From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 00:20:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5384C106566C; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:80:80::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120658FC0C; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9V0KKvD033012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:20:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9V0KHa9073828; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:20:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <201010310020.o9V0KHa9073828@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:20:11 -0400 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20101029135858.E66242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <0C099B90-AFB9-422F-AB75-AFC138A36D20@berlin.ccc.de> <20101029013606.I66242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <201010291342.o9TDggVQ062469@lava.sentex.ca> <20101029135858.E66242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: Denis Ahrens , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Philipp, =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=FCnsche?= , Randy Bush Subject: Re: pending em0 commits for FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:20:26 -0000 At 10:06 AM 10/29/2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >Yes what you have down there looks *sigh* hopefully like a different >issue thought it mbuf fiddling again but way further up the stack. > >Could you please concentrate on only reproducing the > if: discard frame w/o packet header >issue rather than breaking things left and right as well? ;-) OK, some good news. After recompiling RELENG_8 with the em driver from HEAD I am no longer able to recreate the "discard frame w/o packet header" ! ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike