From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 16:04:39 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C461106566C for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sidetripping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E098FC0C for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so3834300fxe.13 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:04:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iwBZVl/ni1r7ctKeq4FmU41sj35xSem49uYJdZ6owCE=; b=u/F7kqNTMYSfqOp1ggS1RqpdFZANUhEDw9svgWZOsu4g/iEtigqOWJhv4jS69Z8N62 wtT0lJjsk6vgxJG7JVtsiijObfO9euyWBqHgYzSI0oozNURPJPQ9/t/Qq68vg7iK1RaS PXrkn+4gZzBuifgoSl3vbVwGco5QMI4OjEBWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.6.91 with SMTP id 27mr3101479fay.145.1315152277921; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.23.10 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:04:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> References: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:04:37 +0200 Message-ID: <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> From: ian ivy <sidetripping@gmail.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:04:39 -0000 Hello, Sorry, but link and images are unreached for me, so I do not have chance to review it. It seems that OpenDNS is blocking this site, probably due to some enabled filters. Best regards! 2011/9/3, freebsd-security@freebsd.org <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>: > I am out of office right now and will get back to you when I return. If you > don't hear from me, my assistant should contact you shortly. I wish I were > as lucky as the people who work with this work at home company, you should > check them out..Click Here > > Enable images or click here > > Let me know what you think after you have a chance to review. > Cheers! > > If you no longer wish to receive emails, please unsubscribe > > 866-288-1880 > 5150 yarmouth ave, Encino, CA 91316 > On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:32:37 +0200, ian ivy wrote: > From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 17:42:59 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F135E106566C for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834428FC21 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so4483895wwi.31 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:42:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bMthzYd0NMebKm3hU0GmoTOnwpsqd3B3iUprKdXhksI=; b=rdTqcLEofxIVls9lm83tKj8nNN1goGo/Df2CFJdHg/o/jhYZnYrkR43ocDlccrafh3 frLmHv8plkz6XMu06c+vS5arQUZBAeJoUHiXjD07ObRtPsdBFo98DHH7Wcx5qW5XN/nt v/2povmvfNo3GN4AgoHv0OiNgpMzgYw6qcWn4= Received: by 10.227.143.76 with SMTP id t12mr3072846wbu.22.1315156797114; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2sm5496309wbp.5.2011.09.04.10.19.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:19:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:19:48 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110904181948.549f3c93@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> References: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:43:00 -0000 On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:04:37 +0200 ian ivy wrote: > Hello, > Sorry, but link and images are unreached for me, so > I do not have chance to review it. It seems that OpenDNS > is blocking this site, probably due to some enabled filters. You replied to a spam. From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 21:01:02 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E9E1065670 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fabian@wenks.ch) Received: from batman.home4u.ch (batman.home4u.ch [IPv6:2001:8a8:1005:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D65E8FC08 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at home4u.ch Received: from flashback.wenks.ch (fabian@flashback.wenks.ch [62.12.173.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by batman.home4u.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p84L0r8q037589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:00:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fabian@wenks.ch) Message-ID: <4E63E705.9010707@wenks.ch> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:00:53 +0200 From: Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> <20110904181948.549f3c93@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110904181948.549f3c93@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:01:02 -0000 Hello Ian Sorry, that I can not help on your initial question, but something with the e-mail you got is very strange. On 04.09.2011 19:19, RW wrote: > On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:04:37 +0200 > ian ivy wrote: > >> Hello, >> Sorry, but link and images are unreached for me, so >> I do not have chance to review it. It seems that OpenDNS >> is blocking this site, probably due to some enabled filters. > > You replied to a spam. At first, it looks like an ordinary out of office message, but then it is more then a spam or something else which tries to trick the reader into clicking an URL, which eventually could hurt your computer. The answer you received had only be sent to you and not to the whole mailing list. It is strange, that it has the sender set to freebsd-security@freebsd.org. Do you see some other e-mail address (or hostname / IP address) in the header lines of the e-mail? Or do you see the URL where the "click here" is pointing to (better do not click on them)? If you could provide the details, then this "fake" subscriber can probably be removed and blocked by the list admins. It looks like this has some system, as I found the same question about this e-mail in archives of other mailing lists, eg. [1], [2] (several in the left pane) and [3] (even on full-disclosure, with faked sender address of the original sender). [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/django-users@googlegroups.com/msg125720.html [2] http://markmail.org/message/z2lxq5mf35cgow5l [3] http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-August/082161.html bye Fabian From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 21:47:46 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C84E1065674 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53028FC19 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5BB5E31 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p84LRpFQ003948 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:27:51 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:27:51 +0000 Message-ID: <3947.1315171671@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: VIMAGE and OpenVPN idea... X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:47:46 -0000 Here is an idea for an interesting little project: Imagine a firewall where all the external interfaces are confined in a jail which has no IP-connectivity to the rest of the machine. Start OpenVPN outside the jail, have it setup a two-way pipe and fork a childprocess, which attaches to the jail and performs out all public-side socket operations inside the jail, passing only the raw encrypted packets over the pipe. Tada: Nothing in the jail can be hacked... Only problem is: OpenVPN doesn't know this trick. But how hard could that be ? Somebody[tm] should do that... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 10:57:31 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DADC1065670 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fabian@wenks.ch) Received: from batman.home4u.ch (batman.home4u.ch [IPv6:2001:8a8:1005:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A15E8FC19 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:57:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at home4u.ch Received: from flashback.wenks.ch (fabian@flashback.wenks.ch [62.12.173.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by batman.home4u.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p86AvTsi033875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:57:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fabian@wenks.ch) Message-ID: <4E65FC99.4050307@wenks.ch> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:57:29 +0200 From: Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> <20110904181948.549f3c93@gumby.homeunix.com> <4E63E705.9010707@wenks.ch> In-Reply-To: <4E63E705.9010707@wenks.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:57:31 -0000 Hello Just for your information. On 04.09.2011 23:00, Fabian Wenk wrote: > Do you see some other e-mail address (or hostname / IP address) in > the header lines of the e-mail? Or do you see the URL where the > "click here" is pointing to (better do not click on them)? Ian had answered privately to me with the details. According to it, this e-mail tries to trick the reader into clicking a link (if the image is not visible, which would be loaded from a remote URL) to probably verify the e-mail address of the receiver. Luckily the URLs are (probably wrongfully) pointing to click.freebsd.org which does not exists. The e-mail use a faked sender address which is set to freebsd-security@freebsd.org, but according to the header lines the e-mail was not sent from a system belonging to the FreeBSD project. I have sent an e-mail with all the details to the admins of the mailing list, as I suspect we have a rouge subscriber in the list. bye Fabian From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 13:38:50 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DCC1065679 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fabian@wenks.ch) Received: from batman.home4u.ch (batman.home4u.ch [IPv6:2001:8a8:1005:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BDF8FC12 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:38:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at home4u.ch Received: from flashback.wenks.ch (fabian@flashback.wenks.ch [62.12.173.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by batman.home4u.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p86Dclm1048791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:38:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fabian@wenks.ch) Message-ID: <4E662266.1060403@wenks.ch> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:38:46 +0200 From: Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> <20110904181948.549f3c93@gumby.homeunix.com> <4E63E705.9010707@wenks.ch> <4E65FC99.4050307@wenks.ch> In-Reply-To: <4E65FC99.4050307@wenks.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:38:50 -0000 Hello On 06.09.2011 12:57, Fabian Wenk wrote: > I have sent an e-mail with all the details to the admins of the > mailing list, as I suspect we have a rouge subscriber in the list. Is is a bad idea only to trust the spell correction for a foreign language, obviously it should be "rogue" instead of "rouge". :) bye Fabian From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 15:23:08 2011 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51021106564A for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sidetripping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE2D8FC08 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so906103fxe.13 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wrzZgWF9EpS3l8qSYGdwnWkUPyds0aRIza5aubpkUUQ=; b=qxLhuF49dAr6+ECT5uR89X6bcH7IEwBxbSnPreBKpq8aR8R3LUjnnHf24JZ8TtIKbt A4yrduJctTUvN9XB9Z3aPgQy6x4Rn+jMSKK24Loh/BC61bOp245XbO3WKRn0dUMLIHmm 5OYB4rHbRKOLxFtDqLUX3zrMl1fGph2mPMtGg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.16.205 with SMTP id p13mr12376faa.69.1315408777548; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.23.10 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E662266.1060403@wenks.ch> References: <4e627e90.1250640a.5c76.2907SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAASvXNs3Wv3xenLVqU1hdErSQFH0OYZ_nevKovB0Ns9XqqPt9w@mail.gmail.com> <20110904181948.549f3c93@gumby.homeunix.com> <4E63E705.9010707@wenks.ch> <4E65FC99.4050307@wenks.ch> <4E662266.1060403@wenks.ch> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:19:37 +0200 Message-ID: <CAASvXNtFkOcXrhJk9JzcqmEKXmnFcC=0uTC=j0D2hJxAyXdufw@mail.gmail.com> From: ian ivy <sidetripping@gmail.com> To: Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" <freebsd-security.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:23:08 -0000 Hello! Since, Fabian has taken steps to resolve the problem of spam (He sent detailed e-mail to the admins), let say, that this problem is "solved". Can we get back to the question about 'IP fragmentation ID'? Thanks. Best regards! Fabian, thanks for the commitment. Ian. 2011/9/6, Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch>: > Hello > > On 06.09.2011 12:57, Fabian Wenk wrote: >> I have sent an e-mail with all the details to the admins of the >> mailing list, as I suspect we have a rouge subscriber in the list. > > Is is a bad idea only to trust the spell correction for a foreign > language, obviously it should be "rogue" instead of "rouge". :) > > > bye > Fabian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >