From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 4 20:02:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56790106566B for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075EC8FC12 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pB4K2OPO013780 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:02:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4EDBD1D1.2080802@missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:02:25 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Move ctm to ports? X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:02:26 -0000 How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base system, and making it into a port? One advantage is that changes to ctm (like allowing different compression programs, or incorporating svn into ctm) can be made relatively quickly. For example, the following PR has not been acted upon: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/159665 Also, if I want svn incorporated into ctm, then it will need the subversion port as a dependency. What would the disadvantages be?