From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 17 10:14:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3218106564A; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB1F8FC12; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533C846B32; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 06:14:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:14:18 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Stacey Son In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1191160420.20110629145915@serebryakov.spb.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Lev Serebryakov Subject: Re: OpenBSM: does somebody work on it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:14:18 -0000 On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Stacey Son wrote: >> I'm trying to use audit, and has some problems. First one is impossiblity >> to create custom event class, and second one I hit is with auditreduce(1) >> >> auditreduce doesn't filter events by date (-b/-a/-d options with any >> arguments produces empty output), it doesn't merge files properly and >> doesn't pick up files automagically, as Solaris' one does. It doesn't have >> -C/-M/-O functionality of Solaris' one, too. So, proper merging of audit >> trial files seems to be impossible :( >> >> I could try to fix & extend auditreduce(1), but does somebdy but me need >> it? >> >> Does somebody use audit on FreeBSD on production systems? > > FYI, a better place to discuss this would be the trustedbsd-audit mailing > list. There are quite of few people that use OpenBSM in production on > FreeBSD and Mac OS X that hang out on that list usually. Hi Lev: Just catching up on back e-mail, and bumped into this thread. Did you file PRs for these bugs? As Stacey mentions, the trustedbsd-audit mailing list is where most discussion of OpenBSM takes place. It's generally pretty quiet, but there are quite a few people using audit in production, and I'm sure they'd appreciate bug reports (and even fixes!). Robert