From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 23 00:22:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5128A1065670; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@ddteam.net) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8045C8FC0C; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2725262bwz.13 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.82.96 with SMTP id a32mr2075990bkl.179.1295742150013; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rnote.ddteam.net (184-210-135-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.135.210.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v1sm5325171bkt.5.2011.01.22.16.22.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:22:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:22:26 +0200 From: Aleksandr Rybalko To: Ivan Voras Message-Id: <20110123022226.0567c2ff.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20110119125407.be7669b9.ray@dlink.ua> <20110120084955.GD1716@garage.freebsd.pl> <20110120122644.9a38974c.ray@dlink.ua> <20110121154636.f10529d8.ray@dlink.ua> <20110121154303.GG1698@garage.freebsd.pl> <20110123003013.90378231.ray@ddteam.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_LZMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:22:32 -0000 On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:12:30 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > On 22 January 2011 23:30, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > > > So as result of small discussion (thanks Ivan and Pawel Jakub) think > > best name is GEOM_UCOMPRESS (module do only UN-compress). > > It's a good name, I'd accept it. But since you already have a > descriptive name, why not add the missing "N" and make it > GEOM_UNCOMPRESS? It's more user-friendly in case future users start > wondering what the "U" means :) I'd like full names like UNCOMPRESS, but found UNIX historical examples like umount. Anyway, agree with you and rename it to GEOM_UNCOMPRESS :) WBW -- Aleksandr Rybalko