From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 04:57:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030631065670 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhartmei@insomnia.benzedrine.cx) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (106-30.3-213.fix.bluewin.ch [213.3.30.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C60B8FC13 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (localhost.benzedrine.cx [127.0.0.1]) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p8B4vYAu004445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:57:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from dhartmei@localhost) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.14.1/8.12.10/Submit) id p8B4vWTj013824; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:57:33 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:57:32 +0200 From: Daniel Hartmeier To: Mario Lobo Message-ID: <20110911045732.GC29437@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> References: <201109101042.53575.lobo@bsd.com.br> <20110910160810.GB29437@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> <201109101917.30117.lobo@bsd.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109101917.30117.lobo@bsd.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VPN problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:57:44 -0000 Why do you have a tun0 interface on the NAT box? That's a virtual tunnel interface, not a physical interface. I thought the client (!= the NAT box) is the VPN endpoint. Not all encapsulation is done there, the NAT box is somehow involved in this? Daniel