From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 20 21:13:01 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB8EBEE
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:13:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com)
Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com
 [69.77.177.114])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B769B8FC0C
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:13:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD365644B
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:03:03 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:03:03 -0500
From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com>
To: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with
 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Organization: Intertainservices
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz>
 <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b1cf29ee9a4442df56a718cedd0516e1@intertainservices.com>
X-Sender: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1
X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 6CD365644B.AF883
X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:13:02 -0000

On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote:
>> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about 
>> config,
>> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. 
>> And they
>> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
>
> Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and
> Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is.
>
> Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think.
>
>> 
>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html
>>
>> Graphs are available as PDF attachments
>>
>> 
>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf
>>
>> 
>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf

These numbers show very significant improvements. Any 
possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too 
much work? I know many have and still complain about our current 
scheduler.