From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  2 18:04:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28722106566C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Jan 2011 18:04:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [91.209.218.18])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9418FC13
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Jan 2011 18:04:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from broadband-109-173-73-7.nationalcablenetworks.ru ([109.173.73.7]
	helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1PZRsq-000Lsl-Ng
	for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:38:22 +0300
Message-ID: <4D20B80A.3000702@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:38:18 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ru;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: kame NAT PT implementation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:04:12 -0000

Hi.

I wonder why kame NAT PT implementation has never been imported to the tree?

I've tried to move my home box from dual stacked (private IPv4 and IPv6 
addresses) to IPv6 only. (My router is dual stacket of course.) 
totd+faithd works but they can't completely satisfy me. I want to have 
complete protocol translation and I see no way to achive without NAT PT.

-- 
Sem.