From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 11:07:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5545C106564A for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282AF8FC22 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0GB70PN057602 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0GB6xgH057600 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:59 GMT Message-Id: <201201161106.q0GB6xgH057600@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:00 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/159646 emulation [linux] [patch] bump Linux version in linuxulator f kern/156691 emulation [vmware] [panic] panic when using hard disks as RAW de o kern/156353 emulation [ibcs2] ibcs2 binaries that execute on 4.x not working o kern/155577 emulation [boot] BTX halted after install. Reboot during install o kern/155040 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux recvfrom doesn't handle proto fa o kern/153990 emulation [hyper-v]: Will not install into Hyper-V on Server 200 o kern/153887 emulation [linux] Linux emulator not understand STB_GNU_UNIQUE b o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o kern/151714 emulation [linux] print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of supp a bin/150262 emulation [patch] truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted p kern/144584 emulation [linprocfs][patch] bogus values in linprocfs o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux] path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain so o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 20:40:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7F7106566B for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388098FC08 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcwo16 with SMTP id wo16so2022851obc.13 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:40:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.76.225 with SMTP id n1mr14324248igw.11.1326744724531; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:12:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from dormouse.experts-exchange.com ([72.29.164.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm68910076ibh.4.2012.01.16.12.12.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:12:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: Jason Helfman Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:11:17 -0800 From: Jason Helfman To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3 0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:40:27 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, and removing from bsd.sites.mk? There is also a referrence to it in bsd.linux-rpm.mk, but not certain how this should be handled. This seems to be a legacy site-index. Thanks, Jason - -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPFIRlAAoJECBZmmNBUNPcUAoIAIOQCvTgpP9bAdZO3cQCT6re iOWQSTI0z+wivr7z6ZQwkhDO8sP8cxz5/ptpsgjKoiyvQt8D1jpy0JnZk3oB2MWr IJYJ54c6HA++gioTrUcNBLCXCc7EwJ8uDeggRKFLg+nfHZaPfwF2/cgVUedZZf12 rMvfg2z/EDDtL5Umc0DadV25JMEWUVkyYbtAHUGVLdGljEErrtILHo4AAVSaXtD5 5eFPR79HiHQQIGKAqBAsj/uXdlUNFTC0o+K+MC7/lL/sMFc/cOUP+vBpQx81NzqJ D9FfrcVVCnvY4gcLlRKTTB38Bq40YfRwu4EFq6PkVEkTNpSOkhEp5rTFryfOwVE= =fazy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 08:31:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9BA1065747; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4008FC0A; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q0H8VgYq002844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:31:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q0H8VgIJ002843; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:31:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16777; Tue, 17 Jan 12 00:23:17 PST Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:22:50 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: jgh@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:31:45 -0000 Jason Helfman wrote: > I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that > MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. > > Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, > and removing from bsd.sites.mk? > > There is also a referrence to it in bsd.linux-rpm.mk, but not certain how > this should be handled. This seems to be a legacy site-index. This might better be asked on ports@ (Cc'd). I would think that Fedora is a sufficiently common distribution to warrant keeping this setting in a central location, in case of future need in a non-X port, unless its presence is causing problems. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 18:44:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E588106564A for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBB28FC1D for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so8526086iag.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.170.3 with SMTP id d3mr13520436icz.7.1326825872711; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from dormouse.experts-exchange.com ([72.29.164.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id or2sm28250859igc.5.2012.01.17.10.44.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:44:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: Jason Helfman Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:43:45 -0800 From: Jason Helfman To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20120117184345.GC71184@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4F15C05E.4000606@passap.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4F15C05E.4000606@passap.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3 0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:44:34 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39:26PM +0400, Boris Samorodov thus spake: >Hi All, > >17.01.2012 00:11, Jason Helfman пишет: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> >> I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that >> MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. >> >> Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, >> and removing from bsd.sites.mk? > >Objection, sir! ;-) No worries. > >> There is also a referrence to it in bsd.linux-rpm.mk, but not certain how >> this should be handled. > >This is handled someting like this: any fedora linux port that does not >define it's MASTER_SITES uses it. From bsd.linux-rpm.mk: >----- >. if ${LINUX_DIST} == "fedora" >. ifndef MASTER_SITES >MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX} >----- > Yes, I saw this, and was grepping through the tree, looking for ports that define LINUX_DIST as fedora, and didn't see any, but maybe my grep was wrong. - -jgh - -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPFcFhAAoJECBZmmNBUNPcTF8H/3NMLRVLGMMLbTBY9swWGYJQ /fMg+fx3Upna0D8qiDcNBGLZc4MCUMozjr94kPCCNhUTI13rXIsyBC3Y3JT7w++o RIx3YM6QIjna8EXVLp7nZZIroyFzFC2rAUSwaDaNtt6UzVyZ/ilzWTK2PfbvnJKm sTxFAHzf36nNLs5cXVkW23iP/Vea8QvW3U/QhGIAZdC8Bvm+6aIdKtJRugymj1Dm awfVK5LumXythzIfprK8PGyRbuuWz+d0indHTPopNeCkciMpR1Pzh+fB03g98EV8 nC8OS3K7Ns56ePqvE5atbjuSGOJM1zg6RILl7ofYyJbTLq+ZRRJRL2DNqrK1YGw= =1QMD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 21:32:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D8D1065670 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02338FC15 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggki1 with SMTP id i1so5323984ggk.13 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:32:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hHgas3JoireTb81rvOtAxAncnUNJRI4hyrXx10TGvKA=; b=ANoB+VC78OnZGEhHQfpoGJFpo/WOoKNbVdeqpUVSZ96eWgSlkJ1SPEr0ROWBvRAgdX qlvPoqUTgE4G+BKqgPdwph7dplekQbnpzatxPAgPFfbfxbrPTbpHKQSIAaeDIzeZ7y8y +uLNhE7a6pZpipcbTLS94M30lKHggeEYYKilc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.161.135 with SMTP id xs7mr21547314igb.15.1326920951254; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:09:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:09:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:09:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:09:10 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:32:02 -0000 On 17 Jan 2012 08:32, wrote: > > Jason Helfman wrote: > > I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that > > MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. > > > > Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, > > and removing from bsd.sites.mk? > > > > There is also a referrence to it in bsd.linux-rpm.mk, but not certain how > > this should be handled. This seems to be a legacy site-index. > > This might better be asked on ports@ (Cc'd). > > I would think that Fedora is a sufficiently common distribution > to warrant keeping this setting in a central location, in case > of future need in a non-X port, unless its presence is causing > problems. > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly developed by Fedora. Chris From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 21:44:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB905106566C; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=357edbc5d=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC748FC0A; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwEAOA0F0+BbgogVmdsb2JhbABErEiBGgEhAiQlgXIBAQU4Aj8QCw4KLiEiFAYBEsEViTgBAQgJHwIBAQoMEQMKAQ4JEA8CAQIBAQIDAwEBAQECCAoXMREbLASBUxYJAQECEAECAwEGAwIDBAEEgmRjBIg7lgCBWYdn X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,531,1320645600"; d="scan'208";a="89585632" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Jan 2012 15:14:38 -0600 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:14:38 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Chris Rees , perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <666152AB4483DEBB619367C0@utd71538.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=874 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:44:28 -0000 --On January 18, 2012 9:09:10 PM +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other > people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly > developed by Fedora. > I'm not sure I follow. If Fedora is making an rpm available for download, how is it "stealing" their bandwidth to download the rpm from there? Wouldn't be equally "stealing" to download it from anywhere else? -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 22:44:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1295106566C for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916448FC14 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C3C985619E; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:27:47 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:27:47 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:44:18 -0000 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other > people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly > developed by Fedora. Correct. dougb has pointed this out before and no one has taken the cycles to go act on it. Consider this a task that needs volunteers. (A similiar caveat applies to the Debian and NetBSD sites; I believe it was Debian he flagged previously.) mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 11:52:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FF21065672; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46698FC18; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q0JBqeen021680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:52:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q0JBqe29021679; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:52:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA29759; Thu, 19 Jan 12 03:41:49 PST Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:41:21 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: linimon@lonesome.com Message-Id: <4f1863d1.Fic+p76hZFab0jQU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:52:44 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with > > other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if > > it's explicitly developed by Fedora. > > Correct. dougb has pointed this out before and no one has taken > the cycles to go act on it. Consider this a task that needs > volunteers. > > (A similiar caveat applies to the Debian and NetBSD sites; > I believe it was Debian he flagged previously.) Isn't this concern orthogonal to the original one about maintaining a (set of) correct MASTER_SITE setting(s), for use by such ports as can legitimately use Fedora/Debian/NetBSD/whatever sites? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 12:07:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57166106564A; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306DC8FC16; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E413256173; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:07:14 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:07:14 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20120119120714.GB16345@lonesome.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> <4f1863d1.Fic+p76hZFab0jQU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4f1863d1.Fic+p76hZFab0jQU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:07:15 -0000 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41:21AM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Isn't this concern orthogonal to the original one about maintaining > a (set of) correct MASTER_SITE setting(s), for use by such ports as > can legitimately use Fedora/Debian/NetBSD/whatever sites? Yes, IMHO. mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 19:57:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E01106564A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nerv@dawncrow.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903738FC0C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.20] (pD9530439.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.83.4.57]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MVHuk-1S9Iw90ITm-00ZAQ4; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:45:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1872C9.50000@dawncrow.de> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:45:13 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9_Hentschel?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111220 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:C5hXQXh/IzVyfaONMUcFcvoahqbH3V2Gzi74RQuiN2H zKAThsi3B6j02E4opY/wW6w00v7lQoSftIPLM+4pURKT9rHKXb vDij8U8y0ivFj7Ca9Z9DgHo/2ObWwvnSEaSYrsfWPMgN7zNR4H G8CXY/CrNUEgjGbzJmxEza3Nzs6HBxL7nfiXTyDIcHihTg1fxm Bm4O6+gV5Qjx9b6ckFWnf3GZD+0HaCOamVfK/5wlOuTzD/z6eD KTcdvBetHC7/x4PFtlOHw39+QnpGVVT6/FE1SKxJy1CUj58s8+ OKTbSjrAsGL8mdlWP37RKr5zem9YF7t76aqUO7+pSMstNvDkQZ 49hIAXteHn0U6JnbzlV8= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:59:36 +0000 Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:57:52 -0000 >> >>> The latter makes this statement "Wine 64bit works at the moment only on >> >>> Linux." which would indicate that, at this stage, FreeBSD is precluded. That, >> >>> however, is just my speculation. worth a try :) (be free to report bugs about not working on freebsd to wine as enhancement) >> >>> >> >>> To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine64. >> >> >> >> There is still a need for the 32bit wine, as the wow64 build will ONLY >> >> run 64bit windows apps, so for the majority of applications and games, >> >> we'll still need the 32bit wine. >> > >> > Is that because wow64 is unstable in wine64? >> > >> > Wow64's reason for existence is to run 32-bit Windows binaries on 64-bit >> > Windows/Wine and it works pretty well for most applications. >> > >> > __Martin >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-emulation at freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe at freebsd.org" >> wow64 doesnt -exist- in wine64 unless you compile the 32bit wine >> alongside it. >> >> You have to build it twice, to get two binaries "wine" and "wine64" and >> if you build them "properly" what happens when you attempt to execute a >> 64bit app with "wine" it's automatically relaunched with "wine64" But >> the reverse is NOT true. > > OK, that's what I would call unstable. Eventually though, I would expect a > packaged wine64 to include wow64, just like Windows does. That's not unstable, that's the way it needs to be done. To clarify this confusing thread: wine64 as standalone can run 64-bit windows apps (on a 64-bit processor of course) wine(32) can run 32-bit windows apps a wow64 setup means wine64 and wine(32) side by side with some exchange mechanisms to run 32-bit apps in the same wineprefix as 64-bit ones Linux distros handle packaging that differently: fedora uses the i386 package as a dependency, arch builds both together -- Best Regards, André Hentschel From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 13:12:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99E7106564A for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [193.34.186.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85058FC13 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0KDCG0p052325; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:16 GMT (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id q0KDCG3B024786; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:16 GMT Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q0KDCGUP024782; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:16 GMT Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:16 GMT Message-Id: <201201201312.q0KDCGUP024782@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <4F1872C9.50000@dawncrow.de> (message from =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9_Hentschel?= on Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:45:13 +0100) References: <4F1872C9.50000@dawncrow.de> Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:12:20 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:45:13 +0100, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9 Hentschel?= said: > > >> >>> > >> >>> To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine64. > >> >> > >> >> There is still a need for the 32bit wine, as the wow64 build will ONLY > >> >> run 64bit windows apps, so for the majority of applications and games, > >> >> we'll still need the 32bit wine. > >> > > >> > Is that because wow64 is unstable in wine64? > >> > > >> > Wow64's reason for existence is to run 32-bit Windows binaries on 64-bit > >> > Windows/Wine and it works pretty well for most applications. > >> > > >> > __Martin > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > freebsd-emulation at freebsd.org mailing list > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe at freebsd.org" > >> wow64 doesnt -exist- in wine64 unless you compile the 32bit wine > >> alongside it. > >> > >> You have to build it twice, to get two binaries "wine" and "wine64" and > >> if you build them "properly" what happens when you attempt to execute a > >> 64bit app with "wine" it's automatically relaunched with "wine64" But > >> the reverse is NOT true. > > > > OK, that's what I would call unstable. Eventually though, I would expect a > > packaged wine64 to include wow64, just like Windows does. > > That's not unstable, that's the way it needs to be done. Yes, sorry, I didn't mean to sound critical of Wine. > To clarify this confusing thread: > wine64 as standalone can run 64-bit windows apps (on a 64-bit processor of course) > wine(32) can run 32-bit windows apps > a wow64 setup means wine64 and wine(32) side by side with some > exchange mechanisms to run 32-bit apps in the same wineprefix as 64-bit ones > > Linux distros handle packaging that differently: > fedora uses the i386 package as a dependency, arch builds both together I'm glad that it is just a packaging issue (the original topic of this thread). __Martin From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 08:29:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FD91065678 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsmonj.FreeBSD.org (portsmonj.freebsd.org [69.147.83.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5DE8FC08 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmonj.freebsd.org (portsmonj.freebsd.org [69.147.83.46]) by portsmonj.FreeBSD.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0L8TBhQ058691 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:11 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:11 GMT Message-Id: <201201210829.q0L8TBhQ058691@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:11 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: graphics/linux-tiff description: TIFF library, Linux/i386 binary maintainer: emulation@FreeBSD.org status: FORBIDDEN deprecated because: expiration date: 2011-10-14 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=linux-tiff portname: x11-toolkits/linux-pango description: Linux pango binary maintainer: emulation@FreeBSD.org status: FORBIDDEN deprecated because: expiration date: 2011-10-14 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11-toolkits&portname=linux-pango If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 08:29:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF14106564A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsmonj.FreeBSD.org (portsmonj.freebsd.org [69.147.83.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27C28FC18 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmonj.freebsd.org (portsmonj.freebsd.org [69.147.83.46]) by portsmonj.FreeBSD.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0L8TQrV060990 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:26 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:26 GMT Message-Id: <201201210829.q0L8TQrV060990@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked forbidden X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:29:26 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, including errors seen on the build farm, is included below. portname: graphics/linux-tiff forbidden because: Vulnerable since 2004-10-13, http://portaudit.freebsd.org/8816bf3a-7929-11df-bcce-0018f3e2eb82.html build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=linux-tiff portname: x11-toolkits/linux-pango forbidden because: Vulnerable since 2009-05-13, http://portaudit.freebsd.org/4b172278-3f46-11de-becb-001cc0377035.html build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11-toolkits&portname=linux-pango If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 09:18:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E74106566C for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F6D8FC14 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E20075C29 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:13:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:57:27 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: linux-threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:18:48 -0000 By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads in one of them. This came in on the ports@ list: Unmaintained marked broken: portname: devel/linuxthreads broken because: does not build build errors: none. overview:http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=linuxthreads I'm curious as to why this wouldn't be coming to the emulation list as isn't it critical to the use of the linux ports? And is the maintainer situation similar to other linux ports- as in the list maintains it for critical purposes? Just curious... :) From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 14:02:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2CA106566B for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CBA8FC12 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E9A3456173; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:02:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:02:20 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Da Rock Message-ID: <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com> References: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux-threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:02:22 -0000 On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 06:57:27PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the > updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads is one > of them. The portsmon email is strictly mechanical. It's just going off the fact that the maintainer for the port is ports@. fwiw. mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 14:05:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E59106566C for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A86F8FC15 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9275C28; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:42 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C5D55C21; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1AC52B.2070202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:01:15 +1000 From: freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux-threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:05:12 -0000 On 01/22/12 00:02, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 06:57:27PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the >> updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads is one >> of them. > The portsmon email is strictly mechanical. It's just going off the > fact that the maintainer for the port is ports@. > > fwiw. Yeah I'm aware of that. What I'm wondering is why it might not be maintained by emulation@ instead of ports? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 15:11:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2E81065670 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D5E8FC0A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p4FC43C3D.dip.t-dialin.net [79.196.60.61]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89F58844017; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:11:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB73B14DD; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:11:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:11:08 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Da Rock Message-ID: <20120121161108.000074bc@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs42 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 89F58844017.A0508 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1327763473.77769@W1gj7OBht5XN4jv5obA09g X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux-threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:11:27 -0000 On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:57:27 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the > updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads in one > of them. > > This came in on the ports@ list: > > Unmaintained marked broken: > > portname: devel/linuxthreads > broken because: does not build > build errors: none. > overview:http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=linuxthreads > > I'm curious as to why this wouldn't be coming to the emulation list > as isn't it critical to the use of the linux ports? And is the > maintainer situation similar to other linux ports- as in the list > maintains it for critical purposes? It is not a linuxulator port. It is doing what the old linux threads lib was doing (each thread is a process), just on FreeBSD. There was a timeframe where this gave better performance for the native MySQL than our default threads lib. Now our threads lib is better, and we do not need the linuxthreads ports anymore. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137