From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 13 19:19:02 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6594B106564A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:19:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bounces@nabble.com)
Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5E48FC1D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156])
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bounces@nabble.com>) id 1Pyqof-0005DB-G2
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:19:01 -0700
Message-ID: <31138978.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinOrNfq5FBOPkXcExjN=mzZCKazxeG8BMJNFVer@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl
References: <4D7943B1.1030604@FreeBSD.org>
	<90325.1299852096@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<4D7A42CC.8020807@FreeBSD.org>
	<98496.1299861978@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<4D7B44AF.7040406@FreeBSD.org>
	<60071.1299936937@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<AANLkTinOrNfq5FBOPkXcExjN=mzZCKazxeG8BMJNFVer@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:19:02 -0000



Vin=C3=ADcius Zavam wrote:
>=20
>=20
> i'm still curious about things like CPUTYPE=3D and -march=3D configured a=
s
> native, gentlemen.
> is it the "golden egg" to use with our system or not? why "natives"
> aren't in the benchs?
>=20
> /me feels confused.
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Vin=C3=ADcius Zavam
> profiles.google.com/egypcio
>=20

Apparently -march=3Dnative would equal -march=3Dcore2
with 65nm generation Core2s, this is not the case with
Penryns.. But there are none in the test?=20

However, I agree that testing with -march=3Dnative
would be simpler and more straightforward.

regards,=20
- Jakub Lach
--=20
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchm=
ark%3A-gcc-base-vs.-gcc-ports-vs.-clang-tp31119986p31138978.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.