From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 16 02:06:31 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0D0106564A
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:06:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CB78FC12
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	q8G26S1B091225; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:06:29 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <50553424.2080902@missouri.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:06:28 -0500
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
References: <5017111E.6060003@missouri.edu>
	<20120814003614.H3692@besplex.bde.org>
	<50295F5C.6010800@missouri.edu>
	<20120814072946.S5260@besplex.bde.org>
	<50297CA5.5010900@missouri.edu> <50297E43.7090309@missouri.edu>
	<20120814201105.T934@besplex.bde.org>
	<502A780B.2010106@missouri.edu>
	<20120815223631.N1751@besplex.bde.org>
	<502C0CF8.8040003@missouri.edu>
	<20120906221028.O1542@besplex.bde.org>
	<5048D00B.8010401@missouri.edu> <504D3CCD.2050006@missouri.edu>
	<504FF726.9060001@missouri.edu>
	<20120912191556.F1078@besplex.bde.org>
	<20120912225847.J1771@besplex.bde.org>
	<50511B40.3070009@missouri.edu>
	<20120913204808.T1964@besplex.bde.org>
	<5051F59C.6000603@missouri.edu>
	<20120914014208.I2862@besplex.bde.org>
	<50526050.2070303@missouri.edu>
	<20120914212403.H1983@besplex.bde.org>
	<50538E28.6050400@missouri.edu>
	<20120915231032.C2669@besplex.bde.org>
	<50548E15.3010405@missouri.edu> <5054C027.2040008@missouri.edu>
	<5054C200.7090307@missouri.edu>
	<20120916041132.D6344@besplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120916041132.D6344@besplex.bde.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Complex arg-trig functions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions."
	<freebsd-numerics.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:06:31 -0000

One more thing I would like an opinion on.

In my code I check for |z| being small, and then use the approximations:
casinh(z) = z
cacos(z) = Pi - z
catanh(z) = z

However these approximations are not used in the papers by Hull et al, 
and the code works just fine if I don't include these in the code.

The only reason I put this code in is because I thought it would go a 
little faster in the cases that |z| is small.  Checking |z| is small 
takes no time at all.

So what do you think?  Should I keep these in the code or not?

Thanks, Stephen