From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 16 01:36:34 2012
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981681065678
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:36:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490618FC12
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:36:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	q6G1aRfu071921
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:36:27 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <5003701B.7070706@missouri.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:36:27 -0500
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: SVN for ports
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:36:34 -0000

The FreeBSD project has now moved ports from cvs to svn.  But, ports is 
in a separate repository from src.  So if there is going to be a svn 
mailing list for ports, it will be a separate mailing list from ctm-svn.

So

1.  Does anyone anticipate wanting a ctm-svn-ports, or will ctm-ports be 
enough?

2.  At some point, I would like to stop creating deltas for ctm-cvs. 
These deltas take a long time (an hour or two) for my computer to 
create.  (It takes about a minute to create ctm-svn deltas.)  Will this 
upset people?

I am not in a hurry to do this - I don't plan to remove any mailing 
lists for a while.

Thanks, Stephen