From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 3 01:35:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3C61065692 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 01:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:198:206::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5658FC1F for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 01:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (localhost.spoerlein.net [IPv6:::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o031ZcSu067363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 02:35:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: (from uqs@localhost) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o031ZcQT067362; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 02:35:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 02:35:37 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: martinko Message-ID: <20100103013537.GK3508@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: martinko , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gstat: geom_gettree = -1: No such file or directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:35:40 -0000 On Fri, 01.01.2010 at 18:47:27 +0100, martinko wrote: > Hi list, > > gstat(8) does not work here on 8.0 (it worked happily on 6.x and 7.x) : > > # gstat > gstat: geom_gettree = -1: No such file or directory > > Is this known ? What can I do ? I doubt that it is widely known, but I've seen these 2-3 times before when fussing around with USB media and/or md(4) devices with gmirror on top. Basically, if you get really creative with the geom layering, this is likely to happen. It sure is a bug, but without a good way to reproduce, noone's gonna fix it. Regards, Uli