9P978jJSRWWjNBDztszoBoEJpzqiGjuIoPEfNXJZ2xPqbxvaXxWnxZvnyXzd18=; Message-ID: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: FAW.jXwVM1m1MD0zXVUy8OIIuBFBj.t3bjfyFxBW.GiZ_p9 g8siVdz6fuynLvPWKRYCCOufh5nvzu9SEtj77wNv1vh7SsUT0b.LH_oIf7iA 8tNwz0MfnsAhVUGmgSIrSB2pKHi3_G6bKVzyCSo7wVtG.j4CfyXZ1gUJCv2c JtQIzfAIb3tzfLi._HlO8QVtbRbTRwoG2CiassQ-- Received: from [94.21.120.245] by web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:17:46 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:17:46 -0800 (PST) From: S Mathias To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:37:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: "ultimate" backup choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:20:27 -0000 i have: "SERVER A" "SERVER B" with "full root permisson" [ssh, etc] each server has a folder. i want to backup a folder in "SERVER A". are there any backup methods, that meets these two requirements? : 1) running from e.g.: a cronjob 2) when running, it just checks the folder in "SERVER A" and "SERVER B". if a file/folder has been added/removed/modified in the "SERVER A"'s folder, then it copies/removes it/them to "SERVER B"'s folder. please help! Thank you in advance! [for any links, howtos :\ ] have a nice weekend From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 14:50:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640EA106566C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D868FC20 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.136] (helo=smtp5.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRQmR-0005Kp-7t; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:50:35 +0100 Received: from 541980a1.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.128.161] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp5.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRQmQ-0002ei-2i; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:50:34 +0100 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB4139856; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:50:33 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:50:34 +0100 Message-Id: References: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: S Mathias X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1PRQmQ-0002ei-2i X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.599, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, SPF_PASS -0.00) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ultimate" backup choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:50:40 -0000 On 11 dec 2010, at 13:17, S Mathias wrote: > i have: > "SERVER A" > "SERVER B" >=20 > with "full root permisson" [ssh, etc] >=20 > each server has a folder. >=20 > i want to backup a folder in "SERVER A". >=20 > are there any backup methods, that meets these two requirements? : >=20 >=20 > 1) running from e.g.: a cronjob >=20 > 2) when running, it just checks the folder in "SERVER A" and "SERVER = B". if a file/folder has been added/removed/modified in the "SERVER A"'s = folder, then it copies/removes it/them to "SERVER B"'s folder. >=20 > please help! >=20 > Thank you in advance! [for any links, howtos :\ ] >=20 http://everythinglinux.org/rsync/ --=20 Peter Boosten http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 15:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94B01065672 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C188FC12 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so2747908eyh.37 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:42:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.12.211 with SMTP id y19mr2482464eby.12.1292082128535; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:42:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:41:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101211002225.D61647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101210060704.A3B641065783@hub.freebsd.org> <20101211002225.D61647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ian Smith Subject: Re: xpbargains.net spam [was: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:11 -0000 On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 11, Message: 27 > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:54:37 -0500 > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > No, he didn't. These mails are FORGED as being from freebsd-questions > participants, and on first glance may appear to be list postings. They > used to get posted to the list itself also, but postmaster@ blocked the > nuisance source back in August. However that doesn't stop them from > targetting individual list participants, like you. > > If you examine the full mail headers, it's likely to have originated > from the following IP address. If so, you just need to block that > address at your mailserver. But if they've moved, we need to know .. > > Quoting from a message to postmaster@ in August: > > > As Roland pointed out, the phishing/virus/whatever referral has switched > > from downwind.com.au to xpbargains.net, and possibly some others. > > > > Here's the business: > > > > % dig +short -x 64.38.11.26 > > allmail.0b2.net. > > % dig +short allmail.0b2.net. > > 64.38.11.26 > > % dig +short dusk.parklogic.com > > 64.38.11.26 > > > > If you can discard by Message-ID then every one of these, including the > > privately mailed ones, has @dusk.parklogic.com there. > > > > If you can block by IP, then that's the one. Or by hostname, every one > > so far has been relayed by allmail.0b2.net (that's a zero). > > So if the full headers reveal coming from that hostname or that IP or > any other IP in 64.38.11.26/29, just block that and move on. > > If it's a different address range now, please provide the full headers > for the message you received, with a copy to postmaster@freebsd.org > > Thanks, Ian (please cc me on any reply, I take this list as a digest) > Of all the mail I got on this subject, yours was the most informative. Thanks. But my question is this. Does GMail provide access to the full headers? For example when I click 'Show Details' I see the following and not much else > from Paul B Mahol > sender-time Sent at 4:30 AM (GMT+11:00). Current time there: 2:35 AM. > to Chris Brennan > cc FreeBSD-Questions , Mark > date Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:30 AM > subject Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' The above header just arrived as I was typing this so I thought it an excellent example. Obviously, I've masked addresses but the point is the same, g-mail doesn't give much in the way of detail. Short of flagging one item as spam has the potential risk of sending all FreeBSD-Questions mail to the spam folder which is just a swirling vortex of nothingness that gets deleted. If it's managed to get routed there, it stays there, I rarely go digging for mail in my spam folder because I rarely find stuff that was sent to detention without rightfully being there. C- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 15:42:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709261065673 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smathias1972@yahoo.com) Received: from web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 265C98FC18 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23224 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Dec 2010 14:34:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1292078060; bh=VWRcaJSxJ0d9y5XnrPOTtqfpBP73iFZH7sTkFCOzS4c=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VnakE5SeTZrzWPY/Wcdq1jb+fRWlLW2tlqRms5mSKNgZ7/Dr77RUP4M/9EzHlZ53KQDFWcG7Iy7/9ASPLEChKDCFh2G9weBfLlcSMpC3lYuaJyRNnjN7ozOOXS6EwtnlhLFOmoIG4ZkgZxPX0pvBHwYQ0n0ijF9KuJa+s7buSHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UA0H2vhsuJPXMpw2+k/K8NB1heg3y3dwulczuic/1D4VaGFkxkkDBz5YPL2r9o8cCbMucMK+5hX3r5P4QuE59djR7bWWa2nUFqV5cQc67TNrtBgkcgpmxgCcFMs6osWyoxx4OJIcow+aBnMLVkrj16N012RvYXQwidHZPQqraP4=; Message-ID: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: YrIXPIQVM1ktvHdyOhQjifg0NHYlET64_uvoQtRNBJ7IT7E AnuGNmSRRdviVRd7FrGGsGBbkID._5tm0lyHFwJmd4x6f7EFH8atY8Vo.hq8 HEOC7S6LzDrXcl4vx3kJ2t2AmnsyFvzWF8ZV4f0Em42U7DvkxmAwkeiUS4Fd CHZT.QKXMnx3_DN2yQtuDsG.cOqaltyCDv13T9w-- Received: from [94.21.120.245] by web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:34:20 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 06:34:20 -0800 (PST) From: S Mathias To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:08:01 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: bash increment in a given way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:42:37 -0000 It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing sequence, in a given way: # {START..END..INCREMENT} $ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done Welcome 0 times Welcome 2 times Welcome 4 times Welcome 6 times Welcome 8 times Welcome 10 times $ but what's the "magic" for this? : $ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done Welcome 0 times Welcome 1 times Welcome 4 times Welcome 5 times Welcome 8 times Welcome 9 times $ thanks:\ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:10:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAAE1065673 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E578FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-134-77.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.134.77]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C5D1ECD7; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:10:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBBGACSH001914; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:10:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:10:12 +0100 From: Polytropon To: S Mathias Message-Id: <20101211171012.6185da47.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ultimate" backup choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:10:15 -0000 On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:17:46 -0800 (PST), S Mathias wrote: > each server has a folder. Allow me a polite sidenote: Please try to use the correct terminology. Those are called directories, not "folders". > i want to backup a folder in "SERVER A". > > are there any backup methods, that meets these two requirements? : > > > 1) running from e.g.: a cronjob > > 2) when running, it just checks the folder in "SERVER A" > and "SERVER B". if a file/folder has been added/removed/ > modified in the "SERVER A"'s folder, then it copies/removes > it/them to "SERVER B"'s folder. Maybe cpdup can help here. Anyway, rsync would be a recommended choice. After installing them, you'll dinf documentation in "man cpdup" and "man rsync", /usr/local/share/doc/rsync/ - those are well documented. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:17:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791361065670 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail18.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36E58FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mai.dhcp.concrete.lan (unverified [203.122.251.29]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 49305570-1927428 for multiple; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:47:55 +1030 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Indexer In-Reply-To: <20101211171012.6185da47.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:47:50 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <659713EE-7DC5-4C39-B72E-AA20536F1106@internode.on.net> References: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20101211171012.6185da47.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.1 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: S Mathias , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ultimate" backup choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:17:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>=20 >> 1) running from e.g.: a cronjob >>=20 >> 2) when running, it just checks the folder in "SERVER A" >> and "SERVER B". if a file/folder has been added/removed/ >> modified in the "SERVER A"'s folder, then it copies/removes >> it/them to "SERVER B"'s folder. >=20 >=20 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/backup-basics.html William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNA6QxAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JRzsP/2rtrtu7a1vPc3jmhOMppg9q YJYcFTAOcVDR6rjb+82WBn75GgkhGWGfVmOwUThbyu/5kzfvsb70gVzWdia6RcuG Dr5XBFjObYQYRBme7sJBRuRZH1xwb3fzFzbkBf/moi2GvH7yi98FKAkqU8jtmgYN +/Qls+BHYthE8We7HV+02FGmC1s0uC6boebjdrwSFLdBjvM5ehUg4Lb7UL40bckz piC6OpL4vkRmx3VtpsxShvunljaCctiOAkYrs77TMIkooa7pV1kVBbvadUCylx/1 /YZpuz33KnL5+Sd+69HDNOkd+4Ix0a/SPglZdVif9qPt8yAFraxMxqCDauddzEyX bzp6qlEMoSxW8oLptImkI91dYjoMJlT5V51rF5UN50jVlfMKGp4JydK2/T9WBYY3 zN1KagMtzmhz0wgN+Fy2TEh7K034IDtVLZVu34ZGPVgJh8C3+b41CKD2JdtQSMXD 2R64rSerJw3Di9b9Gm/Djt27TR32HDagj/UUH24Gn4uArOkkccmYYgpVR2BrQXPf D6WlopScMhzpRGa7U1IvLMdfe7gLLqVWFQmCkd/mTz2RhT5gBiB2kSOwVtePGDnC dKeM9ahBo+JNC8wSqZq64KOPoqqAkWNRB0oQxjcsP+IsTx8Q+vNDNebjENSz2sBo woXN30B9tPU3Ea21Zqwx =3DGHAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:22:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30231065674 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DD08FC1B for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRSDa-0006S0-Q0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:22:42 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:22:42 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:22:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:23:11 -0500 Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com> <740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> <92849C6B31FD4396BBF187F9A6A9E655@GRANTLAPTOP> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:22:44 -0000 Grant Peel wrote: snip] > > \FYI for anyone that is following my thread on updating one single port: I > must have a somwhat busted installation. Using port upgrade failed ... > sorry I did not remember to keep the output, but, I was able to download > the source from proftpd.org and install it from scratch. > What I do on a fairly regular basis (usually about once a week) is the following: cd to /usr/sup <- this is where I keep my supfiles and housekeeping csup -L 2 ports && portsdb -uF && pkgdb -u && portversion This refreshes the ports tree and downloads the current matching INDEX database. Then the package database gets updated and checked and if there are no errors portversion runs to identify ports in need of update. Of course, what to do about the results is left up to the sysadmin. If I am inclined to update (usually just a portupgrade -a most of the time) I will then consult UPDATING. Preparing some kind of fallback in case of failure is a good idea for anything in production. I'm lucky enough to have an extra spare hard drive in every box to which I can do a dump immediately prior to upgrade. I also believe in test bedding stuff first. My 2 servers at home have the same services running on them as the 7 I have at work. So I run any updating on the two boxen at home first. If that is trouble free I might then do the ones at work. If not, the ones at work won't be touched. One thing I've noticed over the years is portupgrade works best when done more frequently so fewer things get upgraded at any one time. Letting a box go for 6 months and needing to update 100 things is more prone to failure. Each approach has it's pros and cons. Some shops don't want frequent updating because it is more likely to take a production system down, and that is perfectly reasonable to the point that old software doesn't have exploits. There have been a few updates to portupgrade itself lately. But there is a pretty fair chance if the command line shown above rolls all the way through with zero errors it may be taken as a good sign. Any errors at all and I would stop and find out what's wrong before moving on to actually updating anything. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:24:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733B410656A5 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006ED8FC1A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA87DE7163; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=CBgRW3QvRTCi p27V72/r0IXYXTY=; b=HY2Tjoqk/WDU5irRZBypA6UpaR7G2/8cZ6IKCsoTq2TR ebM9WGSte5MkybvBkV/ZmxHt2yn5p0Qm7tSXqNEWyeL0eAPuJ3ZnokxBx+7/1UJ0 zbGwPEALjWpIVa8KUejCJvccwqQ/b5aw3WQIw+WWdVT+TiJiTMRT6V6KnF172hY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Fq5hPf GEvDQg+tdqZsqk4udTbJ+z+GA652ywL07XSC2pQtoU4x4SPOoMEx4mXjC66jYyFe UYif367f7N3MQJbrkn7+/+GGXWnMTCxgT8h/REXBJpVV+1f30jttlfsdt84/OdjA QkcoD4xzzRSLjZkZKGscdfMlldBSnRk8xVejs= Received: from unknown (client-86-27-21-134.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.21.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F738E7153; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:27 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:08 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Chris Brennan Message-ID: <20101211162408.00005afe@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <20101210060704.A3B641065783@hub.freebsd.org> <20101211002225.D61647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ian Smith Subject: Re: xpbargains.net spam [was: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:29 -0000 On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500 Chris Brennan wrote: > Does GMail provide access to the full headers? Click the down arrow and select "Show original". -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:30:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AED1065672 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5D8FC15 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so3322657ewy.10 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:30:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.36.2 with SMTP id r2mr2223909ebd.51.1292085039397; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:30:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:30:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101211162408.00005afe@unknown> References: <20101210060704.A3B641065783@hub.freebsd.org> <20101211002225.D61647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101211162408.00005afe@unknown> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:30:19 -0500 Message-ID: To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ian Smith Subject: Re: xpbargains.net spam [was: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:30:42 -0000 On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500 > Chris Brennan wrote: > > > Does GMail provide access to the full headers? > > Click the down arrow and select "Show original". > > -- > Bruce Cran > Awesome! Thanks Bruce. Now I can put what Ian provided to good use :D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:02:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139801065672 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yy.guest@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E798FC1D for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so5306507bwz.8 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:02:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ewtiSE8hNZTrnIs+OJi7k/8y716cIDpIRTUTgJHBRPA=; b=CSS3CMd+laSuaKJqq5hT/5jkKWNnx++CdJQRzj0rIeE4fzOc7jzW4NmmmtdQHkw/aP K2ZtD+nV8X/sJRoFAL+RLE9Y0VO1sZ+gI2VGZX9zhpWKXU+n62Ub21jBIzphHejuw4JG bC0LXzf2uUJcg+VK00BQ+V4RDHbjVxt9kNMN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=O5ta2FHcBk6xvOuHtCMskm0NZGRlL6Wit7Hm7n7beZ1jqKXRR4q5O2sevF51LB5Ggk iK0v5ediTb74C/Qo9QGbASkEtTRD3b9O8I7AD6BfGeP+rvIxzqwxoXHVj93tFZvWx+6m hdBnweTsCEC8dqLG8dFLrTvcwlBD82H/XHhko= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.136 with SMTP id i8mr1941198bkg.74.1292083350383; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:02:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.102.196 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:02:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:02:30 +0300 Message-ID: From: "K. Yura" To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:34:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: pass for single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:02:32 -0000 ============================================================ FreeBSD .dlink 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC 2010 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 ============================================================ Hi. Where can I set up password for single user mode? Thanx. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:03:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9586E1065675 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5070C8FC1A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so4283254qyk.13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:03:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uErO1dGxXINDF3fRA4QoMVp80jcFC49vzkmhdXOkWpw=; b=QRSPUiiesPY1/O4c3oxcvKN3RP8yILDZHpH+bF1/j0bv+nh50sxEVco8FxqZzc7Qq2 cmXyXF90cZgaZai9bubwr2gEH/5V4fMIsqG6NBDmAbmIqNup9OS86RXFuKlu7eChesv/ NYnR44XTD8HTlbT3AN/T2jyw2b4wAUYISfM4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jxlaSgkkQQJtI5P3ywBZMQ4R/JZ5paIGDBre0IFW77hnx9m1m6qIeno0uNyqmWiHIv SzXvUpTn36eJazSOIH/VRAQESCPygw+WFDcvNrVg/cgPVqt4toc7XL55rytRFlOTnqhF jCjaXxDlhH6XrqL59HIj88lxdnViy6z/v4Li8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.144 with SMTP id hy16mr1859829qcb.259.1292083393374; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:03:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.210 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:03:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:03:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: Redd Vinylene To: questions X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:34:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Postfix and Gmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:03:14 -0000 Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client? I'm tired of all this using mutt on several boxes, setting up virtual MySQL accounts and domains with crap webapps. Figured I'd just use Gmail for it all and be done with it. Curious what sort of experiences y'all have though. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:35:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA0B1065696 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A968FC08 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4836459qwj.13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:35:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0irvulemSTeoxf/HB/Tc5ig7qaPui3pJFv+3PNNQli8=; b=OiR5wQEF6w3oFXW3dJ7gHjbg/gN1eu+VmB9W/4e/ak8KjWUlgtfaUAj+4YOgxkcS7f etERMxrELzPktKFX1T3TxOYLg+SqqNHmDcsVDU7GFmMj1E04KTzTQ3NK5mUhnF4D6ByR q5CMuTjJc+oMxGpZr0xLJfF2J3gsadyTdAErw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Jm2yK9JNPHp6optHkPmZZE1OUpNwYcQq66uwv0cheLw+xF/M8yjZ7vjy8Y1WqpiS6d g0YLtnpS9aYClLPifiK0dPUH1NmLL/ariSPwFipN4MmhftGE/q7DOCGtX4vULd8u0Jmh xwVPxyrF89uGnGQoJGuxyAy5q6nl40MI1ZGBQ= Received: by 10.229.219.136 with SMTP id hu8mr1946846qcb.171.1292085330793; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:35:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.148 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:34:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:34:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: S Mathias Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bash increment in a given way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:35:32 -0000 something like that? for i in `seq 1 20 | awk 'BEGIN{n=3D0; max=3D4; avg=3Dmax/2}{if (n<=3Davg) = {print $0;} n++; if (n>=3Dmax) {n=3D0;} }'` do echo welcome $i times done On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:34 PM, S Mathias wrote: > , that i can use this, when i want --=20 Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:36:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFCA1065694 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E78E8FC24 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4837236qwj.13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:36:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OQ/U5icukyJC1NkrGpDb7eG6BYibhMFWp9FqYuzc3rI=; b=BZ66+sFrk+euRm6H10Yma4dtYMTOsbopDftT+Jm/0fI4NK9R0S+VlCwOJu6cbxFgju XNvsJB8CsJ8k6fZ65+zdkfb6QokJpc/csIH4q9jZ4BqFAHpTy4wplY7X5rAWYUU8itOh r7vtWw9t5QNd6xY8/V7IMUc3W3PCOQChXVF9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Eji3Ep4ayE46Zx0GivmxqEFbkEub7bewc8CmJLHxKBBVM2DJ/eWnyUh5Wx1UNWraz7 cjOtUCm7KqsHAeHpMDzWC+jsjI+cfZv+3NsW4lz41lRpWVPn4z1QcyBJZymgsho/fqlB Dig5uU/eex1JRUxVYP5YB3eW0xq4qmdDqqmFs= Received: by 10.229.215.6 with SMTP id hc6mr1939100qcb.133.1292085406807; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:36:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.148 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:36:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:36:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: S Mathias Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bash increment in a given way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:36:48 -0000 with seq starting with 0, to fit your example... On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Samuel Mart=EDn Moro wr= ote: > something like that? > for i in `seq 1 20 | awk 'BEGIN{n=3D0; max=3D4; avg=3Dmax/2}{if (n<=3Davg= ) {print > $0;} n++; if (n>=3Dmax) {n=3D0;} }'` > do > echo welcome $i times > done > > > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:34 PM, S Mathias wrote= : > >> , that i can use this, when i want > > > > > -- > Samuel Mart=EDn Moro > {EPITECH.} tek5 > CamTrace S.A.S > (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 > 1 All=E9e de la Venelle > 92150 Suresnes > FRANCE > > "Nobody wants to say how this works. > Maybe nobody knows ..." > Xorg.conf(5) > --=20 Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:40:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA67510656CB for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E5E8FC19 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so2761868eyh.37 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:40:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.12.194 with SMTP id y2mr2246607eby.25.1292085620893; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:40:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:40:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:40:00 -0500 Message-ID: To: Redd Vinylene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions Subject: Re: Postfix and Gmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:40:22 -0000 On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client? > I'm tired of all this using mutt on several boxes, setting up virtual MySQL > accounts and domains with crap webapps. Figured I'd just use Gmail for it > all and be done with it. Curious what sort of experiences y'all have > though. > In theory, you should be able to plop your POP3/IMAP info into GMail and be off and running. (I would set up lables to sort your mail tho) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:45:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248CD106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDD38FC0A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRSZn-0007tj-TV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:45:39 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:45:39 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:45:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:46:08 -0500 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Postfix and Gmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:45:42 -0000 Redd Vinylene wrote: > Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client? [snip] Hate to break it you, but Postfix is not client software. FWIW though, there are two problem areas wrt to running a mail server. There's running the mail server itself, and then there's trying to run a mail server with bad broken DNS. You'd be surprised by how often 'mail' problems turn out to be the latter. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 16:47:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE89106566C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6A78FC08 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4843418qwj.13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:47:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=hGaYXMVuwYDcIDOv6c/DJcNDtsA9i+3JuCpGNHjNjPw=; b=vQVC+4DuqEI3dUAT6TOoAm+G/IwABWux+owkE1m9k1ZBKUpq0iajAvu2RvdYi3VwSd CbnGbOxlFVgRsjPyzJ45PlhtmKncO7kVe6GP5C2aSwtr3669a9RAdbU7q+4Kizr8J1yT r4mZsnTi4cWH2p36+DfjnRyszsla6UoaF46o0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=se1P4hG8/tc4Vy3C3oCtgmk2VeicA+duF+QgXPgMW6sgshpnSANUgvfCV4xmZPmHcE 64myI3ATd9+1+ILNq2HJ6EwkPfKDJf/V+WC8DhoUDeIgVHvIk7K2mwqukVAicb3Ckfy1 64MK3KyhF1uiD/k64gR+YYJdvnvMt/pg7Q7ak= Received: by 10.229.236.66 with SMTP id kj2mr1888010qcb.285.1292086071906; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:47:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.148 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:47:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:47:11 +0100 Message-ID: To: S Mathias Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bash increment in a given way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:47:53 -0000 also... if (nwr= ote: > with seq starting with 0, to fit your example... > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Samuel Mart=EDn Moro = wrote: > >> something like that? >> for i in `seq 1 20 | awk 'BEGIN{n=3D0; max=3D4; avg=3Dmax/2}{if (n<=3Dav= g) {print >> $0;} n++; if (n>=3Dmax) {n=3D0;} }'` >> do >> echo welcome $i times >> done >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:34 PM, S Mathias wrote= : >> >>> , that i can use this, when i want >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Samuel Mart=EDn Moro >> {EPITECH.} tek5 >> CamTrace S.A.S >> (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 >> 1 All=E9e de la Venelle >> 92150 Suresnes >> FRANCE >> >> "Nobody wants to say how this works. >> Maybe nobody knows ..." >> Xorg.conf(5) >> > > > > -- > Samuel Mart=EDn Moro > {EPITECH.} tek5 > CamTrace S.A.S > (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 > 1 All=E9e de la Venelle > 92150 Suresnes > FRANCE > > "Nobody wants to say how this works. > Maybe nobody knows ..." > Xorg.conf(5) > --=20 Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 17:02:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B1D106566B for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001EE8FC08 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so5348614bwz.8 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:02:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=gWWaw68Rz6bQGWLtH4yBr9e8Syldy7zh1WPDp4zi8H0=; b=bw5E9ZqW6hAMUjW+9t5HTEJ7OepO0M3/kxP/xrZei6/EpDvL/TYz5le9np/yxz0b1X 4UpPmOozeb7SR6kf3fCMURJ4OeogOHYvLSua70PLoEOUpW1W+ivrZV1R1US1Mdnimloq 51fY3GCPY59FOqInpOLAWPkeEZmz3PKanY5lI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=K8hWJzRTRTHpk3W6CYZYIiR7XCX5jrUsqM+E/tKWMJgrdXL9tNdAN2fawU4lKKHa3Z pW3Bg3QFN01RY4P8tfPWQXlhdbv50R0q/lAWaBVM5ws798mVaHPDO3XfrMXNjYFKq7pP TMNuESuWaJ4/atJnNLSBh5AhkSpXZyBNv5Kz0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.98.130 with SMTP id q2mr1964347bkn.31.1292085345776; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:35:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:35:45 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: "K. Yura" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pass for single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:02:16 -0000 Have a look at /etc/ttys. Chris -------- Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 11 Dec 2010 16:34, "K. Yura" wrote: > ============================================================ > FreeBSD .dlink 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC > 2010 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > ============================================================ > Hi. Where can I set up password for single user mode? Thanx. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 17:33:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B1F1065670 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DE08FC15 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4532970wwf.31 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:33:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=l2w80Hl95S71k+/Roqppw9r5HmgOPTAClaHj8MuHkV0=; b=bekd9V+8JRjOTI5VT/edPe3LE8PeguXMIupIEJHEjrqCk2NZtUQdtS3mRlQdtoXQr8 JAGEZLYADUQX/Tza9NDJXJMU3aZM3NXXNilzbmEhDp1SzkYXNEfxW3jF8EVgXKupeE7W nxYS9DecQjRSG6wfmvzkiLox0sHQ4Tz+YQWME= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wlpX8FU2kAab1Pa1T7ZMIKyQ2GSP45s0u/nvuFksW/D1N7leBdsvFxQ+HjjN2kPeKt 5TQlwo9DKPypGcQbxQprX5zbki1GVF3g59xIyYmSamcckTTMVhRi8nh0nT9yulbehx43 zDe2KRQhiMs35xMXtLFRKEdJ2bhH8zKJCQWiM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.179.149 with SMTP id h21mr2501001wem.44.1292088823864; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:33:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <659713EE-7DC5-4C39-B72E-AA20536F1106@internode.on.net> References: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20101211171012.6185da47.freebsd@edvax.de> <659713EE-7DC5-4C39-B72E-AA20536F1106@internode.on.net> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:33:43 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Indexer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: S Mathias , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ultimate" backup choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:33:46 -0000 On 11 December 2010 16:17, Indexer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> > >> 1) running from e.g.: a cronjob > >> > >> 2) when running, it just checks the folder in "SERVER A" > >> and "SERVER B". if a file/folder has been added/removed/ > >> modified in the "SERVER A"'s folder, then it copies/removes > >> it/them to "SERVER B"'s folder. > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/backup-basics.html > > William Brown > > pgp.mit.edu > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNA6QxAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JRzsP/2rtrtu7a1vPc3jmhOMppg9q > YJYcFTAOcVDR6rjb+82WBn75GgkhGWGfVmOwUThbyu/5kzfvsb70gVzWdia6RcuG > Dr5XBFjObYQYRBme7sJBRuRZH1xwb3fzFzbkBf/moi2GvH7yi98FKAkqU8jtmgYN > +/Qls+BHYthE8We7HV+02FGmC1s0uC6boebjdrwSFLdBjvM5ehUg4Lb7UL40bckz > piC6OpL4vkRmx3VtpsxShvunljaCctiOAkYrs77TMIkooa7pV1kVBbvadUCylx/1 > /YZpuz33KnL5+Sd+69HDNOkd+4Ix0a/SPglZdVif9qPt8yAFraxMxqCDauddzEyX > bzp6qlEMoSxW8oLptImkI91dYjoMJlT5V51rF5UN50jVlfMKGp4JydK2/T9WBYY3 > zN1KagMtzmhz0wgN+Fy2TEh7K034IDtVLZVu34ZGPVgJh8C3+b41CKD2JdtQSMXD > 2R64rSerJw3Di9b9Gm/Djt27TR32HDagj/UUH24Gn4uArOkkccmYYgpVR2BrQXPf > D6WlopScMhzpRGa7U1IvLMdfe7gLLqVWFQmCkd/mTz2RhT5gBiB2kSOwVtePGDnC > dKeM9ahBo+JNC8wSqZq64KOPoqqAkWNRB0oQxjcsP+IsTx8Q+vNDNebjENSz2sBo > woXN30B9tPU3Ea21Zqwx > =GHAI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > if you are zfs and the said dirs are zfs file systems you could do incremental zfs send and receives between each box From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 17:48:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF125106566B for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phanquochien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714488FC1A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so4629691wyf.13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:48:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7WvJAegfikTSFPqS2h5IB+C2kb8hw0Dn+luSZ/k5Fb4=; b=RmUJNRcTgvbmIrjuUUbopDIsLbFckGzRJXl9Jb1Vtf/zZ/hwn8xsdw9sRhBG4lPGnj LUcvvWwdJjhin3WSqN2iKJtYoDMV3pD2ZIpYmQqysWmapCVOIxH1kpIwg3wMlqUz3sGT rdhIj5Iuxr2vRHI0FQ1m2AW3dUwUGRcJcJ4To= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ZW/DvLQP407JLCLXUvKEbJ4A80CtqgO6oGOewPPw4VSI2vCm3wTA1/O3MNivWSvtjL XcG7Ar43Cq3MpVIgFaKbg86dG8smWtcyLNA80qxmPcKv2T/FSsHefgChcQ4RxvRNX2Du saV9umr7vA53jQZ0TAOf/8q62gIBkTcQebj04= Received: by 10.227.207.133 with SMTP id fy5mr507173wbb.222.1292088528395; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:28:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.139 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:28:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Phan Quoc Hien Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:28:28 +0700 Message-ID: To: "K. Yura" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pass for single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Hi, To set password for single usermode in FreeBSD: * 1.Edit /etc/ttys* vi /etc/ttys * 2.Change the following line *: *From* console none unknown off secure > *To* console none unknown off insecure > *3.Save and quit editor(vi)* Reboot the box and boot into single user mode, if you wanna test it. By the way, the keyword "insecure" imply to the console is insecure and thus required root password to be authenticated before single user mode can be access. It DOES NOT mean that the console is run insecurely. Take note. On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:02 PM, K. Yura wrote: > > ============================================================ > FreeBSD .dlink 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC > 2010 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > ============================================================ > Hi. Where can I set up password for single user mode? Thanx. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best regards, Mr.Hien E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com Website: www.mrhien.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 17:57:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0F71065670 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447258FC13 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id htWS1f0021GXsucABtxENi; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:57:14 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id htxA1f0091f6R9u8UtxBVQ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:57:13 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:57:08 -0800 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:57:08 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101211175708.GH11485@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: bash increment in a given way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:57:15 -0000 On Sat 11 Dec 2010 at 06:34:20 PST S Mathias wrote: >It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing sequence, in a given way: > ># {START..END..INCREMENT} >$ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done >Welcome 0 times >Welcome 2 times >Welcome 4 times >Welcome 6 times >Welcome 8 times >Welcome 10 times >$ > >but what's the "magic" for this? : > >$ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done >Welcome 0 times >Welcome 1 times >Welcome 4 times >Welcome 5 times >Welcome 8 times >Welcome 9 times >$ man jot(1) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 18:06:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A73106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCB78FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id htrf1f0021HpZEsA8u6Ss5; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:06:26 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hu6Q1f0091f6R9u8au6QcH; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:06:26 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:06:23 -0800 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:06:23 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101211180623.GI11485@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <485300.96624.qm@web121409.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20101211175708.GH11485@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101211175708.GH11485@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: bash increment in a given way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:06:27 -0000 On Sat 11 Dec 2010 at 09:57:08 PST Charlie Kester wrote: >On Sat 11 Dec 2010 at 06:34:20 PST S Mathias wrote: >>It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing sequence, in a given way: >> >># {START..END..INCREMENT} >>$ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done >>Welcome 0 times >>Welcome 2 times >>Welcome 4 times >>Welcome 6 times >>Welcome 8 times >>Welcome 10 times >>$ >> >>but what's the "magic" for this? : >> >>$ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done >>Welcome 0 times >>Welcome 1 times >>Welcome 4 times >>Welcome 5 times >>Welcome 8 times >>Welcome 9 times >>$ > >man jot(1) Or maybe not. It's still morning here and the coffee hasn't kicked in yet. I usually reach for jot when constructing loops that look like yours, but on second glance I'm not sure it can produce the output you want. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 19:49:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F79106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: from fep12.mx.upcmail.net (fep12.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1E98FC18 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101211194915.IEGP2213.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net>; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:49:15 +0100 Received: from bps.jodocus.org ([24.132.166.223]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id hvpE1f0264pXSfL01vpFxN; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:49:15 +0100 X-SourceIP: 24.132.166.223 Received: from jodocus.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bps.jodocus.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBBJnEYh057054; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:49:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from joost@jodocus.org) Received: (from joost@localhost) by jodocus.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBBJnEYu057053; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:49:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from joost) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:49:14 +0100 From: Joost Bekkers To: Steve Randall Message-ID: <20101211194914.GA56763@bps.jodocus.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joost Bekkers , Steve Randall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101207132656.260bf792@locust.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101207132656.260bf792@locust.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bps.jodocus.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:49:14 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at bps.jodocus.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=tMVj8KYobzzX0EiRnC7vY2isLrCxFvdg4RrHWPZXwJ0= c=1 sm=0 a=Rit7POsq_2oA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hYwbykyqAAAA:8 a=Az9N2DPw4vPJ4StsBSYA:9 a=Ns1kOzm7GqvOSk2vZ46lKi5agPcA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=VIfz433Ik-8A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount root during freebsd-update 7.0 -> 8.1 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:49:18 -0000 On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:26:56PM -0600, Steve Randall wrote: > > > 2010/12/5 : > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with > > >> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads > > >> (I'm > > >> using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded > > >> manually) > > >> It then claims it can't mount / > > Your disk was at one time "dangerously dedicated" and later converted > to MBR. But there is still an obsolete BSD label in block 1 of the disk. > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 seek=1 count=1 Yes, that fixed it. Thanks -- greetz Joost joost@jodocus.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 20:00:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E459B1065670 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:00:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nekoexmachina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADCE8FC19 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so2804612eyh.37 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:59:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=dmfqVEcu47RTE6lxR7IBk85UFcxpv0wdVallq/xuzBw=; b=bjIWqcT4kuTEMlCLSoPld0J/RecsEDGqcRHmCUMJS7L0eHtDnyuYe2pTtren2kJ4QF bC00f5VzDJoFMhC/W9qzJ173KHIzZL8w1IARV7TBkLBb8n9G+BMrCDb3URkBSDfHduOu a8lQe61fNM1nGMubU9XEjUmVgtWxqFX/jshQE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=eOPjdqBSsCUmdUquDNLq1bbY8m2qPRY7XoLayKwHsyApCY2Bd3OmeSX2f2jDD5sZew +j/2RMMkHBCTK3TQ/1em5q90+gb8/iR8dcjwXgirnwS0TgRA6ldSDQRpE33tw/hnfusL 0Y+x3tB/OahrGlFzEArYq4KhSbgcgHLwBd3H0= Received: by 10.213.35.138 with SMTP id p10mr2382721ebd.22.1292097598612; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([188.134.12.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q58sm3542620eeh.21.2010.12.11.11.59.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:59:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:59:39 +0300 From: Mikle Krutov To: xinyou yan Message-ID: <20101211195939.GA51364@takino.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umask .ape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:00:01 -0000 On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 03:16:56PM +0800, xinyou yan wrote: > 1. > In my system > umask enter > 022 > > I want to know why i do the commander > > umask -S > it show Improper mask > not u=rwx,g=..... > > 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac > > > thank you > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" mplayer will actually play anything. -- Old mercenaries never die. They go to hell and regroup. With best regards, Mikle Krutov, Bercut ltd. Technical Support department From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 21:05:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BC0106564A for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AED8FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC96157378; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:05:05 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=soyeomul; i=bh@izb.knu.ac.kr; bh=m RJ/OoJgHPrwSOTnh2ardckjR/NvYJZj3yUsy5fZiLs=; b=aRAE0R1Gw8D5R3iy/ oYBgrO8KbINQciOrHw+XTI06D6XABz8WYOKNEBAq2WvVBzbbL3dAyPxUdxH0RQpB GiU52VlCcIhs8VAh4wbEO/uTmzocc0R2nMuo4FE9D6yJMDhlrX1V6C/97a31ka7D 1w079xgUukJHP1l+Y93ipIToE0= Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F9957375; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:05:05 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.home (unknown [183.106.74.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F206A1CD73; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:05:04 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: Redd Vinylene Organization: GR References: X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-Window-System: GNU Network Object Model Environment X-My-Name: =?utf-8?B?7Zmp67OR7Z2sKOm7g+eCs+eGmSk=?= X-My-Country: Republic of Korea OpenPGP: id=96B196FE (expiration: 2013-10-26); perference=sign Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:04:54 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Redd Vinylene's message of "Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:03:13 +0100") Message-ID: <8662v0xbpl.fsf@betla.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: questions Subject: Re: Postfix and Gmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:05:07 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Redd Vinylene =EC=93=B0=EC=8B=9C=EA=B8=B8: > Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client? > I'm tired of all this using mutt on several boxes, setting up virtual MyS= QL > accounts and domains with crap webapps. Figured I'd just use Gmail for it > all and be done with it. Curious what sort of experiences y'all have thou= gh. It's not impossible. There are several how-to documents. See Google. What i found are:=20=20 [1] http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/Postfix_configured_with_Gmail_SMTP [2] http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_tutorial.html =2D-=20 =EC=86=8C=EC=97=AC=EB=AC=BC =ED=99=A9=EB=B3=91=ED=9D=AC(=E9=BB=83=E7=82=B3= =E7=86=99) | .. =EC=B6=9C=ED=95=AD 15=EB=B6=84=EC=A0=84.. "Mr. Corleone promises only to speak in your favor on this labor trouble as= a=20 matter of friendship in return for your speaking in behalf of his client." -- Tom Hagen, "Chapter 1", page 61 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0D53sACgkQsCouaZaxlv5PbACfXxNqosepNQijucuQnQxcYOTw +soAn08CsW2CRYw8HwOxMcBVSy3q0aHQ =fQV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--