From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 17 16:44:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CE8106564A for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from dd18116.kasserver.com (dd18116.kasserver.com [85.13.138.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62B8FC0A for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.207.132.225] (tmo-109-17.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.109.17]) by dd18116.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B53D16601A3; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:25:32 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Christian Baer Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:25:00 +0200 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Maximum secure filesystem-size with geli X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:44:38 -0000 Hello Folks! This is quite a novum for me: The first message to a mailing list from an Android phone. :-) But since I am very far away from a "real" computer, I have to do it this was. Maybe there will be an answer by the time I get home so I can dig in directly. :-) Now I know this question has been asked before, but somehow there has never been a definite answer. What is the official maximum recommended file system size when encrypting with geli and AES or Camellia. I am not asking about the security of the ciphers (64 bit blocks like Blowfish has would not be good for modern file system sizes) or geli in itself but rather about at hat size it is recommended to make two file systems and thus creating two keys for the entire size. Does it make a diff if there are less IVs? Since newer and larger HDs now longer come with 512 byte sectory but instead with 4096 byte sectors, I guess this changes things too. Has anyone got a recommendation for me? -- Best regards from Germany! Chris From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 17 17:17:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F28F1065676 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net) Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (60.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C638FC12 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7B03745CA0; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:17:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (89-73-195-149.dynamic.chello.pl [89.73.195.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A536E45C9B; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:16:59 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Christian Baer Message-ID: <20110417171659.GD22319@garage.freebsd.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.garage.freebsd.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum secure filesystem-size with geli X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:17:22 -0000 --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 06:25:00PM +0200, Christian Baer wrote: > Hello Folks! >=20 > This is quite a novum for me: The first message to a mailing list from an= Android phone. :-) But since I am very far away from a "real" computer, I = have to do it this was. Maybe there will be an answer by the time I get hom= e so I can dig in directly. :-) >=20 > Now I know this question has been asked before, but somehow there has nev= er been a definite answer. >=20 > What is the official maximum recommended file system size when encrypting= with geli and AES or Camellia. I am not asking about the security of the c= iphers (64 bit blocks like Blowfish has would not be good for modern file s= ystem sizes) or geli in itself but rather about at hat size it is recommend= ed to make two file systems and thus creating two keys for the entire size. >=20 > Does it make a diff if there are less IVs? Since newer and larger HDs now= longer come with 512 byte sectory but instead with 4096 byte sectors, I gu= ess this changes things too. >=20 > Has anyone got a recommendation for me? Recent GELI uses one key for every 2^20 sectors, so no more than (2^20)*sectorsize bytes is encrypted using one key, so file system size should not be an issue. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk2rIIsACgkQForvXbEpPzQyoACdGVcW2RQsBbTFfKRkzaXLXpCP DsgAoNWomZSd3E+KcCZ5/ghOlth2AFl0 =2VEf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 17 17:41:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D61106566B for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from dd18116.kasserver.com (dd18116.kasserver.com [85.13.138.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9DC8FC21 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (p3E9ED579.dip.t-dialin.net [62.158.213.121]) by dd18116.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B2996601AB; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:41:14 +0200 (CEST) References: <20110417171659.GD22319@garage.freebsd.pl> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20110417171659.GD22319@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Christian Baer Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:40:35 +0200 Message-ID: <3f1c3e5e-fef7-4e5c-a9ae-ca362aaa5bf7@email.android.com> Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Maximum secure filesystem-size with geli X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:41:19 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > Recent GELI uses one key for every 2^20 sectors, so no more than > (2^20)*sectorsize bytes is encrypted using one key, so file system size > should not be an issue. What does "recent" mean in this context? As of what version of FreeBSD is this the case? Kind regards. Chris -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 17 17:46:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE60106566C for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:46:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net) Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (60.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383548FC08 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 9FE1645EE6; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:46:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (89-73-195-149.dynamic.chello.pl [89.73.195.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8465E45B36; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:46:26 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Christian Baer Message-ID: <20110417174626.GE22319@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20110417171659.GD22319@garage.freebsd.pl> <3f1c3e5e-fef7-4e5c-a9ae-ca362aaa5bf7@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3f1c3e5e-fef7-4e5c-a9ae-ca362aaa5bf7@email.android.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.garage.freebsd.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Maximum secure filesystem-size with geli X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:46:47 -0000 --BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:40:35PM +0200, Christian Baer wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >=20 > > Recent GELI uses one key for every 2^20 sectors, so no more than > > (2^20)*sectorsize bytes is encrypted using one key, so file system size > > should not be an issue. >=20 > What does "recent" mean in this context? As of what version of FreeBSD is= this the case? FreeBSD 8.2. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com --BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk2rJ3IACgkQForvXbEpPzQP/wCgndF/SIIZVO0iSfcm5FPIPrVf osQAoM+eEXrFzR4+cAYZhIGvWLc1oLyo =SBzI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BQPnanjtCNWHyqYD-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 17 21:45:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23B21065674 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0AB8FC12 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBZmC-0002H9-L4 for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:45:04 +0200 Received: from dtmd-4d0bcd07.pool.mediaways.net ([77.11.205.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:45:04 +0200 Received: from christian.baer by dtmd-4d0bcd07.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:45:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org From: Christian Baer Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:41:40 +0200 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20110417171659.GD22319@garage.freebsd.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dtmd-4d0bcd07.pool.mediaways.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.11 In-Reply-To: <20110417171659.GD22319@garage.freebsd.pl> Subject: Re: Maximum secure filesystem-size with geli X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:45:08 -0000 On 17.04.2011 19:16, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > Recent GELI uses one key for every 2^20 sectors, so no more than > (2^20)*sectorsize bytes is encrypted using one key, so file system size > should not be an issue. Hmm, then I guess it was a good idea to update from 8.0 before I set up the new drive. :-) Thank you for the infomation so far! This however makes another question arise: Is there some recommendation on the ratio between geli's -s option and the options -b and -f of newfs (I don't think -i option is important to geli)? Basicly: If I use different block sizes for the file system (in my case much larger than the default), would it be a good idea to use the same size as geli's sector size? If so, which sizes should be the same? Sector size (geli) and blocksize or frag size (newfs). I intend to use UFS. Best regards and good night! Chris From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 11:06:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E551065674 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE368FC15 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3IB6x8B019489 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:06:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3IB6wxh019486 for freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:06:58 GMT Message-Id: <201104181106.p3IB6wxh019486@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:06:59 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/155994 geom [geom] Long "Suspend time" when reading large files fr o kern/154226 geom [geom] GEOM label does not change when you modify them o kern/152609 geom [geli] geli onetime on gzero panics o kern/150858 geom [geom] [geom_label] [patch] glabel(8) is not compatibl o kern/150626 geom [geom] [gjournal] gjournal(8) destroys label o kern/150555 geom [geom] gjournal unusable on GPT partitions o kern/150334 geom [geom] [udf] [patch] geom label does not support UDF o kern/149762 geom volume labels with rogue characters o bin/149215 geom [panic] [geom_part] gpart(8): Delete linux's slice via o kern/147667 geom [gmirror] Booting with one component of a gmirror, the o kern/145818 geom [geom] geom_stat_open showing cached information for n o kern/145042 geom [geom] System stops booting after printing message "GE o kern/144905 geom [geom][geom_part] panic in gpart_ctlreq when unpluggin o kern/143455 geom gstripe(8) in RELENG_8 (31st Jan 2010) broken o kern/142563 geom [geom] [hang] ioctl freeze in zpool o kern/141740 geom [geom] gjournal(8): g_journal_destroy concurrent error o kern/140352 geom [geom] gjournal + glabel not working o kern/135898 geom [geom] Severe filesystem corruption - large files or l o kern/134922 geom [gmirror] [panic] kernel panic when use fdisk on disk o kern/134113 geom [geli] Problem setting secondary GELI key o kern/133931 geom [geli] [request] intentionally wrong password to destr o bin/132845 geom [geom] [patch] ggated(8) does not close files opened a o kern/132273 geom glabel(8): [patch] failing on journaled partition o kern/131353 geom [geom] gjournal(8) kernel lock o kern/129674 geom [geom] gjournal root did not mount on boot o kern/129645 geom gjournal(8): GEOM_JOURNAL causes system to fail to boo o kern/129245 geom [geom] gcache is more suitable for suffix based provid f kern/128276 geom [gmirror] machine lock up when gmirror module is used o kern/127420 geom [geom] [gjournal] [panic] Journal overflow on gmirrore o kern/124973 geom [gjournal] [patch] boot order affects geom_journal con o kern/124969 geom gvinum(8): gvinum raid5 plex does not detect missing s o kern/123962 geom [panic] [gjournal] gjournal (455Gb data, 8Gb journal), o kern/123122 geom [geom] GEOM / gjournal kernel lock o kern/122738 geom [geom] gmirror list "losts consumers" after gmirror de o kern/122067 geom [geom] [panic] Geom crashed during boot o kern/121364 geom [gmirror] Removing all providers create a "zombie" mir o kern/120091 geom [geom] [geli] [gjournal] geli does not prompt for pass o kern/115856 geom [geli] ZFS thought it was degraded when it should have o kern/115547 geom [geom] [patch] [request] let GEOM Eli get password fro o kern/114532 geom [geom] GEOM_MIRROR shows up in kldstat even if compile f kern/113957 geom [gmirror] gmirror is intermittently reporting a degrad o kern/113837 geom [geom] unable to access 1024 sector size storage o kern/113419 geom [geom] geom fox multipathing not failing back o kern/107707 geom [geom] [patch] [request] add new class geom_xbox360 to o kern/94632 geom [geom] Kernel output resets input while GELI asks for o kern/90582 geom [geom] [panic] Restore cause panic string (ffs_blkfree o bin/90093 geom fdisk(8) incapable of altering in-core geometry f kern/88601 geom [geli] geli cause kernel panic under heavy disk usage o kern/87544 geom [gbde] mmaping large files on a gbde filesystem deadlo o bin/86388 geom [geom] [geom_part] periodic(8) daily should backup gpa o kern/84556 geom [geom] [panic] GBDE-encrypted swap causes panic at shu o kern/79251 geom [2TB] newfs fails on 2.6TB gbde device o kern/79035 geom [vinum] gvinum unable to create a striped set of mirro o bin/78131 geom gbde(8) "destroy" not working. 54 problems total. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 12:43:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6255D106567F; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A88B8FC1A; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3JChQqb032065; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:26 GMT (envelope-from ae@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from ae@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3JChQO2032061; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:26 GMT (envelope-from ae) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:26 GMT Message-Id: <201104191243.p3JChQO2032061@freefall.freebsd.org> To: pawel.rsc[despammer]pl@FreeBSD.org, ae@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org From: ae@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/88601: [geli] geli cause kernel panic under heavy disk usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:26 -0000 Synopsis: [geli] geli cause kernel panic under heavy disk usage State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: ae State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 19 12:42:56 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=88601 From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 22 09:22:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB40106566B; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743FB8FC16; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3M9MAar066489; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:22:10 GMT (envelope-from pjd@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from pjd@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3M9MA8p066485; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:22:10 GMT (envelope-from pjd) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:22:10 GMT Message-Id: <201104220922.p3M9MA8p066485@freefall.freebsd.org> To: kvedulv@kvedulv.de, pjd@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org, pjd@FreeBSD.org From: pjd@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/152609: [geli] geli onetime on gzero panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:22:10 -0000 Synopsis: [geli] geli onetime on gzero panics State-Changed-From-To: open->patched State-Changed-By: pjd State-Changed-When: ptk 22 kwi 2011 09:21:43 UTC State-Changed-Why: Fixed in HEAD, thanks. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-geom->pjd Responsible-Changed-By: pjd Responsible-Changed-When: ptk 22 kwi 2011 09:21:43 UTC Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take this one. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152609