From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 20:18:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAD81065674; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe06.c2i.net [212.247.154.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6650F8FC0C; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:18:43 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 196809555; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:18:41 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:15:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4EA9127E.80504@entel.upc.edu> <201110290851.15130.hselasky@c2i.net> <20111029183807.GF1713@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20111029183807.GF1713@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq,NwSZ4V" =?iso-8859-1?q?=7CLR=2E+tj=7Dg5=0A=09=25V?=,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC( =?iso-8859-1?q?=0A=09=3AAuzV9=3A=2EhESm-x4h240C=609=3Dw?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110302115.40450.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quirk for a USB mass storage device X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:18:44 -0000 On Saturday 29 October 2011 20:38:07 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > + err = usbd_do_request(udev, NULL, &req, &buf); > > + if (err) > > + buf = 0; > > + > > + return (buf); > > +} > > You could drop 'err' variable and just check function return directly. > There is only one extra empty line at the begining of the function. No, because there is &buf. I'll add your device to the device quirk list. --HPS