From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 08:20:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCBF106566C; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAC88FC0A; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OctaHexa64-MkII (HPQuadro64.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4E8KQUC065895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 May 2012 09:20:27 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:20:28 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Alexander Motin Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4FAD12E3.3000608@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FABDE10.8090304@FreeBSD.org> <61CDA17B687F1C733EE1B017@OctaHexa64-MkII> <4FACF8BA.4020500@FreeBSD.org> <4FAD12E3.3000608@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-R amd64 - graid, should it survive 'pulling' a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:20:34 -0000 --On 11 May 2012 16:23 +0300 Alexander Motin wrote: > I've committed patch to the HEAD branch: > http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235270 > > It should cleanly apply to 8/9-STABLE. Hi, I've applied this to 9-RELEASE (as it's what we've been doing all the testing on so far) - and indeed it does seem to fix the problem. I can now pull drives at random, and it survives. Inserting a new drive also kicks off a RAID rebuild. Thanks, -Karl