From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 07:56:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236051065670; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 07:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CF58FC0A; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 07:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 26C5B56236; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 01:39:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 01:39:10 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: gahr@FreeBSD.org, wenheping@gmail.com, gelraen.ua@gmail.com, oliver@FreeBSD.org, fluffy@FreeBSD.org, amdmi3@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org, danfe@FreeBSD.org, dev2@heesakkers.info, multimedia@FreeBSD.org, rene@FreeBSD.org, jnlin@csie.nctu.edu.tw, martymac@FreeBSD.org, philip@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120304073910.GC25330@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:49:11 +0000 Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: [avg@FreeBSD.org: Re: ports/156253: [exp-run] [patch] Update devel/boost-* from 1.45 to 1.46.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 07:56:18 -0000 At some point FreeBSD needs to update to the latest version of boost One or more of your ports was shown to break during our last -exp run: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.8-exp.20120127093941/ Can each of you take a look to see if the latst version of the port from upstream fixes known problems with boost? Thanks. mcl for reference: aqsis- gahr@FreeBSD.org cgal- wenheping@gmail.com eiskaltdcpp-lib- gelraen.ua@gmail.com galaxyhack- ports@FreeBSD.org gigi- oliver@FreeBSD.org gstreamer-qt4- fluffy@FreeBSD.org lander- amdmi3@FreeBSD.org libYGP- ports@FreeBSD.org libreoffice- office@FreeBSD.org libtorrent-rasterbar- dougb@FreeBSD.org luxrender- danfe@FreeBSD.org merkaartor- dev2@heesakkers.info mkvtoolnix- multimedia@FreeBSD.org openlierox- amdmi3@FreeBSD.org openvrml- ports@FreeBSD.org plee-the-bear- amdmi3@FreeBSD.org ros-common- rene@FreeBSD.org scribe- jnlin@csie.nctu.edu.tw simgear- martymac@FreeBSD.org springlobby- amdmi3@FreeBSD.org wesnoth- philip@FreeBSD.org ----- Forwarded message from Andriy Gapon ----- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:35:52 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, churanov.port.maintainer@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/156253: [exp-run] [patch] Update devel/boost-* from 1.45 to 1.46.1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120221 Thunderbird/10.0.2 Just a note that 1.49 has been released. Regarding the exp-run results and this comment http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156253#reply7 - I think that the number of the failing ports is sufficiently small and the current boost version is sufficiently outdated to justify breaking those ports and putting onus on their maintainers and upstreams. I suspect that in some case just updating the ports to the latest upstreams could fix the problems. http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/libreoffice-3.4.5.log This bug report seems to describe the same issue and has fixes: https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=64945 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43139 http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/gstreamer-qt4-0.10.1_1.log http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/wesnoth-1.8.6.log Googling for provides a number of recipes for a fix - the problem seems to be universally caused by #define foreach BOOST_FOREACH somewhere in (non-boost) source code. http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/gstreamer-qt4-0.10.1_1.log Again google helps (): https://bugreports.qt-project.org//browse/QTBUG-22829 Every problem seems to have a solution already. We are not the first to use newer boost :-) But it's unreasonable to expect that a single person should fix all the problems in advance. The task should be parallelized among maintainers of the dependent ports (and their users with hacking skills). -- Andriy Gapon ----- End forwarded message -----