From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 16 09:29:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6021065670 for ; Sun, 16 May 2010 09:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0748FC1E for ; Sun, 16 May 2010 09:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so1182523vws.13 for ; Sun, 16 May 2010 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.108.7 with SMTP id d7mr1724953vcp.41.1274002168188; Sun, 16 May 2010 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.122.31 with HTTP; Sun, 16 May 2010 02:29:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 12:29:08 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxcb message - is it still relevant X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 09:29:29 -0000 On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> As far as I could tell xcb is currently the default Xlib. Is the >> following message that libXcb is experimental still true? ... > > No, but if the - informal - experiments I made are correct the claims > about "dramatic improvements in speed" are an exaggeration. It would be nice if the message were removed. About the speed - what kind of experiments did you perform?