From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 05:26:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD1A106564A; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128298FC13; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q245QECv008430; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:26:14 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q245QEwR008426; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:26:14 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 05:26:14 GMT Message-Id: <201203040526.q245QEwR008426@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/165647: [acpi] Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE [regression] X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:26:15 -0000 Old Synopsis: Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE New Synopsis: [acpi] Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE [regression] Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-acpi Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 05:25:47 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Submitter has narrowed this down to a small set of acpi commits. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165647 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:01:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90851065670; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808C78FC1C; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G1nMF040755; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:01:49 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G1nPA040737; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:01:49 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:01:49 GMT Message-Id: <201203041601.q24G1nPA040737@freefall.freebsd.org> To: alangrow+b9d2265c@gmail.com, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: i386/114562: [acpi] cardbus is dead after s3 on Thinkpad T43 with a TI1510 CardBus Bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:01:49 -0000 Synopsis: [acpi] cardbus is dead after s3 on Thinkpad T43 with a TI1510 CardBus Bridge State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:01:48 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=114562 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:02:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00FB1065672; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AAF8FC0A; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G2HoN042270; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:17 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G2Hvb042266; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:17 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:17 GMT Message-Id: <201203041602.q24G2Hvb042266@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dieter@lin-k.net, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/115947: [hang] Dell poweredge 860 hangs when stressed and ACPI is enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:02:17 -0000 Synopsis: [hang] Dell poweredge 860 hangs when stressed and ACPI is enabled State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:02:16 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115947 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:02:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12431065676; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E7C8FC16; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G2qc0042463; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:52 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G2qS8042458; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:52 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:02:52 GMT Message-Id: <201203041602.q24G2qS8042458@freefall.freebsd.org> To: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/119200: [acpi] Lid close switch suspends CPU for 1 second on HP nx6125 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:02:53 -0000 Synopsis: [acpi] Lid close switch suspends CPU for 1 second on HP nx6125 State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:02:51 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119200 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:03:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44775106566C; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9958FC0A; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G3Jct042635; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:19 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G3IA1042630; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:18 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:18 GMT Message-Id: <201203041603.q24G3IA1042630@freefall.freebsd.org> To: golf@henoc.com, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: i386/129953: [acpi] ACPI timeout (CDROM) with Shuttle X27D X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:03:20 -0000 Synopsis: [acpi] ACPI timeout (CDROM) with Shuttle X27D State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:03:18 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129953 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:03:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661271065675; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB008FC16; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G3hGJ042809; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:43 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G3gS1042804; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:42 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:03:42 GMT Message-Id: <201203041603.q24G3gS1042804@freefall.freebsd.org> To: martin@email.aon.at, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/130683: [ACPI] shutdown hangs after syncing disks - ACPI race? X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:03:43 -0000 Synopsis: [ACPI] shutdown hangs after syncing disks - ACPI race? State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:03:42 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130683 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:04:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98761065672; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13528FC0A; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G45Xr042983; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:05 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G45Ss042978; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:05 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:05 GMT Message-Id: <201203041604.q24G45Ss042978@freefall.freebsd.org> To: cyril.elkaim@free.fr, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/137053: [hang] FreeBSD 8.0 BETA2Compaq Mini 700 locks on boot when running on battery X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:04:05 -0000 Synopsis: [hang] FreeBSD 8.0 BETA2Compaq Mini 700 locks on boot when running on battery State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:04:04 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=137053 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 16:04:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C6C106566C; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEEE8FC1C; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q24G4WHQ043174; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:32 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q24G4WCX043170; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:32 GMT (envelope-from jh) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:04:32 GMT Message-Id: <201203041604.q24G4WCX043170@freefall.freebsd.org> To: darinp@gmail.com, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: jh@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: i386/144045: [acpi] [panic] kernel trap with acpi enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:04:32 -0000 Synopsis: [acpi] [panic] kernel trap with acpi enabled State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: jh State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 4 16:04:31 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144045 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 01:33:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B062106566C for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212DC8FC1E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.189]) by fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q24N6BD7004552 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:06:11 +1100 Received: from c211-30-171-136.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c211-30-171-136.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.171.136]) by mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q24N626F000691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:06:03 +1100 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:06:02 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: jh@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <201203041602.q24G2qS8042458@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20120305092259.C1032@besplex.bde.org> References: <201203041602.q24G2qS8042458@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/119200: [acpi] Lid close switch suspends CPU for 1 second on HP nx6125 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:33:38 -0000 On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 jh@freebsd.org wrote: > Synopsis: [acpi] Lid close switch suspends CPU for 1 second on HP nx6125 HP nx6325 had the same bug. I happened to test this yesterday and was surprised to find that it was fixed. All other sleep modes are still unusable, but this might be because I don't have anything except default acpi to support powe management in the kernel (no acpi_hp) and my userland is from 2004. Further investigation shows that the main problem described in the PR is still there -- the system still seems to stop for 1 second. But now the time according to the ACPI timecounter isn't corrupted by 1 second after this system comes back. The fix might have been in timer code and have little to do with acpi. But last time I checked more details, all timers and interrupts seemed to stop for 1 second. The behaviour is still hard to explain, with some most parts of the system apparently stopping, but not all. According to ping -i 0.1: % PING etaplex.bde.org (192.168.2.7): 56 data bytes % ... % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.080 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=986.046 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=886.075 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=786.079 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=686.076 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=586.072 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=486.073 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=386.088 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=286.086 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=186.083 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=86.082 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.075 ms % 64 bytes from 192.168.2.7: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.074 ms According to this, the NIC didn't lose any packets while the system stopped. % Script started on Mon Mar 5 09:52:01 2012 % ttyp0:bde@etaplex:/d/tmp/r> time countll % 10.04 real 10.01 user 0.00 sys % ttyp0:bde@etaplex:/d/tmp/r> time sleep 10 % 10.00 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys Normal operation. countll counts to 10 billion, taking 2 cycles per iteration, so with a CPU frequency of 1.995 GHz it takes almost exactly 10 seconds. % ttyp0:bde@etaplex:/d/tmp/r> time countll % 11.18 real 11.16 user 0.00 sys % ttyp0:bde@etaplex:/d/tmp/r> time sleep 10 % 10.00 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys % Script done on Mon Mar 5 09:53:59 2012 With the screen turned off in the middle of each (doesn't matter if it is turned back on). The counting process still presumably takes only 20 billion CPU cycles, but now it takes 1.18 seconds longer. The accuracy of the sleep is even more interesting. The sleep is for a certain number of timer ticks, but last time I checked, there were no timer ticks during the 1-second pause. This has probably been fixed by the new timer code. It has to compensate for not interrupting for every tick in normal operation, and this apparently handles lost ticks perfectly too. Bruce From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 11:07:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714311065673 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461C18FC2D for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q25B72qX034777 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:02 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q25B718W034775 for freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:01 GMT Message-Id: <201203051107.q25B718W034775@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:07:02 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/165647 acpi [acpi] Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE [regr o kern/164329 acpi [acpi] hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature shows strange v o kern/163268 acpi [acpi_hp] fix driver detach in absence of CMI o kern/162859 acpi [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working o kern/161715 acpi [acpi] Dell E6520 doesn't resume after ACPI suspend o kern/161713 acpi [acpi] Suspend on Dell E6520 o kern/160838 acpi [acpi] ACPI Battery Monitor Non-Functional o kern/160419 acpi [acpi_thermal] acpi_thermal kernel thread high CPU usa o kern/158689 acpi [acpi] value of sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate ne o kern/154955 acpi [acpi] Keyboard or ACPI doesn't work on Lenovo S10-3 o kern/152438 acpi [acpi]: patch to acpi_asus(4) to add extra sysctls for o kern/152098 acpi [acpi] Lenovo T61p does not resume o i386/146715 acpi [acpi] Suspend works, resume not on a HP Probook 4510s o kern/145306 acpi [acpi]: Can't change brightness on HP ProBook 4510s o i386/143798 acpi [acpi] shutdown problem with SiS K7S5A o kern/143420 acpi [acpi] ACPI issues with Toshiba o kern/142009 acpi [acpi] [panic] Panic in AcpiNsGetAttachedObject o kern/139088 acpi [acpi] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP error o amd64/138210 acpi [acpi] acer aspire 5536 ACPI problems (S3, brightness, o kern/137042 acpi [acpi] hp laptop's lcd not wakes up after suspend to r o i386/136008 acpi [acpi] Dell Vostro 1310 will not shutdown (Requires us o bin/135349 acpi [patch] teach acpidump(8) to disassemble arbitrary mem o kern/132602 acpi [acpi] ACPI Problem with Intel SS4200: System does not p kern/128634 acpi [patch] fix acpi_asus(4) in asus a6f laptop o bin/126162 acpi [acpi] ACPI autoload failed : loading required module o kern/123039 acpi [acpi] ACPI AML_BUFFER_LIMIT errors during boot a i386/122887 acpi [panic] [atkbdc] 7.0-RELEASE on IBM HS20 panics immed o kern/121504 acpi [patch] Correctly set hw.acpi.osname on certain machin s kern/112544 acpi [acpi] [patch] Add High Precision Event Timer Driver f o kern/105537 acpi [acpi] problems in acpi on HP Compaq nc6320 o kern/91594 acpi [acpi] FreeBSD > 5.4 w/ACPI fails to detect Intel Pro/ o kern/73823 acpi [request] acpi / power-on by timer support o kern/56024 acpi ACPI suspend drains battery while in S3 33 problems total. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 17:50:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD061065673; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553048FC15; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q26HoCFx053324; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:50:12 GMT (envelope-from jkim@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jkim@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q26HoC9F053320; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:50:12 GMT (envelope-from jkim) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:50:12 GMT Message-Id: <201203061750.q26HoC9F053320@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jkim@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, jkim@FreeBSD.org From: jkim@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/165647: [acpi] Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE [regression] X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:50:12 -0000 Synopsis: [acpi] Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE [regression] Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-acpi->jkim Responsible-Changed-By: jkim Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 6 17:46:35 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: The problem is analysed and I am working on a workaround. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165647 From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 23:51:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B601065675; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nm.knife@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E118FC14; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so4518623wer.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nm.knife@gmail.com designates 10.216.137.97 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.137.97; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nm.knife@gmail.com designates 10.216.137.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nm.knife@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=nm.knife@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.137.97]) by 10.216.137.97 with SMTP id x75mr9633541wei.25.1331077870696 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:51:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gsBxBbvw4nUthC8NgkWZRDPeosdNtTPmsfkO1mhUdJs=; b=x8X9hQRN3GX4BBr/OC5JyWmgUouWT7SaJIv2yxe7R7O0Jo0NeVal2jFFBrNQmXBCBX v0nu9JoJNwv7MLsTlm0DVoNea/1iIo/U/lVeCFQZWEWs35ns10e6uyGanUGdwTfcckPT BpJHBlM44aa+6pTD0XM9VNUgp4WfYcAK7Q4lx+ujP65Ct4Z8exTKQqIyivgXE2Ldn5qc ILpJIsR8LTwNnhtZzX0mIeScjsp/Q9Y29jZ/v+Akl+r5SDSMlBhOHGHPkHKZzitr4JWF dqO8B+CK24SAiBFGy3hhVN4Nv+udZE/4TAzOJYdDaPVkYA/o2kfKZO1ftt066o9kEo+q FHxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.137.97 with SMTP id x75mr7676513wei.25.1331076306530; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:25:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.198.18 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:25:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F40A2D4.6000000@gmail.com> References: <4E836C06.9070405@gmail.com> <4E8374A7.90105@gmail.com> <4E9BDF13.4040006@gmail.com> <4F38211D.4070305@mehnert.org> <4F40A2D4.6000000@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:25:06 -0800 Message-ID: From: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= To: matt , freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: x220 notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:51:12 -0000 I will be buying a X220 soon and have some questions: 1. Which wireless has better support? ThinkPad 11b/g/n Wireless (Realtek RTL8192SE / RTL8188CE) Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1000 2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on GNU/Linux, so I would assume it will be the same on FreeBSD with webcamd and not worth the $30? (which also frees up space for 3x3 antenna) 3. Any disadvantages in usage for turning off the UEFI? 4. How far is the AMD64 kernel suspend/resume? What do you mean by video doesn't resume? 5. I'll be getting the IPS screen and want to make sure all the brightness issues won't f it up. Is there yet a working way to control brightness without interrupting the fan? Cheers. 2012/2/18 matt > I got 10-CURRENT installed on the x220 again. > > 1. Standard GENERIC kernel > 2. Buildworld/installworld from today's CVS > 3. No DRM/KMS patches or any other "factors" > 4. Witness KDB disabled in loader.conf (otherwise panic on suspend). > 5. setting hw.pci.do_power_suspend=0 wil prevent some AE_NO_METHOD > errors where it tries to set PCI express ports to D2 (the ports > themselves, I think...not the attached device) > > This is what I've found as I investigate the backlight/resume issue. I > am not very good at understanding ASL, but here's what I see. > > 1. _WAK calls a number of display related methods > 2. There are apparently brightness related calls here, as well as some > other video related calls > 3. Some of this behavior depends on /VIGD, whatever that is. > 4. The brightness calls seem to connect over LPC to the embedded controller > 5. Some of the brightness methods check OSI for WIN7 > > I will add that iasl finds 35 errors in this fine piece of lenovo work. > However, none of the errors appear to be near _wak. I've attached an > acpidump asl if it helps anyone who has a better eye for ASL and > resume/brightness problems. I think we can control brightness at least > with acpi_video, it attaches but not correctly..."active=0"...I haven't > gone back over its source in comparison with ASL yet either. Probably > acpi_ibm will work also, as the acpi methods seem to just call the > embedded controller over the lpc bus? Unfortunately it seems something > has changed with the ec, as some of the data becomes corrupt when > acpi_ibm is loaded. > > Resume obviously works fine in Win7, works 80-95% of the time in Linux > (seems like KMS fail when it doesn't resume on Linux), and it resumes > fine on FreeBSD except no video. No bad messages in logs after resume. > > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 23:52:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1011065673; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E6A8FC15; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so8869076obb.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sendtomatt@gmail.com designates 10.60.3.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.3.34; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sendtomatt@gmail.com designates 10.60.3.34 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sendtomatt@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=sendtomatt@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.3.34]) by 10.60.3.34 with SMTP id 2mr3165118oez.27.1331077934898 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:52:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=SWqCCfEPr2/Eo/KPAdnPChSsN1rz9RvkbbehYmSBMmc=; b=oU1ADgZw48VcaLtuFxgXAfNrYkxxeJP2n4g6eiNfEJSfOj3DguD6qzpjsVCu7/chgC LmzBy8cjQ0v/a3qrcZuJ+RvfdDJasbXJpMYiRz2uj2AnkeHQ6Z3p6LybJCoBLGvkZBgG dz6SCXQuQvbjJKcNlVppu9fjNQwusfdUBKHdDFzzHIxgQbI4RvYrHLY4t6lDYNVv/3wM QTY3tOL9xW0NF9hNq+9kNEYe7cVgSoeRaEdd/XdvERsuPWzzhw0QCdiYAo3YQW0TXstj tlBhfUQSvBYEObhoeaeh3af4Fo2Vw+zY9quxBN+SogirRt+tkNePNwaPWV6pgSThmn+5 VCLw== Received: by 10.60.3.34 with SMTP id 2mr2742384oez.27.1331077934800; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bakeneko.local (adsl-67-118-230-86.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net. [67.118.230.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x9sm1335131oea.7.2012.03.06.15.52.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:52:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F56A2DA.2070703@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:50:50 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120301 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?0JvRjtCx0L7QvNC40YAg0JPRgNC40LPQvtGA0L7Qsg==?= References: <4E836C06.9070405@gmail.com> <4E8374A7.90105@gmail.com> <4E9BDF13.4040006@gmail.com> <4F38211D.4070305@mehnert.org> <4F40A2D4.6000000@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x220 notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:52:16 -0000 On 03/06/12 15:25, Любомир Григоров wrote: > I will be buying a X220 soon and have some questions: > > 1. Which wireless has better support? > > ThinkPad 11b/g/n Wireless (Realtek RTL8192SE / RTL8188CE) > Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1000 > > 2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on > GNU/Linux, so I would assume it will be the same on FreeBSD with > webcamd and not worth the $30? (which also frees up space for 3x3 antenna) > > 3. Any disadvantages in usage for turning off the UEFI? > > 4. How far is the AMD64 kernel suspend/resume? What do you mean by > video doesn't resume? > > 5. I'll be getting the IPS screen and want to make sure all the > brightness issues won't f it up. Is there yet a working way to control > brightness without interrupting the fan? > > Cheers. > > 2012/2/18 matt > > > I got 10-CURRENT installed on the x220 again. > > 1. Standard GENERIC kernel > 2. Buildworld/installworld from today's CVS > 3. No DRM/KMS patches or any other "factors" > 4. Witness KDB disabled in loader.conf (otherwise panic on suspend). > 5. setting hw.pci.do_power_suspend=0 wil prevent some AE_NO_METHOD > errors where it tries to set PCI express ports to D2 (the ports > themselves, I think...not the attached device) > > This is what I've found as I investigate the backlight/resume issue. I > am not very good at understanding ASL, but here's what I see. > > 1. _WAK calls a number of display related methods > 2. There are apparently brightness related calls here, as well as some > other video related calls > 3. Some of this behavior depends on /VIGD, whatever that is. > 4. The brightness calls seem to connect over LPC to the embedded > controller > 5. Some of the brightness methods check OSI for WIN7 > > I will add that iasl finds 35 errors in this fine piece of lenovo > work. > However, none of the errors appear to be near _wak. I've attached an > acpidump asl if it helps anyone who has a better eye for ASL and > resume/brightness problems. I think we can control brightness at least > with acpi_video, it attaches but not correctly..."active=0"...I > haven't > gone back over its source in comparison with ASL yet either. Probably > acpi_ibm will work also, as the acpi methods seem to just call the > embedded controller over the lpc bus? Unfortunately it seems something > has changed with the ec, as some of the data becomes corrupt when > acpi_ibm is loaded. > > Resume obviously works fine in Win7, works 80-95% of the time in Linux > (seems like KMS fail when it doesn't resume on Linux), and it resumes > fine on FreeBSD except no video. No bad messages in logs after resume. > > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing > list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > > > > -- > Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) > Ditch the webcam...it's grainy under linux, probably would be the same under FreeBSD...haven't even tried. Intel wireless is THE way to go...that Realtek is barely supported on Linux (I believe 8192SU is still staging drivers...) FreeBSD only legacy boots, however "UEFI USB Support" must be on to allow USB booting for some reason. I have IPS...it's very nice, but still no brightness yet. I'll get a chance to look at again this weekend most likely. I think it's just an issue with our acpi_ibm that isn't talking to the embedded controller right. Resume works, but the screen is not on. I can now confirm it is *off* and not just "dimmed/no backlight". Setting BIOS to use an external monitor and disabling internal exhibits same behavior as internal display, i.e external monitor set as BIOS primary does not come back from power save. I have tried typing dpms force commands, did not work. Once resume & brightness work, it will be great for FreeBSD...everything else seemed fine, although I have not used fingerprint reader or card reader... An interesting note is that the BIOS does whitelist the wireless card, and the wwan slot defaults to being a mSATA until it detects a whitelisted USB ID or perhaps has no PCIe lines...not sure but my ral card I'm working with will not detect in the second slot at all. The slot may start as PCIe only in earlier bios, haven't checked (google x220 egpu & x220 msata issue). Matt From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 10:10:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F226B106566B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50DA8FC12 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q27AADLP096549 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:10:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q27AAD8A096546; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:10:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:10:13 GMT Message-Id: <201203071010.q27AAD8A096546@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: Irina Liakh Cc: Subject: Re: kern/162859: [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Irina Liakh List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:10:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/162859; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Irina Liakh To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, msuszko@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/162859: [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:51:03 +0200 Same situation here, my laptop is HP Compaq 530. (Excluding there is no debug.acpi.max_tasks on my sysctl tree). Things were working excellently until upgrading from 8.2 to 9.0.