From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 00:13:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F1F106566C for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B76B8FC0A for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p330DwNe059041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:13:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p330DwIP059040; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA17466; Sat, 2 Apr 11 16:08:16 PST Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:07:54 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: christopher-ml@telting.org, utisoft@gmail.com Message-Id: <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6+b5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 00:13:59 -0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting wrote: > > One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell. > > I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone > who has spent hours struggling with rpm ... would never dare to > even think of such terms when using the Ports Collection. Dependency purgatory?