From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 13 00:57:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCBB106566B for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD788FC0C for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1807302vws.13 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=predatorlabs.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FUwXHjbcpYNA8Uz2VILftcGGw0JpzbiK1Y0C+x/hyo8=; b=HTN09bdFdHvhm2PitY55FkEC/PGFop2aSsHsHEMY6pERKUyyM9zrHLytzHpQUoSmeb okN/0hs9FHQVLlK8T4Cl02Vo5danSijN/WxYr9zJ8lr9J9ZGhZg3K7gX31xpjLGMV7u3 Ag9S8/9lg4FnYbg4l4cv/wzgXWi7UosWAq8jE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=predatorlabs.net; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bM+2a5I4fnZ35ie9y7ZFmZNxxXFbVEQIdPuOM73/76J9HsRWTpOzThlyuZCYrUDXgO uliRkgb2xeF3imROpbtthp68ISXI6vOb9WXmohegj7ndO+lxAXhbYxGBU2qPCIFg+Wuh V9BWMMXGb2P/L35keS2tBGv8qgGadcdlEaq9Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.146 with SMTP id n18mr1417931vdt.232.1299977833472; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.192.140 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:13 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.76] In-Reply-To: <4d7b9e57.6946340a.3823.46fdSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> References: <20110310120028.6013310656B0@hub.freebsd.org> <20110310161721.59652106566B@hub.freebsd.org> <4d7b9e57.6946340a.3823.46fdSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:13 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Roger Marquis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AW: Question Update Java Security Updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:57:14 -0000 On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Roger Marquis wrote: >>> The reason for that is that they haven't been necessary. =A0This cannot= be >>> said for openjdk, not yet at least. >>> >> >> There have been 191 "vulnerabilities" for the lifetime of JDK 1.6, >> according to Secunia. java/jdk16 is at update 4 out of 24. Unless you >> are running only trusted local apps with no networking support, that >> is highly dubious. > > Vulnerability is relative to your application of course. =A0The > "vulnerabilities" you site for JDK have not been relevant to my servers > or apps or most commonly used apps (other than webstart). =A0That cannot = be > said for the Openjdk. > > But equating advisories with vulnerabilities does bring up an important > point, and I expect religious preferences will continue to take > precedence over actual user experience. > > Roger Marquis > If you have info showing that these vulnerabilities are bogus and don't affect most people, please post it. Sun though the issues were important enough to patch and the "important point" it raises is that, for Java, I trust Sun more than you. If mailing list traffic (here, questions, ports) is any indication, most people using Java care about the browser plugin. And the patch 4 plugin is vulnerable to a number of issues. That's not an opinion. The best that can be said is that most exploits will be Windows specific. This change is almost certainly going to happen, sooner or later. There's nothing happening with the old ports. If you have issues with openjdk, it would be in your best interest to raise specific complaints so they can be fixed, rather than make accusations about "religious preferences." --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 03:51:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5631065676 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C48FC14 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E558667892; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:51:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: References: <20110310120028.6013310656B0@hub.freebsd.org> <20110310161721.59652106566B@hub.freebsd.org> <4d7b9e57.6946340a.3823.46fdSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <20110314035120.6F5631065676@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AW: Question Update Java Security Updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:51:20 -0000 Rob Farmer wrote: > If you have info showing that these vulnerabilities are bogus and > don't affect most people, please post it. Sun though the issues were > important enough to patch and the "important point" it raises is that, > for Java, I trust Sun more than you. We should distinguish between Java's JDK, JRE, and webstart. The vulnerabilities you note are not in the JDK or the JRE, they are in webstart. Webstart is the browser plugin. As I noted earlier but neglected to add IMO, the server apps and most commonly used apps are specifically "other than webstart". If I inferr correctly from your email we are in disagreement about the popularity of javaws and not the relative security of java, javac, etc. > If mailing list traffic (here, questions, ports) is any indication, > most people using Java care about the browser plugin. I don't see it that way for a few reasons. 1) the webstart plugin generates more mail because it has so many more problems. 2) I haven't personally seen much use of applets or javaws. YMV obviously. And 3) It has also been my experience that FreeBSD is used far more as a server OS than as a desktop OS. That (#3) is changing to be sure. Yahoo's project Rewire is purging that company of FreeBSD and PC-BSD is making the desktop more viable. I'll grant you FreeBSD may be becoming more of a desktop than a server OS. > This change is almost certainly going to happen, sooner or later. And I am looking forward to that as long as the transition isn't rushed. >From difficult experience with the latest (Linux) Gnome, KDE, gjc, ... which were all rushed and broke far more than they fixed. For obvious reasons I'm not keen on repeating those experiences with Java. Sun's QA of Java is still second to none. The OpenJDK may never have the resources to do that kind of QA but it will, at some point, get enough QA to avoid the bugs and vulnerabilities which handicapp javaws and limit the adoption of so much other OSS. That point, however, is not now or soon. > There's nothing happening with the old ports. If you have issues with > openjdk It's not about "issues" with anything, it's about objective measures of the frequency of mandatory upgrades, time spent maintaining applications, and the relative time and money required to use different OS'. But as long as the "old" java ports don't get any more difficult to install or use I suppose it shouldn't matter which one is FreeBSD's official java. IMO, Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 08:14:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FA6106564A for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from smadev.internal.net (host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C368FC16 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smadev.internal.net (localhost.internal.net [127.0.0.1]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p2E8EOKV085870 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:14:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id p2E8ENbi085869 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:14:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:14:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20110310120028.6013310656B0@hub.freebsd.org> <20110314035120.6F5631065676@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110314035120.6F5631065676@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201103141014.23577.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Subject: Re: AW: Question Update Java Security Updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:14:27 -0000 =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 Monday 14 March 2011 05:51:19 =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Roger = Marquis =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > Rob Farmer wrote: > > If you have info showing that these vulnerabilities are bogus and > > don't affect most people, please post it. Sun though the issues were > > important enough to patch and the "important point" it raises is that, > > for Java, I trust Sun more than you. >=20 > We should distinguish between Java's JDK, JRE, and webstart. The > vulnerabilities you note are not in the JDK or the JRE, they are in > webstart. Webstart is the browser plugin. As I noted earlier but /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/javaws !=3D /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/p= lugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so and (similarly) /usr/local/openjdk6/bin/javaws !=3D /usr/local/openjdk6/jre/lib/IcedTeaPlug= in.so > neglected to add IMO, the server apps and most commonly used apps are > specifically "other than webstart". >=20 Agreed on that. Never bothered with javaws either. > If I inferr correctly from your email we are in disagreement about the > popularity of javaws and not the relative security of java, javac, etc. >=20 > > If mailing list traffic (here, questions, ports) is any indication, > > most people using Java care about the browser plugin. >=20 > I don't see it that way for a few reasons. 1) the webstart plugin > generates more mail because it has so many more problems. 2) I haven't > personally seen much use of applets or javaws. YMV obviously. =20 I do not see the browser plugin that way. Surely applets did not make it, a= s opposed to flash or hot supercharged use of javascript, but there is a vast amount of old ap= plets that need to be kept running. People still use them to do work with them. And the people who wrote those applets (like in my case) cause Java was wha= t i was more familiar with, and not willing to learn new technologies just for the sake = of an old graphic browser app. It does not make any business sense. > And 3) It=20 > has also been my experience that FreeBSD is used far more as a server OS > than as a desktop OS. That (#3) is changing to be sure. Yahoo's project > Rewire is purging that company of FreeBSD and PC-BSD is making the > desktop more viable. I'll grant you FreeBSD may be becoming more of a > desktop than a server OS. >=20 I have thought of switching to Ubuntu at our home computer, but then again, in the end i find it a silly idea ;) > > This change is almost certainly going to happen, sooner or later. >=20 > And I am looking forward to that as long as the transition isn't rushed. > >From difficult experience with the latest (Linux) Gnome, KDE, gjc, ... > which were all rushed and broke far more than they fixed. For obvious > reasons I'm not keen on repeating those experiences with Java. Sun's QA > of Java is still second to none. The OpenJDK may never have the > resources to do that kind of QA but it will, at some point, get enough QA > to avoid the bugs and vulnerabilities which handicapp javaws and limit > the adoption of so much other OSS. That point, however, is not now or > soon. >=20 Now you are comparing apples and oranges. Just because you had some hard ti= me upgrading some linux boxes with gnome, kde, gjc (yes the first 2 have probl= ems in FreeBSD, as well, as of late) does not say anything about upgrading openjdk in FreeBSD. Java has (at least when talking about same version upgrades) was the least = of the nightmares of any upgrade i have gone through. Surely you must re-write certain apps i= f you go from java5 to java6, but that is anticipated, going from e.g. openjdk6-b21 = to openjdk6-b22 should not be any major concern. > > There's nothing happening with the old ports. If you have issues with > > openjdk >=20 > It's not about "issues" with anything, it's about objective measures of > the frequency of mandatory upgrades, time spent maintaining applications, > and the relative time and money required to use different OS'. But as > long as the "old" java ports don't get any more difficult to install or > use I suppose it shouldn't matter which one is FreeBSD's official java. >=20 > IMO, > Roger Marquis > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 11:07:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30041106564A for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046988FC12 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2EB73Bn002608 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:07:03 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2EB73it002606 for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:07:03 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:07:03 GMT Message-Id: <201103141107.p2EB73it002606@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:07:04 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/155381 java java/openjdk6 does not build with WEB option enabled o java/155107 java [patch] port java/diablo-jdk16 small cosmetic fix for o ports/154884 java java/openjdk6: Every NetBeans version on FreeBSD 8.1 c o ports/151923 java [patch] java/openjdk6: free and native openjdk bootstr o ports/151042 java [patch] java/openjdk6 Respect CC o ports/150142 java Not installed java/openjdk6 on file system zfs /usr/lo o java/147512 java Crash of RXTX-2.1-7 on AMD64 system o ports/142704 java [PATCH] java/jai-imageio: use $SUB_FILES to dynamicall o java/138729 java java/jdk16: setting 'export AWT_TOOLKIT=MToolkit' caus o java/138728 java java/jdk16: SIGSEGV in java runtime o java/128948 java java/jdk16 built from source can't bind a socket, but o java/128809 java JVM aborted when GNU RXTX write to serial port. o java/123555 java linux-sun-jdk15, linux-sun-jdk16 produce a coredump o java/122513 java native JDKs unbuildable with Linux ones f java/121692 java java/jdk16: Java 1.5 1.5.0.14p8 crashes in RMI TCP Con o ports/120372 java java/linux-sun-jdk16: linux-sun-jre1.6.0 plugin doesn' o java/120146 java java/jdk15: netbeans 6.0 causes java core dump on amd6 o ports/119732 java java/linux-sun-jre16: linux-sun-jre16 plugin doesn't w o java/119063 java An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime o java/118956 java eclipse and netbeans break on diablo-jdk15 o java/118496 java Eclipse packages do not work with 6.3-RC1/amd64 o java/116667 java linux-sun-javac1.4 hangs on SMP o ports/116082 java java/linux-sun-jdk16 jconsole is unable to connect to o java/114644 java tomcat goes out of PermSpace, jvm crashes o ports/113751 java java/linux-sun-jdk15: linux-sun-jdk-1.5.0.12,2 - java o ports/113467 java Multiple "missing return value" errors building JDK on f java/112595 java Java appletviewer frequently hangs (kse_release loop) o java/110912 java Java krb5 client leaks UDP connections o java/97461 java Diablo JDK does not report Update level in a format su s java/62837 java linux-sun-jdk14 executables hang with COMPAT_LINUX in 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 19:55:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A467A106564A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan.chen@solnetsolutions.co.nz) Received: from wlmld.solnetsolutions.co.nz (wlmld.solnetsolutions.co.nz [203.99.128.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA618FC1A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wlmld.solnetsolutions.co.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 06D4BB300AB for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:35:26 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from jonathan.chen (unknown [192.168.1.173]) by wlmld.solnetsolutions.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CB8B300AA for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:35:25 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <19658_1300304126_4D8110FE_19658_11709_1_4D811180.9060101@solnetsolutions.co.nz> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:37:36 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen Organization: Solnet Solutions User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Copyrighted-Material: Please read the disclaimer at the bottom of this email. Subject: openjdk6 java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketGetOption(Native Method) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:55:17 -0000 Hi, I'm running openjdk6-b22_1 on a 8-STABLE/amd64 host, and I'm noticing Exceptions with the following stacktrace signature: 2011-03-15 15:16:39,402 ERROR [errorlog] java.net.SocketException: Bad address java.net.SocketException: Bad address at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketGetOption(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.getOption(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:299) at java.net.Socket.getSendBufferSize(Socket.java:1107) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpConnection.open(HttpConnection.java:737) at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.http.SoapUIMultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager$HttpConnectionAdapter.open(SoapUIMultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager.java:1666) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector.executeWithRetry(HttpMethodDirector.java:387) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector.executeMethod(HttpMethodDirector.java:171) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:397) at ... There appears to be a problem with PlainSocketImpl.socketGetOption, and this impacts on most web-client software, eg: soap-ui, Eclipse updates, etc. Is anyone seeing this? Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen Solnet Solutions Limited t: +64 9 9775800 Level 7, Brookfields House, f: +64 9 9775801 19 Victoria Street West, ddi: +64 9 9775871 PO Box 6619, m: +64 21 635618 Auckland 1141, New Zealand http://www.solnetsolutions.co.nz/ Attention: This email may contain information intended for the sole use of the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you believe you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender or postmaster@solnetsolutions.co.nz as soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 08:01:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D232106566B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD2D8FC1E for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42C81C1D9E6 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950CB1C00165 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vAK89O7v5byU for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.reifenberger.com (ppp-93-104-112-85.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.112.85]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.reifenberger.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0B851353D0; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.reifenberger.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C90353CF for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:16 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Reifenberger To: java@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: openjdk6 wont compile on FreeBSD-current/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:01:34 -0000 Hi, I get the follwing error when trying to compile openjdk6 on -current / amd64. During make config the "POLICY" and "WEB" options where selected. Any clues why it breaks for me (I suspect the software to compile on the ports cluster). ... cd /mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product/../generated; cp includeDB /mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product/../generated/includeDB.current cd /mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product/../generated; cp /mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/hotspot/make/bsd/platform_amd64 /mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product/../generated/platform.current gmake[6]: Entering directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product' gmake[6]: *** No rule to make target `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/hotspot/src/cpu/amd64/vm/x86_64.ad', needed by `../generated/adfiles/bsd_x86_64.ad'. Stop. gmake[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product' gmake[5]: *** [ad_stuff] Error 2 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/bsd_amd64_compiler2/product' gmake[4]: *** [product] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/build/bsd-amd64/hotspot/outputdir' gmake[3]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/hotspot/make' gmake[2]: *** [product] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work/hotspot/make' gmake[1]: *** [hotspot-build] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/scratch/amd64/usr/ports/java/openjdk6/work' gmake: *** [build_product_image] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/openjdk6. *** Error code 1 ... Thanks in advance! Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.Reifenberger.com From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 11:00:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0B106564A; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063DA8FC1A; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2IB0T5b016296; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:00:29 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2IB0Tba016292; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:00:29 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:00:29 GMT Message-Id: <201103181100.p2IB0Tba016292@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/155657: java/openjdk6: missing symlink for include/freebsd/* X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:00:30 -0000 Synopsis: java/openjdk6: missing symlink for include/freebsd/* Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-java Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 18 11:00:29 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155657