From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  2 08:15:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A611065670;
	Sun,  2 Sep 2012 08:15:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
	[87.139.233.65])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ACB8FC0A;
	Sun,  2 Sep 2012 08:15:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100])
	(Authenticated sender: ohauer)
	by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58C6F20491; 
	Sun,  2 Sep 2012 10:15:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <50431591.5040406@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:15:13 +0200
From: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Waitman Gobble <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com>
References: <1346543324.15749@da3m0n8t3r.com>
In-Reply-To: <1346543324.15749@da3m0n8t3r.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>,
	"apache@FreeBSD.org" <apache@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted
X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Support of apache-related ports  <freebsd-apache.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-apache>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-apache@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>,
	<mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:15:18 -0000

On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>>> > > OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected when i did
>> > the test... 
>> > 
>> > snip ...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > So it seems more and more the reported issue is a local one.
> 
> I agree. So you *don't* need testing on my 9 machine, right?

Right,

Thanks for your support!

--
Regards,
olli