From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 11:06:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC731065675 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B8B8FC18 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q91B6Jpf024243 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:06:19 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q91B6IDf024241 for apache@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:06:18 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:06:18 GMT Message-Id: <201210011106.q91B6IDf024241@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: apache@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to apache@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:06:19 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/171900 apache [patch] www/mod_setenvifplus update to 0.18 o ports/165809 apache add mod_proxy patch to www/apache22 o ports/157554 apache www/apache22: Apache RLimitNPROC does not work as inte o ports/156787 apache www/mod_auth_kerb2 fails on undefined symbol with base o ports/147282 apache errors when starting www/apache22 after installation o o ports/137729 apache www/mod_auth_kerb2 port broken on 8.0-BETA2 due to sec o ports/125183 apache www/apache22 wrong SUEXEC_DOCROOT o ports/124375 apache security/heimdal: www/mod_auth_kerb doesn't compile ag 8 problems total. From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 16:24:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25E6106566B; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4878A8FC12; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2012 12:24:24 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BSE24778; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:24:23 -0400 X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from pool-173-63-112-200.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([173.63.112.200]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2012 12:24:23 -0400 Message-ID: <5069C3B3.9050500@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:24:19 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120820 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: anders@freebsd.org, apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Is it worth the effort to make proxy and server communicate via Unix socket? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:24:25 -0000 In a fairly common setup today, a proxy (say, Varnish) runs on the same system as the actual "backend" server (such as Apache). Would it be worthwhile to alter them both to allow them to talk via a socket instead of via TCP (on the lo0 interface)? Or is the win just too negligible? Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 21:10:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212BB106566C; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 21:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anders@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fupp.net (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD37A8FC16; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 21:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by fupp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32F35925A; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 23:04:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fupp.net ([80.91.36.20]) by totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iDYnmzlfvWDX; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 23:04:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by fupp.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86BEA59259; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 23:04:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 23:04:07 +0200 From: Anders Nordby To: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: <20121001210407.GA10881@fupp.net> References: <5069C3B3.9050500@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5069C3B3.9050500@aldan.algebra.com> X-PGP-Key: http://anders.fix.no/pgp/ X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 1E0F C53C D8DF 6A8F EAAD 19C5 D12A BC9F 0083 5956 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is it worth the effort to make proxy and server communicate via Unix socket? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:10:43 -0000 Hi, On man, okt 01, 2012 at 12:24:19pm -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > In a fairly common setup today, a proxy (say, Varnish) runs on the same > system as the actual "backend" server (such as Apache). > > Would it be worthwhile to alter them both to allow them to talk via a > socket instead of via TCP (on the lo0 interface)? > > Or is the win just too negligible? Thanks! I don't see the point. Varnish usually runs on separate servers. On a small scale setup, the likely improvements would be negligible. The Varnish developers also do not want Varnish to become a web server, it's just not it's job. Your time is better spent improving your cache hit ratio (% of requests cached) as well as integrating purging with your content management systems when caching dynamic pages. If you are serving flat files only you may want to consider just using lighttpd or nginx, which are known to be fast. Regards, -- Anders. From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 2 07:11:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B821065670 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gangplanksxh@facebookmail.com) Received: from p6040-ipadfx01sizuokaden.shizuoka.ocn.ne.jp (p6040-ipadfx01sizuokaden.shizuoka.ocn.ne.jp [219.160.179.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20CF8FC12 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (HELO vmms.mmsc.telstra.com) ([10.156.74.4]) by hmkt8-sms-irp05.msg.in.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:11:26 +0900 From: Telstra Online To: Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:11:26 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------ojixrdx" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Telstra Online - Your Account Balance X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 07:11:31 -0000 ------------ojixrdx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit * * * PLEASE CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT BALANCE IN ATTACHED FILE * * * ------------ojixrdx--