From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 15:42:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE11106564A for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patpro@patpro.net) Received: from rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [193.30.227.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4808FC0A for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack.patpro.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5E11CC020 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:23:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at patpro.net Received: from amavis-at-patpro.net ([127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eNNvztHrbrk2 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:23:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Patrick Proniewski Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-95-983677913; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:23:30 +0200 Message-Id: <088E1AE3-AACB-4A59-A7D5-2B33C41DBBA5@patpro.net> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: tuning advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:42:57 -0000 --Apple-Mail-95-983677913 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello, I bet you don't have this kind of request much. I need tuning advice, = because my system doesn't use all it's RAM, and I feel like it's a = shame. I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0 on a quad core Xeon E5450 (3GHz). System sits on a 1TB drive. /, /tmp, /var are UFS, everything else is = ZFS+compression. The box has 16 GB RAM, but not fully used: = http://patpro.net/images/mem_rack.png Sysctl output is available at http://patpro.net/images/sysctl.txt I've increased some values: /etc/sysctl.conf=20 kern.ipc.shmmax=3D536870912 kern.ipc.shmall=3D131072 The server is not heavily loaded, but any advice allowing me to benefit = from the remaining RAM is welcome. patpro= --Apple-Mail-95-983677913-- From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 06:49:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6791065672; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crodr001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E998FC08; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so224251bkb.13 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:49:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IWA8n2fiTof049bjODx2+wRWm0r8/zHCPlIeYiqYofY=; b=SZEVEj4q2pEd72Rq6C4JN7wd9v583nLU2VvWI+eywf8Np3lrOAgOHklzYaGXG6ZZjP wU/spVGhi+Ysishig8KeJ8y7cY83KA/6A85pZ2h3IERlLoca05nOkz4+/SWFa4h+brT/ K4S7fyOxPAFIdOkW0GGH7EE6rtFmPEMGRPaZM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr232752bkw.355.1316501341537; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.140.24 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:49:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110907133646.29b11668@desktop.pc> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:49:01 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 50V-2v2l1yePEJltY7flZLvxqAc Message-ID: From: Craig Rodrigues To: Chris Brennan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:54:11 +0000 Cc: Aldis Berjoza , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:49:03 -0000 Chris Brennan wrote: > Anything gonna be done with this? It has promise but needs some more people > involved. The original web page which started this thread was removed from the FreeBSD.org web site: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2011-September/345334.html For anyone who wants to help update the web site content, the best thing to do is to check out the FreeBSD web site from the "www" module in CVS (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ ) and submit patches to freebsd-www@freebsd.org, or "www" category via send-pr. -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@crodrigues.org From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 16:45:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ABB106567B for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CB88FC1A for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R63Cu-0004P5-IN for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:30:04 +0200 Received: from 178.214.36.169 ([178.214.36.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:30:04 +0200 Received: from citrin by 178.214.36.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:30:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Anton Yuzhaninov Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Vega Lines: 23 Sender: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.214.36.169 User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2 (i386)) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:52:14 +0000 Subject: hwpmc overflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:45:13 -0000 It seems to be, that hwpmc counters overflow is not properly handled. I want to count TLB misses and run: pmcstat -C -w1 -d -p INSTR_RETIRED_ANY -p DTLB_MISSES.ANY -p MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS -p ITLB_MISSES.ANY -p MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L3_MISS With -C values should monotonous increase, but in output I see overflous. Example output: http://pastebin.com/JiEF9AcU 2120463169 2139646836 281472837488169 281472855479093 2139646836 is near to 2^31 - max value for signed int (int32_t) -- Anton Yuzhaninov From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 20:27:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C235A1065673 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8468FC16 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R66ue-0003zp-Py for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:27:28 +0200 Received: from 178.214.36.169 ([178.214.36.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:27:28 +0200 Received: from citrin by 178.214.36.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:27:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Anton Yuzhaninov Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Vega Lines: 39 Sender: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.214.36.169 X-Comment-To: Anton Yuzhaninov User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2 (i386)) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:19:08 +0000 Subject: Re: hwpmc overflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:27:30 -0000 On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:12:57 +0000 (UTC), Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: AY> pmcstat -C -w1 -d -p AY> INSTR_RETIRED_ANY -p DTLB_MISSES.ANY -p MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS -p AY> ITLB_MISSES.ANY -p MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L3_MISS AY> AY> With -C values should monotonous increase, but in output I see AY> overflous. AY> AY> Example output: AY> http://pastebin.com/JiEF9AcU AY> AY> 2120463169 AY> 2139646836 AY> 281472837488169 AY> 281472855479093 AY> AY> 2139646836 is near to 2^31 - max value for signed int (int32_t) AY> Some more debug info: # uname -a FreeBSD test.vega.ru 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 20 14:41:45 UTC 2011 root@example.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 hwpmc: TSC/1/64/0x20 IAP/4/48/0x3ff IAF/3/48/0x61 UCP/8/48/0x3f8 UCF/1/48/0x60 kern.hwpmc.debugflags: pmc=ops When in pmc out shown values 2111155514 281473102541203 in dmesg I can see PMC:OPS:2: rw id=4 -> old 7dd5ad3 PMC:OPS:2: rw id=4 -> old ffff904a7193 So probmles somewhere in kernel (not in pmcstat) -- Anton Yuzhaninov From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 01:27:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFB71065673 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18CA8FC0C for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so1032868ywp.13 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:27:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O1ujiBgAZr0FfC8WdmqRUR8z8Tn5w8gJ8efUIylmhRM=; b=rMs4xAKUaxbyd4xzMA/7AWVWa+JyPbfdaSGe6pmLS1zGcEGKGBKDnwD7M9B7iFxURy 6wvtAsZjUHdDs9VLb3s0DS2MMG817aOU/sC66/6KKc5WkkBLOmExN8OffIYrMiizxUuM df5ix5DpcO4O9wwI8bQAEis6A5osLDK4bNdHk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.75.227 with SMTP id z63mr949670yhd.55.1316568453109; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.42 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:27:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:27:33 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DOil1Mv-AYvkPUzpA3avXxAbE-Y Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Anton Yuzhaninov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hwpmc overflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:27:34 -0000 Is this an AMD class CPU? The way the counters work on some platforms is that they count _up_ to an overflow value, trigger the overflow interrupt, and PMC then is supposed to calculate what the original value was. It sounds like maybe that isn't working correctly for a certain class of counters? Adrian From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 05:48:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE14106566C for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78398FC0A for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Fg2-0004sR-Le for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:48:58 +0200 Received: from 178.214.36.169 ([178.214.36.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:48:58 +0200 Received: from citrin by 178.214.36.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:48:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Anton Yuzhaninov Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Vega Lines: 13 Sender: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.214.36.169 X-Comment-To: Adrian Chadd User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2 (i386)) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:14:15 +0000 Subject: Re: hwpmc overflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:49:00 -0000 On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:27:33 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: AC> Is this an AMD class CPU? AC> AC> The way the counters work on some platforms is that they count _up_ to AC> an overflow value, trigger the overflow interrupt, and PMC then is AC> supposed to calculate what the original value was. AC> It sounds like maybe that isn't working correctly for a certain class AC> of counters? CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz -- Anton Yuzhaninov From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 07:04:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6851065672; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D028FC12; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1R6zoX-0005aw-LT>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:04:49 +0200 Received: from e178025198.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.25.198] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1R6zoX-0001iE-Iz>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:04:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:04:49 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110916 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.25.198 Cc: Subject: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:04:51 -0000 I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I wish to use it also on FreeBSD. Are there alternatives? What are people using on HPC FreeBSD? Greetings, Oliver From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 07:12:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08D3106566C; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:12:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECF38FC12; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1R6zvu-00078i-Nt>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:12:26 +0200 Received: from e178025198.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.25.198] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1R6zvu-0002EE-LQ>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:12:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4E7C315A.1000606@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:12:26 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110916 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" References: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.25.198 Cc: Subject: Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:12:28 -0000 On 09/23/11 09:04, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port > sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. > > My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I > wish to use it also on FreeBSD. > > Are there alternatives? What are people using on HPC FreeBSD? > > Greetings, > Oliver > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" As I can see, net/clusterit is broken due to the same reason! There is obviously no equeuing tool for FreeBSD HPC clusters at this time running FBSD 9? From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 15:47:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5769C106564A for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:47:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110948FC12 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home-nat.elischer.org [67.100.89.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8NFlpNV091801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4E7CAA51.2060102@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:48:33 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Hartmann, O." References: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:47:54 -0000 On 9/23/11 12:04 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port > sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. > > My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I > wish to use it also on FreeBSD. > > Are there alternatives? What are people using on HPC FreeBSD? so how broken is it? Since almost none of the active developers use SGE it is up to the users to help us get it fixed.. > Greetings, > Oliver > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 16:12:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB52106564A; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94858FC12; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8NFwYQ6098115; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:58:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8NFwYxX098114; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:58:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:58:33 -0500 From: Brooks Davis To: "Hartmann, O." Message-ID: <20110923155833.GA97579@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:12:59 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port > sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. >=20 > My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I > wish to use it also on FreeBSD. I've not had a decent 9.0 system available until quite recently and haven't had as much time as I'd like for FreeBSD HPC stuff lately. I'm taking a look at it today. It looks like I should be able to get it fixed, but ancient version of tcsh that is failing to compile is really annoying to patch for utmpx. -- Brooks --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFOfKypXY6L6fI4GtQRAi16AKCPM1XpLo0PCF+ZdUoj66HLqbpAvQCfXt7B eN1aE8lect9O/wBD9gx9csM= =pK+4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 16:28:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9516106566B; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31138FC12; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8NGRVWb098287; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:27:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8NGRVlp098286; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:27:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:27:31 -0500 From: Brooks Davis To: "Hartmann, O." Message-ID: <20110923162731.GB97579@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <4E7C2F91.8040705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110923155833.GA97579@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110923155833.GA97579@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:28:46 -0000 --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:58:33AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port > > sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. > >=20 > > My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I > > wish to use it also on FreeBSD. >=20 > I've not had a decent 9.0 system available until quite recently and haven= 't > had as much time as I'd like for FreeBSD HPC stuff lately. I'm taking a > look at it today. It looks like I should be able to get it fixed, but > ancient version of tcsh that is failing to compile is really annoying to > patch for utmpx. I've committed a fix to the sge62 port. Assuming the change makes it through some testing without me acquiring more pointyhats I'll add it to the older ones next week. -- Brooks --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFOfLNyXY6L6fI4GtQRAhNwAKCmga+YoXygqg4ywtnGxEWDESpVMQCdGd+u ztBkuUnl6d+5mwc+65uBvSI= =Qs4H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa--