From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 04:12:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ABE970 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8758FC12 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAK4Cvq7012782 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:12:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <50AB0348.3010205@missouri.edu> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:12:56 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Merging svn-ports-cur with svn-cur Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:12:58 -0000 Having just added the doc repository to svn-cur, it now seems like it makes sense to merge svn-ports-cur with svn-cur, and close down svn-ports-cur. I want to get opinions. 1. The reason I had a separate svn-ports-cur in the first place was a lack of understanding on my part. 2. I won't do this until I see that svn-cur is working with the additional repository. 3. If you have recently updated ctm to handle svn-cur, then no new update is necessary - it should all work as is. Stephen