From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 19:02:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B4A106564A for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28848FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E91ED23C63 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:02:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3ACD23C60 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:02:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usbctlt011.secnap.com (10.70.2.19) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:02:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC911CF.10402@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:02:39 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4FC8C070.3000008@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC8C070.3000008@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Fwd: anoncvs.. offer X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:02:43 -0000 tabthorpe@ suggested that I send this to you (I guess it makes sense, portmgr is only ports ;-) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: anoncvs.. offer Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:15:28 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp To: I am currently running a (semi public) tinderbox at lorie.secnap.net. It is in our secure data center, 100Mbs fiber, battery and generator backup, takes three different permissions on card key to get in (only two people have those permissions). Pretty secure, (we are a managed network security company), staffed 24/7. I noticed that the ports anon cvs is broken in us (heard its broken everywhere except tw and fr). I would volunteer a jailed public anoncvs.us.FreeBSD.org /and/or anoncvs1.FreeBSD.org. since we are moving everything to svn, I would volunteer to host that. No sense in cvs just for ports at this point. any interest? ps, video of our SOC: Yes, everyone in the video works here. one at the very end is my clone (first born) former marine, runs the SOC and DC. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 20:19:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CD81065677 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@qxnitro.org) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620C08FC1A for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3511476bkv.13 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:19:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxnitro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HmxXWFOrdFlY4ybTWrW6/mlqN9WQwlUz1JqfGAOsWCk=; b=qDvYBDuNmqfk4wNWHpNlqiioriUgO5rPyQ7quNZ7qS9eM3lzXxQlLYNihpQ8zGbK+V zrr5gElIgUZMMdXxbL69Ai9/MtvEluxwVrzKKlAj4oLTm6qAhTZsp5XWBFevP2nokuVQ tFmi3WNyf8tkih12mMU0tDB+PgcVAARq7Ef+o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=HmxXWFOrdFlY4ybTWrW6/mlqN9WQwlUz1JqfGAOsWCk=; b=M9B9ZoosnhV8kyRK0lnbLxuiAZ2gcfKPFYy71tbEdSNQDEO/KQ2qglV+4gC5Xo5Fc5 u0VI61pRIS7aTg1Cu0sJnMYqxg5ThQBmbFwLVJESJroq8HfQ9V86cFA2xLlLQR3Sj4FN 8PpEEkIM6aBgoqm8muvEvMoOq1vi/JC3ymzbnnuJy9ZbuxHeG8eZyyXUO8cqEuy05dFz uI2hIGokE1GIwB/UYLzZUkdN4jW3f0Ln8z7UlH7lNHe08Olqu8P7rTe+fsTx/CeBnKnh YQCAgz+9zlL4ZIojMutYCpQ26bQC4+pv5OcIt/dTpl7joDy0MptRqc+ItUCReWPSrpV7 rIHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.134.6 with SMTP id ia6mr4112927bkc.51.1338668361871; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: simon@qxnitro.org Received: by 10.205.39.199 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:19:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [46.7.100.49] In-Reply-To: <4FC911CF.10402@freebsd.org> References: <4FC8C070.3000008@freebsd.org> <4FC911CF.10402@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:19:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Yb1-f8SifhpqZQEu8oFpPqPYuSs Message-ID: From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGW8lx1ORY5vU7gZWAbbwAcyr/i9rDtFVVupBwftbyYptfu4eqaJ9A6EnC79cQ7mCmwhPO Cc: hubs@freebsd.org, Brad Davis Subject: Re: anoncvs.. offer X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:19:24 -0000 On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > tabthorpe@ suggested that I send this to you (I guess it makes sense, > portmgr is only ports ;-) Hey, Yes, hubs is probably the best place. > I am currently running a (semi public) tinderbox at lorie.secnap.net. > It is in our secure data center, 100Mbs fiber, battery and generator > backup, takes three different permissions on card key to get in (only > two people have those permissions). > Pretty secure, (we are a managed network security company), staffed 24/7. > > I noticed that the ports anon cvs is broken in us (heard its broken > everywhere except tw and fr). > > I would volunteer a jailed public anoncvs.us.FreeBSD.org /and/or > anoncvs1.FreeBSD.org. If somebody is willing to run an external anoncvs, I would be very happy with this. See any problems with this brd (who have run a mirror in the past)? Is it running now? Do you plan to run it over pserver or ssh? > since we are moving everything to svn, I would volunteer to host that. > No sense in cvs just for ports at this point. Not sure what you mean by this part - for svn the anon access is pretty much built in? > ps, video of our SOC: Hmm, you guys use pie charts in network monitoring? ;-) -- Simon