From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  7 22:23:31 2012
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9E11065675
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 Sep 2012 22:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668868FC12
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 Sep 2012 22:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	q87Lxtcm084451
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:59:55 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <504A6E5B.2040803@missouri.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:59:55 -0500
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
References: <5003701B.7070706@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5003701B.7070706@missouri.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: SVN for ports
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 22:23:31 -0000

On 07/15/2012 08:36 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> The FreeBSD project has now moved ports from cvs to svn.  But, ports is
> in a separate repository from src.  So if there is going to be a svn
> mailing list for ports, it will be a separate mailing list from ctm-svn.
>
> So
>
> 1.  Does anyone anticipate wanting a ctm-svn-ports, or will ctm-ports be
> enough?
>
> 2.  At some point, I would like to stop creating deltas for ctm-cvs.
> These deltas take a long time (an hour or two) for my computer to
> create.  (It takes about a minute to create ctm-svn deltas.)  Will this
> upset people?
>
> I am not in a hurry to do this - I don't plan to remove any mailing
> lists for a while.

It looks like cvs for ports is going to stop in February (not my 
decision).  So I will try to get ctm-svn-ports up and running in a short 
time.  I had to get more disk space, and I just got that today.