From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 14 04:25:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3382106566C; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431448FC13; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F1741C734; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:25:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wevgnu2x6pi; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:25:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 3E42641C733; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:25:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF70D4448F3; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:24:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <4CDF0C99.5080201@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101114042205.G78896@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <4CDEFC2D.4090908@freebsd.org> <20101113212800.O78896@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4CDF0C99.5080201@freebsd.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limitations on jail style virtualization X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:25:08 -0000 On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote: Hi Julian, > It was only a short discussion among "non developers" during a short breakout > session. > the session was "what is this VIMAGE/jails thing"? > and was not a dev-summit meeting but an "introduction to vimage" for end > users. Ok. Thanks for the follow-up. Much appreciated. > During the discussion people were asking questions that they had. Some of the > questions > I could answer well but others resulted in discussions that ended up with > things like, > "we you could do that but that would require that you had a different > /dev/pfsync for > each jail, and we have no way to do that yet". Well, to my understanding pfsync might already be fixed but maybe it was just /dev/pf. Ermal might want to follow-up but to my understanding a) there'll be one for every jail (given you allow it to show up in devfs) and b) based on credtials on open you'll figure out the right jail. > I promised the group that after the meeting I would bring up the topic with > other interested > developers... so here we are.. Tahnks a lot! /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html