From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 16 01:08:58 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7794C1065670;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:08:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de)
Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084518FC0C;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id
	p9G18uXN097575; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:08:56 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de)
Received: (from marius@localhost)
	by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9G18uNS097574;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:08:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius)
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:08:56 +0200
From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
Message-ID: <20111016010856.GM39118@alchemy.franken.de>
References: <20111009165838.GA19886@alchemy.franken.de>
	<20111010192238.GC1781@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
	<20111011212318.GC81376@alchemy.franken.de>
	<20111011225531.GD5661@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
	<20111012204222.GC39118@alchemy.franken.de>
	<20111012235707.GD9138@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
	<20111013214903.GH39118@alchemy.franken.de>
	<20111014203226.GA16192@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
	<20111015205616.GL39118@alchemy.franken.de>
	<5E65282B-DBCB-4143-93DE-3501A0D72E22@my.gd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5E65282B-DBCB-4143-93DE-3501A0D72E22@my.gd>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>,
	"current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>,
	"net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: nge(4), tl(4),
	wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO
	bitbang MII]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:08:58 -0000

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> > patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
> > for 9/head:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
> > for 8:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff8
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> > 
> 
> 
> While I don't have any box with this hardware, I'm thinking you might want to get a bit more specific about what you want tested...
> 
> What do you think the patch might break ?
> 

Basically, if there's something wrong with the patch the driver should
fail to attach, if it still does and gets a link all should be fine.

Marius